Rhode Island's Fiscal Stability Act and Municipal Transparency Portal
-
Upload
lincoln-institute-of-land-policy -
Category
Government & Nonprofit
-
view
23 -
download
0
Transcript of Rhode Island's Fiscal Stability Act and Municipal Transparency Portal
1
Rhode Island’s Fiscal Stability Act and Municipal Transparency PortalDecember 2, 2016
The Fiscal Stability Act (FSA)…
Fiscal Stability Act:
• Was established in response to the city ofCentral Falls seeking protection underChapter 9 of the US Bankruptcy Code
• Provides multiple tiers of state support forfiscally unstable municipal entities
Creates three levels of State oversight andcontrol:
1. Appointment of a Fiscal Overseer
2. Appointment of a Budget Commission
3. Appointment of a Receiver
2
• Prohibits municipalities from filing for judicial receivership in statecourt
• Municipalities cannot file for bankruptcy in federal court withoutstate authorization
Reserves the authority to seek judicial relief to theexecutive branch
Preserves state and municipal access to the capitalmarkets
• The latter will not be covered in this document
Addresses cities and towns as well as fire districts
• The first level of support is the appointment of a “fiscaloverseer” to review, supervise and/or approve certainmunicipal financial matters• Within 120 days of appointment, the fiscal overseershall develop a 3-year operating and capital financialplan, including a preliminary analysis of the city’s/town’sfinances and initial deficit recommendations• Additional powers: Compel operational, performance or forensic
audits, or other assessments Employ, retain and supervise managerial,
professional and clerical staff, at the expense of thecity/town, subject to DMF approval
FSA § 45-9-3: Fiscal Overseer (Level I)
3
2. Budget Commission
3. Receiver
FSA § 45-9-3: Fiscal Overseer (Level I)
DOR Director may appoint a fiscaloverseer:
• At request of the municipality (jointlyfrom chief elected official and city ortown council), or
• If municipality fails to comply with therequirements of §§ 45-12-22.1 – 45-12-22.5, (i.e., not filing a corrective actionplan when projecting a year-enddeficit), or
• If at least 2 out of the 5 criteria (listedright) specified in the statute apply
• Example: East Providence
4
City/town projects a deficit in the budget in the current and upcomingfiscal year
City/town has not filed its required audits with the auditor generalfor two successive fiscal years
City/town has been downgraded by one of the nationallyrecognized statistical rating organizations
City/town is otherwise unable to obtain access to credit markets orobtain financing on reasonable terms as determined by DORDirector
City/town does not promptly respond to requests made by the DORDirector, auditor general, or chairpersons of the house and/or senatefinance committees for financial information and operating datanecessary to assess the fiscal condition of the city/town
FSA § 45-9-3: Fiscal Overseer (Level I)
5
Responsibilities of the Fiscal Overseer
• Recommend sound fiscal policies for implementation to thecity/town
• Supervise all financial services and activities• Advise selected city/town employees• Provide assistance in all matters related to municipal financial
affairs• Assist in development and preparation of municipal budgets
and spending plans• Review all proposed contracts and obligations• Monitor the expenditures of all funds• Approve the annual or supplemental budgets of the city/town
and all of its departments• Report monthly to the director of revenue, the auditor general,
the governor, and the chairpersons of the house finance andsenate finance committees on the progress of deficit reduction
Responsibilities of the Cities/Towns
• Submit all department budgets to the fiscal overseer for reviewand approval
• Submit all requests for municipal budget transfers to the fiscaloverseer for review and approval
• Annually appropriate amounts sufficient for the properadministration of the fiscal overseer and staff, as determined inwriting by the division of municipal finance. If the city/town failsto appropriate such amounts, the funds shall be deducted fromthe city's/town's distribution of state aid
FSA § 45-9-6: Budget Commission (Level II)
• The second stage, a budget commission, is establishedif the powers of the fiscal overseer are not sufficient toestablish fiscal stability, or by request of themunicipality
• A budget commission has significantly broader powersthan those granted to a fiscal overseer Includes the authority to exercise all powers of a
city’s/town’s elected officials The composition, duties and powers of a budget
commission are spelled out in RIGL § 45-9-6
6
1. Fiscal Overseer
3. Receiver
FSA § 45-9-5: Budget Commission (Level II)
7
• DOR Director may appoint a budget commission at the request of the municipality:• Request must come jointly from chief elected official and city or town council• Example: Woonsocket
• DOR Director shall appoint a budget commission if a fiscal overseer and DMF report that the city/town:• Is unable to present a balanced budget;• Faces a fiscal crisis that poses an imminent danger to the safety and welfare of the city/town or its property;• Will not achieve fiscal stability without the assistance of a budget commission; or• Should not be granted approval of its tax levy for the fiscal year• Example: East Providence
FSA § § 45-9-7, 8: Receiver (Level III)
• The final stage includes the appointment of a receiver torestore fiscal stability
• Powers of a receiver:1. Include all powers of the fiscal overseer and
budget commission;2. Include all powers of elected and appointed
officials and bodies of the city/town (receiver’spowers supersede but officials shall be allowedto advise); and
3. Include the power to file for federal bankruptcyin the name of the city/town under Chapter 9 ofTitle 11 of the United States Code, and to act onthe city's/town's behalf in any such proceeding.
