REVISED DRAFT WORK PLAN FOR TECHNICAL OVERSIGHT

EPA Region 5 Records Ctr.

CD Ml 256M8 CAMP DRESSER & McKEE

environmental engineers, scientists, One Woodward Avenue, Suite 1500planners, & management consultants Detroit, Michigan 48226

313963-1313

April 3, 1993

Ms. Lisa SummerfieldSuperfund Section j j J-H |Environmental Response Division hllil APR - 5 I993Department of Natural Resources ijStevens T. Mason Building :' pjfrj^^I^pFKKlalVi ;P.O. Box 30028 —^^^^^^M^Lansing, MI 48909

RE: Revised Draft Work Plan - Technical OversightWaste Management-Holland Lagoons Superfund SiteMDNR Contract No. 6622CDM No. 1785-39-RT

Dear Ms. Summerfield:

Camp Dresser & McKee (CDM) is pleased to submit two (2) copies of the Revised Draft WorkPlan for Michigan Department of Natural Resources (MDNR) of the Phase I RemedialInvestigation (RI) oversight work . The RI is to be performed by SEC Donohue (SECD),Michigan Landfill Holdings, Inc.'s (MLH) contractor at the Waste Management-Holland Lagoons(WMHL) Superfund Site.

Information contained within this work plan is based upon information supplied to CDM byMDNR's letter dated August 26,1992, and the work plan prepared by SECD dated June, 1992.This revision contains MDNR written comments (dated February 19,1993) to CDM's September11,1992 approved Final Draft Work Plan and SECD's proposed Work Plan dated February,1993.

1.0 INTRODUCTION

The purpose of this document is to establish a Work Plan for the oversight activities of the RIwork to be performed by SECD at the WMHL Superfund Site. This document is developed infulfillment of Article H-E of Contract No. 6622 between MDNR and CDM. This documentincludes the scope of work, staff resources and project organization that CDM will bring to theWMHL Superfund Site project.

The WMHL site is located in the southwest corner of Ottawa County in the south central lower

wc:\mdiir\holland\04029302

Printed on recycled paper

Ms. Lisa SummerfieldApril 2,1993

CAMP DRESSER & McKEE

peninsula of Michigan (Figure 1). The site is situated approximately 29 miles southwest of GrandRapids; T5N R16W, Section 15 (Figure 2). The address of the site is 2700 North 168th Avenue.Holland, Michigan.

2.0 SITE HISTORY

According to the work plan prepared by SECD, Jacobusse Refuse Service Company operated an80 acre site between 1945 to approximately 1981. Reportedly a landfill was operated on the sitefrom 1957 to 1964. Jacobusse Refuse Service Company was purchased by Refuse Service, Inc. inSeptember, 1972, and was later merged into Michigan Waste Systems, Inc. in June, 1973.Michigan Waste Systems, Inc. later changed its name to Waste Management of Michigan, Inc.The site is currently owned by Michigan Landfill Holding, Inc.

The operations at the site have included industrial waste hauling, sludge dewatering, seepagelagoons, and reportedly conducted waste disposal activities and open burning of refuse. Sitefeatures are presented in Figure 3. The various types of waste handled at the site have included:organic pigment plant solids, sand and floor washings, calcium sulfates resulting from limeneutralization of sulfuric acid, insoluble solvents and freon extractable hydrocarbons, aluminumand other hydroxides, vinegar tank solids and grain byproducts, extractants and liquid biologicalwaste activated sludge, wet milk and food processing bacterial digester sludges, calciumphosphate, and general refuse. Yearly averages of metallic sludges and organic wastes werereported as 419,196 gallons and 2,997.733 gallons, respectively. In 1968, forty-three 55 gallondrums of chloral hydrate were buried on the site and subsequently removed in 1980 withoutincident. In 1969 or 1970 Jacobusse began hauling waste to the newly opened Southwest OttawaCounty Landfill (SOCL) which opened in 1968. During 1972, Jacobusse signed a stipulationpermit for groundwater discharge through its seepage lagoons. The permit specified allowablelevels of metals and organics in the seepage water to be discharged to the groundwater, and thepH levels in the seepage lagoons to be regulated. MDNR required the installation of agroundwater monitoring well system. Several monitoring wells were installed surrounding thelagoons on the site. In 1976, Jacobusse received a second groundwater discharge permit whichsuperseded the 1972 permit. The 1976 permit was more stringent than the previous permit andincluded restrictions on oil and grease levels, and procedures for disposing of acid and organicwastes.

MDNR halted the dewatering of plating wastes via seepage lagoons on a statewide basis onNovember 1, 1977. During an inspection of the site by MDNR personnel in December, 1978, thelagoon sludges had been removed. MDNR sampled the on-site monitor wells and 9 domesticwells hi June, 1979. Sampling results indicated the presence of lead (70 to 140 ppb) in the on-sit(imonitoring wells. One domestic well sampled (2741 168th Avenue) indicated the presence oftrichloroethylene (TCE) (amount unknown). Jacobusse informed MDNR in March, 1980 that itwould no longer be accepting any liquid or solid waste at the site after March 4, 1980.

wc:\mdnr\holland\04029302



Subsequent sampling by MDNR has indicated consistent TCE contamination at the 2741 168thAvenue well. The highest level of TCE contamination detected was 67 ppb. The Jacobusse Sitewas placed on the National Priority List (NPL) on June 10, 1986 based upon a USEPA FieldInvestigation Team inspection and the site score according to USEPA's Hazard Ranking System(HRS). The main criterion for the NPL listing appears to be potential groundwater impacts.

