Population genetics, comparative genomics, and natural selection Simon Myers.
Rhodes, J; Beale, MA; Vanhove, M; Jarvis, JN; …researchonline.lshtm.ac.uk/3482754/1/A Population...
Transcript of Rhodes, J; Beale, MA; Vanhove, M; Jarvis, JN; …researchonline.lshtm.ac.uk/3482754/1/A Population...
Rhodes, J; Beale, MA; Vanhove, M; Jarvis, JN; Kannambath, S;Simpson, JA; Ryan, A; Meintjes, G; Harrison, TS; Fisher, MC; Bi-canic, T (2017) A Population Genomics Approach to Assessing theGenetic Basis of Within-Host Microevolution Underlying RecurrentCryptococcal Meningitis Infection. G3 (Bethesda). ISSN 2160-1836DOI: 10.1534/g3.116.037499
Downloaded from: http://researchonline.lshtm.ac.uk/3482754/
DOI: 10.1534/g3.116.037499
Usage Guidelines
Please refer to usage guidelines at http://researchonline.lshtm.ac.uk/policies.html or alterna-tively contact [email protected].
Available under license: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/
1
Apopulationgenomicsapproachtoassessingthegeneticbasis1
ofwithin-hostmicroevolutionunderlyingrecurrentcryptococcal2
meningitisinfection3
JohannaRhodes1,MathewA.Beale2,MathieuVanhove1,JosephN.Jarvis3,4,5,Shichina4
Kannambath6,JohnA.Simpson7,AntheaRyan7,GraemeMeintjes8,ThomasS.Harrison6,5
MatthewC.Fisher1*,TihanaBicanic6*6
1-DepartmentofInfectiousDiseaseEpidemiology,ImperialCollegeLondon,London,7
UnitedKingdom8
2-DivisionofInfectionandImmunity,FacultyofMedicalSciences,UniversityCollege9
London,London,UnitedKingdom10
3-Botswana-UPennPartnership,Gaborone,Botswana11
4-DivisionofInfectiousDiseases,DepartmentofMedicine,PerelmanSchoolof12
Medicine,UniversityofPennsylvania,Philadelphia,Pennsylvania,UnitedStatesof13
America14
5-DepartmentofClinicalResearch,FacultyofInfectiousandTropicalDiseases,London15
SchoolofHygieneandTropicalMedicine,London,UnitedKingdom16
6-InstituteofInfectionandImmunity,St.George’sUniversityLondon,London,United17
Kingdom18
G3: Genes|Genomes|Genetics Early Online, published on February 10, 2017 as doi:10.1534/g3.116.037499
© The Author(s) 2013. Published by the Genetics Society of America.
2
7-NationalHealthLaboratoryService,Greenpoint,CapeTown,SouthAfrica19
8-ClinicalInfectiousDiseasesResearchInitiative,InstituteofInfectiousDiseaseand20
MolecularMedicineandDepartmentofMedicine,UniversityofCapeTown,CapeTown,21
SouthAfrica22
*Correspondingauthors:[email protected];[email protected]
Abstract24
RecurrenceofmeningitisduetoCryptococcusneoformansaftertreatmentcauses25
substantialmortalityinHIV/AIDSpatientsacrosssub-SaharanAfrica.Inorderto26
determinewhetherrecurrenceoccurredduetorelapseoftheoriginalinfectingisolate27
orreinfectionwithadifferentisolateweeksormonthsafterinitialtreatment,weused28
whole-genomesequencingtoassessthegeneticbasisofinfectionin17HIV-infected29
individualswithrecurrentcryptococcalmeningitis.Comparisonsrevealedaclonal30
relationshipfor15pairsofisolatesrecoveredbeforeandafterrecurrenceshowing31
relapseoftheoriginalinfection.Thetworemainingpairsshowedhighlevelsofgenetic32
heterogeneity;inonepairwefoundthistobearesultofinfectionbymixedgenotypes,33
whilstthesecondwasaresultofnonsensemutationsinthegeneencodingtheDNA34
mismatchrepairproteinsMSH2,MSH5andRAD5.Thesenonsensemutationsledtoa35
hypermutatorstate,leadingtodramaticallyelevatedratesofsynonymousandnon-36
synonymoussubstitutions.Hypermutatorphenotypesowingtononsensemutationsin37
thesegeneshavenotpreviouslybeenreportedinC.neoformansandrepresentanovel38
3
pathwayforrapidwithin-hostadaptationandevolutionofresistancetofirst-line39
antifungaldrugs.40
Introduction41
TheHIV/AIDSpandemichasledtoalargepopulationofprofoundly42
immunocompromisedindividualsthatarevulnerabletoinfectionbytheopportunistic43
funguspathogenCryptococcusneoformans(Hagenetal.2015).Thismycosisposesa44
considerablepublichealthprobleminsub-SaharanAfrica,whichhasthehighest45
estimatedannualincidenceofcryptococcalmeningitis(CM)globally(Parketal.2009),46
withthemajorityofinfectionscausedbyCryptococcusneoformanssensustricto47
(previouslyreferredtoasCryptococcusneoformansvar.grubii)(Jarvis&Harrison2007).48
StandardtreatmentforHIV-associatedCMincludesthelong-termuseofazoledrugs49
suchasfluconazole,followinginitial1-2weekinductiontreatmentwithamphotericinB,50
whichisoftennotavailable(Brouweretal.2004).Microevolutionoccursinresponseto51
drugpressure,leadingtoresistance,aphenomenonpreviouslydescribedinC.52
neoformans(Ormerodetal.2013;Sionovetal.2010).Patientswhoappearsuccessfully53
treated(evidencedbysymptomresolutionandsterilisationofcerebralspinalfluid(CSF))54
canrelapseduetopersistinginfections,whichinsomecasesappeartohaveevolved55
resistancetofirstlineantifungaldrugs.Intheabsenceofcontinuedantifungaltherapy56
andrestorationoftheirimmunesystemthroughantiretroviraltherapy(ART),patients57
withHIV/AIDSalsohaveahighprobabilityofrecurrenceofCM(Bozzetteetal.1991).58
4
Variousmethodsofwithin-hostevolutionareavailabletoeukaryoticpathogens,most59
notablysexualandparasexualreproduction,althoughthesearedifficulttoobservedue60
totheoftencrypticnaturerecombinationoffungi.Aneuploidy,recombinationinthe61
telomeres,andmutatorstates(Roderoetal.2003)alsoprovidemeansofrapidwithin-62
hostevolution,withothermechanismsstilllikelytobediscovered.Theaccumulationof63
SNPsalongsidecopynumbervariationandaneuploidyhasbeenwitnessedduring64
infectionindifferentfungalpathogenspecies,enablingrapidadaptiveevolution(Caloet65
al.2013)andconferringresistancetoantifungaldugs(Hickmanetal.2015).Candidiasis66
iscausedbynumerousCandidaspecies,yetwithin-hostevolutionamongstthese67
speciesdiffers.InfectiousstrainsofCandidaalbicansareusuallysusceptibletoazole68
antifungaldrugs,butresistancecanevolveviatheevolutionofdrug-resistantaneuploid69
isolates,whichcontainanisochromosomeoftheleftarmofchromosome5(Selmeckiet70
al.2009).Theleftarmofchromosome5containstwoimportantgenesinvolvedin71
resistancetoantifungals:ERG11,atargetofazoles,andTAC1,atranscriptionfactorthat72
activatesdrugeffluxpumpexpression.Conversely,Candidaglabrataareintrinsically73
poorlysusceptibletoazoles,andhavemorerecentlyevolvedmulti-drugresistanceto74
bothazolesandechinocandins(Pfaller2012;Panackaletal.2006;Alexanderetal.2013).75
Theoccurrenceofwithin-hostdiversityandrecombinationhasbeenwitnessedin76
eukaryoticpathogens,notablyC.albicans:mutationandrecombinationratescanbe77
increasedunderstressfulconditions,suchasdrugtreatment(Forcheetal.2009;Fordet78
al.2015),resultinginloss-of-heterozygosity(LOH)andaneuploidy(Forcheetal.2009).79
ThesegeneticalterationscontributetothemaintenanceofapopulationofC.albicans80
5
withinthehostenvironment(Forcheetal.2009),anddrugpressurecanresultin81
diverginglevelsoffitness(Cowenetal.2001).82
SimilarresponsestoantifungaldrugshavebeenobservedinC.neoformans;Point83
mutationsintheorthologERG11werealsoshowntoconferfluconazoleresistance,by84
causingtheaminoacidsubstitutionG484S(Roderoetal.2003).Sionovetal.(Sionovet85
al.2010)demonstratedlargescalechromosomalduplications(primarilychromosome1)86
arefundamentaltoovercomingfluconazole(FLC)drugpressureinamousemodel,87
contributingtofailureofFLCtherapy.Theduplicationofchromosome1included88
increasedcopynumberofgenesERG11,thetargetofFLC,andAFR1,atransporterof89
azoles(Sionovetal.2010),althoughothergenesarealsothoughttobeinvolvedinFLC90
resistance(Sionovetal.2013;Pauletal.2015).PreviousstudiesofseriallycollectedC.91
neoformansisolateshaveconfirmedin-hostmicroevolution,includingtheoccurrenceof92
large-scalegenomicrearrangements(Fraseretal.2005;Blasietal.2001;Illnait-Zaragozi93
etal.2010).LikeC.albicans,theC.neoformansgenomeiscapableofundergoing94
chromosomalduplicationandlossunderstressessuchasdrugpressureorinvasionof95
thehumanhost(Friesetal.1996).Thesechromosomalduplicationsareoftenlostwhen96
theselectivepressureisremoved(Sionovetal.2010).97
Thedevelopmentofmutatorstatesviahypermutabilityisarapidlyexpandingareaof98
studyinbacteria,particularlyPseudomonasaeruginosaincysticfibrosis(CF)patients.99
Here,hypermutabilityhasbeenshowntohaveanassociationwithantimicrobial100
resistance(Oliveretal.2000;Maciáetal.2005),causingsignificantimplicationsinthe101
6
earlytreatmentofcysticfibrosispatientstopreventchronicinfection(Burnsetal.2001;102
Maciáetal.2005).Fewstudieshaveexploredhypermutationinpathogenicfungi;103
