RSA 2014 Handout

3
Dr. Lauren E. Obermark, University of Missouri-St. Louis; [email protected] “Expanding the Canon of Memory: A Case Study of the Oklahoma City National Memorial Museum” (RSA 2014) 1 Presentation in a Nutshell Goal: Explicating an emerging “pedagogy of memory.” Characteristics of pedagogy of memory: 1) Value-driven and often reliant on epideictic rhetoric. 2) Thoughtfully utilizing material rhetoric and multimodal approaches to remembrance and education. Rhetorical Education: Lessons about history are aligned with value-heavy lessons about how to participate and engage in the present day. Benefits: Memory used to build toward civic engagement; new possibilities for rhetorical education in the 21 st century. Challenges: Didactic nature of value-driven education can suppress choices and voices and oversimplify difficult topics like trauma. Bibliography Alcoff, Linda. “The Problem of Speaking for Others.” Who Can Speak? Authority and Critical Identity. Judith Roof and Robyn Weigmen, eds. Urbana: U of Illinois P, 1995. Print. Beiner, Guy. "In Anticipation of a Post-Memory Boom." Cultural Analysis 7 (2008): 107-12. Print. Blair, Carole. “Communication as Collective Memory.” Communication As: Perspectives on Theory. Ed. Greg Shepherd, Jeff St. John, and Ted Striphas. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 2005. 51-59. - - -. “Contemporary U.S. Memorial Sites as Exemplars of Rhetoric's Materiality.” Rhetorical Bodies. Ed. Jack Selzer and Sharon Crowley. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press, 1999. 16-57. Print. Casey, Edward. "Public Memory in Place and Time." Framing Public Memory. Ed. Kendall Phillips. Tuscaloosa: U of Alabama P, 2004. 17-44. Print. Clark, Anne E. A Museum Walking Tour. Oklahoma City: The Oklahoma City National Memorial Foundation, 2006. Clark, Gregory. Rhetorical Landscapes in America: Variations on a Theme from Kenneth Burke.

description

RSA 2014 Handout

Transcript of RSA 2014 Handout

Page 1: RSA 2014 Handout

Dr. Lauren E. Obermark, University of Missouri-St. Louis; [email protected] “Expanding the Canon of Memory: A Case Study of the Oklahoma City National Memorial Museum” (RSA 2014)

1

Presentation in a Nutshell

Goal: Explicating an emerging “pedagogy of memory.” Characteristics of pedagogy of memory: 1) Value-driven and often reliant on epideictic rhetoric. 2) Thoughtfully utilizing material rhetoric and multimodal approaches to remembrance and education. Rhetorical Education: Lessons about history are aligned with value-heavy lessons about how to participate and engage in the present day. Benefits: Memory used to build toward civic engagement; new possibilities for rhetorical education in the 21st century. Challenges: Didactic nature of value-driven education can suppress choices and voices and oversimplify difficult topics like trauma.

Bibliography

Alcoff, Linda. “The Problem of Speaking for Others.” Who Can Speak? Authority and Critical Identity. Judith Roof and Robyn Weigmen, eds. Urbana: U of Illinois P, 1995. Print.

Beiner, Guy. "In Anticipation of a Post-Memory Boom." Cultural Analysis 7 (2008): 107-12. Print.

Blair, Carole. “Communication as Collective Memory.” Communication As: Perspectives on Theory. Ed. Greg Shepherd, Jeff St. John, and Ted Striphas. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 2005. 51-59.

- - -. “Contemporary U.S. Memorial Sites as Exemplars of Rhetoric's Materiality.” Rhetorical Bodies. Ed. Jack Selzer and Sharon Crowley. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press, 1999. 16-57. Print.

Casey, Edward. "Public Memory in Place and Time." Framing Public Memory. Ed. Kendall Phillips. Tuscaloosa: U of Alabama P, 2004. 17-44. Print.

Clark, Anne E. A Museum Walking Tour. Oklahoma City: The Oklahoma City National Memorial Foundation, 2006.

Clark, Gregory. Rhetorical Landscapes in America: Variations on a Theme from Kenneth Burke.

