Riazi Daubert 1980

download Riazi Daubert 1980

of 6

Transcript of Riazi Daubert 1980

  • 8/16/2019 Riazi Daubert 1980

    1/6

    Ind Eng. Chem. Process

    Des.

    Dev. 1980, 79, 289-294

    28s

    a firm should or should not enter into the m anufacture of

    an existing chemical.

    T o use the proc edure , two pieces of information ar e

    required: (1) he demand curve for the product;

    (2)

    es-

    timates of the annual cost of manufacture. Using the

    above information, eq 4a a nd 4b ar e solved simultaneously

    an d a search over process unit sizes can be performed to

    find the size that maximizes profit under each market

    assumption (Cournot 's Implicit Collusion).

    In this m anne r, a range of process un it sizes along with

    estimates of mark et share, price, output, a nd profits can

    be determin ed for the firms. Tables similar to Tables VI1

    an d VI11 can also be prep ared which can serve the process

    designer as quick, qualitative guides for the characteriza-

    tion of firms' behavior on any specific chemical marke t th at

    the firm may be considering entering.

    By means of this procedure, more information is

    available for the dec:ision-making process withou t the usual

    assumptions t o estimate m arket shares an d production.

    Furth erm ore, the rule-of-thumb procedures

    so

    common in

    sett ing price are no t needed.

    We ca nnot conclude from our studi es which of the two

    assumptions, Implicit Collusion or Cournot's, describes

    bet ter t he m ark et behavior of the oligopolistic firms in the

    chemical process industr ies. Th e only way to test the

    validity of the tw o assump tions would be to compare their

    predictions with a ctual performance for a particular duo-

    poly. To d o this, the total cost equation must be derivable

    from th e process technical information and enough price

    history mu st be available to estimate a dem and curve at

    the time of decision. Th e equilibrium price and ind ustry

    ou tpu t plus each firm's ma rket sha re could then be com-

    pared w ith the actual situation . Of course, such a com-

    parison assumes that the f irms behave in an optimal

    fashion either by analysis or by experience.

    Acknowledgment

    The authors would like to acknowledge the financial

    support provided by the Latin American Scholarship

    Program of the A merican Universit ies (LASP AU), the

    Chemical Engineering Department of the University of

    Delaware, and the Universidad C atijlica Madre y Maes tra,

    Santiago, Dominican Republic. Th e authors are also most

    grateful for many helpful discussions with Professor Eri c

    Brucke r, Dean, College of Business an d Econom ics of th e

    University of Delaware.

    Literature Cited

    Bogaert,

    R.,

    M.ChE. Thesis, University of Delaware, Newark, DE, 1979.

    Cohen, K . J.; Cyert, R. M Theory of the Firm: Resource Allocation in a Market

    Leftwich,

    R.

    H. The Price System and Resource Allocation , 5th ed.; The

    Miller, R.

    L.

    Intermediate Microeconomics , M&aw-Hill: New York, NY, 1978;

    Von Neumann, J.; Magenstern, 0. Theory of

    Games

    and Economic Behavior ,

    Wei, J.;

    Russell,

    T. W. F.; Swartzhnder, M. W. The Structure of the Chemical

    Economy , Prentice-Hall: Englewocd Cliffs, NJ, 1965; p 138.

    Dryden Press: Hinsdaie, IL, 1973; p 9.

    p 293.

    Princeton University Press: Princeton, NJ, 1953; Chapter 1.

    Processing Industries , McGraw-Hill: New York, NY, 1979;

    p

    52.

    Rece iv ed f o r reuiew June 26, 1979

    Accep t ed

    November

    26, 1979

    Predict ion of the Composit ion

    of

    Petroleum Fractions

    Mohiammad

    R.

    Riazi and Thomas E. Dauber l

    Department

    o

    Chemical Engineering, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, Pennsylvania 16802

    Based on t h e composition of defined hydrocarbon mixtures, an a ccura te, generalized method is proposed to predict

    t h e firactional composition of paraffin s, naphthenes, and aromatics contained in both light and heavy petroleum

    frac tion s. Viscosity, spec ific gravity, and refractive

    index of t h e desired

    fraction are

    used

    a s

    input

    parameters.

    Introduction

    In prediction of physical and thermodynam ic properties

    of petroleum fractions

    it

    i s impor tan t to de termine the

    proportion of paraffinic, naphthenic, and aromatic hy-

    drocarbons present

    in

    the fraction (H uang and Daubert ,

    1974; Riazi, 1979). Since the comp osition of petroleum

    fractions is not usually experimentally determined, de-

    velopment of a reliable metho d to es timate molecular type

    analysis is qu ite necessary.

