42A01SEW13 2.10097 OTTO 010

GEOPHYSICAL STUDY

MAGNETIC SURVEY

AND

HORIZONTAL LOOP ELECTROMAGNETIC SURVEY (HEM)

DISTRICT OF OTTO AND TECK

ONTARIO

MADE FOR: HSK MINERALS LTD.

RECEIVEDMAY 2 8 1987

MINING LANDS SECTION

BY: DENIS BOISCONSULTANT GEOLOGIST

APRIL 1987

42AeiSE*el3 2.18097 OTTO 010U

TABLE OF COKTENTS

Page

INTRODUCTION

LOCATION AND ACCESS. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . l

DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY................................ 2

List of claims...................................... 2

GEOLOGY OF PROPERTY AND SURROUNDINGS................... 3

DESCRIPTION OF SURVEY.................................. 4

INTERPRETATION OF RESULTS.............................. 4

Magnetic survey..................................... 4

Electromagnetic survey.............................. 7

CONCLUSION. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8

RECOMMENDATIONS. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10

BIBLIOGRAPHY. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12

INTRODUCTION:

This document comments the results of a magnetic and

horizontal loop electromagnetic survey (HEM), done by MAGMA

EXPLORATION, for HSK MINERALS LTD., during the month of

February 1987, on a property located in the Kirkland Lake

district, Ontario.

LOCATION AND ACCESS:

The property under study in this report is located in

the central-southern part of the district of Teck and the

northern part of the district of Otto, at approximately five

(5) miles south-west of Kirkland Lake, Ontario. The property

is easily accessible by Highway 66, which goes through its

northern part.

Reference: map 1:50 000

GEOLOGY OF PROPERTY AND SURROUNDINGS:

The property is located in the central-southern part

of the Abitibi Belt. In this area, volcanic, sedimentary and

associated intrusive rocks are enclosed in a syncline going

down towards the east. Two main groups of rocks make up this

area, they are:

The Temiscamink Group in the north, made up of mafic

and felsic breccia, flow breccia, tufs and arkosic sedi

mentary formation. Many syenitic intrusives are associated

with it.

In the southern part, we find the Larder Lake Group,

made of ultramafic and basaltic komateites, calcoalea line

andesites, conglomerates, argilites and iron formations.

Sills and stock of ultramafic to mafic composition may also

be observed deeper south. The Temiskamlnk and Larder Lake

groups are separated in the northern part of the property by

the Cadillac-Larder Lake break, oriented east-north-east in

this area. Numerous gold showings have been found in this

zone. More than 23 million ounces of gold have been

extracted from the immediate area of Kirkland Lake located

less than five (5) miles from the property under survey.

DESCRIPTION OF SURVEY:

The geophysical surveys have been made on a grid

comprising 24 lines spaced at 300 feet and oriented 355 N.

This grid totals more than 14.7 mi. in length.

The magnetic survey has been carried out with an

instrument called OMNI IV from EDA. The readings have been

taken every 50 feet, following the grid lines, on a total

surveyed distance of approximately 14.2 mi.i

The horizontal loop electromagnetic survey (HEM) has

been carried out with an instrument called Max-Min II, from

APEX. The readings have been taken every 50 feet. A

separation of 100 meters between the coils has been used.

The 444 Hz, 1777 Hz and 3555 Hz frequencies have been used

for this work. A total of 9.2 mi. of line has been covered

during this survey.

INTERPRETATION OF RESULTS

Magnetic survey:

The property is caracterized by the presence of

magnetic axes oriented 90 N to 100 N. The central-southern

part of the property shows the presence of a series of basic

units cut by a structure of direction 325 N.

Only the magnetic axis M-9 shows an association with

an electromagnetic conductor. The coincidence of these

anomalies could be associated to the presence of sulfurs.

We observe in the northern part of the property, an

important magnetic depression cutting the basic formation in

this area. Striking in a 320 N direction this signature does

not show electromagnetic association.

The Ml and MA axes are oriented towards 90 N and are

separated by a directionnal structure 325 N. These axes may

reach 1,000 feet in length and close to 1,500 nT of amplitude

at the position of line 15+OOE to 1+50S. With a wavelength

inferior to 150 feet, these axes could be the indication of

this basic units or of magnetic sulfides horizons located

less than 50 feet under the surface.

The M2 and M3 axes reach 3,000 feet in length and are

also separated by the same directionnal structure 325 N.

