RPT ON GEOPH SUR BRISCOE BRYCE PROP
Transcript of RPT ON GEOPH SUR BRISCOE BRYCE PROP
e.4151 BRYCE 010
REPORT ON GEOPHYSICAL SURVEYS
BRISCOE-BRYCE PROPERTY
BRYCE TOWNSHIP
LARDER LAKE MINING DIVISION,
NORTHEASTERN ONTARIO
RECEIVEDSEP 2 51981
MINING LANDS SECTION
August, 1981 W. E. Brereton, P.Eng
8, ft* o
l. INTRODUCTION
This report outlines the results of ground geophysical surveys
carried out on the Briscoe-Bryce gold prospect during
November and December, 1980. The work was carried out by MPH Consulting Limited of Toronto on behalf of Windjammer
Power and Gas Ltd. and Yvanex Developments Ltd. of Calgary
and Toronto, respectively.
The report describes field operating procedures, presents
results of the geophysical surveying and makes recommendations
for diamond drill..testing of the most prospective gold targets.
2. PROPERTY
The property consists of 10 unpatented mining claims inBryce Township, Larder Lake Mining Division, as follows;
Claim Number Location
579215 - NWi Si Lot 10 Con 4579216 ^ NWi Ni Lot 12 Con 4579217 ^ SWi Ni Lot 12 Con 4579218 " NEi Si Lot 10 Con 4578257 -- NWJ Si Lot 11 Con 4578261 ^ NWJ Si Lot 12 Con 4578263 x- SWi Si Lot 12 Con 4578264 " NEi Si Lot 12 Con 4578265 - SEi Si Lot 12 Con 4578266 - - SWJ Si Lot 11 Con 4
3. LOCATION, ACCESS AND INFRASTRUCTURE
The property is located 30 miles (48 km) south of Kirkland Lake in northeastern Ontario (see Location Inset Map -
Geophysical Sheets).
It is readily accessible via Highway 560 which leads to
Charlton from the TransCanada Highway, No. 11, at Englehart,
Ontario. Concession roads and finally a bush road lead directly to the property from the end of Highway 560.
The one mile bush road to the property was constructed by
former operators and is best traversed by 4-wheel drive or
all-terrain vehicle.
Bush roads also lead into adjoining Tudhope Township from
Highway 65, 4 miles south of the property at Leeville. Hydro
electric power and a spur-line of the Ontario Northland
Railway are located at Leeville. There is also hydro-electric
power transmission to the Hills Lake fish hatchery less than
5 miles by road to the east.
Miners and general labour are available from surrounding
centres of service and supply such as Kirkland Lake, Elk Lake,
Matachewan, Earlton, Haileybury and Cobalt.
4. GEOLOGY
4.l General
The property straddles the boundary between the Catherine
Group and the Skead Group of earliest Precambrian
(Archean) volcanics. The Catherine Group is comprised
of Mg-rich and Fe-rich tholeiitic basalt flows with
Fe-rich tholeiites predominating at the top of the group.
The Skead Group consists mainly of massive calc-alkaline
volcanic fragmental rocks of basalt, andesite, dacite
and rhyolite composition. Some flows are present in the
group. The fragmental rocks range from crystal tuff to
tuff-breccia and flow breccia. The coarser fragmental
rocks contain a wide variety of felsic fragments. The
main source of the volcanic ejecta appears to have been
a large volcanic centre in Skead Township to the north
of the present property area. Recent government mapping
suggests the presence of an additional volcanic centre
in the vicinity of Heather Lake immediately south of
the present ground.
The contact between these two formations, the 'Contact
Zone' of previous workers, crosses the property in the
vicinity of 4+OON. Present and previous work on the
'Contact Zone 1 indicates that there is a major unit of
interflow metasediments consisting of ^aminated cherty
and tuffaceous rocks, containing pyrite and chalcopyrite
separating the two formations.
Porphyry and lamprophyre dykes intrude the volcanic
rocks. An elliptical stock of feldspar porphyry con
taining several gold veins is centered 2 miles east of
the property. Another porphyry body located by recent
government mapping occurs on the west portion of the present property immediately south of Honeymoon Lake.
The Round Lake granitic batholith occurring directly
north of the property forms 'basement 1 to the volcanic units in the area.
Rock units on the property strike east-northeast and are steeply to vertically dipping. There is no evidence
of any fold closures in the immediate property area.
Pillows in the Catherine basalts indicate tops to the
southeast.
The property is located between two major regional
faults striking N 40 0W, the Cross Lake Fault and the
Montreal River Fault. A study of the fracture pattern
in Bryce Township indicates 3 prominent fracture
directions; northwest, northeast to east-northeast and north-south. A major northeast-trending airphotographic
linear herein termed the 'Sunday Creek Linear 1 passes to the south of the property. These fractures are impor
tant in that most of the gold mineralization recognized to date in the area is controlled by one of the above
fracture directions, e.g. the Briscoe-Bryce No. l
Vein Zone.
4.2 Mineralization
A 1941 Ontario Department of Mines report describes 34 gold prospects in the Bryce-Robillard area (Moorhouse,
Vol. l, Part 4, ODM Annual Report, 1941). This author
classified the more important gold occurrences into a
number of types according to structure and mineralization
as follows:
a) Mineralized shear zonesb) Mineralized porphyriesc) Mineralized joints and shear zones in granite
The first group consists of deposits that occur in 1)
northeast-trending zones, 2) north-south zones and 3)
northwest-trending zones. In the northeast-trending
zones, three types were recognized, i) those mineralized
with disseminated pyrite and other sulphides with quartz,
ii) those mineralized with massive pyrite - quartz and
iii) those mineralized with pyrite accompanied by chrome,
mica and quartz.