    Many methods have been developed to predict the

    percentage of paraffins, naphthen es, and aromatics in an

    olefin-free petroleum fraction. Th e most common proce-

    dures are the n d llf method and the refractivity-inter-

    cept-density method The n d M method of Van Nes and

    Van W esten (1951) fo r estim ating the percentage carbon

    as aromatic, naphthenic, or paraff inic structure from

    measured values of density, refractive index, sulfur content,

    and molecular weight is a set of empirical equations at 20

    or

    70 C.

    Th e refractivity-intercept-density meth od of Kurtz et

    al. (1958) is a triangular graphical relation between per-

    centage carbon as arom atic, naph thenic , or paraffinic;

    refractivity intercept

    ( R J ;

    nd density. Thi s method re-

    quires tha t the arom atic percentage m ust be known.

    A number of other procedures have been discussed in

    various sources (Boelhower et al., 1954; Ku rtz e t al., 1958,

    1936,1937; Van Nes and V an Westen, 1951; Waterman et

    al., 1958). However, all of the existing metho ds are useful

    only for high-boiling virgin fractions a nd are acc urate only

    for data on which the m ethod is based. The main purpose

    of this work was to develop a general meth od t o predict

    mole fraction of paraffinic, naphthe nic, or arom atic com-

    poun ds for light and heavy fract ions which is not based

    on the composition of a certain group of petrole um frac-

    tions.

    Development

    If

    the mole fraction of paraffins, nap hthen es, an d aro-

    matics for an olefin-free petroleum fraction are defined as

    980 American Chemical Society

    196-4305/80/1119-0289$01.00/0

  • 8/16/2019 Riazi Daubert 1980

    2/6

    290

    Table

    I.

    Ind.

    Eng.

    Chem. Process Des. Dev., Vol.

    19, No.

    2, 1980

    Values of Characterization Factors in Figure 1

    value range

    hydrocarbon type M Ri VGC K I

    Daraffin 331-535 1.048-1.05 0.74-0.75 13.1 -13.5 0.267-0.27 3

    Aapht hene

    2

    4 8-4 29

    1.03-1.046

    aromatic 180-395 1.07-1 lo 5

    xp,x,, and x respectively, three expressions for prediction

    of these thr ee unknowns can be developed. Th is requires

    a set of three in depen dent equation s relating xp,

    x

    and

    x,

    to each other and some other known parameters. Th e

    first equation is the obvious molar balance.

    xp+ x,

    +

    x,

    =

    1

    1)

    Th us, two more equations are needed. In development of

    these equations, it is necessary that properties of petroleum

    fraction be related t o the p roper ties of each homologous

    hydrocarbon g roup by a mixing rule, the simplest of which

    is Kay’s rule. Therefore, at least two parameters are

    needed to develop the two equations.

    In order to predict t he composition of petroleum frac-

    tions w ith reasonable accuracy, fractions are divided into

    two molecular weight ranges-viscous fraction s (200

    < M

    <

    500) and light fractions

    ( M

    <

    200). It should be noted

    that these molecular weight range values are approximate

    values.

    1. Viscous

    Fractions

    Among different characteriza-

    tion factors proposed in t he literature, refractivity intercept

    (Ri) and viscosity gravity cons tant (VGC ) were chosen for

    developm ent of the two equations to use with eq 1. In

    selection of these two parameters, it was a t tempted to

    choose a parameter which can best se parat e different ho-

    mologous hydrocarbon groups. Refractivity interc ept

    (Kurtz and Ward, 1936, 1937) is defined by

    R i = n -

    d

    2

    -

    The VGC is defined by Hill and Coats (1928) as

    1 0 s 1.0752 log (VI - 38)

    (3)

    (4)

    in which Vl and V, are Say bolt universal viscosities at 100

    an d 210 OF, respectively. Equ ation s 3 and 4 give ap-

    proximately the same value for VGC of a given hydro-

    carbon . Since in the ab ove equations viscosity is defined

    as

    Saybolt universal (SSV viscosity, therefore the y cannot

    be used for light hydrocarbons (approximately M 180).

    Figure 1and Table

    I

    show a comparison between Ri and

    VGC with two other characterization factors: Watson

    K

    and a factor

    I

    proposed by Huang (1977). Parameter

    I

    is

    a fun ction of only refractive index.

    VGC

    =

    10 - log (V, 38)

    S 0.24 0.022 log (V, 35.5)

    0.755

    GC =

    n - 1

    I = -

    n

    +

    2

    (5)

    From Figure

    1

    it is obvious that R i and VGC separate

    paraff ins, naphthenes, an d aromatics better th an either

    of the o ther two parame ters. Also, Ri and VGC vary over

    a small range when compared with

    K

    and

    I .