These axes are found in a sector with stronger magnetic

expression than the previous ones. These axes show ampli

tudes reaching 800 nT at the line 9+OOE at position 8+50S.

These two axes are moved up for a few tens of feet along a

plan axis of direction 325 N, and are separated by a magnetic

depression due to the dipole effect, generated at the

extremity of M2 and M3 axes. These axes tend to show varia

tions in the contents of magnetic minerals of the underlying

basic units.

The axis shows the southern limit of an area whose

average magnetic expression is 200 to 300 nT superior to the

background. This axis of more than 2,000 feet in length is

bordered on its southern part by the EM1 and EM2 conductors.

This axis could indicate the presence of basic breccia.

The M6 axis indicates the northern limit of this

area. The latter is not associated with any conductor, and

may reach 1,000 nT. This axis longer than 2,500 feet, could

indicate the presence of a basic unit.

The M4A, M5 and M8 axes are punctual anomalies found

respectively at lines 9+OOE and 48+OOE. These anomalies may

reach 1,000 nT. The dipolar character of these anomalies

suggests the presence of concentrations of magnetic minerals,

and this, at a depth inferior to 30 feet below the surface.

The M7, M10 and Mil axes are axes of more than 1,500

feet in length found in the northern part of the property.

These axes could indicate the presence of basic units.

The M9 anomaly is a punctual anomaly found at line

48+OOE at position 21+OOS, This anomaly of 1,000 nT, corres

ponding to an electromagnetic conductor, suggests the

presence of a concentration of sulfides, and this, at less

than 50 feet below the surface.

- E lectromagnetic survey:

We observe the presence of five (5) conductor axes

which clearly indicate the presence of slight disconnections

following an axis of 325 N. The conductor axes EM1, EM2 and

EMS follow, at a 300 foot distance, the shape of the magnetic

contours, these axes, together with the EM 4 axis compose

angles varying from 55 to 70 degrees among themselves, and

suggest the presence of a conjugated fractured system.

We note in the northern part a few effects of."short

cables" at line 63+OOE level 12+OON. We also notice that the

shores of Lake Vigras are well underlined by the results of

the in-phase and out-of-phase compounds at frequencies 1777

and 3555 Hz.

We have kept during this interpretation, only the

anomalies which showed significant variations of the in-phase

and out-of-phase results at frequency 444 Hz. In relation to

a more thorough study of the geological structure which

existing on this property, certain signatures could eventual

ly be reevaluated.

CONCLUSION:

Eleven (11) magnetic axes and five (5) conductor-

zones have been defined during the recent survey. Based upon

the work done to this day, the sector of magnetic anomaly M9

and conductor EMS as well as the disconnection zones along

the axes EM1 , EM2, EM3 and EM4 warrant further investiga

tion. These anomalies show interesting characteristics; it

is thus recommended to continue the investigations on this

property .

Denis Bois Consultant Geologist

April 1987

Page 9

HEM ANOMALIES

AXE LOCALI WIDTH LENGTH CONDUC DEEP DIREC DIP # SATION (feet) (feet) TIVITY (feet) TION

(Mhos)

EM2

EM3

EM4

EMB

12+OOE 17+50S

15+OOE 17+508

18+OOE 14+508

21+OOE 13+508

24+OOE 15+508

27+OOE 17+90S

39+OOE 19+708

45+OOE 14+508

48+OOE 21+508

120

20

10

45

20

50

30

1800

1800

600

600

1400

1400

1600

2 1600 * Cut the trend of * Sheared Zone ?

50 60

35 30

25 60

25 50

45 30

50 20

35 60

20 120 mag. axes

30 150 20 60 * Magnetic coincidence.

90N 90

90N 90

70N 50S

70N 50S

125N 60N

125N 90

55N ?

55N ?

? 90

10

RECOMMENDATIONS:

It is important to identify the nature of the

conductors. The coexistence of magnetic anomaly M9 and of

conductor EM5 suggests the presence of an intraformational

conductor associated to a concentration of sulfides. The

existence of a conjugated fractured system close to the

Cadillac-Larder Lake break, has been considered. This sector

warrants a more thorough investigation.

It is thus be recommended:

1) Establish precise correlations between these

anomalic axes, the surface cartography and the

previous drilling data.