8
1. Fiscal Overseer
2. Budget Commission
FSA § § 45-9-7, 8: Receiver (Level III)
9
• DOR Director shall appoint a receiver if budget commission recommends appointment of receiver after concluding that itspowers are insufficient to restore fiscal stability to the city or town
• DOR Director, in consultation with the auditor general, may skip fiscal overseer and budget commission by appointing areceiver in a fiscal emergency (Example: Central Falls and CCFD)
FSA: Continued Oversight
10
State oversight continues for 5 years after termination of fiscal overseer/budget commission/receiver:• If bankruptcy was filed for the city/town: administration and finance officer• If no bankruptcy was filed for the city/town: finance advisor
Powers and duties of finance advisor/administration and finance officer are spelled out in RIGL §45-9-10 and 45-9-10.1
DOR Experience with FSA
11
Central Falls East Providence Woonsocket Central Coventry FDStep 1: Fiscal Overseer
November 2011 Projected deficits Rating downgrade
Step 2: Budget Commission
December 2011 Overseer/DMF report
May 2012 City request
Step 3:Receiver
July 2010 Fiscal emergency
May 2014 Fiscal emergency
Bankruptcy August 2011 December 2014
Bankruptcy End October 2012 (Completed) October 2015 (Dismissed)
FSA Resolution April 2013 September 2013 March 2015 October 2015
DOR Continued Oversight
Admin & Finance Officer 2013-2018
Finance Advisor 2013-2018
Finance Advisor 2015-2020
12
Rhode Island’s Municipal Transparency Portal
Municipal transparency portal
Portal Description:
• The municipal transparency portal enablespublic access to municipal datasets hostedonline, improving the transparency,accessibility and accountability of citygovernment
• The initial pilot will include 12municipalities and one regional schooldistrict (RSD)
Goals:
1. Improve current required reporting;
2. Unify the format of the adopted budgetsurvey, 5-year forecast; and quarterlyreports;
3. Provide for consistent definitions;
4. Streamline the process for municipalities;
5. Create a centralized location for municipalfinancial information; and
6. Provide for presentation of financial datathrough online Transparency Portal
13
Changes in reporting
14
Submission of data (Budget-to-Actual, Municipal Data Report, 5 Year Forecast, Adopted Budget Survey) electronically to DMF;
Submission of finalized Transparency Report from DMF to municipalities;
Posting of Transparency Report to municipality’s website within 10 days of receipt (signed by appropriate parties);
Submission of Transparency Report to RIDE and OAG; and
Inclusion of Transparency Report in the municipality’s final audit report.
Pilot communities
Pilot municipalities include: • Barrington
• Bristol
• Bristol-Warren Regional School District
• Cranston
• Glocester
• Lincoln
• Middletown
• North Providence
• Pawtucket
• Providence
• Smithfield
• South Kingstown
• West Warwick
15
Implementation guidance
16
• Goals:• Improve data consistency and comparability• Establish guidelines consistent with generally
accepted accounting principles• Provide account definitions, mechanisms (forms and
templates) for data collection, and answers tofrequently asked questions
• Provide for meaningful comparisons amongcommunities
• Foster collaboration, and facilitate exploration ofshared services among communities.
Implementation guidance is provided to create a centralized location for municipal financial
information – an important effort to enhance transparency
and provide citizens with a clear and uniform view of key financial data for their city or
town.
Highlights of implementation guidance
17
Reportable Government ServicesPurpose:
• Improve data consistency and comparability• Definition is broader than activity included in General fund
Materiality test:• May limit the inclusion of amounts in the Uniform Portal Data Collection Form when
expenditures for an activity meeting RGS criteria represent less than 1% of the certified taxlevy (or estimated levy when not certified) for applicable fiscal year.
Always to be included in RGS, regardless of materiality test:• SAFER grants• COPS grants• CDBG grants used to fund salaries and other operating costs, but excluding revolving loan fund
activities, where applicable
Highlights of implementation guidance
18
Employee Health Benefit Costs• Establish guidelines, consistent with generally accepted accounting principles• Enhance comparability of amounts reported• Adopt practices that promote consistency for local government regardless of self-insured or
third party risk pool/administrator
Police and Fire Detail• Relevant in cases where external entities reimburse municipality for cost of providing police or
fire personnel on—site for activity or event
School Reporting• School operations presented in same format as municipal operations• School reporting consistent with UCOA guidelines• All school funds to be included in reporting to Municipal Transparency Portal• Each MTP account is mapped to corresponding UCOA code
20
Appendix
Appendix I: Requirements Apart from the FSA
21
• RIGL § 45-12-22.2 requires a municipality projecting a year-end deficit in its quarterly report tosubmit a corrective action plan for approval by DMF
• RIGL § 45-12-22.3 requires a municipality with a year-end deficit to submit a deficit reduction planto eliminate the deficit over no more than 5 years, for approval by the auditor general
• RIGL § 45-12-22.7 allows DMF or the auditor general, if concluding that a corrective action plan ordeficit reduction plan is insufficient, to pursue remedies including:A petition to the Superior Court for mandatory injunctive relief; Implementation of a budget commission; orWithholding of state aid
Appendix II: Other FSA Restrictions
22
Administrative Expenses:
• City/town responsible for all administrative expenses incurred during state oversight
• Costs for administration and finance officer or finance advisor are shared 50/50 between city/townand state
Collective Bargaining Agreement:
• No CBA can be approved unless the fiscal overseer/budget commission/receiver has participated inthe negotiations and provides certification that the CBA has no detrimental impact on municipalservices; and
• Fiscal overseer/budget commission/receiver cannot reject or alter any existing CBA, unless byagreement, during the term of the CBA