RR ThePower
description
Transcript of RR ThePower
-
I I A S N e w s l e t t e r | # 3 3 | M a r c h 2 0 0 4 1 5
> Research & Reports
By Audr ius Be inor ius
Astrology is Indias richest and mostvital tradition: some 100,000 man-uscripts covering various aspects ofIndian astral sciences (lit. jyotiQaPAstra)exist worldwide. Since the end of thenineteenth century, classical philolo-gists and historians of Indian religionand science, such as H. Kern, A. Weber,and H.-G. Thibaut, have made effortsto preserve and publish long-neglectedSanskrit astrological texts, emphasiz-ing their autonomous value. Arguably,only science historians have ever both-ered to look at astrological practice, yeteven they have limited their interest tocontemporary mathematics or astron-omy, and clearly remain a long wayfrom putting astrology in its propersocial or intellectual context (Pingree1997). The importance of medievalastrological texts in understanding thehistory of culture and ideas is morefully appreciated today, mainly due toDavid Pingrees historical studies andhis immense project, Census of the ExactSciences in Sanskrit.
Yet, many questions arise: how canwe explain astrologys large-scale sur-vival and even its persistent prolifera-tion? What was its role in traditionalsociety and within ancient bodies ofknowledge? Why did and does astrolo-gy appeal to educated Indians? Thispaper briefly discusses these questions,emphasizing some methodological andhermeneutical considerations.
For a long period the notion of pseu-do-sciences has hindered historical andcontextual investigation into phenom-ena like astrology and other forms ofdivination. According to RichardLemay, we cannot understandmedieval attitudes toward astrology by
applying to this science our contempo-rary paradigm (to use Kuhns conven-ient term) as this seems to foreclosein advance all avenues leading to themedieval mind, to its structural frame-work, and to the contents of its own dif-ferent paradigm(Lemay 1987:58). Onlya hermeneutical approach can lay barethe key concepts that supported ancientscience. Such an approach can alsoreveal the overall structure of ideas con-structed with these concepts, the localmodes of cultural transmission ofknowledge, methods of social control,and the nature of the cultural norms,that shaped the traditional epistemicfield.
In the traditional Indian context,astrology formed an indispensable andintimate part of traditional science andcosmology. It appealed to educatedIndians precisely because it was arational system, or could be made tolook like one. With reference to Greekcivilization, G. Sarton once remarkedthat Greek astrology was the fruit ofGreek rationalism, and received somekind of justification from the notionof cosmos, which is so arranged thatno part is independent of the otherparts and the whole.
The same can be said about theIndian cultural context. Acceptance ofastrology as a learned and scientificstudy was a common attitude, if notthe norm, hence the greatest Indianastronomers (Varahamihira, Brah-magupta) were also astrologers. Bothorigin and subject matter of astrologywere considered to be divine andastrology fascinated many of the great-est minds because it provided a totalvision of reality, uniting the macro-cosm with the human microcosm. Itwas due to the interest in prediction
and control as well as to the belief thatdivination could be socially beneficial,that divination developed as a body ofsocial and psychological knowledge.
Ancient applied scienceIn very ancient times, Indian rulers
acquired their legitimacy by claiming adivine connection, for example descentfrom the Sun, Moon, or Jupiter. Hencethe very first task for astrologers in thepast was to establish such divine sanc-tion for the rulers. The YAjavalkyasmOti (1:307) holds that the rise and fallof kings depends on the influence ofplanets, therefore a king should rely onhis astrologers. Most of the royal char-ters issued by ancient and medievalIndian rulers bear dates with astro-nomical details, which were no doubtsupplied by the court astrologer. It isnot by chance that this tradition wasalso actively cultivated by the patronageof the powerful Maharajas.
