RHINOLOGY REVIEW part 2

96
Marilene B. Wang, MD, FACS Professor UCLA Division of Head Neck Surgery Chief of Otolaryngology VA Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System

description

RHINOLOGY REVIEW part 2. Marilene B. Wang, MD, FACS Professor UCLA Division of Head Neck Surgery Chief of Otolaryngology VA Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System. Sphenoid Sinus Distances. From Anterior Nasal Spine To Sphenoid Ostium7 cm To Pituitary Fossa8.5 cm. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Transcript of RHINOLOGY REVIEW part 2

Page 1: RHINOLOGY REVIEW part 2

Marilene B. Wang, MD, FACSProfessor

UCLA Division of Head Neck SurgeryChief of Otolaryngology

VA Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System

Page 2: RHINOLOGY REVIEW part 2
Page 3: RHINOLOGY REVIEW part 2
Page 4: RHINOLOGY REVIEW part 2

From Anterior Nasal Spine◦To Sphenoid Ostium 7 cm

◦To Pituitary Fossa 8.5 cm

Page 5: RHINOLOGY REVIEW part 2

Middle turbinateLamina papyraceaEthmoid foveaCribriform plateSphenoid

Page 6: RHINOLOGY REVIEW part 2

Facial pain/pressureNasal obstruction/blockage

Nasal discharge/purulence/discolored postnasal drip

Page 7: RHINOLOGY REVIEW part 2

Hyposmia/anosmiaPurulence in nasal cavity on examination

Fever (acute rhinosinusitis only)

Page 8: RHINOLOGY REVIEW part 2

HeadacheFeverHalitosisFatigue

Page 9: RHINOLOGY REVIEW part 2

Dental painCoughEar pain/pressure/fullness

Page 10: RHINOLOGY REVIEW part 2

AcuteSubacuteChronicRecurrent, acuteAcute exacerbations of chronic

Page 11: RHINOLOGY REVIEW part 2

Duration up to 4 weeks> 2 major factors1 major factor + 2 minor factors

Nasal purulence on exam

Page 12: RHINOLOGY REVIEW part 2

Duration 4-12 weeks>2 major factors1 major factor + 2 minor factors, or nasal purulence on exam

Complete resolution after effective medical therapy

Page 13: RHINOLOGY REVIEW part 2

Duration > 12 weeksHistory same as for subacuteFacial pain does not constitute suggestive history in absence of other nasal symptoms or signs

Page 14: RHINOLOGY REVIEW part 2

>4 episodes/year + each episode last >7-10 days.

Absence of intervening signs of chronic rhinosinusitis

Page 15: RHINOLOGY REVIEW part 2

Sudden worsening of chronic rhinosinusitis

Return to baseline after treatment

Page 16: RHINOLOGY REVIEW part 2

AllergiesImmunodeficiencyGenetic/congenital

Page 17: RHINOLOGY REVIEW part 2

EndocrineNeuromechanism

Page 18: RHINOLOGY REVIEW part 2

AnatomicNeoplasticAcquired mucociliary dysfunction

Page 19: RHINOLOGY REVIEW part 2

• Microorganisms—viral, bacterial, fungal

• Noxious chemicals, pollutants, smoke

• Medications• Trauma• Surgery

Page 20: RHINOLOGY REVIEW part 2

• S. pneum (20-43%)• H. influenzae (22-35%)• Strep spp. (3-9%)• Anaerobes (0-9%)• M. catarrhalis (2-10%)• S. aureus (0-8%)• Other (4%)

Page 21: RHINOLOGY REVIEW part 2

S. pneum (25-30%)H. influenzae (15-20%)M. catarrhalis (15-20%)S. pyogenes (2-5%)Anaerobes (2-5%)Sterile (20-35%)

Page 22: RHINOLOGY REVIEW part 2

Mild disease with no recent antimicrobial use

Augmentin, AmoxicillinVantinCeclorOmnicef

Page 23: RHINOLOGY REVIEW part 2

Tequin, Levaquin, AveloxAugmentinCombination (Amox or clinda + Suprax)