The Briscoe-Bryce No. l Vein Zone would be an excellent
example of a mineralized shear zone of type ii).
The present author recognizes an additional and very important type of gold occurrence in the area, namely gold associated with laminated interflow sedimentary horizons consisting of cherty and tuffaceous material containing stratiform laminae and disseminations and stringers of pyrite and chalcopyrite. These units are typically sheared and show varying degrees of serici tization, carbonatization and chloritization. This variety would be analogous to Moorhouse's 'mineralized' shear zones of type a-1. The Contact Zone on the Briscoe-Bryce property and reported occurrences on the J.R. Campbell property would be of this type. Much of the ore from some of the world's major gold deposits such as Amoco's Detour deposit and the Dome Mine at Timmins is derived from orebodies of this type.
Moorhouse notes that gold values in the area do not
appear to be confined to any one mineral. Samples of apparently pure pyrite taken by that author gave a variable content of gold, whether the pyrite was in porphyry country rock, in coarse cubes in vein material, massive in quartz veins or as massive pyrite.
Gold content of chalcopyrite-bearing samples is like wise variable being very high in some cases and negli gibly low in others. Sphalerite, galena and arsenopyrite also do not appear to be indicative of gold values. Native gold has been found in most of the more interesting prospects such as the Briscoe-Bryce but in some, the gold is more closely associated with pyrite, probably as tiny grains in the pyrite crystal lattices.
The only serious attempt at commercial gold production in the area was from the Briscoe-Bryce No. l Vein Zone. There are no accurate records of the work but, according to Harold Briscoe Sr., a total of approximately 100 tons of ore was milled in a 60-75 ton per day mill installed on the property in the mid 1960's. The rock milled was taken from the decline and No. l and No. 2 shafts on the 'A 1 and 'C 1 zones respectively. Average grade of the mill feed is reported to have been in the 0.5 to 0.6 oz per ton range. The operation appears to have been rela tively crude. In any event, the mill burned down in 1967 'before steady production had been achieved 1 .
l
5. GEOPHYSICAL SURVEYS
5.1 General
Geophysical surveys consisting of VLF-EM, magnetometer
and Induced Polarization were completed on the property
during November and December of 1980.
VLF-EM and magnetic surveys were routinely completed
over the entire line grid including two detail grid areas,
Systematic IP surveying was only carried out over the
detail grid areas. This work was done to determine the
ability of the technique to locate known mineralization
and hence its potential for further gold exploration on
the property. Additionally, several lines outside of
the detail areas were surveyed with IP to investigate
specific VLF-magnetic targets.
5.1.1 Linecutting
The lines on which the surveys described herein
were carried out represent the southern and wes
tern extremities of a grid centered to the north
on patented ground. The 0+00 position on the
baseline was established at the old headframe on
claim 24227 and extended the length of the pro
perty at a bearing at 070 . Crosslines were esta
blished at 100 m intervals with detailed lines
over areas of interest at 50 m. Stations were
established at 25 m intervals.
A total of approximately 20 km of line was cut,
chained and picketed on the claims herein.
5.2 Instrumentation
5.2.1 VLF Survey - The VLF method employs as a source one of the numerous submarine communications transmitters in the 15 to 25 KHz band located throughout the world. At the surface of the earth these radio waves propagate predominantly in a single mode along the earth-air interface. This mode is known as the 'surface wave'. Over
flat homogeneous ground and in the absence of vertical conductive discontinuities, the magnetic field component of this radio wave is horizontal and perpendicular to its direction of propagation.
Where non-horizontal structures such as faults, contacts and conductors give rise to changes in ground conductivity, secondary modes are generated which produce a vertical component of the magnetic field. This produces an ellip tical polarization of the total field in a plane perpendicular to the direction of propagation.
Commercial VLF instruments enable detection of disturbing structures by measuring the tilt angle of the major axis of the polarization ellipse. On flat homogeneous ground the tilt angle will be zero, but in the vicinity of conducting disturbances it will acquire a finite value.
Direction of tilt indicates direction of the disturbing structure. Ability to deduce such parameters as depth, depth extent, dip and width
l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l
10
of anomalous structures is minimal. Fortunately,
this does not seriously affect location of points where VLF profiles cross the upper limit of
dipping structures which can be identified as areas of greatest change in tilt angle per unit
of distance.
The transmitting station used during the survey
was Seattle, Washington, at 18.6 KHz.
The instruments specifications are presented in
Appendix II.
5.2.2 Magnetometer Survey - An Exploranium/Geometrics
Model G816 Proton Precession field magnetometer
was used to survey the grid. This system utili-f-zes the precession of spinning protons of a
hydrogen atom within a hydro carbon fluid. These
spinning magnetic dipoles (protons) are polarized by applying a magnetic field using a current within a coil of wire. When the current is dis-
. continued the protons precess about the earth's magnetic field and in turn generate a small current in the wire. This frequency of precession
is proportional to the earth's total magnetic
field.
This instrument is read directly in gammas repre
senting the absolute value of the earth's total
field for that station.
Correction of the magnetic data for instrument and diurnal drift was done by re-occupying
previously established base stations periodically
11
(approximately every l hour) during the course of the survey. In this manner a drift curve can be established and adjustment of the field readings can be made such that they are all related to an established datum. Instrument specifications are presented in Appendix II.
