ROTTA, E. H.a,*, BITENCOURT, C. S. , MARDER, L ... · CEM AEM CEM AEM + - E CA D CC E • Different...
Transcript of ROTTA, E. H.a,*, BITENCOURT, C. S. , MARDER, L ... · CEM AEM CEM AEM + - E CA D CC E • Different...
ROTTA, E. H.a,*, BITENCOURT, C. S.a, MARDER, L.a, BERNARDES, A. M.a
a. LACOR, PPGE3M, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Rio Grande do Sul* Corresponding author, [email protected]
• Phosphorus (P) is an essential nutrient for all life forms;
• Demand of food and commodities industry phosphate rock– One of the 20 critical raw materials1;
• Excessive P loads inserted on natural water bodies:– Eutrophication2;
1. Introduction
Researches ontechnologies to
phosphorusrecovery from
wastewater
1. European Commission, 2014. Memo 14/377.7. Brussels, BE;
2. Shepherd, J.G., Sohi, S.P., Heal, K. V, 2016. Water Research. 94, 155–165.
• Different processes wereproposed to the recoveryand concentration of P:– Biochar adsorption2;
– Crystallization3;
– Precipitation4 and;
– Membrane-based process5
• Electrodialysis6;
1. Introduction
3. Le Corre, K.S., Valsami-Jones, E., Hobbs, P., Parsons, S.A., 2009. Critical Reviews in Environmental Science and Technology. 39, 433–477;
4. Qiu, G., Ting, Y., 2014. Bioresource Technology. 170, 221–229;
5. Xie, M., Shon, H.K., Gray, S.R., Elimelech, M., 2016. Water Research. 89, 210–221;
6. Ebbers, B., Ottosen, L.M., Jensen, P.E., 2015. Electrochimica Acta. 181, 90–99.
• Different processes wereproposed to the recoveryand concentration of P:– Biochar adsorption2;
– Crystallization3;
– Precipitation4 and;
– Membrane-based process5
• Electrodialysis6;
1. Introduction
3. Le Corre, K.S., Valsami-Jones, E., Hobbs, P., Parsons, S.A., 2009. Critical Reviews in Environmental Science and Technology. 39, 433–477;
4. Qiu, G., Ting, Y., 2014. Bioresource Technology. 170, 221–229;
5. Xie, M., Shon, H.K., Gray, S.R., Elimelech, M., 2016. Water Research. 89, 210–221;
6. Ebbers, B., Ottosen, L.M., Jensen, P.E., 2015. Electrochimica Acta. 181, 90–99.
CEM CEMAEM AEM
+ -
E DCA CC E
• Different processes wereproposed to the recoveryand concentration of P:– Biochar adsorption2;
– Crystallization3;
– Precipitation4 and;
– Membrane-based process5
• Electrodialysis6;
1. Introduction
3. Le Corre, K.S., Valsami-Jones, E., Hobbs, P., Parsons, S.A., 2009. Critical Reviews in Environmental Science and Technology. 39, 433–477;
4. Qiu, G., Ting, Y., 2014. Bioresource Technology. 170, 221–229;
5. Xie, M., Shon, H.K., Gray, S.R., Elimelech, M., 2016. Water Research. 89, 210–221;
6. Ebbers, B., Ottosen, L.M., Jensen, P.E., 2015. Electrochimica Acta. 181, 90–99.
CEM CEMAEM AEM
+ -
E DCA CC E
HPO42-
HPO4-
Na+
• P recovery from sewage sludge ash (SSA):– SSA by-product of dewatered sewage sludge combustion in an
incinerator7,8;
1. Introduction
7. Guedes, P., Couto, N., Ottosen, L.M., Ribeiro, A.B., 2014. Waste Management. 34, 886–892;
8. Ottosen, L.M., Jensen, P.E., Kirkelund, G.M., 2016. Waste Management. 51, 142–148;
• P recovery from sewage sludge ash (SSA):– SSA by-product of dewatered sewage sludge combustion in an
incinerator7,8;
• The objective of this work was to test the technical feasibility of a5-compartment ED cell in the treatment of a phosphate containingsolution aiming the recovery of P from municipal wastewater;
1. Introduction
7. Guedes, P., Couto, N., Ottosen, L.M., Ribeiro, A.B., 2014. Waste Management. 34, 886–892;
8. Ottosen, L.M., Jensen, P.E., Kirkelund, G.M., 2016. Waste Management. 51, 142–148;
2.1. Solutions
• Phosphate containing solution:
• Electrolytic solution:
2. Materials and Methods
Salts Concentration
NaH2PO4.H2O 0.33 g L-1
Na2HPO4.7H2O 0.65 g L-1
Salt Concentration
Na2SO4 4 g L-1
2.2. Electrodialysis Cell
• Membranes:– CEM: HDX100;
– AEM: HDX200;
– Supplied by Hidrodex®;
– 16 cm²;
• Electrodes:– Ti/70TiO230RuO2;
– 16 cm²
2. Materials and Methods
2.3. Determination of the limiting current density
• Current-Voltage Curves (CVC) method9;
• 2 mA each 30 seconds;
• Duplicate.
