The futurecoverResearc

c

ures of safry: Final rech Initiative

omp

Fu

Fawkes

AccompTitle

fety, compeport on thee

Thpens

uture

S, Palmer J

and

Qu

panying d

ensation ae Futures

he fuation

A bes Re

J, Inayatulla

Inst

Recover

ueens Ha

Res

documents

nd Rese

uturen an

rief resea

ah S, Burke

titute for

ry Resea

all, Parlia

search R

s to this reRe

arch Repo

es ofd rec

reporrch I

R, Miller M

Safety,

arch Futu

ament Ho

Report #

eport eport numb

ort No. 081

f safecove

rt on Initia

M, Worland

Compen

ures Wor

ouse, Mel

Augus

0811-0

ber

1-017-R2

ety,ery:

the tive

P, Ellis N

nsation

rkshop

bourne

st 2011

017-R1

Research

CONT

LIST OF

1. E

2. IN

3. M

4. M

4.1 H

4.2 S

4.3 IS

5. O

5.1 O

5.2 A

6.0 T

7.0 F

7.1 S

7.2 B

7.3 P

7.4 P

8.0 FG

9.0 E

9.1 IN

9.2 IN

9.3 S

9.4 T

9.5 S

9.6 S

10. C

11. O

h Report No.

TENTS

F FIGURES

EXECUTIVE

NTRODUC

METHODOL

METHODS .

HORIZON SC

STAKEHOLD

SCRR ANAL

OUTCOME

OUTPUT ......

ANALYSIS ...

TRANSITIO

FUTURES W

SCENARIO D

BIG IDEAS E

PREVENTIV

PARTNERSH

FUTURES OGLOBAL C

EMERGING

NDICATORS

NTERVENT

SOCIAL RES

TRANSLATIO

SYSTEM CA

SUMMARY ..

CONCLUSI

OTHER OU

0811-017-R

S.................

E SUMMAR

TION ........

LOGY .......

..................

CANNING P

DER DIALOG

LYSIS AND R

OF HORIZ

....................

....................

ON: ONLINE

WORKSHO

DEVELOPM

EMERGING F

E VERSUS C

HIPS VERSU

OF SAFETYONTEXT ..

G KNOWLE

S AND MEAS

ION RESEA

SEARCH .....

ON RESEAR

APACITY RE

....................

ON ............

TPUTS FR

R2

..................

RY ..............

..................

..................

..................

ROJECT .....

GUE .............

REPORTS ...

ON SCANN

....................

....................

E BLOG DIS

OP: SCENA

ENT.............

FROM SCEN

COMPENSA

US GOVERN

Y, COMPEN..................

DGE NEED

SURES .......

ARCH ............

....................

RCH .............

SEARCH .....

....................

..................

ROM THE P

..................

..................

..................

..................

..................

....................

....................

....................

NING: THE

....................

....................

SCUSSION

ARIOS .........

....................

NARIOS ......

ATION FOCU

NMENT LEA

NSATION A..................

DS AND PR

....................

....................

....................

....................

....................

....................

..................

ROJECT ...

..................

..................

..................

..................

..................

...................

...................

...................

GLOBAL C

...................

...................

NS ON HOR

..................

...................

...................

US IN TIMES

DERSHIP IN

AND RECO..................

RIORITY RE

...................

...................

...................

...................

...................

...................

..................

..................

P

..................

..................

..................

..................

..................

....................

....................

....................

CONTEXT .

....................

....................

RIZON SCA

..................

....................

....................

S OF BOOM

N TIMES OF

OVERY IN A..................

ESEARCH A

....................

....................

....................

....................

....................

....................

..................

..................

Page 2 of 27

..................

..................

..................

..................

..................

...................

...................

...................

..................

...................

...................

AN OUTPUT

..................

...................

...................

AND BUST

BOOM AND

A NATIONA..................

AREAS ....

...................

...................

...................

...................

...................

...................

..................

..................

7

............ 3

............ 4

............ 5

............ 5

............ 6

............. 6

............. 7

............. 9

.......... 10

........... 10

........... 11

TS ..... 13

.......... 14

........... 14

........... 16

........... 18

D BUST20

AL AND .......... 23

.......... 24

........... 25

........... 25

........... 26

........... 26

........... 26

........... 26

.......... 27

.......... 27

Research

LIST O

FIGURE

FIGURE

FIGURE

FIGURE

FIGURE

FIGURE

FIGURE

FIGURE

FIGUREVERSUS

FIGUREVERSUS

FIGURE

FIGURECOMPE

h Report No.

OF FIGU

E 1. METHO

E 2. PATH O

E 3. GENER

E 4. OVERV

E 5. GLOBA

E 6. GLOBA

E 7. GLOBA

E 8. BEST A

E 9. SAFETS REACTIV

E 10. SAFES GOVERN

E 11. PREV

E 12. INTERENSATION A

0811-017-R

URES

ODOLOGIC

OF KNOWL

RIC FUTUR

VIEW OF F

AL FUTURE

AL FUTURE

AL FUTURE

AND WORS

TY, COMPEVE ..............

ETY, COMPNMENT-LED

VENTIVE PA

RSECTIONAND RECO

R2

CAL SEQUE

LEGE FLOW

RES WHEE

UTURES R

ES: PROAC

ES: COOPE

ES AND BL

ST CASE S

ENSATION ..................

PENSATIOND ................

ARTNERSH

OF PREFEOVERY FUT

ENCE .........

WS IN THE

L ................

RESEARCH

CTIVE VER

ERATIVE V

LOG THEME

SCENARIOS

AND RECO..................

N AND REC..................

HIPS AND

ERRED GLTURES AT

..................

E FUTURES

..................

H INITIATIV

SUS REAC

VERSUS INT

ES .............

S ...............

OVERY FUT..................

COVERY FU..................

BLOG THE

OBAL FUTBLOG THE

P

..................

S RESEARC

..................

E ACTIVITI

CTIVE .........

TERESTS-B

..................

..................

TURES: PR..................

UTURES: P..................

EMES .........

URES ANDEMES .........

Page 3 of 27

..................

CH INITIAT

..................

IES ............

..................

BASED .....

..................

..................

REVENTIV..................

PARTNERS..................

..................

D SAFETY, ..................

7

............ 5

IVE ...... 6

............ 8

.......... 10

.......... 12

.......... 12

.......... 14

.......... 15

E .......... 20

SHIP .......... 22

.......... 23

.......... 24

Research

1. E

The ISCcontext acompens

Informatgenerateselectedthem, inthemes considerdrivers mand pro

The 18311 onlinediscussisafety, c

The blogstakeholhealth aeconomeconomWorkshomodel ve

The Futuscenariopartnersdevelopiby Workpriority fonew indiand incr

This repDialogueforces shand recothemes wDialoguescenarioknowledeach of tthose in

h Report No.

