RIP 3.2-2 Industry testing of the draft cTGD Modifying exposure scenarios at DU level Break out...

24
RIP 3.2-2 Industry testing of the draft cTGD Modifying exposure scenarios at DU level Break out session Arona meeting 30-31 August, 2007 FDLF

Transcript of RIP 3.2-2 Industry testing of the draft cTGD Modifying exposure scenarios at DU level Break out...

Page 1: RIP 3.2-2 Industry testing of the draft cTGD Modifying exposure scenarios at DU level Break out session Arona meeting 30-31 August, 2007 FDLF.

RIP 3.2-2 Industry testing of the draft cTGD

Modifying exposure scenarios at DU level

Break out session

Arona meeting 30-31 August, 2007

FDLF

Page 2: RIP 3.2-2 Industry testing of the draft cTGD Modifying exposure scenarios at DU level Break out session Arona meeting 30-31 August, 2007 FDLF.

M

DU

DU

Arcosolv PM Arcosolv PMFormulated

product

LYONDELL BRENNTAGDYRUP

HEMPEL

FDLF

Supply chain perspectiveDU-formulator and their customers

OC’s

ESSDSESSDSESSDS

DU

FORMULATOR END-USER

Page 3: RIP 3.2-2 Industry testing of the draft cTGD Modifying exposure scenarios at DU level Break out session Arona meeting 30-31 August, 2007 FDLF.

M DUESSDSESSDSESSDS

DU

Compliance check by DU

ES

Keep windows and doors open during application winter

4hours 8 hours (niche business)

5% 0,5% (pregnant painters)

DU

Human:

Environment: Emission fractions can not be related to.

Page 4: RIP 3.2-2 Industry testing of the draft cTGD Modifying exposure scenarios at DU level Break out session Arona meeting 30-31 August, 2007 FDLF.

M DUESSDSESSDSESSDS

DU

Compliance check by DU

ESDU

Implement OC’sfrom ES

CSR-DU

Inform

ES

Keep windows and doors open during application winter

4hours 8 hours (niche business)

5% 0,5% (pregnant painters)

Human:

Environment: Emission fractions can not be related to.

Page 5: RIP 3.2-2 Industry testing of the draft cTGD Modifying exposure scenarios at DU level Break out session Arona meeting 30-31 August, 2007 FDLF.

M DUESSDSESSDSESSDS

DU

Compliance check by DU

ESDU

Use 3Use 2Use 1

1000’s preparations

100’ssubstances

……Use n

ES

OverflowDelayPoor answers(CBI)

Implement OC’sfrom ES

CSR-DU

Inform

Page 6: RIP 3.2-2 Industry testing of the draft cTGD Modifying exposure scenarios at DU level Break out session Arona meeting 30-31 August, 2007 FDLF.

DUESSDSESSDSESSDS

DU

Solution Give DU-formulator a tool to act competent

Use x n

ESModifier

DNEL/PNECPhys.-Chem.

Models

RMM’s forSAFE USE

PECregional

DUM

CEFIC

Use

CEPEFEICAAISE

Page 7: RIP 3.2-2 Industry testing of the draft cTGD Modifying exposure scenarios at DU level Break out session Arona meeting 30-31 August, 2007 FDLF.

ES-Modifier Prototype 1/2

GENERIC USE SCENARIO:• Application of paints; adhesives; sealants

and cleaning agents on surfaces

• Professional/Consumer

• In-door/Out-door

• Manual or Spray application

• +++ other OC’s

Page 8: RIP 3.2-2 Industry testing of the draft cTGD Modifying exposure scenarios at DU level Break out session Arona meeting 30-31 August, 2007 FDLF.

ES-Modifier Prototype 2/2

Human exposure assessment• Inhalation: Stoffenmanager (other choices possible)• (Dermal inhalation)

Environmental exposure assessment: EUSES• Water• Water, STP• Soil(Excel version, RIVM/Radboud University)

Page 9: RIP 3.2-2 Industry testing of the draft cTGD Modifying exposure scenarios at DU level Break out session Arona meeting 30-31 August, 2007 FDLF.

INPUT Phys.-Chemical data DNEL/PNEC

Page 10: RIP 3.2-2 Industry testing of the draft cTGD Modifying exposure scenarios at DU level Break out session Arona meeting 30-31 August, 2007 FDLF.

INPUT USE Conditions Model parameters RMM

Page 11: RIP 3.2-2 Industry testing of the draft cTGD Modifying exposure scenarios at DU level Break out session Arona meeting 30-31 August, 2007 FDLF.

OUTPUTExposure: Human/Env.Exposure/DNEL; PNEC

+/- RMM

Page 12: RIP 3.2-2 Industry testing of the draft cTGD Modifying exposure scenarios at DU level Break out session Arona meeting 30-31 August, 2007 FDLF.

INPUT USE Conditions Model parameters RMM

Page 13: RIP 3.2-2 Industry testing of the draft cTGD Modifying exposure scenarios at DU level Break out session Arona meeting 30-31 August, 2007 FDLF.

