Rrpp Fmrdp Approved
Click here to load reader
-
Upload
crismediona -
Category
Documents
-
view
889 -
download
318
description
Transcript of Rrpp Fmrdp Approved
FINAL MINE REHABILITATION AND DECOMMISSIONING PLAN FOR THE RAPU-RAPU POLYMETALLIC PROJECT
Prepared for
Rapu-Rapu Minerals, Inc. and Rapu-Rapu Processing, Inc.
By
BMP Environment & Community Care, Inc.
12C PET Plans Tower, EDSA Guadalupe Viejo, Makati City, Philippines
Ph +632 8905902 Fax +632 8973984 Email [email protected]
30 July 2010
© BMP Environment & Community Care, Inc. 2010
BMP Environment & Community Care, Inc. generated the information contained in this document solely for the use of Rapu-Rapu Minerals, Inc. and Rapu-Rapu Processing, Inc. in accordance with generally accepted professional principles and practices in environmental assessment and mine decommissioning and rehabilitation. No other warranties, express or implied, are made.
All rights reserved. No section or part of this document may be extracted, altered, reproduced, or electronically stored or transmitted in any form without the written permission of BMP Environment & Community Care, Inc.
AUTHORSHIP AND REVIEW
Document Title: Final Mine Rehabilitation and Decommissioning Plan for the Rapu-Rapu Polymetallic Project
Date: 30 July 2010
Authors:
Expert Expertise
Dr. Perfecto P. Evangelista Soils, agriculture, erosion, and land capability
Ninette P. Ramirez Water and air quality
Dr. Leonardo M. Florece Terrestrial biology and rehabilitation
Jose N. Tanchuling Process, decommissioning, scheduling, maintenance, and monitoring
Marita G. Cuaño Stakeholder engagement and assessment and social planning
Dr. Rolando V. Cuaño Risk assessment, editing, and integration
Revision History
Revision Date of Issue Description Authority
Name Signature
1 27 December 2007 The document is issued for review by RRMI and RRPI.
Rolando V. Cuaño, Ph.D.
President
2 30 December 2007 Comments of RRMI and RRPI considered and the document is issued for review by MGB Region V and MRFC.
Rolando V. Cuaño, Ph.D.
President
3 16 July 2010 Comments of MGB, MRFC, and CLRFSC considered and the document is issued for review by RRMI and RRPI.
Rolando V. Cuaño, Ph.D.
President
4 30 July 2010 Comments of RRMI and RRPI considered and the document is issued to the MGB.
Rolando V. Cuaño, Ph.D.
President
Table of
1 COMP
1.1 Le
1.2 Pr
2 EXEC
2.1 M
2.2 Al
2.3 Co
2.4 R
2.5 Co
3 BACK
3.1 H
3.2 Pr
3.3 Pr
3.4 M
3.5 Im
3.6 Le
4 STAK
4.1 R
4.2 Ho
4.2.1
4.2.1
4.2.1
4.2.2
4.2.2
4.2.2
4.2.2
4.2.2
4.2.2
4.2.2
5 RISK
5.1 O
5.1.1
5.1.2
5.1.3
5.1.4
5.1.5
5.2 UT
5.2.1
Content
PANY INFO
egal Rights
roject Facili
CUTIVE SUM
ajor Issues
lternative P
onclusions
isks ...........
osts ..........
KGROUND
istory ........
roduction P
roduction H
anpower C
mplications f
essons from
KEHOLDER
RMI/RRPI O
ost and Sur
Community
1.1 June 2
1.2 April 2
Socio-Econ
2.1 Popul
2.2 House
2.3 Gende
2.4 Educa
2.5 Occup
2.6 Incom
ASSESSM
pen Pit ......
Slope Failu
Inaccuracie
Failure of P
Slow Filling
Failure of t
TSF-PAF D
Slope Failu
s
ORMATION
..................
ties ...........
MMARY ....
.................
ost-Mining
..................
..................
..................
INFORMAT
..................
rocess ......
History ........
omplement
for Mine Clo
m Progressiv
R INFORMA
Officers, Ma
rrounding C
y Consultatio
2007 ..............
2010 ..............
nomic Situat
ation and Pop
eholds and Ho
er and Age Pr
ational Profile .
pation and Em
me Profile .......
MENT ..........
..................
ure of Final P
es in the PAF
PAF Wall Co
g of Pit .........
he Pit Explo
Dump .........
ure of the UT
N .................
..................
..................
..................
..................
Land Uses
..................
..................
..................
TION .........
..................
..................
..................
t .................
osure .........
ve Rehabili
ATION AND
anagers, an
Communities
ons ..............
......................
......................
tion in the Im
pulation Growt
ousehold Popu
rofile ..............
......................
mployment Pro
......................
..................
..................
Pit Wall ........
F-NAF Wast
over ..............
....................
ratory Tunne
..................
TSF-PAF Du
..................
..................
..................
..................
..................
.................
..................
..................
..................
..................
..................
..................
..................
..................
..................
tation ........
D INVOLVE
nd Personne
s ................
...................
.....................
.....................
pact Barang
th Rate ..........
ulation ...........
.....................
.....................
ofile ...............
.....................
..................
..................
...................
te Rock Mod
...................
...................
el Plug .........
..................
mp ..............
..................
..................
..................
..................
..................
..................
..................
..................
..................
..................
..................
..................
..................
..................
..................
..................
MENT ........
el ...............
..................
....................
......................
......................
ays .............
......................
......................
......................
......................
......................
......................
..................
..................
....................
el.................
....................
....................
....................
..................
....................
Jul
..................
..................
..................
..................
..................
..................
..................
..................
................. 2
..................
..................
..................
..................
..................
................. 3
................. 3
..................
..................
..................
...................
......................
......................
...................
......................
......................
......................
......................
......................
......................
..................
..................
...................
...................
...................
...................
...................
................. 5
...................
i
ly 2010
. 1-1
. 1-1
. 1-2
. 2-1
. 2-1
. 2-2
. 2-4
. 2-7
2-12
. 3-1
. 3-1
. 3-1
. 3-3
. 3-5
3-11
3-15
. 4-1
. 4-1
. 4-2
.. 4-3
... 4-3
... 4-6
4-10
. 4-10
. 4-12
. 4-12
. 4-16
. 4-17
. 4-22
. 5-1
. 5-2
.. 5-2
.. 5-4
.. 5-5
5-10
5-12
5-14
5-14
July 2
ii
5
5
5
6
6
6
6
6
6
2010
5.2.2 Fa
5.2.3 AM
5.3 LTSF
5.3.1 Slo
5.3.2 Fa
5.3.3 AM
5.4 Enviro
5.4.1 Slo
5.4.2 AM 5-2
5.5 Low S
MINE CLO
6.1 Final
6.2 Closu
6.3 Decom
6.3.1 No
6.3.2 Ha
6.3.3 En
6.3.4 Sa
6.4 Mine
6.4.1 Att
6.4.1.1
6.4.1.2
6.4.1.3
6.4.2 Fie
6.4.2.1
6.4.2.2
6.4.2.3
6.4.3 Re
6.4.3.1
6.4.3.2
6.4.3.3
6.4.3.4
6.4.3.5
6.4.4 So
6.4.4.1
6.4.4.2
6.5 Planti
6.5.1 Nu
6.5.2 Se
ailure of NAF
MD, Heavy M
.................
ope Failure o
ailure of the N
MD, Heavy M
onmental A
ope Failure o
MD, Heavy M28
Survival and
OSURE PL
Land Use .
ure Criteria .
mmissionin
on-hazardous
azardous Ma
ncapsulation
afety and Hea
Rehabilitati
tainment of R
Stability ...
Productivit
Self-Susta
eld Revegeta
LTSF Impo
LTSF Emb
Open Pit B
ehabilitation M
UTSF – PA
UTSF – PA
Open Pit B
Sites of Pr
Sites of Of
oil Requireme
Topsoil ....
Compostin
ing Program
ursery Opera
eedling Produ
Capping .....
Metals, and S
..................
of the LTSF E
NAF Capping
Metals, and T
Area ............
of Ponds’ Em
Metals, Tailin
d Land Cove
LAN ............
..................
..................
g Plan .......
s Materials, E
terials and W
of PAF Mate
alth Plan ......
ion Plan .....
Rehabilitation
......................
ty ...................
ining Conditio
ation Trials ...
oundment ......
bankment and
Buffer Zone ....
Models.........
AF Dump and
AF Dump and
Buffer Zone ....
rocess Plant, P
ffices, Accomm
ents ..............
......................
ng ..................
m ................
tions ............
uction ...........
....................
Sediments in
..................
Embankmen
g ..................
Tailings in the
..................
mbankments .
gs, and Sed
er Rate of P
..................
..................
..................
..................
Equipment, a
Wastes .........
erials ............
....................
..................
n Goals .......
......................
......................
on ..................
....................
......................
Slope ...........
......................
....................
LTSF Impoun
LTSF Emban
......................
Power Plant, W
modations, Me
....................
......................
......................
..................
....................
....................
T
...................
the UTSF-P
..................
t ..................
...................
e LTSF Efflue
..................
...................
diment in Env
Plantations
..................
..................
..................
..................
and Structure
...................
...................
...................
..................
...................
.....................
.....................
.....................
...................
.....................
.....................
.....................
...................
ndments .......
nkments and S
.....................
Workshop, an
ess and Laund
...................
.....................
.....................
..................
...................
...................
Table of C
....................
AF Dump Ef
..................
....................
....................
ent ...............
..................
....................
vironmental A
..................
..................
..................
..................
..................
es ................
....................
....................
....................
..................
....................
......................
......................
......................
....................
......................
......................
......................
....................
......................
Slopes ...........
......................
d ROM Pad ...
dry .................
....................
......................
......................
..................
....................
....................
Contents
............. 5-18
ffluent ... 5-21
........... 5-22
............. 5-22
............. 5-24
............. 5-26
........... 5-27
............. 5-27
Area Effluen
........... 5-31
............. 6-1
............. 6-1
............. 6-5
........... 6-11
............. 6-12
............. 6-13
............. 6-15
............. 6-16
........... 6-32
............. 6-32
................ 6-32
................ 6-33
................ 6-34
............. 6-35
................ 6-35
................ 6-36
................ 6-37
............. 6-38
................ 6-39
................ 6-39
................ 6-40
................ 6-41
................ 6-42
............. 6-42
................ 6-42
................ 6-42
........... 6-43
............. 6-43
............. 6-45
s
8
1
2
2
4
6
7
7
nt
1
1
1
5
1
2
3
5
6
2
2
2
3
4
5
5
6
7
8
9
9
0
1
2
2
2
2
3
3
5
Table of C
6.5.3
6.5.4
6.6 So
6.6.1
6.6.2
6.7 M
6.7.1
6.7.2
7 SCHE
7.1 Sc
7.2 Co
7.2.1
7.2.1
7.2.1
7.2.1
7.2.2
7.2.2
7.2.2
7.3 Co
7.4 To
7.5 Bu
7.6 O
7.6.1
7.6.2
8 REFE
9 ANNE
TABLES
Table 1-1.
Table 2-1.
Table 2-2.
Table 2-3.
Table 2-4.
Table 2-5.
Table 3-1.
Table 3-2.
Table 3-3.
Table 3-4.
Table 3-5.
Contents
Nursery To
Care, Prote
ocial Plan ..
Project Per
Impact Com
aintenance
Care and M
Monitoring
EDULE OF
chedule of D
ost of Deco
Decommis
1.1 Disma
1.2 Treatm
1.3 Conta
Rehabilitat
2.1 Gradin
2.2 Reveg
ost of Maint
otal Cost of
uild-up of F
ther Closur
Temporary
Sudden, U
ERENCES .
EXES .........
Dimensions o
Alternative po
Specific post-
Closure risks
Cost summar
Cost summar
Earth materia
Gold, copper,
Manpower co
Manpower co
Manpower co
ools and Mat
ection and C
..................
rsonnel ........
mmunities ....
and Monito
Maintenance
Plan ...........
OPERATIO
Decommiss
ommissionin
sioning ........
antling and Re
ment ..............
ainment ..........
tion ...............
ng and Draina
getation Works
tenance an
f FMRDP ...
MRD Fund
e Scenarios
y Closure ......
nplanned Cl
..................
..................
of major struct
ost-mining land
-mining land u
of the Project
ry of FMRDP ..
ry of decommi
als moved from
and zinc prod
ount of RRMI a
ount of RRPI p
ount of RRMI p
terials ..........
Conditioning o
..................
....................
....................
oring Plan ..
e Plan ...........
....................
ONS AND C
sioning and
ng and Reh
....................
emoval of Equ
......................
......................
....................
age Works .....
s ...................
d Monitorin
..................
..................
s ................
....................
osure ..........
..................
..................
ures ..............
d uses ...........
uses ...............
t .....................
......................
ssioning and
m the open pit
duction ..........
and RRPI as a
per Departmen
per Departmen
...................
of Seedlings
..................
...................
...................
..................
...................
...................
COSTS ......
Rehabilitat
abilitation ..
...................
ipment and S
.....................
.....................
...................
.....................
.....................
ng ...............
..................
..................
..................
...................
...................
..................
..................
.....................
.....................
.....................
.....................
.....................
rehabilitation
.....................
.....................
at 15 April 201
nt as at 15 Apr
nt as at 15 Ap
....................
...................
..................
....................
....................
..................
....................
....................
..................
tion.............
..................
....................
tructures .......
......................
......................
....................
......................
......................
..................
..................
..................
..................
....................
....................
..................
..................
......................
......................
......................
......................
......................
......................
......................
......................
0 ..................
ril 2010 ..........
pril 2010 .........
Jul
...................
...................
................. 6
...................
...................
................. 6
...................
...................
..................
..................
..................
...................
......................
......................
......................
...................
......................
......................
................. 7
................. 7
................. 7
................. 7
...................
...................
..................
..................
......................
......................
......................
......................
......................
......................
......................
......................
......................
......................
......................
ly 2010
iii
6-46
6-47
6-48
6-48
6-49
6-53
6-53
6-55
. 7-1
. 7-1
. 7-2
.. 7-2
... 7-3
... 7-4
... 7-5
.. 7-7
... 7-7
... 7-8
7-15
7-16
7-16
7-16
7-16
7-17
. 8-1
. 9-1
... 1-3
... 2-2
... 2-5
... 2-7
. 2-12
. 2-12
... 3-4
... 3-4
... 3-7
... 3-7
... 3-8
July 2
iv
Tabl
Tabl
Tabl
Tabl
Tabl
Tabl
Tabl
Tabl
Tabl
Tabl
Tabl
Tabl
Tabl
Tabl
Tabl
Tabl
Tabl
Tabl
Tabl
Tabl
Tabl
Tabl
Tabl
Tabl
Tabl
Tabl
Tabl
Tabl
Tabl
Tabl
Tabl
Tabl
Tabl
Tabl
Tabl
Tabl
Tabl
Tabl
Tabl
Tabl
Tabl
2010
e 3-6. Man
e 3-7. Man ......
e 3-8. Budg
e 3-9. Brea
e 3-10. Spec
e 4-1. Popu
e 4-2. Hous
e 4-3. Gen
e 4-4. Educ
e 4-5. Occu
e 4-6. Inco
e 4-7. Com
e 5-1. Impl
e 5-2. Invecapa
e 5-3. Com
e 5-4. Redu
e 5-5. Resu
e 5-6. Resu
e 5-7. Deta
e 5-8. Phys
e 6-1. Pre-
e 6-2. Slop
e 6-3. Spec
e 6-4. Non-
e 6-5. Proje
e 6-6. Haza
e 6-7. FMR
e 6-8. Reco
e 6-9. Nurs
e 6-10. Nurs
e 6-11. Seed
e 6-12. Tool
e 6-13. Livel
e 6-14. FMR
e 6-15. Mine
e 7-1. Sche
e 7-2. Cost
e 7-3. Cost
e 7-4. Cost
e 7-5. Cost
e 7-6. Cost
power count o
power count o.....................
geted and act
akdown of ann
cies planted in
ulation and po
seholds and h
der and age p
cational profile
upational prof
me profile of i
mparison of me
emented chan
ntory of remaacity, BCM, Ju
mparison of US
uction of total
ults of HELP a
ults of HELP a
ails of the envi
sicochemical p
and post-min
pe, slope lengt
cific post-mini
-hazardous m
ect’s hazardou
ardous materi
RDP safety iss
ommended cr
sery compone
sery implemen
dlings for each
s and materia
lihood assets
RDP maintena
e closure mon
edule of decom
t of dismantlin
t of decommis
t schedule of g
t estimates of
t schedule of r
of RRPI contra
of RRMI contr......................
ual SDMP .....
nual SDMP ex
n the buffer zo
opulation grow
household pop
profile of impac
e of impact ba
ile of impact b
mpact barang
ean income lev
nges in open p
aining pit wasuly 2010 .........
SEPA’s 4 dem
metals from t
annual modeli
annual modeli
ronmental are
properties of s
ing land uses
th, and other r
ng land use a
aterials and m
us materials a
als and mode
sues and guide
ops during the
nts and area .
ntation schedu
h species to b
als for nursery
and key indica
nce works .....
itoring plan ....
mmissioning a
g the facilities
ssioning .........
grading and d
revegetation w
revegetation w
actors as at 15
ractors and RR......................
......................
xpenditures an
one ................
wth of impact b
pulation of imp
ct barangays,
arangays, 2010
barangays, 20
gays, 2010 .....
vels, 2000 an
pit parameters
ste materials ......................
monstration cov
reated plots ..
ng for the UTS
ng for the LTS
ea ponds .......
soils at the Pro
.....................
requirements .
nd closure crit
modes of dispo
and stocking le
e of disposition
elines ............
e 18 April 201
......................
ule .................
be produced by
establishmen
ators .............
......................
......................
and rehabilitat
s ....................
......................
rainage works
works ............
works .............
T
5 April 2010 ..
RMI/RRPI con.....................
.....................
nd budget into
.....................
barangays, 19
pact barangay
2010 ............
0 ...................
10 .................
.....................
d 2010 ..........
s ....................
and LTSF us.....................
ver technologi
.....................
SF-PAF dump
SF .................
.....................
oject site .......
.....................
.....................
teria ..............
osition ...........
evels .............
n ....................
.....................
0 consultation
.....................
.....................
y RRPP ........
nt and operatio
.....................
.....................
.....................
tion works .....
.....................
.....................
s ....................
.....................
.....................
Table of C
......................
ntractors as at......................
......................
major program
......................
95 to 2007 ....
s, 2001 and 2
......................
......................
......................
......................
......................
......................
sage and UTS......................
es .................
......................
p ....................
......................
......................
......................
......................
......................
......................
......................
......................
......................
......................
ns ...................
......................
......................
......................
ons.................
......................
......................
......................
......................
......................
......................
......................
......................
......................
Contents
..................3-9
t 15 April 2010..................3-9
................ 3-11
ms .......... 3-12
................ 3-16
................ 4-11
2010 ......... 4-12
................ 4-13
................ 4-16
................ 4-17
................ 4-23
................ 4-26
..................5-2
SF-PAF dump..................5-4
..................5-7
..................5-8
................ 5-20
................ 5-25
................ 5-27
................ 5-32
..................6-3
..................6-6
..................6-7
................ 6-12
................ 6-14
................ 6-14
................ 6-16
................ 6-38
................ 6-45
................ 6-45
................ 6-46
................ 6-46
................ 6-51
................ 6-54
................ 6-55
..................7-1
..................7-3
..................7-5
..................7-8
..................7-8
................ 7-11
s
9
09
1
2
6
1
2
3
6
7
3
6
2
p 4
7
8
0
5
7
2
3
6
7
2
4
4
6
8
5
5
6
6
1
4
5
1
3
5
8
8
1
Table of C
Table 7-7.
Table 7-8.
Table 7-9.
Table 7-10.
FIGURES
Figure 1-1
Figure 1-2
Figure 1-3
Figure 1-4
Figure 2-1
Figure 3-1
Figure 4-1
Figure 5-1
Figure 5-2
Figure 5-3
Figure 5-4
Figure 5-5
Figure 5-6
Figure 5-7
Figure 5-8
Figure 5-9
Figure 6-1
Figure 6-2
Figure 6-3
Figure 6-4
Figure 6-5
Figure 6-6
Figure 6-7
Figure 6-8
Figure 6-9
Figure 6-10
Figure 6-11
Figure 6-12
Figure 6-13
Contents
Schedule of s
Annual cost o
Annual expen
Schedule of F
Location of t
Mineral tene
Land classif
Project facili
Perspective
Simplified bl
Host and su
Structural m
Inferred PAF
UTSF – PAF
Adit rehabilit
UTSF - PAF
UTSF – PAF
UTSF – PA
LTSF emban
RRPP water
Conceptual decommissi
Field indicat
Experimenta
Experimentaslope………
Revegetatioperimeter ar
Planting desusing bambo
Planting desslopes………
Planting des
Planting des
Planting des
Proposed la
The central
Air, water, a
salaries and w
of maintenance
nditures for the
FMRD Fund de
the Rapu-Rap
ements map…
ication map…
ities as of July
view of the m
lock diagram o
rrounding com
map……………
F in the final p
F dump and LT
tation…………
F dump upslop
F dump downs
AF dump/LTS
nkment design
r sampling sta
perspectiveoning and reh
tors and LFA i
al set-up of LT
al set-up of re………………
n trial experireas……………
sign for the UToo (Kawayang
sign for the U…………………
sign for the op
sign for the site
sign for the site
y-out of new t
objective of M
nd aquatic bio
wages of the F
e and monitor
e FMRDP ......
eposit ...........
puPolymetallic
…………………
…………………
y 2010…………
major Project fe
of mineral pro
mmunities of th
…………………
pit walls………
TSF drainage
…………………
pe of embankm
slope of emba
SF cover sys
n………………
ations…………
e view of habilitation……
ndices………
TSF impoundm
evegetation tr…………………
mental set-up…………………
TSF – PAF dgtinik)…………
UTSF – PAF d…………………
pen pit buffer z
es of process
es of offices a
temporary nur
MGB’s SDMP…
ology sampling
MRD Team ..
ring ................
.....................
.....................
c Project………
…………………
…………………
…………………
eatures at min
cessing..……
he Project……
…………………
………………
e channels to t
…………………
ment…………
ankment………
stem…………
…………………
…………………
the Projec…………………
………………
ment revegeta
rial for the LT…………………
p for the ope…………………
ump and LTS…………………
dump and LT…………………
zone and perim
plant and oth
and accommod
rsery…………
…………………
g stations afte
......................
......................
......................
......................
…………………
…………………
…………………
…………………
ne closure……
………………
…………………
…………………
………………
he open pit…
…………………
………………
…………………
……….…..……
…………………
…………………
t area afte…………………
………………
tion trial………
TSF embankm…………………
n pit buffer z…………………
SF impoundme…………………
SF embankm…………………
meter areas…
er industrial fa
dations………
………………
…………………
er mine closure
Jul
......................
......................
......................
......................
………….
…………..
…………...
………….
…………...
...……….
…………..
…………..
…………...
…….….. 5
………….. 5
..………. 5
………… 5
………….
…………. 5
………….. 5
er mine …………
…………
…………
ment and ………..….
zone and ………….
ent areas …………
ments and ………….
……………
acilities…
…………...
…………
………….
e………. 6
ly 2010
v
. 7-15
. 7-15
. 7-18
. 7-18
1-1a
1-1b
1-2a
1-2b
2-2a
3-2a
4-1a
5-2a
5-4a
5-11a
5-13a
5-15a
5-17a
5-19
5-23a
5-30a
6-5a
6-34
6-36
6-37
6-38
6-39
6-40
6-40
6-41
6-42
6-44
6-50
6-57a
July 2
vi
PHO
Phot
Phot
Phot
Phot
Phot
Phot
Phot
Phot
Phot
Phot
Phot
Phot
Phot
Phot
Phot
Phot
Phot
Phot
Phot
Phot
Phot
Phot
Phot
Phot
Phot
Phot
Phot
Phot
Phot
Phot
Phot
Phot
Phot
Phot
2010
OTOS
to 3-1. The
to 3-2. The
to 3-3. The
to 3-4. Two impa
to 3-5. The
to 3-6. Bino
to 3-7. Swit
to 3-8. The
to 3-9. The 14
to 3-10. Fem
to 3-11. Med
to 3-12. Cam
to 3-13. Agohcrop
to 3-14. Agoh
to 4-1. BMP
to 4-2. RRM
to 4-3. The
to 4-4. The parti
to 4-5. RRM
to 4-6. Malo
to 4-7. Bino
to 4-8. Ms. 5
to 4-9. The prob
to 4-10. The appr
to 4-11. As e
to 4-12. This
to 4-13. The
to 4-14. Engr
to 4-15. Dr. R
to 4-16. Malo
to 4-17. Pagcbara
to 4-18. Bino
to 4-19. BMP
to 4-20. TinoFMR
Project’s open
crusher and p
wharf which h
hundred andact barangays
water system
osawan Barang
ch over to ALE
Binosawan B
SDMP brings
male residents
ical missions
mp clinic consu
ho, ipil-ipil, ta. ...................
ho growing we
P’s M Cuaño d
MI/RRPI Mana
meeting with
participants cipants from B
MI’s President,
obago Brgy. C
osawan Brgy. C
Cuaño presen
loss of elecblems. ............
effects on rehensive abo
expected, the l
Sitio is at risk
participants fr
r. R Corpus di
Rolando Cuañ
obago Brgy. C
colbon Brgy. Cangay. ...........
osawan Brgy. C
P’s Dr. Florece
pan Brgy. ChaRDP. ..............
n pit looking w
processing pla
houses the con
d one studenenjoy financia
for Brgy. Pag
gay Hall. .......
ECO Power G
ridge. ............
in experts to
honing their s
in the impact
ultations from
alisai, and mo......................
ell along the b
discusses the S
agers take note
RRMI/RRPI M
from each Brgy. Pagcolb
, Engr. R Corp
Chairman R As
Chairman Cab
nts the problem
ctricity and m......................
the water sut environmen
oss of liveliho
k from a tailing
rom the direct
scusses the m
ño explains the
Chairman Asun
Chairman Mol......................
Chairwoman B
e asks the crow
airwoman Esp......................
west (April, 20
ant (April, 2010
ncentrate stor
nts in the secal support from
gcolbon. .........
......................
Grid. ...............
......................
improve the s
skills in the ma
barangays. ...
local residents
oton-boton wit......................
buffer zone. ....
Social Plan co
es. ................
Managers and
barangay abon. ................
pus, welcomes
sunsion makes
badonga resp
ms identified b
medical missio......................
systems rankntal impacts. .
ood and emplo
gs dam breach
impact Baran
meeting object
e post mining
ncion discusse
lave recounts ......................
Bendal does t
wd their prefe
pringael thank......................
T
10). ...............
0). .................
rage and conv
condary level m the SDMP.
.....................
.....................
.....................
.....................
skills of residen
aking of abaca
.....................
s average 150
th Callopogon.....................
.....................
omponent of th
.....................
key staff on 1
re acknowled.....................
s the participa
s a comment.
onds to the fa
by the particip
ons rank third.....................
k second. T.....................
oyment is the n
h. ...................
ngays. ............
tive. ..............
land use to th
es the benefits
the positive i.....................
he same for h
rred crops. ...
ks RRMI for in.....................
Table of C
......................
......................
veyor. .............
and 8 reside......................
......................
......................
......................
......................
nts in priority l
a slippers. ......
......................
0 patients ever
nium mucono......................
......................
he FMRDP. ...
......................
7 April 2010.
dged. Stan......................
ants. ...............
.....................
cilitator’s ques
ants due to m
d and fourth ......................
The participa......................
number one p
......................
......................
......................
e participants
sof the RRPP.
mpacts of the......................
er barangay. .
......................
ncluding her ba......................
Contents
..................3-2
..................3-3
..................3-3
ents from two................ 3-12
................ 3-13
................ 3-13
................ 3-13
................ 3-13
livelihoods. ..3
................ 3-14
................ 3-14
ry month. 3-14
oides as cove................ 3-17
................ 3-17
..................4-1
..................4-1
.................4-2
ding are the..................4-3
..................4-3
..................4-3
stion. .........4-3
mine closure. 4
in the list o..................4-5
ants are also..................4-5
problem. .....4-5
..................4-6
..................4-8
..................4-8
s. ................4-8
. ................4-8
e Project to his..................4-9
..................4-9
..................4-9
arangay in the..................4-9
s
2
3
3
o 2
3
3
3
3
-
4
4
4
er 7
7
1
1
2
e 3
3
3
3
-
of 5
o 5
5
6
8
8
8
8
s 9
9
9
e 9
Table of C
Photo 4-21.
Photo 4-22.
Photo 4-23.
Photo 5-1.
Photo 5-2.
Photo 5-3.
Photo 5-4.
Photo 6-1.
Photo 6-2.
Photo 6-3.
Photo 6-4.
Photo 6-5.
ANNEXES
Annex 9-1.
Annex 9-2.
Annex 9-3.
Annex 9-4.
Annex 9-5.
Annex 9-6.
Annex 9-7.
Annex 9-8.
Annex 9-9.
Annex 9-10.
Annex 9-11.
Contents
Sta. Barbara ....................
Fe of Sta. Bprogram. ......
CARE Managfor the Colleg
The herringbo
The Project’s
Lime dosing a
The different located imme
A grassland a
A typical seco
An aerial pho
A cropping co
The RRPP nworks. ..........
Participants to
Program and
Highlights of t
Participants to
Program and 15
Highlights of
RRMI’s house
Pit flooding si
HELP modeli
Floral species
Market study
Brgy. Chairma......................
arbara ackno......................
ger Lanuzo bae admissions
one drainage o
constructed w
at the FDU. ....
sections of tdiately downs
along the ridge
ondary forest g
tograph of the
ombination tha
nursery with a......................
o the commun
Powerpoint P
the 3 June 200
o the commun
Powerpoint P
18 April 2010
ehold survey f
mulation stud
ng for the UTS
s found at the
of selected cr
an Balwid rec......................
owledges the ......................
ares the comptest. .............
on top of the i
wetland. .........
......................
the LTSF damslope of the em
e of Catmon a
growth in the P
e Project site a
at can be adop
assorted seed......................
nity consultatio
Presentation fo
07 community
nity consultatio
Presentation fo
community co
form ..............
y ...................
SF and LTSF
Project site ...
rops ...............
alls the impac.....................
company’s sc.....................
pany’s plan to.....................
mproved tailin
.....................
.....................
m embankmembankment. ..
and Maypajo c
Project area. .
and vicinities p
pted at some P
dlings used fo.....................
on of 3 June 2
or the 3 June 2
y consultation
on of 18 April
or the 18 April
onsultation ....
.....................
.....................
cover system
.....................
.....................
cts of the RRP......................
cholarship an......................
o prepare high......................
ngs layer. .......
......................
......................
nt. The Envi......................
atchments. ....
......................
prior to Project
Project sites ..
or the buffer ......................
2007 ...............
2007 commun
......................
2010 .............
2010 commu
......................
......................
......................
s ...................
......................
......................
Jul
PP to his bara......................
d toilet assist......................
h school grad......................
......................
......................
......................
ironmental Ar......................
......................
......................
ct developmen
......................
zone reveget......................
......................
nity consultatio
......................
......................
nity consultati
......................
......................
......................
......................
......................
......................
ly 2010
vii
ngay.... 4-9
tance ... 4-9
uates . 4-10
. 5-15
. 5-28
. 5-29
rea is . 5-30
... 6-1
... 6-2
t. 6-2
. 6-41
tation . 6-44
... 9-1
on 9-3
... 9-9
. 9-12
ion 9-
. 9-27
. 9-36
. 9-52
. 9-61
. 9-75
. 9-82
July 2
viii
AD
Ag
ALD
AM
AM
AR
Au
BA
BC
BC
BM
Brg
CIL
CN
CP
CS
Cu
DE
DIA
D/S
DS
DT
EC
EC
EFA
EIA
ES
EP
FD
FM
FO
G
GS
FA
HA
HC
HD
HE
HH
2010
ITR
D
MD
MIC
RD
PA
C
CM
MP
gy
L
N
P
IRO
NR
A
S
W
C
CC
A
A
R
EP
U
MRDP
OS
SM
RS
A
C
DPE
LP
H
Australian De
Silver
Anoxic limest
Acid mine dra
Australian Mi
Acid rock dra
Gold
Barangay Po
Benguet Corp
Bank cubic m
BMP Environ
Barangay
Carbon-in-lea
Cyanide
Centipoise
Commonwea
Copper
Department o
Direct impact
Downstream
Domestic soli
Dry tonne
Electrical con
Environmenta
Ecosystem F
Environmenta
Estimated su
Environmenta
Field detoxific
Final Mine Re
Factor of safe
Gram
Golden Sunlig
Furfuryl alcoh
Hectare
Humidity cell
High-density
Hydrological
Household
epartment of In
tone drain
ainage
ning Industry
inage
wer Associatio
poration
meter
ment & Comm
ach
alth Scientific a
of Environmen
t area
id waste
nductivity
al compliance
unction Analy
al impact asse
rvival rate
al Protection a
cation unit
ehabilitation a
ety
ght Mines, Inc
hol resin seala
polyethylene
Evaluation of
Abbrev
ndustry, Touri
Council
on
munity Care, In
and Industrial
nt and Natural
certificate
ysis
essment
and Enhancem
and Decommis
c.
ant
Landfill Perfo
viations u
sm, and Reso
nc.
Research Org
Resources
ment Program
ssioning Plan
rmance
used in t
ources
ganization
he Studyy
Abbrevia
HSM
HSO
IIA
Lafayette
LFA
LGU
LTSF
M
MCE
MEND
MGB
MPSA
MRL
MSDS
NAF
NAMRIA
NSO
OBE
PA
PAB
PAGASA
PAF
PCARRD
PM
PP
PPE
PPIAF
QDEH
QSPS
QSS
ROM
RRMI
RRPI
RRPP
S
SCUBA
SDMP
SP1
ations us
Health an
Health an
Indirect i
Lafayette
Landsca
Local Go
Lower ta
Meter
Maximum
Mine Env
Mines an
Mineral P
Meters re
Material
Non-acid
National
National
Operatin
Per annu
Pollution
Philippin
Potential
PhilippinDevelopm
Project M
Polishing
Personal
Public-Pr
Queensla
Quartz-s
Quartz-s
Run-of-m
Rapu-Ra
Rapu-Ra
Rapu-Ra
Sulfur
Self-cont
Social De
Settling p
ed in the
nd Safety Man
nd Safety Offi
mpact area
e Philippines,
pe Function A
overnment Uni
ilings storage
m credible ear
vironment Neu
nd Geoscience
Production Sh
educed level
Safety Data S
d forming
Mapping and
Statistics Offi
g basis earthq
um
Adjudication
e Atmospheric
lly-acid formin
e Council for Ament
Manager
g pond
l protective eq
rivate Infrastru
and Departme
ericite-pyrite-s
ericite-schist
mine
apu Minerals,
apu Processin
apu Polymetal
tained underw
evelopment a
pond 1
e Study
nager
ce
Inc.
Analysis
it
facility
rthquake
utral Drainage
es Bureau
haring Agreem
Sheet
Resources In
ce
quake
Board
c, Geophysica
ng
Agriculture, Fo
quipment
ucture Advisor
ent of Environ
schist
Inc.
g, Inc.
lic Project
water breathing
nd Manageme
e
ment
nformation Aut
al, and Astrono
orestry and N
ry Facility
ment and Her
g apparatus
ent Program
thority
omical Service
atural Resour
itage
Jul
es Administra
rces Research
ly 2010
ix
tion
h and
July 2
x
SP
ST
SW
T
TV
UK
UM
UN
UN
U/S
US
US
UT
Zn
2010
2
P
WMM
I
KDFID
MMI
NR/KP
NR/MgO
S
EPA
FEMA
SF
Settling pond
Sewage treat
Storm Water
Tonne
TVI Pacific, In
United Kingdo
Ungay-Malob
Potassium pe
Magnesium p
Upstream
United States
United States
Upper tailings
Zinc
2
tment plant
Management
nc.
om Departme
bago Mines, In
ermanganate t
passivation tec
s Environment
s Federal Eme
s storage facil
Abbrev
Model
nt for Internat
nc.
technology
chnology
tal Protection
ergency Mana
ity
viations u
ional Develop
Authority
agement Agen
used in t
ment
cy
he Studyy
Final Min
1 CO
Company N
Project Nam
Head Office
Minesite Ad
Contact Per
Telephone
FAX No:
Email addre
1.1 Leg
The Rapu-Rcopper-zinc Province of A
The depositMineral ProdMPSA 163-22).Ungay-Ma
In 1961, UMBenguet CoTVI Pacific with RRMI. acquiring a UMMI entereclaims and m
The Rapu-Certificate (E
ne Rehabi
MPANY IN
Name:
me:
e Address:
ddress:
rsons:
No.:
ess:
gal Rights
Rapu Polymewith minor
Albay (Figure
t is coveredduction and 2000-V whicalobago Mine
MMI granted rporation (BCInc. (TVI). InIn Decembe100% interesed into an agmineral rights
Rapu PolymECC) by the
litation &
FORMATIO
RAP
RAP
RAP
8th F
37 S
Pas
Brgy
Eng
RRM
Eng
RRP
+63
+63
roge
etallic Projecgold deposi
re 1-1).
d by 72-ha Sharing Agrh were granes, Inc. (UMM
full exploratiC). The latten November r 1999, RRMst in the Projgreement wits belonging t
metallic Proe Departmen
& Decomm
ON
PU-RAPU M
PU-RAPU PR
PU-RAPU PO
Floor Linden
San Miguel A
sig City
y. Pagcolbon
gr. Rogelio E
MI President
gr. Marcial B.
PI President
32 638 2741
32 636 5205
er.corpus@rr
ct of RRMI ait located in
patented clareements (M
nted on 30 AMI) is the ho
ion and deveer subsequer 1998, TVI eMI purchasedject subject tth RRMI wheto UMMI was
oject was gnt of Environ
missioning
INERALS, IN
ROCESSING
OLYMETALL
Suites
Avenue
n, Rapu-Rap
. Corpus
t
Campos
rpi.com.ph
and RRPI op the eastern
aims and 33MPSAs), nampril 1999 and
older of the p
elopment rigently assigneentered into d the joint veto certain coerein the opts confirmed.
granted an ment and Na
g Plan
NC. (RRMI)
G, INC. (RRP
LIC PROJEC
u, Albay
perates the Un end of Ra
35-ha claimsmely, MPSA d 18 Octobeatented claim
hts over the d its rights aa joint ventnture interesnditions. In ion for RRM
Environmenatural Resou
Jul
PI)
CT
Ungay-Maloapu-Rapu Is
s subject of122-1998-V
er 2000 (Figu
ms and MPS
mining claimand obligatioture arrangest of TVI, thethe same moI to purchase
ntal Compliurces (DENR
1-1
ly 2010
bago land,
f two V and ure 1-
SAs.
ms to ns to ment ereby onth, e the
ance R) on
July 2
1-2
12 JProjapprRRMSepProg
Basareacom
1.2
Figu
the
2010
July 2001. ect’s Environroval by the MI and RRPtember 2004gram (SDMP
ed on NAMRa that is clas
mprising the P
Project
ure 1-4 maps 180-ha Mine
Open pi
Run-of-m
Gold pro
Power p
Upper ta
Lower ta
Environm
Worksho
Explosiv
Chemica
Offices
Accomm
Nursery
Mess an
Sewage
Landfill
Access
Concent
In March 200nmental ProtMGB of the
I to commen4, MGB app
P).
RIA’s Land Cssified as alProject site (F
t Facilities
the facilitiese Developme
t
mine (ROM)
ocessing pla
plant
ailings storag
ailings storag
mental area
op
ves storage a
als storage a
modations
nd laundry
e treatment p
roads and
trate storage
02, the Minetection and Ee Project’s Fnce developmproved the P
Classificationienable andFigure 1-3).
s of the Projent Area, are:
pad
nt and coppe
ge facility (UT
ge facility (LT
and handling
area
lant (STP)
e and convey
es and GeosEnhancemenFeasibility Stment works iProject’s So
n Map Nos. 8 disposable
ect as at July:
er-zinc proce
TSF) – poten
TSF)
g area
yor and pier.
Com
sciences Burent Program (udy on 27 Sin Septembe
ocial Develop
818 and 114. RRMI pur
y 2010. The
essing plant o
ntially acid-fo
pany Inf
eau (MGB) aEPEP). The
September 2er 2003. A pment and M
46, the Projerchased the
major facilit
or base meta
orming (PAF)
formation
approved thee subsequen2002 enabledyear after, inManagemen
ect sits on an180-ha land
ties, all within
als plant
) dump
n
e nt d n
nt
n d
n
T
S
Company
Table 1-1 proend of mine
Table 1-1. D
M
Open pit
Length (
Width (n
Pit botto
Pit void
Pit voidmRL), m
UTSF-PAF du
PAF dum
UTSF e
Impound
LTSF
Tailings
LTSF em
Impound
Tailin
Wate
Source: RRMI
y Inform
ovides the dlife.
Dimensions o
Major Structu
(west-to-east)
north-to-south
om, mRL
area, m2
d volume (13m3
ump
mp surface, m
mbankment e
ded capacity,
surface eleva
mbankment e
ded capacity
ngs solids, m3
er, m3
ation
imensions of
of major struc
ure
, m
), m
35 mRL to 3
m2
elevation, mRL
BCM
ation, mRL
levation, mRL
3
f major Proje
ctures
As a
35 2
L
2
L
1
ect structures
at June 2010
950
360
85
112,827
2,442,057
21,907
178
2,049,753
143
162
1,047,833
395,018
s as at June
Projec
Jul
e 2010 and a
cted End of MLife
830
360
35
144,647
6,603,399
83,466
210
2,313,555
166
170
3,736,876
325,400
ly 2010
1-3
at the
Mine
Final Min
2 EXEC
2.1 Major
The major is
The environmine closuDecommissi
The physica
Fina
Phypote
Phypolis
Stocprocarea
Hardmes
Phy
Stee
Che
Othe
Soil vege
Seleapp
The chemica
Heaslopstoc
Heaand
ne Rehabi
CUTIVE SU
r Issues
ssues of mine
mental issuere that neeioning Plan (
al aspects are
al pit void and
sical stabilityentially acid-f
sical stabilityshing ponds,
ckpiles, hardcessing plantas, workshop
dstands, equss and laund
sical stability
ep slopes, ba
eck dams and
er built-up ar
provision oretation, and
ection of indropriate to th
al aspects ar
avy metals apes of the UTckpiles at the
avy metals awetland at t
litation &
MMARY
e closure are
es pertain toed to be a(FMRDP).
e:
d physical st
y and bare sforming (PAF
y and bare s, and wetland
dstands, equt, crusher anps, and pier;
uipment, strury, and sewa
y and bare su
are surfaces,
d silt fences
reas that req
r conditionin
digenous florhe contempla
re:
and acid genTSF-PAF du
e ROM pad;
and hydroxidhe environm
& Decomm
e environmen
o the physicaaddressed b
tability of fina
urfaces of thF) dump and
surfaces of thd at the envi
uipment, andnd aggregate
uctures, andage treatmen
urfaces of th
, and hardsta
along creeks
uire revegeta
g to support
ral species, ated post-min
neration potemp, tailings
es containedmental area, a
missioning
ntal and soci
al and chemby the Fina
al pit walls;
he upper taili lower tailing
he settling poronmental ar
d wastes at es plant, pow
wastes at tnt plant (STP
e landfill faci
ands of the h
s and slopes
ation;
t the re-esta
i.e., trees, ning land use
ential of the and PAF em
d in the settand
g Plan
ial.
ical aspects al Mine Re
ngs storage gs storage fa
onds, anoxicrea;
the run-of-mwer plant, exp
he offices, aP);
ility;
haul and acce
;
blishment of
shrubs, vinee.
final pit wambankment o
tling ponds,
Jul
of the Projeehabilitation
facility (UTSacility (LTSF)
c limestone d
mine (ROM) plosives, sto
accommodat
ess roads;
f robust end
es, and gras
lls, surfacesof the LTSF,
polishing po
2-1
ly 2010
ect at and
SF) – );
drain,
pad, orage
tions,
emic
sses,
s and , and
onds,
July 2
2-2
The comincoto br
2.2
FiveThe
Tabl
weaclos
Table 2-
Post-mUse
Retirem
Retreat Center
2010
Chemicaplant, wo
major sociammunities caome-generatiring about th
Alternati
e alternative se are:
1. Retirem
2. Retreat
3. Rehabili
4. Eco-tour
5. Forest p
le 2-1 compaknesses. F
ure.
-1. Alternati
mining Land Alternative
ment Village
and Stud
als, oil, andorkshops, sto
al issue is suan only becong projects
hese livelihoo
ve Post-Mi
post-mining
ent village
and study ce
itation center
rism and
plantations an
pares the altFigure 2-1 is
ive post-min
Aging need roomythey ca
Retentuse –accom
The flamay bsports
The apeacefprovidethe ma
The fadirect some o
dy A seceveryd
explosives orage facilitie
ustainability oome sustaincan be esta
od and incom
ining Land
land uses ha
enter
r
nd agro-fores
ternative pos a perspect
ing land uses
Strength
balikbayans a quiet, sun, and secludan retire.
tion of facilitie– ports, roadmmodations, an
atlands of the e developed areas.
area is securful. Quality-sers are most ainland.
acility will conand indirect
of the residen
cluded placeday distrac
stored in thes, and STP
of the host cnable if alterblished. Th
me-generatin
d Uses
ave been ide
stry.
ost-mining lative view of
s
hs
and foreignnny, picturesqded place wh
s for the Villagds, power plnd mess hall.
UTSF and LTinto recreation
re and generkilled health clikely availabl
ntinue to prov employmentts.
, removed fction and
Ex
he reagents .
communities rnative marke Project’s Sg projects ah
entified and e
and uses in the major
ners que, here
ge’s ant,
TSF n or
rally care e in
vide t to
Thepaththe
A ensstab
Therede
AccduriNov
A dSomtheamay
A suc
from an
A ens
xecutive S
area of the
after mine cket-driven livSDMP can bhead of mine
evaluated fo
terms of stproject featu
Weakne
island is aloh. This may bretirees.
good FMRDsure the physibility of rehabi
e facilities mesigned for typ
cessibility willing the raivember to Feb
dedicated hosme other faaters, shops,y have to be p
market studycess.
good FMRDsure the physi
Summary
e processing
closure. Thevelihood andbe marshalede closure.
r the Project
trengths andures at mine
esses
ong the typhbe distressing
DP is criticalical and chemlitated structu
may need to phoon- proofin
l be a probiny months
bruary.
spital is needacilities such , and groce
provided.
y is critical
DP is criticalical and chem
y
g
e d d
t.
d e
hoon g to
to mical res.
be ng.
blem of
ded. as
eries
for
to mical
P
Re
Eco
Executiv
Post-mining LUse Alternati
habilitation Ce
o-tourism
ve Summa
Land ive
atpesta
RCpha
Tma
Tpeso
Tdso
enter DcoResesuanisth
Reusac
Thmqu
Thdiso
ThroPato
Thmnase
Thdiso
ary
Stre
tmosphere ofeace are idetudy center. Tll of these.
Retention of Center’s use –lant, accommall.
he flatlands may be develreas, meditatio
he area is seaceful. Retourced from th
he facility wilirect and indome of the res
rug and alcountry is oehabilitation ecluded, safupportive of rend alcoholismland’s isolatioe stormy mon
etention of facse – port, ccommodation
he flatlands ay be develo
uest outdoor tr
he facility wilrect and indome of the res
he island setolling hills amiacific Ocean
ourism site.
he flatlands ofay be devel
atural forests. erve as a lake
he facility wilrect and indome of the res
engths
f quiet reflecteal for a retrThe island can
facilities f– port, roads
modations, an
of UTSF anloped into reon retreat and
secure and great masters he mainland.
ll continue to direct employsidents.
cohol abuse on the rise
Center tfe, complet
ecovery from am is needeon especially
nths is a plus f
cilities for the roads, powens, and mess
of UTSF anped into a wilreatment prog
l continue to direct employsidents.
tting and pictidst a full view
make a go
f the UTSF anoped into tra The flooded and fishing a
l continue to direct employsidents.
tion and reat and n provide
for the s, power nd mess
d LTSF ecreation d trails.
generally may be
provide ment to
in the e. A hat is te and addiction ed. The y during factor.
Center’s er plant, hall.
d LTSF lderness
gram.
provide ment to
turesque w of the od eco-
nd LTSF ails and pit may
rea.
provide ment to
Wea
stability of re
The Centervacated duriof November
The facilitieredesigned fo
A market ssuccess.
A good FMensure the pstability of re
The facilitieredesigned fo
Other facilititreatment, aare needed.
A market ssuccess.
A good FMensure the pstability of reh
Accessibility during the rai
The facilitiredesigned and eco-touri
The beach ar
The opportdiving are lioceanic curre
Jul
aknesses
ehabilitated str
r may havering the rainy r to February.
es will needfor typhoon-pr
study is crit
MRDP is crphysical and cehabilitated str
es will needfor typhoon pro
ies for detoxand support p
study is crit
MRDP is crphysical and chabilitated str
will be a iny months.
ies need for typhoon-ism.
reas are limite
tunities for imited by theents.
ly 2010
2-3
ructures.
to be months
to be oofing.
tical for
ritical to chemical ructures.
to be oofing.
xification, programs
tical for
ritical to chemical uctures.
problem
to be -proofing
ed.
SCUBA e strong
July 2
2-4
Post-mUse
Forest pagro-for
2.3
The retrefromtyphbette
The purpoceaas thCas
Giveminiphysarea
The are conf
Tabl
struc
2010
mining Land Alternative
plantations anrestry
Conclus
major disadeat and study
m November hoon proofinger than the R
same majoposes. The anic currentshe Misibis Rtilla, and Ma
en the disadving land usesical, econoas.
residents ofcoconut, abafirmed the po
le 2-2 lists thcture.
d This isschemplantatpart of
Prior tuse oDeveloThe rbring t
The pbamboBasedproduc
ions
dvantages foy center, andto February
g. On top oRapu-Rapu lo
or disadvantadditional d
s for SCUBAResort in Cagagallanes, So
vantages of te is forest pmic, market
f the impact baca, bananaotentials and
he specific po
Strength
s the easiestme. The
tions can bef mine rehabili
to mining, theof a portionopment Area re-developmenhe land back t
products incluoo, abaca, a on a ma
cts have good
r the re-deved rehabilitatioy and the in
of these disaocation can b
ages affect drawbacks aA diving, and
raray Islandorsogon.
the four alterplantations at, and socia
barangays rea, pili, and tig feasibility of
ost-mining la
hs
t re-developme agro-foree established tation.
e sole econon of the Mis for agricultnt will therefto its former u
ude coconut, and tiger grarket study, potentials.
elopment of on center ar
nvestment cadvantages, nbe found in t
the re-deveare the limite abundance , Albayand t
rnative post-and agro-forel factors of
ecommendedger grass. Af propagating
and uses pro
Ex
A msucc
ment estry
as
omic Mine ure. fore
use.
pili, ass. the
Mosas accowill site.
the Project sre the accessapital requirenumerous alhe Bicol mai
elopment of ed beach are
of competinhe whale sha
-mining land estry. This uRapu-Rapu
d the major aA market stug said crops
ogrammed fo
xecutive S
Weakne
market studycess.
st of the Projepower
ommodations,have to be re.
site as retires problems aed for new ternative sitenland.
the site for eas in the is
ng eco-tourisark sites of D
uses, the pruse blends w
Island and
agricultural cdy implemenat the Projec
or each Proje
Summary
esses
y is critical
ect facilities splant, roa
, mess hall, eemoved from
ement villageand typhoonsfacilities andes which are
r eco-tourismsland, strong
sm sites suchDonsol, Pilar
referred postwell with the
surrounding
crops. Thesented by BMPct site.
ect facility o
y
for
such ads, etc., the
e, s d e
m g h r,
t-e g
e P
r
Tab
P
Ope
RO
Golmet
Pow
UTS
Executiv
le 2-2. Spe
Project FacilitStructure
en pit
M pad
d plant and batals plant
wer plant
SF-PAF dump
ve Summa
ecific post-mi
ty or e
Sp
Lak
Agr
ase Agr
Agr
p Bamgra
ary
ning land use
pecific Post-mLand Use
ke for aqua cu
ro-forestry zon
ro-forestry zon
ro-forestry zon
mboo and tigess plantation
es
mining e
lture Sa
C
C
Eas
F
Rs
ne H
F
D
S
P
ne H
Rs
Ds
F
D
S
P
ne H
Rs
H
F
Ds
D
S
P
er Dum
Hc
So
Ho
F
PDum
Sg
F
S
Stabilize pit waanalysis and s
Cover PAF pit
Construct UTS
Establish and at pit perimetespecies
Fix pit drainag
Ring the buffersignages
Haul out stock
Fix drainage
Deep ripping o
Soil conditionin
Planting with c
Haul out stock
Remove cablestorage tanks,
Decontaminatespills
Fix drainage c
Deep ripping o
Soil conditionin
Planting with c
Haul out used
Remove cablestorage tanks,
Haul out sludg
Fix drainage
Decontaminatespills
Deep ripping o
Soil conditionin
Planting with c
mp surface
Haul in NAF (ncomposite cov
Spread and coover PAF dum
Haul in and spover NAF - HD
Fix drainage
Planting with bmp slope
Stabilize UTSFgeotechnical a
Fix drainage
Soil conditionin
Required Wo
alls and confirtability assess
walls
SF-LTSF wate
revegetate 20r with agoho,
e
r zone with ba
piles and unne
of hardstand
ng
coconut and pi
piles, reagent
s, pipes, concequipment, a
e and remove
hannel
of hardstand
ng
coconut and pi
and unused p
s, pipes, concequipment, a
e and wastes
e and remove
of hardstand
ng
coconut and pi
non-acid formiver
ompact NAF ap
read topsoil oDPE cover
bamboo
F-PAF dump aanalysis and st
ng
Jul
orks
rm by geotechsment
er channel to p
0-m wide buffeipil-ipil, and ot
arbed wire and
ecessary mat
ili
ts, and wastes
crete, masonryand structures
oil and chem
ili
petrochemicals
crete, masonryand structures
oil and chem
ili
ing) – HDPE
and install HDP
or planting sub
and confirm bytability assess
ly 2010
2-5
nical
pit
er zone ther
d safety
erials
s
y,
ical
s
y,
ical
PE cover
bstrate
y sment
July 2
2-6
ProjeS
LTSF
Environm
Workshostorage chemicaand STP
Offices, accommnursery,laundry
Landfill
2010
ect Facility orStructure
mental area
op, explosivesand handling,
al storage areaP
modations, mess and
r SpecifiL
Bamboograss pl
Ponds a
s , as,
Agro-for
Agro-for
Agro-for
ic Post-mininLand Use
o and tiger antation
and wetland
restry zone
restry zone
restry zone
ng
Ripra
Plant
LTSF su
Pump
Leaveand w
Stabi
Instal
Haul HDPE
Fix dr
Soil c
PlantLTSF du
Stabianaly
Fix dr
Soil c
Ripra
Plant
Settlinstabiland s
Fix dr
Soil c
Ripra
Plant
Haul
Remostoragand s
Haul
Decospills
Fix dr
Deep
Soil c
Plant
Remoequip
Haul
Deep
Soil c
Plant
Remowaste
Haul
Fix dr
Ex
Req
ap sloping surf
ing with tiger g
rface
p out and treat
e tailings solidwick drains
lize tailings by
l drainage on
in, spread, anE cover over L
rainage
conditioning
ing with bambump slope
lize LTSF andysis and stabili
rainage
conditioning
ap sloping surf
ing with tiger g
ng ponds (SPized and conf
stability assess
rainage
conditioning
ap of sloping s
ing of slopes w
out used and
ove cables, pipge tanks, equi
structures
out sludge an
ntaminate and
rainage
p ripping of har
conditioning
ing with cocon
ove cables, pippment, structur
out wastes
p ripping of har
conditioning
ing with cocon
ove cables, pipes
in final cover a
rainage
xecutive S
quired Works
face
grass and Bra
t tailings wate
ds to dry, aided
y dumping larg
improved taili
d compact NALTSF and PAF
boo
d confirm by gety assessmen
face
grass and Bra
s) and polishinirmed by geotsment
urface
with tiger gras
unused petroc
pes, concrete,ipment, oil-wa
d wastes
d remove oil a
rdstand
nut and pili
pes, concrete,res, and unne
rdstand
nut and abaca
pes, concrete,
and contour
Summary
achiaria
r
d by sprinkling
ge boulders
ings surface
AF and installF embankmen
eotechnical nt
achiaria
ng pond (PP) technical analy
ss and Brachia
chemicals
, masonry, ater separators
and chemical
, masonry, ecessary mate
a
, structures,
y
g
l nt
ysis
aria
s,
erials
and
P
Accslop
Conand
Table 2-3
Project Stru
Open pit
Executiv
Project FacilitStructure
cess roads andpes
ncentrate storad conveyor and
2.4 Risks
The risk assidentified sein Table 2-3.
3. Closure r
Facility or ucture
ve Summa
ty or e
Sp
d Somothe
age d pier
Pie
s
sessment uneveral risks o
risks of the P
Risks
Slope failure pit wall
ary
pecific Post-mLand Use
me for agro-foers for road
r
ndertaken foon physical a
Project
of final A teinsta“genlikelyalignreve
To aredurecowas fromm.
RRMremeyearwall
mining e
D
S
P
orestry; Sa
F
Fdc
A
Res
H
D
P
or the variouand chemica
echnical revieabilities in thenerally structuy coincide wnment of foliersals” (Tumbo
address the iuction at the nommendations flattened from
m 20 m to 10 m
MI should coedial and safrs before minestability must
Deep ripping o
Soil conditionin
Planting with c
Stabilize slopeanalysis and s
Fix drainage
For access roadeep ripping, scoconut and a
Access roads
Remove cableequipment, strstorage and co
Haul out waste
Decontaminate
Pier donated to
us facilities aal stability. T
P
w of pit slope north and wure-controlled ith alteration iation and thokon, 2007).
nstabilities, slnorth wall weres for the northm the original m, and the be
ontinue to mofety measurese closure, i.e.t be conducted
Required Wo
of hardstand
ng
coconut and pi
es and confirmtability assess
ads to be closesoil conditioninbaca
donated to the
s, pipes, concuctures, and w
onveyance
es
e oil and chem
o community
and structureThese risks a
Particulars
es conductedest walls of thprimarily alozoning conta
he near-vertic
ope face reae recommendeh wall above 1
of 55o to 40o
rm at 140 mR
onitor the pit s can be und, in 2011, a cd.
Jul
orks
ili
m by geotechnsment
ed, drainage wng, and plantin
e community
crete, storage wastes for con
mical spills
es of the Prare characte
d in March 20he pit. The inng shear zon
acts and enhcal cross join
alignment and ed. RRMI im
140 mRL. Tho, the bench hRL extended f
walls so thadertaken immecomprehensive
ly 2010
2-7
ical
works, ng with
tanks, ncentrate
roject rized
007 confirmednstabilities arenes that mosanced by the
nting with dip
bench heighplemented thee bench slope
height reducedrom 5 m to 10
at appropriateediately. Twoe review of pi
d e st e p
t e e d 0
e o t
July 2
2-8
Project FaciStructur
2010
lity or re
InacPAFrock
Failucove
Risks
ccuracies in thF-NAF waste k model
ure of PAF waer
e In 2001,waste roin the fidevelopminaccuradeposit f
RRMI prbased onPAF areais found much big
RRMI alsfor extraPAF maLTSF.
Open-pitinsights before minventoryin the PAreflected
all To reducwalls, RRmm (EPreinforce
A better roughly surfacesall surfacinert manin field-sc
After apprisks of fin the ROctober
Lafayette Phock model whicnal pit walls
ment in 200te. RRMI cofor the prepara
rovided BMP n the 2005 woas along the fto extend in
gger than Lafa
so provided itsaction from theaterials need t
t mining is onon the actua
mine closure,y of PAF/NAFAF wall sealin
d in the FMRD
ce the risks ofRMI plans to cPEP, 2002). ement, it is brit
alternative is 31 % of sho. With a viscoces contactednganese-iron cale demonst
plication, the cfailure of the P
RRPP open pi2010.
Ex
Partic
hilippines, Incch became thand the AM
5, this wastommissioned ation of a new
with plans shorks. From thefinal highwallsall directions
ayette’s 2001 e
s latest invente open pit. Ato be stored
going and thel extent of PA i.e., in 20
F materials wing works andP Fund.
f AMD and hecover the walls
However, sttle with low te
potassium petcreting costsosity compara by the runoffoxide layer forations comm
cover treatmePAF wall covet are necessa
xecutive S
culars
. (Lafayette) e basis for preD potential. te rock moddrilling workswaste rock m
howing the exese plans, BM. The PAF fin. Its total areestimate.
ory of PAF anAround 1.19 mwithin the UT
e wall exposurAF and NAF 011, the finalll have to be excess PAF
avy metals ges with shotcrethotcrete is e
ensile strength
rmanganate ps. The materble to water, tf. Upon contarms. The tecissioned by th
nt may deterioer, treatment tary for three y
Summary
generated a edicting the P
During the del was founs at the fring
model.
xtent of PAF MP inferred thenal pit wall surea is 11.2 ha
nd NAF waste million BCM oTSF – PAF d
res continue tmaterials. Tl PAF/NAF wreviewed. Anmaterials nee
eneration fromte to a thickne
expensive andhs.
passivation whrial can be sthe treatment act with the suchnology was he USEPA.
orate. To mintrials at selecyears to com
y
PAF-NAF AF extent actual pit
nd to be es of the
and NAF e extent of rface area a which is
materials of excess dump and
to provide Two years walls and ny change eds to be
m the PAF ess of 100 d without
hich costs prayed to can cover ulfides, an evaluated
nimize the cted areas
mmence in
Project Stru
UTSF-PA
Executiv
Facility or ucture
AF dump
ve Summa
Risks
Slow filling ofand generatioacid and metafrom the pit wand floor
Failure of theexploratory tuplug
Slope failure UTSF-PAF d
ary
f pit on of als
walls
The condto fiSurfopencorredatayear
RRMdecoNAFFurt325,whicRoucondthe d
The As rannuevap
To rwallsThescovenatuand introthe p
pit unnel
Benminedepogointhe p
In 20pit inDuriwill b
To geolmasScaldesi
of the ump
To afromUTSmixeof thpres
The (u/s)vallewith estim
GHDelev
post-mining ducted a hydrll the final pit face runoff fron pit. Using esponding to
a, the simulatirs for mean co
MI’s updated eommissioningF materials intther, the pit w,400 m3. Thesch is 19 % inughly, the pit fidition, 12.6 yedriest conditio
figures indicaregards the drual discharge poration rate.
reduce the risks during the sse are remoering of all PAural filling may
it can buffer toduce lime thapit is being flo
guet Corporaeral property, osit down to
ng southeastwpit floor is at 8
011, RRMI wingress. The ing mine decobe dumped in
ensure the lological invest
ss surroundingling and grouign and mater
accommodatem the open pitSF into a PAFed with large he improved tassure.
dump will be ) side of the eey. The final a 10 m widemated total vo
D amended tvation in the
P
use of the ological simulvoid up to 13
om the UTSF-the one-yea
the wettest, dion returned 3onditions, and
estimate of th, the companyto the pit to caill store the trese materials w
n excess of Billing times wilears under theon.
ate the increasrying out of thto the open p
ks of AMD anslow pit filling,oval of the aAF walls even y be aided bythe acid generat will maintaiooded.
ation, the cosank an explabout 100 mR
ward daylightin85 mRL. Thus
ill plug the adrest of the ad
ommissioningto the pit to ca
ong-term inteigation and hg the plug siteuting may be rial will be fina
e the unantic, RRMI decide
F dump. Afteboulders. A ailings layer to
constructed tembankment, slope of the d berm at elev
olume of 866,0
the design bydownstream
Particulars
pit is a lakation to determ35 m spilling PAF dump an
ar rainfall datdriest, and typ3.7 years for 31.4 years fo
he pit void is 6y plans to dumap the pit ingreated alkalinewill reduce th
BMP’s simulatill lengthen to 4e mean condi
sed likelihood he pit lake, thipit even under
d heavy meta two options
acid-generatingbelow the spilpumped sea
rated from then a pH sufficie
ompany whichloratory shaft RL. From theng near the Pas, no water exi
it with concretdit will be plu, NAF materiaap the pit ingre
egrity of the hydrogeologicae should be unrequired to plized after the
ipated volumed to convert
er drying, the herringbone do dissipate the
o an elevationextending ac
dump is propovation 90 m. T000 BCM.
y adding a 10(d/s) face, in
Jul
ke for aqua mine how longelevation of 5
nd LTSF is divta of Virac,
pical year on rethe wettest c
or the driest co
6.6 million m3
mp a total of ress to the exe tailings watehe pit void to ion input of 54.4 years undition, and 37.4
for the slow fiis has been rr dry condition
als generationare available g rocks fromlling level. Alt
awater. Seawae walls. Anothent to precipit
h initially invat the center
e shaft, an adagcolbon Creeits from the ad
ete extending 3ugged with coalsestimated aess to the tunn
plug, a detaal assessmenndertaken prioprepare the s investigations
e of PAF wathe impoundiupper layer o
drainage was e excess tailin
n of 210 m oncross the entirosed at an angThe PAF wast
0 m wide bencreasing the
ly 2010
2-9
culture. BMPg it would take5.2 million m3
verted into theCatanduanes
ecord as inpucondition, 10.6ondition. 3. During mine100,000 m3 o
xploratory aditer estimated a6.2 million m3
5.2 million m3
der the wettes4 years unde
illing of the pituled out. The
ns exceeds the
from the PAFprior to filling
m the pit andternatively, theater is alkalineher option is totate metals as
vestigated ther of the Ungaydit was drivenek. Currentlydit.
30 m from thempacted clayat 100,000 m3
nel.
iled structurant of the rockor to pluggingite. The plugs.
aste materialsng area of theof tailings wasplaced on top
ngs pore wate
n the upstreamre width of thegle of 1V:2.7Hte will have an
erm at 200 me slope angle
P e 3. e s t 6
e of t. at
3 3. st r
t. e e
F . d e e o s
e y n y,
e y.
3
al k . g
s e s p r
m e H n
m e
July 2
2-10
Project FaciStructur
2010
0
lity or re
Risks
between surface t
In view oplans to dump widump hewill be loheight to
GHD perthe u/s aPAF dumwhich wewere bassampling
With resFOSs fe0.76; for the u/s dand 0.72method coefficienreality, hreversalsmore acc
Using tdisplacemOBE. Fowere 0.6displacemdam desfrom very
Based ostore anslope stanalysesto be unand stabconsultan
berms from to drain toward
of additional ebuild another
ill be construceight to the UTocated at 17
o 210 m and w
rformed staticand d/s PAF dmps gave accere assumed, sed on field o
g and measure
spect to pseell below unity
the d/s PAF dump is 1.01; 2 for Stage 2.of analysis isnt acting on ahowever, ears. A better mcurately recog
the PLAXIS ments for the or the d/s dum
63 m for Stagement was 0.5
sign will be aby large earthq
on its latest in additional 90tability assesss under MCE dertaken imm
bility and a fulnt in 2011 are
Ex
Partic
1V:2.7H to 1ds the edge of
excessive PAFr PAF dump dcted in two sTSF embankm0 m. The se
will include a se
and pseudo-sdumps. The
ceptable FOS the material p
observations ement of tailin
udo-static sta. Under MCEdump, the FOfor the d/s du According t
s unreliable bea mass is permrthquake acceethod of asse
gnizes actual e
software, Gu/s dump at
mp, the estimae 1 and 1.43 m1 m for Stagele to withstanduakes.
ventory of PA00,000 BCM sment under and OBE load
mediately. Coll dam stability
e likewise requ
xecutive S
culars
1V:2.5H, and f the dump (G
F materials frod/s of the UTStages. The firment height ocond stage wecond berm at
static stability static stabilityresults. Exce
parameters usand measuregs are no long
ability assessE, the FOS foOS is 0.36. Unump, the FOSo GHD (undaecause it assmanent and inelerations are
essment is defearthquake co
GHD (2008) 1.4 m under
ated crest dispm for Stage 2.e 1.GHD belied the loading a
AF excess maat the UTSF static condit
ding for the UTontinual survey audit by a t
uired.
Summary
grading the fGHD, 2007a).
om the open TSF embankmrst stage will
of 178 m. A 10will increase tt 190 m (GHD
slope assessy assessmentsept for the taised in the assements. Unfoger possible.
sments, the cor the u/s PAFnder OBE, the
Ss are 0.67 foated), the psesumes that thn one directione cyclic with formation ana
onditions.
estimated tMCE and 0.5
placements un. Under OBE,eves that its “dand crest disp
aterials, RRM– PAF dump
tions and deTSF – PAF du
eillance of damthird-party geo
y
flat upper
pit, RRMI ment. The
bring the 0 m berm the dump
D, 2007b).
sments for s for both lings data essments
ortunately,
computed F dump is e FOS for
or Stage 1 udo-static e seismic n only. In
direction lysis for it
the crest 5 m under nder MCE , the crest defensive” placement
I plans to p. A new eformation ump need m integrity otechnical
Project Stru
LTSF
Executiv
Facility or ucture
ve Summa
Risks
Failure of thecapping
AMD and heametals in the UTSF-PAF deffluent
Slope failure LTSF emban
ary
NAF RRMmatedummate
The
1.
2.
3.
4.
avy
ump
Duriinto metaWhilthe conc
of the kment
GHDsteed/s scoresubs
GHDconttailin
GHDand defopermGHDand
Basestorefor wundeof dparty
MI proposes terials consisti
mp edge, 10 erials.
NAF capping
Long-term coGHD recommmixing the uplacement ofwith time dela
Failure of d/sbelieves its “strong earthqacceleration o
Rainfall erosidrainage chaenergy dissip
Water infiltratmodeling to system. Thedata of Viracweather cond1,867 to 1,91a 1 mm HDPclay, the leaka
ing mine closthe open pit.
als, and sedile the NAF capit lake watercentrations via
D’s latest desepening of the shoulder, place, and replacestantial width a
D believes thtrolling concengs at mine clo
D’s slope stabd/s slopes o
ormation anamanent crest sD maintains itcrest displace
ed on its latee an additionawhich a staticer MCE and O
dam integrity ay geotechnica
P
to encapsulateng of 2.5 m thm long NAF
may fail due
onsolidation omended (whicupper layer of dump in layay, etc. (2007a
s PAF dump “defensive” daquakes up to of 0.90g.
on – Gradingnnels, armorinators along th
tion through thevaluate the
e modeling coc for driest wditions. BMP6 m3 of water E is inserted bage goes dow
ure, the drain If the NAF c
iment generaapping is beinr. Lake watera precipitation
sign amendmed/s face from
cement of Zonement of the and broad gra
he revised filntrated leaksosure and cap
bility assessmf the LTSF glyses using settlement aftets “defensive”ement from str
est inventory oal 240,000 BC
c slope stabilitOBE conditionand stability a
al consultant in
Particulars
e the PAF duhick NAF andF materials w
to:
f tailings undech RRMI impof tailings wityers spanning a).
following a am design caa Richter Mag
of the final sng of erosion-e channels.
he NAF cappin water limitinovered one yweather, aver
P found the cto leak througbetween the u
wn to 1.37 to 1
nage from theapping is comted from the ng repaired, lir pH will rise aand adsorptio
ents on the L 22o to 24o, ine 1B materialoriginal 3-part
adation (GHD,
ter is not lik. Thus, theypping to preve
ments under save acceptabthe PLAXIS er the OBE of” dam design rong earthqua
of excess PAFCM at the LTSy assessmentns are requireand a full damn 2011 are als
Jul
ump surface wd 0.3 m thick twill fully encl
erlying the u/plemented), ath competent the entire ta
strong earthqan withstand tgnitude of 8.2
surface, place-prone section
ng – BMP peng capability year using therage weathercover system gh the PAF maupper NAF co.58 m3.
e UTSF-PAF dmpromised, the
dump may ime slurry canand reduce dion.
LTSF include nclusion of siltys on the d/s s
rt filter with a 2006).
kely to be ay recommend ent water infiltr
static conditioble results. H
software indf 0.8 m and M can withstan
akes.
F materials, RSF. This is at and deformaed. A continuam stability auso required.
ly 2010
2-11
with compositetopsoil. At theose the PAF
/s PAF dumpamong others
PAF rockfillailings surface
quake – GHDthe loading o2 and bedrock
ement of linedns, and use o
rformed HELPof the cove
e daily rainfalr, and wettesallowing from
aterials. Whenoarse and NAF
dump will flowe AMD, heavygo to the pitn be added toissolved meta
the followingy rockfill in the
side of the claysingle filter o
s effective inthe drying o
ration (Ibid.).
ns for the u/sHowever, cresdicated some
MCE of 2.17 mnd the loading
RRMI plans toadditional loadation analysesal surveillancedit by a third
e e F
p. s, , e
D of k
d of
P r ll
st m n F
w y t. o al
: e y
of
n of
s st e . g
o d s e -
July 2
2-12
Project FaciStructur
Revegetation
2.5
The at P
The in te
2010
2
lity or re
Failucapp
AMDmetain th
Lowand of pl
Costs
cost to deco 157,913,987
total decomerms of Proje
Risks
ure of the NAFping
D, heavy als, and tailing
he LTSF efflue
w survival rate percent coverlanted species
ommission a7. This is br
Table 2-4.