EXECUT

CRR Futuresand opportusation and

tion on natioed by a Hord 183 articlecluding the is presentered in the amost commactive vers

3 articles bee discussioons were a

compensatio

g themes selders, and tnd safety. ic flux, and ic boom anop prevenersus gove

ures Worksos preferredship was theing researc

kshop particfor researchicators of heeasing capa

ort draws toe Project byhaping themovery and thwhich emere project. Itos that the Fdge needs athese nine Australian

0811-017-R

TIVE SU

s Research unity for debrecovery ov

onal and glorizon Scannes which co

underlying d within therticles enonly identifi

sus reactive

came the cns (blogs) inalyzed andon and reco

eeded discuhe productiThe contexthe scenari

nd bust, tontive approaernment lea

hop then add by Workshe operating h questions

cipants on thh on improviealth, identiacity of sys

ogether the y pointing tom, and Worhe means orged from tht is this inteFutures Resand researcareas, theresafety, com

R2

MMARY

Initiative habate amongver the next

obal trends ning Projectnsidered treworldviews

e frameworknvironmentaied - globale approach

catalyst for tnvolving invd generatedovery.

ussions at aon of both o

xt for these sios have be

ogether withach versusdership.

ddressed itshop participmodel. Thi

s to addresshe researching intervenifying futuretems in res

outcomes oo the intersekshop parti

of achievinghe blog discrsection betsearch Initiah questionse will be op

mpensation

Y

as been desg its stakehot 25 years.

and futurest. From oveends and pos and mythsk of those gal crisis andl cooperatio

hes to the fu

the first stagvited contribd themes of

a Futures Woptimistic ascenarios w

een presenth and the uns reactive/c

self to the cants in whicis process os the knowleh questions ntion policiee social issuearch and p

of the Horizection betwecipants' pre them. This

cussions antween globa

ative has ops can be coportunities and recove

signed to polders abou

s writing acrer a million rossible futus. In this relobal prospd hi-tech neon versus puture.

ge in the Stabutors. Thef critical sig

Workshop amnd pessimis

was generaled in this R

nderlying drompensatio

critical pathsch preventioof backcastedge needsthey had ge

es and progrues, translatprogram de

zon Scannineen alternaeferred futurs intersectio

nd which seal futures a

pened up asnsidered. Tfor develop

ery to inform

P

rovide a richut knowledg

ross 11 areareferences, res and facport, an oveects most c

ew world pursuit of se

akeholder De outcomes nificance to

mong a widestic scenarioly characte

Report withinivers identif

on focus, an

s required toon was the ting laid thes of a preferenerated shrams, aheadting researclivery.

ng Project ative global fres of safetyon occurs aeded the Stnd stakehos the contexThe report cments at th

m and engag

Page 4 of 27

h informatioge needs in

as of interethis project

ctors which erview of thcommonly and the un

ectoral inter

Dialogue prof these

o the future

e range of os for the furised as onn the framewfied in the nd a partne

o achieve thfocus and e groundworred future. howed a cled of develo

ch more effe

and the Stakfutures andy, compens

across the ntakeholder lder generaxt in which concludes thhe global levge with each

7

on safety,

est was t shape e main

derlying rests

oject -

of

uture of e of work of

erships

he

ork for Voting

ear ping ectively

keholder the

sation ine

ated

hat, in vel and h other.

Research

2. I

A prioritylonger teVictoria

This is afutures, futures wInitiativeprocess compan

3. M

The Futu

Ao

Arur

AThe chro

Howevesuggestsseries ofcritical liProject i

bp

h Report No.

NTROD

y for ISCRRerm knowle(WorkSafe)

a brief reporthen engag

within this we was condu

and its outcion reports

METHOD

ures Resea

A Horizon Sof safety, co

A Stakeholdreviewing thunderlying mrecovery se

Analysis and

onological s

r the three s. At the hef online (blonk which con two ways

by seeding dpresented to

0811-017-R

UCTION

R is to estabdge needs ).

rt on the Fuged ISCRR wider contexucted in sevcomes, andon particula

DOLOGY

arch Initiativ

Scanning Prompensation

der Dialoguehese broad tmyths), thenctor over th

d reports of

sequence of

FIGURE

main compeart of the mog) discussionnects thes:

discussionso the Future

R2

N

blish an ageof the Trans

tures Reseastakeholdext, and knowveral stagesd includes inar stages of

Y

e is an integ

roject to iden and recov

e Project totrends and n exploring e next 25 y

f these data

f these thre

E 1. METH

onents are methodology

ons about t Horizon Sc

s in the Stakes Worksho

enda for ressport Accid

arch Initiativrs in a dialowledge nees over 2010n the final sf the project

gration of th

ntify nationavery.

o engage keidentifying possible fut

years and th

a by ISCRR

ee compone

HODOLOG

much morey is an analythe Horizoncanning Pro

keholder Diop)

search whicent Commi

ve which exogue to idends to realize-1011; this ection a listt.

hree compo

al and globa

ey stakeholdtrend drivertures for the

he knowledg

.

ents is illustr

GICAL SEQ

e closely intysis and rep Scanning P

oject and th

alogue proc

P

h will meet ssion (TAC

xplored globntify possible a preferreis a brief ovt of the more

onents:

al trends re

ders and oprs (causes, e safety, coge needs of

rated in the

QUENCE

egrated thaport to stakeProject. The Stakehold

cess (nine b

Page 5 of 27

the short aC) and Work

bal long termle health aned future. Tverview of tre detailed

elevant to th

pinion leadeworldviews

ompensationf a preferred

following d

an this sequeholders fo

his analysis der Dialogu

blog themes

7

nd kSafe

m nd safety The he entire

e future

ers in s and n and d future.

diagram:

uence llowing a is the e

s

Research

tbp

The pathprovides

FIG

4. M

4.1 H

The Hor

Wet'p

Wa

Wr

Over a mfutures wMore infcompens

h Report No.

hrough synboth the Hopresented in

h of knowles the framew

GURE 2. P

METHOD

HORIZON

rizon Scann

What are thenvironmenransport, sapush' factor

What is the and knowled

What are threcovery an

million referwebsites, wformation issation and

0811-017-R

thesising, arizon Scannn this Repor

dge flows thwork for the

PATH OF K

DS

SCANNIN

ning Project

e global futt, political, lafety, comprs)

current statdge transfe

e preferred d knowledg

ences werewith addition

available inrecovery

R2

at the end oning Projectrt).

hrough the e analysis in

KNOWLEGI

NG PROJE

posed the f

ure trends iegal and et

pensation, re

tus of healthr fields? ('w

futures in hge transfer f

e found throal referencen the longerFinal report

of the Futuret and the St

Initiative is n this Repor

GE FLOWINITIATIVE

ECT

following qu

in social, tethical (STEEecovery and

h, work, traweight' facto

health, workfields? ('pul

ough searches identifiedr companiot on the ISC

es Researchtakeholder

shown in thrt.

S IN THE E

uestions in

chnologicalEPLE) aread knowledg

nsport, safers)

k, transport,l' factors)

hes of databd by a referen report Th

CRR Future

P

h Initiative, Dialogue Pr

he following

FUTURES

a data sear

/scientific, eas, and in hee transfer fi

ety, compen

, safety, com

bases, Googence panel he futures os Research

Page 6 of 27

the outputsroject (the a

g diagram, a

S RESEAR

rch:

economic, ealth, work,fields? (so-c

nsation, rec

mpensation

gle, journalsand projec

of safety, h Initiative.

7

s from analysis

and

RCH

, called

covery

n,

s, and t staff.

Research

4.2 S

Warm-u

Three wkey indivbased m

Online d

'Thoughgroups oability to

The blog(see AppISCRR Finform pby ISCR

Futures

The worcompensdesignedProfessoa panel nine theWorkshorecovery

FtAIg

h Report No.

