RPT ON VLF & MAG SURS · at 31 Delair Ores., Thornhill, Ontario. The claims are numbered L561730,...
41
Y 4IP15NE833e 2.5740 CAIRO 010 COMSTATE RESOURCES LTD. Report on Electromagnetic (VLP) and Magnetic Surveys for the Cairo Township Property, Larder Lake Mining Division Ontario July, 1983 Timmins, Ontario R. Bald RECEIVED AUG 3 0 1983 LANDS SECTfo, o c/' O.O O
Transcript of RPT ON VLF & MAG SURS · at 31 Delair Ores., Thornhill, Ontario. The claims are numbered L561730,...
Y
4IP15NE833e 2.5740 CAIRO 010
COMSTATE RESOURCES LTD.
Report on
Electromagnetic (VLP) and Magnetic Surveys for the
Cairo Township Property,Larder Lake Mining Division
Ontario
July, 1983
Timmins, Ontario
R. Bald
RECEIVEDAUG 3 0 1983
LANDS SECTfo,
oc/'
O.OO
41P15NE8330 2.5740 CAIRO 010C
Table of Contents
Introduction
Location, Access and Topography
Previous Work
Regional Geology
Property Geology
Electromagnetic Survey
Results
Magnetic Survey
Results
Conclusions and Recommendations
References
Declaration
Figures/Maps:
Figure 1: Location of Cairo Township Claim Group
Figure 2: General Geology in vicinity of the Cairo Township Property
Map 1: Outcrop Map
Map 2: VLF - EM Map
Map J : Magnetic Map
-1-
Introduction
This report covers two geophysical surveys, including
electromagnetic and magnetic surveys, carried out over a claim
group located about one-quarter mile northeast of the Town
of Matachewan, Ontario (Figure 1). The property consists of
twelve unsurveyed, contiguous claims of approximately 40 acres
each, situated in Cairo Township, District of Timiskaming,
Larder Lake Mining Division.
The surveys were conducted by U.T.M. Technical Services
Inc., 141 Principale, Rouyn, Quebec, for Comstate Resources,
during the period June l and 2 for the VLP survey and June
1st to 3rd, 1983, for the magnetic survey.
The claims are currently held by D.R. Pyke, residing
at 31 Delair Ores., Thornhill, Ontario. The claims are numbered
L561730, L650115 to L650118 inclusive, L650130 to L650134
inclusive, L757832 and L757833.
Location, Access and Topography
The western edge of the claim group is situated about
one-quarter mile northeast of the town of Matachewan, Ontario.
Matachewan is about 35 miles southwest of Kirkland Lake, via
Highway 66, which transects the property. The northeastern
portion of the property is accessible by the Garbage Disposal
Road and the northwestern portion is accessible by a trail
to Knott Lake. The southern border of the claim group is the
Montreal River, thus easily accessible by boat. The Matachewan
O 1320
CAIRO TWR
KIMBERLEY TWR
CAIRO TOWNSHIP PROPERTY
-3-
transformer station js just outside the western margin of the
claim group. Large areas of outcrop occur south of Highway
66 and in the northwestern and northeastern corners of the
property, whereas the rest of the grid is covered by
glacial deposits including eskers and glaciofluvial material
(Map 1).
Previous Work
Following the discovery of gold in 1916, the Matachewan
area was mapped by Burrows (1918,1920), Cooke (1919) and
subsequently by Dyer (1955) and Lovell (1967).
There are no current assessment records available to the
writer concerning the nature or extent of any exploration work
undertaken on the Comstate property. Lovell (1967), indicates
that the property was formerly held by the Matachewan Hub
Pioneer Syndicate, who reportedly excavated a trench 110 feet
long near thesouth central boundary of the claim group. The
trench traversed a volcanic-diabase dike contact bearing white
pyrite and minor magnetite contained within a quartz-carbonate
matrix.
The property, consisting of ten previously patented mining
claims, came open for staking in June, 1981. Two other claims
were subsequently added to the northeast corner.
Regional Geology
The Matachewan area borders the northwest margin of the
Round Lake Batholith, and is on the south limb of a major
-4-
synclinorium, the axis of which trends westerly approximately
seven miles north of the area (Pyke et al, 1973). A large
pluton of syenite, the Cairo Stock, underlies the northeast
portion of Cairo Township. Volcanic rocks of komatiitic, tholeiitic
and calc-alkaline affinities trend westward across Cairo and
Powell Townships, but have not as yet been mapped in sufficient
detail to be accurately delineated. Intercalated with the
volcanic rocks are thick sequences of sedimentary rocks. It
is the contact zones of the more southerly sedimentary
sequence with the underlying volcanics, in association with
syenitic intrusions, which has formed the focal point for the
known gold mines in the area.
The north trending Matachewan dike swarm intrudes the
Early Precambrian (Archean) rocks, and has been dated at 2485
million years (Fahrig and Wanless, 1963).
Flat-lying Proterozoic sediments of the Cobalt Group
unconformably overlie the Archean rocks.
A number of major faults traverse the Matachewan area
(Figure 2), notably the Larder Lake Fault zone and the Montreal
River Fault. The easterly trending Larder Lake break is in
proximity to numerous gold camps throughout its strike length -
notably those of Kirkland Lake, Larder Lake, Noranda, Cadillac,
Malartic and Val d 1 Or. The exact positioning of the fault
through the Matachewan area is uncertain, but is believed to be
as depicted in Figure 2. Furthermore, the Montreal River Fault,
which traverses the Matachewan area, shows a spatial relationship
to a number of mines or camps - for example: Kidd Creek, Timmins,
LEGEND PRECAMBRIAN
PROTEROZOIC PpS Cobalt sediments
ARCHEAN
1*1*1 Syenite
j-j'-\ T rondhjemite
PM?] Gabbro
Ultramafic!
Sediments
Volcanics
N
SYMBOLS
U* Fault
"gf] Shaft
Oh
1 Miles.-i :l Km.
lllillllllllll11" 4 4* *'444 *xflft.*|
lake l
itae ttolidaled
-,-f. . . . . . . . l .TTT-r-TTTTTTT
X-l 44444444444444444444 v* 44444444444444444444
J.JJJJ1*!*.