    This indicates

    th at a single value for Ri, for instance , can characterize Ri

    values for all paraffin s. Da ta on viscosity, refractive index,

    and density of heavy hydrocarbons were taken from AP I

    Research Project 42 (1962). For heavy

    ( M

    > 200) hydro-

    carbon s, average values of R i and VGC for each homolo-

    gous hydro carbo n group were estimated . Values of 1.0482,

    0.89-0.94

    10.5-13.2 0.278-0.308

    0.95-1.13 9.5-12.53 0.29 8-0.362

    c 3 2 N

    A

    1

    I

    I I

    I

    I

    I

    I

    I

    I I

    1 0 4 I

    Ob

    oa

    I 0 2

    R

    1 A I

    I I I I I I I I I I

    0

    9

    I O 1 0 8

    GC 1

    0 7 o a 4

    I N

    I

    A i El

    K I

    I

    I I

    I

    I I

    I I

    I

    I

    9

    10

    12

    13

    I 4

    1

    I

    lpl I

    A

    I

    I L I I I I I I I I

    1

    0 2b

    o

    2a 0

    30

    0 32 0 34 0

    36

    Figure 1. Comparison of different characterization factors (see

    Table

    I).

    1.038, an d 1.081 were obta ined for the average Ri of pa -

    raffins, naphthene s, aro matics, while values of 0.744,0.915,

    and 1.04 were obtained for the average VGC of paraffins,

    naph thene s, and aromatics, respectively. By using Kay’s

    mixing rule, Ri and VGC of an olefin-free petroleum

    fraction can be obtained by the following equations

    Ri = 1 . 0 4 8 2 ~ ~1 . 0 3 8 ~ ~1 . 0 8 1 ~ ~ (6)

    VGC

    =

    0 . 7 4 4 ~ ~0 . 9 1 5 ~ ~1 . 0 4 ~ ~ (7)

    A

    regression of 33 defined hydrocarbon mixtures changes

    the co nstants in these equations less than 2% . Various

    compositions of these ternary systems were used-n-oc-

    tadecane(P)-2-butyl-l-hexahydrindan(N)-2(ar),

    -d i -

    methyl-3-octyltetralin(A);n-octadecane(P)-1-a-decalyl-

    pentadecane(N)-2(ar) ,

    6-dimethyl-3-octyltetralin(A);

    and

    n-octadecane P)-9 -as-perhydroindacenylheptadecane-

    (N)-11-a-naphthyl-10-heneicosene(A)-where , N , a n d

    A refer to paraffin, naphthene, and aromatic, respectively.

    After regression, eq 6 and 7 become

    (8)

    (9)

    Ri and VGC equa tions together with eq

    1

    can then be

    solved simultaneously to obtain equations for

    xp,

    x an d

    x, which can then be used to predict the composition of

    viscous fractions

    ( M

    > 200)

    if

    Ri and VGC are

    known.

    Th e

    final results after simultaneous solution of eq 1,8, an d 9

    may be summarized as follows

    (10)

    (11)

    (12)

    2. Light Fractions As mentioned earlier for light

    petroleum fractions the VGC canno t be calculated as de-

    f ined by eq 3 and 4. I t was attempted t o define a new

    Ri

    =

    1 . 0 4 8 6 ~ ~1 . 0 2 2 ~ ~1 . 1 1 ~ ~

    VGC = 0 . 7 4 2 6 ~ ~0 . 9 ~ ~1 . 1 1 2 ~ ~

    xP

    =

    9.00 + 12.53Ri 4.228VGC

    X = 18.66 19.90Ri + 2.973VGC

    X

    = 8.66 + 7.37Ri

    +

    1.255VGC

  • 8/16/2019 Riazi Daubert 1980

    3/6

    Ind. Eng. Chem. Process Des. Dev.,

    Vol. 19,

    No. 2,

    1980

    291

    Table 11. Data on the Composition

    of

    Light Petroleum Fractions'

    1

    2

    3

    4

    5

    6

    7

    8

    9

    10

    11

    12

    1 3

    1 4

    15

    1 6

    17

    18

    1 9

    20

    21

    22

    23

    24

    25

    26

    27

    28

    29

    30

    31

    32

    33

    34

    35

    36

    37

    38

    39

    40

    41

    42

    no.

