Riverside County 2010-2012 AMAO Performance

20
Riverside County 2010-2012 AMAO Performance Wes Scott Mitch Aulakh

description

Riverside County 2010-2012 AMAO Performance. Wes Scott Mitch Aulakh. Overview. From 2010-2012, how have districts in Riverside County performed on AMAOs at the elementary, middle, and high school levels? What sort of growth has been realized by each district on the various AMAOs. Overview. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Transcript of Riverside County 2010-2012 AMAO Performance

Page 1: Riverside County 2010-2012 AMAO Performance

Riverside County 2010-2012 AMAO Performance

Wes ScottMitch Aulakh

Page 2: Riverside County 2010-2012 AMAO Performance

Overview

• From 2010-2012, how have districts in Riverside County performed on AMAOs at the elementary, middle, and high school levels?

• What sort of growth has been realized by each district on the various AMAOs

2

Page 3: Riverside County 2010-2012 AMAO Performance

Overview

• What can the similarities in performance on various measures tell us about district successes and struggles?

• Are there any practices that you’ve found to be particularly successful that could be shared out?

3

Page 4: Riverside County 2010-2012 AMAO Performance

• Are students increasing their English proficiency as determined by CELDT?– Students must increase one or more CELDT level– Or maintain at early advanced or advanced (CELDT 4 or 5)

• Targets increase slightly each year

AMAO 1

Page 5: Riverside County 2010-2012 AMAO Performance

AMAO 2 Rules for Cohort Inclusion: Prior to 2010

• Prior year beginning or early intermediate– Current proficient

• Been in US schools at least 4 years• Prior year intermediate• Prior year early advanced or advanced

– Not English proficient prior year• Any of these criteria met, must obtain target level of Fluent

English Proficient– Must score early advanced or advanced overall and score no lower

than intermediate on any component of CELDT (reading, writing, listening, and speaking)

Page 6: Riverside County 2010-2012 AMAO Performance

AMAO 2a and 2b

• Percent of Students Scoring Fluent English Proficient (FEP)– AMAO 2a• Students in US school LESS than 5 years

– AMAO 2• Students in US school More than 5 years

6

Page 7: Riverside County 2010-2012 AMAO Performance

RIVERSIDE COUNTY ES, MS, & HS PERFORMANCE

2010-2012 AMAO 1, AMAO 2a & 2b, and AMAO 3

7

Page 8: Riverside County 2010-2012 AMAO Performance

8

AMAO 1 AMAO 2a AMAO 2b AMAO 3 ELA AMAO 3 Math0.0

10.0

20.0

30.0

40.0

50.0

60.0

70.0

80.0

90.0

100.0

49.8

26.4

43.639.7

53.955.0

22.2

40.843.0

57.5

62.7

25.7

48.344.4

57.0

Riverside County Elementary School AMAOs 2010-2012

2010 2011 2012

%

Page 9: Riverside County 2010-2012 AMAO Performance

Riverside County Districts 2010-12 ES Level AMAO Growth

9

DistrictAMAO 1 AMAO 2a AMAO 2b AMAO 3 ELA AMAO 3 Math

Percent Rank Percent Rank Percent Rank Percent Rank Percent RankAlvord Unified 12.6 13 1 9 3.3 12 6.9 5 2.7 14Banning Unified 20.3 5 0.6 10 10.7 4 7.9 3 7.8 3Beaumont Unified 4.2 20 -1.3 15 -8.1 21 8.1 2 6.3 5Coachella Valley Unified 12.8 11 -1 13 1.2 15 4 14 -0.9 18Corona-Norco Unified 10.9 16 -2.9 18 6.1 8 3.4 15 3 13Desert Sands Unified 12.5 14 1.6 6 12.9 3 6.3 9 2.2 15Hemet Unified 14 10 -1.4 16 0.8 17 2.3 19 2.1 16Jurupa Unified 21 3 4.3 5 7.4 7 4.3 13 6 6Lake Elsinore Unified 15.1 7 -1.2 14 10.3 5 -11.6 21 -10.9 21Menifee Union Elementary 12.7 12 -1.9 17 3.3 13 5.4 11 5.4 8Moreno Valley Unified 8.4 18 -9.4 21 0.2 18 5.3 12 5.2 9Murrieta Valley Unified 20.5 4 1.3 7 5 9 6.8 7 3.3 12Nuview Union 14.8 8 -0.2 12 1.2 14 14.7 1 11.4 1Palm Springs Unified 14.2 9 6.2 4 21.9 2 6.3 8 4.5 10Palo Verde Unified 29 2 7.5 3 9.6 6 3.4 16 1 17Perris Elementary 5.6 19 -8.6 20 3.7 10 -2 20 -4.9 20Riverside County Office of Ed. 2.2 21 0 11 0 19 2.5 18 -4.1 19Riverside Unified 16.6 6 1 8 0.9 16 6.9 6 5.9 7Romoland Elementary 32.5 1 7.8 2 40.1 1 3.1 17 3.4 11San Jacinto Unified 8.6 17 -2.9 19 -3.7 20 5.5 10 7.9 2Temecula Valley Unified 11.3 15 10.6 1 3.6 11 7 4 7.5 4County Wide 12.9 -0.7 4.7 10 13 13