3.0 PROJECT OBJECTIVES

The objective of this project is to provide oversight for the MDNR during the Phase IRI activitieswhich will be performed at the Waste Management-Holland Lagoons Superfund Site by SECD.The objectives of the SECD Phase I RI Work Plan are:

• Site mapping,

• Well elevation surveying,

• Geophysical survey,

• Identification of study areas,

• Preliminary subsurface and surface soil sampling,

• Depth to groundwater measurements, and

• Preliminary groundwater sampling.

4.0 PROJECT ORGANIZATION AND STRUCTURE

A project organizational chart is provided outlining the CDM personnel and appropriatecontractors who will be involved in the Michigan WMHL Superfund Site (Figure 4). Trainingand qualifications of CDM personnel are discussed in Section 5.0.

5.0 STAFF ROLES AND QUALIFICATIONS

Individual CDM staff members, classifications, titles, project roles, and years of ContractLaboratory Program (CLP) experience are listed in Table 1. Resumes of the individuals listed areon file with the MDNR at Lansing, Michigan in the Special Services Section with Christine M.Iversen, Contract Administrator, Environmental Response Division. A summary of health andsafety training and medical monitoring status of CDM staff is provided in Table 2.



Ms. Lisa SummerfieldApril 2,1993


6.0 PROJECT ACTIVITIES

This section presents the generalized scope of work used to develop the costs associated with thisWork Plan.

6.1 Project Planning and Management

The tasks which will be performed in association with the project planning and managementactivity include:

Development and submittal of the Oversight Work Plan (this document). After receivingwritten comments, CDM will make appropriate changes and will submit six (6) copies ofthe final document to the MDNR.

Development and submittal of the Health and Safety Plan (HASP). CDM will reviewavailable data regarding chemicals likely to be present at the WMHL site and will assessthe potential hazards that may be encountered during field activities. The WMHL siteHASP win be written in accordance with CDM's corporate health and safely programs andOSHA requirements to mmimiyg the risk to project staff from potential chemical andphysical hazards that may be encountered during field activities. The HASP win includeinformation on expected contaminants, a hazards evaluation, anticipated level of personalprotection, decontamination procedures, a list of necessary monitoring equipment, andemergency procedures and phone numbers. All personnel conducting field activities at theWMHL she will be required to attend a pre -entry briefing to be held prior to initiating anysite activities, win read and sign the HASP and to have satisfied the OSHA trainingrequirements outlined in 29 CFR 1920.120. One copy of the HASP win be submitted tothe MDNR for their files and one copy of the HASP will be available on-site during allfield activities.

Performance of various appropriate administrative tasks such as required weekly reportingdocuments, cost tracking and scheduling.

6.2 Project Tasks

The foUowing section describes the tasks to be completed by CDM during the Michigan WMHLSuperfund Site RI as outlined in MDNR's letters dated August 26,1992 and February 19,1993.

Task 1: Keep daily field notes and provide them to MDNR Project Manager on a weeklybasis. The weekly reports will be submitted mid-week, for field activities thatoccurred during the previous week.

Prtnttti on flKyctotf

CAMP DRESSER . MoKEE

PageS

Task 2: Provide daily notification to MDNR Project Manager for the overall site activitiesand the tasks planned for the following day. Daily afternoon phone calls will bemade to MDNR and will be followed up with a field memo.

Task 3 Provide immediate notification to MDNR Project Manager or his/her designatedrepresentative of any deviations from the SECD Work Plan, or of any unusualoccurrences at the site. Notification will be made via the telephone and will befollowed up with a field memo.

Task 4 Provide oversight of the geophysical survey conducted at the site. CDM willprovide an on-site geologist with experience in conducting terrain conductivity(EM) surveys to oversee the geophysical surveys to be performed by SECD. Theon-site geologist will monitor field activities for conformance with the SECD'sWork Plan, SECD's Quality Assurance Project Plan (QAPP), SECD's FieldSampling Plan (FSP). All observations will be documented.

Task 5 Provide oversight of well elevation survey which will be conducted by SECD atthe site. CDM will provide on-site personnel to oversee the well elevation surveyto be done by SECD.

Task 6 Provide oversight for groundwater elevation monitoring performed by SECD.CDM will also measure groundwater levels in all the monitoring wells. Waterlevels will be measured from the top of each well casing to the nearest 0.01 footusing an electronic water level indicator.

Task 7 Gather and analyze duplicate samples on potential subsurface and surface soilcontamination associated with the site. The CDM field geologist at his/herdiscretion will split samples collected by SECD personnel. A total of three (3)duplicate soil samples will be collected. Two (2) of these soil samples will betaken from on-site locations and the other one (1) soil sample will be collectedfrom a designated background location. The soil samples will be immediatelypreserved as outlined in SECD's FSP and QAPP and placed in coolers with ice.Whenever soil samples are collected, the samples will be shipped that day to theContract Laboratory Program (CLP) laboratory and analyzed for the contaminantslisted in the Target Compound List (TCL) as outlined in the SECD final workplan. The soil samples will be analyzed for VOCs, semi volatiles, pesticides/PCBs,metals, and cyanide by methods specified in EPA's CLP Statement of Work(SOW) 3/90 or latest revision. The soil target compound analytical parameters aresummarized in Table 3. CDM chain-of-custody protocols will be followed foreach sampling event.



