RIVERBANK FILTRATION - Springer 978-0-306-48154-3/1.pdf · PDF fileRIVERBANK FILTRATION...
date post
30-Sep-2018Category
Documents
view
215download
0
Embed Size (px)
Transcript of RIVERBANK FILTRATION - Springer 978-0-306-48154-3/1.pdf · PDF fileRIVERBANK FILTRATION...
RIVERBANK FILTRATION
Water Science and Technology Library
VOLUME 43
Editor-in-Chief
V. P. Singh, Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge, U.S.A.
Editorial Advisory Board
M. Anderson, Bristol, U.K.L. Bengtsson, Lund, Sweden
J. F. Cruise, Huntsville, U.S.A.U. C. Kothyari, Roorkee, IndiaS.E. Serrano, Lexington, U.S.A.
D. Stephenson, Johannesburg, South AfricaW.G. Strupczewski, Warsaw, Poland
The titles published in this series are listed at the end of this volume.
RIVERBANK FILTRATION
Improving Source-Water Quality
edited by
CHITTARANJAN RAYUniversity of Hawaii at Mnoa,
Honolulu, Hawaii, U.S.A.
GINA MELINNational Water Research Institute,Fountain Valley, California, U.S.A.
and
RONALD B. LINSKYNational Water Research Institute,Fountain Valley, California, U.S.A.
in collaboration with
NWRI National Water Research Institute
Fountain Valley, California, U.S.A.
KLUWER ACADEMIC PUBLISHERSNEW YORK, BOSTON, DORDRECHT, LONDON, MOSCOW
eBook ISBN: 0-306-48154-5Print ISBN: 1-4020-1133-4
2003 Kluwer Academic PublishersNew York, Boston, Dordrecht, London, Moscow
Print 2002 Kluwer Academic Publishers
All rights reserved
No part of this eBook may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic,mechanical, recording, or otherwise, without written consent from the Publisher
Created in the United States of America
Visit Kluwer Online at: http://kluweronline.comand Kluwer's eBookstore at: http://ebooks.kluweronline.com
Dordrecht
Acknowledgements
This book is the direct result of the many excellent presentations and ideas brought forwardat the International Riverbank Filtration Conference, held by the National Water ResearchInstitute in cooperation with the United States Environmental Protection Agency, LouisvilleWater Company, and Cincinnati Water Works, in November 1999. The efforts of the followingindividuals are gratefully acknowledged.
Editors
Chittaranjan Ray, Ph.D., P.E.University of Hawaii at MnoaHonolulu, Hawaii, United States
Gina MelinNational Water Research InstituteFountain Valley, California, United States
Ronald B. LinskyNational Water Research InstituteFountain Valley, California, United States
Contributors
Harish Arora, Ph.D., P.E.OBrien & Gere Engineers, Inc.Landover, Maryland, United States
Kay BallLouisville Water CompanyLouisville, Kentucky, United States
William P. Ball, Ph.D., P.E.Johns Hopkins UniversityBaltimore, Maryland, United States
Philippe Baveye, Ph.D.Laboratory for Environmental GeophysicsCornell UniversityIthaca, New York, United States
v
vi
Philip Berger, Ph.D.Ijamsville, Maryland, United States
Edward J. Bouwer, Ph.D.Johns Hopkins UniversityBaltimore, Maryland, United States
Jrg E. Drewes, Ph.D.Colorado School of MinesGolden, Colorado, United States
Rolf Gimbel, Ph.D.IWW Rheinisch-Westflisches Institut fr WasserforschungInstitut an der Gerhard-Mercator-Universitt DuisburgMlheim a.d. Ruhr, Germany
William D. GollnitzGreater Cincinnati Water WorksCincinnati, Ohio, United States
Thomas Grischek, Ph.D.Institute for Water ChemistryDresden University of TechnologyDresden, Germany
Alison M. Gusses, M.S.University of CincinnatiCincinnati, Ohio, United States
David L. Haas, P.E.Jordan, Jones, and GouldingAtlanta, Georgia, United States
Thomas Heberer, Ph.D.Institute of Food ChemistryTechnical University of BerlinBerlin, Germany
Stephen Hubbs, P.E.Louisville Water CompanyLouisville, Kentucky, UnitedStates
Henry Hunt, CPGCollector Wells International, Inc.Columbus, Ohio, United States
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS vii
Ronald B. LinskyNational Water Research InstituteFountain Valley, California, United States
Hans-Joachim Mlzer, Ph.D.IWW Rheinisch-Westflisches Institut fr WasserforschungInstitut an der Gerhard-Mercator-Universitt DuisburgMlheim a.d. Ruhr, Germany
Ilkka Miettinen, Ph.D.National Public Health InstituteDivision of Environmental HealthKuopio, Finland
Gina MelinNational Water Research InstituteFountain Valley, California, United States
Till Merkel, M.Sc.DVGW Water Technology CenterKarlsruhe, Germany
Charles OMelia, Ph.D., P.E.Johns Hopkins UniversityBaltimore, Maryland, United States
Chittaranjan Ray, Ph.D., P.E.University of Hawaii at MnoaHonolulu, Hawaii, United States
Michael J. Robison, P.E.Jordan, Jones, and GouldingAtlanta, Georgia, United States
Traugott Scheytt, Ph.D.Technical University of BerlinBerlin, Germany
Jack Schijven, Ph.D.National Institute of Public Health and the EnvironmentMicrobiological Laboratory for Health ProtectionBilthoven, The Netherlands
Dagmar Schoenheinz, M.Sc.Institute of Water ChemistryDresden University of TechnologyDresden, Germany
viii
Jrgen Schubert, M.Sc.Stadtwerke Dsseldorf AGDsseldorf, Germany
Thomas F. Speth, Ph.D., P.E.United States Environmental Protection AgencyCincinnati, Ohio, United States
R. Scott Summers, Ph.D.University of ColoradoBoulder, Colorado, United States
Ingrid M. Verstraeten, Ph.D.United States Geological SurveyBaltimore, Maryland, United States
Jack Wang, Ph.D.Louisville Water CompanyLouisville, Kentucky, United States
W. Joshua WeissJohns Hopkins UniversityBaltimore, Maryland, United States
Graphic Design
Tim HoganTim Hogan GraphicsWestminster, California, United States
Table of Contents
RIVERBANK FILTRATION: IMPROVING SOURCE-WATER QUALITY
IntroductionC. Ray, Ph.D., P.E.,J. Schubert, M.Sc., R.B. Linsky, and G. Melin
What is Riverbank Filtration?Historical SignificanceUnrecognized RBF PlantsSimilarities Between RBF and Slow Sand FiltrationSurface-Water Contaminants of ConcernCase Studies of Log Removal Credit in the United StatesThe Value of Applying RBF as a Pretreatment Technology
Part I: Systems
Chapter 1: Conceptual Design of Riverbank Filtration SystemsH. Hunt, CPG, J. Schubert, M.Sc., and C. Ray, Ph.D., P.E.
