· Roof strength comparison with/without windscreens Figure 6 shows that when tested under FMVSS...
10
Transcript of · Roof strength comparison with/without windscreens Figure 6 shows that when tested under FMVSS...
![Page 1: · Roof strength comparison with/without windscreens Figure 6 shows that when tested under FMVSS 216, typical maximum forces generated at conditions of 50 pitch and 250 roll are](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022042312/5edadec809ac2c67fa687101/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
![Page 2: · Roof strength comparison with/without windscreens Figure 6 shows that when tested under FMVSS 216, typical maximum forces generated at conditions of 50 pitch and 250 roll are](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022042312/5edadec809ac2c67fa687101/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
![Page 3: · Roof strength comparison with/without windscreens Figure 6 shows that when tested under FMVSS 216, typical maximum forces generated at conditions of 50 pitch and 250 roll are](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022042312/5edadec809ac2c67fa687101/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
![Page 4: · Roof strength comparison with/without windscreens Figure 6 shows that when tested under FMVSS 216, typical maximum forces generated at conditions of 50 pitch and 250 roll are](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022042312/5edadec809ac2c67fa687101/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
![Page 5: · Roof strength comparison with/without windscreens Figure 6 shows that when tested under FMVSS 216, typical maximum forces generated at conditions of 50 pitch and 250 roll are](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022042312/5edadec809ac2c67fa687101/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
![Page 6: · Roof strength comparison with/without windscreens Figure 6 shows that when tested under FMVSS 216, typical maximum forces generated at conditions of 50 pitch and 250 roll are](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022042312/5edadec809ac2c67fa687101/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
![Page 7: · Roof strength comparison with/without windscreens Figure 6 shows that when tested under FMVSS 216, typical maximum forces generated at conditions of 50 pitch and 250 roll are](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022042312/5edadec809ac2c67fa687101/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
![Page 8: · Roof strength comparison with/without windscreens Figure 6 shows that when tested under FMVSS 216, typical maximum forces generated at conditions of 50 pitch and 250 roll are](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022042312/5edadec809ac2c67fa687101/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
![Page 9: · Roof strength comparison with/without windscreens Figure 6 shows that when tested under FMVSS 216, typical maximum forces generated at conditions of 50 pitch and 250 roll are](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022042312/5edadec809ac2c67fa687101/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
![Page 10: · Roof strength comparison with/without windscreens Figure 6 shows that when tested under FMVSS 216, typical maximum forces generated at conditions of 50 pitch and 250 roll are](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022042312/5edadec809ac2c67fa687101/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)