2. Materials and Methods
9. Bernardes, A.M., Ferreira, J.Z., Rodrigues, M.A.S., 2014. Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Berlin, Heidelberg.
2.3. Determination of the limiting current density
• Current-Voltage Curves (CVC) method9;
• 2 mA each 30 seconds;
• Duplicate.
2. Materials and Methods
9. Bernardes, A.M., Ferreira, J.Z., Rodrigues, M.A.S., 2014. Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Berlin, Heidelberg.
V
+ -
V
ilim
Power Supply
2.4. Electrodialysis experiments
• ED tests were carried out in triplicate;
• Room temperature;
• Conductivity, pH and cell potential were monitored;
• Solution aliquots were collected at pre-established time andsubmitted to ion chromatography analysis;– Study of the ions transfer;
– Efficiency of the ED process to remove and recover phosphate;
2. Materials and Methods
𝑝𝑒% = 𝐶𝑖 − 𝐶𝑡
𝐶𝑖× 100
3. Results and Discussions
3.1. Limiting current density
• HDX100:– one plateau
– one ilim– typical behavior10;
10. Scarazzato, T., Buzzi, D.C., Bernardes, A.M., Romano Espinosa, D.C., 2015. Journal of Cleaner Production. 91, 241–250.
3. Results and Discussions
3.1. Limiting current density
• HDX100:– one plateau
– one ilim– typical behavior10;
• HDX200:– two plateaus
– two ilim– differs from the
conventional;10. Scarazzato, T., Buzzi, D.C., Bernardes, A.M., Romano Espinosa, D.C., 2015. Journal of Cleaner Production. 91, 241–250.
3.1. Limiting current density
3. Results and Discussions
Presence of twoplateaus11
Different phosphorus-containing species12
pH conditions
11. Pismenskaya, N., Nikonenko, V., Auclair, B., Pourcelly, G., 2001. Journal of Membrane Science. 189, 129–140;12. Puigdomenech, I., 2004. Inorganic Chemistry, Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm, Sweden.
3.2. Evaluation of Electrodialysis
• 0.53 mA cm-2;
– 75% of ilim,AEM113;
• 15 hours;– 200 µS cm-1 (water supply);
3. Results and Discussions
13. Buzzi, D.C., Viegas, L.S., Rodrigues, M.A.S., Bernardes, A.M., Tenório, J.A.S., 2013. Minerals Engineering. 40, 82–89.
3.2. Evaluation of Electrodialysis
• Conductivity
3. Results and Discussions
CEM CEMAEM AEM
+ -
H2PO4-
HPO4-
Na+
E CA D CC E
SO42-
Na+
SO42-
Na+
3.2. Evaluation of Electrodialysis
• pH
3. Results and Discussions
pH in the dilutedcompartment
Water Dissociation
OH-
Pass throughthe AEM
H+
Shifts theequilibrium to
the formation ofH3PO4
3.2. Evaluation of Electrodialysis
• Cell voltage
3. Results and Discussions
↑ solution electrical resistance
Removal of the number of ionsavailable in D compartment
↓ pH ofcentral
compartment
Formation ofH3PO4
3.2. Evaluation of Electrodialysis
• While the pe% for Na+ is over than 92%, phosphate-containingspecies reported a lower value, around 61%, possibly due to H3PO4
availability;
3. Results and Discussions
Ionic specie Percent Extraction (pe%)
Phosphate-containing species (HxPO4
x-3)(60.82 ± 6.48) %
Sodium (Na+) (92.21 ± 1.21) %
• CVCs showed an unusual behavior for the AEM (HDX200);
•
• Further experiments should be done to try to achieve higher
phosphate species recovery;
– Controlling the solution pH;
– operating in a continuous way or;
– changing successively the solution in the diluted compartment.
4. Conclusions
Changes on pH conditions in D compartment
Formation of H3PO4
pe% of P-containingspecies wasrestricted