STAKEHO

up worksho

warm up worviduals in th

methodology

discussion

t Leaders' wof contributoo think broad

gs remainedpendix 4 of Futures Resreparation f

RR and pres

s Workshop

rkshop, whicsation and d to be infoor Sohail Indiscussion mes alreadop exercisey. Exercise

Futures Whhe wheel a

Appendix 11SCRR Futu

generic futu

0811-017-R

LDER DIA

ops

rkshops wehe stakeholdy.

n (blogs)

were engagors, and to pdly and insp

d open fromThe future

search Initiafor the Futu

sented at th

p

ch brought recovery rermation-richayatullah, awith Thougy identified s to develos included:

eel: a form and produce1 of The futures Researres wheel is

R2

ALOGUE

re held for Tder organis

ged to introdparticipate ipire others i

m Septembes of safety, ative) was pures Workshe Workshop

together keegulators, Mh and to stima video prepht Leaders as a result p scenarios

of mind-maes a radial ptures of saferch Initiatives shown be

TAC, WorkSations to th

duce blogs oin discussioin discussio

er to Octobe compensaprovided to hop. Nine kp.

ey experts aMonash Univmulate debapared for theon the outcof the blog

s of possible

apping whicpattern of pfety, compee for more delow:

Safe and Me Initiatives

on each of ton. The leaon.

er 2010. A tion and recThought Le

key themes

and stakehoversity and ate. It inclue Initiative ocomes of th discussione futures in

ch places anprimary/seconsation anddetails on th

P

onash Univs aims and

the 11 topicders were s

summary ocovery Fineaders and from the bl

olders from sother organded a prese

on compense blog onlins were usesafety, com

n issue or trondary/tertiad recovery he futures w

Page 7 of 27

versity to intfutures stud

c areas to sselected for

of the blog onal report o the ISCRRlogs were id

safety, nisations, wentation by sation futurne discussiod as a basi

mpensation

rend at the cary impacts Final repowheel proce

7

troduce dies-

elected r their

outputs n the

R team to dentified

as futurist es, and ons. The s for and

centre of s. (See ort on the ess). A

Research

Stadoasrps

Bma

Swe

1Fawkes,TrobeUni

h Report No.

Scenarios: irends acros

and recoverdevelopmenof longer terasked to destrategy in trealise this sprevent the so the scena

Backcastingmake a prefand a timelin

Scoping reswere asked establish an

S(2009).Howiversity.

0811-017-R

FIGUR

nternally coss a range ory Final rent is used inrm strategy epen their shis scenarioscenario? 3realisation ario has a g

g: identifyinferred scenane of neces

search questo scope cr

n order of pr

wandwhyfut

R2

RE 3. GEN

onsistent poof fields (se

eport on then the private

developmescenarios bo? 2. What

3. What are of this scen

greater poss

g the eventario a realityssary milest

stions: folloritical researiority.

turesstudiesa

NERIC FU

ortrayals of ee Appendixe ISCRR Fue sector, anent 1. Scenaby respondin

are the narthe narrativ

nario? 4. In sibility of be

ts and trendy, the stratetones leadin

owing the baarch questio

areusedinhe

UTURES W

possible futx 9 of The ftures Resead increasingario groupsng to the qurratives, stoves, stories what ways

eing realised

ds which woegic pathwang up to the

ackcasting eons and allo

ealthpolicym

P

WHEEL

ture states, futures of saarch Initiativgly in the puin the Futu

uestions: 1. ries, metapand metapcan you re-d or avoided

ould need toays to realize scenario.

exercise, Wcate votes t

aking.Unpub

Page 8 of 27

which integafety, compve). Scenaublic sector

ures WorkshWhat is the

phors, that cphors that ca-script the nd?

o have transzing the sce

Workshop grto each que

lishedPhDth

7

grate pensation ario r, as part hop were e core can help an narrative

spired to enario,

roups estion to

esis.La

Research

4.3 I

ISCRR athe FutuInitiative

R P

a

Tp

TS

At

Pt

ISCRRsand in th

This RepDialoguein the saattention

Below iscompone

h Report No.

SCRR AN

analyses, pures Researe. ISCRRs

Review and

Preparation articles

The analysispresented to

The synthesScanning Pr

A summary his Report

Preparation his Report.

s contributiohe compani

port builds oe Project. Iafety, compen to the imp

s an overvieents of the

0811-017-R

ALYSIS A

resentationrch Initiativeactivities in

cataloguin

and publica

s of blog poo the Future

sis of outpuroject which

of feedback

of technica

ons throughon reports l

on the outpt highlights ensation anortant conn

ew of the HoFutures Re

R2

AND REPO

s and repore, culminatinncluded:

g of Horizon

ation of the

ostings and es Worksho

ts from bothh is present

k received o

al and other

hout the Futlisted at the

uts of the Hthe domina

nd recovery nections bet

orizon Scanesearch Initi

ORTS

rts enabled ng in this Re

n Scan data

Annotated

developmeop

h the Staketed in this R

on the Futu

r reports on

ures Reseae end.

Horizon Scaant themes futures cantween them

nning, Stakeative.

transitionseport which

a into 11 top

Bibliograph

ent of nine e

holder DialoReport

res Resear

the Futures

arch Initiativ

anning Projein writings onvassed by

m.

eholder Dia

P

between thh synthesize

pic areas

hy of selecte

emerging th

ogue Projec

rch Initiative

s Initiative li

ve are prese

ect and the on global/nastakeholde

logue and I

Page 9 of 27

he various ses the outpu

ed Horizon

hemes which

ct and the H

e, presented

isted at the

ented in this

Stakeholdeational futurers, then dra

SCRR anal

7

stages of uts of the

Scan

h was

Horizon

d later in

end of

s Report

er res and aws

lysis

Research

FIG

5. OCONT

5.1 O

Of the oexpertiseacross 1

h Report No.

GURE 4. O

OUTCOMTEXT

OUTPUT

ne million ae in occupa11 areas of

1. The fut

2. The fut

3. The fut

4. The fut

5. The fut

6. The fut

7. The fut

8. The fut

9. The fut

10. The fut

11. The fut

0811-017-R

OVERVIEW

ME OF H

articles geneational healtinterest:

ture of disa

ture of heal

ture of work

ture of indiv

ture of occu

ture of tech

ture of susta

ture of corp

ture of avoid

ture of at ri

ture of trans

R2

W OF FUTU

HORIZO

erated by thth and safet

bility and re

th

k

vidual respo

upational he

nology

ainability

orate socia

ding uninten

isk sub gro

sport.

URES RES

ON SCAN

he horizon sty and road

ehabilitation

onsibility ver

ealth and sa

al responsib

nded harm

oups

SEARCH I

NNING:

scan, 650 w traffic injur

n service de

rsus the we

afety

ility

in compens

P

INITIATIVE

THE GL

were revieweies. The pa

livery mode

elfare state

sation syste

Page 10 of 2

E ACTIVIT

LOBAL

ed by a pananel shortlis

els

ems

27

TIES

nel with sted 183

Research

The innowritten uBrief No

An annoFutures report). the full te

5.2 A

ISCRR hdominanvariouslychange, step chapresent)in these

tfo

tp

The two framed fand inte

2Posturesresponse,presponsibilorganizatioCulturalPhJournalofM

h Report No.

ovative dataup in a sepa: 1010-011-

otated biblioResearch AThis bibliogext of the re

ANALYSIS

has since ant themes. y concernedresource s

anges in tec). Ensuring future worl

he kind of lefocused (for

he kind of cproactive or

diagrams bfirstly withinrests-based

spertaintotheposturerelatesitybutfightingoncananticipathases:ACriticalManagementR

0811-017-R

a text miningarate report -R1B.

ography of thAnnotated Bgraphy waselevant artic

S

nalyzed theThis analysd with two mhortages an

chnology whthe wellbei

ds would de

eadership wr example n

cultural appr reactive.

below summn the two pod models of

eorganizationstohowtheresagainstitandteitsresponsibReviewandaC

Reviews,online

R2

g methodolHorizon Sc

he 183 articBibliography included incles.

e articles witsis showed main global nd social dihich would ming of populepend on:

which emergationalist o

roach or po

marise the fostures reaf leadership

scharacterinitsponseismadedwithaproactiility.FromMaConsolidativeM10.1111/j.1468

ogy used incanning Pro

cles was prey, October n the ISCRR

thin each othat researcprospects: sruption) anmake the fulations the

ged - cooper corporatis

osture2 to

futures enviactive and p

p:

sinteractions,[Forexamplevestance,[anoaon,F.,A.LindgModelofCorpo82370.2009.00

n the Horizooject techni

epared and2010, web

R online blo

f these areachers, expeenvironme

nd a hi-techuture dramaeir livelihoo

erative and st); and

owards the f

saged in thproactive

soratherthane]adefensiveporganization]agreen&V.SwaerateSocialRes0278.x,p.26.