444444444444444 \44444
*V^* ^ * * r A ID rt 'CT+XO 444 .CAIRO. 5J
ri
4444. 4. 4444444444444444444444444444444444444
4444t + 44444 4 4 4
* 4 44 4 4 4 444
+^^+^V^^+ +^* + + + + ;*;+:sd ^ l^l T + T +%]* * * 4 ^ ^ 4 4 4 4 4 4 4^i|IWiil* A 4 * H
"^ T 4 4 4 \V*. 4. .f 4 4^ 4. 4. 4. y^fefwHfeMiifff 444
iirJ^^^-\NNNNNN:^^WlI\^\444 4X 4 4* * 4 X +444? 4444
'4 4.4 4 4
Illllllllllll'llP^v 4 444444444444444444444444444
-ot
Tigure fc -General geology in the vicinity of Matachewan (Modified after Lovell, 1967).
-6-
and Elk Lake. Numerous other northerly trending faults are
known in the Matachewan area, many of which are filled "by
diabase dikes.
Property Geology
The property was mapped at a scale of l" c ioo 1 and the
report was filed for assessment, with accompanying map, in July,
1983.
About half the property is covered by relatively flat-
lying sediments of the Cobalt Group, consisting largely of
moderately well sorted polymictic conglomerates.
A variety of Archean volcanic rocks, largely consisting
of mafic flows and lesser intercalated felsic to intermediate
pyroclastic rocks are exposed along the south portion of the
claim group. Minor cherty sulphide iron formation is also
present. A lense of serpentinized peridotite extends into
the east portion of the claim group. Cursory examination by
Comstate Resources in 1982, revealed the presence of minor
komatiitic volcanic rocks, near the western extremity of the
volcanic x exposures, that are in fault contact with the underlying
mafic volcanic rocks. This fault zone is interpreted to form
part of the Larder Lake break. To the east of the property
the fault is taken to be coincident with the shear zone at the
south margin of the Cairo stock (Lovell,1967). To the west,
the fault largely separates Archean and Proterozoic rocks.
Here the volcanic rocks are intensely sheared near the Protero-
zoic-Archean contact; a drillhole in the Cobalt sediments
-7-
immediately south of the proposed Larder Lake fault zone
(Figure 2) did not encounter the Archean basement till a
depth of 1100 feet (Lovell,1967).
Electromagnetic^ Survey
The V.L.P. (very low frequency) electromagnetic survey
was conducted by U.T.M. Technical Services Inc. during the
period June l to 2nd, 1983, over 21.12 miles (111,500 feet)
of previously cut line at 200 foot intervals trending 0050 AZ.
The instrument used was a Geonics EM-16 system.
Specifications of the unit are attached. The transmitter station
used for the present survey was Cutler, Maine (N.A.A.) which
uses a frequency of 17.8 kHz, with a radiated power of lOOOkW.
The instrument has two receiving coils and the parameters
measured are:
1) the vertical in-phase component (tangent of the tilt angle),
2) the vertical out of phase component (quadrature component).
The interpretation of the results uses the relative
measurements of these two parameters and it is possible to
outline poor conductors such as sheared contacts, breccia zones,
faults, alteration zones, in addition to good sulphide or
graphite conductors.
Electromagnetic readings were taken at 50 foot intervals
for a total of 1977 readings.
Results
Results of the electromagnetic survey are shown in profile
-8-
f orm on Map 2 at a EC.ale of one inch equals 200 feet.
A relatively wide zome 6f interference occurs along the power
transmission and telephone lines running along Highway 66.
VLF conductors in this area were disregarded during the analysis
of the VLF data, although conductors in bedrock may exist along
the zone. Nineteen VILF conductors greater than 200 feet long
are indicated on Map '2 along with a number of single station
anomalies (Table 1). Eleven conductors are underlain by Cobalt
sediments, including -fchree which occur within the limits of
the garbage dump and unay be partly caused by metal garbage.
Locally the conductors trend parallel to the strike of the
sediments. Seven conductors are underlain by a mafic intrusion
with an ultramafic border phase, including two which occur
within the limite of the garbage dump and may also be partly
caused by metal garbage. These conductors generally strike
parallel to the long *ais of the intrusion and conductors
B, F, P, Q and M may be along the contact between Cobalt
sediments and the ultramafic-mafic intrusion. Conductor D
is underlain by rhyolite intruded by Matachewan diabase. Along
the south margin of the property, the VLF readings appear to
indicate a conductor to the south. However, this may be caused
by the swiftly flowing Montreal River which forms the south
boundary of the claim group.
Magnetic Survey
The magnetic survey was conducted by H.T.M. Technical
Services, Inc. during the period June 1st to 3rd, 1983, over
-9-
21.12 miles (111,500 feet) of previously cut lines at 200 foot
intervals trending 0050 AZ.
A total of 2175 magnetic readings were taken with a
Geonics proton magnetometer model G8l6.-The instrument measures
the total magnetic field directly in gammas (see enclosed
specifications). Readings were taken every 50 feet along lines
spaced at 200 foot intervals. Diurnal correction was done by
the loop method which involved taking readings continuously
along1he baseline and re-reading the baseline each time it was
crossed when readings were taken along1he lines.
Results
The results of the magnetic survey are shown on Map 3.
Cultural features such as the power transmission line, the
telephone line and the garbage dump tend to distort the magnetic
values of the underlying rocks. A magnetic low, with values
in the order of 57*000 to 58,000 gammas, locally occurs
under the power transmission line on the north side of Highway
66. Abundant metal garbage occurs in and around the garbage
dump, possibly causing localized magnetic highs. The large
area in the western and northern portions that are underlain
by Cobalt sediments is characterized by relatively flat
magnetic values in the order of about 58,000 to 59,000 gammas.
A large area covering the central to west central portions of the
grid shows magnetic values of about 60,000 to greater than
64,000 gammas. This area of high magnetic expression possibly
outlines an extensive ultramafic-mafic intrusion consisting of
-10-
locally magnetic gabbro with a serpentinite border phase, that
outcrops in the southwestern part of the property. Locally
strongly magnetic, northwesterly trending Matachewan diabase
dikes intrude a felsic to mafic Archean metavolcanic sequence
in an area bounded on the east by the park, roughly on the
north by Highway 66 and the Cobalt sediments on the west.