Decommiss
Rehabilitati
Maintenanc
Total
mmissioning aect facility.
Table 2-5.
Open pit
UTSF – PA
LTSF
Industrial a
Total
F During mat RRMIopen pit.cover caemploye
The samerosion acommissand the settleme
gs ent
Surface pit. Any in-pit thro
r s
The quicareas. Tfloral speyears pri
and rehabilitaoken down a
Cost summ
Activity
sioning
ion
ce and monit
and rehabilita
Cost summrehabilitatio
Activity
AF dump
nd other are
mine closure, ’s field detoxi. Drying of the
apping using thd for the UTS
me risks of covare valid for tsion a tailings proposed tailnt volume and
runoff from thacid, heavy m
ough the addit
ck re-establishTo ensure thecies and schior to mine clo
ate the mineas follows:
mary of FMRD
toring
ation cost of
mary of deon
eas
Ex
Partic
the tailings wfication unit (Fe tailings followhe same set aF are conduct
ver cap crackinthe LTSF. Prsettlement m
ings cover cad pore water r
he covered LTmetals, and tation of lime slu
hment of veghis, revegetatihemes of soil osure, commen
d out and bu
DP
Amoun
P 131,
11,
15,
157,
P 142,273,9
ecommission
Amoun
P 26,
18,
89,
7,
142,
xecutive S
culars
ater will be puFDU) before bws, after whicand thickness ted.
ng, elongated rior to mine cl
modeling basep. The modeeleased.
TSF tailings wailings in the durry.
etative cover on trials invoconditioning
ncing in Octob
uilt up areas
nt
076,575
197,412
640,000
913,987
987 may be b
ing and
nt
520,957
554,097
508,036
690,897
273,987
Summary
umped out anbeing release
ch rock stabilizof composite
depression, alosure, RRMI
ed on hard taieling will dete
will drain into drainage will b
is critical forolving various
are programmber 2010.
is estimated
broken down
y
nd treated d into the
zation and materials
and water needs to
lings data rmine the
the open be treated
r the bare mixes of
med for 3
d
n
Executiv
Excluded froRRMI and R
RRMI is resPAF dump, the economdecommissiomillion or 95
ve Summa
om the FMRRRPI employ
sponsible for and LTSF. Ric zone of thoning and r
5 % and RRP
ary
DP cost are ees.
the decommRRPI is resp
he Philippine rehabilitation PI’s share is P
the pre-clos
missioning aponsible for t
Economic Z cost of P P 7.7 million
sure works a
nd rehabilitathe other ProZone Authori142.3 millionor 5 %.
nd retrenchm
ation of the ooject facilitiesty (PEZA). Tn, RRMI’s s
Jul
ment packag
open pit, UTs which fall inThus, of the
share is P 1
ly 2010
2-13
ge for
SF – nside total
134.6
Final Min
3 BAC
3.1 His
Benguet Co1961 to 199(TVI). In NDecember 1was called tproject devengineering programs.
The environgranted the
The Mines Protection afeasibility stu
Rapu-Rapu by RRMI. Pstripping follsurface was
On 11 Octobthe stream metal-laden Subsequent
On 9 Novemuse of cyania Cease-and
After comploperations, extraction an
In October Malaysia Sm
3.2 Produ
The RRPP million t. Thconcentratesthickener arfrom the loasilver dore b
ne Rehabi
CKGROUN
tory
orporation (B98. SubsequNovember 191999, RRMI the Rapu-Raelopment. and enviro
nmental impaProject an e
and Geoscand Enhanceudy was likew
Processing, Project conslowed in Feb extracted be
ber 2005, theand coast.
tailings frotly, RRMI/RR
mber 2005, Dide. Subseqd Desist Ord
liance by thPAB lifted itsnd processin
2008, Asianmelting Corp.
uction Pro
extracts sulfhe sulfide ores. The goldre treated in aded carbonbars.
litation &
ND INFORM
BC) exploreduently, BC a998, TVI ent
purchased apu Polymet
The works nmental stu
act assessmnvironmenta
ciences Bureement Prograwise approve
Inc. (RRPI) struction worbruary 2005. eginning July
e events ponOn 31 Oct
om the LTRPI voluntaril
DENR suspequently, the Per.
he Project ws Order in Feng of base m
n shareholde. infused cap
cess
fide and oxie is processed-bearing ox
a carbon-inn, electrowon
& Decomm
MATION
d and evaluassigned its rtered into a the joint ventallic Project
included rudies, and c
ment for the al compliance
eau (MGB) ram (EPEP) ed on 27 Sep
was establirks commenc The gold oy 2005.
nd of the goldtober 2005, TSF were ry stopped op
ended the PrPollution Adj
with the conebruary 2007etal ores.
ers LG Intepital into the P
de ore by oed by flotatioxide ore andn-leach (CIL)n onto wire
missioning
ated the Unrights and ojoint venture
nture interes(RRPP), pro
esource drilcommunity d
RRPP was e certificate (
approved tin March 20
ptember 200
shed to procced in Septeore which occ
d plant overfdue to heavreleased intperations.
roject’s wastudication Bo
nditions requ7. A month
ernational, KProject.
open pit at aon to separatd overflow so) plant. Thewool, and s
g Plan
ngay-Malobabligations to e agreementst of TVI. Thogressed frolling, metallu
development
completed ECC) on 12
the Project’s002. The P02.
cess the lumember 2003.curred as ox
flowed, releavy rains, cyato the stre
tewater dischoard (PAB) is
uired for theafter, RRMI/
Korea Resou
a maximum tely produceolution from adsorbed g
smelted to p
Jul
ago deposit TVI Pacific,t with RRMI
he Project, wom exploratiourgical testwand aware
in 2000. DJuly 2001.
s Environmroject’s defin
mp ores extra. Pre-produxide cap nea
asing cyanideanide and heam and c
harge permitssued the Pr
e resumptio/RRPI started
urces Corp.,
annual rate e copper and
the zinc taigold is recovproduce gold
3-1
ly 2010
from , Inc. I. In which on to work, ness
ENR
ental nitive
acted ction
ar the
e into eavy oast.
t and roject
on of d the
and
of 1 zinc ilings vered and
July 2
3-2
Ph
At tmateThe requpotedumarea
Proccoppthick
The carbusinwith
Figu
The 8,00
2010
hoto 3-1. Th
the open piterials are claore is deliv
uired. The entially acid mped in desigas.
cessing of thper and zinkening, filteri
treatment obon elution ang fixed-bed the carbon f
ure 3-1 is a si
Project has00-tonne (t) s
he Project’s o
t, waste andassified into vered by truc
waste is fforming (PA
gnated areas
he sulfide onc sulfides, ng, and stora
f gold oxide and regeneracarbon colufrom the CIL
mplified bloc
s a wharf, aships. The c
open pit look
d ore materore or waste
cks to the Rfurther sampAF) depends for subsequ
re entails a selective
age.
ore requiresation, and gomns. The lo
L plant.
ck flow diagra
approximateloncentrate s
king west (Ap
rials are drile depending
ROM pad anpled, classifing on the uent handling
sequence oflotation of
s crushing, mold recovery.oaded carbo
am of RRPI’s
ly 120 m instorage and c
Backgro
pril, 2010).
led and theg on the assad dumped infied as nonrock type ag in the tailin
of crushing, copper su
milling, carbo Gold from
n is eluted a
s beneficiatio
length, capconveyor is p
ound Inf
en blasted. ays of blasthn separate s-acid formin
and sulfide cngs dam and
milling, bulklfides, and
n-in-leach (Czinc tailings
and regenera
on processes
pable of accpart of the wh
formation
The brokenhole cuttingsstockpiles asng (NAF) ocontent, and waste dump
k flotation oconcentrate
CIL) processis recovered
ated togethe
s.
commodatingharf facility.
n
n s. s r d p
of e
s, d r
g
Backgrou
Photo 3-2.
3.3 Produ
Overburden gold ore follosame month
Mining operagold plant re
Table 3-1 pre2005 until Meither gold o
und Info
The crusher
Photo 3-3
uction Hist
stripping atowed in July
h. In Octobe
ation resumeemained clos
esents the PMarch 2010. oxide or base
rmation
r and process
3. The wharfand conve
tory
t the open py 2005. The r 2005, oper
ed in March sed with the d
roject’s total A total of 1
e metal ore a
sing plant (A
f which houseyor.
pit commencProject was
rations were
2007 with thdepletion of t
materials m2,986,564 t
and 11,208,1
April, 2010).
ses the conc
ced in Febru declared in stopped.
he start-up othe gold oxid
ovement frowere moved44 t were wa
centrate stora
uary 2005. commercial
f the base mde ore.
m the open pd, of which, 1aste.
Jul
age
Extraction ooperation o
metals plant.
pit from Febr1,778,420 t
ly 2010
3-3
of the n the
The
ruary were
Ta
O
g
g
G
S
CC
Zd
July 2
3-4
Tabl
conctotal% Cwere
able 3-2. Go
Paramete
Ore Milled, dt
Head Grade
% Copper
% Zinc
g/t Gold
g/t Silver
Gold, g
Silver, g
Copper Concentrate,
% Copper
% Zinc
g/t Gold
g/t Silver
% Arsenic
Zinc Concentdt
2010
Table 3
Source: R
le 3-2 showcentrates prol of 184.5 kg
Cu and 10.1 e produced.
old, copper,
er 200
t 132
1
11
184
597
, dt
trate,
3-1. Earth m
Year
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
Total
RRMI
ws the totaoduced by thg of Au, 597.% Zn, and 4
and zinc pro
05 200
2,305 110,
0.9
1.6
.87 1.2
1.13 23.
4,472
7,884
1,4
24.
15.
14.
426
0.3
1,5
materials mov
Was
2
2
1
l amount ohe Project fro9 kg of silve
44,462 dt of Z
oduction
6 2007
720 493,2
98 1.41
68 2.59
28 1.56
56 26.3
95 9,27
23 26.1
92 14.1
79 17.4
.64 368.5
39 0.47
82 14,61
ved from the
ste, tonnes (t)
2,346,427
3,761,238
2,260,264
650,291
1,813,740
376,184
11,208,144
of gold (Auom February er (Ag), 48,26Zn concentra
7 2008
289 110,89
1 1.29
9 2.74
6 1.95
37 22.64
72 3,433
5 21.68
9 11.46
49 19.33
56 251.70
7 0.76
14 3,263
Backgro
e open pit
)
1
u) bullion a2005 until M
64 dt of Cu cate grading 4
2009
94 665,644
1.44
2.43
2.24
4 31.13
3 27,009
8 24.02
6 8.68
3 27.22
0 370.23
1.26
3 20,136
ound Inf
Ore, t
187,270
172,789
464,190
110,248
659,139
184,784
,778,420
nd copper/zMarch 2010. concentrate 4.8 % Cu an
2010
(Jan-Mar)
4 174,361
1.29
2.03
2.02
31.48
7,055
22.55
7.94
24.87
384.43
1.10
4,867
formation
zinc (Cu/Zn As shown, agrading 24.0
nd 48.3 % Zn
Gold Ore Total
132,205
1.87
11.13
184,472
597,884
n
) a 0 n
Base Metal Ore Total
1,554,908
1.37
2.40
1.91
28.51
48,264
24.05
10.05
24.06
365.30
1.02
44,462
Param
% Coppe
% Zinc
g/t Gold
g/t Silver
% Arsenic
Recoveri
Copper, %
Zinc, %
Gold, %
Silver, %
Source: RRP
Backgrou
meter
er
c
ies
%
PI
3.4 Manp
As at 15 ApOf this, 173
From Table
the three dir% and 15 %of Rapu-Raresidents of personnel do
Of the direcand RRPI of11 %.
Tables 3-4 aDepartment.EngineeringThese threeresidents: 33number of eThese Depresidents: 1Managemen
Table 3-6 proAs shown,
und Info
2005
80.9
44.1
power Com
pril 2010, theare deployed
3-3, 46 % of rect impact b
% of RRMI anpu Municipathe municipao not come f
ct impact baf 17 %. Pag
and 3-5 brea. For RRPI, Production
e Departmen3, 38, and 1
employees arartments ag7 of 58 for
nt and Safety
ovides the nuthe contrac
rmation
2006 2
6.40
44.00
4.60
181.90 1
0.45
33.3
37.4
20.7
35.5
mplement
e total numbed at RRMI an
f RRMI emplbarangays ofnd RRPI perality. Thus, ality. On a rfrom Region
rangays, Magcolbon is se
ak down theI, the Depar, and Sales
nts also emp9, respectivere Geology, gain employGeology, 34
y.
umber of emctors’ employ
2007 2
7.23 4
46.92 4
5.09
154.03 1
0.56
34.9
53.7 4
21.1
26.3
er of RRMI/Rnd 291 at RR
oyees and 3f Binosawanrsonnel, resp72 % and 5regional basiV.
alobago has econd at 12
e staffing ofrtments with and Supply
ploy the bigely. For RRMining, and
y the greate4 of 53 for
mployees andyees total 4
008 20
4.78 3
46.07 50
5.42 4
05.78 10
0.52 0
52.2 6
49.6 6
30.8 4
34.4 4
RRPI personRPI.
35 % of RRP, Malobago,
pectively, com50 % of RRMs, only 9 %
the largest % share. B
f RRMI and the greatesChain Mana
ggest numbeRMI, the three
Environmenest number Mining, and
d point of hir412, of whic
09 201
(Jan-M
.46 2.7
0.00 48.
.15 4.4
1.39 104
.48 0.4
7.8 71
2.4 66
9.3 49
8.3 49
nnel stood at
PI employeesand Pagcolb
me from the MI and RRPand 22 % of
employmeninosawan is
RRPI by pst number oagement at
er of direct ie Departmenntal Managem
of direct im27 of 45 fo
re of the conch, 185 are
Jul
10
Mar)
Gold OTota
71
.24
47
4.72
43
.0
6.3
9.8 80.9
9.4 44.
t 464 (Table
s are residenbon. Anotheother baran
PI employeesf RRMI and R
nt share in Rnot a far thi
point of hire of employees100, 65, andimpact barants with the ment and Sampact baraor Environm
ntractors of Re the contra
ly 2010
3-5
Ore al
Base MeOre Tot
4.82
48.29
4.60
122.2
0.50
54.5
57.4
9 39.1
1 39.8
3-3).
nts of er 26 gays s are RRPI
RRMI ird at
and s are d 45. ngay most afety. ngay ental
RRPI. actual
etal al
9
4
July 2
3-6
empbaraand comresidouts
Tabl
empcontBinoMaloof R% ocom
2010
ployees of Rangays. Of t
24 or 6 % fme from the dents of the side of Regio
le 3-7 does tployment at tractors’ emposawan provobago is sec
Rapu-Rapu pof RRMI conme from outsi
RRPI. Fortythis, 98 or 24from Pagcolother baranMunicipality
on V.
he same bre175 followedployment of vides the mocond at 21 orrovide anothtractors’ emde of Region
y-six percent4 % of 412 cobon. Anothe
ngays of Ra. Only 12 %
eakdown for d by the con236, 40 %
ost number or 9 %. Pagcer 21 emploployees. Fo
n V. Ninety-f
t of the 412ome from Maer 17 % of t
apu-Rapu. T% of the cont
RRMI contrantractual emp
come from of contractorcolbon is thirdyees. Thus,orty-three pefour or 92 %
Backgro
2 are residealobago, 69 othe RRPI coThus, 63 %tractors’ emp
actors. GALployees of Rthe direct im
rs’ employeed at 17 or 7 , Rapu-Rapuercent of theof this are G
ound Inf
ents of the dor 17 % fromntractors’ totof total em
ployees come
LEO providesRRMI at 40. mpact baranes at 56 or 2%. The othe
u residents ace contractorsGALEO empl
formation
direct impacm Binosawantal workforce
mployees aree from areas
s the bigges Of the tota
ngays. Brgy24 % of 236er barangaysccount for 49s’ employeesoyees.
n
ct n, e e s
st al y. 6. s 9 s
B
Background
Table 3-3
Direct Im
Binos
Malob
Pagco
Other Ba
Legazpi/
Within R
Outside
Total
Sources: R
Table 3-4. Ma
Point
Direct Impact B
Binosawan
Malobago
Pagcolbon
Other Barangay
Legazpi/Albay
Information
3. Manpower cou
Point of Hire
mpact Barangays
sawan
bago
olbon
arangays in Rapu-R
/Albay
Region V
Region V
RMI and RRPI
anpower count of R
t of Hire
Barangays
ys in Rapu-Rapu
n
unt of RRMI and R
Male F
25
42
29
Rapu 39
59
8
49
251
RRPI per Departm
Corp. Corp.Plan.
3
RRPI as at 15 Apr
RRPI
Female Total
25
5 47
29
4 43
13 72
2 10
16 65
40 291
ment as at 15 Apr
HRA Eng
5
2 1
1
3 1
7 3
ril 2010
% Male F
35
9 24
16 29
10 23
15 43
25 17
3 6
22 15
100 157
ril 2010
g’g. Finance
5
6
2
8 1
31 3
RRMI
Female Total
24
1 30
2 25
2 45
10 27
6
1 16
16 173
Prod. Purch.
10
18
10
8 1
11 3
% Male
46
14 49
17 71
15 52
26 82
16 76
4 14
9 64
100 408
Sec. SSCM
6
6
7
12
1 8
TOTAL
Female Total
49
6 77
2 54
6 88
23 99
2 16
17 81
56 464
M TSD To
4 2
5 4
2
4
5 7
July 2
3
l %
39
11
17
12
19
21
3
17
100
otal %
25 9
47 16
29 10
43 15
72 25
2010
-7
Ju
3
uly 2010
3-8
Point
Within Region V
Outside Region
Total
Notes: Corp. is CSecurity; S
Source: RRPI
Table
Direc
B
M
Pa
Othe
Lega
With
Outs
Tota
Notes:
Source:
t of Hire
V
n V
Corporate; Corp. Plan.SSCM is Sales and Su
3-5. Manpower
Point of Hire
ct Impact Barangays
inosawan
Malobago
agcolbon
er Barangays in Rap
azpi/Albay
in Region V
side Region V
al
Corp. is Corporate; CRelations and Corpor
: RRMI
Corp. Corp.Plan.
2
8 4
8 9
. is Corporate Planninupply Chain Managem
count of RRMI pe
Corp
s
1
pu-Rapu 1
4
1
7
CARE is Community Arate Affairs.
HRA Eng
1 5
1 1
14 10
ng; HRA is Human Rment and TSD is Tech
er Department as
p. CARE
2
1
2
5
Action, Relations, and
g’g. Finance
5
3 10
00 14
Resources and Adminnical Services Departm
at 15 April 2010
EMSD Ge
11
6
10
6
9
2
1
45
Education; EMSD is E
Prod. Purch.
8 4
65 8
istration; Eng’g. is Enment.
eology Mining
1 12
14 10
2 12
32 6
2 5
2
5 8
58 53
Environmental Manag
Sec. SSCM
1 1
2 5
4 45
ngineering; Prod. is P
g PRCA
5
5
ement and Safety De
Background
M TSD To
10 6
24 2
Production; Purch. Is
Total %
24 1
30 1
25 1
45 2
27 1
6 3
16 9
173 10
partment, and PRCA
d Informatio
otal %
10 3
65 22
291 100
Purchasing; Sec. is
%
4
7
4
26
6
3
9
00
is Public
on
B
Background
Table 3-
Direct I
Bino
Malo
Pag
Other B
Legazp
Within
Outside
Total
Source: R
Table 3-
Direct I
Bino
Malo
Pag
Other B
Information
-6. Manpower co
Point of Hire
mpact Barangays
osawan
obago
colbon
Barangays in Rapu-
pi/Albay
Region V
e Region V
RRPI
-7. Manpower co
Point of Hire
mpact Barangays
osawan
obago
colbon
Barangays in Rapu-
n
ount of RRPI cont
SSASI
-Rapu
40
32
72
ount of RRMI cont
GALEO
15
18
16
-Rapu 20
tractors as at 15 A
HES S
9
17
7
37
17
1
3
91
tractors and RRM
R
ORICA D
1
3
1
1
April 2010
SGS PSSI
4
9 16
4 7
17 23
MI/RRPI contractor
R M I C O N T R
DBMG 168
REGORON
1
1
4
6
rs as at 15 April 2
A C T O R S
Local M T
40
MDS Local P
60
80
16
4 27
13
1
2
18 185
010
Total %
40
56 24
21 9
17 7
21 9
I Total
69
98
24
68
38
67
48
412
RRMI/RR
Total
125
119
41
89
July 2
3
%
46
17
24
6
17
9
16
12
100
RPI
%
44
19
18
6
14
2010
-9
Ju
3
uly 2010
3-10
Legazp
Within
Outside
Total
Source: R
Point of Hire
pi/Albay
Region V
e Region V
RRMI and RRPI
GALEO
11
1
94
175
R
ORICA D
3
2
5
16
R M I C O N T R
DBMG 168
2
3
3
A C T O R S
Local M TTotal %
16 7
3 1
102 43
236 100
Background
RRMI/RR
Total
54
70
150
648
d Informatio
RPI
%
8
11
23
100
on
Backgrou
3.5 Impli
The closurechemical, an
Losregucomand
In acontbara648
RRMRapat Pperioresid
TheP 1wag
LosSocannindirthe breainto
Table 3-
Source: R
und Info
cations for
of the Rapund biological
ss of jobs –ular employm
me from the d83 % or 383
addition to thtractor compangays and 3or 498 come
MI and RRPpu-Rapu andP 340.6 milliood of 4 yeardents and P
closure of t31 million a
ges, and ben
ss of commuial Developual budget orect impact bSDMP budgaks down thethe major pr
-8. Budgete
Year
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
RRMI
rmation
r Mine Clos
u-Rapu Polyimplications
– As discussment as at 1direct impact 3 from Regio
he regular epanies. Of 374 or 58 % e from Regio
PI estimate other Albay
on and P 183rs gives ave45.9 million
he Project wannually for efits.
unity develoment and M
of P 13.5 milbarangays oet and actua
e annual SDMrograms.
ed and actua
SDM
6
10
13
13
13
13
sure
ymetallic Projs. The major
sed in the 15 April 2010
barangays, on V.
employees af this, 285 oare Rapu-R
on V.
the total say resident em3.7 million, rerage annualfor other Alb
would mean Rapu-Rapu
opment proManagemenllion accruing
of Sta. Barbaal expenditurMP expendit
al SDMP
MP Budget
(P)
6,590,000
0,800,000
3,500,000
3,500,000
3,500,000
3,500,000
ject will haver ones are as
preceding S0 to 464 pe58 % or 268
are some 64or 44 % co
Rapu resident
laries, wagemployees froespectively. figures of P
bay residents
the loss of 1and other
ograms – Tht Program g to the direara, Tinopanres for the yetures from 20
Ac
e social, ecos follows:
Section, the ople, of whic
8 from the Ra
48 contractuaome from thts. Seventy-
es, and benom 2005 to eAveraging th
P 85.2 millions.
,112 jobs anAlbay reside
he Project al(SDMP) witct impact ba, and Linao.ears 2005 to007 to 2009 a
tual SDMP (Poff)
4,400,00
6,500,00
10,900,0
13,200,0
13,700,0
14,400,0
Jul
onomic, phys
Project provch, 39 % orapu-Rapu Is
als employehe direct im-seven perce
efits accruinend of April 2he figures ovn for Rapu-R
nd approximents as sala
so implementh an estimarangays and Table 3-8 g
o 2010. Tabl
and 2010 bu
P, rounded
00
00
000
000
000
000
ly 2010
3-11
sical,
vides r 180 land,
ed by mpact ent of
ng to 2010 ver a Rapu
ately aries,
nts a mated d the gives le 3-9 udget
July 2
3-12
Table 3-9.
Pr
Education a
Livelihood, and food se
Health and
Socio-econinfrastructu
Capacity building and
Total
Source: RRMI
2010
2
Breakdown
rogram
and training
employmeecurity
sanitation
nomic res
and capabd socio-cultura
I
For 201026 % fosanitatiosocio-ecSDMP s
n of annual S
200
1,80
ent, 26
1,50
6,80
ility al
60
10,90
0, 27 % of thr capacity an
on; and 15 conomic infraservices once
Photo 3
SDMP expend
Expen
07
00,000
60,000
00,000
00,000
00,000
00,000 1
he annual SDnd capability% each for astructures. e the Project
3-4. Two husecondaimpact from the
ditures and b
nditures (P)
2008
1,800,000
320,000
1,000,000
9,200,000
900,000
3,200,000
DMP budget y building an
livelihood, The local go
t closes dow
undred andary level anbarangays
e SDMP.
Backgro
budget into m
2009
2,600,000
600,000
630,000
9,200,000
700,000
13,700,000
is allotted fond socio-cultuemploymentovernment wn.
d one studnd 8 residen
enjoy finan
ound Info
major program
2010 Bud(P)
0 3,900,
0 2,200,
0 2,400,
0 2,200,
0 3,700,
0 14,400,
or education ural; 17 % fo, and food
will be unable
dents in thnts from twncial suppo
ormation
ms
dget Tota
,000 10,1
,000 3,4
,000 5,5
,000 27,4
,000 5,9
,000 52,3
and trainingor health andsecurity ande to fill in the
he wo ort
n
al(P)
100,000
400,000
500,000
400,000
900,000
300,000
g; d d e
Photo 3-5
Photo 3-7
Backgrou
5. The wate
7. Switch ov
und Info
r system for
ver to ALECO
rmation
Brgy. Pagco
O Power Grid
olbon. Ph
d. Ph
hoto 3-6. Bin
hoto 3-8. Th
nosawan Ba
he Binosawan
Jul
rangay Hall.
n Bridge.
ly 2010
3-13
P
P
July 2
3-14
hoto 3-9. Tthliv
hoto 3-11.
2010
4
he SDMP brhe skills ovelihoods.
Medical mbarangays.
Loss oftaxes anexcise toccupat
The DEyear life P 244 mbalance share.
All thesbarangareplace
rings in expeof resident
missions in
f taxes and nd fees. Thtax for the nional fees fo
NR estimatenet of incen
million or P 40of P 2.8 b
e tax contribay and munthe lost tax r
erts to improts in prio
the imp
fees – The he major taxnational gover the local go
ed the total ttives and ba0.7 million anillion or P45
butions will icipal levelsrevenues.
ove ority
Photo
pact Photo
Project paysxes and feesernment andovernment.
tax and fee ased on currennually is the
59.3 million
be lost with, there are
Backgro
3-10. Femathe m
3-12. Camresidmont
s the nationas are the cod business t
payments ofent metal price share of loannually is
h the closureno alternati
ound Info
ale residentsmaking of aba
p clinic conents averagth.
al and local gorporate incotax, real est
f the Projectces at P 3 bilcal governmthe national
e of the Prove industries
ormation
s honing theaca slippers.
nsultations fge 150 patie
governmentsome tax andtate tax, and
t over its sixllion. Of this
ments and the governmen
oject. At thes which can
n
eir skills in .
from local ents every
s d d
x-s, e nt
e n
Backgrou
Collcomthe and seekway
Incrand subsweamarexac
Detewatemainusab
Bio-inclu
3.6 Lesso
The Project are focusedarea.
und Info
lapse of locmmunity prog
economies oservices, m
k opportunitiy of ghost tow
reased presservices, th
sistence optather, poor srginal and wilcerbate the p
erioration oer wells, andntain. Overble.
-physical anude:
Erosion (bodisturbed arindustrial arhuman healthe streamssediment im
Acid mine dexploration The heavy msources as excessive qcramps, nau
Heavy metaPAF dump,
Chemicals. such as cyaWithout anythey will con
ons from P
does not len on reveget
rmation
cal economygrams, and tof the direct
many of the mes elsewher
wns.
sures on foe migrants aions but the oil conditionll not approxpressures on
of infrastrucd piers whichr time, thes
nd chemica
oth wind- anreas of the orea, accommlth and visuaturbid and u
mpacts on agr
drainage (AMadit, UTSF-Pmetals dissowell as edibuantities, he
usea, and org
als and sludgand LTSF.
The Projectanide (CN),
y program byntaminate the
Progressive
nd itself to prating the 40
y and abandtaxes and feimpact baramigrants andre. The dire
orest and aqand residents
forest and ms, and terrai
ximate the san the natural
ctures – Theh the local g
se structures
al effects in
nd water-boopen pit, ROmodations, al aesthetic unfit for biotaricultural pro
MD) and heaPAF dump,
olved under able fishes aeavy metals gan failure.
ge in the ga
t uses seversulfuric acid
y RRMI/RRPe environmen
e Rehabilit
rogressive re0-m wide buf
donment of ees will inevingays. Withd local residect impact ba
quatic resous who stay imarine resouin, the return
alaries and wresources.
e Project willgovernmentss will deterio
the absenc
orne) and seOM pad, tailioffices, andimpacts. W
a and humaductivity and
avy metals frand LTSF. acidic condit
and shellfishemay cause
bion check d
ral toxic ched (H2SO4),
PI to dispose nt and impac
tation
ehabilitation. ffer zone at
the area – tably lead to
h the loss of ents will leaarangays are
urces – Withn the area wurces. Howens from thes
wages of the
leave behindo not have
orate and w
ce of rehabi
ediment fromngs dam an
d access roWater-borne n use. Erod
d the existing
rom the opeAMD destro
tions may coes. Ingestevomiting, di
dams, settlin
micals to behydrochloric of these che
ct human and
RRMI’s rehthe periphe
Jul
The loss of o the collapsjob opportun
ave the areae likely to go
h the loss of will have no oever, becaus
se options wProject. Thi
nd access roe the capac
will no longe
ilitation – T
m the bare nd waste duoads. Dust
sediment mded into landg vegetation.
en pit, ROM oys the streontaminate wed by humaniarrhea, stom
ng ponds, UT
eneficiate the acid (HCl),emicals propd biotic healt
habilitation efery of the Pr
ly 2010
3-15
jobs, se of nities
a and o the
f jobs other se of
will be s will
oads, ity to
er be
hese
and mps,
has akes
d, the
pad, ams. water ns in mach
TSF-
e ore etc.
perly, th.
fforts roject
July 2
3-16
Tabl
provrobu
Table 3-
See
Major Sp
Agoho
Narra
Ipil-ipil
Talisay
Rattan
Anabiong
Minor Sp
Carogcog
Haminda
Bani
Apatot
Molave
Moton-bo
Oos
Katmon
Pili
Tuba
Notes:
1. Es
2. ES
3. ES
4. ES
Source: R
Prioof coappl
The
The goodsupp
The buffeincidmaythanreco
2010
6
le 3-10 lists tvides an asustness.
10. Specie
edlings
pecies Used
g
pecies used
g
ang
oton
stimated surviva
SR is 70 to 89 %
SR is 40 to 69 %
SR is below 40 %
RMI
r to plantingoco dust, halication of fer
tree species
use of Calld. The spepress cogon
excellent per zone but dence of firey become sun a year to ommended:
the major anssessment o
s planted in
Scie
Casuarina e
Pterocarpus
Leucaena le
Terminalia c
Calamus sp
Trema orien
Koordersiod
Macarangat
Pongamia p
Morinda bra
Vitex parviflo
Barringtonia
Acapypha sp
Dilinia philip
Canarium ov
Jetropha cur
al rate (ESR) is 9
%.
%.
%.
, RRMI undey, or chickenrtilizer, mulch
s that perform
lopogonium aecies must b
(Photo 3-13)
erformance also in som under the s
usceptible to decompose
nd minor speof the spec
the buffer zo
entific Name
equisetifolia
s indicus
eucocephala
catapa
.
ntalis
dendron pinnat
tanarius
pinnata
cteata
ora
a asiatica
p.
pinensis
vatum
rcas
90 to 100 %.
ertakes soil tn manure. Ahing, ring we
med excellen
as cover crobe used exte).
of agoho we abandone
stand was refires becauscompletely.
ecies plantedcies’ surviva
one
E
Exc
Go
Exc
Go
Go
Po
tum Go
Fa
Exc
Go
Go
Exc
Fa
Fa
Fa
Go
reatment actAfter plantingeeding, and r
ntly are show
op was a goensively not
was the majoed and open eported. These of the ac To avoid
Backgro
d in the buffel rate and
stimated Sur(Qualitative
cellent1
ood2
cellent
ood
ood
or4
ood
ir3
cellent
ood
ood
cellent
ir
ir
ir
ood
tivities such , the subseqre-planting.
wn in Photos
ood innovatiojust to impr
or reason fospaces (Pho
e fire was pucumulating lfires in the
ound Info
er zone. Thgeneral ap
rvival e)
Gen
Exce
Goo
Exce
Goo
Goo
Poor
Fair
Poor
Exce
Fair
Goo
Exce
Poor
Fair
Fair
Goo
as liming anuent activitie
3-13 and 3-14
on. Its growrove the soi
r its use nooto 3-14). Ht off quite eaeaf litter thafuture, the f
ormation
he Table alsopearance o
neral AppearaRobustness
ellent
od
ellent
od
od
r
r
ellent
od
ellent
r
od
nd applicationes are liming
4.
wth was quiteil but also to
ot only in theHowever, oneasily. Agoho
at takes morefollowing are
n
o r
ance/ s
n g,
e o
e e o e e
Backgrou
Cleabetw
Inte
und Info
ar the base oween the row
rplant agoho
Photo 3
Photo 3
rmation
of trees withws of trees at
o with ipil-ipil
3-13. Agohowith Ccrop.
3-14. Agoho
h leaf litter byt an interval o
or any other
o, ipil-ipil, taCallopogoniu
o growing we
y raking themof every two
r species.
alisai, and um muconoid
ell along the
m at the cenyears.
moton-botondes as cover
buffer zone.
Jul
nter in mound
n r
ly 2010
3-17
ds or
Photo 4
Final Min
4 STA
4.1 RRM
To initiate thstaff of RRMand scope oRRMI/ RRPto their emp
4-1. BMP’s MPlan com
On 27 DeceFMRDP. Thproposed mtheir sequenrevised and
On 17 April staff of RRMmethodologycovered the closure risks
The participRehabilitatioincluded, am
Ma
Add
Upd
ne Rehabi
AKEHOLDE
MI/RRPI Of
he planning MI and RRPIof the FMRDI and BMP inloyees the sa
M Cuaño dimponent of t
ember 2007he focus wa
management ncing and cothen submitt
2010, BMP MI and RRPIy, major findmajor issue
s together wi
pants were lon Fund Comong others:
rket study fo
ditional comm
dated invento
litation &
ER INFORM
fficers, Man
process on on 1 June
DP, its statutn the procesalient feature
scusses thethe FMRDP.
7, BMP press on the envplans. Disc
osts. Basedted to the Mi
returned to the draft FM
dings, FMRDes during minth the propo
likewise briemmittee (MR
r the post-m
munity consu
ory of PAF, N
& Decomm
MATION AN
nagers, an
the FMRDP2007. BMP
tory basis, thss. It was ages of the FM
e Social Ph
sented to thvironmental cussion then on the discnes and Geo
the Project MRDP. The DP costs, anne closure, tsed manage
efed on the RFC) after t
ining land us
ultations on t
NAF, and cla
missioning
ND INVOLV
d Personn
P, BMP met P briefed the he plan formgreed that RRDP and the
hoto 4-2. RR
e officers oand social r
n centered ocussion outcoosciences Bu
site to presepresentation
d FMRDP scthe post- minement plans.
additional wtheir review
ses
he FMRDP
ay
g Plan
VEMENT
el
with the Maparticipants ulation proceRMI/RRPI we planning pr
RMI/RRPI M
f RRMI andisks of mineon the closuomes, the drureau Region
ent to the Man was dividechedule. Thning land us
works requirof the draft
Jul
anagers andon the defin
ess, and rolewill cascade drocess.
anagers take
d RRPI the e closure andure activitiesraft FMRDPn V Office.
anagers anded into four phe major findse, and the m
red by the ft FMRDP.
4-1
ly 2010
d key nition es of down
e notes.
draft d the and was
d key parts: dings major
Mine This
July 2
4-2
Pho
On 2revis
All temp
4.2
The comnamBinoand 15 %
2010
Provisio
Estimat
Review
Provisio
oto 4-3. The
21 July 2010sed FMRDP
1. To highl
2. To consthe FMR
3. To agree
three objectployee redep
Host an
SDMP apprmmunities of mely, the Direosawan and Linao (Figur
% is shared a
S
on of an acid
tion of decom
w of the use o
on in the FM
meeting wit
0, BMP met w. The meeti
ight the diffe
sult on the seRDP and
e on the FMR
tives were aployment sup
nd Surroun
roved by thethe Project
ect Impact Athe Indirect Ire 4-1). The among the IIA
Stakehol
d neutralizatio
mmissioning
of HDPE and
RDP of alter
h RRMI/RRP
with the Maning objective
erences of the
ensitive, land
RDP version
achieved. Ipport program
nding Com
e MGB in Set. The com
Areas (DIAs) Impact AreasDIAs get 85
As.
lder Info
on and heav
cost for the i
d soil cover in
rnative livelih
PI Managers
nagers and kes were:
e revised FM
d use, expen
n for submiss
n addition, m proposed i
mmunities
eptember 20mmunities hcomprised b
s (IIAs) made5 % of the to
rmation
y metal remo
infrastructure
n the TSF an
hood for the l
and key sta
key staff of R
MRDP from t
nse, and wo
sion to the M
the participan the FMRD
04 defines tave been dby Brgys. Mae up of Brgy
otal SDMP bu
and Invo
oval plant
es, etc.
d
ocals.
ff on 17 Apri
RRMI/RRPI to
he old versio
ork schedulin
GB.
ants concurP.
he host anddivided into alobago, Pags. Sta. Barbaudget and th
olvement
l 2010.
o present the
on
ng aspects o
rred with the
d surroundingtwo groups
gcolbon, andara, Tinopanhe balance o
t
e
of
e
g s, d n, of
Photo 4
Photo 4
Stakehol
4.2.1 Com
4.2.1.1 Ju
A communityFunctions Rattended byMalobago, community ccommunity c
4-4. The paare ackparticipa
4-6. Malobagmakes a
During the cwhich he/shThe problem
lder Info
mmunity Co
une 2007
y consultatioRoom. The y the local lPagcolbon, consultation;consultation.
rticipants froknowledged. ants from Brg
go Brgy. Cha comment.
consultation,e believes th
ms cited were
ormation
onsultation
on on the FMmeeting wa
eaders and and Binosa; Annex 9-2
The highlig
om each ba Standing a
gy. Pagcolbo
airman R As
each partiche communite:
and Invo
s
MRDP was heas hosted bresidents o
awan. Annex
is the progrghts of the co
arangay are the on.
Ph
sunsion Ph
cipant was aty will experi
olvement
eld on 3 Juneby RRMI/RRof the three x 9-1 is the ram and Powonsultation a
hoto 4-5. RRwe
hoto 4-7. BinCaqu
asked to enuence as a re
t
e 2007 at theRPI, facilitate
DIA baranglist of pa
werpoint preare summariz
RMI’s Presidelcomes the
nosawanabadonga resestion.
umerate five esult of closu
Jul
e Project’s Ped by BMP, gays, i.e., Barticipants toesentation fozed in Annex
dent, Engr. participants.
Brgy. sponds to th
major problure of the Pro
ly 2010
4-3
Public and
rgys. o the r the
x 9-3.
R Corpus
Chairmane facilitator’s
ems, oject.
,
n s
July 2
4-4
2010
1. Loss ofidentifiedincomes
Fishencoprob
Pigg
Coclandcom
Coodailymem
Rec
2. Loss ofcosts ofdistribut
3. Loss oparticipaout rate distance
4. Loss ofcompanprovide
5. Loss ofRapu-RaProject’smissions
6. Maintenimportanare concalso wansome rAsuncio
7. Environ
LandbreaLTS
S
f livelihood d potential s. These are
hing which ouraged by blem is the st
gery, poultry,
conuts, abacad. Some pammunity durin
operative to my needs. Mambers should
covery of scra
f water souf the water sion lines.
of educatioants. The sc
from elemee of Brgy. Po
f electricity y gone, nobelectricity to
f health serapu Municips monthly ms will be disc
nance of ronce of roads cerned abounts to operatoad section
on wanted the
nmental pro
dslide/tailingach was rais
SF.
Stakehol
and employlivelihoods
e:
is the bestproviding b
tormy weath
, and goat ra
a, and vegetarticipants wng mine closu
manage a stalobago Brgyd first be train
ap materials
rces – 13 psystem com
onal assistchool teacheentary to highblacion to th
– 7 participbody would p
the direct im
rvices and pal Governm
medical missicontinued onc
oads – 2 pput up by th
ut their maintte a tricycle ans, i.e., wide road to go
blems such
s dam breased by a res
lder Info
yment – citewhich may
t means ofancas, netser from Octo
aising.
tables. Howewanted the cure.
tore from why. Chairman ned.
from the min
participants. mponents suc
tance and er from Brgyh school. S
he high schoo
pants. The pay the rent
mpact barang
medical miment’s very s
ons are veryce the mine
participants. he Project estenance at talong the roa
dening and straight to h
as
ach – 2 partsident in the
rmation
ed by 20 parbe develop
f livelihood , and other
ober to Febru
ever, the procompany to
here the memR Asuncion
ne decommis
The concerch as water
scholarsh. Pagcolbon
She attributedol site.
participants for the gen
gays.
ssions – 4 small budgety important closes down
The particpecially durinthe end of thad. This willslope flatte
is barangay.
icipants. The Sitio immed
and Invo
ticipants. Thped to repla
available. fishing gea
uary which st
blem is the adonate the
mbers can pusaid that the
ssioning.
n is on the storage tan
ip opportudeplored th
d this to pov
are afraid terator sets a
participantst for health sto the comm
n.
ipants acknng the wet sehe Project. O
require impening. Brgy
he risk of a diately down
olvement
he attendeesace the los
It may bear. The onlytops fishing.
availability olands to the
urchase theie prospective
maintenancenk and wate
unities – 7he 90 % dropverty and the
that with theand fuel tha
s. Given theservices, the
munity. Said
owledge theeason. TheyOne residenrovements iny. Chairman
tailings damnslope of the
t
s st
e y
of e
r e
e r
7 p e
e at
e e d
e y
nt n n
m e
Pho
Pho
Stakehol
oto 4-8. Msideto m
oto 4-10. Theranalsoenv
lder Info
Heavy meta
Fishing/seas
Visual proble
AMD – 1 pa
. Cuaño presntified by thmine closure
e effects on nk second. To apprevironmental i
ormation
ls – 2 partici
s – 4 particip
em/desert –
rticipant.
sents the prohe participan.
the water syThe participaehensive mpacts.
and Invo
pants.
pants.
2 participant
oblems nts due
Ph
ystems ants are
about
Ph
olvement
ts.
hoto 4-9. Thmisthe
hoto 4-11. Alin
t
e loss of elessions rank e list of probl
As expecteivelihood andnumber one p
Jul
ectricity and third and f
ems.
ed, the lod employmeproblem.
ly 2010
4-5
medical fourth in
oss of nt is the
July 2
4-6
4.2.1
The RepMaloindirafter
The discalsoaddineedthe high
Effe
2010
1.2 April 2
draft FMRpresentativesobago, Pagcrect impact rnoon sessio
positive ancussed. The o tackled. Titional issuesded to take tprogram of
hlights.
ects of minin
Direct icommunmining oNow, thschool a27th ammining m(IRA). All hous
Brgy. Chmost of
S
Photo 4-12
2010
RDP was ps from all seccolbon and B
barangays on. Annex 9-
d negative econcerns an
The participas. The facilto better prep
the commu
ng operation
impact baranity. Accordioperations, veir barangay
and college. ong 37 baramade the baMining’s gre
seholds are n
hairman Petthe homes
Stakehol
. This Sitio breach.
presented toctors attendeBinosawan at
of Sta. Bar-4 is the list o
effects of thnd issues thaants were aitators also spare themseunity consult
ns
angays - Oing to Brgy. Cvery few resy has one o With respec
angays in Rarangay less
eatest contribnow connecte
ter Molave oin his baran
lder Info
is at risk f
o the impaed. Participattended the mrbara, Linaoof participant
he mining opat were articusked if thessolicited the
elves for RRMtation and A
Overall, the Chairman Residents couldof the highesct to the eco
Rapu-Rapu ms dependentbution is the ed to ALECO
of Pagcolbonngay as a m
rmation
from a tailin
act barangaants from themorning sess and Tinops to the com
perations on ulated in the e were still ir views on t
MI’s and RRPAnnex 9-6 p
operations eynold Asund attend schst number ofonomy, Malomunicipality. t on the Inteelectrificatio
O.
n cited the pmeasure of p
and Invo
ngs dam
ays on 18 e direct impacsion while than were premunity cons
the people’2007 consurelevant andthe steps thePI’s closure. resents the
positively acion of Malo
hool becausef students atobago now ra
Income sernal Revenn of the who
resence of aprogress. H
olvement
April 2010ct barangays
hose from theesent in theultation.
’s lives wereultations wered if they hade community Annex 9-5 isconsultation
affected theobago, beforee of povertyttending highanks 8th fromsources fromue Allotmen
ole barangay
appliances inHe noted tha
t
0. s e e
e e d y s n
e e y. h
m m nt y.
n at
Stakehol
morscho
BrgyimprHowlivelshelthis dust
Indirassito BKagthemnighopeinclu
ChaSDMMan
Brgythe that theirremfisheharv
It wmeehad take
Preparation
When askedback to theirraising. Thvegetables.
The impact the mine cloand learn ne
The challengand developand in partn
lder Info
re students olarship prog
y. Chairwomrovements i
wever, she sihood. Durinllfish for foodto the mine
t coming from
rect impact bstance and p
Brgy. Chairmawads are
m to construht so there isration are beuding him, ar
airman BalbinMP funds to nager Lani La
y. ChairwomSDMP educthe overall
r barangay ain scared ermen. Durvest copra an
was unfortunaeting. The b
to go backen up in defe
n for Mine C
d about theirr traditional ie traditional
barangays rosure is only ew skills fast
ge for the Cpment activitership with th
ormation
could attengrams.
man Enida Bn the baranstressed thang the rainy sd. She lamewastes that
m the mine w
barangays -provision of t
man Conradoemployed b
uct and repas not much etter off becare engaged i
n reiterated acquire landanuzo said th
man Heidi Esation, infrasteconomic imare employeof the nega
ring the rainynd process a
ate that onlyoat that the home. The
rence to the
losure
post-miningncome genefarming prod
esolved to athree years so that they
ARE team isies necessarhe impact co
and Invo
d high scho
endal of Binngay. Moreat the sea wseason whe
ented that thet washed to tworks.
The participtoilets as beo Balbin, ap
by RRMI’s Eair their hous
improvemenause they han fishing.
the barangad in a lower hat land acq
springael adtructure, spo
mprovement ed by the mative effects y season wh
abaca to surv
y two particother represe two that aBarangay of
g life, the imperating activitducts include
allocate moreaway, they u
y could imple
s to identify ry to accompommunities.
olvement
ool and col
nosawan alse people cowould forevn the peopleere were no the sea. Sh
pants from Snefits from mpproximately
Exploration Gses. Howevnt in their livve no vices.
ay’s requestarea for a reuisition is su
dmitted that orts and othe
was minimamine. She
of mining. hen it is notvive.
cipants from sentatives weattended didfficials who w
pact communties such as e coconut, ab
e SDMP fundunderstand tment and su
viable opporplish the inco
t
lege due to
o concurredould afford er be their could not fismore shells
he also comp
ta. Barbara cmining operay 20 residenGroup. Theirver, they drinves. Those Those wh
to use P 2elocation sitebject to MGB
Brgy. Tinopar projects. Hl because oalso stated Most of thpossible to
Brgy. Linaoere riding in c
not commewere not pres
nities said thfishing, farmbaca, root cr
ds for livelihothat they havccessfully m
rtunities, conome objectiv
Jul
o the compa
d that there to own houmain sourc
sh, they relie. She attribplained abou
cited scholaations. Acconts includingr wages enank alcohol eemployed in
ho were not h
250,000 frome. RRMI’s CB’s approval.
an benefits However, shnly six men that the pe
he residentso fish, the pe
o made it tocapsized so
ent on the tosent.
hat they wouming and livesrops, banana
ood projectsve to work ha
manage proje
nduct the trave in consult
ly 2010
4-7
any’s
were uses. ce of ed on buted ut the
rship rding
g two abled every n the hired,
m the CARE .
from e felt from
eople s are eople
o the they
opics
ld go stock a and
s. As arder
ects.
aining ation
P
P
July 2
4-8
The be cincreof O2010livel
Issu
The remconcPagBara
Photo 4-13.
Photo 4-15.
2010
SDMP is thcarefully planease in the m
Operating Co0 to at leasihood projec
ues and Con
socio-econain the samcerns). As ocolbon and angay Powe
The participBarangays.
Dr. Rolandomining land
S
e key to the nned and exemandatory Sost, the annust P 20 milliocts to ensure
ncerns on M
omic conceme except for
of date, 152 147 of 150
r Association
pants from th
o Cuaño exuse to the p
Stakehol
community’secuted in ordDMP Fund f
ual SDMP Fuon from 201that the com
Mine Closure
rns and issr the loss ofout of 163 h
0 HHs in Bins (BAPAs) i
he direct imp
plains the participants.
lder Info
s sustainabider to attain from 1% of Dund is expec11 to 2013.
mmunities are
e
sues raised f Electricity (households nosawan han all three ba
pact Ph
post Photo
rmation
lity. The prothe sustaina
Direct Mining cted to incre The increm
e sustainable
during the (Item 4 of th(HHs) in Ma
ave switchedarangays are
hoto 4-14. Em
4-16. Malodiscu
and Invo
oject’s final Sability objecti
and Milling Cease from P ment would e at the end o
April 2007 he original lialobago, 52 od over to ALe now functio
Engr. R Cormeeting obje
bago Brgy. usses the be
olvement
SDMP shouldve. With theCost to 1.5%14 million inbe used fo
of mine life.
consultationist of closureof 67 HHs inLECO. Theonal.
rpus discussective.
Chairman nefitsof the R
t
d e
% n r
n e n e
es the
Asuncion RRPP.
Photo 4-1
Photo 4-1
Photo 4-2
Stakehol
17. PagcolbrecountsProject t
19. BMP’s Dpreferre
21. Sta. Barecalls tbaranga
lder Info
bon Brgy. s the positito his barang
Dr. Florece aed crops.
arbara Brgy.the impacts ay.
ormation
Chairman ve impactsgay.
asks the crow
Chairman of the RRPP
and Invo
Molave of the
Ph
wd their Ph
Balwid P to his
Ph
olvement
hoto 4-18. Bd
hoto 4-20. Ttb
hoto 4-22. Fca
t
Binosawan Bdoes the sam
Tinopan Brgyhanks RRbarangay in t
Fe of Sta. Bcompany’s assistance pr
Jul
Brgy. Chairwme for her ba
y. ChairwomRMI for inthe FMRDP.
Barbara acknscholarship
rogram.
ly 2010
4-9
woman Bendarangay.
man Espringancluding h
nowledges thp and toi
dal
ael her
he let
July 2
4-10
4.2.
4.2.2
Tabl
Rapin thincreAlbain thRRM
TheFromaver
In thBinopopuand incre
The 0.94RapThisbara
2010
0
2 Socio-E
2.1 Popul
le 4-1 shows pu Municipalihe populatioease is 9.8 %ay’s 1.25 % ahe area for thMI and RRPI
re is a markm 2000 to 20rage annual
he DIAs, Paosawan’s 12ulation figureinstitutional
ease. It inclu
IIAs of Lina4 %, respectpu-Rapu’s 1.s indicates thangay.
S
Photo 4-2
Economic S
ation and P
the populatity and Albay
on of the im% which is sixannual growthat period, th’s presence.
ked differenc007, populatpopulation in
agcolbon re2 % and Maes refer to to population.
udes the emp
ao, Sta. Barbtively. Lina64%. Tinophat benefits
Stakehol
23. CARE companschool admissio
Situation in
opulation G
on and popuy Province fr
mpact barangx times Raputh rate. As the substantia
e between tion in the DIAncrease in th
flected the alobago’s 8 otal populatio This expla
ployee popula
bara and Tino and Sta. pan’s populafrom the min
lder Info
Manager Lny’s plan t
graduates ons test.
the Impact
Growth Rate
ulation growtrom 1995 to gays. Fromu-Rapu’s 1.6there were nal population
the populatioAs grew by
he IIAs regist
highest incr%. The 20
on. It has noains Pagcolbation.
nopan recordBarbara’s p
ation incremening operatio
rmation
Lanuzo bareto prepare for the C
t Barangays
th of the six i2007. It sho
m 2000 to 264 % yearly io other majon increase co
on increase ian average tered 2.89 %
rease of 52007 Nationalot been disagbon’s statisti
ded increaseopulation grent is only hons may hav
and Invo
es the
high College
s
mpact baranows significa
2007, the ovncrease andor companiesould only be
n the DIAs aof 16.27 % p.
% p.a. col Statistics Oggregated intically skewe
es of 5.86 %owth is at lehalf of the mve limited ef
olvement
ngays, Rapuant increasesverall annuad seven timess established
e attributed to
and the IIAsp.a. while the
mpared withOffice (NSOto household
ed population
%, 5.4 % andeast 3 times
municipality’sffects on this
t
-s al s d o
s. e
h ) d n
d s s. s
S
Table 4-1.
Time
9/1/1995
5/1/2000
8/1/2007
Increase (De
1995-2000
2000-2007
1995-2007
Annual Aver
1995-2000
2000-2007
1995-2007
Source: NSO f
Stakeholder
Population and po
Binosawan
447
454
852
ecrease)
7
398
405
rage Percent Increa
0.33%
12.09%
7.60%
for the population figur
Information
opulation growth o
Malobago P
348
400
631
52
231
283
ase (Decrease)
3.15%
7.97%
6.82%
res.
n and Involv
of impact baranga
Pagcolbon TotBa
170
147
699
(23)
552
529
-2.85%
51.79%
26.11%
ement
ays, 1995 to 2007
tal Direct rangays
Lin
965 2
1,001 2
2,182 4
36 1
1,181 12
1,217 1
0.79%
16.27%
10.58%
7
nao Sta. Bar
70 146
87 92
09 128
17 (54)
22 36
39 (18)
1.33% -7
5.86% 5
4.32% -1
rbara Tinopan
538
556
594
) 18
38
) 56
.79% 0.70
5.40% 0.94
.03% 0.87
n Total
Indirect Barangays
954
935
1,131
(19)
196
177
0% -0.42%
4% 2.89%
7% 1.56%
Total Impact Barangays
1,919
1,936
3,313
17
1,377
1,394
% 0.19%
% 9.81%
% 6.09%
July 2010
4-1
Rapu-Rapu Municipality
28,797
29,176
32,646
379
3,470
3,849
0.28%
1.64%
1.12%
11
Albay Province
1,005,315
1,090,907
1,190,823
85,592
99,916
185,508
1.79%
1.26%
1.55%
July 2
4-12
To hMayFor % o
The
4.2.2
Tabl
the The popuaccothe past
Table 4-2.
Baranga
Binosawan
Malobago
Pagcolbon
Total DIAs
Linao
Sta. Barbara
Tinopan*
Total IIAs
TOTAL
Source: RRMI s
4.2.2
Tabl
ratioold cof sfor 4
2010
2
have a basis y 2010. TheTinopan, hor 577 of 667
following Se
2.2 House
le 4-2 shows nine-year penumber of
ulation growtounts for theincrease is tures elsewh
Households
ay THous
2
a
3
surveys; *Tinop
2.3 Gende
le 4-3 gives to of 112 malecomprising 4chooling age45%. Of 1,14
S
for the Socie survey cov
owever, only households
ections discu
eholds and H
the populatieriod, the pohouseholds th is 30% wi significant paccounted f
here came ba
s and house
Total seholds
P
95
76
35
206
56
31
103
190
396
an’shouseholds
er and Age P
the gender ae per 100 fem42 % of the te. The work41 women, 5
Stakehol
al Plan of thevered all the 67 (43 %) owere survey
uss the result
Household P
ion of the imopulation in t
grew by 84th a 52% inc
population infor by returnack to work fo
hold populat
2001
Population
444
381
129
954
295
123
660
1,078
2,032
s and population
Profile
and age profmales. The total. Almosking age gro545 (48%) be
lder Info
e FRMDP, Rhouseholds
of 157 houseyed. The surv
ts of RRMI’s
Population
mpact areas ithe DIAs mo4 % from 20crease in thecreases. Th
ning residentfor the Projec
tion of impac
Average Household
Size
4.67
5.01
3.69
4.63
5.27
3.97
6.41
5.67
5.13
n for 2010 provi
file. There population is
st half (47%) oup compriseelong to the r
rmation
RRMI conducin the DIAs,
eholds were vey form is a
household s
n 2001 and 2ore than dou06 to 380. e number of hhe people intts. Those wct.
ct barangays
d Tota
Househ
150
163
67
380
84
46
157
287
667
ided by Brgy. C
are more ms young with of the samp
es 55% and reproductive
and Invo
cted a surveyLinao, and Sinterviewed.
attached as A
survey.
2010, respecubled from 9For the IIAshouseholds. erviewed saiwho left to s
, 2001 and 2
2
l olds
Popu
8
8
3
2,
4
2
7
1,
3,
hairwoman Heid
ales than fethose less th
ple, numberinthe dependeage of 15-49
olvement
y in April andSta. Barbara. Overall, 87Annex 9-7.
ctively. Ove954 to 2,013s, the overa In-migrationid that half oseek greene
2010
2010
ulation H
834
874
305
,013
407
215
778
,400
,413
di Espingael.
males with ahan 15 yearsng 1,131, areents accoun9.
t
d a. 7
r 3. ll n of r
Average Household
Size
5.56
5.36
4.55
5.30
4.85
4.67
4.96
4.88
5.12
a s e nt
S
Table
Fema
0-4
5-9
10-14
15-19
20-24
25-29
30-34
35-39
40-44
45-49
50-54
55-59
60-64
65 &
No da
Sub-T
Male
0-4
Stakeholder
4-3. Gender and
Age Bino
le
4
9
4
9
4
9
4
9
4
9
4
over
ate of birth
Total
Information
d age profile of im
osawan Mal
57
56
51
50
33
23
21
17
20
18
15
8
4
13
2
388 4
66
n and Involv
mpact barangays,
obago Pagc
57
62
51
40 2
43
37
33
20
9
17
10
9
10
13
3
414 1
75
ement
2010
colbon Lin
16 2
18 2
18 1
21 1
13 1
15 2
9 1
9
7
5
3
6
1
2
1
143 1
22
nao Sta. B
29 1
28 1
19 5
15 1
13 9
20 7
15 6
8 6
9 3
5 2
6 3
5 8
4 2
9 3
11
96 9
26
Barbara Tino
4 2
6 3
5 2
2 3
9 1
7 9
6 1
6 8
3 1
2 5
3 7
8 6
2 1
3 8
2
96 20
13
opan Dire
2 13
3 13
8 12
3 11
5 89
9 75
1 63
8 46
7 36
5 40
7 28
6 23
1 15
8 28
2 5
05 94
23
ect Indir
30 29
36 28
20 19
1 15
9 13
5 20
3 15
6 8
6 9
0 5
8 6
3 5
5 4
8 9
5 11
45 19
163
July 2
4-1
rect Tota
9 159
8 164
9 139
5 126
3 102
0 95
5 78
54
45
45
34
28
19
37
1 16
6 114
26 189
2010
13
al
9
4
9
6
2
5
8
4
5
5
4
8
9
7
6
41
9
Ju
4
5-9
10-14
15-19
20-24
25-29
30-34
35-39
40-44
45-49
50-54
55-59
60-64
65 &
No da
Sub-T
Total
0-4
5-9
10-14
15-19
uly 2010
4-14
Age Bino
4
9
4
9
4
9
4
9
4
9
4
over
ate of birth
Total 4
osawan Mal
66
70
61
31
24
20
24
24
18
17
9
3
13
-
446 4
123 1
122 1
121 1
111
obago Pagc
60 2
58
48
50
31
41
29
14
13
13
6
8
11
3
460 1
132 3
122 4
109 3
88 3
colbon Lin
24 2
16 1
18 1
18 1
15 2
6 1
10 1
8
7
7
5
3
3
1
162 2
38 5
42 5
34 3
39 3
nao Sta. B
24 1
18 9
19 1
19 1
20 1
16 1
10 3
8 3
9 2
7 3
6 5
4 4
9 5
16
211 1
55 2
52 3
37 1
34 3
Stake
Barbara Tino
7 3
9 2
9 2
1 1
3 1
2 7
3 8
3 1
2 1
3 4
5 5
4 3
5 8
19 19
27 4
33 7
4 5
31 5
eholder Info
opan Dire
7 15
3 14
5 12
1 99
4 70
7 67
8 63
0 46
5 38
4 37
5 20
3 14
8 27
3
93 1,0
5 29
0 28
1 26
8 23
rmation and
ect Indir
50 24
44 18
27 19
9 19
0 20
7 16
3 10
6 8
8 9
7 7
0 6
4 4
7 9
3 16
68 21
93 55
86 52
64 37
38 34
d Involvemen
rect Tota
4 174
8 162
9 146
9 118
0 90
6 83
0 73
54
47
44
26
18
36
6 19
1 127
5 348
2 338
7 301
4 272
nt
al
4
2
6
8
0
3
3
4
7
4
6
8
6
9
79
8
8
1
2
S
20-24
25-29
30-34
35-39
40-44
45-49
50-54
55-59
60-64
65 & o
No da
Total
Source:
Stakeholder
Age Bino
over
ate of birth
: RRMI survey
Information
osawan Mal
64
47
41
41
44
36
32
17
7
26
2
834 8
n and Involv
obago Pagc
93 3
68 3
74
49
23
30
23
15
18
24
6
874 3
ement
colbon Lin
31 3
30 4
15 3
19 1
15 1
12 1
10 1
11 1
4
5 1
0 2
305 4
nao Sta. B
32 2
40 2
31 1
18 9
17 6
14 4
13 6
11 1
8 6
18 8
27 0
407 2
Barbara Tino
20 2
20 2
8 1
9 1
6 2
4 2
6 1
3 1
6 4
8 1
0 2
15 39
opan Dire
6 18
3 14
8 13
6 10
7 82
0 78
1 65
1 43
4 29
6 55
2 8
98 201
ect Indir
88 32
45 40
30 31
09 18
2 17
8 14
5 13
3 11
9 8
5 18
8 27
13 40
July 2
4-1
rect Tota
2 220
0 185
1 161
8 127
7 99
4 92
3 78
1 54
37
8 73
7 35
7 242
2010
15
al
0
5
1
7
9
2
8
4
7
3
5
20
Tab
Ma
0-4
5-9
10-
15-
20-
25-
30-
35-
40-
45-
50-
55-
60-
65
Tot
N/A
Fem
0-4
5-9
10-
15-
20-
July 2
4-16
4.2.2
The leveschofromconsThisthe wNatiBinoreac
ble 4-4. Edu
AGE Co
ale
4 2
9 2
-14 1
-19 1
-24 1
-29 1
-34 1
-39 8
-44 6
-49 6
-54 5
-59 3
-64 2
& over 4
tal 15
A 2
male
4 1
9 2
-14 1
-19 1
-24 1
2010
6
2.4 Educa
educationalel is low comool and 3 ou
m high schoosultation, a tes is attributabwhole Rapu-onal High S
osawan, Linach by land fro
ucational pro
ount N/A
222 211
228 103
94 52
90 22
40 9
17 5
02 3
84 4
67 4
64 3
51 2
36 2
25 0
49 9
569 429
21 16
95 188
213 71
82 55
71 22
26 7
ational Profi
l profile of thmpared to Rut of ten areol and 3 outeacher said ble to poverty-Rapu Island
School locateao, Malobagom Tinopan.
ofile of impac
PE S
2
17
10
2
0
1
1
2
2
1
0
0
0
2
40
0
1
27
9
2
0
Stakeho
le
he impact baRapu-Rapu Me elementaryt of 100 havthat the dropy and the absd, there is oned in Brgy. Pgo, Pagcolbo
ct barangays
IN SCH
EL UG
3 3
8 92
8 89
6 20
0 26
0 31
0 30
0 26
0 11
0 20
0 15
0 14
0 15
0 22
25 414
0 3
1 2
6 100
6 76
11 18
1 16
lder Info
arangays is sMunicipality. y undergraduve academicp-out rate frosence of an
nly one seconPoblacion. Ion and Sta.
s, 2010
EG
0
1
4
29
24
27
17
15
26
24
19
12
7
9
214
2
0
0
6
19
16
ormation
shown in Tab
One in teuates. Sevec degrees. om elementaaccessible hndary schooIt can only bBarbara. It w
HS UG
HG
0 0
0 1
22 9
92 10
35 20
22 13
24 15
15 15
12 7
8 3
7 5
6 1
0 1
3 3
246 103
0 0
1 0
2 1
29 1
60 19
36 21
and Invo
ble 4-4. Then people finen out of 10 During th
ary to high schigh school inl. This is thebe reached bwould take t
G C
1
1
0
0 7
0 13
3 8
5 3
5 2
2
3
3
0
1
1
3 45
0
0
0
0
9 18
19
olvemen
e educationanished grade00 graduatede April 2007
chool is 90%n the area. Ine Rapu-Rapuby boat fromtwo hours to
V V
0 0
0 0
0 0
1 0
1 0
3
2
1
0
0 0
0 0
0 0
1 0
0 0
9 4
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
1 0
1 0
t
al e d 7
%. n u
m o
VG CG
0 2
0 5
0 0
0 1
0 12
1 6
1 6
1 3
1 2
0 2
0 0
0 1
0 0
0 0
4 40
0 0
0 2
0 6
0 0
0 1
0 9
AGE
25-29
30-34
35-39
40-44
45-49
50-54
55-59
60-64
65 & over
Total
N/A
Notes: N/A is nSchool School
Source: RRMI s
Stakehol
Count N
110
95
68
65
52
44
42
22
48
1433 3
18
not available; PGraduate; HS UGraduate; CG isurvey
4.2.2.5 Oc
Table 4-5 preworking popof the workeof the mininthe low educ
Table 4-5.
O
Fisherman
Farmer
Laborer
Welder
Carpenter
Teacher
Businessma
Driver
Construction
Process Ope
lder Info
N/A PE
4 0
0 3
2 1
2 0
3 1
0 0
2 1
1 0
6 1
363 46
15 0
PE is Pre-ElemUG is High Schs College Grad
ccupation a
esents the ocpulation. Theers in the areg-related pocational attai
Occupationa
Occupation
n/businesswo
n Worker
erator
ormation
IN SCH
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
25
0
entary; IN SCHool Undergraduuate.
nd Employm
ccupational pe fishermen,
ea. The weldositions indicnment and le
al profile of im
oman
and Invo
EL UG
EG
19 15
19 12
14 20
17 30
16 18
17 21
15 16
11 4
23 14
363 191
0 2
H is In School; uate; HG is High
ment Profile
profile. The w, farmers, anders and car
cated in the tevel of skills
mpact baran
Female
2
8
2
0
7
22
15
0
4
0
olvement
HS UG
35
28
12
8
5
1
4
1
2
224
1
EL UG is Elemh School Gradu
e
women compnd laborers srpenters maktable requirein the impac
gays, 2010
Male
121
81
84
51
23
3
8
23
14
17
t
HG C
18 8
18 3
11 2
7 0
6 1
3 0
2 1
3 0
1 0
111 52
0 0
mentary Schoolate; C is Colleg
prise nearly still constituteke up anothee manual labct barangays
Total
123
89
86
51
30
25
23
23
18
17
Jul
C V
8 0
3 5
2 2
0 0
0
0 0
0
0 0
0 0
2 9
0 0
l Undergraduatege; V is Vocatio
a fifth of the te the bulk (3er 10%. Mabor. This refs.
% of Tota
14.5
10.5
10.1
6.0
3.5
2.9
2.7
2.7
2.1
2.0
ly 2010
4-17
VG C
1 1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1 4
0
e; EG is Elemenal; VG is Voca
total 35%) jority flects
al
CG
10
7
4
1
2
2
1
2
1
48
0
entary ational
July 2
4-18
Bus
Cat
Che
Brg
Con
Ope
Em
Sew
Sar
Con
For
Hel
Lau
Mas
Pig
Sta
Hou
Lea
Spo
Coo
EM
Mai
Min
Pan
Stre
Wa
Ass
Bar
Bla
Boa
Ele
Eng
2010
8
Occu
siness Admini
terer
ecker
gy. Official
ntractor
erator
ployee (RRPI
wer/Dressmak
ri-Sari Store O
ntractual
restry
per
undry Woman
son
gery
aff
usemaid
adman
otter
ok
D Operating U
intenance Cle
ner
ntry Staff
eet Sweeper
ater Tender
st. Plant Supe
rangay Health
sting Crew
at Operator
ctrician
gineer
pation
strator
)
ker
Owner
Unit
erk
rvisor
Worker
Stakeho
Fem
6
4
1
4
0
0
1
10
8
0
0
0
7
0
6
0
5
0
0
0
0
0
0
4
4
0
0
2
0
0
0
0
lder Info
male M
6
4
1
4
0
0
1
0
8
0
0
0
7
0
6
0
5
0
0
0
0
0
0
4
4
0
0
2
0
0
0
0
ormation
Male
7
7
10
7
10
10
9
0
1
8
7
7
0
7
1
7
0
5
5
4
4
4
4
0
0
4
3
1
3
3
3
3
and Invo
Total %
13
11
11
11
10
10
10
10
9
8
7
7
7
7
7
7
5
5
5
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
3
3
3
3
3
3
olvemen
% of Total
1.5
1.3
1.3
1.3
1.2
1.2
1.2
1.2
1.2
0.9
0.8
0.8
0.8
0.8
0.8
0.8
0.6
0.6
0.6
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.4
0.4
0.4
0.4
0.4
0.4
t
Stakehol
O
Engineering
Flagman
Staff (Galeo)
Laundry Wa
Pantry
Process Cre
Security Gua
Streetsweep
Surveyor
Utility
Vendor
Pit Technicia
Asst. Superv
Baker
BAPA Office
Boat Captain
Boatman
Bodyguard
Caretaker
Crusher
Day Care Te
Driver/Opera
Environment
Fabric Helpe
Gasoline Bo
Logman
Lubeman
Maintenance
Policeman
Private Emp
Pump Tende
Saleslady
lder Info
Occupation
Maintenance
)
sher
ew
ard
per
an
visor
er
n
eacher
ator
tal Monitor
er
y
e
loyee
er
ormation
e Crew
and Invo
Female
0
0
0
3
2
0
0
2
0
1
3
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
1
0
1
0
0
2
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
2
olvement
Male
3
3
3
0
1
3
3
1
3
2
0
3
2
2
2
2
1
2
1
2
1
2
2
0
2
2
2
2
2
1
2
0
t
Total
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
Jul
% of Tota
0.4
0.4
0.4
0.4
0.4
0.4
0.4
0.4
0.4
0.4
0.4
0.4
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.2
ly 2010
4-19
al
July 2
4-20
Sen
Spo
Brg
Ent
Mid
Wa
Adm
Airc
Arm
Aut
Bag
Bea
Bla
Boa
Boa
But
Cap
Cle
Cru
Dat
Day
Dril
Dril
Ele
EM
Em
Eng
Equ
Equ
FDT
Filtr
Fire
2010
0
Occu
nior Citizen
otter(Galeo)
gy. Employee
trepreneur
dwife
ater Treatment
min Asst.
con Technicia
my Personnel
to Electrical
ggage
autician
sting Helper
at Crew
at Driver
tcher
ptain
erk
usher Operato
ta Encoder
y Care Teache
ling Operator
ling/Blasting/C
ctronics
E Crew
ployee
gineering Staff
uipment Chec
uipment Coord
T -LAB
ration
eman
pation
t Operator
n
r
er
Checker
ff
ker
dinator
Stakeho
Fem
1
0
1
1
2
0
1
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
1
0
1
0
0
0
1
0
1
1
0
0
0
0
0
lder Info
male M
1
0
1
1
2
0
1
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
1
0
1
0
0
0
1
0
1
1
0
0
0
0
0
ormation
Male
1
2
1
1
0
2
0
1
0
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
0
0
1
0
1
1
1
0
1
0
0
1
1
1
1
1
and Invo
Total %
2
2
2
2
2
2
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
olvemen
% of Total
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
t
Stakehol
O
Flagman/Sp
Foreman
Fuelman
Genset Ope
Geology Sta
Grader Oper
Hand Sewin
Helper (Crus
Janitor
Kakanin Ven
Logistic
Logistic Staf
Machinist
Mechanical T
Mechanic
Medicine Op
Mining Surve
Mining/Drive
Mobile Crush
Monitor (Rea
Musician
Nurse
Painter
Pilot
Planning Cre
Power Tend
Room Attend
Safety Office
Scrap Buyer
Seaman
Secretary
Security
lder Info
Occupation
otter
rator
aff
rator
g
sher)
ndor
ff
Technician
perator
eyor
er
her
agent)
ew
er
dant
er
r
ormation and Invo
Female
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
1
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
1
0
0
1
0
olvement
Male
1
1
1
1
1
1
0
1
1
0
1
0
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
0
0
1
1
0
1
t
Total
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
Jul
% of Tota
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
ly 2010
4-21
al
July 2
4-22
Sr.