2) Carry out an inducted polarisation survey (I.P.)

on the existing lines, between 12+OOE and 51+OOE,

and this from the base line to the southern limit

of the property, on a total distance of 5 miles.

The actual orientation of the lines would allow

the identification of a possible anomaly on the

11

conductor axes as well as on the disconnection

plans. A configuration for N - 4 and A - 100

feet, would be advisable according to the depth

estimates of the conductors as obtained so far.

3) Carry out a cross study of induced polarization

for N - 4 and A - 100 feet, along the line

60+OOE, and this, from the base line up to

position 25-t-OON, in order to evaluate the

potential in polarizable material of the magnetic

depression previously reported in this sector.

BIBLIOGRAPHY :

Page 12

DV-83-16 Lithostratigraphic Map of the Abitibi Subprovince. MERQ-OGS, 15500,000, 1983

Kerrich R. Watson C. P. The Macassa Mine, Archean Load Gold Deposit, Kirkland Lake Ontario Geology Patterns of Alteration and Hydrothermal Regimes* Economic Geology, Vol 79, 1984

Ploeger F.R. St Cracket J.H. Relationship of Gold to Syenitic Intrusive Rocks in Kirkland Lake CIMM S.V. 24, 1982.

XEROX TELECOPIER 495-1: 9-10-87:10:29AM

, F F: O M 5 0 9 S

* 4169216926;* 1

'87.10.89 89:32

FAX TRANSMIT T AL

DATE

TO :

FROM :...C... B**S

H le,.. Vb-

FAX NO:

FAX NO: -4/t-- S6W- -SO 9

XEROX TELECOPIER 495-l; 9-1 0-87; 10: 30AM ; * 4169216926;# 2

,* FROM 50 9 S '87.10.69 09133

PROFESSIONAL ASSESMINT

i dtol&rti i

I fttt Canadian eitUtn.

Univttftity0in Inl'™' ***r** l n ^^in^ring O tology front

I work in Abitibi lino* md n tibi lino* 19 1 *i txplonition md (in tw*oh*r 6 f Survnying, Hydroftology andt tht Hinvral Ttohnologry Deart *m*n t '" *m*n t of th*

in th* oom^ny for did thv

DENIS BOIS 20-08-67

Report of Work ^j(Goopiv/si-ol, Geoloyic-.l,

^A81SE0913 2.10897 OTTO 300

Geophysical- Ground EM, MAG.

SK Minerals Limited

ITowrsh:p C' -V 03

Teck, Otto'Projector's L icence No.

T-1391

IPO-lll Richmond Street West, Toronto M5H 2G4 ________y ConiiMiiy ' Oa;e of Survey ( from s, ic) 'Total Miles of line Cut

*agma. Corporation ^, ??, 8l j \*. Ql 8 ?, . AL.... .^...l"-,'an.i Ai'rtrcss o* Author ; of Q?n-Tnrhnir:.-)l loor.rt'

Penis Bois, 20 Reilly ST. Rouyn, Quebec J9X-3N9

4K' ; !S Requested per Each Claim in Columns at rig Clairns T raversed (List i n numerical sociuonce)

tfei

s

1'

i?!''

fi1

i

t

W l! Provisions

7cr first surv.-y:

Enter 40 riays. (This includes ii-.e cutting)

For eoch additional survey: us ng the same nud:

Enter 20 days i!or eacni

C1 ^ vs fjcr Geophvs'Cfll '

Cl.'iicn

- E.ectron-^netic ^ Q ^

- MagnotorTkerer ^ 0

- Rodiometf 'c

- Other

Geological

Geochemical !

Mining Claim

Prol Number

89J181^ i891856

9". Days

ft ji.'l ?i'ei"!oTH"s! liere

j Note: S rwciai provisions

credits do not jppi

Vpa Ot Work Performed

Total number of mining clairrs covered by this fODort o' work.

For Office Use Onlytv.j. D.r/s Cr. Oato Racorded i.' 'ung Facorder

.Datft Approvori a s flecornod 3r jncr Oec

li.May f 13,1987'

' -'t'iv. :.':'" ; ', T.'vit : - iv- .- RIM'';:;C:H ^'.i .I'tinvit;- r.i-.m-.ii'c;:^ i:: T: MCTS ofit forth m ;ne Report of Work .innexcci hurtto, naving performed the work

Ministry ofNorthern Development

Ontario

Technical Assessment Work Credits

Det*

October 26, 1987

File

2.10097Mlnlno Recorder'i Report of Work No. . -^

220

Recorded HolderH.S.K. Minerals Limited

Townthlp or Are*

Teck A Otto

' i '

l''

1

sij,,,...,.

jL:L '

i;., i'*',

sil. 1 :

f"

j,.