    M Tb d n S

    0.7322 1.4 074 0.736502

    131

    144

    120

    142

    162

    227

    214

    126

    129

    162

    127

    157

    171

    1 5 3

    127

    1 3 3

    130

    127

    162

    132

    1 6 1

    130

    126

    166

    161

    137

    130

    166

    137

    1 3 3

    127

    1 3 3

    165

    1 5 4

    165

    157

    160

    137

    1 3 3

    130

    170

    196

    28 2

    321

    260

    32 2

    404

    547

    535

    297

    306

    39 7

    298

    385

    417

    385

    29 7

    315

    30 4

    29 5

    39 2

    303

    40 5

    312

    30

    0

    406

    397

    329

    307

    40 5

    329

    316

    297

    317

    40 3

    37 2

    40 3

    38 5

    39 2

    329

    318

    307

    41 7

    0.77 33

    0.8008

    0.7358

    0.7586

    0.8045

    0.8578

    0.8433

    0.7517

    0.7701

    0.799

    0.769

    0.801

    0.810

    0.786

    0.7637

    0.762

    0.759

    0.752

    0.788

    0.759

    0.792

    0.763

    0.763

    0.808

    0.806

    0.782

    0.775

    0.805

    0.778

    0.7740

    0.77

    0.767

    0.786

    0.779

    0.797

    0.7915

    0.793

    0.7756

    0.7711

    0.7671

    0.799

    1.4335

    1.4436

    1.4188

    1.4260

    1.4444

    1.4776

    1.4694

    1.428

    1.434

    1.4463

    1.433

    1.447

    1.45

    1.444

    1.4301

    1.435

    1.4325

    1.427

    1.449

    1.424

    1.45

    1.4345

    1.4343

    1.4485

    1.45

    1.437

    1.4352

    1.448

    1.437

    1.4354

    1.4328

    1.4365

    1.443

    1.4398

    1.4457

    1.444

    1.4442

    1.4382

    1.4356

    1.4378

    1.4464

    0.7774

    0.8046

    0.7395

    0.7624

    0.8083

    0.8616

    0.847 5

    0.7555

    0.7740

    0.803

    0.7725

    0.805

    0.816

    0.7899

    0.7675

    0.7658

    0.7628

    0.7558

    0.792

    0.7628

    0.796

    0.7668

    0.7668

    0.8121

    0.8101

    0.786

    0.7789

    0.809

    0.7819

    0.7779

    0.77 39

    0.7709

    0.7899

    0.7829

    0.8

    0.7955

    0.797

    0.7795

    0.775

    0.771

    0.8025

    composition

    v210

    X P Xn

    X a

    0.364 0.362 0.582 0.056

    0.444

    0.525

    0.414

    0.503

    0.739

    1.239

    1.179

    0.464

    0.520

    0.7

    1

    0.555

    0.75

    0.83

    0.78

    0.535

    0.51

    0.47

    0.458

    0.700

    0.52

    0.74

    0.508

    0.50

    0.79

    0.76

    0.60

    0.55

    0.74

    0.557

    0.530

    0.516

    0.515

    0.753

    0.665

    (1.43)

    (1.27)

    (1.33)

    (0.92)

    (0.87)

    (0.83)

    (1.55)

    0.397

    0.186

    0.619

    0.593

    0.309

    0.298

    0.388

    0.605

    0.490

    0.375

    0.420

    0.300

    0.260

    0.538

    0.500

    0.665

    0.650

    0.655

    0.580

    0.510

    0.563

    0.656

    0.637

    0.285

    0.295

    0.390

    0.420

    0.365

    0.455

    0.475

    0.510

    0.600

    0.590

    0.600

    0.420

    0.435

    0.425

    0.460

    0.490

    0.500

    0.420

    0.396

    0.698

    0.306

    0.308

    0.643

    0.456

    0.415

    0.135

    0.315

    0.440

    0.390

    0.495

    0.525

    0.181

    0.270

    0.170

    0.170

    0.170

    0.225

    0.395

    0.187

    0.171

    0.174

    0.505

    0.495

    0.415

    0.400

    0.455

    0.350

    0.320

    0.310

    0.150

    0.200

    0.190

    0.405

    0.385

    0.395

    0.320

    0.295

    0.290

    0.410

    0.205

    0.106

    0.076

    0.099

    0.048

    0.233

    0.172

    0.260

    0.195

    0.185

    0.190

    0.205

    0.215

    0.281

    0.230

    0.165

    0.180

    0.175

    0.195

    0.095

    0.250

    0.173

    0.189

    0.210

    0.210

    0.195

    0.180

    0.180

    0.195

    0.205

    0.180

    0.250

    0.210

    0.210

    0.175

    0.180

    0.180

    0.220

    0.215

    0.210

    0.170

    M =

    molecular weight; Tb

    =

    50% normal boiling p oint,

    F; d =

    liquid density at 20 and

    1

    atm,

    g/cm3; =

    refractive in -

    dex at 20

    C

    and

    1

    atm; v z l kinematic viscosity at 210

    ,

    cSt.