however,mutationsintheyeastSaccharomycescerevisiaegenesPMS1,MLH1and104
MSH2,whichareallinvolvedinmismatchrepair,havebeenshowntoleadto100-to105
700-foldincreasesinmutationsthroughoutthegenome(Strandetal.1993).106
FrameshiftmutationsinanorthologofthemismatchrepairgeneMSH2havealsobeen107
showntocontributetomicroevolutioninthesisterspeciesofC.neoformans,108
Cryptococcusgattii(Billmyreetal.2014).109
Herewedescribeacomparativegenome-sequencingbasedapproachtoinvestigate110
microevolutioninseriallycollectedisolatesofC.neoformans.Theseisolateswere111
grownandstoredfromfreshCSFofpatientswithCM,priortostartingandduring112
antifungaltherapyusinginductionwithamphotericinB-basedregimens,followedby113
fluconazole.Weusedwhole-genomesequencingtodescribethenatureofinfectionin114
17patientstogaininsightsintothedynamicsofrecurrentinfections.115
MaterialsandMethods116
Samplesandpatients117
SixteenSouthAfricanpatientsandoneUgandanpatientdemonstratingclinicalevidence118
ofcryptococcalmeningitiswerestudied.Allpatientswereeitherpartofobservational119
studiesorclinicaltrial(Bicanicetal.2007;Bicanicetal.2008;Jarvisetal.2012;Longley120
etal.2008;Jarvisetal.2010).EthicalapprovalwasobtainedfromtheWandsworth121
ResearchEthicsCommitteecoveringSt.George’sUniversityofLondon(Longleyetal.122
7
2008;Bicanicetal.2007;Bicanicetal.2008;Jarvisetal.2012).InSouthAfrica123
additionalethicalapprovalwasobtainedfromtheUniversityofCapeTownResearch124
EthicsCommittee;inUganda,fromtheResearchEthicsCommitteeofMbarara125
UniversityofScienceandTechnology.Allpatientsinitiallypresentedwithcryptococcal126
meningitisandweretreatedusinginductiontherapywith7-14days’amphotericinB127
deoxycholate0.7-1mg/kg/d,withorwithout100mg/kg/dofflucytosine(withone128
patient,IFNR63,alsoreceivingadjunctiveinterferongamma),followedbyfluconazole129
consolidationat400mg/dfor8weeksandmaintenancetherapyat200mg/dfor6-12130
months(n=16pairs),untilimmunerestorationonARTwithaCD4countof>200131
cells/µL.ThesinglepatientinUgandareceivedinductiontherapywithfluconazole1600132
mg/dfor2weeksfollowedbyfluconazoleconsolidationandmaintenanceandART,as133
above(n=1pair).Aspartofstudyprocedure,patientsenrolledinclinicaltrialshad134
quantitativecryptococcalculturesperformedonserialCSFsamples.Patientswitha135
recurrenceoftheircryptococcaldiseasefollowinginitialtreatmentandpositiveCSF136
cultureforCryptococcusatthetimeofdiseaserecurrencewereincludedinthestudy.137
Westudiedtheclinicalcryptococcalisolatestakenoninitialdiagnosis(priortoinitiation138
oftreatment)andcomparedeachwiththeCryptococcusisolatedfromCSFon139
recurrenceofdiseaseinthesamepatient(Table1).140
Multi-locussequencetyping141
TodiscernwhethermixedorsinglegenotypeinfectionswereextractedfromCSF,multi-142
locussequencetyping(MLST)wasperformedonthreeindependentcoloniesfora143
8
subsetofthestudyisolates,accordingtothemethodsoutlinesinMeyeretal.(Meyeret144
al.2009),withmodificationsasoutlinedinBealeetal.(Bealeetal.2015).145
Molecularmethods146
C.neoformanswasisolatedfromHIVinfectedindividualsonlocationbyplatingCSFonto147
SabourandDextrose(SD)agar(Oxoid,FisherScientific),andgrowingat30˚Cfor48148
hours.ArepresentativesampleoftheC.neoformanspopulationwastakenbyselecting149
abroad‘sweep’ofallcoloniesontheSDagarplate,whichwasstoredin150
cryopreservativemedium(80%SDbroth,20%glycerol)at-80˚Cuntilfurthertesting.151
Thisapproachensuresallgeneticdiversityismaintainedthroughtheprocess,andsingle152
colonypickingonlyoccursatthefinalstageofliquidcultureandDNAextraction.153
FrozenstockswereplatedontoSDagarandculturedfor72hours.Asinglecolonywas154
inoculatedinto6mlYeastPeptoneDigestbroth(Oxoid)supplementedwith0.5MNaCl155
andculturedat37°Cwithagitation(165rpm)for40hours,followedbygenomicDNA156
extractionusingtheMasterpureYeastDNApurificationkit(Epicentre)modifiedby157
additionoftwocyclesofrapidbeadbeating(45secondsat4.5m/second)usinga158
FastPrep24homogeniser(MPBio).GenomicDNAlibrarieswerepreparedusingthe159
TruSeqDNAv2orTruSeqNanoDNAkit(Illumina),andwholegenomesequencingwas160
performedonanIlluminaHiSeq2500atMedicalResearchCouncilClinicalGenomics161
Centre(ImperialCollegeLondon)aspreviouslydescribed(Rhodesetal.2014).162
Datapolicy163
9
Allrawreadsandinformationonlineagesofisolatesinthisstudyhavebeensubmitted164
totheEuropeanNucleotideArchiveundertheprojectaccessionPRJEB11842.165
Wholegenomesequenceanalysis166
RawIlluminareadswerealignedtotheC.neoformansreferencegenomeH99(Loftuset167
al.2005)usingtheBurrows-WheelerAligner(BWA)v0.75amemalgorithm(Li2013)168
withdefaultparameterstoobtainhighdepthalignments(average104x).Samtools(Li169
etal.2009)version1.2wasusedtosortandindexresultingBAMfiles,andgenerate170
statisticsregardingthequalityofalignment.Picardversion1.72wasusedtoidentify171
duplicatereadsandassigncorrectreadgroupstoBAMfiles.Furthermore,BAMfiles172
werelocallyrealignedaroundinsertionsanddeletions(INDELs)usingGATK(McKennaet173
al.2010)version3.4-46‘RealignerTargetCreator’and‘IndelRealigner’,followingbest174
practiceguidelines(VanderAuweraetal.2013).175
Singlenucleotidepolymorphisms(SNPs)andINDELswerecalledfromallalignments176
usingGATK(McKennaetal.2010)version3.4-46‘HaplotypeCaller’inhaploidmodewith177
arequirementthatallvariantscalledandemittedareaboveaphred-scaleconfidence178
thresholdof30.BothSNPsandINDELswerehardfilteredduetoalackoftrainingsets179
availableforC.neoformansbyrunningVariantFiltrationwithparameters“DP<5||MQ180
<40.0||QD<2.0||FS>60.0”;thisexpressionensuredlowconfidencevariantswere181
filteredoutiftheymetjustoneofthefilterexpressioncriteria.Resultinghigh-182
confidencevariantsweremappedtogenesusingVCF-annotator(BroadInstitute,183
10
Cambridge,MA,USA)andthelatestrelease(CNA3)oftheC.neoformansreference184
genomeH99andgeneontology.185
Someisolatesweresuspectedofhavingnon-haploidgenomesduetothehighnumber186
oflowconfidencevariants.Fortheseisolates,‘HaplotypeCaller’wasrepeatedindiploid187
mode.188
Theaverage(mean)coverageforeachisolateweredeterminedusingGATK(McKenna189
etal.2010)version3.4-46‘DepthOfCoverage’underdefaultsettings.TheC.190
neoformansH99(Loftusetal.2005)wasagainusedasreference.Inordertodetermine191
aneuploidy,whole-genomecoveragedatawasnormalisedandregionsdisplaying192
normalisedcoverageequalto2weredeemeddiploidevents(likewise,normalised193
coverageequalto3weredeemedtriploidevents,andsoon),whereasnormalised194
coverageequaltozerowasdeemedadeletionevent.195
Susceptibilitytesting196
ThesusceptibilitytestingofallrelapseisolateswereperformedwiththeMICRONAUT-197
AMsusceptibilitytestingsystemforyeast(Merlin)asrecommendedbythe198
manufacturer.MICRONAUT-AMallowsthedeterminationofMICsofamphotericinB,199
flucytosine,fluconazole,voriconazole,posaconazole,itraconazole,micafungin,200
anidulafunginandcaspofungin,andcommercialisesthewell-established,butlaborious,201
CLSIbrothmicrodilutiontechnique.Briefly,foreachisolatefivecolonieswereusedto202
preparea0.5-McFarland-standardsuspensionin0.9%NaCl.1:20dilutionwasprepared203
in0.9%NaCland1:5dilutionwaspreparedin11mlRPMIbrothprovidedwiththekit.204
11
100µlASTindicatorand50µlMethylenebluesolutionsweremixedwiththebrothfor205
manualsusceptibilitytesting.ThebrothwastheninoculatedontoMerlinMICRONAUT206
96-welltestingplates(100ul/well)andincubatedat30°Cfor72hours.Thelowest207
concentrationofanantifungalagentwithnodetectablegrowth(MIC)wasdetermined208
foreachisolatebasedonfungalgrowth(pink)ornogrowth(blue).ObtainedMICswere209
interpretedaccordingtoC.albicansEUCAST(Vers.7.0/12-08-2014)values(Rodríguez-210
Tudelaetal.2010;Alastruey-Izquierdo&Cuenca-Estrella2012).211
Phylogeneticanalysis212
Whole-genomeSNPswereconvertedintorelaxedinterleavedPhylipformat.Rapid213
bootstrapphylogeneticanalysisusing500bootstrapreplicateswascarriedouton62214
isolatesintotal(Table1)usingRAxML-HPCversion7.3.0(Stamatakis2006)asdescribed215
inAbdolrasoulietal.(Abdolrasoulietal.2015):35isolatesfromthisstudyinadditionto216
27isolates(‘non-study’)wereincludedtoshowthephylogeneticcontextoftruerelapse217
infections.Thesenon-studyisolates,whilstfromaclinicalsource,werenotrecurrent218
isolatesandwerenotisolatedaspartoftheclinicaltrialsdescribedintheearlier219
Methodssection.ResultingphylogenieswerevisualisedinFigTreeversion1.4.2220
