Rob Roebeling, Hartwig Deneke and Arnout Feijt
description
Transcript of Rob Roebeling, Hartwig Deneke and Arnout Feijt
![Page 1: Rob Roebeling, Hartwig Deneke and Arnout Feijt](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062305/56814f68550346895dbd1e9f/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
Rob Roebeling,
Hartwig Deneke and Arnout Feijt
GEWEX Cloud Assessment Meeting
Madison, United States of America
6 -7 July 2006
"METEOSAT-8 (SEVIRI) CLOUD PROPERTY RETRIEVALS
FOR CLIMATE STUDIES"
![Page 2: Rob Roebeling, Hartwig Deneke and Arnout Feijt](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062305/56814f68550346895dbd1e9f/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
2
Introduction
Introduction
Validation for the CloudNet sites
Sensitivity
Norrkoping Cloud Work Shop results
Conclusions
![Page 3: Rob Roebeling, Hartwig Deneke and Arnout Feijt](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062305/56814f68550346895dbd1e9f/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
3
Introduction
![Page 4: Rob Roebeling, Hartwig Deneke and Arnout Feijt](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062305/56814f68550346895dbd1e9f/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
4
Retrieval Method
Project: Climate Monitoring SAF (CM-SAF)
Satellites: METEOSAT-8/SEVIRI and NOAA-17/AVHRR
Channels: VIS (0.63 m) and NIR (1.6 m) and IR (10.8 m)
Products: COT, CLWP, CPH (and Reff)
RTM: Doubling Adding KNMI model (DAK)
Surface reflectance: MODIS white sky albedo
Optical thicknesses: 0 -256
Water clouds: spherical droplets (1 -24 m)
Ice clouds: imperfect hexagonal crystals (6,12, 26, 51 m)
![Page 5: Rob Roebeling, Hartwig Deneke and Arnout Feijt](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062305/56814f68550346895dbd1e9f/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
5
Examples Meteosat-8 Cloud Properties
Cloud Thermodynamic Phase
Water Ice Clear
Cloud Optical Thickness
![Page 6: Rob Roebeling, Hartwig Deneke and Arnout Feijt](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062305/56814f68550346895dbd1e9f/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
6
Inter-calibration
NOAA-17/AVHRR&
METEOSAT-8/SEVIRI
![Page 7: Rob Roebeling, Hartwig Deneke and Arnout Feijt](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062305/56814f68550346895dbd1e9f/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
7
Inter-Calibration: NOAA17 vs. METEOSAT-8
Diff. ~5% Diff. ~20%
SEVIRI vs. AVHRR reflectances using observations from
August – December 2004 over Central Africa.
![Page 8: Rob Roebeling, Hartwig Deneke and Arnout Feijt](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062305/56814f68550346895dbd1e9f/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
8
Results after re-calibration
SEVIRI and AVHRR COT and CLWP after re-calibration to MODIS
using observations of April and May 2004 over Northern Europe.(SEVIRI: 0.6 m + 6% and 1.6 m +2%; AVHRR: 0.6 m + 6% and 1.6 m +22%)
Diff. 0- 5% Diff. 0- 5%
![Page 9: Rob Roebeling, Hartwig Deneke and Arnout Feijt](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062305/56814f68550346895dbd1e9f/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
9
Validation
![Page 10: Rob Roebeling, Hartwig Deneke and Arnout Feijt](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062305/56814f68550346895dbd1e9f/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
10
CloudNet Data
Cabauw
Paris
Chilbolton
Chilbolton
CLWP: 1 year of microwave radiometer
data at 2 CLOUDNET sites
COT: 1 year of pyranometer data, 27 stations
![Page 11: Rob Roebeling, Hartwig Deneke and Arnout Feijt](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062305/56814f68550346895dbd1e9f/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
11
Comparison: Example CLWP product
SEVIRI CLWP 1 May 2004 CLWP time series from SEVIRI and microwave radiometer at Chilbolton, UK
![Page 12: Rob Roebeling, Hartwig Deneke and Arnout Feijt](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062305/56814f68550346895dbd1e9f/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
12
CLWP Validation
Distribution of diff. LWP Meteosat-8 - MW, July 2004 (Chilbolton)
Distribution of Meteosat-8 LWP July 2004(Chilbolton)
![Page 13: Rob Roebeling, Hartwig Deneke and Arnout Feijt](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062305/56814f68550346895dbd1e9f/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
13
CLWP Validation: Daily medians summer
Chilbolton, UK
![Page 14: Rob Roebeling, Hartwig Deneke and Arnout Feijt](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062305/56814f68550346895dbd1e9f/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
14
CLWP Validation: Monthly medians summer
Chilbolton, UK
Palaiseau, France
![Page 15: Rob Roebeling, Hartwig Deneke and Arnout Feijt](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062305/56814f68550346895dbd1e9f/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
15
CLWP Validation: Daily medians one year
Chilbolton, UK
![Page 16: Rob Roebeling, Hartwig Deneke and Arnout Feijt](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062305/56814f68550346895dbd1e9f/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