Page 24: RHINOLOGY REVIEW part 2

BactrimDoxycyclineZithromax, Biaxin, Erythromycin

Switch to quinolone if no improvement in 72 hours

Page 25: RHINOLOGY REVIEW part 2

QuinoloneAugmentinClindamcin + rifampinConsider IV abx

Page 26: RHINOLOGY REVIEW part 2

Augmentin, AmoxicillinVantinCeclorOmnicefSwitch if no improvement after 72 hours

Page 27: RHINOLOGY REVIEW part 2

BactrimMacrolide

Page 28: RHINOLOGY REVIEW part 2

AugmentinRocephinBactrim, macrolideConsider IV abx if no improvement

Page 29: RHINOLOGY REVIEW part 2

Afrin for 3 daysNormal saline spraysDecongestantsAntihistamines?Steroids

Page 30: RHINOLOGY REVIEW part 2

Periorbital cellulitisPreseptal cellulitis/abscess

Orbital cellulitisOrbital abscessCavernous sinus thrombosis

Page 31: RHINOLOGY REVIEW part 2

• Widespread affliction—the most common allergic disease

• Affects 10-30% of American adults—

• >20 million people, adults and children

• Results in missed work and school days, poor quality of life

Page 32: RHINOLOGY REVIEW part 2

Allergic saluteShinersItchy, red conjunctivaSneezingPost-nasal drip, rhinorrhea, congestion

Page 33: RHINOLOGY REVIEW part 2

DustMold, mildewPlantsAnimal danderFeathers/down

Page 34: RHINOLOGY REVIEW part 2

PollenSmogTrees, grasses, weedsDust, fertilizer, chemicals

Page 35: RHINOLOGY REVIEW part 2

• Asthma• Allergic fungal sinusitis• Cystic fibrosis• Mucociliary dysfunction• Connective tissue disorders (Wegener’s granulomatosis, sarcoid)

Page 36: RHINOLOGY REVIEW part 2

Nasal polyposisSamter’s triad (aspirin sensitivity, nasal polyps, asthma)

Cocaine use

Page 37: RHINOLOGY REVIEW part 2

AntibioticsAntihistaminesNasal steroidsNormal saline irrigationsAllergy evaluation +/- immunotherapy

Page 38: RHINOLOGY REVIEW part 2

Sinus CT scanConsider anatomic factors—septal deviation, nasal polyps, concha bullosa, ostio-meatal blockage

Page 39: RHINOLOGY REVIEW part 2

Nasal polyposisAnatomic blockage—deviated septum, enlarged turbinate, concha bullosa

MucoceleOrbital abscess

Page 40: RHINOLOGY REVIEW part 2

Fungal sinusitis—allergic vs. invasive (mucor)

Tumor of nasal cavity or sinus

Page 41: RHINOLOGY REVIEW part 2

Chronic, recurrent sinusitis

Failure to respond to maximal medical therapy

Obtain cultures

Page 42: RHINOLOGY REVIEW part 2

Nasal congestionHeadache/sinus painFatigueProlonged bleeding/crusting

Page 43: RHINOLOGY REVIEW part 2

Breach of lamina papyracea—damage to extraocular muscles, periorbital ecchymoses

Damage to optic nerve—blindness

Breach of cribriform—CSF leakMeningitis

Page 44: RHINOLOGY REVIEW part 2

May be a lifelong diseaseAllergy control—antiihistamines, nasal steroids, immunotherapy

Oral steroids—judiciouslyAntibiotics for acute exacerbations

Page 45: RHINOLOGY REVIEW part 2

Environmental control—avoid carpet, damp, mold, older homes, smog

Saline irrigations

Page 46: RHINOLOGY REVIEW part 2

Alternative therapies—acupuncture, stress management, herbal remedies

Pain managementMulti-disciplinary effort—work with allergy, infectious disease, neurology/pain management services