    O F

    cSt. xpr x = inole fraction

    of

    paraffin, naphthene, and aromatic. References: no. 1-8: Lenoir and Hipkin

    (1973);no. 9-42:

    this

    work

    (eq 24).

    Values in the parenthese s are kinematic viscosities at 100

    private communication (1977).

    Values

    of n

    for no. 9-42 a re calculated using the met hod suggested in

    characterization factor for light hydrocarbons to be used

    instead of V G C an d the n to develop a series of equa tions

    similar to eq 10, 11, ,and 1 2 for prediction of the compo-

    sition of light petroleum fractions.

    Specific gravities

    of

    l ight paraff inic and naphthenic

    hydrocarbons are plotted against the natura l logarithm of

    their kinematic viscosities at 100 O F in Figure 2. An

    almost linear relationship exists between S and In uloO for

    paraffins and naph thene s, each with the same slope. Th e

    following equations represent the lines

    for paraffins: S = 0.0332 In

    vloO

    + 0.7336 (13)

    for naphthenes: S = 0.0332 In vloo + 0.7853 (14)

    The se equations can reproduce data w ithin an average

    deviation of less than 2 . Th e new characterization factor

    for light hydrocarbons may be defined as a function of

    S

    and In u lW.

    V G F = a + bS +

    c

    In u lW (15)

    where V G F

    =

    viscosity gravity fun ction, new characteri-

    zation parameter,

    S ==

    specific gravity a t 60160 O F , vloO

    =

    kinematic viscosity at 100

    OF

    St, and

    a,

    b ,

    c

    =

    numerical

    consta nts. Arbi trary values of 0.74 and 0.92 have been

    chosen for the average V G F of paraffins and na phthen es,

    respectively. Th us by substituti ng eq 13 and 14 into eq

    15 the constants a b, and

    c

    can be determined and eq

    15

    becomes

    V G F

    = - 1.816 + 3.4848 0.1156 In vloo

    (16)

    Eq uat ion 16 gives the value of

    V G F

    for any hydrocarbon

    or

    fraction for which its specific gravity and kinematic

    viscosity at 100 O F are known.

    By following the same procedure a correlation relating

    V G F to specific gravity an d kinem atic viscosity a t 210 O F

    can be derived

    V G F

    = 1.948 + 3.5358 0.1613 In vzl0 (17)

    in which

    vzlo

    is kinematic viscosity at 210 O F n centistokes.

    Equations 16 and 17 which are similar to eq 3 a nd 4 give

    almost the same value for V G F of a hydrocarbon

    or

    pe-

    troleum fraction.

    Using eq 16 an d 17, average value s of V G F for light

    paraff ins, naphthe nes, and aromatics are 0.74, 0.92, and

  • 8/16/2019 Riazi Daubert 1980

    4/6

    292 Ind. Eng. Chem. Process Des. Dev., Vol. 19, No. 2,

    1980

    l n ( k i n e m a t i c

    V I S C O I I ~ ~ )

    1

    100' F

    Figure 2. Viscosity-gravity relationship.

    Table 111. Data on the Composit ion of Viscous Petroleum Fractions

    composition

    no. M Tb d n S

    VI,

    XD Xn

    Xa

    1

    233 569.6

    0.9082 1.50 16 0.9119

    48.2 0.34 1 0.459 0.190

    2 248

    620.0 0.9360

    1.5212 0.9397 66.7 0.304 0.430 0.2 26

    3 267 652.4

    0.9568 1.5366 0.9605

    111.1

    0.309 0.370 0.321

    4

    281

    688.4 0.9 671 1.5452 0.9708 203.1 0.318 0.340 0.342

    5 305 724.4

    0.9742 1.5492 0.9779 516.5 0.329 0.322 0.349

    6 245 582.2 0.8497

    1.4719 0.8535

    43.2 0.584 0.318 0.097

    7 28 2

    648.8

    0.8709

    1.4842 0.8746

    58.7 0.565

    0.307 0.128

    8 325 717.2 0.8845

    1.4919 0.8883 108.8 0.584 0.289 0.128

    9 403 798.2

    0.9001 1.5002

    0.9046

    336.0 0.590 0.280

    0.130

    10 265 614.6 0.8319 1.4637 0.8357

    45.5

    0.700

    0.227 0.073

    11 297 675.8

    0.8425

    1.4694 0.8463 59.4 0.694 0.224 0.081

    12 523 937.0 0.8750 1.4865 0.8760

    463.0 0.784 0.133 0.083

    13 250

    - - - -

    0.8912 1.4896 0.8939 60.6 0.105 0.639 0.256

    14 394

    - - - - 0.8664

    1.477 0.87 155.4

    0.720 0.250

    0.030

    15

    253

    - - - -

    0.877

    1.4838

    0.88

    54.6 0.580

    0.340 0.080

    16 364

    - - - - 0.907

    1.5142 0.936 680.5 0.102 0.455 0.443

    a =

    molecular weight; Tb

    =

    normal boiling point,

    O F

    d

    =

    liquid density at 20

    C

    and

    1

    atm, g/cm3;

