Risk Communication during Food Product Recalls By Robert B. Gravani, Ph.D. Department of Food...

63
Risk Communication Risk Communication during Food Product during Food Product Recalls Recalls By Robert B. Gravani, Ph.D. Department of Food Science Cornell University

Transcript of Risk Communication during Food Product Recalls By Robert B. Gravani, Ph.D. Department of Food...

Page 1: Risk Communication during Food Product Recalls By Robert B. Gravani, Ph.D. Department of Food Science Cornell University.

Risk Communication during Risk Communication during Food Product RecallsFood Product Recalls

By

Robert B. Gravani, Ph.D.

Department of Food Science

Cornell University

Page 2: Risk Communication during Food Product Recalls By Robert B. Gravani, Ph.D. Department of Food Science Cornell University.

National Center for Food Protection &

Defense

at the

University of MinnesotaDefending the safety of the food system

through research and education

Page 3: Risk Communication during Food Product Recalls By Robert B. Gravani, Ph.D. Department of Food Science Cornell University.

Academic Collaborators

Page 4: Risk Communication during Food Product Recalls By Robert B. Gravani, Ph.D. Department of Food Science Cornell University.
Page 5: Risk Communication during Food Product Recalls By Robert B. Gravani, Ph.D. Department of Food Science Cornell University.

IN THE NEWS…

Page 6: Risk Communication during Food Product Recalls By Robert B. Gravani, Ph.D. Department of Food Science Cornell University.

183 people in 18 states confirmed

ill with Salmonellosis

traced to contaminated

tomatoes

204 people ill with E. coli O157:H7, 3 deaths in 26 states

Page 7: Risk Communication during Food Product Recalls By Robert B. Gravani, Ph.D. Department of Food Science Cornell University.

Notable National Recalls

Page 8: Risk Communication during Food Product Recalls By Robert B. Gravani, Ph.D. Department of Food Science Cornell University.

Characteristics of a Food RecallCharacteristics of a Food Recall

• Possibility of harm to consumers

• Potential to significantly damage reputation

• Involve multiple audiences and stakeholders

• Of interest to the media

• Often unique, involving many foods

Adapted from Andrew, 2009

Page 9: Risk Communication during Food Product Recalls By Robert B. Gravani, Ph.D. Department of Food Science Cornell University.

Food Product RecallsFood Product Recalls

• 1999 279

• 2000 384

• 2001 393

• 2002 396

• 2003 266

• 2004 293

• 2005 255

• 2006 240

• 2007 338

• 2008 565

Year Recalls Year Recalls

Food Institute Report, 2009

Page 10: Risk Communication during Food Product Recalls By Robert B. Gravani, Ph.D. Department of Food Science Cornell University.

Food Product RecallsFood Product Recalls• According to the Food Institute Report,

565 food and beverage recalls in 2008 are the highest ever!

• When compared to 2007, recalls due to: Salmonella, increased +800% Listeria, increased +20% E. Coli, decreased -22% Undeclared ingredients, increased +16%

Food Institute Report, 2009

Page 11: Risk Communication during Food Product Recalls By Robert B. Gravani, Ph.D. Department of Food Science Cornell University.

Recalled Food Products Recalled Food Products

Saulsbury, adapted from Food Institute Report, 2009

Page 12: Risk Communication during Food Product Recalls By Robert B. Gravani, Ph.D. Department of Food Science Cornell University.

FDA Food Recalls by Class 1997- 2007

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

140

160

180

200

1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007

Year

Nu

mb

er o

f re

calls

Class IClass IIClass IIIMixed

Chen, 2009

Page 13: Risk Communication during Food Product Recalls By Robert B. Gravani, Ph.D. Department of Food Science Cornell University.

FDA Class I Food Recalls due to Salmonella , Listeria monocytogenes , E. coli O157:H7 and Allergens

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007

Year

Nu

mb

er

of

rec

alls

Salmonella

L. monocytogenes

E. coli O157:H7

Allergens

Chen, 2009

Page 14: Risk Communication during Food Product Recalls By Robert B. Gravani, Ph.D. Department of Food Science Cornell University.