1L:.

fe-

trimriM,,

iff:i ; .1fL!

if-

t

f.1;!h

I..

Type of survey and number of Assessment days credit per claim

Geophysical17

40Maonfttomflter ^w rUyt

Rxrlinnvtru- rtnyf

fnHiiMri pnlxrimtlnn clay.

Othor rfjiy*

Section 77 (1 9) See "Mining Claims Assessed" column

Geological days

Man days Q Airborne Q

Special provision Q Ground [X]

Q Credits have been reduced because of partialcoverage of claims.

Q Credits have been reduced because of correctionsto work dates and figures of applicant.

Mining Claims Assessed

L 894181*891856-891860*842767-842782'842660-843400-843837*843171

Special credits under section 77 (16) for the following mining claims

No credits have been allowed for the following mining claims

C") not sufficiently covered by the survey Insufficient technical data filed

The Mining Becorder may reduce the above crediu if necessary In order that the total number of approved assessment days recorded on each claim does not exceed the maximum allowed as follows: Geophysical - 80; Geologocal - 40; Geochemical - 40; Section 77(19)-60.

28(85/12}

Ontario

Ministry of Natural Resources

GEOPHYSICAL - GEOLOGICAL - GEOCHEMICAL TECHNICAL DATA STATEMENT

File.

TO BE ATTACHED AS AN APPENDIX TO TECHNICAL REPORTFACTS SHOWN HERE NEED NOT BE REPEATED IN REPORT

TECHNICAL REPORT MUST CONTAIN INTERPRETATION, CONCLUSIONS ETC.

Type of Survey(s)

Township or Area t?\ Claim Holder(s)

Survey Company

Author of Report

Address of Author

Covering Dates of Survey

Total Miles of Line Cut

(linecutting to office)

SPECIAL PROVISIONS CREDITS REQUESTED

ENTER 40 days (includes line cutting) for first survey.

ENTER 20 days for each additional survey using same grid.

~ i . i Geophysical

-Electromagnetic

DAYS per claim

Radiometric

-Other —Geological.

Geochemical.

AIRBORNE CREDITS (Special provision credits do not apply to airborne surveys)

Magnetometer. .Electromagnetic . Radiometric

DATE:

(enter days per claim)

SIGNATURE:

Res. Geo!.. .Qualifications.

Previous Surveys File No. Type Date Claim Holder

MINING CLAIMS TRAVERSED List numerically

(prefix) number)

i

l

TOTAL CLAIMS. 12L

837 (5/79)

GEOPHYSICAL TECHNICAL DATA

GROUND SURVEYS — If more than one survey, specify data for each type of survey

Number of Stations Station interval

Profile scale

^ "X

(670) io4O Number of Readings | Line sparing "5OQ

Contour interval &OO

yBW ZC<5

Instrument ——'Accuracy — Scale constant.

Diurnal correction method

Base Station check-in interval (hours). Base Station location and value___________\Jfr\UuB,

InstrumentCoil configuration

Coil separation -—

Accuracy -———— Method:

l DO(To

CD Fixed transmitter

-t-

CD Shoot back D? In line CD Parallel line

Parameters me^nred(specify V.L.F. itation)

'P

O

InstrumentScale constantCorrections made.

Base station value and location

Elevation accuracy.

Instrument

INDUCED POLARIZATION

MethodParameter

*H

E2•H

W Power —.*4

ElectrodeElectrode

Tvoe of e

1 _ l lime Domain S — On time

Off time

— Delay time

— Integration time

spacing ——————————————— - — ——

lectrorle . ... ——————— —

1 _ i frequency uomaui

Frequency

Range

SELF POTENTIALInstrument________________________________________ Range.Survey Method————————————-—-——————————^—.-—-—..—.——-—.————.

Corrections made.

RADIOMETRICInstrument ——-—. Values measured —.

Energy windows (levels) _________^____________^__^________^______Height of instrument____________________________Background Count. Size of detector..————^--——————————————————...———^-.——.——.^——Overburden —.^^—.—-^.^-—-—.——-^.^^.^.—...-.—...—--——.———..^-..^^.^-———.——.