P

on Scanningcal review,

published address at g site for ea

as by codingerts and comntal crisis (r

h new worldatically differd, health, s

collaborativ

future ant

e Horizon Sand then by

characterizingtostureisassocidoptsapostureen2010,'OrganponsibilityDeve

Page 11 of 2

g Project ha ISCRR Re

by ISCRR (the end of tach topic al

g them accmmentatorsresulting in d (resultingrent from thecurity and

ve or intere

ticipatory an

Scan articley the coope

thenatureoftiatedwithadmefromwhichthnizationalStageelopment',Inte

27

as been esearch

(ISCRR this ong with

cording to s were habitat from

he equity

sts-

nd

s, erative

hemittingheesandernational

Research

FIGUR

The tenscultures focused

h Report No.

FIGURE

RE 6. GLO

sions evidenare also evon the futu

0811-017-R

5. GLOBA

OBAL FUT

nt in the Hovident in there of safety

R2

AL FUTUR

TURES: C

orizon Scane outcomes y, compensa

RES: PROA

COOPERAT

ning Projecof the Stak

ation and re

ACTIVE V

TIVE VER

ct between dkeholder Diaecovery.

P

VERSUS R

SUS INTE

different opealogue discu

Page 12 of 2

REACTIVE

ERESTS-B

erating modussed below

27

ASED

dels and w, which

Research

6.0 TS

Each of the Horizblog site

The blogsummarwere prefollowing

12

3

4

56

789

These threcoverydata can

h Report No.

TRANSITSCAN O

the blogs ezon Scanni

e, as well as

g discussionry of the posepared for Tg nine them

1. Universa2. Greater

harm of 3. Increase

clients th4. Broader

evidence5. New wa6. New rela

business7. Technol8. Diversity9. System

hemes reprey. Their conn be seen in

0811-017-R

TION: OUTPUTS

established ng Project.

s the annota

ns generatestings whiThought Lea

mes which cu

al care and focus on nocompensat

ed engagemhrough consr ways of mee base ys of assesationships (s, unions, wogical chany as the norintegration.

esent aspecnnection witn the followi

R2

ONLINE S

by ISCRR d Horizon Sc

ated bibliog

ed a total of ich focusedaders. An Iut across th

support foron-financialtion scheme

ment with wosumer empeasuring su

ssing and m(partnershipworkers, comnge paced brm equity .

cts of a prefth the optiming diagram

BLOG D

discussed ocan articlesraphy of all

f 105 postind on futures ISCRR anahe 11 topic a

r disability l needs, espes orkers throu

powerment iuccess in im

managing risps and collammunities, by social chas the chal

ferred optimmistic globalm:

DISCUSS

one of the 1s in the topic 183 selecte

gs contribuof safety, clysis of the areas:

pecially emo

ugh the emin care syst

mproving he

sks dealinaborations): including glange: reclalenge

mistic future futures aris

P

SIONS O

1 areas of ic area wereed articles.

ted by 73 incompensatioblog discus

otional, to re

ployment reems alth of socie

g with emergovernmen

lobally iming huma

e for safety, sing from th

Page 13 of 2

ON HOR

interest idene posted on

ndividuals. on and recossions ident

reduce unin

elationship a

ety, needs a

rging risks nts, NGOs,

anity

compensathe Horizon S

27

RIZON

ntified in each

A overy tified the

tended

and with

an

tion and Scan

Research

7.0 F

7.1 S

The blogStakehothe follow

G

G

G

G

G

G

G

G

h Report No.

FIG

FUTURE

SCENARIO

g themes foolder Dialogwing propos

Group 1:

Group 2:

Group 3:

Group 4:

Group 5:

Group 6:

Group 7:

Group 8.

0811-017-R

GURE 7.

ES WOR

O DEVELO

ormed the bue the Fusitions abou

Diversity

New wayeg nanot

Greater f

30% of s

Broader society

Universa

Employm

New par

R2

GLOBAL

RKSHOP

OPMENT

asis for discutures Workut the future

y is embrace

ys of assesstechnology

focus on em

scheme bud

ways of me

al care and

ment based

rtnerships a

FUTURES

P: SCENA

cussion by kshop - and e which the

ed by the sc

sing and mand genom

motional an

dget is prev

easuring sc

support for

on trust

and relations

S AND BLO

ARIOS

groups in ththe develogroups had

cheme (peo

anaging rismics

d mental ne

ention

heme succe

disability

ships in the

P

OG THEM

he next stagpment of scd identified:

ople are mo

ks, especia

eeds

ess in impro

system.

Page 14 of 2

ES

ge of the cenarios ba

ore valuable

ally emergin

oving the he

27

sed on

e)

g risks

ealth of

Research

Some offigure be

Other grsector:

p u p in b m

Another following

Dm

F T S

c

h Report No.

f the groupselow:

F

roups gener

prevention vuniversal copublic/ influendependenboom vs. bumarket drive

group examg drivers:

Demographymigration Financial anTechnologySocial Adocommunities

0811-017-R

s developed

FIGURE 8.

rated scena

vs. compenoverage vs. ence vs. scit authority/

ust ers vs. socia

mined the tr

y: Increase

nd economic: changing topting a haps.

R2

d best case

BEST AN

arios using c

sation work/ road ience/ evideregulation a

al drivers.

rend of dive

d workforce

c pressure othe nature oppiness sca

e and wors

ND WORST

critical varia

injury coveence and control

ersity and de

e diversity fr

on the sociaof work andale for succe

st case scen

T CASE S

ables that p

erage

vs. commu

eveloped sc

rom an age

al support sd health neeess will driv

P

narios, sum

SCENARIO

oint to vario

unity society

cenarios fro

ing society

system: increds of technve changes

Page 15 of 2

mmarised in

OS

ous tensions

y/ collaborat

om each of t

and high n

reased self-no workersto work and

27

the

s in the

tion

the

et

-reliance. . d

Research

The pref

Pm

E S

t A M

The leas

R N D U

g L

le

Other iss

Nndin

Tw

A detailesafety, c

7.2 B

In ISCRRhad elabthe scendecisiongovernmpeople wcooperacharacte

Moreove'wait till acompenswhich ancompensacknowlpreventio

These ewhich pa

h Report No.

ferred scen

Prevention omeasured inEquity and vStocks (eg the system t

An informedMeasures o

st preferred

Reactive Not funded tDriven by inUnfocussedgreater focuLevels of disevels).