Page 47: RHINOLOGY REVIEW part 2

4 types of allergic reactions (Gell and Coombs)

Type 1 – IgEType 2 - IgG--antigenType 3 – Immune complexType 4 – Delayed hypersensitivity

Page 48: RHINOLOGY REVIEW part 2

• Mast cells bind IgE via their Fc(ε) receptors

• Mast cell degranulates and releases mediators--produce allergic reactions

• Hypersensitivity usually appears on repeated contact with the allergen.

• Examples of type I allergic reactions–Anaphylaxis, atopic asthma, atopic eczema, drug allergy, hay fever

Page 49: RHINOLOGY REVIEW part 2

• Antibody (IgG or IgM) directed against antigen on an individual's own cells, or against foreign antibody (after blood transfusion)

• Cytotoxic action by killer cells, or to lysis mediated by the complement system.–Autoimmune hemolytic anemia, Goodpasture's

syndrome, hemolytic disese of the newborn, myasthenia gravis, pemphigus

Page 50: RHINOLOGY REVIEW part 2

• Immune complexes (antigen and usually IgG or IgM) deposited in the tissue

• Complement is activated and polymorphonuclear cells are attracted, causing local tissue damage and inflammation. – Polyarteritis nodosa, post-streptococcal

glomerulonephritis , systemic lupus erythematosus

Page 51: RHINOLOGY REVIEW part 2

• T cells, sensitized to antigen, release lymphokines following secondary contact with the antigen

• Cytokines induce an inflammatory response, activate and attract macrophages, release inflammatory mediators.

• Antibodies produced against fixed cellular or tissue antigens are usually autoantibodies– Crohn's disease, leprosy, tuberculosis, sarcoidosis,

schistosomiasis

Page 52: RHINOLOGY REVIEW part 2

Parents with allergy greater likelihood of producing allergic children

Food allergies Environment— air pollution Smoking

Page 53: RHINOLOGY REVIEW part 2

History—environmental exposure, smoking, seasonal occurrence, pets, foods

Examination ◦ Allergic shiners◦ Allergic salute◦ Supratip crease◦ Dennie’s lines (skin fold under eyes)◦ Adenoid facies

Page 54: RHINOLOGY REVIEW part 2

Skin testing◦ Prick/puncture (scratch or patch)◦ Intradermal◦ Dilutional intradermal (skin end-point

titration-SET) In vitro testing

◦ RAST (radioactive marker)◦ ELISA (enzymatic marker)

Page 55: RHINOLOGY REVIEW part 2

Prick—few drops of purified allergen pricked onto skin surface (dust, dander, pollen)

Patch—large patch with different allergens (latex, medications, metal, fragrances, preservatives)

Histamine or glycerin used as positive controls

Page 56: RHINOLOGY REVIEW part 2

• Intradermal injection of allergens at increasing concentrations to measure allergic response

• Start with a very dilute solution• If 2mm of growth noted, then second

injection at a higher concentration is given to confirm the response

• End point is concentration of antigen that causes an increase in the size of the wheal followed by confirmatory whealing

• Stop at 13 mm

Page 57: RHINOLOGY REVIEW part 2

Avoid medications which may interfere◦Antihistamines◦Antidepressants◦Antacids

Page 58: RHINOLOGY REVIEW part 2

Anaphylaxis◦ Low-grade fever◦ Lightheadedness or dizziness ◦ Wheezing or Shortness of breath ◦ Extensive skin rash ◦ Swelling of face, lips or mouth ◦ Difficulty swallowing or speaking

Page 59: RHINOLOGY REVIEW part 2

RAST -radioallergosorbent test—detect specific IgE antibodies to allergens

Improved sensitivity without loss of specificity

Excellent reproducibility across the full measuring range of the calibration curve