{type, depth - include outcrop map)

OTHERS (SEISMIC, DRILL WELL LOGGING ETC.) Type of survey_________________:—————Instrument .-^-....——————.——^^-^^—^^—.—— Accuracy.^^^———^—^————————————Parameters measured.

Additional information (for understanding results).

AIRBORNE SURVEYS Type of survey(s)——^— Instrument(s) ——————

(specify for each type of survey)Accu racy—-—-—-————————-—.

(specify for each type of survey) Aircraft used.—^—^——————.^—.^^-———-.—————....————.

Sensor altitude-Navigation and flight path recovery method.

Aircraft altitude.—.____________________________Line Sparing Miles flown over total area———.——-—-——-—.—-—-—.....——.——Over claims only.

GEOCHEMICAL SURVEY - PROCEDURE RECORD

Numbers of claims from which samples taken.

Total Number of Samples. Type of Sample.

(Nature of Material)

Average Sample Weight——————— Method of Collection————————

Soil Horizon Sampled. Horizon Development- Sample Depth————Terrain————————

Drainage Development——————————— Estimated Range of Overburden Thickness.

ANALYTICAL METHODSValues expressed in: per cent Q

p. p. m. Dp. p. b. LJ

Cu, Pb, Zn,

Others_____

Ni, Co, Ag, Mo, As.-(circle)

Field AnalysisExtraction Method. Analytical Method- Reagents Used——

Field Laboratory AnalysisNo. ^—.———-.—

SAMPLE PREPARATION(Includes drying, screening, crushing, ashing)

Mesh size of fraction used for analysis———-

Extraction Method. Analytical Method . Reagents Used——.

Commercial Laboratory (- Name of Laboratory.— Extraction Method— Analytical Method -Reagents Used ————.

.tests)

.tests)

-tests)

General. General.

Suite 800,111 Richmond Street West Toronto, Ontario M5H 2G4

TEL. (416) 364-0001 MINERALS LIMITED PAX. (416) 364-5098

May 2 5, 1987

Mr. Gary L. Weatherson,Mining Lands Section,Mineral Development and Lands Branch,Mines and Minerals Division,Whitney Block, Room 6610,Queen's Park,Toronto, Ontario.M7A 1W3

Dear Sir:

Re: HSK Minerals LimitedTechnical Report for Geophysical Survey Otto and Teck Townships

Enclosed please find a completed Technical Data Statement for geophysical surveys performed on the 13 claim HSK property in Otto and Teck Twp. The Work Report for this survey has already been filed with the mining recorders office, a copy is enclosed.

I trust this i s satisfactory but if more information is required plerase contact at your earliest convenience.

Yours turly,HSK MINERALS LIMITED

RECEIVEDc. E. Page" MAY 28Consulting Geologist

MINING LANDS SECTION

' '; f^i*' f* i .- j.1 - * V l- i* H if fm j

November 12, 1987

NOV11 feW

fi u a P?, \ \f l POur File: 2.10097

Mining RecorderMinistry of Northern Development and Mines4 Government Road EastKirkland Lake. OntarioP2N 1A2

Dear Sir:. - ' - ' - , - . ' ' ' ' '' . r ' - ' i. . - ,. x ,,.''. i" 1 ., *v':*-. *:'".-'- J \ - ' .'

RE: Notice of Intent dated October 26. 1987Geophysical (Electromagnetic and Magnetometer) ,. ,Survey on Mining Claims 1-894181 et alIn the Townships of Teck and Otto

The assessment work credits* as listed with the above-mentioned Notice of Intent* have been approved as of the above date*

Please Inform the recorded holder of these mining claims and so Indicate on your records.

Yours sincerely*

W.R. Cowan* Manager Mining Lands Section Mines and Minerals Division

Whitney Block. Room 6610 Queen's Park Toronto. Ontario M7A 1M3

Telephone: (416) 965-4888

AB:plEnclosure: Technical Assessment Work Credits

cc: Mr. G.H. FergusonMining A Lands Commissioner Toronto* Ontario

HSK Minerals LimitedSuite 800111 Richmond Street WestToronto* OntarioM5H 2G4

Resident Geologist Kirkland Lake* Ontario

'1

Vi '•- -'\ S'--.- - - 'i, "i - - t ' f- -i* "- l B1 - -- c i*.-. 'f-,/*"- . - \**'.?-* : i --. ' '*

,/ . -i.; -- :: . ;:.-.iii., .. , S'^',,-.- -.*v ' ' --* - --' v^jr-"/ . , — ! -* .-r, - •-i.. iLfv: -"-i;- "-'' - "

-*.r 'j. ''-w^! .T'- c—-Xj-'^V^ TB^- -(t-1 -- ..