sues raised

New types onot have thedeveloped pnitiatives. There will powill be need

ed descripticompensatio

BIG IDEAS

Rs analysisborated a nunarios was tn-making to ment, unionswith disabilittive efforts

erising these

er, rather than injury/ hesation systenticipates fusation. Thiedgement oon, and bet

merging idearallel those

0811-017-R

arios gener

orientation in terms of, tvaluing peotrust, technothat suppor

d communityf performan

scenarios a

to address ncentives thd priorities aus on prevenssatisfaction

d in the deve

of communie same compolicy - the u

ossibly be oded after the

on of the scon and reco

S EMERGI

s of the outpumber of bthat there ismore collab

s and other ties and theof others ane conditions

an taking aealth probleem to reducuture demans preventiveof the interdtter harmon

eas thus idee identified

R2

rated by the

in a universthe developple (their diology, takinrt effectiveney/ society wnce of syste

also shared

broader scoat lead to e

and directionntion n among us

elopment of

ty partnershmmitment touse of scien

opportunitiee global fina

cenarios is covery Fina

ING FROM

puts of the ig ideas. O

s likely to beborative decnon-govern

eir carers. Ind are repres is that of a

risk-averseem happensce costs, in nds on the se posture wdependenceizing of all s

entify differein the globa

e eight grou

sal and integpment of indifferences, eg on of respess as well

where respoems to reflec

d a number

ope (eg meemphasis onn, especially

sers and po

f scenarios

hips, includo evidence-bnce (eviden

es arising froancial crisis

contained inal report on

M SCENAR

Futures WoOne of the be a shift fromcision-makinment organ this futureesented in pa jazz band

e, reactive as' then respa preferredsystem andwill entail the of physicasectors of th

ent leadershal Horizon S

ps shared a

grated systedividual andexperiencesponsibility) as efficienc

onsibility is sct the above

of themes:

ental health)n compensay missed op

oorer health

included:

ing those wbased polic

nce) might s

om the inno.

n the compathe ISCRR

RIOS

orkshop, it wbig ideas wm the dominng and actinisations, pe, citizens apartnership playing ha

approach wpond, and a d future therd focuses onhe systematal, social anhe health sy

hip models Scanning Pr

P

a number of

em that has communitys, capabilitieand flows (ecy shared e themes (a

) and therefoation pportunities

(individual

which are may seen in m

slow down th

ovation and

anion reporR Futures Re

was evidentwhich emergnance of goon between

professionaland other pls. The guidrmoniously

hich turns otightening o

re will be a pn preventiontic use of fod emotionaystem.

and approaroject:

Page 16 of 2

f themes:

s concern foy wellness es) eg informat

a healthy s

fore unsusta

s for develop

and comm

arket-drivenmodern govehe develop

re-building

rt The futuresearch Init

t that particiged stronglyovernment in industry, l organisatiolayers gain ding metaphtogether.

on the concof the proactive apn rather tha

oresight, an al aspects o

aches to the

27

or, and is

tion) in

ociety).

ainable

pment of

unity

n, may ernment-ment of

which

res of tiative.

ipants y from n

ons and from the hor

cept of

pproach an

f

e future

Research

C P

The Worsafety, ctimes tw

Econom

Econom

Econom

In times High netpeople tchange tequity isis diminiin-dema

Workplaconditiondistinguithere is for peop

Lower wWork hucommunto work f

3TheFinamoreactivAccessed

h Report No.

Cross-secto

Proactive/p

rkshop groucompensatio

wo extreme

mic boom:

mic bust:

mic boom

of economt migration so gain workthe demogr

s embraced shed. The nd employe

ace diversityns such as ishing pre-eindividual a

ple to take re

working hourubs evolve tnity life) andfrom home.

ncialTimesdeveandsucces8April2011.)

0811-017-R

oral collabor

preventive

ups also ackon and reco sets of con

More ressafety, c

Tighteninof compe

conditions

ic boom, emsupported bk (including raphic profilas the potewar for tale

ees.

y has implichearing los

existing fromand communesponsibility

rs are legislthat offer bed employers

efinesboomssfulandthen)

R2

rative partn

posture ve

knowledgedovery systemnditions:

sources avacompensatio

ng of resouensation sy

s

mployment by governmthose who

le of commuential for ement means

cations for ins and ment

m newly acqnity awareny.

lated and wenefits for ws (such as s

andbustasfosuddenlyfail

nership mo

ersus reacti

d that economs. Future

ailable for reon and reco

rces availabystems 3.

levels are hment policies

have been unities and

mployers to that workin

njury rates atal health prquired workness of the b

work/life balaworkers (sucsatisfied wo

ollows:Asituls(Source:ht

odel versus

ve/compen

omic condite economic

esearch, innovery system

ble for innov

high and wos, and oppolong term uworkplacesbe too spec

ng condition

and compenroblems are-related probenefits of a

ance is withch as reducrkers), and

uationinwhicttp://lexicon.f

P

governme

nsation-foc

tions are a mflux will pro

novation anms

vation, thre

orkforce shortunities for

unemployeds. People arcific about es favour the

nsation sche more prevoblems is coa safer life a

hin the reached travel timmore peop

chaneconomft.com/Term?

Page 17 of 2

nt-led mod

cused post

major influeoduce at diff

nd investme

at to sustai

ortages emer a diverse rd with disabre valued anemployee ae requireme

hemes. Agevalent and omplex. Hoand more in

h of the mame, connecple will have

myregularlybe?term=booma

27

del

ture.

ence on ferent

nt in

nability

erge. range of

bilities) nd ttributes

ents of

-related

owever nclination

ajority. tions to

e options

ecomesandbust.

Research

Econom

In times

I C

Mobility come to vulnerab

A more csets in foresourceand entemanagin

Below isleadershversus p

7.3 PAND BU

Prevent

One of ttowards traffic cr

Stakehowith worto manacompensrelated ienvironm

The Stakdisabilityeven duthe schecompens

4Atthetimbeingprov

h Report No.

mic bust c

of bust, the

ncreased d

Consequent

is reduced the fore as

ble populatio

command/cor several yes and increerprises. Song their reso

s an analysihip models preventive -

PREVENTUST

tive focus i

he drivers fa system oash-related

olders who wrk-related inge their dissation systellness, whe

ment, enviro

keholder Diy, but recogring boom

emes wouldsation to pr

meofthesedvidedforrefo

0811-017-R

conditions

ere are two

emands on

tly, rationing

and the pros societal strons and as

control type years. Thereeased self-societal bondources.

s of the Fut partnershin the futur

IVE VERS

in boom a

for a more pof universal d care syste

work in persnjury or illneabilities whems it has bre causatio

onmental fa

ialogue prodgnized that s

times, for ad have to berevention.

discussionsthiormofdisabili

R2

major drive

welfare an

g and a risk

ofile of popuress increasthe risk of j

economy, ee is a genersufficiency ads weaken

tures Workships versus re of econom

SUS COMP

and bust t

preventive acare ratherms from the

sonal injury ess or transpile people w

been possibn is usually

actors outsid

duced stronschemes coa broader rae associated

swasapromtycareandsu

ers:

nd personal

k-averse ap

ulation healtses, particujob losses l

even war-tral expectatat multiple land people

shop outputgovernmenmic flux des

PENSATIO

times

approach tor than the cue health car

compensatport-relatedwith disabilitble to definey multi-factode work, an

ng support fould not reaange of cond with a shif

inentissueinupportinAust

injury sche

proach to s

th risks chaularly amongooms.

time econotion of beingevels - indiv

e are forced

ts within thent led - and cscribed abo

ON FOCUS

o illness andurrent separe system.

tion are awad injuries recties from ote work-relatorial, includid personal

for universaalistically affnditions. Heft in emphas

thecommuntralia.

P

mes

ervices deli

anges. Mentg disadvant

omy, emergeg looked aftviduals, famto become

e frameworkcultural posve.