Ste
STP
STP
Sur
Sur
Tra
Tre
Wa
Wa
Wa
Wo
TOT
Sourc
4.2.2
Hou
Tabl
casemonmorin ththe R
2010
2
Occu
EMD Tech
eward
P Aide
P Operator
rveyor
rvey Aide
aveler
easurer
aiter
arehouseman
ater Sampler
ood Cutter
TAL
ce: RRMI surve
2.6 Incom
usehold Hea
le 4-6 showses, those innthly cash ince than P 2,7
he IIAs is onRRPP is the
pation
ey
me Profile
ads
s the month the DIA eacome of mal
771 average nly 30% of th
reason for t
Stakeho
Fem
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
16
ly incomes arn more the householdearnings in t
he median inhe disparity.
lder Info
male M
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
60 6
of male andhan their coud heads in ththe IIAs. Th
ncome of P 5
ormation
Male
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
689
d female hounterparts inhe DIA is P 7e median m5,900 in the
and Invo
Total %
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
849
usehold hean the IIA. T7,077 which onthly incomDIAs. Emp
olvemen
% of Total
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
100.0
ads. In bothThe averageis 2.55 times
me of P 1,750ployment with
t
h e s 0 h
S
Table
I
Male
Less
10,00
15,00
20,00
25,00
30,00
35,00
40,00
45,00
50,00
55,00
60,00
65,00
70,00
75,00
80,00
85,00
90,00
95,00
100,0
Stakeholder
e 4-6. Income pr
ncome (P)
e
s than 10,000
00 - 14,999
00 - 19,999
00 - 24,999
00 - 29,999
00 - 34,999
00 - 39,999
00 - 44,999
00 - 49,999
00 - 54,999
00 - 59,999
00 - 64,999
00 - 69,999
00 - 74,999
00 - 79,999
00 - 84,999
00 - 89,999
00 - 94,999
00 - 99,999
000 & over
Information
rofile of impact ba
Binosawan
104
7
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
n and Involv
rangays, 2010
Malobago P
95
27
3
2
1
1
1
ement
Pagcolbon
40
14
1
2
Linao Sta.
56
2
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Barbara Tin
31
2
nopan Dir
52 23
4
4
4
1
1
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
rect Indir
39 139
48 4
4 0
4 0
1 0
1 0
1 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
1 0
July 2
4-2
rect Tota
9 378
52
4
4
1
1
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
2010
23
al
Ju
4
I
N/A
None
Sub-
Minim
Aver
Medi
Maxi
Fem
Less
10,00
15,00
20,00
25,00
30,00
35,00
40,00
45,00
50,00
55,00
60,00
65,00
70,00
uly 2010
4-24
ncome (P)
e
-Total
mum
rage
ian
mum
ale
s than 10,000
00 - 14,999
00 - 19,999
00 - 24,999
00 - 29,999
00 - 34,999
00 - 39,999
00 - 44,999
00 - 49,999
00 - 54,999
00 - 59,999
00 - 64,999
00 - 69,999
00 - 74,999
Binosawan
0
25
137
210.00
5,553.57
5,000.00
25,000.00 1
7
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Malobago P
20
150
500.00
8,422.77
6,700.00
115,000.00 2
7
Pagcolbon
3
60
500.00 1
7,253.72 2
6,000.00 1
20,700.00 11
5
Linao Sta.
0
18
76
,000.00 1,5
2,771.21 3,7
,750.00 3,5
1,000.00 12
2
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Stake
Barbara Tin
8
41
500.00 20
796.97 2,1
500.00 2,0
,000.00 8,0
4
eholder Info
nopan Dir
2
2 2
54 34
00.00 403
35.58 7,07
00.00 5,90
00.00 53,56
10 1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
rmation and
rect Indir
23 0
25 28
47 17
3.33 1,000
76.69 2,771
00.00 1,750
66.67 11,000
9 16
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
d Involvemen
rect Tota
23
8 53
1 518
0.00 552.5
1.21 6,000.
0.00 4,862.
0.00 42,925
6 35
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
nt
al
50
32
50
.00
S
I
75,00
80,00
85,00
90,00
95,00
100,0
N/A
None
Sub-
Minim
Aver
Medi
Maxi
Stakeholder
ncome (P)
00 - 79,999
00 - 84,999
00 - 89,999
00 - 94,999
00 - 99,999
000 & over
e
-Total
mum
rage
ian
mum
Information
Binosawan
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
6
13
1,000.00
2,214.29
2,000.00
5,000.00
n and Involv
Malobago P
5
12
1,000.00
4,214.29
5,000.00
9,000.00
ement
Pagcolbon
2
7
2,000.00
3,260.00 1
2,500.00 1
6,000.00 2
Linao Sta.
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
6
8
500.00 2,0
,250.00 2,6
,250.00 2,7
2,000.00 3,0
Barbara Tin
1
5
000.00 20
625.00 1,7
750.00 1,4
000.00 4,0
nopan Dir
0
0
0
0
0
0
7
3 6
13 3
0.00 1,33
42.00 3,22
50.00 3,16
00.00 6,66
rect Indir
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
7 0
6 10
32 26
33.33 500.
29.52 1,250
66.67 1,250
66.67 2,000
July 2
4-2
rect Tota
0
0
0
0
0
0
7
0 16
6 58
00 1,125.
0.00 2,734.
0.00 2,687.
0.00 5,500.
2010
25
al
00
64
50
00
July 2
4-26
Pre-
AccoMalotranbase
The plainevid
The Coopoorin this 47pers
Tabl
2010Tabbara
Tab
20
Ac
2010
6
-Project Inco
ording to Robago and Pslate to avered on a surv
revenue fign/unskilled la
dence of the
poverty thordinating Borest province
he province is7.8 %. This son-month.
le 4-7 compa0 income dale, there is aangays as a
ble 4-7. Co
000 mean inco
ctual 2010 me
S
omes
RRMI/RRPI’SPagcolbon wrage monthlyey conducte
gures seem abor at thatmarginal exis
hreshold anoard also cores in the Phis P 11,858 wmeans that
ares the meaata were cullea significantresult of the
mparison of
Barangay
ome per annu
ean income ba
Stakehol
S SDMP, thwere P 10,00y incomes od in 2000.
to be rightt time was stence of mo
nd poverty rroborate thelippines. As
which is equinearly half o
an annual ined from RRM
improvemeRRPP.
mean incom
m
ased on survey
lder Info
he 2000 me00, P 34,000of P 833, P 2
t consideringP 100 per
ost of the res
incidence ese figures. s of 2000, theivalent to P 9of the popula
comes of DMI’s househont in mean
me levels, 200
Binosaw
10
y 65
rmation
ean annual 0 and P 15,52,833 and P
g that the pday. This
sidents.
levels of In 2000, Alb
e annual per988.16 per mation lived o
IA residents old survey daannual inco
00 and 2010
wan Malo
,000
5,653
and Invo
income in 500, respecti
1,292. The
prevailing wwas also o
the Nationabay ranked 3r capita povemonth. Poven less than P
in 2000 andata. As gleames in the d
obago P
34,000
93,312
olvement
Binosawanively. Thesefigures were
wage rate fooverwhelming
al Statistica33rd of the 44erty thresholderty incidenceP 988.16 pe
d 2010. Theaned from thedirect impac
Pagcolbon
15,500
86,945
t
n, e e
r g
al 4 d e r
e e ct
Final Min
5 RIS
Risk is a twuncertainty and Merkhof
During the care as follow
Open pi
UTSF-P
LTSF –
Environm
Reveget
ne Rehabi
SK ASSESS
wo-dimensionover the occfer, 1993).
closure of thws:
t –
Slope failure
Inaccuracies
Failure of PA
Slow filling floor
Failure of th
PAF dump -
Slope failure
Failure of th
AMD, heavy
Slope failure
Failure of th
Failure of th
AMD, heavy
mental area
Slope failure
AMD, heavy
tation –
Low surviva
litation &
SMENT
nal concept currence, tim
he Rapu-Rap
e of final pit w
s in the PAF-
AF wall cove
of pit and g
e pit explora
e of the UTS
e NAF cappi
y metals, and
e of the LTSF
e NAF cappi
e single filter
y metals, and
–
e of ponds’ e
y metals, and
l rate and so
& Decomm
involving theming or mag
pu Polymeta
wall
-NAF waste
er
eneration of
atory tunnel p
F-PAF dump
ing
d sediment in
F embankme
ing
r system
d tailings in th
embankments
d sediment in
oil cover of pl
missioning
e possibility nitude of tha
allic Project,
rock model
f acid and m
plug
p
n the UTSF-P
ent
he LTSF efflu
s
n Environmen
lanted specie
g Plan
of an adverat adverse o
the risk sou
metals from t
PAF dump
uent
ntal Area effl
es
Jul
rse outcomeoutcome (Co
urces and ev
the pit walls
fluent
5-1
ly 2010
e and ovello
vents
s and
July 2
5-2
5.1
5.1.
Like
Duriindicto 3and fractprotexpefolia
AfteRRMinsta“genaltervertistruc
Tuminsta10 tothe less
It winstagene
The with
To arealian in
RRMof th
2010
Open P
1 Slope F
elihood
ing the feasibcated two typ
3-m wide minthe quartz-s
tured than tection, raveected. Anoth
ation (EPEP,
r stripping aMI commissiabilities in thnerally structration zoningical cross joctural map o
mbokon (200abilities rango 30 m high.quartz-serici competent c
was observedabilities due erally stable
south wall respect to th
address theignment by 2ntermediate
MI revised thhe open pit.
Table 5
North w
Above
Benc
Pit
Failure of Fi
bility study opes of weak neralized secsericite-pyritethe mafic voling and undher complica2002).
and extractiooned a geote north and ture-controlleg contacts a
ointing with dof the open p
7) noted thaging from ben.” He furtherite-schist (QScompared to
d that part oto the struclike the sout
is generally he dip direct
north wall 25o to 30o an2.5 m berm.
he bench slopTable 5-1 det
5-1. Implem
Pit Paramete
wall
140 mRL
ch slope, o
inal Pit Wal
of the Projectmaterials w
ctions with de schist (QSolcaniclastic dercutting leation noted is
on which exptechnical revwest walls o
ed primarily and enhancdip reversalsit area.
at “the north nch scale of r stated that SS) alteratio
o the others.
of the west ctures and wth wall (Ibid.)
stable due ion of foliatio
instabilities, nd the reduc
pes and heigtails these re
mented chang
rs
ll
t, the geologwithin the opedissolution fa
SPS) which is rocks (MV
eading to des the north w
posed the wview of the pof the open palong shear
ced by the as” (Tumboko
wall, from ef 5 to 10 m hthe greater a
on zone. Th
wall which jweathering. )
primarily to on and the be
Tumbokon ction of the 2
ghts and bermevisions.
ges in open p
Original Des
55
ic mapping aen pit area. actors indicas generally wC). It was
estabilizationwall of the op
walls of the opit slopes. Tpit. The insta
zones that alignment ofon, 2007). F
east to west, high to as muarea of the fi
he rock mass
joins the no The other
the favorabetter rock ma
(2007) reco20-m bench
m widths at t
pit paramete
sign L
Risk Ass
and analysesThese are th
ative of grouweaker and
concluded of the pit w
en pit which
open pit, in The review cabilities weremost likely cf foliation anFigure 5-1 is
bears numeuch as 2 to 3nal north wa
s strength of
rth wall alsohalf to the
le slope facass strength
ommended aheight by 2
the north and
rs
atest Design
40
sessmen
s of core logshe isolated 1ndwater flowmore closelythat withou
walls can bewill be cut to
March 2007confirmed thee found to becoincide withnd the nearTumbokon’s
erous pit wa3 benches oall will rest onf this zone is
o manifestedsouthwest is
ce orientation(Ibid.).
a slope faceto 10 m with
d south walls
t
s 1 w y
ut e o
7, e e h r-s
ll of n s
d s
n
e h
s
Risk Ass
B
B
At
B
Be
B
B
So
Ab
B
B
B
Fro
B
B
1
Be
B
B
Fin
Sou
Adverse Co
An unstablethe pitlake. impacts sucfor aqua cudownstreamthe PAF wal
Implications
Pit wall stabparameters.safety meascomprehensstabilization
essment
Pit Param
Bench height,
Berm width, m
140 mRL
Berm width, m
elow 140 mRL
Bench slope, o
Bench height,
outh wall
bove 140 mRL
Bench slope, o
Bench height,
Berm width, m
om 140 to 100
Bench slope, o
Bench height,
110 mRL Berm
elow 100 mRL
Bench slope, o
Bench height,
nal pit bottom,
urce: RRMI
onsequence
e final north aThe adverse
ch as AMD alture. Seco
m. An unstablls.
s to the FMR
bility has im RRMI shousures can bsive review works for im
meters
m
m
m
o
m
L o
m
m
0 mRL o
m
m width, m
o
m
mRL
es
and northwee consequenand heavy mndly, the pit ble final pit w
RDP
proved as auld continue e undertakeof pit wall
mplementatio
Original
2
5
5
5
2
6
2
5
6
2
no
6
2
3
est wall will cnces will be i
metals. Firstlyt lake effluenwall will also
a result of thto monitor th
en immediatel stability mn during min
l Design
0
5
5
5
0
5
0
5
5
0
ne
5
0
5
continually bn terms of phy, this will prnt will impaco render use
he implemenhe walls so tely. Two ye
must be cone decommis
Latest Des
10
5
10
55
20
63
10
5
65
10
3
65
20
35
ring rocks ahysical imparevent the usct the receivieless any cov
nted changeshat appropriears before nducted to
ssioning.
Jul
sign
nd sedimentacts and chemse of the piting water bo
over treatmen
s in the opeate remediamine closufinalize the
ly 2010
5-3
t into mical lake
odies nt on
en pit l and re, a e pit
July 2
5-4
5.1.
Like
Potesulfidrainnot assowhe
In 2predwallsinacto ge
The exteinfer
BMPPAF
Opeactuand wasNAFcapadum
Tab
Cl
PAF
NAF
Uns
Tota
Sourc
RRMLTSBCM166
2010
2 Inaccur
elihood
entially acid-des which wnage (AMD)generate A
ociated habiten exposed to
001, Lafayetdicting the Ps. In 2005, d
ccurate. Subenerate data
new waste rent of PAF arred the exte
P found the PF area totals
en pit miningual extent of
NAF waste te materials
F, and 0.23 acity of the
mp site capac
le 5-2. Invedum
Pit Waste assification
F
F
suitable
al
ce: RRMI
MI plans to dSF. UTSF SM. Within the
to 170 mRL
racies in th
-forming (PAwhen expos. Non-acid
AMD. As sttats. It makeo AMD.
tte generatePAF extent in
during the acbsequently, Ra for the form
rock model iand NAF ba
ent of PAF ar
PAF final pit 11.2 ha whic
g is ongoing the PAF andmaterials asstand at 4.5million m3 aUTSF-PAF d
city of 1.19 m
entory of remmp capacity, B
Remain
2,7
1,5
2
4,5
dispose of tStage 2 frome LTSF, the can accomm
e PAF-NAF
AF) materialsed to oxygeforming (NAtated previoes the water
d a PAF-NAn the final pictual pit deve
RRMI commismulation of a
s completedased on thereas along th
wall surfacech is much b
and the wad NAF maters at July 20 million m3, o
are unsuitabldump and m
million m3 of P
maining pit wBCM, July 20
ning LT
43,135
32,837
33,662
09,634
he excess Pm 150 to 210
PAF Zone fromodate an ex
F Waste Roc
s are those ren and mois
AF) materialsously, AMD
unfit for use
AF waste rocit walls and elopment, thssioned drillinew waste ro
and RRMI pe 2005 drillinhe final pit wa
e area extensbigger than La
all exposuresrials. Table 5
10. As showof which 2.7 le materials
material requPAF material
waste materia010
TSF Usage
408,095
694,093
1,102,188
PAF materia0 mRL can arom 164 to 17xtra 240,000
ck Model
rocks and easture potentis are those r
destroys the. Heavy me
ck model whthe AMD ge
his waste rocing works at ock model.
provided BMng works. alls.
sive in all dirafayette’s 20
s continue to5-2 is the invwn, the totamillion m3aror clay. Co
uirements of ls is needed.
als and LTS
UTSF-PDump St
5 1,1
3
8 1,1
ls within theaccommodat70 mRL and
0 BCM.
Risk Ass
arth materiaially generatocks and eae receiving
etals in the ro
ich became eneration pock model wasthe fringes o
P with plansFrom these
rections (Figu
001 estimate
o provide insventory of reml estimated re PAF, 1.5 monsidering ththe LTSF, a
.
F usage and
PAF age 2
ADu
49,980
49,980
e UTSF Stagte an additiothe tailings c
sessmen
als containingte acid minearth which do
stream andocks dissolve
the basis footential of thes found to beof the deposi
s showing theplans, BMP
ure 5-2). Thee.
sights on themaining PAFremaining pimillion m3 arehe remainingan additiona
d UTSF-PAF
Additional ump Needed
1,185,060
838,744
233,662
2,257,466
ge 2 and theonal 900,000capping from
t
g e o d e
r e e it
e P
e
e F it e g al
F
0
4
2
6
e 0 m
Risk Ass
The NAF aencapsulatio
Adverse Co
An inaccuratof the final during mine
Implications
An underestmetals genestabilization,
The pit wasexcess matei.e., a minimmaterials.
5.1.3 Fail
Likelihood
As discusseAMD. Thuscover. The influx of atm
To reduce thto cover themay be prob
1. It is
2. Conwill t
Some workeDiscrete potoughness a
Jones and Wfiber-reinforcshotcreting, surface combroken down
essment
nd unsuitabon works and
onsequence
te PAF-NAFPAF pit walclosure may
s to the FMR
timated extenerated during, and cover t
ste materialserials may be
mum 3-m thic
lure of PAF
ed previously, one internakey objectiv
mospheric oxy
he risks of AMe PAF walls blems with th
expensive fo
ncrete is typictend to crack
ers attempteolypropylene and inhibit cra
Wong (1994)ced, high-vothe dump s
mpaction. Tn into:
Cement
Fibers
le materials d covering of
es
waste rock ls. PAF ma
y also be und
RDP
nt of PAF alog mine closutreatment an
for extractioe dumped intkness, is not
Wall Cover
y, PAF mateationally acceve of dry covygen and mo
MD and heavwith shotcre
his approach
or application
cally brittle wk and separa
ed to lower tfibers were
acking.
) successfulllume fly ashurfaces were
The total cos
totaling 1,0f the pit ingre
model leadsaterials that derestimated
ong the final re. This wild cost than w
on may alsoto the pit. Ft a problem w
r
erials exposeepted AMD pver systems oisture infiltra
vy metals geete to a thick.
n on large ar
with very low ate following
the material e also incor
ly used a roh shotcrete tore stabilized st of the sho
072,406 BCMess to the ex
s to the undeneed to be
d.
pit walls willl require mowhat is origin
o be undereull encapsulawith the ade
ed to oxygenprevention anis to provide
ation into the
eneration fromkness of 100
reas and incr
tensile strensmall deflec
cost by usirporated into
botic spray bo seal acidicthrough reslotcrete appli
1.28
1.88
M will be usploratory adi
restimation omanaged a
mean morere surface p
nally provided
stimated, in ation of the equacy of NA
n and moistund control tece a barrier th
PAF materia
m the PAF w0 mm (EPEP
reased thickn
ngths. Unreitions.
ng large volo the shotcr
boom to appc waste rock loping to a gication was
8
8
Jul
sed for the it.
or overestimand encapsu
e AMD and hpreparation, sd in the FMR
which caseexcess mate
AF and unsui
ure will genechnology is a
hat minimizesal.
walls, RRMI pP, 2002). T
ness.
inforced con
lumes of fly rete to incr
ply a 75mm dumps. Pri
grade of 22o
Cdn $ 18.4
ly 2010
5-5
PAF
ation lated
eavy slope RDP.
e, the rials, table
erate a dry s the
plans There
crete
ash. rease
thick ior to o and 46/m2
July 2
5-6
Oneintaceffec
In 2techtechinclu
Tabl
The pit gareachoswatepatteoxiddete
Bothtech
The MENCu, the bwere
2010
e year after ct. The workctiveness of
005, the UShnologies in hnologies, wuded:
EcoBon(MT2) of
MagnesNevada-
PotassiuDuPont current p
Furfuryl Idaho Fa
le 5-3 compa
demonstratigold mine in a on the highsen to provider injection erns, spacin
dation and pHermine wall p
h field and lhnologies.
field methodND ProgramFe, Mn, Ni, background/e undertaken
Fly ash
Aggregates
Labor
Equipment
application, kers acknowthe cover in
EPA commispreventing
which were
dTM ARD (Ef Denver, Co
sium passiva-Reno (UNR
um permangTechnology
patent holde
alcohol resalls, Idaho.
res the cove
ion was condMontana.
hwall for covede referencetests perforng, and miH in fracturespermeability a
aboratory ev
d used was . This entailand Zn, in r
/control plot. n.
(incl. transpo
it was repowledged that
restricting ac
ssioned a dethe genera
selected ba
coBond) devlorado
ation technolR)
ganate techy with field ar) and
in sealant (F
er technologie
ducted at GoEach technoer treatment.e data. Priormed. This neralogical s; and hydroand characte
valuations w
the residual ed the compresidual wasThree residu
ortation)
orted that thmore tests acid generatio
emonstrationation of AMDased on a
veloped by M
ogy (UNR/M
nology (UNapplications d
FARS) deve
es.
olden Sunlighology provide A backgrouor to treatmeclarified theaperture; g
ogeology, i.e.eristics.
were perform
wash field sparison of toth samples toual wash fiel
1.40
7.10
3.30
3.50
he cover, deare needed ton.
n project to tD from an careful stud
Metals Treat
MgO) develo
R/KP) devedeveloped a
eloped by Int
ht Mines, Incer was givenund/ control pent, the highe geology,
geochemistry., water injec
med to evalu
sampling deval metal loado that in wasd samplings
Risk Ass
espite some to evaluate t
est the perfoopen-pit hig
dy of detaile
tment Techn
ped by the
eloped and and applied b
termountain
c. (GSM), an n a 15.24 mplot of the sahwall was dri.e., fracture
y, i.e., visibction at selec
ate the app
veloped for tding per unit sh residual s, spaced 2 m
sessmen
cracks, wasthe long-term
ormance of 4ghwall. Theed literature
nologies, LLC
University o
patented byby UNR (the
Polymers o
active openm by 15.24 mame size wasrill cored ande orientationble depth oct intervals to
plied highwal
the Canadianarea, i.e., Al
samples frommonths apart
t
s m
4 e e,
C
of
y e
of
-m s d
n, of o
ll
n l,
m t,
R
Table 5-
Par
Design
Materia
Viscosit
Effect o
Applicat
Docume
Risk Assessm
-3. Comparison o
ameter
objective To trhandcostswasteconvephospproceoxidahighw
l type A stapyriteleachcontainsolucomp
ty Compcentipto corunof
n runoff Runoan inc
tion Can b
ented use Microwasteoxidizcontarecyc
ment
of USEPA’s 4 dem
EcoBond
reat soils in situ, thling, transportation
s associated wies generated entional technolophate-based AMess was developedation of pyrite on walls, and undergrou
able insoluble compe and any other shable form of aminant is convuble, stable nonhazplex.
parable to water, i.epoise (cp), allowingontact all surfaceff.
off water from treatecreased pH.
be sprayed to surfa
oencapsulation oe rock and passivazed waste; stabiliaminated soils for Ecling site.
monstration cover
d
hereby reducing n, and disposal th secondary
by many ogies. The MD treatment
to prevent the mine dumps,
und workings.
Tredsc
pound coats the surfaces. The
each metal verted to an zardous metallic
Athw
e., viscosity of 1 g the treatment es covered by
Cctor
ed surfaces has Ra
ces. C
of unoxidized ation of AMD in ization of Pb-
EPA at a battery
r technologies
UNR/
To treat soils and roeducing handling,
disposal costs secondary wastes gconventional techno
A stable insoluble he contact of met
with the MgO solutio
Comparable to watecentipoise (cp), alloo contact all surunoff.
Runoff water from tran increased pH.
Can be sprayed to s
/MgO
ocks in situ, therebytransportation, andassociated with
generated by manyologies.
coating forms fromtal sulfide mineralson.
er, i.e., viscosity of 1owing the treatmenrfaces covered by
reated surfaces has
surfaces.
U
y d h y
To treat soils anreducing handlidisposal costsecondary wastconventional tecof the cheminexpensive available.
m s
An inert mangaforms when asolution contacts
1 t y
Comparable to wcentipoise (cp), to contact all runoff.
s Runoff water froan increased pH
Can be sprayed
Evaluated in fielat the Gilt Edgeat the Golden Swaste piles and
UNR/KP
nd rocks in situ, theng, transportation, ts associated tes generated by mchnologies. The cmicals required
and commerc
anese-iron oxide la basic permangas the sulfide.
water, i.e., viscosityallowing the treatmsurfaces covered
om treated surfacesH.
to surfaces.
ld-scale demonstrat Mine for an EPA s
Sunlight Mine on surhighwall.
ereby and with
many costs
are cially
Acid-cured alcohol resivery resistaover time. Tas subsurfabarriers pahydraulicstrength, ftensile strenresistance, resistance, cycling.
layer anate
The acid-cuand solventwaste rock the physicais very stabl
y of 1 ment d by
Viscosity of
s has
Can be spra
tions study rface
In the oilundergroundmining wast
July 2
5
FARS
polymers, e.g., n sealant, are foun
ant to dissipation orThey are also veryace hydraulic and assing numerous tconductivity, comflexural strength, ngth, water immers
base resistance, wet-dry cycling,
ured polymer is act resistant. It bindand, as a result, inl stability of the higle.
approximately 8 cp
ayed to surfaces.
industry to cond wand formationstes.
2010
-7
furfuryl nd to be r erosion y durable
diffusion tests on
mpressive splitting
sion, acid solvent thermal
id, base, ds to the ncreases ghwall. It
p.
nsolidate s and on
July 2
5-8
Tab
T
% r
% r
% r
% r
% r
% r
Sourc
The bindcontsamsyst
The mob
Tabl
coattherthe cannleasOcto
Adv
The the P
2010
The labnatural testing pair permwashingresults UNR/KP4, and t82 % (Tdemonscompare
le 5-4. Red
Treated vs. Co
reduction of A
reduction of C
reduction of Fe
reduction of M
reduction of N
reduction of Zn
ce: USEPA, 200
HC testing ding capabilittainer. This
mple, the pH tems expose
test results bility.
le 5-3 indicating around teby increasirisk of failunot be discost 3 years priober 2010.
verse Conse
ability of thePAF pit walls
boratory metweathering procedure is meation, 3 dg with a fixedfor the mine
P plots, the phe range of
Table 5-4). Tstration and ted to the bac
duction of tota
ontrol E
l
u
e
Mn
i
n
05.
encounteredties, this samcreated surranged from
ed to air, indic
for the othe
ates that eathe PAF matng the physire of the counted. Thusior to mine c
equences
e cover treats is continge
thod was thprocedures cyclic, durinays of wate
d volume of we wall sam
pH was as lowaverage per
The FARS-rethe percent ckground res
al metals fro
EcoBond
20
-211
24
49
48
-40
d problems fmple had to rfaces for oxm 4 to 5 ancating some
r treated sam
ch of the 4erial. The cocal stability oover treatmes, field trials closure are in
ment to inhibnt on the phy
he Humidity and acceler
ng which the er saturated water. The tpling show tw as the pH rcent metals
ecorded pH wmetal reduc
sults.
m treated plo
UNR/MgO
38
26
-16
82
50
75
for the FARSbe physical
xidation. Hend the electr
metals mob
mples showe
4 cover techover materiaof the highwaent after appinvolving sendispensable
bit the generysical and ch
Cell (HC) Trates sulfide sample is sair permeatestworks lahat for the Eof the backg
s reduction wwas steady action ranged
ots
O UNR
6
7
3
5
7
7
S sample. Bly broken apnce, in the t
rical conductility for Fe an
ed a neutral
hnologies proal FARS evenall. Notwithsplication at tveral cover te. The field
ration of AMDhemical integ
Risk Ass
Testing whicmineral oxi
ubjected to 3ion, and 1 dsted for 41
EcoBond, UNground plot, iwas betweenat pH 4 to 4between 75
R/KP
62
76
30
51
72
76
Because of thpart to fit inttest results ftivity (EC) wnd SO4.
pH and a la
ovide a stabn binds to thestanding thesthe Rapu-Ratreatment sctrials must c
D and heavygrity of the co
sessmen
ch simulatesidation. The3 days of dryday of watedays. Field
NR/MgO, andi.e., less than
n -211 % and.5 for the ful
5 % to 91 %
FARS
75
85
85
84
90
91
he polymer’sto the testingfor the FARS
was typical o
ack of metals
ble insolublee waste rockse propertiesapu pit wallschemes for acommence in
y metals fromover.
t
s e y r d d n d ll
%,
s g S of
s
e k, s, s
at n
m
Risk Ass
If the cover dissolved heand coast.
Implications
The FMRDPpessimistic cannot be aas:
Com
In-pNeumixeturbwhic
ThematemetaAMD(calccarbreac
Thethroslud
Mosthe (SE
Biocferti
Thedecodepcondleadto p
Thebene
essment
fails after apeavy metals.
s to the FMR
P may have side, if the l
assured, the
mplete remov
it lime treatutraMillRapiders suitable fidity, dissolvch can fit a fl
AMD and erial to raiseals to precipD include hycium carbonbonate). Hydction involvin
neutralizatiough the form
dge:
st metals preminimum soNES, 2000).
chemical trelizer to the p
added orgomposed byleted from ditions stimuding to an increcipitate, re
addition of efits: photos
pplication, the This will im
RDP
to be reviselong-term phcover treatm
val of expose
tment usingTREAT (wwfor mixing an
ved metals, aat-bed truck.
dissolved me the pH of tpitate. Alkaydrated lime nate), causticdrated lime ig sulfuric ac
on of AMD cmation of me
2ecipitate as holubilities of
eatment whiit lake (Eary
ganic materiy aerobic mithe bottom ulate the grocrease in pH emoving unde
fertilizer stimynthesis slig
e pit lake wampact the aq
ed dependinghysical and
ment option is
ed acid-gene
g a portableww.estechnolnd dosing vaand even CN.
metals treatmthe AMD strlis which ca(calcium hyc soda (sods the most c
cid and hydra
causes dissoetal hydroxide
→hydrated metmetal hydro
ch involves and Castend
ial will sinkcro-organismlayer result
owth of sulfaand Fe2+ an
esired metals
mulates the ghtly raises p
ater will acidiqua culture a
g on the reschemical effs ruled out i
erating rocks
e water treaogies.com.a
arious powdeN. The syste
ment involveream to leve
an be used idroxide), lim
dium hydroxcommonly usated lime is:→ ∙ 2olved metalse/carbon pre
, tal complexe
oxides occur
the additiodyk, 2009).
k to the lakms. Eventuating in reduate-reducing
nd H2S conces from the la
growth of ppH, plankton
fy and becomat the pit lake
ults of the fiefectiveness on favor of ot
from the pit.
atment systeu). The sys
er reagents toem is portab
es the additels that causin the chem
me (calcium oide), and sosed alkali. T
s to precipitaecipitates wh
es M(OH)2·nHr in the pH r
on of organ
ke bottom wlly, dissolved
ucing conditi and iron-re
entrations. Ske water.
phytoplankto directly inte
Jul
me enrichede and the str
eld trials. Aof the wall cther options
.
em such asstem has inteo deal with A
ble, skid mou
tion of an ase the solubi
mical treatmeoxide), limesoda ash (soThe neutraliz
ate from solich settle to
H2O. In genrange of 7 t
nic material
where it wid oxygen wions. Redueducing bactSulfides will b
n with 3 noegrates disso
ly 2010
5-9
with ream
At the cover such
s the ernal AMD, unted
alkali ilized nt of
stone dium ation
ution form
neral, to 10
and
ll be ill be ucing teria, begin
table olved
July 2
5-10
5.1.
Like
FlooEnvsucc
GHDdataAdmmea
The
GHDscen
2010
0
metals iadsorptibottom, water.
4 Slow Fi
elihood
oding has beironment Neceed, the foll
1. Acid gen
2. Geotech
3. Predicte
4. Hydroge
5. Hydrolog
D (2001 anda recorded aministration’s an annual rai
One is tmeasure
The secrainfall o
The thir1984 wh
assumption
Annual e
No grou
Benguetresulting
Tailings
D’s time estimnario, 8 year
into their boon site for tthereby rem
illing of Pit
een used aseutral Drainalowing shoul
neration pote
hnical charac
ed pit water a
eology of the
gy of the ope
2002) condat the Philip(PAGASA) Vnfall were us
the mean vaements.
cond is the “of the driest c
rd is the avehich is 4,738
s included:
evaporation
ndwater inflo
t Corporatiog in a pit-wat
pond runoff
mates of comrs for the “dry
ody mass antrace metalsmoving integ
s the closureage Programd be conside
ential of the p
cteristics of th
and groundw
open pit and
en pit.
ducted a watppine AtmosVilla Hermossed:
lue, i.e., 3,74
dry” climate consecutive
erage of the mm.
was kept con
ows to the op
n’s adit wither volume of
flowed into t
mpletion of py” scenario, a
nd the surfacs. Upon thegrated and
e method fom (MEND, 1ered:
pit walls
he pit walls
water quality
d
ter balance spheric, Geosa station fro
46 mm, whic
estimate of 3-year perio
wettest con
nstant at 1,2
pen pit were
h outlet elevf 2.15 million
the pit.
pit flooding arand 2.7 year
ce area of teir death, the
adsorbed m
or some ope1995) states
study for theophysical andom 1971 to 2
ch is the ave
2,122 mm dd from 1992
nsecutive 3-y
71 mm;
assumed;
vation of 100n m3, and
re 3.5 years rs for the “we
Risk Ass
he plankton e plankton smetals from
en pit mines that for the
pit closure d Astronomi2000. Three
rage of all a
derived by ato 1994.
year period f
0 m was as
under the “met” scenario.
sessmen
provides ansettles to the
the surface
s. The Minee method to
using rainfaical Services estimates o
nnual rainfal
averaging the
from 1982 to
ssumed open
mean” rainfa
t
n e e
e o
ll s
of
ll
e
o
n
ll
Risk Ass
BMP ran a nfinal pit confspilling elevlocation andthe Project subcatchme(Figure 5-3)inflows to the
As in the Gyear daily rais 1968 at 1the “typical” at the Virac climatologica
For the simumodel accouurban areasrainfall interlayers, and i
SWMM conthrough the ability to hanshapes as weither kinemregimes succonceptualizseveral majogroundwater
The full repofound that, apit. If wet cother hand, Based on thexpected tha
Upon filling-system. Hounder dry, wup whatever
RRMI’s updmillion m3. Dm3 of unsuiFurther, as wbe dried andout of the LT
essment
new hydrologfiguration, pi
vation is mord weather exp
site, thus tents of the L. Followinge pit were as
HD work, thainfall data. ,537 mm; this 1959 at 2station. Theal normal da
ulation, BMPunts for varios. These prorception frominterflow betw
ntains a flexidrainage sy
ndle networkwell as natu
matic wave orch as backwzes a drainaor environmr, and transp
ort of the pitassuming noconditions wi
if drought cohe results ofat the pit will
-up of the oowever, this wet, or normar the weather
ated estimaDuring mine itable materwill be discud the tailingsTSF. The tr
gic simulationit spilling elere than doubposure, Viracthis station’s
LTSF, UTSF,g Golder’s 2ssumed.
hree weatherThe “dry” we
he “wet” wea2,917 mm whe other weatta and rainfa
P used USEPous hydrologocesses are
m depressionween ground
ible set of hystem networks of unlimiteural channelsr full dynamicwater, surchaage system ental compa
port compartm
t flooding simrmal weathell occur for conditions perf the SWMMbe fully filled
open pit, evais not expec
al conditionsr condition o
te of the pit decommissio
rials into theussed subseq
water whichreated alkalin
n of the pit flevation, and ble GHD’s ec, Catanduas rainfall da, and open 2005 hydrog
r conditions eather corresather to the which approximther parametall-intensity-d
PA’s Storm Wic processes
e time-varyingn storage, indwater and th
hydraulic mork of channeed size, uses, model spc wave flow arging, reveas a series
artments maments.
mulation stuer conditions,consecutive yrsist, the est
M modeling ad up from 7 t
aporation wicted to exce. Thus, the nce it attains
t void up to oning, the co
e pit to cap quently, durih is estimatene tailings w
ooding usingweather. T
estimate at 5nes is found
ata were usepit contributegeological c
were simulasponds to thewettest year mates the meters for the sduration-frequ
Water Manags that producg rainfall, evnfiltration of he drainage
odeling capaels and stora a wide varieecial elemenrouting methrse flow, ans of water de up by th
dy is attache, it will take 1years, it will timated time and historicato 13 years.
ll still be theeed the annuopen pit will s its maximum
the spilling ompany plan
the pit ingrng mine decd at 325,400
water can be
g better inforhe final pit v5.15 million to more closed for the se to the disconclusions,
ated but this e driest yearwhich is 19
ean annual rsimulation weuency data.
gement Modece runoff fromvaporation ofrainfall into system.
abilities usedage units. Tety of standants like stora
hods, and md surface pand materiae atmosphe
ed as Annex
0.6 years totake only 3.of full floodi
al meteorolog
e major lossual dischargealways be n
m storage ca
elevation of ns to dump aress to the commissionin0 m3 will be tdischarged i
Jul
rmation abouvoid up to 13m3. In termsely approxisimulation. charge to thno groundw
s time using r on record w
995 at 5,037 rainfall measere based on
el (SWMM). m urban and f standing wunsaturated
d to route rThese includeard open corage units, u
model variousponding. SWal flows betwere, land sur
x 9-8. The so fully fill the o.7 years. Onng is 31.4 yegical record,
s of water ine to the openear to fully fapacity.
f 135 mRL isa total of 100exploratory
ng, the LTSFtreated and tinto the ope
ly 2010
5-11
ut the 35 m ms of mate The
he pit water
one-which
mm; sured n the
The non-
water, d soil
unoff e the nduit
utilize s flow WMM ween rface,
study open n the ears. , it is
n the en pit filled-
s 6.6 0,000
adit. F will aken n pit.
July 2
5-12
The m3 wfillingmea
Adv
Eve4.4 ygreawea
Imp
To coptiofloorseleassu
For costtreatestim
Duriseawexpethe ostag
Othebioc
5.1.
Like
Benan emRLnearfromthe the c
Withbe sadit
2010
2
unsuitable mwhich is 19 %g times will
an condition,
verse Conse
n under the years. The
ater AMD geather conditio
lications to
counter the ons prior to r or full cove
ection of theured results.
the potassiut at US $ 5.5tment for themated at US
ing filling, thewater. Seawerience of BHoption (Scha
ge pumping f
er options wchemical trea
5 Failure
elihood
guet Corporexploratory sL. From the r the Pagcol
m the adit. Padit, impacticreek has re
h pit ingress submerged owith a 30-m
materials an% in excess lengthen to and 37.4 ye
equences
continuous slow filling weneration. Aons, the oxida
the FMRDP
risks of AMfilling: remo
er treatment e option will
um permanga52/m3 which e PAF pit wa$ 620,000.
e option is towater is alkaHP Billiton inafer and Earyfrom the sea
which have atment.
of the Pit E
ration, the coshaft at the shaft, an ad
lbon Creek. Prior to excav
ng severely ecovered.
elevation of once the pit
m long concre
d treated taof BMP’s si4.4 years uars under th
wet weatherwill expose thAs the pit flation and AM
P
MD generatioval of exposof the PAF depend on
anate passivis roughly 3
alls, the tota
o supplementline and it ca
n its Island Cy, 2009). Thup to a head
been alread
Exploratory
ompany whiccenter of th
dit was drive Currently, t
vation at the Pagcolbon C
100 mRL anfills. Prior to
ete from the
ilings water mulation inpnder the wee driest cond
r conditions, he bulk of thlooding is p
MD generatio
on during thsed acid-genpit walls eve
n the cost, b
vation techno31 % of shotal one-time tr
t the precipitan buffer the
Copper Projehe only probld of 135 mRL
dy discussed
y Tunnel Plu
ch initially invhe Ungay-Mn for 130 m the pit floor open pit be
Creek. With
nd a pit spillio filling and pit ingress.
will reduce tput of 5.2 milttest conditiodition.
the open pihe PAF wallsprolonged unon processes
he slow pit nerating rocken below theboth capital
ology, Moncrtcreting costsreatment cos
ation and sue acid generact in Canadaem for the RL.
d are in-pit
ug
vestigated thalobago depgoing southeis at 85 mRlow the 100 h the acidic f
ng elevation within 2011 The remain
Risk Ass
the pit void tlion m3. Rouon, 12.6 yea
it is expecteds to oxidationnder the nors will intensify
flooding, RRks from the pe spilling leve
and operat
rieff (2006) es. Assumingst for the 11
rface runoff ated from thea attests to thRRPP is the c
lime treatm
he mineral prposit down teastward an
RL. Thus, nomRL, AMD fflows from th
of 135 mRL, RRMI plan
ning 100 m le
sessmen
to 6.2 millionughly, the pi
ars under the
d to fill up inn and hencermal and dryfy.
RMI has twopit walls and
vel. The finating, and the
estimated theg a 1-m thick.2-ha area is
with pumpede walls. Thehe viability ocost of multi
ment and the
roperty, sankto about 100
nd daylightingo water exitsflowed out ohe adit gone
L, the adit wis to plug theength toward
t
n it e
n e, y
o d al e
e k s
d e
of -
e
k 0 g s
of e,
ll e d
Risk Ass
the portal wlaid to fully c
Barcena et a
1. Hyd
2. Shethe
3. Dee
4. Exce
5. Longfrom
The workersMerrispruit in
The workersrelatively simthat favor floacting on thedisplacemen
Another keyand high in recommend plug and the
The open pnaturally. TOnce the piThese factor
Adverse Co
If the plug faPagcolbon Cbe damaged
Implications
The plug mcrucial (Idem
Caremec
Detagrou
essment
will be filled mcover the con
al. (2005) en
raulic jacking
ear failure throck mass
ep beam flexu
essive seepa
g-term chemm, say, acid r
s also note tn South Afric
s state thatmple, the anow along or e plug must nt.
y factor is thesulfates canthe applicat
e use of a sp
pit walls anThese fracturit is filled wirs make the
onsequence
ails, roughly 2Creek. Becad.
s to the FMR
must seal them.):
eful selectionchanical and
ailed knowleundwater pre
manually withncrete plug fr
umerated fiv
g of rock sur
rough the co
ure failure
age around t
mical/physicarock drainage
the occurrenca, and Colo
t while the choring of thclose to the
be transferre
e chemical cn significantlytion of a layecific concre
d rocks of res have beeth water, hyfailure of the
es
2 million m3
ause of the to
RDP
e exploratory
n of the moshydraulic ch
edge of theeferential pat
h compactedrom the pit (F
ve possible fa
rrounding the
oncrete, alon
the plug and
al breakdowne (ARD).
nce of major rado in US.
design of thhe plug in the plug is moed to the roc
composition oy reduce the
yer of low peete cement fo
the Rapu-Ren exacerba
ydrostatic pree adit plug lik
of pit lake worrential flow
y adit in per
st appropriatharacteristics
e hydrogeothways.
d clay. AnotFigure 5-4).
ailure modes
e plug
ng the rock/
possible bac
n of concrete
plug failures
he concrete he rock withoore difficult. ck without ca
of concrete. e service lifeermeability inormulation.
Rapu Polymated by blastessure at th
kely.
water will gusw, structures
rpetuity. To
te location fos of the rock.
logical envi
ther 4 m thic
s for tunnel p
concrete con
ckward erosi
e, grout or s
s in three m
body and out causing s
Thus, the vusing signific
Aggressivetime of a plu
nert material
etallic Projeting to mine e adit plug
h out of the aalong and ne
achieve this
or the plug w
ronment to
Jul
ck of clay w
plugs:
ntact, or thro
ion and
surrounding
ines: Marcop
reinforcemestress condivery strong fcant fracturin
e water low iug. The woupstream o
ect are fract the ore depwill be 350
adit and flowear the cree
s, two things
with regard to
avoid pos
ly 2010
5-13
ill be
ough
rock
pper,
ent is tions force ng or
n pH rkers
of the
tured posit. kPa.
w into k will
s are
o the
ssible
July 2
5-14
The strucotheconscommay
The plugthe p
The inclu
5.2
5.2.
Like
The dowelevOctoemb
To aRRMIn thof thdumelevThe
In A(Figu
2010
4
first will enctural weakner excavationsisting of fa
mpressive strey have to be
second itemg site. The oplug is comp
structural guding the cho
UTSF-P
1 Slope F
elihood
UTSF embawnstream sidvation. Tailinober 2005. bankment.
accommodatMI decided tohe original plhe embankm
mp is proposevation 90 m.
PAF waste w
April 2007, Gure 5-5):
Some rocompetetailings.
Addition
Increasi
Modifyinfrom the
Placemedissipate
nsure that tnesses such ns. It will reace mappingength, stiffneundertaken t
m entails a hyutcomes will
pleted and th
geological inoice of plug m
PAF Dump
Failure of th
ankment is ade. The crengs from the The tailin
te the unanto dry the tailan, the dum
ment, extendined at an ang This resultwill have an
GHD introduc
ock stabilizatent Zone 3C
n of a 10-m w
ng the slope
ng the profilee consolidatio
ent of dumpe excess tail
the plug siteas faults, fis
equire a threg and coringess, Poissonto prepare th
ydrogeologicl enable the e resulting w
nvestigation, material mus
he UTSF-PA
an earthfill eest of the ee milling of ogs surface
ticipated volings in the Up will be conng across thgle of 1V:2.7s in an overestimated to
ced the follo
tion of the taiC type PAF r
wide berm at
angle betwe
e of the d/s faon of tailings
p drainage ings pore wa
e is in sounssures, shaleee-dimensiong. The imp’s ratio, and
he site.
cal assessmprediction o
water seepag
hydrogeolost be comple
AF Dump
embankmentarthfill embaoxide ore wewas measu
ume of PAFUTSF and usnstructed to ae entire widt7H with a 10rall angle of otal volume o
owing amend
ilings prior torockfill will b
200 m eleva
een berms fr
face to take below the d
layer on toater pressure
nd homogenes, schists, fnal structuraportant parashear streng
ent of the roof changes inge around an
ogical assessted prior to t
t with a stabankment waere placed inured at 172
F waste matse the reservan elevation th of the valle0-m wide be1V:3H. The
of 866,000 BC
dments to R
o placement e mixed with
ation in the d/
rom 1V:2.7H
into accountump.
p of the ime and to drain
Risk Ass
neous rock, friable or sofl geological
ameters to mgth. Scaling
ck mass surn the water rnd beyond the
sment, and he adit plugg
ilizing PAF rs constructen the UTSF 2 m elevatio
erials from tvoir area as a
of 210 m oney. The finarm breaking e top of the CM.
RMI’s PAF d
of the dump.h the upper
/s face.
to 1V:2.5H.
the settleme
mproved tailinn rain or spri
sessmen
i.e., free oft material, oinvestigation
measure areand grouting
rrounding theregime whene plug.
plug designging in 2011.
rockfill at theed to 175 m
from July toon near the
the open pita PAF dumpn the u/s sidel slope of the the slope adump is flat
dump design
. Specifically3-m layer o
ent expected
ngs layer toingwater.
t
of r n e g
e n
n .
e m o e
t, p. e e at t.
n
y, of
d
o
Risk Ass
Afte3 mencasettl
Chadraichan
To further recommendUTSF embastorage areasurface withmonitor the
Based on APAF dump activities” drecommend
To dissipatespring watertop of the im0.5 m deepconnected totrench extenthen filled wThe herringbembankmen
essment
er the full heim thick. This
apsulating lalement of the
anging the flan towards thnneled into a
control the ed that the i
ankment and a. The subsh time delayUTSF emba
AA Tugade’s constructio
dated 30 ations.
Photo 5
e excessive r entering th
mproved tailinp dug approxo 8 finger drnding outwar
with 1.5 m thibone drainagnt. This drain
ght of the dus thickness iayer during de tailings. It w
at upper surfhe outside ea shotcreted
tailings setnitial layer oproceeding
sequent layeys. Piezomenkment and
reports titledn” dated 27August 20
5-1. The heimprove
pore water e dump to b
ngs layer. Thximately alorains equallyrd to the souck graded filge dischargen conveyed t
ump is reachis deemed c
deformation cwill also prov
rface to a graedge of the toe drain tha
ttlement andof rockfill be p
in a westerlyers are also eters and grdump.
d “Herringbo7 June 200
007, RRMI
erringbone ded tailings lay
pressure frobe removed,he drainage
ong the centy spaced anuth and northlter material ed into a drathe water dow
hed, placemecritical to macaused by eavide better e
aded surfacedump. Fro
at discharges
d to improvplaced commy direction toto be placedround movem
one drainage07, and “UT
substantia
drainage on yer.
om the tailin a herringboconsisted ofter of the dud constructeh wings of th(sorted head
ain along the wn the existi
ent of a NAFaintaining thearthquakes arosion contro
e, i.e., slopeom the edges into the UT
e the dumpmencing fromowards the red spanning tment prisms
” dated 8 JuTSF additiolly complie
top of the
ngs and to aone drainage
a main trenump area. ed on both she dump. Thd size materupstream ed
ng spillway i
Jul
F capping at e integrity oand consolidol.
e of 1 %, thae drain, wat
TSF spillway.
p stability, m the crest oear of the taithe entire tais will be use
une 2007, “Uonal construed with G
e
allow any rae was placench 2 m wideThis trench
sides of the he trenches rials from thedge of the Unto the LTSF
ly 2010
5-15
least of the ation
at will ter is
GHD of the ilings ilings ed to
UTSF ction HD’s
in or ed on e and
was main were
e pit). UTSF F.
July 2
5-16
GHDdrainmatetailinmodelevstabwhic
GHDdum
The The 0.5 m
GHDassumaxu/s tailin
Eac
In Non tPAF
The the bermstagheigThe
2010
6
D (2007a) cned state aerial strengtngs for whichdified dump vation returnebilized tailingsch assumes
D carried oump. Two seis
Operatinproduceservice this eartchance bedrock
Maximumagnituseismote(Ibid.). Tand bed
minimum Festimated c
m and 1.4 m
D likewise umed valuesximum consotoe of the U
ngs settleme
1. Cracking
2. Elongate
h scenario w
November 20he d/s side o
F waste mate
d/s dump wdump to the
m will be locge 1 is 368,0ght to 210 m
estimated P
onducted a nd PAF roch parameterh no hard da
design wheed a minimus, the FOS wzero strength
t pseudo-stasmic events w
ng basis eaes ground mlife of the prthquake has of exceeda
k acceleration
m Credible de that canectonic provThis has a re
drock acceler
FOS estimatecrest displacem, respective
predicted ths for coefficieolidation settlUTSF emba
ent:
g of the low-
ed depressio
will allow the
007, GHD revof the UTSFerials from th
will be constre current heiated at 170
000 loose cuelevation an
PAF volume i
slope stabilckfill that is rs that are bata on frictionere an addium factor of went up to 2.h for the taili
atic analyseswere conside
arthquake (Omotions at siroject” (USFE
a return pernce over 50n of 0.42g.
Earthquaken occur alovince or soueturn period ration of 0.90
ed for the Oement under
ely.
he long-terment for consoement of 3.5
ankment. G
permeability
on within the
ingress of ai
viewed RRMF embankme
e open pit.
ructed in twoight of the Um elevation.bic meters (nd will includmpounded in
ity assessmrelatively fre
based on gen angle and witional 10-msafety (FOS01. Under thngs, the FOS
s on the criticered:
OBE) which ite that can EMA, 2005).riod of 1:4750 years with
e (MCE) is ong a recource area unof 1:10,000 y
0g.
OBE and MCr both scena
m ultimate colidation and5 m occurring
GHD identifie
NAF cappin
dump surfac
r and rainwa
MI’s plan to cnt. This pla
o stages (GHUTSF emban. The expecLCM). The
de a second n Stage 2 is
ent for the ee draining. eotechnical iwet density a wide berm
S) of 1.55. Che dynamic oS falls below
cal circular s
is defined reasonably
As establi5 years whichh a Richter
defined as gnized fault
nder the curyears with a
CE were 1.01arios using th
consolidation initial void rg at the thick
ed two (2) m
ng and
ce.
ater into the P
create an addn was neces
HD, 2007b). nkment at 17cted PAF volsecond stag10-m wide b782,000 LCM
Risk Ass
UTSF emba The asses
nvestigationsare available
m is provideComplementeor static lique
w 1, at 0.61.
slip surface f
as “an eartbe expecte
shed for theh is equivaleMagnitude
“the largestt or within rent tectonicRichter Mag
1 and 0.76, he PLAXIS s
n of the taratio. The rekest area of tmajor concer
PAF.
ditional PAF ssitated by th
The first sta78 m elevatilume for imp
ge will increaberm at 190 M (Figure 5-6
sessmen
ankment in assment useds except the
e. The GHDed at 200 med with rockefaction case
for the UTSF
thquake thaed within thee Project siteent to a 10 %
of 6.8 and
t earthquakea particula
c frameworkgnitude of 8.2
respectivelysoftware was
ailings undeesults gave atailings at therns from the
waste dumphe excessive
age will buildion. A 10 mpoundment inase the dump
m elevation6).
t
a d e -
m k-e
F
at e e, % d
e r
k” 2
y. s
r a e e
p e
d m n p
n.
Risk Ass
GHD’s slopeacceptable runcertainty the friction a
Stability assminimum faStage 2, res(2008) estimMCE at 0.63
In summaryembankmenassumed, tobservationsare no longe
With respectPAF dump uto GHD (undthat the seisreality, howemethod of aearthquake withstand th
Recently, asopen pit, RRwhich need 0.9 million Bmillion BCM Adverse Co
After mine cdump. The materials of million BCM
Thenecethe meta
TheLTSaddimpa
essment
e stability aresults: FOS(and risk) in
angle and we
sessment rectors of safe
spectively anmated the cr3 m for Stage
, the static stnt gave accehe material s and measuer possible.
t to pseudo-sunder MCE adated), the psmic coefficieever, earthqassessment conditions. e loading an
s a result ofRMI estimatto be stored
BCM of the e will be store
onsequence
closure, a verinstability ri
f 0.9 million of PAF. Th
UTSF-PAF essary to strabsence of als into the o
dump slideSF may sustaitional load. acts more se
ssessment fS of 2.26 for the assessm
et density of t
esults for psety below und 0.36 for Strest displacee 1 and 1.43
tability asseseptable FOS
parametersurements. U
static assessand for the d
pseudo-staticent acting onuake acceleis deformati GHD believd crest displ
f the updateded an addit and encaps
excess PAF ed at the LTS
es
ry strong earsk increasesBCM and tee following a
dump slumprengthen therepairs, ero
open pit.
es and the fain damages Repairs wil
evere in this c
for the d/s Pr Stage 1 anment is the the tailings (I
seudo-static nity, i.e., 0.6tage 2 underement under
m for Stage
ssments for bS results. Es used in tUnfortunately
sments, the cd/s PAF dumc method of an a mass is erations are on analysis ves that its acement fro
d inventory ional volumesulated with materials at
SF tailings im
rthquake mays with the plemporarily pradverse scen
ps and the Ne dump strucosion will set
failed PAF ms such as crall be more excase.
PAF dump und 2.00 for Sassumed (aIbid.).
conditions (67 and 0.72 r MCE. Usinr OBE at 0.5 2.
both PAF duExcept for ththe assessmy, sampling
computed FOmp under botanalysis is upermanent acyclic with dfor it more “defensive”
m very large
of PAF and e of PAF mNAF (Sectionthe UTSF S
mpoundment
y lead to a san to store rior to final dnarios are co
AF cover cacture and to t in bringing
materials areacked NAF cxpensive an
under static Stage 2. Thnd not meas
(both OBE under OBE g the PLAXI
51 m for Sta
mps u/s andhe tailings dments were and measur
OS fell belowth OBE and nreliable becand in one ddirection revaccurately redam design earthquakes
NAF waste aterials of 1n 5.1.2). RR
Stage 2. Theand PAF em
lope failure oan additionadeposition atnceivable:
p is crackedreseal the PAMD, sedim
e caught by capping in vied the advers
Jul
conditions he only sourcsured) value
and MCE) for Stage 1S software, age 1 and u
d d/s of the Udata which
based on rement of tai
w unity for thMCE. Acco
cause it assudirection onlyversals. A becognizes an will be abs.
materials a1.14 million
RMI plans to se balance of mbankment.
of the UTSF-al volume of t the LTSF,
d. Repairs wPAF materialsment, and h
the LTSF. ew of the sudse environm
ly 2010
5-17
gave ce of
es for
gave and GHD
under
UTSF were field
ilings
e u/s rding umes y. In better ctual
ble to
at the BCM store 0.24
-PAF PAF 0.24
will be s. In eavy
The dden ental
July 2
5-18
Imp
A neMCEmatestruc
Conyearcom
5.2.
Like
The throlift aelevfollo
Figu
The
2010
8
lications to
ew slope staE and OBE erials need tcture may be
ntinual survers before mi
mmissioned to
2 Failure
elihood
current desugh the plac
and span of vation, the Powing, arrang
0.3-m th
0.5-m th
1-m thicand
1-m thic
ure 5-7. UT
capping is e
Provide
Control
Prevent
Prevent
the FMRDP
bility assessloading tha
to be underte required.
illance of dane closure, o undertake
of NAF Cap
sign providescement of low10 m. Once
PAF surface ged from top
hick topsoil
hick coarse-g
ck fine-graine
ck coarse-gra
TSF – PAF d
expected to a
a medium fo
erosion
surface flow
infiltration.
P
ment under at consider ttaken immed
am integrity i.e., in 2011a full dam st
pping
s for the encw-permeabilite the final el
will be capto bottom (F
grained NAF
ed NAF (clay
ained NAF m
dump and LT
achieve the f
or revegetatio
w from contac
static conditthe additionadiately. Bas
and stabilit, a third-parttability audit.
capsulation ty oxide wasevation of th
pped with coFigure 5-7):
which will pr
y) which will b
material which
TSF cover sy
following:
on of the sur
cting the taili
ions and defal load of 1ed on the re
y should alsty geotechni
of PAF matste at a minimhe PAF dumomposite ma
revent the cla
be the barrie
h acts as cap
stem.
rface
ngs and
Risk Ass
formation an.14 million Besults, a re-d
so be undercal consulta
erials at themum thicknesp is attained
aterials cons
ay from dryin
r of oxygen a
pillary break
sessmen
alyses undeBCM of PAFdesign of the
rtaken. Twoant should be
e dump edgess of 2 m ped, i.e., 210 msisting of the
ng out
and moisture
t
r F e
o e
e r
m e
e
Risk Ass
The NAF ca
1. Longnumfor cof 3embdep
2. Failuscen
3. Rainvulnchanprovpote
4. Watcappseasstoreno nWilliaverunde
BMP evaluaHELP (Hydrattached as
HELP is a qof landfills, accepts weaeffects of sumoisture stodrainage, acontainmentdrain layersmodeled. evapotranspoperation ofmodel is to a
As in the hrainfall datasubjected toand the wett
essment
pping may fa
g-term consmerical modeconsolidation3.5 m occurrbankment. ression of th
ure of the dnarios were d
nfall erosion nerable to rannels. Sucvided with enential.
ter infiltrationping design son rainfall wed water thronet wetting iams et al. rage annualerlying mine
ated the caprologic EvaluAnnex 9-2.
uasi-two-dimcover syste
ather, soil anurface storagorage, lateraland leakaget systems in, low perme
The modepiration, drainf a wide varassist in the
ydrologic simset of Virac
o three annutest year on
ail due to one
solidation of eling conductn and initial ring at the tGHD state
e NAF surfac
d/s PAF dumdiscussed in
of the NAFainfall erosioh areas neenergy dissipa
n through theis a store/r
without shedough the dryup or drying(2006), a sl rainfall, efwastes.
pability of thation of Land
mensional hyems, and otnd design dage, runoff, inl subsurface
e through sncluding varieability barrieel facilitatesnage, and linriety of wastcomparison
mulation for c, Catanduanual rainfall screcord.
e or a combi
f the tailingsted by GHD void ratio gathickest areaed that this ce (GHD, 20
mp following the precedin
capping. Tn are those
ed armoring. ating structu
e NAF capprelease coveding it, since
y season throg out of the store/releaseffectively eli
e PAF covedfill Performa
ydrologic modther solid waata, and usesnfiltration, evdrainage, le
soil, geomemious combiner soils, ands rapid esner leakage te containmeof design alt
the pit floones. The Pcenarios, na
nation of the
s underlyingbased on as
ave a maxima of tailings
might lead007a).
a strong eang Section.
The areas wadjacent to The drainares to reduc
ping into the er. This cove this will eroough evapotr
cover from cover can minating co
er system toance) compu
del for conduaste contains solution tecvapotranspiraeachate recirmbrane, or ations of ve
d synthetic gstimation ofthat may be
ent designs. ternatives (S
oding, BMP’sProject’s UTSamely, the dr
e following fa
g the u/s PAssumed valu
mum consolidat the u/s t
d to crackin
arthquake.
within the dumo the edge age channels
ce flow veloc
PAF materiaver is designode the coveranspiration. year to yealimit percol
ontinuous we
o handle rainuter software
ucting water nment facilitichniques thaation, vegetarculation, uns
composite egetation, cogeomembranf the amoe expected to
The primarychroeder et a
s HELP modSF - PAF coriest year, th
Jul
actors:
AF dump. ues for coeffidation settletoe of the Ung or elong
The conceiv
mp surface and toe drais also need tcities and ero
als. The cuned to storeer, and to rel The objectiar. Accordinlation to 1 %etting up of
nwater usinge. The results
balance anaies. The mat account foative growthsaturated ve
liners. Wover soils, lane liners maounts of ruto result fromy purpose oal., 1994).
deling used over system he average y
ly 2010
5-19
The cient ment
UTSF gated
vable
most nage to be osion
urrent e wet ease ive is ng to % of f the
g the s are
alysis model or the , soil
ertical Waste ateral ay be unoff, m the of the
the was
year,
July 2
5-20
Tab
Pre
Ru
Eva
Dra
Lea
Lea
Tabl
and thickNAF
Fromthrothe c
Adv
Watmeta
Imp
A crBascove
To alter
Of thin a minidumm3 a
2010
0
le 5-5. Res
Param
ecipitation
noff
apotranspirati
ainage collect
akage through
akage through
le 5-5 summawettest yea
k topsoil, LayF clay, and L
m Table 5-5, ugh the PAFcover system
verse Conse
ter percolatinals. The AM
lications to
ritical objectied on the Her system de
improve thernatives such
Steepen
Increasi
Adding 1
Adding and Lay
he four alterncomposite l
imization. Fmp is reducedand 1.54 m3,
sults of HELP
meter
on
ed from Layer
h Layer 3
h Layer 4
arizes the rer on record. yer 2 is the 0ayer 4 is the
the cover syF dump annum at significa
equences
ng through tMD will discha
the FMRDP
ive of the coHELP modeliesign.
e cover sysh as:
ning the slope
ng the thickn
1-m thick NA
1-mm high-dyer 3.
natives and iner, i.e., co
For instance,d to 1.37 m3
respectively
P annual mod
Drie
57
r 2
sults of the H As shown
0.50-m thick 1.00-m thick
ystem will alually. This isnt quantities
the PAF dumarge into the
P
over system ing, this obje
stem’s ability
e of Layer 2
ness of Laye
AF clay as La
density polye
based on thembination of, under the 3. For the avy.
deling for the
est Year
7,487.54 m3
16,721.83
37,370.42
3,714.02
1,847.40
1,866.81
HELP modein Figure 5-7
coarse-graik coarse-gra
low from 1,8s a narrow r
s will occur u
mp will resuopen pit and
is to keep wective is not
y to limit in
r 2
ayer 5 and
ethylene (HD
e HELP modf geomembradriest conditverage and
e UTSF-PAF
Average Y
109,09
54,20
48,94
3,98
1,95
1,89
ling for the d7, Layer 1 in ned NAF, La
ained NAF.
847 to 1,916 range indicatnder any typ
ult in AMD ad impact the
water away t likely to be
nfiltration, B
DPE) in betw
deling resultsane and claytion, the annwettest year
Risk Ass
dump
ear Wet
92 m3 18
05.91
43.77
84.82
57.53
95.56
driest year, athe model i
ayer 3 is the
m3 of waterting that leake of weather
and dissolutifish cages.
from the PAe attained by
BMP conside
ween the orig
s, the fourth wy, gives the nual leakagers, the leakag
sessmen
ettest Year
88,368.84 m3
130,378.71
50,509.24
3,890.56
1,938.47
1,916.15
average years the 0.30-m1.00-m thick
r to percolatekage throughr condition.
ion of heavy
AF materialsy the curren
ered severa
ginal Layer 2
which resultsbest leakage
e to the PAFges are 1.58
t
r, m k
e h
y
s. nt
al
2
s e F 8
Risk Ass
In practice, been noted constructed critical to deprescribed s
The stabilityand typhoon(1995) summa method toon the geodeveloped fo
With Dreq in
For the soil kg/m2. Λ wwind, is, saycited valueswhich will ov
5.2.3 AMD
Likelihood
AMD, heavya result of ththe precedin
Adverse Co
The AMD, hculture in the
Implications
The failure following act
Befo
- Des
- Build
- Field
- Res
essment
the performathat neitheproperly to
esigners whstandards (D
y of the HDPns has been marized expe
o determine, omembrane or the require
m, ρP in kg/m
protective lwhich is the y 240 km/h, as returned a verlie the HD
D, Heavy M
y metals, andhe four failurng Section.
onsequence
heavy metale lake and th
s to the FMR
scenarios idtivities:
ore mine clos
sign review fo
d-up of the d
d lysimeter te
search on lon
ance of comr the clay srealize the e
ho cannot alaniel, 1993).
PE insert undraised as an
erimental daamong otherthat would ed depth Dreq1 ∙m3, µGM in kg
ayer, ρP is 1maximum vaand z is 210
figure of 16DPE at 800 m
Metals, and S
d sediments re scenarios
es
ls, and sedihe stream an
RDP
dentified in S
sure
or the UTSF-
dump strictly
ests
ng-term perfo
mposite linerssoil nor the excellent perlways be as.
der severe wn issue. Re
ata on uplift ors, the requiprevent it f
q at altitude z
0.0050/m2, V in m/s
1800 kg/m3.alue of the sm at the UT
60 mm. Thmm. Thus, no
Sediments
may be exps for the UTS
ments will dnd coast dow
Section 5.2.2
-PAF dump t
following the
ormance of m
s has been vgeomembra
rformance ofssured that
weather condlative to this
of geomembrred thicknesfrom being z above sea
085 .s, and z in m
µGM of thsuction facto
TSF/PAF dumis is much lo uplift of the
in the UTS
ected in the SF-PAF dum
drain into thwnslope of the
must be av
to ensure sei
e constructio
mine waste a
very good. ane componef the composthe liner wil
ditions of str, Giroud, Peranes by wins of a protecuplifted. Tlevel is:
.
e 1-mm thicor is 1. V, thmp. Solving fower than th
e HDPE is lik
F-PAF Dum
UTSF-PAF mp cover syst
e open pit e pit will be im
voided. This
ismic stability
n protocols
and tailings c
Jul
Moreover, itent needs tsite liner. Thll be built to
rong gusty welte, and Batnd and presective layer pl
The formula
ck HDPE is he velocity ofor Dreq usinghe soil thickkely.
mp Effluent
dump effluestem describe
lake. The mpacted.
s will require
y
cover system
ly 2010
5-21
t has o be his is o the
winds hurst
ented aced they
0.94 of the g the
kness
nt as ed in
aqua
e the
s
July 2
5-22
5.3
5.3.
Like
The 10-mberm
In S(Figu
As rbe atailinby th
2010
2
During m
- Implemeedges, cchannel
- PAF cov
- Reveget
- If require
After min
- Mainten
- Monitori
LTSF
1 Slope F
elihood
LTSF embam wide bermms for the d/s
September 20ure 5-8):
D/s face10 to 5 m
Zoning o3B) that
Zoning materialsilty clay
Co-dispo
Replaceand broa
regards the laas effective ngs at mine che pump-out
mine closure
entation of gchannel linins
ver capping u
tation
ed, deployme
ne closure
ance works
ng for erosio
Failure of th
ankment hasms at 20-m s embankme
006, GHD am
e of the LTSFm
of d/s shoulddoes not co
of main or s on the d/sys with more
osition of PA
ement of thead gradation
ast design ain controllingclosure and t, treatment,
good surfaceng, and place
using compo
ent of a porta
on vegetatio
on, settlemen
he LTSF Em
a design u/sheight inter
ent is approx
mended the
F steepened
der of LTSF anform to the
lower clay s side of the
than 35 % o
AF materials w
3-part filter .
mendment, Gg concentratcapping to pand discharg
e drainage deement of en
osite liner
able water tr
on
nt, and slope
mbankment
s slope of 1Vrvals. The
ximately 1V:2
design for th
from 22o to
altered to all grading for
core modifcore. Zone
of particles le
with tailings
with a sing
GHD believeted leaks. Tprevent watege of tailings
esign includergy dissipa
reatment sys
e failure.
V:1.8H and aoverall dow
2.5H or 22o (G
he LTSF. T
24o by redu
ow the incluthe d/s shou
fied to allowe 1B comprisess than 75 μ
to form the u
le filter of su
es that the reThus, they rer infiltration.
s water into th
Risk Ass
ing armoringating structur
tem at the pi
a d/s slope ownstream sloGHD, 2004).
his entailed
cing the berm
sion of silty rlder rockfill (
w placement ses NAF claμm in size.
u/s slope of t
ubstantial wi
evised filter isecommend t The drying he open pit.
sessmen
g of drainageres along the
it lake
of 1V:2H withope including.
the following
m width from
rockfill (Zone(Zone 3C)
of Zone 1Bayey silts and
the LTSF.
idth (>4.5 m
s not likely tothe drying owill be aided
t
e e
h g
g
m
e
B d
)
o of d
Risk Ass
GHD conduembankmenanalyses wedata on frictas follows (G
On pond(FO
For the su/s estim
Senfrictibetwstab
An athe acce
Psegavethe Rich
While the ethe use of mgravity are moisture of improve the
With respecwithstand thelements of
1. Ampsettl
2. Weleros
3. Ampthe c
4. Non
essment
ucted static nt. As in the ere based ontion angle anGHD, 2006):
the final d/sd 1 at a maS) derived w
the upstreamstarter dike, of the slopemated FOSs
sitivity analyion angle of ween 38o anbility criteria.
additional sePAF rock oxeptable.
udo-static see FOS lower1:475 years
hter Magnitud
stimated FOmeasured dat
required. Rthe tailings. reliability of
ct to seismiche loading GHD’s desig
ple free boarlement, estim
l-designed asion if the co
ple drainagecore.
n-occurrence
and pseudUTSF asses
n geotechnicnd wet densi
s slope of thaximum watewas 1.75.
m (u/s) slopethe minimum
e having no s meet ANCO
yses were unZone 3B ma
nd 46o. The
ensitivity anaxidizing and l
eismic analyr than unity. OBE of Ric
de 8.25, the
OSs under stta on tailingsRRPI has st The compathe stability
c events, Gand crest d
gn are:
rd, i.e., 4 m, mated at 2.6
and construcre (or face) c
zones to al
of liquefiable
do-static slopssment, the al investigatty are availa
he embankmer level of R
e of the embam FOS was 2
or low strenOLD’s 1999 s
ndertaken onaterials betw
e FOSs rang
alysis was unlosing streng
yses on the A permane
chter Magnituestimated cr
tatic conditios settled denstarted samp
any will contiassessments
GHD maintaindisplacemen
to take intom.
cted filters docracked as a
llow for disc
e materials a
pe stability material streions except t
able. The re
ment in a draRL 60.5 m, t
ankment whi2.45. For thength, the minstability criter
n the d/s facween 32o andge from 1.5
ndertaken ingth by 30 %.
critical circunt crest settlude 6.8. Forest settleme
ons are accesity, particle
pling and menue the sams
ns that its “nt from stro
account the
ownstream oa result of the
harge of flow
at the TSF fo
assessmentength paramthe tailings fsults of the a
ained state he minimum
ich includes e same slopenimum FOSria under sta
e of the LTSd 38o and Zo56 to 1.94,
the LTSF eThe resultin
lar slip surfalement of 0.5r the 1:10,00
ent is 2.6 m.
eptable, refinsize distribu
easuring themplings and m
“defensive” dng earthqua
e likely seism
of the earthfie earthquake
w through po
oundations.
Jul
ts on the Leters used infor which no assessments
and with sem factor of s
the oxide coe with the tai
S was 2.42. atic condition
SF by varyingone 3C matestill meeting
embankmentng FOS at 1.
ace for the L5 m is likely 00 years MC
nements throution, and spee density anmeasuremen
dam designakes. The
mic induced
ill core to coe.
ossible crac
ly 2010
5-23
LTSF n the hard
s are
ettling afety
ore of ilings The
s.
g the erials g the
t with 72 is
LTSF after
CE of
ough ecific nd % nts to
can key
crest
ontrol
ks in
July 2
5-24
As dthe tstabrequ
Adv
Permmaymatehous
Imp
Simasseaddidamclosunde
To iuse com
For invecodi
5.3.
