Risk assessment Part 3 - pks.rs za saradnju sa EU/Direktiva 2004-108... · Risk assessment Part 3...

Belgrade Serbia 11the Novemberr 2010

Risk assessment

Part 3

Bert van Dijk

Radiocommunications Agency

Belgrade, Serbia

11th November 2010


Radiocommunications Agency NL2

Why risk Assessment

2

.

•The use of Impact assessment in the work of Market Surveillance Authorities (MSA) could be a logical to:

EMC products domain is very large too large to be able to follow all EMC market penetration in detail and to act against

Therefore it is recommended to make proper choices and to set priorities

Reasons using and risk assessment procedure the quality and quantity of Market surveillance activities

To promote the effectiveness market surveillance

Concentrate risk EMC products, only

Optimal use the limited financial and capacity inspectors resources



Risk Assessment

Risk assessment is a “discipline” that can help define decision problems more clearly

The method of Risk Assessment:

Is worked out and practiced by the Radiocommunications Agency

Agreed in ADCO/R&TTE and EMC/ADCO for EU cross border campaigns

Recommended for national Market surveillance activities

in The Netherlands

Choose the application with the highest impact on society and economy:

» Highest relevance

» Best way to utilize our scarce recourses.



Decision tree to determine risk products

To be decided by national MSA Which products will be

determined

Not relevant to consider relevantrisk MS activities

Relevant to consider in case of market surveillance

authorities

Impact assessment procedures related on future European R&TTE campaigns are based on the following essential questions on will it:

� cause (harmful) interference in other radio products� create unfair competition between the economic market players � hinder the introduction of innovative radio products� prejudice other than economic market players � reduce significant the compliance with the essential requirements;

Impact assessment procedures related on future European R&TTE campaigns are based on the

following essential questions on:



Risk assessment

5

1. Define the risk of a non-compliance products to the economy and society (‘Severity of consequences of violation’)

2. Define the probability that this risk will occur (‘Chance’)

3. Risk= Severity * Chance (R=S*C)

4. Rate different applications or groups of equipment

5. Choose the highest ranking (application or equipment) for

– National program

– National surveillance campaign.



Severity of consequence of violation (S)

• radio interference as a consequence of non-compliance with the regulations. This might be interference within or outside the radiofrequencies or interference on product.

• Financial/economic severity of non-compliance (has the offender derived an advantage from violation of the regulations?

• Any social impact of non-compliance (for example a sense of insecurity regarding confidentiality of communications)

• Physical and health/safety consequences of non-compliance (accidents due to interference in radio communications and electromagnetic radiation exposure)

• Non-compliance affecting the image of the MSA that have a surveillance role or are responsible for regulation, respectively (negative publicity, political risks etc.)



Probability of risk of violation (C)

A) Spontaneous compliance dimension

• refers to elements of social control or when the product has been well designed so that there are no incentives to violate the rules (cost effective or from a market behavior point of view).

B) The ‘enforcement dimension’

• appeals to the probability of violation after certain enforcement activities have been carried out. Here important elements like risk of detection or sanction and the severity of the sanction play arole in determining that probability



6.62431331Example product

1 – 251 - 51 - 51 - 51 – 51 - 51 - 51 - 5Scoremin - max

Enforcement

(dimension)

(y)

Spontaneous

Compliance

(dimension)

(x)

Credibility of

the Authority

(e)

Physical and

Health

(d)

Social impact

(c)

Economic

and

Financial

(b)

Radio

interference

(a)

Risk R=S·C

Max=25 (R)

Probability or risk of violation (C)C = (x+y)/2

Severity of consequences of violation (S)S = a+b+c+d+e/5

Aspects of violation

Risk (R)=Severity (S)*Probability or risk of violation (C)



The method (2)

The final score is determined by multiplying:

the average severity of risk (S) by the average probability of risk violation (C).

This final figure is the risk profile for that application

A potential candidate for a MSA activity could be is an product has a score higher than 8.

» To priories is more important than the figure is itself!

12 -25 (great)8 - <12 (medium)3 - <7 (small)1- >3 (very small)

Min.1 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Max.25



16.24542534GSM repeaters

5.62243322GSM mobile

2.82231212Radio controlled Toys

10.22451344RIFD

6.42241524Example DECT

8.12431331Example LP FM transmitters

1 – 251 - 51 - 51 - 51 – 51 - 51 - 51 - 5Score min - max

En

forcem

ent

(dim

ensio

n)

(y)

Sp

on

taneo

us

Co

mp

liance

(dim

ensio

n)

(x)

Cred

ibility o

f the

Au

tho

rity(e)

Ph

ysical and

H

ealth(d

)

So

cial imp

act(c)

Eco

no

mic an

dF

inan

cial(b

)

Rad

io in

terference

(a)

Risk R

=S·C

Max=25 (R

)Probability or risk

of violation (C)C = (x+y)/2

Severity of consequences of violation (S)S = a+b+c+d+e/5A

spects o

f violatio

n

R&TTED productsExample risk assessment



Example risk assessment

9.64441133LED Lamps

1.61111122Digital photo frame

1.61111122Hard multimedia disk

1.61111122Set top box TNT / SAT

3.62211124Reversible heat pump or air conditioner

81143124Microwave oven painted inside

9.83411353Household appliances

9.83411352Battery powered appliances and portable tools.

83143122Aesthetics equipments (equipment used for beauty of skin and health

83143122Body massage equipment

63143125RF stimulator

63143125Ultrasonic equipments

EMC Directive Product to be assessed

1 – 251 - 51 - 51 - 51 – 51 - 51 - 51 - 5Score min – max

Enforce

ment

(dimens

ion)

(y)

Spontan

eous

Complia

nce

(dimens

ion)

(x)

Credibili

ty of

the

Authorit

y(e)

Physical

and

Health

(d)

Social

impact

(c)

Econom

ic and

Financia

l(b)

Radio

interfer

ence

(a)

Risk

R=S·C

Max=25 (R)

Probability or risk of violation C = x+y/2

Severity of consequences of violation (S)S = a+b+c+d+e/5

Aspects of violation

EMC products



Probability of violation (max.5)

High riskMedium risk

Very small risk Small risk

LPFM

RCT

GSMR

PS ET

DECT

PLT

GSM

RFID

Example Matrix level risk

Severity of violation max 5

LED •



Results risk assessment

Conclusion EMC ADCO after conducting the risk assessment (October 2010, Budapest

LED lamps will be candidate for the next cross border campaign 2011

All MSA are invited to join the campaign

Start campaign January 2011



Conclusions

Impact assessment can be a good tool for determining an risk product for national activities and/or cross border MS campaign

.

A Pragmatic Impact Assessment is the Risk analyses

» Easy to use by experts in the field (enforcement en surveillance)

It has also the advantage that it yields an overview of all EMC products and possible activities and their effects on the equipment market and society.

This “risk assessment” method is recommended as a standard procedure to determine the regular national activities of each national organisation.

Choose the products with the highest Risk!



Further suggestions and remarks

Risk assessment Part 3 - pks.rs za saradnju sa EU/Direktiva 2004-108... · Risk assessment Part 3...

Documents

Transcript of Risk assessment Part 3 - pks.rs za saradnju sa EU/Direktiva 2004-108... · Risk assessment Part 3...