S IN TIME

d injury is a ration of wo

are of the inceiving suppher causes ted injuries, ng factors ffactors.

al care and sford to offer ence broadesis upstream

ityinthelead

Page 18 of 2

ivery.

tal health istaged and

es if a receter with few

milies, comme more self-r

k of the idenstures rea

ES OF BOO

foreseeableork-related a

nequity of pport to assis do not4. F but not wo

from the wo

support for r compensaening the scm from

duptomajor

27

ssues

ssion wer munities reliant in

ntified active

OM

e move and

people st them urther, in rk-

orking

tion, cope of

proposals

Research

Other faare increis becommonitorihealth efemploym

These fasafety, nof health

A prevenplay a siis embedyet mate

Shared rinnovativinterventcompensSocial inmetaphosafety-re

A bust to reducto safetyendeavo

Reactive

Where aan emphinjuries oas requihealth is

With thispreventiaccess icontinue

Below iswith a co

h Report No.

ctors will ineasingly woming increasng and manffects of iso

ment relatio

actors suppnot just workh are key dr

ntive responignificant rodded in newerialized.

responsibilive technolotion and presation syste

nnovation beor for this iselated risks

economy isce costs. Hoy emerges aours.

e/compens

a reactive aphasis in the once they hring major e

ssues), as a

s approach,ng 'repeat cnformation

e to increase

s a summaryontinued co

0811-017-R

fluence theorking remotsingly blurrenaging workolation. Thisnship based

ort the argukplace or verivers.

nse in both ole in better w technolog

ty for safetyogies. Indiveventive safems based ecomes a d the redesig(such as fa

s likely to prowever withas local indu

sation focu

pproach is tsystem on

have occurreexpenditureare the cons

, the prevencustomers'. that could ee, and in tim

y of a boomompensation

R2

scope of stely from maed. Remotekplace riskss and the ned less on co

ument for a ehicle safety

boom andassessing

gies, and inn

y is enablediduals assufety measuon measure

driver of tecgn of a planatigue, work

roduce safeh all stakehoustrial capa

us during b

taken and tassessing ted, rather th

es. Other hesequences o

ntion systemThere is un

empower peme of bust

m/bust futuren focus.

afety, companagers, ane work has s and incideeed to comontrol, and

combined sy, and one

d bust econrisk and monovation oc

d by individuume more pres, and aces that are hnological d

nes instrumk conditions

ety concernsolders focus

acity is re-bu

boom and b

he focus cothe specifichan on the ealth probleof non-work

m is given lenequal acceersonal decthe system

e which con

pensation and the bounimplications

ents, and forpete for talemore on tru

system addin which the

nomic condonitoring peccurs to solv

uals accessersonal res

ctively particmeaningfuldevelopmen

ment panel tos).

s in the shosed on prevuilt with safe

bust times

ontinues to c causes of holistic neems are negk and non-tr

ess emphasess to techncision makin

m may becom

ntrasts a pre

P

nd recoveryndary betwes for a prever new risks ent will bringust.

ressing unie psycho-so

itions enablrformance a

ve problems

s to quality ponsibility f

cipate in mo and importnts for preveo display da

rt term as mvention, a stety being bu

be on compwork and tr

eds of peoplglected (partransport inju

sis and is inenology and ng. Compenme unsusta

eventive/un

Page 19 of 2

y systems. een home aventive mod

such as meg about a n

iversal healocial determ

les technoloat all levelss which hav

informationfor early onitoring tant for them

vention. Theata concern

many enterptringent appuilt into all n

pensation, transport-relle which areticularly meuries.

effective in limited potensation costainable.

niversal care

27

Workers and work el in ental new

th and minants

ogy to . Safety

ve not

n via

m. e

ning

prises try proach new

there is ated e seen ental

ential to ts

e focus

Research

7.4 PBOOM

Partners

All sectoapplicatirelationsbecausethis areaoperatin

The infoaccess tmodels b(such asGovernmtheir size

Partners

Where pmateshredistrib

Trust incimplicati

h Report No.

FIGURE 9

PARTNERAND BUS

ships in a b

ors have moions. A movships and coe of the incra. Universag.

rmation-richto informatiobetween ens grants fromment regulae.

ships in a b

policy and sip rules asute resourc

creases as vons for safe

0811-017-R

9. SAFETYPR

SHIPS VEST

boom time

ore money tve to a full iooperation weased role

al access to

h environmeon and technterprises. m companie

ators are mu

bust time

trategy resp a response

ces including

various parety and reco

R2

Y, COMPEREVENTIV

ERSUS GO

e

to invest in information within partnof diverse pdata and k

ent featureshnology. RiIdeas are ges and workuch smaller

ponses are e to economg technolog

rties recognovery a w

ENSATIONVE VERSU

OVERNME

research an society is n

nerships. Nplayers in thknowledge is

s open soursk monitori

generated akplaces) leaas collabor

led by a ramic crisis, agies.

ise they areworkplace ba

N AND RECS REACTI

ENT LEAD

nd technoloneeded to e

New measurhe system, as sought, su

rce technolong apps and owned b

ad to big chration offers

nge of sectnd enterpris

e all in this ased on trus

P

COVERY FIVE

ERSHIP I

ogical develoenable consrement systand new resupporting a

ogies and faare developeby communanges deep

s the potent

ors throughses seek to

together. Tst and posit

Page 20 of 2

FUTURES

N TIMES

opment andstructive tems are research focu 'we' model

acilitates eqed via partnities smap in commutial for reduc

h partnershi share and

This has tive relation

27

:

OF

d

quired uses on of

qual nership all seeds nities. ctions in

ps,

nships is

Research

more likeenvironm

New wayexpenditindividuaenables curtailing

Improvevehicleshabits.

Governm

In this scthrough Big scale

In a bootechnolocell resebenefits disabiliti

Technolto the fothis scenmonitorsmeasurerepeatab

A significpartnerstechnolodriven (rby gover

Governm

In an enFor examselectiveadoptingscenario

Forced tlooks fortelemedapproacdominateassesse

h Report No.

ely to fosterment which

ys of assestures downals risk profthis area of

g personal f

ments in sa have built-

ment-leade

cenario, ratpartnershipe policy cha

m environmogical develearch, nanot

to the heales to gain im

ogy enablinre offering enario, costss performanes relevant ble.

cant differeships wouldogical develresponding rnment.

ment-leade

vironment omple, strateely applied. g a focused o is 'Centrel

to pursue opr technologiicine, requir

ch to underses, as it is w

ed.

0811-017-R

r a sense ofwill suppor

ssing and m. These inclfiles amongf innovationfreedoms a

afety emerg-in speed re

ership in a

her than pops, governmanges are p

ment, there opment andtechnology th and wellbmprovemen

ng remote pemploymen of health c

nce and meto a healthy

nce betwee, in a thrivinopment. Foto demand)

ership in a

of crisis, goegies such a

Governmeeconomic mink goes br

pportunitiesies that canre scaling-u

standing andwell establis

R2

f responsibit return to w

managing rislude develo

g governmen to be pursre addresse

e through inestrictions fo

boom time

olicy and strment steps inpossible and

is more govd applicatioand other b

being of thents in health

processes, snt and healtcare reduce.asures succy society tha

en the partnng economyor example ) if it is partn

bust time

overnment as more aggnt assumesmanagemeoke'.

s for doing bn reduce cosup to make ad respondinshed and its

ility to reducwork of thos

sks that will oping platforent and relevsued once thed in a colla

ntersectoraorcing drive

e

rategy respon as a confd strategic r

vernment inons. For exabiotechnoloe populationh and return

such as teleh care bene. Technologcess. Goveat are valid

nerships andy, influence the develonership-fun

leads the wgressive uss responsibent approach

business in sts. Some oan impact ong to a limites costs and

ce harm anse harmed i

contribute trms for shavant agencihe risks of eaborative pr

al partnershirs to adapt

onses beingident regularisk-taking is

nvestment inample, thereogies. Over n by enablinn to product

emedicine aefits for thosgy is used toernment is th, relevant, r

d governmeexpenditurepment of soded, and m

way by settinse of patentsility for lookh. A metap

a more cosof these, suon governmed range ofimpacts ca

P

d to offer ann the workp

to safety arering informaies. The trusexposing perocess.