    n =

    refractive index

    at 20 and

    1

    atm; S

    =

    specific gravity at 6 0/ 60 F; V,,

    =

    Saybo lt Universal Viscosity at

    100 F,

    SSU. References: no.

    1-11:

    Van Nesand Van Westen (19 51); no. 12: Witco (1973) ;no

    1 3 :

    Pennzo il(l9 75); no. 14-16:

    A.S.M.E.

    (1953).

    Table IV. Results

    of

    Prediction

    of

    the Composition of Light P etroleum Fractions

    abs dev, mole fraction

    X P Xn

    no.

    of

    m o lwt VG F

    Xn

    data source oils range Rirang e range xpra nge range av bias max av bias max

    Lenoirand

    8

    100-230 1.041- 0.787- 0.19- 0.30- 0.039 -0.0 23 -0.125 0.043 -0.0 03 0.093

    Hipkin 1.051 1.06 0.62 0.65

    industrial 34 126- 171 1.044- 0.827- 0.26- 0.13- 0.0 33

    -0.010

    -0.09 5 0.04 0.019 0.114

    company 1.055 0.950 0.66 0.53

    1.055 0.95 0.66 0.65

    total 42 100-230 1.041- 0.787- 0.19- 0.13- 0.034 -0.012 -0.125 0.041 0.015 0.114

    Absolute deviation = Xpred - x e x p ~ ;ax = maximu m dev iation; av = ( l / N ) z : deviationl; bias = ( l /N)xdeviation;

    N =

    number

    of

    data points.

    1.12. Average values for Ri of paraffins, naphthenes, and

    aromatics are 1.046, 1.04, an d 1.066, respectively. There-

    fore, Ri

    and V G F

    for a petroleum fraction can be estimated

    by

    Ri

    =

    1 . 0 4 6 ~ ~1 . 0 4 ~ ~1 . 0 6 6 ~ ~ (18)

    V G F =

    0 . 7 4 ~ ~0 . 9 2 ~ ~

    1 . 1 2 ~ ~

    ( l 9 )

    Physical properties of 45 light defined hydrocarbon mix-

    tures were estimated using the composition of the m ixture,

    properties of components from API Reseach Project 44

    (1978), an d Kay's mixing rule. After regression of eq 18

    and 19 with th e composit ions of th e 45 defined hydro-

    carbon mixtures and solution simultaneously with eq

    1,

    the following expressions were derived for xP, , , a nd

    x , .

  • 8/16/2019 Riazi Daubert 1980

    5/6

    Ind.

    Eng.

    Chem. Process

    Des. Dev.,

    Vol. 19, No.

    2, 1980

    293

    xP

    = 23.94 + 24.21Ri 1.092VGF

    X, = 41.14 39.43Ri + 0.627VGF

    X, = 16.2 + 15.22Ri + 0.465VGF

    (20)

    (21)

    (22)

    Th e above equations can be used to predict the compo-

    sition of an olefin-free petroleum fraction

    if

    Ri and VGF

    are known. Equa tions 20, 21, and 22 are similar to eq 10,

    11,

    an d 12 for composition prediction of viscous fractions.

    Since refractive indices of petroleu m fractio ns are no t

    always known, it is imp orta nt to predic t refractive index

    with a good degree of accuracy in order to estimate the

    refractivity inte rcep t from eq 2. Hu ang (1977) correlated

    molecular weight to boiling point, refractive index and

    density as follows

    (23)

    =

    7.7776 X

    10-67-

    2.11971-2.089d

    b

    where M = molecular weight, T b

    =

    norm al boiling po int,

    OR

    d =

    density at 20

    C

    an d

    1

    atm, g /cm3, and I

    =

    characterization factor defined in eq

    5 .

    By rearranging eq

    23 and 5, the following correlations for prediction of re-

    fractive index of petroleum fractions were derived.