Chen, 2009

Page 15: Risk Communication during Food Product Recalls By Robert B. Gravani, Ph.D. Department of Food Science Cornell University.

FSIS Class I Food Recalls due to Salmonella , Listeria monocytogenes , E. coli O157:H7 and Allergens

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

45

50

1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007

Year

Nu

mb

er

of

rec

alls

Salmonella

L. monocytogenes

E. coli O157:H7

Allergens

Chen, 2009

Page 16: Risk Communication during Food Product Recalls By Robert B. Gravani, Ph.D. Department of Food Science Cornell University.

Top ten Food Safety ProblemsTop ten Food Safety Problems

• In U.S. Food Processing Industry

• Three round Delphi Study with 15 FS experts

• Evaluated frequency & severity of FS risks

• Five processing industry sectors

• Three plant sizes

• Identified top ten food safety problems

Sertkaya, et. al. 2006

Page 17: Risk Communication during Food Product Recalls By Robert B. Gravani, Ph.D. Department of Food Science Cornell University.

Top Five Food Safety ProblemsTop Five Food Safety Problems

Sertkaya, et al. 2006

Food Safety Problem Percent Votes

Deficient employee training 94

Contamination of raw materials 75

Poor plant & equipment sanitation 75

Poor plant design & construction 75

No preventive maintenance 69

Page 18: Risk Communication during Food Product Recalls By Robert B. Gravani, Ph.D. Department of Food Science Cornell University.

Recalls by Specific Processor problem

FDA, 2004

Page 19: Risk Communication during Food Product Recalls By Robert B. Gravani, Ph.D. Department of Food Science Cornell University.

Food Policy Institute Consumer SurveyFood Policy Institute Consumer Survey

• Telephone interviews

• Reached 1,101 Americans from 50 states

• Adults > 17 years of age

• Conducted between Aug. 4 - Sept. 24, 2008

• What consumers know about food recalls

Hallman, et al, 2009

Page 20: Risk Communication during Food Product Recalls By Robert B. Gravani, Ph.D. Department of Food Science Cornell University.

Food Policy Institute Consumer SurveyFood Policy Institute Consumer Survey

• Most believe recalls are relevant to

others not to themselves

• Misconceptions about the food product

recall process & the role of government

in it are widespread

• Only 6 in 10 Americans have ever looked

for a recalled food in their homesHallman, et al, 2009

Page 21: Risk Communication during Food Product Recalls By Robert B. Gravani, Ph.D. Department of Food Science Cornell University.

Recall MessagingRecall Messaging

• Current practices result in messages to 50-60%

of the public within 4-7 days, depending on

the aggressiveness of communication strategies

• In an ideal scenario, recall messages may reach

and be understood by up to 90% of the public

Hallman, et al, 2009

Page 22: Risk Communication during Food Product Recalls By Robert B. Gravani, Ph.D. Department of Food Science Cornell University.

Consumer Use of MediaConsumer Use of Media

• 59% Local televisions news

• 38% Network news

• 34% Cable news

• 42% Daily newspaper

• 42% Radio news

• ~ about 40% of public do not regularly

access news through standard channels.

Pew, 2004

Page 23: Risk Communication during Food Product Recalls By Robert B. Gravani, Ph.D. Department of Food Science Cornell University.

Where Consumers got Their Where Consumers got Their Recall Information on TomatoesRecall Information on Tomatoes

Saulsbury, adapted from Hallman, et al, 2009

Page 24: Risk Communication during Food Product Recalls By Robert B. Gravani, Ph.D. Department of Food Science Cornell University.

Recall MessagesRecall Messages

• Recall press releases are too complex

• Written at a grade level higher than that

of nearly half of the U.S.

population

• A significant portion of the population

would: not process or understand the message

not avoid exposure to the recalled foodNovak & Biskcup, 2009

Page 25: Risk Communication during Food Product Recalls By Robert B. Gravani, Ph.D. Department of Food Science Cornell University.

