RFP #E194-1922 Issue Da 9, 2015 Training for Procurement ... · e of the mos iness mode ourcing in...

RFP #E1Issue DaTrainingTechnic

Technica

SourcingUniversitlive trainiwith asso Dawn TiuFlorida ois responemail is aAmy’s restandardEducatio Why is S

1. SocoadpAU

2. SG

3. S

crp

4. SBWof

5. A

qin

6. S

oHthin

194-1922 ate: May 2g for Procucal Respon

al Response T

g Industry Grty online anding. SIG’s hoociates locat

ura, Presideoffice. Dawn’nsible for theafinnila@sigsume is incls. Amy is a

on. Dawn Tiu

SIG/Forefron

SIG has partnrganization ompanies ast the forefronelivering cutrevious CPO

American StaUniversity of

SIG can bringGroup can de

SIG and Forereating currirofessional l

SIG has submBusiness (WBWBENC Cert

f our deliver

All of Forefrouality standa

ncluded in Ta

SIG is partnenline progra

Higher Learnhe SIG Univen the RFP se

29, 2015 rement Pro

nse Tab 1:

Tab 1: Execu

roup, Inc. (Sd mobile currome office isted througho

nt and CEOs phone num

e reporting reg.org. Amy Fuded in the life long edu

ura (listed ab

t Group the

nered with threpresentings members. nt of their tratting edge traO at Amerisoandard and VTennessee.

g all of the oeliver all the

efront Groupculum togetlearning obje

mitted applicBE) and Smtified and thery through sm

nt training isards of sectiab 1 with req

ering with Ariams and profing Commisersity curricuection 1B.

ofessionalsExecutive

utive Overvie

Execu

IG) is presericulum offers at 6 N. 2nd

out the coun

of SIG is rember is 904-equirementsFinnila is alsbackground

ucator and isbove) will ba

right choice

he Forefrontg the Office oSIG strives

aining and paining since ourceBergenVP of Globa

nline and mtraining in liv

p have a histher, and havectives.

cations for Wall Businesseir certificatemall and dive

s also recognon 1B throuquired docum

izona State fessional cer

ssion (the higulum, meetin

s Overview

ew -

tive Overvie

nting this proring and parStreet, Suitetry that work

esponsible fo-310-9557 as in XIV. Hero the person

d section of ts currently wck Amy up f

for your pro

t Group. SIGof the CPO ato keep the resentations2002. Their

n, EVP of Col Sourcing a

obile capabive interactiv

ory of collabve a proven

WBENC and s Enterprise e is includederse busines

nized for congh their certments to dem

University fortification, wghest level ong if not exce

w

of 2

ew

roposal resportnering with e 202, Fernak remotely fr

or this RFP and email is d

r phone numn who wouldthe training o

working on hefor account p

ogram? The

G is the premand has majkey issues t

s. The Forefr president aorporate Supat PepsiCo, a

ilities to this ve sessions.

boration, fromtrack record

State of Flo(SBE). Fore

d in the tab wss entities.

ntinuing edutification by Imonstrate q

or cooperativwhich will lendof accreditatieeding your

onse througthe Forefro

andina Beacrom their hom

and works [email protected]

mber is 904-2d manage thoverview ander Masters inpurposes.

reasons are

mier memberjority of the that keep CP

front group hand founder pply Manageas well as a

RFP while t

m writing whd of meeting

rida certifiedefront Groupwith our plan

ucation units ISM. The ceuality of pro

ve promotiond their accreion in the Unr quality stan

h our SIG nt Group for

ch, FL 3203me offices.

ut of the SIGorg. Amy Fin297-3124 ane account. d quality n Online

e numerous:

rship Global 1,000PO’s up at n

has been was the ement at professor at

the Forefron

hite papers to today’s

d Women Owp is already n to have 100

and meets tertificate is grams.

n of quality editation by nited States)ndards as sta

r all 4

G nnila nd

0 night

t

nt

o

wned

0%

the

) to ated


Technica

7. Sthgaw

8. FcomE

9. Ftr

10. Spisto

11. 1


al Response T

SIG and Forehe forefront olobal summidditional 12-

which keeps

orefront Groomprehensiv

manage eachEconomy, wil

orefront Groraining to on

SIG has built

rofessionalss because ofo thrive, grow

00% of our t

29, 2015 rement Pro

nse Tab 1:

Tab 1: Execu

efront Groupof what is thits a year (56-18 one day us current in

oup’s Presideve sourcing h for optimalll be publishe

oup has delivline format if

a reputations as well as tf the constanw and mainta

training will b

ofessionalsExecutive

utive Overvie

p together woe “Next Bes6 breakout ssessions ar

n all changes

ent, Bonnie books ever value balaned by Palgra

vered extensf required by

n as being ththe most sount drive to stain a leader

be with certi

s Overview

ew -

ork with hunt Practice” in

sessions, 6 ground the wos to the sour

Keith is an awritten on s

ncing. The boave McMillan

sive public ey any agenc

he premier mught after ortay leading eship position

fied small an

w

2 of 2

dreds of comn our industrgeneral sessorld, each wrcing industr

author of onsourcing busook, titled Sn in October

entity trainingcy to do so.

membership rganization foedge and innn.

nd diverse b

mpanies eacry. In additiosions each s

with 4-8 presery.

e of the mosiness mode

Sourcing in thr 2015.

g and can ad

organizationfor higher-conovative that

businesses.

ch year to ston SIG puts summit), an entations, al

st ls and how the New

dapt any and

n for sourcinoncept trainint SIG contin

tay in on 2

l of

to

d all

ng ng. It ues


Technica

1. T

dGiswp Fain


al Response T

This RFP reseveloped by

Group, LLC-os that we areworld class o

roven track

or purposesdditional res

n person coma. Firm’s

b. Days

c. Owne

d. Organ

e. Webs

f. Year F

g. Missio

h. Simila

i. Gover

29, 2015 rement Pro

nse Tab 2:

Tab 2: Exper

sponse is bey Sourcing Inour partner fe combining rganizationsrecord of co

s of this respsponses frommponent of ts primary bu SIG-6 Nand hours o SIG- 7am

ership Struct SIG 100 Forefronnization Cha SIG and

site Address: SIG- SIG ForefronFirm was Fo SIG-199 Forefronon Statemen SIG, see

ar work with SIG has

associatdistricts,Canada participa

ForefronAuthorityLexmark

rnment Clien SIG-part

joining SSummitsspeaker

ofessionalsExperienc

rience and Q

Experien

ing presentendustry Grouor in personthe online, m

s who have bollaboration.

ponse, SIG hm Forefront Gthe training.siness addre. 2nd Street,

of operation:m EST to 7pure: % owned by

nt Group-100art: Forefront, s: G.org nt Group- forounded: 91 nt Group-200nt, Companye page Tab 1public or primajority of t

tion along wi public and and investm

ate within SIGnt Group- Day, PPL Electk, Applebeesnt List and dticipating sta

SIG so they rs, Regionalsat an event

s e and Qua

Qualification

nce and Qu

ed by SIG Uup, Inc. (SIG delivery of t

mobile and ibeen collabo

has respondeGroup when

ess and officSuite 202, F

pm PST

y Dawn Tiura0% owned b

see Tab 1

refrontgroup

02 y Goals 1 vate entitiesthe Global 1ith many pubprivate unive

ment agencieG for educatallas Area Ratric Utilities, s, Little Caesiscounts ove

ate agenciesreceive a 25

s and Sympo.

alifications

ns - Page 1 o

ualifications

niversity, anG) in conjunc

training. Thn person traorating for a

ed as lead on relevant to

ce locationsFernandina B

a by Bonnie Ke

.com

s ,000 compa

blically owneersities, states from dozetion and besapid TransitMetLife, CIGsars/ er the past ts have typica5% discount osiums and a

s

f 3

s

n online curriction with thehe richness oaining capab

number of y

on this propothe

: Beach, FL 3

eith

anies as memed investor ute agencies, ens of countst practice sh, Tennessee

GNA, MGM M

hree (3)yearally been prefor their atteattend for fre

iculum e Forefront of our responbilities of twoyears and ha

osal, but incl

32034

mbers or ouutilities, schoprovinces o

tries that haring. e Valley Mirage, ABB

rs: ecluded fromendance at ee if they are

nse o ave a

uded

r ool of

B,

m

e a


Technica


al Response T

j. Client

k. Descr

l. Descr

m. Descr

n. Descr

o. Descr…..wi

p. Descr

29, 2015 rement Pro

nse Tab 2:

Tab 2: Exper

ForefronElectricsimilar dForce Stinstructotraining DefenseTenness

t retention ra SIG has ribe the firm’ SIG has b

last three y Forefront Gribe any geo SIG none, Forefront Gribe the resp SIG and F

to the corrthe issue, Universitycomplaintsaccount wleaders in

ribe Custome SIG and F

education that are uscurrent rel5 regardinthe quality

ribe the meththin a Partic SIG and F

companies Each Part

negotiatedPurchasinfile for billi

Each clientiming.

ribe the invo


rience and Q

nt Group- A, Kentucky

discounting atrategic Souors) any USAmaterial was

e Acquisitionsee. ate over the

maintained s growth oveen named years. Group has c

ographical lim all online Group-none

ponse procedForefront Grorect departmfor example, Research, s are reconc

with the suppthe companer Satisfacti

Forefront Grooffering, the

sed to improevancy of thg Section IB

y standards lhods and procipating StateForefront-Bots, individualsicipating Stad; a client nug Entities anng, timing a

nt would be b

icing proces

s e and Qua

Qualification

rizona PubUtilities. In

as mentionedrcing Course

AF Acquisitios then adjus University,

past three (3a 94% memer the past ton the Inc.’s

consistently gmits by state

dure to custooup- Depend

ment with thee it may be ro

with the accciled throughort of escala

ny with the reon evaluatiooup-for purpere is a post ove our delivhe offerings.B2 of the RFlisted below ocesses thae: th SIG and Fs, organizati

ate or Purchaumber assignnd Participatnd mode of billed accord

ss and accep

alifications

ns - Page 2 o

lic Service, addition, thd in pricing pe, then instron team withsted to fit a sthrough affil

3) years mber retentiothree (3) yeas Fastest Gr

grown by doe name:

omer complading on the t

e account agouted to IT, count agent h the accounation procedesulting recoon method: oses of this course surv

ver and conte Example inP for Proposin Section I

at would be u

Forefront paions per yeaasing Entity ned and the ting States wdelivery.

ding to the n

pted method

s

f 3

Louisville he United Sproposal. Deructed/coachh a spend ovsourcing couliation with U

on rate over ars: rowing Comp

ouble digits t

aints and setype of comp

gent in chargSearch, Accnotified. Any

nt agent assidures to engaommendatio

RFP and thvey sent to aent as well a

ncluded in Tasals that do B1. used to man

articipate withar, so this is would be unspecific req

would be not

egotiated m

ds of paymen

Gas and tates Air Foeveloped thehed (1 of 4 ver $100M. Trse at the

University of

the last 3 ye

panies for th

the last 3 ye

ervice issuesplaint, it is ro

ge of followincounting, Loy and all igned to thatage the seni

on(s).

e online all participanas assess thab 3 and in Tnot fully me

age multiple

h hundreds not an issueniquely quirement of ted in their c

ethod and

nt;

rce, e Air

The

ears.

he

ars.

s: outed ng gin,

t ior

nts e Tab et

e

of e.

the client


Technica

2. L

3. D

4. T


al Response T

q. Total

r. Descr

itigation: a. SIG nb. Forefr

Debarment:

a. SIG vsuspefrom p

b. Forefrdebarexcludor age

Technology aa. SIG a

ordersa firew

29, 2015 rement Pro

nse Tab 2:

Tab 2: Exper

SIG and Faccepts A

number of p SIG maint

and anothcurriculum

In additioncontractor

Forefront GUniversity available t

ribe the crim SIG -cond Forefront G

one ront Group n

erifies that nended, propoparticipation ront Group vrred, suspended from paency.

and Data Send Forefrons and receivwall between


rience and Q

Forefront, SIGCH, wire, ch

personnel emains a nationer 18 full-tim

m and trainingn for on-site trs that are ceGroup is alsof Tenness

to deliver oninal backgroucts criminaGroup- cond

none.

neither the Oosed for debin this procu

verifies that nded, proposrticipation in

curity: t will utilize te assessme

n the course

s e and Qua

Qualification

G would issuheck, echeck

mployed by ynal presence

me staff dedig events. training Foreertified in all o associatedee where m site training

ound check pal backgrounducts crimina

Offeror nor itsbarment, decurement by aneither the Osed for deban this procure

the learning ents via the Swork and th

alifications

ns - Page 3 o

ue the invoick and credit

your firm by e and has 14cated to trai

efront Groupof their in-p

d through Boany of the a

g. procedure fo

nd on every al backgroun

s principals clared ineligiany governm

Offeror nor itrment, declaement by an

managemeSIG websitee testing.

s

f 3

ce for all traicard for all p

location: 4 people in tining and de

p maintains aerson traininonnie Keith

adjunct profe

or all trainingperson hirednd on every

are presentlible, or volunment departmts principals ared ineligibny governme

nt system (L. This is a se

ning and payments.

the Florida oevelopment o

approximateng. (President) w

essors are al

g staff: d by SIG. person hire

ly debarred, ntarily excludment or ageare presentle, or volunt

ent departme

LMS) to placecure server

office of

ely 9

with lso

d.

ded ncy. tly arily ent

ce r with

RFP #E19Issue DaTraining Technic

Technica

1. TdGiswp Fath

94-1922

ate: May 29 for Procureal Response

al Response T

This RFP reseveloped by

Group, LLC-os that we areworld class o

roven track

or purposesdditional res

he training. b. Firm’s

s. Days

t. Owne

u. Organ

v. Webs

w. Year F

x. Missio

y. Simila

z. Gover

, 2015 ement Profee Tab 1 #2:

Tab 1 #2: Do

E

sponse is bey Sourcing Inour partner fe combining rganizationsrecord of co

s of this respsponses from

s primary bu SIG-6 Nand hours o SIG- 7am

ership Struct SIG 100 Forefronnization Cha SIG and

site Address: SIG- SIG ForefronFirm was Fo SIG-199 Forefronon Statemen SIG, see

ar work with SIG has

associatdistricts,Canada participa

ForefronAuthority

rnment Clien SIG-part

joining SSummitsspeaker

Forefron

essionals Documen

ocumentatio

Experience

ing presentendustry Grouor in personthe online, m

s who have bollaboration.

ponse, SIG hm Forefront G

siness addre. 2nd Street,

of operation:m EST to 7pure: % owned by

nt Group-100art: Forefront, s: G.org nt Group- forounded: 91 nt Group-200nt, Companye page Tab 1public or primajority of t

tion along wi public and and investm

ate within SIGnt Group- Day, PPL Electnt List and dticipating sta

SIG so they rs, Regionalsat an event

nt Group- U

tation Supp

on Supportin

and Qualif

ed by SIG Uup, Inc. (SIG delivery of t

mobile and ibeen collabo

has respondeGroup when

ess and officSuite 202, F

pm PST

y Dawn Tiura0% owned b

see Tab 1

refrontgroup

02 y Goals 1 vate entitiesthe Global 1ith many pubprivate unive

ment agencieG for educatallas Area Ratric Utilities iscounts ove

ate agenciesreceive a 25

s and Sympo. nited States

porting Qua

g Quality Sta

fications

niversity, anG) in conjunc

training. Thn person traorating for a

ed as lead on relevant to

ce locationsFernandina B

a by Bonnie Ke

.com

s ,000 compa

blically owneersities, states from dozetion and besapid Transit

er the past ts have typica5% discount osiums and a

s Airforce, sim

ality Standa

andards - Pa

n online curriction with thehe richness oaining capab

number of y

on this propothe in perso

: Beach, FL 3

eith

anies as memed investor ute agencies, ens of countst practice sh, Tennessee

hree (3)yearally been prefor their atteattend for fre

milar discou

ards

age 1 of 4

iculum e Forefront of our responbilities of twoyears and ha

osal, but inclon compone

32034

mbers or ouutilities, schoprovinces o

tries that haring. e Valley

rs: ecluded fromendance at ee if they are

nt.

nse o ave a

uded nt of

r ool of

m

e a


Technica

94-1922


al Response T

aa. Client

bb. Descr

cc. Descr

dd. Descr

ee. Descr

ff. Descr…..wi

gg. Descr

hh. Total


Tab 1 #2: Do

t retention ra SIG has ribe the firm’ SIG has b

last three y Forefront Gribe any geo SIG none, Forefront Gribe the resp SIG and F

to the corrthe issue, Universitycomplaintsaccount wleaders in

ribe Custome SIG and F

education that are uscurrent rel5 regardinthe quality

ribe the meththin a Partic SIG and F

companies Each Part

negotiatedPurchasinfile for billi

Each clientiming.

ribe the invo SIG and F

accepts A

number of p SIG maint

and anothcurriculum

In additioncontractor

essionals Documen

ocumentatio

ate over the maintained s growth oveen named years. Group has c

ographical lim all online Group-none

ponse procedForefront Grorect departmfor example, Research, s are reconc

with the suppthe companer Satisfacti

Forefront Grooffering, the

sed to improevancy of thg Section IB

y standards lhods and procipating StateForefront-Bots, individualsicipating Stad; a client nug Entities anng, timing a

nt would be b

icing procesForefront, SIGCH, wire, ch

personnel emains a nationer 18 full-tim

m and trainingn for on-site trs that are ce

tation Supp

on Supportin

past three (3a 94% memer the past ton the Inc.’s

consistently gmits by state

dure to custooup- Depend

ment with thee it may be ro

with the accciled throughort of escala

ny with the reon evaluatiooup-for purpere is a post ove our delivhe offerings.B2 of the RFlisted below ocesses thae: th SIG and Fs, organizati

ate or Purchaumber assignnd Participatnd mode of billed accord

ss and accepG would issuheck, echeck

mployed by ynal presence

me staff dedig events. training Foreertified in all

porting Qua

g Quality Sta

3) years mber retentiothree (3) yeas Fastest Gr

grown by doe name:

omer complading on the t

e account agouted to IT, count agent h the accounation procedesulting recoon method: oses of this course surv

ver and conte Example inP for Proposin Section I

at would be u

Forefront paions per yeaasing Entity ned and the ting States wdelivery.

ding to the n

pted methodue the invoick and credit

your firm by e and has 14cated to trai

efront Groupof their in-p

ality Standa

andards - Pa

on rate over ars: rowing Comp

ouble digits t

aints and setype of comp

gent in chargSearch, Accnotified. Any

nt agent assidures to engaommendatio

RFP and thvey sent to aent as well a

ncluded in Tasals that do B1. used to man

articipate withar, so this is would be unspecific req

would be not

egotiated m

ds of paymence for all traicard for all p

location: 4 people in tining and de

p maintains aerson trainin

ards

age 2 of 4

the last 3 ye

panies for th

the last 3 ye

ervice issuesplaint, it is ro

ge of followincounting, Loy and all igned to thatage the seni

on(s).

e online all participanas assess thab 3 and in Tnot fully me

age multiple

h hundreds not an issueniquely quirement of ted in their c

ethod and

nt; ning and payments.

the Florida oevelopment o

approximateng.

ears.

he

ars.

s: outed ng gin,

t ior

nts e Tab et

e

of e.

the client

office of

ely 9


Technica

2. L

3. D

4. T

94-1922


al Response T

ii. Descr

itigation: a. SIG nb. Forefr

Debarment:

a. SIG vsuspefrom p

b. Forefrdebarexcludor age

Technology aa. SIG a

ordersa firew


Tab 1 #2: Do

Forefront GUniversity available t

ribe the crim SIG -cond Forefront G

one ront Group n

erifies that nended, propoparticipation ront Group vrred, suspended from paency.

and Data Send Forefrons and receivwall between

essionals Documen

ocumentatio

Group is alsof Tenness

to deliver oninal backgroucts criminaGroup- cond

none.

neither the Oosed for debin this procu

verifies that nded, proposrticipation in

curity: t will utilize te assessme

n the course

tation Supp

on Supportin

o associatedee where m site training

ound check pal backgrounducts crimina

Offeror nor itsbarment, decurement by aneither the Osed for deban this procure

the learning ents via the Swork and th

porting Qua

g Quality Sta

d through Boany of the a

g. procedure fo

nd on every al backgroun

s principals clared ineligiany governm

Offeror nor itrment, declaement by an

managemeSIG websitee testing.

ality Standa

andards - Pa

onnie Keith adjunct profe

or all trainingperson hirednd on every

are presentlible, or volunment departmts principals ared ineligibny governme

nt system (L. This is a se

ards

age 3 of 4

(President) wessors are al

g staff: d by SIG. person hire

ly debarred, ntarily excludment or ageare presentle, or volunt

ent departme

LMS) to placecure server

with lso

d.

ded ncy. tly arily ent

ce r with


Technica

SIG Univlearnerssuccess

SIG Univ

The missleaderssupport

Vision

The visiowide coprocureour alum

94-1922


al Response T

versity (SIGs and to es, both aca

versity Mis

sion of SIG by engagts and prom

on of SIG Uommitmenement andmni.