The diabase dikes are characterized by local magnetic highs
greater than 60,000 gammas, located at: 1) L6W,12*OOS;
2) L10W and L12W, between 8+OOS and 12+OOS; 3) L6W, from
about 11-fOOS to L8W, from 7+OOS to 3-iOOs; and 4) L2W, from
the river to 10+OOS and probably continuing to I4W, from 9+OOS
to 7+OOS. A high magnetic value of greater than 62,000
gammas corresponds to an outcrop of locally graphitic sulphide
facies iron formation at 10,6+003.
Conclusions and Recommendations
1. The power transmission and telephone lines along Highway
66 interfere with the bedrock VLF and magnetic values.
2. The garbage dump on the northeast portion of the property
contains abundant metal garbage and may cause erroneous VLF
and magnetic anomalies.
3. Elsewhere the magnetic survey appears to correspond with the
mapped geology, outlining more precisely the ultramafic-mafic
intrusion in the southeast-central part of the property.
4. In general, the YLF conductors tend to be broad and weak.
The conductors in the mafic intrusion tend to be parallel
to the northern margin of the intrusion, possibly outlining
zones of different composition or sulphide and/or magnetite-
-11-
rich zones. The conductors in the Cobalt sediments which
are parallel to the bedding may "be caused by contacts between
beds of different composition or, in the case of the randomly
oriented conductors, may be faults within the Cobalt sediments
or overburden effects. The only VLF conductor positively
outlined in the Archean metavolcanic rocks warrants further
investigation, although the east end may be caused by pyrite-
bearing diabase.
5. The VLF conductors, especially those in the ultramafic-mafic
intrusion and the matavolcanic rocks warrant further
prospecting and sampling.
TABLE 1: Description of VLF Conductors.
inductor
A
B (mag)
C
D (mag)
E
F
Length
^00'
^00'
^400*
^00'
^00'
^00'
Approx. Trend
Northwest
East-West to
northeast
Northeast
East-west
East-west
West-northwest
Rock type
Cobalt
Cobalt? or
Mafic intrusion?
Cobalt
Rhyolite H- Diabase
Cobalt
Cobalt? or
G (mag)
H
I
J ^00'
East-west
Northwest
East-west
East-west
mafic intrusion?
Mafic intrusion?
Cobalt
Cobalt
Cobalt
Approx. Location
L20W,7N to
to L26E,13N
L12E,20N to L16E,21N
L8W to L6W, 12S
L8W to L6W,?N
L30E,17N to
L22E to 24E,5N
L10E,16N to L12E,14N
L4E,22N to L12E,23N
L2E,13N to L8E,13N
Comment
Open at west end; Striking into Knott Lake
Parallel to Cobalt- Mafic Intrusion Contact. East end within limits of garbage dump.
Roughly parallel to strike of Cobalt
Diabase on east end of conductor.
Within limits of garbage dump; Open at east end; Possibly close to Cobalt-mafic intrusion contact.
Magnetic correspondent on east end; Roughly parallel to strike of mafic intrusion.
Open at west end; Possibly 2 separate conductors
. Table l (cent.)1 -4
"i Conductor Length Approx. Trend Rock Type
M (mag)
N
O (mag)
P (mag)
Q (mag)
R
S
^00'
>800 t
^00'
^00'
>200'
^200
northeast
East-northeast to east-west
West-northwest
We s t-northwest to east-west
East-west
East-west
East-west
East-west
East-northeast
Co"balt
Mafic intrusion?
Cobalt?
Cobalt
Mafic Intrusion
Mafic Intrusion?
Mafic Intrusion?
Cobalt
Mafic Intrusion
Approx* Location
L14E,16N to L18E,201T
,9N to L32E,10N
,5N to L8E,4N
L20E,20N to L28E,18N
L2W,2S to L2E,2S
L16E to 18E,9N
L14E to L16E,8N
116W to L14W,20S
L18E,6S to 120E,5S
Comment
Within limits garbage dump.
Open at east end; Roughly parallel to stri of mafic intrusion; West end within limits of garbage dump.
Magnetic correspondence on east end.
Within limits of garbage dump.'
Roughly parallel to strike of mafic intrusion.
Close to Cobalt-mafic intrusion; and parallel to strike of contact.
Close to Cobalt-mafic intrusion; and parallel to strike of contact.
Open at east end.
Roughly parallel to strike of mafic intrusion; Open at west end.
References
Burrowe,A.G.
1918: The Matachewan gold area; Ont. Bureau of Mines, Vol. 27, pt. l, p. 215-240
1920: Matachewan gold area; Ont. Dept. of Mines, Vol. 29, pt. 3, p. 53-64
Cooke, H. C.
1919: Geology of Matachewan district, Northern Ontario; Geol. Survey of Canada, Mem. 115
Dyer, W.S.
1935: Geology and ore deposits c f the Matachewan-Kenogami area; Ont. Dept. of Mines, Vol. 44, pt. 2, p. 1-55 (published 1936)
Pahrig, W.R. and Wanless, R.K.
1963: Age and significance of diabase dike swarms of theCanadian Shield; Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences, Vol. 2, No. 4, p. 278-298
Lovell, H.L.
1967: Geology of the Matachewan area, District ofTimiskaming; Ont. Dept. of Mines, G.R. 51, 6lp. Accompanied by Maps 2109,2110. Scale l inch to i mile
Pyke, D.R., Ayres, L.D. and Innes, D.G.
1973: Timmins-Kirkland Lake Sheet, Cochrane, Sudbury andTimiskaming Districts; Ont. Div. of Mines, Geological Compilation Series, Map 2205* Scale l inch to 4 miles.
"Page l
EM16 SPECIFICATIONS
MEASURED QUANTITY
SENSITIVITY
RESOLUTION
OUTPUT
OPERATING FREQUENCY
OPERATOR CONTROLS
POWER SUPPLY
DIMENSIONS
WEIGHT
In-phase and quad-rphase components ; of vertical magnetic field as a percentage of horizontal primary field, {i.e. tangent of the tilt angle and ellipticity).
In-phase si1501 Quad-phase :i 401
nNulling by audio tone. In-phase indication from mechanical inclino meter and quad-phase from a graduated dial.
15-25 kHz VLF Radio Band. Station selection done by means of plug-in units.
On/Off switch, battery test push button, station selector switch, audio volume control, quadrature dial, inclinometer.
6 disposable 'AA* cells.