5.2.3 Induced Polarization Survey - A McPhar P 660
variable frequency induced polarization system was used for this survey. This system utilizes a 2.5 kw transmitter capable of transmitting at 5 different frequencies in the range of 0.125 to 5 Hz. Frequencies of 0.3 and 5 Hz were employed for the Bryce survey.
The receiver is a solid state unit with a 2 megaohm input impedance and a voltage range of 100 microvolts to 10 volts.
A dipole-dipole array was used as a surveying technique with a dipole 'a' spacing of both 25 and 50 metres. For routine coverage, readings with a dipole separation 'n 1 of l through 5 were taken at each station. As the dipole separation 'n 1 increases, the effective depth of penetration is increased. For this reason, readings at n ^ 6 were taken for several areas of interest.
Radio contact using walkie-talkies enabled synchronization of current on/off times between operators to ensure personal safety.
The technical specifications of the survey equipment are presented in Appendix II.
12
For each dipole separation 'n 1 at each station,
two electrode potentials are measured, one with
the low transmitter frequency (F.) and one with a high transmitter frequency (F. ).
The apparent resistivity value of the ground is found from mathematical formula utilizing the
electrode potential value coupled with the
current output from the transmitter at the same
instant, and a geometrical constant dependent on the array type being used and the dipole separa
tion 'n 1 .
For a constant transmitting current the voltage between the potential electrodes and hence the apparent resistivity increases as frequency
decreases.
The frequency domain induced polarization method
is based on this frequency effect and defined as follows:
FE ^ pF, - pF, 1 h
PF,
Where pF, apparent resistivity at low frequency
pF, apparent resistivity at high frequency.
This value is often called the Percent Frequency
Effect (PFE).
The plotting point for both PFE and apparent resistivity values were taken as being the mid
point of the surveying array.
13
A second factor which can be calculated from this data is the Metal Factor (MF) and is defined as:
MF s PFE pa
Disseminated mineralization in a high resisti vity rock gives rise to a much larger PFE than similar mineralization in a lower resistivity rock since the current paths through the barren non-polarizable rock are in parallel with the current paths through the conductive particles. This calculation is only strictly correct when the apparent resistivity is the true resistivity of the rock. Thus, MF is generally not a diagnostic quantity though in particular areas can be quite useful.
5.3 Data Presentation
The VLF-EM data are presented as profiles with positive to the left and negative to the right such that a true
crossover is'indicated by the VLF profile crossing a gridline from left to right while looking north up the line.
A further manipulation was performed on the VLF dip angle,, namely the calculation of a VLF 'first derivative 1 This consists simply of subtracting dip angle values for adjoining stations and contouring the results. Conductor trends are often more obvious from such a contour presentation relative to dip angle profiles.
The magnetic data are shown as a series of isomagnetic contours superimposed on a map of corrected magnetic
values recorded at each station. Contour intervals
were chosen to suitably highlight magnetic features of the survey area.
Induced polarization data from the survey lines are pre sented in pseudosection form. To obtain this type of sentation, data for each station is plotted on a vertical section at the point of intersection of 45 0 lines drawn from the baselines or surface starting at the mid-point of the current and potential electrodes. In this way the readings appear at points directly below the centre of the electrode spread at vertical distances which increases with the "n 1 value for the spread. The result is in the form of a two-dimensional plot in vertical section.
VLF and magnetic survey results for the main grid area are presented on Maps 2a to 2c. Map 2c, the VLF first derivative map, has been employed as an overall property compilation map on which have been plotted known and reported gold occurrences, IP anomalous zones, major geological contacts and 1981 diamond drill holes.
Induced Polarization results are presented in pseudo
section form in Appendix III.
5.4 Survey Results
5.4.1 VLF Survey - VLF surveying was carried out both to directly locate sulphide concentrations and to map shear or fault structures which could host gold-bearing veins. Of particular interest were northeast-trending shear zones which host most of the gold showings in the township. The VLF surveying was carried out using the Seattle transmitter to obtain optimum coupling with northeast conductors.
15
The VLF survey located numerous northeast-
trending conductive features (Map 2b). Most of these probably relate to northeast-trending shear
zones. Several are directly coincident with
topographic features such as creeks and cliff
edges. These are in turn probably a reflection of fault or shear zones in most cases.
The best VLF-indicated examples of potential fault/shear zones are at the extreme south ends
of lines 15 + O OW to 18 * OOW and along the cliff-edge in the central portion of claim
579215.
The broad VLF response underlying Honeymoon Lake
is suggestive of a wide, surficial conductor such as lake bottom sediments.
The strongest and sharpest VLF response is that
over the Contact Zone on claim 579217 where
previous drilling and trenching indicate the
conductivity to be due to a combination of
shearing and sulphide mineralization in interflow
sediments.
5.4.2 Magnetic Survey - The northwest portion of the
grid area is characterized by relatively high
magnetic relief and activity. There are loca
lized magnetic highs of up to 6000 gammas above background. Numerous high gradient, narrow and
short strike length magnetic anomalies attest to
a number of narrow discrete, near-surface magnetic
sources.
16
The remainder of the grid is characterized by generally low magnetic activity with total relief rarely in excess of 100 gammas.
These two sharply contrasting magnetic domains relate to two contrasting geological domains. The northwest portion of the property is under lain by tholeiitic basalts of the Catherine Group. A variable magnetite content within these mafic lavas gives rise to an erratic and variable relief magnetic pattern. The remaining area of low magnetic relief reflects the Skead Group of pyro clastics. These rocks are generally more felsic than the underlying basalts with a substantially decreased magnetite content.