One may wonder why astrology was,and still is, so widely used. Perhapsbecause it provides a tangible, visibletemplate for predicting ones fate. Tra-ditionally it is thought that a personskarma has caused him to be born at atime when the horoscope would lead tohis fortunate or unfortunate condition.Hindus believe that heavenly bodies the planets (graha), constellations (rAPi),and asterisms (nakQatra) have a divineinfluence on the earth and on individ-ual people. These planetary effects arecommonly considered as the fruits ofkarma.
In the words of Judy F. Pugh, Thesecelestial forces begin to influence theperson from the time of conception andbirth. Hindu astrology offers schema-tizations of the influence of planets onthe developing embryo and stresses theimportance of birth time as the keypoint through which karma is made vis-ible and hence future actions and cir-cumstances are made known (Pugh1986:135). In that sense, astrology as anapplied science reflects popular under-standing of the manifestations of fatein the experiences of everyday life, andjustifies itself as inspiring a healthy reli-gious and social attitude. Karma teach-ings serve as a means of legitimizingthe application of astrology in religiousand social practices.
Like most ancient Indian disciplines,astrology is traditionally believed to con-sist of eternally valid knowledge witheternally fixed contents and unchang-ing rules. Astrologers were always refer-ring to ancient divine revelation of astro-logical knowledge, and they indulged ina free improvisation on certain themes.Like the other Indian PAstras (tradition-al disciplines), astrology was preservedwithin families of practitioners, andmembers of each such family wouldremain faithful over many generationsto a particular group of texts and wouldgenerally not be interested in educatingoutsiders or in making innovations intheir traditional learning.
Different knowledgestructures
Generally speaking, rather than tak-ing astrologys irrationality as given, itis more fruitful to consider howgrounds for belief in prediction and div-ination in the ancient world differedfrom our own and the way in whichtheir different ordering of knowledgemight be related to a different social,cultural, and even political context. AsT.S. Barton has rightly pointed out,Ancient astrology offers a contrastingcase to our organization of knowledge,illustrating the artificial, historicallyspecific nature of boundaries betweenknowledge and pseudo-knowledge,intellectual discipline and technicalcraft, science, and mysticism (Barton1994:30). It seems that if and wherehistorical astrology is human-centred,this will not pertain to astronomical ormathematical science, but rather to psy-chology and social science. Nonethe-less, it must be stressed that much inIndia that currently goes under thename of Indian astrological scholarshipin fact merely serves as a vehicle for thepropagation of nationalist ideas on theone hand or of escapist and utopiannotions on the other. The revival of socalled traditional Indian medicine is acase in point.
As Gyan Prakash has shown, in late-nineteenth-century British India, theHindu intelligentsia began to canonizea body of contemporary scientificknowledge, in particular ancient Indi-an texts and traditions (Prakash1999:88). The definition of classicaltexts as scientific was crucial in thisprocess because this gave justificationto their status as the embodiment ofeternal and universal laws. The West-ern-educated intelligentsia felt impelledto reinterpret classical astrological textsand by casting the texts in the languageof the Western scientific discourse, theyconstrued a body of indigenous scien-tific traditions consistent with Westernscience. As a result, we often find thatcurrent astrological concepts are uncrit-ically projected into earlier times, inaccordance with the notion that noactual evolution can have taken place.It is for this reason that the claim ofastrological practice to be scientific is
still very strong in its contemporaryIndian context.
In my opinion, unless one examinesthe basic Indian astrological treatisesin their fullest social and intellectualcontexts, as far as practically possible,it is impossible to give a reasonable andaccurate answer to the question whattraditional Indians think of astrology.The vast-scale text-critical andhermeneutical examinations of thosetreatises that I propose, are significantfor the study of ancient Indian cultureand also for understanding contempo-rary religious practices and beliefs. South Asia
Street astrologer and
palmist at work,
Chennai.
Pandit Dr Ashish
Bhattacharya (Cal-
cutta) representing a
more sophisticated
astrological tradi-
tion, validating itself
by the use of ancient
astrological texts and
nourished mainly by
the guru-PiQya
(teacher-disciple)
system.
Bo
th p
ho
tos
by
Au
dri
us
Bei
no
riu
s