Like
As wwithalsothe opensurfa
2010
4
5. The mabroad csettleme
discussed prtailings impo
bility assessmuired.
verse Conse
manent cresy lead to damerials or instses located d
lications to
ilar to what essment anditional PAF v
m integrity aure, i.e., in ertake a full
mprove the lof filter or h
mmissioned.
the long-terestigate the bisposal study
When pmore tha
The hydto 10 tim
Leachat
2 Failure
elihood
was done fo PAF boulde
o be placed odrying of tain pit. Moreace to handl
ain body of tcrest up to ents.
reviously, arooundment arement and d
equences
st settlementmage of the tability of thedownslope o
the FMRDP
was recommd deformationvolume of 24
and stability 2011, a thirdam stability
long-term phhigh-density
rm stabilizatbenefits derivy, Shang, Wa
ermeated wan 3 orders o
draulic gradiemes as comp
te from the co
of the NAF
or the UTSF-ers, and covover the PAlings, tailings
eover, a here tailings see
the dam, wh200 m. T
ound 240,00ea. This is aeformation
ts in excess tailings and e embankme
of the LTSF (
P
mended for tn analyses u40,000 BCMshould likew
rd-party geoty audit.
hysical stabilthickener to
tion of acid-ved from the ang, Koval, a
ith AMD, theof magnitude
ent for AMD ared to that f
oal fly ash ne
F Capping
-PAF dump, ered with theF waste dums water will ringbone draepages durin
here sharp chis should
0 BCM of exadditional loaanalyses un
of those esPAF cover sent itself. A(Photo 4-11).
the UTSF-PAunder MCE a
M are requirewise be untechnical co
ity of the LTSbring down
-generating mcodispositio
and Fyfe (20
e hydraulic ce from 1 x 10
to break throfor water.
eutralizes the
the tailings e NAF comp
mp u/s of thebe pumped ainage will bng placemen
changes in treduce the
xcess PAF mad on the LTnder MCE a
stimated dursystem and At risk from
AF dump, a and OBE coned. A contindertaken. nsultant sho
SF after minthe moistur
mine tailingson of mine ta06) found tha
conductivity o0-6 to 1 x 10-9
ough the coa
e acidic pore
in the LTSFposite matere clay core (out, treated,be installed nt of the NAF
Risk Ass
topography opotential fo
materials will TSF for whichand OBE co
ing the PLAexposure of a dam insta
new static snditions that ual surveillaTwo years
ould be comm
e closure, a re in the taili
s, the Projecilings with flyat:
of coal fly ascm sec-1.
al fly ash is i
e fluid of mine
F will be drieials. The NA(Figure 5-7). and dischaat the stabi cover syste
sessmen
occur, has aor differentia
be stored ah static slopeonditions are
AXIS analysisacid-forming
ability are the
slope stabilityconsider the
ance of LTSFbefore minemissioned to
study on theings must be
ct must alsoy ash. In one
sh decreased
increased up
e tailings.
ed, stabilizedAF cover wi To facilitaterged into theilized tailings
em.
t
a al
at e e
s g e
y e F e o
e e
o e
d
p
d ll e e s
Risk Ass
The proposeUTSF-PAF scenarios:
1. Longsettlcove
2. Failustro
3. RainsurfarunoTheof ththe c
4. Wat
To assess thmodeling foyear, and we
Table 5-6.
Precipitation
Runoff
Evapotransp
Drainage co
Leakage thro
Leakage thro
As shown inthrough the
Adverse Co
Any one of materials anThe AMD wand coast do
Another likeimpermeabilThe cover b
essment
ed NAF covedump, the N
g-term conslement modeer capping is
ure of the LTng earthquak
nfall erosion ace of the Non discharge edge channhe erosion-pchannel will
ter infiltration
he infiltrationr the LTSF aettest year w
Results of H
Parameter
n
piration
llected from L
ough Layer 3
ough Layer 4
n the Table, fcover system
onsequence
the four faind tailings. Till discharge ownslope.
ely consequelity of the taiecomes vuln
er system is NAF cover in
solidation of eling based s yet to be un
TSF embankke.
of the NAFAF cover sy
es towards chnels will convrone areas abe required.
n through the
n limiting caparea. The s
were used. T
HELP annual
ayer 2
from 8,930.2m.
es
ilure scenariThis will leadinto the ope
ence is the lings. Over
nerable to ero
identical to tn the LTSF
tailings undon the hard
ndertaken.
kment or furt
F capping –ystem will be hannels locavey the runofand placeme
e NAF cappin
pability of thesame sets o
The modeling
modeling fo
Driest Yea
271,605.53
85,80
178,67
7,76
8,84
8,93
24 to 9,123.1
ios will resud to AMD geen pit and im
build-up of time, the veosion, thereb
the design shmay fail und
derlying thed tailings dat
ther settleme
As in the Ugraded to a
ated at the edff into the pit ent of energy
ng into the ta
e cover systof rainfall datg results are
r the LTSF
ar Aver
3 m3 515
3.59 2
4.30 2
3.50
7.73
0.24
11 m3 of wat
ult in water pneration andpact the fish
water in thegetation on by exposing t
hown in Figu
der any one
cover systta and conte
ent of the ta
UTSF-PAF dslope of 1 %
dges of the tdiversion ch
y dissipating
ilings or PAF
em, BMP peta for the drisummarized
rage Year
,416.09 m3
262,825.00
235,210.98
8,060.78
9,319.29
9,081.73
er are estima
percolating td dissolution cages as w
he cover systop of the cothe tailings a
Jul
ure 5-7. As ine of the follo
tem – A taiemplated tai
ailings follow
dump, the to% so that sutailings rese
hannel. Armo structures a
F dump.
erformed a Hiest year, no
d by Table 5-6
Wettest Ye
889,967.25
626,180
239,398
7,964
9,218
9,123
ated to perc
through the of heavy me
well as the str
stem due toover may beand PAF.
ly 2010
5-25
n the owing
ilings ilings
ing a
opsoil rface rvoir. oring along
HELP ormal 6.
ear
5 m3
.375
8.84
4.40
8.22
3.11
olate
PAF etals. ream
o the lost.
July 2
5-26
Alteherror ex
Imp
Twoon hshou
AnoLayeannuwett
5.3.
Like
AMDfailu
Adv
As iwill dow
Imp
The
2010
6
rnatively, if wringbone draxcessive hyd
lications to
o items are phard tailings uld determin
ther is the imer 2 and Layual leakage ttest years, th
3 AMD, H
elihood
D, heavy meure of the em
verse Conse
n the case odrain into th
wnslope of the
lications to
failure scen
Before m
- Des
- Field
- Ressyst
During m
- Imparmdiss
- Taili
- Rev
After min
water does ninage, the wdrostatic pres
the FMRDP
paramount. Odata and ase the settlem
mprovement yer 3 is expeto the tailing
he annual lea
Heavy Metal
etals, and sebankment or
equences
of the UTSFe open pit lae pit will be i
the FMRDP
arios identifie
mine closure
sign review fo
d lysimeter te
search on lotems
mine closure
lementation oring of dr
sipating struc
ings and PAF
vegetation
ne closure
not build up water may ovssure may in
P
One is the cossuming the ment volume
of the coveected to minis or PAF ma
akage is estim
ls, and Taili
diments mayr the NAF co
-PAF dump ake. The aqmpacted.
P
ed must be a
or the LTSF t
ests
ong-term pe
of good sainage edg
ctures along t
F cover capp
within the coverwhelm thenduce a dam
ompletion of use of an efand pore wa
r system. Timize the waaterials is redmated at 9.9
ings in the
y be expecteover system.
effluent, thequa culture i
avoided. Th
to improve s
erformance
surface draies, channethe channels
ping using co
over system e LTSF’s sin breach.
a tailings seffective coveater released
The addition ater leakage.duced to 9.3695 and 9.77 m
LTSF Efflue
ed in the LTS
e AMD, heavn the lake a
is will require
eismic stabil
of mine wa
inage desigl lining, ands
omposite line
Risk Ass
and it is nongle filter sys
ettlement mor system. T
d.
of 1 mm HD For the dri
6 m3. For them3, respectiv
ent
SF effluent a
vy metals, annd the strea
e the followin
ity
aste and ta
n including d placemen
er
sessmen
ot bled by thestem. Piping
odeling basedThis modeling
DPE betweeniest year, thee normal and
vely.
as a result o
nd sedimentsam and coas
ng activities:
ailings cove
contouringnt of energy
t
e g
d g
n e d
of
s st
r
g, y
T
S
Risk Ass
-
-
5.4 Env
5.4.1 Slop
Likelihood
The environpolishing poSP1 and SPwater cominthe streams
SP1 intercepwaste dumpflow channefrom the was
SP2 collectsPerforming tthe storm flo
The PP prowaste dump
Table 5-7 pro
Table 5-7. D
Pa
Dam crest lev
Embankment
Top water lev
Storage at top
Source: GHD, 20
Downslope constructed conditions. (STP) efflueaerobic zoneThe cells are
essment
Maintenance
Monitoring fo
vironmenta
pe Failure o
nmental areaond, PP, andP2 to PP. Thng from the L
and coast.
pts dischargep area. Its oel for the stoste dump.
s dischargesthe same fu
ows leading t
ovides a finap before relea
ovides details
Details of the
arameters
vel, mRL
height (max.)
vel, mRL
p water level,
004
of the PP owetland. ThAt the lower
ent, redox ree, metals aree planted wit
e works on v
or erosion, s
al Area
of Ponds’ E
a consists od an aerobiche purpose oLTSF and wa
es and settleutlet structurrm flows. T
s from the Lnctions as Sto the PP.
al opportunityase of the dis
s of the SP1
e environmen
), m
m3
outlet is a ghe wetland isr anaerobic zeactions imme precipitatedth the native
vegetation
settlement, an
Embankmen
of two sedic wetland. Aof the enviroaste dump (o
es suspendere to the PP
The ALD prov
TSF and theSP1, it has a
y to settle ascharges to t
, SP2, and P
ntal area pon
SP1
62.0
17
60.5
45,000
gravel and s a series of zone which
mobilize metd and sorbedreed Typha
nd slope failu
nts
ment settlinAnoxic limes
onmental areor LTSF emb
d sedimentsis a low-flow
vides pH cor
e northern ha low-flow AL
and treat disthe environm
PP.
nds
S
6
6
12
limestone chcells, each his fed by tretals as insold by algae, hAugustofolia
ure.
g ponds, Sstone drainsa is to improbankment) p
from the souw ALD and arrection for a
half of the wLD and high-
charges fromment.
SP2
62.3
7
61.0
2,000
hips channehaving anaerated sewageuble sulfidesumic materia
a.
Jul
SP1 and SPs (ALDs) conove the qualprior to releas
uthern half oa rock-lined acidic discha
waste dump a-flow channe
m the LTSF
PP
57.0
7
56.0
8,500
el that feedsrobic and aee treatment s. At the uals, and bact
ly 2010
5-27
P2, a nnect ity of se to
of the high-arges
area. el for
and
s the robic plant
upper teria.
July 2
5-28
Accoenvi
The cut-o
Adv
Thepondmeta
Imp
Duriproggeotdraingras
5.4.
Like
RRMRRM
2010
8
ording to GHironmental d
Steady s
Rapid dr
Earthqu
design comoff trench ex
verse Conse
re are no hds’ embankmal hydroxides
lications to
ing mine clgrammed wtechnical annage, riprapss and Brach
2 AMD, HEffluen
elihood
MI provided BMI regularly
Photo 5-2.
HD (2004), tams:
seepage and
rawdown (if a
ake – Minim
mprises an u/xcavated to m
equences
houses downments occurss precipitated
the FMRDP
losure, the works includ
alysis and sp of sloping hiaria.
Heavy Mett
BMP with waconducts wa
The Project’
he following
d flood condi
applicable) –
um FOS of 1
/s clay core,moderately w
nslope of thes, the streamd in the pond
P
environmene unloadingstability assesurface, soi
als, Tailing
ater quality sater quality s
’s constructe
FOSs have
tion – Minim
– Minimum F
1.1.
a three-stagweathered roc
e environmem and coastds.
ntal area stg of sedimessment, stail conditionin
gs, and Se
sampling datsampling for
ed wetland.
e been adop
um FOS of 1
FOS of 1.4
ge filter zoneck.
ental area. t will be imp
tructures wilment and slabilization wong, and plan
ediment in
ta for the perr analyses b
Risk Ass
ted for the d
1.5
e, d/s rockfil
If a slope facted with s
l be maintaudge from orks if requirnting of slope
n Environm
riod 2007 to y SGS Labo
sessmen
design of the
ll shell and a
failure of thesediment and
ained. Thethe ponds
red, fixing oes with tige
mental Area
March 2010oratory. The
t
e
a
e d
e s, of r
a
0. e
Risk Ass
analytical rerepresentatioconductivity,Pb, Cd, Al, as dissolvedand guidelinexcept for C
BMP assess2010. DurDetoxificatiowas continuo
Photo 5-3.
The FDU cprovide mixiof cyanide dreagents. Tsmall delivesupplies ele
Depending oquality issue
Cyacom(Na
Cyamay
essment
esults are dilions are av, TSS, dissoMg, Mn, Ni, d metals. Cne values (a
Cu.
sed the pH aring the samon Unit (FDUous (Photo 5
Lime dosing
consists of tng and the indestruction. The reagentsry pumps. Tctrical power
on the reagees such as:
anide-non-compliant. In thaOCl) may be
anide-compliy be used to
igently encodailable. Thlved oxygenFe2+, and Fe
Comparison mbient) are
and conductimpling, SP U) located do5-3).
g at the FDU.
hree 20-ft cntroduction o The first cs are mixed
The air is supr to the lightin
ents used, th
ompliant withhis case, eithe used.
iant, base m reduce the s
ded in the dhe paramete, cyanide, sue3+). All meof analyticalnon-conclus
ivity at the P1 was bei
ownslope of
.
containers wof oxygen whcontainer has in the procpplied using ng tower and
he FDU has
h DENR stanher hydrogen
metals-non-csoluble base
atabase. Nuers being mulfates, alkaltals, except l results withsive since th
Project’s wateng unloadef SP 2 was
with concretehich is requirs a working
cessing planta mobile die
d dosing pum
s the flexibilit
ndards, basen peroxide (H
compliant. Se metals.
umerical as wmonitored ininity and memercury, areh DENR stahe latter are
er quality stad of sedimeoperational
e floors anded for the INplatform fo
t and addedesel-run commps.
ty to deal w
e metals sucH2O2) or sod
Sodium hydr
Jul
well as grapclude pH, T
etals (Cu, Fee being anal
andards (efflu for total me
ations on 18 ent. The and lime do
d air spargeNCO/SO2 proor the additiod to the FDU
mpressor that
with various w
ch as Cu anddium hypoch
rosulfide (Na
ly 2010
5-29
phical TDS,
e, Zn, yzed uent) etals,
April Field osing
rs to ocess on of U via t also
water
d Zn-lorite
aHS)
July 2
5-30
Of th14), the the beinbein
Accoexpoclossitua
Apathe reduthat
Regimpr
2010
0
pH-nonsodiumthe pH used.
he stations sand PP (St
ponds, the spH improvem
ng unloaded ng serviced.
ording to RRosed PAF mure, the PAFation to impro
Photo 5-4
rt from the eUTSF – PA
uce the inflowby then, the
gular water rovement.
n-compliant. bicarbonateis high, eith
sampled, Untation 16) wesamples werment. It couof sediment
RMI, the AMaterials in th
F will be fullyove.
4. The differEnvironmeembankm
encapsulatioAF dump anws to the en
e FDU will no
quality mon
Reagents se (NaHCO3) her hydrochl
gay US (Staere acidic, i.ere circum-neuld not be tht. It could n
MD which goe LTSF emb
y covered wit
rent sectionental Area ent.
on of the PAnd the LTSFvironmental
o longer be ne
nitoring is n
such as limemay be useloric acid (H
ation 10), SPe., pH of 2.9eutral. Appahe ALD downnot also be t
oes to the ebankment (Ph
th NAF. RRM
s of the LTis located i
AF materials,F impoundm
area (Figure
eeded.
needed to c
e (CaO), cad to adjust t
HCl) or sulfur
P2 V notch (S9 to 4.0 (Figu
arently, the Fnstream of Sthe wetland
environmenthoto 5-4). OMI therefore
TSF dam eimmediately
the diversioent into the e 5-3). Cons
confirm the
Risk Ass
ustic soda (he pH of aciric acid (H2S
Station 13), Sure 5-9). DoFDU was resSP 1 since thsince at tha
al area comver time andexpects the
embankmentdownslope
on of surfaceopen pit w
sequently, RR
expected w
sessmen
(NaOH), andidic water. ISO4) may be
SP 2 (Stationownstream osponsible fohe latter was
at time it was
mes from thed during minewater quality
t. The
of the
e runoff fromwill drasticallyRMI believes
water quality
t
d f e
n of r s s
e e y
m y s
y
Risk Ass
Adverse Co
If the water area is requthe passive
Implications
The results plan for the
5.5 Low
Likelihood
The quick rePAF dump, rate for the p
Poonutrpit. are
The
-
-
-
-
-
-
essment
onsequence
quality doesuired. It can existing ALD
s to the FMR
of RRMI’s reenvironment
w Survival
e-establishmeLTSF, hards
plantations m
or soil conditirients. This i Foundationsubsoil and
important so
Texture whicpore space,
Soil structurparticles aredegree of ag
Soil organicwater infiltradecreases sphosphorus(CEC).
CEC which plants. The l
Soil pH. Ge
Plant nutrienpotassium (and sulfur (Scopper (Cu)
es
s not improvbe through
D and wetlan
RDP
egular water tal area.
and Land C
ent of vegetastands, and rmay result fro
ons – The ss expected o materials ulikewise have
oil properties
ch directly inthe more air
re which is e bound togeggregation, th
c matter whiation and hsoil erosion , and sulfur,
is the abilitylarger the CE
enerally, the p
nts – The priK). The secS). The micr, iron (Fe), m
ve as expecan active syd system.
quality mon
Cover Rate
ative cover isroads for rec
om the follow
oil has poor of materials sed for the e poor prope
s are:
nfluences ther and water t
the mannerether into uhe better the
ch improvesholding capa
losses, sup, and augme
y of the soilEC, the more
preferred pH
mary nutriencondary nutrironutrients a
molybdenum
ted, lime treystem such a
itoring are c
e of Plantat
s critical for tclamation. A
wing:
properties ataken from tprocess plan
erties.
e amount of pthe soil can r
r and stabilitnits called a
e soil.
s the soil’s pacity, enhancpplies plant ents the soil
l to retain cae nutrients th
H for most pla
nts are nitrogients are calre boron (B)(Mo), and ch
eatment at thas the FDU o
ritical to fina
tions
the bare areaA low surviva
and it does nhe deep pornt and other
pore space iretain.
ty with whicaggregates.
physical conces soil aggnutrients su
l’s cation ex
ations in a fhe soil can su
ants is betwe
gen (N), phoscium (Ca), m, manganesehlorine (Cl).
Jul
he environmor better, thro
lizing the clo
as of the UTal and land c
ot have the rtions of the or Project fac
n soil. The m
ch individual The greate
ndition, incregregate stabuch as nitroxchange cap
form availabupply.
een 5.5 and 7
sphorus (P) magnesium (e (Mn), zinc
ly 2010
5-31
ental ough
osure
TSF – cover
plant open ilities
more
clay r the
eases bility, ogen, pacity
ble to
7.0.
, and (Mg), (Zn),
July 2
5-32
To bMayresu
Table 5-8.
Observat
1
2
S1
S2
S3
S4
S5
Note: Data on
Fromextrevery
The soil rang
The low.fertilreha
Adv
The
2010
2
better undersypajo Creek aults are show
Physicoche
tion L
Soil Maypa
Soil cau/s of
Near C
Near M
Near Creek
Lafaye192
Near Creek
S1 to S5 were
m Table 5-8, emely acidicy low.
soil in obsereaction is v
ges from very
primary and In view of lizer/composabilitation.
Use of eexotic slitter tak
Forest fi
Poor popruning,
verse Conse
adverse imp
1. Dust
stand the soand the soil
wn in Table 5
emical prope
Location
dump, u/ajo
apping of PAF1
Catmon Creek
Maypajo Creek
Pagcolbo
ette section no
Pagcolbo
lifted from the E
the soil in c, organic ma
rvations S1 tvery acidic exy low to low.
d secondary this, approp
st and inorg
exotic speciepecies tend es much lon
ire – Grassla
ost-planting , mulching, a
equences
pacts of low s
oil at the Projcapping of th
5-8.
rties of soils
Texture
/s Loam
F, Loam
k Clay loam
k Clay loam
n Sandy loam
o. Clay loam
n Sandy claloam
EIA of the Proje
observation atter is low t
to S5 rangesxcept for S5
data confirmpriate organiganic fertiliz
es not well anot to encouger to decom
ands and thic
maintenanceand watering
survival and
ject site, BMhe PAF whic
at the Proje
e pH
4.0
3.9
m 5.3
m 5.5
5.3
m 5.0
ay 5.6
ect.
nos. 1 and to very low,
s from sandywhich is me
m that the naic-based fertzer, is indis
adapted to thurage the grmpose, thus
ck dry forest
e works –during dry d
land cover r
MP sampled tch is farther u
ct site
OM (%
0.24
3.32
1.84
2.58
2.74
1.65
3.24
2 has loamphosphorus
y clay loam tedium acidic
tural fertility tilization, i.e.spensable t
he site – Aparowth of endcreating fire
litter are sus
The seedlindays.
rates for the
Risk Ass
the soil dumupstream. T
%) P (p
4 2.
2 0.
4
8
4
5
4
m texture, soand potass
o clay loam . Organic m
of the soils i, combinatioto the succ
art from the emic specieshazards.
sceptible to fo
ngs need ri
plantations a
sessmen
mp upslope oThe analytica
pm) K (
.3 0
.4 0
oil reaction isium are both
texture. Thematter conten
is very low toon of organiccess of site
slow growths. Also thei
orest fires.
ng weeding
are:
t
of al
meq)
0.1
0.1
s h
e nt
o c e
h, r
g,
Risk Ass
2. Rain
3. Rain
4. Visu
Implications
The experierelevant to tthe choice revegetationschemes of heightdiame
essment
nfall erosion
nfall-induced
ual aesthetic
s to the FMR
ence gainedthe mine reh
of plantation trials that c
soil conditioeter, and cov
which may b
slope instab
impacts.
RDP
by RRMI iabilitation. Ton species consider variooning will beerage statist
be critical for
bility and
in its buffer The soil to bwas not a
ous mixes oe implementetics of the va
r the NAF cov
zone revegbe worked onall-inclusive. of trees, grased. At regurious specie
ver systems
getation worn will be diffe
For thesesses, and vinular pre-detes will be mea
Jul
rks is not toerent. Moreoe reasons, nes over diffeermined interasured.
ly 2010
5-33
otally over, field
erent rvals,
Final Min
6 MIN
6.1 Fina
DENR Admdeterminatio
Minesitecapabilitof the magreed i
Therefore, thland uses mmining land the land use
Based on tdevelopmen
1. Opeof gcylinSamnegcatc
Photo 6-1.
2. Forevoluriverparvshow
ne Rehabi
NE CLOSUR
al Land Us
ministrative Oon of a post-m
e decommissty that is fun
mine area, unin partnership
he general rmay be consid
use and thee change.
the EPEP, pnt area has th
en or grasslarasses, shru
ndrica),Talahmbong (Blumundo). Phot
chments.
A grassland
ested area - ume Molave rs. The domviflora), Lingows a second
litation &
RE PLAN
se
Order No. 1mining land u
sioning and nctional and pnless other mip with local c
rule is return dered provide local comm
prior to the hree broad la
and area – Arubs, and herbhib (Sacchamcabal samifto 6-1 shows
along the rid
Roughly 30type. The fo
minant specio-lingo (Vitexary growth fo
& Decomm
1996-40, as use:
rehabilitatioproximate tomore beneficcommunities
of the mineed that they
munities and
Rapu-Rapuand uses:
round 65 % bs. The gra
arum spontafera), Lantana grassland
dge of Catmo
0% of the arorest area isies are Narx turizaninoworest typical
missioning
amended,
on shall aimo the land uscial land uses and Local G
e-disturbed laare more belocal govern
u Polymetalli
of the site isssland is doaneum), Ayna (Lantana d along the ri
on and Mayp
rea is a secos concentratera (Pterocarwii) mixed win the Projec
g Plan
provides gu
to establishse prior to ths are pre-de
Government
and to its origeneficial comnment units (
c Project, t
covered by ominated by ya-as (Scatcamara) anidge of Catm
pajo catchme
ondary growed along gulrpus indicusith rattan spct area.
Jul
uidelines on
h a land ushe disturbancetermined anUnits.
ginal use. Ompared to the
(LGUs) agre
the 180-ha
different spe Cogon(Impetaria palmifld Lagundi (
mon and May
ents.
wth forest of llies, creeks,
s), Molave (ecies. Phot
6-1
ly 2010
n the
se ce nd
Other e pre-ee on
mine
ecies erata flora), Vitex ypajo
low–, and Vitex
to 6-2
July 2
6-2
Pho
whicareadisc
2010
3. Kaingin is concePineappand Cam
to 6-3 is an ch dominatesa which tracecernible.
Ph
Photo 6-2.
- Approximaentrated on
ple (Anonas mote (Ipomos
aerial photos the ridges
es the creeks
hoto 6-3. Anvic
A typical sProject area
ately 5% of ththe flatland
comosus), Gsa batatas).
graph of the, gentle slops and covers
n aerial phocinities prior
secondary foa.
he Project is d and side Gabi (Coloca
e Project sitepes, and flats the gullies a
otograph of to Project de
M
orest growth
an active upslopes. The
asia esculen
e and vicinititlands is conand some slo
the Projectevelopment.
Mine Clos
h in the
pland cultivate dominant nta), Rice (O
es. The openspicuous. Topes and flat
t site and
sure Plan
tion. Kainginspecies are
Oryza sativa)
en grasslandThe forestedtlands is also
n
n e ),
d d o
Table 6-1.
Project FStru
Open pit
ROM pad
Mine Clo
As regards thost of phys
1. Soil poss
2. Rec
3. Nea
4. Land
5. Natu
6. Soc
7. Own
Based on ththe communfor the Proje
1. Reti
2. Retr
3. Reh
4. Eco
5. Fore
The strengthpresented ipresenting fmining land the reasons
Pre- and pos
Facility or cture
osure Pla
the other prosical, econom
type and fersibilities
creational and
arness to and
d use and de
ural hazards
io-cultural pr
ner and inves
he pre-Projecnity consultaect. These a
rement villag
reat and stud
habilitation ce
-tourism and
est plantation
hs, weaknesn Table 2-1
for each majuse optionsfor the prefe
st-mining lan
Pre-Proje
Open or gra
Secondary 30 %
Kaingin – 5
n
ospective lanmic, market a
rtility, slope,
d conservatio
d needs of m
evelopments
references a
stor preferen
ct land usestions, five alre:
ge
dy center
enter
d
ns and agro-
sses or cavea1. Table 6-
jor facility ofs. Finally, therence provid
nd uses
ect Land Uses
assland – 65 %
growth forest
%
nd uses, it is and social fac
and climate
on values
markets, inclu
s in adjacent
nd
nces.
s; physical, elternative po
-forestry.
ats, and fina-1 extends f the Projecthe preferred ded.
s P
Land
%
–
Lake for
Eco-tourfishing a
Agro-fore
Natural f
recalled thatctors. These
which define
ding housing
areas
economic, mst-mining lan
al evaluation the post-mint, the pre-Propost-mining
Post-mining
d Use Option
aqua culture
rism – lake anrea
estry zone
forest
t land use is e are:
e, most of al
g and industr
arket and sond uses hav
of each landning land uoject land us land use is
ns Prefe
d
Lakepit wa go
Instefor prodresidof Nsea
Agrovaluirrefu
Jul
determined
ll, the agricu
ries
ocial factors;ve been iden
d use have use selectionse and the
s determined
ferred Post-M
e for aqua cuwalls of the laood eco-touris
ead, the pit laaqua cultur
duce will be vdents during tNovember to fishing will be
o-forestry zoneue of natufutable. H
ly 2010
6-3
by a
ltural
; and tified
been n by post-
d and
Mining Land U
ulture – The bake will not mm site.
ake can be ure. The lvital to the lothe rainy mon
February whe restricted.
e- The ecologural forests owever, fore
Use
bare ake
sed ake ocal nths hen
gical is
ests
Gome
Po
UT
LT
July 2
6-4
Project FacilStructure
old plant and betals plant
ower plant
TSF-PAF dum
SF
2010
ity or e
P
base
p
Pre-Project Laand Uses Post-
Land Us
Agro-forestry
Natural fores
Agro-forestry
Natural fores
Bamboo and plantation
Natural fores
Recreation o
Meditation re
Wilderness qtreatment pro
Bamboo and
M
-mining
se Options
y zone
t
y zone
t
tiger grass
ts
r sports area
etreat and trails
uest outdoor ogram
tiger grass
Mine Clos
Preferred
cannot por livelihdirely ncloses. propagatcoconut their selAnnex 9
Agro-forepreferredreasons The agplanted a
Agro-forepreferredreasons The agplanted a
s
Bamboo – The Ucontain materialsDuring mthe PAFexposed will be coNAF andlong-termcover isshallow-rgrass Becauseversatilityconstructindustriesfeasible planted oof the UT
Shallow-needed embankmpreferredbecause market vis a gowidespre
Becauseplantablerooted spost-minforests, meditatiowildernesout.
Bamboo – This is
sure Plan
d Post-Minin
provide quick hood which thneed once The agricultution in the ROand pili. Thelection are p
9-10.
estry zone d based on raised for the
gricultural croare coconut an
estry zone d based on raised for the
gricultural croare coconut an
and tiger grasUTSF – PAFthe excess
s from the mine closure F and metals to the elemeovered with ad conditioned
m integrity of s crucial. rooted plantsmust be
e of its econy and durabi
ction and s, the bamboochoice. Bamon the flat reTSF – PAF du
-rooted plants on th
ment and slod species are of their ec
value and Bracood cover pead in the area
e of the lime species species, the
ning land userecreatio
on retreat andss quest mu
and tiger grass preferred b
n
g Land Use
cash, food, he residents the Project ral crops for OM pad are
e reasons for presented in
– This is the same
e ROM pad. ops to be nd pili.
– This is the same
e ROM pad. ops to be nd pili.
ss plantation F dump will PAF waste
open pit. and so that will not get
nts, the PAF lmost 3 m of d soil. The the NAF-soil Thus, only
s such as introduced.
nomic value, ility for light
cottage o is the most mboo will be eservoir area ump.
are likewise he UTSF opes. The Tiger grass
onomic and chiaria which lant and is a.
mitations on to shallow alternative
es of natural on area, d trails, and
ust be ruled
ss plantation ased on the
Project FStru
Environmen
Workshop, estorage andchemical stoand STP
Offices, accommodanursery, melaundry
Landfill
Access roadslopes
Concentrateand conveyo
Mine Clo
Facility or cture
ntal area
explosives d handling, orage areas,
ations, ess and
ds and
e storage or and pier
Figure 6-1 ismine decom
6.2 Clo
The MGB, mine closuRapu Polym
Phyphysclosmain
osure Pla
Pre-Proje
s a conceptummissioning a
osure Criter
in its guidelre. These
metallic Proje
sical stabilitysical deterio
se-out, the ntenance is a
n
ect Land Uses
ual perspectand rehabilita
ria
ines for the goals are a
ect (RRPP):
y – The abilration and nrisk of failuacceptably lo
s P
Land
plantatio
Natural f
Recreati
Meditatio
Wildernetreatmen
Ponds a
Eco-tourfishing a
Agro-fore
Natural f
Agro-fore
Offices, accommand laun
Agro-fore
Natural f
Some foothers fo
Pier
tive view of ation works.
preparation adopted as th
lity of the Pnot to pose aure of the ow.
Post-mining
d Use Option
on
forests
on or sports a
on retreat and
ess quest outdnt program
nd wetland
rism – lake anrea
estry zone
forest
estry zone
hospital, odations, mes
ndry hall
estry zone
forest
r agro-forestryor road
the Project
of an FMRDhe general c
roject compa hazard to component
ns Prefe
area
trails
door
sam– PA
d
Pondhavevalucan funcimpr
AgroprefereasThe plan
ss
AgroprefereasThe plan
AgroprefereasThe plan
y; AgroprefereasThe plan
Pier and
area after th
DP, prescribclosure criter
onent to witpublic healthand the re
Jul
ferred Post-M
me reasons raisAF dump.
ds and wetlae aesthetic
ue. Moreoveperform filt
ction should rovement in th
o-forestry zoferred based sons raised fo
agricultural nted are cocon
o-forestry zoferred based sons raised fo
agricultural nted are cocon
o-forestry zoferred based sons raised fo
agricultural nted are cocon
o-forestry zoferred based sons raised fo
agricultural nted are cocon
r for donation tmanagement
he completio
bes four goalria for the R
thstand failuh and safetyequired leve
ly 2010
6-5
Mining Land U
sed for the UT
and– These and ecolog
r, the structutering and s
there be he water qualit
one – This on the sa
or the ROM pcrops to
nut and pili.
one – This on the sa
or the ROM pcrops to
nut and abaca
one – This on the sa
or the ROM pcrops to
nut and pili.
one – This on the sa
or the ROM pcrops to
nut and abaca
to the commut by the LGU.
on of
ls for Rapu-
re or y. At el of
Use
TSF
will gical ures sink
no ty.
is ame pad.
be
is ame pad.
be .
is ame pad.
be
is ame pad.
be .
nity
July 2
6-6
Basthe P
Table 6-2.
Project C
Hilltop or flu
Crests, impoundsurfacesPAF dand ponds
Surfaceand siplant, plant, workshoexplosivareas, accommnurserylaundry,
Hillslope
Open pi
UTSF –
- U/s sl
2010
Chemicachemicamay betreatmen
Visual acomponunderstaremovedbuildingslandscap
Productifood, fuproductsplots ansustaine
ed on the geProject may
Slope, slope
Component
ve
berms , andment ares of UTSF dump, LTSFenvironmenta
es of ROM paites of golbase metalpower plan
ops, ves storagSTP, offices
modation, , mess, an, and landfill
it final walls
– PAF dump
lope
al stability – als or contame enhanced nt systems.
acceptability ent to blenanding that d. The visuas or structupe.
ivity or self-suel wood, lus through re
nd plantationed by natural
eneral closurbe formulate
e length, and
d a –
F, al
d d s t,
e s,
d
Graded sof 1 % dirdrainage c
Dependengeotechniat the time
Slope a
The ability ominants into
by providi
– The abilitynd with thethe traces
al acceptabilures, derelic
sustaining cumber, woodehabilitation s. Self-sust processes a
re criteria, sloed. These ar
other requir
Slope
urface at a slorected toward channel
nt ical assessme of closure
angle betwe
of the Projectthe environ
ng a syste
y of the Proje surroundiof a Projeclity and nuisct equipmen
condition – Pd for furnituof the minin
taining condiand will not r
ope, drainagre shown in
rements
ope the
Design years’ r
Design years’ r
on ment
Design years’ r
Design years’ r
een
M
t component ment. Durin
em of conta
ject componngs. This
ct componenance concer
nt, odors an
Productivity iure, or otheng-disturbed ition means require huma
e, and otherTable 6-2.
Drainage
flood of 1:1return period
flood of return period
flood of 1:1return period
flood of 1:1return period
Mine Clos
to prevent thng closure aainment, col
ent or the pgoal is s
nt cannot berns cover thend smoke,
s the ability er safe and
land into rathat the end
an interventio
FMRDP req
0,000
1:100
ComHDPthickn
0,000 1-m abovspillin
0,000 10-malong
10-m
sure Plan
he release oactivities, thisllection, and
prior site of aset with thee completelye abandonedand scarred
y to generated marketableainfed arabled use can beon.
quirements o
Others
posite soil –E capping oness
thick PAF wave the 135ng elevation
m thick NAF g the lift edges
m wide berm
n
of s d
a e y d d
e e e e
of
– NAF- f 2.8 m
all cover 5 mRL
capping s
m at 90
Proje
- D
LTS
SP
Soil sub
Plantati
For
Agr
Shr
Table 6-
Pro
Open p
Mine Clo
ect Compone
D/s slope
SF
1, SP2, and P
bstrate
ons
restland
ro-forestry
rubland
Table 6-3 re2-2. It likewi
-3. Specific
oject Facility oStructure
it
osure Pla
ent
berm
Slopeberm
Slopeberm
PP
Ru
CrOa
Plant
Fuelw(Casubamb
The a
Brach
eproduces thse provides
post-mining
or Sp
Lake
n
Slope
s of 1V:2.5H
e angle bs of 1V:3H
e angle bs of 1V:2H
Recover topsouse in buffer zo
Compost gardresidues. SamOM, C:N ratio,analyses, dete
tations are in s
wood plantatiuarina equiseboos will be pl
agricultural cro
hiaria will be u
e project facthe specific c
land use an
pecific Post-m
Land Use
for aqua cultu
between
between Deyea
Deyea
oil from all conone or idle lan
den and food mple the com, and heavy m
ermine applica
self-sustaining
ion using naetifolia). At tanted.
ops are cocon
used as cover
cility and speclosure crite
nd closure cr
mining
e
ure
Drainag
esign flood ofars’ return per
esign flood ofars’ return per
nstruction andnds revegetati
organics, resipost for analy
metals. Basedation rates for
g condition. Ac
ative ipil-ipil he UTSF – P
nuts, pili, abac
crops at the s
ecific post-mria for each f
iteria
Pit walls stanalysis an
PAF pit wapassivation
Pit flooded
20-m wideendemic Brachiariaof the analo
Drainage f1:10,000 ysize to alestablished
Pit buffer z
Pit lake waa Class C w
Pit lake use
ge
m
1m
f 1:10,000 riod
511
f 1:10,000 riod
d work sites. on within six m
idual wood anyses of nutriend on closure sthe plantation
chieved groun
(Leucaena ePAF dump an
a, and tiger gr
slopes.
ining land usfacility.
Closure
tabilized and cnd stability ass
alls fully coven technology
down to 135
e pit buffer species likewith tree/planogue site
or pit inflow aears’ storm evlow for partiad
one ringed wit
ater compliantwaterbody
ed for aqua cu
Jul
Othe
mRL and 200
10-m wide bmRL and 190
5-m wide berm110 mRL, 13150 mRL
If necessary, months.
nd timber, andnts, pH, mois
soil substrate s.
nd cover is at l
eucocephala) nd LTSF rese
rass
se given in T
Criteria
confirmed by sessment
ered with field
mRL
zone revege ipil-ipil, ant/litter cover a
and outflow devent with ampal blockage
th barbed wire
t with DENR s
ulture
ly 2010
6-7
ers
mRL
berm at 170 mRL
m at 90 mRL, 30 mRL, and
stockpile for
d agricultural sture content, and compost
east 75 %.
and agoho ervoir areas,
Table
geotechnical
-trialed AMD
getated with agoho, and at least 75 %
esigned for a ple width and of sediment
e
standards for
July 2
6-8
Project Stru
ROM pad
Gold plant ametals plant
Power plant
UTSF-PAF d
2010
Facility or ucture
and base t
dump
Specif
Agro-fores
Agro-fores
Agro-fores
Tiger gras
fic Post-minin
Land Use
stry zone
stry zone
stry zone
ss plantation
ng
St
Drapapa
H
Soon
Plco
St
Ceqre
Ore
Drapasu
H
Soon
Plco
U
Ceqre
Slm
Drapasu
H
Soon
Plco
Dum
Fiovan
C
Cgr1%
D
M
tockpiles and
rainage chanainfall with amartial blockagead surface reg
ardstands dee
oil conditionen field trial tes
lanting of cocover at least 7
tockpiles, reag
ables, pipes, quipment, struemoved
il- and chemicemoved
rainage chanainfall with amartial blockageurface regrade
ardstands dee
oil conditionen field trial tes
lanting of cocover at least 7
sed and unus
ables, pipes, quipment, struemoved
ludge, wastesmaterials haule
rainage chanainfall with amartial blockageurface regrade
ardstands dee
oil conditionen field trial tes
lanting of cocover at least 7
p surface
ield-trialed NAver PAF dumpnd QC protoco
over surface i
over surface cravel (to minim% to drain tow
rainage chann
Mine Clos
Closure Crite
unnecessary
nnel designemple width ae of sediment garded for long
ep-ripped
d to enhancets
conut and pil5 %
gents, and wa
concrete, mauctures, and un
cal-contamina
nnel designemple width ae of sediment ed for long-term
ep ripped
d to enhancets
conut and pil5 %
ed petrochem
concrete, mauctures, and u
s, and oil-cond out
nnel designemple width ae of sediment ed for long-term
ep ripped
d to enhancets
conut and pil5 %
AF-HDPE comp surface follools
s conditioned
contains high mize sheet er
wards the dum
nels along du
sure Plan
eria
materials hau
ed for 1:100and size to aestablished ag-term erosion
e plant growt
li with tree/p
astes hauled o
asonry, storagnnecessary m
ated soil and m
ed for 1:100and size to a
established arm erosion con
e plant growt
li with tree/p
micals removed
asonry, storagunnecessary m
ntaminated s
ed for 1:100and size to a
established arm erosion con
e plant growt
li with tree/p
mposite coverowing construc
to support ba
percentage orosion) and gp periphery
ump surface p
n
led out
0 years’ allow for nd ROM n control
h based
lant/litter
out
ge tanks, materials
materials
0 years’ allow for and plant ntrol
h based
lant/litter
d
ge tanks, materials
oils and
0 years’ allow for and plant ntrol
h based
lant/litter
r placed ction QA
amboo
of coarse raded at
periphery
Pro
LTSF
Mine Clo
oject Facility oStructure
osure Pla
or Sp
Tiger
n
pecific Post-m
Land Use
r grass plantat
mining
e
D
tion L
L
dischargingdesigned foand size toand with hand adjaceerosion) es
Planting ofleast 75 %
Dump slopes
UTSF-PAFgeotechnic
Dump over
Cover surfaand Brachi
Sloping sur
Spoon draichannels gdiversion crain with ablockage oalong the slopes (to c
Planting ofslope with
LTSF surface
Tailings wato comply freshwater
Tailings soby sprinkle
After dryinlarge bould
Herringbontailings sur
Field trialeover LTSfollowing co
Cover surfa
Cover surfagravel (to 1% to drain
Drainage cdischargingdesigned foand size toand with hand adjaceerosion) es
Planting embankme
LTSF dump sl
LTSF-wast
Closure
g to the opeor 1:10,000 yeo allow for paheavy riprap aent flood-pronstablished
bamboo on d
F dump stabcal analysis an
rall slope is 1H
ace is conditioiaria
rface riprappe
ns across thegoing downslochannel desigmple width an
of sediment anchannels a
counter flood e
f tiger grass cover at least
ater is pumpewith DENR
, and discharg
lids are allowers and wick dr
ng, tailings arders
ne drainage rface
ed NAF-HDPESF and PAFonstruction QA
ace is conditio
ace contains hminimize sheen towards the
channels along to the opeor 1:10,000 yeo allow for paheavy riprap aent flood-pronstablished
of bamboo ent surface wit
opes
te dump stab
Jul
Criteria
en pit diversears’ rain with
artial blockagearmor along tne slopes(to c
dump surface
bilized and cnd stability ass
H:3V or 18o
oned to suppo
ed to prevent f
e dump slope aope to connectgned for 1:1nd size to allond with heavy and adjacent erosion) estab
and Brachiar75 %
ed out, treatedR Class C stged to the ope
ed to stand anrains
re stabilized
installed o
E composite cF embankmA and QC pro
oned to suppo
high percentaet erosion) anLTSF periphe
ng LTSF surfaen pit diversears’ rain with
artial blockagearmor along te slopes (to c
on LTSF th cover at lea
bilized and c
ly 2010
6-9
sion channel ample width
e of sediment the channels counter flood
with cover at
confirmed by sessment
ort tiger grass
flood erosion
and drainage t to the LTSF 0,000 years’ ow for partial riprap armor flood-prone
blished
ria on dump
d at the FDU tandards for
en pit
nd dry, aided
by dumping
n improved
cover placed ent surface
otocols
ort bamboo
age of coarse nd graded at ery
ace periphery sion channel ample width
e of sediment the channels counter flood
and PAF ast 75 %
confirmed by
July 2
6-10
Project Stru
Environmen
Workshop, estorage and chemicals stand STP
Offices, acconursery, me
2010
0
Facility or ucture
tal area
explosives handling, torage areas,
ommodationsss and laundr
Specif
Ponds an
Agro-fores
, ry
Agro-fores
fic Post-minin
Land Use
d wetland
stry zone
stry zone
ng
ge
Dde
Can
Sl
SpchSwsechco
Plsl
Sge
D1Hst
Can
Sl
Drablalsl
Plsl
Wof
U
Ceqre
Slso
Drapawco
H
Soon
Plco
Cst
M
eotechnical an
ump overall sesign review u
over surface ind Brachiaria
loping surface
poon drains ahannels goingP2 designed fidth and sizeediment and whannels and ounter flood er
lanting of tigeope with cove
Ps and PPeotechnical an
ump overall H:2V or 27o d/tatic and seism
over surface ind Brachiaria
loping surface
rainage chanain with ampleockage of sedong the chaopes (to coun
lanting of tigeope with cove
Wetland dischaf DENR for a C
sed and unus
ables, pipes, quipment, struemoved
ludge, wastesoils and mater
rainage chanainfall with amartial blockagorkshop surfaontrol
ardstands dee
oil conditionen field trial tes
lanting of cocover at least 7
ables, pipes,tructures, and
Mine Clos
Closure Crite
nalysis and sta
lope is 1H:2.2using hard dat
s conditioned
e riprapped to
cross the dum downslope tofor 1:10,000 ye to allow fowith heavy rip
adjacent florosion) establi
er grass and er at least 75 %
P stabilized nalysis and sta
slope is 1H:1/s subject to a
mic conditions
s conditioned
e riprapped to
nels designede width and sidiment and wiannels and ter flood erosi
er grass and er at least 75 %
arge conformsClass C freshw
ed chemicals
concrete, mauctures, and u
s, oil-, and chrials hauled ou
nnel designemple width age of sedimeace regraded
ep ripped
d to enhancets
conut and pil5 %
concrete, munnecessary
sure Plan
eria
ability assessm
25V or 24o subta on tailings
to support tig
prevent flood
mp slope and do connect to Syears’ rain witr partial blocprap armor a
ood-prone sloished
Brachiaria o%
and confirmability assessm
1.7V or 30o a design revie
to support tig
prevent flood
d for 1:10,00ize to allow foith heavy ripraadjacent flooion) establishe
Brachiaria o%
s to effluent stwater body
removed
asonry, storagunnecessary m
hemical-contaut
ed for 1:100and size to aent establishfor long-term
e plant growt
li with tree/p
masonry, equmaterials rem
n
ment
bject to a
ger grass
erosion
drainage SP1 and th ample ckage of long the
opes (to
on dump
med by ment
u/s and ew under
ger grass
erosion
0 years’ or partial ap armor od-prone ed
on dump
tandards
ge tanks, materials
aminated
0 years’ allow for hed and erosion
h based
lant/litter
uipment, moved
Pro
Landfill
Access
Concenconveyo
Mine Clo
oject Facility oStructure
roads and slo
ntrate storage or and pier
6.3 Dec
The AustraCouncil of Aor at the ceinfrastructur
Mine decom(QueenslandIndustry Cou
Remvalu
osure Pla
or Sp
Agro-
opes Someother
and Pier
commissio
lia-New ZeaAustralia (MCessation of es and servi
mmissioningd Departmeuncil, 1990):
moval from thueor any exis
n
pecific Post-m
Land Use
-forestry zone
e for agro-forers for road
ning Plan
aland MineraCA) define mmineral prodces.”
for the Pnt of Enviro
he site of ansting or poten
mining
e
e
estry;
als and Enmine decommduction and
Project invoonment and
ny materials,ntially hazard
Wastes ha
Hardstands
Soil conditon field tria
Planting ofcover at lea
Cables, pipremoved
Final soil cand erosio
Drainage cexcavated
Hardstands
Soil conditon field tria
Planting ocover at lea
Slopes staanalysis an
Drainage wfor partial riprap armflood-prone
For accesssoil conditio
Planting ofcover at lea
Access roa
Cables, pipand strucconveyanc
Oil and che
Pier donate
ergy Councmissioning as
ends with t
olves the fHeritage, 1
equipment dous substan
Closure
uled out
s deep ripped
tioned to enhal tests
f coconut and ast 75 %
pes, concrete
over placed an control
channel desigand armored
s deep ripped
tioned to enhal tests
of coconut anast 75 %
abilized and cnd stability ass
works with amblockage of
mor along thee slopes estab
s roads to be oning based o
f coconut and ast 75 %
ads donated to
pes, concrete,ctures for coe and wastes
emical spills d
ed to the comm
cil (ANZMECs “a process the removal
following ba1995 and A
or structuresnce, equipme
Jul
Criteria
hance plant g
abaca with tr
, structures,
and contoured
gned for 1:100
hance plant g
nd piliwith tr
confirmed by sessment
ple width and sediment and
e channels ablished
closed, deepon field trial re
abaca with tr
o the commun
, storage tankconcentrate s
hauled out
econtaminate
munity
C) and Minthat begins of all unwa
asic approaAustralian M
s having resent or structu
ly 2010
6-11
rowth based
ree/plant/litter
, and wastes
for drainage
0 years’ rain
rowth based
ree/plant/litter
geotechnical
size to allow d with heavy and adjacent
p ripping and sults
ree/plant/litter
nity
s, equipment storage and
ed
erals near
anted
ches ining
sidual ures.
July 2
6-12
6.3.
The and disp
Tab
M
Stbo
Emca
Copaun
EqgrideAucirantrelaboff
St
Capo
2010
2
Treatmestructure(cement
Containmequipmecontami
1 Non-ha
decommissstructural p
position.
le 6-4. Non
Materials, Equ
ockpiles of worrow material
mpty jute sacardboard conta
onveyor belt arts, and consnused
quipment foinding, CIL
etoxification, u/Ag recovercuits, thickennd loadout, eatment, poweboratory and fice, etc.
orage and mix
ables, power osts, and pipes
ent at site of es by variotation or bac
ment at sitent or strunated area p
azardous Ma
sioning worksparts of the
n-hazardous
ipment, and Parts
waste rocks, s
cks, wooden, ainers
sections, tirsumables, eith
or mining, L cyanidat
carbon eluery, furnace,ing, concentra
steam boer generation,assay, water
xing tanks
lines, electrs
any existingous means kfilling), buria
te of any ctures thro
possible, enc
aterials, Eq
s will generaProject. Tab
materials an
Structural
soil, and
plastic or
res, spare her used or
crushing, ion, CN tion, kiln, flotation
ate storage oiler and workshop, treatment,
rical wires,
g or potentialsuch as c
al, or underg
existing or ugh collect
capsulation, c
quipment, a
ate various nble 6-4 lists
nd modes of d
Hauled to sstabilization a
The supplierscontainers.
The remaininfor pick-up aexpected to blandfill.
The materialspick-up at the
The residuainsignificant,
The equipmedismantling, h
The residuainsignificant,
The contentsdrained and sat the site.
The tanks adismantling, h
The residuainsignificant,
Usable mater
The residuals
M
ly hazardoushemical tre
ground storag
potentially ion and stcapping, sub
nd Structur
non-hazardothese mate
disposition
Mode of Di
sites for rehaand grading pu
s have the firs
ng containers at the site. Tbe insignifican
s are sold toe site.
als, which are disposed
ent is sold tohaul-out, and r
als, which are disposed
s of storagesold to users
are sold to haul-out, and r
als, which are disposed
rials are donat
s are sold to
Mine Clos
s materials, eatment, fixinge.
hazardous torage in tbmersion, bu
res
us materialserials and th
sposition
abilitation andurposes.
st priority in re
are offered tThe residualsnt, are dispos
users and r
are expecteof in the TSF.
users and rremoval from
are expecteof in the LTSF
and mixingand recyclers
users and reremoval from
are expecteof in the LTSF
ted to the com
users and r
sure Plan
equipment ong in solids
substancesthe smallesrial, etc.
s, equipmenthe modes o
d used for
etrieving the
to recyclers s, which are sed of in the
recyclers for
ed to be
recyclers for the site.
ed to be F.
g tanks are s for pick-up
ecyclers for the site.
ed to be F.
mmunity.
recyclers for
n
r s
s, st
t, of
Mine Clo
Materials,
Tables, chcabinets
Roofing, wwindows, a
Concrete flo
Sludge of s
Sludge of S
6.3.2 Haz
DENR Admwastes thatdisposal. Th
A. Was
B. Acid
C. Alka
D. Was
osure Pla
Equipment, aParts
hairs, beds,
walling, toilet nd other fixtur
oors and slabs
septic tanks
STP
zardous Ma
ministrative Ot need spehe hazardou
stes with cya
d wastes
ali wastes
stes with inor
n
and Structura
drawers, an
fixtures, doorres
s
terials and
Order No. 36cial storages waste type
anide
rganic chem
al
pick-up a
Non-usaare dispo
nd Furniturethe comm
The resipick-up a
Non-usaare dispo
rs, Usable itand com
Non-usaTSF.
These mand used
The septi
Septiccomp
Lids tanks
The tcompa
All chamdrained othe safe
The sludand pollumake thesoil amen
The STP
Wastes
6, Series ofe, treatmentes are:
icals
Mode o
at the site.
bles, which arosed of in the
e is donated tmunity.
duals are solat the site.
bles, which arosed of in the
tems are donamunity.
bles are sold
materials are had for stabilizati
ic tanks are d
c tanks and letely by a DE
are removed are broken up
tanks and draacted.
mbers of the trof water, analportion is disc
dge is recoverutants. Any re sludge safendment.
P is hauled out
f 2004 lists , transport,
of Disposition
re expected toLTSF.
to the Project
ld to users a
re expected toLTSF.
ated to the Pr
as scrap or di
auled to sites ion and gradin
decommissione
leach drainENR-accredited
and the bop.
ains are bac
reatment planlyzed, treated
charged to the
red and testeequired treatm. The safe sl
t of the Project
and definesprocessing
Jul
n
o be insignifica
t employees a
and recyclers
o be insignifica
roject emplpye
isposed of in
for rehabilitatng purposes.
ed as follows:
ns are emptd contractor.
ottoms of sep
ckfilled and th
nt are completd if required, ae environment.
ed for pathogement is doneudge is used
ct site.
s the hazar, recycling,
ly 2010
6-13
ant,
and
for
ant,
ees
the
tion
tied
ptic
hen
tely and .
ens e to
for
rdous and
July 2
6-14
The the o6-5 t
Table
Haz
Hyd
Zinc
Cop
Sod
Hyd
Sod
Sod
Dies
Source
Tabl
sammate
Tab
Pr
2010
4
E. Reactive
F. Inks, dye
G. Waste o
H. Putresci
I. Oil
J. Containe
K. Immobil
L. Organic
M. Miscella
RRPP usesores. The htogether with
e 6-5. Proje
zardous Mateor Waste
rated lime
c sulfate
pper sulfate
ium cyanide
rochloric acid
ium hydroxide
ium metabisu
sel oil
e: RRPI
le 6-6 presenme modes wi
erials during
le 6-6. Haz
Hazard
rocess water w
e chemical w
es, pigments
organic solve
ible/organic w
ers previous
ized wastes
chemicals a
aneous waste
s various typeazardous on
h their stockin
ect’s hazardo
erial Che
e
lfite
nts the modell be adoptedecommiss
zardous mate
dous Materia
with cyanide
wastes
s, paint, latex
ent
wastes
ly containing
and
es.
es of chemicnes, based ong levels.
ous materials
emical Formu
Ca(OH)2
ZnSO4
CuSO4
NaCN
HCl
NaOH
Na2S2O5
C12H23
e of dispositiod for the haioning.
erials and mo
ls
x, adhesives
g toxic chemi
cals for the eon the hazard
s and stockin
ula Haza
on for the handling of oil
ode of dispos
The tailings treated in theeffluent that nThe effluent dundergoes fin
M
, organic slud
icals
extraction of dous waste t
ng levels
rdous WasteType
C
E
E
A
B
E
E
I
azardous maand chemic
sition
Mode of Di
which containe CN detoxificanearly compliedischarges tonal destruction
Mine Clos
dge
Au, Ag, Cu, ypes, are sh
Stockin
aterials and wcal spills or c
sposition
n the processation circuit. Tes with DENRthe LTSF wh
n before disch
sure Plan
and Zn fromhown in Table
ng Level (t)
260
90
16
50
25
25
100
200
wastes. Thecontaminated
s water are The result is R standards. here the CN harge to the
n
m e
e d
Mine Clo
Ha
Acids and w
Alkalis and
Reactive ch
Paints
Oil, wastes
Sludge of area
Batteries
6.3.3 Enc
AMD is acidworkings. It
osure Pla
azardous Mat
wastes
wastes
hemicals and w
, and sludge
ponds in the
capsulation
ic runoff dert also dissolv
n
terials
wastes
e environment
of PAF Ma
ived from theves the heav
stream a
Unused prospectResidualLTSF.
Acid waslime and
Treated released
Unused prospectResidualLTSF.
Alkaline and dispo
Treated released
Unused prospect
Residualauthorize
ResidualLTSF.
Unused prospect
ResidualDENR-au
Unused prospect
Oil wastauthorize
tal The sludwhich isunloadedthe LTSF
Unused suppliers
Used barecyclers
aterials
e oxidation ovy metals pre
Mode o
and sea.
chemicals aive users an containers a
stes of the ladisposed of in
effluent compby the LTSF
chemicals aive users an containers a
wastes of thosed of in the
effluent compto the environ
chemicals aive users and
chemicals ed treaters.
containers a
chemicals aive users and
chemicals anuthorized trea
oil and otherive users and
es and sludged recyclers a
dge made ups the producd together withF.
batteries are s for site pick-u
atteries are pics and treaters.
of sulfides in esent in said
of Disposition
and containerd suppliers f
are washed an
aboratory are n the LTSF.
pliant with DEto the environ
and containerd suppliers f
are washed an
he laboratory LTSF.
pliant with DEnment.
and containersuppliers for s
are picked
are washed an
and containersuppliers for s
nd containers aters.
r petrochemicsuppliers for s
ge are pickednd treaters.
p mostly of mct of AMD nh the sedimen
sold to prospeup.
cked up by D
tailings, wasd materials. T
Jul
n
rs are sold for site pick-nd buried at
neutralized w
NR standardsnment.
rs are sold for site pick-nd buried at
are neutraliz
NR standards
rs are sold site pick-up.
up by DEN
nd buried at
rs are sold site pick-up.
are picked up
cals are soldsite pick-up.
d up by DEN
metal hydroxidneutralization nt and brought
ective users a
DENR-authoriz
ste rocks, or The iron sulf
ly 2010
6-15
to up. the
with
s is
to up. the
zed
s is
to
NR-
the
to
p by
to
NR-
des is
t to
and
zed
mine fides,
Tab
O
July 2
6-16
pyritThe
Thutwo cann
The on tredudisscove
6.3.
Tabl
togethe F
ble 6-7. FM
Project FaciStructur
pen pit
2010
6
te (FeS2) anoverall stoic
s, the oxidatkey constitu
not proceed.
RRPP will uthe PAF mauce oxygen dolution of heer, only shall
4 Safety a
le 6-7 preseether with theFMRDP Safe
MRDP safety
lity or re
H
Do
Rc
Fbf
I
Fswa
Awri
Cp
Pt
nd phyrrhotitchiometry of
tion of pyrite uents: water
use dry soil cterials of thediffusion andeavy metals ow-rooted flo
and Health
ents the reqe correspondety and Heal
issues and g
Required
Haul out waste
Decontaminatoil spills
Remove pucables, and eq
Fix pit wall slbe exposedflooding
Install PAF wa
Fix pit outletside slopewidening, armoring
Allow the pit twater from rarunoff, and inflow
Condition the pit perimeter
Plant agoho athe pit perimet
e (Fe[1-x]S), pyrite oxidat72and other suand oxygen
covers with te UTSF – P water infiltrawill be prev
oral species
Plan
uired works ding safety clth Plan.
guidelines
d Works
es
te and remove
mps, pipesquipment
lopes that wild after pit
all covers
drainage byflattening
and rock
to accumulateainfall, surface
groundwater
soil along the
and ipil-ipil onter
are regardetion is repres
→ulfide mineran. If either
thickness of PAF dump aation into thevented. To will be plant
of the FMconcerns and
Safety Co
e
,
l t
y , k
e e r
e
n
Skeletonor pains
Noise
Hazardsequipme
Dust and
Heat stre
Slips an
Drownin
M
ed as the dosented as:
2 2als and the p
constituent
2.8 m supplend LTSF. Te PAF materensure the led.
RDP by Prod issues and
oncerns or Is
n-muscular in
s of ent operation
d fumes
ess
d falls
g
Mine Clos
ominant sulfi
roduction of is not prese
emented by The composials. Thus, Along-term int
oject facility d applicable
ssues Ap
the
njuries
heavy
Sehaz(Mskeor heaopefall
Sefum
Seext
Seme(PP
Se855
sure Plan
ide minerals
AMD requireent, oxidation
1-mm HDPEite cover wiAMD and thetegrity of the
or structureguidelines o
pplicable GuidSafety and H
of this FM
ection 4.2 zards) and S
Medical emereleton-muscupains, noise,avy eration, and ls
ection 4.3 mes)
ection 4.4 (Ttremes)
ection 5.1 easures) and PE)
ection 5.2 (PP5 for drowning
n
s.
e n
E ll e e
e of
delines in Health Plan RDP
(Physical Section 7.2 rgency) for lar injuries hazards of
equipment slips and
(Dust and
Temperature
(Control Section 5.2
PE) – Rule g
Project Stru
ROM pad
Gold planmetal plant
Mine Clo
Facility or ucture
t and base t
osure Pla
Requ
Put up safety sigedge.
Haul ouunnecess
Decontamoil spills
Fix drainaflatteningrock armo
Deep rip
Condition
Plant coc
Test residfor pH, drain, adetoxificaneeded
Haul ouunused wastes
Confirm been no storage a
Remove crusher, tanks, pcolumns, electrowinscrubber,circuits, sbreakers,
Remove roof, waconcrete
Decontamoil and ch
Fix drainaflatteningrock armo
n
uired Works
barbed wire gnages on th
t stockpiles sary materials
minate and rem
age by side s, widening, oring
hardstand
n the soil
onut and pili.
dual process wCN and me
nd treat in ation circuit
ut crushed reagents,
that there leakage from
areas and tank
conveyor SAG mill, l
pumps, reac
nning cells, o furnace, flot
storage tanks, etc.
cables, palls, racks,
minate and remhemical spills
age by side s, widening, oring
Safet
and he pit
and
move
slope and
Skeor p
Nois
Hazequ
Dus
Hea
Slip
water etals;
the t if
ore, and
has m the ks
belt, leach ctors,
kiln, oven, tation , bag
pipes, and
move
slope and
Skeor p
Nois
Hazequ
Dus
Hea
Slip
Che
Elec
ty Concerns
eleton-musculapains
se
zards of ipment operat
st and fumes
at stress
ps and falls
eleton-musculapains
se
zards of ipment operat
st and fumes
at stress
ps and falls
emical hazards
ctrocution
or Issues
ar injuries
heavy tion
ar injuries
heavy tion
s
Jul
Applicable the Safety a
of this
Section hazards) a(Medical eskeleton-muor pains, noheavy operation, falls
Section 4fumes)
Section 4.4extremes)
Section measures) (PPE)
Section 4hazards) a(Chemical E
Section hazards) a(Medical eskeleton-muor pains, noheavy operation, falls
Section 4fumes)
Section 4.4extremes)
Section 4.6
Section measures) (PPE)
ly 2010
6-17
Guidelines innd Health Pla
s FMRDP
4.2 (Physind Section 7
emergency) uscular injuroise, hazards
equipmeand slips a
.3 (Dust a
4 (Temperatu
5.1 (Contand Section 5
4.1 (Chemind Section 7
Exposures)
4.2 (Physind Section 7
emergency) uscular injuroise, hazards
equipmeand slips a
.3 (Dust a
4 (Temperatu
(Electrocution
5.1 (Contand Section 5
n an
cal 7.2 for ies of ent and
and
ure
trol 5.2
cal 7.3
cal 7.2 for ies of ent and
and
ure
n)
trol 5.2
Po
UT
July 2
6-18
Project FaciStructur
ower plant
TSF – PAF du
Embankment
Impoundment
2010
8
lity or re
D
C
P
Hpa
Rcts
Do
Ffr
D
C
P
ump
Rbe
Pdec
C
PB
t Hc
Sao
H
Required
Deep rip hards
Condition the
Plant coconut
Haul out usedpetrochemicaland wastes
Remove caconcrete, mastanks, equistructures
Decontaminatoil and chemic
Fix drainage flattening, wrock armoring
Deep rip hards
Condition the
Plant coconut
Rehabilitate batters and embankments
Provide drainage syerosion andcontrol
Condition the
Plant tiger Brachiaria.
Haul in NAcomposite cov
Spread and cand install over PAF dum
Haul in a
d Works
stands
soil
and pili.
d and unusedls, sludge
ables, pipessonry, storagepment, and
te and removecal spills
by side slopeidening, and
stands
soil
and pili.
downslopecrests of the
s
permanentystems andd sediment
soil
grass and
AF – HDPEver
compact NAFHDPE cover
mp
and spread
Safety Co
d ,
, e d
e
e d
Skeletonor pains
Noise
Hazardsequipme
Dust and
Heat stre
Slips an
Chemica
Electroc
e e
t d t
d
Skeletonor pains
Noise
Hazardsequipme
Dust and
Heat stre
Slips an
E
F r
d
Skeletonor pains
Noise
Hazardsequipme
M
oncerns or Is
n-muscular in
s of ent operation
d fumes
ess
d falls
al hazards
ution
n-muscular in
s of ent operation
d fumes
ess
d falls
n-muscular in
s of ent operation
Mine Clos
ssues Ap
the
njuries
heavy
Sehaz(Ch
Sehaz(Mskeor heaopefall
Sefum
Seext
Se
Seme(PP
njuries
heavy
Sehaz(Mskeor heaopefall
Sefum
Seext
Seme(PP
njuries
heavy
Sehaz(Mskeor hea
sure Plan
pplicable GuidSafety and H
of this FM
ection 4.1 zards) and Shemical Expo
ection 4.2 zards) and S
Medical emereleton-muscupains, noise,avy eration, and ls
ection 4.3 mes)
ection 4.4 (Ttremes)
ection 4.6 (Ele
ection 5.1 easures) and PE)
ection 4.2 zards) and S
Medical emereleton-muscupains, noise,avy eration, and ls
ection 4.3 mes)
ection 4.4 (Ttremes)
ection 5.1 easures) and PE)
ection 4.2 zards) and S
Medical emereleton-muscupains, noise,avy
n
delines in Health Plan RDP
(Chemical Section 7.3 sures)
(Physical Section 7.2 rgency) for lar injuries hazards of
equipment slips and
(Dust and
Temperature
ctrocution)
(Control Section 5.2
(Physical Section 7.2 rgency) for lar injuries hazards of
equipment slips and
(Dust and
Temperature
(Control Section 5.2
(Physical Section 7.2 rgency) for lar injuries hazards of
equipment
Project Stru
LTSF
Embankm
Impound
Mine Clo
Facility or ucture
ment
ment
osure Pla
Requ
conditionecover
Fix drainaflatteningrock armo
Plant bam
Rehabilitabatters aembankm
Remove and decwork
Decommitower ansystem
Provide drainage erosion control
Condition
Plant tiBrachiaria
Pump ousupernatato dischar
Dry tailsprinklinggrading o
Haul in composite
Spread aand instover PAF
Haul inconditionecover
Fix drainaflattening
n
uired Works
ed soil over
age by side s, widening, oring
mboo.
ate downsand crests ofments
tailings delcant return
ission dend underdrai
permasystems
and sedi
n the soil
ger grass a.
t and treat taant if required rge to open pi
lings aided g and wicks of surface
NAF – He cover
and compact tall HDPE c dump
n and sped soil over
age by side s, widening,
Safet
NAF
slope and
Dus
Hea
Slip
slope f the
livery pipe
ecant nage
anent and
ment
and
Skeor p
Nois
Hazequ
Dus
Hea
Slip
Che
ilings prior
it
by and
HDPE
NAF cover
pread NAF
slope and
Skeor p
Nois
Hazequ
Dus
Hea
Slip
Che
Dro
ty Concerns
st and fumes
at stress
ps and falls
eleton-musculapains
se
zards of ipment operat
st and fumes
at stress
ps and falls
emical hazards
eleton-musculapains
se
zards of ipment operat
st and fumes
at stress
ps and falls
emical hazards
wning
or Issues
ar injuries
heavy tion
s
ar injuries
heavy tion
s
Jul
Applicable the Safety a
of this
operation, falls
Section 4fumes)
Section 4.4extremes)
Section measures) (PPE)
Section 4hazards) a(Chemical E
Section hazards) a(Medical eskeleton-muor pains, noheavy operation, falls
Section 4fumes)
Section 4.4extremes)
Section measures) (PPE)
Section 4hazards) a(Chemical E
Section hazards) a(Medical eskeleton-muor pains, noheavy operation, falls
Section 4fumes)
Section 4.4extremes)
Section measures)
ly 2010
6-19
Guidelines innd Health Pla
s FMRDP
and slips a
.3 (Dust a
4 (Temperatu
5.1 (Contand Section 5
4.1 (Chemind Section 7
Exposures)
4.2 (Physind Section 7
emergency) uscular injuroise, hazards
equipmeand slips a
.3 (Dust a
4 (Temperatu
5.1 (Contand Section 5
4.1 (Chemind Section 7
Exposures)
4.2 (Physind Section 7
emergency) uscular injuroise, hazards
equipmeand slips a
.3 (Dust a
4 (Temperatu
5.1 (Contand Section 5
n an
and
and
ure
trol 5.2
cal 7.3
cal 7.2 for ies of ent and
and
ure
trol 5.2
cal 7.3
cal 7.2 for ies of ent and
and
ure
trol 5.2
En
Wstochar
Ofacnula
July 2
6-20
Project FaciStructur
nvironmental a
Workshop, exorage and h
hemical reas, and STP
ffices, ccommodationursery, mesundry
2010
0
lity or re
r
PB
area Rbe
Pdec
C
PB
xplosives handling,
storage P
Hmw
Rlct
Do
Toodo
Ffr
D
C
P
ns, ss and
Rcwsu
Required
rock armoring
Plant tiger Brachiaria.
Rehabilitate batters and embankments
Provide drainage syerosion andcontrol
Condition the
Plant tiger Brachiaria.