ps, for examand change

g led by a raator to lead s in favour.

n scientific re are more itime, these

ng people wtive work.

and telecomse who are o reshape hhe leader inreliable, rea

ent-led mode on researolutions may

more evidenc

ng the ruless to stamp o

king after thephor for asp

st efficient wch as remo

ment spendinf health andan be more

Page 21 of 2

n enabling place.

e sought toation about st between

ersonal data

mple, motoe their drivin

ange of secpolicy and

research aninvestments investment

with particula

mmunicationhome-base

how governn developingalistic and

dels is that rch and y be more mce-based if

s for others out compete populationects of this

way, governote working ng. A medid safety issudirectly trac

27

keep

partners a and

r ng

ctors strategy.

nd s in stem ts bring ar

ns, come ed. In ment g

market-driven

to follow. ition are n,

nment and cal ues cked and

Research

Howevethe valuebusinessapproacsocial mbut tendsocial re

The follopartners

F

The prefand a prdiscussi

h Report No.

r stemminge of shiftingses. A portf

ches to prevmarketing str

to innovateesponses ar

owing is an ships-led sy

FIGURE 10

ferred safetreventive apons:

0811-017-R

g from the ng to a prevefolio approavention and rategies. Ree within currre initially w

overview ofstem for sa

0. SAFETYPARTNE

ty, compenspproach, ex

R2

eed for govntion-based

ach is prefersome big t

egulators tarent bounda

weak, in part

f boom/busfety, compe

Y, COMPEERSHIP VE

sation and rxpands upon

vernment tod overall aprred with soticket items

ake the leadaries. Promt because th

st futures wiensation an

ENSATIONERSUS GO

recovery futn the nine t

save monepproach to mome investms are suppod in innovatipts for broahere is little

th a governd recovery.

N AND REOVERNME

ture which chemes eme

P

ey, regulatomanaging risment acrossrted such aon in the en

ader popula money ava

ment-led ve

COVERY ENT-LED

combines a erging from

Page 22 of 2

ors eventualsk in their

s a variety oas highly visnvironment

ation health ailable.

ersus a

FUTURES

partnershipthe blog

27

ly see

of sible

of 'crisis' and

S:

ps model

Research

8.0 FI

Early in suggesteDialoguedata in 1which inDialogueapproacsustaina

The corrProject) DialogueScan andiscussienablingThe globwith Austrust. Cointo new

h Report No.

FIGURE

FUTUREN A NAT

the ISCRR ed key trene on safety,11 key areaformed the e outputs em

ches (versusability of sys

relations beand preferr

e Project), lnd the Stakeons. In the

g context forbal context wstralia in resollaborative

w approache

0811-017-R

11. PREV

ES OF STIONAL

Futures Reds and pos compensas, and analFutures Wo

mphasised s reactive astems.

etween prefered safety, cie in those a

eholder Dialse areas, thr foresight awill influenc

search, laboe work on pres to health

R2

VENTIVE P

AFETY,L AND G

esearch Initsible futures

ation and recysis of the borkshop. Bthe importand sectoral

erred nationcompensatiareas identlogue the here are opand preventce, and provour market mrevention unand safety

PARTNER

COMPEGLOBAL

iative, analys which procovery. Onlblog output

Both the Horance of proa approache

nal and globion and recoified at the nine theme

pportunities tion in safetvide opportumobility andndertaken i elsewhere

RSHIPS AN

ENSATIO CONTE

ysis of the Hovided the cline blog diss by ISCRRrizon Scan oactive, preves) for future

bal futures (overy futurecritical interes which emfor the globty, compensunities for cd skills, instn Australia in a world.

P

ND BLOG

ON ANDEXT

Horizon Scacontext for thscussions oR, indicated outputs andentive and e population

(from the Hoes (from thersection betmerged frombal future to sation and rcollaborationitutional trahas the pot

Page 23 of 2

THEMES

D RECOV

an outputs he Stakeho

on Horizon S nine strong

d the Stakehcollaborativn wellbeing

orizon Scane Stakeholdtween the H

m the online provide anrecovery syn and exchansparency tential to tra

27

VERY

older Scan g themes holder ve and the

nning er

Horizon e blog

ystems. ange and

anslate

Research

The folloHorizon Stakeho

FIGUR

The altepreventivinterestsnational consequculture osafety, cin bust upstream

9.0 ER

In envisain the FuThe backnowledquestion

h Report No.

owing table Scan article

older Dialog

E 12. INTCOMPEN

rnative worve and proas, and respointerests re

uences are of this futurecompensatiotimes, the s

m from com

EMERGIRESEAR

aging the mutures Workckcasting prdge needs idn was the su

0811-017-R

shows the es and the ue project.

ERSECTIONSATION A

rst case futactive approonsibility aneact to unanborne by ane impedes ron and recosystem is th

mpensation t

ING KNORCH AR

most importakshop also gocess, in wdentified, prubject of a v

R2

intersectionsafety, com

ON OF PRAND REC

ture replaceoach, with a

nd leadershinticipated gn increasingrather than overy. In bhreatened bto preventio

OWLEDGEAS

ant compongenerated a

which criticalroduced fivevote by part

n between tmpensation a

REFERREDCOVERY F

es global coa reactive cip left to govlobal changgly impoverenables preoom times

by a lack of on.

GE NEE

ents of theia set of knol paths to pre clusters oticipants to

he global fuand recove

D GLOBALUTURES A

ooperation aulture, the pvernment. ges with conrished goveeventive an, the governcooperative

EDS AND

r preferred owledge neereferred sce

of research qestablish a

P

utures envisry futures d

L FUTUREAT BLOG

and safety ppursuit of inIn this futurnflict and inernment systd collaboratnment is abe effort acro

D PRIOR

scenarios, eds over theenarios werquestions. n order of p

Page 24 of 2

saged in thedeveloped o

ES AND SATHEMES

partnershipsndependent re, sectoral efficienciestem. The gtive approa

ble to innovaoss sectors

RITY

stakeholdee next 25 yere describedEach resea

priority.

27

e over the

AFETY,

s, and a sectoral and , and the

global aches to ate, but to

r groups ears. d and arch

Research

9.1 I

Researcsystems

Researc

9.2 I

Researc

h Report No.