The magnetic data in conjunction with the VLF data have provided an excellent picture of the fault pattern in the area, particularly of north to northwest-trending fractures. These breaks are of interest in that gold-bearing veins are localized along them in some cases. In other - areas, these faults offset pre-existing northeast vein structures.
Interpreted fault patterns are indicated on compilation map 2C.
5.4.3 Induced Polarization Survey - The IP surveying was carried out specifically to locate sulphide concentrations known to be associated with some gold occurrences in the area.
17
The 25 m dipole spacing was selected to optimize target resolution and detectability. Readings were taken at spacings up to ^6 to allow for
maximum exploration penetration.
The IP data is presented in the form of pseudo-
sections of both Percent Frequency Effect (PFE)
and Apparent Resistivity. Anomalous zones are
outlined on the pseudosections with solid bars indicating strong zones and broken bars indicating weaker or poorly defined zones. These anomalous
localities have also been transcribed onto the
relevant compilation maps.
a) South Zone - Five survey lines were extended
south to cover the South Zone. (Lines 0+00
to 2+OOW inclusive). Low gold values asso
ciated with quartz-pyrite-chalcopyrite
veining are present at this location.
The IP pseudosection data from the South Zone
is displayed on drawings 5 to 9 (Appendix III). Map 2c shows the location of the South Zone
occurrences in relation to the IP and VLF-EM
anomalies.
The apparent resistivity data outline a number
of fairly strong vertical structures which
persist to depth. The complexity of the
pseudosection is increased by a number of
north-south structures traversing the zone
and the overlapping of resistivity responses
at larger spread lengths.
18
Because of the small amplitude values of the
PFE data, no well-formed anomalous structures
could be outlined using only the PFE data.
The interpretational procedure thus was to
outline structure using the apparent resisti
vity pseudosections and to utilize the PFE
data to outline any possible polarizable zones within structures so located.
As a result of this procedure the IP survey
has outlined a weakly polarizable zone
approximately coincident with the South gold
zone.
The PFE anomalies are approximately 501 above
background with the strongest and most con
sistent value present at the deepest levels investigated with the IP survey array.
All of the PFE pseudosections covering the
South Zone showed a small anomalous surface
expression. Depth to the strongest polari
zable zones, however, is interpreted at approximately 75 metres.
The IP anomaly in the area of the South Zone is bounded on its east end by a north-south fault and is open to the west. The PFE
anomaly was semi-coincident with a strong VLF-EM anomaly which is also open to the west.
19
Other ~ Several lines of reconnaissance IP surveying were carried out on the property with a view to outlining further polarizable zones which could potentially host gold mineralization. These lines were chosen on the basis of magnetic, VLF-EM and geological data.
For this work, 50 metre dipole spreads were used. Although the larger spacing reduces discrimination, the deeper penetration and
increased production of the longer spreads outweigh the disadvantages.
Line 11+OOW - This line was surveyed to
evaluate a number of VLF-EM conductors in the vicinity of reported quartz-sulphide 'r-
gold occurrences at the southern extremity
of the property.
A distinct PFE zone associated with a strong apparent resistivity feature was located between 1+37S to 1+75S. This zone is located on the northern flank of a VLF-EM conductor.
The PFE values defining this zone are up to 4 times above background and describe a well- formed anomaly pattern. No surface expression
was interpretable from the PFE data. The depth to the anomaly is estimated at 120
metres.
A second anomaly on this line is located
between 4+50S to 5+OOS and is outlined as a
strong PFE anomalous zone persisting to depth.
l
20
The zone is straddling two reported gold occurrences (Map 2c). The PFE data indicate a broadening of response at depth (Drawing 16 - Appendix III).
21
6. CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
Results of exploration work carried out to date both by previous workers and in the course of the present programme
are sufficiently encouraging to warrant diamong drill
evaluation of the most prospective targets. Two holes should be drilled to test favourably located VLF-IP targets on claims
579215 and 578265-266 as follows:
Claim 579215
- a 350 ft. hole drilled grid north at -50O from 44-40mS on line O+SOmW will investigate a strong VLF feature in the
vicinity of the 'South Zone 1 occurrence. There is a weak resistivity feature immediately to the north containing
some scattered PFE highs which will also be investigated by the drill hole.
Claim 578268, 578266
- a 350 ft. hole drilled grid north at -50O from 5-f25mS on
line 11+OOmW will test a distinct IP target to the east of
Honeymoon Lake. There are two quartz-sulphide vein
exposures in the immediate area with low gold values.
Diamond drilling should recover N-size core and should commence
as soon as a machine can be secured.
Recommendations to further explore the gold potential of the
property area will be contingent on the results of the above.
Respectfull
W.E. Brereton,
HOLE 81-8 314 ft. at - 50*
Claim 578265SE 1/4 SI/2 Lot 12, Cone.4Bryce Township
Claim 578266SWI/4 SI/2 Lot II, Cone.4Bryce Township
YVANEX-WINDJAMMER J.V.
BRISCOE-BRYCE PROPERTYLOCATION MAP
HOLE 81-8Ut. C-409
l: 2500OciwlMNt
W.E.BreretonDrain: GC S Ltd.Oiu A ug. 1981
MPH Consulting Limited
l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l
APPARENT RESISTIVITY
7+OOS
n = l
{1=2
0=3
0 = 4
0=5
0 = 6
n s l
0=2
0 = 3
0 = 4
0 = 6
PFE.