Haul out usedmaterials, chwastes
Remove sawlathes, sandcables, pipetanks, walls, ra
Decontaminatoil and chemic
Test impoundoil-water sepaoil-contaminatdrain clean woil-water sepa
Fix drainage flattening, wrock armoring
Deep rip hards
Condition the
Plant coconut
Remove caconcrete, mawalls, structures, unnecessary m
d Works
grass and
downslopecrests of the
s
permanentystems andd sediment
soil
grass and
d and unusedhemicals, and
ws, grindersers, planers
es, concreteacks, etc.
te and removecal spills
ded water inarator, collectted waterater, and sea
arator
by side slopeidening, and
stands
soil
and pili.
ables, pipesasonry, roof
equipmentand
materials
Safety Co
d
e e
t d t
d
Skeletonor pains
Noise
Hazardsequipme
Dust and
Heat stre
Slips an
d d
, , ,
e
n t
r, al
e d
Skeletonor pains
Noise
Hazardsequipme
Dust and
Heat stre
Slips an
Chemica
Electroc
, f, , d
Skeletonor pains
Noise
Hazardsequipme
M
oncerns or Is
n-muscular in
s of ent operation
d fumes
ess
d falls
n-muscular in
s of ent operation
d fumes
ess
d falls
al hazards
ution
n-muscular in
s of ent operation
Mine Clos
ssues Ap
the
(PP
Se855
njuries
heavy
Sehaz(Mskeor heaopefall
Sefum
Seext
Seme(PP
njuries
heavy
Sehaz(Ch
Sehaz(Mskeor heaopefall
Sefum
Seext
Se
Seme(PP
njuries
heavy
Sehaz(Mskeor hea
sure Plan
pplicable GuidSafety and H
of this FM
PE)
ection 5.2 (PP5 for drowning
ection 4.2 zards) and S
Medical emereleton-muscupains, noise,avy eration, and ls
ection 4.3 mes)
ection 4.4 (Ttremes)
ection 5.1 easures) and PE)
ection 4.1 zards) and Shemical Expo
ection 4.2 zards) and S
Medical emereleton-muscupains, noise,avy eration, and ls
ection 4.3 mes)
ection 4.4 (Ttremes)
ection 4.6 (Ele
ection 5.1 easures) and PE)
ection 4.2 zards) and S
Medical emereleton-muscupains, noise,avy
n
delines in Health Plan RDP
PE) – Rule g
(Physical Section 7.2 rgency) for lar injuries hazards of
equipment slips and
(Dust and
Temperature
(Control Section 5.2
(Chemical Section 7.3 sures)
(Physical Section 7.2 rgency) for lar injuries hazards of
equipment slips and
(Dust and
Temperature
ctrocution)
(Control Section 5.2
(Physical Section 7.2 rgency) for lar injuries hazards of
equipment
Project Stru
Landfill
Main acces
Concentratand convey
Mine Clo
Facility or ucture
ss road
te storage yor and
osure Pla
Requ
Haul out w
Deep rip
Condition
Plant coc
Remove concrete,wastes
Haul in contour
Fix draina
Deep rip
Condition
Plant coc
Fix damaareas
Stabilize s
Fix draina
For acceclosed, ripping, and planand abac
Donate amaintainecommunit
Remove concrete,equipmen
n
uired Works
wastes
hardstands
n the soil
onut and abac
cables, pstructures,
final cover
age
hardstands
n the soil
onut and pili.
aged sections
slopes
age
ess roads todrainage,
soil conditioting with coca
access roads ted to ty.
cables, pstorage ta
nt, structures
Safet
ca
Dus
Hea
Slip
pipes, and
and
Skeor p
Nois
Hazequ
Dus
Hea
Slip
Che
s and
o be deep
oning, conut
to be the
Skeor p
Nois
Hazequ
Dus
Hea
Slip
pipes, anks,
and
Skeor p
Nois
ty Concerns
st and fumes
at stress
ps and falls
eleton-musculapains
se
zards of ipment operat
st and fumes
at stress
ps and falls
emical hazards
eleton-musculapains
se
zards of ipment operat
st and fumes
at stress
ps and falls
eleton-musculapains
se
or Issues
ar injuries
heavy tion
s
ar injuries
heavy tion
ar injuries
Jul
Applicable the Safety a
of this
operation, falls
Section 4fumes)
Section 4.4extremes)
Section measures) (PPE)
Section 4hazards) a(Chemical E
Section hazards) a(Medical eskeleton-muor pains, noheavy operation, falls
Section 4fumes)
Section 4.4extremes)
Section measures) (PPE)
Section hazards) a(Medical eskeleton-muor pains, noheavy operation, falls
Section 4fumes)
Section 4.4extremes)
Section measures) (PPE)
Section 4hazards) a(Chemical E
ly 2010
6-21
Guidelines innd Health Pla
s FMRDP
and slips a
.3 (Dust a
4 (Temperatu
5.1 (Contand Section 5
4.1 (Chemind Section 7
Exposures)
4.2 (Physind Section 7
emergency) uscular injuroise, hazards
equipmeand slips a
.3 (Dust a
4 (Temperatu
5.1 (Contand Section 5
4.2 (Physind Section 7
emergency) uscular injuroise, hazards
equipmeand slips a
.3 (Dust a
4 (Temperatu
5.1 (Contand Section 5
4.1 (Chemind Section 7
Exposures)
n an
and
and
ure
trol 5.2
cal 7.3
cal 7.2 for ies of ent and
and
ure
trol 5.2
cal 7.2 for ies of ent and
and
ure
trol 5.2
cal 7.3
July 2
6-22
Project FaciStructur
1.
2010
2
lity or re
w
Dc
Dc
General Site
1.1 Introdu
Major athe hauremovachemicaremovaendemisignageconcern
1.2 Site De
The Raat a mato sepaoverflow(CIL) ponto ware depthe SO
The maare:
Required
wastes
Decontaminatchemical spills
Donate piecommunity
e and Safety
uction
activities durul-out of un
al of equipmeal spills; gra
al of hardstac and indus
es around thens of these a
escription
apu-Rapu Poaximum annuarately produw solution frlant. The adire wool, andposited in a
2 - Air proces
ajor structure
Open pit
ROM pad
d Works
te oil ands
er to the
y Informatio
ing the mineused materient and struding of slopends and pa
strial floral se rehabilitate
activities are
olymetallic Pual rate of 1 uce Cu and Zrom the Zn dsorbed goldd smelted to waste rock
ss, are stored
es in the Pro
Safety Co
d
e
Hazardsequipme
Dust and
Heat stre
Slips an
Chemica
on
e decommissials, spare
uctures; decoes and surfarking areas;
species; anded facility sitelisted in Tabl
Project emplomillion t. ThZn concentratailings thick
d is recoveredproduce godump; the t
d in the LTSF
oject site for
M
oncerns or Is
s of ent operation
d fumes
ess
d falls
al hazards
sioning and parts, and wontamination
aces; fixing o conditioning
d provision oes. The safele 6-7.
oys open pit e sulfide oreates. The gokener is tread from the lold and silvertailings, whicF.
r decommiss
Mine Clos
ssues Ap
the
heavy Sehaz(Mskeor heaopefall
Sefum
Seext
Seme(PP
rehabilitationwastes; dismn and removof drainage; bg of the soilof fencing, bety and healt
mining to exe is processeold-bearing oated in a caroaded carbon
dore bars. ch are detox
sioning and
sure Plan
pplicable GuidSafety and H
of this FM
ection 4.2 zards) and S
Medical emereleton-muscupains, noise,avy eration, and ls
ection 4.3 mes)
ection 4.4 (Ttremes)
ection 5.1 easures) and PE)
n will includemantling andval of oil andbreaking andl; planting obunding, andth issues and
xtract the oreed by flotationoxide ore andrbon-in-leachn, electrowonWaste rocks
xified through
rehabilitation
n
delines in Health Plan RDP
(Physical Section 7.2 rgency) for lar injuries hazards of
equipment slips and
(Dust and
Temperature
(Control Section 5.2
e d d d of d d
e n d h n s h
n
Mine Clo
2. Personn
The follofinal min
The PM
All persoSafety Mdate, timtopics di
Safety mupdatedthat may
osure Pla
Gold pla
Power p
UTSF-P
LTSF
Environm
WorkshoSTP
Offices,
Landfill
Access
Concent
nel and Bas
owing Projecne rehabilitat
Project Man
Manager – H
Mechanical-
Security Offi
Physician an
Fire Departm
is in charge
onnel involvManager or me, location, iscussed.
meetings witd of changesy impact safe
n
ant and base
plant
PAF dump
mental area
op, explosive
accommoda
roads and sl
trate storage
sic Site Safe
ct personnelion and deco
ager (PM)
Health & Saf
-Electrical Ma
ice
nd Nurse and
ment.
of all FMRD
ed in the FMhis assistanand names
th all workers to the planety and healt
e metals plan
es storage a
ations, nurse
lopes
e and convey
ety Requirem
and officesommissionin
fety (HSM)
anager
d
D works at the
MRD shall unts. Documes of personne
rs will be hen as well as th. All safety
nt
nd handling,
ry, mess, an
yor and pier
ments
are involveg (FMRD):
e site.
undergo a joentation of thel in attenda
eld on a weechanges in meetings wi
chemical sto
d laundry
d in the safe
b briefing byhe job briefiance, and a
ekly basis tosite conditioll be docume
Jul
orage areas
ety works fo
y the Healthng will statebrief synops
o keep persoons or operaented.
ly 2010
6-23
, and
or the
h and e the sis of
onnel tions
July 2
6-24
3.
4.
2010
4
Emergency
The FRMD drawn up anconform with
During emerdoctor or nufire or evadepartments
All accidentsas practical,The incidenworkers duri
In times of tthe situationrequired.
All Project esteep and utraining progOrder No. 20
Training top
First
Prop
Eme
The trainingdescriptionsissues, hazadocumented
Hazards As
During the Ffollowing haz
Che
Phy
Dus
Tem
Adv
y Response
works shall nd reaction ch the new job
rgencies, therse on duty.
acuation is s. If a contrac
s, including i, i.e., no longt should be ing the next
typhoons or n and determ
employees aunstable aregrams shall f000-98 titled
ics should in
t-aid
per use of pe
ergency notif
g should incl and responards, and reqd and filed wi
ssessment
FMRDP workzard types:
emical hazard
sical hazards
st and fumes
mperature ext
erse weathe
have an emcommittees tbs on hand.
e Health and Then, he wnecessary,
ctor is involv
njuries, incidger than an
analyzed bsafety meeti
other naturamine if work
and contractoas should ufollow Rule 3 “Mine Safet
clude, but no
ersonal prote
fication proto
lude a reviensibilities, tasquirements uith the HSO.
ks, Project e
ds
s
tremes
er and
mergency resto beorganizAll reporting
d Safety Officwill notify the
the HSO ed, the HSO
dents, and ne8-hour shift, y the HSO ng.
al calamitieskers’ lives ar
ors handling undergo train31, Section 9ty and Health
ot be limited
ective equipm
ocols
ew of Healthsk hazards, unique to the
employees an
M
sponse plan.zed shall be g protocols sh
ce (HSO) wilPM as quickwill contact
O will notify th
ear misses mto the HSOand the res
, the PM shre at risk an
hazardous ning. The d9, Chapter IIh Standards”
to, the follow
ment (PPE) a
and Safetyand other s
e working ar
nd contracto
Mine Clos
. Emergencyretained and
hall be strictl
ll first coordinkly as possibt the securhe contractor
must be repo, copy furnisults dissemi
ould immedind a work s
materials anuration and of DENR A.
wing:
and
Policies, insafety and hrea. All train
rs will be ex
sure Plan
y plans to bed updated toly followed.
nate with theble. In case ority and firer’s office.
orted as soonshed the PMinated to the
iately assessuspension is
nd working incoverage o
Administrative
ndividual taskhealth relatedings shall be
xposed to the
n
e o
e of e
n M.
e
s s
n of e
k d e
e
Mine Clo
4.1 Che
Theproclubrthe
Worglov
Matebe mexpoon hand
Worexpoeyesresp
4.2 Phy
Phymosnois
Slipspracweesign
To pheavsuchsite.
Persabsoto enois
Onlyequheavgrou
osure Pla
Electrocution
emical Haza
chemical hcess plant icants in the LTSF and UT
rkers should ves, rubber b
erial Safety Dmaintained aosed to the cchemical prdling, storag
rkers assignosure to airbs, nose, or piratory distre
ysical Hazar
sical hazardst common sse, heavy equ
s, trips, and ctices, keepinekly safety nages, and re
prevent skelevy objects wh as forklift, .
sonnel expoorbers, acou
enclose the nse levels are
y fully trainedipment at thevy equipmenund personne
n
n.
ards
azards emasuch as cygenerator s
TSF – PAF d
minimize exboots, eye go
Data Sheetsat the site achemical. Throperties, spe, and other
ed in the fieborne particu
throat, couess, and effe
rds
s such as fasource of wouipment, dus
falls may beng work areameetings th
estrictions to
eton-musculawithout assischain block,
osed to excustic screensnoise sourceabove norm
d, qualified, le work site. nt include buel contact, an
anate from tyanide, acidet and mechdump.
xposure to thoggles, apron
s (MSDSs) foand reviewehe MSDS shpill responser special prec
eld should bulates or coughing, nauects due to de
alls, trips, sliorkplace injust, and extrem
e avoided thras free of obhat stress entry.
ar injuries, wstance. Apwheelbarrow
cessive nois, or other noe. Workers al auditory c
icensed, and Hazards co
urns, hydraund rollover.
he reagentss, alkalis, r
hanical shop;
hese elemenns, or other P
or each chemd by all per
hould alwayse procedurecautions to b
be aware oforrosive vaposea, dizzineermal contac
ps, and musuries. Workeme temperat
rough properbstructions, pgood house
workers will bppropriate mw, cart, etc.
se levels woise-reducingare to use
communicatio
d authorized ommonly asslic fluids andThe safety m
and chemicreactive che; heavy meta
nts through tPPEs as app
mical used in rsonnel whobe consulte
s, fire hazae implement
f the commoors, includingess, drowsinct.
scle strains aers may alsotures hazard
r control meaprovision of aekeeping, s
e reminded materials han
will be made
will wear eag barriers shstandard haon.
personnel wsociated withd fuels, trafficmeasures are
Jul
cals used inemicals; oil als and tailin
the use of rupropriate.
the Project o use or maed for informards, as weted.
on symptomg irritation oness, heada
are generallyo be exposes.
asures, safe adequate lighsafety mats
not to lift largndling equipe available a
arplugs. Nould be prov
and signals w
will operate hh the operatioc movemente:
ly 2010
6-25
n the and
gs in
ubber
must ay be ation
ell as
ms of of the ache,
y the ed to
work hting,
and
ge or ment
at the
Noise vided when
eavy on of t and
July 2
6-26
2010
6
4.3 Dust an
All workshall beequipmeventilatiowith wat
4.4 Tempe
Burns – Avexhaust pipsignages on
Hydraulic flcontainmen
Traffic movcolored, higheavy-trafficof a field spor negotiatinground pers
Rollover – structures, bof travel roseatbelts; oequipment bor tracks.
nd Fumes
kers must usee maintainedent and veon must be pter.
rature Extre
Heat stress stress. Digshould be mbe scheduleoral tempertemperature
Cramps – Vtreatment ingentle mass
Exhaustion pale and cdizziness, ha cool areaclothing to a3 or 4 doses
voidance of pes or mufflen or near hot
luids and fut of any spills
ement and ggh-visibility c areas; useotter to guideng a tight crosonnel appro
Fitting of mblinkers, andoute for obsobservance by grounding
e appropriated in good whicles mustprovided in c
emes
– Workers aital thermom
made availabed every tworature exceee returns to n
Victims are ncludes one sage and war
– The sympclammy skineadache, na
a and be maallow air circus.
f contact wiers, etc.; uset surfaces.
uels – Immes; repairs to
ground perssafety vests
e by equipmee the heavy owded area; oach the equ
mobile equipd signal lightstructions, hof speed l
g of buckets
e PPEs like working and t have reguconfined area
are to obsermeters, drink
le at the siteo hours for 1eds 38oC wnormal, i.e., le
to be movor two glassrm, wet towe
ptoms are bn, profuse ausea, and faade to lie fulation. Wate
M
th hot surfae of safety g
ediate shutdbe done by a
onnel contacs by groundent of backuequipment olowering of ipment.
pment with ts; personneholes, slopeimits; immo
s or insertion
dust masks sanitary an
ular engine as and dusty
ve each otheing water, a
e. During hot10 to 15 minill not be aess than 37o
ved to a coses of waterel over the af
ody temperaperspiration
ainting. Thelat except wer is to be dr
Mine Clos
aces such aguards or co
down of equa mechanic.
ct – Wearingd personnel
up lights andoperator whebooms or bu
roll-over anel training; cas, ditches, bilization of
n of blocks u
when in thed hygienic ccheck-ups.
y areas must
er for early snd electrolytt conditions, nutes. Persollowed to wC.
ool, covered or electroly
ffected area.
ature in exce, lethargy victim is to
when drinkinrunk every 15
sure Plan
as radiatorsovers; safety
uipment and
g of brightlyl working in
d alarms; useen backing upuckets before
nd protectiveareful surveyetc.; use o
f unattendedunder wheels
e field. PPEscondition; a Adequatet be sprinkled
signs of heate beveragesbreaks musonnel whose
work until his
area. Theyte beverage
ess of 38oCand fatiguebe moved to
ng with open5 minutes fo
n
s, y
d
y-n e p e
e y
of d s
s ll e d
at s
st e s
e e,
C, e, o n r
Mine Clo
4.5 Adv
Advand unstbecotask
4.6 Ele
The
osure Pla
Stroke –as high and strovictim shthe victibag is a
The HSearly moday. Wenough be given
verse Weath
erse weathethunderstor
table groundoming projecked to determ
ectrocution
control mea
Trainingequipme
De-ener
Live parpartition
At leastcompanarea
Temporaprovided
Use of renergize150V to
No woroperatinpresent
Exclusioelectrica
n
– The victimsas 40oC, red
ong pulse, pohould be mom’s body splso placed o
SO will identornings or ev
Workers will water and e
n to personne
her
er conditionsrms. Their ds; exposurctiles, and c
mine when wo
asures agains
g of employeent
rgization of a
rts of electriing or screen
t two men sion, the pers
ary covers, gd before leav
rubber glovesed electricalground
k to be donng at 750V
on of metal al equipment
s of stroke md or flushed ossible loss ooved to a cooponged with n the victim’s
tify strenuouvenings to tabe providedlectrolyte beel assigned i
s include stroassociated
re to lightnicollapsed strork stoppage
st electrocut
ees assigned
all equipment
ic equipmenning
shall work tson left behi
guards, warnving unfinishe
s, shields, a conductors
ne on energunless two
ladders wt
manifest bodyskin, nausea
of consciousol, shady areisopropyl al
s head.
s tasks whicake advanta
d with a temverage at allin remote pa
ong winds, hazards areing and strouctures and es are neces
ion are:
d to disman
t scheduled f
t guarded a
together. Wnd is to work
ning signs aned jobs
nd other safs or equipm
gized electrio or more e
hile working
y temperatura, dizziness, ness, deliriumea with all PPcohol or coo
ch can be sge of the co
mporary cove times. Hanrts of the Pro
heavy precipe poor visibilong winds; uprooted tre
ssary.
ntle electric
for demolition
gainst accid
When necesk only outsid
nd other safe
ety equipmeent operatin
cal equipmeexperienced
g in proxim
Jul
res which ma headache, m, or coma. PE removedol water. An
scheduled doolest time oered shelter nd-held radiooject site.
pitation, lighlity; slipperyloose mate
rees. The P
machineries
n
dental contac
ssary to leade the hazar
ety devices t
ent by workerng at more
ent or condemployees
ity to energ
ly 2010
6-27
ay be rapid The
d and n ice
uring of the
with s will
tning y and erials PM is
and
ct by
ve a dous
to be
rs on than
uctor s are
gized
July 2
6-28
5.
2010
8
Controls
5.1 Contro
The Promeasure
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
5.2 PPE
The PPEand spethere isprovisionare:
Personnel aequipment opersonnel
Lockout or taand other m
ol Measures
oject is adoes during the
The HSO ischemical an
A safety protask safety a
Each field tsuch as mimplemented
Field teamscommunicat
All hazardouventilated se
Containers ochecked for
Only trainedFMRD areagloves shousigns of wea
For high-risktwo should bgive immedi
Es issued tocific jobs to b potential ens on PPEs
awareness ofor the releas
ag-out proceachinery tha
opting the foe FMRD.
s responsibled physical ha
ocedure for analysis mus
team is respmarkings, wd.
s assigned tions equipm
us materials ecure storage
of hazardousleaks. Their
d and propeas. Corrosivuld be regulaar and tear.
k areas andbe assignedate assistan
o each workebe performed
exposure to found in DE
f potential hase of stored
edures to preat can move o
ollowing eng
e for remindazards of the
newly recogst be dissemi
ponsible for warning sig
to remotement.
must be stoe site with ad
s chemicals r MSDSs mu
erly protecteve-resistant arly checked
d non-routine. This “buddce to an inju
er depend od. All workephysical an
ENR Adminis
M
azards due td energy or
event startup or release ha
gineering an
ing all persoe FMRD wor
gnized hazarinated to all w
ensuring thagns, placar
e areas are
ored in a desdequate spill
must be cleaust be readily
d personnelPPEs such
d for any pe
e proceduresdy system” wred fellow.
n the monitors must wea
nd chemical strative Orde
Mine Clos
to unexpectematerial tha
of equipmenazardous sub
nd administr
onnel to be aks.
rds developeworkers.
at site contrds, barriers
e to be pr
signated, plac containmen
arly labeled ay available in
are allowed as boots,
erforations, p
s, teams of will allow an
ored conditior appropriatehazards. T
er No. 98, Se
sure Plan
ed start-up oat can injure
nt, pumps, bstances.
rative contro
aware of the
ed through a
rol measuress, etc. are
rovided with
carded, wellnt.
and regularlyn the HSO.
d to work inaprons, and
punctures, o
no less thanemployee to
ons, hazardse PPEs whenThe relevaneries of 2000
n
of e
ol
e
a
s e
h
-
y
n d r
n o
s, n nt 0
Mine Clo
Respiratmay resmust alw
6. Site Con
The follo
osure Pla
Rule 852 - tension wireor other suit
Rule 853 - Ehands or arexcept when
Rule 854 - Aexposure to
Rule 855 - Wlife-saving a
Rule 856 - Wdusts, or oxrespiratory p
Rule 857 -working and
Rule 858 - employees falling or slip
Rule 859 -provided wit
tory, dermal,sult in exposuways be avai
ntrol
owing shall g
Access to th
Sufficient wpersonnel m“No Open Fl
Only visitorssite. All visihazards at th
All workers entering and
Cordon-off abeing worke
n
When workes or cables, able insulate
Employees hrms shall ben the use of t
Appropriate eeye injury.
Workers exppparels.
Where therexygen deficieprotective eq
Personal pd sanitary and
Safety beltsworking at e
pping from da
Employeesth the necess
, eye, head, ure to chemilable at the w
guide the HS
he site should
warning or must be placelame” must b
s with prior auitors will be he site and s
and visitorsd leaving the
areas and ped on.
king on live appropriate
ed materials
handling matee required tothe equipme
eye protectio
posed to risk
e is harmful ency, workerquipment.
protective ed hygienic co
s, harness, elevations 3angerous he
s assigned sary and app
hand, and foical hazardsworking area
O on the bas
d be limited t
caution signed in all worbe visibly pla
uthorization oriented on
shall be prov
s must be site.
place approp
electrical cir high-tensionshall be use
erials likely too wear appront introduces
on equipmen
ks of drowni
concentratiors shall be r
quipment shondition.
straps or li3 m above oeights.
to work in propriate per
oot protection. Enough wa
a.
sic features o
to authorized
ns that prorking areas. aced.
from the PMn the ongoinvided with the
required to
priate signag
rcuit or when rubber glovd for protecti
o puncture, aopriate protes equal or gr
t shall be wo
ng shall be
on of gases, required to w
hall be mai
felines shallor where the
a confined sonal protec
n are requireater for drink
of a site cont
d personnel o
hibit entry Other warnin
will be permng works, ine proper PPE
sign in and
e when haz
Jul
n handling ves, rubber ion.
abrade, or irective equipreater hazard
orn when the
required to
vapors, miswear approp
ntained in g
l be worn bere is haza
space shactive equipme
ed when activking and was
trol plan:
only.
to unauthong signs suc
mitted entry toncluding posEs.
d sign out w
zardous sites
ly 2010
6-29
high-mats
ritate ment ds.
ere is
wear
sts or priate
good
by all rd of
ll be ent.
vities shing
rized ch as
o the ssible
when
s are
July 2
6-30
7.
2010
0
HSOAdd
All dplachazafacil
Emergency
Emergency place at theOrder No. procedures.
Provblas
Des
Freq
Infonatupers
All ato thdisc
Duriand
WheHSM
All in
A diin al
Any a phinjurmay
Theand be rrepooccu
O staff must itional safety
disposable Pced in plastardous and ity.
y Response
response an site. Chap98, Series The guideli
vision of alasts mean fire
signation of e
quency of firs
rmation to bure, location,sonnel injury
accidents, inche managemcovery.
ing emergenthe rescue t
enever a maM must recei
ncidents sho
rectory listinll working are
employee whysician. Dery, it is criticay return to wo
HSO will maincidents oc
recorded, asort (e.g., injuurrences tha
inspect hazay measures m
PPEs, plasticic trash bagwill not req
and Prepare
nd preparednter X, Sectioof 2000 p
nes require,
arm system , one long an
evacuation ar
st aid and res
be provided , size, and e.
cluding injurment and MG
ncy situationteam or the e
ajor incidentve immediat
ould be docum
g of all key peas.
who suffers aepending upoal to performork only with
aintain a proccurring at ths well as acries, illnesset could have
ardous work must be impl
c sheetings, gs. These iquire dispos
edness Proc
ness procedon 49, Rulesrovide guideamong othe
for each tynd one short
reas
scue drills
when reportextent of eme
ries, incidentsB Regional O
ns, communiemergency re
t or high pote verbal noti
mented.
personnel fo
an injury or con the exte
m follow-up tethe written a
oject file of anhe site. Any ccidents or es, accidentae resulted in p
M
sites prior tolemented wh
and other ititems are gsal at a ha
cedures
ures during s 637 to 639elines in th
ers, the follow
ype of emert mean slope
ting an emeergency, any
s, and near Office within
ication lines esponse tea
otential incideification, follo
or the FMRD
chemical expnt and type
esting within approval of th
ny safety anactual or po
incidents thaal damage topersonal inju
Mine Clos
o entry of wohen deemed
tems for disenerally notzardous wa
FMRD work of DENR A
he preparatiowing:
rgency (e.g., failure, etc.)
ergency incidy materials i
misses must8 hours of o
between thm must be g
ent occurs, owed by a wr
works must
posure is reqof exposure
24 to 48 houhe attending
d health-relaotential expoat require tho property, orury).
sure Plan
orking teamsnecessary.
sposal will bet considered
aste disposa
ks must be inAdministrativeon of these
, three shor)
dent such asnvolved, and
t be reportedoccurrence o
he PM, HSMgiven priority.
the PM andritten report.
t be available
quired to seere, illness, ours. A worke physician.
ated activitiesosures are tohe filing of ar "near miss
n
s.
e d al
n e e
rt
s d
d r
M .
d
e
e r r
s o a "
Mine Clo
7.1 Fire
TheSec2000
7.2 Me
A roof mpresAdm
7.3 Che
In thpote
osure Pla
e
complete gtion 71, Rule0. The majo
In case of fiDepartment and extent materials sto
The Fire Dextinguisher
Workers shoby the fire, ithe site espe
The workersare availableworkers are
If the fire calocation upw
dical Emerg
ound-the-clocmedical stafscribed undministrative O
In the eventimmediately
If the illnessfor further in
Workers witinstances, th
emical Expo
he event of entially toxic
Respiratory Any loss ofsubstances,immediate tr
Dermal Con
n
uidelines ones 1082 to 1or ones are a
re, the Leadand the HSOof fire. Theored inside th
Department rs or to evacu
ould shut-offf it can be secially where
s should attee, when propproperly trai
annot be conwind of the w
gency
ck medical teff assigned er Chapter
Order No. 98,
t of a seriousy.
s or injury allonjury, the indi
th suspectedhe worker sh
osure
a respiratorysubstance, t
exposure (inf consciousn even if the reatment or s
ntact – Was
n fire protect105 of DEN
as follows.
dman or otheO, in this orde authorities he burning s
should advuate to a saf
f all equipmesafely done. e hazardous
mpt to contaperly advisedined to hand
trolled, the fwork site.
eam must bedepends oXIV, Secti
, Series of 20
s injury, the
ows the movividual may b
d back or nehould be stab
y exposure, the following
nhalation) –ness or expo
individual asurveillance
sh and rinse
tion are enuR Administra
er personnel der, apprising
should alsotructure.
vise the wofer ground.
ent and mac Otherwise, chemicals a
ain the fire if d by the Firele the emerg
field team wi
e available aton the numion 64, Ru000.
employee m
vement of thebe immediate
eck injuries abilized while w
dermal or eprocedures
Move the vicosure to ele
appears to hby a qualifie
e affected ar
merated undative Order N
will immediag them of theo be informe
orkers whet
chineries thaworkers shore stored.
appropriate fe Departmengency.
ll evacuate a
t the Project ber of workles 864 to
ust notify the
e victim withely transporte
are not to bewaiting for as
ye contact, will be follow
ctim to freshevated levelsave fully recd physician.
rea for at le
Jul
der Chapter No. 98, Serie
ately call thee location, caed of the typ
ther to use
at will be affeould stay far
fire extinguisnt to do so, a
all personnel
site. The numkers presen
867 of D
e clinic and
hout any poteted to the clin
e moved. In ssistance.
or ingestion wed.
h air immedias of known covered, req
east 15 min
ly 2010
6-31
XIX, es of
e Fire ause, pe of
fire
ected from
shers and if
l to a
mber nt as ENR
HSO
ential nic.
such
of a
ately. toxic uires
utes.
July 2
6-32
6.4
6.4.
The be a
6.4.1
Withforce
To aUTSwidtthe struc
For haveaccithe are brusunbrflamdonegrassche
The Cou
2010
2
Tran
Eye the qua
Ingefacil
Mine R
1 Attainm
rehabilitatioattained as fo
1.1 Stabili
h respect to es (Robertso
Short-ducyclonesdesign v
Slow buand winstructura
address flooSF-PAF dumth and size tochannels a
ctures will be
fires which e the compedental outbrend of the rabrushed. T
shed grass isrushed gras
mes will not de at the endsses have aeme, the gra
foregoing suncil for Agr
nsport victim
Contact - Fnearest me
lified physici
estion - Immeity.
Rehabilitatio
ment of Reh
n goals of thollows.
ity
stability, theon and Clifto
uration extres. At times, values.
t perpetual and erosion; wal materials;
ods, the dramp, and LTSo allow for paand adjacene designed fo
most likely oetitive ability eak. The plainy seasonhe brushed s 0.5 m left ases. This a
damage the sd of the rainlready grown
asslands may
strategy has riculture, For
to the neare
Flush eye/s cedical facilityan is require
ediately trans
on Plan
habilitation
he FMRDP a
e plan recogn, 1987):
eme eventsthese pheno
action of forcweathering aand intrusion
inage channSF will be deartial blockagt flood-pronor the 1:100
occur in grasto outshadeanting distan, the grassegrass is pla
and right fromarrangementseedlings. S
ny season. n, serving thy be rehabilit
been testedrestry and N
est medical fa
continuouslyy. Follow-
ed.
sport to the n
Goals
are identical
gnizes and p
s like floodsomena apply
ces which brand chemican by roots, a
nels of the esigned for ge of sedime
ne slopes. years’ rain.
sslands, the e the grass ance is 2 m as along the ced in betwe
m the base oft will ensureSoil erosion iBy the time
he function otated in 4 yea
d in a 3-yeaNatural Res
M
acility.
y for 15 minuup treatmen
nearest avai
to the closur
provides for t
s, fires, eay forces to st
ing about deal change of nimals, and
critical structhe 1:10,000
ent and with The chann
revegetationand that can long slope astrip of seedeen the seef the seedling
e that in casis not a prob the rainy sof soil erosioars.
ar research fources Rese
Mine Clos
utes. Transpnt or exami
lable emerge
re criteria. T
two classes
rthquakes, tructures in e
eterioration stailings, cov
men.
ctures such 0 years’ rainheavy riprapels for the
n plan will uwithstand fi
and 3 m acrodlings acrossdlings. The gs, leaving bse of accideblem becauseeason comeon control.
funded by thearch and D
sure Plan
port victim toination by a
ency medica
The goals wi
of disruptive
and tropicaexcess of the
uch as watever liners, o
as open pitn with amplep armor along
less critica
se trees thare in case o
oss slope. As the contou width of the
behind 2 m oental fire, thee brushing ises again, theThrough this
he PhilippineDevelopmen
n
o a
al
ll
e
al e
r r
t, e g al
at of At
r e
of e s e s
e nt
Mine Clo
(PCARRD) tthe training personnel shtheoretical acompany als
For earthquto deformatiresults, “defethe design settlements;
To counter sa high perceground immrecommendgully erosion
For protectiogeneration oexpensive thpreventing wworkmanshi
Root intrusioand vines aIntrusion by conditions a
6.4.1.2 Pr
The selectiothe Project selection wa
Among the vthe species plantations. (Casuarina e
The agricultresidents dugreatest ma
Finally, the species. Alsand non-foraand bamboo
The market
osure Pla
that ended ion Fire Ma
hould also uaspects; anotso needs to i
akes, the UTion analysesensive” dam were a free well-design
sheet and guentage of coediately. Oned along rivn, riprap will
on of the taiof AMD, a chan the simwater infiltratp for either t
on of the covas cover speanimals or mre self-susta
roductivity
on of natural site is mean
as based on f
various useswhich are g These sp
equisetifolia)
tural crops curing the comrket potentia
UTSF-PAF dso because oage. In the os for light co
study for the
n
n March 201anagement hndergo a Firther day is fonvest on a fo
TSF-PAF dus under an Mdesigns wer
eboard that ed and cons
ully erosion, oarse gravel ne creeping sers, streamsbe placed al
lings and PAomposite NAple soil covtion. This phe compacte
ver system isecies. No tmen will be aaining.
forest and nt to exact thfloral species
s of wood by good sourcepecies inclu).
chosen for tmmunity consals. These cr
dump and LTof the metalscurrent reha
onstruction w
e selected cro
10. The resheld last 27 re Managemor practical aorest ranger
ump and LTSMCE and Ore formulatedtakes into a
structed filters
the mine rehand will comspecies to bes, and highlyong the UTS
AF dump froAF-HDPE co
ver, the comperformance ed clay or HD
s prevented tree species addressed by
agro-forestryhe greatest s thriving in t
the residentes of fuel wouded ipil-ipil
the FMRDP sultations anrops were co
TSF areas ms present undabilitation deswere selected
ops is attach
search outpuMay 2010 aent Training.
applications owhich will fa
SF embankmOBE loading.d and implemaccount the s downstream
habilitation pmbine grass e propagatedy erodible orSF-PAF dum
om weatherinover system posite coveris not easily
DPE liner.
by the sole will be plan
y regular ma
y plantationsproductivity the area (An
ts, fuel seemood were se
(Leucaena
were thosend which weroconut, pili, a
may only be derneath, thesign, tiger grd.
hed as Annex
uts were dissat Baguio C. One day caof fire controacilitate fire c
ment designs Based on
mented. Thelikely seism
m of the eart
lan will use sand vines thd is Brachiarir landslide-pp and LTSF
ng, sulfide oxwill be used
r is found toy compromis
use of shallnted over thintenance wo
s as post-minfrom the lannex 9-9).
med the mostelected for th leucocepha
recommendre found by
and abaca.
planted withe species murass useful fo
x 9-10.
Jul
seminated dCity. RRMI/Rcan be devoteol strategies. control.
s were subjethe deform
e key elemenmic-induced thfill core, etc
soil that conhat can coveria. Bamboosprone areas.
slopes.
xidation, andd. Though mo perform wesed by defec
low rooting ghe cover sys
works until the
ning land usnd. The spe
t pressing. The natural foala) and ag
ded by the BMP to have
h shallow-roust be non-eor broom-ma
ly 2010
6-33
uring RRPI ed to The
ected ation
nts of crest c.
tains er the s are For
d the more ell in cts in
grass stem. e site
se for ecies
Thus, orest goho
local e the
oting edible aking
July 2
6-34
6.4.1
Pressurvdisreused
The ComassesimpThe
2010
4
1.3 Self-S
sently in thevival rates ofegards all thd as a meas
Ecosystemmmonwealth essment of reple indicatorsEFA model
1. Landscareflect snutrient
Figu
Data areflow, usrunoff anpatchesrelative
ustaining C
e Philippinesf floral speci
he other aspeure of self-su
m FunctionScientific anehabilitation s to assess has three int
ape functionstability or recycling of th
ure 6-2. FieldHind
e collected osually downsnd transporte, are distingsizes measu
Condition
s, the evaluaes, usually tects of a fulustaining con
n Analysis nd Industrial at disturbedhow well a later-related pa
analysis (Lsistance to ee landscape
d indicatorsdley, 2004).
on a line translope. Landed materials uished from
ured. For eac
ation of rehtrees. The ly functioninndition.
(EFA) waResearch O sites. It is aandscape is arts, namely
LFA) – Simperosion, infilt and soil. Fi
s and LFA
nsect that isdscape featu are recorde zones of rech zone type
M
habilitation wproblem withg ecosystem
as developeOrganization a field monitofunctioning
y:
ple field inditration or waigure 6-2 show
indices (T
oriented in ures that inted. Zones ofesource gaine, the indicat
Mine Clos
works is delih this appro
m. It cannot
ed by the(CSIRO) to
oring proceduas an ecolog
cators are mter holding cws the indica
Tongway an
the directionerrupt, diverf resource losn, i.e., patcheors are asse
sure Plan
mited to theach is that itherefore be
e Australianassist in the
ure that usesgical system
monitored tocapacity, andators.
nd
n of resourcert, or absorbss, i.e., interes, and thei
essed.
n
e it e
n e s
m.
o d
e b r-r
Mine Clo
Tworehatimeconsto th
TheThematrehaprov
2. Vegprovshelcom
3. Habstatubiota
BMP tested method app30 minutes vegetation crequiredby t
BMP will usedetermine w
6.4.2 Fiel
In situationsthere is littlefuture soil ctrials becomboth the tesoundness The revegetLTSF impozone.Progra
6.4.2.1 LT
Figure 6-3 isspecies. Tblumeana va(T1) – gardeand T3 - 50
osure Pla
o transects abilitated lane, a time sstructed. Rilhe LFA trans
selection ofse sites, whure, highly fuabilitated lanvide target va
etation and svides nutrienlter for othe
mposition and
bitat complexus of fauna ia have been
the LFA at tlicable in theto finish. T
component he LFA.
e the LFA anwhether the re
ld Revegeta
s where plane room for eonditions are
me indispensachnical (speof species ctation trials woundment, ammed for 3
TSF Impoun
s the revegeThe trial will ar. spinosa).en soil + cog inorganic f
n
are often sdforms along
series recordll surveys caect to monito
f analogue orhich are locaunctional lanndscape analues for the
structure comnts for an ecer biota. Vd structure an
xity – This fin the ecosys used to mon
the Rapu-Rae Philippineshe method and a soils
nd EFA reguehabilitated s
ation Trials
nt growth is cerror in cost e different frable priors toecies site adchosen (marwill be done fLTSF embayears, the tr
dment
tation trial foonly use o
The soil ammpost + chicfertilizer (14-
sufficient to g the specificd of ecosys
an also be incor the quanti
r reference sated in the
ndscape. Thed are self-sLFA indices
mposition – Vcosystem anVegetation nd its functio
focuses on stem. Indicanitor mine re
apu Project ss. On the aveneeds an ins expert to
ularly as partsites are in s
critical to theestimation a
rom those obo mine rehadaptability arket potentiafor sites wheankment a
rials should c
or the LTSF one species melioration tre
cken dung; -14-14). T1 is
gather LFAc transects istem changcorporated aty and growt
sites is cruciavicinity of th
ey have mansustaining.
s in rehabilita
Vegetation hnd it providemonitoring
onal role in th
the habitat ators such a
ehabilitation w
site. It was ferage, each tnterdisciplina
determine
t of maintenaself-sustainin
e success ofand work impbtaining in thbilitation. Re
and soil treaal and accepere soil fertilitnd slope,
commence at
impoundmeof bamboo
eatments howT2 – 25 g ins a mixture o
A data. Ms undertakene or develo
and undertakth of rills and
al to the effehe Project any of the attriLFA data frtion.
has a highly fs suitable hcan shed l
he landscape
available fos ants, reptilworks.
ound to be atransect requ
ary team -onthe soil ph
ance and mog conditions
f rehabilitatioplementationhe present, fevegetation atment) and ptability by thty is a limitinand the ot the latest in
ent using bam(Kawayang
wever are thnorganic fertof 3 media of
Jul
Monitoring ofn annually. opment mayken perpendid gullies.
ctive use of area, represeibutes of thefrom these
functional roabitat, food,ight on spe
e.
or fauna andles, and soil-
a straight foruired about 2ne to handlehysical attrib
onitoring wors.
on works, wn, and wherefield revegettrials incorpo socio-econhe local peog factor as iopen pit bn October 20
mboo as thegtinik - Bamhree: Treatmetilizer (14-14f equal propo
ly 2010
6-35
f the Over y be cular
LFA. ent a final sites
le. It and ecies
d the -litter
rward 20 to e the butes
rks to
where e the ation orate omic
ople). n the
buffer 010.
e test busa ent 1
4-14); ortion
July 2
6-36
withseedNAF
The distrrandand deteameexpe512
6.4.2
The embthe ame
Figu
Twoand thremonalsowill seedexpe
2010
6
a volume odlings duringF cover.
Figure 6
experimentributed. Eachdomly chosediameter gr
ermined by elioration treaeriment will bm2 to accom
2.2 LTSF
fast establibankment an
poor qualityelioration tec
ure 6-4 illustro species, tig
survival as e times. Gro
nitored at 4-mo at 4-month be evaluateddlings/cuttingerimental site
of 30 cm3. Ing planting. F
6-3. Experimrevegeta
al set-up of h treatment cn as sampleowth at 4-moharvest metatments on gbe 1 x 1 m.
mmodate 180
Embankme
shment of vnd slope. Tigy of the NAhniques will
rates the expger grass or S
affected by owth paramemonth intervaintervals. Td by harvestgs, at 180 e. The plant
T1 and T2,Fertilization is
mental set-uation trial
the trial is contains 20 ee seedlings fonthinterval. thod at the growth/biomaThus, the sp
0 total numbe
nt and Slop
vegetative coger grass anAF embankmbe tested.
perimental sS1 and Brac3 soil ameli
eters such asals. For Bra
The total abot method in for each spting distance
, the fertilizes critical in v
up of the
replicated 3 experimentafor measurinAbove grouend of 3 ye
ass. The planpace requireder of seedling
e
over is crucd Brachiaria
ment and sl
set-up of thechiaria or S2oration treats number of achiaria, the ve-ground bthe third yea
pecies, and is 1 x 1 m.
M
r will be appview of the p
e LTSF im
times and tal seedlings wng growth paund biomass ears to detenting distancd for this expgs (Figure 6-
cial to the re are the seleope materia
e LTSF emb, will be montments - T1, tillers and hearea covereiomass (dry ar. The revean approxi
Mine Clos
plied once atpoor soil cond
mpoundment
treatments awhere 5 seedarameters su
(oven dry wermine the ece of each seperiment is a3).
ehabilitation ected speciesals, the sam
ankment annitored in term
T2, and T3eight of tiger ed in % will b
weight) for eegetation triamate area o
sure Plan
t the base oditions of the
t
are randomlydlings will be
uch as heighweight) will beeffect of soeedling in theapproximately
of the LTSFs. In view o
me three so
d slope trialms of growth
3 – replicatedgrass will be
be monitoredeach speciesal needs 360of 1,024 m
n
of e
y e ht e il e y
F of il
l. h d e d s 0 2
Mine Clo
Figu
6.4.2.3 Op
In the FMRfacilities will residents. amelioration
Figure 6-5 isspecies to collection arspecies is 1trials for the
osure Pla
ure 6-4. Expemb
pen Pit Buff
RDP, the opebe planted wThe objectiv
n technique fr
the experimbe planted re the same80 or a tota3 sites requ
n
erimental sebankment an
fer Zone
en pit buffewith ipil-ipil ave of the fierom among t
mental set-upand monitor as the othe
al of 360 seeire a total of
et-up of revnd slope
r zone and and agoho toeld revegetathe 3 treatme
p which is simred. All other two. Theedlings over 2,560 m2 of
vegetation tr
perimeter ao cater to theation trial isents previous
milar to the pher variablese number of
an area of land.
rial for the
areas of thee fuel wood n to determisly selected.
rior two set-us and the reseedlings re1,024 m2. T
Jul
LTSF
e various Prneeds of the ne the best
ups except iegularity of required for The reveget
ly 2010
6-37
roject local t soil
n the data each ation
July 2
6-38
6.4.
The accoplanwithpotereha
Table
Sho
Plan
Anim
2010
8
Figure 6-
3 Rehabi
selection oount the technts. For exam the leaders
entials wereabilitation mo
e 6-8. Reco
ort-Term Crop
ts
Pechay
Okra
Sitao
Camote tops
Eggplant
Upo
Squash
Patola
mals
Poultry
Swine
-5. Revegetazone and
litation Mod
of species fhnical, economple, the ags of the com verified in
odels propos
ommended c
ps (Annuals)
ation trial exd perimeter a
dels
for rehabilitaomic, and sogricultural crmmunity are
a market ed. The ma
rops during t
Medium-T
Plants
Pineap
Abaca
Banan
Green
xperimental sareas
ation and aocio-cultural rops that wee shown in
study haverket study is
the 18 April 2
Term (2 to 3 Y
pple
a
na
pepper
M
set-up for the
agro-forestry dimensions
eresuggestedTable 6-8. T
e been inteattached as
2010 consult
Years)
Frui
Mine Clos
e open pit b
developmeof the variou
d during the The crops wgrated into Annex 9-10.
tations
Long-Term (>
it trees/Trees
Pili
Coconut
Indian mango
sure Plan
uffer
ent took intous crops andconsultation
whose markethe various
> 3 Years)
o
n
o d n et s
Mine Clo
6.4.3.1 UT
The soil in tmaterials exHence, planrequirementrooted plantbamboo is thand durablevery high at
Figure 6-6 is and LTSF. requirement
Figu
6.4.3.2 UT
The soil quabe roughly scoarser andaddition, a v
Tiger grass are availableTinopan, is with economsuch as Bra
Tiger grass total of 10,0cuttings/ha.
osure Pla
TSF – PAF D
the UTSF – xcavated frots to be intro
t of preservints are eligibhe most feas for light conthe baranga
the rehabilit The bamb
t is 1,667.
ure 6-6. Planimpo
TSF – PAF D
ality of the emsimilar to thad bouldery. vine with goo
and Brachiae in the islanproducing b
mic value suchiaria.
at a planting000 suckers/ Figure 6-7 is
n
Dump and L
PAF dump om the deepoduced shoung the long-tble. Grassesible choice. nstruction anay and munic
tation model boo planting
nting designoundment ar
Dump and L
mbankmentsat of the imp
As regardsd and quick
aria are the mnd and Brac
broom or “tamch as tiger g
g distance of /ha. Brachias the planting
LTSF Impoun
and LTSF per portionsld be toleranterm integrity
es exhibit the The bambo
nd the cottagcipal levels.
for the impog distance i
n for the Ureas using ba
LTSF Emban
s and slopespoundment as plants, shacover charac
most feasiblechiaria is widmbo”. The grass and a
0.5 m alongaria at 0.5 x g design.
ndments
impoundmens of the opent of low soil y of the NAFe required p
oo also has ee industries.
oundment ares 2 x 3 m
UTSF – PAamboo (Kaw
nkments and
of the UTSFrea. The on
allow-rooted cteristics is id
e choices. Tespread. Orehabilitation
a plant with s
g strips and 21 m needs
nts, i.e., NAFen pit, will bfertility. ConF-HDPE covplant characeconomic val The deman
eas of the UT. Thus, th
AF dump anwayang tinik)
d Slopes
F – PAF dumnly differenceones are a
deal.
Tiger grass pne indirect i
n model incosoil erosion
2 m betweena total of 20
Jul
F and unsuibe nutrient-pnsidering alsover, only shacteristics andue. It is versnd for bamb
TSF – PAF dhe total see
nd LTSF
mp and LTSFe is that it wlso required
planting matempact baranorporates a prevention v
n strips requir0,000 runne
ly 2010
6-39
table poor. o the
allow-d the satile oo is
dump edling
F will will be
. In
erials ngay, plant value
res a rs or
July 2
6-40
6.4.3
The into (Casplanat th
Figu
ipil is
2010
0
F
3.3 Open
open pit bua fuel woo
suarina equintations of RRhe same time
ure 6-8 is thes 2 x 4 m or
Figure 6-7. Pa
Pit Buffer Z
ffer zone anod plantationisetifolia). BRMI. Fuel we contribute t
planting dea total of 1,2
Figure 6-8.
Planting desand LTSF em
Zone
d perimeter n using nativoth species
wood plantatioto mitigating
sign for the 250 seedlings
Planting desand perimet
ign for the mbankments
areas of theve ipil-ipil (Lthrive luxuriaons will reduclimate chan
perimeter ars/ha for each
sign for the ter areas
M
UTSF – PAand slopes
e Project faciLuecaena leantly in the a
uce the pressnge.
reas. The sh species.
open pit bu
Mine Clos
AF dump
lities can beeucocephala)area and thesure on natur
pacing of ag
uffer zone
sure Plan
e transformed) and agohoe buffer zoneral forest and
goho and ipil
n
d o e d
-
Mine Clo
6.4.3.4 Sit
These sites in the Projedirect impaccoconut as Bicolano diepili, its suppthe establishlong standinin Brgy. Pag
P
Figure 6-9 isper hectare
osure Pla
tes of Proce
are best devect site. Forct barangaya crop is un
et, the markeply cannot cohment of piling practice ingcolbon.
Photo 6-4. Aa
s the plantingfor each crop
Figure 6-9
n
ess Plant, Po
veloped into r instance, c
ys of Pagcondeniable beet value of coope with the plantations
n the Bicol R
A cropping adopted at so
g design for p is 157 seed
9. Planting dand other
ower Plant,
plantations coconut is tholbon and Because of thopra, and the requiremenis viable. C
Region. Phot
combinatioome Project
the coconutdlings.
design for thindustrial fac
Workshop,
of coconut ahe dominant
Binosawan. he indispensae various usets of the conoconut interto 6-4 shows
on that casites
t and pili. T
e sites of prcilities
and ROM P
and pili whicht agricultural
The social ability of coces of coconunfectionary icropped with such intercr
an be
he total num
ocess plant
Jul
Pad
h grow luxuril crop in the acceptabilitconut milk tout. In the candustry. Heh pili has beropping in a
mber of seed
ly 2010
6-41
antly e two ty of o the se of ence, een a
farm
dlings
July 2
6-42
6.4.3
The abacProjplan
Figu
numrequ
6.4.
Adeof gsubs
6.4.4
The buffegrubreha
6.4.4
Commicrbrowsoil
2010
2
3.5 Sites o
sites of officca. Abaca isect site. In f
ntation at the
ure 6-10 is thmber of coconuirement per
Fig
4 Soil Re
quate good-ood-quality ssoil enriched
4.1 Topso
topsoil recoer zone revbbed immedabilitation.
4.2 Comp
mposting is throorganismswn or black aamendment
of Offices, A
ces, accomms one of the fact, the Bico site is econo
he planting dnut seedlingshectare is 1
gure 6-10. Pa
quirements
-quality soil issoil are the t
d by compost
oil
overed by thegetation priately before
osting
he controlled, mainly bacand with earto perform t
Accommoda
modations, mcrops menti
ol Region is aomically feas
design for cos is 157 seed,250 suckers
Planting desiaccommodat
s
s a major detopsoil recovt of the dome
he Project durogram. Une mine clos
d decomposicteria and furthy smell. The following:
ations, Mess
ess, and lauioned by thea producer osible.
oconut and adlings/ha. Fs.
ign for the stions
eterminant ofvered prior toestic solid wa
uring construnless new aure, there w
ition of organungi, into a The material,:
M
s and Laund
ndry will be e community of abaca. As
abaca. At 8 or abaca at 2
sites of office
f rehabilitatioo the construaste.
uction has loreas in the
will be no to
nic (i.e., carbstable hum
, i.e., compo
Mine Clos
dry
planted with leaders as v
s shown in An
x 8 m spac2 x 4 m spac
es and
on success. uction of faci
ong been usvicinity are
opsoil availa
bon-containinmus material
st, is used p
sure Plan
coconut andviable for thennex 9-10, its
cing, the totacing, the tota
The sourceslities and the
sed up in thecleared and
able for mine
ng) matter bythat is dark
primarily as a
n
d e s
al al
s e
e d e
y k a
Mine Clo
Enh
Incre
Imp
Incretem
Red
Sup
The processany potentia
The feedstoclippings, bdecomposabhomogeneowaste (DSW
Sort
Size
Treacarb
Procturn
Curirempres
Assuming a generate ovin the Philipsuccess, abocomposting works.
6.5 Pla
6.5.1 Nur
The Project’volume of
osure Pla
ance the tex
ease soil fert
rove soil stru
ease the abperature
duce erosion
ppress weed
s is managedal environmen
ck for the cobrush, and tble organicsus materials
W). The meth
ting of the fee
e reduction b
atment to obon-to-nitrog
cessing thated windrows
ing where thaining availa
sent.
DSW generer 300 days ppines, abouout 30 t of coand building
nting Prog
rsery Opera
s present nuseedlings n
n
xture and app
tility
ucture and ae
bility of the s
and
growth and p
d to accelerantal or nuisa
omposting prtree prunings. The avas such as yahods entail (I
ed materials
by hammerm
optimize comen ratio, and
may emplos, aerated sta
he compost able nutrients
ration rate ofa total DSW
ut 40 % of ompost may g up its com
ram
ations
ursery needseeded durin
pearance of
eration
soil to retain
plant disease
ate decomponce problem
rocess includgs; food scrailable com
ard trimmingsIbid.):
s to remove u
ills, shredde
mposting cod pH
oy, in order atic piles, an
is allowed s are metabo
f 0.5 kg/persW of 150 t. B
this or 60 tbe generate
mpost stockp
s to be transfng the full-b
soil
n water and
es.
osition, optimms (USEPA, 1
des yard trimraps; scrap posting mets solely or h
unwanted ma
rs, or rotating
onditions in
of increasind in-vessel s
to stabilize olized by the
son-day, a thBased on chat is composted annually. pile in prepa
ferred to a sitblast rehabil
nutrients an
mize efficienc1994).
mmings such paper prod
thods can heterogeneou
aterials
g drums
terms of m
ng complexitsystems and
in piles or w microorgan
housand Proaracterizationtable. At 50The Project ration for m
te that can aitation work
Jul
nd moderate
cy, and mini
as leaves, gducts; and ohandle relatus domestic
moisture con
ty, passive p
windrows asisms that are
oject workersn studies of D0 % composhould now
mine rehabilit
accommodateks. The cu
ly 2010
6-43
e soil
mize
grass other tively solid
ntent,
piles,
s the e still
s can DSW sting start ation
e the urrent
July 2
6-44
nursnew
Figu
accoprodarea
2010
4
sery, which dw site must be
ure 6-11 is thommodate tduction of sea, buildings, c
Figure 6-1
does not have relatively fl
Photo 6-5.
he proposed the requiredeedlings succompost she
1. Proposed
ve the necessat, accessibl
The RRPPseedlings urevegetation
layout of th number ofh as potting
eds, etc. Tab
d lay-out of n
sary facilitiesle, and with a
P nursery used for thn works.
he new nursf seedlings shed, trans
ble 6-9 is the
new tempora
M
s, will also haa permanent
with assohe buffer z
ery. The reand the st
splant beds, area breakd
ry nursery
Mine Clos
ave to be upt water sourc
orted zone
equired area andard facilhardening aown of the n
sure Plan
pgraded. Thece.
is 0.4 ha tolities for the
area, workingnursery.
n
e
o e g
Table 6
1. Nurs
2. Prep
3. Prep
4. Sow
5. Potti
6. Tend
7. Hard
8. Culli
Mine Clo
Ta
O
P
G
H
S
C
T
The nurserythe duration of light consconcrete angermination surrounded
Table 6-10 isthat seedling
6-10. Nurse
Activities
sery relocation
paration of see
paration of see
wing of seeds
ng
ding/caring of
dening off
ng and gradin
6.5.2 See
For the rehaseedlings, sshown in Tab
osure Pla
able 6-9. Nu
Nursery C
Office and stor
Potting/working
Germination sh
Hardening area
Space for potte
Compositing ar
Total
y to be estabfor rehabilita
struction matnd plywood
bed may bby hollow blo
s the nurserygs are availa
ery implemen
s
n/upgrading
edbeds
edboxes
seedlings
ng
edling Prod
abilitation ofuckers, and ble 6-11.
n
ursery comp
Component
e room
g shed
hed
a
ed seedlings
rea
blished is temation work isterials. For
walling wite bamboo wocks.
implementaable for planti
ntation sched
A S
× ×
uction
f the whole runners will
ponents and a
Are
1
2
mporary becs 3 to 4 yearsinstance, theth nipa shinwith nipa roo
ation scheduling in May o
dule
O N
×
× ×
×
× ×
Project-distu have to be
area
ea (m2)
100
100
100
1,000
2,121
100
cause the des only. Thuse office and ngles roofinofing and th
le. It shows r June.
D J
× ×
× ×
×
×
urbed areas, produced by
Cost (P
100,000
20,000
20,000
20,000
359,800
evelopment as, the structustock room g. The poe compostin
the prior act
F M
× ×
×
×
a total of 9y the RRPP.
Jul
P)
0
0
0
0
0
area is smallres can be mmay be madotting shed ng area mus
tivities neede
A M
× ×
×
952,769 asso. The details
ly 2010
6-45
l and made de of
and st be
ed so
J J
orted s are
July 2
6-46
Tabl
S
Impo
Emb
Open
Sites
Sitesacco
6.5.
Tabl
oper
2010
6
e 6-11. See
ites for RehaSpec
oundment area
UTSF-PAF du
LTSF
Bamboo
bankments and
UTSF-PAF du
LTSF
Tiger gra
Brachiari
n pit buffer zo
Agoho
Ipil-ipil
s of industrial
Coconut
Pili
s of offices anommodations
Coconut
Abaca
3 Nursery
le 6-12 preseration and th
Table 6-
Too
Plastic
Potting
Rubbe
Sprinkl
Spade
edlings for e
bilitation andcies
as
ump
(kawayangtin
d slopes
ump
ass suckers
iarunners
ne
areas
d
y Tools and
ents the toohe estimated
-12. Tools a
ols and Mater
bags (3 x 5 c
g media/garde
r/plastic hose
er
ach species
d Seedhe
ik) 1
10
20
1
1
1
d Materials
ls and matecosts.
and material
rials
m)
n soil
to be produc
lings per ectare
1,667
0,000
0,000
1,250
1,250
157
157
147
1,250
erials needed
ls for nursery
Quantity
128 m3
100 m
10 pcs
3 pcs
M
ced by RRPP
Total AreaRehabilita
(ha)
5.00
16.27
21.27
3.40
26.32
29.72
29.72
4.54
4.54
9.01
9.01
6.86
6.86
d for the nu
y establishme
Estim
Mine Clos
P
a for tion
Tot
ursery establ
ent and oper
mated Costs (
150,000
25,600
600
2,500
2,100
sure Plan
tal Seedlings Needed
35,457
297,200
594,400
5,675
5,675
1,429
1,429
1,077
10,427
lishment and
rations
(P)
n
d
Mine Clo
Sh
Ga
Ra
Pla
Sp
Ga
W
Fe
6.5.4 Car
Five activitie
Watthe to asomwateWat
Shareduneednursand hownursweaany strip
Seesuppenoorgamayby lo
Protseedaffecnea
osure Pla
Tools and M
hovel
arden fork
ake
anting bar
prayer
arden tools
heel barrow
ertilizer (14-14
re, Protectio
es are import
tering - Provinursery. Wat
avoid sun scme species. ering using tering may be
ading - Shadiuce evapotrad for shadisery location
full shade wever, shadinsery must beather, time of
covering mps, netting, et
edling Nutritioply of soil nuugh to booanic matter isy be applied ocal experim
tection againdlings; henccting seedlinr the root co
n
Materials
-14)
on and Con
tant:
ision of adeqtering howev
calding. WateIf possible, sprinkler mue reduced to
ing is relatedanspiration sng differs a. Tiny seedliis needed o
ng is quickly e flexible enof day, etc. A aterial is suitc.
on - The produtrients. If post growth. Ns preferred. before sowi
mentation for
nst Fungal ance, careful ongs is dampiollar, causing
Quan
3 pc
5 pc
3 pc
10 p
1 p
5 se
3 pc
4 ba
nditioning o
quate moistuver, must be ering in the the water ust ensure to 3 waterings
d to wateringstress. It m
according toings of smalover the nur
or graduallyough to accom
nursery beditable, e.g.,
duction of heossible, soil Normally, poIf this is not ing. The ratespecies and
nd Insect Pesobservation ing off. This
g the typical s
ntity E
cs
cs
cs
pcs
pc
ets
cs
ags
of Seedlings
re at all timedone early iafternoon mpH should
hat the soil s per week w
g since loweust be reme
o species, sl seeded spe
rsery shed. y reduced. Tmmodate sp
d normally habanana leav
ealthy seedlinused for pototting mediapossible, fer
e of fertilizer potting med
st - Numerouis needed. is characte
symptom of
Estimated Co
2,100
1,000
1,500
2,500
3,000
2,500
2,400
4,000
s
es is essentian the mornin
may result tobe less thain pots is n
when seedling
r plant and sembered, ho
stages of deecies are usDepending
The system oecies differe
as its own suves, grass, w
ngs dependstted seedlinga with adeqrtilizer in the r application dium concern
us diseases The most rized by havseedlings to
Jul
osts (P)
al for seedlinng until 8 amo damping oan 7. Overnot over soags get bigger
soil temperatowever, thatevelopment, sually very te
on the speof shading in
ences, changupport and alwood or bam
s on an adeqgs must be fquate amoun
form of granmay be dec
ned.
can damageserious dis
ving rotten tioppling over.
ly 2010
6-47
gs in only
off of head aked. r.
tures t the and
ender ecies, n the es in most
mboo
quate fertile nt of nules cided
e tree ease ssue This
July 2
6-48
6.6
6.6.
The disti
Accolast
The prog
2010
8
is causeseedling
The tropavoided
Hardenitreatmencutting oshade, a
Social
1 Project
Public-Privnguishes five
1. Pre-layoand sup
2. Job-seaprior to t
3. Trainingemploymemploym
4. Employecontract
5. Large-scsmall nongove
ording to PPtwo are supp
PPIAF alsogram, three p
Survey and redebaselineunlikely support.assistan
ed by over-gs should be
pics have a lby soil steril
ng of Seedlnts are neceoff of fertilizeand cutting b
Plan
t Personnel
vate Infraste main types
off advice anpport open to
rch assistantermination,
g which canment elsewhment.
ee enterpristual work for
cale, labor inenterprise ernment orga
PIAF, the firsplementary e
o mentionedpreparatory s
of employeeeployment ne for subseqto find jobs q
. Those witnce, and skill
-watering ofremoved rig
lot of insectslization and t
ings – Beforessary. Theser applicatio
back of shoot
ructure Advs of employe
d counselingthe displace
ce which caand help in b
n either be here or train
se which ththe Project.
ntensive pubdevelopmen
anizations, a
st three formelements tha
that in ordesurveys are n
es to underseeds; to iden
quent monitoquickly and wth the most s upgrading
f seedlings. ght away.
s that can dathe use of ins
re the seedlse are graduon, gradual ets.
visory Faciee redeploym
g which may ed worker, tra
an include plabuilding skills
retraining ning in sma
he company
blic works pront projects nd communi
m the core ofat can be app
er to come needed, nam
stand their sntify the mosoring and evwill benefit fr
skills and mor retraining
M
Once this
amage younsecticides.
ings are plaual reductionexposure to
lity (PPIAFment support.
cover adviceauma, financ
acement hels and confide
and skill uall business
y helps em
ograms, locafunded
ity self-help g
f most redeppropriate in s
up with a mmely:
kills, capabist vulnerable valuation. Trom job-creatmobility can
g.
Mine Clos
s occurs, th
g seedlings.
anted in the of irrigationsunlight by
) of the W These are:
e on separatce, and life co
p, time off foence to find a
upgrading foor livelihoo
mployees se
al communityby local groups.
ployment proome circums
meaningful r
lities, post-Pgroups; andhose at hightion activitiesbenefit from
sure Plan
he damaged
This can be
field, certainn or watering
reduction o
World Bank
tion, servicesounseling.
or job searcha new job.
or new paidods for self
et up to do
y activities ogovernment
ograms. Thestances.
redeploymen
Project plansd to provide ahest risk ares and incomem job-search
n
d
e
n g, of
k
s
h
d f-
o
r t,
e
nt
s, a e e h
Mine Clo
Survand and
Survto de
A little morEmployee R
Theconsthe rede
Thecounmaroppoon t
Theassibase
Theprio
Theevalindic
RRMI and RRetrenchme
6.6.2 Imp
As emphasineeded in or
Sustainabilitadopted as help the hresponsible,implementinconsistent w
osure Pla
vey of the lademand. Tchanges an
vey of redepeliver.
re than threRedeploymen
advice on csequential teinduction. T
eployment su
key elemennseling, job rket survey ortunities, anhe survey re
counseling stance will ed on the res
redeploymer to mine clo
redeploymluation, andcators.
RRPI are finent Policies.
pact Commu
ized by the rder to avoid
ty is recognizthe central o
host commu self-reliant,
ng, and manwith people e
n
abor market,The survey isd to improve
ployment serv
ee years to nt Support Pr
closure of Prermination ofThe employeupport.
ts of the Prosearch assis
will be cond the featur
esults, additio
will target be open to sults of the c
ent support psure beginni
ent support improveme
nalizing the R
unities
World Bank major comm
zed as an imobjective for unities achie, resource-baging commmpowermen
both formas not one-tim
e the redeplo
vice provide
mine closurogram can b
roject activityf personnel ee will also
oject’s redeplstance, and onducted tores of the neonal element
all employeall workers.
counseling.
program will ing in Octobe
t program ent processe
Retirement F
k, sustainabmunity proble
mperative by tthe SDMP.
eve sustainabased commmunity develont.
l and informme but doneoyment activit
rs, types of
ure, the maibe defined as
y, e.g., consmust be relabe briefed o
oyment supptraining. An
o define theeded redepts can be pro
es and thei. The traini
be administeer 2011.
will be comes based o
Fund Benefit
ility throughoems during m
the MGB. In As shown iability by t
munities that opment proj
al, includingperiodically
ties.
service offer
n features s follows:
truction, or tayed to the on the major
port are pre-n employee she employeloyment sup
ovided.
r spouses. ing will be g
ered by the P
mplemented on measurab
t Plan and R
out the whomine closure.
n fact, sustain Figure 6-1
ransforming are capable
ects. This t
Jul
g areas of suy to detect tr
red, and cap
of a conce
the mine andemployee d
r elements o
-layoff advicesurvey and
ee needs, pport. Depen
The job segiven to wo
Project two y
by monitoble perform
Redundancy
ole mine cyc.
nability has 2, the SDMP
the latter e of develotransformatio
ly 2010
6-49
upply rends
pacity
ptual
d the uring
of the
e and labor labor nding
earch rkers
years
oring, ance
y and
cle is
been P will
into ping, on is
July 2
6-50
Figu
Basmajo
All fospurincre
As mimpasustwill h
The build
2010
0
ure 6-12. Th
ed on the eor problems
Lack of
Lack of
Lack of
Lack of vulnerab
four problemr demand aease in incom
mentioned, tact barangatainability is have earned
United Kingding blocks o
Human health thachieve
Social arelations
Natural services
he central ob
nvironmentaof the impac
income and
basic social
basic infrast
f technical able groups.
s are attribund have mume.
the SDMP fys can achthat by the t
d the assets,
gdom Departof a sustaina
assets or cahat togethertheir liveliho
assets are tships upon w
assets are s useful for liv
bjective of MG
al impact assct barangays
income oppo
services
ructures and
and financial
table to the ultiplier effec
for the Projeieve sustaintime the Procapital, or bu
ment for Inteble livelihood
apital represer enable peoood objective
the social rewhich people
the natural velihoods are
GB’s SDMP
sessment (Eare the follo
ortunities
d
l support to
lack of econcts such as
ect has beenability beyooject is closeuilding block
ernal Develod:
ent the skills,ople to pursues.
esources sudraw in purs
resource stoe derived.
M
EIA) done forowing:
o the farmer
nomic activitieincrease in
n required bnd mining.
ed, the host ks of a sustai
pment (UKD
, knowledge,ue different
ch as netwsuit of their li
ocks from w
Mine Clos
r the RRPP
rs, fishermen
es in the areconsumptio
by the MGBOne view
and impact nable liveliho
DFID, 1999) i
ability to lablivelihood st
orks, organivelihood obj
which resourc
sure Plan
in 2000, the
n, and othe
ea that wouldon due to an
B so that theof achievingcommunitiesood.
identified five
bor and goodtrategies and
izations, andectives.
ce flows and
n
e
r
d n
e g s
e
d d
d
d
Table
Asset
Person
Human
Social
Mine Clo
PhysuppenviProdprod
Finaregu
Murray and the Canadia– which comwere made p
Table 6-13 lassets.
The SDMP FMRDP framindicators of
6-13. Liveli
t or Capital
nal
n
osure Pla
sical assets port livelihoironment thaducer goodsductively.
ancial assetsular money in
Ferguson (2an setting. Tmprised motivpart of physi
lists UKDFID
will have its meworks, a f the six liveli
ihood assets
Motivatio
Self-este
Self-conf
Self-perc
Emotiona
Assertive
Spiritualit
Skills (bo
Knowledg
Ability
Employa
Good hea
Leadersh
Cooperat
Networks
Family su
Friendsh
Relations
n
comprise thoods. Infraat help peopls are the too
s are the finanflows, that p
2001) adapteThis meant thvation, self-ecal assets.
D’s five ass
own annualmonitoring phood assets
s and key ind
Exam
on
em
fidence
ception
al well-being
eness
ty
oth technical a
ge
bility and earn
alth
hip
tion
s and intercon
upport
ips
ships of trust a
e basic infraastructure ce meet their
ols and equi
ancial resourpeople use to
ed UKDFID’he introductioesteem, asse
sets together
l monitoring program cans. Table 6-13
dicators
ples
and interperso
ning power
nnectedness
and exchange
astructure anconsists of r basic needspment that
rces, in the fo achieve the
’s Sustainabon of a new ertiveness, e
r with Murra
program. Wn be tailored
lists these in
nal)
es
nd producer gchanges t
s and to be people use
forms of avaeir livelihood
le Livelihoodasset type –
etc. Moreove
ay and Ferg
Within the FMto focus on
ndicators.
Ke
Values form
Survey onhappiness
Share of ve
Gross and
Adult literac
Mean years
Life expect
Health facil
Under 5 ye
New filariapopulation
Technical s
Leadership
Enterprise
Employmen
Industries and non-m
Effective co
Participatioand politics
Crime rate
Jul
goods needeto the phymore producto function m
ilable stocks objectives.
ds Framewo– personal aser, natural as
guson’s pers
MRDP or SDn key quantif
ey Indicators
mation progra
n life satisfa
ery/fairly happ
net enrolmen
cy
s of schooling
tancy
lities and serv
ears old morta
asis/TB cases
skills
p training
development
nt status
(classified inining-related)
ommunity orga
on levels in s
ly 2010
6-51
ed to ysical ctive. more
s and
ork to ssets ssets
sonal
DMP-fiable
m
action and
py people
t ratios
g
vices
lity rate
s per 1,000
skills
nto mining-
anizations
community
July 2
6-52
Asset or C
Natural
Physical
Financial
Notes: The exexam
The optiminco
OwifromMunComimpr
The
2010
2
Capital
xamples of persmples of natural
movement mal areas
orporated into
ng to the bum the excisenicipal, and mprehensive rovement of
major eleme
Partnership a
Political partic
Land
Forests
Wild resource
Water
Air quality
Erosion prote
Waste assimi
Storm protect
Biodiversity
Child and elde
Secure shelte
Clean afforda
Information
Basic consumstore and othe
Affordable tra
Tools and equ
Income from and self-empl
Available fina
Regular inflowtransfers, fam
Credit rating
Access to cre
sonal, human, sassets come fro
of these indmay then
o the SDMP
dget limitatioe and real pProvincial GLand Use Pliving standa
ents of the S
Examples
nd collaborati
cipation
es
ction
lation
tion
er care
er
able energy
mer needs (eer services)
ansportation
uipment
productive acloyment)
nces and sav
ws of money mily, gifts, in-ki
edits
social, physical, om UKDFID.
icators throube identifiefor the succe
ons of the SDproperty tax
GovernmentsPlans of the mards of the ho
ocial Plan fo
on
e.g., local gr
ctivity (employ
ings
(from governnd)
and financial a
ugh time caned together eeding perio
DMP, the cox contributions. A compmunicipality ost commun
or the FMRD
M
Qas
Ac
Pr
En
rocery
De
Ac
Sa
Sam
Prfa
Fa
Ri
Irr
La
yment
nment
Pe
Po
Fi
ssets are taken
n be measurwith corre
d.
orrective projns of the Plete couplingand provincities.
