Rorschach Inkblot Test
-
Upload
pamela-bianca-mas -
Category
Education
-
view
576 -
download
59
Transcript of Rorschach Inkblot Test
![Page 1: Rorschach Inkblot Test](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022050616/55a994221a28ab9f218b4611/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
![Page 2: Rorschach Inkblot Test](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022050616/55a994221a28ab9f218b4611/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
RORSCHACH INKBLOT TEST
![Page 3: Rorschach Inkblot Test](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022050616/55a994221a28ab9f218b4611/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
HERMANN RORSCHACH
![Page 4: Rorschach Inkblot Test](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022050616/55a994221a28ab9f218b4611/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
HISTORICAL ANTECEDENTS
• J. Kerner (1857) – individuals report uniquemeanings when viewing inkblot stimuli
• Binet – proposed using inkblot test whenRorschach was only 10 years old.
• Whipple (1910) – first set of standardizedinkblots
• Psychodiagnostik (1921)
• David Levy – brought Rorschach’s test to USA
![Page 5: Rorschach Inkblot Test](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022050616/55a994221a28ab9f218b4611/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
INKBLOT TEST
• Name of Test:
• Author:
• Date Published:
• Publisher:
• Edition/Revision:
Rorschach Inkblot Test
Hermann Rorschach
1921
Hogrefe Publishing
Three volume work that has spanned at least three editions
![Page 6: Rorschach Inkblot Test](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022050616/55a994221a28ab9f218b4611/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
NOTABLE INDIVIDUALS
• Samuel J. Beck – wrote several books onRorschach and influenced generations ofRorschach practitioners.
• Marguerite Hertz – stimulated considerableresearch on the Rorschach.
• Bruno Klopfer – published several keyRorschach books and articles.
• Zygmunt Piotrowski and David Rapaport –continued to exert influence on practitionersin spite of overwhelming contrary evidence.
![Page 7: Rorschach Inkblot Test](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022050616/55a994221a28ab9f218b4611/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
DESCRIPTION
• Type of test:
• What it measure:
• Number of items:
• Type of items:
• Norm:
Individual Test
Psychological disorders
10
Inkblots
Never been adequately normed
![Page 8: Rorschach Inkblot Test](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022050616/55a994221a28ab9f218b4611/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
DESCRIPTION
VALIDITY
Rorschach inkblot test’s popularity (1940sand 1950s) was based on clinical evidencegathered from a group of Rorschach virtuososwho used blind analysis
![Page 9: Rorschach Inkblot Test](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022050616/55a994221a28ab9f218b4611/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
DESCRIPTION
RELIABILITY
• Traditionally the Rorschach is believed to be unreliable.
• Through meta-analysis, K. Parker (1983) reported an overall internal reliability coefficient of .83
![Page 10: Rorschach Inkblot Test](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022050616/55a994221a28ab9f218b4611/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
ADMINISTRATION
• Preliminary remarks concerning thepurpose of testing.
• Free association phase
• Inquiry
![Page 11: Rorschach Inkblot Test](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022050616/55a994221a28ab9f218b4611/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
SCORING
• Location – where on the blot was the perceptseen(located)?
– Whole (W), Common detail (D), or Unusual detail(Dd)
• Determinant – What feature of the inkblotdetermined the response?
– Form (F), Movement (M, FM, m), Color (C),Shading (T)
![Page 12: Rorschach Inkblot Test](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022050616/55a994221a28ab9f218b4611/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
SCORING
• Form Quality – To what extent did the perceptmatch the stimulus properties of the inkblot?
– F+ or +; F; F- or –
• Content – What was the percept?
– Human (H), Animal (A), Nature (N)
• Popular-original – How frequent is the perceptseen in normative samples?
![Page 13: Rorschach Inkblot Test](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022050616/55a994221a28ab9f218b4611/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
SCORING
CONFABULATORY RESPONSESThe subject overgeneralizes from a part to a whole.
![Page 14: Rorschach Inkblot Test](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022050616/55a994221a28ab9f218b4611/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
DISADVANTAGE
• Overpathologizing
• Lack of relationship to psychological diagnosis
• Lack of incremental validity
• The problem of “R”
![Page 15: Rorschach Inkblot Test](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022050616/55a994221a28ab9f218b4611/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
EXNER’S COMPREHENSIVE
SYSTEM
![Page 16: Rorschach Inkblot Test](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022050616/55a994221a28ab9f218b4611/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
RORSCHACH’S DEVELOPMENT
• Provides standardized administration, scoring, and interpretation.
• Placed emphasis on structural rather than content variables.
• Collected a considerable body of psychometric data.
• Uniform Rorschach system
![Page 17: Rorschach Inkblot Test](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022050616/55a994221a28ab9f218b4611/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
EXNER’S CRITICS
• Atheoretical nature of approach
• Underutilization of content data
• Complexity of the system
• Small sample size, large number of variables, dearth of cross-validation studies, inaccessibility to public scrutiny.
![Page 18: Rorschach Inkblot Test](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022050616/55a994221a28ab9f218b4611/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
ALTERNATIVE APPROACHES
![Page 19: Rorschach Inkblot Test](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022050616/55a994221a28ab9f218b4611/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
ALTERNATIVE APPROACHES
• Standardized clinical interview described by Aronow and his colleagues.
• Projective method of accessing the internal world of the individual espoused by Paul Lerner.
• Joint representation
![Page 20: Rorschach Inkblot Test](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022050616/55a994221a28ab9f218b4611/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
HOLTZMAN INKBLOT TEST
![Page 21: Rorschach Inkblot Test](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022050616/55a994221a28ab9f218b4611/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
INKBLOT TEST
Name of Test:
Author:
Date Published:
Publisher:
Edition/Revision:
Holtzman Inkblot Test
Wayne Holtzman
1961
Springer International Publishing
![Page 22: Rorschach Inkblot Test](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022050616/55a994221a28ab9f218b4611/html5/thumbnails/22.jpg)
DESCRIPTION
• Type of test:
• What it measures:
• Number of items:
• Type of items:
• Norm:
Individual Test
Personality Structure
2 forms of 45 cards
Inkblot
Ranging from 5-year-olds to adults
![Page 23: Rorschach Inkblot Test](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022050616/55a994221a28ab9f218b4611/html5/thumbnails/23.jpg)
DISCUSSION
• Has standardized administration and scoring
• Subject is permitted to give only one response per card
• Has 22 dimensions of scoring
• Well established norms for each scoring category
![Page 24: Rorschach Inkblot Test](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022050616/55a994221a28ab9f218b4611/html5/thumbnails/24.jpg)