^,.. ; ^^-r*^

,j" ^ i?'.;-

It'vfc

V' -'ivS'"'^.^*^ ••i"-* 1**^'-' '-i*,^': ^ " f' jf'yc* ;v^* T---v- - ""^ v' ""' "V" :~!i."'-.'*^

^'!fE?ck;Tj^^

t; ® t U ®|

8457 tJFWSft*

f?" C; .v,

-'^V^r^-Vi ^'-* ' 'v a . -'

-**S^t-iT3

^ V \- rr-Vj-6^.^-4^

•*"J-3-rv-tfl

i L - i1

H5*3-H^a :,,-^,.( fp)1 - . i '-c/

laso-*o7" 'ii,--—.-p — T— —

1 '1 '

? '; © i ©i.-:

- 1 L1A* -501 i,54H9C2

t

—— , -i

^ 1 . l-

546904 1543903j

- T f

Li~T@^~~

55C3G3: ^TU^^*. 'a^s1, ' :'T©!^^' :

*4-S*2-i- V53C302iS.CJ**7r -i|t.ri-"."i it.V"V /The -i. '^^- -©- — 4 -^-~^^- -JcVio *" r L ] C"..'" 6L j

j L

^sys-M.

®

L V.^HHwmKBiVT'PH i nm 1' ii^mr-Bnn^a Lil

JM1 Vj '

0*4i |MSS3C^ ^^ '— _ .

L '

1

u r1 *t^rf'-^j"\n,^.H

WW J t^J ;

L -:p ..3 Q 43 9V'T1

a®

II

L l U

"W5*-?? | i*a-atrzr---J-,.., -

L- - i i.1

^mg-L-wj s^H^B-rs5

"— —— .w-y.™^-?-.-"— -' ' — -r— i- l i- 1

i- i^T~\ ~^l t ft *y J x4*6556^5537^ "' ""^— '~

- — ™^'^^^ ' /a^ r . ^ n ^,-, r•fr*a-^5'5ia-ts^34 1

m-*5/ L (^7) :5iC257 'r 54-if533,

L.-, ^^.

A-*4 }550Z9H ^^5^4^

i —

/

®1

f CPL

T*^74-,?**-t?*

^iiOp'il'e--

^OOSTh-

.-T^S- fr^T5TD r^oO5'6^ ^6^t^6 r?'Jt)-''JS J

L

^

i-rtre-S-4*'

L L

•^t4rS^'r-'Zfi-a4jXa

-f ea tyo- i-y^s^i^- :1

^r

- .-.^^catws^ts

S e cert

fp^Ro'jnd

rv-t ^ P n! H S{Vi ,-~--i j \ V W s ^-•i

THE TOWNSHIP

OTTODISTRICT OF ^TIMISKAMING

,

-;. ; LARDER; LAKE., ' . MINING DIVISION -^

f ' ' * * ""

SCALE:1-INCH^4O CHAINS

LEGEND

PATENTED ^ tAHDCROWN LAHO SALSLEASES,UXATED LANDU1CENS2 OF OCCUPATIONMINING RIGHTS ONLYSURFACE RIGHTS . ONLYROADSIMPROVED ROADSKING'S HIGHWAYS ,,RAILWAYS , -~POWEH LINESMARSH OR MUSKEGMINES .- iC ;--CAHCELLEO *"^- PATENTED S.R.O. .

or

: ' NOTES

l 400' surface rights peservalton q-Jong ,, the 'shores of all lakes ana rivers.

S/J^V ,- yM/ S^ 2'-j iro w-

^\ ,'*

--r.".wii"^i'^aiBaswff

42A01SE0013 2.10097 OTTO 200

,

PLAN NO,-V::- -

*** K r- 1, * ' ,X^i y™iiOj OF r

KIRKLAND

?'*' 1. ' ,*Sfe\ C ")''i. .