(http://tree.bio.ed.ac.uk/software/figtree/).Thesameprocesswascompletedforeach221
chromosomeindividuallyforall62isolates,using250replicatesintherapidbootstrap222
analysis.223
GeneOntologyandKEGGpathwayanalysis224
12
Non-synonymous(nsSNPs)mutationsuniquetoeachtimepointforeachpairwere225
assessedforsignificantlyoverrepresentedgeneontology(GO)annotationsand226
metabolicpathways.Briefly,genesfoundtocontainansSNPmutationwere227
interrogatedforoverrepresentedBiologicalProcessOntologyintheC.neoformansH99228
database.GOtermsthatwerefoundtobeassociatedwithgenesmappingtothe229
InterProdomaindatabaseweretransferredtoGOassociations,usingap-valuecut-off230
ofp<0.05.FormetabolicpathwayenrichmentingenescontainingnsSNPs,geneswere231
interrogatedagainsttheKEGG(Kanehisaetal.2016)pathwaysourceforC.neoformans232
H99,usingap-valuecut-offofp<0.05.233
Identifyingsitesunderselection234
BayeScan2.01(Foll&Gaggiotti2008)usesanoutlierapproachtoidentifycandidateloci235
undernaturalselection.Themethodusestheallelefrequenciesthatarecharacteristic236
ofeachpopulationandestimatestheposteriorprobabilitiesofagivenlocusundera237
modelthatincludesselectionandaneutralmodel.Theprogrammethendetermines238
whetherthemodelthatincludesselectionbetterfitsthedata.Thisapproachallowsthe239
simultaneousassessmentoftheinfluenceofbothbalancingandpurifyingselection.240
LociunderbalancingselectionwillpresentlowFSTvalueswhereashighFSTvaluesreflect241
patternsoflocaladaptation(purifyingselection)(Excoffieretal.2009).Analysiswasnot242
undertakenfortheVNIIandVNBlineagesduetolownumbersofisolates,whichwould243
beinsufficienttoovercomethestrongpopulationstructure.VNIIsolatesatday0were244
assignedtoapopulationandtheirassociatedrelapseisolatesconstitutedthesecond245
13
population.Analyseswereconductedusingthestandardparametersincludinga50,000246
burninperiodand100,000iterations.Severalanalyseswereconductedvaryingthe247
priorodds(from10,100to1,000)fortheneutralmodel.248
Results249
Clinicalanddemographicinformation250
Thestudyincludedpairedisolatesfrom17patients,withamedianageof32years(IQR251
26-36)andmedianCD4countatCMdiagnosisof22(IQR9-71)cells/µL.Sixpatients252
weremale,9werefemale,withthegenderoftwopatientsunrecorded.Themedian253
timebetweeninitialandrecurrenceisolateswas115days(minimum55days,maximum254
409days).InthoseforwhomARTstatuswasknown,2of16(13%)patientswere255
alreadyonARTattheinitialCMepisode;6outof15(40%)patientshadnotstartedART256
priortoCMrecurrence.257
DetailedclinicalnoteswereavailablefortherecurrentCMepisodein7patients:two258
(CCTP52andRCT9)hadnotattendedfollowupandneverstartedARTpriortoadmission259
withrecurrence–bothdiedoftherecurrentCM.Onepatient(CCTP32)hadnotbeen260
takingfluconazolefor2weekspriortorecurrence.Infourpatients(CCTP27,CCTP50,261
RCT24,IFNR63)whowereadherenttobothARTandfluconazoleatrecurrencewere262
assessedashavingCMimmunereconstitutioninflammatorysyndrome(CM-IRIS).263
SequencingofpairedsamplesisolatedfrompatientsinfectedwithC.neoformans264
14
Priortosequencing,multiplecoloniesfromasubsetofisolatesincludedinthisstudy265
wereanalysedusingMLSTtoinvestigatewhetheramixedinfectionwaspresentinthe266
originalCSFextract.Theresultsshowthatmixedinfectionswerenotpresentin12out267
of17Pairsincludedinthisstudy.OnePair(Pair7)wasonlytestedonce,andallele268
types(AT)werenotsufficienttoconcludewhethersequencetype(ST)100or196was269
presentinbothoriginalandrecurrentisolate.Ontwoseparateattempts,STsforPairs3270
and17couldnotbedetermined,reflectinganeedforwhole-genomesequencing(WGS)271
tocharacterisethesePairs.STsforPairs1and6wereinconclusive,andsuggestiveofa272
mixedinfectionpresent.273
Werecoveredanaverageof23.9millionreadsfromeachisolate,withanaverageof274
98.8%ofreadsmappedtotheC.neoformansH99referencegenome(Loftusetal.2005),275
andanaveragecoverageof104+/-31.2(standarddeviation).Toenablecomparative276
studiesanddetectmicro-evolutionarychanges,precisevariant-callingwasneeded;277
variantswereidentifiedandfalsepositivelow-confidencevariantswerefilteredoutto278
provideasetofhigh-confidenceSNPs(seeMaterialsandMethods).Fullalignment,279
coverageandvariantcallingstatisticsareprovidedinSupplementaryMaterialsTable5.280
Duetoahighnumberoflow-confidenceSNPsfilteredoutinsomeisolates,whichis281
suggestiveofheterozygousSNPs,variantcallingwasre-runindiploidmode(see282
Methods)forallisolatesinPairs3,4,5and17(resultsinSupplementaryMaterialsTable283
6).284
15
AhighlevelofdiversitywasobservedwithintheVNBlineage,resultinginlongbranch285
lengthsamongstisolateswithinthisclade(Figure1).AlthoughallVNBisolateswere286
mappedtotheC.neoformansH99reference(Loftusetal.2005),whichisaVNIlineage287
isolate,wedonotbelieveSNPnumbersobservedintheVNBlineageareinflatedbythe288
largephylogeneticdistancetothereferencegenome.ThisisbecauseSNP289
determinationrevealedonly21.6%ofSNPsthatwediscoveredweresharedbythe290
threeVNBPairsincludedinthisstudy(Pairs3,12and17),highlightingthelarge291
amountsofgeneticdiversityseenwithinthislineageaswehavepreviouslynoted(58).292
Phylogeneticanalysisshowedthatofthe17pairsofrelapseisolates,threepairswere293
lineageVNB,whilstfourandtenbelongedtolineagesVNIIandVNIrespectively(Figure294
1).TheaveragepairwiseSNPdiversitywasfarhigheramongstisolatesfromtheVNB295
lineage(140,835SNPs)comparedtoisolatesintheVNI(17,808SNPs)andVNII(938296
SNPs)lineages,showingthattheVNIandVNIIlineagesarelessdiversethanVNBacross297
ourcohort.Onaverage,isolatesoftheVNB,VNIIandVNIlineagesaccumulated365,12298
and3uniqueSNPsperdaybetweenthetimeoftheoriginalisolationandtherecurrence299
ofinfection.IsolatesintheVNBlineageweremorelikelytoexperienceaploidyevent,300
withanaverageof1.6changesinploidyperisolate.LessthanoneisolateintheVNII301
andVNIlineageswould,onaverage,experienceploidyevents(0.375and0.26302
respectively).303
Allpairs,withtheexceptionofPair7,wereisolatedfrompatientsinSouthAfrica;Pair7304
wasisolatedfromapatientinUganda.Weclassifiedthesecondisolateasarelapseof305
16
theoriginalinfectionifmorethan97%ofSNPswereincommonbetweenoriginaland306
recurrentisolates.Themajorityofpairshad>99%SNPsimilarity(Table2)between307
originalandrecurrentisolates,withPairs6,7and14displaying97%,98%and97%308
similarityrespectively.Therefore,allpairs,withtheexceptionofPairs3and17(SNP309
similarity44%and56%)couldbeclassifiedasrelapsedinfectionsonthisbasis.This310
confirmspreviousresultsobtainedbyMLST,andthattheoriginalandrecurrentisolates311
sequencedofPairs1and7(whichhadpreviouslydemonstratedapotentialmixed312
infection)wereindeedtruerelapseinfections.313
WithintheVNBpairs(3,12and17),theaccumulationofSNPsbetweenoriginaland314
recurrentinfectionvariedwidely.Weobserved178and304SNPs/dayforCCTP50-d257315
andCCTP50-d409respectively(Pair3),8SNPs/dayforPair12,and968SNPs/dayforPair316
17.DuetothevariationinSNPaccumulationbetweenPair12andPairs3and17,we317
hypothesisedthatPair12wasatruerelapseoftheoriginalinfection,whilstPairs3and318
17areshowinginflatedSNPnumbersduetoreinfectionorananomalousrateof319
evolution.320
Antifungalsusceptibilitytesting321
Fluconazolesusceptibilitytesting(Table1)usingtheEtest®(bioMerieux)wascarriedout322
for12isolates(includingthreepairedisolates)inthisstudybytheaccreditedcentral323
MicrobiologylaboratoryinCapeTownatthetimeoftheclinicalepisode;fiveofthese324
(CCTP27-d121inPair1;CCTP50andCCTP50-d257inPair3;RCT24-d154inPair6;325
IFNR11-d203inPair15)hadMICsabovetheestablishedepidemiologicalcut-offvalue(≥326
17
8μg/ml)forfluconazole(FLC).Allpairswereretestedfollowing5-10yearsfrozen327
storageinglycerolusingtheMICRONAUT-AMsystemforyeastsusceptibility(Methods):328
allwerefoundtobesensitivetoFLC.329
ThefourfoldincreaseinFLCMICobservedinPairs1and3initialandrecurrent330
infectionsprovideasoundbasisforrelapseofinfectionduetodrugresistance:inPair1331
(patientCCTP27),theinitialisolatehadasusceptibleFLCMICof4ug/ml,whilstthe332
recurrentisolatewasresistantatanMICof64ug/ml;inPair3(CCTP50),theinitial333
isolateMICwas16ug/ml(intermediate),whilstahighlyresistantMICof256ug/mlwas334
foundonrecurrenceatday257.335
Serialisolatessharearecentcommonancestor,suggestingrelapseofinfection336
ToinvestigatewhethertheC.neoformansisolatedfromthesamepatientwererelapse337
infectionoftheoriginalisolate,orinfectionwithanewisolate,weundertook338