6+OOS l
5-fOOS 4+OOS
-0.3
\z-o
MOO* l00+0SOO+Isoo+zSOOi-2
—l—SOO+1 NOO-H00-J-OSOO+3soo+s
OO+O 3NH
l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l
APPARENT RESISTIVITY
2+OON l
n = l
n = 2
0=3
0=4
0=5
0 = 6
2+OON
n = l
0 = 2
0 = 3
0 = 4
0 = 5
0 = 6
L E G E N D
DOUBLE DIPOLE ARRAY
a s* no te o 1~
STATION LOCATION
0 = 25 m o= 1,2,3,4,5,6
-5OO
-\.o-
PFE200 S. IOCS.
APPARENT RESISTIVITY
CONTOUR LEVEL (ohm-metres)
PERCENT FREQUENCY
EFFECT CONTOUR LEVEL
STATION LOCATION
ANOMALOUS INDUCED
POLARIZATION ZONE
LOCATION MAP
SO lOOnwtrBS
YVANEX - WINDJAMMER J.V
BRISCOE-BRYCE RROSRECT
I.P PSEUDO SECTIONSProject No; C4O9
Scale: P1250
Drawing No: 5
By: DAVID JONES
Drawn: E.O.
Date: JANUARY, 1981
MPH Consulting Limited
l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l
APPARENT RESISTIVITY
n= l
n = 2
n * 3
n s 4
n s 5
n *'6
n = l
7+OOS 6+OOS 5OOS
247
r+oos 6*OOS 5+OOS
-0.6 - O-2. -0.8
0.3 \ O -0.3 - /.O -0.7 -O.5 -/.3.
\
,\
M '8 (A •8 z
•3-
2000
-; 18
00
.a w
U) u) w .UI
to UI
• Uf IS
O
30
o
rs N O o 01 •8 w O -i o
m 01 o
l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l
l o"
APPARENT RESISTIVITY
2+OON i
n = l
n * 2
n = 3
n = 4
0 = 5
0 = 6
2-iOON i
n = l
0 = 2
0=3
0 = 4
0=5
0=6
PFE
L E G E N D
DOUBLE DIPOLE ARRAY
, cK1 a * no
p, PzV a Xz
a - 2 5m
-50O-——
STATION LOCATION
n ~
——\.0
200 S. IOCS. l
APPARENT RESISTIVITY
CONTOUR LEVEL (ohm-metres)
PERCENT FREQUENCY
EFFECT CONTOUR LEVEL
STATION LOCATION
ANOMALOUS INDUCED
POLARIZATION ZONE
LOCATION MAP
5O
YVANEX - WINDJAMMER J.V
BRISCOE: - BRVCE RROSRECT
IP PSEUDO SECTIONSProject No: C4O9Scale: IM25ODrawing No. 6
By DAVID JONES
Drawn: E.J.
Date: JANUARY, 1981
MPH Consulting Limited
*APPARENT RESISTIVITY
n^ l
n* Z
n s 3
n s 4
n * 5
n = B
7+OOS 6+OOS i
5-t-OOS 4-KXDS
•7*1
73* 41
7-K)OS 6-t-OOS
n s l
h *2
n = 3
n-s 4
n r 5
5+OOS i
4*OOS
-1.0 -O.2 o?, 0.2
PFE.
72J&1 l l HO35 X" 8778
APPARENT RESISTIVITY2+OON
n = l
ion ioo
\-V 130
\'
0=4
0=5
0 = 6
2+OON
LEGEND
DOUBLE DIPOLE ARRAY0 = 2
C, Cz P, P2 , K o si no le a X
STATION LOCATION
O".2 , 0 = 4 0 = 2501 0=1,2,3,4,5^6
0.2 O.I-oN n=5 sOO-~~~ APPARENT RESISTIVITY
S CONTOUR LEVEL (ohm -metres)
0:' n ~ 6 PERCENT FREQUENCY
1 -*-0 tFFtCI CONTOUR LEVEL
-.—- 200S. IOOS. PFE 1 ———————— 1 STATION LOCATION
^^^ ANOMALOUS INDUCED ^^^ POLARIZATION ZONE
\g 50 lOOmetres
YVANEX - WINDJAMMER J.V
BRISCOE- BRYCE PROSPECT
IP PSEUDO SECTIONSProject Nor C4O9
Scale: 1 I25O
Drawing No: 7
By DAVID JONES
Drawn: E. J.
Date: JANUARY, 1981-
( MPH y M PH Consulting Limited
i :1 1 1 1 1
II l lul l l l l
l
l
riiiiiiiiiiiiiiiit
APPARENT RESISTIVITY
n = l
0=2
0=3
0 = 4
0 = 5
0 = 6
0 = 1
0=2
0=3
0=4
0 = 6
PFE.
7+OOS
7-i-OOS i
6+OOSl
5+00 Sl
4+OOSl
5+OOS l
4+OOS
/
-t-
•in CO
tal ^
\,
Ut
'W'
aa
(ft
\'ut
o*.
/ u)
o).
..O \
8 (A O •i o l
m
w 8
l r i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i t
APPARENT RESISTIVITY
2+OON i
lor IOO
izs
n = l
n = 2
n s 3
11=4
0=5
n - 6
2+OON
O.I
n s l
n = 2
n = 3
0 = 4
n = 5
n = 6
PFE
L E G E N D
DOUBLE DIPOLE ARRAY
a ^ na K o 1
STATION LOCATION
a s 25 m n = 1,2^,4,5,6
-5OO
-\.o-200 S. IOCS
APPARENT RESISTIVITYCONTOUR LEVEL (ohm-metres)
PERCENT FREQUENCY EFFECT CONTOUR LEVEL
STATION LOCATION
ANOMALOUS INDUCED POLARIZATION ZONE
MAP
50 KJOmetres
YVANEX -WINDJAMMER J.V
BRISCOE - B.RVCE RROSRECT
IP PSEUDO SECTIOIVJSProject No.- C4O9
Scale: IM25ODrawing No. 9
By DAVID JONESDrawn: E.J.