.: -r 'T

Bernhart' Twp. M.327

Amikouga

52JI

-, l L ake,W77 \ 76

OttO TWO. M.379

T-

THE TOWNSHIP

TECKDISTRICT OFTIMISKAMING

LARDER LAKE MINING DIVISION

SCALE'l-INCH^O CHAINS

DISPOSITION CROW L ANDS

PATENT, SURFACE AND MINING RIGHTS....." , SURFACE RIGHTS ON^Y ......,....." , MINING RIGHTS ONLY^....^^

LEASE, SURFACE AND MINING RIGHTS...." , SURFACE RIGHTS ONLY .........." , M.NING RIGHTS ONOT,.. ^..^..

LICENCE OF OCCUPATION ,. .. ... ..^.^.,ROADS — , IMPROVED ROADS ~ ^ KING'S HIGHWAYS R A l L W AY S POWER LINES MARSH OR MUSKEGMINES CANCELLED

•SyT

a

c.

NOTES400' surface rights reservation along the shores of all lakes and rivers.

.Areas shown thus V-^H for slime disposal.'"

Mining claim L.5779 — Mining Rights subject to Sec. 36 of the Mining Act. (R.S.O. 1950)

AREAS WITHDRAWN FROM STAKING

SURFACE RIGHTS KITHDRAHN TROMSECIIGI 3*/* ORDcfi NO. rf. 76/fo f 4^n ———:——r-—————

[2/ S URFACE AND HIKING RIGHTS WITHDRAWN TROH STAKING SECTION 36/80 QRDF.R NO. tt). ! 08

(3/ SURFACE AND MINING RIGHTS NITHDRAWN FRO* ST&KIIMi SECTION 35/80 ORDER NO. yy/. Q /Qb

ftND MINING RIGHTS WITHDRAWN FROf STAKING SECTION 36/80 ORDER NO. \Vr jj3t* ' *

SURFACE AND MINING RIGHTS WITHDRAWN FROM STAKING SECTION 36/80 ORDER NO. J.i

M1NSN3 RIGHTS WITHDRAWN FROM S1AKING

SECTION1 iG/80 OrtDER UO. W 90/67 N R

PLAN NO.-MIVI

OM

MINISTRY OF NATURAL RESOURCESSURVEYS ANJft MAPPiwn

TEC

K To

wns

hip

LE

GE

ND

Inst

rum

ent

: M

AX

MIN

Freq

uenc

y :

44

4 H

z

Sep

arat

ion

IOO

m

Verti

cal

scal

ein

ch *

40

'/o

l.p

10+0

0 s

10 to

20

O. P

•9 x •w x l

•y \ V

•H •H

-20

15+O

O s

OTT

O

Tow

nshi

pC

ondu

ctor

:

Faul

t :

20*00

SD

a

843837

25+O

O

S

O O 4- O 1. -J

UJ o o 4- 10 \. J

UJ o o 4- (D i.

Ui O

O 4 O) 1. -J

UJ o o 4- l. -l

UJ o o 4- l. -J

Ul o o 4- CDl

UJ o o 4- \-

UJ o o -t ^J- OJ l. -J

UJ o o CM

l

UJ o o -v O

rO i.

UJ

O o * ro lO i- J

UJ o o -4- to

UJ o o ro i.

UJ o o 4- (M

t.

UJ o o 4- vn ^T \. -l

Ul

O o 4- GO ^J- \.

UJ o o \ -l

UJ o o VO

KE

Y

MA

P

SC

AL

E:

C2

5O

OO

O

42

A0

15

E0

01

3

2.1

0097

OTT

O2

20

HSK

Min

eral

s Li

mite

d

(PR

OFI

LES

)

H.E

.M.

SU

RV

EY

MA

GM

AE

XP

LO

RA

TIO

N

DAT

E M

arch

1 9

87D

RAW

N

BY:

D. L

ariv

tore

, Y. G

oule

tA

PP

RO

VE

D

BY

:

SC

AL

E:

100

O IO

O

20

0

300

40

0

5OO

Blan

che

TEC

K To

wns

hip

B L

-0*0

0

: w

f-i

w \

\ 'T

\

\ K

f

LEG

EN

D

Inst

rum

ent

: M

AX

MIN

H

Freq

uenc

y :

1777

Hz

Sep

arat

ion

100

m

Ver

tical

sc

ale

l inc

h *

40

07o

:l

IO+

OO

S

/2O

O. R

-10 x 7 7

^ -H. \

- \

-20

I5+

OO

S

OTT

O

Tow

nshi

p

2O+O

O S

84

38

37

25+O

O

S

O O •*- o l. J

UJ o o t TOl. -J

111 o o

UJ o o * O) l -J

UJ o o -4- OJ l.