C CAMP DRESSER & McKEE

Page6

TaskS Gather and analyze duplicate ground water samples. A total of two (2)groondwater split samples will be collected. One from a monitoring well screenedat 20 feet and one (1) from a monitoring well screened at 40 feet

Prior to collecting each groundwater sample, COM will measure the depth togroondwater and the total depth of the monitoring well. Water levels win bemeasured from the top of each well casing to the nearest 0.01 foot using anelectronic water level indicator. The volume of standing water inside the wellcasing will be calculated, and the results will be used to determine the volume ofwater required to evacuate three well volumes. These measurements will becompared to the volume of water evacuated by SECD during the well purging.CDM will take field measurements of pH, specific conductance, temperature anddissolved oxygen several times during well evacuation. Consistent pH, specificconductance, and temperature measurements will indicate that stagnant water frominside the well casing has been removed, and representative groundwater from theaquifer has entered the well screen and will be sampled. A HyDAC three-functionmeter win record the temperature, pH, and specific conductance. Dissolvedoxygen will be recorded using an YSI dissolved oxygen meter.

AO samples win be immediately preserved as outlined in SECD's FSP and QAPPand placed in coolers with ice. Shipments will be made daily to a ContractLaboratory Program (CLP) laboratory and analyzed for the contaminants listed inthe Target Compound List (TCL) as outlined in the SECD final work plan. Thegroundwater samples win be analyzed for VOCs, semi volatiks, andpesticides/PCBs by methods specified in EPA's CLP Low Concentration SOW10/92 or latest revision. Groundwater samples win be analyzed for metals andcyanide by methods specified in EPA's CLP SOW 3/90 or latest revision. Thetarget compound analytical parameters are summarized in Table 4. CDM chain-of-custody protocols win be followed for each sampling event

Task 9 Provide MDNR a technical memorandum summarizing analytical results alongwith raw data and data validation. CDM will review the analytical results providedby the laboratory based on the following parameters: holding times, surrogatecompound recoveries, matrix spike/matrix spike duplicates, blank results (method,field, and trip blanks), and laboratory control samples. The output of this task willbe a table summarizing the analytical results with qualifying notations and a briefmemorandum describing the methods used in the evaluation. The technicalmemorandum will be delivered within two weeks of the receipt of the laboratoryreports.

Ms. Lisa SummerfieldApril 2 1993 CAMP DRESSER & McKEE

Several quality control samples will be collected during the project and are listedbelow.

Trip Blanks: Trip blanks will be included with each cooler shipment containingsamples for analysis of VOCs. Trip blanks are used to detect contamination byVOCs during sample shipping and handling. Trip blanks are vials of analyte-freewater that are filled in the laboratory, transported to the sampling site, andreturned to the laboratory with the collected field samples for VOC analysis. Tripblanks are not opened in the field. A total of five (5) trip blanks have beenbudgeted: three (3) for the soil sampling shipments and two(2) for thegroundwater sampling shipments.

Field Duplicates: Field duplicates are additional samples of each different matrixcollected that are sent to the laboratory for the same sample analysis. One (1) soiland one (1) groundwater duplicate sample will be collected and submitted for allspecified parameters.

Equipment Rinsates: Equipment rinsate blanks are distilled or de-ionized water(depending on what type of rinse water was used) samples that have been passedthrough decontaminated sampling equipment. These samples will be analyzed forthe same parameters as the collected samples. These samples are used as ameasure of the adequacy of the decontamination process. Equipment rinsatesamples will be collected at a rate of one sample per piece of equipment per day.A total of five (5) equipment rinsate blanks have been budgeted: three (3) for thesoil sampling equipment and two(2) for the groundwater sampling equipment

Matrix Spike/Matrix Spike Duplicates: Matrix Spike (MS) and Matrix SpikeDuplicate (MSD) samples will be collected and analyzed when utilizing EPA's CLPSOW 3/90 or latest revision. Both organic and inorganic soil samples willimplement the EPA's CLP SOW 3/90 or latest revision methodology. MatrixSpike and MSD samples will be collected for inorganic water samples thatimplement the EPA's CLP SOW 3/90 or latest revision methodology. One (1) soilMS sample and one (1) soil MSD sample will be collected and analyzed for VOCs,semi-volatiles, pesticides/PCBs, metals, and cyanide. One (1) groundwater MSand MSD will be collected and analyzed for metals and cyanide.

Laboratory Control Sample: A Laboratory Control Sample (LCS) sample isperformed in place of MS and MSD samples when the samples are analyzed inaccordance with EPA's CLP Low Concentration SOW 10/92 (or latest revision).An LCS is an internal laboratory quality control sample designed to assess (on asample delivery group (SDG) by SDG basis), the capability of the laboratory toperform the analytical method. All organic water samples will utilize LCS



Ms. Lisa SummerfieldApril 2,1993PagcS


methodology. Groundwater LCS for VOCs, semi-volatiles, and pesticides/PCBswiU be prepared and analyzed.

Task 10 Provide document review and comment COM will review draft reports submittedby SECD to MDNR and provide written comments to MDNR.

The following assumptions have been made in the development of the budget and schedule:

The amount of time spent performing field activates will be proportional to SECD fieldactivities. For budgeting purposes, COM has made the following assumptions regardingfield event sampling hours:

Geophysical Survey 2 Weeks (8 hours per day),

Wen Elevation Survey 2 Days (10 hours per day),

Soil Sampling 2 Weeks (8 hours per day), and

Groundwater Sampling 2 Weeks (8 hours per day).