Page 2: RSA 2014 Handout

Dr. Lauren E. Obermark, University of Missouri-St. Louis; [email protected] “Expanding the Canon of Memory: A Case Study of the Oklahoma City National Memorial Museum” (RSA 2014)

2

Columbia: University of South Carolina, 2004. Print. Conn, Steven. Do Museums Still Need Objects? Philadelphia: U of Pennsylvania P, 2010. Print. Enoch, Jessica. “Composing a Rhetorical Education for the Twenty-First Century:

TakingITGlobal as Pedagogical Heuristic.” Rhetoric Review 29.1 (2010): 165-85. Print. Eves, Rosalyn Collings. "A Recipe for Remembrance: Memory and Identity in African-

American Women's Cookbooks." Rhetoric Review 24.3 (2005): 280-97. Print. Frentz, Thomas S. "Memory, Myth, and Rhetoric in Plato's Phaedrus." Rhetoric Society

Quarterly 36 (2006): 243-62. Print. Gaither, Edward Barry. “ ‘Hey! That’s Mine!’: Thoughts on Museums and Pluralism.” Eds.

Karp, Ivan, Christine Mullen Kreamer, and Steven D. Lavine. Museums and Communities: The Politics of Public Culture. Washington: Smithsonian Institute Press, 1992. Print.

Halloran, S. Michael. “Writing History on the Landscape: The Tour Road at Saratoga Battlefield as a Text.” Rhetorical Education in America. Eds. Cheryl Glenn, Margaret M. Lyday, and Wendy Sharer. Tuscaloosa: U of Alabama P, 2004: 129-144. Print.

Halbwachs, Maurice. On Collective Memory. 1st ed. Chicago: U of Chicago P, 1992. Print. Hessler, Brooke. “Identification as Civic Literacy in Digital Museum Projects: A Case Study of

the Oklahoma City National Memorial and Museum” Community Literacy Journal. (Fall 2011): 23-37. Print.

Heyse, Amy Lynn. "The Rhetoric of Memory-Making: Lessons from the UDC's Catechisms for Children." Rhetoric Society Quarterly 38.4 (2008): 408-32. Print.

Hooper-Greenhill, Eilean. Museums and Education: Purpose, Pedagogy, Performance. London and New York: Routledge, 2007. Print.

Horner, Winifred Bryan. “Reinventing Memory and Delivery.” Inventing a Discipline: Rhetoric Scholarship in Honor of Richard E. Young. Ed. Maureen Daly Goggin. Urbana, IL: National Council of Teachers of English, 2000. 173-184.

Jack, Jordynn. "Space, Time, Memory: Gendered Recollections of Wartime Los Alamos." Rhetoric Society Quarterly 37 (2007): 229-50. Print.

Nora, Pierre. “Between Memory and History: Les Lieux de Memoire.” Representations 26 (Spring 1989): 7-24. Print.

The Oklahoma City National Memorial and Museum. The Oklahoma City National Memorial and Museum Foundation. Web. 27 January 2014.

Prelli, Lawrence J., ed. Rhetorics of Display. Columbia: U of SC P, 2006. Print. Pruchnic, Jeff, and Kim Lacey. “The Future of Forgetting: Rhetoric, Memory, Affect.” Rhetoric

Society Quarterly. 41.5 (2011): 472-494. Print. Ricker, Lisa Reid. "(De)Constructing the Praxis of Memory-Keeping: Late Nineteenth-Century

Autograph Albums as Sites of Rhetorical Invention." Rhetoric Review 29.3 (2010): 239- 56. Print.

Rohan, Liz. "I Remember Mamma: Material Rhetoric, Mnemonic Activity, and One Woman's Turn-of-the-Twentieth-Century Quilt." Rhetoric Review 23.4 (2004): 368-87. Print.

Sheard, Cynthia. “The Public Value of Epideictic Rhetoric.” College English. 58.7 (Novemeber 1996): 765-794. Print.

Simon, Roger I., Sharon Rosenberg, and Claudia Eppert. Between Hope and Despair: Pedagogy and the Representation of Historical Trauma. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield, 2000. Print.

Winter, Jay. "The Generation of Memory: Reflections on the Memory Boom in Contemporary Historical Studies." Bulletin of the German Historical Institute 27 (2000): 69-92. Print.

Wright, Elizabethada A. "Rhetorical Spaces in Memorial Places: The Cemetery as a Rhetorical Memory Place/space." Rhetoric Society Quarterly 35.4 (2005): 51-81. Print.

Yates, Frances Amelia. The Art of Memory. Chicago: University of Chicago, 1966. Print.

Page 3: RSA 2014 Handout

Dr. Lauren E. Obermark, University of Missouri-St. Louis; [email protected] “Expanding the Canon of Memory: A Case Study of the Oklahoma City National Memorial Museum” (RSA 2014)

3