P are as follo
Mine Clos
Key In
uantity and ssets
ccess to resou
roductivity of r
nvironmental q
ecent and stur
ccess to electr
afe water sour
anitary toilets anagement
rimary and scilities, and te
arm-to-market
ice dryers
rigation facilitie
ake flood man
er capita incom
overty inciden
nancial servic
from Murray an
red. Problemctive projec
ects may alsProject to thg of the SDe is key to t
ows:
sure Plan
dicators
quality of
urces
resources
quality
rdy habitation
ricity
rces and distr
and domestic
secondary seachers
t roads
es
nagement
me
nce
ce organization
nd Ferguson, 2
matic or noncts that are
so be fundedhe BarangayDMP with thethe sustained
n
natural
ibution
c waste
chools,
ns
001. The
-e
d y, e d
Mine Clo
Within the S
Annsocideve
Fungove
Within the F
MeeFMR
Revafte
Devloca
Discsoci
Revcomasse
Devgove
Finaplan
6.7 Mai
6.7.1 Car
Successful implemented
Regof coSpo
Repsurv
Fertbe a
osure Pla
SDMP framew
ual review oo-economic elopment of
ding of the ernments
MRDP frame
etings with thRDP, especia
view of the ker five years o
velopment of al governmen
cussion of thal assets aft
view of themmunities andets two year
velopment of ernments, an
al review of knt closure.
intenance a
re and Main
rehabilitationd until the pla
gular weedingompeting ve
ot weeding on
planting –Thivival must be
tilizer applicaapplied using
n
work:
f the SDMP’indicators, idcorrective pr
corrective
ework:
he impact coally its social
ey quantifiabof Project ope
corrective pnts in the nex
he terms aner five years
e key quand terms and rs before pla
corrective pnd FMRDP
key quantifia
and Monito
tenance Pla
n work can antation reac
g – As muchgetation regun a 0.5 m rad
is is normale undertaken
ation – One mg complete fe
’s accomplisdentification rojects
projects, sin
ommunities l component
ble socio-ecoeration
projects for fuxt five years
nd conditionss of Project o
ntifiable socconditions ont closure
rojects for fu
ble socio-ec
oring Plan
an
be achievedches its fruiti
h as possibleularly at leasdius from the
ly done 2 t to determine
month after pfertilizer at th
hments, meaof problema
ngly or joint
during Proje
onomic indica
unding singly
s of transfeoperation
cio-economicof transfer to
unding singly
conomic indic
d if the follong or mature
e, the plantest every 3 moe base of see
o 3 times ae the numbe
planting, bashe rate of 25
asurement ofatic or non-op
ly, by the S
ect construct
ators of the h
y or jointly b
r to the com
c indicators the commun
y or jointly by
cators of hos
owing activitie stage
ed seedlings onths during edling is acce
after plantinger of spots for
al fertilizer a g/plant for t
Jul
f key quantifptimal areas
SDMP and
tion to clarify
host commun
by the SDMP
mmunities o
of the imnities of the s
y the SDMP,
st communiti
ies are regu
must be cleg the first 3 yeptable.
g. Monitorinr replanting.
application shthe first year
ly 2010
6-53
fiable , and
local
y the
nities
P and
f the
mpact social
local
es at
ularly
eared ears.
ng of
hould r and
July 2
6-54
Aftethe orga
The in tework
Tab
Sloandpit,envacc
LevPAroaand
CloUT
2010
4
increasetwice a y
Monitoriincidenc
Pruning infected
Mulchingat the badecomp
Watering
r RRMI/RRPpeople’s or
anization will
Plantatio
Harvesti
Marketin
decommisserms of regrks are listed
ble 6-14. FM
Project FaCompo
opes along thed embankmen, UTSF – PAFvironmental cess roads
vel surfaces oAF dump, Lads, industriald accommoda
osure drainagTSF – PAF
ed to 50 g/plyear, prefera
ng of pest ace of insect p
– To be dobranches.
g – After wease of the se
posed, will se
g – In case o
PI establisherganizations have memb
on Maintena
ing and Proc
ng and Finan
ioned Projecading, work in Table 6-14
MRDP maint
acility or onent
e walls, bermsnts of the opeF dump, LTSF
ponds, an
of the UTSF LTSF, accesl sites, officesations
ge channels odump, LTSF
ant for the sably July and
and diseasespest and dise
one on the th
eeding, organeedlings. Therve as comp
of drought, w
ed the plantaof the bara
bers assigned
nce and Prot
cessing and
nce.
ct facilities anrepairs, and
4.
tenance work
Mai
s, en F, nd
Repair ofre-armori
Removal vegetatio
Repair obulging, e
– ss s,
Regrading
Re-armorgravel su
Repair obulging, e
Removal vegetatio
Establishchannel
of F,
Repair ofchannels
second and td October.
s – Regularease infestat
hird year, th
nic materialshis will consepost for the c
watering mus
ations, their angay wherd to the follow
tection
nd structuresd re-establish
ks
ntenance Wo
f surface protng
of unn
of cracks, suberosion, gullies
g
ring or replacrfacing materi
of cracks, suberosion, gullies
of unn
ment of
f broken andand trash trap
M
third year. F
r patrol workion.
is involves t
s such as brerve soil moicrop.
t be done to
managemenre the plantwing function
s will also reqhment of dra
orks
tection or As
desirable As
bsidence, s
As
As
cement of ial
As
bsidence, s
As
desirable As
drainage As
cracked ps
As
Mine Clos
Fertilization m
k is needed
the removal
ushed weedsture. The w
avoid high m
nt can be tuation is locns:
quire mainteainage chan
Freque
s required.
s required.
s required.
s required.
s required.
s required.
s required.
s required.
s required.
sure Plan
must be done
to check the
of dried and
ds are placedweeds, when
mortality.
urned over tocated. Each
enance worksnels. These
ency
n
e
e
d
d n
o h
s e
Mine Clo
ProjeCo
environmenroads, induand accomm
6.7.2 Mon
Table 6-15 component.
Table 6-15.
Project FaCompo
Plantations
Industrial
osure Pla
ect Facility or omponent
tal ponds, astrial sites, o
modations
nitoring Pla
summarizes
Mine closu
acility or onent
areas,
n
access offices,
Remvege
Remand r
Remdebritrash
Remdebrithe d
Re-achan
Clea
an
the mine
ure monitorin
Paramet
LFA Soil trantransects persite) –brokenness, type and sdeposited msoil roughness, nature, slaksoil surface soil fertility
LFA Vetransect(collowith soil tranFloral composition, structure, andthe landscapcover, litter growth development
Habitat compHabitat desfaunal including ants
Surface stabil
Maintenance
moval of etation
moval of any sreconstruction
moval of seis in the c
h traps
moval of seis that can mi
drainage
armoring and nnel sinuosity
ring of drainag
closure mo
ng plan
ters
nsect (2 r facility
Crust erosion
severity, materials,
surface surface
ke test, texture,
VisLFpaso
LaN, Mn
egetation cated nsect) – species
d role in pe; tree
cover; and
of trees
Visidestrcha
Megrolitte
plexity – scription,
species s
Visspeanchaha
lity Vis
e Works
undesirable
settled sectionn
ediment andchannels and
ediment andgrate to block
improving the
ge channels
nitoring plan
MonitoringApproach
sual and feelA soil trarameters eil fertility
boratory analyP, K, Ca, M
n, Zn, Cu, Fe,
sual– Floral spentification ructure aracterization
easurement –owth, canopyer covers
sual– Fecies identifid straracterizationbitat descriptio
sual – Settle
Fre
e As required
As required
As required
k
As required
e As required
As required
n required f
g h
– all ansect except
yses - Mg, S, Mo
Annu
pecies and
– Tree y, and
Faunal ication ucture , and on
ement, Wee
Jul
requency
d.
d.
d.
d.
d.
d.
for each Pr
Frequency
ual
ekly during
ly 2010
6-55
roject
the
July 2
6-56
P
accoffi
UTLTSenv
Op
2010
6
Project FacilitComponen
commodationsices, and road
TSF – PAF SF, vironmental po
pen pit
ty or nt
s, ds
dump, and
onds
Embstabi
Dam
Seep
Tailinstabi
Closconddrainstabi
PAF
Slop
Parameters
bankment sloility
m crest stability
page
ngs surface aility
ure ouduits anage channility
wall covers
e stability
MA
pondingor rill signs ofailure, areas
opes Visualcracks,gully efans, oinstabilbare unwant
MeasurPiezom
y Visualpondingor rill signs ofailure, and vegetat
Visualdiscoloseepagemban
Measurrates
area Visualpondingor rill signs ofailure, areas
utlet and nels
Visualcracks,settlemsigns ofailure
Visualcracks,gully efans, oinstabilbare unwant
M
Monitoring Approach
g, gully, sheeerosion, othe
of instability oand bar
– Tensio settlemen
erosion, alluviother signs ity or failur
areas, anted vegetation
rementmeters
– Settlemeng, gully, sheeerosion, othe
of instability obare area
unwantetion
– Wet spotration, o
ge througkment
rement – Flo
– Settlemeng, gully, sheeerosion, othe
of instability oand bar
– Block scou
ment, and otheof instability o
– Tensio settlemen
erosion, alluviother signs ity or failur
areas, anted vegetation
Mine Clos
Freq
et, er or re
wet mOctober or right arain anduring period fotwo years
Monthly wet monafter a and quathe drierthe next t
on nt, al of e, nd n
-
Weekly wet monafter a and monthe drierthe first tw
Monthly wet monafter a and quathe drierthe next t
nt, et, er or s,
ed
s, or gh
ow
nt, et, er or re
s, ur, er or
Weekly wet monafter a monthly months uyear.
on nt, al of e, nd n
Weekly wet monafter a and monthe drierthe first tw
Monthly
sure Plan
quency
months of to February
after a heavy nd monthly
the drier for the first s.
during the nths or right
heavy rain rterly during r period for three years.
during the nths or right
heavy rain nthly during r period for wo years.
during the nths or right
heavy rain rterly during r period for three years.
during the nths or right
heavy rain; during drier
up to the fifth
during the nths or right
heavy rain nthly during r period for wo years.
during the
n
Mine Clo
Project FaCompo
Adjacent downstream
Figure 6-13 closure.
osure Pla
acility or onent
and m areas
locates the
n
Paramet
Crest and stability
Drainage cstability
Dust
Surface water
Aquatic biolog
e air, water,
ters
berm Vispoor sigfaianveg
channels Viscraset
Vispaan
Mededuga
r quality Viswa
In-anAsMn
gy LaPlains
Eleideweme- F
and aquat
MonitoringApproach
sual – Settlending, gully, rill erosion,
gns of instabilure, bare d unwgetation
sual – Backs, ttlement
sual – Susprticulates durid windy days
easurement –position ratesst depouges
sual – turbiditater staining
-situ and laboalyses – pH,
s, Cd, Cu, Fen, Pb, Zn, BOD
boratory analyankton, besects
ectrofishing, entification, eighing, and etal tissue anFishes
ic biology s
g h
ement, sheet, other
ility or areas,
wanted
wet after and the the n
Blocks, scour,
Weewet after montmontyear
ended ng dry
– dust s from osition
Wee
Quarmeasfirst Annuthree
ty and
oratory TSS,
e, Hg, D5
Weein-sit
For analyfor thIf resmuchcompstandfor years
yses – enthos,
heavy alyses
Annu
ampling sta
Jul
Frequency
months or rr a heavy
quarterly dudrier period
next three yea
ekly during months or r
r a heavy rthly during dths up to the
r.
ekly for visual.
rterly surement for
two yeually for the ne years.
ekly for visual tu analyses.
the laborayses, quarthe first two yesults do not vh and pliant with DEdards, annuthe next th
rs.
ual
ations after
ly 2010
6-57
right rain ring for
ars.
the right rain; drier fifth
for the
ars. next
and
tory terly ars. vary are
ENR ually hree
mine
Table 7-1.
Projec
Open Pit
UTSF (W
LTSF
Final Min
7 SCH
7.1 Sch
Table 7-1 prefor the RapuMaintenance
. Schedule
ct Facility
Waste Dump)
ne Rehabi
HEDULE O
hedule of D
esents the su-Rapu Polyme and enviro
of decommis
Com
Pit wall, perimeteand adit
) Surface, embankmslope
Surface, embankmslope
litation &
OF OPERAT
Decommiss
chedule of thmetallic Projenmental mon
ssioning and
mponents
buffer zoner fencingplug
ment, and
ment, and
& Decomm
TIONS AND
sioning and
he various dect. The bulnitoring are t
d rehabilitatio
Pa
e, g,
Projected
PAF wall
Fix drain
Plug adit
Perimete
Revegeta
Nurse
Planta
Protec
Environm
d Projected
Rehabilit
Install HD
Revegeta
Nurse
Planta
Protec
Environm
d Projected
Treat tail
Dry impo
Rehabilit
Revegeta
missioning
D COSTS
d Rehabilit
decommissiok of the workto follow until
on works
arameter/Wo
d end of ope
l cover treatm
age
t
er fence
ation
ery operation
ation establis
ction and ma
mental monito
d end of ope
tation (earthw
DPE
ation
ery operation
ation establis
ction and ma
mental monito
d end of ope
lings water
oundment are
tation (earthw
ation
g Plan
ation
ning and rehks will be coml 2023.
orks
ration
ment
shment
aintenance
oring
ration
works)
shment
aintenance
oring
ration
ea
works)
Jul
habilitation wmpleted by 2
Area/Volu
2
11.2 ha –
130 m
2013
2,727
4.5
2
2
2014
2014
2
150,000
5 ha – 2
5
2
2
2014
2014
2
325,400
16.27 ha –
325,400 2
Vario
7-1
ly 2010
works 2014.
ume/Timing
2013
2013 - 2014
m3 – 2013
3 - 2014
m - 2013
54 ha
2013
2013
4 – 2016
4 - 2023
2013
0 m3 – 2013
2013 - 2014
5 ha
2013
2014
4 - 2016
4 - 2023
2013
0 m3 - 2013
– 2013 – 201
m3 – 2014 -2015
us areas
g
4
4
Ia
R
E
July 2
7-2
Project Fa
ndustrial anareas
Roads
Environmenta
7.2
7.2.
As dcom
2010
acility
nd other Rbpco
Vr
al areas S
Cost of
1 Decom
discussed in mponents:
Remova
Compon
ROM pad, gobase metapower concentrate offices, and q
Various mineroads
SP1 SP2,and
f Decommi
missioning
Section 6.3,
al from the si
nents
E
old plant, al plant,
plant, area,
quarters
P
R
R
R
E
e access R
R
E
d PP R
E
issioning a
g
mine decom
te of materia
Schedul
Param
Nursery o
Plantation
Protection
Environment
Projected en
Remove faci
Remove foun
Revegetation
Nursery o
Plantation
Protection
Environment
Rip soil
Revegetation
Nursery o
Plantation
Protection
Environment
Revegetation
Nursery o
Plantation
Protection
Environment
and Rehabi
mmissioning w
als, equipme
e of Ope
meter/Works
peration
n establishme
n and mainte
tal monitoring
d of operatio
lities/equipm
ndations
n
peration
n establishme
n and mainte
tal monitoring
n
peration
n establishme
n and mainte
tal monitoring
n
peration
n establishme
n and mainte
tal monitoring
ilitation
works can b
nt or structur
rations a
s A
ent
nance
g
on
ment
ent
nance
g
ent
nance
g
ent
nance
g
e broken dow
res
and Costs
Area/Volume
2013
2016
2014 – 2
2014 - 20
2013
2013
2013
Various a
2013
2014
2015 - 20
2014 - 20
2014
6.86 h
2013
2014
2015 – 2
2014 - 20
0.48 h
2013
2014
2015 - 20
2014 - 20
wn into three
s
e/Timing
016
023
reas
017
023
a
017
023
a
017
023
e
Schedule
Treastruc
Conequ
7.2.1.1 Di
The various mechanical Project. Thdismantled esales values
Table 7-2 prestimates us
Table 7-2.
1 - ROM pat pier
a. Haul o
b. Remo
c. Remo
d. Remo
e. Remo
f. Break
g. Haul o
Sub-tot
2 - Wareho
a. Haul o
b. Haul o
c. Break
d. Haul o
Sub-tot
3 - Office,
a. Remo
b. Remo
e of Oper
atment at sitectures and
ntainment atipment, or st
smantling a
items that nequipment,
he cost of thequipment os are not con
resents the esed the rates
Cost of dism
ad, gold pla
out stockpile
ove sidings, h
ove equipme
ove wirings a
ove roof and
foundation/h
out concrete
al
ouse and lay
out unneces
out scraps (m
k foundations
out concrete
al
quarters, se
ove furnitures
ove structure
rations a
e of any exis
t site of atructures.
and Remova
need to be dsteel structu
heir dismantor the steel asidered in th
estimated cos of RRMI’s m
mantling the f
Projec
ant, base m
es, chemicals
haul to pier a
nt, haul to pi
and pipings, h
posts, haul t
hardstands
/contaminate
ydown areas
sary chemica
metal, HDPE
s/hardstands
/contaminate
ecurity fence
s/fixtures (re
es (retain a p
nd Costs
sting or pote
ny existing
al of Equipm
dismantled anures, tanks, tling and reand copper she FMRDP.
ost of dismamain contrac
facilities
ct Facility
metal plant, c
s, and indust
area
ier area
haul to pier a
to pier area
ed soil
s except at t
als
E, rubber, etc
s (warehouse
ed soil*
e, and other
tain some fo
ortion for the
s
ntially hazard
or potentia
ment and Str
nd removed piping, and
moval can bscraps. For
antling the vactor, GALEO
concentrate
trial wastes
area
the wharf ar
c.)
e area only)*
r structures
or the FMRDP
e FMRDP tea
dous materia
ally hazardo
ructures
from the sited electrical ebe offset byr conservatis
arious Projec.
e storage are
rea
P team)
am)
Jul
als, equipme
ous substan
e are the vaequipment oy the sale osm purposes
ct facilities.
Total
rea
187
84
1,629
62
62
837
854
3,718
66
199
265
132
207
ly 2010
7-3
ent or
nces,
rious f the f the
s, the
The
(P)
7,720
4,920
9,720
2,200
2,200
7,208
4,972
8,940
6,460
9,380
0
0
5,840
2,920
7,840
July 2
7-4
4 -
5 -
Gra
* - pa
7.2.1
Haza
Tabl
is plabruSinc
Haz
For usedoil, tpick40,0
The alkasignm3 omaxP14
2010
c. Remove p
Sub-total
Concentrat
a. Remove e
b. Remove p
c. Remove e
d. Haul out c
e. Break fou
Sub-total
- Power Plan
a. Remove e
b. Break and
and Total
art of processing
1.2 Treatm
ardous Mater
le 6-5 gives tlanned, all stupt, the maxce the materi
zardous Was
the hazardod oil and battthe Project’s
k-up per drum000.
other hazaralis, etc. can nificant wouldof process w
ximum volum/m3, the tota
posts/pedest
te loading/co
equipment
pipings/steel
electricals
concrete/con
undation/hard
nt
equipment
d remove fou
g plant
ment
rials On Stoc
the stocking tocks will be
ximum amouials are unus
stes
us wastes foteries, their rmaximum m
m of used oil
rdous wastebe treated in
d be the procwater per d
me of procesl treatment c
Project Fa
tals
onveying fa
frames
ntaminated so
dstands and
undation and
k
levels of hae depleted onunts of matesed, they can
or which exteretrieval by th
monthly geneis about P 1
es listed in T
n the FDU orcess water. ay will be gss water forcost for 5,000
Schedul
acility
acility
oils
haul out bro
d scarify area
azardous matn the day of erials on ston be repurcha
ernal treatmehe DENR-aceration rate is1,000. Thus
Table 6-6 sucr in the laborAt full capac
generated. r treatment. 0 m3 of proce
e of Ope
ken concrete
a*
terials for theclosure. Wck correspoased by the
ent or containccredited treas about 40 d, the total tre
ch as procesratory. In tecity of the prThis value At an esti
ess water is
rations a
e
e Project. When closure nd to the stsupplier or re
nment is requater is monthrums. The g
eatment cost
ss water witrms of quantrocess plant,can be ado
mated treatmP 70,000.
and Costs
Total (P)
180,200
520,960
520,960
694,400
211,980
88,920
243,459
230,208
1,468,967
3,384
0
5,978,091
When closureis sudden o
tocking levelecycler.
uired such ashly. For usedgoing rate fot is roughly P
th CN, acidstity, the mos, about 5,000opted as thement cost o
s
0
0
0
0
0
0
9
8
7
4
0
1
e r l.
s d r
P
s, st 0 e
of
Table 7-
Open p
1. PAF w
a. Pre
b. Ins
UTSF
PAF du
1. Coars
a. Loa
b. Spr
c. Com
2. Fine-g
a. Loa
b. Spr
c. Com
3. Instal
Schedule
The decommtanks. A slu
Finally, the FDU prior to4.66 million.
Adding up that P 4.87 mi
7.2.1.3 Co
Containmencontact oxygof heavy me
Containmenof PAF wall through a N(Section 5.2.
Table 7-3 pre
-3. Cost of d
it
wall cover
epare area
tall cover
mp near-leve
se-grained NA
ad and haul N
read of cappin
mpaction
grained clay m
ad and haul N
read of cappin
mpaction
l 1 mm HDPE
e of Oper
missioning wudge remova
estimated tao discharge t
he cost estimllion.
ontainment
nt works are gen or wateretals are prev
nt or encapsucovers (Sect
NAF-HDPE c2) and LTSF
esents the de
decommissio
Activity
el surface
AF material, 1m
AF capping m
ng materials
material, 1m th
AF capping m
ng materials
E
rations a
will also requl budget of P
ailings liquid o the open p
mates, the to
meant to covr. In effect, tvented.
ulation workstion 5.1.3) ancomposite caF (Section 5.3
ecommission
oning
y
m thick
materials
hick
materials
nd Costs
uire the remP 100,000 is
at mine clospit. At a unit
otal treatmen
ver or encapthe materials
s are programnd adit plug (ap are also 3.2).
ning costs fo
s
oval of sludearmarked.
sure of 325,4cost of P 14
nt cost of ha
psulate PAF s become in
mmed at the(Section 5.1.5
programmed
r the Project
Timing of Works
2013
2013
2013
2013
2013
2013
2013
2013
2013
ge from the
400 m3 will b4, the total tre
zardous was
materials soert and AMD
e open pit wit5). PAF encd at the UTS
.
Vol m3
Arh
11
5.
50,000
50,000
5.
5.
50,000
50,000
5.
5.
Jul
STP and s
be treated aeatment cost
stes is estim
o that they doD and dissol
th the installcapsulation wSF – PAF d
rea ha
Unit Cost (P)
.20 229
.00
56
16
.00 4
.00
56
16
.00 4
.00 131.43
ly 2010
7-5
septic
at the t is P
mated
o not ution
ation works dump
Total Cost (P)
25,656,960
2,776,824
799,167
217,500
2,776,824
799,167
217,500
6,571,500
July 2
7-6
4. Coarse-gr
a. Load an
b. Spread
c. Compac
LTSF
Tailings sur
1. Treatment
2. Dry TSF s
3. Apply bou
a. Load an
b. Spread
4. Coarse-gr
a. Load an
b. Spread
c. Compac
5. Fine-grain
a. Load an
b. Spread
c. Compac
6. Install 1mm
7. Coarse-gr
a. Load an
b. Spread
c. Compac
PAF emban
1. Coarse-gr
a. Load an
b. Spread
c. Compac
2. Fine-grain
a. Load an
2010
rained NAF m
nd haul NAF c
of capping ma
ction
rface
t of tailings wa
surface
ulders for stabi
nd haul of PAF
of boulders
rained NAF m
nd haul NAF c
of capping ma
ction
ned clay mater
nd haul NAF c
of capping ma
ction
m HDPE
rained NAF m
nd haul NAF c
of capping ma
ction
kment
rained NAF m
nd haul NAF c
of capping ma
ction
ned clay mater
nd haul NAF c
Activity
aterial, 0.5 m
capping mater
aterials
ater before dis
ilization
F boulders for
aterial, 1m thi
capping mater
aterials
rial, 1m thick
capping mater
aterials
aterial, 0.5 m
capping mater
aterials
aterial, 1m thi
capping mater
aterials
rial, 1m thick
capping mater
thick
ials
scharge
tailings stabil
ck
ials
ials
thick
ials
ck
ials
ials
Schedul
TimW
201
ization
e of Ope
ming of Works
Vm
2013 25
2013 25
2013
2013 325
3 – 2014
2015 325
2015 325
2015 162
2015 162
2015
2015 162
2015 162
2015
2015
2015 81
2015 81
2015
2015 8,
2015 8,
2015
2015 8,
rations a
Vol m3
Area ha
5.00
,000
,000
5.00
16.27
5,400
0
5,400
5,400
2,700
2,700
16.27
2,700
2,700
16.27
16.27
,350
,350
16.27
0.89
900
900
0.89
900
and Costs
Unit Cost (P)
Tot
56 1,
16
4
14 4,
0
56 18,
16 4,
56 9,
16 2,
4
56 9,
16 2,
4
131.43 21,
56 4,
16 1,
4
56
16
4
56
s
tal Cost (P)
,388,412
399,583
217,500
,659,728
0
,071,572
,861,476
,035,786
,600,488
707,745
,035,786
,600,488
707,745
,383,661
,517,893
,300,244
707,745
494,275
142,252
38,715
494,275
b. Spr
c. Com
3. Instal
4. Coars
a. Loa
b. Spr
c. Com
Industr
1. Remo
2.Remo
3. Treat
Total
Schedule
read of cappin
mpaction
l 1mm HDPE
se-grained NA
ad and haul N
read of cappin
mpaction
ial and other
ove facilities/s
ove of foundati
hazardous w
7.2.2 Reh
Mine rehabfollowing:
Eart
Fixinarm
Revplan
7.2.2.1 Gr
Table 7-4 is component.
e of Oper
Activity
ng materials
AF material, 0.
AF capping m
ng materials
areas
tructures/equi
ions and hards
astes and rem
habilitation
ilitation wor
th and rock g
ng of drainagoring, and si
vegetation wontation maint
rading and D
the cost sch
rations a
y
5 m thick
materials
ipment
stands or post
move sludge
rks follow a
grading work
ge channelsnuosity and
orks which inenance, and
Drainage Wo
hedule of the
nd Costs
ts/pedestals
after mine d
ks to achieve
, inlets, and
nclude nursed protection.
orks
e grading an
s
Timing of Works
2015
2015
2015
2015
2015
2015
2013
2013
2013
decommissio
the desired
outlets in te
ery operation
nd drainage w
Vol m3
Arh
8,900
0.
0.
4,450
4,450
0.
ning. They
slopes and s
erms of gradi
ns, soil ameli
works for ea
Jul
rea ha
Unit Cost (P)
16
.89 4
.89 131.43
56
16
.89 4
y consist of
slope lengths
ient, side slo
ioration, plan
ach major Pr
ly 2010
7-7
Total Cost (P)
142,252
38,715
1,169,727
247,137
71,126
38,715
3,872,119
2,105,973
210,000
131,076,575
f the
s
opes,
nting,
roject
Ta
Op
1.
UT
PA
1.
July 2
7-8
Table 7
Open pi
1. Const
UTSF
1. Fix div
2. Const
LTSF
1. Install
a. Tre
b. Loa
c. Spr
2. Const
Total
7.2.2
RevmodareaTabl
able 7-5. Co
pen pit
Revegetate u
a. Nursery op
b. Plantation e
c. Plantation m
d. Manageme
TSF
AF dump nea
Apply topsoil,
a. Load and h
b. Spread top
2010
7-4. Cost sc
t
truct concrete
version chann
truct concrete
herringbone d
enching
ad and haul dr
read of drain m
truct concrete
2.2 Reveg
vegetation wodels. The ma, industrial ale 7-5.
ost estimates
Ac
using endemic
perations
establishment
maintenance a
ent cost (First
ar-level surfac
, 0.3m thick
haul topsoil
psoil
chedule of gr
Activity
drainage chan
el
drainage chan
drainage
rainage mater
materials
drainage chan
getation Wo
orks on a pemodels coverareas, offices
s of revegeta
ctivity
c species (20m
t
and protection
five years)
ce
rading and d
nnel
nnel to open p
ials
nnel to open p
rks
er hectare bared the opens and accom
ation works
m wide buffer)
n (Year 1 - 3)
Schedul
rainage work
201
500,
650
pit 250
pit 400
1,800
asis were asn pit, UTSF
mmodations, e
Timing
2
2
2014
2014
2
2
e of Ope
ks
3 201
,000
0,000
0,000
0
0
0
0,000
0,000
ssessed for – PAF dum
etc. The cos
g of works A
2013
2013
4 – 2016
4 – 2018
2014
2014
rations a
4 2015
0 113,
0 416,
0 112,
0
642,
the various mp, LTSF, est estimates
Areaha Un
4.54
5.00
and Costs
5 Tota
500,0
650,0
250,0
,478 113,4
,524 416,5
,050 112,0
0 400
,052 2,442,0
rehabilitationnvironmentaare shown in
nit Cost (P)
Tot
9,795
15,200
45,641
9,539
56
15
s
al
000
000
000
478
524
050
0,00
052
n al n
tal Cost (P)
44,470
69,009
207,212
43,307
833,047
224,100
2. Reveget
a. Nurser
b. Planta
c. Plantat
d. Manag
Slope
1. Reveget
a. Nurser
b. Planta
c. Plantat
d. Manag
LTSF
Tailings su
1. Apply top
Load and
Spread to
2. Reveget
a. Nurser
b. Planta
c. Plantat
d. Manag
PAF emba
1. Apply top
Load and
Spread to
2. Reveget
a. Nurser
b. Planta
c. Plantat
d. Manag
TSF Slope
1. Reveget
Schedule
ate using Bam
ry operations
tion establishm
tion maintena
gement cost (F
ate using tige
ry operations
tion establishm
tion maintena
gement cost (F
urface
psoil, 0.3 m th
d haul topsoil a
opsoil
ate using Bam
ry operations
tion establishm
tion maintena
gement cost (F
nkment
psoil, 0.3 m th
d haul topsoil a
opsoil
ate using tige
ry operations
tion establishm
tion maintena
gement cost (F
e
ate using Tige
e of Oper
Activity
mboo
ment
nce and prote
First five years
r grass and Br
ment
nce and prote
First five years
hick
at 0.3m thick
mboo
ment
nce and prote
First five years
hick
at 0.3m thick
r grass and Br
ment
nce and prote
First five years
er grass and B
rations a
ection (Year 1
s)
rachiaria
ection (Year 1
s)
ection (Year 1
s)
rachiaria
ection (Year 1
s)
Brachiaria
nd Costs
Tim
- 3) 2
2
- 3) 2
2
- 3) 2
- 3) 2
s
ming of works
2013
2014
2014 – 2016
2014 – 2018
2013
2013
2014 – 2016
2014 – 2018
2016
2016
2013
2016
2017 – 2019
2017 - 2021
2013
2013
2013
2013
2014 – 2016
2014 - 2018
s Areaha
5.00
3.40
16.27
16.27
0.89
25.43
Jul
Unit Cost (P)
9,460
13,526
37,960
9,539
1,717
10,352
2,082
9,539
56
15
9,460
13,526
37,960
9,539
56
15
1,717
10,352
2,082
9,539
ly 2010
7-9
Total Cost (P)
47,300
67,630
189,799
47,695
5,838
35,197
7,079
32,433
2,710,736
729,221
153,916
220,067
617,605
155,200
148,282
39,890
1,523
9,183
1,847
8,462
In
1.
2.
Ro
1.
2.
En
1.
To
July 2
7-10
a. Nursery op
b. Plantation e
c. Plantation m
d. Manageme
dustrial and
Grade surfac
Revegetate u
a. Nursery op
b. Plantation e
c. Plantation m
d. Manageme
oads
Rip soil
Revegetate u
a. Nursery op
b. Plantation e
c. Plantation m
d. Manageme
nvironmental
Revegetate u
a. Nursery op
b. Plantation e
c. Plantation m
d. Manageme
otal
Tabl
2010
0
Ac
perations
establishment
maintenance a
ent cost (First
other areas
ce
using endemic
perations
establishment
maintenance a
ent cost (First
using coconut
perations
establishment
maintenance a
ent cost (First
l areas
using Tiger gra
perations
establishment
maintenance a
ent cost (First
le 7-6 is the c
ctivity
t
and protection
five years)
c species
t
and protection
five years)
and abaca
t
and protection
five years)
ass and Brach
t
and protection
five years)
cost schedule
n (Year 1 - 3)
n (Year 1 - 3)
n (Year 1 - 3)
hiaria
n (Year 1 - 3)
e of the reve
Schedul
Timing
2
2
2014
2014
2
2
2
2015
2015
2
2
2
2015
2015
2
2
2014
2014
egetation wor
e of Ope
g of works A
2013
2013
4 – 2016
4 -2018
2013
2013
2014
5 – 2017
5 – 2019
2014
2013
2014
5 – 2017
5 - 2019
2013
2013
4 – 2016
4 - 2018
rks.
rations a
Areaha Un
9.01
6.86
6.86
0.48
and Costs
nit Cost (P)
Tot
1,717
10,352
2,082
9,539
15
9,801
2,086
17,600
9,539
15
9,461
15,613
27,871
9,539
1,717
10,352
2,082
9,539
8,
s
tal Cost (P)
43,668
263,282
52,953
242,605
403,752
88,289
18,794
158,548
85,930
307,429
64,898
107,091
191,174
65,430
831
5,011
1,008
4,618
,755,360
S
Schedule of O
Table 7-6. C
Open pit
a. Nursery o
b. Plantation
c. Plantation
d. Managem
UTSF
PAF dump ne
1. Apply topso
a. Load and
b. Spread to
2. Revegetate
a. Nursery o
b. Plantation
c. Plantation
d. Managem
UTSF Slope
1. Revegetate
a. Nursery o
b. Plantation
Operations a
Cost schedule of r
Activity
operations
n establishment
n maintenance and p
ment cost (First five y
ear-level surface
oil, 0.3m thick
haul topsoil
opsoi
using Bamboo
operations
n establishment
n maintenance and p
ment cost (First five y
using tiger grass a
operations
n establishment
and Costs
revegetation work
protection (Year 1 -
years)
protection (Year 1 -
years)
nd Brachiaria
ks
2013 2
44,470
69,009
3) 0 69
0 8,
0 833
0 224
47,300
0 67
3) 0 63
0 9,
5,838
35,197
014 2015
0 0
0 0
9,071 69,071
,661 8,661
3,047 0
4,100 0
0 0
7,630 0
3,266 63,266
,539 9,539
0 0
0 0
2016 2017
0 0
0 0
69,071 0
8,661 8,661
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
63,266 0
9,539 9,539
0 0
0 0
2018 2019
0 0
0 0
0 0
8,661 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
9,539 0
0 0
0 0
9 2020 202
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
July 2
7-1
21 Total
0 44,470
0 69,009
0 207,213
0 43,305
0 833,047
0 224,100
0 47,300
0 67,630
0 189,798
0 47,695
0 5,838
0 35,197
2010
11
Ju
7
uly 2010
7-12
c. Plantation
d. Managem
LTSF
Tailings surfa
1. Apply topso
a. Load and
b. Spread to
2. Revegetate
a. Nursery o
b. Plantation
c. Plantation
d. Managem
PAF embankm
1. Apply topso
a. Load and
b. Spread to
2. Revegetate
a. Nursery o
b. Plantation
Activity
n maintenance and p
ment cost (First five y
ace
oil, 0.3m thick
haul topsoil at 0.3m
opsoil
using Bamboo
operations
n establishment
n maintenance and p
ment cost (First five y
ment
oil, 0.3m thick
haul topsoil at 0.3m
opsoil
using tiger grass a
operations
n establishment
protection (Year 1 -
years)
m thick
protection (Year 1 -
years)
m thick
nd Brachiaria
2013 2
3) 0 2,
0 6,
0
0
153,916
0
3) 0
0
148,282
39,890
1,523
9,183
014 2015
,360 2,360
,487 6,487
0 0 2
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
2016 2017
2,360 0
6,487 6,487
2,710,736 0
729,221 0
0 0
220,067 0
0 205,868
0 31,040
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
Schedule
2018 2019
0 0
6,487 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
8 205,868 205,8
0 31,040 31,04
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
e of Operatio
9 2020 202
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
68 0 0
40 31,040 31,0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
ons and Cost
21 Total
0 7,080
0 32,435
0 2,710,736
0 729,221
0 153,916
0 220,067
0 617,604
040 155,200
0 148,282
0 39,890
0 1,523
0 9,183
ts
S
Schedule of O
c. Plantation
d. Managem
TSF Slope
1. Revegetate
a. Nursery o
b. Plantation
c. Plantation
d. Managem
Industrial and
1. Grade surfa
2. Revegetate
a. Nursery o
b. Plantation
c. Plantation
d. Managem
Roads
1. Rip soil
2. Revegetate
a. Nursery o
Operations a
Activity
n maintenance and p
ment cost (First five y
using tiger grass a
operations
n establishment
n maintenance and p
ment cost (First five y
d other areas
ace
using endemic spe
operations
n establishment
n maintenance and p
ment cost (First five y
using coconut and
operations
and Costs
protection (Year 1 -
years)
nd Brachiaria
protection (Year 1 -
years)
ecies
protection (Year 1 -
years)
abaca
2013 2
3) 0 6
0 1,
43,668
263,282
3) 0 17
0 48
135,211 268
88,289
0 18
3) 0
0
0 307
64,898
014 2015
616 616
,692 1,692
0 0
0 0
7,651 17,651
8,521 48,521
8,541 0
0 0
8,794 0
0 52,849
0 17,186
7,429 0
0 0
2016 2017
616 0
1,692 1,692
0 0
0 0
17,651 0
48,521 48,521
0 0
0 0
0 0
52,849 52,849
17,186 17,186
0 0
0 0
2018 2019
0 0
1,692 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
1 48,521 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
9 0 0
6 17,186 17,18
0 0
0 0
9 2020 202
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
86 0 0
0 0
0 0
July 2
7-1
21 Total
0 1,848
0 8,460
0 43,668
0 263,282
0 52,953
0 242,605
0 403,752
0 88,289
0 18,794
0 158,547
0 85,930
0 307,429
0 64,898
2010
13
Ju
7
uly 2010
7-14
b. Plantation
c. Plantation
d. Managem
Environmenta
1. Revegetate
a. Nursery o
b. Plantation
c. Plantation
d. Managem
Total
Activity
n establishment
n maintenance and p
ment cost (First five y
al areas
using tiger grass a
operations
n establishment
n maintenance and p
ment cost (First five y
protection (Year 1 -
years)
nd Brachiaria
protection (Year 1 -
years)
2013 2
0 107
3) 0
0
831
5,011
3) 0 3
0 9
1,155,798 2,05
014 2015
7,091 0
0 63,725
0 13,086
0 0
0 0
336 336
924 924
55,756 375,970 4
2016 2017
0 0
63,725 63,725
13,086 13,086
0 0
0 0
336 0
924 924
4,035,994 459,578
Schedule
2018 2019
0 0
5 0 0
6 13,086 13,08
0 0
0 0
0
924
8 343,004 267,1
e of Operatio
9 2020 202
0 0
0 0
86 0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
80 31,040 31,0
ons and Cost
21 Total
0 107,091
0 191,175
0 65,430
0 831
0 5,011
0 1,008
0 4,620
040 8,755,360
ts
Tab
Pro
Sec
Env
Hea
Saf
For
Nur
Con
Lab
Tot
Schedule
7.3 Cos
Tables 6-14
respectivelyProject ManForester, Codownsized aand their sal
ble 7-7. Sch
Position
oject manager
cretary
vironmental O
alth & Safety O
fety Assistant
rester
rsery Foreman
nstruction Offi
borers
tal
Table 7-8 prAside from tand water qMaintenancecosts shown
Table 7-8.
Salaries Team
Water qua
Air Quality
Equipmentmaintenan
Mini-exc
10-whee
Total
e of Oper
st of Mainte
and 6-15 pre. The prog
nager and coonstruction as the FMRDlaries and wa
hedule of sa
n Mo
r
Officer
Officer
n
icer
resents the cthe salaries aquality monie and monitn in Table 7-6
Annual cos
Particulars
and wages
ality monitoring
y monitoring
t operatnce
cavator
eler truck
rations a
enance and
esent the FMgrams will bonsisting of Officer, Nur
D works progages.
laries and wa
onthly Salary
40,000
10,000
25,000
25,000
15,000
15,000
10,000
25,000
8,500
cost of mainand wages otoring,and eoring works
6.
st of maintena
s
of FMRDP
g
ion and
nd Costs
d Monitorin
MRDP maine implemenan Environm
rsery Foremgress to comp
ages of the F
y Ye
No.
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
2
10
ntenance anof FMRD persearthmoving
for the plan
ance and mo
Yr 1 to 2
2,366,000
200,000
100,000
200,000
200,000
3,066,000
s
ng
tenance andnted by a dement Officeran, and thepletion. Tabl
FMRD Team
ear 1 to 2
Annual S
520,00
130,00
325,00
325,00
195,00
195,00
130,00
325,00
221,00
2,366,0
d monitoringsonnel, the oequipment
ntations are
onitoring
Yr 3 to 5
0 676,000
0 200,000
0 100,000
0 200,000
0 200,000
0 1,376,000
d monitoringedicated tear, Health andeir assistantsle 7-7 lists the
m
alary No
00
00
00 1
00
00
00
00 1
00
00 2
000 4
g over a perother cost cooperation anincluded in
Yr 6 to 10
0 676,000
0 0
0 0
0 200,000
0 200,000
0 1,076,000
Jul
g work program headed d Safety Ofs. The teae team mem
Year 3 to 10
o. Annu
1 32
1 13
2 22
4 67
riod of 10 yeomponents arnd maintenathe reveget
0 Total
0 10,140,00
0 1,000,00
0 500,00
0 2,000,00
0 2,000,00
0 15,640,00
ly 2010
7-15
rams, by a
fficer, am is mbers
0
ual Salary
25,000
30,000
21,000
76,000
ears. re air ance. ation
00
00
00
00
00
00
July 2
7-16
7.4
Tabl
totalthe fielddesiexclemp
Tabl
deco
7.5
Tabl
ProjAdmof fo
7.6
The progrobuscen
7.6.
Temfacto
2010
6
Total C
le 2-4 is the cl cost is estipre-closure w
d trials; strucign; third-pauded are the
ployees.
le 7-9 showsommissionin
Build-u
le 7-10 is theect’s FMRD
ministrative Oour years.
Other C
foregoing grammed miustness of thnarios are te
1 Tempor
mporary closuors such as:
Market continue
Inaccessopeningoperatio
Environmmay leaincident
Labor pUnless t
Natural such asundergro
Cost of FMR
cost summarmated at P works such ctural geologarty full dame retrenchme
s the annual g cost, rehab
up of FMRD
e schedule oD Fund of Order No. 7,
Closure Sc
discussionsne closure. e activities, smporary clos
rary Closur
ure of the Ra
– Depresseed operation
sibility of thes which will
ons can resum
mental incidead to the issu
will be the th
problems – the labor pro
hazards – Es the procesound mine.
RDP
ry of the FMR157,913,987as comprehe
gy investigatm stability aent package
programmedbilitation cos
D Fund
of deposits rP 157,913
Series of 20
cenarios
s, schedules However, t
schedules, asure and sud
re
apu-Rapu Po
d copper prof the mine
e ore – Pit w require remme.
ent – A tailinuance by thehird one, it w
These may blems are re
Earthquakes ss plant, powRepairs are
Schedul
RDP for the R7. It should ensive reviewtion, hydrogeaudit, and te and redeplo
d expenditurst, and mainte
required to b3,987 in ac005. The Fu
s, and costthere are ot
and cost estimdden, unplan
olymetallic P
rice and a bvery unprofit
wall failure, cmedial and r
ngs dam bree DENR of a
will be extrem
include woesolved, the
and typhoonwer lines anneeded befo
e of Ope
Rapu-Rapu Pbe noted thw of pit wall eological asstailings settloyment supp
res for the Fenance and
build up the ccordance wunds build-up
t estimates ther closure mates needs
nned closure.
Project may
bleak price table.
collapsed mire-developme
each or chema cease-and
mely difficult t
ork lock-outsProject cann
ns can damand transformore the Proje
rations a
Polymetallic at the estimstability; PA
sessment, aement modport program
MRDP brokemonitoring.
Rapu-Rapu with Table p is spread o
apply to tscenarios fo
s to be confir.
be triggered
outlook whic
ine ramp, orent works b
mical spill by-desist ordeo have the o
s, stoppagesnot resume o
age a vital Pmer, and theect can restar
and Costs
Project. Theate excludes
AF wall coveand adit plugdeling. Alsoms for Projec
en down into
Polymetallic1 of DENRover a period
the case ofor which thermed. These
by a host o
ch make the
r caved minebefore mining
y the Projecer. Since theorder lifted.
s, or strikesoperations.
Project facilitye open pit ort.
s
e s r g o ct
o
c R d
of e e
of
e
e g
ct e
s.
y r
Schedule
Under any othe Project gtasked to imfor salaries maintenance
Table 7-10 isyear of opetemporary cto finance th
7.6.2 Sud
If the factorsenough, the
Under this dismantling site of any containmentstructures.
The dismansale of reusdismantling estimated bcapping, grafinance the operating lifoccurred.
e of Oper
one of the fogoes into car
mplement the and wages
e will require
s the scheduerations, a dlosure happe
he care and m
dden, Unpla
s responsibletemporary c
scenario, dand removaexisting or pt at site of a
tling and remsable equipm
and removaudget of P ading, draindecommissi
fe and the a
rations a
oregoing conre and maintcare and ma
s. Accordine an annual b
ule of requiredeposit of Pens after themaintenance
anned Closu
e for the temclosure may d
decommissiol from the si
potentially haany existing
moval of mament, scrap mal. The trea210,000. Cage, and reoning and r
amount of FM
nd Costs
nditions and tenance. Tab
aintenance ang to the Tbudget of P 3
ed deposits P 69 millione second yeae.
ure
porary closudegenerate i
oning activitte of materiaazardous suor potential
aterials and smaterials, anatment of pr
Containment ehabilitation rehabilitationMRD Fund
s
pending theble 7-7 detailsactivities togeTable, the f3 million.
for the FMR will have b
ar of operatio
ure are not sointo sudden
ties are initals, equipmeubstances, elly hazardou
structures wnd unused srocess wateof the tailingworks. The works will built up, the
e rectifications the organizether with theirst two yea
RD Fund. Dubeen made.
on, there will
olved or do nand unplann
tiated. Theent or structuquipment, o
us substance
ill be self-liqtocks will par and sludgegs and PAFe capacity odepend on w
e sudden, un
Jul
n of the probzation that we annual budars of care
uring the se. Assumingbe ample m
not improve ned closure.
ese includeures; treatmer structures;es, equipme
uidating, i.e.ay for the coe will requir
F dump will of the Projewhat year onplanned clo
ly 2010
7-17
blem, will be dgets
and
cond g the oney
soon
the ent at and nt or
., the ost of re an need ct to
of the osure
Ju
7
Tab
FM
Dec
Reh
Maimon
Tota
uly 2010
7-18
le 7-9. Annual ex
MRDP Activity
commissioning 52
habilitation 2
intenance and nitoring
al 55
xpenditures for th
2013 2014
2,668,757
2,955,798 2,055,7
0 3,066,0
5,624,555 5,121,7
Table 7-10.
Year
Percent
Amount
Cumulative
he FMRDP
4 2015
0 78,407,818
756 1,018,022
000 3,066,000
756 82,491,840
Schedule of FMR
1
0
0
2016 20
0
4,035,994 459
1,376,000 1,376
5,411,994 1,835
RD Fund deposit
2
43.7
69,008,412 49,
69,008,412 118
17 2018
0 0
9,578 343,004
6,000 1,376,000
5,578 1,719,004
3 4
31.3 18.
427,078 29,529
,435,490 147,965
2019 2
0
267,180
1,076,000 1,0
1,343,180 1,1
5
7 6.3
9,916 9,948,581
5,406 157,913,98
Schedule
2020 2021
0
31,040 31,04
076,000 1,076,00
07,040 1,107,04
6
0
1
87
e of Operatio
2022
0
40
00 1,076,000 1
40 1,076,000 1
Total
100
157,913,987
ons and Cost
2023 Tota
131,076
11,197
,076,000 15,640
,076,000 157,913
ts
al
6,575
7,412
0,000
3,987
Final Min
8 REF
Australian DCompletIndustry
Australia-Ne2000.StrAustralia
Australian M
Barcena, I.ConstruProject.
BMP, 2002Polymet
Brodie, M.JManage
Covello, V.TAssessin
Daniel, D.EDisposa
Daniel, D.E.Disposa
David, C.P. DrainagLaboratoDiliman.
Dionne, J., Act.
Eary, L.E. aPit Lakeand L.E
EnvironmenManage
GHD, undat
GHD, 2008.ModelinFacility.
ne Rehabi
FERENCES
Department tion in Lead
y.
ew Zealand rategic Frama.
Mining Indust
, Llamas Bction to isola 9th Internati
2.Environmetallic Project.
., Robertsonement for Me
T. and Merkng Health an
., 1993. Laal ed. by D.E.
and Koerneal ed. by D.E.
and Romeroe (AMD) Aory, Nationa.
undated. Min
nd D.N. Cases Character. Eary. Socie
t Australia, ement in Mini
ed.The Curre
Rapu-Rapu g Carried ou
litation &
S
of Industry, ding Practice
Minerals andmework for
ry Council, 1
B., Bueno Jate Active Zoonal Mine W
ental Protec
n, A.G., andtal Mines.
khofer, M.W.nd Environme
ndfills and . Daniel.Cha
er, R.M., 199. Daniel. Cha
o, R.G., 2006Abatement al Institute of
ning Site Re
stendyk, 200ristics, Predicety for Mining
2002. Mineing.
ent State of P
Tailings Stout on Propos
& Decomm
Tourism, ae Sustainabl
d Energy CoMine Closu
990. Mine R
J., Garcia-Sones of Inac
Water Congre
ction and
d Gadsby, J
, 1993. Riskental Risks.
Impoundmenpman & Hall
3. Cover Sysapman & Hal
6. Final Repoand Controlf Geological
ehabilitation
09. The Statective Modeling, Metallurgy
e Decommis
Play in Emba
orage Facilitysed Addition
missioning
and Resourcle Developm
ouncil and Mre.ISR 2000
Rehabilitation
Siñeriz, J.L.,ctive Zones ess.
Enhancem
.W., 1992.
k AssessmePlenum Pres
nts in Geotel, London.
stems in Geoll, London.
ort on the Evl StrategiesSciences, U
Requiremen
e of the Art ong, and Susty & Exploratio
ssioning in B
ankment Dam
y and Wastenal PAF Sto
g Plan
ces, 2006.Mment Program
Minerals Cou0/155, ISRN
n Handbook.
Suso, B.Ain Coal Mine
ent Progra
Cost Effectiv
nt Methods.ss, New York
echnical Pra
otechnical Pr
valuation of R. EnvironmeUniversity of
t as Stipulat
of Pit Lake Rtainability edon.
Best Practic
m Earthquak
Dump Resurage Upper
Jul
ine Closure m for the M
uncil of Aust 0 642 721
A., 2005. e, WATERC
am, Rapu-R
ve Closure
. Approachek.
actice for W
Practice for W
RRPI’s Acid ental Monitof the Philipp
ted in the M
Research in d. D.N Caste
ce Environm
ke Design.
ults of NumeTailings Sto
8-1
ly 2010
and Mining
ralia, 1386,
Plug HEM
Rapu
Plan
s for
Waste
Waste
Mine oring
pines,
ining
Mine ndyk
ental
erical orage
July 2
8-2
GHD
GHD
GHD
GHD
GHD
Giro
Gold
McC
MEN
Mur
Que
Rob
RSG
Sch
Sch
2010
D, 2007a. Design and
D, 2007b.RaTailings Stor
D, 2007c.RaModeling of
D, 2006.RapTailings Stor
D, 2004.Rapand Environ
oud, J.P., Wind.Geosy
der AssociatRapu-Rapu,
Closkey, A.LHighwalls – U.S. Environ
ND, 1995. RCase Studie
ray, J. and Economic D
eensland Deof Contamin
bertson, A.MContainmenpapers/conta
G Global, 20Pit.
afer, W.M. aLake GeochModeling, aMetallurgy &
roeder, P.R.R.L., 1994.EngineeringEnvironmen
Report for Recommend
apu-Rapu Tarage Facility
apu-Rapu TLower Tailin
pu-Rapu Tarage and Wa
pu-Rapu Phamental Area
Pelte, T., ynthetics Inte
tes, 2005.Hy Albay Provi
L., 2005. PreFinal Repo
nmental Prot
Review of In-es.
Ferguson, MDevelopment
partment of nated Land in
M. and Cliftont of ainment.pdf
05.Rapu-Ra
and Eary, L.Ehemistry and nd Sustaina
& Exploration
., Dozier, T.S
.The Hydrol Documentatal Protection
Upper Tailinded Construc
ailings StoraPAF Dump
Tailings Storngs Storage F
ilings Storagaste Dump D
ase B. Desig.
and Bathuernational.Vo
ydrogeologicance, Philippi
evention of rt. Mine Watection Agenc
pit Disposal
M., 2001. WoConsortium,
Environmenn Queensland
on, A.W., 19Tailings
pu Project W
E., 2009. ApWater Qualibility ed. D.N
n.
S., Zappi, P.logic Evalua
ation for Versn Agency, O
ngs Storagection Proced
age Facility Stability Ana
rage and WFacility.
ge Facility Design Repor
gn Report fo
rst, R.J., ol. 2, No. 6.
al Investigatnes.
Acid Mine aste Technolcy and U.S.
Practices fo
omen in Tra, Toronto.
nt and Heritad.
987. Designs. http:
Waste Materi
pproaches foity in in MineN Castendy
.T., McEnroeation of Lasion 3.Office
Ohio, U.S.A.
Facility, Prure.
and Waste alysis.
Waste Dump
and Waste rt.
r Tailings St
1995.Uplift
ion, Rapu-R
Drainage Gogy ProgramDepartment
or the Preve
ansition Out
age, 1995.Gu
n Considerat://www.rober
ial Modeling
r Developinge Pit Lakes Ck and L.E. E
e, B.M., Sjosandfill Perfoof Research
Re
roposed Wa
Dump, Prop
p, Results o
Dump, Mod
torage and W
of Geomem
apu Polymet
eneration from Activity IIIof Energy.
ntion of Acid
of Poverty.
uidelines for
tion for the rtsongeocons
for the Unga
g Predictive MCharacteristicEary. Society
strom, J.W., ormance (Hh and Develo
eferences
aste Dump –
posed Uppe
of Numerica
dified Lowe
Waste Dump
mbranes by
tallic Project
rom Open-piI, Project 26
d Drainage –
Women and
Assessmen
Long Termsultants.com
ay-Malobago
Models of Pics, Predictivety for Mining
and PeytonELP) Modeopment, U.S
s
–
r
al
r
p
y
t,
it 6.
–
d
nt
m m/
o
it e g,
n, el S.
Referenc
SENES ConPassive
Shang, J.Q.of Acid-Enginee
Tongway, DMonitori
Tumbokon, V
Tumbokon, 2009.
Tumbokon, V
United KinLivelihoo
United StateMunicipa
United StateDam Sa
Williams, D.Store/ReProceedMissour
Woodward-CPolymet
ces
nsultants Ltded. By G.A.
, Wang, H.LGenerating
ering, vol. 18
D.J. and Hinng and Asse
V.M., 2010.
V.M., 2009.
V.M., 2007. T
gdom Depods Guidanc
es Environmeal Solid Was
es Federal afety, Earthqu
J., Stolberg elease Covedings of Sevei, U.S.A., 26-
Clyde Philipptallic Project.
., 2000. ActTremblay an
., Kovac V., Mine Tailing, issue no. 2
ndley, N.L., essing Lands
Geotechnica
Geotechni
Technical Re
artment force Sheet: Intr
ental Protectste.Office of S
Emergency uake Analyse
D.J. and Curer System oventh Interna-30 March 20
pines, Inc., 2
tive Treatmend C.M. Hog
and Fyfe J.,gs using Coa.
2004. Landsscapes.CSIR
al Notes, 25
ical Notes a
eview of the
r Internatioroduction.
tion Agency,Solid Waste
Managemenes and Desig
rrey, N.A., 2ver Potentiational Confe006, p. 2385
2000. Envir
ent in MENDgan.
2006.Site-sal Fly Ash in
scape FunctRO Sustainab
February 20
nd Impressio
North Wall,
nal Develo
1994. Comand Emerge
nt Agency, gn of Dams.
006. Long-teally Acid-Forerence on Ac5-2396.
ronmental Im
Vol. 5 Treat
pecific Study Journal of
tion Analysisble Ecosyste
010.
ons Site Vis
Ungay-Malo
opment, 199
mposting Yardency Respon
2005.Federa
erm Performaming Waste
cid Rock Dra
mpact Statem
Jul
tment Active
y on StabilizMaterials in
s.Procedurems, Canberr
sit, 28 Decem
bago Pit, RR
99. Sustain
rd Trimmingsnse.
al Guideline
ance of Kidses and Dumpainage. St. L
ment, Rapu-R
ly 2010
8-3
e and
ation Civil
s for ra.
mber
RMI.
nable
s and
s for
ston’s ps in
Louis,
Rapu
Final Min
9 ANN
Annex 9-1.
ne Rehabi
NEXES
Participant
litation &
ts to the com
& Decomm
mmunity cons
missioning
sultation of 3
g Plan
June 2007
Jul
9-1
ly 2010
9-2
July 2
2010
Annexess
Annexes
Annex 9-2.
Program aconsultatio
and Powerpon
point Presenntation for thhe 3 June 2
Jul
2007 comm
9-3
ly 2010
unity
9-4
July 2
2010
Annexess
Annexes
Jul
9-5
ly 2010
9-6
July 2
2010
Annexess
Annexes
Jul
9-7
ly 2010
9-8
July 2
2010
Annexess
Annexes
Annex 9-3.
HIGHLIGHT
3 June 2007
Mr. R CastPagcolbon, 2007, RRMImonths laterthe closure recognition ofor everyoneclosure planthe Governmcompany emlivelihood fo
Engr. Corpurequirementleast five (5)to be establoperations thappened toto prevent itthe commun
Dr. Cuaño rdevelopmen(EIA), commof an envirothe same pro
Dr. Cuaño sare becausenecessary cProject shouthe Governmlivelihoods e
Dr. Cuaño d2005-07 andwords, name
He said that
1. To distu
Highlights
TS OF COMM
7
tro introduceand BinosawI/RRPI was r, the compaplanning is of the fact the even afternning to archment. The mployees. Tr the commu
us thanked tht of the Gov) years beforlished by theo ensure thao almost all mts recurrencenity.
recalled the nt. There wamunity perceponmental comocess of con
stated that the of the absclosure funduld not makement and theven after the
discussed thed Condition Nely, rehabilita
t based on th
prevent or eurbed land
of the 3 June
MUNITY CO
ed the partiwan. Mr. J Cgiven by the
any is now bea requiremeat a mine is
r the mine ishery. The ta
string is thThe closure unity and emp
he participanernment. It
re mine closue company. at the commmining comme. To be su
process whicas a baselineption surveympliance cernsultation and
he chaos andsence of pla. He said t anybody sa
he company e mine is gon
e bases of aNo. 20 of theation and dec
he MGB’s dra
eliminate lonto a phys
e 2007 comm
NSULTATIO
cipants fromCubias welcoe DENR the eing requiredent of the Goa finite resou
s gone, closarget or bull’she company
planning wployees is hi
nts for their t needs to bure. Over fiv Thus, monunity does n
munities in thuccessful, th
ch the Rapue study condu, and commurtificate (ECCd environme
d dislocationnning and th
that the currad. On the co
are taking ne.
an FMRDP we Rapu-Rapucommissioni
aft guidelines
ng-term envisically and
munity consu
ONSON THE
m the DIAs,omed them w
permanent d to do a closovernment uurce and thaure plannings eye is the y and the aill make surt.
time. He sabe submittedve (5) years, ey will be av
not end up ashe past. Thee planning n
u-Rapu Projeucted, Envirounity endorsC) to the Pro
ental study is
n which typifihe failure ofrent closure ontrary, peopthe correct
which are DEu Project’s ECing.
s, an FMRDP
ironmental imchemically
ultation
E FMRDP
namely, Bwith a remarklicense to opsure planningnder the Mint to ensure a
g is needed. better livelihrrow is the e that the ta
aid that the cby all minin
the full closuvailable at ths a ghost tow
e closure planneeds the fu
ect went throonmental Impement whichoject. For threquired.
ed mine closf the compaplanning forple should besteps to en
ENR AdminisCC. He then
P has two sp
mpacts by rstable, visu
Jul
Brgys. Malobk that in Febrperate. Foug. He statedning Act. It a better liveli He likened
hood. The bocommunity
arget of a b
closure planng companieure budget nhe end of mwn. This is nning is inte
ull participatio
ough before pact Assessh led to the ghe mine clos
sures in the ny to put upr the Rapu-Re happy bec
nsure sustain
strative Orden defined two
pecific goals:
returning miually accept
9-9
ly 2010
bago, ruary ur (4) d that
is in hood d the ow is
and better
n is a es at eeds ining what nded on of
mine ment grant sure,
past p the Rapu ause
nable
r No. o key
ning-able,
9-10
July 2
Dr. CDecMon
Ms. consmusthe c
Ms. five Pag95 %nextserv
ShecitedsustGovSDMannuRap
Sheallothealcapayear
Ms. conswhicProjsucc
Engconsskillstherthe qualcrea
0
2010
productiuses of t
2. To ensuprovidedand to th
Cuaño then commissioninnitoring Plan,
Cuaño discusiders both st define the critical eleme
Cuaño noted(5) year percolbon.Brgy
%. Ms. Cuañt five (5) yeavices will be f
informed thd the recommtainability shvernment estMP. As perual budget a
pu-Rapu Proj
then showetted to sociolth and sanitacity buildingrs, the focus
Cuaño stresultations onch he believeect. The ceeding Sect
r. Corpus dsultations to s which the ce was just nisland. Aftelified labor w
ated short-te
ve, or self-sthe land and
ure that alted/establishedhe host and
presented thng Plan, Fin, and the Cos
ussed the Sothe workforcretrenchmen
ent is the tra
d the doublinriod, 2001 to.Binosawan ño said that aars is requireformulated.
e body of themendation o
hould start attablished a r the implemamounts to ect, this is ro
ed the breakd-economic intation; 14 %g. Ms. Cuaof the SDMP
essed that thn the FMR/Des the commmajor probltion.
delivered thboth the co
company didnot enough lor constructio
was needed. erm jobs su
sustaining cod the surroun
ernative skild and left beneighboring
he five (5) mal Mine Rehsts.
ocial Plan coce and the hnt package ansfer of socia
ng of the popo 2006. Theposted a poa credible fod. It is for th
e availability of the World t day one ofvehicle for a
menting rules1 % of the oughly equiva
down of the nfrastructure for food, se
año noted thP must switc
he communiP. She then
munity will exlems identif
e closing rommunity and in the DIAs ocal labor av
on, operation To accommch as cons
ondition, taknding areas a
lls and sustehind to mincommunities
major componhabilitation P
omponent of host commuand labor sual assets and
pulation of the biggest groopulation groorecast of pohis populatio
y of best pracBank: to havf the mining attaining suss and regulamine’s direcalent to P 20
2007 SDMPes; 19 % for ecurity, emphat to enhanch to employm
ity consultatn asked eachxperience as fied by the
remarks. Hd the compa prior to consvailable. So s stage ensu
modate the lostruction of w
king into conand as agree
tainable livene employees.
nents of the Plan, Social
f the FMRDPunities. For pport prograd services.
e three (3) howth of 150 %owth of 99.8 pulation for t
on that a tran
ctices for minve a succesproject. Ms
stainability inations of thect mining an0 million for 2
P budget. Foeducation aloyment, and
nce sustainament and live
ion is the fih one to writea result of cparticipants
He stressed any. He thestruction. Wthe contract
ued. At this ocal unskilledwetland, un
nsideration thed with the st
lihood oppoes and their
FMRDP. TPlan, Maint
P. She said tthe workfor
ams. For the
ost barangay% was recor%; Brgy. M
the host baransfer of socia
ne closure plsful closure,s. Cuaño stan the mine. e Mining Actd milling cos
2007.
orty-two percnd scholarshd livelihood; bility in the elihood.
rst of a sere five (5) ma
closure of thes are discu
the importaen recalled th
When constructor had to histage, highl
d residents, tloading of c
Annexes
he beneficiatakeholders.
ortunities arer dependents
These are thetenance and
that the Planrce, the Plane community
ys during therded in Brgy
Malobago hadangays in theal assets and
lanning. She, planning foated that the This is the
t, the SDMPsts. For the
cent (42 %) iship; 15 % foand 8 % fonext five (5
ries of publicajor problemse Rapu-Rapuussed in the
tance of thehe census oction startedire outside oly skilled andthe companycheck dams
s
al
e s
e d
n n y,
e y. d e d
e r e e P e
s r r )
c s u e
e of d, of d y
s,
j
Annexes
establishmejobs.
With respeccoordinate w
He said thaconsultationinvolve otheimplored eac
Engr. Corpubarangays wplanned welthe SDMP bswitch to viEngr. CorpuBetter and implemented
Mr. Castro rHe also saidmap and to g
Mr. Cubias inputs.
nt of buffer z
ct to health with the comp
at the preses are being
er participantch one to pa
us remindedwould get arll, the commbudget indicaable liveliho
us discouragmore sus
d.
reiterated thad that the cogather demo
and Ms. Ca
zone, etc. O
and water ppany’s comm
ent consultatheld for the gts such as trticipate.
d the body round P 5 munity would ated that the
oods is needged the partstainability-en
at the presenommunity staographic and
alleja took tu
f course, not
problems, Emunity staff.
tion is but good of the cthe Purok Le
of the SDMmillion. Thisreap a lot o
e bulk is goinded in orderticipants fromnhancing p
nt consultatioaff will be go socio-econo
urns to than
t all local uns
Engr. Corpus
one of a secommunity. Teaders and
MP. At P 2s budget is of benefits. Hng to infrastr to make thm using the projects suc
on is the firstoing to the bomic data for
nk all the pa
skilled reside
s advised th
eries of conThe next conheads of or
20 million, ebig and if thHe also saidructures. Hehe communi
SDMP fundch as livel
t of a series arangays to r the FMRDP
articipants fo
Jul
ents can be g
e participan
nsultations. nsultations wrganizations.
each of the he programsd that a reviee believes thities sustainds for electrihoods can
of consultatprepare a s
P.
or their time
9-11
ly 2010
given
ts to
The would He
DIA s are ew of hat a able. ricity. n be
tions. social
and
9-12
July 2
Ann
2
2010
nex 9-4. Paarticipants to the communnity consultation of 18 Appril 2010
Annexess
Annexes
Jul
9-13
ly 2010
9-14
July 2
4
2010
Annexes
s
Annexes
Annex 9-5.
Program aconsultatio
and Powerpon
oint Presenttation for the 18 April 2
Jul
2010 comm
9-15
ly 2010
unity
9-16
July 2
6
2010
Annexess
Annexes
Jul
9-17
ly 2010
9-18
July 2
8
2010
Annexess
Annexes
Jul
9-19
ly 2010
9-20
July 2
0
2010
Annexess
Annexes
Jul
9-21
ly 2010
9-22
July 2
2
2010
Annexess
Annexes
Jul
9-23
ly 2010
9-24
July 2
4
2010
Annexess
Annexes
Jul
9-25
ly 2010
9-26
July 2
6
2010
Annexess
Annexes
Annex 9-6.
HIGHLIGHT
Direct Impa
Ms. LaniLanpresentationRRMI.
Engr. RogeFMRDP. He
Mr. Roy Cer
Dr. RollyCuafour parts:
1. The
2. Stat
3. Majo
4. FMR
Dr. Cuaño dSubsequentelimination ophysically acondition anmine employ
Dr. Cuaño rthe FMRDPwith the leadMalobago, awith RRMI athe draft to tthe direct im
He then discclosure are stability andissues are tPAF dump, need for mSDMP to gra
The FMRDPand study c
Highlights
TS OF COMM
act Barangay
nuzo of RRMn and consul
er Corpus, Pe cited the D
rvantes of the
año of BMP
FMRDP and
tus of the FM
or findings of
RDP costs an
defined the twtly, he enumof long-term and chemicand the provisyees and dep
recalled the . These are Bders and repand Pagcolband RRPI, sthe MGB and
mpact and ind
cussed the mthe final pit
d bare surfache heavy meand tailings
market-drivenadually wean
P consideredcenter, reha
of 18 April 2
MUNITY CO
ys, 18 April
MI’s CARE Dtation. She
President of ENR regulat
e CARE Dep
made the FM
d its legal ba
MRDP of the
f the RRPP
nd schedules
wo key wordmerated its environmentally stable, ion of alternapendents an
completed aBMP’s site apresentativesbon, desk anubmission od MRFC. Thdirect impact
major findingvoid and ph
ces of the Uetals and AMand PAF em
sustainablen the residen
d five alternabilitation cen
2010 commun
NSULTATIO
2010
Department eencouraged
f RRMI, rection and then
partment intro
MRDP prese
asis
RRPP
s.
ds of FMRDPtwo specif
tal impacts bvisually ac
ative skills and to the host
activities relaassessment ws of the threend modeling of the draft Fhe next step
barangays w
gs of the FMRhysical stabilUTSF – PAFMD generatio
mbankment oe livelihood nts away from
ative post-minnter, eco-tou
nity consulta
ONS ON THE
explained the the participa
called the pn explained t
oduced all th
entation. He
P: “decommisfic goals whby returning tceptable, pr
and sustainabt and neighb
ated to the foworks from 1e direct impaworks, disc
FMRDP to this the presenwhich will be
RDP. The mlity of the finF dump andon potential
of the LTSF. and income
m mining dep
ning land usurism, and f
tion
E FMRDP
e objective oants to share
rior activitieshe requireme
he participant
divided his
ssioning” andhich are thhe mining-diroductive, oble livelihoodoring commu
ormulation a to 4 June 20act barangayussions of t
he MGB, andntation of thecompleted w
major physicanal pit walls d LTSF. Theof the final pThe major s
e-generatingpendence.
es: retiremeforest planta
Jul
of the comme their ideas
s related toents of the P
ts.
presentation
d “mine close preventioisturbed land
or self-sustad opportunitiunities.
and finalizatio007, consultys of Binosathe draft FMd presentatioe draft FMRDwithin the da
al issues of and the phy
e major chempit walls, UTsocial issue ig projects in
nt village, reations and a
9-27
ly 2010
unity s with
o the Plan.
n into
sure”. n or
d to a aining es to
on of ation
awan, RDP on of DP to ay.
mine ysical mical SF – s the
n the
etreat agro-
9-28
July 2
forethe benelandre-d
BasworkrequFMR
Ms. basebara
She
Malohis becaattenbeinfundDefi
RapMalo
Ms. 200
Ms. the She
Brgyinclu
Mr.
8
2010
stry. He citefinal choice efits, and inp
d use for eaceveloped int
ed on the prks are requiuired for eacRDP.
MayetteCuaed on the 2angays – 92
then asked
1. Did life i
2. Please consulta
3. What is plan to c
4. What plaplantatio
5. What ste
obagoBrgy. barangay. Oause of povnding high s
ng 27th amonds reach milnitely, there
pu-Rapu Muobago is not
Cuaño ask1, it was P 1
Cuaño comparticipants relayed wha
y. Chairmanuding contrac
Balonzo ask
ed the strenwill depend puts of the c
ch Project facto a lake for a
roposed postred for each
ch facility. H
año showed 2001 and 20% for Binosa
the participa
n the barang
review the ation. Are the
your opinionconvert the m
ants do you ons can you
eps does the
Chairman ROn educatio
verty. Now, school and cng 34 barangllions compawere many m
unicipal PlanIRA-depend
ed how muc00,000. Now
mented thatwhat percen
at she heard
n Asuncion rctuals.
ked how abou
gths and weon markets,
community. cility. Most oaqua culture
t-mining landh Project face concluded
the participa007 census. awan, 78 % f
ants to answe
gays improve
problems ere changes
n or suggestmining-disturb
like to propapropose?
e community
eynold Asunn, before ththe baranga
college. Thegays to 8th. ared to othemajor improv
nning and dent as it ear
chMalobagow, it’s P 700,
t IRA is depent of the pothat the Proj
replied abou
ut SSS?
eaknesses o, additional c Dr. Cuaño
of the uses ae.
d use, certaincility. Dr. Cd the present
ants the popu She notedfor Malobago
er the followi
e as a result
mentioned s or additions
tion on the dbed land into
agate? What
have to und
ncion cited the operation,ay has one
e economic The baranga
er barangaysvements whe
Developmerns extra inco
’s IRA is. ,000.
endent on arpulation is p
oject is good
ut 80 % of
of each alterncapital requirpresented th
are agro-fores
n decommissuaño enumetation with th
ulation figure the high poo, and 120 %
ing questions
of the mine?
during the s?
draft FMRDPo an agro-for
t organizatio
dertake to pre
he positive i very few reof the high
ranking of May now has s with hunden the mine o
nt Officer ome from oth
Brgy. Chairm
rea and poppositively imponly for thos
the househo
native. Accorements, soche proposedstry. The op
sioning and erated the vahe estimated
es of the threopulation gro
% for Pagcolb
s:
? Please exp
June 2007
P. Do you agrestry area?
n or manage
epare for min
mpacts of thesidents atteest number
Malobago imelectric powereds of thouoperated.
Balonzo exher sources.
man Asuncio
ulation. Shepacted by the employed.
old head ar
Annexes
ording to himcio-economicd post-miningpen pit will be
rehabilitationarious works
d costs of the
ee barangaysowths of thebon.
plain.
7 community
gree with the
ement for the
ne closure?
he Project onended schoo
of residentsmproved from
er. Barangayusands only
xplained tha
on replied in
e then askedhe operation.
re employed
s
m, c g e
n s e
s e
y
e
e
n ol s
m y y.
at
n
d n.
d,
Annexes
Brgy. ChairmLanuzo advcompany sh
Ms. Cuaño r
Teacher Myher husbandnone from M
Maryanne redelayed.
Ms. Cuaño aare they now
The participa
Jenny comm
Venus refute
Brgy. Chairm
Ms. Cuaño unemployed
Rommel said
Tony asked accident, the
Rodolfo com
Ms. Cuaño unemployed
Ping suggesthe spouse.