Date : JANUARY, 1981
MPH Consulting Limited
l
l
l
l
l
l
l
l
l
l
l
l
l
l
l
l
l
l
l
APPARENT RESISTIVITY
n= l
0 = 2
n r 3
0 = 4
0=3
0=4
0 = 6
PEE.
7+OOS l
6+OOS l
5+OOS l
4-t-OOS i
2254
2597
5-t-OOS 4-KX)S
tfstt)
VA
•'•o
W
\n •*
00
l t,
o w
tt\
lit d\
in
.o w)l o *JO
o 8
tfll /
M '3X
IM
h* •K*
•100
00
vft
Y
\.
K*
X
(d •5
*-
8 W ro •f •8 w o o o •t- z
Z m
"f o ^
00
137
ISO—
-0.1
APPARENT RESISTIVITY
2+OON l
n = l
n = 2
n = 3
0=4
2+OON
n * t
0 = 2
0=3
0 = 4
0=5
0=6
L E G E N D
DOUBLE DIPOLE ARRAY
no S
a z 25m
-50O-——
STATION LOCATION
n z
-\.o-
PFE 2OOS.l^^
IOCS. l
APPARENT RESISTIVITYCONTOUR LEVEL (ohm -metres)
PERCENT FREQUENCY EFFECT CONTOUR LEVEL
STATION LOCATION
ANOMALOUS INDUCED POLARIZATION ZONE
LOCATION MAP
50
YVANEX - WINDJAMMER J.V
BRISCOE- BRYCE PROSPECT
IP PSEUDO SECTIONSProject No: C4O9
Scale: II25ODrawing No. 8
By. DAVID JONESDrawn: E.J.
Date: JANUARY, 1981
MPH Consulting Limited
l
l
l
l
l
l
l
l
l
li
l
l
l
l
l
l
l
l
APPARENT RESISTIVITY
o* t
o = Z
0 = 3
n s l
0=2
0 = 3
0 = 4
0 = 5
PFE.
7+OOS i
6+OOS l 5+OOS
r4400S 3+00 S
l2+OOS
\
7+OOS i
750*5
fffio
/*2*T
wtoz
'•o
o...
o-s
o.,
0-3
8
(A O 8 M -6 o 04 ft •o o • o o z O
) •8 z
500C
•3O
OO
•8O
OO
1^80
0
-ISO
OO
o o W
l)o 8
10
00
0.
r 1000
-150
0 -2
000
3000
O
O zw
5000
'
IN)
•O o z -O o z
•500
0
Oi * -O o
V"-
,30
00
•500
0O
) •8 z
8! w•
-o o z
V00 •6
o z
o o
APPARENT RESISTIVITY
9*OON
n = l
0 = 2
0 = 3
0=4
9*OON
o - l
o t 2
0=3
0 = 4
0=5
LEGEND
DOUBLE DIPOLE ARRAY
a * no K a
STATION LOCATION
o* 1,2:
-500
-\.o-
PFE 2OOS. IOCS.
APPARENT RESISTIVITY
CONTOUR LEVEL (ohm - metres)
PERCENT FREQUENCY EFFECT CONTOUR LEVEL
STATION LOCATION
ANOMALOUS INDUCED
POLARIZATION ZONE
CATION MAP
5O lOOmetTBs
YVANEX - WINDJAMMER J.V
BRISCOE - BRYCE: PROSPECT
IP PSEUDO SECTIONSProject No: C4O9Scale: I--25OODrawing No: 16
By DAVID JONESDrawn: E.J.Date: JANUARY, 1981
MPH Consulting Limited
l l ltri
ano
Ministry of Natural F
GEOPHYSICAL - GEOLOGICAL TECHNICAL DATA -S'
4IP89NEW47 2 .4151 BRYCE 900
TO BE ATTACHED AS AN APPENDIX TO TECHNICAL REPORTFACTS SHOWN HERE NEED NOT BE REPEATED IN REPORT
TECHNICAL REPORT MUST CONTAIN INTERPRETATION, CONCLUSIONS ETC.
'ypeofSurvey(s) Magnetometer, VLF-EM, IP bwnship or Ar^ Bryce Township________ llaim Holders) Petromet Resources Ltd.
urvey company MPH Consulting Limiteduthor of Report W. E. Brer e ton, P.Eng.
Address of Author 706-141 Adelaide St .W, Toronto, On t. jvering Dates of Snrvpy Nov. 1980-Jan. 1981——-————-
(linecutting to office)
otal Miles of Line Cut 10.8
SPECIAL PROVISIONS CREDITS REQUESTED
ENTER 40 days (includes line cutting) for first survey.ENTER 20 days for each additional survey using same grid.
Geophysical—Electromagnetic-—Magnetometer———Radiometric———Other IP-10
DAYS per claim
40
20
Geological.Geochemical.
IRBORNE CREDITS (Special provision credits do not apply to airborne (urveyi)
r f
agnetometer. .Electromagnetic. . Radio
Aucr. 1981
(enter days per claim) f ^
SIGNATURE-:Report or Agent
les.'Geol.. .Qualifications.revious Surveys File No. Type Date Claim Holder
MINING CLAIMS TRAVERSED List numerically
(prefix)
L
L
L
L
L
L* •••H
L
L
(number)
579216
579217 t
578257
578261.