COM wfll arrange for analytical laboratory services and coordinate collection of samplesand delivery to the laboratory.

Proposed Work Plan budget tables are presented in Table 5 through Table 8 and a proposedwork schedule is illustrated in Table 9. The schedule is based upon CDM's experience inperforming similar projects and the schedule supplied by SEC Donohue's Final Work Plan.

Two copies of this Revised Draft Work Plan are submitted to MDNR for review and commentAfter MDNR review and comment, CDM win make the appropriate revisions and submit six (6)copies of die final work plan with appropriate OF-60 forms. Subsequent tasks beyond work plandevelopment win be initiated upon receipt of written authorization to proceed (Le. DepartmentPurchase Order).

Ms. Lisa SummerfieldApril 2, 1993 CAMP DRESSER & McKEE

Camp Dresser & McKee is looking forward to working with Michigan Department of NaturalResources on the Waste Management-Holland Lagoons Superfund Site. Should you have anyquestions about the contents of this letter proposal or attachments, please feel free to call theundersigned at (313) 963-1313.

Very truly yours,


Timothy R.Project Director/Site Manager

cc: I. A. GillisFile Div. 3.4

wc:\mdnr \holland\04029302


LIST OF FIGURES

Figure

1 Geographic Location Map

2 Site Location Map

3 Site Features

4 Project Staff Organizational Chart

LIST OF TABLES

lahk

1 COM Personnel Classification

2 Health & Safety Status

3 Summary of Soil Analytical Program

4 Summary of Groundwater Analytical Program

5 Waste Management-Holland Lagoons Supertund Work Plan: CDM Budget Estimate ForDirect Labor

6 Waste Management-Holland Lagoons Supertund Work Plan: CDM Budget Estimate ForOther Direct Costs

7 Waste Management-Holland Lagoons Supertund Work Plan: Subcontractors Budget

8 Waste Management-Holland Lagoons Supertund Work Plan: Estimated Budget Summary

9 Waste Management-Holland Lagoons Supertund Work Plan: Proposed Project Schedule

HOLLAND LAGOONSSUPERFUND SITE

LEGEND

County Boundary® District Office

Michigan Department of Natural Resources

Geographic Location MapHolland Lagoons Superfund Site

environmental engineers, scientists,planners, A management consultants Figure No. 1

SRE LOCATION

Adopted from the U.S.G.S. TopograpMeol Mop of GtodrtMM. Mte*u. 1985


Site Location MapHolland Lagoons Superfund Site

Figure No. 2

Ia>o

O(Sl

ooasa3<fO

RESIDENTIAL

SOUTHWEST OTTAWACOUNTY LANDFILL

PRIVATE PARCEL

CONCRETE BUNKER

APPROXIMATELOCATION OFFORMER LAGOONS

BARRICADE

CONCRETEDEBRIS

00<o

a:o

FENCEDSTORAGE TRAILS ACROSS

SITE

VACANT AND RESIDENTIAL

Modified from Figure 2 SECD Report. June 1992.


Site FeaturesHolland Lagoons Superfund Site

environmental onginoars. scientists,planners, & management consultants Figure No. 3

Michigan Department ofNatural Resources

Project AdministratorLisa Summerfield

Client Officer

A. Barry SeymourCDM

oo

«M9»

~9>O

Program Directorand Site Manager

Timothy R. CullenCDk

ioa§

Technical ReviewQA / QC

Jun Toshitani

RydrogeologyIan A. Gillis

Laboratory

CompuChemLaboratories Jnc.

CD1I Staff

Field Geologist

Michigan Department of Natural Resourses

Project Staff Organizational ChartHolland Lagoons Superfund Site

0f0WMrv» • AMfiOgfVvfMitisctoittst*.

<t consultant! Figure No. 4

TABLE 1COM PERSONNEL CLASSIFICATION

STAFF NAMEBIEZE, C.BONA, J.BILLIG, P.BUSS, D.HAWTHORNE, J.JOHNSON, C.LAVELLE, J.MARLOWE, C.MURRAY, K.PHEENEY, W.PREBLE, R.RAGO, L.SEYMOUR, A.B.YOSHITANI, J.BARKER, F.B.BAUBIN, M.CULLEN, T.DAVIS, R.DEDENE, D.DEMBOWSKI, K.DEWAR, W.DRAKE, J.DUFFY, J.KEIL, D.MOSS, J.NEIBERT, J.POULTER, H.SEWALL, A.SULLIVAN, T.TENBROEK, M.WESTMAN, D.WHEELER, G.YAMAYA, C.

CLASSIFI-CATION

P4P4P4P4P4P4P4P4P4P4P4P4P4P4P3P3P3P3P3P3P3P3P3P3P3P3P3P3P3P3P3P3P3

TITLESENIOR ENV. SCIENTISTPRINCIPAL ENGINEERPRINCIPAL SCIENTISTASSOCIATE SCIENTISTSENIOR VP ENGINEERVP ENGINEERSR. TOXICOLOGIST

ASSOCIATE ENGINEERVP/CONSTRUC. COORD.ASSOCIATE ENGINEERPRINCIPAL ENGINEERSENIOR VP ENGINEERSENIOR VP ENGINEERSENIOR ENV. SCIENTISTENV. SCIENTISTPRINCIPAL SCIENTIST