16
CLWP Validation: Monthly medians one year
Chilbolton, UK
![Page 17: Rob Roebeling, Hartwig Deneke and Arnout Feijt](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062305/56814f68550346895dbd1e9f/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
17
Validation Pyranometer
![Page 18: Rob Roebeling, Hartwig Deneke and Arnout Feijt](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062305/56814f68550346895dbd1e9f/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
18
Sensitivity
![Page 19: Rob Roebeling, Hartwig Deneke and Arnout Feijt](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062305/56814f68550346895dbd1e9f/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
19
Assessment error budget
Co-location & resolution (48 g m-2) Position ground station Parallax VIS – NIR mismatch Wobbling of the satellite Plane parallel assumption
MW – Radiometer (30 g. m-2)
Difference due to sampling different cloud portions (20 g m-2)
![Page 20: Rob Roebeling, Hartwig Deneke and Arnout Feijt](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062305/56814f68550346895dbd1e9f/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
20
Assessment error budget
RT RT & FOV
FOV FOV
FOV
Total
![Page 21: Rob Roebeling, Hartwig Deneke and Arnout Feijt](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062305/56814f68550346895dbd1e9f/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
21
Assessment error budget
222
2222
36~6070__
60~203048__
mgSumErrMSG
mgErrValTot
![Page 22: Rob Roebeling, Hartwig Deneke and Arnout Feijt](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062305/56814f68550346895dbd1e9f/html5/thumbnails/22.jpg)
22
Sensitivity: viewing geometry6:00hr
0 = 70 = 83 7:00 hr
0 = 60 = 97 8:00 hr
0 = 51 = 110 9:00 hr
0 = 42 = 123
Fig. CLWP frequency distributions 21 June 2006 over Northern Europe
![Page 23: Rob Roebeling, Hartwig Deneke and Arnout Feijt](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062305/56814f68550346895dbd1e9f/html5/thumbnails/23.jpg)
23
Sensitivity: viewing geometry
Loeb and Coakley, 1997, Journal of Climate
![Page 24: Rob Roebeling, Hartwig Deneke and Arnout Feijt](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062305/56814f68550346895dbd1e9f/html5/thumbnails/24.jpg)
24
Conclusions
![Page 25: Rob Roebeling, Hartwig Deneke and Arnout Feijt](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062305/56814f68550346895dbd1e9f/html5/thumbnails/25.jpg)
25
Conclusions (1)
Re-calibration reduces the differences between NOAA-17
and METEOSAT-8 retrievals of COT and CLWP over
Northern-Europe to about 5%.
There is good agreement between SEVIRI and microwave
radiometer retrieved cloud liquid water path.
The accuracy of SEVIRI CLWP retrievals decreases at solar
zenith angles > 60 degrees.
Accuracy changes due to geometry may manifest artificial
trends
![Page 26: Rob Roebeling, Hartwig Deneke and Arnout Feijt](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062305/56814f68550346895dbd1e9f/html5/thumbnails/26.jpg)
26
Conclusions (2)
Part of the validation differences can be explain by co-
location and sampling differences.
The 15 minutes time resolution SEVIRI have enabled the
synergetic use of ground-based and satellite
observations.
![Page 27: Rob Roebeling, Hartwig Deneke and Arnout Feijt](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062305/56814f68550346895dbd1e9f/html5/thumbnails/27.jpg)
27
Comparison Cloud Work Shop17 January 2006
![Page 28: Rob Roebeling, Hartwig Deneke and Arnout Feijt](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062305/56814f68550346895dbd1e9f/html5/thumbnails/28.jpg)
28
Comparison CWS: Cloud Optical Thickness
![Page 29: Rob Roebeling, Hartwig Deneke and Arnout Feijt](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062305/56814f68550346895dbd1e9f/html5/thumbnails/29.jpg)
29
Comparison CWS: Effective Radius
![Page 30: Rob Roebeling, Hartwig Deneke and Arnout Feijt](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062305/56814f68550346895dbd1e9f/html5/thumbnails/30.jpg)
30
![Page 31: Rob Roebeling, Hartwig Deneke and Arnout Feijt](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062305/56814f68550346895dbd1e9f/html5/thumbnails/31.jpg)
31
Methods: Radiative Transfer Modelling
R(sur)
Above the cloud
Below the cloud
ac
bc
Scattering and absorption
Reflectance,
Cloud properties
•Geometric thickness •Thermodynamic phase
•Optical thickness
•Effective radius
•Droplet distribution
Cloud properties
•Geometric thickness •Thermodynamic phase
•Optical thickness
•Effective radius
•Droplet distribution
![Page 32: Rob Roebeling, Hartwig Deneke and Arnout Feijt](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062305/56814f68550346895dbd1e9f/html5/thumbnails/32.jpg)
32
Inter-calibration
NOAA-17/AVHRR&
METEOSAT-8/SEVIRI
![Page 33: Rob Roebeling, Hartwig Deneke and Arnout Feijt](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062305/56814f68550346895dbd1e9f/html5/thumbnails/33.jpg)
33
Inter-Calibration: NOAA17 vs. METEOSAT-8
Diff. ~5% Diff. ~20%
SEVIRI vs. AVHRR reflectances using observations from
August – December 2004 over Central Africa.