phylogeneticanalysestodeterminetheirrelationships.339
Asdescribedabove,thehighlevelofcommonSNPs,andsubsequentlowlevelofunique340
SNPs,betweenrecurrentisolatesindicatedthatallpairs,withtheexceptionofPairs3341
and17,wererelapseoftheoriginalinfections(Table2).Phylogeneticanalysis(Figure1)342
confirmedthatallpairs(exceptingPairs3and17)clusteredtogetherwithshortbranch343
lengths,confirmingthelowlevelofdivergencebetweenoriginalandrecurrentisolates,344
thusconfirmingthattheywererelapseoftheoriginalinfections.However,only46%and345
56%ofSNPswerefoundtobeincommonbetweeninitialandrelapseinfectioninPairs346
3and17respectively(Figure1andTable2).TheseVNBpairs(Pair3;CCTP50,CCTP50-347
18
d257andCCTP50-d409andPair17;IFNR23andIFNR23-d179)showedmarkedlylonger348
branchlengths,suggestingeitherreinfectionorelevatedratesofwithin-hostevolution.349
Furtheranalysiswasundertakentoconfirmorrefutethatreinfectionbyadifferent350
isolatewasresponsibleforPairs3and17.Phylogeneticanalysisforallisolatesincluded351
inFigure1wererepeatedforeachofthe14C.neoformanschromosomesindividually352
(SupplementaryFigure1).353
PhylogeneticanalysisofPair3showedthattheoriginalinfectinggenotypeofCCTP50354
washighlyrelatedtotheisolateIFN26(notincludedinthisstudy,butincludedinthe355
phylogenytoassistwithdefininglineages-seeMaterialsandMethods).Allthree356
genotypesfromPair3werefoundtobephylogeneticallyclusteredtogether,butwith357
longbranches(Figure1).Chromosome-by-chromosomeanalysisindicatedthatPair3358
seriallyisolatedgenotypesdisplayeddifferingrelationshipsforeachchromosome,and359
allthreeserialgenotypeswereclusteredtogetheronlyinthephylogenyfor360
chromosome1(SupplementaryFigure1).Allthreegenotypeswerephylogenetically361
similarforthreeotherchromosomes,howeverlongbranchesandclusteringwith362
additionalnon-studyisolatessuggesteddifferingevolutionaryrelationships.Thethree363
seriallyisolatedgenotypesofPair3werecompletelyphylogeneticallydissimilarinthree364
chromosomes;theremainingchromosomessaweithertheday1isolate(CCTP50)and365
day409isolate(CCTP50-d409),ortheday257isolate(CCTP50-d257)andday409366
isolate(CCTP50-d409)phylogeneticallymorerelated.367
19
Pair17isolates(IDIFNR23)clusteredtogetherinonlytwoofthe14chromosomal368
phylogeniesexplored(Chromosomes10and12);intheremainingchromosomal369
phylogenies,thePair17isolateseitherdisplayedaclosephylogeneticrelationship,but370
withlongbranches(6chromosomes),orwerephylogeneticallydistinctfromone371
another,andweremorephylogeneticallyrelatedwithotherstudyoradditionalisolates372
(6chromosomes).373
Microevolutionwithinthehumanhost374
Ourdatapresentauniqueopportunitytoobservemicroevolutionofallthreelineagesof375
C.neoformansinthehumanhost.Althoughmultiplefactorsdetermineevolutionary376
rates,identifyingnon-synonymousSNPs(nsSNPs)thatcauseaminoacidchangeisa377
standardmethodforinferringgeneticdiversityandobservingnaturalselectionon378
codons.379
Lessthan3%ofnsSNPswereuniquetorecurrentisolatesinallpairs,furthersuggesting380
thatallpairsarerelapseoftheoriginalinfection,withtheexceptionoftheVNBPairs3381
and17(15.2%and59.8%ofallnsSNPsareunique,respectively).382
SNPsuniquetoeachtimepointforeachpairwereidentified.AllSNPsatDay1inall383
pairs,andallSNPsattimeofisolateofrecurrentinfectioninallpairs,werecompared.384
NoSNPswerefoundtobecommontoall17pairsateitherDay1oratpointof385
recurrentinfection;however,therewereVNIIandVNBlineage-specific,andtimepoint-386
specific,commonSNPs.387
20
FiveSNPs,allintergenic,werefoundtobecommonatDay1,alongwithfivedifferent388
SNPs,alsointergenic,withinVNBpairs(Pairs3,12and17).ThreeintergenicSNPswere389
commontoallVNIIpairs(Pairs2,4,5and9)attimepointDay1,whilst14SNPswere390
commontoallVNIIpairsatthepointofrecurrentinfection,fiveofwhichwere391
intergenic.Theremaining9SNPswerelocatedinthe5’untranslatedregion(UTR)gene392
SMF1(CNAG_05640),ametaliontransporterwithanaturalresistance-associated393
macrophageprotein.Selectionanalysisindicatedthatthisgenewasnotunderselection394
pressure,however.395
Toevaluatethegeneticdivergence,Wright’sfixationindexes(FST)werecalculatedto396
identifySNPsunderselectioninVNIoriginalandrecurrentinfectionpopulations397
investigating96,856loci(seeMethods).Noputativelociundereitherdiversifyingor398
balancingselectioncouldbedetectedusingafalsediscoveryrate(FDR)of0.05.FST399
valueswerelimitedtonotexceed3.47x10-5.400
Aneuploidyasageneratorofdiversityinrecurrentinfection401
Normalisedwhole-genomecoveragewasplottedtoobservepossibleaneuploidy402
(increaseordecreaseincopiesofchromosomes)andcopynumbervariation(CNV)403
events.Aneuploidyeventswereobservedin7genomepairs,suggestingeither404
interspersedortandemduplicationsoflargesegmentsofthegenome.405
Ormerodetal.(Ormerodetal.2013)previouslypublishedastudyshowingrelapse406
isolatesexhibitinganeuploidiesofchromosome12.Weobservedaneuploidyof407
chromosome12infourpairs(Pairs1,5,10and14)includedinthisstudy.The408
21
aneuploidyspanneddifferentregionsofchromosome12inallpairs,butallaneuploidies409
werepresentintherightarmofthechromosome:inPair5theaneuploidywas410
restrictedto392kbpofonechromosomearm;inPair1,theaneuploidyspannedan411
entirearmofchromosome12(603kbp).Pair14displayedthisaneuploidyinboththe412
initialandrecurrentinfection,andtheaneuploidyspannedthewholechromosome;the413
recurrentinfectionisolateofPair10alsodisplayedaneuploidyalongthewhole414
chromosome.Evaluationofthereaddepthalongchromosome12revealedtriplication415
ofthechromosome12arminthePair1recurrentinfectionisolate,aphenomenonalso416
seeninOrmerodetal.(Ormerodetal.2013).FurtheranalysisofreaddepthinthePair417
5recurrentisolaterevealedadiploidgenome,andchromosome12wasalso418
experiencingtriploidy.CurrentannotationoftheC.neoformansH99genomereveals419
thepresenceof327genesinchromosome12;therightarmofchromosome12has260420
genespresent.Wescannedthegenespresentinthisarmofchromosome12forgenes421
potentiallyinvolvedinvirulence,whichmightproveadvantageoustotheprogressionof422
infectionordrugresistance.OnesuchgenewasSFB2(CNAG_06093),whichisinvolved423
intheconservationofthesterolregulatoryelement-bindingproteinpathway(SREBP)424
(Changetal.2009).Analcoholdehydrogenase(GNO1–CNAG_06168)wasalsopresent,425
whichisthoughttobeinvolvedinthedefenceagainsthostresponse(deJesús-Berríos426
etal.2003).Analysisforenrichmentofmetabolicpathwaysalsorevealedthatthe427
genespresentinthischromosomearmaresignificantlyinvolvedinthemetabolismof428
drugs(correctedp-valuep<3.81e-2).429
22
Wesearchedforcopynumbervariationingenesknowntobeinvolvedindrug430
resistanceandvirulence.CAP10appearedtobehaploidinallisolates,withthe431
exceptionofPairs4and5,wheretheinitialinfection(CCTP52)andrecurrentinfection432
(RCT9-d99)werefoundtobediploid,respectively.However,oncloserinspection(see433
Methods),webelievethattheisolatesinPairs4and5(CCTP52andRCT9-d99)have434
diploidgenomes,implyingthattheCAP10geneisactuallytetraploid.Whetherthe435
remainingisolatesinthesetwopairs(CCTP52-d55andRCT9)havediploidgenomes436
couldnotbedistinguished,however,itisclearthatCAP10losesploidyfrominitial437
infectiontorelapseforPair4,withnoevidenceoflossofheterozygosity(LoH),whilst438
thereverseistrueforPair5.CAP10wasalsofoundtobetetraploid(asthegenomesof439
theseisolateswerefoundtobediploid)inbothinitialandrecurrentinfectionsforPairs440
3and17.441
TheERG11geneonchromosome1wasfoundtohaveincreasedcopynumberin442
numerouspairs(2,3,4,5,9,12,and17),andwasnotfoundtobelineage-associated.443
HoweverthisCNVwasmaintainedthroughoutinfectiontorecurrenceinallpairs,with444
theexceptiontoPair4;sincePair4initialinfection(CCTP52)wasfoundtohaveadiploid445
genome,ERG11wastetraploid,andlostthisploidytobediploidwithrespecttotherest446
ofthegenomeintherecurrentinfection(CCTP52-d55).Whilstchromosome1was447
duplicatedintheinitialinfectionisolateofPair15(IFNR11),ERG11wasfoundtobe448
haploid;theploidyofchromosomewassubsequentlylostintherecurrentinfection449
isolateofPair15(IFNR11-d203).450
23
ERG11inPair4(IDCCTP52)didnothaveanynsSNPsintheoriginalinfection(CCTP52),451
butonensSNPswaspresentinERG11intherecurrentinfection(CCTP52-d55).Clinical452
notesshowthatthepatientfromwhichPair4wasisolatedwasgivenfluconazole(400453
mg/d)oninitialinfection,didnotattendfollowuporreceiveARTorfurtherfluconazole,454