Not always necessary to remove patient from an anthihistamine medication regimen

If skin conditions (such as eczema) are so widespread that allergy skin testing can not be done

Page 60: RHINOLOGY REVIEW part 2

ELISA – enzyme linked immunosorbent assay

Used more for food allergies Not as sensitive as skin tests

Page 61: RHINOLOGY REVIEW part 2

Environmental control◦ Stop smoking, clean house, avoid mold,

indoor plants, pets, HEPA filter Pharmacotherapy

◦ Antihistamines, anti-leukotrienes, mast-cell stabilizers, topical and systemic steroids

Page 62: RHINOLOGY REVIEW part 2

Specific allergens Vial test

◦ Intradermal test◦ Smallest measurable dose

Once or twice weekly injections Dose escalated Continue treatment 3-5 years

Page 63: RHINOLOGY REVIEW part 2

Invasive◦Acute fulminant ◦Chronic invasive◦Granulomatous invasive

Page 64: RHINOLOGY REVIEW part 2

Noninvasive◦Saprophytic fungal infestation

◦Fungal ball, “mycetoma”◦Allergic fungal rhinosinusitis

Page 65: RHINOLOGY REVIEW part 2

Corollary to allergic bronchopulmonary aspergillosis (ABPA)

AFRS cycle◦Immune and eosinophilic response to protein components of fungi

◦Sinonasal inflammation, viscid allergic fungal mucin, obstruction, stasis

Page 66: RHINOLOGY REVIEW part 2

Bony remodeling Inflammatory mediators

◦Major basic protein◦Eosinophilic peroxidase◦Tumor necrosis factor◦Interleukins◦Interferons

Page 67: RHINOLOGY REVIEW part 2

Evidence of Type I hypersensitivity (IgE mediated)

Nasal polyposis Characteristic CT findings Eosinophilic mucous Positive fungal smear

Kuhn and Javer: Otolaryngol Clin North Am 2000,33:2;419-432

Page 68: RHINOLOGY REVIEW part 2

Asthma Unilateral predominance Radiographic bone erosion Fungal culture Charcot-Leyden crystals Serum eosinophilia

Kuhn and Javer: Otolaryngol Clin North Am 2000,33:2;419-432

Page 69: RHINOLOGY REVIEW part 2

Not all 5 criteria for diagnosis

Gradual nasal airway obstruction

Thick nasal mucous/crustsMay take years to manifest

AFS-like syndrome

Page 70: RHINOLOGY REVIEW part 2

ImmunocompetentNormal ESR, WBCAtopic◦Asthma, hay fever, inhalant allergy

•Nasal polyposis

Page 71: RHINOLOGY REVIEW part 2

Hyperactive allergic inflammatory response

Possible fungal toxinInflammatory mediatorsRecurrent bacterial sinusitis

Page 72: RHINOLOGY REVIEW part 2

Role of IgENot consistently elevated in serum

Local IgE-mediated immune response in nasal mucosa

IgE as cause of inflammation or merely a marker

Page 73: RHINOLOGY REVIEW part 2

Allergic response to fungus by skin testing and in vitro (radioallergosorbent) methodology

Variable culture results (64-100%) from sinus contents

Page 74: RHINOLOGY REVIEW part 2

Allergic fungal mucin◦Sheets of eosinophils◦Charcot-Leyden crystals◦Extramucosal fungal elements

Page 75: RHINOLOGY REVIEW part 2
Page 76: RHINOLOGY REVIEW part 2

CT◦Unilateral or asymmetric◦Sinuses Expanded--Bony attenuation or erosion

◦Displacement of adjacent structures

◦Signal heterogeneity

Manning S et al. Laryngoscope 1997;107:170-176

Page 77: RHINOLOGY REVIEW part 2
Page 78: RHINOLOGY REVIEW part 2
Page 79: RHINOLOGY REVIEW part 2