42 x 1 4 x 9cm
Instrument: 1.6 kg Shipping i 4.5 kg
jpi'^^^v^fi^4 -t v'i A ^.tf*ift-5*ftr--^5t^ '?^'*v-'.'.' *
1.8
•.' ; ';' t'"' i ;:' 1 ''.'-i ; ",Vtv 1 "7 / '.i f''; ' .' *:'-,'' ,v.'.' •'•"•'i'V '"i.-.i';'"
Hitt:
20. OM to M.tH
t fmtocb **k MtuV
on*
I'ovt.r
Accurmcy fj rttl
Weight:
S difH nuin*rit In
Twelw ur,lv*r tertei
J.6 *c* "l*" it*hU|U-fype Ul-
Mule or r*()Uo*m**( tig- tndioKor lifW on
and Mm*ctrt -40
J*.tt*ry b Mto-lfTC; lover ttmf* rt ~ tur* ot*r*t ton option*])
firnrui Uinougli O to M
cunoellfait. fa**rchthge*tty tnountod oe. *fif*r*lf fitff or tlfcdxtd to Ifick-
ConBole: i . l x 1 x JO. l inch** (t x 1 6 x E7 cm) Sensor: 4. 6 x t Inchei (11 x Hean) Biifi: l Inoli dttn^Ur x fi fi. ter^th (S cm x
1.44 oro)
Aluminum Mlatf
(.e 4't.11.6
1. 1i.eS^6.1
Declaration
I, E.G. Bald, submit this document to certify that
the following statements are, to the best of my knowledge,
true and correct:
1. That I have received the following university degrees:
Honours B.Se. in Geology Laurentian University 1975
M.Se. in Earth Science University of Manitoba 1981
2. That I am a member of the Geological Association of
Canada.
3. That I have been working as a geologist for eight years.
Respectfully Submitted,
R. Bald
Ontario
Ministry of Na
GEOPHYSICAL - GEOLOl TECHNICAL DA'
41P15NE833e 2 .5748 CAIRO 900
TO BE ATTACHED AS AN APPENDIX TO TECHNICAL REPORTFACTS SHOWN HERE NEED NOT BE REPEATED IN REPORT
TECHNICAL REPORT MUST CONTAIN INTERPRETATION, CONCLUSIONS ETC.
Type of Survcy(s)
Township or Area.
Claim Holdcr(s)
y l - -* Vi fl *Survey Company. Cr'./j-./JjL.-..
Author of Report.
Address of Author
Covering Dates of
MM iM
(linecuttingio office)
Total Miles of Line Cui^
SPECIAL PROVISIONS CREDITS REQUESTED
ENTER 40 days (includes line cutting) for first survey.
ENTER 20 days for each additional survey using same grid.
Geophysical
-Electromagnetic
-Magnetometer
-Radiometric
Other.. .
Geological^.
Geochemical.
AIRBORNE CREDITS (Special provision credits do not apply to airborne lurveyi)
Magnetometer .Electromagnetic ^ (enter days per claim)
DATE: . SIGNATURK: Author of
Res. Gcol.^
Previous Surveys File No. l
.Qualifications^.
Date
.................. .................. ................. ...................R.E.CI4M.ED.AUB1 01P/83
----•WlNlMG"LA-N05"6ttvr-r©
fe*VJt:4*-S J
). 7orort"io *f/Si"'-?r /* v^ ,
)
DAYSper claim
p} ir X-C?
rr /i-iP
y to airborne lurveyi]
iiomrtrir
/2f ^1^^of Rejfort or Agent
;
Holder
r pi VE [\yL\-V"*'-"*"'*
ffi 1 0 1983
.l.A*DS..feT.
r\ 1
J/ft
y
KM'
1
1
1
MINING CLAIMS TRAVERSED List numerically
x/- ^5^ y 73 o-(prefix) (number)
,,,,,...,..............,..,^Q./^.:::o o y y ^)"*6SO) )~]~
^ So f i Qro5o y 3 oo^SO/ 3/
6 5 Ox'3 2.
(o5oy^^VtX^^ v"' ' J^J
&SO/34*-^^5 7^3^:-7^ ~7jQ !5 3
,,.,,,,,,,,,,,,,,.,,.ZoZ.Q.D.Q.
.................................................................
/-?-TOTA^ f AIMS '^- '
837 (6/79)
IND
UC
ED
PO
LA
RIZ
AT
ION
EL
EC
TR
OM
AG
NE
TIC
MA
GN
ET
IC
H
?
0 C
~)
crt
r
H o E
Q-
- rt
cr
: j
j
1 t o r
^ f" *. C
L
C r p .1 iM i v ) i. 5 i 1 5 i
i^U
&k,
O j 1
Of
-
' J.
A
*
-H
1
i -i
u t
— - 5" 3 1' :
•* A
J
J C
1 :
S E
I' T)
C
* S s f r f
b
D (
5 :
* ;
•5 '
3
r; rt
? ^
'^
O
OS
r*
r
1 ^
si
CL
:
'D 3 3
L i
1 ? main D
^^
^^
o
oc
c rt
rt3
3
O
O cf
3 a; 5"
r E
o f
l s
i ;
l i i i cIj r *t s 3' j i; 3 D 1 t*
t 0 f c r j f i i ! ( : l73
i n D n i*
a -*- 3 S 5 tt 3 a. 5" 2 5" 3
] * ( ( iri r.
!D
:3
|
i i
i.
f! 3 !
n *
-*
r U 3
i^-
-4
t
S S
1 j
1 '
l
- N•e '
U
'
1 i
| j
3 /l ^ 2L . M i EA r\ r^ ^
S "v3 v "S T
3
NJ
•if
^
g
t" SL ^ K 1
f
?
j
-
o
5 1
i
2 v
Vi K D
V
T)
D
*S
k ^*
^,
f-*-
^ i
vi
— .
K i X ^ D
V~
C
/3 O
Os ^ 9 o n *T
3 a; 3 rt"
~ 5' rt
>
(T
(
2 :
s ;D —^ 1 M
C
l
? 1 3 "t
X*
-* 5'
•^ a /j -t- •D 0 V CN ^\ •o xS Js^
•s
a t
M ;
yi
crt
(
LO
(r-*
- f
tt 1
:0*
'
n l. 3
Ca 3 i
C
rt
- V \ ,
Nl/
0^ r^" Cs ^
w t
B
.