andwasthenre-admittedanddiedfromCMrecurrenceatday55.MICvalueswere455
unfortunatelynotavailableforeitheroriginalorrecurrentisolates.456
NonsensemutationsinDNAmismatchrepairgenescausehypermutatorstates457
Phylogeneticanalysisonachromosome-by-chromosomebasisrevealedthatPair3458
isolatesonlyclusteredtogetherintwoofthefourteenchromosomes;thethreeisolates459
werephylogeneticallydissimilarin4chromosomes,whilstday257and409isolates(Pair460
3CCTP50-d257andCCTP50-d409)werephylogeneticallymoresimilartoeachother461
thantotheday1isolate(CCTP50)infivechromosomes.Day1andday409isolates462
weremorephylogeneticallysimilarthantotheday257isolateinthreechromosomes.463
Thelackofphylogeneticsimilarity(12outof14chromosomes)showninthethree464
isolatesofPair3indicatedthatthesethreeisolatesdonotshowarecentcommon465
ancestor,andprovidesevidenceforreinfectionwithanewisolate,ratherthanrelapse.466
Incontrast,thetwoisolatesinPair17wereonlyphylogeneticallyrelatedforfiveoutof467
the14chromosomes(SupplementaryFigure1),suggestingthatonthisbasisthe468
recurrentinfectionwasdistinctenoughastobedefinedasanon-relapseinfectionin469
thisPair.However,onfurtherinvestigationthiswasfoundnottobethecase.470
24
Weanalysedthecoverageprofilesandsynonymous/non-synonymousratiosofboth471
isolatesinPair17(Figure2c).Althoughtheaneuploidiesobservedwereextensive472
throughoutthegenome,theincreasesinploidyappearedonsimilarchromosomesin473
bothisolates.Asimilarobservationwasseenforthestrikinglyincreasednumberof474
nsSNPsinbothisolatesinPair17:41,549and46,622nsSNPsforIFNR23andIFNR23-475
d179respectively;anevenlargerincreaseinsynonymousSNPswasalsoobserved476
(68,094and82,172synonymousSNPsforIFNR23andIFNR23-d179respectively).We477
thereforesoughttoidentifyamechanismresponsibleforthehighnumberof478
synonymousandnsSNPs,andploidy.479
PreviousstudieshavereportedthatmutationsintheDNAmismatchrepairgeneMSH2480
haveresultedhypermutatoreffectsinbacteriaandtheyeastS.cerevisiae(Drotschmann481
etal.1999).BothPair17isolateswerefoundtoharbourtwononsense(i.e.point482
mutationsintheDNAsequencethatresultinaprematurestopcodon)mutationswithin483
thecodingregionofthegeneencodingMSH2,theDNAmismatchrepairprotein.484
NonsensemutationsinMSH2werenotobservedinanyotherpairsincludedinthis485
study.Thesemutationswereinthesamepositionsinboththeoriginalandrecurrent486
isolates(Ser-888-STOPandSer-86-STOP).487
Wethenperformedagenome-widesearchinbothPair17isolatestoidentifyfurther488
nonsensemutationsinDNAmismatchrepairgenes.BothPair17isolateswerefoundto489
harbourasinglenonsensemutationwithinthecodingregionsofgenesencodingMSH5490
andRAD5.Again,nonsensemutationsinthesegeneswerenotobservedinanyother491
25
pairsincludedinthisstudy.ThesenonsensemutationscausedGln-1066-STOPinRAD5,492
andGln-709-STOPinMSH5inbothoriginalandrecurrentisolates.493
Sincethelikelihoodofsuchmutationsoccurringbychanceinindependentgenomes494
lackingacommonancestorisverysmall,thissuggestthatratherthanbeinga495
reinfection,thiswasindeedarelapseoftheoriginalinfection,andthephylogenetic496
dissimilaritybetweenthetwoisolateswasduetohypermutation.Atotalof293SNPs497
werelocatedinMSH2inbothPair17isolates,comparedtoameanof30SNPsper498
isolateintheremainingPairsthatwestudied(SupplementaryTable2).MoreSNPs499
overallwereobservedintherecurrentisolate(IFNR23-d179)inbothRAD5andMSH5500
(361and357respectively)whencomparedtotheoriginalisolate(IFNR23–320for501
RAD5,305forMSH5).Thesenumbersareconsiderablyhigherthantheaverageof46502
SNPsand37SNPsperisolateintheremainingPairsincludedinthisstudyforRAD5and503
MSH5respectively.504
Discussion505
RelapseofCMcausedbyC.neoformansisusuallyduetothepersistenceandrecurrence506
oftheoriginalinfectingisolate(Spitzeretal.1993),andstudiesoftenfocusonratesof507
within-hostmicroevolutionbetweenseriallycollectedisolates.However,recentstudies508
haveshownthataninfectionofapopulationofdissimilargenotypesisresponsiblefor509
20%ofrelapsecases(Desnos-Ollivieretal.2010).Weusedwhole-genomesequencing510
todistinguishco-infectionsofapopulationofgenotypesfromarelapseofasingle511
genotypeowingtotreatmentfailure(Figure3).UsingWGSwecandistinguishbetween512
26
relapsesofinfectionofthesamegenotype,whichdifferbyonlyafewSNPs,whilstinitial513
infectionbyapopulationofdissimilargenotypeswillseeadifferenceofmanySNPs514
betweeninitialandrelapseinfectionasgeneticdriftoccurs.OurresultsshowthatC.515
neoformansincursnumerousuniquesmallandlarge-scalechangesduringinfection,and516
thatasubsetofthesemayhaveadaptivevalue.Whilstthisstudyisconcernedwiththe517
genomicsofrecurrentinfectionsbyidentifyingSNPchangesandploidypotentially518
involvedinthepersistenceofC.neoformansinfection,futureworkshouldinvestigate519
thepotentialroleofgeneexpressionchangesandgenenetworksinvolvedinchangesin520
fitnessamongstthepopulationsofinfectinggenotypesthatunderpintherecurrenceof521
infection.PreviousstudiesinBrucellainfectionandTBhavehighlightedthemeritsof522
usingtranscriptomicstoidentifypatientsrequiringmoreintensivetreatment(Dufortet523
al.2016)anddifferentiatingbetweendormancyandreactivation(Kondratievaetal.524
2014)respectively.GiventhehighergeneticvariationobservedintheVNBlineage,the525
genomicdatacouldalsobeexploitedtoinvestigategenomecontentvariation,asthisis526
knowntobeamajordeterminantinyeastphenotypicvariation(56).Suchapproaches527
arelikelytoincreaseourunderstandingofclinicalcasesofrecurrentC.neoformans528
infectionsthroughidentifyingthegeneticbasisofphenotypicswitching(D’Souza&529
Heitman2001)andthegeneregulatorynetworksinvolvedinlatency,virulenceand530
resistancetoantifungaltherapies.531
Onepair(Pair3)includedinthisstudydidnotdisplayarelapseoftheinitialinfecting532
isolate.Analysisofthispairshowedthatonly46%ofSNPswereincommonbetween533
theinitialandrecurrentinfection,suggestingthatrelapsewascausedbyanew,albeit534
27
similar,genotype.Theseco-infectioneventsarerarelyreportedinliterature;however,535
Hagenetal.didfindevidenceofco-infectioninasinglepatientusingAFLP(58).The536
extensivechromosomalcopynumbervariations,oraneuploidies,observedinPair3537
(Figure2)alsoshowthatdifferentgenotypeswereisolatedatsubsequenttimepoints538
(days257and409).PhylogeneticanalysesshowedthatthispairbelongstotheVNB539
lineage;itisknownthatapopulationofVNBgenotypescanbefoundinonelocation,540
suchasonthesametree(Vanhoveetal.2016).Therefore,itispossibleforasingle541
immunocompromisedindividualtoinhaleaclusterofbasidiosporesfromasingle542
matingpopulation,whichwouldleadtoaclusterofrelated,butrecombinedgenotypes543
thatthencometodominatetheinfectionatdifferenttimepoints.Althougha544
populationcanresideinanenvironmentalreservoir,recombinationbetweengenotypes545
canoccur,generatingcloselyrelated,yetdistinct,genotypes(Figure3b).Thislatter546
hypothesissupportsourobservationsofdifferingnumbersofnsSNPsbetweenday257547
(CCTP50-d257)andtheoriginal(CCTP50)andday409(CCTP50-d409)isolates,aswellas548
theploidiesandMICvalues(Table1)seenatthetimeofsampleisolation:theday1549
isolate(CCTP50)initiallyhadanintermediateFLCMICof16ug/ml,whilsttherecurrent550
isolateatday257hadahighlyresistantFLCMICof256ug/ml.TheseMICvaluesare551
suggestiveofdrug-resistantgenotypesbeingpresentandselectedforwithinthispatient552
bytheprolongedmaintenanceonFLCmonotherapyfollowinginductiontherapywith553
amphotericinB.ItisalsolikelythatthepopulationofVNBisolatescirculatinginthe554
patientwerenotsufficientlysampledbysequencingonlyonecolonyateachtimepoint,555
andthatdeepersequencingwouldhaveuncoveredgreatergenomicdiversity.556
28
Theoccurrenceofaneuploidy,whereanabnormalnumberofchromosomesisobserved,557
isseenasanevolutionaryprocessthatrapidlyaltersfitness,andhasbeendescribedin558
multiplehumanfungalpathogensasameansofgeneratingdrugresistance(Selmeckiet559
al.2006;Sionovetal.2010).Sionovetal.(Sionovetal.2010)reportedtheduplication560
ofmultiplechromosomesinresponsetohighconcentrationsofFLC,whichresultedin561
genotypesdevelopingFLCdrugresistance.AssociatedgeneduplicationsinC.562
neoformanschromosome1includedERG11andAFR1,whicharebothtransportersof563
azoledrugs.WhilstduplicationsofERG11wereseeninsevenpairs(2,3,4,5,9,12and564
17),thesewerenotnecessarilyassociatedwithanentireduplicationofchromosome1.565