IntroductionWell Types and the Suitability of Vertical Versus
Horizontal Collector WellsEvolution of the Design of Horizontal Collector Wells
Chapter 2: American Experience in Installing Horizontal Collector WellsH. Hunt, CPG
IntroductionTimelineHistorical ProgressionCollector Well ConstructionHydrogeological Investigation/TestingDesign and Construction Details
Chapter 3: German Experience with Riverbank Filtration SystemsJ. Schubert, M.Sc.
IntroductionRiver Characteristics for Siting RBFFlow Dynamics of Rivers and the River/Aquifer InteractionField Studies on RBF Hydraulic Aspects
Chapter 4: Riverbank Filtration Construction Options Consideredat Louisville, KentuckyS. Hubbs, P.E.,K. Ball, D.L. Haas, P.E., and M.J. Robison, P.E.
IntroductionSite ConditionsSite Hydraulic CharacteristicsSoft-Soil Tunnel OptionHard-Rock Tunnel Option with Horizontal Collector WellsHard-Rock Tunnel Option with Vertical WellsConventional Collector Well DesignConstruction Cost Estimate NotesEvaluation of Alternatives
1
19
29
35
49
ix
x
Chapter 5: Operation and Maintenance ConsiderationsH. Hunt, CPG, J. Schubert, M.Sc., and C. Ray, Ph.D., P.E.
IntroductionSelect Operating Wells in the United StatesSelect Operating Wells in GermanyOther ApplicationsConclusion
Part II: Contaminant Removal
Chapter 6: Removal of Pathogens, Surrogates, Indicators, and ToxinsUsing Riverbank FiltrationJ. Schijven, Ph.D., P. Berger, Ph.D., and I. Miettinen, Ph.D.
IntroductionWhy RBF for Microbial Pathogens?Pathogen Occurrence in Surface WaterHealth EffectsOutbreaks Related to the Use of Riverbank-Filtered
Drinking WaterRequired Treatment of Surface Water for Drinking-Water
Production in the United States, Finland, andThe Netherlands: Implications for RBF Treatment
Hydrology and HydrogeologyMicroorganism Removal by RBF: ProcessesSurrogate Microorganisms and Other IndicatorsRemoval by RBF and Artificial InfiltrationCyanobacteria (Blue-Green Algae)Conclusions
Chapter 7: Riverbank Filtration Case Study at Louisville, KentuckyJ. Wang, Ph.D.
IntroductionPrevious Studies Conducted at Louisville, KentuckyDescription of the RBF FacilityDetermination of Water Time Travel and Groundwater DilutionNOM and Disinfection Byproduct Precursor RemovalRemoval of Microbial ContaminantsSummary
Chapter 8: Reduction in Disinfection Byproduct Precursors and PathogensDuring Riverbank Filtration at Three Midwestern United StatesDrinking-Water UtilitiesW.J. Weiss, E.J. Bouwer, Ph.D., W.P. Ball, Ph.D., P.E., C.R. OMelia, Ph.D., P.E.,H. Arora, Ph.D., P.E., and T.F. Speth, Ph.D., P.E.
IntroductionSite DescriptionsInorganic MonitoringMicrobial MonitoringDisinfection Byproduct Formation Potential TestingSimulated Conventional TreatmentUniform Formation Conditions TestingRisk Calculations for Disinfection Byproduct Formation DataConclusions
61
73
117
147
TABLE OF CONTENTS xi
Chapter 9: Occurrence, Characteristics, Transport, and Fate of Pesticides,Pharmaceuticals, Industrial Products, and Personal Care Productsat Riverbank Filtration SitesI.M. Verstraeten, Ph.D., T. Heberer, Ph.D., and T. Scheytt, Ph.D.
IntroductionPhysical and Chemical Characteristics
of Selected Classes of OrganicsThe Presence of Pesticides, Pharmaceuticals, Industrial Products,
and Personal Care Products in Riverbank-Filtered WaterCase StudiesConclusions
Chapter 10: Effectiveness of Riverbank Filtration Sitesto Mitigate Shock LoadsH. Mlzer, Ph.D., J. Schubert, M.Sc., R. Gimbel, Ph.D.,and C.Ray, Ph.D., P.E.
IntroductionExperience Ga