Food Product RecallsFood Product Recalls

• Slow to develop

• Cascading Warnings

• Passive Communication

• Complex Messages

• No Targeting of Messages

• Risk Fatigue

Seeger & Novak, 2009

Page 26: Risk Communication during Food Product Recalls By Robert B. Gravani, Ph.D. Department of Food Science Cornell University.

Improving Recall EffectivenessImproving Recall Effectiveness

• More timely messages

• Better constructed messages

• Broader dissemination of messages

• Have the potential to increase the

effectiveness of recalls by 30% - 40%

Seeger & Novak, 2009

Page 27: Risk Communication during Food Product Recalls By Robert B. Gravani, Ph.D. Department of Food Science Cornell University.

Risk Communication Risk Communication

• Considers human perceptions of risk

• Multi-directional communication among communicators, publics and stakeholders

• Activity before, during and after an event

• An integral part of an emergency response plan

• Empowers people to make their own informed decisions

Page 28: Risk Communication during Food Product Recalls By Robert B. Gravani, Ph.D. Department of Food Science Cornell University.

What Risk Communication is NOT:What Risk Communication is NOT:

• Spin doctoring

• Public relations

• Crisis management

• How to write a press release

• How to give a media interview

• Always intended to make people

“feel better” or reduce their fear

Page 29: Risk Communication during Food Product Recalls By Robert B. Gravani, Ph.D. Department of Food Science Cornell University.

The goals of Risk CommunicationThe goals of Risk Communication

Tailor communication so it takes into account the

emotional response to an event

Empowers publics to make informed decisions

Prevent negative behavior that hampers response or

causes more harm/

Encourages constructive responses to crisis or danger

Page 30: Risk Communication during Food Product Recalls By Robert B. Gravani, Ph.D. Department of Food Science Cornell University.

We’re ALL risk communicatorsWe’re ALL risk communicators* Family members

* Neighbor to neighbor

* Employees / co-workers

* Extension educators

* The rumor mill

* Online blogs

* “Person on the street” interviews

* Many other channels of communication

From parking lot attendant to CEO…

Page 31: Risk Communication during Food Product Recalls By Robert B. Gravani, Ph.D. Department of Food Science Cornell University.

Best Practices of Risk CommunicationBest Practices of Risk Communication

• An integrated approach

• General principles rather than specific prescriptions about method, channels & messages

• Not a plan

• Principles & processes that form the foundation for effective risk communication

Page 32: Risk Communication during Food Product Recalls By Robert B. Gravani, Ph.D. Department of Food Science Cornell University.

Best Practices in Best Practices in Effective Risk CommunicationEffective Risk Communication

Risk & crisis Risk & crisis communication communication isisan ongoing an ongoing processprocess

USDA CSREESFEMA

Page 33: Risk Communication during Food Product Recalls By Robert B. Gravani, Ph.D. Department of Food Science Cornell University.

• Think risk communications all the time

NOT “after the fact, how do we explain this”

• Risk communication must be part of the policy

development process including the pre-crisis,

decision making process

• Continuously evaluate and update the crisis

communication plans

Page 34: Risk Communication during Food Product Recalls By Robert B. Gravani, Ph.D. Department of Food Science Cornell University.

Best Practices in Best Practices in Effective Risk CommunicationEffective Risk Communication

Conduct pre-eventplanning & preparedness activities

FEMA

Page 35: Risk Communication during Food Product Recalls By Robert B. Gravani, Ph.D. Department of Food Science Cornell University.

• Address existing, emerging and

anticipated issues

• If a catastrophic event occurred

tomorrow, have you determined

your…

• Roles ?

• Responsibilities ?

• Response ?

Page 36: Risk Communication during Food Product Recalls By Robert B. Gravani, Ph.D. Department of Food Science Cornell University.

• Address potential hazards, determine

how to reduce risk, plan an initial

response, evaluate different risk

scenarios, etc.

• Update regularly

• Conduct practice exercises,

activities and drills

Page 37: Risk Communication during Food Product Recalls By Robert B. Gravani, Ph.D. Department of Food Science Cornell University.