Sionovetal.suggestedthatERG11contributedtotheduplicationofchromosome1566
(Sionovetal.2010);weobservedonlyoneisolate(IFNR11ofPair15)displayinga567
duplicationofchromosome1,butasinglecopyofERG11,suggestingploidywasnot568
completethroughoutthechromosome.Sincethisisolatewastheinitialinfection,we569
canassumethattheduplicationofchromosome1wasnotsolelyduetostressofazole570
drugtreatment,suggestingthatploidycanbeactivatedunderdifferentconditions,such571
asthestressassociatedwithadaptationtothehost.Apossiblelimitationisthatthe572
observedduplicationmaybeduetoprolongedfrozenstorage.573
Ormerodetal.(Ormerodetal.2013)showedananeuploidy(duplication)in574
chromosome12betweenseriallycollectedisolates.Fourpairsincludedinthisstudy575
(Pair1,5,10and14)allshowedaneuploidyinchromosome12;however,Pair14(ID576
IFNR19)displayedthisaneuploidyinboththeinitialandrelapseinfections.Since577
aneuploidiesaretypicallylostuponremovalofdrugpressure(Sionovetal.2010),one578
29
canassumethatthisaneuploidywasmaintainedduetopreviousdrugexposure579
potentiallynotreportedbythepatient,orthataneuploidyhelpsC.neoformansadaptto580
thehostenvironment(Morrow&Fraser2013).Chromosome12experiencedtriploidy581
inthePair1recurrentisolate(CCTP27-d121);thispairalsodemonstrateddrug582
resistancetofluconazole,withaFLCMICof4atinitialinfection,andaFLCMICof64at583
recurrentinfection.Ormerodetal.(Ormerodetal.2013)hypothesisethatthelarge584
numberofgenesaffectedbytheincreasedcopynumberofchromosome12contributes585
tometabolomedifferences;however,wehypothesisecopynumbervariationof586
chromosome12isaresponsetoFLCstress,resultinginincreasedMIC,andthatsome587
genespresentonchromosome12,suchasERG8andCAP6,maybetargetsofazole588
drugsorinvolvedinC.neoformansvirulence.589
Antimicrobialdrugsimposestrongselectionpressureonpathogens,withmayleadto590
theevolutionofdrugresistance(Muetal.2010;Didelotetal.2016);thereare,however,591
fitnesscostsassociatedwiththeevolutionofresistancetoantifungaldrugsthatmay592
impactfitness(Cowenetal.2001).Genome-widescansforsitesunderselectionleads593
totheidentificationofpossiblesitesofdrugresistance.Wedidnotidentifyany594
significantsiteswhencomparingVNIoriginalinfectionversusrecurrentinfection,and595
thenumberofVNBandVNIIisolatesweretoolowforanalysis.Whilsttheseresults596
couldbeinterpretedastherebeingnositesunderselectionintheVNIisolatessampled597
inthisstudy,itismorelikelythatsimilarpatternswouldnotbeseenamongst598
individualsduetostochasticityandclonalinterference(Didelotetal.2016).Itisalso599
likelythatasthereislittlerecombinationinVNIisolatescomparedtoVNBandVNII600
30
isolates(Khayhanetal.2013;Litvintsevaetal.2011;Litvintseva2005)andtherefore601
linkageiscompleteacrossthegenome,furtherhamperingselectionanalysis.We602
thereforefoundnoevidenceforgeneticallydeterminedalterationsindrugresistancein603
thestudyisolates.604
MICvalueswereonlyobtainedfor9outof35isolatesinthisstudyatthetimeof605
sampling.Susceptibilitytestingatalaterdaterevealedalltheisolatestobesusceptible606
toantifungaldrugsincludingFLC,suggestingthatanyresistantphenotypeshadbeen607
lostintheabsenceofdrugselectivepressure.Itisthereforeimportantforcliniciansto608
requestsusceptibilitytestinginrealtime,attheveryleastinallcasesorrecurrentCM.609
WhilstPair17didnotexhibitahighpercentageofcommonSNPsbetweentheoriginal610
andrecurrentisolatesindicativeofarelapseinfection,theelevatedrateofSNPs611
observedinallchromosomesofbothisolatessuggestedthiswasnotare-infectionas612
seeninPair3(Figure3c).Rather,ourresultssuggestthattheisolatesinthispairwere613
exhibitingahypermutatorphenotype,asaresultoftwononsensemutationsintheDNA614
mismatchrepairgeneMSH2,andonenonsensemutationineachoftheDNAmismatch615
repairgenesRAD5andMSH5.Whilstpreviousstudieshaveshownhypermutator616
phenotypesaidadaptationtostress(Magditchetal.2012),andwehypothesisethat617
hypermutationmayleadtoadaptationofdrugresistanceunderthestressofantifungal618
treatment.Theseresultsarethefirsttotheauthors’knowledgetoreportonnonsense619
mutationsinMSH2,RAD5andMSH5inC.neoformans.Furtherinvestigationisrequired620
todeterminewhetherthesenonsensemutationshavearoleindrugresistance621
31
phenotypesusingtranscriptomicapproachesandcreatingsingle-geneknockout622
mutantsofMSH2,RAD5andMSH5.Itisalsonecessarytotestthevirulenceof623
hypermutatorisolatesinthemousemodelandtodescribetheimpactoftheincreasein624
mutationratethatoccuraresultofthishypermutation.Ourstudyonlyincludesone625
pairofhypermutatorgenotypes,sofurthersamplingisrequiredtoidentifywhetherthis626
phenomenonisspecifictotheVNBlineage,whetherhypermutatorsoccurintheVNII627
andVNIlineages,andwhethertheyareclinicallyrelevant.628
Thisworkrepresentsthemostextensivecomparativegenome-sequencingbasedstudy629
toinvestigatemicroevolutioninseriallycollectedisolatesofC.neoformanstodate.The630
observationofaninfectionofasinglepatientwithapopulationofVNBisolatesis631
clinicallyrelevant,aswidelyuseddrugregimenswithazolemonotherapymaynotbe632
effectiveagainstsuchageneticallydiverseinfection.Itisalsolikelythattheextensive633
geneticdiversityseeninclinicallyisolatedVNBisolatesmaybeduetomixedinfection.634
HypermutationduetononsensemutationsintheDNAmismatchrepairgenesMSH2,635
RAD5andMSH5causeanincreasedmutationandrateofaneuploidyinC.neoformans,636
whichmayconferanincreasedabilitytoadapttodrugpressure.Furthersamplingis637
requiredtoidentifywhetherhypermutationisaphenomenononlyobservedintheVNB638
lineage,andhowthesemutationsimpactthefitnessofC.neoformansbyimposinga639
highgeneticload.640
Acknowledgements641
SpecialthankstoMr.IanWrightforhisfinancialcontributiontothisproject,andDr.642
32
WinnieWuandStarLabUKforsupplyingfilterpipettetipsfreeofcharge.Thisworkwas643
fundedbyaMedicalResearchCouncilgrant(MRCMR/K000373/1)awardedtoMCFand644
agrantfromImperialCollegeLondon(WPIA/F24085)awardedtoJR.JJwassupported645
bytheWellcomeTrust(trainingfellowship,WT081794)andissupportedbyagrantfrom646
thePennCenterforAIDSResearch(CFAR),anNIH-fundedprogram(P30AI045008).647
ThankyoutoSeanLoboandAhsanAwaisBokhariforinitialworkonMICsandMLST,648
respectively. 649
Authorcontributions650
TB,JJ,JS,AR,GMandTSHconductedtheclinicalstudiesandprovidedisolatesincluded651
inthisstudy.TB,JJandMCFconceivedtheresearchquestion.JRandMBconceivedthe652
experiments;MBperformedlibrarypreparationsforsequencing,withassistancefrom653
MV.JRperformedalignments,variantcallinganddownstreamanalysis,andwrotethe654
paper.MVperformedBayeScananalysis.Allauthorsreadandcontributedtothispaper.655
References656
Abdolrasouli,A.etal.,2015.GenomicContextofAzoleResistanceMutationsin657AspergillusfumigatusDeterminedUsingWhole-GenomeSequencing.mBio,6(3),658pp.e00536–15.659
Alastruey-Izquierdo,A.&Cuenca-Estrella,M.,2012.EUCASTandCLSI:HowtoAssessin660VitroSusceptibilityandClinicalResistance.CurrentFungalInfectionReports,6(3),661pp.229–234.662
Alexander,B.D.etal.,2013.IncreasingechinocandinresistanceinCandidaglabrata:663clinicalfailurecorrelateswithpresenceofFKSmutationsandelevatedminimum664inhibitoryconcentrations.ClinicalInfectiousDiseases,56(12),pp.1724–1732.665
Beale,M.A.etal.,2015.GenotypicDiversityIsAssociatedwithClinicalOutcomeand666
33
PhenotypeinCryptococcalMeningitisacrossSouthernAfricaJ.M.Vinetz,ed.PLoS667NeglectedTropicalDiseases,9(6),p.e0003847.668
Bicanic,T.etal.,2007.Fungalburden,earlyfungicidalactivity,andoutcomein669cryptococcalmeningitisinantiretroviral-naiveorantiretroviral-experiencedpatients670treatedwithamphotericinBorfluconazole.ClinicalInfectiousDiseases,45(1),671pp.76–80.672
Bicanic,T.etal.,2008.High-DoseAmphotericinBwithFlucytosinefortheTreatmentof673CryptococcalMeningitisinHIV-InfectedPatients:ARandomizedTrial.Clinical674InfectiousDiseases,47(1),pp.123–130.675
Billmyre,R.B.etal.,2014.HighlyRecombinantVGIICryptococcusgattiiPopulation676DevelopsClonalOutbreakClustersthroughbothSexualMacroevolutionandAsexual677Microevolution.mBio,5(4),pp.e01494–14–e01494–14.678
Blasi,E.etal.,2001.Evidenceofmicroevolutioninaclinicalcaseofrecurrent679Cryptococcusneoformansmeningoencephalitis.Europeanjournalofclinical680microbiology&infectiousdiseases:officialpublicationoftheEuropeanSocietyof681ClinicalMicrobiology,20(8),pp.535–543.682