?
!
? •* S' 3 3- ? se S" 2" ! 5 u^
™*1
3-
D i 3
-x—
\ ^ s^. "
", \ 1 ^ K.
v^ .O
-v
\ '
^ j^
\ . ^ N
^ -
o
J ,
•z.- 3 s- •^ v
l i ! [ M A
sV V "K \^ \ ^— 'o i t ^ ^ . —
s. CA "N tt ^ V Q J* w
\"*
0
> ? ^ 5 < 1 ys 2, rt*
| 1 r^- U 3 r* r*\ s \ a
N
iI 5 1 MA
^
CN lA \j ^ rs ^ ^ V ^
^ 1 ^ v^
r\ si
rV
\^ ^
(
?\
?*J -*. 2 \ r-*- [ \ 1 x ^ r
7 ? i T)
^ Q-?
,S
i
r '
3" rt- i — — Os 0 l' VI O
V 2. Q N 0
1 , ^2 1 3 ^. i /i *o
i
z c 3 cr •* 2, ^ Q K) /^ A4 ^ ^ \ l?^^
^^H
•^v
^^^
^
0 ROUND
SURVEYS
3 S i o
2 o
~,
*9
J 5
\ o
2. r
•^
HQ
. W
* G
a;
X-,
Z
5 S
2 >
o
r
s-
o^
SO
J^
0 "^ Z <
SELF POTENTIAL Instrument_______________________________________ Range.Survey Method ^_________^^_^_____________^^^_______.^^________^__
Corrections made.
InstrumentValues measured .
Energy windows (levels)———^—^—-^-.—.——-^.^—————-^—.^—...-.^———..—.
Height of instrument___________________________Background Count, Size of detector—-—-——————.^—^^—-—-—————————.——..^—.—-..—.....^—^—
Overburden —-—-—-——--.-—-.——..———^—.^^————.-—.————.——.————.—..—.(type, depth - include outcrop map)
OTHERS (SEISMIC, DRILL WKLL LOGGING ETC.) Type of survey^^—————————...————..-^———
Instrument -.—^^.—.^^.^^^-^^.^^—^.--.^-—— Accuracy——-—————.—-^——————--—--—————Parameters measured.
Additional information (for understanding results).
AIRBORNE SURVEYSType of survey(s)———
Instrument(s) —————(specify for each type of survey)
Accuracy——————————-——-.-—(specify for each type of survey)
Aircraft used _____.____.__. ___^^———————-—-.—-—.
Sensor altitude-Navigation and flight path recovery method —
Aircraft altitude_________ ______________________Line Sparing Miles flown over total area__________________________Over claims only.
GEOCHEMICAL SURVEY - PROCEDURE RECORD
Numbers of claims from which samples taken.
Total Number of Samples- Type of Sample.
(Nature of Material)
Average Sample Weight-—————— Method of Collection———————-
Soil Horizon Sampled— Horizon Development—
Sample Depth_____Terrain.———————-.
Drainage Development_____ ——————
Estimated Range of Overburden Thickness.
SAMPLE PREPARATION(Includes drying, screening, crushing, ashing)
Mesh size of fraction used for analysis —.-..-...-^
ANA LYTICAJL MKM IQDS
Values expressed in: per cent p. p. m. p. p. b.
D CHO
Cu, Pb, Zn, Ni, Co, Ag, Mo, As,-{circle)
Others_________________——————————Field Analysis (-
Extraction Method.
Analytical Method-
Reagents Used___Field Laboratory Analysis
No. (_______.__. Extraction Method^-^
Analytical Method ——— Reagents Used -————-
Commercial Laboratory Name of Laboratory^
Extraction Method
Analytical Method Reagents Used .^—.-
.tests)
.tests)
-tests)
General_General.
Please Type or print. If number o1 mining ctBirnt traversed exceeds space on this form, attach a lilt. Only days credits calculated in the "Expenditures" section may be entered in the "Expend. Days Cr." columns. Do not use shaded areas below.
Report of Work(Geophysical, Geological, Geochemical and Expenditures)
The Mining ActType of SurveyU)
Proipector't Licence rMoClaim Holder(t)
Survey Company Data of 'Survey JJrpm ft Total Miles of line Cut
Name and Addreit of Author (of Geo-Technical report)
Credits Requested per Each Claim in Columns at rightSpecial Provisions
For first survey:
E mer 40 days. (This includes line cutting)
For each additional survey: using the same grid:
Enter 20 days (for each)
Man Days
and eniRtfJl^h|S | y
IN 2 8 198
MINING LANDS S
Airborne Credits
Note: Special provisions credits do not apply to Airborne Surveys.
Geophysical
- Electromagnetic
- Magnetometer
- Radiometric
- Other
Geological
Geochemicet
Geophysical
L IBectromagnetic
- Masnetometer
' - Radiometric
- OtherECTION
Geological
Geochemical
Electromagnetic
Magnetometer
Radiometric
Days perClaim
2-o
^0
Days per Claim
Days per Claim
——————
Mining Claims Traversed (List in numerical sequence)
Expenditures (excludes power stripping)Type of Work Performed
Performed on Claim(s)
Calculation of Expenditure Days Credits
Totel ExpendituresTotal
Days Credits
EInstructions
Total Days Credits may be apportioned at the claim holder's choice. Enter number of days credits per claim selected in cojt/mns at right,
Mining ClaimPrefix Number
is roAM
Expend. Dayi Cr.
JUN
R
Mining ClaimPrefix
LAUiv.\\? n ' \ i- '
1983 '2|3|4
Number
PMIJTtr
Exptnd. Day* Cr.
Total number of mining claims covered by this report of work. -6
For Office Use OnlyTotal Days Cr, Recorded
L oCertlffcation Verifying Report o
Date Re*308*2 O 1983Mining Recorder AC -7 i r} Cf
.JLk.\4*r* --
/l hereby certify that l have a personal end intimate knowledge of the facts set forth in the Report of Work annexed hereto, having performed the work or witnessed same during and/or after its completion and the annexed report is true.
^\ J *Ltd- . vw^v~ Ministryot Report of Work
OntarioResources (Geophysical, Geological,
Geochemical and Expenditures)
Instructions: — Please type or print.- If number of mining claims traversed
exceeds space on this form, attach a list. Note: - Only days credits calculated in the
"Expenditures" section may be entered in the "Expend. Days Cr." columns.
