Rhetoric and Interpretation
description
Transcript of Rhetoric and Interpretation
![Page 1: Rhetoric and Interpretation](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022051421/568167e8550346895ddd560a/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
Rhetoric and Interpretation
Advanced Rhetorical WritingMatt Barton
![Page 2: Rhetoric and Interpretation](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022051421/568167e8550346895ddd560a/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
The Value of Interpretation
• Learning to interpret works of literature and art can help us interpret things like ads, speeches, and terrorism.– Rhetoric can put “literary criticism” to work at
understanding “everyday” things that matter to us.
![Page 3: Rhetoric and Interpretation](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022051421/568167e8550346895ddd560a/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
Rhetorical Interpretation
• Rhetorically interpreting a poem requires a consideration of– the world it depicts– the world it reflects– the word its audiences reside in.
• Rhetoricians consider the circumstances of an object’s creation and its reception over time…History matters.
![Page 4: Rhetoric and Interpretation](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022051421/568167e8550346895ddd560a/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
Genre & Literary Movements
• Works that depart from tradition are really arguments for a new definition of art or literature.– Who gets to decide what is “art” and what is
not?
![Page 5: Rhetoric and Interpretation](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022051421/568167e8550346895ddd560a/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
Effect of Art
• “By reinforcing or challenging values and beliefs, symbolic acts can influence attitudes towards a variety of crucial matters.”
![Page 6: Rhetoric and Interpretation](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022051421/568167e8550346895ddd560a/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
Keatsian Imperative
• “New Criticism” emphasizes “disinterested interest” in art and criticism.– Don’t read things “into” works; only read
things “out” of them.• “Truth of a work” is found strictly in the work itself;
context completely irrelevant.– Leads to a sort of civic detachment and
selfishness.• Literature ought to be instead “equipment
for living.”
![Page 7: Rhetoric and Interpretation](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022051421/568167e8550346895ddd560a/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
Interpreting Symbolic Acts
• Stockhausen: 9/11 was “the greatest work of art imaginable for the whole cosmos.”– “The journalist in Hamburg completely ripped
my statements out of a context, which he had not recorded in its entirety, to use it as a vile attack against my person and the Hamburg Music Festival.” --Stockhausen
![Page 8: Rhetoric and Interpretation](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022051421/568167e8550346895ddd560a/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
Terrorist Rhetoric
• If military strikes are designed to maximize the destruction of enemy resources, terrorist attacks are designed to maximize news coverage.– Terrorists use our own media against us (we
terrorize ourselves).– The terrorists of 9/11 didn’t get to control how
others interpreted their act.
![Page 9: Rhetoric and Interpretation](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022051421/568167e8550346895ddd560a/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
PC• “Political Correctness” concerns an
“ideological” vocabulary.– Substitutes euphemisms for traditional terms
to avoid offending some people.• Police Officer vs. Policeman• “Learning Disability” vs. “Slow” • 40 BCE (Before Common Era) rather than 40 BC
(Before Christ)
![Page 10: Rhetoric and Interpretation](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022051421/568167e8550346895ddd560a/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
Doublespeak
• Doublespeak is “evasive language, language that gives every appearance of imparting information without actually doing so.” – “Rightsizing” vs. Laying People Off– “Strategic Withdrawal” vs. Retreating
![Page 11: Rhetoric and Interpretation](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022051421/568167e8550346895ddd560a/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
Neutral Language
• Taking a stance against PC usually takes as a given that there’s a “neutral language” available.– Burke argues that “terminologies are lenses
through which we see the world.” • These lenses (or “screens”) serve to express and
shape our valuation of matters even if we don’t intend them to.
![Page 12: Rhetoric and Interpretation](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022051421/568167e8550346895ddd560a/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
Screens
• “Pro-Choice” vs. “Pro-Abortion”• “Pro-Life” vs. “Anti-Choice”• “Estate Tax” vs. “Death Tax”• “Liberating Iraq” vs. “Occupying Iraq”• “Freedom Fighters” vs. “Terrorists”• “Sexual Orientation” vs. “Sexual Lifestyle”
![Page 13: Rhetoric and Interpretation](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022051421/568167e8550346895ddd560a/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
You’re Being Politically Correct
• Challenging someone with being PC means doing the following:– Unmasking supposedly neutral terms and
showing them to be persuasive claims– Setting up an opposition between a PC term
and “what it really says”– Accusing the person of having “an agenda.”
![Page 14: Rhetoric and Interpretation](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022051421/568167e8550346895ddd560a/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
Debunking
• It’s easy to fall into the trap of seeing everyone else as having an ideology.– We all engage in rhetoric and struggle with
competing interpretations of the world, right and wrong, and identity.