Page 10: Riverside County 2010-2012 AMAO Performance

10

AMAO 1 AMAO 2a AMAO 2b AMAO 3 ELA AMAO 3 Math0.0

10.0

20.0

30.0

40.0

50.0

60.0

70.0

80.0

90.0

100.0

61.7

32.3

49.9

34.8

41.6

58.1

31.3

47.4

36.8

44.5

63.9

28.1

51.0

38.8

44.5

Riverside County Middle School AMAOs 2010-2012

2010 2011 2012

%

Page 11: Riverside County 2010-2012 AMAO Performance

Riverside County Districts 2010-12 MS Level AMAO Growth

11

DistrictAMAO 1 AMAO 2a AMAO 2b AMAO 3 ELA AMAO 3 Math

Percent Rank Percent Rank Percent Rank Percent Rank Percent Rank

Alvord Unified 5 7 -7.7 15 4.8 8 4.5 8 4.5 10Banning Unified -2.7 17 -23.1 19 -3.2 15 6.9 5 7.8 3Beaumont Unified -7.9 20 -3.1 12 -8.9 20 4.5 9 12.1 2Coachella Valley Unified -0.9 14 -1.5 11 -0.4 11 3.2 12 -1 15Corona-Norco Unified 4.2 8 -6.4 14 -1.1 13 2.9 13 2.8 11Desert Sands Unified 7.4 4 -3.8 13 7.8 4 6 6 7.4 5Hemet Unified 6.5 5 20.5 2 1.2 10 2.7 14 2.1 13Jurupa Unified 3.2 9 5.3 6 5.7 5 4.7 7 6.1 6Lake Elsinore Unified -3.9 19 -9.4 16 -4.5 17 -8.6 22 -5.1 20Menifee Union Elementary -11.3 21 7.9 4 -13.4 21 3.9 11 2.3 12Moreno Valley Unified 1.1 11 -9.5 17 -3.4 16 9.6 2 5.6 8Murrieta Valley Unified 15.8 1 4.2 7 9.3 2 8.1 3 1.7 14Nuview Union -57.6 22 -30.8 21 -49.4 22 9.8 1 16.5 1Palm Springs Unified 6.5 6 7.3 5 8.2 3 -1.8 19 -3.4 18Palo Verde Unified 0.3 13 23.3 1 -4.6 18 0.7 17 -1.6 16Perris Elementary 8.2 3 3.8 8 5.1 6 -2 20 -4.9 19Perris Union High -1 15 3.8 9 9.5 1 0.8 15 7.8 4Riverside County Office of Education -1 16 -33.3 22 -1.5 14 0.8 16 -3.3 17Riverside Unified -3.9 18 -19.4 18 -7.5 19 7.5 4 5.8 7Romoland Elementary 3.1 10 -23.5 20 -0.7 12 -6.2 21 -12.5 22San Jacinto Unified 0.6 12 -1.2 10 2.9 9 3.9 10 4.6 9Temecula Valley Unified 13 2 9.5 3 4.9 7 -1 18 -5.3 21County Wide 2.2 -4.2 1.1 4 2.9

Page 12: Riverside County 2010-2012 AMAO Performance

12

AMAO 1 AMAO 2a AMAO 2b AMAO 3 ELA AMAO 3 Math0.0

10.0

20.0

30.0

40.0

50.0

60.0

70.0

80.0

90.0

100.0

55.2

22.2

43.6

27.2

32.6

49.8

21.2

39.8

33.136.4

57.7

21.0

46.0

28.5

38.1

Riverside County High School AMAOs 2010-2012

2010 2011 2012

%

Page 13: Riverside County 2010-2012 AMAO Performance

Riverside County Districts 2010-12 HS Level AMAO Growth

13

District AMAO 1 AMAO 2a AMAO 2b AMAO 3 ELA AMAO 3 MathPercent Rank Percent Rank Percent Rank Percent Rank Percent Rank