![Page 34: Rob Roebeling, Hartwig Deneke and Arnout Feijt](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062305/56814f68550346895dbd1e9f/html5/thumbnails/34.jpg)
34
Results after re-calibration
SEVIRI and AVHRR COT and CLWP after re-calibration to MODIS
using observations of April and May 2004 over Northern Europe.(SEVIRI: 0.6 m + 6% and 1.6 m +2%; AVHRR: 0.6 m + 6% and 1.6 m +22%)
Diff. 0- 5% Diff. 0- 5%
![Page 35: Rob Roebeling, Hartwig Deneke and Arnout Feijt](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062305/56814f68550346895dbd1e9f/html5/thumbnails/35.jpg)
35
Sensitivity: viewing geometry
Fig. 0.6 m reflectance vs. viewing zenith angle
AVHRR MSG AVHRR MSG
![Page 36: Rob Roebeling, Hartwig Deneke and Arnout Feijt](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062305/56814f68550346895dbd1e9f/html5/thumbnails/36.jpg)
36
Sensitivity: viewing geometry
Fig. 1.6m reflectance vs. viewing zenith angle
AVHRR MSG AVHRR MSG
![Page 37: Rob Roebeling, Hartwig Deneke and Arnout Feijt](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062305/56814f68550346895dbd1e9f/html5/thumbnails/37.jpg)
37
Retrieval Method
Wate
r
Cloud
s
Ice
Cloud
s
![Page 38: Rob Roebeling, Hartwig Deneke and Arnout Feijt](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062305/56814f68550346895dbd1e9f/html5/thumbnails/38.jpg)
38
Influence of reflectance spectra
SCIAMACHY reflectance spectra for 5 typical scenes (Stammes et al. 2005)
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1
1450 1500 1550 1600 1650 1700 1750Wavelengths [nm]
Re
fle
cta
nc
e
Water CloudIce CloudVegetationOceanDesert
AVHRR SEVIRI
Diff. Ice clouds < 10%Diff. Water cloud < 3%
![Page 39: Rob Roebeling, Hartwig Deneke and Arnout Feijt](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062305/56814f68550346895dbd1e9f/html5/thumbnails/39.jpg)
39
Monthly COT and CLWP compositesCOT Meteosat-8, May 2004
CLWP Meteosat-8, May 2004 CLWP NOAA-AVHRR, May 2004
COT NOAA-AVHRR, May 2004
![Page 40: Rob Roebeling, Hartwig Deneke and Arnout Feijt](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062305/56814f68550346895dbd1e9f/html5/thumbnails/40.jpg)
40
CLWP Validation: Palaiseau daily results
![Page 41: Rob Roebeling, Hartwig Deneke and Arnout Feijt](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062305/56814f68550346895dbd1e9f/html5/thumbnails/41.jpg)
41
Sensitivity: retrieval cloud optical thickness
Fig. 0.63 m reflectivities
Error in retrieved COT and Reff assuming errors of ± 1, 2 and 3%
Fig. 1.6 m reflectivities
![Page 42: Rob Roebeling, Hartwig Deneke and Arnout Feijt](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062305/56814f68550346895dbd1e9f/html5/thumbnails/42.jpg)
42
Results using pre-launch calibration
Cum. freq. dist. COT for water clouds
Cum. freq. dist. CLWP for water clouds
SEVIRI > AVHRR
Diff. 0- 20% Diff. 10 - 20%
SEVIRI < AVHRR
![Page 43: Rob Roebeling, Hartwig Deneke and Arnout Feijt](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062305/56814f68550346895dbd1e9f/html5/thumbnails/43.jpg)
43
Position station