Revised Nutrient Sufficiency Ranges and Fertilizer Guidelines for Pecan
description
Transcript of Revised Nutrient Sufficiency Ranges and Fertilizer Guidelines for Pecan
Sam
uel R
ober
ts N
oble
Fou
ndat
ion
Oklahoma State University
Aub
urn
Uni
vers
ity
Sam
uel R
ober
ts N
oble
Fou
ndat
ion
Oklahoma State University
Aub
urn
Uni
vers
ityRevised Nutrient Sufficiency Ranges and Fertilizer Guidelines for Pecan
Michael Smith – Oklahoma State UniversityCharles Rohla – Samuel Roberts Noble Foundation
Bill Goff – Auburn University
Sam
uel R
ober
ts N
oble
Fou
ndat
ion
Oklahoma State University
Aub
urn
Uni
vers
ity
Is a managed nutrition program important?
• Maintaining a balance among nutrients is essential.
• Excessive application of a nutrient will not increase growth or production, but will increases cost and may cause other problems.
• Shortages reduce growth, yield, cold hardiness and the ability to cope with stress.
Sam
uel R
ober
ts N
oble
Fou
ndat
ion
Oklahoma State University
Aub
urn
Uni
vers
ity
Why leaf samples?• Represents nutrients available and absorbed by the tree.• Leaf elemental concentrations are closely correlated
with tree performance.
Why not soil samples?• Frequently little, if any, correlation between soil test
levels of nutrients with tree performance or leaf elemental concentrations.
• Primary value of soil sample is pH and to diagnose problem areas.
Sam
uel R
ober
ts N
oble
Fou
ndat
ion
Oklahoma State University
Aub
urn
Uni
vers
ity
When and what to sample?• Leaves from the 1st growth
flush that are fully expanded, but before nut nutrient demand increases.
• Typically July.• Collect – the middle leaflet
pair from the middle leaf on sun-exposed shoots.
• Sample ≈100 leaflet pairs representative of the orchard.
Sam
uel R
ober
ts N
oble
Fou
ndat
ion
Oklahoma State University
Aub
urn
Uni
vers
ity
Are elemental sufficiency ranges among locations similar?
• Physiological nutrient requirement for pecan is not affected by geographic location.
• Little effect of yield on nutrient requirement.
Nutrient Nutrient removal/100 lbs
Nitrogen 1.3 lbs
Phosphorus 0.4 lbs
Potassium 0.6 lbs
Calcium 0.2 lbs
Magnesium 0.2 lbs
Iron 0.00001 lbs
Zinc 0.00002 lbs
Manganese 0.00002 lbs
Copper 0.000001 lbs
Sam
uel R
ober
ts N
oble
Fou
ndat
ion
Oklahoma State University
Aub
urn
Uni
vers
ity
Native & low-input orchards vs. high-input orchards
• Native and low-input orchards are:– Less productive– Lower nut value– Fewer inputs such as irrigation, crop load rarely
managed, less pest control, greater damage tolerance.
–Marketed to shellers vs. “gift-pack” and international markets.
Sam
uel R
ober
ts N
oble
Fou
ndat
ion
Oklahoma State University
Aub
urn
Uni
vers
ity
Nitrogen – Native & low-input• <2.3% Low. Double last year’s N application rate. If the
orchard did not receive N last year apply 150 lb/acre N.• 2.3% to 2.5% Normal. Optimum. Continue present N
application rate.• 2.5% to 2.7% Normal. Nitrogen application can be reduced
without affecting yield or nut quality. Decrease the application rate by 20%.
• 2.7% to 3.0% Normal. Nitrogen application can be reduced without affecting yield or nut quality. Decrease the application rate by 50%.
• >3.0% Above normal. Withhold all N for 1 year.
Sam
uel R
ober
ts N
oble
Fou
ndat
ion
Oklahoma State University
Aub
urn
Uni
vers
ity
Nitrogen – High-input orchard
• <2.3% Very low. Double present N application rate. • 2.3% to 2.4% Low. Increase the present N rate by
30%.• 2.4% to 2.7% Normal. Optimum. Continue the
present N application rate.• 2.7% to 3.0% Normal. Nitrogen application can be
reduced without affecting yield or nut quality. • >3.0% Above normal. Decrease application rate by
50%.