— Do not use shaded areas below.
Address
Survey Company 7
Name and Address^&i Author (of Geo Technical repor
Credits Requested per Each Claim in Columns at rightSpecial Provisions
For first survey:Enter 40 days. (This includes line cutting)
For each additional survey: using the same grid:
Enter 20 days (for each)
Man Days ft jK.Complete reverse side and enter total(s) here
MM
Airborne Credits
Note: Special provisions credits do not apply to Airborne Surveys.
Geophysical
- Electromagnetic
- Magnetometer
- Radiometric
- Other
ideological
eochemical ^ c i \/ P r(.U.V K k-N TSW6"
- Magnetometer
lANOStrSECTI- Other
Geological
Geochemical
Electromagnetic
Magnetometer
Radiometric
Days per Claim
-2*o-2^
l ———'Days per
Claim
———ON
Days per Claim
Mining Claims Traversed (List in numerical sequence)
Expenditures (excludes power stripping)Typ* Of Work Performed
Performed on Claim(s)
Calculation of Expenditure Oayi Credits
Total Expenditures_______l •i-
Total Days Credit*
15
InstructionsTotal Days Credits may be apportioned at the claim holder's choice. Enter number of days credits per claim selected In colurttos at right.
s
\Prefix
Z.
\
•' '
: ' . V
•'••.-v;
^
•••'• : 'i;
, ; : - :"'
lining ClaimNumber
^T^/J#7f3
e3
-1A
-7-
Expend.Days Cr.
* * ' ' t
PU JIJn
o | JjlUi
,-;
,:'U
^Prefix
; "'
*
-. } 'K
R L /19 OIV.
Jt!^0198| 1 jij J
. ",' :'*', ' ''V^i
' •:.'-.-t^'.^v'v'i
. -" '.-" ; "*'-•^'/;::; 'l
lining ClaimNumber
K U
^ '[j]\U)
PM
4|5|6
Expend.Days Cr.
Total number of mining claims covered by this report of work.
Record/d
CeX'f'cation Ver/fying Reportof Work f
ignature)
l hereby certify that l have a personal and intimate knowledge of the facti ut forth in the Report of Work annexed hereto, having performed the work or witnessed same during and/or after its completion and the annexed report Is true.
Postal Address of Person Ce
1 T ' Oll/il)
Natural
Ontario
^Report of Work(Geophysical, Geological, Geochemical and Expenditures)
Instructions: - Please type or print.— If number of mining claims traversed
exceeds space on this form, attach a list. Note: - Only days credits calculated in the
"Expenditures" section may be entered in the "Expend. Days Cr." columns.
— Do not use shaded areas below.The M ini "9 Actype of SurveyU)
Claim Holder(s) Prospector's Licence No.
Date of Surrey (f/qm Sijo) Total Mile* of lint Cut
Name and Address of Author (of Goo-Technical report)
TP '3/92.* 7?O.Credits Requested per Each Claim in Columns at rightSpecial Provisions
For first survey:
Enter 40 days. (This includes line cutting)
For each additional survey: using the same grid:
Enter 20 days (for each)
Man Days
Complete reverse side and enter total(s) here
Rf(./v
FINING uAirborne Credits
Note: Special provisions credits do not apply to Airborne Surveys.
Geophysical
- Electromagnetic
- Magnetometer
- Radiometric
- Other
Geological
Geochemical
Geophysical
- Electromagnetic
"^ e^ Ma an altimeter
-tJYlD- RadiomBTtie**'
* aot^Geological
^erS&TfOrV
Electromagnetic
Magnetometer
Radiometric
Days per Claim
2.0ZQ-
Days per Claim
Day t per Claim
Expenditures (excludes power stripping)Typ* of Work Performed
Performed on Claim(s)
Calculation of Expenditure Days Credits
Total ExpendituresTotel
Days Credits
15Instructions
Total Day* Credit! may be apportioned at the claim holder'i choice. Enter number of days credltt per claim selected in column* at right.
Mining Claims Traversed (List in numerical sequence)Mining Claim
Prefix
^
'
Number
6SosJ^^)So;J6&SOJ;?&SOJJ&
Expend.Days Cr.
l
L.
•*\
i 'it|8
Mining ClaimPrefix
•u.. DEM IN
i*' ' '
JUN
9|10jll|
-
•- . :
Number
R U A k C
5 t1 ': "^^•01983^'v \ iJ\J^J
PM
2|l|2i3t4|3|G
Expend. Days Cr.
Total number of mining claims covered by this report of work.
For Office Use OnlyTotel Days Cr. Recorded
Certification Verifying Report of Work
Date Recorded
20J981as Recorded!.
Mining Recorder
-d"'Vy* f""nr I2
' l hereby certify that l have a personal and intimate knowledge of the facts set forth in the Report of Work annexed hereto, having performed the work or witnessed same during and/or after its completion and the annexed report is true.
Name and Postal Address of Person Certifying
Ministryof Geotechnical Natural Report
' Ontariow^^irces
Approval
File
Mining Lands Comments
V To: Geophysics
CommentsX")
Approved | | Wish to tee again with corrections
DTo: Geology - ExpendituresComments
[| Approved | ] Wish to see again with correctionsDate Signature
To: Geochemistry
f~| Approved \ \ W ish to see again with corrections
l [To: Mining Lands Section, Room 6462, Whitney Block. (Tel: 5-1380)
1693 (81/10)
1983 08 12
164,165,166
2,5740
Mr. George 0. KoleszarMining RecorderMinistry of Matura! Resources4 Government Road EastP.O. Box 984Kirkland Lake, OntarioP2N 1A2
Dear Sir:
He have received reports and maps for a Geophysical (Electromagnetic and Magnetometer) suvey submitted under Special Provisions (credit for Performance and Coverage) on Mining Claims l 561730 et al 1n the Township of Cairo.
This material will be examined and assessed and a statement of assessment work credits will be disaed.