Tab 1 #2: Do

GU) is commngage anademicall

sion Statem

G Universityging them motes exc

University isnt to acadd governa

essionals Documen

ocumentatio

mitted to md challengy and prof

ment

y is to crea in a collab

cellence in

s to be inteemic excence throug

tation Supp

on Supportin

meeting thge them afessionally

te the moborative le

n online ed

ernationallellence in gh innova

porting Qua

g Quality Sta

he needs oas they gro.

st well rouearning enducation.

ly recognizsourcing, otive teach

ality Standa

andards - Pa

of today’s ow and ac

nded globnvironment

zed for ououtsourcin

hing and th

ards

age 4 of 4

diverse chieve

bal sourcint that foste

r institutionng, he success

ng ers,

n-

s of


S

Technica

SIG Unive

such, we

incorpora

Below is a

Course N Student N Job Title Years in p INSTRUCTPlease ciwhere 1 appropriyou. COURSE C N/A = No1=Strong2=Disagre3=Neithe4=Agree 5=Strong 1. I wa 2. I ha for 3. I wa of t 4. This

194-1922 ate: May 2g for Procucal ResponSIG Univers

al Response T

ersity prides i

use an onlin

ate their fee

an example

S

Name: ______

Name (optio

(if applicabl

present posit

TIONS ircle your resmeans "stronate or not a

CONTENT (P

ot applicablely disagree ee

er agree/nor ly agree

as aware of

ad the prerethis course.

as well informthis course.

s course lived

29, 2015 rement Pro

nse Tab 1: sity Post-C

Tab 1: #2 Do

tself on prov

ne survey of

dback into t

of a survey

IG University

____________

onal): _______

e): _________

tion? <1

sponse for eangly disagreepplicable to

Please subm

e

disagree

the prerequ

quisite know

med about t

d up to my e

ofessionals#2 Documourse Eval

ocumentatio

viding an env

students an

the program

that is used

y Course Eva

________

____________

____________

1-3 3-5 5

ach questione" and 5 me

o this course.

mit your rating

uisites for this

wledge and s

the objective

expectations

s mentation oluation Ch

on of Quality

vironment th

d instructors

m.

for most of t

aluation Que

Training Loc

_____________

___________

5+

n. Rate aspeeans "strongly

Your feedb

g for each o

course.

skills

es

s.

of Quality hecklist for

y Standards -

hat seeks to

at the end

the SIG Unive

estionnaire -

cation: _____

____ Date: __

ects of the cy agree." Chback is since

of the followin

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

Standards Online eL

- Page 1 of 3

continuously

of each cou

ersity course

STUDENTS

_____________

_____________

course on a hoose N/A if erely apprec

ng questions

A 1 2 3

A 1 2 3

A 1 2 3

A 1 2 3

s earning

3

y improve. A

urse and

ework:

_______

__

1 to 5 scale,the item is niated. Than

s)

4 5

4 5

4 5

4 5

As

not k


S

Technica

5. The COURSE 6. The 7. The 8. Inte 9. The pra 10. The 11. The 12. The COURSE 13. The 14. The whe 15. The 16. The cou COURSE 17. The 18. The eve 19. It w 20. I ha


al Response T

e content is r

DESIGN

e course obje

e course acti

eractive mul

e activities in actice and fe

e test(s) in thi

e difficulty lev

e pace of thi

INSTRUCTOR

e instructor w

e instructor wen needed.

e instructor w

e instructor dursework we

ENVIRONME

e training env

e training enverything I nee

was easy for m

ad no issues

29, 2015 rement Pro


Tab 1: #2 Do

relevant to m

ectives are c

ivities stimula

timedia was

this course geedback.

is course we

vel of this co

s course is a

(FACILITATO

was well prep

was helpful a

was a good p

id a good joll-understood

NT

vironment fo

vironment foeded to lear

me to acces

logging on o


ocumentatio

my job.

clear to me.

ated my lear

s essential in

gave me suf

re accurate

ourse is appro

ppropriate.

OR)

pared.

nd available

presenter.

ob of makingd.

or this site wa

or this site prorn.

ss the course

or off the tra


on of Quality

rning.

the course.

fficient

e and fair.

opriate.

e

g the

as comfortab

ovided

e online.

ining environ


y Standards -

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

ble. N/A

N/A

N/A

nment. N/A

Standards Online eL

- Page 2 of 3

A 1 2 3

A 1 2 3

A 1 2 3

A 1 2 3

A 1 2 3

A 1 2 3

A 1 2 3

A 1 2 3

A 1 2 3

A 1 2 3

A 1 2 3

A 1 2 3

A 1 2 3

A 1 2 3

A 1 2 3

A 1 2 3

s earning

3

4 5

4 5

4 5

4 5

4 5

4 5

4 5

4 5

4 5

4 5

4 5

4 5

4 5

4 5

4 5

4 5


S

Technica

COURSE 21. I ac 22. I wi23. The 24. I wi pro SELF-PAC 25. On 26. Vid 27. How ___ Provid___Reduc___Update___Make c___Make t___Slow d___Allot m___Improv___Use the 28. What

chara 29. What 30. What


al Response T

RESULTS

ccomplished

ll be able toe course cov

ll recommenofessionals.

CED DELIVERY

line was a g

eo is an imp

w would you

e better infore content coe content covcourse activitthe course lesown the pace

more time for tve the tests use discussion b

t other improacters)

t is least valu

t is most valu

29, 2015 rement Pro


Tab 1: #2 Do

d the objecti

use what I lvered everyt

nd this cours

Y

ood way for

portant aspe

u improve th

mation beforevered in courvered in coursies more stimuss difficult. e of the courshe course. ed in the couoards less.

ovements wo

uable about

uable about


ocumentatio

ves of this co

earned in thhing I expec

e to other so

r me to learn

ct of the co

is course?

e course. rse. se. ulating.

se.

urse.

ould you rec

this course?

this course?


on of Quality

ourse.

his course. cted to learn

ourcing

n this conten

urse.

(Check all th

___C___In___Im___Im___M___Sp___Sh___A___U

commend in

? (Free text b

? (Free text b


y Standards -

N/A

N/An. N/A

N/A

nt. N/A

N/A

hat apply.)

Clarify the councrease contemprove the inmprove courseMake the courpeed up the phorten the tim

Add more videtilize the discu

this course?

box up to 400

box up to 400

Standards Online eL

- Page 3 of 3

A 1 2 3

A 1 2 3 A 1 2 3

A 1 2 3

A 1 2 3

A 1 2 3

urse objectiveent covered instructional mee organizatiorse more difficpace of the c

me for the coueo to the couussion boards

? (Free text b

0 characters

0 characters

s earning

3

4 5

4 5 4 5

4 5

4 5

4 5

s. n course. ethods. n. cult. course. urse. rse. more.

box up to 40

s)

s)

0


Technica

Online a Learnersachievinimmedia If learnetake thereceive to the lelearned. A little hcreated have excertificatUniversiprofessicurriculudiscoverdemons All quiz to a psylessons pedagogwho hasthey areevaluateevaluatiocharactethe certilearning In Perso The For

The 5E Study. T

1. E


al Response T

and Mobile:

s in the onlng the coursate scoring.

ers were to Certified Sa certificatearner and t

istory of theat the requisted for yetion for souity to come onals to va

um developred to be oftrated, we u

and test quchomatriciaas they app

gy for youths skills and e competene. We use ton strategieeristics of ofication acc to make su

on Training:

efront Grou

learning cyThe learning

Engage, in w

29, 2015 rement Pro

nse Tab 1:

Tab 1: #2 Do

ine and mose objective

take the coSourcing Pe if they pastheir emplo

e professiouest of our mears for basurcing and o

to fruition. lidate the n

pers to test f adequate undertook d

uestions arean for validaply to andrah. All of the knowledget, motivatedhe instructoes and givenline learne

creditation wure that we

:

up follows t

ycle was orig cycle has

which a stu

ofessionals#2 Docum

ocumentatio

How Lear

obile formates by taking

omplete SIGProfessionss with a 80yer that this

nal certificamembers. Msic procuremoutsourcingFirst we ha

need for certhe assessdepth to fitdeveloping

e written byation. We a

agogy. Andronline curr

e in the subjd, have gooor as a cone support wers to help we also stu

e were able

he 5E’s Cy

ginally deves four phase

udent's inter

s mentation o

on of Quality

rning is Val

t receive dirg quizzes a

G Universitynal examina0% passings massive b

ation, this cMost certificment activitg. It has takead to do a srtification. Tment again the needs a full curric

y sourcing palso have eragogy is thriculum is dject, they hod time mansultant or ghen neededin the deve

udied the imto smooth

cle of Learn

eloped by Bes:

rest is capt

of Quality

y Standards -

idated

rect feedbaat the end o

y curriculumation with reg rate. Thisbody of kno

certification cation throuies, howeveen close to

skills assessThen we wonst existing

that the skculum for ce

professionaexperts valihe process directed at tave the abnagement sguide on thed. We've al

elopment ofmpact of cul

out any bia

ning:

Biological S

tured and th

Standards

- Page 1 of 2

ack as to theof each less

m they couldemote procs would proowledge wa

and SIG Uugh companer there is n

o two years sment of soorked with acontent. W

kills assessmertification.

als and thendating the qthat adults

the self-direility to set leskills, and ae side. We lso studied f the curricultural differeases in the

Sciences Cu

he topic is e

s

2

eir successson with

d submit toctoring to ovide validaas digested

niversity wenies like ISno accreditfor SIG

ourcing a number o

When none wment

n are submiquestions a learn versu

ected learneearning goaability to seprovide sethe diversi

ulum. As paences on curriculum.

urriculum

established

s in

o

ation and

ere M ted

of was

itted and us er, als,

elf lf-ty

art of

.

d.


Technica

2. Et

3. Etu

4. Ebd

The fifthunderstaEvaluati

All of theon activi

"5Es Over


al Response T

Explore, in whrough faci

Explain, in whe instructo

understandiExtend, in wbut similar sdiscussion t

h E is Evaluanding, andon should t

e in person ity to ensur

rview: The 5E

29, 2015 rement Pro

nse Tab 1:

Tab 1: #2 Do

which the silitated quewhich studeor leads a ding. which studesituations, atopic.

uate, in whid leads studtake place t

training more the learn

instructional m

ofessionals#2 Docum

ocumentatio

student is astioning anents are asdiscussion o

ents are askand the inst

ch the instrdents to assthroughout

odules haveers go thro

model". nasa.g

s mentation o

on of Quality

allowed to cd observatked to explof the topic

ked to applytructor guid

ructor obsesess wheththe cycle,

e interactivugh the 5E

gov. NASA. 24

of Quality

y Standards -

construct knion. lain what th

c to refine th

y what theydes the stud

rves each sher what thenot within it

ve lessons, E’s.

4 February 20

Standards

- Page 2 of 2

nowledge in

hey have dihe students

y have learndents towar

student's kney have leats own set

case studie

12.

s

2

n the topic

scovered, as'

ned in differd the next

nowledge aarned is truephase.

es and han

and

rent

and e.

ds


Technica


al Response T

29, 2015 rement Pro

nse Tab 1:

Tab 1: #2 Do

ofessionals#2 Docum

ocumentatio

s mentation o

on of Quality

of Quality

y Standards -

Standards

- Page 1 of 1

s

1


Technica

To assessDonald Kmove seqlevel reprlevels req This pagemanner pused in b

Level 1 - react to t

Level 2 - advanceand post

Level 3 - occurredother woattitudeslearner?"program

Level 4 - level meameasurincosts, redresults in

Source: inst


al Response T

the effectivKirkpatrick. Aquentially thresents a mo

quire more ri

e shows two per the Kirkp

business.

Level 4Results

Level 3Behavi

Level 2Results

Level 1Results

Reactions – the program

Learning – Eed in skills, knt-tests are us

Transfer – Thd in learners' ords, "Are the

being used " Many traine's effectiven

Results – Oftasures the su

ng increasedduced accidfinancial ter

tructionaldesign

29, 2015 rement Pro

nse Tab 1:

Tab 1: #2 Do

SIG

veness of a trAccording tohrough levelsore precise mgorous and

ways of disppatrick's Partn

4:

3: ior

2:

:

Evaluation am.

Evaluation atnowledge ored to assess

his level mea behavior du

e newly acqu in the everyers believe thess.

ten referred uccess of a td productiondents, increarms is difficult

n.gordoncomp

ofessionals#2 Docum

ocumentatio

University

raining progo his model, es two, three ameasure of ttime-consum

playing Kirkpners website

To what degof the learnreinforceme

To what deglearned durjob.

To what degknowledge,participatio

To what deglearning eve

at this level m

t this level atr attitude. So the level of

asures the traue to the trauired skills, knyday environhis is the true

to as "the botraining prog

n, improved qased sales ort to measure

puter.com/Evalu

s mentation o

on of Quality

Assessme

ram, we turnevaluation sand four as bhe effective

ming analysis

patrick's Four e, and secon

gree targeteing event(s)

ent.

gree participring training

gree particip, skills, and an in the lear

gree participent.

measures ho

ttempts to aometimes pre learning.

ansfer that ining progranowledge ornment of theest assessme

ottom line," tgram by quality, redur higher reture and difficu

uation.html

of Quality

y Standards -

nt Program

n to the fourhould beginbudget and

eness of the ts.

r Levels of Evnd, the way t

ed outcome and subseq

pants apply when they a

pants acquirattitudes basrning event.

pants react f

ow participa

scertain thee-tests

am. In r

e nt of a

this

uced rn on investm

ult to link dire

Standards

- Page 1 of 1

m

r-level moden with level od time allow. training; how

valuation. Firsthe four leve

es occur, as aquent

what they are back on

re the intended on their

favorably to

nts in a train

extent stud

ment. Howevectly with tra

s

1

el created byone and then Each succe

wever the hig

st, the preferels are comm

a result

the

ded

o the

ning program

ents have

ver, determiining.

y n essive gher

rred monly

m

ning


Technica

Faculty/InstructoRecord

Curriculu

Develope

ITstaff

Administ/RegistraRecordK

The log afaculty alon an an

Many of webinarsindustry.

94-1922 ate: May 29 for Procureal Response

al Response T

orofEdu

Deg

Yea

Ins

um

ers/

Edu

Deg

Yea

Ins

trationation/Keeping

Edu

Deg

Yea

Ins

above is malso have licenual basis. W

our online fas, forums and

, 2015 ement Profee Tab 1: #2

Tab 1: #2 Do

Profession

ucation

grees

ar

stitution

WH

ucation

grees

ar

stitution

WH

ucation

grees

ar

stitution

WH

intained for enses (JD, CWe ask them

aculty are alsd other educ

essionals 2 Documen

ocumentatio

nal Develop

WorkHistory

WorkHistory

WorkHistory

all parties inCPA, Doctor m to all subm

so executivecational venu

tation of Q

on of Quality

pment of Sta

SubjectMatter

SubjectMatter

SubjectMatter

nvolved in SIetc.) that req

mit their licen

es in the Souues to help t

uality Stand

y Standards -

aff and Instr

Certification&Trainings



IG Universityquire them tnse renewals

urcing Industhem stay ab

dards

- Page 1 of 1

ructors

nss

ProfessDevelop

nss

ProfessDevelop

nss

ProfessDevelop

y. In additioto have conts to keep on

stry and attenbreast of cha

1

sionalpments

Tp

sionalpments

Tp

sionalpments

Tp

on, many of otinuing educn file.

nd conferenanges in the

Trainingplan/goals

Trainingplan/goals

Trainingplan/goals

our ation

ces, e

RFP IssueTrainTech

Tech

Objec

Advaof: ProjeConti I seekeduca Profe

SIG –

St. M

Emm

#E194-1922e Date: Maning for Prohnical Resp

hnical Respo

1518 Pe

ctive

nce my career

ect Managemeingency Planni

k to use these sation as I comp

essional Experi

– Sourcing Indu

Assista

Michael Academ

Kinder

a Love Hardee

4th Gra

2 y 29, 2015 curement P

ponse Tab 1

onse Tab 1: #

Am

nbrook Driv

path in a corp

ent ing

skills to impactplete my Maste

ience

ustry Group, Fe

ant Director of

Develop Cu

Publish Less

Course Adm

Project Man

Accreditatio

ICE

Certified in

my, Fernandina

rgarten Teache

SMART

Early A

Lead Te

Reaccr

Various

Membe

Volunt

e, Fernandina B

ade Teacher

Came i

demon

Professiona: #2 Docum

#2 Documen

my Finnila

ve, Fernandin

orate educatio

t the growth aer’s Degree in

ernandina Bea

f SIG University

rriculum

sons

ministration

nagement

on Preparation

E Credentialing

Litmos, Articu

a Beach, FL

er – Third Grad

T Board Trainin

Adopter and Pil

eacher ‐ Schoo

editation

Lead Membe

s continuing ed

Example: Lin

er of the Golf C

eer Coach – Gi

Beach, FL

n midyear whe

nstrated my ad

ls mentation o

ntation of Qu

a‐Assista

na Beach, FL

onal setting wit

Multi‐TaTeamwo

nd performancEducation in In

ch, FL

y

n

g Specialist

late Storyline

de Teacher

ng

ot of New Sup

ol Improvemen

er of the Third

ducation cours

ndaMood Phon

Committee Fun

irls on the Run

en a teacher ab

aptability and

of Quality S

uality Standa

ant Direct

L 32034 ◊ 90

th a company

asking ork

ce of an innovanstructional De

per Kids Readin

nt Plan,

Phase team, T

ses

nics & Sequenc

ndraising Team

bruptly resigne

focus in a diffi

Standards

ards - Page 1

tor SIG Un

04‐556‐4094

that values my

O D

ative organizatesign for Onlin

A

2

ng Program

Team Member

cing (Dyslexia E

m

2

ed and success

icult situation

1 of 2

niversity

4 ◊ amyfinni

y diverse exper

OrganizationalDetail Oriented

tion while contne Learning.