Best Practices in Best Practices in Effective Risk CommunicationEffective Risk Communication

Foster Foster partnerships with partnerships with the publicthe public

USDA CSREES

Page 38: Risk Communication during Food Product Recalls By Robert B. Gravani, Ph.D. Department of Food Science Cornell University.

• Who are your publics?

• Build strong, positive relationships

with key publics before a crisis occurs

• Publics include stakeholders, consumer

groups, racial and ethic communities

• Use cultural agents

to deliver messages

Page 39: Risk Communication during Food Product Recalls By Robert B. Gravani, Ph.D. Department of Food Science Cornell University.

Best Practices in Best Practices in Effective Risk CommunicationEffective Risk Communication

FEMA

Collaborate & Collaborate & coordinate with coordinate with credible sourcescredible sources

Page 40: Risk Communication during Food Product Recalls By Robert B. Gravani, Ph.D. Department of Food Science Cornell University.

• Colleges & universities; Cooperative Extension

• Local, county, state & federal government agencies

• Stakeholders – associations, co-ops, unions, etc.

• Industry alliances and trade associations

• Consumer groups

• Others

Establish strategic relationships Establish strategic relationships and networks before a crisis and networks before a crisis

Page 41: Risk Communication during Food Product Recalls By Robert B. Gravani, Ph.D. Department of Food Science Cornell University.

Identify Subject Matter ExpertsIdentify Subject Matter Experts

Epidemiologists, risk assessors, food

scientists, health educators, risk

comm specialists, microbiologists, etc.

Provide “independent credible”

statements, facts, images, etc.

Present scientific data, statistics, up-

to-date knowledge, background, etc.

CDC

Page 42: Risk Communication during Food Product Recalls By Robert B. Gravani, Ph.D. Department of Food Science Cornell University.

Best Practices in Best Practices in Effective Risk CommunicationEffective Risk Communication

Meet the needs ofMeet the needs ofthe media & remainthe media & remainaccessibleaccessible

FEMA

Page 43: Risk Communication during Food Product Recalls By Robert B. Gravani, Ph.D. Department of Food Science Cornell University.

• Recognize that the media is the primary

channel to the public

• Accessibility as expression of concern

• Media training is vital

“The media is not the enemy…”

Page 44: Risk Communication during Food Product Recalls By Robert B. Gravani, Ph.D. Department of Food Science Cornell University.

Building RelationshipsBuilding Relationships

Preparedness activities should include:

• Fostering relationships with members of the media

• Identifying local media who cover stories in your area and read/listen to them regularly

• Create contact lists

• Recognizing different media needs

Page 45: Risk Communication during Food Product Recalls By Robert B. Gravani, Ph.D. Department of Food Science Cornell University.

Goals for Media PreparationGoals for Media Preparation• Know what you want to say

• Know how you want to say it

• Anticipate reporter’s questions & know

what your answers will be

• Being well prepared will allow you to be

clearer, more comfortable and convincing

Page 46: Risk Communication during Food Product Recalls By Robert B. Gravani, Ph.D. Department of Food Science Cornell University.

Use Many ChannelsUse Many Channels

• Websites

• Email

• Blogs

• Podcasts

• Fact sheets

• Posters

•Shopper cards

• Hot/help lines

• Information

meetings

• Town meetings

• Word of mouth

• Mailings

•Social networks

Page 47: Risk Communication during Food Product Recalls By Robert B. Gravani, Ph.D. Department of Food Science Cornell University.

Best Practices in Best Practices in Effective Risk CommunicationEffective Risk Communication

Listen to the public’s Listen to the public’s

concern and understandconcern and understand

the audiencethe audience

USDA CSREES

Page 48: Risk Communication during Food Product Recalls By Robert B. Gravani, Ph.D. Department of Food Science Cornell University.

• Respond to the publics beliefs

whether they are accurate or not

• Monitor many channels of communication

and keep the public’s concerns in mind

• Build a trust relationship with the public;

it is a reservoir of good will

-“it is an emotional bank account”

Page 49: Risk Communication during Food Product Recalls By Robert B. Gravani, Ph.D. Department of Food Science Cornell University.