ENV. ENGINEERENV. ENGINEERCHEMICAL ENGINEERENV. SCIENTISTGEOLOGISTENV. SCIENTISTCIVIL ENGINEERENV. ENGINEERENV. ENGINEERENV. SCIENTISTENV. ENGINEERENV. ENGINEERENV. ENGINEERENV. ENGINEERENV. ENGINEER

PROJECT ROLESENIOR GEOSCIENTISTPROJECT CONTROL/SUB-MANAGERTOXICOLOGICAL ASSESSMENTSENIOR ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENTISTMIDWEST AREA MANAGER

TOXICOLOGICAL ASSESSMENTHEALTH & SAFETY COORDINATORTECHNICAL REVIEWTECHNICAL REVIEWSENIOR HYDROGEOLOGISTSENIOR ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERCLIENT OFFICERPROJECT QA/QC OFFICERSENIOR ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENTISTHYDROGEOLOGISTPROJECT DIRECTORHEALTH & SAFETYRESIDENT PROJECT ENGINEERHYDRAULICS ENGINEERS&A/QAO/DQOHYDROGEOLOGISTGEOLOGISTHYDROGEOLOGISTSITE MANAGERSITE MANAGERTRAINER FOR EDM SOFTWAREBIOREMEDIATION SPECIALISTHAZ. WASTE ENGINEERHAZ. WASTE ENGINEER/MODELLERPROJECT ENGINEER

TREATMENT DESIGN ENGINEER

YEARS OF CLPEXPERIENCE

14N.A.N.A.

5N.A.N.A.N.A.

N.A.N.A.N.A.N.A.N.A.N.A.

10

12

3N.A.

53

15

N.A.N.A.

5N.A.

41

N.A.N.A.

WC:\MDNR\TAB1.XLS 4/2/93 [Table 1 Page 1 of 3]

TABLE 1COM PERSONNEL CLASSIFICATION

STAFF NAMEBHAOAT, S.BOUVETTE, T.BROWN, N.CAPRIOTTI, A.CROOKE, Y.FARVER, B.FUJIKAWA. L.GILLIS, 1.HANK, R.JENNINGS, R.KILLIP. S.KING, T.KUSEK, L.LANTZ, R.MACKIF., D.PATEL, P.PUTSCHER, A.RYS, M.SMITH, K.SORENSON, M.STORY, R.ZUELLIQ, T.GESELL, L.HODGE, S.KEOUGH, W.MEKJIAN, G.MILLER, M.MULLIGAN, K.NORTON, R.FOSZCZ. G.KAZMIERCZAK, D.McCULLUM, H.

CLASSIFI-CATION

P2P2P2P2P2P2P2P2P2P2P2P2P2P2P2P2P2P2P2P2P2P2PIPIPIPIPIPIPIT3T3T3

TITLEENV. SCIENTISTENV. ENGINEERENV. SCIENTISTENV. SCIENTISTENV. ENGINEERENV. ENGINEERKNV. ENGINEERHYDROGEOLOGISTENV. SCIENTISTMECH. ENGINEERENV. SCIENTISTCHEMICAL ENGINEERENV. SCIENTISTENV. SCIENTISTENV. SCIENTISTCHEMICAL ENGINEERHYDROGEOLOGISTENV. SCIENTISTCHEMICAL ENGINEERENV. SCIENTISTCONTRACT ADMIN.MARKETING COORD.ENV. ENGINEERENV. SCIENTISTENV. SCIENTISTSTAFF ENGINEERENV. ENGINEERENV. ENGINEERENV. SCIENTISTTECH. ILLUSTRATORMARKETING COORD.CONTRACT ADMIN.

PROJECT ROLEGEOCHEMISTWATER RESOURCES ENGINEERHYDROGEOLIGISTHEALTH ft SAFETY COORDINATORPROJECT ENGINEERDESIGN ENGINEERENVIRONMENTAL MNGINF.nR/CHEMISTHYDROGEOLOGISTPROJECT GEOCHEMISTMECHANICAL ENGINEERHYDROGEOLOGISTPROJECT MANAGERLIMNOLOGIST/ASSISTANT SITE MGR.HYDROGEOLOGIST

CHEMISTHYDROGEOLOGISTHYDROGEOLOGISTCHEMICAL ENGINEERHYDROGEOLOGIST

PUBLISHING SPECIALIST

ECOLOGICAL ASSESSMENTSTAFF ENGINEERENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEER

ADMIN. ASSISTANT TO PROJECT MGR.CONTRACT ADMINISTRATION


1101212211

N.A.3214

54144

N.A.1

N.A.2

N.A.

N.A.N.A.

1N.A.N.A.N.A.

WC:\MDNR\TAB1.XLS 4/2/93 [Table! Page 2 of 3]

TABLE 1CDM PERSONNEL CLASSIFICATION

STAFF NAMESELIGA, B.ALMANZA, C.NICHOLSON, P.VOZZA, A.AYRIS, N.BELLEHEUMER, N.DANIELS, C.DAVIS, A.HARPER, J.JACKSON, T.MATTHEWS, M.PAPIA, N.TISZA, STRUMAN, R.WILLIAMS, S.ZAVALA, V.

CLASSIFI-CATION

T3T2T2T2CLCLCLCLCLCLCLCLCLCLCLCL

TITLEDRAFTSMANTECHNICIANTECHNICIANTECHNICIANADMIN. MANAGERSECRETARY

SECRETARYSECRETARYOFFICE SVCS. CLERKSECRETARYSECRETARYSECRETARYOFFICE SVCS. CLERKPROPOSAL DEV. COORD.SECRETARY

PROJECT ROLECAD OPERATOR/DRAFTSMANENVIRONMENTAL TECHNICIANENVIRONMENTAL TECHNICIANDESIGN/DRAFTSMAN

WORD PROCESSOR


N.A.5

N.A.N.A.N.A.N.A.