NDICATO

ch questionss what sho

What is tdrive it)? What do In relationsafety:

o Wo W

ch questions

What woumental) aIs there aOHS? (16What typsystem oWhat newthat matte

NTERVEN

ch questions

How can for you? What wouof injury?What arethe develWhat mainsight in

o Ho Th

(2

What is tWhat is tthe impacWhat lesscontext) tWhat willCan safe

0811-017-R

ORS AND M

s to developould be mea

he definition(15 votes) we want to n to drivers

What is the pWhat is the b

s to develop

uld constituand social oa positive co6 votes) e of evidenf safety/comw measureser to people

NTION RE

s to develop

general pra(40 votes) uld be an e

? (From wore the organislopment of akes people to:

ow to help (

he design a22 votes)

he impact ohe effectivects sustainasons can bethat work w change em

er outcomes

R2

MEASURE

p paradigmasured:

n of health a

measure ato change

psychology best means

p technica

ute an objecoutcomes? (orrelation be

ce do we nempensation/s could be ine and are le

SEARCH

p better pol

actitioners b

ffective wayrk or cars)? sational soca safe workwell/ what

(collective r

and adminis

of compensaeness of treaable? (10 voe learnt from

well? (10 votmployers ats arise from

ES

m definition

and safety w

and how do community

of safety?of educatio

al indicators

ctive set of m(29 votes) etween mea

eed (for ide/recovery)?ntroduced t

ess likely to

licy and pro

be trained to

y to change(26 votes)

cial/ culturak culture? (2contributes

responsibilit

stration of sc

ation on oveatment andotes) m collaborates) ttitude to divincreasing

ns of the p

we are aim

we want to paradigm t

on? (4 votes

s how the

measures to

asures of tr

entifying ind? (1 vote) that cover lebe dismiss

ogram inte

o know/ infl

e community

l/ historical 22 votes) s to wellness

ty) those wh

chemes tha

erall wellne what is its

ative models

versity? (6 vlevels of co

P

urpose and

ing for (or th

measure itto mutual a

s)

e system sh

o define hea

ust and me

icators and

ess tangibleed as soft s

erventions:

uenced to s

y attitudes t

facts that e

s, that can b

ho are not w

at reinforce t

ss? (18 votimpact on m

s (including

votes) ooperation a

Page 25 of 2

d boundaries

he culture w

t? (4 votes) accountabilit

hould be me

alth (physic

easures of g

measures

e aspects/ astuff(1 vote

say work is

to the accep

enable or im

be applied t

well?

this knowle

tes) mental heal

those from

and trust? (

27

s of

which will

ty for

easured:

cal /

good

in a new

aspects e).

s good

ptability

mpede

to gain

edge?

lth? Are

a global

2 votes)

Research

9.3 S

Researcrecovery

9.4 T

Researcdevelopm

9.5 S

Researc

9.6 S

Overall:

I Q S T S

The resuintervent

Researcwere the

h Report No.

What is k

o Ww

o Co R

What inteshow wha

SOCIAL R

ch questionsy systems.

What willWhat willHow shoumental heWhat bar

TRANSLAT

ch questionsment

How do wdevelopinHow do w

SYSTEM C

ch questions

What cap

SUMMARY

nterventionQuestions reSocial reseaTranslation System cap

ults indicatetions, both

ch on what ae next highe

0811-017-R

known abou

World modelorkers)

ommunity e

elevant mo

ervention reat does and

ESEARCH

s to assess

ingness /de the makeuuld we undeealth? (8 vorriers do em

TION RES

s to improve

we synthesing programwe translate

CAPACITY

s to strengt

pabilities do

Y

research welated to indarch was allresearch wacity resea

e a high priopolicy and p

aspects of sest priority a

R2

ut collaborat

s of employ

empowerme

dels of gove

esearch (thad does not w

H

the future

esire is therup of societyerstand the otes) mployers see

SEARCH

e the take u

se what wes? (7 votes

e new resea

Y RESEAR

then capac

o we need to

was given thdicators walocated 29 v

was allocatedrch was allo

ority amongprograms.

systems shoareas of res

tion in terms

yer / union e

ent

ernment / p

at does not work? (1 vo

context fo

re in commuy be in 2035 values and

e for divers

up of resea

e already kn)

arch better?

RCH

city of the s

o build a sa

he highest pas second hvotes d 11 votes ocated 1 vo

stakeholde

ould be mesearch.

s of:

engagemen

private enter

focus on risote)

r operating

unity to eng5? eg. migrad attitudes o

ity in the wo

arch in polic

now and tra

? (4 votes)

system for re

afer workpla

priority with ighest prior

ote.

ers for resea

asured (par

P

nt (especiall

rprise (1 vot

sk factors) c

safety, com

age in wellnation, gendeof the Victor

orkplace of

cy making a

nsfer it to th

esearch and

ce? (1 vote

158 votes rity with 70 v

arch which

radigm) and

Page 26 of 2

ly compens

te)

could be do

mpensation

ness? (11 ver, age (9 vrian populat

2035? (1 vo

and program

hose who a

d program

e)

votes

will improve

d how (tech

27

ation

ne to

and

votes) votes) tion to

ote)

m

re

delivery:

e

nical)

Research

Three brtrends, hstrength

Several informatrecoveryparticulaengagem

10. C

The ISCglobally,opened drawing critical a

The blogDialogueseeded Worksho

Finally, bresearchpreventioThese reimportan

11. O

ISCRR http://ww

Ellis N aFutures http://ww

Past, prWorksho

Horizon

Styliano 2010. Universi

Fawkes safety, cISCRR,

h Report No.

road areas how to transening of sy

of the question exchany futures. Rar included lment.

CONCLU

CRR Futures in safety, cup a spaceattention to

areas which

gs providede project. Fdiscussionsop with the

both global h questions on rather thesearch quent resource

OTHER

Futures Reww.iscrr.com

and FawkesWorkshop,

ww.iscrr.com

resent and fop, 27 Octo

n Scanning

u M. To strSchool of Pty, ISCRR R

S, Palmer JcompensatioAugust 201

0811-017-R

of researchslate researstems.

stions develge which lie

Research prlearning fro

USION

s Research compensati for conside

o the interseemerged fr

a transitionFrom analyss in the Futuglobal cont

context andwhich refle

han compenestions, andfor ISCRR

OUTPUT

esearch Annm.au/files/ne

S. Drivers27 Octobe

m.au/futures

future of Woober 2010

Project tech

rike a balanPhilosophicaResearch R

J, Inayatullaon and reco11

R2

h were givenrch findings

oped in thises at the introposals to m world les

Initiative haon and recoering safetyection of starom the blog

n from the Hsis of the bloures Worksext of the H

d stakeholdect the knownsation, on d the outputplanning an

TS FRO

notated Biblews/Annota

for futures r 2010, Pars_bibliog_p

orkSafe Vic

hnical review

ce: A histoal, Historica

Report No: 0

ah S, Burkeovery: Final

n less prioris into practic

s process otersection odevelop be

ssons in col

as enabled overy, and f

y and compeakeholders g discussio

Horizon Scaog discussiohop, and w

Horizon Sca

ders scenarwledge needanticipationts of the Fund its future

OM THE

liography, Oated_bibliog

in SCR: therliament Hopres.html

ctoria and T

w, ISCRR

ory of Victoral and Intern0611-018-R

e R, Miller M report on t

ty - researcce, and rese

ffer an oppoof global andetter policy a

laborative m

a scoping ofor its Victoensation futscenarios w

ons.

anning Projeons emergehich linked

an.

rio-buildingds of future n and foresigtures Initiat

e research a

PROJEC

October 201graphy_211

emes from use, Melbo

AC, video

Research B

ias workersnational Stu

R1B

M, Worland he ISCRR F

P

ch into sociaearch on ca

ortunity for td safety, coand programmodels and

of new and rian stakehotures in a glwith global f

ect to the Sted the nine the outputs

have genernew partneght rather thtive listed beagenda.

CT

10 02010.pdf

blogs. Preurne

presented a

Brief No: 10

scompensadies, Facul

P, Ellis N. Futures Res

Page 27 of 2

al conditionapacity

the kind of mpensation

m interventid employer/u

emerging isolders. It hlobal contexfutures in th

takeholder themes wh

s of the Futu

rated a set erships focuhan reactioelow, will be

esentation a

at ISCRR F

10-011-R1B

ation schemlty of Arts, M

The futuressearch Initia

27

s and

n and ons in union

ssues as xt, by he

ich ures

of used on n. e an

at ISCRR

utures

B

me, 1985 Monash

s of ative,