Bozzette,S.A.etal.,1991.Aplacebo-controlledtrialofmaintenancetherapywith683fluconazoleaftertreatmentofcryptococcalmeningitisintheacquired684immunodeficiencysyndrome.CaliforniaCollaborativeTreatmentGroup.TheNew685Englandjournalofmedicine,324(9),pp.580–584.686
Brouwer,A.E.etal.,2004.CombinationantifungaltherapiesforHIV-associated687cryptococcalmeningitis:arandomisedtrial.Lancet,363(9423),pp.1764–1767.688
Burns,J.L.etal.,2001.LongitudinalassessmentofPseudomonasaeruginosainyoung689childrenwithcysticfibrosis.TheJournalofinfectiousdiseases,183(3),pp.444–452.690
Calo,S.,Billmyre,R.B.&Heitman,J.,2013.GeneratorsofPhenotypicDiversityinthe691EvolutionofPathogenicMicroorganismsH.True-Krob,ed.PLoSpathogens,9(3),692pp.e1003181–4.693
Chang,Y.C.etal.,2009.Conservationofthesterolregulatoryelement-bindingprotein694pathwayanditspathobiologicalimportanceinCryptococcusneoformans.695EukaryoticCell,8(11),pp.1770–1779.696
Cowen,L.E.,Kohn,L.M.&Anderson,J.B.,2001.Divergenceinfitnessandevolutionof697drugresistanceinexperimentalpopulationsofCandidaalbicans.Journalof698bacteriology,183(10),pp.2971–2978.699
deJesús-Berríos,M.etal.,2003.Enzymesthatcounteractnitrosativestresspromote700fungalvirulence.CurrentBiology,13(22),pp.1963–1968.701
34
Desnos-Ollivier,M.etal.,2010.MixedInfectionsandInVivoEvolutionintheHuman702FungalPathogenCryptococcusneoformans.mBio,1(1),pp.e00091–10–e00091–10.703
Didelot,X.etal.,2016.Within-hostevolutionofbacterialpathogens.Naturereviews704Microbiology,14,pp.150–162.705
Drotschmann,K.,Clark,A.B.&Kunkel,T.A.,1999.Mutatorphenotypesofcommon706polymorphismsandmissensemutationsinMSH2.CurrentBiology,9(16),pp.907–707910.708
Dufort,M.J.etal.,2016.Geneexpressionprofilespredicttreatmentoutcomesin709Brucellosis.TheJournalofImmunology,196(1Supplement),pp.66.21–66.21.710
D’Souza,C.A.&Heitman,J.,2001.Itinfectsme,itinfectsmenot:phenotypicswitching711inthefungalpathogenCryptococcusneoformans.JournalofClinicalInvestigation,712108(11),pp.1577–1578.713
Excoffier,L.,Hofer,T.&Foll,M.,2009.Detectinglociunderselectioninahierarchically714structuredpopulation.Heredity,103(4),pp.285–298.715
Foll,M.&Gaggiotti,O.,2008.Agenome-scanmethodtoidentifyselectedloci716appropriateforbothdominantandcodominantmarkers:aBayesianperspective.717Genetics,180(2),pp.977–993.718
Forche,A.etal.,2009.EvolutioninCandidaalbicansPopulationsDuringaSinglePassage719ThroughaMouseHost.Genetics,182(3),pp.799–811.720
Ford,C.B.etal.,2015.TheevolutionofdrugresistanceinclinicalisolatesofCandida721albicans.eLife,4,p.e00662.722
Fraser,J.A.etal.,2005.Chromosomaltranslocationandsegmentalduplicationin723Cryptococcusneoformans.EukaryoticCell,4(2),pp.401–406.724
Fries,B.C.etal.,1996.KaryotypeinstabilityinCryptococcusneoformansinfection.725Journalofclinicalmicrobiology,34(6),pp.1531–1534.726
Hagen,F.etal.,2015.RecognitionofsevenspeciesintheCryptococcus727gattii/Cryptococcusneoformansspeciescomplex.FungalGeneticsandBiology,72878(C),pp.16–48.729
Hickman,M.A.etal.,2015.Parasexualploidyreductiondrivespopulationheterogeneity730throughrandomandtransientaneuploidyinCandidaalbicans.Genetics,200,731pp.781–794.732
Illnait-Zaragozi,M.T.etal.,2010.Microsatellitetypingandsusceptibilitiesofserial733CryptococcusneoformansisolatesfromCubanpatientswithrecurrentcryptococcal734
35
meningitis.BMCInfectiousDiseases,10(1),p.289.735
Jarvis,J.N.&Harrison,T.S.,2007.HIV-associatedcryptococcalmeningitis.AIDS,21(16),736pp.2119–2129.737
Jarvis,J.N.etal.,2012.Adjunctiveinterferon-γimmunotherapyforthetreatmentof738HIV-associatedcryptococcalmeningitis.AIDS,26(9),pp.1105–1113.739
Jarvis,J.N.etal.,2010.AdultmeningitisinasettingofhighHIVandTBprevalence:740findingsfrom4961suspectedcases.BMCInfectiousDiseases,10(1),p.67.741
Kanehisa,M.etal.,2016.KEGGasareferenceresourceforgeneandproteinannotation.742Nucleicacidsresearch,44(D1),pp.D457–62.743
Khayhan,K.etal.,2013.GeographicallyStructuredPopulationsofCryptococcus744neoformansVarietygrubiiinAsiaCorrelatewithHIVStatusandShowaClonal745PopulationStructureO.Zaragoza,ed.PLoSONE,8(9),p.e72222.746
Kondratieva,T.etal.,2014.Latenttuberculosisinfection:Whatweknowaboutits747geneticcontrol?Tuberculosis,94(5),pp.462–468.748
Li,H.,2013.Aligningsequencereads,clonesequencesandassemblycontigswithBWA-749MEM.750
Li,H.etal.,2009.TheSequenceAlignment/MapformatandSAMtools.Bioinformatics,75125(16),pp.2078–2079.752
Litvintseva,A.P.,2005.MultilocusSequenceTypingRevealsThreeGenetic753SubpopulationsofCryptococcusneoformansvar.grubii(SerotypeA),Includinga754UniquePopulationinBotswana.Genetics,172(4),pp.2223–2238.755
Litvintseva,A.P.etal.,2011.EvidencethattheHumanPathogenicFungusCryptococcus756neoformansvar.grubiiMayHaveEvolvedinAfricaK.Nielsen,ed.PLoSONE,6(5),757p.e19688.758
Loftus,B.J.etal.,2005.Thegenomeofthebasidiomycetousyeastandhumanpathogen759Cryptococcusneoformans.Science,307(5713),pp.1321–1324.760
Longley,N.etal.,2008.DoseResponseEffectofHigh-DoseFluconazoleforHIV-761AssociatedCryptococcalMeningitisinSouthwesternUganda.ClinicalInfectious762Diseases,47(12),pp.1556–1561.763
Maciá,M.D.etal.,2005.Hypermutationisakeyfactorindevelopmentofmultiple-764antimicrobialresistanceinPseudomonasaeruginosastrainscausingchroniclung765infections.Antimicrobialagentsandchemotherapy,49(8),pp.3382–3386.766
36
Magditch,D.A.etal.,2012.DNAMutationsMediateMicroevolutionbetweenHost-767AdaptedFormsofthePathogenicFungusCryptococcusneoformansR.C.May,ed.768PLoSpathogens,8(10),p.e1002936.769
McKenna,A.etal.,2010.TheGenomeAnalysisToolkit:AMapReduceframeworkfor770analyzingnext-generationDNAsequencingdata.GenomeResearch,20(9),pp.1297–7711303.772
Meyer,W.etal.,2009.Consensusmulti-locussequencetypingschemeforCryptococcus773neoformansandCryptococcusgattii.MedicalMycology,47(6),pp.561–570.774
Morrow,C.A.&Fraser,J.A.,2013.Ploidyvariationasanadaptivemechanisminhuman775pathogenicfungi.SeminarsinCellandDevelopmentalBiology,24(4),pp.339–346.776
Mu,J.etal.,2010.Plasmodiumfalciparumgenome-widescansforpositiveselection,777recombinationhotspotsandresistancetoantimalarialdrugs.Naturegenetics,42(3),778pp.268–271.779
Oliver,A.etal.,2000.HighfrequencyofhypermutablePseudomonasaeruginosain780cysticfibrosislunginfection.Science,288(5469),pp.1251–1254.781
Ormerod,K.L.etal.,2013.ComparativeGenomicsofSerialIsolatesofCryptococcus782neoformansRevealsGeneAssociatedwithCarbonUtilizationandVirulence.G3:783Genes|Genomes|Genetics,pp.1–12.784
Panackal,A.A.etal.,2006.Clinicalsignificanceofazoleantifungaldrugcross-resistance785inCandidaglabrata.Journalofclinicalmicrobiology,44(5),pp.1740–1743.786
Park,B.J.etal.,2009.Estimationofthecurrentglobalburdenofcryptococcalmeningitis787amongpersonslivingwithHIV/AIDS.AIDS,23(4),pp.525–530.788
Paul,S.,Doering,T.L.&Moye-Rowley,W.S.,2015.CryptococcusneoformansYap1is789requiredfornormalfluconazoleandoxidativestressresistance.FungalGeneticsand790Biology,74,pp.1–9.791
Pfaller,M.A.,2012.Antifungaldrugresistance:mechanisms,epidemiology,and792consequencesfortreatment.TheAmericanjournalofmedicine,125(1Suppl),793pp.S3–13.794
Rhodes,J.,Beale,M.A.&Fisher,M.C.,2014.IlluminatingChoicesforLibraryPrep:A795ComparisonofLibraryPreparationMethodsforWholeGenomeSequencingof796CryptococcusneoformansUsingIlluminaHiSeqK.Nielsen,ed.PLoSONE,9(11),797p.e113501.798
Rodero,L.etal.,2003.G484Saminoacidsubstitutioninlanosterol14-alpha799demethylase(ERG11)isrelatedtofluconazoleresistanceinarecurrent800
37
Cryptococcusneoformansclinicalisolate.Antimicrobialagentsandchemotherapy,80147(11),pp.3653–3656.802
Rodríguez-Tudela,J.L.etal.,2010.EUCASTbreakpointsforantifungals.Drugnews&803perspectives,23(2),pp.93–97.804
Selmecki,A.,Forche,A.&Berman,J.,2006.Aneuploidyandisochromosomeformation805indrug-resistantCandidaalbicans.Science,313(5785),pp.367–370.806
Selmecki,A.M.etal.,2009.Acquisitionofaneuploidyprovidesincreasedfitnessduring807theevolutionofantifungaldrugresistance.H.D.Madhani,ed.PLoSGenetics,5(10),808p.e1000705.809
Sionov,E.etal.,2010.CryptococcusneoformansOvercomesStressofAzoleDrugsby810FormationofDisomyinSpecificMultipleChromosomesS.G.Filler,ed.PLoS811pathogens,6(4),p.e1000848.812
Sionov,E.,Chang,Y.C.&Kwon-Chung,K.J.,2013.AzoleHeteroresistancein813Cryptococcusneoformans:EmergenceofResistantCloneswithChromosomal814DisomyintheMouseBrainduringFluconazoleTreatment.Antimicrobialagentsand815chemotherapy,57(10),pp.5127–5130.816