N.A.N.A.N.A.N.A.N.A.N.A.N.A.

WC:\MDNR\TAB1.XLS 4/2/93 [Table 1 Page 3 of 3]

TABLE 2HEALTH AND SAFETY STATUS

STAFF NAMEAlmanza, CraigAnderson, DavidBhagat, SneBlaze, ClarenceBuss, DanCarlson, TroyCovault, DlanneCrooke, YolandaCullen, TimothyDavis, RachelDeDene, DuaneDewar, WendyDuffey, TomGesell, LauraGillis, IanHank, RobertHodge, ScottJennings, RobertKilllp, ScottKing, ToddLantz, RlkMiller, MichaelPutscher, AndreaRys, MarkSwanson, DaveSorenson, MarkWestman, Dean

STATUSActiveActiveActiveReserveReserveActiveActiveActiveActiveActiveActiveActiveActiveActiveActiveActiveActiveActiveActiveActiveActiveActiveActiveActiveActiveActiveActive

ORIGINAL40-HRDec-89Feb-90Jun-90Feb-88Nov-87Aug-88Oct-90Mar-91Jul-84Nov-85Nov-84Aug-85Nov-82Jan-90Jul-91Aug-89Jan-87Jan-90Apr-88Jun-90Nov-87Sep-88May-88Jan-90Sep-87Jul-86Oct-91

REFRESHERDUE DATE

Jul-92Aug-93Jul-92Jun-93Nov-92Dec-92Oct-92Feb-93Mar-94Dec-92Mar-92Jan-93Nov-92Jan-92Jul-93Oct-92Dec-92Feb-93Aug-92Jul-93Jul-92Nov-92Jul-93Jan-93Aug-92Oct-92Oct-92

ORIGINALSUPERVISORY

Nov-90Oct-90Jun-92

Nov-90

Mar-90Dec-87

Feb-88Nov-87

Oct-90

Jul-90Jun-90May-91

May-88Jul-90Jun-88Oct-89Feb-92

ORIGINALFIRSTAID

Dec-89

May-86

Jul-90None

Jul-90May-86Jun-86None

DUE DATES FOR:RESPIRATORFIT TESTING

Feb-93Aug-93Jun-92Aug-91Jul-90Jun-92Dec-92Feb-93Jul-92

Past DueSep-92Jul-92Jul-91

May-92Jul-92Jul-92Jun-92May-91Jul-92Jul-92Dec-92Nov-92Aug-92Dec-92Sep-91Dec-92Oct-92

ANNUALPHYSICAL

Apr-93Apr-93Jul-93Nov-92Oct-91Jun-92Oct-92Feb-94Feb-94Dec-92Apr-92Feb-93Sep-92Mar-92Jun-92Oct-92Nov-92Jul-92Jun-93Aug-93May-93Apr-93Jun-93Mar-93Nov-91Oct-92Oct-92

Reserve=Not normally utilized for field work.

c:\mdntViasp\tab2.xls 4/2/93

TABLESSummary of Soil Analytical Program

Item Chemical Contaminant Detection Limit (ug/kg)

Volatiles123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233

ChloromethaneBromomethaneVinyl ChlorideChloroethaneMethylene ChlorideAcetoneCarbon Bisulfide1 , 1 -Dichloroethene1,1-Dichloroethane1 ,2-Dichloroethene (Total)Chloroform1 ,2-Dichloroethane2-Butanone1,1,1 -TrichloroethaneCarbon TetrachlorideBromodichloromethane1 ,2-DichloropropaneCis- 1 ,3-DichloropropeneTrichloroetheneDibromochloromethane1 , 1 ,2-TrichloroethaneBenzeneTrans- 1 ,3-DichloropropeneBromoform4-Methyl-2-pentanone2-HexanoneTetrachloroethene1 , 1 ,2,2-TetrachloroethaneTolueneChlorobenzeneEthylbenzeneStyreneXylenes (Total)

101010101010101010101010101010101010101010101010101010101010101010

T ABLE 3 (Con t)


Semi-Volatiles34353637383940414243444546474849505152535455565758596061626364

Phenolbis (2-ChloroethyI) ether2-Chlorophenol1 3-Dichlorobenzene1 ,4-Dichlorobenzene1 ,2-Dichlorobenzene2-Mcthylphenol2 '̂-Oxybis (1-Chloropropane)4-MethylphenolN-Nhroso-di-n-dipropylamineHexachloroethaneNitrobenzeneIsophorone2-Nitrophenol2,4-Dimethylphenolbis (2-Chloroethoxy) methane2,4-Dichlorophenol1 ,2,4-TrichlorobenzeneNaphthalene4-ChloroanilineHexachlorobutadiene4-Chloio-3-methylphenol2-MethylnaphthaleneHexachlorocyclopentadiene2,4,6-Trichlorophenol2,4,5-Trichlorophenol2-ChloronaphthaIene2-NitroanilineDimethyl phthalateAcenaphthylene2,6-Dinhrotoluene

330330330330330330330330330330330330330330330330330330330330330330330330330800330800330330330

TABLE 3 (Cont)


Semi-Volatiles (Cont.)656667686970717273747576777879808182838485868788899091929394959697