    M S

    200: I

    =

    3.583 x

    10-3Tb1.0147(M/d)-0.4787

    24a)

    1

    = (-)

    + 21

    1 - I

    where

    n

    = refractive index at 20 C , Tb = 50% boiling

    poin t a t 1a tm , O R h4 = molecular weight, and

    d

    = liquid

    density at 20

    C

    an d

    1

    atm , g/cm3. Equatio n 24 can

    predict refractive index of light ( M

    <

    200) fractions within

    an average deviation of about 0.5% while for heavy frac-

    tions the error is abfout4-5%.

    For

    heavy fracti ons, a correlation similar to eq 24 can

    be derived by use of data available on refractive indices

    of heavy hydrocarbons in API Research Project 42 (1962).

    After regression of dat a, the following equatio n was derived

    M 200:

    I = 1.4

    X

    10-3Tb1.0u M /d)-0 .3984

    r i = (-)+

    21

    1 - I

    The equations can predict refractive indices of heavy pe-

    troleum fraction s within an average deviation of 0.2%.

    Evaluation of the I?roposed Correlations

    Tables I1 an d I11 show experime ntal dat a on the com-

    position of light and heavy petroleum fractions from

    various sources. All physical properties necessary to use

    the proposed correlations are also given.

    Equa tions 20, 21, and 22 were used t o predict th e com-

    position of the light M < 200) fractions listed in Tab le

    11.

    A summary of results is given in Table IV, and

    point-by -point evaluations a re available. Average devia-

    tion s of 0.03 an d 0.04 mole fractions were obt ain ed for

    x p

    an d

    x,,

    respectively. Similar results for heavy fractions

    are shown in Ta ble V using eq

    10,11,

    and 12 for prediction

    of the composition of the fractions listed in Table 111.

    Average deviations of

    0.018

    and

    0.01

    mole fractions for xp

    an d x,, respectively, were obtained. Th e results are gen-

    erally better tha n those of existing methods such as the

    n-d-M

    method.

    Table VI shows a comparison

    of

    the use of experimental

    vs

    predicted compositions as inp ut to enthalpy and vis-

    cosity prediction meth ods. As shown, predict ed compo-

  • 8/16/2019 Riazi Daubert 1980

    6/6

    294 Ind. Eng. Chem. Process Des. Dev. 1980, 19 294-300

    Table VI.

    Predicted Compositions for Entha lpy and

    Viscosity Predictions

    Comparison

    of

    the Use of Experimental

    vs.

    av deva

    no.

    of

    frac- exptl

    pro pert y tions comp n pred comp n

    liquid enthalpy 435 2.4 Btuilb 2.7 Btu/lb

    vapor enthalpy 292 3.7 Btul lb

    3.5 Btullb

    viscosity at

    38

    2.9% 2.8%

    100 F light)

    2

    10

    F (light)

    100 F (heavy)

    210 F

    heavy)

    viscosity at 38 5.7% 5.2%

    viscosity at

    10

    8.1% 8.5%

    viscosity at 10 3.5%

    3.5%

    Absolute deviation

    =

    predicted property - experimen-

    tal property.

    perimental property)/experimental propert y]

    x

    100 av =

    l/N)

    deviation 1

    sitions do not materially affect the results.

    L i t e r a t u r e C i t e d

    American Petroleum Institute (API) Research Project 42, Properties of Hy-

    drocarbons

    of

    High Molecular Weight , American Petroleum Institute

    (1962).

    Deviation, %

    =

    [(predicted property ex-

    iv = number of data points.

    API Research Project 44, Selected Values

    of

    Properties

    of

    Hydrocarbons and

    h a t e a Compounds' , Taoles of Physical and Thermodynamic Properties of

    Hydrocarbons.

    A

    and M Press, College Station, Texas (extant 1978).

    A S M.E. Research Cornminee on Lubrication, 'Viscosity and Density of Over

    40 Luoricating Fluids of Known Composition at Pressures

    to

    150,000 psia

    and Temperatures to 425 OF ', Report No. 1. 1953.

    Boelhower. C.. Waterman, H. 1.. J . I n s t Pel., 40. 116 (1954).

    Hili. J B.. Coats, H. B.. I nd Eng. Chem.. 20, 641 (1928).

    huang. P. K.. Ph.D Thesis, Department of Chemical Engineering, The Penn-

    hdang. P. K.. Daubert, T. E.,

    I n d

    Eng. Chern. Process De s Dev

    13,

    359

    Kurtz. S. S I r.. King. R. W., Stout. W. J.. Peterkin, M.

    E., Ana l

    Chern 30,

    Kurtz. S. S Jr., Ward, A. L.. J . Franklin I n s t 222. 563 (1936).