Spitzer,E.D.etal.,1993.PersistenceofinitialinfectioninrecurrentCryptococcus817neoformansmeningitis.Lancet,341(8845),pp.595–596.818
Stamatakis,A.,2006.RAxML-VI-HPC:maximumlikelihood-basedphylogeneticanalyses819withthousandsoftaxaandmixedmodels.Bioinformatics,22(21),pp.2688–2690.820
Strand,M.etal.,1993.DestabilizationoftractsofsimplerepetitiveDNAinyeastby821mutationsaffectingDNAmismatchrepair.NATURE-LONDON-,365(6443),pp.274–822276.823
VanderAuwera,G.A.etal.,2013.FromFastQdatatohighconfidencevariantcalls:the824GenomeAnalysisToolkitbestpracticespipeline.Currentprotocolsinbioinformatics825/editoralboard,AndreasD.Baxevanis...[etal.],11(1110),pp.11.10.1–11.10.33.826
Vanhove,M.etal.,2016.GenomicepidemiologyofCryptococcusyeastsidentifies827adaptationtoenvironmentalnichesunderpinninginfectionacrossanAfrican828HIV/AIDScohort.MolecularEcology,pp.1–34.829
830
831
832
38
Figurelegends833
834
Figure1–PhylogeneticanalysisofC.neoformansvar.grubiiisolatesinthisstudy835
(coloured),withadditionalisolates(showninblack)addedtodistinguishtruerelapse836
infections,orrecurrentinfections,andassociatedlineages.Wehypothesisethat837
isolatesresultingfromtruerelapseinfectionswouldbecloselyrelatedphylogenetically.838
Bootstrapanalysisover500replicateswasperformedonWGSSNPdatafrom62isolates,839
includingthe35isolatesincludedinthisstudy,togenerateanunrootedmaximum-840
likelihoodphylogeny,withallbranchessupportedto69%orhigher(withtheexception841
toaparticularlyclonalVNIclade,includingPair15only,whichonlyhad47%branch842
support).BranchlengthsrepresentthenumberofSNPsbetweentaxa.843
39
844
Figure2–Extensivechromosomalcopynumbervariationwasobservedinallisolatesin845
Pairs3and17,whencomparedtoH99.Pair2isincludedtoillustrateisolateswithout846
ploidyandextensivensSNPs.Here,normalisedwhole-genomedepthofcoverageis847
shown,averagedover10,000-bpbins,inscatterplots.Barplotsrepresenttheposition848
ofnsSNPs.Thepurpletrackrepresentstheoriginalisolate,orangetherecurrentisolate,849
andgreen(inthecaseofPair3)forthefinalrecurrentisolate.a)Noincreaseinploidyis850
40
observedineithertheoriginalorrecurrentisolateofPair2,andasmallnumberof851
nsSNPsareseen.b)IncreaseinploidyisobservedinmanychromosomesintheDay1852
isolateforPair3,someofwhicharelostovertime.AlargenumberofnsSNPsare853
observedinallchromosomesinisolatesofPair3,withchromosome6beingthe854
exception:veryfewnsSNPsarelocatedinchromosome6inCCTP50andCCTP50-d409,855
whereasover2000nsSNPsareobservedinchromosome6inCCTP50-d257.c)againin856
ploidyisobservedforChromsomes2,4,6and9comparedtotheDay1isolateinPair17,857
whereasploidyremainsunchangedforChromosomes1and12.858
41
859
42
Figure3–HypothesesofroutesofinfectionofthehumanhostbyC.neoformansvar.860
grubii.a)Inhalationofasinglepopulationofbasidiosporesintoanewhost.Duetolow861
within-hostdiversityandbeingdrugnaïve,therewillbeabottleneckinpopulationsize862
duetoantifungaldrugtreatment.However,iftheinitialdrugregimenisinsufficientto863
steriletheCSF,resistancemaydeveloponFLCmaintenancetherapyduetoselection864
pressure,resultinginrelapsedinfectionfromproliferationofadrug-resistantisolate.b)865
VNBlineageC.neoformansexiststheenvironmentasapopulation,whichcanundergo866
recombinationtoproducegeneticallysimilarisolates,butwithsignificantlydiversity.867
Duetotransmissionbottlenecks,onlyasampleofthepathogendiversitywillbe868
transferredtothehost,inthiscase,byinhalation,butitispossibleforapopulationofC.869
neoformanstoinfectasingleimmunocompromisedindividual.Someisolatesmaybe870
susceptibletoantifungaldrugsandarethusbecomingremoved,whilstotherisolates871
maybeinherentlyresistantandhencecausearelapseinfection.c)Mutationsinthe872
DNAmismatchrepairgeneMSH2causeanisolatetobecomeahypermutator.Some873
genotypesmaybesusceptibletoantifungaldrugs,butthehighmutationrateallowsthe874
infectiontoadaptrapidlytothehostandevolvedrugresistance.Thesegenotype875
proliferateinthehost,thuscausingrelapseinfection.876
Tables877
Table1:DetailsofC.neoformansisolatesandMICs(ifavailable)attimeofisolationfrom878
SouthAfricaandUganda(Pair7only)usedinthisstudy.AmB=amphotericinB1879
43
mg/kg/d,asperhospitalguidelinesatthattime,unlessotherwisestated;VOR=880
voriconazole300mg/d;5FC=flucytosine;FLC=fluconazole.881
Pair# IsolateID Dayofisolation FluconazoleMIC
atisolation
TreatmentofCM
episode(ifknown)
1 CCTP27 1 4 AmB3days
1 CCTP27-
d121
121 64 VORuntilCD4>200
cells/uL
2 CCTP32 1 4 AmB7days
2 CCTP32-
d132
132 6 AmB7days
3 CCTP50 1 16 AmB14days
3 CCTP50-
d257
257 256 AmB14days
3 CCTP50-
d409
409 n/a AmB7days
4 CCTP52 1 n/a FLC400mg/d
4 CCTP52-d55 55 n/a FLC400mg/d
5 RCT9 1 2 AmB0.7mg/kg/dplus
5FCfor14days
5 RCT9-d99 99 n/a AmBuntildeath
6 RCT24 1 4 AmBplus5FCfor14
44
days
6 RCT24-d154 154 12 FLC800mg/d
7 1600-1 1 n/a FLC16000mg/dfor14
days
7 1600-1-d106 106 n/a
8 IFNR63 1 n/a AmBplus5FC
8 IFNR63-d128 128 n/a
9 IFNR24 1 n/a AmB7days
9 IFNR24-d101 101 n/a
10 IFNR18 1 n/a AmB7days
10 IFNR18-d134 134 n/a
11 IFNR14 1 n/a AmB7days
11 IFNR14-d97 97 n/a
12 IFNR13 1 n/a AmB7days
12 IFNR13-d95 95 1
13 IFNR6 1 n/a AmB7days
13 IFNR6-d73 73 1
14 IFNR19 1 n/a AmB7days
14 IFNR19-d111 111 n/a
15 IFNR11 1 n/a AmB7days
15 IFNR11-d203 203 12
45
16 IFNR27 1 n/a AmB7days
16 IFNR27-d204 204 n/a
17 IFNR23 1 n/a AmB7days
17 IFNR23-d179 179 n/a
882
Table2:AhighnumberofsharedSNPsinmostpairsindicateasharedcommonancestor.883
NumberofSNPscommontobothinitialandrecurrentinfection,alongwithnumberof884
SNPsandnon-synonymousSNPsuniquetoeachtimepoint.Percentagesgivento2d.p.885
Pair CommonSNPs
(%total)
Day1SNPs
(%total)
No.Day
1
nsSNPs
(genes
mapped
)
RelapseSNPs
(%total)
No.Relapse
nsSNPs
(genes
mapped)
Relapse#2
SNPs(%total)
No.Relapse
#2nsSNPs
(genes
mapped)
1 13490(98.49) 97(0.71) 9(8) 110(0.81) 19(8)
2 289557
(99.29)
1080(0.37) 110(55) 991(0.34) 108(45)
3 261718
(46.77)
127631
(32.78)
25331
(2741)
45769(14.88) 8342(2099) 124498
(32.24)
23957
(2541)
4 289574 1169(0.40) 145(58) 1096(0.38) 145(56)
46
886
Supplementarymaterial887
TableS1-MLSTresultsofindependentlytestingthreecoloniesperstudyisolate.888
(99.22)
5 289367
(99.20)
1261(0.43) 127(54) 1080(0.37) 127(59)
6 13122(95.78) 133(1.00) 5(2) 445(3.28) 82(56)
7 47833(97.83) 522(1.08) 81(65) 537(1.11) 94(72)
8 46883(98.76) 294(0.62) 29(9) 296(0.63) 26(16)
9 289458
(99.27)
1033(0.36) 141(58) 1109(0.38) 105(55)
10 12687(98.29) 104(0.81) 4(3) 117(0.91) 11(5)
11 12732(98.38) 110(0.86) 10(2) 99(0.77) 6(5)
12 221973
(99.37)
636(0.29) 55(27) 778(0.35) 61(30)
13 48062(98.58) 396(0.82) 31(11) 294(0.61) 28(15)
14 28960(95.66) 288(0.98) 44(19) 1026(3.42) 105(57)
15 29736(98.40) 254(0.85) 21(14) 228(0.76) 17(13)
16 45437(98.56) 325(0.71) 30(18) 341(0.74) 30(14)
17 376568
(56.43)
117436
(23.77)
22567
(4153)
173359
(31.52)
33543
(4427)
47
TableS2-NumberofSNPsinMSH2ineachisolate,categorisedbytypeorlocation.SYN889
=synonymousSNP,NSY=non-synonymousSNP,p5UTR=5’UTR,p3UTR=3’UTR,890
NON=nonsensemutation.891
TableS3-Non-synonymousSNPsinPair3isolates,perchromosome892
TableS4-Numberofnon-synonymousandsynonymousSNPsperisolate893
TableS5-Detailsofalignmentandvariantcallingforallpairedisolatesincludedinthis894
study895
TableS6-NumberofhomozygousandheterozygousSNPsinisolatesofPairssuspected896
ofdiploidy.897
FigureS1–PhylogeneticanalysiseachchromosomeofC.neoformansiisolatesinthis898
study(coloured)withadditionalisolates(showninblack),toidentifywhetherPair3899
consistsofdifferentisolatesorisarelapsedinfection.WehypothesisedthatifPair3900
wasarelapsedinfection,allisolateswouldsharethesamephylogeneticrelationshipin901
all14chromosomes.Rapidbootstrapanalysisover250replicateswasperformedon902
SNPdatafrom62isolatestogenerateanunrootedmaximum-likelihoodphylogeny(only903
branchesnotsupportedto100%areindicatedabovebranches).Branchlengths904
representthenumberofSNPsbetweentaxa.905
FigureS2–Chromosomalcopynumbervariationcanbeobservedinsomeisolatesin906
Pairs1,4,5,10,14and15,whencomparedtotheC.neoformansreferencegenome,907
H99.Normalisedwhole-genomedepthofcoverageisillustratedhere,averagedover908
48
10,000-bpbinsandrepresentedasascatterplot.Barplotsrepresentthepositionof909
nsSNPs,wherethepurpletrackrepresentstheoriginalisolate,andorangerepresents910
therecurrentisolate.NotethatPairs2,3and17arenotpresentinthisFigure,asthey911
arerepresentedinFigure2.912