Ms. Cuaño t
PagcolbonBof the minePagcolbon heducation. barangays hcooperative the program
Ms. Cuaño BMP’s expeSDMP for ed
man Asuncioised that the
howed docum
reiterated he
yla asked Brgd is a local
Malobago wa
eplied that s
asked: beforw?
ants replied t
mented that t
ed the comm
man Asuncio
asked whatd?
d that the un
why the coey are not pa
mmented that
redirected td?
sted that a liv
then steered
Brgy. Chairma. Householdhad a hard tPagcolbon hhave to do wwhich can h
ms offered by
commented erience in otducation. Th
on said that he GALEO emments attestin
r question on
gy. Chairmancontractor ants to work.
ome people
e the operat
that they still
here’s no mo
ment. She sai
on said fish is
t should be
nemployed ha
mpany shouaid while abs
t a lot of cont
the discussio
velihood prog
the discussi
an Peter Mos in his baratime travelinhas high schwhile the m
help even if ththe compan
that the highher projects eir aim is to
he will still hmployees areng to the pay
n the plight o
n Asuncion oand he gets
don’t like to
tion, people w
l are.
ore fish to ca
id fish can st
s seasonal.
done so th
as no SSS a
uld go througsent.
tractors hire
on: what sho
gram for wom
ion to Brgy. P
lave stated tangay now g to Pagcolb
hool and colline is still ahe mine is g
ny seriously.
hest form of where the have at leas
ave to coorde members oyment of emp
of unemploye
on the 80 %workers fro
o work as co
were either f
atch.
till be caught
at the bene
and other ben
gh a contrac
minors.
ould be don
men be esta
Pagcolbon.
that Pagcolbhave applianbon. Now, tege scholarsround is to one. He enj
f sustainabilitcommunity st one househ
dinate with thof SSS and ployees’ prem
ed.
% employmenm other bar
ontractual be
farmers or fis
.
efits of minin
nefits.
ctor. If contr
ne to improv
blished so th
on is the mances. Beforthe thrust ofs now. He salook into othoined the pa
ty is educatioset aside 30hold membe
Jul
he companyPhilHealth.
miums.
nt. She saidrangays bec
ecause the p
shermen – w
ng will reach
ractuals mee
ve the life o
hat they can
ain host barare, students f the barangaid that whaher needs liarticipants to
on. She rel0 to 40 % or finish studi
9-29
ly 2010
. Ms. The
d that ause
ay is
where
h the
et an
f the
help
ngay from ay is
at the ike a take
ayed of the es.
9-30
July 2
Sionscho
Ms.Camopare
BinobarasourwheSheis pethe issu
Ms. the needcons
BMPsurvplanprodidena mimpo
Sionplan
Dr. C
Dr. and
A lad
Dr. F
Pagand com
Dr. COncsomprop
Ping
0
2010
ny observed olar’s preferr
Cuaño replieount per chilents shoulde
osawanBrgy.angays. Thorce of liveliho
en fishing is n said that theersonally agameeting. Ses against th
Cuañorecallcommunity ded. She sasulted on the
P’s Dr. Leonvey the plannted in the mduct – the sntify the plantarket study. orted can be
ny replied thant on.
Cuaño stated
Florece comchicken can
dy participan
Florece ackn
colbonBrgy. farming. H
mpany can he
Cuaño advisce fully paid, me portion ofposals from t
g said that sh
that the schred course is
ed that in othd is allocater any amoun
. Chairwomaose without hood. Accordnot possible.e wastes of tainst mining.
She asked thhem. In gene
led one objeis facing to id that they w
eir needs and
nardo Florects. Now, his
mining-disturbshort-term, mts and anima He enjoine
e grown in the
at food self-s
d that a spac
mmented thatn be raised. T
nt said that th
nowledged th
Chairman Me believed
elp to redistri
sed the crowthe land revf the land fothe communi
he doesn’t ha
holars can os offered only
her projects, ed and the cnt in excess o
an EnidaBenhouses befoding to her, t But now, ththe mine like. However, she company eral, the com
ctive of the cprepare for
will visit the d the plans fo
ce informed s mission is bed land. Hemedium-termals in each cd them to bee island.
sufficiency is
ce can be pro
t if land is nThey don’t re
he problem is
he problem.
Molave said tthe residentbute some la
wd that the laverts back to or the commity are neede
ave a big plo
only enroll iny in a private
a scholarshchild can looof the allotted
ndal agreed ore have hothe residentshe shells aree dust go to tshe is repres
y to do whatmpany did so
consultation r mine closucommunity tor mine closu
the crowd tto help the
e mentionedm, and long-tcategory. The self-sufficie
a good stra
oposed for v
ot available equire big ar
s the theft of
that he had ts could staands.
and was usethe compan
munities’ liveed so the siz
ot of land to p
n a governmschool?
ip committeeok for the scd fund.
that there wuses now. Bs rely on shee gone. Shethe barangaysenting the pt is right so ome good an
which is to dure. She satomorrow so ure.
hat he was residents id three possibterm. He a
he list of prodent as the ve
tegy. Howev
egetable farm
for planting,reas.
f animals.
been advocaart small. H
ed as collateny. The comelihood use. e of required
plant on. She
ment school.
e is created.hool he/she
was improveBut the sea ellfish during attributed thy. She admipeople of thethe people d bad things
determine thaid that a So
the people c
in the islanddentify crops ble types of
asked the paducts will be egetables cu
ver, there are
ming in the F
, animals like
ating backyaHis question
ral for the Ppany is willin He said th
d land can be
e plants in po
Annexes
What if the
A maximumwants. The
ement in the is the maing high waveshis to miningitted that she
e barangay inwill have no
s.
he challengesocial Plan iscan again be
d in 2007 tos that can beagro-forestryarticipants to subjected to
urrently being
re no lands to
FMRDP.
e native pigs
ard gardeningn is how the
Project’s loanng to allocatehat livelihoode identified.
ots.
s
e
m e
e n s
g. e n o
s s e
o e y o o g
o
s
g e
n. e d
Annexes
Ms. Cuaño They mentieggplant, upgreen peppe
At this point,
The crowd r
Ms. Cuaño crowd.
asked the oned the fo
po, and squaer. The long
, Dr. Florece
eplied that s
acknowledg
participants ollowing shoash. The m-term crops a
asked why t
ome people
ed the farm
to enumeraort-term cro
medium-term are pili, coco
the residents
are lazy and
to market r
ate the prefeops: pechay,
ones are pinonut, and ind
s don’t have
d that the are
road as one
erred agro-fo, okra, sitaoneapple, abaian mango.
backyard ga
ea was hit by
e problem. S
Jul
orestry prodo, camote ace, banana,
ardens.
y El Niño.
She thanked
9-31
ly 2010
ucts. tops, , and
d the
9-32
July 2
HIG
Indi
Ms. FMR
Engminiprov
Sta.beinbaraprov
Tinoreha
Mr.
Dr. Rfour
The
Ms.
TinoFMR
2
2010
HLIGHTS O
rect Impact
LaniLanuzoRDP present
r. Roger Coring law agaivisions.
Barbara Brng discussedangay submivision of fishi
opanBrgy. Cabilitation pro
Roy Cervant
RollyCuaño parts:
1. The FM
2. Status o
3. Major fin
4. FMRDP
presentation
MayetteCua
1. Did life i
2. Please consulta
3. What is plan to c
4. What plaplantatio
5. What ste
opanBrgy. ChRDP.
OF COMMUN
Barangays
of RRMI’s Ctation and co
rpus gave a inst the 199
rgy. Chairmad could be itted its livelng gear and
hairwoman Hogram even i
tes of CARE
of BMP mad
RDP and its
of the FMRDP
ndings of the
costs and s
n was roughl
añoasked the
n the barang
review the ation. Are the
your opinionconvert the m
ants do you ons can you
eps does the
hairwoman E
NITY CONSU
, 18 April 20
CARE Deparonsultation.
brief backgr5 Mining Ac
an ConradoBsuccessfully
ihood propobanca.
HeideEspringif the latter is
introduced t
de the FMRD
legal basis
P of the RRP
e RRPP
chedules.
ly similar to t
e participants
gays improve
problems ere changes
n or suggestmining-disturb
like to propapropose?
e community
Espringael as
ULTATIONS
010
rtment expla
round on thect which inc
Balwid hopey applied to
osal to RRM
gael thankeds just an indir
the participa
DP presentat
PP
that for the d
s to answer t
e as a result
mentioned s or additions
tion on the dbed land into
agate? What
have to und
sked how he
ON THE FM
ained the nee
FMRDP. Hludes the FM
ed that the so his baranI on raising
d RRMI for rect impact b
nts.
tion. He divi
irect impact
the following
of the mine?
during the s?
draft FMRDPo an agro-for
t organizatio
dertake to pre
er barangay
MRDP
ed and impo
He then compMRDP on e
sustainable gay. He snative chick
including Tinbarangay.
ded his pres
barangays.
questions:
? Please exp
June 2007
P. Do you agrestry area?
n or manage
epare for min
would be inc
Annexes
ortance of the
pared the oldnvironmenta
developmensaid that thekens and the
nopan in the
sentation into
plain.
7 community
gree with the
ement for the
ne closure?
cluded in the
s
e
d al
nt e e
e
o
y
e
e
e
Annexes
Ms. Cuaño physical rehwill be includ
She informein Sta. BarbTinopan haspopulation dthe mining ospeak up so
Brgy. Chairexploration were able tonight. Thosengaged in f
Fe added th
An employethere would
Ms. Cuaño a
Brgy. Chairmwhen no fisbecause the
Ms. Cuaño w
Susan replie
Fe said thatmonth, they
Ms. Cuaño use the fund
According tosaid that whThe compan
Brgy. Chairmcan be used
Mr, Cervanteplan to use t
Ms. Cuaño commented there is now
replied thahabilitation isded in the So
ed the particibara. As of s 157 househdata are avaoperation in
o the compan
rman Balwidgroup. Tho
o construct orse employedfishing are je
at the compa
ee resident abe projects f
asked how m
man Balwid h can be ca
ere were few
wanted to kn
ed copra, cha
t they sell chsell from 30
mentioned thd. In some o
o Ms. Lanuzoat is importa
ny is proposin
man Balwid ad to buy the la
es replied ththe SDMP fu
suggested ththat Sta, Ba
w a move to in
t there are required. T
ocial Plan.
pants that inJanuary 201holds with 77ilable for Linyour lives, p
ny will know.
d said that ose employer repair their d in the opeealous. Econ
any helped th
acknowledgefor women.
much is the a
said he hadught. He nafishermen.
now the main
arcoal makin
harcoal at P to 50 sacks
hat in preparf BMP’s clien
o, Sta. Barbaant is for highng to offer tu
asked whethand.
hat this may und to buy th
hat the baraarbara is nonclude indire
no mining-The baranga
n 2001, there10, there are78 residents nao. She thepositive and
28 barangaed included
houses. Theration are bnomic improv
hrough scho
ed the help
average incom
no idea. Incarrated that
n source of liv
ng, cassava,
100 per sac. They repla
ring the SDMnts, 30 % of
ara has an Sh school gradutorial classe
her they can
not be accepe land for a s
angay use thot entitled to ect barangay
-disturbed laay, together w
e were 31 hoe now 85 ho
as of the saen asked the
negative? S
ay residentstwo kagawa
he problem isbetter off. Tvement in St
olarships. RR
the compan
me per family
come is not before that t
velihood in S
and sweet p
ck. They spant with the s
MP, it is the the budget is
SDMP allocaduates to be
es to prepare
relocate to a
ptable to MGschool site o
heir share of an excise ta
ys in the shar
ands in Tinowith Sta. Ba
ouseholds wuseholds wit
ame month. e crowd: whaShe encoura
s are emploads. They hs that they drThose unema. Barbara is
RMI also prov
y extended.
y as in fishin
constant anthey could c
Sta. Barbara.
otatoes.
end for fuel ame species
people’s chos allotted for
ation for 6 to accepted inthe high sch
a lower locati
GB judging thof another ba
the excise tax. Ms. Cuaring of excise
Jul
opan; hencearbara and L
with 123 residth 358 residShe said tha
at is the effeaged everyon
oyed by RRhave moneyrink alcohol employed whos not much.
vided toilets
He hoped
ng?
nd there are catch a lot of
at 1 gallon. s.
oice on wher education.
8 scholars. n Bicol Univehool students
ion if SDMP
heir rejectionarangay.
tax. Ms. Laaño advisede tax. In som
9-33
ly 2010
e, no inao,
dents ents. at no
ect of ne to
RMI’s y and every o are
.
that
days f fish
Per
ere to
She ersity. s.
fund
n of a
nuzo d that me of
9-34
July 2
BMPindir
Brgypres
Ms. to le
Ms. clos
In tbara% oposi
Ms.
Brgystronresidhard
Ms.
ShirdistainduwomNiño
Ms. expo
Ms.
Ms. “Kar
Ms.
Ms. stresimpr
Ms.
Manrainy
4
2010
P’s projects, rect baranga
y. Chairmansented the pl
Lani told theearn everythi
Cuaño askure.
the absenceangay. She r 6 men are itive side, sh
Cuaño aske
y. Chairpersng winds, thdents do nod to continue
Cuaño aske
rley said thaance and freustry. She smen to contino who gets th
Lanuzo statorters to get
Cuaño sugg
Lanuzo conragomov” ins
Cuaño furth
Lanuzo saissed that therove the indu
Cuaño then
nuel replied ty season. T
the direct baays. She ask
n Balwid ansan to raise n
e Brgy. Chaing about pou
ked what oth
e of a replysaid that theemployed. Pe noted the S
ed for the ma
on Espringahe people ct feel bad fo
e with their liv
ed the particip
at the abacaeight cost, taid that theynue the proghe products a
ted that one orders.
gested to use
tinued that sstead of plas
er suggested
id that they e endeavor ustry.
asked abou
that the malehe silt comes
arangays agked for the co
swered P 25native chicke
rman that twultry and free
her visions t
y, TinopanBeir lives did nPeople are sSDMP benef
in source of
ael said that concentrate or being unavelihood.
pants for the
a they produhe income i
y already recgram. They at a very low
way is to ma
e the web an
she approachtic bags. Th
d to offer the
plan to creis not an ov
t the male re
es are mostlys from the m
greed to giveost of the new
50,000 for aens.
wo residents e range raisi
the resident
Brgy. Chairpnot progressscared of thefits in educat
livelihood in
most of theon agro-fore
able to work
eir plans for t
uce is sold is low. Herceived trainin
also make w price. They
ake new des
d surf for ne
hed Gaisanohis is still und
e products as
eate a websvernight thing
esidents of T
y fishermen.mountain (not
e a small porw site.
an area mo
of Sta. Barbng.
ts have for
person Espris because ofe negative efftion infrastru
the baranga
e residents westry like cowith the co
he barangay
to Catanduar vision is tong. She neewalistambo.
y have to loo
signs for slip
w designs.
o and LCC ader negotiatio
s corporate g
site to introdg. Continuo
inopan.
The sea bet part of the m
rtion of their
re than 1 h
ara will be s
Sta. Barbara
ngael talkedf the mine. Ofects of the mcture, sports
ay.
were fishermoconut and mpany. The
y after mine c
anes. Howeo have an aeded the sup
The buyer k for other of
ppers and su
nd offered bons.
giveaways.
duce the proous practice
ecomes murkmine).
Annexes
excise tax to
ha. He also
sent to Tarlac
ra after mine
d about heOnly about 8mine. On thes, etc.
men. Duringabaca. Ouey just strive
cosure.
ever, due toabaca slippepport of other is from Stooffers.
ubmit them to
bags made o
oducts. Sheis needed to
ky during the
s
o
o
c
e
r 8 e
g r e
o r r
o.
o
of
e o
e
Annexes
Ms. Cuañobbare areas fisherman. Splant, is pos
Manuel said
Ms. Cuaño a
Shirley replieto maintain a
Ms. Cuaño rwith which tlivelihood pr
believed the swith tiger g
She asked wsible.
d that they br
asked why n
ed that they a good relati
recommendeto improve trogram for th
siltation to begrass or aba
whether an im
ing the catch
ot put up a c
borrow mononship with h
ed that their lthe fish catce Social Plan
e due to kainaca. She t
mprovement
h to the buye
cooperative t
ey from the him.
livelihood proch. She askn.
ngin. She enthen asked in fishing, lik
er instead of
hat will sell t
buyer during
ogram shoulked the part
njoined everyabout Manu
ke the establi
selling to the
he products.
g difficult time
d include fishticipants to t
Jul
ryone to planuel’s vision ishment of a
e local reside
.
es. So they
hing gear or think of the
9-35
ly 2010
nt the as a n ice
ents.
have
boat best
9
Ju
A
D
P
NAP
P
2
9-36
uly 2010
Annex 9-7. RRM
Date Taken: _____
Part I – RESPOND
Name of RespondeAddress Previous Residence
Part 2 - HOUSEHO
2.01: Household/
Name of Househ
MI’s household su
______________
DENT’S INFORM
ent
(Immediately Prior
OLD INFORMAT
Family Composi
hold Member
rvey form
__
MATION:
to Transfer to Bara
ION (Those Livin
ition (Nuclear an
Relationship Household He
F
No. of Yeaangay)
ng in the Househ
d Extended)
to ead
Age M
FAMILY PROFIL
Religionrs Residing
hold Only):
Gender M
M F S
E
Time Started: _
Age Barang
Marital Status
M W Sep
_______ Time E
Gengay
Highp
Ended: ______
der Male
hest Education C
Annexe
e Female
Completed
es
A
2
2
Annexes
2.01: Children an
Nam
2.02: Health & Nu
Name of Ch
nd Youth (Aged 6
me
utritional Status
hild
Age
6+ to 18 Years O
Age
GenderM F
of Children Age
ImmunBCG DPT
Old and Unmarrie
Educational IS OS
d Six Years Old
HEAL
nization MMR HepaB
ed)
Status GradLNA
and Below):
LTH
Monthly CYes No
de/Year Level
Check-Up Sometimes V
School Attend
Status VL L N
ded/Attending an
NUTRITION
De-Wormed AN
9-
July 2
nd Location
Nutrition Feeding
-37
2010
9
Ju
2
9-38
uly 2010
2.03:Health Cond
Na
dition of Househo
ame
old Member (All
Age
Che
Coug& Co
Ages):
eck Type of Illnes
gh old
Flue URT
ss Suffered Duri
TI Hyper-Tension
P
ng the Past 12 M
PTB Others (S
Months W
Specify) Self
Where Treatment W
Trad
HilotBHW
R
M
Annexe
Was Sought?
HU/
MHO
Dist.
Hosp
Pri
Do
es
v.
oc.
A
2
2
2
2
Annexes
2.04: Economic A
2.04.01: For WAG
Na
2.04.02: For SEL
Na
2.04.03: Income/F
Activity of House
GE EMPLOYED M
ame
LF-EMPLOYED:
ame
Financial Suppor
ehold Members
Members of the H
Age Ski
Age Skil
rt from Other So
Household Contr
Compet
ills Possessed
Compet
lls Possessed
urces
ributing to House
tencies
Where/When Learned
tencies
Where/WhenLearned
ehold Income:
Compa
n Self-Em
Wage
any S
Reg
Self-E
mployment Activ
e=Employment
Status IncMCas Con
Totals
Employment
vity(ies) IncM
Totals
9-
July 2
come/ Month
Contribution to HH
Income
come/ Month
Contribution to
HH Income
-39
2010
u-H
u-o
e
9
Ju
2
F
W
E
S
E
C
H
T
2
9-40
uly 2010
Sourc
2.05. Hou
2.05.01: Expendit
Expen
Food
Water
Electricity
Shelter
Education
Clothing
Health (Medicines
Transportation
2.05.02: Summar
ce
Average
usehold Expense
tures (These sho
nse Category
& Services)
Su
ry of Income and
Frequency
Monthly Income
es
ould be accompli
Am
ub-Total
d Expenses
Amount
e/Financial Suppo
ished FIRST befo
ount Per Month
Total Agg
ort from Other S
ore asking quest
Entertainmen
Birthdays, Fi
Others (Spec
Source
regate Amount f
ources (A above
tions on income
Expense Catego
nt
estas & Other Ce
cify):
Frequ
from Other Sour
e divided by 12 m
in Part 2.04.01 a
ory
elebrations
Grand Total
uency
rces (A)
months)
and Part 2.04.02)
Amount
Annexe
Amount
Per Month
es
A
Annexes
Inc
Particulars
ome
TOTAL
Amount Per YeaaR
Particular
Expenses
rs
TOT
Amou
TAL
9-
July 2
unt Per Year
-41
2010
9
Ju
2
A
2
E
9-42
uly 2010
2.05/03: Surplus/
Annual Income
Where Sur
2.06. Hom
2.06.01: Homelot
Own
LeR
Estimated Land Ar
/Deficit Income
If, SURPLU
rplus Income Go
melot Ownership
and House
Ho
eased or Rented
GoveL
rea of Homelot, in
Annual E
US INCOME
?
p, Housing, Facil
melot
ernment. Land
OwnePare
ncluding the yard:
Expenses
Amount
ities and Amenit
ed by ents
Owned Relativ
SQM
Ho
ties
by ve
Own
M. Estimated F
Surplus:
ow Deficit Being M
Leased or Rented
Floor Area of the
If, DEFICIT INC
Met?
House
Government. Land
Building:
Deficit:
OME
Am
Owned by Parents
O
Annexe
mount
Owned by Relative
SQM.
es
e
A
2
2
C
G
In
M
C
O
Annexes
2.06.02: Floor Pla
2/06/02: Type of
Concrete Slabs
G.I. Sheets
ndigenous/Native
Mixed Concrete an
Anahaw
Nipa
Cogon Grass
Coconut Leave
Combination o
Combination of GI
Others (Please Sp
an of the House (
Housing Materia
Roofing
Type of Material
Matrials:
nd GI Sheets
es
of Native Materials
Sheets//Native M
pecify):
(Make a rough sk
als
s
Mats.
ketch of the floo
Concrete
Wood
Bamboo
Combina
Combina
Combina
Others (
r plan)
Wallin
Type of Mate
e (Made of Ceme
o Splits
ation of Concrete
ation of Wood and
ation of Concrete
(Please Specify):
ng
rial
nt & Blocks)
and Wood
d Bamboo
and Bamboo
Earth
Bamboo
Wood
Concrete
Tiles
Combinatiospecify))
Flooring
Type of Matrial
on materials
9-
July 2
g
(Please
-43
2010
9
Ju
2
1
2
T
S
A
G
S
D
2
H
If
(
( (
9-44
uly 2010
2.06.03: Room P
-Room House
2.06.04: Home A
I
TV Set
Sing-A-Long/Vide
Aircon
Gas Range/LPG S
Sala Set (Wood/U
Dining Set (Table
2.06.05: Toilet Fa
Have Own Toilet?
f NO, how does th
) Open area (sh
) Rivers/Streams)
artitions
Number of R
2-Room House
ppliances and F
Item
5
Stove
pholstered)
and Chairs)
acility
YES (
he Household disp
horeline/bushes)
Drop=and-Flow
Room Partitions
3-Room House
urnishings
Have N
) NO (
pose off their hum
( ) Meow Cover)
( ) Defecating
Chec
4+-Room Hou
None
Beds (Cus
Tokador/A
Refrigerato
Radio/Cas
Telephone
Componen
Chec
)
man excreta?
System (Dig-an
just anywhere
k/Encircle, as App
use Porch Liv
Item
shion/Wood)
Aparador/Dresser
or/Freezer
ssette Recorder
e (Landline/Mobile
nt
k/Encircle, as App
If YES, Type
( ) Flush-Ty
nd- ( ) Flush-Ty
( ) Flush/Bu
plicable
E
ving Kitchen
Have No
e)
plicable
e of Toilet Facility
ype, with Septic Ta
ype (Buhos), with
uhos Type dischar
Existing Parts of th
Dining Bath
one
Microwave/
Blender
Rice Cooke
Traditional
Others:
ank
Septic Tank
rging into river/str
he House
hroom: Bedroo
Item
/Oven Toaster
er
Stove
ream
Annexe
m: #
Have Non
es
ne
A
(
2
R
O
F
H
L
L
L
O
R
L
Annexes
) Wrap-and-Thr
2.06.05: Source o
Wate
River/Stream
Open Deepwell
Free-Flowing Sprin
Hand-pumps
Level 3 Water Sys
Level 2 Water Sys
Level 3 Water Sys
Others: (Specify):
River/Stream
Legend: Ad = Ade
row
of Water:
er Source
ng
stem
stem
stem
equate for Househ
( ) Others:
Dom
Ad
hold Use Inad
Chec
mestic Use
Inad Ad
d = Inadequate fo
( ) Pit Type
k/Encircle, as App
For Dri
Inad Tested?
or Household Use
with Enclosures
plicable
nking Use
d Positive
Neg
Tested = Reg
DistanMeters
source togative
gularly Tested for
nce (in s) from o House?
DisfromPit/S
Bacterial Contam
9-
July 2
stance (in Meters)m nearest GarbagSeptic Tank/Cana
mination
-45
2010
) e
al
9
Ju
T
L
9-46
uly 2010
2.07. Soli
Type of Waste Ge
Legend: Throwing
id Waste Dispos
enerated by House
g-1 = Throwing in
al
ehold
the yard/surround
Estimated Vol(in Kilos)
ding Throwing-2 =
lume
Throwin1
= Throwing into riv
Waste D
g- Throwing-2
ver/streams/creek
Disposal System B
Dumping B
ks/canals and othe
Being Used/Applie
Burying Burn
er water bodies
Annexe
ed
ing Segregatin
es
ng
A
Annexes
2.08. Comorg
Name of H
2.09. Oth
Area U
mmunity Involveanizations):.
HH Member
her REAL and PE
REAL
LAND
Use L
ement and Part
ERSONAL PROPE
PROPERTIES (L
Location
ticipation (List a
Name & Addres
ERTIES or the Fa
Land and Buildin
Location
affiliation of HH
ss of Organizatio
amily:
g)
BUILDING
Use
H members with
Membership
on
Q
e
h any commun
p
Position Held
PERS
Qty. Item
ity/cause-oriente
d Member S
SONAL PROPER
9-
July 2
ed/political/peop
ince When (Year
RTIEIS
Use
-47
2010
ple
r)
9
Ju
9-48
uly 2010
2.10. Com
Specific
mmunity Resour
Resource
rces and Utilizatio
Estimated V
Quantity
on (List down al
Volume Whereor FUnit
l natural, biologi
e Located Found? No
cal and econom
Utiliz
o Yes I
ic resources fou
zed?
f YES, as What
und in the commu
Wh
Annexe
unity):
here Sold?
es
A
R
2
Annexes
2.11. Compercram
Rank Statem
2.11 Suggested
Priority
1st
2nd
3rd
4th
5th
mmunity Problemceived by the R
mpant.)
ment of the Probl
Community proj
ms, Needs, Issuespondent. Ask
lem / Identified N
jects (List down
ues and Concernk the Responden
Need / Communit
Respondent’s 5
ns (List down pnt to rank them
ty Issue or Conce
5 Most Preferred
prevailing commaccording to th
ern Se
Community Proj
munity problems,e order of gravi
ector Affected
jects):
, needs, issues ty, with 1 as the
Est’d. #
9-
July 2
and concerns ae most serious o
# or % Affected
-49
2010
as or
9
Ju
W
A
B
9-50
uly 2010
Write down any o
A. LISTING OF IS
B. LIST DOWN IS
other relevant inf
SSUES AND CON
SSUES, CONCER
formation gather
NCERNS ON ENV
RNS AND/OR COM
red that cannot b
VIRONMENT:
MMENTS ON TH
be captured unde
E COMPANIES A
er any of the pre
AND THE MINING
ceding columns
G OPERATIONS:
and/or spaces/
Annexees
A
C
P
Annexes
C. LIST DOWN R
Printed Name of
RESPONDENTS’S
Interviewer: ____
S RECOMMENDA
______________
ATIONS:
______________ Signature: _________________________________ Date: __
9-
July 2
______
-51
2010
9-52
July 2
Ann
I.
The hydrincluinterand
SWMthroabilicond(4) modpond
Somsystfor f
SWMbetwSWM
A.
Thiscomin a file.
B.
Thisfrominfiltcom
2
2010
nex 9-8. Pit
DESCR
USEPA’s rologic proceude: (1) timerception from(5) interflow
MM also cough the draity to: (1) haduit shapes utilize either
del various flding.
me of the typtem componeflood control,
MM conceptween severaMM objects t
The Atmosp
s compartmmpartment. R
study regionThe principa
a) Rain
b) Rec
c) Sou
d) Nam
The Land S
s is represenm the Atmostration to the
mpartment.
t flooding sim
PIT
FOR THE
IPTION OF S
Storm Watesses that pre-varying rai
m depressionw between gr
ontains a fleinage systemndle networkas well as nr kinematic low regimes
pical applicaents for flood and flood pl
tualizes a dal major enthey contain
phere Comp
ment represeRain gages sn. The rainfaal input prope
nfall data typ
cording time i
rce of rainfa
me of rainfall
Surface Com
nted through phere comp
e Groundwat
mulation stud
T FLOODING
RAPU-RAP
SWMM
er Managemroduce runofinfall; (2) ev
n storage; (4)roundwater a
exible set of m network oks of unlimiteatural channwave or full, such as ba
ations of SWd control, sizlain mapping
drainage sysvironmental include:
partment
ents the prupply precipll data can berties for rain
pe (e.g., inten
interval (e.g.
ll data (input
data source
mpartment
one or morpartment in tter compartm
dy
G SIMULATI
PU POLYMET
ment Modeff from urbanvaporation of) infiltration oand the drain
f hydraulic mof channels ated size; (2) nels; (3) modl dynamic wackwater, su
WMM includezing of detentg of natural c
stem as a compartme
recipitation pitation data be either a usn gages inclu
nsity, volume
, hourly, 15-
t time series
e.
re subcatchmthe form of ment and als
ION STUDY
TALLIC PRO
l or SWMMn, as well as f standing sof rainfall intonage system
modeling caand storage use a wide
del special elwave flow rourcharging, re
e the designtion facilities
channel syste
series of wents. These
that falls for one or mser-defined tude:
e, or cumulat
minute, etc.)
or external f
ment objectsrain; it send
so as surface
OJECT
M accounts non-urban a
urface wateo unsaturate.
pabilities to units. Thesevariety of stlements like
outing methoeverse flow,
n and sizingand their ap
ems.
water and mcompartme
onto the lamore subcatctime series o
ive volume)
ile) and
. It receives ds outflow ine runoff to th
Annexes
for variousareas. These
er; (3) rainfaed soil layers
route runofe include thetandard openstorage unit
ods; and, (5 and surface
g of drainageppurtenances
material flowsents and the
and surfacechment areasor an externa
precipitationn the form ohe Transpor
s
s e ll
s,
ff e n t; ) e
e s
s e
e s al
n of rt
Annexes
Subcatchmeelements direither nodes
The principa
a)
b)
c)
d)
e)
f)
g)
h)
i)
Within the sprovide storcatch basindescribed bparameters
a)
b)
c)
d)
e)
C. The Gro
This receiveinflow to thobjects.
For this studsignificant flo
D. The Tra
This comparwater to outf
ents are hydrect surface s of the drain
al input param
Assigned ra
Assigned lan
Tributary su
Imperviousn
Slope
Characterist
Manning's n
Depression
Percent of im
sub-catchmerage volume. or as larg
by a functiofor storage u
Invert elevat
Maximum de
Depth-surfac
Evaporation
Ponded surf
oundwater C
es infiltration he Transport
dy, the Grouow was dete
ansport Com
rtment contafalls or to sto
drologic unitrunoff to a s
nage system
meters for su
in gage for o
nd uses
rface area
ness
tic width of ov
n for overland
storage in bo
mpervious ar
ents are stor. Physically, e as a laken or table ounits include:
tion
epth
ce area data
potential an
face area wh
Compartmen
from the Lant compartme
undwater Coected in the p
mpartment
ains a netwoorage units.
ts of land wsingle dischaor other sub
ubcatchment
outlet node o
verland flow
d flow on bot
oth pervious
rea with no d
rage units. they could
e. The voluof surface a:
a
nd
hen flooded.
nt
nd Surface cent. This c
mpartment wproject area (
ork of conveyInflows to th
whose topogarge point. Dbcatchments.
ts are:
r subcatchm
th pervious a
and impervi
depression st
These are represent stometric propearea versus
compartmentcompartmen
was not cons(Golder, 200
yance elemeis compartm
raphy and discharge out
ent
and imperviou
ous areas an
torage.
drainage syorage facilitieerties of a s
height. The
t. It transferst is modele
sidered since5)
ent or channement come fro
Jul
drainage sytlet points ca
us areas
nd
ystem nodeses as small storage unite principal
s a portion oed using Aq
e no aquifer
els that transom surface r
9-53
ly 2010
stem an be
that as a
t are input
f this quifer
r with
sport unoff
9-54
July 2
and with
Eacprecinclusubcequa
1.
Infiltsoil infilt
1.a)
Thisexpolongminiover
1.b)
Thiscoluabovhydr
1.c)
Thisrunotabucumcurvtime
2.
Flowmomequafollo
2.a)
SteaIt asThu
4
2010
groundwate Node and L
h subcatchmcipitation anduding infiltracatchment isation over th
Infiltratio
tration is thezone of per
tration:
Horton'
s method is onentially frog rainfall eveimum infiltratr time, and th
Green-A
s method for umn, separave. The inpuraulic conduc
Curve N
s approach ioff. It assumeulated Curve
mulative rainfave number, te for distinct r
Flow Ro
w routing withmentum equations). The
owing equatio
Steady
ady Flow roussumes thats, inflow hyd
er interflow. Link objects.
ment surfaced any designation, evapos continuouse subcatchm
on
e process of rvious subca
s Equation
based on eom an initial ent. Input pation rates, a he time it tak
Ampt Metho
modeling inting soil wit
ut parameterctivity, and th
Number Met
s adopted fres that the t
e Number. Dall and remathe soil's hydrain events),
outing
hin a conduiuations for g
SWMM useons:
Flow Routin
uting represet within eachdrographs at
The compon
e is treatednated upstreoration, andly updated w
ment.
rainfall penatchments a
mpirical obsmaximum r
rameters reqdecay coeff
kes a fully sat
od
nfiltration assth some initrs required ahe suction he
hod
rom the NRCotal infiltratiouring a rain
aining capacdraulic condand the time
t link in SWMgradually varr has a choic
ng
ents the simph computatiothe upstrea
nents of the T
d as a nonleam subcatcd surface with time by
etrating the areas. SWMM
servations wrate to somequired by thificient that deturated soil t
sumes that atial moisture
are the initial ead at the we
CS (SCS) Con capacity oevent, this
ity. The inpuuctivity (usee it takes a fu
MM is governried, unsteadce on the lev
plest type of onal time stm end of the
Transport Co
linear reservchments. Therunoff. Depsolving num
ground surfM offers thre
which show te minimum ris method inescribes howto completely
a sharp wettie content be
moisture deetting front.
Curve Numbeof a soil cancapacity is d
ut parameterd to estimatully saturated
ned by the cdy flow (i.e.vel of sophis
routing posstep, the flowe conduit are
ompartment
voir. Inflow ere are sevepth of watemerically a w
ace into the ee choices
hat infiltratioate over the
nclude the mw fast the raty dry.
ng front exiselow from seficit of the s
er method fon be found frdepleted as s for this mete a minimumd soil to com
conservation , the Saint tication used
sible (actuallyw is uniform e simply tran
Annexes
are modeled
comes fromeral outflowser over the
water balance
e unsaturatedfor modeling
on decreasese course of amaximum and
te decreases
sts in the soaturated so
soil, the soil's
or estimatingrom the soil'sa function o
ethod are them separation
mpletely dry.
of mass andVenant flow
d to solve the
y no routing)and steady
nslated to the
s
d
m s, e e
d g
s a d s
il il s
g s
of e n
d w e
). y. e
Annexes
downstreamrelate flow ra
This type ofexit losses, conveyancerouting is inpreliminary a
2.b) Kine
This routingmomentum surface equa
The maximuAny flow in pond atop tavailable.
Kinematic wconduit. Thisthrough the entrance or network layosteps, in thesignificant, especially fo
2.c) Dyn
Dynamic Waand thereforof the continat nodes.
With this foconduit becoccurs whenexcess flow drainage sys
Dynamic walosses, flow both water legeneral netwIt is the metdownstreamgenerality cominute or leneeded to m
m end, with nate to flow ar
f routing canand flow re
networks, wnsensitive toanalysis usin
ematic Wav
g method soequation in
al the slope o
um flow that excess of th
the inlet nod
wave routing as can result ichannel. Hoexit losses, outs. It can
e order of 5 tothen this a
or long-term s
namic Wave
ave routing sre produces nuity and mo
orm of routinomes full, sn the water d
is either losstem.
ave routing reversal, an
evels at nodwork layout, thod of choi
m flow restriomes at a pss (SWMM w
maintain num
o delay or crea (or depth
nnot accounteversal or pwhere each o the time ng long-term
e Routing
lves the coneach cond
of the condu
can be convhis entering de and be r
allows flow ain attenuated
owever, this fflow reversausually mai
o 15 minutesalternative casimulations.
Routing
solves the cothe most th
omentum equ
ng, it is posuch that flowdepth at a nst from the s
can accounnd pressurizees and flow even those cce for systeictions and
price of havinwill automatierical stabilit
hange in shah).
t for channepressurized f node has step emplocontinuous s
ntinuity equauit. The latt
uit.
veyed througthe inlet no
re-introduced
and area to vd and delayeform of routi
al, or pressurintain numers. If the aforean be an
omplete one-eoretically auations for co
ssible to repws can exce
node exceedsystem or ca
nt for channed flow. Becin conduits, containing mms subjectewith flow r
ng to use mically reducety).
ape. The no
l storage, baflow. It can only a singl
oyed and is simulations.
ation along wter requires
gh a conduit de is either d into the co
vary both spaed outflow hyng cannot a
rized flow. Itrical stability
ementioned eaccurate an
-dimensionalaccurate resuonduits and
present preseed the full s the maximan pond ato
el storage, cause it coupthe routing m
multiple downd to significaregulation vuch smaller
e the user-de
rmal flow eq
ackwater effeonly be usee outflow linreally only
with a simplthat the slo
is the full nolost from th
onduit as ca
atially and teydrographs account for ba is also restr
y with modeeffects are nond efficient
l Saint Venaults. These ea volume co
surized flownormal flow
mum availablop the node
backwater, ples togethemethod can bstream diverant backwate
via weirs antime steps,
efined maxim
Jul
quation is use
ects, entranced with dennk. This for
y appropriate
lified form oope of the w
ormal flow vhe system orapacity beco
emporally witas inflow is roackwater effricted to den
erately large ot expected trouting met
nt flow equaequations coontinuity equ
w when a clw value. Floo
e depth, andand re-ente
entrance orer the solutiobe applied torsions and loter effects dund orifices. in the order
mum time ste
9-55
ly 2010
ed to
ce or dritic m of e for
of the water
alue. r can omes
hin a outed fects, dritic time
to be thod,
ations onsist ation
osed oding d the r the
r exit on for o any oops. ue to This
r of a ep as
T
A
1
E
B
1
9-56
July 2
Eacdeptwhe
For natu
II.
The studcom
Table 1. Inpu
Paramet
A. Atmosphere
. Rainfall
Evaporation
B. Land Surfac
. Open Pit
6
2010
h of these roth and bed
ere the Hazen
this study, ure of the hyd
INPUT P
following inpdy objective iming from pre
ut Parameter
ter
e Compartmen
Ra
Ra
Ra
Voint
Da
ce Compartme
Vo
De
De
(m
3
4
6
7
9
10
12
13
Im
Ar
outing metho(or friction) sn-Williams eq
the Kinematdrologic regim
PARAMETE
put data wers to determin
ecipitation.
r for SWMM
Valu
nt
ain 1959
ain 1968
ain1995
olume of rainterval for ever
aily Evaporatio
ent
olume = 5,152
epth to Surfac
epth Surfa
m) (m
35
45 4
60 23
75 35
90 53
05 75
20 98
30 109
mpervious area
rea = 3.74 ha
ods employsslope. The oquation is us
tic Wave Rome and obje
RS
re used for thne the time t
Modeling
e / File
nfall at 10-miry rainfall even
on
2,718 m3
ce Area
ace Area
m2)
64
4,411
3,760
5,341
3,627
5,262
8,535
9,239
a = 0%
s the Manninone exceptiosed instead.
outing was uctives of the
he long-termthat the open
VirStat
nute nt
RainfaDuratio(RIDF)Virac W
Virac Station
ng equation ton is for circ
used considestudy.
m flood studyn pit will be fi
Source
rac Weather ion, PAGASA
-do-
-do-
all Intenson Frequen) Curve fWeather Statio
Weathn, PAGASA
RRMI
BMP
RRMI
BMP
to relate flowular Force M
ering the av
in the projecilled-up with
Represerainfall co
Represecondition
Represeflood con
ity cy for on
Since davailablerainfall based othe RIDfis assum
her The Aveper MoNormals weather
Based on
Annexes
w rate to flowMain shapes
vailable data
ct area. Thewater mostly
Remarks
ents annuaondition
ents annualn
ents annual ndition
daily rainfalle from PAG
duration is on the rainfall f curve. All ra
med to start at
erage Daily Eonth in Cli
was used foconditions.
n soil type and
s
w s,
a,
e y
l normal
drought
wettest or
l data is GASA, the
estimated amount in
ainfall event 10 AM.
Evaporation matological
or the three
d analysis
Para
2. UTSF
3. LTSF
C. Ground
D. Transpo
1. Infiltratio
Curve Num
Conductivi
Drying Tim
2. Flow Ro
Annexes
ameter
dwater Compa
ort Compartm
on
mber
ity
me
outing
V
Surface slo
Impervious
Manning’s
Canal conn
Length = 61
Maximum d
Initial eleva
Final eleva
Shape: Traof 1V: 0.25
Manning’sn
Area = 3.7
Slope = 0.5
Impervious
Manning’s
Canal conn
Length = 10
Maximum d
Initial eleva
Final eleva
Shape: Traof 1V: 0.25
Manning’sn
Area = 17.
artment (Not A
ent
Curve
Kinematic W
Value / File
ope = 0.5%
area = 0%
n = 0.025
necting to the O
1.74 m
depth = 1.5 m
ation = 210 m
tion = 191.80
apezoid with si5H
n = 0.035
4 ha
5%
area = 0%
n = 0.025
necting to the O
04.86 m
depth = 1.5 m
ation = 165 m
tion = 167.50
apezoid with si5H
n = 0.035
67 ha
Applicable, ba
e Number Meth
82
1 mm / hr
2 days
Wave Routing
Open Pit
m
ide slope
Open Pit
m
ide slope
ased on Golde
hod
g
Source
RRMI / BM
RRMI / BM
BMP
BMP
BMP
BMP
BMP
RRMI
RRMI / BM
RRMI / BM
RRMI / BM
BMP
BMP
BMP
BMP
BMP
BMP
er 2005 Repor
GHD Repo
GHD Repo
GHD Repo
GHD Repo
SWMM
Assu
MP Base
MP Base
Assu
Base
MP
Assu
MP Base
MP Base
Assu
rt)
ort
ort ThisusedOnlythe simu
ort Base
ort Base
Baserecomain
Jul
Rema
umption
ed on soil type
ed on soil type
umption
ed on soil type
umption
ed on soil type
ed on soil type
umption
s CN for averd by GHD wy one CN will
long-termulation.
ed on soil type
ed on soil type
ed on availabords, parameten objective of
9-57
ly 2010
arks
e and analysis
e and analysis
e and analysis
e and analysis
e and analysis
rage season was also use be inputted fm (annu
e and analysis
e and analysis
le hydraulic ers, and the the study
s
s
s
s
s
as ed. for al)
s
s
9-58
July 2
III.
The in thcondWearainfWearainfintenmad
The pit aconsTo eopenpara
For miniconsor lsubcopen
Basfor t135 it wihandpers
BasoccuAssuto filthe oby adrouby 1
In srecomax
8
2010
RESULT
SWMM modhe open pit idition was deather Stationfall, the estather Stationfall at 10-minsity. All rade to conform
subcatchmeare the UTSFsidered as oensure that an pit was asameters requ
the UTSF aimal slope ostructed alonower surfaccatchments n pit.
ed on the rethe entire pemRL spilling
ill take only d, it will takesist in the are
ed on the murring althouuming the noll up the opeother hand, tat least 0.7 ught year an.2 years.
ummary, baord, it is expximum of 13
TS AND DIS
del was usedin cases of determined ban. Since thetablished Ra
n was used tnute interval
ainfall is assm with the rai
ents consideF, LTSF, andne subcatchall rainfall falssumed to beuired by SWM
and the LTSof only 0.50ng the perimce elevationwill be captu
esults of the eriod, the opg elevation (3.7 years foe more thanea.
meteorologicugh it is diformal conditn pit will be the occurrenyear. The od one wet o
sed on the rpected that thyears.
SCUSSIONS
d to determindrought, norased on the e rainfall datainfall Inteno spread thels based on umed to occinfall input re
ered in this sd the open pment since aling in the oe a relativelyMM.
F, the areas0%. In additeter of UTSF. This is toured and wil
study and aen pit will taTable 2). If
or the open p30 years fo
cal record frofficult to pretion as the breduced by
nce of at leasoccurrence or flood year,
results of thehe open pit
ne the annurmal, and wehistorical data from PAG
nsity Duratioe recorded vthe establis
cur starting equired by SW
study that copit itself. Theall the rainfalpen pit will by large drain
s are assumtion, it is asF and LTSF o ensure thll be diverted
assuming thaake 10.6 yea
flood conditpit to reach or the open
om PAGASAedict the seqbaseline, if onabout two yest one drougof the three, will have an
e SWMM mwill fully fill
al volume ofet or flood coata available GASA is repoon Frequencvolume of dashed rainfall at 10 AM. TWMM.
ntribute to the open pit wil falling withi
be accountednage channe
med to be ressumed thatthat is nearbat all runofd to the dra
at normal wears to fully filions will occits maximumpit to fill up
A, the threequence of tne flood or wears (i.e, fromht year will inweather co
n ultimate ef
odeling and up from a m
f water that wonditions. Ein PAGASA orted as vol
cy (RIDF) foaily rainfall induration for
These assum
he dischargeth an area on this area wd in the storeel with no ou
latively levet drainage cby an area wff from the inage canal
eather conditl up with waur for conse
m volume. Oif drought co
e weather cothe weather wet year occm 10.6 to 8.7ncrease the
onditions, or ffect of reduc
historical mminimum of
Annexes
will be storedEach climate
for the Viracume of dailyor the Viracnto volume o
each rainfamptions were
e to the openof 10.92 ha iswill be storeded water, theutlet to fit the
l with a verycanal will bewith the same
two definedgoing to the
tion will exisater up to theecutive yearsOn the otheonditions wi
onditions areoccurrence
curs, the time7 years). Ontime to fill upat least one
cing the time
meteorologica7 years to a
s
d e c y c
of ll e
n s
d. e e
y e e d e
st e s, r ll
e e. e n p e e
al a
Table
D
Annexes
2. Estimate
Weather C
Normal C
Drought
Flood C
Drought & No
Flood & Norm
All Weather
The only sigevaporation water lossesproject area normal, drou
Upon filling-system. Consurface areavolume of 1discharge tofor normal; aor be near whatever is
ed Filling-Up
Condition
Condition
Condition
Condition
rmal Condition
mal Condition
r Conditions
gnificant wateloss in the
s. Based fro(inclusive of
ught and floo
up of the opnsidering thea of the ope09,201 m3.
o the open pand, 355,118
to fully fillethe weather
p Period of O
N
W
n
er loss from area as provm the simulaf the open pi
od or wet wea
pen pit, evap normal annn pit which This annuait for all wea
8 m3 for flooded-up (depencondition on
Open Pit (in y
Normal
10.6
-
-
Weather Comb
10.3
10.0
9.6
7.7
4.9
7.4
7.1
6.7
4.5
4.2
3.9
the open pit vided by PAation modeliit) is 244,826ather conditi
poration loss ual evaporatis 10.92 ha,
al volume of ather conditiod). Thus, it isnding on th
nce it attains
years)
Drought
-
31.4
-
bination
1
2
3
-
-
1
2
3
1
2
3
is through eAGASA (Tabng, the annu6 m3, 161,83on, respectiv
will still be ttion loss of 1 this will resevaporation
ons (164,345s expected thhe daily andits maximum
Floo
-
-
3.7
-
-
-
1
2
1
1
1
2
2
2
evaporation. le 3) is usedual evaporati34 m3 and 35vely.
he major los,272.84 mm
sult to an ann is still less 5 m3 for drouhat the open d monthly ram storage cap
Jul
od T
7
The normal d to estimateion loss from55,118 m3 d
ss of water inm and the top
nual evapor than the anught; 244,82pit will alway
ainfalldistribupacity.
9-59
ly 2010
TOTAL
10.6
31.4
3.7
11.3
12.0
12.6
8.7
6.9
9.4
10.1
10.7
7.5
8.2
8.9
daily e the m the uring
n the most
ration nnual 26 m3 ys be ution)
T
9-60
July 2
Table 3. No
S
N
D
Sour
Refe RosWatLabo
0
2010
ormal Evapo
Month
January
February
March
April
May
June
July
August
September
October
November
December
TOTAL
rce: PAGASA
erence:
sman, Lewister Supply aoratory Cinc
oration in Vira
s A, 2007. Sand Water innati, OH 45
ac, Catandua
Daily Ev
Storm WaterResources 5268, USEPA
anes
vaporation (
2.48
3.21
3.90
4.30
4.35
3.73
4.10
3.90
3.47
3.16
2.87
2.26
41.73
r ManagemeDivision NaA.
(mm)
ent Model Uational Risk
Monthly E
1
User’s ManuManageme
Annexes
Evaporation
76.88
93.09
120.90
129.00
134.85
111.90
127.10
120.90
104.10
97.96
86.10
70.06
1,272.84
ual version 5nt Research
s
(mm)
5. h
Annexes
Annex 9-9.
H
A. CLIM
1. Rain
Based on loVirac, CatanRapu Polymrecords of thselected to r
2. Tem
Unlike the rain PAGASAfor the 30-yethe Hydroloprocessing t
3. Win
The normal wind condititopography
4. Rela
The normal are 81.3%, According toto Type II ocharacterizefrom Novem
5. Sola
The intensitparameter mobserved amcover could
Thus, the HE1995. The HUSA as refenearest weadaily solar ra
HELP mod
HELP MODE
OF T
MATE PARA
nfall
cation and enduanes wa
metallic Projehat station wrepresent the
mperature
ainfall data, d. To compenear record atogic Evaluatto generate s
nd Speed an
wind speed on is assumand proximit
ative Humid
annual relat80.3%, 83%
o PAGASA, tof the Modi
ed by the absmber to Janua
ar Radiation
ty of solar measured in mount of clonot be conve
ELP model wHELP model erence for coather stationadiation in R
deling for the
ELING FOR T
HE RAPU-R
AMETERS O
exposure to ts selected t
ect site. For were reviewee normal, dro
daily tempernsate for the t the same Vtion of Landstochastically
d Direction
at the Virac med to prevaity of the two
dity
tive humidity% and 84.3%the climate ofied Coronasence of a dary which is r
n
radiation is the weatherud cover preerted into so
was used to dis using the
orrelating theis in Honol
apu-Rapu fo
e UTSF and L
THE UTSF A
RAPU POLYM
OF THE HEL
the elementsto approximar purposes oed. The annought and flo
rature recorddata gap, th
Virac station dfill Performy the daily te
Weather Stil in the projeareas.
y (RH) in Vir% for the 1st
of Virac and tas Classificadistinct dry sreflected in t
not recorder station thatesent in the lar radiation
determine thestablished
e solar radiatulu, Hawaii.
or the three y
LTSF cover s
AND LTSF C
METALLIC P
LP MODELIN
s, the PAGASate the rainf
of the HELP ual rainfall in
ood seasons,
ds for the yeahe monthly nwas used. T
mance Versiemperature to
ation is 10.8ect area con
ac is 82%. , 2nd , 3rd , athe whole of
ation of Philieason but a he quarterly
ed in PAGAcould be resky. Unfortintensity.
he daily solarweather stattion in the st This statio
years under s
systems
COVER SYST
PROJECT
NG
SA weather sfall distributimodeling, thn 1959, 1968, respectively
ars selected normal valueThese valueson 3 (HEL
o be used in
km/hr blowinsidering the
The normaand 4th quarCatanduane
ippine Climavery pronouRH.
ASA weathelated to solaunately, the
r radiation fortions in the dtudy area. Fo
on was usedstudy.
Jul
TEMS
station locateion in the Rhe annual ra8 and 1995 y.
are not avaies of temperas were fed to
LP3) modethe simulatio
ing easterly. relatively si
al quarterly rter, respecties island belates.This typunced wet pe
r stations. ar radiation is
amount of c
r 1959, 1968different stator this study
d to correlate
9-61
ly 2010
ed at Rapu-ainfall were
lable ature o the
el for on.
This milar
RHs ively. ongs pe is eriod
The s the cloud
8 and es of
y, the e the
9-62
July 2
B.
The wasthe cove0.5-out, and
The tailinare
The the movacceeffecmoisdrainsystdrainmodsyst
C.
The UTSfill uthe fromat thTabl
2
2010
UTSF A
Upper Tailite dump for generation
ered with com thick coar1-m thick fi1-m thick co
same covengs have beepotentially ac
HELP3 comcover system
vement acrosepts weathercts of surfacsture storagenage, and letems includinn layers, low
deled. Fromtem design a
INPUT D
cover systeSF and LTSFp the open phigher eleva
m all parts of he surface sle 1.
AND LTSF CO
ings Storagepotentially aof acid min
omposite marse-grained Nne-grained N
oarse-grained
er system wen dried duricid-forming.
mputer program. The pross, into, thror, soil and dece storage, re, lateral subeakage throung various cw permeabil
m the analysialternatives m
DATA
em design foF. The runoffpit. Consideration compar
the area or oil of the UT
OVER SYST
e Facility (Uacid-forming ne drainage terials consi
NAF (non-aciNAF (clay) wd NAF mater
will cap the Lng mine clos They also c
am was usedogram is a qough and ouesign data arunoff, infiltrabsurface draiugh soil, geocombinationsity barrier sois of water b
may be evalu
or this studyf from these ing the relatired to surroua runoff of 1
TSF and LTS
TEM
UTSF) of the(PAF) materand heavy
sting of, fromid-forming) w
which will berial which ac
Lower Tailinsure. Just lik
contain eleva
d to evaluatquasi-two-dimut of landfillsand uses solation, evapoinage, leach
omembrane os of vegetatoils, and synbalances genuated.
y allows surfareas will b
ively level tounding area,100%. GrassSF. The deta
e Project hasrials. During
metals, them top to botwhich will pree the barrier ts as capillar
ngs Storage ke the PAF w
ated concentr
te the rainwamensional hys or waste rution techniq
otranspirationate recirculaor compositetion, cover snthetic geomnerated by H
ace runoff tobe conveyed pography of runoff is as
ses and herbails of the in
s been convmine closur
e PAF matettom, 0.3-m event the clayof oxygen a
ry break.
Facility (LTwastes, the trations of he
ater handlingydrologic morepositories. ques that acn, vegetativeation, unsature liners. Wassoils, waste membrane linHELP3, alter
o be generaby drainagethe UTSF an
ssumed to bebs will be allonput data are
Annexes
verted into are, to prevenerials will bethick topsoily from drying
and moisture
TSF) after itstailings solids
eavy metals.
g capability oodel of wate
The modeccount for thee growth, sorated vertica
ste repositorycells, latera
ners may bernative cove
ated from thee channels tond LTSF ande contributedowed to growe provided in
s
a nt e l, g e,
s s
of r
el e il
al y al e r
e o d d w n
Table 1.
Param
A. Weathe
1. Rainfall
Param
2. Temper
3. Wind S
4. Relative
5. Solar R
Paramete
B. Evapo-
a) UTS
b) LTS
C. Evapo
a) UTS
Paramete
b) LTS
D. Runoff
a) UTS
b) LTS
E. Layer D
1. UTSF
Layer
Layer
Layer
Annexes
Input Param
meter
er
l V
meter
rature V
peed
e Humidity
Radiation H
er
-transpiration
SF
SF
rative Zone D
SF
er
SF
f Area
SF
SF
Data
1
2
3
meters
Source
Virac WeaStation, PAGASA
Source
Virac WeaStation, PAGASA
-do-
-do-
HELP model alatitude of ViCatanduane
Source
n
RRMI / BM
RRMI / BM
Depth
RRMI / BM
Source
RRMI / BM
RRMI / BM
RRMI / BM
Thickness (c
30
50
100
Re
ather 1959
Re
ather 197
197
197
and irac,
es
Area
P 3
P 17
P 3
Area
P 3
P 3
P 17
cm) Tex
ecords
, 1968 and 1995
ecords
76 – 2005
76 – 2005
76 – 2005
-
a / Depth
3.74 ha
7.67 ha
30 cm
a / Depth
30 cm
3.74 ha
7.67 ha
xture No.
9
1
16
Basis for /
Quite similar the project aravailability oflong periods
Basis for /
Only ava
-
-
No historical available
Desc
Leaf area indand weeds isgood or 3.
Leaf area indand weeds isgood or 3.
Evaporative ztopsoil depth
Desc
Evaporative ztopsoil depth
Runoff will be100% of the
Runoff will be100% of the
Desc
Topsoil /
Coarse-gra(~san
Fine-grain
/ or Selection
conditions asrea and f records for
/ or Selection
ailable data
-do-
-do-
record is
cription
dex of grassess assumed to
dex of grassess assumed to
zone depth = or 30 cm
cription
zone depth = or 30 cm
e generated aarea.
e generated aarea.
cription
/ Loamy soil
ained NAF clayndy soil)
ned NAF clay
Jul
n R
s Daily raiencoded
n R
Normal vencoded
Normal vencoded
Normal qvalues a
Daily sowas predon obseradiationHawaii
R
s be
s be
R
at
at
Char
HELP
y HELP
HELP
9-63
ly 2010
Remarks
nfall data werd
Remarks
value is d
value is d
quarterly are encoded
lar radiation dicted based rved solar
n in Honolulu,
Remarks
Remarks
-
-
racteristics
default values
default values
default values
re
s
s
s
2
9-64
July 2
Layer 4
2. LTSF
Layer 1
Layer 2
Layer 3
Layer 4
D.
1.
1.a)
The maxBasdrain
A mexpem3 fleak
The thanat leslopcollethe obse(Layhead
4
2010
RESULT
UTSF
Normal
average mximum in Deced on the renage collecte
maximum perected (Tablefor Layers 3 kage during N
result shown the total of east two charpe). Due to tector drain. Ocollector dr
erved daily hyer 1) excepd on top of L
100
30
50
100
100
TS AND DIS
Year (1959)
monthly lateracember at 9
esults, the draed from Laye
rcolation or lee 2.1). This le
and 4, respNormal Year
ws that the lapercolation oracteristics othe small widOn the otherrain since Lhead on top
pt for the moLayer 3 is mo
1
9
1
16
1
SCUSSIONS
)
al drainage .256 mm andainage from er 2 during N
eakage of abeakage is eqpectively. Like
is also unifo
ateral drainaor leakage thof Layer 2: smdth of Layer 2r hand, the inayer 2 is a
p of Layer 3 onth of Juneore than 70 c
Co
Co
F
Co
collected frod minimum iLayer 2 is re
Normal Year
bout 4.78 mquivalent to ae the lateral
orm.
age collectedhrough Layemall width an2, water hasnside water
almost level. wherein the
e (Table 2.2)cm or more th
(~clayey s
oarse-grained(~sandy s
Topsoil / Loa
oarse-grained(~sandy s
Fine-grained N(~clayey s
oarse-grained(~sandy s
om Layer 2in February aelatively unifis about 3,98
m month-1 than annual tot drainage fro
d from Layerrs 3 and 4. Tnd a relativels a limited sp
has a low p This cond
e water eve). From Octhan 20 cm at
soil)
NAF clay soil)
amy soil
NAF clay soil)
NAF clay soil)
NAF clay soil)
is only 8.8at 8.218 mmform per mon85 m3 (Table
hrough Layetal of 1,958 mom Layer 2,
r 2 is only sThis could bey level gradi
pace to traveotential to tr
dition is refln goes up ttober to Mart Layer 1.
Annexes
HELP defau
HELP defau
HELP defau
HELP defau
HELP defau
879 mm withm (Table 2.1)nth. The tota
e 2.3).
rs 3 and 4 ism3 and 1,895, the monthly
lightly highee attributed toient (only 1%l towards the
ravel towardsected in theto the topsorch, the daily
s
ult values
ult values
ult values
ult values
ult values
h ). al
s 5 y
r o
% e s e il y
Annexes
**************
Table 2.1
----------------
MAY/NOV J
-------
PRECIPITA108.6
565.1
RUNOFF 0.00
466.50
EVAPOTRA98.37
85.33
LATERAL D8.426
FROM LAY9.256
PERCOLAT
LAYER 3
PERCOLAT
LAYER 4
----------------
Table 2.2
----------------
AVERAGE
TOP OF L78.462
STD. DEVIA
HEAD ON
**************
*************
***************
MONTH
-----------------
UN/DEC
ATION
ANSPIRATIO
DRAINAGE C
YER 2
TION/LEAKA
TION/LEAKA
-----------------
MONTH
-----------------
DAILY HEAD
LAYER 3
ATION OF DA
TOP OF LAY
***************
**************
***************
HLY TOTALS
-----------------
ON
COLLECTED
AGE THROU
AGE THROU
-----------------
HLY SUMMA
-----------------
D ON
AILY
YER 3
***************
***************
**************
S (MM) FOR
-----------------
JAN/JUL
------- -
219.8
245.8
125.03
2.29
78.30
153.75 1
D 9.193
8.801
UGH 4.701
4.095
UGH 3.183
4.199
-----------------
ARIES FOR D
-----------------
75.521
3.422
6.808
**************
***************
**************
YEAR 1959
-------------
FEB/AUG
------- --
137.0
113.7 23
73.57 19
0.03 3
81.94 10
145.08 125
8.318
8.988
4.264 4.66
4.355 4.1
4.208 4.70
4.017 3.9
-----------
DAILY HEAD
-------------
76.258 74
52.880 62.6
2.946 5.01
4.552 11.2
**************
***************
********
G MAR/SE
------ -
289.9
38.5 18
97.70
35.72 7
06.91 9
5.14 9
9.165
8.723
61 3.988 4
90 4.725 4
06 4.577 4
33 4.162 4
DS (CM)
.027 53.877
600 61.647
13 4.577 2
224 2.542
********
*********
Jul
EP APR/
------- -
74.0 1
9.0 5
0.0
72.87 47
98.82 14
98.08 9
8.610 8
9.212 8
4.136 3.857
4.589 4.780
4.786 4.206
4.130 4.575
7 54.411 48
76.422 77
2.855 0.940
3.228 1.01
9-65
ly 2010
/OCT
-------
157.9
577.6
2.35
73.29
44.32
92.60
8.926
8.928
7
0
6
5
.807
7.031
0
2
9-66
July 2
Tab
------
PER
PR
RU
EV
DR
PE
AV
PE
CH0.06
SO
SO
AN
*****
1.b)
The withlatercolle
A m(Tabequithe unifo
For perc4 is only
*****
Tab
------
MAY
------
PRE128
6
2010
le 2.3
-----------------
RCENT
RECIPITATIO
UNOFF
VAPOTRANS
RAINAGE CO
ERC./LEAKA
VG. HEAD O
ERC./LEAKA
HANGE IN W6
OIL WATER
OIL WATER
NNUAL WAT
***************
Drough
monthly late an annual tral drainage ected from La
maximum perble 2.1). Thivalent to anlateral drainorm.
this period,colation throumore than t
y within the w
***************
le 3.1
-----------------
Y/NOV JUN/
--
ECIPITATION.8
ANNUAL TO
-----------------
ON
SPIRATION
OLLECTED
AGE THROU
ON TOP OF L
AGE THROU
WATER STO
AT START O
AT END OF
TER BUDGE
***************
t Year
eral drainagetotal of 99.3 collected coayer 2 during
rcolation of ais is slightly nual total of
nage from La
, the lateral ugh Layers 3the percolatio
width or dept
***************
MONTHLY T
-----------------
DEC
N
OTALS FOR
-----------------
FROM LAYE
UGH LAYER
LAYER 3
UGH LAYER
ORAGE
OF YEAR
F YEAR
ET BALANCE
**************
e collected fromm (Table 3uld still be cog Drought Ye
about 4.67 mlower than 41,847 m3 an
ayer 2, the m
drainage c3 and 4 (Tabon through Lth of Layer 2
**************
TOTALS (MM
-----------------
YEAR 1959
-----------------
ER 2
3
4
E
***************
om Layer 2 r3.3). Even duonsidered reear is 3,714
mm month-1 t4.78 mm for nd 1,867 m3 fmonthly perc
collected froble 3.3). GenLayer 3 whe.
***************
M) FOR YEA
-----------------
JAN/JUL
------- --
196.3
9
--------
MM
----------
2916.90
1449.356
1308.657
106.5461
52.3403
659.9518
50.6833
877.875
879.533
-0.0007
***************
ranges from uring the dro
elatively unifom3 (Table 3.
through Layethe normal
for Layers 3 colation duri
m Layer 2 nerally, the pn the daily h
***************
AR 1968
--------
FEB/AUG
----- -----
36.5 92
C
----------
109092.0
54205.9
48943.7
3984.8
32 1957.
31 1895.
1.658
32832
32894
7 -0.02
****
7 to 9.16 mmought period,orm. The ann3).
ers 3 and 4 ayear. The pand 4, respeng Drought
is equal to percolation thhead on top
****
MAR/SEP
--- ------
.4 11.
Annexes
U. METERS
-------
031 100.00
906 49.69
773 44.86
824 3.65
.528 1.79
.556 1.74
62.003
2.531
4.535
28 0.00
m (Table 3.1, the monthlynual drainage
are expectedpercolation isectively. LikeYear is also
the total ohrough Layeof Layer 3 is
APR/OCT
-- ------
.8 31.6
s
S
3
) y e
d s e o
of r s
T
--
6
Annexes
53.4
RUNOFF 0.00 1.3
63.32 13.
EVAPOTRA91.69
77.85
LATERAL D8.082 7.2
FROM LA8.800 9.0
PERCOLAT3.686
LAYER 3 4.360 4.55
PERCOLAT4.031
LAYER 4 3.578 4.22
----------------
Table 3.2
----------------
AVERAGE D42.192
TOP OF L68.213 70
STD. DEVIA0.944 0.8
HEAD ON9.449 5.29
*************
37
34
ANSPIRATIO
DRAINAGE C290
AYER 2 091
TION/LEAKA
57
TION/LEAKA
21
-----------------
MONTH
-----------------
DAILY HEAD
LAYER 3 .147
ATION OF D858
N TOP OF LA99
**************
ON
COLLECTED
GE THROUG
GE THROUG
-----------------
HLY SUMMA
-----------------
D ON
DAILY
AYER 3
***************
61.9
0.0
82.60
96.08
D
GH 4.619
GH 4.673
-----------------
ARIES FOR D
-----------------
72.44
***************
151.8
99.98
0 11.4
0 93.96
8 118.95
9.133 8
7.063
9 4.212
3.738
3 4.504
4.006
-------------
DAILY HEAD
-------------
45 68.112
39.564
5.226 6
0.676
***************
301.7 2
0.03
41 89.0
99.82 2
74.56 11
.480 8.95
7.483 7.3
4.243
3.801 3
4.769 4
3.905 3
DS (CM)
58.419 4
41.915 46
6.590 3.84
1.277 12.4
*********
Jul
249.7 2
0.04
02 16
26.96 3
13.08 9
56 8
389 9
3.853 3
.788 4
4.400 4
.611 3
48.635 45
6.143 73
40 1
466 5
9-67
ly 2010
221.2
0.00
68.59
31.90
91.76
8.383
9.156
3.891
4.649
4.411
3.806
5.269
3.568
1.250
5.308
9-68
July 2
*****
Tab
------
PER
PR100
RU29.0
EV
DR
PE
AV
PE
CH
SO
SO
AN
*****
1.c)
The max4.3)year300
Percand perctwo from
*****
Tab
------
MAY
------
PRE197
*****
8
2010
***************
le 3.3
-----------------
RCENT
RECIPITATIO.00
UNOFF 09
VAPOTRANS
RAINAGE CO
ERC./LEAKA
VG. HEAD O
ERC./LEAKA
HANGE IN W
OIL WATER
OIL WATER
NNUAL WAT
***************
Flood Y
monthly lateximum of 9.2. This annuar. This couldmm of rainfa
colation thro51.23 mm f
colation throulayers is 3,8
m Layer 2.
***************
le 4.1
-----------------
Y/NOV JUN
--
ECIPITATION.3
*
***************
ANNUAL TO
-----------------
ON
SPIRATION
OLLECTED
AGE THROU
ON TOP OF L
AGE THROU
WATER STO
AT START O
AT END OF
TER BUDGE
***************
Year
eral drainage27 mm with al total is evd be partly aall occurring
ugh Layers 3for Layers 3ugh the two 854.651 m3 w
***************
MONTHLY T
-----------------
N/DEC
N
**************
OTALS FOR
-----------------
FROM LAYE
UGH LAYER
LAYER 3
UGH LAYER
ORAGE
OF YEAR
F YEAR
ET BALANCE
**************
e collected froan annual toen slightly lottributed to tonly from Ju
3 and 4 varie and 4, resplayers is alm
which is a bi
**************
TOTALS (MM
-----------------
JAN/JUL
-------
202.1
321.9
***************
YEAR 1968
-----------------
M
-
ER 2
3
5
4
E
***************
om Layer 2 votal of 104.0ower than ththe uneven uly to Decem
es within 1 mpectively (Tamost the samt lower than
***************
M) FOR YEA
-----------------
FEB/A
-------
121.5
438.5
***************
8
--------
MM
---------- -
15
4
999.209
99.3053
49.395691
562.1846
49.914711
-58.437
879.533
821.096
0.0001
***************
varies from a03 mm or 3he lateral dradistribution o
mber.
mm with an aable 4.1). Agme. The tota
the lateral d
***************
AR 1995
--------
AUG M
-------
61.4
501.9
****
C
---------
537.10
447.108
37370.422
3714.019
1847.39
1866.81
-2185.54
32894.5
30708.9
0.003
****
a minimum o,891 m3 (Taainage duringof rainfall wit
annual total gain, this sh
al percolationdrainage of 3
****
MAR/SEP
-------
117.0
361.5
Annexes
CU. METERS
-------
57487.535
16721.826
2 65.01
9 6.46
99 3.21
0 3.25
42 -3.80
535
994
0.00
of 7.68 mm toables 4.1 andg the normath more than
of 51.83 mmhows that then through the3,890.555 m
APR/OCT
------
0 109.5
946.0
s
S
-
5
6
1
6
o d al n
m e e 3
T
-
5
0
Annexes
RUNOFF 3.13
******
EVAPOTRA153.23
79.98
LATERAL D
FROM LAY
PERCOLAT
LAYER 3
PERCOLAT
LAYER 4
----------------
Table 4.2
----------------
AVERAGE D
TOP OF L
STD. DEVIA
HEAD ON
**************
*************
Table 4.3
----------------
PRECIPIT
RUNOFF
EVAPOTR
DRAINAG
PERC./LE
AVG. HEA
PERC./LE
CHANGE
SOIL WAT
SOIL WAT
ANNUAL W
**************
ANSPIRATIO
DRAINAGE C
YER 2
TION/LEAKA
TION/LEAKA
-----------------
MONTH
-----------------
DAILY HEAD
LAYER 3
ATION OF DA
TOP OF LA
***************
**************
ANNUA
-----------------
TATION
RANSPIRAT
GE COLLECT
EAKAGE THR
AD ON TOP
EAKAGE THR
IN WATER S
TER AT STA
TER AT END
WATER BUD
***************
103
103.5
ON 79
61
COLLECTED
GE THROUG
AGE THROU
-----------------
HLY SUMMA
-----------------
D ON
AILY
AYER 3
***************
***************
L TOTALS F
-----------------
ION
TED FROM L
ROUGH LAY
OF LAYER
ROUGH LAY
STORAGE
ART OF YEA
D OF YEAR
DGET BALA
***************
3.27 37.7
59 218.69
9.39 95.8
.39 144.4
D 9.094 8
8.913 9.
GH 4.561
4.412
UGH 4.535
3.933
-----------------
ARIES FOR D
-----------------
70.296
64.743
5.750
11.265
**************
***************
FOR YEAR 1
-----------------
LAYER 2
YER 3
3
YER 4
AR
ANCE
**************
73 0
9 371
86 79
40 116.
8.194 8.793
181 8.902
4.071 4.02
4.678 4.55
4.123 4.58
3.729 3.93
-------------
DAILY HEAD
-------------
68.294 50.2
74.641 75
6.973 2.22
4.770 4.3
**************
***************
1995
-------------
MM
----------
5036.60
3486.062
1350.514
104.0255
51.83076
643.5706
51.23390
44.764
821.096
865.860
0.0008
**************
0.00 0
.69 238.
.46 107.
75 123.3
7.970 7.6
9.209 8.95
23 3.788 3
54 4.720 4
80 4.454 4
32 4.542 4
DS (CM)
212 46.130
.689 76.230
28 0.925 0
78 3.757 1
********
*********
CU. METER
----------
188368.8
130378.7
50509.24
3890.55
69 1938.4
6 1916.1
1674.175
30708.9
32383.16
0.028
********
Jul
0.00
.41 83
.32 12
30 8
683 7.857
56 9.273
3.831 3.771
4.623 4.799
4.260 3.927
4.513 4.706
43.036 45.
0 78.356 79
0.870 1.244
1.699 1.103
RS PERCE
-------
844 100.00
711 69.21
42 26.81
55 2.07
471 1.03
148 1.02
5 0.89
994
68
0.00
9-69
ly 2010
0.00
30.99
20.42
89.02
9
7
6
479
.179
4
3
ENT
0
9-70
July 2
2.