Yours very truly,
E.F. AndersonDirectorLand Management Branch
Whitney Block, Room 6450Queen's ParkToronto, OntarioM7A 1W3Phone:(416)965-1380
A. Barr.mc
cc: Dale R. Pyke31 Del air Crescent Thornhill, Ontario L3T 2M3
cc: R. Raine29 3rd Avenue Timmins, Ontario P4H 1B9
cc: K. Gunnison P.O. Box 1163 Timmins, Ontario P4N 7H9
cc: R. BaldP.O. Box 1163 Timmins, Ontario P4N 7H9
NOIID3S SQNV1 9NINIVY
m\ o 190V
O 'J
i
-i1
^u^LM^bwpfa/ pU&J
's is
jf\
1. FIEL^TORK
Type of Work
ASSESSMENT WORK BREAKDOWN
Name 6c Address Dates WorkedNumber of 8 hour days
.llirVJ^-tL :rkl1# .-5: .^f]5. A .* e r r i K^ -ip* l C- /Co u, 4 n /?6}. ^ ••--•---'•----f------^-'-5 ---^--^---"---
2. CONSULTANTS"Number of Name k Address Dates Worked (specify in field or office) 8 hour days
3. DRAUGHTSMAN. TYPING. OTHERS (specify)"" Number ofName 6 Address Type of Work Dates Worked 8 hour days
J&im. .If^ l I'll 13. L Jf/.(^J^l-1.. .Xks .yjl W l h-9... — . — ... — — — —l y S*-. l C..'' ^~
TOTAL 8 HOUR TECHNICAL DAYS -—---—-—.
4. LINE-CUTTING * "~Number ofName Address Dates Worked 8 hour days
TOTAL 8 HOUR LINE-CUTTING DAYS
ASSESSMENT WORK BREAKDOWN ^
i . ^^
1; Type of Survey XLt..^J^.^~...J^n^...LJf^. Qfi^llSr-....
2. Township or Area .?~,QSX.Q-..-
3. Numbers of Mining Claims Traversed by Survey
4. Number of Miles of Line Cut ...^~i.:.'.t-...'?lLi5^:i.. Flown
*5, Number of Stations Established ......—.....—.............................—.......
*6. Make and type of Instrument Used ..........,...........................................
*7. Scale Constant or Sensitivity p.........................................................
*8. Frequency Used and Power Output .......................................................
9. Summary of Assessment Credits (details on reverse side)
Total 8 hour Technical Days (Include Consultants, Draughting etc.) ,..................
Total 8 hour Line-Cutting Days ...................
Calculation
______ x 7 = _______ -f _________ - ______ ~ ______ * _____________ Technical Line-cutting Number Assessment credits
of claims per claim
The dates listed on this form represent working time spent entirely within the limitsof the above listed claims ll CheckIf otherwise, please explain .........,.................................................
Dated: jfL^,4.^^---*----.--^------- Signed:
Note: (A) * Complete only if applicable.(B) Complete list of names, addresses and dates on reverse side.(C) Submit separate breakdown for each type of survey.(D) Submit in duplicate.
RECEIVEDAUG l O 1983
MINING LANDS SECTION
Ministry ol - Natural J Besources
Application to Record The Staking Out of Mining Claim(s)
Thti
Please Print in Block Letters
Full Name of Applicant/^R.
Prospector's Licence Office Use - Receipt No, s
Full Address (If not an Ontario resident, also give name and address for service)
Signature of Applicant Date Dated at
/fi AT fan f w
Name and Address for service In Ontario If non-rwldent
Mining Division
J AX cTownship or Area (see Note 1 below)
GroupCWm No.
Tag Number (Record Number)
See Note 2
Staking
Date Time Description if Township is subdivided
Restaklng of Claim No.
Office Use Only Reservations
CH
OCT
V/x
Notes: 1. A separate application and group sketch must be used for each separate township or araa.
2. When claims are pretagged the tag numbers must be shown above and on the group sketch on page 4.
:or Department UjK^Dnly
ReC. No.
786 fey? w
Group Sketch of claims listed on page 1 Scale: 11nch - 1 320 f eat (20 chaini)
V l i
r\\ v 4.
s. "
l' c ? I& (V.0 C'
iK
;^
x *
X N ^ X
0t
^ ^1 ^b v\
*. "
U (A
\if
\IV
ONl
l ,
^,j (M l'
cs
M•
^
CJ*s
lcL
o;\j
o
Alma Twp.- M.202
in'760076/714750
594682 594683 594684 .594685 5 94686
at DID i 594677 i 594676'594675 l- -L ,- - -
586564 5 06563 1586562 ' 56 1520 .561521_^_ L. A-I- — —t— -*-i —. —
Fort \Watac.hewon1429219
--U... J. 586558'586559 586560 586561- - -l 561 5 2 2 l 56 1523
L 'L L l L
735710 (735683 735660 586552i 5 66551 l 586550' 5 86549.586548
387571 '387567- - — -f- - — --
. L586953 .586954 586955 | 586956
/76//0777, 760778 *735708 7 35678 7 67593
- n586931 . 586950 586949:586948 .SB694 586946, 586945
L , U
586943' 586944 l 561525
L
57392 67597 l 76 7596 , ^v l
_ __ J. ^TTE
i 7651716 Matachewan 760086 l 760087 f 760070 \585L4S l 586439 586940] 586941r"" ~TL~ ~"~K~—"U - -f ^--
L
760090 JJ6009I - IJf Jl5?50 "*8 ' 5 85047 | 585046 | 585045 ' 5 6l5044r 5 85 O l 6 '
(76079B 7607
— r J 760767760095 76008**
760097 J 76009814468 \56180II
568016 568017 -~ L 'L
7C8797 ' 7 60780 l 760773 ^160774 J
|5-,B004 (568005
- -)-l - J - - - 1511446 . 511447 "
17607901760731 l5MV48 . 511149
5S75\U® Z f 5 31665 -
5sSol@a8^4rn. 4 — — J
7 .4966^4 .6/43522 6 81123 [5051*9
U9S960 495961 .49596
76/0374 17*05/3 . ———— ——————-
1760375 1760376
Kimberley Twp.- M.226
OOJ C\J
i ci
> oLL
THE TOWNSHIP OF
CAIRODISTRICT OF
TIMISKAMING
LARDER LAKEMINING DIVISION
SCALE: 1-INCH 40 CHAINS
LEGEND
PATENTED LAND
CROWN LAND SALE
LEASESLOCATED LAND
LICENSE OF OCCUPATION
MINING RIGHTS ONLY
SURFACE RIGHTS ONLY
ROADSIMPROVED ROADSKING'S HIGHWAYSRAILWAYSPOWER LINES
MARSH OR MUSKEG
MINESCANCELLED PATENTED for S.R.O.
