RLetters

32
RLetters Charles h. pence Notre dame hps nescent

description

A brief update for the folks at NESCent about the status of the RLetters software.

Transcript of RLetters

Page 1: RLetters

RLettersCharles h. pence Notre dame hps

nescent

Page 2: RLetters

Why doI care?

Page 3: RLetters

Human psychologists

Evolutionary theorists

neuroscientists

Behavioral ecologists

Page 4: RLetters

Human psychologists

Evolutionary theorists

neuroscientists

Behavioral ecologists

Page 5: RLetters

Human psychologists

Evolutionary theorists

neuroscientists

Behavioral ecologists

Page 6: RLetters

Human psychologists

Evolutionary theorists

neuroscientists

Behavioral ecologistsDe

cisi

on m

akin

g

Page 7: RLetters

What doThey say?

Page 8: RLetters

Let's each readThirty journal

Articles!

Page 9: RLetters

Let's each readThirty journal

Articles!

Page 10: RLetters
Page 11: RLetters
Page 12: RLetters

What canIt do?

Page 13: RLetters
Page 14: RLetters

What sets apart two groups?Evolutionary theorists: mating

Human psychology: foraging

Mating female females male selection males sexual mateEvolution population genetic trait traits fitness species

Preference frequency reproductive speciation evolutionary

Foraging decision participants experiment task were wasHuman behavior time making across decisions option

Information choices research about had each optimal

Page 15: RLetters
Page 16: RLetters

What sets apart two groups?Behavioral Ecology: mating

Neuroscience: Mating

Females choice size behaviour males mating female moreMate use male competition success selection test their

Sperm first traits all there fish experiment significantly

Brain neural expression auditory song response geneSystem neurons responses receptor regions forebrain

Nucleus activity activation behavior stimuli songs

Page 17: RLetters
Page 18: RLetters

What brings groups together?All groups versus all of pubmed-OA

Foraging mate mating patch females sexual males preyFemale choice male foragers preference behavior song

Forager ecology preferences food rape behavior patchesSelection evolution attractiveness courtship socialSpecies reward cues behavioral traits evolutionary

Reproductive mates trait predictor choices psychologySex habitat learning predation task fitness bees theory

Decisions competition offspring copying search songs

Page 19: RLetters

see foragingmate

matingpatchfemales

sexual

malesfemale

prey

choicemale

preferenceforagers

behavior

song

forager

food

ecology

rape

patches

social

reward

cues

traits

trait

sexbees

cue

ess

beesize

bird

neurons

wasps

trial

preferences

behaviour

evolutionselection

attractiveness

courtship

species

behavioral

reproductive

evolutionary

predatormates

habitat

learning

predation

psychology

choices

task

theory

fitness

decisionscompetition

copying search

songs

nest

offspring

brain

optimalbirds

men

speciation

animal

participants

animals

decision

sperm

experiment

predators

model behavioural

faces

costs

success

ecological

sociobiology

feeding

resource

adaptive

models

searching

naturalist

individuals

intake

ethology

auditory

predictions

conspecific

remating

movement

risk

option

rules

environment

fishenergy

coercion

partner

women

advertisers

risky

stimulus

mated

rate

neural

probability

olfactory

leaving

sexually

budget

genetic

psychological

resources

quality

stimuli

condition

spent

rule

strategy

dynamics

biology

hunting

variation

game

parents

rewards

heuristics

webs

individual

time

density

travelants

strategies

equilibrium

encounter

value

investment

mushroom

natural

population

facial

marauder

arousal

spiders

visual

face

cultural

cost

cognitive

parental

reinforcement

trials

amygdala

term

inbreeding whine

retaliator

adaptation

tasks

signals

dominance

random

informationcannibalism

copulationmaking

body

spider

earnings

host variance

theoretical

responses

effects

sensory

scenthuman

experience

memory

switching

guppiesassortative

flocks

items

conditionsflower

ornaments

nectar

discriminationfrequency

preferred

nature

reserves

parameter

distribution

neuroscience

response

attractive

focal

habitats

agevirgin

subject

hosts

distance

insect

rates

men'ssympatric

spatial

choose

options

optimality

phonotaxisbreeding

patterns

across

nuptial

honey

conspicuous

significant

firstspecific

significantly

field

Page 20: RLetters

What canIt do?

else

Page 21: RLetters

Find collocationsPlot by dateAnalyze term networkExtract proper nounsExport citations

Page 22: RLetters

PMC: 'evolutionary theory'“fitness landscape” (p = 9e-16)“inclusive fitness” (p = 1e-15)“fitness correlates” (p = 2e-15)“malthusian fitness” (p = 4e-15)“fitness landscapes” (p = 4e-15)“fitness costs” (p = 6e-15)“wrightian fitness” (p = 6e-15)“token fitness” (p = 1e-14)

Page 23: RLetters

Find collocationsPlot by dateAnalyze term networkExtract proper nounsExport citations

Page 24: RLetters
Page 25: RLetters

Find collocationsPlot by dateAnalyze term networkExtract proper nounsExport citations

Page 26: RLetters
Page 27: RLetters

Find collocationsPlot by dateAnalyze term networkExtract proper nounsExport citations

Page 28: RLetters

Caveatlector

Page 29: RLetters

The future:evotext

Page 30: RLetters

The future:evotext

Page 31: RLetters

The future:evotext

Grant (my boss)Coming soon to a nescent near you

Page 32: RLetters

http://rletters.nethttp://evotext.org

@pencechphttp://charlespence.net