Best Practices in Best Practices in Effective Risk CommunicationEffective Risk Communication

Communicate with Communicate with compassion, concern compassion, concern & empathy& empathy

USDA CSREES

Page 50: Risk Communication during Food Product Recalls By Robert B. Gravani, Ph.D. Department of Food Science Cornell University.

• Un-natural for technical experts They are taught to be unemotional

• Be aware of metamessages

Body language

Speaking style, pacing, emphasis

Location & attire

• Humanize the response

Page 51: Risk Communication during Food Product Recalls By Robert B. Gravani, Ph.D. Department of Food Science Cornell University.

Best Practices in Best Practices in Effective Risk CommunicationEffective Risk Communication

DemonstrateDemonstratehonesty, candorhonesty, candor& openness& openness

FEMA

Page 52: Risk Communication during Food Product Recalls By Robert B. Gravani, Ph.D. Department of Food Science Cornell University.

Honesty, Candor & Openness Honesty = not lying

Candor = Communicating the entire truth,

even if it will reflect negatively on an

agency or organization

Openness = accessibility & immediacy

Page 53: Risk Communication during Food Product Recalls By Robert B. Gravani, Ph.D. Department of Food Science Cornell University.

• Honesty and credibility

• It involves risk sharing

• Acknowledge uncertainty with direct responses

““Here’s what we know, here’s what we Here’s what we know, here’s what we

don’t know, here’s how we’re doing to don’t know, here’s how we’re doing to

find more answers, and here’s when find more answers, and here’s when

we’ll get back to you with more we’ll get back to you with more

information.”information.”

Page 54: Risk Communication during Food Product Recalls By Robert B. Gravani, Ph.D. Department of Food Science Cornell University.

Best Practices in Best Practices in Effective Risk CommunicationEffective Risk Communication

Accept Accept uncertaintyuncertainty& & ambiguityambiguity

FEMA

Page 55: Risk Communication during Food Product Recalls By Robert B. Gravani, Ph.D. Department of Food Science Cornell University.

• Inherent uncertainty of crisis & risk

• Information vacuum will be filled!

• Get there first with credible info

• Share information when it is available

“ “ We do not yet have all the facts.”We do not yet have all the facts.”

Page 56: Risk Communication during Food Product Recalls By Robert B. Gravani, Ph.D. Department of Food Science Cornell University.

Best Practices in Best Practices in Effective Risk CommunicationEffective Risk Communication

Give people Give people meaningful meaningful things to do things to do(self–efficacy) (self–efficacy)

Page 57: Risk Communication during Food Product Recalls By Robert B. Gravani, Ph.D. Department of Food Science Cornell University.

• Give people something to do

• The importance of meaningful actions

reasserts personal control during an

uncertain or threatening situation

Present as must do, should do, or could doPresent as must do, should do, or could do

--not duct tape and plastic!

Page 58: Risk Communication during Food Product Recalls By Robert B. Gravani, Ph.D. Department of Food Science Cornell University.

The First 24/48 Hours are CriticalThe First 24/48 Hours are Critical

• Often sets the tone for the incident

• Must demonstrate leadership!

• Actions speak louder than words

• On Day 1, it is a story of the incident

• On Day 2, it is a story of the company’s response

• Develop effective messages, communicate widely

and consistently

Page 59: Risk Communication during Food Product Recalls By Robert B. Gravani, Ph.D. Department of Food Science Cornell University.

It takes a Risk It takes a Risk Communication Plan to…Communication Plan to…

Be firstBe first

Be rightBe right

Be credibleBe credible

Page 60: Risk Communication during Food Product Recalls By Robert B. Gravani, Ph.D. Department of Food Science Cornell University.

Applying the ConceptsApplying the Concepts

www.ific.org

Page 61: Risk Communication during Food Product Recalls By Robert B. Gravani, Ph.D. Department of Food Science Cornell University.
Page 62: Risk Communication during Food Product Recalls By Robert B. Gravani, Ph.D. Department of Food Science Cornell University.
Page 63: Risk Communication during Food Product Recalls By Robert B. Gravani, Ph.D. Department of Food Science Cornell University.

The End