April 2015 – pre

2007 – 2015, 20

r on Phases On

Educational Pr

2006 – 2007

sfully complete

la@comcast

rience and skil

l Skills d

tinuing to furth

esent

004‐2006

ne and Two

eparation)

ed the year wh

t.net

ls in the areas

her my

hich

RFP IssueTrainTech

Tech

St. Pa

LaVan

Educa

Capel

Unive

Unive

North

North

Othe

#E194-1922e Date: Maning for Prohnical Resp

hnical Respo

aul’s Catholic S

4th Gra

nway Corpora

Accou

Office

ation

lla University –

Maste

Learni

ersity of Wiscon

B.S. El

ersity of Kansas

Teach

hwestern Mich

Teach

Gener

h Central Michi

Associ

r

Certifi

Runne

Tutor

2 y 29, 2015 curement P

ponse Tab 1

onse Tab 1: #

School, Olathe

ade Teacher

School

Reaccr

Membe

ation, Charlevo

nting Assistant

Accoun

Handle

Worke

Assistant

Typed profe

Worke

Created

Handle

– Minneapolis,

er of Health Ad

ing. Scheduled

nsin – Milwauk

ementary Edu

s – Lawrence,

er Education p

igan College –

er Education p

ral Education c

igan College –

iates of Applie

ed Teacher Gr

er (5K, 10K, hal

children with s

Professiona: #2 Docum

#2 Documen

, KS

Improvement

editation Team

er of the Catho

oix, MI

t

nts receivable,

ed incoming ca

d closely with

essional letters

d with legal do

d and maintain

ed incoming ph

MN

ministration c

completion M

kee ‐ Milwauk

cation with a m

KS

preparation cla

Traverse City,

preparation cla

lasses

Petoskey, MI

d Science in Bu

rade K‐6 in the

lf marathons)

special needs

ls mentation o

ntation of Qu

Plan Science T

m Member

olic Schools We

accounts paya

lls and other v

the Senior Acc

s and internal o

ocuments invo

ned databases,

hone calls and o

lasses. Switch

March 2017.

ee, WI

minor in Social

sses

MI

sses

usiness Manag

State of Florid

of Quality S

uality Standa

Team Member

eek Committee

able, spreadshe

various office ta

countant and o

office memos

lving land own

, created sprea

other various o

ed focus to Ma

Studies

gement

da

Standards

ards - Page 2

r

e

eet creation

asks

other business

ners, created le

adsheets

office assignm

aster of Educat

2 of 2

2001‐2

1995‐1

investors

1992 –

ease agreemen

ents from thre

2014 –

tion in Instruct

1998‐2

1996 ‐

1991,

1992 –

2002

1996

– 1994

nts

ee managers

– present

tional Design f

2000

‐ 1998

1996

– 1995

or Online


Technica

CD CPrefa H Se 1 Pr

2 Fo

3 C 4 D 5 St R


al Response T

SIG Un

Contents ace

ow to Use Thetting Up On

rofile of the O Training Co Readings a Sample As

oundations o Training Co Readings a Sample Dis

Cognitive Stra Training Co Readings a Sample Dis

Developing C Training Co Readings a Sample Dis

trategies for Training Co Readings a Sample Dis Final Assigneferences

29, 2015 rement Pro

nse Tab 1:

Tab 1: #2 Do

niversity Ta

his Manual nline Training

Online Learnompetencieand Presentassignments a

of Cognition ompetencieand Presentascussions

ategies to Suompetencieand Presentascussions an

Cognitive, Soompetencieand Presentascussions an

Managing Yompetencieand Presentascussions annment

ofessionals#2 Docum

ocumentatio

able of Co

g

ner es ations

and Discussio

and Learnines ations

upport Learnes ations d Assignmen

ocial and Teaes ations d Assignmen

Your Online Ces ations d Assignmen

s mentation o

on of Quality

ontents for

ons

ng

ers’ Thinking

nts

aching Prese

nts

Course

nts

of Quality

y Standards -

Online Tea

g

ence Online

Standards

- Page 1 of 1

achers

s

1

ix xiii

xiv xvi

1 3 3 4

17 19 19 20

31 33 33 35

51 53 53 56

93 95 95 97

101 119


Technica

Sourcing employecould dato the Cocomprehtype of p

An emploand comof the emdisregardaction.

STATEMENProhibitio

The Comand in prbelow, "kgovernm

No emploin violatiofirm any potherwise

In utilizingreputablereasonabcriteria aand com


al Response T

Industry Groees with respamage the Company andhensive statepayments an

oyee's actiompetence. Amployee for d of the princ

NT OF POLICon of Improp

mpany expecromoting thekickbacks" or

mental action

oyee of the on of any appayment of e) to:

any person private or gby the custopurpose of ientity in anyany governpolitical offiwithholdingany comme

g consultantse, qualified ible in relationd procedu

mpensation o

29, 2015 rement Pro

nse Tab 1:

Tab 1: #2 Do

oup (SIG) whect to stand

Company's red to employeement, requind political c

ns under thisAccordingly,

position assigciples of this

Y per Payments

cts all emploe Company r "bribes" intens are unacc

Company opplicable law anything of

or firm emplovernmentaomer in any inducing or ry governmenmental officce, for the p of action) o

ercial transacs, agents, saindividuals on to the serv

ures to be utiof sales repre

ofessionals#2 Docum

ocumentatio

ho runs SIG Udards of condeputation aees involvedired standard

contributions

s Policy are sthose actiongnments and Policy will b

s

oyees to use position on i

ended to indceptable an

or any Controw, offer or ma value (in the

oyed by or aal, for the pucommerciarewarding antal matter; ial, political

purpose of inor the exercisction or in an

ales represenor firms undervices performlized in inter

esentatives.

s mentation o

on of Quality

University maduct expectnd otherwise

d. The purposds of condu.

significant inns constituted promotione grounds fo

only legitimaissues beforeduce or rewand prohibited

olled Affiliateake directly e form of co

acting for orrpose of indl transactionction (or wit

party or officducing or rese of influencny governm

ntatives or otr compensa

med. The Conational tranConsultants,

of Quality

y Standards -

aintains certated in areas e result in serse of this Polct and prac

ndications ofe an importan. Corresponor appropria

ate practicee governmeard favorabld.

e acting on or indirectly

ompensation

r on behalf oucing or rew

n; or any govthholding of

cial of such ewarding favce by such oental mattethers, the Cotion arrangempany will isnsactions wit, agents or re

Standards

- Page 1 of 5

ain policies t where improrious adverselicy is to affir

ctices with re

f the individunt element i

ndingly, insenate managem

es in commental authoritle buying de

the Compay through ann, gift, contrib

of any customwarding any vernmental e action) by a

party, or anyvorable actiofficial, party

er. ompany will ements, whicssue from timth respect toepresentativ

s

5

o guide its oper activitiee consequem, in a

espect to ce

ual's judgmein the evaluansitivity to or ment discipl

ercial operatties. As stateecisions and

ny's behalf sy other persbution or

mer, whethe favorable aentity, for thea governme

y candidateon (or y or candida

employ onlych are me to time o the selectioves retained

es nces

rtain

nt ation inary

ions d

shall, on or

er action e ntal

e for

ate in

y

on in


Technica

relation twith all la

The provientertainviolative particulaminor goadministrexercise

When cuintendedbusiness

Political C

The Compolitical oby law.

In the Unprocess. to any po

While simUnited Ststate and

The laws the Unitecontributcitizenshi

In foreignpolitical cbe approcontributalso be gaffiliate's


al Response T

o the provisiaws, regulati

isions of this nment or gift of law as ap

arly not in theovernment ofrative actionsound discre

ustomer orgad to provide courtesies b

Contribution

mpany will nooffice in sup

ited States, fGenerally, feolitical party

milar laws appates corpora

d local elect

governing ped States vartions to politip.

n jurisdictionscontributionopriate if prutions shall begoverned by Board of Dir

29, 2015 rement Pro

nse Tab 1:

Tab 1: #2 Do

ion of goodsons and Com

section are s not of subs

pplied in thae United Statfficials where

n required in etion and co

anizations, goguidance wy their empl

s

ot make any port of such

federal law sederal law p

y or candida

ply in some sate contribution campai

participationry widely. In cical parties)

s and in states are lawful,

udent in amoe governed by written guidrectors. Any

ofessionals#2 Docum

ocumentatio

s or services mpany polic

not intendedstantial valuet environmetes), it may be customary the orderly

ontrol in auth

overnmentawith respect t

oyees, such

contribution candidacy

strictly contrprovides thatte in connec

states and thutions to cangns are lawf

n by corporacertain counare lawful a

e and local j contributionount and othby written gudelines or oth contribution

s mentation o

on of Quality

to the federcies governin

d to apply toe, customarynt. In some c

be acceptaby in order to econduct of

horizing such

al agencies oto acceptan policies sha

n to any poli except as p

ols corporatt no corporaction with an

heir political ndidates andful.

tions in the pntries, contribnd expecte

jurisdictions ns by the Coherwise consuidelines. Coher form of wn by the Com

of Quality

y Standards -

ral governmeng employee

o ordinary any in local bucountries (buble to make expedite or operations.

h business en

or others havnce of enter

all be respec

itical party oprovided in t

te involvemeation may cony federal el

subdivisionsd political pa

political procbutions to thd as a matte

of the Unitedompany or bsistent with gontributions bwritten authompany or by

Standards

- Page 2 of 5

ent must age conduct.

nd reasonabsiness relatiout not in all c such insubst secure routiManagers a

ntertainment

ve publishedrtainment, gited.

or to any canhis Policy an

ent in the fedontribute anlection.

s, in many jurarties in conn

cess of counhe political per of good c

d States wheby a Controllegood judgmeby a Controority as estaby a Controlle

s

5

ree to comp

ble business onships and ncountries, antantial gifts tne

are expectedt and gifts.

d policies ifts or other

ndidate for nd as permitt

deral politicaything of va

risdictions in nection with

ntries other thprocess (inclucorporate

ere corporated Affiliate ment. Compalled Affiliate blished by th

ed Affiliate sh

ply

not nd to

d to

ted

al lue

the

han uding

te may any shall

he hall


Technica

comply inthe annu

This Policygovernmor governreasonabor activitnot regalawfully in

Reports a

Any empmay be, to assignfor financ

Any empcustomeany empdistributotype of cproductspromptlycounsel,

Any manlegal couaction asthe matt

Discussio

Communcompetitexistencesimilarity


al Response T

n all respectual review pr

y is not intenmental agenc

nmental polble costs incies organizerded as conncur such co

and Periodic

ployee who i contrary to ed Compancial activity.

ployee who ars or stateme

ployee is engor or other peconduct (whs) which, if eny report such or to the ma

nager receivunsel and ths warranted er to higher

ons And Exch

nication withtor would bee of an undeof action. Th

29, 2015 rement Pro

nse Tab 1:

Tab 1: #2 Do

ts with the prrocess provid

nded to prevcies or to theicies or pracurred by thed to solicit vo

ntributions to osts.

Reviews

s requested this Policy w

ny legal cou

acquires infoents of indivi

gaged in conerson or film ether or not ngaged in b

h informationanager in the

ing a report ereafter will, under the pmanageme

hange Of Inf

h a competite illegal is, in erstanding, phe prohibitio

ofessionals#2 Docum

ocumentatio

rovisions of loded by this P

vent the come general puctices affectie Company toluntary poli political pa

to make, auill promptly rnsel, or to th

ormation (forduals involvenduct forbid representing in connecti

by an employn to the empe departme

as cited ab, after appro

provisions of tent.

formation Wi

tor on subjec antitrust litig

particularly ifns set forth b

s mentation o

on of Quality

ocal applicaPolicy.

mmunicationublic with resing business to establish oitical contribrties or cand

uthorize or areport such ie manager

r example, ned) that give

dden by this Pg the Compaon with a trayee of the C

ployee's mannt having re

ove will promopriate investhis Policy. Su

ith Competit

cts as to whicgation, likely f the commubelow are th

of Quality

y Standards -

able law and

n of Companspect to exis operations. or administe

butions from didates, whe

gree to any nformation t in the depa

newspaper res the emploPolicy, or thaany in any transaction invCompany, wnager, to assesponsibility f

mptly consustigation, takuch manage

tors

ch an underto serve as i

unication is ahus intended

Standards

- Page 3 of 5

d shall be rep

ny views to lting or prop Moreover, u

er political ac individual e

ere the Com

offer or payto the emplortment havin

reports, repooyee reasonat any sales ransaction isvolving the C

would violatesigned compfor financial

lt with assignke timely remer will also p

rstanding wimportant ev

accompanied to avoid an

s

5

ported as pa

egislators, osed legislat

under this Poction commmployees arpany may

yment whichoyee's manang responsib

orts from n to believe t representats engaged inCompany or

e this Policy, wpany legal activity.

ned Compamedial or oth

romptly repo

th the vidence of thed or followentitrust

art of

tion olicy, ittees re

h is, or ager, bility

that ive, n the r its will

ny her ort

he ed by


Technica

prosecutdifficult to

Accordincompetitcompetitprohibitethe opinineither vparagrapsources wother legthe comp

Participa

A. No em

(1) at a(2) at a

Coand

(3) at apurreq

B. EmploycertificatBefore paproducts

Violation

A. ViolaticircumstaCompantolerated

B. Discipldirectly in

(1) any


al Response T

tions, which to defend su

ngly, no emptor, or otherwtor, informat

ed by paragron of Compiolate the anph does not who are not gal and policpetitive infor

tion in Trade

mployee shal

any surreptitany meetingmpany's emd Exchange any informalrpose of disc

quirements eyees should tion activitiesarticipating s, employees

s of the Polic

ions of the Pances of the

ny's interest ind nor condon

inary action n a violation

y employee

29, 2015 rement Pro

nse Tab 1:

Tab 1: #2 Do

though baseccessfully.

ployee shall dwise furnish ttion on any sraph A abov

pany legal contitrust laws n preclude ob acting for a

cy restrictionsrmation that

e Association

ll attend or r

ious meetingg where ther

mployee is pre of Informatio meeting of

cussing businstablished b also be awas, which impin committes should con

cy

olicy are groe particular vn preventingned.

will be take of the Polic

who may ha

ofessionals#2 Docum

ocumentatio

ed on merely

discuss with to or acceptsubject as tove on complounsel, suchnor furnish a btaining com competitors applicablet may be ob

ns and Other

remain prese

g of compete is a discussecluded fromon with Com competitor ess matters wy such trade

are that partpact compet

es or organiznsult with Co

ounds for discviolation andg violations a

n, not only ay, but also a

ave delibera

s mentation o

on of Quality

y circumstan

a competitot from a com

o which an uliance with S discussions reasonable

mpetitive infor in transmittie to transacttained from

r Meetings w

ent:

titors; sion by comm discussing

mpetitors; or members ofwithout obse

e associationticipation in titors or suppzations, whicmpany lega

charge or otd having as aand making c

against indivagainst:

ately failed to

of Quality

y Standards -

ntial evidenc

or or any thirmpetitor or a

nderstandinSection I of t or transmitta basis for infeormation frong the informions with the a third-party

with Compet

mpetitors of ag by the para f a trade asserving the fon for its businstandard de

pliers, may rach develop sal counsel.

ther disciplina primary obclear that vi

iduals who a

o report a vi

Standards

- Page 4 of 5

ce, may nev

rd party actiny third part

ng with the cthe Shermanal of informaerring such a

om independmation. Howe federal govy source.

titors

any subject wagraph abov

sociation heormal procedness meetingevelopment aise antitrust standards o

nary action, bjective furtholations are

authorize or

iolation of th

s

5

vertheless be

ng for a ty acting for

competitor isn Act unless, ation would a violation. Tdent third-pawever, certaivernment lim

which the ve on Discus

ld for the dural

gs. and produc concerns. r certify

adapted toherance of t neither

participate

he Policy;

e

r a s in

This arty in

mit

ssions

ct

the the


Technica

(2) anycon

(3) therefle

C. Wheregood faitdisciplinamay, with

Reports a

A. Any emPolicy wilthe empl

B. Any emother eminformatisuch con

I [name oundersta

_________

[Printed N


al Response T

y employee ncerning a v

e violator's mect inadequ

e an employth on the ad

ary action mhin the limits

and Periodic

mployee whll promptly reloyee was so

mployee whmployee is en

on to the manduct, then t

of Employeend all of its t

____________

Name]

29, 2015 rement Pro

nse Tab 1:

Tab 1: #2 Do

who may haviolation of thanagerial su

uate leadersyee is accusedvice of Comay be taken permitted b

Reviews

ho is requesteeport such ino directed b

o acquires inngaged in coanager to wto the assign

e] have receerms and ag

_____ _

[

ofessionals#2 Docum

ocumentatio

ave deliberahis Policy; anuperiors, to thhip and lacked of violatinmpany legal n against theby law, assist

ed to engagnformation toy the manag

nformation tonduct forbi

whom the emned Compan

eived and reagree to be b

____________

[Signature]

s mentation o

on of Quality

ately withhelnd he extent thk of diligencng the antitru counsel afte

e employee in the empl

ge in any aco the managger, then to

that gives theidden by the

mployee repony legal cou

ad a copy obound by the

___________

of Quality

y Standards -

d relevant a

at the circume. ust laws, ander full disclosunder this Pooyee's defe

ctivity which ger to whom assigned Co

e employeee Policy will ports or, if the

unsel.

of this Code e provisions c

______

[Date

Standards

- Page 5 of 5

and material

mstances of

d the emplosure of the molicy; and thnse.

is or may bem the individompany leg

e reason to bpromptly rep

e manager is

of Ethics Polcontained th

_______

e]

s

5

l information

f the violatio

oyee has reliematerial factshe Company

e contrary toual reports, oal counsel.

believe that port such s engaged in

icy Statemeherein.

n

n

ed in s, no y

o this or, if

any

n

ent,


Technica

The Instrucoursewaposition t Duties an Key Resp

Wri Wo Wo

an For Lia Co

Specifica

Ba Tw Ext Prio Exc Ab Ab

tha Ab Ab


al Response T

uctional Desiare for procuthrough 12/3

nd Responsib

ponsibilities in

ites accuratorks closely works closely wd sound instrmats and pises with voic

ollaborates w

ations

chelors dego to five yeatreme attentor experienccellent writte

bility to read bility to write at promotes bility to applybility to work w

29, 2015 rement Pro

nse Tab 1:

Tab 1: #2 Do

SIG Instr

igner/Writer urement, go31/2016.

bilities

nclude but a

e and high qwith client orwith editors tructional derepares docceover talen

with team me

ree in businears experienction to detaice with e-leaen and oral cand understin a clear, su learning y instructionawell as a me

ofessionals#2 Docum

ocumentatio

ructional D

(Contractorovernance, ri

are not limite

quality coursr subject mao ensure qu

esign cuments for cnt to coordinembers to e

ess, English, ece in writing l and ability

arning coursecommunicattand state auccinct style

al design staember of a t

s mentation o

on of Quality

Designer Jo

r) will help prisk and com

ed to:

seware tter expert (Sality of gram

courseware nate recordinsure timely

education o or instruction to multitask eware prefetion skills nd federal o

e and develo

ndards to meam

of Quality

y Standards -

ob Descrip

roduce timempliance train

SME) to detemmar, spellin

developmeng schedulin delivery of c

r other relevnal design in a fast-pacrred

ordinances, lop interactiv

multimedia co

Standards

- Page 1 of 1

ption

ly and high ning. This is a

ermine coursg, tone and

ent ng courseware

vant field

ced environ

laws and guve and enga

ourseware

s

1

quality a contract

se content voice, flow,

ment

uidelines aging conten

, style

nt


Technica

SI The Condesign amanagecriteria bused to courses by varioassociatcourse-sAdditionway the How Wa This editiand ConUPCEA MWorkingdefined Rubric dsponsoreHigher Ereviews;not adethen tesfurther fireviewe The QuadatabasassignmQuality Mthe Coneligible f


al Response T

IG Univers

ntinuing andand evaluaed—that mbut do not evaluate a(MOOCs); us sponsorstions, goversponsoring nally, courseey must be s

as the Rubric

ion of the runtinuing EdMid-Atlantic Group wa the range

developmeed a prelim

Education R and addequately adted on a raine-tuning. d and endo

ality Mattersse of traineent to a revMatters-matinuing andfor QM reco

29, 2015 rement Pro

nse Tab 1:

Tab 1: #2 Do

ity Quality

d Professiontion of onlinay have pacarry acad

and improveand profess, including rnment ageorganizatioes to whichstructured a

c Develope

ubric was ducation Assc Regional s establishe of courses nt plan; an

minary set ofRubric; condd annotatio

ddress the eange of nonOnce approrsed by th

s Program pd QM Contview team.

anaged revd Professionognition.

ofessionals#2 Docum

ocumentatio

y Assuranc

nal Educatine and bleass/fail, skills

demic crede college-bsional train businessesencies and ons and couh it applies mand have c

ed?

developed sociation (U organizatioed. Over a to which thd appointef non-creditducted a fions to the R

elements ofn-credit couroved by th

he Quality M

promotes atinuing and. Any subscview of its cnal Educatio

s mentation o

on of Quality

e –in Conj

on Rubric (nded courss-based or it. Based o

based, non-ing and pe, profession special-inturses to whimay be eithcompletion

in collaborUPCEA), thron. A joint Q12-month p

he CPE Rubed the workt course revt-gap analRubric whe non-crediturses, and the Steering Matters Aca

a quality revd Professionribing instituourse or coon (CPE) sta

of Quality

y Standards -

junction w

CPE Rubricses—facilita other com

on this defin-credit cou

ersonal devnal and vocerest societich this rubrher instructo criteria.

ration with trough the pQM/UPCEAperiod, the bric would aking group. views baseysis of the rrever the stt courses. Ththe joint co Committee

ademic Ad

view procesnal Educatioution/organ

ourses. Couandards in a

Standards

- Page 1 of 1

with Quality

c) is intendeated, mentpletion or c

nition, the ruurses; massivelopment c

cational orgties. There iric is applicor led or se

the UniversiparticipatioA Steering CSteering Co

apply; appr The workind on the exresults of thetandard anhe revised R

ommittee ae, the CPE visory Coun

ss and provon Reviewenization marses that sua course re

s

1

y Matters

ed for the ored or self

certificationubric may bve open oncourses offeganizations s no limit to

cable. lf-paced; e

ity Professioon of the Committee ommittee roved the

ng group xisting QM e prelimina

nnotation dRubric was pproved soRubric wasncil.

vides a ers eligible fay conductccessfully m

eview are

f-n be nline ered and

o the

either

onal

and

ary id ome s

for t a meet


Technica

Design

The desigsubject msystematdevelopgoals. Spattention

In the de

Docu

Appl(cog

Desig

Crea

Appl

Develop

In the decontent storyboatechnoloaccordin

Implem

The implTraining fand testi(softwaredesign.


al Response T

SIG Unive

Phase

gn phase dematter analtic and specing and eva

pecific mean to details.

esign phase

ument the in

ly instructiongnitive, affec

gn the user

ate a protot

ly visual des

pment pha

evelopment assets bluep

ards and graogies. Testerng to feedb

mentation p

ementationfacilitators cing procedue or hardwa

29, 2015 rement Pro

nse Tab 1:

Tab 1: #2 Qu

ersity use

eals with leaysis, lesson pcific. Systemaluating a sns each ele

, developer

nstructional

nal strategiective, and p

interface an

ype

sign (graphic

ase

t phase, instprinted in thaphics. If e-lers debug ma

back.

phase

n phase devcover the coures. Preparare) and stu

ofessionals#2 Quality

uality Standa

es the AD

arning objecplanning, an

matic meanset of planne

ement of the

rs:

, visual, and

es accordingpsychomoto

nd user exp

c design)

tructional dehe design phearning is inaterials and

velops proceourse curricration for lea

udent registr

s y Standard

ards Require

DI Model

ctives, assesnd media ses a logical, oed strategiee instruction

d technical

g to intendeor)

erience

esigners andhase. In this

nvolved, pro procedure

edures for trulum, learniarners includration. Imple

ds Requirem

ments - Pag

l of Instruc

ssment instruelection. Theorderly met

es targeted nal design p

design strat

ed behavio

d develope phase, the

ogrammers des. The proje

raining faciling outcomdes trainingementation

ments

ge 1 of 2

ctional De

uments, exee design phthod of iden for attaining

plan must be

tegy

oral outcome

ers create an designers cdevelop or

ect is review

litators and mes, methodg them on ne includes ev

esign.

ercises, conthase should ntifying, g the projece executed

es by doma

nd assemblecreate integrate ed and revi

learners. d of deliveryew tools valuation of

tent, be

ct's with

ain

e

ised

y,

f the


Technica

This is alsapplicat

Evaluat

The evalevaluatio

http://ww


al Response T

o the phasetion or webs

tion phase

uation phason is presen

ww.nwlink.co

29, 2015 rement Pro

nse Tab 1:

Tab 1: #2 Qu

e where thesite function

se consists ont in each st

om/~doncla

ofessionals#2 Quality

uality Standa

e project mans.

of two partsage of the A

ark/history_isd

s y Standard

ards Require

anager softw

: formative ADDIE proc

d/addie.htm

ds Requirem

ments - Pag

ware is in pla

and summacess.

ml

ments

ge 2 of 2

ace, and th

ative. Forma

hat the learn

ative

ning


Technica

Online CAntonio Adobe Antonio HexperienconsultinNASA, S

He is a nEngland.