578263
578264
578265
578266
8 l
TOTAL CLAIMS.
l l l l l l l l
iitano
Ministry of Natural Resources
GEOPHYSICAL - GEOLOGICAL - GEOCHEMICAL TECHNICAL DATA STATEMENT
File.
TO BE ATTACHED AS AN APPENDIX TO TECHNICAL REPORTFACTS SHOWN HERE NEED NOT BE REPEATED IN REPORT
TECHNICAL REPORT MUST CONTAIN INTERPRETATION, CONCLUSIONS ETC.
Type of Survey(s) Magnetometer, VLF-EM, IP_________
Township or Arra Bryce Township______________________ !
Claim Holder(s)______________________Windjammer Power Si Gas, Yvanex Developments Ltd.
Survey Company MPH Consulting Ltd. .————.——--. Author of Report W. E. Brereton, P.Enq. ————————-Address of Amhnr 706-141 Adelaide St.W., Toronto,Ont. Covering Dates of Survey Nov. 1980-Jan. 1981________
(Ijnccutting to office)
Total Miles of Line Cut. 1.2
SPECIAL PROVISIONS CREDITS REQUESTED
ENTER 40 days (includes line cutting) for first survey.ENTER 20 days for each additional survey using same grid.
Geophysical—Electromagnetic-—Magnetometer-——Radiometric——
DAYS per claim
40
20
-Other IP-2QGeological.Geochemical.
AIRBORNE CREDITS (Special provision credits do not apply to airborne surveys)
l
Magnetometer. .Electromagnetic Radiometric
n ATR. Aug. 1981
(enter days per claim)
SIGNATURE
/L'f ^7————————jQ ^——.r-T.-n-j-^T^.S:.-.!!.. ^ ^™PI
Author #t Reporl or Agent
lRes.Geol.. .Qualifications.Previous Surveys
File No. Type Date Claim Holder
MINING CLAIMS TRAVERSED List numerically
(prefix) (number)
L 579218
S
TOTAL CLAIMS.
GEOPHYSICAL TECHNICAL DATA
GROUND SURVEYS - If more than one survey, specify data for each type of survey
Number of Stations —JLP-Q _____________________ Number of Readings 800Station interval 2 5 m_____________________Line spacing——50-100 mProfile scale___________:————————:————————i———————————————————Contour interval —.
Instrument Geometrics G-816
Accuracy - Scale constant l gammaDiurnal correction method looping method; re-occupation of established base stations
Base Station check-in interval (hnnrs) S to l hr.———-——-—————-^-————————-———————Base Station location and value several base stations - as indicated_______;——.——
Instrument __Geonics VLF EM-16
Coil configuration ;————————————— Coil separation ———————————————— Accuracy -- - -t-%————————————Method: CD Fixed transmitter D Shoot back CD In line D Parallel line Fr^q^nry Seattle, Washington, 18.6 kHz____________________________
(specify V.L.F. station)
Parameters measured————————————————————————————————————————————:—————-...——-
Instrument.Scale constant.Corrections made.
Base station value and location.
Elevation accuracy-
Instrument McPhar P660 Variable FrequencyMethod D Time Domain G9 Frequency Domain Parameters - On time ______L———________________ Frequency . 0-3 and 5 Hz
—Off time_________\_________________ Range 0.125 to 5 Hz— Delay time.—————————————————————————— Integration time____:_________________H w
Power 2.5 kilowatt transmitterElectrode array dipole-dipole
Electrode spacing . 25 and 50 mType of electrode steel rods
00 lO OJ
l
Q:
UJ Q.oQIDh-
ROBILLARD TWP M - 579
3396 119436
579225 . 512471
5IT27 151690 (L)MRO
^-CLOSED TO
TO SEC 38 (f)
SEPT
OF MINING ACT
20/78)
C\l
l̂
CL
CL
X O
LJ CD
8 76 5
CANE TWP M-211
41Pa9NEW847 2.4151 BRYCE
THF TOWNSHIPor
BRYCEDISTRICT OF
TIMISKAMING
LARDER LAKEMINING DIVISION
SCALE: 1 -INCH 40 CHAINS
LEGEND
PATENTED LANDCROWN LAND SAIFLEASES
LOCATED LANDLICENSE OF OCCUPATIONMINING RIGHTS ONLYSURFACE RIGHTS ONLY
ROADSIMPROVED ROADS
KING'S HIGHWAYSRAILWAYS
POWER LINES
MARSH OR MUSKEGMINESCANCELLED PATENTED S.R.O.
orC.S.
Loc.L.Q.
M.R.Q S.R.O.
.L"*,.—^-^
NOTES
400' surface rights reservation along the shores of all lakes and rivers.
Areas w ithdrawn from staking under Section 43 of the Mining Act l R.SG. :97Ok •i--rt ; . NO File Date D isposition
DATE OF ISSUE
Ministry of Natural Rwurces
PLAN NO. M-282ONTARIO
MINISTRY OF NATURAL RESOURCESSURVEYS AND MAPPING BRANCH
O oO
O
ui O O A-
O O A-
O
O A- o.
O O A-
O o A-o o •T
o o A-
o o -V
o o
8I-7
36
6 FT
8I-8
3
I4F
T
o o A-
58®
LotlZ
Lot
I0Lo
t 9
LE
GE
ND
VLF
- E
M
PR
OF
ILE
M
AP
Inst
rum
en
t :
GE
ON
ICS
E
M -
16
Sta
tio
n:
SE
AT
TL
E
WA
SH
ING
TO
N,
FR
EQ
UE
NC
Y
I8-6
K
Hz
SE
AT
TL
E
20
O.
-20
070.