3-NitroanilineAcenaphthene2,4-Dinitrophenol4-NitrophenolDibenzofuran2,4-DinitrotolueneDiethyl phthalate4-Chlorophenyl phenyl etherFluorene4-Nitroaniline4,6-Dinitro-2-methylphenolN-Nitrosodiphenylamine (1)4-Bromophenyl-phenyl etherHexachlorobenzenePentachlorophenol •PhenanthreneAnthraceneCarbazoleDi-n-butyl phthalateFluoranthenePyreneButyl benzyl phthalate3,3'-DichlorobenzidineBenzo (a) anthraceneChrysenebis (2-Ethylhexyl) phthalateDi-n-octyl phthalateBenzo (b) fluorantheneBenzo (k) fluorantheneBenzo (a) pyreneIndeno (1,2,3-cd) pyreneDibenzo (a,h) anthraceneBenzo (g,h,i) perylene

800330800800330330330330330800800330330330800330330330330330330330330330330330330330330330330330330

TABLE 3 (Co«t)

Item | Chemical Contaminant Detection Limit (ug/kg)

Pesticides/Aroclors9899100101102103104105106107108109110111112113114US

Alpha-BHCBcta-BHCDelta-BHCGamma-BHC (Lindane)HeptachlorAldrinHeptachlor epoxideEndosulfanIDieldrin4,4'-DDEEndrinEndosulfan II4,4'-DDDEndosulfan sulfate4,4'-DDTp.p'-Methoxychlor

1.71.71.71.71.71.71.71.73333333333333317.0

Endrin ketone 33Endrin aldehyde 33 !

116 Alpha-chlordane 1.7117 Gamma-chlordane 1.7118119120

Toxaphene 170.0Aroclor-1016 33.0Aioclor-1221 67.0

121 Aroclor-1232 33.0122 Aroclor-1242 33.0123 Aroclor-1248 33.0124 Aroclor-1254 33.0125 Aroclor-1260 33.0

TABLE 3 (Cont.)

Item Chemical Contaminant Detection Limit (mg/kg)

Metals126127128129130131132133134135136137138139140141142143144145146147148149

AluminumAntimonyArsenicBariumBerylliumCadmiumCalciumChromiumCobaltCopperIronLeadMagnesiumManganeseMercuryNickelPotassiumSeleniumSilverSodiumThalliumVanadiumZincCyanide

3.53.60.30.20.10.43.20.50.50.94.20.313.00.30.13.5

370.00.30.592.00.30.60.22.0

TABLE 4Sutmary of Groudwater Analytical Program

Item Chemical Contaminant Detection Limit (ug/L)

Volatile;1234567891011121314IS1617181920212223242526272829303132333435

ChloromethaneBromomethaneVinyl ChlorideChloroethaneMefhylene ChlorideAcetoneCarbon Disulfide1,1-Dichloroethene1 , 1 -DichloroethaneCis-1 ,2-DichloroetheneTrans-l^-DichloroetheneChloroform1 ̂ -Dichloroethane2-ButanoneBromochloromethane1,1,1-TrichJoroethaneCarbon TetrachJorideBromodichloromethane1 ,2-DichloropropaneCis-1 ,3-DichloropropeneTrichloroetheneDibromochloromethane1,1,2-TrichloroethaneBenzene1 rans- 1 p-UicoloropropeneBromofonn4-Methyl-2-pentanone2-HexanoneTetrachloroethene1,1^2-Tetrachloroethane1^-Dibromoethane (Ethylene dibromide)TolueneCJhloro benzeneEthylbenzeneStyrene

1111251111111511111111111155

TABLE 4 (Cont.)


Volatiles (Cont.)3637383940

Xylenes (Total)1 ,3-Dichlorobenzene1 ,4-Dichlorobenzene1 ,2-Dichlorobenzenel,2-Dibromo-3-chloropropane (DBCP)

11111

Semi- Volatiles414243444546474849505152535455565758596061626364656667

Phenolbis (2-Chloroethyl) ether2-Chlorophenol2-Methylphenol2,2'-Oxybis (1-Chloropropane)4-MethylphenolN-Nitroso-di-n-dipropylamineHexachloroethaneNitrobenzeneIsophorone2-Nitrophenol2,4-Dimethylphenolbis (2-Chloroethoxy) methane2,4-Dichlorophenol1 ,2,4-TrichlorobenzeneNaphthalene4-ChloroanilineHexachlorobutadiene4-Chloro-3-methylphenol2-MethyhiaphthaleneHexachlorocyclopentadiene2,4,6-Trichlorophenol2,4,5-Trichlorophenol2-Chloronaphthalene2-NitroanilineDimethyl phthalateAcenaphthylene

5555555555555555555555

205

2055

TABLE 4 (Cont)


Semi-Volatiles (Cont.)6869707172737475767778798081828384858687888990919293949596979899100

2,6-Dinitrotoluene3-NhroanilineAcenaphthene2,4-Dinitrophenol4-NitrophenolDibenzofuran2,4-DinitrotolueneDiethyl phthaJate4-Chlorophenyl phenyl etherFluorene4-Nitroaniline4,6-Dinitro-2-methylphenolN-Nhrosodiphenylamine ( 1 )4-Bromophenyl-phenyl etherHexachlorobenzenePentachlorophenolPhenanthreneAnthraceneDi-n-butyl phthalateFluoianthenePyieneButyl benzyl phthalate33'-DichloTobenzidine¥> f \ Luenzo (a) antnraceneChrysenebis (2-EthylhexyI) phthalateDi-n-octyl phthalateBenzo (b) fluorantheneBcnzo (k) fluorantheneBenzo (a) pyreneIndeno (1 ,23-cd) pyreneDibenzo (a^i) anthraceneBenzo (g4u) perylene

5205

202055555

20205552055555555555555555

TABLE 4 (Cont.)