Antonio eMaster odirector cthe LoneCollege i

Brad PetPartner, Brad is o“Band Onclients caand prac“astonishLegal 50guy you InnovativYear for

Brad hastransactioapplicatio

Before laReprese

Brad is aBusiness


al Response T

CurriculumHumphreys

Humphreys ce in global

ng, and businShell Oil, Hew

native of Albu. He current

earned his Bf Business Acapacity for

e Star Collegnstructing th

terson Mayer Brow

one of the nane” lawyer foalling him a “ctical,” “the ghingly talente0. Legal 50have to haveve Lawyer in2013.

s worked witons for outsoons develop

aw school, Bntative.

a graduate ofs. He studie

, 2015 ement Profee Tab 2: Exp

Tab 2: Exper

m Develops

is a strategicsourcing an

ness planninwlett-Packar

uquerque, Ntly resides in

Bachelor of BAdministratioHabitat for He, both in H

he managem

wn LLP

ation’s top ouor as long as“brilliant, straold standard

ed.” Brad is 0 has quotee on your te 2012. Best

h ISG on soourcing finanment and m

Brad worked

f Harvard Laed computer

essionals perience a

rience and Q

ers and In

c sourcing and negotiationg across murd, Gap Inc.,

New Mexico an the San Fra

Business Adon at the UnHumanity anouston, Tex

ment curricul

utsourcing las it has rankategic deal gd of legal adalso one of d clients sayam.” Brad wLawyers na

urcing transnce and acc

maintenance,

as a compu

aw School ascience as a

nd Qualific

Qualification

structors

and marketinons, marketinultiple indust and Adobe

and has liveancisco Bay

ministration iversity of Hd as Chairmas. He wasum for their

awyers. Chaked outsourcguy,” “a wonvisers on ITa small grou

ying that Brawas recognizamed Brad a

sactions sinccounting, IT i contact cen

ter program

nd the Univean undergra

cations

ns - Page 1 o

ng expert witng and advetry verticals Systems In

ed in Houstoy Area and w

at the Univeouston. He

man for the Bs also an adj

associate d

ambers USAcing lawyers.nderful lawyeT outsourcingup of lawyerad is “an ‘inszed by the F

as its Chicag

ce 1998. Heinfrastructurnters and oth

mer and as

ersity of Chicaduate at No

f 7

th 20 years pertising mana

and geograc.).

n, Texas anworks in ‘Silic

ersity of Newhas served

Business Advunct profess

degree progr

A has ranked. Chamberser who is smg and contrars given the spiring negotFinancial Timgo Technolog

e has workere, human reher functions

an IBM Mar

cago Graduaorthwestern U

professionalagement, saphies (includ

d London, con Valley’.

w Mexico anon a board visory Boardsor at Lone Sram.

d Brad as a s has quoted

mart, creativeacts” and top rank by tiator’” and “

mes as a Topgy Lawyer o

d on ISG-ledesources, s.

rketing

ate School oUniversity.

ales ding

nd a of

d for Star

d e

“the p f the

d

of


Technica

Online C DeborahSenior VOfficer Huntingt Debbie jostrategic purchasiSourcing2009. Advisory Associat She recetaxation, Golden GTaxation at the WeHuntingto

Kate VitaFaculty Kate Vitamodel foTennessinfluentia Her pioneTransforWinningCollaborAdvance Vitasek istransformappearedbeen feaMagazineMagazine

Prior to joMicrosoftconsultinConsultin


al Response T

Curriculum

h (“Debbie”)Vice Preside

ton Nationa

oined Huntinsourcing, thng operation

g Officer at K Debbie is aBoard. Sh

ion’s Third P

eived her B.Bfrom Kent S

Gate Universof the Natio

eatherhead on Executive

asek University o

asek is an inr highly collaee, has bee

al people imp

eering work rm Outsour

g in Businesrative Relatment award

s internationmation and ind on Bloombtured in ovee, The Wall e.

oining the Ut, Accenture

ng firm recogng firms.


Tab 2: Exper

m Develop

) Manos-Heent and Chie

al Bank

ngton Nationhird-party risns. Prior to HKeyBank whean early conte is currentl

Party Risk M

B.A. degree,State Universsity of San Fonal and StaSchool of Me Leadership

of Tennesse

ternational aaborative reln lauded by pacting glob

has led to 5rcing, Vestess Relationstionships. for it’s impa

nally recogninnovation thberg radio mer 300 article

Street Journ

niversity of Te, Stream Intgnized by AR


rience and Q

ers and In

enry ef Sourcing

nal Bank in Dk managemHuntington, ere she led ttributor to they on the Steanagement

summa cumsity at Kent

Francisco, Cate Bank. De

Management p Program a

ee

authority for lationships. World Tradal commerce

5 books, incled: How P&ships and GVitasek’s wo

act in advanc

zed for her prough highly

multiple timeses in publicatnal, Journal

Tennessee, ternational aRC Advisory

nd Qualific

Qualification

structors

g

December 20ent, suppliershe was Exthe centralize Sourcing R

eering CommRound Tabl

m laude within 1983 and alifornia, wh

ebbie is a graat Case We

at Fisher Col

her award-w Vitasek, a

de Magazinee.

uding: VesteG, McDonal

Getting to Work also woncing the bus

practical andy collaborativs, NPR, and tions like Foof Commerc

Vitasek’s stnd foundingGroup as o

cations

ns - Page 2 o

009. Her resr diversity, tr

xecutive Vicezed sourcingResource Cemittee of the le.

h University her master

here she pubaduate of theestern Reserllege of Busi

winning reseFaculty memas one of th

ed Outsourld’s and Mi

We: Negotiatn the Supplysiness.

d research-bve and straton Fox Bus

orbes, Chief ce, World Tr

toried careerg Supply Chaone of the “10

f 7

sponsibilitiesravel servicee President ag function froenter and a Risk Manag

Honors, distof taxation d

blished her the Key Execurve Universitiness.

earch and Vember at the Uhe “Fabulous

rcing: Five Ricrosoft Areting Agreemy Chain Coun

based adviceegic partneriness NewsExecutive M

rade Magazi

r includes poain Visions –0 Coolest” B

s include es and and Chief

om 2001 thromember of t

gement

tinctive in degree fromhesis, Multisutive Experiety and the

ested® businUniversity ofs 50+1” mos

Rules That e Redefiningments for Hncil’s Acade

e for driving rships. She. Her work h

Magazine, CIine and Outs

ositions with– a boutiqueBoutique

ough the

state ence

ness f st

Will g

Highly emic

e has has IO source

P&G, e-


Technica

Online C LawrencThe Boe

Senior LperformanegotiatemanagemCertifica

Boeing D Organiza

SIG UnivTraining PublishiBooks –Book of tGeneratiAwards B� Articlefounding Mexico, ajutsu Res� InterviNewspapKingdom

Dawn Ti

SIG, The

Dawn TiuexperienDawn joi1999, brijoining Spartner inand childfrom the

Dawn bri


al Response T

Curriculum

ce A. Kane, eing Compa

Leader – Estance team thed performanment procesations-

Certified OuCertified Ou

Designated

ations-

versity Advg & Certifica

ng Success– Bestselling the Year Awion Indie BooBronze prizees – Co-pubtechnical co

articles havesearch Socieiews – Intervper (Switzerl

m), and Police

ura

e Network fo

ura, SIG's Pce, with the ned SIG as nging the laIG, Dawn hen a CPA firmdren's issuesUniversity o

ings to SIG a


Tab 2: Exper

m Develop

COP-GOV any

tablished thehat created snce-based S

sses and too

utsourcing Putsourcing P

Expert (BD

isory Boardation Comm

s- author of m

ward finalistsok Awards fie. lished treatisonsultant to e appeared iety Journal, viewed by reland), Practie Magazine

or Sourcing

resident andpast 22 yeaCEO, but hatest developeld leadersh

m. Dawn is as in the Jackof Michigan a

a culture of b


rience and Q

ers and In

e IT Infrastrustrategies, wService Levels.

rofessional rofessional

DE) – IT Sou

d Member –mittee Memb

more than a d, three USA inalists, a Be

ses on stratethe Institutein prestigiouFighting Arteporters fromical Taekwon(United Stat

g Executive

d Chief Execars focused oas been actipments in soip positions ctively involv

ksonville, Floand an MS in

brainstormin

nd Qualific

Qualification

structors

ucture stratewrote businesel Agreemen

(COP) in Governanrcing

– SIG, 2014 –ber – IAOP,

dozen booksBook News

everly Hills B

egic sourcinof Traditions publication

ts, and ForeWm Computerndo (United tes), among

s

cutive Officeon the sourcve in SIG as

ourcing and oas CEO of Dved on a nu

orida area. Dn taxation fro

ng and intern

cations

ns - Page 3 o

egic sourcingss requireme

nts (SLAs), a

nce (COP-G

– Present 2015 – Pres

s, including ts Best BooksBook Awards

ng and benchnal Martial Arns such as IWord Magazrworld (UniteKingdom), T other public

r, has over 2cing and outss a speaker outsourcing Denali Groumber of boa

Dawn is a liceom Golden G

nal innovatiof 7

g office. Hireents-driven Sand designed

OV)

sent

two ForeWors Award finas finalist, an

hmarking wirts at the UnInternationalzine. ed States), LTraditional Kcations.

26 years leasourcing indand trusted to SIG memp and before

ards promotiensed CPA Gate Univer

on.

ed and develStatements d full sourcin

rd Magazinelists, two Ned an eLit Bo

th ISG. A niversity of Nl Ryukyu Ka

Le Matin Karate (Unite

adership dustry. In 200

advisor sincmbers. Prior e that as a ng civic, heaand has a B

rsity.

loped a highof Work (SO

ng lifecycle

e ext ook

New rate-

ed

07, ce to

alth BA

h-OWs),


Technica

Online C Mary ZamSIG, The

Mary ZaminformatiSIG includevelopinThought member content tPrior to joconfiguradiverse rimplemesettlemeconsidersMary holhas com

StephanSIG, The

StephanimanagemFortune 1an indepConferenStephaniBefore joIBM and currently growth ochildren, with an e

Jeff FelixSIG, The

Jeff Felixoutsourcto his buswell as coutsourcSIG's leaoffshore


al Response T

Curriculum

mpino e Network fo

mpino, Direcon technolog

ude sourcingng content foLeaders Codiscussionshrough newoining SIG, Mation, executange of direntation of sent and vegets informationds a Bachelpleted certifi

ni McGarry e Network fo

i McGarry, Vment consult100 multinatendent cons

nce for a privi led the prog

oining BenefAccenture. an executiv

f a local chaeducation a

emphasis in

x e Network fo

x, Chief Opeing industry.siness operaonsulting. Jeing, strategi

adership teamoutsourcing


Tab 2: Exper

m Develop

or Sourcing

ctor of Globagy and over

g and develoor the SIG R

ouncil and ths, conductingsletter and bMary workedtion, and aw

ect and indireeveral sourcitation manan sharing anor's Degree ications in H

or Sourcing

Vice Presideting experientionals. Priorsultant wherevately fundegram develoitPoint, StepStephani ha

ve board mearter school aand women'sBusiness Ad

or Sourcing

rating Office. Jeff brings ations role aeff provided c sourcing, em, Jeff led th relationship


rience and Q

ers and In

g Executive

al Sourcing I15 years of

oping contenResource Ceeir respectiv

g benchmarkblog entries. d at Enporio

ward evaluatiect categorieing softwaregement syst

nd usability tin Informatio

Health Inform

g Executive

nt, Global Ence with entr to joining Se she was red IT develop

opment efforphani managas held execmber for a yand regularlys issues. Stedministration

g Executive

er, has over extensive o

at SIG. His bconsulting g

e-procuremehe supplier mps for a large

nd Qualific

Qualification

structors

s

ntelligence, f experience nt for SIG's Genter (SRC),ve working gking activitieMary is alson, where shon for over o

es. Previouse applicationstems. Mary ihe top priorion Science f

mation Techn

s

vents, bringsterprises ranSIG's leadersesponsible fpment comprt for Benefitged numerouutive positio

youth soccery contributesephani has an from UC S

s

18 years of perations, sackground iguidance to ent and relatmanagemene aerospace

cations

ns - Page 4 o

has over 20 in sourcing

Global Summ serving as

groups, manaes, and contro a membere was respoone thousan

sly, Mary coms, including is committedities for any from the Flo

nology, and

s to SIG ovenging from eaship team, Sfor all aspectpany. Prior toPoint, an eaus IT develoons on multipr club. She iss to communa dual BA in anta Barbar

experience upply chain ncludes assmultiple clietionship mannt team that e and defens

f 7

0 years of ex. Mary's respmits, researca member oaging SIG's ributing to orr of the SIG Uonsible for thnd sourcing mpleted the electronic bd to customeproject or or

orida State URequiremen

er 16 years oarly stage ve

Stephani spets of the Nato her consultarly stage IT pment and sple non-profis actively invnity activitiesPsychology

ra.

in the sourcand outsour

signments boents in the arnagement. Pprovided ov

se firm. Jeff h

xperience in ponsibilities ching and of the SRC

Peer2Peer riginal SIG University bohe analysis, events, acrototal design id managemer service anrganization.

University annts Gathering

of diverse entures to ent five yearstional User ting role, company.

sales projecit boards andvolved in thes supporting

y and Sociolo

cing and rcing experieoth in industrea of Prior to joininversight of thhas also hel

as

oard.

oss a and

ment, nd

nd g.

s as

ts for d is e g ogy

ence ry as

ng he IT d


Technica

various leand has

Online C Sarah HoSIG, The

Sarah Hoindustry. marketinfive yearsranged frjoining Abanks in promotindevelopmand an M

In Perso

Angela ESenior C Angela managembusinessimplemeengineerdevelopeIndirect),i2 Techndisposal Hong Ko Tokyo aprofessioAsia. ShUniversit


al Response T

eadership poa BS from th

Curriculum

olliman e Network fo

olliman, VicePrior to joing efforts for s at A.T. Kearom strategic.T. Kearneythe country.g children, w

ment, fundraMBA from the

on Curricul

EasterwoodConsultant

Easterwoodment, with s process rentation of soring efforts ed supply st and held leologies. Angand reducinng,

and Taipei, onal level strhe is a Certty of Tennes


Tab 2: Exper

ositions in lohe University

m Develop

or Sourcing

e President oing SIG's leathe A.T. Keaarney consuc planning to, Sarah was. Sarah has women, and aising, and ste Anderson

lum Develo

d

has over a proven tdesign, sup

olutions for pto drive v

trategies for eadership rolgela has desng the impac

and spearategic sourcified Deal A

ssee.


rience and Q

ocal and comy of Toledo a

ers and In

g Executive

of Marketingadership teaarney Procu

ulting primario procureme in businessheld numeroeducationa

trategic deveSchool at U

opers and

17 years track recordplier identificprocurementvalue gener

a wide ranles at PepsiCsigned supplct of supply

aks converscing and sup

Architect in th

nd Qualific

Qualification

mmunity boaand an MBA

structors

s

g, has 17 yeaam, Sarah wurement & Anily to financia

ent cost redus developmeous leadershl issues, andelopment. SCLA.

Instructor

of experiend in categocation and at automationration and ge of produCo, Yum! Brly chain sustdecisions on

sational Mapply chain mhe Vested ©

cations

ns - Page 5 o

ards in the SeA from Peppe

ars of experwas with A.T.nalytic Solutal services c

uction to bacent at one of hip positionsd has specifiSarah has a

rs

nce in strary strategy assessmentn. Angela haorganization

uct and servrands, EDS,tainability inn the enviro

andarin Chmanagement© methodolo

f 7

eattle Area. erdine Unive

ience in the . Kearney, letions unit. Shcompanies ock-office opethe largest c

s on non-proic expertise BA from Fu

ategic sourcdevelopme

, total cost aas led majorn transformvice groups , FedEx (Kinitiatives relanment. Ang

hinese. Angt skills coursogy, and is o

Jeff is a CPersity

sourcing eading the he also spenon topics thaerations. Befcommercial

ofit boards in membersrman Univer

cing and sent, collaboranalysis, anr procureme

mation. She(both Direc

nko’s) Officeated to equipela was rais

gela has tases in the USon Faculty a

PM

nt at fore

ship rsity

upply rative d the nt re- has t and

e, and pment sed in

aught S and at the


Technica

In Perso ElizabetSenior C Elizabethrealizing practicessupply mchemical Donna MC.P.M., C Donna MInternatiobuilding, Experienplanningexpertisethe team Bruce ASenior C Bruce is experientransporttransportPepsiCo Bruce maPepsiCo Antonio Consulta Antonio experientenure inhelped toand suppestablishsuccessfand guidsupply cresourcea change


al Response T

on Curricul

h Zucker Consultant

h has over 2cost saving

s that suppomanagement ls, professio

Massari Consultant

Massari is anonal Fortunechange man

nce in global , sales and s

e. An optimi and busine

llen Consultant

an independce in the fieltation strategtation operatInc., one of

anaged the food service

L. Torres, Jant

is a Stratece in the Su

n Fortune 50o ensure theply chain de

hed hedgingful track rece functional hain manag

e that is not ae agent with


Tab 2: Exper

lum Develo

20 years of sgs, while asort corporateleader, she nal services

accomplishe 500 companagement aprocuremen

supply chainstic individuss.

dent consultld of logisticsgy, transporttions. Priorthe world’s

restaurant de distribution

J.D.

egic Sourcinupply Chain,00 companiee right fit amesign and m, direct sourord of strateand cross fement there

afraid of tackall internal a


rience and Q

opers and

supply manasuring suppe goals andhas develop

s, packaging

hed, results oanies. Succend cost contnt, global logn managemeal who poss

ant working s and has mtation cost imr to consultinpremier con

division’s Can operations

ng resource, Operationses in leader

mong businemanagementrcing and foegy developfunctional peeby ensuringkling the tactand external

nd Qualific

Qualification

Instructor

agement expplier performd maximize ped supply band contrac

oriented senessful in devtrol throughogistics, manuent with 6-Sisesses strong

for the Foremanaged a wmprovementng Bruce helnsumer packnadian supp

s in Australia

e with The s, Retail andrship positioess unit’s strt. He has pa

orward buy ppment and imeers to perfog favorable tical, all hanl stakeholde

cations

ns - Page 6 o

rs

perience, witmance and in

bottom linebases in indct manufactu

nior leader wveloping & leout the entireufacturing, mgma certificg work ethic

efront Groupwide range oft, network opd senior sup

kaged goodsply chain opea, Mexico an

Forefront d Business Dons. Throughrategic goalsarticipated iprograms. Implementatiormance. Heoutcomes tods on deck t

ers. He is bilif 7

th a record oncorporatinge improvemustries as during.

with over 19 yeading visione business p

master schedation and IS

cs and drive

. He has ovef projects in ptimization, pply chain pos companieserations andd Puerto Ric

Group. HeDevelopmenhout his cars, approachn strategic In addition, ion and the e takes a hoo initiatives.type work anngual in Spa

of identifyingg best devel

ments. A priverse as po

years for n, strategy, tprocess. duling & dem

SO9000 for success

er 15 years the areas oand dedicatositions in th

s. At PepsiCd help establco.

e has extent fields inclureer, Antonioes to innovanegotiationshe has a prability to mlistic approa Finally, hend that will aanish.

g and loped roven oultry,

team

mand

of

of f ed

he Co,

ish

nsive uding o has ation, s and roven

mentor ach to e is a act as


Technica

In Perso Steven SConsulta Steven Soptimizatcollaborasupply cbusinessand consthroughobroad bablends oDeal Arc Bonnie KPresiden Bonnie Kstrategic optimizatclients.