Palo Verde Unified -13.9 19 -4.0 10.0 -14.3 19.0 18.9 1 26.3 1Coachella Valley Unified 3.1 7 3.5 6 2.3 7 -4.9 14 11.8 2Moreno Valley Unified -4.4 15 -16.6 18 -3.4 16 10 2 11 3Perris Union High 15.7 3 17.6 1 17.6 2 6.7 4 7.6 4Palm Springs Unified 0.2 10 -5.2 11 2.1 9 -1.1 12 7 5Banning Unified -2.8 14 -11.4 15 -4.5 17 -3.4 13 6.9 6Jurupa Unified 2.3 9 4.9 4 1.7 10 5 5 6.6 7Corona-Norco Unified -1.7 13 -9.5 14 0.2 12 -0.2 10 5.8 8Beaumont Unified -0.3 11 -20.9 19 -0.9 14 9 3 4.8 9Alvord Unified 8.3 5 -14.2 17 8.6 4 3.1 7 4.8 10Riverside Unified 6.3 6 3.7 5 3.7 6 3.6 6 2.2 11Murrieta Valley Unified 16.8 2 5.0 3 10.7 3 2.1 9 2.1 12Desert Sands Unified -1.2 12 -8.7 12 0.8 11 -0.9 11 1.3 13Lake Elsinore Unified -6.2 17 -13.6 16 -2.0 15 -8.5 18 1 14Riverside County Office of Education -7.6 18 0.0 9 -0.2 13 2.8 8 -1.5 15San Jacinto Unified 10.6 4 -9.3 13 5.8 5 -5.6 15 -1.5 16Nuview Union 37.5 1 0.0 8 37.5 1 -7.6 17 -2.9 17Hemet Unified -5.1 16 1.4 7 -7.3 18 -6.5 16 -3.3 18Temecula Valley Unified 2.9 8 5.9 2 2.2 8 -13.7 19 -10.2 19County Wide 2.5 -1.2 2.4 1.3 5.5

Page 14: Riverside County 2010-2012 AMAO Performance

DISTRICT OVERALL PERFORMANCE2012 AMAO 1, AMAO 2a & 2b, AMAO 3

14

Page 15: Riverside County 2010-2012 AMAO Performance

15

Alvord Unified

Romoland El

emen

tary

Temecu

la Vall

ey Unified

Perris U

nion High

Murrieta

Valley U

nified

Lake E

lsinore

Unified

Corona-Norco

Unified

Menife

e Union El

emen

tary

Desert

Sands U

nified

County-Wide

Jurupa U

nified

Moreno Valle

y Unified

Riversi

de Unified

San Ja

cinto Unified

Nuview Union

Banning U

nified

Palm Sp

rings

Unified

Perris E

lemen

tary

Beaumont U

nified

Hemet

Unified

Coachella

Valley

Unified

Palo Verd

e Unified

Riversi

de County

Office of E

ducation

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

73.169.7

67.3 66.3 65.6 63.8 63.5 63.5 62.3 61.9 61.6 60.6 60.3 60.2 60.1 59.8 59.7 58.3 57.4 57.2 56.351

28.5

Riverside County Districts 2012 AMAO 1 %

Page 16: Riverside County 2010-2012 AMAO Performance

16

Riverside County Districts 2012 AMAO 2a

42.3

34.429.6 29.4 28.6 28 27.7 27.7 27 26.2 26.2 25.7 25.6 24.5 24.1 23.7 23.6 22.3 21.5 20.5 19.6

16.1

00

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

%

Page 17: Riverside County 2010-2012 AMAO Performance

17

Alvord Unified

Temecu

la Vall

ey Unified

Perris U

nion High

Nuview Union

Lake E

lsinore

Unified

Romoland El

emen

tary

Menife

e Union El

emen

tary

Jurupa U

nified

Riversi

de Unified

County-Wide

Perris E

lemen

tary

Desert

Sands U

nified

Corona-Norco

Unified

Murrieta

Valley U

nified

San Ja

cinto Unified

Beaumont U

nified

Moreno Valle

y Unified

Palm Sp

rings

Unified

Hemet

Unified

Banning U

nified

Coachella

Valley

Unified

Palo Verd

e Unified

Riversi

de County

Office of E

ducation

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

67.9

59.4 57.8 56.6 56.453.4 52.1 50.3 49.4 48.4 48 46.9 46.6 45.2 44.8 44.5 44.5 42.9 42.3 41.5

36.5

27.9

16.1

Riverside County Districts 2012 AMAO 2b %

Page 18: Riverside County 2010-2012 AMAO Performance

18

Temecu

la Vall

ey Unified

Beaumont U

nified

Lake E

lsinore

Unified

Menife

e Union El

emen

tary

Murrieta

Valley U

nified

Alvord Unified

Desert

Sands U

nified

Corona-Norco

Unified

Moreno Valle

y Unified

Nuview Union

Riversi

de Unified

Banning U

nified

Romoland El

emen

tary

County-Wide

Jurupa U

nified

San Ja

cinto Unified

Hemet

Unified

Perris E

lemen

tary

Palm Sp

rings

Unified

Perris U

nion High

Coachella

Valley

Unified

Palo Verd

e Unified

Riversi

de County

Office of E

ducation

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

55.9

49.5 47.7 45.6 44.7 44.1 43.5 42.6 42.5 42.2 42.1 41.9 40.2 40.1 38 36.7 36 35.4 34.730.7 29.5

22.5

13.9

Riverside County Districts 2012 AMAO 3 ELA %

Page 19: Riverside County 2010-2012 AMAO Performance

19

Riverside County Districts 2012 AMAO 3 Math

60.257.8 57.7 55.5 54.4 53.5 53.2 51.4 51.1 50.5 49.7 49.6 48.6 48.3 48.1 48.1

45.9 45.242.5 42.5

33.1 31.9

13.9

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

%