UJ o o

UJ o o * COt- -T

UJ o

o CVJ l

UJ o o 4- 1.

UJ o o t -l

UJ o o -fr o to l.

Ul o o 4- to to t- -J

UJ o o -t-

(O TO

UJ o o to l J

UJ o o •*-

CM

I.

UJ o o

LL) O

O •*- CD 't l. -l

UJ

O o -*- in i.

UJ o o •4- "3- lO l' -l

KE

Y

MA

P

SCAL

E:

1:25

0000

42A

01S

E0813

2.1

0097

OTT

O230

HSK

M

iner

als

Lim

ited

(PR

OFI

LES)

H. E

M.

SUR

VEY

MA

GM

AE

XP

LOR

AT

ION

DA

TE

Mar

ch

1987

DR

AWN

BY

: o.

Lar

fvie

re ,

Y.

G.A

PP

RO

VE

D

BY

SC

ALE

TEC

K To

wns

hip

LEG

END

Inst

rum

ent

: M

AX

M IN

H

Freq

uenc

y :

3555

Hz

Sepa

ratio

n :

100

m

Verti

cal

scal

el in

ch -

40

10+0

0 s

20

+ 2O

OR

•0* \ i i

•W *

l•

t t •1, \ , \ x

•rt

^ x

-SO

15+

00

SO

TTO

To

wns

hip

20*0

0 s

D

D

843837

25+O

O

S

O

O * O l. -l

UJ o o •*- to t. -l

UJ o o \.

LU O

O

l. -l

UJ o o t. -l

UJ o o -f lO l. -J

UJ o o -V CO l

UJ o o

UJ o o •4- CO

1.

Ul o o 4- N (M

l

UJ o o \. -l

UJ o o 4-

10 to

\. -J

Ul o o to

UJ o o 4- 0^ K) l. J

UJ o o 4- CM

UJ o o 4- lO ~ l. J

UJ o o 4- GO *t l. -J

UJ o o in l. -J

UJ o o 4- tf ID I-

KEY

MAP

SC

AL

E:

C25

OO

OO

42

A0

1S

Ee

*13

OTT

O2

40

HSK

Min

eral

s Li

mite

d

(PR

OFI

LES)

H. E

M.

SUR

VEY

MA

GM

AE

XP

LOR

ATI

ON

DAT

E M

arch

19

87D

RA

WN

B

Y:

D.

Lariv

iere

, Y

Gou

let

AP

PR

OV

ED

BY

SC

AL

E:

l"-3

OO

'

TEC

K To

wns

hip

LEG

END

nstru

men

t

Base

va

lue

ED

A

OM

NI

IV

58000

Gam

mas

Mag

netic

co

ntou

rs:

v.40

0

^^

- IO

UV

—s.

^-

2000

-v

^-3

00

0-^

10+0

0 s

Mag

netic

de

pres

sion

-.

15+

00

SO

TTO

To

wns

hip

Mag

netic

ax

is :

Faul

t :

20+0

0 s

D

D

25+O

O

S

O

O 4- O l. -J

LiJ O O •*- to l.

UJ o o •t- (D l

UJ o o * O) l. -l

UJ o o l.

UJ o o -*- lO l. -l

UJ o o -*- OD 1. -l

UJ o o CM

l.

ut o o 4- ^t (M l.

UJ o o 4- N CM

1.

UJ O

O -*- o 10 t. -l

UJ o o -*- to TOl. -J

UJ o o to l-

UJ o o 4- O) to l. J

UJ o o 4- CM

UJ o o 4- in r i. -J

UJ o o •f 00

UJ o o 4- ID l

UJ o o 4-

l

KEY

MAP

SC

ALE

: C

28O

OO

O

. tf

*

42A

01S

E*0

13

2.1

00

97

O

TTO

25

0

HSK

Min

eral

s Li

mite

d

(CO

NTO

URS)

MA

GN

ETI

CS

UR

VE

Y

MA

GM

AE

XP

LOR

ATI

ON

DA

TE

Mar

ch

1987

DR

AW

N

BY

: D.

L

orf

V!*

rt

AP

PR

OV

ED

B

Y: f t*

t *