Sam
uel R
ober
ts N
oble
Fou
ndat
ion
Oklahoma State University
Aub
urn
Uni
vers
ity
Nitrogen application factors• Greatest demand
– ≈ 3 weeks after budbreak, late water stage.• Urea - problem with N volatilization
– Temperature > 70oF, moist soil, high pH– Requires at least ¼” of rain or irrigation to incorporate
• Sandy soils or flooding potential– Split application beneficial– Pre-budbreak & late-May– Pre-budbreak to mid-May & late water stage
• Ground cover– Legume may supply all the N needed– Non-legume: applying pre-budbreak appears to favor tree– Application in the weed free area surrounding the tree
• Injection of liquid N into drip or micro-sprinkler system– Minimizes N loss, flexible, economical to use multiple N applications – Up to 50% N reduction without loss of tree performance
Sam
uel R
ober
ts N
oble
Fou
ndat
ion
Oklahoma State University
Aub
urn
Uni
vers
ity
PhosphorusNative & low-input orchard• < 0.12% Low• ≥ 0.12% Normal
High-input orchard• < 0.14% Low• ≥ 0.14% Normal
Apply as a banded application (100 to 150 lb/a P2O5) within the wetted zone if irrigated. Otherwise, about mid way between trunk and canopy periphery. Pre-budbreak & late water stage have both been effective. May have faster response from late water stage application.
Sam
uel R
ober
ts N
oble
Fou
ndat
ion
Oklahoma State University
Aub
urn
Uni
vers
ity
Goff, 2012
Sam
uel R
ober
ts N
oble
Fou
ndat
ion
Oklahoma State University
Aub
urn
Uni
vers
ity
PotassiumNative & low-input orchards• < 0.85% Low.• ≥ 0.85% Normal.
High-input orchard• < 1.0% Low.• ≥ 1.0% Normal.
Apply as a banded application (100 to 150 lb/a K2O)within the wetted zone if irrigated. Otherwise, about mid way between trunk and canopy periphery. If both phosphorus and potassium are needed they can be blended and applied together.
P & K symptoms look alike. P symptoms may develop relatively early in the growing season, as above. P symptoms more likely as nuts fill.
Sam
uel R
ober
ts N
oble
Fou
ndat
ion
Oklahoma State University
Aub
urn
Uni
vers
ity
Other macro-nutrients
• Sulfur• < 0.20% Correct with using (NH4)2SO4 for N and ZnSO4
foliar application for Zn.• Calcium• < 0.70% Apply lime based on soil test with target of 6.8
pH.• Magnesium• < 0.30% Soil test and if pH low adjust with dolomitic
lime. Otherwise use MgSO4 at manufacturer’s recommended rate.
Sam
uel R
ober
ts N
oble
Fou
ndat
ion
Oklahoma State University
Aub
urn
Uni
vers
ity
Boron• < 15 ppm Apply 3 foliar applications of Solubor (20.5%
B) at 0.5-1.0 lb/acre of material. Begin as the 1st leaf unfurls during budbreak, and then twice more at 2-week intervals.
• 15 ppm to 300 ppm Normal, none needed.• > 300 ppm Excess. Determine source, usually irrigation
water, and correct.
In Georgia, foliar B application applied beginning during pre-pollination increased fruit retention and kernel % of ‘Desirable’.
Sam
uel R
ober
ts N
oble
Fou
ndat
ion
Oklahoma State University
Aub
urn
Uni
vers
ity
Manganese
• < 100 ppm Apply 3 foliar applications of MnSO4 (32% Mn) at 6 lbs/acre of material. Begin as the 1st leaf unfurls and then twice more at two week intervals or with the 1st and 2nd generation pecan nut casebearer sprays. MnSO4 and ZnSO4 can be tank mixed and are compatible with most pesticides.
Sam
uel R
ober
ts N
oble
Fou
ndat
ion
Oklahoma State University
Aub
urn
Uni
vers
ity
Zinc
• < 60 ppm – Bearing trees ― 3 application of ZnSO4 at 3 to 6
lbs/acre of material at as 1st leaf unfurls, 1st generation PNC and 2nd generation PNC. If severe or high-input add an application between budbreak and 1st generation PNC. 40 ppm is adequate if foliar Zn not applied, especially for native and low-input orchards.
– Non-bearing ― ZnSO4 at 1 to 2 lbs/100 gal of material as 1st leaf unfurls and then at 2-week intervals as long as new growth is present.
Sam
uel R
ober
ts N
oble
Fou
ndat
ion
Oklahoma State University
Aub
urn
Uni
vers
ity
Iron
• < 50 ppm Cool, wet springs can induce an Fe deficiency that is corrected when conditions improve.– If deficiency acute or
persists 2 years use a foliar applied Fe Chelate or a soil applied EDDHA Fe Chelate.
Heerema et al.
Sam
uel R
ober
ts N
oble
Fou
ndat
ion
Oklahoma State University
Aub
urn
Uni
vers
ity
Copper and NickelCopper• < 6 ppm Copper is rarely
deficient. Use either CuSO4 or Cu Chelate.
Nickel• < 2.5 ppm apply Nickel Plus
or Nickel CBM foliarly• Frequently associated with
old orchard sites with sandy soils, particularly those soils with marine origin.