Bonnie heffective industriesfor the cocomprehprofessioand profefor leadinFortune 1distributiomanufacroles hascontributAdvisory Journal, businessfaculty foAdditionaEducatioAdvisory


al Response T

on Curricul

Symmes ant

Symmes is ation, sourciative contrachains. As a

s solutions thsulting expeout the Unitease of experf skills ensuhitect in the

Keith nt of The Fo

Keith is the Psupply man

tion, strategi

has over 25 yglobal procus, lead globaompanies in ensive orga

onal developessional emng companie100 companon, manufacturing and ss provided Pion to shareCounsel forCorporate F

s books, articor three univeally she is a

on and an MBBoard for V


Tab 2: Exper

lum Develo

a recognizedng, contraccting) methon expert in

hat deliver srience in sta

ed States, anience of glo

ure that soluVested met

orefront Gro

President annagement buic planning,

years of opeurement andal teams, chwhich she snization and

pment prograployees in s

es. She hasnies and twoctured produervice, phar

Procurement/holder valuer the Pharma

Finance Magcles, white persities in thFaculty MemBA advisor a

Vested © and


rience and Q

opers and

d thought leacting, operaodology. . Sbusiness opignificant paart-up and hnd in Canadbal operatiotions are bo

thodology.

oup

d Founder ousiness provconsulting a

erations and d supply manampioned mserved. The d process asams designeeveral comp served in C Fortune 500

ucts, global drmaceutical, /Supply Mane. She servaceutical Ind

gazine and Dpapers and IShe US and thmber at the Uat Temple Ud is a Certifie

nd Qualific

Qualification

Instructor

ader and straational asseSteve’s passperations –

aybacks for hhigh growth da, Europe, ns and cons

oth practical

of The Forefrviding projectand training a

supply mannagement o

major transfosuccess of t

ssessment aed by her. Spanies world

Corporate Ex0 companies

distribution, cchemical an

nagement stved as a memdustry and hDrug Store NSM publicati

he ExecutiveUniversity ofniversity. Sed Vested D

cations

ns - Page 7 o

rs

ategic thinkeessment ansion is helpi

he develophis clients. Scompanies.Asia and La

sulting to theand cost ef

ront Group, t support, chand develop

nagement exrganizations

ormation andthese organnd improvem

She has traindwide and sexecutive ands covering reconsumer prnd defense atrategies thamber of the as been pub

News. She hions and ser

e MBA Progrf Tennesseehe is a Mem

Deal Architec

f 7

er in the aread Vested (ng compani

ps and redesSteve has pr. He has woatin Americae firms he wffective. Ste

LLC, an intehange transipment servic

xperience ans. She has td delivered sizations wasment along wned all levelserves as an d Officer posetail, power roducts and and aerospaat made signWhite Housblished in thehas been a crves as busiram at HEC e Center for

mber of the Ect.

a of supply c(outcome bies improve signs end-toroven operatorked extensa. Steve brin

works with. Teve is a Cer

ernational ition, procesces for globa

nd has desigtransitioned significant res driven by with training s of manageExecutive Citions for thrgeneration aservices, fo

ace, and in thnificant finance Year 2000e Wall Stree

contributor toness adjuncParis. Executive

Executive

chain based

their o-end tional sively ngs a These rtified

ss al

gned

esults

and ement Coach ree and

ood hese cial 0 et o ct


Technica

Code of

Each studwhich, wenvironmresponsibdevelopm

By their aprocedu

Guiding P

SIG UniveUniversityUniversitycommunprinciples

1. HonecommUnive

2. Freedpublienco

3. By thregulAs reactio

Faculty L

1. At lea


al Response T

Student Con

dent brings twhen expressment. Studenbility for creament, where

attendance res, which th

Principles

ersity regulaty and to ency has certainnity. The gens that shape

esty: Personamunity life, bersity in 2015

dom of Exprec safety and

ourages con

eir voluntarylations, statesponsible ad

ons.

ed Classroo

ast one (1) th

29, 2015 rement Pro

nse Tab 1: SIG Un

Tab 1: #2 Do

nduct

to the SIG Uned within the

nts share withating and mae actions are

at SIG Univehey are expe

tions and pracourage respn obligations eral principle

e the regulat

al integrity is both in and o places resp

ession: The rid the rights otroversy and

y attendanced here and dults and rep

ms: Student

houghtful po

ofessionals#2 Documiversity Co

ocumentatio

niversity come communith members oaintaining ane guided by

ersity, studenected to rea

actices are dpect for the r and respones stated beions and pra

expected ooutside of thonsibility for

ight to expreof individualsd dissent.

e at SIG Univ elsewhere, apresentative

Requiremen

osting is requ

s mentation oode of Stud

on of Quality

mmunity uniqty, contributeof the facultyn environmemutual resp

ts are obligaad and unde

designed to rights of othesibilities as a

elow identify actices outlin

f all commue classroom intellectual

ess opinions ms are not com

versity, studeand as enacs of the Univ

nts

uired for eac

of Quality dent Cond

y Standards -

que skills, talee to the quay, administra

ent conducivect, integrity

ated to comerstand.

promote theers. Every stu

a member of University exned in these

nity membem. The Honor

honesty upo

may not be mpromised.

ents agree tocted by appversity, stude

ch student fo

Standardsduct

- Page 1 of 4

ents, values aality of the edation and stave to learniny and reason

ply with its re

e educationudent enrollef the SIG Univxpectations

e Policies and

ers in all aspe Code fully aon the individ

abridged, p The Universit

o comply wipropriate Unints are acco

or every Facu

s

4

and experieducational aff the g and person.

egulations a

nal mission ofed at SIG versity regarding thd Procedure

ects of adopted at Sdual student

provided thaty protects a

th University iversity officiaountable for

ulty posting.

ences

onal

nd

f the

he es.

SIG t.

at and

als. r their


Technica

2. Stude

perso

3. Cours

dead

4. Curric

Non-Fac

1. Discu

2. Stude

3. A mo

conv

4. Mode

conte

Prohibite

Behaviorto disciplresponsibcoveringto the ind Prohibite

1. Cond

2. Falsifi

3. Failurperforeque

4. Inten

5. Inten

6. Acce

7. Acceacts

8. Viola


al Response T

ents are requ

onal experien

sework must

dlines in the c

culum is rein

ulty Led Clas

ussions are le

ents are requ

oderator for t

ersations are

erators will n

ent.

d Conduct

r that violateinary action

ble for a viola up the viola

dividuals invo

d student ac

duct that is d

ication or m

re to complyormance of tested to do

ntionally inter

ntionally shar

essing the ar

essing any stof malicious

ting publishe

29, 2015 rement Pro

nse Tab 1: SIG Un

Tab 1: #2 Do

uired to watc

nce.

t be comple

curriculum.

forced throu

ssrooms: Stu

ed by studen

uired to reply

the course w

e appropriat

ot participa

es University s through theation, either ation, approolved.

ctions includ

disruptive.

isuse of any

y with the reqtheir duties; fso; knowing

rfering with t

ring test attri

rchived test a

udent recorness.

ed University


ocumentatio

ch all videos

ted and sub

ugh interacti

dent Require

nts who must

y and have

will be assign

te.

te in the cla

standards ofe appropriat by direct invpriate action

de, but are n

document,

quest of or infailure to idely furnishing

the freedom

butes or que

attributes.

d online with

y policies, rul


on of Quality

s and post a

bmitted onlin

ive discussio

ements

t post in the c

a discussion

ned to make

ssroom othe

conduct listte judicial provolvement on will be take

ot limited to

record or ins

nterfering wientify oneselfalse informa

of expressio

estions with o

h the intent t

es or regulat


y Standards -

recap or po

ne or directly

n.

classroom o

.

e sure the cla

er than to en

ted here andocess. If it is

or by condonen with resp

o:

strument of i

ith University f to a Univeration to a Un

on of others.

other studen

to change, f

tions.

Standardsduct

- Page 2 of 4

oint of view

y to faculty b

nce per con

ass is on trac

nsure approp

d elsewheredeterminedning, encou

pect to the g

identificatio

y or public ofrsity or publicniversity or p

nts.

falsify or othe

s

4

based on

based on

ncept.

k and

priateness of

e will be subje that a grouraging or

group as well

n.

fficials actingc official whe

public officia

erwise perfo

f

ect p is

l as

g in en l.

orm


Technica

9. Postinfor sa

Attemptsextent as

Honor Co

I. Honor C

All studenUniversity

SIG

By acproobsusthechCo

II. Acad

Any formUniversityevery stuproper aawareneany of thincludes

1. Self-pwritte

2. Misreeffort


al Response T

ng any persoale or posting

s to commit s completed

ode

Code Statem

nts will sign ty. Students w

G UNIVERSITY

my signaturcademic worovisions. I un

bligated to respected dishe dean of stueating is occ

ode.

demic Disho

m of academy such dishondent underscknowledgm

ess or underse following ibut is not lim

plagiarism: ten permission

epresentationt in coursewo

29, 2015 rement Pro

nse Tab 1: SIG Un

Tab 1: #2 Do

onal items og resumes.

acts prohibitd violations.

ment

he followingwho have no

Y HONOR PLE

e below, I afrk. I have readerstand tha

espond by tahonesty to thudents; I macurring; or I m

onesty

mic dishonestnesty will oftestands the stment of inteltanding of winfractions a

mited to:

he submission of the instr

n or falsificatork without a


ocumentatio

n classroom

ted by this C

g pledge at tot signed the

EDGE

ffirm on my had and undeat if I suspecaking approhe instructor y request thmay talk to a

ty is a seriousen result in reandards of alectual inde

what constitulso constitut

on of one pieructors involv

tion of data acknowledg


on of Quality

chat board

Code of Con

the time theye pledge will

honor that I werstood the t or witness vpriate actionin the courseat an instruca student wh

s offense in aemoval fromacademic h

ebtedness. Thutes academes academi

ece of work ved.

in any coursgment. Assum


y Standards -

ds, including

nduct may b

y formally ac not be allow

will abstain fHonor Codeviolations of n. For exampe, to the cha

ctor proctor aho I believe

an academim the coursehonesty and he Honor Comic dishonesic dishonesty

in more than

sework.Coopme that ackn

Standardsduct

- Page 3 of 4

but not limit

be punished

ccept admiswed to regist

from dishonee and I will a the Honor Cple, I may reair of the Hoan exam if I may be viola

ic communit. It is essentia how to avo

ourt will not esty. Any attey. Academic

n one course

perative or cnowledgem

s

4

ed to listing

to the same

ssion to the ter for classe

esty in all bide by thei

Code, I am eport the

nor Court, o believe ating the Ho

ty. At SIG al, thereforeid dishonest

excuse a lacempt to comc dishonesty

e without the

collaborativeent is neces

items

e

es.

ir

or to

onor

, that y by

ck of mmit y

e

e sary


Technica

any tThis isoutsid

3. Coopinstruexpreacad

4. Cheaanotatteminstru

5. The s

6. Stealmedi

7. Forge

8. Forge

III. Stude

Aside froto take pdishones

Inform

ReportCourt,

Asking

ConfroReference: A


al Response T

time you cols not meant de the classr

perative or cuctor. Assumeessly informedemic subjec

ating on exaher person, h

mpt to do souction of the

submission o

ing, alteringia created o

ery or falsific

ery of previo

ent Obligatio

m refrainingproactive stety. Such step

mally discussin

ting suspect or to the de

g an instructo

onting a studAdapted from Ha

29, 2015 rement Pro

nse Tab 1: SIG Un

Tab 1: #2 Do

laborate anto inhibit disroom.

collaborativee collaborat

ed that they cts either ins

minations orhis or her pa

o, during an e teacher of t

f work as on

, redirectingor presented

cation of aca

ous work histo

on

from all formeps to suppops may inclu

ng the Hono

ed dishonesean of stude

or to proctor

dent suspectmilton College St


ocumentatio

d/or coopecussion and

e effort in cotion and/or care. This is noide or outsid

r tests: to givper or any oexaminationthe course.

ne's own that

g, or otherwis by another

ademic docu

ory.

ms of acadert the Honorde:

or Code with

sty to the instnts;

r an exam w

ted of violatudent Handbook


on of Quality

rate, unless y debate of a

ursework witcooperationot meant to

de the classro

ve or receiveother sourcen or test. The

t has been p

se tamperingperson witho

uments.

emic dishoner Code and t

incoming st

tructor of the

when cheatin

ing the Honok


y Standards -

you are expacademic su

thout the expn are not per inhibit discuoom.

e assistance , including e only except

prepared by

g with the forout explicit p

esty, SIG Univto respond t

tudents;

e course, to

ng is suspect

or Code.

Standardsduct

- Page 4 of 4

ressly informubjects eithe

plicit permisrmitted unle

ussion and de

from writtenelectronic sotions will be

another per

rm or contenpermission o

versity studeto incidents o

the chair of

ted;

s

4

ed that it is ner inside or

ssion of the ss you are ebate of

n material, ources, or to

at the explic

rson.

nt of digital of that person

nts are expeof academic

the Honor

not.

cit

n.

ected c


Technica

#3 SIG veriattachm #4. SIG undexecutin


al Response T

ifies that weent a NASP

derstands thng a Particip

29, 2015 rement Pro

nse Tab1: #

Tab1: #3&4 S

e have readPO ValueP

hat negotiatpating Adde

ofessionals#3&4 State

Statements -

Tab 1: #3

d and undeoint Master

ting additioendum

s ements

- Page 1 of 1

& #4 State

rstand all thr Agreemen

nal terms a

1

ements

he terms annt Terms an

and conditio

nd conditionnd Conditio

ons may be

ns in ons.

e required w

when


Technica


al Response T

29, 2015 rement Pro

nse Tab 2:

Tab 2: Exper


rience and Q

s e and Qua

Qualification

alifications

ns - Page 1 o

s

f 1


Technica

Online v

Afoac

Ao

MODULMod

O


Overview

al Response T

versus Cla

All online traollowed by nd Module urriculum is

All in personnline sectio

LE 1: OVERule 1.1: Ov

Objectives: UnderstaState howIdentify tEvaluate

Unit

Unit 2

Unit 3

Unit 4

29, 2015 rement Pro

nse Tab 3:

w of the Fo

Tab 3: #1 Co

assroom Tr

aining is tima short quizthe person

s designed

n training timon.

RVIEW OF verview of

and the rolew procuremhe key cha

e the role of1: Introduc

Lesson 1Lesson 2

2: IntroducLesson 1Lesson 2

3: IntroducLesson 1Lesson 2Lesson 3Lesson 4

4: IntroducLesson 1Lesson 2

ofessionals#1 Course

orefront G

ourse List - Pa

raining

med for eachz. The totaln is doing toto take pla

ming is note

BASIC BUProcurem

e of procurement and buracteristicsf sourcing inction to the: Procurem: Character

Professioction to So: Overview : Glossary ction to Pro: Direct Pro: Indirect P: Services P: Capital Prction to Ou: Outsourci: Considera

s e List

roup In Pe

age 1 of 26

h “lesson” t time comm

o determinece online o

ed on the c

USINESS ent and Su

ement in buuying are ds of a succen procureme Procurem

ment vs. Buyristics of a Sonal ourcing

of Sourcingof EssentiaocurementocurementrocuremenProcuremerocurementutsourcingng Defined

ations for O

erson Train

to be 8-10 mmitment depe the numbeover a 10 we

course over

upply Chai

usiness ifferent

essful procument and sument Roleying Successful

g and Its Tyal Terms t

t nt t

g d Outsourcing

ning Curric

minutes of opends uponer of lessoneek period.

rview list fol

in

urement propply chain

Procureme

ypes

g

culum

online trainn which Cons. The ent.

llowing the

ofessionalmanageme

ent

ing urse tire

ent


Technica

ModO

ModO


Overview

al Response T

ule 1.2: IntObjectives:

Define thand s

Identify dSelect di

Unit

Unit 2

Unit 3Exch

Unit 4


SummarLabel the

respoState theClassify

againUnit

29, 2015 rement Pro

nse Tab 3:

w of the Fo

Tab 3: #1 Co

troduction

he basic busourcing dedifferent payfferent fina1: Financia

Lesson 1Lesson 2Lesson 3

2: CorporaLesson 1Lesson 2

3: Introduchange


4: Types oLesson 1Lesson 2

troduction

ize Sarbane different aonsibilities oe importancand resolve

n 1: Busines



orefront G

ourse List - Pa

to Busine

siness finacisions yment termncial decisial Metrics: Payment : Return on: Internal R

ate Finance: Financial Operating

ction to Int

: Exchange: Political R: Complian

of Savings: Hard Sav: Soft Savin to Busine

es-Oxley Aapproachesof businessce of raisinge ethical iss

ss Ethics D: The Sarba: Ethical De: Raising a

s e List

roup In Pe

age 2 of 26

ess Finance

nce terms t

ms often useion criteria’s

Terms n Net AssetRate of Retue OverviewStatementsvs. Capital

ternational

e Rate RiskRisk ce

ings ngs ess Ethics

Act of 2002 s in ethical ds g ethical isssues and pr

Defined anes-Oxleyecision Maknd Resolvin

erson Train

e

that are ofte

ed in sourcis

ts urn w s l Expenditul Corporate

k

and why it decision ma

sues and horevent such

y Act of 200king ng Ethical I

ning Curric

en used for

ing

res e Finance

was implemaking and t

ow to go abh issue from

02

ssues

culum

r procureme

Foreign

mented the social

bout doing sm occurring

ent

so g


Technica

ModO

ModO

ModO


Overview

al Response T


Classify Define inDescribe

contraUnit


UnderstaIdentify t

operaMatch st

and ePlan and

Unit


Identify cApply usIndicate wIllustrate Identify t

Unit

Unit 2

29, 2015 rement Pro

nse Tab 3:

w of the Fo

Tab 3: #1 Co

troduction

the legal enntellectual pe the formatacts 1: Introduc


troduction

and the imphe types of

ations and pakeholder i

endeavors d practice ef1: Stakeho

Lesson 1Lesson 2Lesson 3Lesson 4

troduction

change maneful techniqwhy organiseveral kehe role of p1: Introduc


2: People FLesson 1Lesson 2


orefront G

ourse List - Pa

to Busine

nvironmentproperty andtion and req

ction to Fu: Legal Env: Intellectua: Traditiona to Stakeh

portance of f stakeholdeprojects interest and

ffective comolder Strate: The Impo: Types and: Stakehold: Stakehold to Change

nagement aques for imzations chay change m

people in chction to Ch: Define Ch: How and : Change MFocused C: The Impo: The Impo

s e List

roup In Pe

age 3 of 26

ess Law

of businesd its typesquirements

undamentavironment al Propertyal and E-Coolder Man

stakeholdeers and the

d stakehold

mmunicatioegy rtance of Sd Roles of Sder Rankingder Commue Managem

and why it iplementingange and wmanagemenhange manahange Manhange ManaWhy Organ

Models Change rtance of Prtance of P

erson Train

ss

of tradition

als

ommerce Cagement

ers and stake roles they

der involvem

on with stak

Stakeholder Stakeholdeg unication Skment

is importang and manawhat kind ofnt models agement

nagement agement nizations C

People People Focu

ning Curric

nal and e-co

Contracts

keholder my play in bus

ment in cert

keholders

r Managemers

kills

t aging changf changes c

hange

used Chang

culum

ommerce

anagemensiness

tain project

ent

ge can occur

ge to Sourc

t

s

cing


Technica

ModO

ModO


Overview

al Response T


Define buSummar

includmanaUnit


Know whRecogniz

Unit

Unit 2

29, 2015 rement Pro

nse Tab 3:

w of the Fo

Tab 3: #1 Co

troduction

usiness anaize the roledes customagement, m1: Busines

Lesson 1Lesson 2Lesson 3Lesson 4Lesson 5Lesson 6Lesson 7Lesson 8Lesson 9Lesson 1Lesson 1

troduction

hat Sourcinze why Sou1: Sourcin


2: High LevLesson 1Lesson 2Lesson 3Lesson 4Lesson 5Lesson 6Lesson 7


orefront G

ourse List - Pa

to Busine

alytics e of businesmer relationsmarketing anss Analytic: What is B: Common : Decision T: Statistical: Root Cau: Gap Mode: ISO 9000 : SWOT An: Fishbone 0: Basic Ex1: The Pow to Sourcin

g Businessurcing Busing Model O: What are : Conventio: Modern Rvel Overvi: Basic Tra: Approved: Preferred : Performan: Vested Bu: Shared Se: Equity Pa

s e List

roup In Pe

age 4 of 26

ess Analyti

ss analyticsship, supplynd pricing dcs usiness AnBusiness ATrees Process Cse Analysisel

nalysis Diagram

xcel Formulwer of Pivotng Busines

s Models arness Mode

Overview Sourcing B

onal Best PResearch Poew of Eachnsaction Pr Provider Provider

nce –Basedusiness Moervices

artnerships

erson Train

ics

s in various y chain mandecisions

nalytics? Analytics M

Control and s

las t Tables ss Models

re els are impo

Business MPractices areoints to a Bh Sourcingrovider

d Agreemeodel

ning Curric

business funagement,

odel

Variation

s

ortant

odels? e Incomple

Better Way g Business

nt

culum

unctions thspend

ete

s Models

at


Technica

O

MODUL

ModO


Overview

al Response T

Unit 3

Objectives: Understa

tacticUndersta

becomUnit

LE 2: HOW ule 2.1: As

Objectives: Align catBuild a cPrepare Identify cDevelop

may hUnderstaUndersta

while UnderstaUnderstaKnow whUnderstaKnow theUnderstaUndersta

categUnderstaHave an Review sUndersta

Strate

29, 2015 rement Pro

nse Tab 3:

w of the Fo

Tab 3: #1 Co

3: ChoosinLesson 1Lesson 2

and the evocal to strategand what drming strate1: The Evo

Lesson 1Lesson 2

TO CONDssess the E

tegory objeccategory proa spend an

category reqa comprehhave on a sand marketand the def

validating, and the stepand the conhy cost anaand the cone basics of and the fundand the basgory initiativand the impintroductio

some helpfuand the signegy


orefront G

ourse List - Pa

ng the App: Business : Integrating

Strategy Historica

olution of thgic rivers contr

egic contribuolution of S: The Evolu: Best in Cl

UCT A SOEnvironme

ctives with ofile nalysis quirements

hensive sumsupplied iteplace trendinition of Besupporting

ps used to ncept of coslysis is imp

ncept of calccost modedamentals

sic make upves portance of on to Team ul tips on pnificance of

s e List

roup In Pe

age 5 of 26

propriate SModel Mapg Sourcing (using the S

al Procurem

e Procurem

ribute to Proutors to theSourcing ution of Souass Sourci

URCING Eent

corporate g

s mmary of them or servicds on items enchmarking, or improvconduct a bst analysisportant to thculating theling of team de

p of an effec

communicaKnowledgerofessionalf Supplier M

erson Train

Sourcing Bpping Business M

SIG Sourciment and S

ment and O

ocurement eir organiza

urcing ng Organiz

EVENT

goals

he supply mce and servic

ng and appving categobenchmark

he overall Se baseline

evelopment.ctive cross-

ation plan ae Assessme affiliations

Matching as

ning Curric

usiness M

Models intong Wheel)MSourcing

Outsourcing

and Outsoutions

zations Tod

market and w

ces purchasly benchmary strategie

king activity

Sourcing pro

. -functional

and team cent and Dev and netwos a supplier

culum

Model

o your SourModule 1.9

industries

urcing

ay

what effects

sed ark informaes

ocess

team to lea

harter velopment

orking r selection

rcing 9:

from

s it

tion

ad


Technica


Overview

al Response T

Know spassur

UnderstaUndersta

term, Understa

StrateUndersta

and dUndersta

solutiUnit

Unit 2

Unit 3

Unit 4

29, 2015 rement Pro

nse Tab 3:

w of the Fo

Tab 3: #1 Co

ecific areasre a good fiand consideand how to

location) toand possiblegy and how to desired outcand how to on, for both1: Internal

Lesson 1Lesson 2Lesson 3Lesson 4Lesson 5Lesson 6

2: ExternaLesson 1Lesson 2Lesson 3Lesson 4Lesson 5Lesson 6

3: Total CoLesson 1Lesson 2Lesson 3

4: CompanLesson 1Lesson 2Lesson 3Lesson 4Lesson 5Lesson 6


orefront G

ourse List - Pa

s suppliers t

erations reqdetermine

o support ye value ele

select the bcome measure th

h buyers anAnalysis: Overview : What is In: Link to B: Requirem: Spend An: Category l Analysis: What is E: Identify M: Market Tr: Supply Ma: Best Prac: Sources oost Analys: Total Cos: Calculatin: Introductio

ny Training: Team Dev: Building th: Team Cha: Team Rol: Team Kno: Professio

s e List

roup In Pe

age 6 of 26

and your c

quired to dethe right mour compa

ements that

best value

he value dend suppliers

of the Assenternal Anausiness Ob

ments Gathenalysis Profile

xternal AnaMarket Playerends arket Asses

ctice Benchof Data is

st Analysis: ng the Baseon to Cost g and Devevelopmenthe Categorarter and Cles and Resowledge, Anal Affiliatio

erson Train

company sh

evelop bestix of suppliny requiremcan be obt

proposition

erived from s

ess Phaselysis

bjectives ering

alysis ers

ssment marking

What is it aeline Modeling elopment

ry Team Communicasponsibilitie

Assessmentons and Ne

ning Curric

hould be “m

t supplier poers (numbe

ments tained from

ns to meet t

the Catego

and Why do

tion es t and Develetworking

culum

matched” to

ortfolio mixer, contract

m the Categ

the requirem

ory Strategy

o we do it?

lopment

x

ory

ment

y


Technica

ModO


Overview

al Response T

ule 2.2: AnObjectives:

Understaeach

Understaand u

Assess tDetermin

strateManage

strateHave a gUnderstaUnderstaUnderstaUnderstaUnderstaUndersta

Unit

Unit 2

Unit 3

29, 2015 rement Pro

nse Tab 3:

w of the Fo

Tab 3: #1 Co

nalyze

and the fou

and how theultimate apphe maturity

ne the appregy stakeholde

egy general knoand the typeand the termand outsourand the basand the roleand the bas1: Sourcin

Lesson 1Lesson 2Lesson 3Lesson 4Lesson 5

2: OutsourLesson 1Lesson 2Lesson 3Lesson 4Lesson 5Lesson 6

3: Supply MLesson 1Lesson 2Lesson 3


orefront G

ourse List - Pa

r category s

e segmentaproach of thy level of a copriate valu

ers and team

owledge andes of servicms BPO, Hrcing stratesics of a bae trust playssics of Relag Strategy: Overview : Category : Sourcing : Sourcing V: Sponsor arcing Strat: Overview : Types of S: Strategies: Balanced : Trust Bas: RelationaMarket Sel: Supplier M: Supplier S: Value Ass

s e List

roup In Pe

age 7 of 26

segments a

ation of a cahe sourcingcategory ue metric fo

ms that are

d perspectices that areRO, RFO, I

egies lanced ecos in an outs

ational Outsy and Deve

of AnalyzeSegmentatStrategy DeValue Estimand Stakehtegy of Outsour

Services Tys for OutsouEconomics

sed Outsourl Sourcing lection Matching Selection Ssessment a

erson Train

and related

ategory drivg strategy

or assessin

e critical to t

ve of outsoe typically oITO, KPO,

onomics sourcing agsourcing Moelopment e Phase tion and Apevelopmenmation holder Mana

rcing ypically Ouurcing s of Outsourcing RelatModels in O

trategy andand Balance

ning Curric

strategy ap

ves the stra

ng the result

the success

ourcing outsourced

LPO, FAO

greement odels

pproach nt

agement

tsourced

urcing Relationships Outsourcing

d Portfolio Oe

culum

pproaches

ategic princ

ts of the

s of the

and CM

tionships

g

Optimizatio

for

ciple

n


Technica

ModO


Overview

al Response T

ule 2.3: ExObjectives:

UnderstaPlan

UnderstaReassesExecute Understa

solicitComprehKnow the

selecKnow theUndersta

assurBe famili

and TComprehUnderstaUnderstaUnderstaUnderstaUnderstaUnderstaUndersta

succeUndersta

ProgrUndersta

Unit

Unit 2

Unit 3

29, 2015 rement Pro

nse Tab 3:

w of the Fo

Tab 3: #1 Co

xecute

and the criti

and a Risk ss stakeholdon internal

and plannintations hend the kee importanc

cting suppliee four key sand the neere successfar with key

Trade Itemshend some and the defand the typeand the Conand basic leand the proand commoand the maessful transand the basrams and the bas1: Impleme

Lesson 1Lesson 2Lesson 3Lesson 4

2: RFx andLesson 1Lesson 2

3: NegotiaLesson 1Lesson 2Lesson 3


orefront G

ourse List - Pa

icality of im

Mitigation Pder alignmeand extern

ng for and e

ey aspects oce of defininers steps for effed for thoroful Negotiat

y concepts os “best practinition of a es of contrantract Manaegal considcess for ma

on pitfalls ofkeup of the

sition sic concepts

sics of balanentation Pl: Program P: Risk Mitig: Stakehold: Communi

d Solicitatio: RFx and S: Supplier Stions : Negotiatio: Analysis a: Best Prac

s e List

roup In Pe

age 8 of 26

plementing

Process to ent and act nal communexecuting ef

of an effectng the decis

fective Negugh prepartions outcomof Negotiati

tices” for rucontract acts and whagement prerations anaging a cf contractin

e implement

s of Supplie

nced suppllan Planning an

gation Plander Alignmecations: Staon Plans SolicitationsSelection D

ons Planninand Preparactice Consid

erson Train

g a rigorous

mitigate theaccordingl

nication plaffective RFx

tive solicitasion criteria

gotiations pration, analymes ions prepar

unning Nego

hen they arrocess and

contract g tation team

er performa

ier scoreca

nd Prioritiza

ent akeholders

s Drivers

ng ation derations

ning Curric

s Program M

e unforeseey

ans x and other

tion documa for evalua

reparation ysis and pla

ration, such

otiations

re needed lifecycle co

m and factor

ance Manag

ards

ation

s and Suppl

culum

Manageme

en

r types of

ment ating and

anning to

h as BATNA

omponents

rs for a

gement

liers

ent

A


Technica

ModO


Overview

al Response T

Unit 4

Unit 5

ule 2.4: BeObjectives

Understamana

UnderstaUnderstaUnderstaUnderstaUndersta

align Understa

criticaperfo

Understaproce

Understavaries

Determinevalu

Use a 5 sperfo

UnderstaComprehUnderstaKnow hoUndersta

SourcIdentify t

differsUndersta

maint

29, 2015 rement Pro

nse Tab 3:

w of the Fo

Tab 3: #1 Co

4: EssentiaLesson 1Lesson 2Lesson 3Lesson 4Lesson 5

5: BusinesLesson 1Lesson 2Lesson 3

enchmark a

and the defagement and the benand Governand Governand how to and differenwith Suppl

and the reaal to the suprmance res

and how SPess, at all ofand how thes across thene what areuation and fstep plan tormance

and the reahend the seand variousow to managand the elemcing Innovahe key enas from Prodand the neetenance


orefront G

ourse List - Pa

al Element: Overview: Using Con: Different T: Contract M: Contract T

ss Award a: Initiate Im: Supplier P: Supplier Mand Refine

inition of Go

nefits of goonance Framnance Frambuild a Gov

nt Governanier Businessons why Spply chain fsults PM can be f the pre awe scope of ae various s

eas and mefrom where o manage s

sons for moelection of es metric sumge deviatioments of Su

ation ablers for faductivity ened for a con

s e List

roup In Pe

age 9 of 26

ts of a Con: What is a ntracts to DTypes of AgManagemeTraps to Avand Transit

mplementatioPerformancManagemee

overnance

od Governamework Strumework Prin

vernance Fnce Modelsss Supplier Pefunction, an

incorporateward, awardactivities foourcing bus

etrics need tto collect t

supplier and

onitor and melements tommary toolsns to the peupplier Prod

acilitating Suhancement

ntinuous im

erson Train

ntract Contract?

Document Cgreements

ent Processvoid tion Plan on Team S

ce Managemnt Scoreca

and how it

ance ucture and Rnciples Frameworks and where

erformance nd to overa

ed into the sd, and contor supplier rsiness modto be meashe data d company

managing so measure ss such as aerformanceductivity, a

upplier Innots provement

ning Curric

Commercia

s and Lifecy

Selection ment rds

applies to

Roles

e they are b

Managemell procurem

strategy detract phasesrelationshipdels. sured for su

y behavior a

sourcing cosuccess a spider grae plan nd how it d

ovation, and

strategy, m

culum

l Relationsh

ycle

supply solu

best applied

ent (SPM) iment

evelopment s

p managem

upplier

and

ompliance

aph

iffers from

d how this

monitoring a

hips

ution

d to

s

ment

and


Technica


Overview

al Response T

UnderstaIntroduce

Unit

Unit 2

Unit 3

Unit 4

29, 2015 rement Pro

nse Tab 3:

w of the Fo

Tab 3: #1 Co

and the drive a 4 step c1: Strategy


2: SupplierLesson 1Lesson 2Lesson 3Lesson 4Lesson 5

3: CategorLesson 1Lesson 2Lesson 3

4: StrategyLesson 1Lesson 2


orefront G

ourse List - Pa

vers for a cocontinuous y Governan: Overview : Introductio: Governan: Relations: Governan: Staffing ar Performa: Supplier P: Supplier R: Cycle of P: Measurem: Supplier P

ry Perform: Complian: Category : Performany Continuo: Supplier I: Continuou

s e List

roup In Pe

age 10 of 26

ontinuous imimprovemence Plan of Evaluate

on to Govence Design hip Manage

nce Functiond Organiz

ance ManaPerformancRelationshipPerformancment AreasPerformancance Manace MonitoriKPIs nce Trackin

ous Improvnnovation Fus Improve

erson Train

6

mprovemenent strategy

e Phase rnance Overviewement Fundnality and P

zations gement

ce Managemp Managem

ce Managems and Weighce Managemagement ing and Ma

ng vement PlaFacilitationment

ning Curric

nt program y

damentals Process

ment Overvment Procement hting ment Plan

anagement

an

culum

view ss


Technica

MODULMod

O

ModO

ModO

ModO


Overview

al Response T

LE 3 SOFT ule 3.1: Su

Objectives: Identify t

stakemana

State whState whSummar

and hUnit

ule 3.2: ChObjectives:

Define CState theMatch stIndicate

changule 3.3: Ne

Objectives: Summar

and wSelect baExamine

gathenegot

ule 3.4: HoObjectives:

Identify aList whatList whatReprodu

29, 2015 rement Pro

nse Tab 3:

w of the Fo

Tab 3: #1 Co

SKILLS REupplier Com

he importaeholder management hat informathat informatize the type

how to man1: Introduc

Lesson 1Lesson 2

hange Man

Change Mane importancakeholder cthe commuge manageegotiation

ize why conwhy it is impasic negotia

e how nonveer some tectiations ow to Write

a well writtet best practt NOT to incce a check


orefront G

ourse List - Pa

EQUIRED Ommunicati

nce of suppnagement,

tion is necetion should es of difficuage them

ction : Setting Ex: Creating a

Plan nagement

nagement ace of manaconsideratiounication reement Skills

nventional portant to pation skillserbal behavchniques fo

e a SOW

en SOW in ttices are coclude in a S

klist for best

s e List

roup In Pe

age 11 of 26

OF TODAYon

plier commurisk manag

essary to conot be comlt conversa

xpectationsa Successf

and identifyaging changons and acquirements

negotiationprepare for t

vior impactsr increasing

their contraonsidered inSOW t practices i

erson Train

6

Y’S SOURC

unication agement and

ommunicatemmunicatedations that c

s for Supplieful Relations

y the driversge and the kctions to enss to avoid p

ns are criticathem

s face-to-fag the rate o

acts n writing a S

in a SOW

ning Curric

CING PROF

s it is related performan

e to a suppld to a supplcan happen

ers ship and C

s key people sure succe

pitfalls and r

al to supplie

ace negotiaof success i

SOW

culum

FESSIONA

ed to nce

lier and whier and why

n with supp

ommunicat

involved ss roadblocks

er relations

tions and n live

AL

y y liers

tion

in

ships


Technica

ModO

ModO

ModO

ModO


Overview

al Response T

ule 3.5: WObjectives:

DistinguiDifferentList the aIdentify tSummarDistingui

Unit

ule 3.6: BaObjectives:

ReproduDistinguiSelect usSummar

Unit

ule 3.7: TeObjectives:

Identify win a c

Select beList what

ule 3.8: CaObjectives:

State theList the tReproduIndicate

29, 2015 rement Pro

nse Tab 3:

w of the Fo

Tab 3: #1 Co

hat Are the

sh betweeniate when aadvantageshe primary ize the procsh between1: Introduc


asic Contra

ce a contrash betweenseful clauseize contrac1: Basic C

Lesson 1Lesson 2

erms and C

what shouldcontract est practicet should nevategory Ma

e concept oools used tce a categohow to take


orefront G

ourse List - Pa

e Different

n RFI, RFPand why eas and disadv

componencess of RFPn RFP and ction to RF: RFx : Request f: Request f: Request f: Request f: Request facting

act and idenn the differees for contrcts from a soontracting: Requirem: Sourcing

Conditions

d be covere

es in wordinver be inclu

anagement

of category to manage ory playbooe advantage

s e List

roup In Pe

age 12 of 26

Types of R

P, RFQ. RFSach type of vantages o

nts of RFP P RFI

Fx

for Informatfor Proposafor Quotatiofor Tender (for Solution

ntify its key ent types ofracts ourcing per

g ments, Type

Contracts a

ed when wr

ng of terms uded in termt

managemecategory so

ok e of the ben

erson Train

6

RFx

S. RFX RFX are re

of RFP and RFI

tion (RFI) al (RFP) on (FRQ) (RFT)

n (RFS)

elementsf contracts

rspective

s, Clausesand Manag

iting terms

and conditms and con

ent ourcing stra

nefits of ca

ning Curric

equired

, Terminatiogement

and condit

tions nditions

ategy

tegory man

culum

on

ions to incl

nagement

ude


Technica

ModO

ModO


Overview

al Response T

ule 3.9: ToObjectives:

Summarin delinitiat

State theinitiat

Define thUnit

ule 3.10: PObjectives:

Indicate projec

Define thand r

List the dpractiUnit

29, 2015 rement Pro

nse Tab 3:

w of the Fo

Tab 3: #1 Co

otal Cost of

ize what tolivering valutive e basic comtive he term “sho1: What is


Project Man

the processct managem

he skills neeisk duties of a pices of proj1: Unders

Lesson 1

Lesson 2Lesson 3



orefront G

ourse List - Pa

f Ownersh

tal cost of oue to the or

mponents to

ould costingTotal Cost: What is T: What is a : What is Snagement

s, principlesment eded within

project manect managetanding Pr: The Basic

Culture a: Principles: Project M

Time, Co: Project M: The Proje: Foundatio

s e List

roup In Pe

age 13 of 26

hip

ownership irganization

o building a

g” is and hot of Ownerotal Cost oCost Modehould CostPrinciples

s, culture a

n managing

nager, as wement roject Mancs to Projecand Talent Ms of Project anagement

ost and Riskanager Dut

ect Manageonal Practic

erson Train

6

is and why in conjunct

cost mode

ow it is usership (TCOf Ownershiel t s

nd talent m

a project s

well as life c

nagement ct ManagemManagemeManagemet Skills incluk Managemties ment Life C

ces of Proje

ning Curric

it is a critiction with a

el to support

ed in sourcinO) and How

p?

managemen

such as sco

cycle and fo

ment includent ent uding Proje

ment

Cycle ect Manage

culum

cal componesourcing

t a sourcing

ng w is it Used

nt related to

ope, time, c

oundational

ing Process

ect Scope,

ement

ent

g

d?

o

cost

s,


Technica

ModO

ModO


Overview

al Response T

ule 3.11: BObjectives:

Gain a gused

Select thteam

Identify tchalletogethUnit


Gain a goutso

Differentappro

Select croutso

Explain tUnit

29, 2015 rement Pro

nse Tab 3:

w of the Fo

Tab 3: #1 Co

Building Cr

eneral unde

he step by s, as well ashe functionenges that her 1: Cross F

Lesson 1

Lesson 2

Lesson 3

Lesson 4

Basic Outs

eneral undeourcing andiate when

opriate for aritical succeourcing the differen1: Basic O

Lesson 1

Lesson 2Lesson 3

Lesson 4Lesson 5

Lesson 6


orefront G

ourse List - Pa

ross Funct

erstanding

step process different anal make upmay arise w

unctional : A Definitio

and A SuFunctiona

: The BuildKey Poin

: The MakeEvery Cro

: Two NeceTeams

ourcing

erstanding the commoit is approp

a company ess factors,

ce betweenutsourcing: A Definitio

Outsourc: Business : When Is I

Why MighOrganiza

: Important: Best Prac

Outsourc: Outsourci

s e List

roup In Pe

age 14 of 26

tional Team

of what a c

ss in how toapproaches p of a crosswhen puttin

Teams on of a Crosuccessful Aal Team ing of a Crots to Reme

e Up of, theoss Functioessary Role

of outsourcon busines

priate to outto outsourcbest practi

n outsourcing on of Outsocing and a HFunctions Tt Appropriaht Outsourc

ation? Models of

ctices and Ccing ng vs Offsh

erson Train

6

ms

cross functi

o build a croused

s functional ng a cross-f

ss Functionpproach to

oss Functioember e “Must Havonal Sourcies in Cross

cing, the mass functionstsource andce ices and bu

ng and offs

ourcing, OthHistory of OThat Are O

ate for a Cocing Not Be

OutsourcinCritical Succ

horing

ning Curric

onal team

oss function

sourcing tefunctional s

nal Team, WBuilding a

onal Sourcin

ves” and Chng Team Functional

any definitis that are ofd when it m

usiness mo

shoring

her Terms UOutsourcingOften Outsoompany to Oe Appropria

ng cess Facto

culum

is and why

nal sourcing

eam and sourcing tea

Why it is UsCross

ng Team a

hallenges fo

l Sourcing

ons of ften outsou

might not be

dels used i

Used for g urced

Outsource aate For My

rs for

it is

g

am

seful

nd

or

rced e

n

and


Technica

ModO

ModO

The Forefenhancedindividual

O


Overview

al Response T


Define Baspec

List the pState the

Unit

ule 3.14: GObjectives:

Define GIdentify tList the cParaphra

front Group od strategic souls and teams.

Our training pr

Instrucwhich managbusine

The 4 spectrworkinworksh

Webincan beAt Lunled for

Onlineto builbest practivit

29, 2015 rement Pro

nse Tab 3:

w of the Fo

Tab 3: #1 Co

BPO

usiness Procts of BPO process ande advantage1: Introduc

Lesson 1Lesson 2

Global Bus

Global Businhe key com

characteristase what it

offers a compurcing, procu

rogram is del

ctor Led courfocus on devegement conceess environme

Cornerstonesum of strategng‐session timhop deliverab

nars : Webinae used to targnch” type trainr commentary

e Series in Cald internal supractices. Topies as well as


orefront G

ourse List - Pa

ocess Outs

d componees, disadvaction to Bu: Introductio: Concepts iness Serv

ness Servicmponents oftics, advanttakes to im

rehensive andrement, cont

ivered in vari

rses : Instructeloping knowepts. They caents

s of Strategicgic sourcing ame for all partbles

ar courses areget specific knning approacy and connect

tegory & Suppply managempics range from Category ful

s e List

roup In Pe

age 15 of 26

sourcing (B

nts of BPOantages andusiness Proon to BPOand Strate

vices

ce, as a platf GBS tages and d

mplement th

d diverse traitracting and s

ous formats:

tor‐Led coursewledge in key san be customi

c Sourcing Woactivities, this ticipants. No

e stand alone nowledge devhes. NOTE : Ttivity, but can

pply Chain Mament excellenm individual cl strategy dev

erson Train

6

PO) and un

O d importancocess Out

egies of BPO

tform for se

disadvantage GBS Stra

ining curriculusupplier mana

es are pre‐destrategic souized to focus o

orkshop : A thcourse integrote: This cour

modules thatvelopment areThese are eithn be paced at

anagement: Once by educatcategory sourvelopment T

ning Curric

nderstand t

ce of BPO tsourcing (

O

ervice shari

ges of GBSategies

um focused oagement capa

veloped trainrcing and caton specific ca

hree‐day focurates a balanrse includes pr

t can be self‐peas. These areher instructor t a customized

Our On‐Line Sting your teamrcing and maThis series sho

culum

the various

(BPO)

ing

S

on driving ability for

ning programstegory ategories or

used on the funce of trainingre‐work and p

paced and whe ideal for “Leled or internad rate.

Series is desigm on sourcinganagement ortens the

s

ull g and post

hich earn ally

gned g


Technica


Overview

al Response T

employour b

This TrainingMost can be Please contaformat selectmodules reqmanagement

This represenprogram.

29, 2015 rement Pro

nse Tab 3:

w of the Fo

Tab 3: #1 Co

yee on‐boardbusiness.

Catalog and delivered in a

ct us for pricited, any custouested. Addit, sourcing sk

condensents our cor Addition


orefront G

ourse List - Pa

ding process a

Course Descrany of the for

ing on any of omization thaitional topics kill enhancem

ed summarre categoral courseswww.th

s e List

roup In Pe

age 16 of 26

as well. These

ription documrmats listed a

the courses. at may be reqrelated to soent and supp

ry of our cuy strategy can be foheforefron

erson Train

6

e modules ca

ment includesabove.

Pricing will bquested by clourcing, procuplier managem

urriculum y developmund in ourntgroup.co

ning Curric

n be customiz

s our core Tra

be based on tients, and theurement, conment can be d

and coursment and mr full Trainom

culum

zed specifical

aining topics.

the delivery e total packagtract developed as

se details managemeing Catalo

lly for

ge of

s well.

ent og at


Technica


Overview

al Response T

The Four Capproacheprocess an Centered orelationshistrategic so The 20 mocourses (2 Workshop The duratiodays, depeteams havebuild out p

29, 2015 rement Pro

nse Tab 3:

w of the Fo

Tab 3: #1 Co

The Fou

Cornerstones es, and tools tnd program.

on market intip structuringourcing proce

odules in the Fto 3 hours in.

on of the Fouending on thee typically incpreliminary ca


orefront G

ourse List - Pa

ur Corners

of Sourcing Sthat together

telligence, stag, and a total cess and toolki

Four Cornerst duration), or

ur Cornerstone level of workcluded stakehategory strate

s e List

roup In Pe

age 17 of 26

tones of S

Strategy Devebuild a best i

akeholder andcost of owneit, and a com

tone methodr can be deliv

ne Strategy Deking session tholders in thisegies for their

erson Train

6

Strategy De

elopment is a in class Sourc

d total businership view, thplete Sourcin

ology can be vered togethe

evelopment Wtime that yous Workshop, r sourcing tea

ning Curric

evelopmen

comprehenscing and Supp

ess goal alignmhe Four Corneng training cu

delivered as er as a Strateg

Workshop ranu would like inand use the tams.

culum

nt

ive set of actplier Managem

ment, supplieerstones is borriculum.

standalone tgy Developme

nges from 2 tncluded. Clietraining sessio

ivities, ment

er oth a

raining ent

to 3 nt on to


Technica

Course Name:

Duration

LearningObjective

Course Name:

Duration

LearningObjective

Course Name:

Duration

LearningObjective


Overview

al Response T

Catego

n: 2 Hours

g es:

At the c

Devebusinesservice

PerfoRisk Ass

Prepcycle co

Use a

Market

n: 2.5 Hou

g es:

At the c

Deveon a su

Unde

Articrate, ca

Orgacategor

Best Pr

n: 2.5 Hou

g es:

At the c

Unde

Applstrateg

Unde

Lear

Unde

Learimprov

Lear

29, 2015 rement Pro

nse Tab 3:

w of the Fo

Tab 3: #1 Co

ry Profile & O

s

conclusion of

elop a Categoss by evaluatiunit

orm a Currensessment

pare a Spend Aonsiderations

a tool such as

t Analysis

urs

conclusion of

elop a comprepplied item o

erstand mark

culate Porter’apacity, comp

anize and anary strategy

actice Bench

urs

conclusion of

erstand the d

y benchmarkies

erstand the st

n how to use

erstand the v

n how to use ed processes

n methods to


orefront G

ourse List - Pa

Objectives As

f this course, s

ory Profile whng time cons

t State Analy

Analysis that s

s Category Se

f this course, s

ehensive sumor service

ketplace trend

s Five Forces peting factors

alyze market

marking

f this course, s

definition of B

k information

teps used in c

benchmarkin

value of seekin

benchmarkin

o organize inf

s e List

roup In Pe

age 18 of 26

ssessment

students will

ich assesses atraints, volum

sis, including

includes histo

egmentation t

students will

mmary of the

ds on items a

and give real and governm

information t

students will

Benchmarking

while validat

conducting a

ng to target c

ng informatio

ng informatio

ormation for

erson Train

6

understand t

a category's cmes, standard

a Current As

orical data, fu

to classify sub

understand t

supply marke

nd services p

l examples ofmental & envi

to support de

understand t

g

ting, supporti

benchmarkin

category cost

on outside of

on to develop

comparison

ning Curric

the following

complexity ands, and total c

ssessment, SW

uture demand

b‐Categories

the following

et and what e

purchased

f market driveironmental is

evelopment o

the following

ing, or improv

ng activity

drivers

your specific

p target cost m

culum

:

nd its impact cost per prod

WOT, and Sup

d, and produ

of spend

:

effects it may

ers such as grssues

of an effective

:

ving category

c industry

models and

on the uct or

pply

ct life

have

rowth

e

y


Technica

Course Name:

Duration

LearningObjective

Course Name:

Duration

LearningObjective

Course Name:

Duration

LearningObjective

Course Name:

Duration

Learning


Overview

al Response T

Unders

n: 2 Hours

g es:

At the c

Com

Gras

Unbuthey ap

Build

Idenelemen

Total C

n: 3 Hours

g es:

At the c

Revie

Und

Revi

Use

Iden

Catego

n: 3 Hours

g es:

At the c

Asseidentifystrategy

Undethe cateCorners

Selecrequire

Risk An

n: 2 Hours

g At the c

29, 2015 rement Pro

nse Tab 3:

w of the Fo

Tab 3: #1 Co

standing Price

s

conclusion of

prehend aspe

p the fundam

undle the valpply to a prod

d supplier cos

tify data sournts

ost Managem

s

conclusion of

ew cost bars

derstand cost

iew the conce

a series of qu

ntify Cost Red

ry Portfolio S

s

conclusion of

ess the strategy the progressy

erstand the vegory, and hostone 1 (inter

ct the most aements

nalysis & Man

s

conclusion of


orefront G

ourse List - Pa

e & Cost

f this course, s

ects of Suppli

mentals of cos

ue chain of thduct or service

st bars for a s

rces to assist

ment

f this course, s

to identify ke

influencers a

ept of Total C

uestions to ga

duction Oppo

Segmentation

f this course, s

gy maturity osion required

various strategow to evaluatrnal, external

ppropriate so

nagement

f this course, s

s e List

roup In Pe

age 19 of 26

students will

ier pricing

st accounting

he specific cae category

pecific produ

in developing

students will

ey drivers

and how to ad

Cost of Owner

ain insights to

rtunities

n

students will

f the current d to realize th

gic sourcing ste the best fit, and total co

ourcing strate

students will

erson Train

6

understand t

g as they appl

tegory, to ide

uct or service

g actual $ val

understand t

ddress them

rship (TCO)

o costs

understand t

sourcing appe expected va

strategies that based on theost analyses)

egy given curr

understand t

ning Curric

the following

y to cost man

entify various

ues for the co

the following

the following

proach for thealue from the

at can be empe current stat

rent business

the following

culum

:

nagement

s cost elemen

ost category

:

:

e category, ane go‐forward

ployed to mante defined in

s objectives a

:

nts as

nd

nage

nd


Technica

Objective

Course Name:

Duration

LearningObjective

Course Name:

Duration

LearningObjective

Course Name:

Duration

LearningObjective


Overview

al Response T

es: Idenprocess

Perfostrategy

Priorwhich r

Deve

Value M

n: 1 Hour

g es:

At the c

Undethe suc

Deve

Selec

Unde

Supply

n: 3 Hours

g es:

At the c

Idenestablis

Undebusines

Deteaccurat

Supplie

n: 3 Hours

g es:

At the c

Unde

Knowassure

Poss

Unde

Unde

29, 2015 rement Pro

nse Tab 3:

w of the Fo

Tab 3: #1 Co

tify the majos.

orm risk analyy process

ritize risk baserisks to addre

elop risk mitig

Metrics & Est

conclusion of

erstand the rocess of a cate

elop the corre

ct the right el

erstand vario

Relationship

s

conclusion of

tify the differshed with sup

erstand how ss model for o

ermine how totely matches t

er Selection S

s

conclusion of

erstand the s

w the specifica good fit

ess a framew

erstand the c

erstand the c


orefront G

ourse List - Pa

r types of risk

ysis and cons

ed on an estiss first

gation plans i

imation

f this course, s

ole of value megory supply s

ect measurem

lements to m

us metric sum

p Selection (B

f this course, s

rent types of ppliers

to map the caongoing supp

o elevate or athe sourcing

Strategy & Po

f this course, s

ignificance of

c areas in whi

work for perfo

onsiderations

ost and bene

s e List

roup In Pe

age 20 of 26

k, and where

iderations ac

mate of outco

n a proactive

students will

metrics and Kstrategy

ment criteria a

easure succe

mmary tools s

usiness Mod

students will

relationships

ategory and bply relationshi

adjust the curstrategy and

ortfolio Optim

students will

f Supplier Ma

ch suppliers a

orming supplie

s required to

efits of the nu

erson Train

6

they occur in

cross multiple

ome, impact

e manner

understand t

Key Performan

and formula

ess

such as a spid

el Mapping)

understand t

s and sourcing

business requip and strateg

rrent relationbusiness req

mization

understand t

atching as a Se

and your com

er matching o

develop the

umber of supp

ning Curric

n the sourcing

e types of risk

and probabil

the following

nce Indicator

der graph

the following

g business mo

uirements to gy manageme

nship type to ouirements

the following

election Strat

mpany should

on your own

best supplier

pliers to your

culum

g and supply

ks within the

ity, and dete

:

s (KPIs) to mo

:

odels that can

the appropriaent

one that mor

:

tegy

be “matched

r portfolio mi

r company

chain

rmine

onitor

n be

ate

re

d” to

x


Technica

Course Name:

Duration

LearningObjective

Course Name:

Duration

LearningObjective

Course Name:

Duration

LearningObjective

Course Name:

Duration

LearningObjective


Overview

al Response T

Undelocation

Strateg

n: 2 Hours

g es:

At the c

Unde

Unde

Unde

Unde

Undesolution

Unde

Program

n: 2 Hours

g es:

At the c

Undeimplem

Evalucompre

Know

Risk Mi

n: 2 Hours

g es:

At the c

Unde

Cond

Unde

Build

Sourcin

n: 2 Hours

g es:

At the c

Plan Catego

29, 2015 rement Pro

nse Tab 3:

w of the Fo

Tab 3: #1 Co

erstand how n) to support

gy Value Bala

s

conclusion of

erstand Value

erstand possi

erstand how

erstand how

erstand the vn

erstand ways

m Planning &

s

conclusion of

erstand the cmenting a sour

uate programehensive and

w the 3 key e

itigation Plan

s

conclusion of

erstand the in

duct risk iden

erstand the 6

d a strong risk

ng & Negotiat

s

conclusion of

for a variety ry strategy


orefront G

ourse List - Pa

to determinet your compa

nce

f this course, s

e Based procu

ible values th

to select the

to quantify th

value of time c

s to provide va

& Prioritizatio

f this course, s

riticality of rigrcing strategy

m and project consistent w

lements of a

n

f this course, s

nherent risks

tification and

6 strategies to

k mitigation p

tion Event Pr

f this course, s

of sourcing e

s e List

roup In Pe

age 21 of 26

e the right mixny requireme

students will

urement and

hat can be ob

best value pr

he value deriv

commitment

alue for the s

on

students will

gid program y

goals and buith stakehold

success prog

students will

to all categor

d assessment

o mitigate risk

plan

reparation

students will

events to ensu

erson Train

6

x of suppliersents.

understand t

sourcing

btain from the

ropositions to

ved from the

ts and busines

supplier in the

understand t

planning and

ild an implemder goals

ram impleme

understand t

ries of spend

k

understand t

ure successfu

ning Curric

s (number, co

the following

e Macro Strat

o meet the re

Macro Strate

ss requireme

e relationship

the following

prioritization

mentation pla

entation plan

the following

the following

ul implementa

culum

ontract term,

:

tegy

equirement

egy solution

nts on supply

p

:

n to the succe

an that is

:

:

ation of the

y

ess of


Technica

Course Name:

Duration

LearningObjective

Course Name:

Duration

LearningObjective

Course Name:

Duration

LearningObjective


Overview

al Response T

Know

Unde

Prep

Busines

n: 2 Hours

g es:

At the c

Unde

Underelation

Dev

Creainterna

Unde

Strateg

n: 2 Hours

g es:

At the c

Undemanage

Unde

Unde

Unde

Unde

UndeSupplie

Supplie

n: 2 Hours

g es:

At the c

Undesupply term su

Undeaward,

Detefrom w

29, 2015 rement Pro

nse Tab 3:

w of the Fo

Tab 3: #1 Co

w how to stru

erstand best

pare a plan fo

ss Award & T

s

conclusion of

erstand the B

erstand differnship

elop a plan fo

te a Transitiol alignment.

erstand the c

gy Governanc

s

conclusion of

erstand the dement

erstand the b

erstand Gove

erstand Gove

erstand how

erstand differer Business Re

er Performan

s

conclusion of

erstand the rechain functiouccess

erstand how award, and c

ermine what ahere to collec


orefront G

ourse List - Pa

ucture an RFI,

practices for

r effective Su

Transition Pla

f this course, s

Business Awar

rent types of

or gaining inte

on plan that e

ritical Change

ce Plan

f this course, s

definition of G

benefits of go

ernance Fram

ernance Fram

to build a Go

rent Governaelationship

ce Managem

f this course, s

easons why Sn, to overall p

SPM can be icontract phas

areas and mect the data

s e List

roup In Pe

age 22 of 26

RFQ or RFP b

setting up an

pplier Negoti

an

students will

rd Process

contracts, wh

ernal alignme

entails the key

e managemen

students will

Governance a

od Governan

ework Struct

ework Princip

vernance Fra

nce Models a

ment Plan

students will

Supplier Perfoprocurement

ncorporated es

etrics need to

erson Train

6

based on cate

nd running an

iations

understand t

hich ones are

ent to suppor

y steps, sched

nt factors and

understand t

nd how it app

nce

ture and Role

ples

amework

and where th

understand t

ormance Mant performance

into the strat

be measured

ning Curric

egory needs a

n effective eA

the following

e appropriate

rt contract im

dule, conside

d approaches

the following

plies to suppl

s

ey are best a

the following

nagement (SPe results, and

tegy develop

d for supplier

culum

and situation

Auction

:

for each bus

mplementatio

rations, and g

s

:

ly solution

pplied to alig

:

PM) is critical d to your firm

ment process

r evaluation a

iness

n

gaining

gn with

to the ’s long

s, pre

and


Technica

Course Name:

Duration

LearningObjective

Course Name:

Duration

LearningObjective

Course Name:

Duration

LearningObjective

Course Name:

Duration

LearningObjective


Overview

al Response T

Use a

Supplie

n: 2 Hours

g es:

At the c

Unde

Know

UndeProduct

Detethinking

Strateg

n: 2 Hours

g es:

At the c

Unde

Iden

Know

Unde

Catego

n: 2 Day (

g es:

Undestrateg

Aligncategor

DeveMarketRFx Pla

Fundam

n: 1 Day

g es:

Impr

29, 2015 rement Pro

nse Tab 3:

w of the Fo

Tab 3: #1 Co

a 5 step plan

er Innovation

s

conclusion of

erstand the e

w what quest

erstand the ptivity enhanc

ermine the tyg

gy Continuous

s

conclusion of

erstand the n

tify the key st

w how to use

erstand how

ry Team Deve

(Cross‐Functio

erstand the kies support th

n internal teary manageme

elop draft doct Analysis, Besn, and Saving

mentals of Co

roved Cost M

1. Cos

2. Cos

3. Cos


orefront G

ourse List - Pa

to manage su

Facilitation

f this course, s

elements of Su

tions to ask to

process for facements

pes of supplie

s Improveme

f this course, s

need for strat

trategy areas

tools within

to build a mo

elopment Pro

onal Working

key concepts rhe manageme

ms, includingent and the ro

cuments for ast Practice Begs Plan

ost Analysis

anagement C

st manageme

st versus Prici

st data gather

s e List

roup In Pe

age 23 of 26

upplier and c

students will

upplier Produ

o evaluate Pro

cilitating Sup

er relationshi

ent Plan

students will

egy monitorin

s to monitor

to adjust or u

onitoring and

ogram (Cross

g Session)

related to catent of spend

g Sourcing & Poles for each

all key compoenchmarking,

Competency i

nt

ng

ring

erson Train

6

ompany beha

understand t

uctivity

oductivity

plier Innovati

ips that foste

understand t

ng and maint

upgrade a str

maintenance

s‐Functional)

tegory managcategories

Procurement,member.

onents of the Category Pla

n:

ning Curric

avior and per

the following

ion, and how

r Innovation

the following

tenance

ategy during

e plan

gement and h

, around the

category straan, Supplier S

culum

rformance

:

this differs fr

and creative

:

its lifecycle

how sourcing

strategy for

ategy, includielection Crite

rom

ng eria,


Technica

Course Name:

Duration

LearningObjective

Course Name:

Duration

LearningObjective

Course Name:

Duration

LearningObjective


Overview

al Response T

High Pe

n: 3 Days

g es

Iden

Incre

Incre

Targbusines

Learrequire

Leverag

n: 1 Day

g es:

Unde

Unde

Unde

Undeto gaini

Procure

n: 2 Days

g es:

This 2 D

Purc

Team

Purc

Mark

Supp

Tota

Prici

Prep

Supp

Cont

Risk

Nego

29, 2015 rement Pro

nse Tab 3:

w of the Fo

Tab 3: #1 Co

4. Und

5. Cos

6. Mac

7. Cos

erformance S

plus Coaching

tify and deve

ease influenci

ease interpers

et key procurss objectives

n how to builed skill levels.

ging Low Cos

erstand how

erstand how

erstand how

erstand how ing alignment

ement & Sou

Day course inc

hase Process

m Formation a

hase Require

ket Analysis &

plier Selection

l Cost Manag

ng Concepts &

paring the RFx

plier Relations

tract Structur

Analysis & M

otiations Plan


orefront G

ourse List - Pa

derstanding C

st Modeling

cro Economic

st Performanc

Sourcing Skills

g

elop high perf

ing skills

sonal and com

rement and s

d knowledge

t Country Sou

to evaluate lo

to compare t

to identify an

to build a lowt for a shift in

rcing Skills En

cludes skill de

and activity

and Commun

ements Plann

&Benchmarki

n

gement & Mo

& Analysis

x / Bid Proces

ship Sustaina

ing

Management

nning

s e List

roup In Pe

age 24 of 26

Costs

c Factors & Ho

ce

s Developme

formance cha

mmunication

ourcing skills

e developmen

urcing Oppor

ow cost coun

total cost and

nd qualify sup

w cost countryn supply

nhancement

evelopment i

drivers

nication

ing

ng

odels

s

bility

erson Train

6

ow to Manag

ent Series

aracteristics in

skills

required for

nt and trainin

rtunities

try sourcing o

d value betwe

ppliers in diffe

y supply strat

Course

n the followin

ning Curric

ge

n yourself and

organization

g plans which

opportunities

een countries

erent market

tegy, and the

ng core areas

culum

d others

n success, tied

h support the

s

/ sites

s

e key consider

s:

d to

e

rations


Technica

Course Name:

Duration

LearningObjective

Course Name:

Duration

LearningObjective

Course Name:

Duration

LearningObjective


Overview

al Response T

Supplie

n: 2 Days

g es:

Undesupplie

Undemutual

Be aareas oincreme

Evaluthem

Invento

n: 2 Days

g es:

Unde

Unde

Dete

Unde

Cond

Evalu

UndeManagi

Cond

Unde

Vested

n: ½ Day o

g es:

Half Da

Vest

1. Wh

2. Wh

3. The

4. Imp

Case

Full Day

29, 2015 rement Pro

nse Tab 3:

w of the Fo

Tab 3: #1 Co

er Business M

erstanding ofrs

erstand how value

ble to evaluatf opportunityental value an

uate all sourc

ory Managem

erstand using

erstand types

ermine all valu

erstand all co

duct an Inven

uate all comp

erstand key cing Inventory

duct a Best Pr

erstand how

Awareness W

or a 1 Day for

y

ed Sourcing M

hat it is

hy it works

e 5 Rules of V

plementation

e Study

y


orefront G

ourse List - Pa

Model Selectio

f all types of b

to assess and

te the curreny or potentialnd performan

cing tools and

ment Skills En

g inventory m

s of MRO Stoc

ues of Orderi

oncepts relate

ntory Simulati

ponents of the

concepts of Dy

ractices Work

to set prioriti

Workshop 1 (

rmat

Model 101 (In

Vested Outsou

n Process

s e List

roup In Pe

age 25 of 26

on Workshop

business relat

d select the m

t business mo shifts to diffence

d approaches

nhancement C

management a

ck

ng and Costs

ed to Forecas

on Exercise

e Bill of Mate

emand Drive

kshop exercis

ies

(Applying Ves

nteractive Pre

urcing

erson Train

6

p

tionship mod

most effective

odels that yoerent model t

for each busi

Course

as a strategy

ting

erial (BOM)

n Inventory, S

e

sted)

esentation)

ning Curric

els that comp

e business mo

ou have in platypes in orde

iness model a

Safety Stock A

culum

panies have w

odel type to d

ce, and identer to drive

and how to ap

Accuracy, and

with its

rive

tify

pply

d


Technica

Course Name:

Duration

LearningObjective

Course Name:

Duration

LearningObjective


Overview

al Response T

InteragreemThey w

Vested

n: ½ Day o

g es:

Half Da

Vest

1. Wh

2. Wh

3. The

4. Imp

Case

Full Day

How

Inter

Vested

n: Six mod

g es:

Undeprocuri

Idento com

Learnot

Unde

Find into Ve

29, 2015 rement Pro

nse Tab 3:

w of the Fo

Tab 3: #1 Co

ractive Learniment. The larill do a “gap a

Awareness W

or a 1 Day for

y

ed Outsourci

hat it is

hy it works

e 5 Rules of V

plementation

e Study

y

w to structure

ractive Learni

Orientation

dules (approx

erstand why ang goods and

tify if you havplete your ow

n the essentia

erstand whet

out where tosted


orefront G

ourse List - Pa

ing Session: Arger group wiassessment” t

Workshop 2 (

rmat

ng 101 (Inter

Vested Outsou

n Process

a Vested Agr

ing and Discu

Online Cours

ximately 4 and

and how Vestd services

ve any “ailmewn self‐diagno

al foundation

ther a Vested

o get addition

s e List

roup In Pe

age 26 of 26

Applying the ll break into sto determine

(Vested Intro

active Presen

urcing

reement

ssion (bigges

se (free)

d half hours)

ted is differen

ents” in your eostic

nal elements o

approach is r

nal informatio

erson Train

6

Vested sourcsmaller groupe what they ca

oduction)

ntation)

st barriers, roa

nt than conve

existing relat

of developing

right for you

on and resour

ning Curric

cing business ps to review ran do better

ad‐mapping o

entional appr

ionships – inc

g any relation

rces if you wa

culum

model to youreal existing dfor each agre

of next steps)

roaches for

cluding being

nship – Vested

ant to dive de

ur deal(s). eement.

)

g able

d or

eeper


Technica


al Response T

, 2015 ement Profee Tab 3:#1

On

Tab 3:#1 Co

essionals Course List

line Curricu

ourse List Onli

Online

ulum by SIG

ine- Page 1

G University

of 1


Technica

#2. CustThe spematurityplace. Tis offeredemonsthat we #3 Cour I would rour facucapabilitsourcingvast catadelivery revising member #4 Servi The onli(semestasynchraudio, a The onliwanted tvideo caproctorin The in pstudies, availablein perso


al Response T

tomization ecific traininy of their orgTherefore w

d as well atrate the vacan adapt t

rse Design

refer you toulty. These ety in all aspg professionalog of coumechanismand adding

rs.

ice Delivery

ne training ter). Howevonous self-nd taught b

ne learningto sit for the

amera, and ng.

person trainand interac

e online coun training c

29, 2015 rement Pro

nse Tab 3:

Tab 3: #2 #3

Tec

g needs or ganization, e are readys add additast experienthe training

o Tab 2-Expexperience

pects of the nals, we harse offering

ms every yeg new offer

y

is currentlyver for purpo-paced modby a season

g is available certificatiocould not b

ing is desigctive dialoguld be talke

currently av

ofessionals#2 #3 #4

3 #4 - Page 1

chnical Res

Participatinaptitude of

y and able ttional traininnce of our c to meet yo

perience and professiorequested

ave the ranggs, we haveear as the irings to kee

y designed oses of thisde. The onlned profess

le via tableton exam, itbe done via

gned to be gue throughed in a clasvailable.

s

1 of 1

ponse Tab

ng Entities f their learneto modify, cng as requicourse deveour needs.

nd Qualificaonals bring

training, froge covered e been creandustry con

ep up with th

to be synchs RFP any oine trainingsional.

ts, smart phwould hav

a tablet or s

instructor lehout the lesssroom setti

3: #2 #3 #4

are expecters and spechange or cired. The lielopers and

ations to revto this RFPom lawyersin our facu

ating contenntinues to che changin

hronous ovof the lesso

g is delivere

hones, or cve to be donsmart phone

ed classroosons. Any cing, in addi

ed to vary becific goalscustomize aist of our fad trainers to

view the bioP vast knows to CPA’s, ulty. As yount and adjuchange. Weg needs of

ver a 10 weons could bed with rich

computers. ne on a come due to rem

om with simclass that wtion to the v

based on ths they have any trainingaculty shoulo ensure yo

ographies owledge and

to seasone can see bysting our

e are constaour clients

ek period be taken in a

media, vide

If a learnermputer withmote

mulations, cawe have vast catalog

he in

g that d

ou

of

ed y our

antly and

an eo,

r a

ase

g of


S

Technica

SIG Unive

such, we

incorpora

Below is a



al Response T

ersity prides i

use an onlin

ate their fee

an example

S

Name: ______

Name (optio

(if applicabl

present posit


CONTENT (P



as aware of



s course lived

29, 2015 rement Pro


Tab 3: #5 Fo

tself on prov

ne survey of

dback into t

of a survey

IG University

____________

onal): _______

e): _________

tion? <1


Please subm

e

disagree

the prerequ

quisite know

med about t

d up to my e

ofessionals#5 Forms Sourse Eval

rms Sample

viding an env

students an

the program

that is used

y Course Eva

________

____________

____________

1-3 3-5 5


o this course.

mit your rating

uisites for this

wledge and s

the objective

expectations

s Sample Clluation Ch

Class Evalua

vironment th

d instructors

m.

for most of t

aluation Que

Training Loc

_____________

___________

5+


Your feedb

g for each o

course.

skills

es

s.

ass Evaluahecklist for

ation - Page

hat seeks to

at the end

the SIG Unive

estionnaire -

cation: _____

____ Date: __


of the followin

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

ation Online eL

e 1 of 3

continuously

of each cou

ersity course

STUDENTS

_____________

_____________


ng questions

A 1 2 3

A 1 2 3

A 1 2 3

A 1 2 3

earning

y improve. A

urse and

ework:

_______

__


s)

4 5

4 5

4 5

4 5

As

not k


S

Technica



al Response T

e content is r

DESIGN

e course obje

e course acti

eractive mul


e test(s) in thi

e difficulty lev

e pace of thi

INSTRUCTOR

e instructor w


e instructor w


ENVIRONME

e training env


was easy for m

ad no issues

29, 2015 rement Pro


Tab 3: #5 Fo

relevant to m

ectives are c

ivities stimula

timedia was


is course we

vel of this co

s course is a

(FACILITATO

was well prep

was helpful a

was a good p


NT

vironment fo


me to acces

logging on o


rms Sample

my job.

clear to me.

ated my lear

s essential in

gave me suf

re accurate

ourse is appro

ppropriate.

OR)

pared.

nd available

presenter.

ob of makingd.

or this site wa

or this site prorn.

ss the course

or off the tra


Class Evalua

rning.

the course.

fficient

e and fair.

opriate.

e

g the

as comfortab

ovided

e online.

ining environ


ation - Page

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

ble. N/A

N/A

N/A

nment. N/A

ation Online eL

e 2 of 3

A 1 2 3

A 1 2 3

A 1 2 3

A 1 2 3

A 1 2 3

A 1 2 3

A 1 2 3

A 1 2 3

A 1 2 3

A 1 2 3

A 1 2 3

A 1 2 3

A 1 2 3

A 1 2 3

A 1 2 3

A 1 2 3

earning

4 5

4 5

4 5

4 5

4 5

4 5

4 5

4 5

4 5

4 5

4 5

4 5

4 5

4 5

4 5

4 5


S

Technica




al Response T

RESULTS

ccomplished



CED DELIVERY

line was a g

eo is an imp

w would you




t is least valu

t is most valu

29, 2015 rement Pro


Tab 3: #5 Fo

d the objecti


nd this cours

Y

ood way for

portant aspe

u improve th


ovements wo

uable about

uable about


rms Sample

ves of this co


e to other so

r me to learn

ct of the co

is course?


se.

urse.

ould you rec

this course?

this course?


Class Evalua

ourse.


ourcing

n this conten

urse.

(Check all th

___C___In___Im___Im___M___Sp___Sh___A___U

commend in

? (Free text b

? (Free text b


ation - Page

N/A

N/An. N/A

N/A

nt. N/A

N/A

hat apply.)

Clarify the councrease contemprove the inmprove courseMake the courpeed up the phorten the tim

Add more videtilize the discu

this course?

box up to 400

box up to 400

ation Online eL

e 3 of 3

A 1 2 3

A 1 2 3 A 1 2 3

A 1 2 3

A 1 2 3

A 1 2 3

urse objectiveent covered instructional mee organizatiorse more difficpace of the c

me for the coueo to the couussion boards

? (Free text b

0 characters

0 characters

earning

4 5

4 5 4 5

4 5

4 5

4 5

s. n course. ethods. n. cult. course. urse. rse. more.

box up to 40

s)

s)

0


S

Technica

SIG Unive

such, we

incorpora

Below is a



al Response T

ersity prides i

use an onlin

ate their fee

an example

S

Name: ______

Name (optio

(if applicabl

present posit


CONTENT (P



as aware of



s course lived

29, 2015 rement Pro


Tab 3: #5 Fo

tself on prov

ne survey of

dback into t

of a survey

IG University

____________

onal): _______

e): _________

tion? <1


Please subm

e

disagree

the prerequ

quisite know

med about t

d up to my e


rms Sample

viding an env

students an

the program

that is used

y Course Eva

________

____________

____________

1-3 3-5 5


o this course.

mit your rating

uisites for this

wledge and s

the objective

expectations


Class Evalua

vironment th

d instructors

m.

for most of t

aluation Que

Training Loc

_____________

___________

5+


Your feedb

g for each o

course.

skills

es

s.


ation - Page

hat seeks to

at the end

the SIG Unive

estionnaire -

cation: _____

____ Date: __


of the followin

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

ation Online eL

e 1 of 3

continuously

of each cou

ersity course

STUDENTS

_____________

_____________


ng questions

A 1 2 3

A 1 2 3

A 1 2 3

A 1 2 3

earning

y improve. A

urse and

ework:

_______

__


s)

4 5

4 5

4 5

4 5

As

not k


S

Technica



al Response T

e content is r

DESIGN

e course obje

e course acti

eractive mul


e test(s) in thi

e difficulty lev

e pace of thi

INSTRUCTOR

e instructor w


e instructor w


ENVIRONME

e training env


was easy for m

ad no issues

29, 2015 rement Pro


Tab 3: #5 Fo

relevant to m

ectives are c

ivities stimula

timedia was


is course we

vel of this co

s course is a

(FACILITATO

was well prep

was helpful a

was a good p


NT

vironment fo


me to acces

logging on o


rms Sample

my job.

clear to me.

ated my lear

s essential in

gave me suf

re accurate

ourse is appro

ppropriate.

OR)

pared.

nd available

presenter.

ob of makingd.

or this site wa

or this site prorn.

ss the course

or off the tra


Class Evalua

rning.

the course.

fficient

e and fair.

opriate.

e

g the

as comfortab

ovided

e online.

ining environ


ation - Page

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

ble. N/A

N/A

N/A

nment. N/A

ation Online eL

e 2 of 3

A 1 2 3

A 1 2 3

A 1 2 3

A 1 2 3

A 1 2 3

A 1 2 3

A 1 2 3

A 1 2 3

A 1 2 3

A 1 2 3

A 1 2 3

A 1 2 3

A 1 2 3

A 1 2 3

A 1 2 3

A 1 2 3

earning

4 5

4 5

4 5

4 5

4 5

4 5

4 5

4 5

4 5

4 5

4 5

4 5

4 5

4 5

4 5

4 5


S

Technica




al Response T

RESULTS

ccomplished



CED DELIVERY

line was a g

eo is an imp

w would you




t is least valu

t is most valu

29, 2015 rement Pro


Tab 3: #5 Fo

d the objecti


nd this cours

Y

ood way for

portant aspe

u improve th


ovements wo

uable about

uable about


rms Sample

ves of this co


e to other so

r me to learn

ct of the co

is course?


se.

urse.

ould you rec

this course?

this course?


Class Evalua

ourse.


ourcing

n this conten

urse.

(Check all th

___Clari___Incre___Impr___Impr___Mak___Spee___Short___Add ___Utilize

commend in

? (Free text b

? (Free text b


ation - Page

N/A

N/An. N/A

N/A

nt. N/A

N/A

hat apply.)

ify the course ease content rove the instrurove course oke the course ed up the pacten the time f more video te the discussio

this course?

box up to 400

box up to 400

ation Online eL

e 3 of 3

A 1 2 3

A 1 2 3 A 1 2 3

A 1 2 3

A 1 2 3

A 1 2 3

objectives. covered in co

uctional methrganization. more difficultce of the coufor the courseto the course.on boards mo

? (Free text b

0 characters

0 characters

earning

4 5

4 5 4 5

4 5

4 5

4 5

ourse. ods.

. rse.

e. . ore.

box up to 40

s)

s)

0


Technica


al Response T

29, 2015 rement Pro

nse Tab 3:

Tab 3: #6 Le

ofessionals#6 Learne

arner Assess

s er Assessme

sment - Page

ent

e 1 of 1

RFP #E194-1922 Issue Da 9, 2015 Training for Procurement ... · e of the mos iness mode ourcing in...

Documents

Transcript of RFP #E194-1922 Issue Da 9, 2015 Training for Procurement ... · e of the mos iness mode ourcing in...