Revision of the Aviation Guidelines
description
Transcript of Revision of the Aviation Guidelines
Revision of the Aviation Guidelines
Strategy Meeting Modernisation of State aid controlBrussels, 11 Juli 2012
Overview
I. Where we are?II. Where do we want to go?III. What is our starting point?IV. What have we done?V. What are the main issues for the review?
2
Liberalisation of air transport market
From national air transport market to EU internal market for air transport
4
Increased competition between airlines and airports
New market players – Emergence of the Low Cost Carriers
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
19
95
19
96
19
97
19
98
19
99
20
00
20
01
20
02
20
03
20
04
20
05
20
06
20
07
20
08
20
09
20
10
Source: OAG summer schedules
Weekl
y s
eats
availa
ble
(m
illio
ns)
Network carrier (incumbent) 44 %
Regional airlines 16 %
Low cost carrier 40 %
2005 Aviation Guidelines1994 Aviation Guidelines
Increased competition and low prices for customers
5
Increased number of regional airports
~460 airports are used for commercial aviation in the EU Member States
6
Increased number of regional airports facilitates local/regional development, but danger of creation of unused capacity
High number of publicly owned airports
Source: ACI
77 % of EU airports are still publicly owned
Publicly owned
77%
Privately owned9%
Mixed ownership
14%
52%720 M pax
34%470 M pax
14%
200 M pax
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
Public Mixed Private
Public airports are usually smaller than mixed/privately owned airports
7
Vast majority of airports is subsidised
High number of small airports
8
~60 % of airports serve less than 1 million passengers in 2010
Source: ACI Europe, Data 2010.
Small airports are not able to support all their costs
~462 airports are used for commercial aviation
≤ 200 000 pax
181 97 80 33 71
≤ 1 M pax 1 – 3 M pax 3 – 5 M pax ≥ 5 M pax
Source: ACI, Year 2010.
These airports usually cannot finance their operating costs from own revenue These airports usually cannot
finance part of their capital costs
Financing of operation of these airports is covered by the 2012 SGEI Decision
These airports are usually self-financing
Where we are
Increased competition between airlines and airports
10
Where do we want to go
Enabled regional/local development and accessibility
Airport overcapacity
Vast majority of airports are subsidised
Airports are not able to cover their costs
No distortion of competition (LCC vs. network carriers)
Continue to enable regional development and accessibility
Avoid duplication of unprofitable airports and creation/ maintenance of overcapacity Avoid waste of public money and reduce the need for public funding (State aid)
Airports able to cover their costs and lure private investments into airport
Operation of an airport and construction of airport infrastructure is an economic activity, except activities falling within public policy remit, e. g. police, customs, air traffic control (Judgement of 12 December 2000 in Aéroport de Paris case,
confirmed by Leipzig-Halle airport judgement of 24 March 2011)
Public funding of airports is subject to State aid rules
12
Question: Would a profit oriented market economy investor finance the investment of the airport or cover operating losses of the
airport?
No aid to the airport Aid to the airport
If yes If no
Aid to airports and airlines is assessed under 2005 Aviation Guidelines
13
Compatibility criteria for investment aid to airports financing airport infrastructure
No compatibility criteria for operating aid to airports to finance their losses
Start-up aid to support launching of new routes from small regional airports
No aid intensity thresholds (up to 100 % on a case by case assessment) and only rarely notified by MS
Exception compensations for Service of General Economic interest only for small airports in remote areas
Only financing of marketing support allowed and was only rarely used by airports and notified by MS
What have we done?
Contact with stakeholders
Public consultation
e. g. ACI Europe, ERAC, IATA, AEA, ELFAA, ERA, individual airports and airlines, etc.
7 April 2011 – 7 June 2011: 89 replies providing feedback on the recent market developments:
• 21 Member States, Norway and 12 regional authorities
• 22 Airports, 9 Airlines, 14 Airline and airport associations
15
Main results of the public consultation
• Simplification and increased transparency
• More enforcement of State aid rules to airports and airlines
• Need for special rules for small airports and airports in remote areas
• More predictable rules for investment aid (clarifications on eligible costs and aid intensity thresholds)
• Rules to avoid distortion of competition between airports located in the same catchment
Majority of the stakeholders supports the revision of the existing guidelines
16
Context and objectives of State Aid Modernisation
18
Sound use of public resources for growth
oriented policies
Limit competition distortions that would
undermine a level playing field in the
internal market
Support growthBetter-prioritised
enforcementStreamlined rules and faster
decisions
Strengthen the quality of the Commission's
scrutiny
Avoid financing overcapacities in airport infrastructure
Limit operating aid to airports and airlines
Clearer and more transparent rules
An integrated approach to assess the financing of airports and their interaction with airlines
Publicly financed airports might reduce the price for the airport services rendered to the airlines
Airlines using this airport could indirectly benefit from an aid
19
Aid granted by a Member State
Where we want to go in the long-term: A "steady state" regime
Investment aid to airports
Operating aid to airports
Range of permissible maximum aid intensities depending on the size
Necessity and proportionality to be demonstrated
Additional capacity created meets medium-term demand in the catchment area and does not lead to duplication of unprofitable infrastructure
Should not be necessary as airports should be able to cover their costs (exception small airports up to 200.000 which can be declared SGEI)
21
Need for a transitional period?
A transitional period could make sense in order to give airports time to adjust and to „grow“ into viability (economies of scale)
≤ 200 000 pax
181 97 80 33 71
≤ 1 M pax 1 – 3 M pax 3 – 5 M pax ≥ 5 M pax
Small airports may have problems in financing their operating cost
Financing of operation of these airports is covered by the 2012 SGEI Decision
Growth potential?
Source: ACI Europe. 22
High number of airports manages to grow into a more viable size
Calculation based on a sample of 245 EU (total number of airports in EU = 462).
Source: Data ACI Europe. 23
How can transitional period be designed?
Investment aid to airports
Operating aid to airports
No phasing-in needed
Immediate introduction of the "steady stage"
Operating aid to airports under certain conditions allowed[with a passenger volume of less than x mio passengers]
24
Under which conditions could operating aid to airports be allowed?
due to unused capacity due to too low airport charges
Why are airports not able to cover their operating costs?
Aid to the airport Aid to the airlines
25
How to exclude existence of aid to airlines by publicly funded airports? Market price
Airlines pay charges corresponding to the costs in accordance with their use of the airport services
Appropriate market benchmarks normally not available at this moment
Assessment based on a "cost approach"
In absence of an appropriate market
benchmark
26
Airport charges and aid to airlines
"Steady state" regime
No aid to the airlines airport charges = market price (benchmarking) airport charges (including non-aeronautical revenues) cover
airport's costs
Transitional period
Compatible aid to the airlines, if the airport charges cover at least 100 % of operating costs to secure that the attraction of the new airlines does not create operating losses to the airport
27
Summary of our policy objectives
28
Clearer approach to aid financing new investments at airports would allow the financing of investments that meet the demand of airlines,
passengers and freight and do thus not lead to a duplication of unprofitable infrastructure
Transitional period for operating aid to airports during which part of operating costs due to unused capacity could be covered
Transparent and clear rules as regards operating aid to airlines