    K d z , S. S., Jr.. Ward. A.

    L .

    J . Franklin Inst 224, 583. 697 (1937).

    Lenoir. . M.. Hipkin. H. G., J . Chern Eng.

    Data

    18, 195 (1973).

    Private communications, Witco Chem. Co.,

    1973.

    Private communications. Pennzoil Co., 1975.

    Private communications, Indbstrial Co., 1977.

    Riazi, M. R.. Ph.D. Thesis. Department of Chemical Engineering, The Penn-

    sylvania State University, University Park, Pa.. 1979.

    Van Nes, K Van Westen, H. A. . Aspects of the Constbtion of Mineral Oils .

    Elsever PJOiiShing Co.. InC.. New Yorrc, 1951.

    Waterman. H I , Boehower. C Cornelissen,J..

    Correht;on Between physical

    Constants and Chemical StrLcture , Elsevier Publishing Co.. Inc.. New York,

    1958.

    sylvanla State University, University Park, Pa., 1977.

    (1974).

    1225 (1958).

    Received f o r rer ieu Ju l y

    23,

    19'79

    . k e e p r e d

    December

    7 , 1979

    The Department of Refining of the American Petroleum Institute

    provided major financial

    s u p p o r t

    of this research.

    Kinetics of Oxydesulfurization of Upper Freeport Coal

    D. Slagle, Y. T. Sh ah, and J.

    B.

    Josh1

    Department of Chem ical and Petroleum Engineering, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 5261

    T he

    kinetics of the oxidation of pyritic

    sul fur

    organic sulfur, and carbon for the

    Upper

    Freeport coal are investigated.

    Experiments were conducted in a semi-batch

    manner.

    The effects of batch time (0-2400 s), emperature (150-210

    C),

    artial pressure of oxygen (0.69-3.44 MPa), and total pressure

    (3.44-6.88

    MPa) were studied. Two alternate

    mechanisms have

    been

    proposed for t h e oxidation of pyritic s u l f u r . In one mechanism the

    fine

    pyrite particles

    are assumed to b e uniformly

    distributed in

    coal particles and the continuous reaction model was found to hoM where

    the rat e of reac tion is second order with respect to pyritic sulfur. In the other mechanism, the pyrite particles

    are assumed to exist free from coal and

    the

    shrinking core model was found to hold

    where the

    rate of reaction

    is controlled by diffusion through ash. Both the carbon oxidation and organic sulfur reactions are z ero order with

    respect to carbon and organic

    sulfur,

    respectively.

    The

    activation energies for all three reactions agree closely

    with those reported in the literature.

    I n t r o d u c t i o n

    T he sulfur in coal occurs in three form s: pyritic, organic,

    or sulfate. Pyrite s, classified as compound s with the for-

    mula FeS, (where the sta ndard value of

    x

    is

    2),

    accounts

    for the bulk of the sulfur in Eastern coals. Organic sulfur

    is a broad classification containing any sulfur which is

    chemically bound to th e actual coal matrix. Organic sulfur

    is th e domina nt sulfur form in Western coals. Sulfates

    con stitu te less than a few percent of the tot al sulfur in most

    coals.

    The direct burning of coal causes the production of

    noxious sulfur oxides

    (S0,'s).

    Pres ently , control of sulfur

    oxide emissions is achieved mainly by either stack gas

    scrubbing or physical coal cleaning techniques. Th e former

    process is both expensive and energy intensive. Th e latter,

    although relatively inexpensive and simple to o perate, is

    less effective. In fact, depending on the sulfur composition

    of the feed coal, a plant b urning physically pre-cleane d coal

    0196-4305/80/1119-0294$01.00/0

    may also have to employ flue gas scrubbing in order to

    meet environmental sta ndard s (T rindad e et al., 1974).

    A

    possible alternative to these processes is chemical coal

    cleaning, i.e., remov al of th e sulfur by me ans of a chem ical

    reaction before burning t he coal.

    There are presently six major chemical coal cleaning

    methods being developed (Oder et al., 1977). O ne of th e

    promising processes is the oxydesulfurization process

    (Friedman and Warzinski, 1977; Friedman et al., 1977).

    In thi s process, the s ulfur is removed by oxidizing coal in

    the presence of water. Th e process is operated at pressures

    between 1.6 and 10 M Pa and temperatures between

    150

    and 220

    C.

    Normally air is used as the gas phase.

    The purpose of this paper is to report a kinetic study

    for the D.O.E. oxydesulfurization process. Kinetic rate

    expressions for the inorganic and organic sulfur removal

    reactions and carbon oxidation reaction for Upper Freeport

    coal are presented.

    980 American Chemical Society