INP
HA
SE
P
RO
FIL
E
VE
RT
ICA
L S
CA
LE
l cm
. r
2O070
.CO
ND
UC
TO
R
AX
IS
— _
_T
OW
NS
HIP
B
OU
ND
AR
Y
^__C
ON
CE
SS
ION
B
OU
ND
AR
Y
.— —
LO
T
LIN
E
——
—
CL
AIM
LI
NE
LA
KE
C R
E E
K { A
rrow
In
dica
tes
Flo
w)
HIL
L
OLD
P
IT
AN
D
TRE
NC
H
LOC
AT
ION
S
DIA
MO
ND
D
RIL
L H
OLE
, I9
8I
41P
*9N
EW
47
2.4
15
1
BR
YCE
21
0
50
too
m
YVAN
EX -
WIN
DJAM
MER
J.V
BR
ISC
OE
- B
RV
CE
P
RO
PE
RT
Y
VLF-
EM
PROF
ILE
MAP
Pro
ject
No
: C
409
Scal
e:
P25
OO
Dra
win
g No
2
a
By
D. J
ON
ES
Dra
wn.
E
.J.
Dat
e,
JAN
UA
RY
, I9
8I
MPH
C
onsu
lting
Lim
ited
o?
,
O O
o o -vO
OO
OO
O JT
O O
O oO
Oo o
O O
ri
\\*o
\o*'
.*o,0
^
6*0
,0^
.00^
^o1,0
^
Con.
iv
o ,
o Jr oO
O
O oO
OO
OO
O
\O.
Hi O
Lot
12Lo
t II
Lot
10Lo
t 9
00s
41P
a9N
E09
47
S.4
15
1
BRYC
E2
20
Scal
e -
:72
mile
5904
8
LE
GE
ND
MA
GN
ETI
C
VA
LUE
IN
G
AM
MA
S
MA
GN
ETI
C
CO
NTO
UR
MA
GN
ETI
C
DE
PR
ES
SIO
N
INS
TR
UM
EN
T :
GE
OM
ETR
ICS
G
-816
PR
OTO
N
MA
GN
ET
OM
ET
ER
CO
NTO
UR
S:
50
0 g
amm
as
________.
100
gam
mas
TOW
NS
HIP
B
OU
ND
AR
Y
CO
NC
ES
SIO
N
BO
UN
DA
RY
LOT
LIN
E
CLA
IM
LIN
E
LAK
E
CR
EE
K
(Arr
ow
In
dica
tes
Flo
w)
DIA
MO
ND
D
RIL
L H
OLE
, 19
81
50
lOO
m
d
VAN
EX -
WIN
DJAM
MER
J.V
BR
ISC
OE
-BR
YC
E
PR
OP
ER
TY
MAGN
ETOM
ETER
SU
RVEY
Pro
ject
N
o:
C4
O9
By
D JO
NE
S
Scal
e:
M 25
00D
raw
n E
.J.
Dra
win
g No
2b
Dat
e JA
NU
AR
Y.
1981
MP
H
Con
sulti
ng L
imite
d
J\ •AT
O O
o o\ x
t"
o o •Y-V
Q.
\O O
\O o
O oO O
J \(P
o o A-1,
O \0
O oO
OO
OO
O
O
O \o \
O O •V \o
o o A-Oo
O oO
OO
O
tf)O
O Jr
O O Jr
ui O O
o o -VO
O
\Oo
o oO
O JrO O
\o*'
Lot9
Scal
e ; l
" s
1/2m
ile
LE
GE
ND
VLF
-EM
D
ER
IVA
TIV
E
MA
P
Inst
rum
ent^
G
EO
NIC
S
EM
- 16
Sta
tion:
SE
AT
TLE
W
AS
HIN
GTO
N,
FRE
QU
EN
CY
18
-6
KH
z
SE
AT
TLE
,
10
VLF
-EM
FI
RS
T D
ER
IVA
TIV
E
(Fro
m
Inph
ase
Val
ues)
10C
ON
TOU
R
INTE
RV
AL
C lO
Vo)
^CO
ND
UC
TOR
A
XIS
W
ITH
D
EP
TH
(m
etre
s)
.TO
WN
SH
IP
BO
UN
DA
RY
.CO
NC
ES
SIO
N
BO
UN
DA
RY
LOT
LIN
E
CLA
IM
LIN
E
LAK
E
-^ C
RE
EK
(A
rrow
In
dica
tes
Flow
)
\AA
/ FA
ULT
mm
mw
mm
m
AN
OM
ALO
US
IND
UC
ED P
OLA
RIZ
ATIO
N
ZON
E
RE
PO
RTE
D
QU
AR
TZ -
SU
LPH
IDE
± G
OLD
O
CC
UR
REN
CE
GEO
LOG
ICAL
C
ON
TAC
T
-A DIA
MO
ND
D
RIL
L H
OLE
, 19
81;
com
plet
ed,
prop
osed
sotO
Om
4IP
e9N
E00
47
2.4
15
1
BR
YCE
S30
- WIN
DJAM
MER
J.V
BR
ISC
OE
-B
RY
CE
P
RO
PE
RT
Y
VLF-
EM
FIRS
T DE
RIVA
TIVE
AND
EX
PLOR
ATIO
N CO
MPILA
TION
Proj
ect
No?
c 40
9Sc
ale.
I-
25O
ODr
awin
g No
2c
By
D. J
ON
ES
/W.B
RE
RE
TON
Draw
n:
E.J
.
Dat
e;
JAN
UA
RY.
1981
MP
H
) M
PH
Con
sulti
ng L
imite
d