INPUT USE Conditions Model parameters RMM

Page 14: RIP 3.2-2 Industry testing of the draft cTGD Modifying exposure scenarios at DU level Break out session Arona meeting 30-31 August, 2007 FDLF.

INPUT USE Conditions Model parameters RMM

Page 15: RIP 3.2-2 Industry testing of the draft cTGD Modifying exposure scenarios at DU level Break out session Arona meeting 30-31 August, 2007 FDLF.

INPUT USE Conditions Model parameters RMM

Page 16: RIP 3.2-2 Industry testing of the draft cTGD Modifying exposure scenarios at DU level Break out session Arona meeting 30-31 August, 2007 FDLF.

INPUT USE Conditions Model parameters RMM

Page 17: RIP 3.2-2 Industry testing of the draft cTGD Modifying exposure scenarios at DU level Break out session Arona meeting 30-31 August, 2007 FDLF.

Input parameters:Conc: 25%ProfessionalIn-doorSpray with aerosolsRoom size < 100m3Large surfacesNo ventillation+ Half mask

OUTPUTExposure: Human/Env.Exposure/DNEL; PNEC

+/- RMM

Page 18: RIP 3.2-2 Industry testing of the draft cTGD Modifying exposure scenarios at DU level Break out session Arona meeting 30-31 August, 2007 FDLF.

Key feature of ES-Modifier

• (Complicated) exposure assessment models assessible to DU – Establish the common boundaries that DU’s can

move within – preferably on an EU-association level– Flexible modification of use scenario from one set of

OC’s to another– Standard reference for DU’s potential later

implementation in own IT-systems

• Translates expert language into an interphase understandable by DU-formulator.

Page 19: RIP 3.2-2 Industry testing of the draft cTGD Modifying exposure scenarios at DU level Break out session Arona meeting 30-31 August, 2007 FDLF.

IC: Industry Category

UC: Use Category

MC: Main category

Lifecycle step

STP

Annual Production

A/B tablesEmission days

+

EUSES – calculation of PEC

Concentration

Emission fractions

Fraction of main source

PEC + PECregionalPEClocal =

Page 20: RIP 3.2-2 Industry testing of the draft cTGD Modifying exposure scenarios at DU level Break out session Arona meeting 30-31 August, 2007 FDLF.

Product type

User segmentIC: Industry Category

UC: Use Category

MC: Main category

Lifecycle step

STP

Annual Production

A/B tables

Product technology

Emission days

+

+extra

EUSES – calculation of PEC

Concentration

Emission fractions

Fraction of main source

Sales outlet

Default values DU-input Can be ”overwritten” by ”expert DU”

PEC + PECregionalPEClocal =

Page 21: RIP 3.2-2 Industry testing of the draft cTGD Modifying exposure scenarios at DU level Break out session Arona meeting 30-31 August, 2007 FDLF.

M DUESSDSESSDSESSDS

DU

Common choice of models

Use x n

Use

ESModifier

DNEL/PNECPhys.-Chem.

Models

RMM’s forSAFE USE

PECregional

CEFIC CEPEFEICAAISE

Page 22: RIP 3.2-2 Industry testing of the draft cTGD Modifying exposure scenarios at DU level Break out session Arona meeting 30-31 August, 2007 FDLF.

Stoffenmanager

Ecetoc class: 1 (Roller/Brush)

1E-10

0,00000001

0,000001

0,0001

0,01

1

100

10000

0,0001 0,001 0,01 0,1 1 10 100 1000 10000 100000

Vapour pressureConcentrationVentillation/LEV: NoDuration: 8hrs

Stoffenmanager > Ecetoc

Stoffenmanager < Ecetoc

X=Y

Use: Brush application

Where: In-doorHow: ManualArea: Medium Room: < 100 m3# of operations: 1

Adhesives assortment – real data

Page 23: RIP 3.2-2 Industry testing of the draft cTGD Modifying exposure scenarios at DU level Break out session Arona meeting 30-31 August, 2007 FDLF.

Stoffenmanager

Ecetoc class: 2 (Spray)

1E-10

0,00000001

0,000001

0,0001

0,01

1

100

10000

0,0001 0,001 0,01 0,1 1 10 100 1000 10000 100000

Stoffenmanager > Ecetoc

Stoffenmanager < Ecetoc

X=Y

Use: Spray application

Vapour pressureConcentrationVentillation/LEV: NoDuration: 8hrs

Adhesives assortment – real data

Where: In-doorHow: Spray w. aerosolsArea: LargeRoom: < 100 m3# of operations > 1

Page 24: RIP 3.2-2 Industry testing of the draft cTGD Modifying exposure scenarios at DU level Break out session Arona meeting 30-31 August, 2007 FDLF.

Conclusion

• Important to have an ES-modifier tool for DU-formulator

• Requirement:– Agreement on models across M/I’s and DU’s. Models

should be flexible and not overly conservative.– Formalised structured parameters required to be given by

supplier in ES: • DNEL/PNEC; PECregional; Phys.-Chem. Data.

– Active role by DU-branch associations on a European scale – preferably across several industry sectors.

– As broad as possible to ”pay” the ”cost” of the validation needed between the stakeholders