MRI-T1 weighted◦ Variable signal intensity in involved sinuses◦ Signal void at periphery (mucosal edema)

MRI-T2 weighted Hypointensity of signal in sinus

(dehydrated allergic fungal mucin) Enhancement of periphery of sinus

(mucosal edema)

Page 80: RHINOLOGY REVIEW part 2
Page 81: RHINOLOGY REVIEW part 2
Page 82: RHINOLOGY REVIEW part 2
Page 83: RHINOLOGY REVIEW part 2

MedicalSurgicalBreak the Allergic Fungal Rhinosinusitis Cycle

Page 84: RHINOLOGY REVIEW part 2

Functional endoscopic sinus surgery Complete ventilation of the sinuses Wide maxillary antrostomies Complete ethmoidectomies Sphenoid sinusotomies Frontal sinusotomies

Page 85: RHINOLOGY REVIEW part 2

Complete removal of allergic fungal mucin and fungal debris

Mucosal sparingSave middle turbinateFrontal sinus obliteration not advised

Page 86: RHINOLOGY REVIEW part 2

PREOPERATIVE REGIMEN◦Antibiotics◦Steroids

Page 87: RHINOLOGY REVIEW part 2

POSTOPERATIVE REGIMEN◦Steroid taper◦Intranasal steroids◦Antibiotics◦Clinic endoscopy and debridement

Page 88: RHINOLOGY REVIEW part 2

Long-term systemic steroids◦Effective ◦Multiple potential complications

◦Screen for DM, cataracts, glaucoma, + PPD, active hepatitis

Page 89: RHINOLOGY REVIEW part 2

Systemic antifungal agents Amphotericin B, itraconazole,

voriconazole Mixed results Expensive Hepatotoxic Need regular evaluation of liver

function tests

Page 90: RHINOLOGY REVIEW part 2

83 patients managed with ESS, itraconazole, low dose oral steroids, topical steroids

36,000 doses of itraconazole—no adverse effects

Reoperation required in only 20%

Rains et al. AJR 2003;17:1-8

Page 91: RHINOLOGY REVIEW part 2

• Intranasal Amphotericin irrigation—chronic rhinosinusitis patients

Ponikau et al. J Allergy Clin Immunol 2002:110:862-866

Reduced mucosal inflammation on CT scanImprovement in symptoms and endoscopic staging in 75%

Ricchetti et al. J Laryngol Otol 2002;116:261-

263Disappearance of polyps in 62% of

mild and 42% of moderate chronic rhinosinusitis

Page 92: RHINOLOGY REVIEW part 2

Beneficial◦ Mabry, Marple et al. (1997 and 1998)◦ Prospective study, immunotherapy after

surgery, patients improved, did not require systemic steroids, recurrences decreased

◦ Retrospective study, 11 patients matched with controls, immunotherapy patients had improved quality of life and objective endoscopic measures of mucosal edema

Page 93: RHINOLOGY REVIEW part 2

Both fungal and nonfungal antigens, administered in separate vials

Weekly immunotherapy, dosage advancement as tolerated

Include wide variety of mold antigens Continue for 3-5 years Regular endoscopy and cleaning

Page 94: RHINOLOGY REVIEW part 2

Caveats Ferguson (1993) reported patients

who received immunotherapy prior to surgery had worsening of symptoms-ongoing antigenic loadlocal reactions, immune complex deposits

Patients who received immunotherapy after surgery improved

Caution with concomitant ABPA, unable to surgically remove fungi in lower respiratory tract

Page 95: RHINOLOGY REVIEW part 2

Recurrence of disease commonSurgical treatment mandatoryMultidisciplinary management

◦Steroids, antifungals—systemic vs. topical

◦Immunotherapy

Page 96: RHINOLOGY REVIEW part 2

Better control with prolonged postoperative medical therapy

Probably immunological disease, not infectious

Therapy evolving as understanding of disease process improves

Prolonged, close follow-up needed