Loc.LO.
M.R.O. S.R.O,
C.e
NOTES
400' Surface Rights Reservation a long the shores of all lakes and rivers
s R - SURFACE RIGHTSsection Order No
M R . MINING RIGHTSDale 3,-ip^silion f ue
\i M F Ta*T room s ite '5376 v 2
SAND and GRAVEL
M T C dowel Pit 206
M T C Gravel Pit 1313
Gravel Pit 204 , File 127307
^) M TC. Gravel Pil 3F-4, File 127307
(69) M.7,C. Pit 3 F-2B
Gravi P.! 205
Grovel P,tMT.C. Gravel p it 3 F-2I
PLAN NO M. 210
ONTARIO
MINISTRY OF NATURAL RESOURCESSURVEYS AND MAPPING BRANCH
4IP15NE8336 2 .5748 CAIRO 200 -O',
CO
UJ CO
UJ
UJ tp
J
UJ CO
UJ o
UJ CO
UJ
UJ
UJ
OD
UJ
CVI
Od
UJ
CM
UJ
OJ
UJ CO CO
UJ
O ro
UJ
CO ro
UJ ro
S.L
. I4
i-0
0 W
. to
26*4
0 W
.
T.L.
0
+00
to
141-0
0 W
.
12*0
0 N
T.L.
11
+ 00
N.
10 +
00 N
.
8+00
N
—
6 tO
O
N.
—
4+
00
N.
—
2+00
N.
S.L.
0
*00
—
2i-0
0 S.
4+00
S
61-0
0 S
.—
00
S
10+0
0 S
11 + 0
0
S. -
12 +
00
S
14+0
0 S
—
16 +
00
S
18 +
00
S. —
TIE
LIN
E Az
. 81
4,p
1SN
EB
33e
2.5
74
B
CA
IRO
210
Az.
261
0 26
+00
N
4+
00
N.
—
KN
OT
T
LA
KE
LEG
EN
D
Pow
er
tran
smis
sion
lin
eTr
ench
Scra
p m
etal
Bush
ro
ad
Out
crop
ar
ea
Cam
ping
ar
ea
Tele
phon
e lin
e
Cla
im
post
(loca
lized)
Cla
im
post
(e
stim
ated
Surv
ey
post
Elec
tric
al
subs
tatio
n
Out
erm
ost
limit
of m
unic
ipal
du
mp
26 +
00
N.
—
24+0
0 N.
—
22 +
00 N
.
—
20 + 0
0 N.
—
18 +
00
N.
—
16 +
00
N.
—
14*0
0 N.
—
12+0
0 N.
—
10 +
00
N.
—
8 +
00
N.
6 10
0 N.
—
41 0
0 N.
—
2 + 0
0 N.
B.L
. 85
2 +
00
S.
—
4+00
S,
—
6 + 0
0 S,
~
8 +
00
S.
CO
MST
ATE
RES
OU
RC
ES
LTD
CA
LGA
RY
, A
LBE
RT
A.
CAI
RO
TW
P.
PR
OJE
CT
Ont
. O
UTC
RO
P an
d S
UR
FAC
E
FEA
TUR
E
MAP
Line
cu
tting
83/0
57 7
to
83/0
5/3
0
E.M
. 16
MA
G.'
83/0
6/01
,02
83/0
6/01
,02,
03
PRO
JEC
T SU
PER
VIS
ION
S
DR
AFT
ING
B
Y'
, S
7 V
^
U.T
.M.
Tech
nica
l se
rvic
es
inc.
141
Pri
ncip
ale,
RO
UYN
Que.
J9
X 4
P3
(819-7
52-36
10
WE
BB
LA
KE
B -
C-0
0
MC
YN
EU
R
LA
KE
UJ
OCM
UJ
O
UJ CM
UJ
UJ -l
LJ -J
o CMO
J CM
CM
UJ
CO
CM
UJ O
ro
UJ
CM ro
UJ
f")
L.
Az 26
+0
0 N
TIE
LINE
AZ
8'
\ \ 14
-14.
--
' -i
l^
—~
^~
—
—
-\—
^—~
lID-
-?,
^^ 5
,( l l—
\ .—
—-—
-
KN
OT
T
LA
KE
LEG
EN
D
limit
of m
unic
ipal
du
mp
26
iOO
N
24
*00
N
2 H *
00 N
18-G
C
N
12+
00
N
10-0
0
N
e * o
o N
6 t
00
N
B.L
8
50
—
4*0
0
S
6 t
00
S
f -
4
5?*
2(.
CO
MST
ATE
RES
OU
RC
ES
LTD
.C
ALG
AR
Y ,
A
LB
ER
TA
.
CA
IRO
TW
P.
PR
OJE
CT
Ont
. V
.L.F
. E.
M.
16
FREQ
. 17
,8 K
hz.
83 83/C
6
f f
U.T
.M.
Tech
nica
l se
rvic
es
inc.
141
Pri
ncip
ale,
RO
UYN
Q
ue.
J9X
4P3
n
•*1P
15N
E83
3a 2
.57
48
C
AIR
O
6133
0 ''^
730
' 6
16
30
6'
L.
Az
261
26*0
0 N
*v f
*f t?
KN
OT
T
LA
KE
S.L.
I4
*-00
W
to
26*4
0 W
.
TL
0
*00
to
14
-t-O
O W
LEG
EN
DC
OM
STAT
E R
ESO
UR
CES
LT
D.
CA
LGA
RY
,
ALB
ER
TA
.G
eom
c pr
oton
m
agne
tom
eter
Pow
er
tran
smis
sion
lin
e
CAIRO TWP. PROJECT On
t.
MAGNETOMETER SURVEY
post
(lo
caliz
ed)
Cia
im
post
(e
stim
ated
83/0
5/17
to
83
/05
/30
83/0
6/01
,02
83/0
6/01
,02,
03
Ele
ctnc
ol
subs
tatio
n
Out
erm
ost
limit
of m
unic
ipal
dum
p
U.T
.M. T
echn
ical
serv
ices
in
c.14
1 P
rinci
pale
, R
OU
YN
Que
. J9
X 4
P3
(819-7
62-36
10