ComgreaLaye(max
The weamorthe highcolle(Lay
*****
Tab
------
MAY
------
PRE108
565
RUN
471
EVA
LAT
FR
PER
LA
PER
LA
------
0
2010
LTSF
mpared to theatly reduced er 2 is greatximum of 45
per unit leaather conditioe than four tdaily head o
her head is ector drain dyer 2).
***************
le 5.1
-----------------
Y/NOV JUN/
--
ECIPITATION.6
.1
NOFF
.81
APOTRANSP
TERAL DRAI
ROM LAYER
RCOLATION
AYER 3
RCOLATION
AYER 4
-----------------
e results of mfor the threeer due to the
5%) that of th
akage from Lons. But conimes as comon top of Laagain due t
due to limited
***************
MONTHLY T
-----------------
DEC
N
PIRATION
NAGE COLL
R 2
/LEAKAGE T
/LEAKAGE T
-----------------
modeling for e weather coe larger areae UTSF.
Layers 3 andnsidering the
mpared to thaayer 3 whichto the limitedd space and
**************
TOTALS (MM
-----------------
JA
--
LECTED
THROUGH
THROUGH
-----------------
the UTSF, tnditions. Altha of LTSF, th
d 4 is almoste larger area at for the UTSh is slightly hd time for td relatively f
***************
M) FOR YEA
-----------------
AN/JUL F
------ -----
219.8
245.8
130.26 76
2.44
78.51 81
53.97 145
3.914 3
3.811 3
4.711 4.
4.173 4
3.476 4
4.237 4
-----------------
he drainage hough the tohe per unit d
t the same aof LTSF, the
SF. This resuhigher at all he standing lat level of t
***************
AR 1959
--------
FEB/AUG
--- ----
137.0
113.7
6.69 201.9
0.15
.94 107.03
5.18 134.93
3.538 3.904
.863 3.741
270 4.668
.475 4.252
.237 4.717
4.039 3.977
--------
collected frotal drainage
drainage is le
as in the UTSe total leakault is further s
times in thewater to tra
he lateral dr
****
MAR/SEP
--- -------
289.9 7
238.5 189
1 0.00 2.
44.70 78
103.42 144
98.08 92.
4 3.705 3.8
3.919 3.7
4.017 4.17
4.733 4.5
4.586 4.7
7 4.280 4.2
Annexes
om Layer 2 isvolume from
ess than hal
SF for all theage volume issupported bye LTSF. Theavel into therainage laye
APR/OCT
- ------
74.0 157.9
9.0 577.6
.35 0.00
8.83 478.26
4.32 105.80
.60 85.33
832 3.667
795 3.930
78 3.890
593 4.782
786 4.219
229 4.611
s
s m lf
e s y e e r
T
-
9
6
0
6
Annexes
Table 5.2
----------------
AVERAGE 50.062
TOP OF L78.560
STD. DEVIA
HEAD ON
**************
**************
Table 5.3
----------------
PRECIPIT
RUNOFF
EVAPOTR
DRAINAG
PERC./LE
AVG. HEA
PERC./LE
CHANGE
SOIL WAT
SOIL WAT
ANNUAL W
**************
Table 6.1
----------------
MAY/NOV J
PRECIPITA
RUNOFF
15.01
EVAPOTRA91.68
MONTH
-----------------
DAILY HEA
LAYER 3
ATION OF D
TOP OF LA
***************
***************
ANNUA
-----------------
TATION
RANSPIRAT
GE COLLECT
EAKAGE THR
AD ON TOP
EAKAGE THR
IN WATER S
TER AT STA
TER AT END
WATER BUD
***************
MONTH
-----------------
UN/DEC
ATION
ANSPIRATIO
HLY SUMMA
-----------------
AD ON
DAILY
AYER 3
***************
***************
L TOTALS F
-----------------
ION
TED FROM L
ROUGH LAY
OF LAYER
ROUGH LAY
STORAGE
ART OF YEA
D OF YEAR
DGET BALA
***************
HLY TOTALS
-----------------
ON
ARIES FOR D
-----------------
7
3.130
7.661
**************
**************
FOR YEAR 1
-----------------
LAYER 2
YER 3
3
YER 4
AR
ANCE
**************
S (MM) FOR
-----------------
JAN/JU
---
19
6
10
DAILY HEAD
-------------
75.882 76.4
55.809 67.
0 2.793 4.9
4.060 10.
**************
**************
1959
-------------
MM
----------
2916.90
1487.408
1331.132
45.6185
52.740761
672.5612
51.39633
1.345
878.376
879.721
-0.0008
**************
YEAR 1968
------------
UL FEB/AU
----- ------- -
96.3 36.5
61.9 151.8
04.55 0.11
0.00 11.4
82.90 9
DS (CM)
495 74.284
088 64.059
921 4.569
119 2.410
********
********
CU. METER
----------
515416.09
262825.0
235210.9
8060.78
1 9319.29
6 9081.7
237.72
155208.
155446.
-0.150
********
UG MAR/S
------- -------
92.4 11.8
301.7 249
0.07 0.0
41 113.11
94.12 100.23
Jul
54.961 55
9 76.712 77
3.098 1.26
3.088 0.96
RS PERCE
-------
94 100.00
000 50.99
984 45.64
1 1.56
92 1.81
732 1.76
26 0.05
.969
.703
0.00
SEP APR/
------- ------
31.6 128
9.7 221.2
00 0.00 1
170.40 6
3 36.56 3
9-71
ly 2010
5.979
7.185
65
63
ENT
6
5
/OCT
-
8.8
53.4
.37
69.55
31.89
9-72
July 2
78.1
LAT3.35
FR3.88
PER3.76
LA4.57
PER4.05
LA4.29
------
Tab
------
AVE
TO
STD
HE
*****
*****
Tab
------
PR
RU
EV
DR
PE
AV
PE
CH
SO
SO
AN
*****
2
2010
11
TERAL DRA50
ROM LAYER84
RCOLATION65
AYER 3 78
RCOLATION58
AYER 4 99
-----------------
le 6.2
-----------------
ERAGE DAI
OP OF LAYE
D. DEVIATIO
EAD ON TO
***************
***************
le 6.3
-----------------
RECIPITATIO
UNOFF
VAPOTRANS
RAINAGE CO
ERC./LEAKA
VG. HEAD O
ERC./LEAKA
HANGE IN W
OIL WATER
OIL WATER
NNUAL WAT
***************
AINAGE COL
R 2
N/LEAKAGE
N/LEAKAGE
-----------------
MONTHLY S
-----------------
LY HEAD ON
ER 3
ON OF DAILY
P OF LAYER
***************
***************
ANNUAL TO
-----------------
ON
SPIRATION
OLLECTED
AGE THROU
ON TOP OF L
AGE THROU
WATER STO
AT START O
AT END OF
TER BUDGE
***************
LLECTED
THROUGH
THROUGH
-----------------
SUMMARIES
-----------------
N 73.04
43.53
Y 4.869
R 3 0.495
**************
**************
OTALS FOR
-----------------
FROM LAYE
UGH LAYER
LAYER 3
UGH LAYER
ORAGE
OF YEAR
F YEAR
ET BALANCE
**************
96.69
3
4.
4.6
-----------------
S FOR DAIL
-----------------
48 68.971 6
39 46.727 5
9 6.320 4.3
5 1.317 10
***************
***************
YEAR 1968
-----------------
MM
----------
1537.10
485.58
1011.1
ER 2 43.9
3 50.0
583.5
4 50.5
-54.1
879
825.
E -0.0
***************
9 119.28
3.897 3.62
3.331 3.57
.635 4.234
3.844 3.93
687 4.504
4.035 3.95
-------
LY HEADS (C
-------
60.743 49.49
51.483 73.7
332 1.379
.687 5.146
***************
***************
8
--------
CU. ME
- ----------
0 2716
89 858
173 1786
9361 77
072063 8
5479
538971 8
137 -9
9.721 15
.584 14
0001
***************
74.57 113
6 3.843 3
75 3.518 3
4.305 3
30 3.926 4
4.778 4
58 3.701 3
CM)
95 47.174 4
98 69.117 7
0.596 0.51
9.224 4.8
****
****
ETERS
-
605.531 1
03.594
674.297
763.505
8847.733
8930.236
566.077
55446.703
5880.625
-0.010
****
Annexes
3.09 92.07
3.642 3.609
3.901 3.759
3.875 3.942
4.655 4.383
4.406 4.461
3.886 3.765
45.240
70.922
16
894
PERCENT
-------
100.00
31.59
65.78
2.86
3.26
3.29
-3.52
0.00
s
7
9
9
2
3
1
5
Annexes
Table 7.1
----------------
JUN/DEC
-------
PRECIPITA
RUNOFF
EVAPOTRA
LATERAL D
FROM LAY
PERCOLAT3.869
LAYER 3 4.801
PERCOLAT3.945
LAYER 4 4.713
----------------
Table 7.2
----------------
AVERAGE 49.281
TOP OF L78.534 79.2
STD. DEVIA1.306
HEAD ON1.012
**************
*************
MONTH
-----------------
ATION
ANSPIRATIO
DRAINAGE C
YER 2
TION/LEAKA
TION/LEAKA
-----------------
MONTH
-----------------
DAILY HEA
LAYER 3 251
ATION OF D
N TOP OF LA
***************
**************
HLY TOTALS
-----------------
ON
COLLECTED
AGE THROU
AGE THROU
-----------------
HLY SUMMA
-----------------
D ON
DAILY
AYER 3
***************
***************
S (MM) FOR
-----------------
JAN/JUL F
------- -
202.1
321.9 4
108.75
121.37 2
79.71
161.06 1
D 3.885
3.861
UGH
UGH
-----------------
ARIES FOR D
-----------------
**************
***************
YEAR 1995
-------------
FEB/AUG MA
------- -
121.5 61.4
438.5 501.9
43.27 0.00
227.73 376.
96.52 83.1
144.40 116.7
5 3.501 3.7
3.912 3.78
4.581 4
4.452
4.566 4
3.959
-------------
DAILY HEAD
-------------
71.029 68
66.
5.416
9.994
**************
***************
AR/SEP APR
------- -
4 117.0 10
9 361.5 94
0 0.00 0.
.80 243.18
7 107.57 12
75 123.30
795 3.531
88 3.917 3
4.083 4.043
4.696 4.55
4.146 4.601
3.844 4.01
DS (CM)
8.778 50.936
229 75.315
6.773 2.32
4.454 4.13
********
********
Jul
R/OCT MAY/
------- -
09.5 197.3
46.0 *****
00 3.13
836.48 *****
20.21 153.1
89.02 79.9
3.499 3.64
3.803 3.934
3 3.828 3
59 4.727 4
1 4.470 4
17 4.577 4
6 47.683 45
5 75.903 76
22 0.580 0
30 3.587 1
9-73
ly 2010
NOV
-------
**
4
8
46
4
3.903
4.628
4.268
4.524
5.725
6.472
0.548
1.536
9-74
July 2
Tab
-----
PER
PR
RU
EV
DR
PE
AV
PE
CH
SO
SO
AN
*****
In stailinheavAnoupsw
To mmaddeptcollefrom
Refe
LeigTaili
USEGuid
4
2010
ble 7.3
-----------------
RCENT
RECIPITATIO
UNOFF
VAPOTRANS
RAINAGE CO
ERC./LEAKA
VG. HEAD O
ERC./LEAKA
HANGE IN W
OIL WATER
OIL WATER
NNUAL WAT
***************
ummary, thengs and PAFvy metals wther possiblewell may des
minimize thede on the coth of Layer ector drain c
m Layer 2; an
erences:
ghton Contraings Storage
EPA, 1994. Tde for Versio
ANNUAL TO
-----------------
ON
SPIRATION
OLLECTED
AGE THROU
ON TOP OF L
AGE THROU
WATER STO
AT START O
AT END OF
TER BUDGE
***************
e purpose oF waste matill be genere scenario istroy the veg
e amount of over system d
2; (3) provconsidered innd (4) installin
actors (Asia)e and Waste
The Hydrologon 3.
OTALS FOR
-----------------
FROM LAYE
UGH LAYER
LAYER 3
UGH LAYER
ORAGE
OF YEAR
F YEAR
ET BALANCE
**************
f the cover terials. If wrated. This ws the upswe
getation and e
f percolation design: (1) ividing seriesn this study ng an HDPE
) Limited, 2Dump and E
gic Evaluatio
YEAR 1995
-----------------
M
-
5
3
1
ER 2
3
6
4
E 0
***************
system is towater reachewill impact thell of water derode the co
or leakage,increasing ths of collectoso that faste
E liner on top
2004. Rapu Environmenta
on of Landfil
5
-------
MM
---------- -
5036.60
3543.749
354.832
45.0730
52.168770
654.2805
51.630527
41.316
825.584
866.899
0.0001
***************
o limit the wes the contaihe fresh watdue to the im
over system.
, the followinhe slope of Lor drains peer and moreof Layer 3.
Rapu Phasal Area.
ll Performanc
CU
---------
889967.250
626180.375
239398.844
7964.405
9218.22
9123.11
7300.466
145880.6
153181.09
0.022
****
water leakingned materiater bodies anmpervious ta
ng amendmeayer 2; (2) inrpendicular
e water could
se B: Design
ce (HELP) M
Annexes
U. METERS
-------
0 100.00
5 70.36
4 26.90
5 0.89
22 1.04
4 1.03
6 0.82
625
94
0.00
g through theals, AMD andnd the coastailings. This
ents may bencreasing theto the main
d be drained
n Report fo
Model: User’s
s
S
e d t. s
e e n d
or
s
A
A
Ta
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
Annexes
Annex 9-10. Flora
able 1.Tree specie
Local/Common
. Agoho
2. Alagaw
3. Alahan
4. Alim
5. Anabiong
6. Anolang
7. Antipolo
8. Apatot/Nino
9. Balat – Buaia
0. Balitahan
1. Bani
2. BasikongKalawa
3. Binunga
4. Bogos
5. Botong
6. Dap – Dap
7. Dita
al species found a
es within the Rap
Name
Casuari
Verbena
Sapinda
Euphorb
Ulmace
Annona
Morace
Rubiace
Logania
Euphorb
Fabace
ang Morace
Euphorb
Euphorb
Lecytidd
Fabace
Apocyn
at the Project site
u-Rapu Project si
Family
inaceae Ca
aceae Pr
aceae G
biaceae M
ae Tr
aceae Pa
ae Ar
eae M
aceae Fr
biaceae Br
ae Po
ae Fi
biacease M
biaceae Ac
daceae Ba
ae Er
aceae Al
ite
Scientific
asuarinaequisetifoli
remnaodorata
uioakoelreuteria
Mallotusmultiglandulo
remaorientalis
apualthialanceolata
rtocarpusblancoi
Morindabracteata
ragraiaracemosa
rideliaglauca
ongamiapinnata
icusbotryocarpa
Macarangatanarius
capyphastipulacea
arringtoniaasiatica
rythrinaorientalis
lstoriascholaris
c Name
ia
osus
a
Excellent lumber, f
Food, tool handles
Lumber, fuel wood
Matchsticks, fuelwo
Fuel wood, food fo
Lumber, fuel wood
Lumber, food, gum
Medicinal, beverag
Lumber, food, nativ
Fuelwood, slope st
Lumber, fuelwood,
Matchsticks, fuelwo
Matchsticks, fuelwo
Fuelwood, native to
Shade tree, fuelwo
Ornamental, native
Lumber, medicine,
Potential Use(
fuelwood, native to t
, native to the site
, native to the site
ood, native to the si
r wildlife, native to t
, native to the site
m/latex, native to the
ge
ve to the site
tabilization, native to
native to the site
ood, native to the si
ood, resin, native to
o the site
ood, native to the sit
e to the site
fulewood, native to
(s)/Advantage(s)
the site
ite
the site
e site
o the site
ite
o the site
te
o the site
9-
July 2
-75
2010
9
Ju
1
1
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
9-76
uly 2010
Local/Common
8. Hamingdang
9. Hauili
20. Ilang – Ilang
21. Ipil-ipil
22. Kakawate
23. Kalamias/Iba
24. Lanetengbundo
25. Lamio
26. Ligas
27. Lingo – Lingo
28. Makaasim
29. Malachico
30. Malapapaya
31. Molave
32. Narra
33. Niyog – Niyogan
34. Pagsahingin
35. Paguringon
36. Pili
Name
Euphorb
Morace
Annona
Mimosa
Fabace
Averrho
ok Apocyn
Anacard
Anarcar
Verbena
Myrtoce
Sapinda
Aracliac
Verbena
Fabace
n Morace
Bursera
Guttifera
Bursera
Family
biaceae M
ae Fi
aceae Ca
aceae Le
ae Gl
oaceae Av
aceae Ki
diaceae Dr
rdiaceae Se
aceae Vi
eae Sy
aceae Tr
ceae Po
aceae Vi
ae Pt
ae Fi
aceae Ca
ae Cr
aceae Ca
Scientific
Macaranga bicolor
icushauili
anangaodorata
eucaenaleucocepha
liricidiasepium
verrhoabilimbi
ibataliagitingensis
racontomelonedule
emecarpuscuneiform
itexturczaninowii
yzygiumnitidum
rigonachrasfalcatoc
olyciasnodosa
itexparviflora
terocarpusindicus
icuspseudopalma
anariumasperum
ratoxylumcelebicum
anariumovatum
c Name
ala
mis
cuspidata
m
Matchsticks, resin,
Matchsticks, fuelwo
Lumber, oil extract
Fuelwood, fodder,
Fuelwood, fodder, the site
Food, juice, native
Excellent lumber, f
Lumber, fuelwood,
Fuelwood, native to
Lumber, tool handl
Excellent lumber, f
Fuel wood, native t
Matchsticks, toothp
Excellent lumber, t
Excellent lumber fo
Food, fuel wood, fo
Lumber, fuelwood,
Lumber, woodcarv
Food, lumber, resin
Potential Use(
native to the site
ood, native to the si
ts, ornamental, fuelw
soil enricher, native
soil enricher, intro
to the site
fuelwood, native to t
native to the site
o the site
les, fuelwood, native
fuelwood, native to t
to the site
picks, native to the s
tool handles, native
or furniture, socially
ood for birds, native
native to the site
ving, fuelwood, nativ
n, native to the site
(s)/Advantage(s)
ite
wood, native to the
e to the site
oduced but adapted
the site
e to the site
the site
site
to the site
acceptable, native
e to the site
ve to the site
Annexe
site
d to the conditions
to the site
es
of
A
3
3
3
4
4
Annexes
Local/Common
37. Rimas
38. TakipAsim
39. Talisay
40. Tindalo
41. Ulaian
Table 2.C
Local/C
1. Apas
2. Balin
3. Bikal
4. Bikal
5. Ditaa
6. Limu
7. Nito
8. Palas
Name
Morace
Euphorb
Combre
Fabace
Fagace
Climbers and vine
Common Name
s
ng–uai
babui
an
ran
san
Family
ae Ar
biaceae M
etaceae Te
ae Af
ae Li
es within the Proje
Family
Arecaceae
Flagellariaceas
Graminae
Graminae
Arecaceae
Arecaceae
Shizaeaceae
Arecaceae
Scientific
rtocarpuscommunis
Macarangagrandifolia
erminaliacatappa
fzeliarhomboidea
ithocarpusllanosii
ect site
S
Calamusr
se Flagellaria
Dinochloa
Dinochloa
Daemono
Calamuso
Lygodium
Calamusm
c Name
s
a
Scientific Name
reyesianus
aindica
aacutiflora
aluconiae
oropsmollis
omatus
mflexuosum
merrillii
Lumber, food, gum
Matchsticks, fuelwo
Shade tree, lumbe
Excellent lumber fo
Fuel wood
Handicr
Handicr
Fiber, e
Fiber, e
Handicr
Handicr
Handicr
Handicr
Potential Use(
m, native to the site
ood, native to the si
r, fuelwood, native t
or furniture, native to
Potential Use
raft, ecological, na
raft, ecological, na
ecological, native t
ecological, native t
raft, ecological, na
raft, fiber, ecologic
raft, fiber, native to
raft, fiber, furniture
(s)/Advantage(s)
ite
to the site
o the site
(s)Advantage(s)
ative to the site
ative to the site
to the site
to the site
ative to the site
cal, native to the s
o the site
e, food, native to t
9-
July 2
site
the site
-77
2010
9
Ju
9-78
uly 2010
Table 3.S
Local/
1. Abac
2. Apato
3. Bamb
4. Dilaw
5. Gum
6. Hago
7. Kaho
8. Lagu
9. Lanta
10. Luya
11. Luya
12. Mala
13. Mata
14. Pand
15. Sagin
16. Sago
17. Salag
Shrubs and herbs
/Common Name
ca
ot
ban
w
amela
onoy
oydalaga
ndi
ana
– luyahan
sambong
anghipon
dakaki
ngmatsing
o
go
s within the Projec
Family
Musaceae
Rubiaceae
Morantaceae
Zingiberaceae
Malvaceae
Asteraceae
Rubiaceae
Lamiceae
Lamiaceae
Zingiberaceae
Zingiberaceae
Asteraceae
Euphorbiaceae
Apocynaceae
Musaceae
Palmae
ct site
S
Musa tex
Morindab
Donaxcan
Curunna
Hisbiscus
Cromolae
Mussaun
Vitexnegu
Lantana c
Zingibero
Globbaca
Vernonia
e Breyniarh
Ervatamia
Musa acu
Metroxylo
Wikstroem
Scientific Name
xtilis
brachteata
nnaeformis
longa
srosa
enaodorata
daphilippica
undo
camara
officinale
ampsophylla
vidalii
hamnoids
apandacaqui
uminata
onsagu
miasp
Textiles, r
Medicinal
Handicraf
Coloring,
Ornament
Obnoxiou
Ornament
Fuel wood
Obnoxiou
Food, me
Food, me
Medicinal
Ornament
Medicinal
Textiles, r
Food,eco
Fiber, slop
Potential Use
rope, ecological
, beverage, ecolo
ft, wrapping, ecolo
dyes, medicinal, e
tal, medicinal, eco
us weed, invasive
tal, ecological
d, medicinal, ecol
us weed, invasive
dicinal, ecologica
dicinal, ecologica
, ecological
tal, ecological (foo
rope, ecological
logical
pe stabilization, p
e(s)/Remarks
ogical
ogical
ecological
ological
species
ogical
species
l
l
od for birds)
aper, Christmas t
Annexe
tree
es
A
Annexes
Local/
18. Samb
19. Walis
20. Wild
Table 4.F
Local/C
1. Buri
2. Coco
3. Edibl
4. Kama
5. Pako
6. Pako
7. Pako
8. Pako
9. Pakp
10. Pakp
/Common Name
bong
s-walisan
ginger
Ferns and palms w
Common Name
onut
le fern
arianggubat
ongalakdan
ongbato
ongbuaya
ongkalabaw
paklawin
paklawinlalaki
Family
Asteraceae
Malvaceae
Zingiberaceae
within the Project
Family
Palmae
Palmae
Woodeiaceae
Senaginellacea
Blechnaceae
Polypodiaceae
Cyatheaceae
Marattiaceae
Aspleniaceae
Aspleniaceae
S
Blumeaba
Sidaacuta
Etlengera
site
Sci
Coryphau
Cocosnuc
Diplazium
ae Seleginell
Blechnum
Microsoru
Cyatheac
Angiopter
Asplenium
Asplenium
Scientific Name
alsamifera
a
a elation
entific Name
utan
cifera
mesculeutum
laplana
morientale
umlongissimum
ontaminans
rispalmiformis
mnidus
mnidus
Medicinal
Slope sta
Food, me
Handicraft
Food, oil (VCO
Food, ecologi
Medicinal, eco
Ecological
Ornamental, e
Ornamental, e
Ornamental, e
Ornamental, e
Ornamental, e
Potential Use
, ecological
bilization, ecologi
dicinal, ecologica
Potential
O), medicinal, han
cal
ological
ecological
ecological
ecological
ecological
ecological
e(s)/Remarks
cal
l
Use(s)
ndicraft, lumber, e
9-
July 2
etc.
-79
2010
9
Ju
9-80
uly 2010
Table 5.G
Local/C
1. Ayas
2. Bikal
3. Bikal
4. Buho
5. Bolo
6. Cogo
7. Kawa
8. Kulap
9. Kulut
10. Maka
11. Sarra
12. Talah
Grasses and bam
Common Name
s –as
babui
o
on
ayankiling
pe
t-kulutan
ahiya
at
hib
boo within the Pro
Family
Poaceae
Poaceae
Poaceae
Poaceae
Graminae
Graminae
Graminae
Graminae
Malvaceae
Mimosaceae
Cyperaceae
Graminae
oject site
Sci
Setariapa
Schizosta
Schizosta
Schizosta
Gigantoch
Imperatac
Bambusa
Paspalum
Triumfette
Mimosa p
Sclera scr
Saccharum
ientific Name
lmiflolia
achyumdiffusum
achyumdielsianum
achyumlumampao
hloa levis
cyclindrica
vulgaris
mconjugatum
erhoniboidea
pudica
robisulata
mspontaneum
Slope stabiliz
Propping, eco
m Propping, eco
o Housing mate
Paper, rope,
Housing mate
Slope stabiliz
Slope stabiliz
Ecological
Ecological
Forage, ecolo
Potential
zation, ecological
ological
ological
erial, furniture
roofing, forage, ec
erial, furniture
zation, forage, eco
zation, ecological
ogical
Use(s)
cological
ological
Annexees
A
Annexes
Table 6.F
Local/C
1. Antip
2. Avoc
3. Balim
4. Caim
5. Calam
6. Tiesa
7. Chico
8. Duha
9. Guav
10. Himb
11. Malu
12. Mang
13. Nang
14. Papa
15. Pome
16. Samp
17. Santo
Fruit–bearing tree
Common Name
polo
cado
mbing
mito
mansi (citrus)
a
o
at
va
babao
ngay
go
gka
aya
elo
palok
ol
es within the Proje
Family
Moraceae
Lauraceae
Oxalidaceae
Sapotaceae
Rutaceae
Sapotaceae
Sapotaceae
Myrtaceae
Myrtaceae
Moraceae
Moringaceae
Anacardiaceae
Moraceae
Caricaceae
Rutaceae
Fabaceae
Meliaceae
ect site
Sci
Artocarpu
Perseaam
Averrhoac
Chrysoph
Citrus mic
Pouteriac
Manilkara
Syzygium
Psidiumgu
Alleaunthu
Moringaol
e Mangifera
Artocarus
Carica pa
Citrus gra
Tamarind
Sandoricu
entific Name
usblandoi
mericana
carambola
yllumcaimito
crocarpa
ampechiana
azapota
mcuminii
uajava
usluzonicus
leifera
aindica
sheterophyllus
paya
andis
dusindica
umkoetjape
Food, latex, g
Food, ecologi
Food, ecologi
Food, ecologi
Food, medicin
Food, ecologi
Food, ecologi
Food, wine, ju
Food, hand to
Food, lumber,
Food, medicin
Food, ecologi
Food, lumber,
Food, medicin
Food, ecologi
Food, medicin
Food, lumber,
Potential
um, ecological, lu
cal, medicinal
cal
cal
nal, ecological
cal
cal
uice, ecological
ools, ecological, m
, ecological
nal, ecological
cal
, ecological
nal, ecological
cal
nal, ecological
, ecological
Use(s)
umber
medicinal
9-
July 2
-81
2010
9-82
July 2
Ann
ComMin
AgriMunof vlikewprod3,10or 3potesele
Thisgrasbarageneobjeanaldeci
The becaforewill cook
1.
Pili (wideSamCap1997inter
ComAlbaHowwooplan
2
2010
nex 9-11. Ma
mprehensiveing Sites in
culture is stnicipal data farious cropswise grown. duction. The04), built-up a309 ha). Theentials for incection of thos
s market studss. These aangays of theral process
ectives; (b) dlyzing the iision as to w
market studause rehabist cover is ncontribute t
king in rural a
Pili
(Canarium oely distribute
mar. It could piz, Negros 7). Majority rcropped wit
mmercial plaay, and Camwever, areasod carvings antation. In 19
arket study o
e Market SRapu-Rapu
till the seconfor 2002 indis. Coconut isAbout 47%
e rest are deareas (5.6%
e myriad of ccreasing the
se species fo
dy delved onare the crohe Rapu-Raps of doing mdeveloping thnformation ghether the g
dy of other crlitation using
needed everyto mitigatingareas. Henc
ovatum) is aned in the hil
also be founOccidental, of cultivated
h fruit trees.
antations aremarines Sur.s planted to and other pu95, this decl
of selected cr
Study of Seu
nd major socate that abs the dominaof the total l
evoted to woor 928 ha),
crops that coe areas of cuor use in reha
nly on five maps highly rpu Polymetaarket researhe research gathered; (erowing of sa
rops (e.g., treg trees is teywhere in th climate ch
ce, the press
n indigenously and mounnd in Quezon
Leyte, Davd pili are in
e being start. These thrpili have de
urposes. In ined to abou
rops
elected Cro
ource of incobout 5,000 faant crop. Aland area oroodlands (20grassland (5ould be growultivation of abilitation wo
ajor crops: crecommendeallic Project.rch which inv plan; (c) co
e) presentingid crops is ec
ees) that will echnically fee country. Tange and to
sure on natur
s nut crop ofntainous aren, Laguna, Bvo and Nuentercropped
rted now in ree provinceeclined due
1975, thereut 1,565 ha.
ps Used in
ome of the armers are eAbaca, root cr 7,713 ha ar0% or 3,240 5.5% or 886 wn in Rapu-some other
ork.
oconut, abaced by the r The studyvolved: (a) dollecting the g the findinconomically
be used for easible and The establisho providing ral forests wi
f the Philippieas of the BBatangas, Oreva Ecija (P
with coconu
Bicol provines are the lto cutting of
e were an e
n the Reha
Rapu-Rapu ngaged in th
crops, and frre devoted toha), shrublaha), and maRapu indicatvaluable cro
ca, banana, residents of y methodolodefining the
information ngs; and (f) and ecologic
rehabilitationworthwhile. hment of treea source oll be reduced
nes. It is coBicol region riental Mindo
Philippines Rut and at th
nces such aargest produf old trees fstimated 2,5
Annexes
abilitation o
municipalityhe cultivationruit trees areo agricultura
ands (19% oangroves (2%tes the goodops, thus the
pili, and tigef the impacogy used theproblem and needed; (dmaking the
cally viable.
n is excluded In generale plantations
of energy fod.
ommonly andand Eastern
oro, PalawanRecommendshe backyards
as Sorsogonucers of pilifor fuelwood540 ha of pi
s
of
y. n e al r
% d e
r ct e d ) e
d l, s r
d n n, s s
n, i.
d, li
Annexes
1.1 Produc
There are athe largest a1996). In Bicwith 145 haCatanduaneplantations a
The averageabout 4,678at 1,758, Orespectively
Pili is an eaestimated yi
Tab
Y
ction Area a
an estimated area at 968 col, Sorsogo
a of plantatioes 4 ha. are found in
e yield per t fruit per yea
Oas at 1,64. A kilogram
arly maturineld per hecta
Table 1
Katutub
Oas
Isarog
Mayon
Mabung
Ibalon
Average
ble 2. Total pha
Year of Produ
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
and Yield
1,218 ha ofha or 79.5%
on has the bons, CamariRapu-Rapu Brgys. Pobla
tree per yeaar followed in43 nuts, theof pili is app
g crop. It care for a 14-y
. Estimated athe Philippi
Pili Variety
bo
ga
e
production of
uction N
f pili plantati% of the totaiggest area nes Sur withas only a
acion, Galicia
ar depends on descendingen Mayon
proximately 3
could bear fryear product
average yielines.
Esti
f pili plantatio
Number of Fru
34,896
52,344
34,896
34,896
34,896
34,896
52,344
ons in the cal area (Bureplanted to ph 100 ha, Cabout 3.57 a, Villahermo
on the varietg order by Kand Isarog
30 pieces.
ruit in 6 to tion period (P
d of pili varie
imated Yield nuts per y
2,453
1,643
1,101
1,244
4,678
1,758
2,146
on at a dens
uits/ha
ountry. The eau of Agricili at 669 ha.
Camarines Nha devoted
osa and Bilba
ty (Table 1). Katutubo at 2
at 1,244 a
7 years. Tab
Phil. Recomm
eties grown i
(number of year)
sity of 1,454
Total Produ
Volume (k
29,662
44,492
29,662
29,662
29,662
29,662
44,492
Jul
Bicol regioncultural Statis. Next are A
Norte 50 ha, to pili. Tao.
Mabunga y2,453 nuts, Iband 1,101
able 2 showsmends 1997)
in
trees per
uction
kg)
9-83
ly 2010
n has stics. Albay and hese
yields balon nuts,
s the ).
9-84
July 2
1.2
MosRecinvopickdelivby thchanoutledelivwith
1.3
The Thewhomidd
1.4
Bicoin thNortfarmare FinisMan
4
2010
Year
Marketing
st farmers acommends 1olved namelyking up or ivering unshehe kilo or bynges dependets. Buyers overed. Shelle shell would
Marketing
market flowre are only 3
olesaler-retaildlemen are i
Processor
ol can be dubhe Bicol regiote. In Albay
mers/produceabout 256
shed/processnila, Batanga
of Production
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
Practices
and traders 997). Somey: pick-up on buying pi
elled pili to py the hundreding on the sof processeded pili wouldsell about P
Channel
w of pili is rel3 middlemenler, and the nvolved – th
rs and Marke
bbed as the on – 23 in Alalone, whic
ers may coutrader-proce
sed productas, Baguio, C
n Numb
sell pili insell in raw
or delivery. li nuts from
processors. Rd, while sheseason. Mosd pili buy dir range from 100 per kilo
atively simp involved in trader-whol
e wholesaler
ets of Pili
pili capital olbay, 8 in Cach is the nerse their proessors of pts are delive
Cebu, Iloilo, a
ber of Fruits/h
34,896
34,896
34,896
17,448
34,896
17,448
17,448
n unshelled and kernel Assembler-w
m farmers oRaw and unslled are bou
st middlemenrectly or mak
P 300 to mogram.
le for both ththe trade – tlesaler-procer-retailer and
of the countryamarines Suearest potentoducts to theili in Bicol ered to provand Davao.
ha Tot
V
or depulpeforms. Two
wholesaler ur producersshelled/depught by the k
n deliver unske orders anore than P 3
he farmer orthe assembleessors. At thd the retailer
y. There arer, 2 in Sorsotial market fe listed procbut only 34vinces in B
al Production
Volume (kg)
29,662
29,662
29,662
14,830
29,662
14,830
14,830
ed form in marketing p
use passeng. Traders u
ulped pili nutsilo or by the helled pili tod wait for pr
320 per kilog
r traders ander-wholesalehe processin(Figure 1).
about 34 pigon, and 1 ifor pili from essors in Ta
4 are registeicol and citi
Annexes
n
sacks (Philpractices areger jeeps in
use trucks ints are bough ganta. Price
o their markeroducts to begram. Those
d processorser, the traderng level, two
ili processorsn CamarinesRapu- rapu
able 3. Thereered in DTIies in Metro
s
l. e n n ht e et e e
s. r-o
s s
u, e . o
Annexes
a) R
Processor
Direct consu
b) P
Fig
Raw/unshelle
Farmer/Produce
umer
rocessed pil
Seconda
gure 1. The
d/shelled pili
er
i
ary link
Processor
marketing flo
and
i
Assembwholesa
ow of pili pro
processed m
bler- aler
Wholesaler
Retailer
oducts (a) raw
material (Phi
Traderwholesa retailer
consum
w/unshelled/
l. Recomme
Jul
r- aler- r
Prim
Direct
mer
/shelled
nds 1997).
9-85
ly 2010
mary
9-86
July 2
Ta
N
1P
2&
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
1
1
1D
1C
1P
6
2010
able 3. List
Name of BusiFirm
1. JJAM Products
2. COP Pili S&
Pastries
3. Albay Pili Nu
Candies
4. Roger & Bet
Candy
5. Weky’s Pilin
Drops
6. Daraga Swe
Café Deligh
7. Mayon Pilin
Candies
8. Morato’s Pil
Candies
9. Noveno’s Pi
Candies
10. Portem’s P
Candies
11. Cozytops P
Candy
12. S. Destura
Pilinut Can
13. MMJ Candy
14. Ed & Pilinuts
of pili proces
iness/ Co
Food John
Sweets Cind
ut RoseBattu
th Pili Roge
nut Welh
eets &
t
Chit
ut Jean
inut Eric
ilinut Cora
Pilinut Vice
Pilinut Jerry
Bonto
ndies
Susa
Pilinut Delia
Lyn Mari
ssors in the A
ontact Person
n Mangampo
dy Perena
emarie ung
er Munda
helmina Batall
Alcera
nete S. Chan
Morato
azon Noveno
nte Portem Jr
y Dimaandal
an B. Destura
a Bongon
lyn Bonto Biro
Albay provin
n Addre
Tula-TuCity
0929-59
Banag, Albay
0916-64
091544
D. Rizal St
(052)-43529
0917-55
Cabang
0918-72
la Bonga, Albay
0916-51
Avila SDaraga
0920-38
Tabaco
0917-55
Centro,
052-484
0916-25
Brg. Albay
0928-24
r Basud, Albay
0921-22
Bongalo
0909-83
Tabaco
0917-44
Rizal St
0919-85
on Rizal St
0909-22
ce (DTI Prov
ess and CP #
ula, Legazp
922824
Daraga
430696/
434632
t. Legazpi City
81-1161/820-
580493
gan, Camalig
282160
Bacacay
199778
Subd. Maroroy, Albay
873573
o City
582815
Guinobatan
4-6174
536173
1, Camalig
469961
Polangu
227647
on, Daraga
322534
o City
469170
t. Tabaco City
554089
t., Tabaco City
261921
vincial Office
Product L
Raw MUs
pi Assorted products;
Pili nut an
a, Assorted candies, pastries;
Pili nut an
y Assorted candies;
Pili nut, su
Assorted candies;
Pili nut su
y, Assorted products, candies;
Pili nut, su
y, Assorted products;
Pili nut, su
Assorted candies;
Pilinut sug
Assorted candies;
Pilinut, su
g, Assorted products;
Pilinut, su
i, Assorted products;
Pili nut, su
Pili flakes;
Pilinut sug
Assorted candies;
Pili nut, su
y Assorted candies;
Pili nut su
y Assorted candies;
Annexes
e 2010).
Lines and
Materials sed
pili
nd sugar
pili pili
nd sugar
pili
ugar
pili
ugar
pili Choco pili
ugar
pili
ugar
pili
gar
pili
ugar
pili
ugar
pili
ugar
;
gar
pili
ugar
pili
ugar
pili
s
Annexes
Name of Fi
15. Busay
16. Pilinut
Candy
17. PCascante
Pilinu
18. JhoPilinut
Cand
19. Jelay’s
20. GueCandy
21. J. BoProducts Candies
22. Glory’s
Deligh
23. ReoSweets
1.5 Profitab
The Phil. Rehectare undperiod. To iwith other ccoconut, fruother crops, reasons: (a)in this counthas export pappeal to coyears with munder norma
Business/ irm
y Pilinuts
Barcelon’s
y
. Barra
ut Candy
o Sanchez
y
s Sweets
erero Pili
orbe Native and Pilinut
s Food
hts
perez Pili
bility Analys
ecommends der a monocmprove the crops such it trees and its use as re
) it is indigentry making itpotentials – ponsumers, emedicinal anal conditions
Contact Pe
Erwin Bonto
Priscilla Barce
Purificacion Cascante
Josie G. Sanc
Jela B. Barbe
Ferdie M. Gue
Jomarie Borb
Gloria Buenzalida
Louresol Reo
sis
(1997) for propping scheprofitability, as papaya.other crops
ehabilitation ous in the Pglobally com
pili nut is supeven foreignend industrial s, (e) it plays
erson A
Riz
092
elon Riz
091
Riz
091
chez Riz
092
echo Riz
091
erero Riz
092
be Riz
092
Basco Riz
092
operez PuTab
091
pili estimatedeme. The it is recom
At presents. Though pimaterial is w
Philippines, (bmpetitive andperior to almers, resin is uses, (d) ps a significa
Address and C
zal St., Tabaco
29-2381854
zal St., Tabaco
19-5771703
zal St., Tabaco
19-3782196
zal St., Tabaco
22-2909108
zal St., Tabaco
10-2053151
zal St., Tabaco
20-2734937
zal St., Tabaco
21-6324340
zal St., Tabaco
20-6756702
rok 3, Salvabaco City
19-7085390
d the cost anbenefit cost mended that, most pili li plantation
worth consideb) it is produd a monopolond and othea known ex
pili is non-pent role in the
CP # Prod
Ra
Pilinu
o City Assorcandi
Pilinu
o City Assorcandi
Pilinu
o City Assorcandi
Pilinu
o City Assorcandi
Pilinu
o City Assorcandi
Pilinu
o City Assorcandi
Pilinu
o City Nativeassorcandi
Pilinu
o City Assorcandi
Pilinu
acion, Assorcandi
Pilinu
nd return for ratio is 1.17
t pili should trees are inmay not be
ering becausced in commy of the foreer nuts, proc
xport of the cerishable - 1e economy o
Jul
duct Lines an
aw Materials Used
ut, sugar
rted pies;
ut, sugar
rted pies;
ut, sugar
rted pies;
ut, sugar
rted pies;
ut, sugar
rted Pies;
ut, sugar
rted pies;
ut, sugar
ve products anrted pilinies;
ut, sugar
rted pies;
ut, sugar
rted pilinies;
ut, sugar
establishing7 for the 15- be intercrontercropped
e as profitabse of the follomercial scaleeign market, cessed delicacountry for m1 year storaof Bicol - 13
9-87
ly 2010
d
pili
pili
pili
pili
Pili
pili
nd ut
pili
ut
g one -year pped with
le as owing only (c) it
acies many ability 3,435
9-88
July 2
farmin thbreacrop
1.6
The procmosdevedeclimpaRapestaRegprogfor agricexpl
TigecounsourintercontenhacloscarbThe main
Tigerecocoun
2.1
Esta“tamlow but Intercity
In ARapplan
8
2010
mers benefitehe industry, akers, providp of Bicol.
Conclusion
supply for cessors. Keyst farms are elopment to line. Plantingacts of typh
pu-Rapu will ablishment ogion 5 agendgram of the B
the local culture.htm).lore the inter
2. Tiger
er grass (Thyntry. It is locrce of incomrspersed wittours servingances the eer spacing a
bon sequestrpropagation
ntenance cos
er grass proommended antry.
Production
ablished mombo” are inte
density. In tthe municiparviews reveafor further pr
Albay, the mupu, its feasibntations. But,
ed, 256 trade(f) the plant
des shelter fo
n
pili nuts at ty informants devastated bboost the in
g at wider areoon and othhave no pr
of more planda, specificalBicol Region
and intern. Most of thrnational mar
r Grass
ysanolaena cally known e for uplandth fruit treesg as soil e
environment along contouration capacn of tiger grst.
oduces pania long time a
n Areas and
onoculture percropped rathe Bicol regality of Lagoaled that morocessing to
unicipality ofbility remains, from interv
ers-processot is environmor wildlife, a
the moment revealed tha
by typhoon. ndustry becaeas or in mosher climate aroblem in tentations is ally under the aimed at inc
national mahe products rket as well.
latifolia) is nas tambo.
communitie and other rosion contrby stabilizin
urs. As a gocity is one imass needs l
cles for a ago by the g
Yield
lantations inndomly with
gion, towns inoy has beest of the tamimprove the
f Manito is ths to be seenviews, Brgy.
ors involved, ment-friendlynd has aest
is still inadeat the supplTherefore, euse until todst provinces abnormalities
erms of maralso in line e Pili Develocreasing therkets (htt://are for loca
native and aIt is a viabl
es. This planperennials inrol measureg soil erosio
ood crop to rmportant conittle capital,
maximum pgovernment t
n the count other fruit tn Camarines
en known to mbo produce
quality.
he number on and resideTinopan tha
significant ny – it preventhetic value,
equate compy becomes establishing day productio
in the Bicol s. Thus, est
rketing raw mwith the De
opment Prog production o/www.neda5.al demand/m
available in ae source oft can be a mn hilly lands. Ecologicalon-prone farrehabilitate dnsideration fo
is easy to m
period of tento promote t
try are not rees and cos Sur are alsproduce larg
ed in this tow
one producerents appear at is not imp
umber indirets erosion, aand (g) it is
pared to theeven more dplantations ion or output region wouldtablishing a materials pro
epartment ofram – whichof pili and its.net/updatedmarket. It’s
almost all ref livelihood omain crop. It by plantingly speaking,
rmlands whedegraded waor choosing manage, and
n years. It he broom in
well documconut in uplaso producingge volume o
wn are broug
r of tiger graadamant in acted by the
Annexes
ectly involvedacts as wind
s the flagship
e demand bydifficult whens a welcomecontinues to
d cushion theplantation in
roduced. Thef Agricultureh is a bannes by-productsd-rdp/cahp12high time to
egions of theor alternativet can also be
g them along, tiger grass
en planted aatersheds, itsthis speciesd has lesse
is one cropndustry in the
mented. Mosand farms ag tiger grassof tiger grassght to Baguio
ass. In Rapu establishinge mining firm
s
d d p
y n e o e n e -r s
2-o
e e e g s
at s s. r
p e
st at s, s. o
-g m
Annexes
produces tamand could yibrooms. Eac
2.2 Marketi
Tiger grass some of thProducers bquantity of tand sell them
Consumers
Accordingly,of good quathe country. wholesale. Wthe thicknesInterviews rtogether is s
2.3 Profitab
The initial cspacing undfarm gate p419 broomswould be absecond yeamaterials. Tproduction y
mbo. Accordield about 43ch broom con
ing Practice
panicles are tambo ma
buy panicles tambo. Tambm to retailers
Tiger gra
Tiger gra
and tam
Figure 2
, there is no ality. It can b
The price oWhile at the s. Price may
revealed thasold at P 60 t
bility Analys
apital neededer prevailingrice of tamb
s, the net rebout 1.27 forar because his will evenyear for tiger
dingly, a hect3,995 paniclentains about
es and Chan
e sold by prakers themsfrom others bo is sold tos in various p
ass produce
ass produce
mbo maker
2. The marke
to consum
problem in me sold within
of tambo at thmarkets, tam
y increase deat the farmgto P 80. This
sis
ed to establisg prices for o at P 50/pc
evenue woulr the first yeof reduction
n increase mr grass is on
tare of tiger ges. This numt 105 panicle
nnel
roducers to selves are awhen their s
o traders by parts of the c
ers
er Tam
eting flow of
mers.
marketing son the commuhe producermbo is sold epending on gate price ofs bundle can
sh one hectalabor and m
c and the nud be about
ear, and is en in plantati
more on the 6n this stage.
grass needs mber of panic
s.
tambo (the also producsupply is not makers of ta
country (Figu
bo trader
tiger grass p
oft brooms ounity where irs’ level may ranging fromthe decorati
f a beer boproduce abo
are of tiger material inpuumber of broP 20,950. Txpected to iion establish6th year becaThe return
about 2,500cles could pro
finished proers of tiger enough to p
ambo and thre 2).
Retailer
panicles from
r tambo as lot is producedrange from
m P 75 to P 9on and thickttle size of
out 5 tambos
grass plantauts is P 16,4oom produceThe benefit ncrease to ahment and ause accordon investme
Jul
0 to 3,000 cluroduce about
oduct) maker grass paniproduce suffihe traders de
rs
m producers
ong as thesed or anywheP 40 to P 5
90 dependinkness of pani
panicle buns.
ation at 2m x477. At a cued per hectacost ratio (B
about 1.87 incost of pla
dingly the higent (ROI) for
9-89
ly 2010
umps t 419
rs or icles. cient
eliver
e are ere in 50 for ng on icles. ndled
x 2m urrent are of BCR) n the nting ghest r one
9-90
July 2
hectinter
2.4
TigetimemarThe demrehabe amar
3. C
The estimabouthe remand
Cocexperegimareaare amerehacomwouwouof ththe to in
3.1
The SpicrecopotenutswithRec5 yerequ
0
2010
tare in the frcrop, tiger g
Conclusion
er grass as re provide ecoginal lands. supply of t
mand remainabilitating mia problem esketed, its oth
Coconut
country todamate shows ut 3.5 millionPhilippines. ains a pillar politics.
conut has beerience and me in terms as, and its ov
better thanelioration, incabilitation sp
mmonly knowuld just leaveuld go back ahe country, itinternational
ncrease plant
Production
varieties of cata. But, oommended foentials of thes per bunch a 4-5 nuts m
commends 19ears, producuires only 3-3
first year is grass product
n
ehabilitation onomic return Sturdy and
tiger grass pns high. Maning sites is specially if gher objective
ay is the leathat the cou
n ha of diverThe industryof the Philip
een appreciabenefits theof providing
verall contribn grass specluding otherpecies, its uwn as the “lae the seedlinagain to the sts demand bo market alontation areas.
n Area and Y
coconut the nly the Lagor commercie two varietieand 14-17 buaking a kilo 975). The Saces 5-7 nuts3.5 nuts.
0.27 and 0tion would be
species will ns to the com
d shallow roopanicles for arket is not
both ecologgood-quality , which is to
ading coconuuntry has ovese crop and y has surviveppine econo
ated more ae country hadirect emploution to natio
ecies in termr services offuse entails lzy man’s crog behind witsite when it oth locally anne should be
Yield
country havuna and theial purposeses. The Lagunches per yof copra or
an Ramon vas/bunch and
.40 in the 2e more profit
improve themmunity andoted, the plathe productyet saturat
gically and ec broom is pstabilize the
ut (Cocos nuer 300 milliotopographic
ed numerousomy with stro
as an econoas had from oyment to theonal economms of carbffered to humesser manaop” becauseth less care is already bend internatioe an incentiv
ve are: (a) Tye San Ram. The very o
guna variety year. A matur about 4,620ariety produc 14-17 bunc
2nd year. It itable just like
e stability of d company. Tant will not ction of broomed; hence, conomically roduced. If
e slopes is a w
ucifera) produn productive
cal mixes in 6s cycles of song influence
mic commodcoconut ind
e less advanmy. Many belbon sequestmans either dagement cose most farme
and maintenearing fruit. Anally is incree to would-b
ypica, (b) Javmon forms uobvious reaso
flowers in 3ure nut weigh0 nuts to maces large nutches per ye
s suggestede pili plantatio
slopes whileThe species ause crackin
m is still limthe use of viable. Marktiger grass
worthy purpo
ucer in the we coconut pa65 out of 78 slump and pre in the coun
dity becausedustry since ntaged peoplieved that coration and directly or indsts. In fact, ers after plannance. ThenAs one majoasing and th
be and prese
vanica, (c) Nnder varietyon is the hig
3-5 years, prhs approximaake a ton ofts. This flowe
ear. A kilogra
Annexes
d that if withon.
e at the sameis adapted tong of slopes
mited and thef species foketing will nocould not beose.
world. Recenalms covering
provinces orosperity andntry’s culture
e of the longthe Spanish
le in the ruraoconut plantsmicroclimatedirectly. As athis crop is
nting coconun, the farme
or export crophe demand aent producers
Nana, and (dy Typica aregh productiveroduces 8-12ately 1.26 kgf copra (Philers also in 3ram of copra
s
h
e o s. e r
ot e
nt g of d e
g h al s e a s
ut r p at s
) e e 2
g, l. -a
Annexes
In Rapu-Rafollowed by with 637 haBinosawan, However, thabandoned physical req
3.2 Marketi
One of the marketing tmarketing oavailable mithere are aRecommend
1. ToovariosolddeaexpoMosthe whoassevolu
2. IrregsomJulyharvof.
3. Lackregaand prodthe the
4. Lackharvcomthe mateby thstorabeca
pu, about 6Galicia and
a, 501, and Malobago,
e potentials mining sites uirements of
ing Practice
most importhe product of nut or copddlemen, tralso some prds 1975):
many middous intermed
d by quantitylers and meorter, througst farmers prexporters. T
olesalers, locemblers, de
ume.
gular sales. me farms, say, Septembevest. In case
k of uniformardless of siz
stores, pricducers are mcopra whichmarket acco
k of supportvest facilitie
mmunity/baramercy of bigerial producehe farmers. age. Storingause of the n
,050 ha of lCaracaran 467 ha, resand Pagco
of the area fis therefore
f coconut (Pl
es and Chan
rtant problemefficiently a
pra is not maders and proroblems rega
lemen. The diaries throu
y through corchants. The
gh his local ocessed the
The exporterscal buyers, aalers, public
Most farmerles are done
er, October of copra, it
m weight andze. However
ces are basemostly basedh the farmersunts for this.
t services sues especiangay level.
g capitalist thed from cocoIt could be sg to wait foneed for cash
lands are dein descendin
spectively. Tholbon have for this crop viable in terate 1).
nnel
ms in the grand getting
much of a pocessors of varding mark
link betweenugh which copra makerse town buyeforeign brok
eir nuts into cs offer highe
and copra suc market, a
rs do their sae only in the
and Decemis only when
d measures.r, in some ined on size.
d on the “cors produced. .
uch as roadally at theTherefore, t
hat usually dionut at the f
stored for a wr a better mh by the lowl
evoted to cong order hashe three direless than is very high
rms of availa
rowing of anbetter pric
problem for various by-p
keting and th
n the farmerscoconut prod. Others are
er or merchakers, sells tcopra. The ner prices thanb-agents. Thnd local sto
ales during ae months of mber. Nuts n the dealer c
Nuts sold instances esThe price p
rriente” gradeThe price d
ds, transportae farmers the small scctate the pricfarm which cwhile but neemarket pricey farmer.
oconut. Brgys the largestectly impact60 ha coco. Coconut fo
able space a
ny crop incluces for themsmall produroducts of cohese are the
s and the products pass. Ne sold to barant sells to tho the proceumber one on others. Nehis group is ores who b
all the monthJanuary, Maare sold im
comes that c
in quantity apecially at thpaid by the e regardlessdictated by th
ation and stlevel or
ale producece of copra. could be mareds to be driee, is howeve
Jul
ys. Villahermt area of cocted barangayonut plantat
or rehabilitationd soil and o
uding coconm. For coccers becausoconut. Howe following (
rocessors areNuts are usrrio or town he exporter.
essing indusoutlet for copext in line arefollowed by uy just in s
hs of the yeaarch, April, Jmmediately copra is disp
are being vahe public mbuyers to c
s of the qualhe middleme
torage and even at
rs are alwayCopra is therketed wholeed well for loer, seldom
9-91
ly 2010
mosa, conut ys of tions. on of other
nut is onut, se of ever, (Phil.
e the sually
sub- The tries.
pra is e the local small
ar. In June, after osed
alued arket
copra ity of en in
post-the
ys at e raw esale onger done
9-92
July 2
3.3
A cohectstartOn tquitecocothouharvprodmakotheprod
3.4
Whiramnaturehacocoto clmormovfor c
The abouThesectprodin thpresfarmmaksuppwhicthroqual
2
2010
Profitability
oconut planttare of cocoting from thethe on the 20e long, theronut plantatiugh income vested at anduction. In Rake this crop per fruit croducts/fruits.
Conclusion
le many belipant cutting
ural forests, abilitation foronut (e.g. virlimate change people to
ve to replant coconut will h
establishmeut 60% of refore, the ctor for yearductivity will he rehabilitatsence of avmers revealeke marketingportive of DAch involves ugh: coconulity improvem
y Analysis
ation will taknutland, it w
e 5th year, sa0th year, the refore more ons in the cmay be decn interval ofapu-Rapu, fa
popular in theps that ne
n
eve that theof mature pa greater
r many reasrgin coconut ge. The popu
replace oldold plantatio
hopefully boo
ent of new pinternationa
coconut indurs to comecontinue to ted mining svailable mard that their easy and coA-Region 5’s
comprehenut planting ament project
ke some timewill take 9 yeles could alreBCR is quiteincome co
country that areasing alreaf 2 months armers interve rural areaseeds pestici
coconut indplantations innumber stilons. One is oil). There iularity of coc plantations
ons. The conost the indus
plantations ially-traded oustry should . Investmenbe worthwhi
sites of the crkets both iproduce are
onvenient. Ms agenda unnsive rehabiand replantinand the Bico
e before a pears before teady be reale high at 4.3uld be derivare almost 4ady towardsor 6 times
viewed harves is its less caides (e.g.
dustry is becon the 1990’sll finds hop the fact thas also the coconut coir fibside by sid
ntinuing searcstry.
s very muchoil and prod
remain an ints in rehable (Habito 19
company willn Albay ane sold in So
Moreover, estnder the Cocilitation andng; coconut
ol coconut co
profit is realizthe breakevelized though 7. The produved from th40 years olds the senile s per year west coconut 5are and mainmango) to
oming a “suns brought abpe in the inat there are ontinuing neeber to controlde with the gch by scienti
h needed siduces 44% mportant sebilitation to 986). Marketl not encound Sorsogon
orsogon and tablishing moconut Industr
developmet rehabilitatiooir production
zed. Accordien point is rereturns are s
uctive years he plantation and are stistage. Cocowhich is ide5 times in onntenance act
produce g
nset” industrout by a log
ndustry and lots of by-p
ed for biofue erosion has
government’ssts to discov
nce the couof copra ingment of theimprove th
ting of coconnter any probn provinces.
the presencore plantationry Development of cocoon by fertilizn corridor.
Annexes
ingly, for onereached. Butstill negativeof coconut is
n. There arell productive
onut could beeal for coprane year. Whativities, unlikegood quality
ry, due to thegging ban on
pursues itsproducts fromel in responses encourageds aggressivever new uses
untry controlsn the worlde agriculturahe industry’snut producedblem due the Rapu-Rapuce of tradersns is likewise
ment Programonut industryzation; copra
s
e t,
e. s e
e, e a at e y
e n s
m e d e s
s d. al s d e u s e
m y a
Annexes
4. Abaca
Abaca (Musindigenous commodity g
More than 1are considerthe fiber procharacteristi
Abaca growwhere the sodrained withof clay loam
It can be groduring warmgrowth. Rainmost conducLeyte and Sarea for abaVisayas at 5
Figures fromindustry is wfiber. The c(http://www.
Plate 1.
sa textilis) oto the Philipgenerating a
100 cultivars red of commoperties of ics are show
s in virtually oil is: (a) volc
h a water tab type, and (f)
own in areasm months. Anfall should cive areas fo
Samar, and thaca and it pro575 kg/ha/yea
m the Fiber worth $ 81 mcrop also pragribusiness
Coconut common countrysid
or Manila hppines. Fromsignificant a
of abaca armercial import
the materialwn in Table 3.
all types of scanic in origi
ble of at least) less than 1
s with a meaA relative hu
be uniformlor abaca arehe peripheraoduces the har, then Bico
Industries Dmillion and throvides direcsweek.com/s
intercroppecropping
de including R
emp, as it m 1961 to 1amount of for
re grown in ttance. In chol. The recom
soils in the cin, (b) rich int 80 cm and ,000 m from
an temperatuumidity of fry distributed
e: the Bicol pal areas of Mhighest yieldol region at 3
Developmene country suct and indir
scientists-em
d with bacombinatio
Rapu-rapu.
is known in1974, it hasreign exchan
the Philippinoosing the cummended cu
ountry, but th organic matfrom 60 to 8sea level ele
ure of 200C drom 78 to 8d throughoutpeninsula, theMindanao. Mind from about 00 kg/ha/yea
t Authority (upplies 84% rect employm
mbark-on-proj
nana is aon in the
n the interns become a nge earnings
es, but so faultivar, it is dultivars and
he most prodtter, (c) loose80% degree evation.
during cold m88% is condt the year. Te Eastern Vindanao is th900 to 1,000
ar.
(FIBA) showof the world
ment to 1.5 ject-to-help-a
Jul
a e
national tradprincipal ex
.
ar, only abouesirable to ctheir agron
ductive arease, friable, (d)of saturation
months and ducive for aThus, so farisayas, islan
he most favo0 kg/ha/year
w that the ad demand for
million Filipabaca-indust
9-93
ly 2010
e, is xport
ut 20 check omic
s are ) well n, (e)
250C baca
r, the ds of rable r, the
baca r raw pinos try).
9-94
July 2
Arouto ab
4.1
Depbefodisafromthe passshow
The(a) Gand papegrowpape(f) enviin otand (http
4.2
Estamarenviline aimsprog
4
2010
und 127,000baca bunchy
Marketing P
pending on thore it reacheadvantage sinm the first mi
2nd& 3rd, thesing it to thwn in Figure
re is a risingGATT ratifica
Eastern Euer and wrapwing popularer, filters, highighly prefeironment friether countrie
(i) sourcp://www.bico
Conclusion
ablishing a pketing sinceironment friewith DA-Re
s to rehabilitagram are:
ha are planty top virus, th
Practices
he location os the consumnce middlemddleman when to the “ee balers/trad3.
g demand foation, (b) newurope, (c) incpper for cigarity, (e) incregh-tech capaerred for coendly, (g) as es, (h) compce of higl.da.gov.ph/o
n
lantation of ae the world endly productegion 5 agenate and expa
ted to abacahe most deva
of the produmer. Thus, c
men dictate pho buys direcntregadoresders who ar
r abaca fibew market opecrease in dearette, (d) inease demanacitor papersordage matreplacemen
parative advagh grade opportunities
abaca in the demand forts over synthnda under thand the abac
a, but in the yastating viral
ucer, abaca gconsumers pprices, hencectly from the” who cleanre usually th
er in the worened for tea emand by Ucrease dem
nd for specis, and other terial over t for asbesto
antage of Phhandmade
s/abaca profi
mining site r abaca fibehetic materiahe Abaca Inca producing
year 2002, a disease of t
goes througpay higher pre, they rake t
farmer in ann and classifhe exporters
ld market. Tbags and meS and Russ
mand for abaal paper fornon-woven asynthetic mos which is chilippine abae paper aile/topic 16.h
will not haveer is increasals. Plantationdustry Deveg areas. The
round 8,000 the plant.
h a series orices. Producthe largest pn “all-in” basfy the fiber b. This mark
This can be eat casing insia for abacaaca fabric ber stencil papand disposab
materials whcarcinogenic ca over thatand as atm/).
e any problemsing due to on developmeelopment Promajor compo
Annexes
ha were los
of middlemencers are at a
profit. Startingsis, it goes tobefore finally
keting flow is
attributed ton India, Chinaa-based fibeecause of itsper, currencyble products
hich are noc and bannedt of Ecuadorart medium
m in terms odemand fo
ent is also inogram whichonents of the
s
st
n a g o y s
o: a r s y
s, ot d r, m
of r n h e
A
Annexes
Table 3. Ab
Cultivars recommendedifferent regio
Eastern Visa
-Linawaan
-Minenonga
-Inosa
-Linino
Bicol Region
-Tinawagan p
-Tinawagan p
-Sogmod
-Lansigon
Mindanao Re
-Tangonon
-Bongolanon
-Maguindana1 Cruz and Baling2 Lanuza and Oy3 Gonzales et.al.
baca cultivars rec
ed in ons
Maturity (days)
ayas1
n2
puti
pula
eg.3
ao
621
594
697
682
-
-
-
-
540
545
-
gkil (1975)
yardo (1060)
(unpub.)
commended in thre
Ave. # of stalks
harvested annually/ha
Av
ha
4,743
6,691
5,013
5,306
1,629
1,494
1,143
54
2,284
3,256
-
ee regions and th
ve. wt. of stalk
arvested (kg)
Ave. fibrecove
16.57
16.56
17.33
20.90
-
-
-
-
36.13
26.61
-
1.7
1.18
1.41
1.58
1.10
1.03
1.03
1.51
1.83
1.97
-
eir agronomic cha
ber ery
Annual fiber yield (ton/ha)
8
8
0
3
3
3
7
1.37
1.31
1.27
1.73
0.43
0.38
0.22
0.18
1.83
1.97
-
aracteristics (Phils
Ave. # of suckers/hill
Testre(kg
7.06
8.32
6.64
6.55
11.42
14.61
23.93
9.12
15.9
20.8
24.6
54
56
57
51
49
50
51
55
49
41
48
s. Recommends f
ensile ength /g-m)
Length
(cm)
4.38
6.89
7.21
1.18
9.54
0.71
1.30
5.70
9.96
1.88
8.37
273.4
272.5
249.0
285.8
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
for Abaca 1977)
Base diameter
(cm)
d
12.8
11.9
13.1
13.6
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
9-
July 2
Tip diameter
(cm)
6.5
6.3
6.6
6.9
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-95
2010
9
Ju
PHs SPPo
F
9-96
uly 2010
Plantation Hagoteros/ trippers
as
Small-scale Planters and Partly tenants or laborer
Puab
La Pr
Figure 3. Abaca m
Village level small or medium scale abaca Producers acting als
s middleman
Village level purely small-scale abaca producers
urely medium scale baca producers
arge-scale abaca roducers
marketing flow (P
r Baa midso Ch
Fili
Trad owne midd midd
In thi expo broke opera
hils. recommends
rrio level ddlemen or
hinese or ipino
ing facilities eithered by provincial leveldlemen or town level dlemen
is large-scale abaca port are handicapped byers which is engaged ating in RP.
s 1977).
Town level middlemen Chinese or Filipino
producers making direy their lack of foreignby multi-national firms
Provinci level
middlem
ct
s
al Regional middlem
men Regional or branch office of a trading c
Opportu the Phils and ware
Export to world market
level men
h alien ompanies
nity in the s. with baling ehousing
Annexees
Annexes
production/dabaca areas
5. Banana
Banana is throughout tin the four Cotabato, afarmers who
In 1986, banha. Southernthe other reMost regionsbackyard an
National avewhere intenper hectare banana indurepresent aemploys aboconsistently Japan, Midd
There are mcultivation. Lwhile cavandmorado are fruit appeal a
Banana is ntemperatureoptimum groand with no
5.1 Marketi
The domesttraders. Morcomponent a
The marketias in DavaoMindoro ansystem follow
disposal of s, and expan
a
considered the archipelaprovinces ond Misamis
o grow banan
nana producn, Central, a
egions due ts in the coun
nd in small-sc
erage yield psive manageper year w
ustry contribbout 2.3% oout more tharanked amo
dle East, Hon
many distincLakatan, latudish is produfast gaining
and because
native to the e injury. Its gowth, the aresustained te
ing
ic market forre often, farmand the mark
ng system foo del Sur ord Batangasws any of the
tissue cultusion/develop
the premierago with largeof MindanaoOriental. Ab
na mainly for
ction reachednd Northern to favorable ntry have lowcale with little
per hectare/yement practi
which is almobutes significof the total
an 40,000 peong the nationg Kong, Sou
ct banana cuundan, bungouced significa acceptance
e of changing
warm and mgrowth is imea should ha
emperature b
r fresh bananmers are theket dictates t
or banana cor as complex
(Phils. Rece 3 distinct p
red abaca pment of new
r fruit crop e contiguous, namely: D
bout 75% of r local consu
d 3.8 million Mindanao oclimate, vas
w productivitye or no care
year is aboutices are emost 4 times cantly to the
Philippine eeople in relaton’s top tenuth Korea, N
ultivars in tholan, and saantly for exp
e in major img consumer p
moist regionsmpaired wheave a monthbelow 150C a
na is a compe least benethe prices.
ould be as six, as many commends patterns as s
plantlets, rew abaca area
in the Philips areas for coDavao del N
the banana mption.
tons from aobtained the st fertile landy because bat all.
t 11.59 tons.ployed couldgreater than
e country’s eexport revented industrie export itemew Zealand
he country bba are plant
port. Other cumporting coun
preferences.
s of Southean rainfall is
hly rainfall ofand higher th
plex system dfitted by the
imple as invoas seven in
1988). Genehown below:
ehabilitation as.
ppines. It isommercial prorte, Davaogrowers, ho
n aggregate highest yieldds and avaianana is gro
But plantatid yield aboun the nationeconomy as nue. Moreovs. This multi
ms. Major expand Italy.
but very fewed for domeultivars suchntries becaus
ast Asia. It isbelow 10 c
f 20-22 cm dan 350C.
dominated bysystem bac
olving only thntermediarieserally, howe:
Jul
of unprodu
s grown typroduction loc
o del Sur, Sowever, are s
e area of 330d as comparelable manpo
own mainly in
ions in Mindaut 40 tons ofnal average.
export earnver, this indi-million busiport markets
w are utilizedestic consumh as senioritase of their lu
s sensitive tocm a monthdistributed ev
y middlemencause the tra
he intermedis, as in Ori
ever, the tra
9-97
ly 2010
uctive
ically cated South small
0,000 ed to ower. n the
anao f fruit
The nings ustry ness s are
d for ption
a and uxury
o low . For venly
n and ading
aries ental
ading
9-98
July 2
5.2
WhibanamosreassomflungcompracprofThe tran
8
2010
1. Farme2. Farme3. Farme
The assemassemblerof assembproductionadded cosand backyThey mayprices to wplace to ppuree, chiof fruit retthey are scome from
The more
(a) Prmar
Pabaprsh
(b) Secoaloasnafato
Profitability
le the profit ana plantatio
st common vsons, the sa
me people in tg communit
mmunities. Unctices are efitable compa
only problesport proble
er Asseer Whoer Ret
mbler usuallr generally dbling and tran is small, psts in the trayard productiy practice sowholesalers.place. In theps, flour or pailers in Legselling come
m the nearby
common ma
ricing - banaultiplied by tre sold by we
ackaging - tamboo baskracticed whehip to maxim
elling - farmompensate foong the banssembler-whational highwrmer. The ba buyers in M
y Analysis
of middlemon in Rapu-Rvarieties thatba variety isthe uplands ies where rnder a smalmployed, a ared to intensem with smaems such as
embler olesalertailer
ly purchasesdictates the fansporting thprefers to sensport of gooon scheme, me form of g. Marketing e local markpowder are tgazpi city mae from Dava
towns of Alb
arketing prac
anas could bthe price peeight.
the most cokets or kainre bananas ize volume tr
mers generalor the high
nana producolesaler-ship
ways and picananas are tanila and ne
en is much Rapu is still t are normals the most pand rural are
rice producel-scale banahectare of
sively managall-scale prods the case i
Wholesale RetailerConsumer
s the farmefarm-gate prhe goods. Tell his produods to the mthe servicesgrading of thpractices vaket, several raded aside
arket stalls reao. Saba andbay.
ctices genera
be sold by cer finger. In b
ommonly usng and wooare crammeransport.
lly bring thecost of trans
ced by otherpper goes toks up banantaken to the earby market
higher thana worthwhilely planted in
preferred vareas. This is ee in not suffana plantatio
banana for ged large scaduction is thin Rapu-Rap
r Retai Cons
rs’ produce rice because
The farmer-guce to midd
market. Undes of the assemhe bananas, ary by type o
forms of bafrom the usu
eveal that thd tuldan are
ally observed
counting thebig commerc
sed containeoden crates.d inside a je
eir produce tsportation, sr farmers. Ino designated
nas bought blocal wholes
t centers.
the farmer-e endeavorn the countryiety and hasespecially trufficient to sun where lescommercial
ale productiohe marketingpu. As indic
ler Coumer
in small que they shouldrower, whoslemen rather the presenmbler cannotthen sell the
of trader/buyanana produual fresh forme bananas (
e the usual v
d by traders i
e number of cial plantatio
ers are sackBulk shipm
ep or truck o
to the markome farmers some placed location uy their agent
saler market
-producer, eseven with thyside. If for fs been part oue to some isupport the ns care and m purpose m
on with BCR g of produceated earlier,
Annexes
onsumer
uantities. Theder the costsse volume oer than incunt small-scalet be avoidedese at higheyer and fromucts such asm. Interviews(e.g. lakatanvarieties tha
nclude:
fingers thenons, bananas
ks, cartoonsment is alsoor van and in
ket place. Tos often bringes, howeverusually alongts and by thefor shipmen
stablishing ahe use of thefood securityof the diet osolated or faneeds of themanagemen
may be moreof about 1.2
e because o, the farmer
s
e s
of r e
d. r
m s s )
at
n s
s, o n
o g r, g e nt
a e y
of r e nt e 2. of r-
Annexes
producers athis situatioproducer frosound good beneficiaries
5.3 Conclu
Marketing ofbecause of is the low prwill be difficthe banana absorbed in variety is a gmust be intrlocal commu
re less benen, governme
om unscrupuas long as
s.
sion
f banana as existing buyrice dictatedult to markeplantation ithe commun
good substitroduced to punity.
efitted due toent support ulous middletraining, sup
experienceders even at by the buyet because os intended fnity. In this ute for cereaut more valu
o the very lowmay be ex
emen. The cpport facilities
d by most fathe local/bar
ers. Excess of the absencfor local concase, the saal/rice. In casue to the raw
w price dictatxtended in oreation of a s and netwo
rmer-producrangay levelvolume of pce of marketnsumption, t
aba variety sse of excess
w material an
ted by the morder to proproducers’ rking are ex
ers is not mu. The only produce at tht in Rapu-Rathe produce hould be gro
s production,d provide em
Jul
middlemen. Uotect the farcooperative
xtended to fa
uch of a proproblem, howe barangay
apu. Howev could be e
own because, food procesmployment to
9-99
ly 2010
Under rmer-may
armer
blem wever
level ver, if easily e this ssing o the
12-C PET Plans TowerEDSA, Guadalupe ViejoMakati City, Philippines
Phone: (632) 890-5902(632) 897-4012
Fax: (632) 897-3984
ENVIRONMENT & COMMUNITY CARE, INC.bmp