Pesticides/ Aroclors101102103104105106107108109110111112113114115116117118119120121122123124125126127128

Alpha-BHCBeta-BHCDelta-BHCGamma-BHC (Lindane)HeptachlorAldrinHeptachlor epoxideEndosulfan IDieldrin4,4'-DDEEndrinEndosulfan II4,4'-DDDEndosulfan sulfate4,4'-DDTp,p'-MethoxychlorEndrin ketoneEndrin aldehydeAlpha-chlordaneGamma-chlordaneToxapheneAroclor-1016Aroclor-1221Aroclor-1232Aroclor-1242Aroclor-1248Aroclor-1254Aroclor-1260

0.010.010.010.010.010.010.010.010.020.020.020.020.020.020.020.10.020.020.010.011.00.20.40.20.20.20.20.2

TABLE 4 (Cont)


Metals128129130131132133134135136137138139140141142143144145146147148149150151

Aluminum

AntimonyArsenicBariumBerylliumffldmuimCalciumChromiumCobaltCopperIronLeadMagnesiumM&ngpneseMercuryNickelPotassium.SeleniumSilverSodiumThalliumVanadiumZincCyanide

3536321432559

422

1303

0.235

370035

92036210

TABLE 5

Waste Management - Holland Lagoons Superfund Work Plan:CDM Budget Estimate For Direct Labor*

TASK DESCRIPTION

Project Administration 4 Management

MDNR/Site Meeting

INITIAL ACTIVITIESWork Plan Finalization

Develop H 4 S Plan

PROJECT ACTIVITIESGeophysical Survey Oversight

Well Surveying

Soil Sampling Oversight

Groundwater Sampling Oversight

Document Review & Comment (OA/OC)

TOTAL

Professional 4

45.00 /Hour

Hours

1

1

4

6

$

SO

SO

$45

$45

SO

$0

$0

$0

$180

$270

'rofessional 3

35.00 /Hour

Hours

30

12

25

3

2

2

2

2

20

98

$

$1,050

$420

$875

$105

$70

$70

$70

$70

$700

$3.430

Professional 2

25.00 /Hour

Hours

45

12

118

24

110

28

104

441

$

$1,125

$300

$2,950

$600

$2,750

$700

SO

$0

$2,600

$11,025

'rofeftsional 1

11.00 /Hour

Hours

10

110

110

30

260

$

SO

so

$180

$0

$0

SO

$1,980

$1,980

$540

$4,680

Technical 3

19.00 /Hour

Hours

30

30

$

$570

$0

SO

$0

$0

SO

SO

$0

SO

$570

Technical 2

15.00 /Hour

Hours

8

5

30

43

$

S120

SO

$75

$0

SO

sososo

$450

$645

Technical 1

13.70 /Hour

Hours

0

$

SO

$0

$0

so

$0

$0

$0

$0

so

$0

Clerical

15.76 /Hour

Hours

20

8

S

60

96

$

$315

$0

$126

$126

$0

$0

SO

$0

$946

$1,513

Direct Labor

Hours

133

24

167

36

112

30

112

112

248

974

$

$3,180

$720

$4,251

$876

$2,820

$770

$2,050

$2,050

$5,416

$22,133

Note: 1) Labor rates reflect fiscal year 1992 rate schedules.

2) * Estimated from SECD Final Work Plan (February 1993).

iag\mdnr\holland\budgetables

TABLE 6

WasU MaM|tmrat - Holland LafooM Suptrfttid Work Pl»:COM Bud|tt Eitlmato For Otktr Dlnct CotU*

i ASK wscKirnoN

PTOJMI Adminiitrilion A Manageminl

MDNR/Sile MMing

INITIAL ACTIVITIESWort Flan Finalliwon

Develop H A S Plm

PROJECT ACTIVITIES

(Mophytical Survty Ovenifhl

Well Swvtytni


Ciroundwiter Sampling Ovfni|hl

Documenl Review A Comment (QA/QC)

TOTAL

PtrDiam Howl*

161 75/<hy Food

Dwi

3

12

3

12

12

41

t

Ml

SI2)not$123

SI23

$2,729

B*u*p-

IMM

f

$200

$l.)21

$2,100

$3,125

Tmw

portMlon

$

$112

$323

$112

$323

$323

$1.199

Coc4t*

WIO/pi

$

$30

$0

130

$23

$30

$20

$20

$20

$125

$310

MINI

$500/ilM

$50

$50

FAX

SIOO/p,

$

$30

$20

$50

MM)

Owner

$

$20

$40

$23

$270

$110

$60

$593

Supplief

$

$10

$30

$22

$205

$13

»JJ5

$292

$50

$1,067

Tel*

phm

$

$30

$30

$10

$40

$25

$40

$40

$50

$305

Computer

ttOO/hr

$

$0

$0

$0

$0

$0

so

CAD

tlOOMw

$

$50

$300

$350

Total

ODCi

$

$110

$160

$220

$12

$1,615

$446

$3,360

$3,782

$635

$10,479

Note: • Eillmued from SECD Final Work Plan (February 1993),

ieg\mdnrVhollaiuTbiiil|Mabln

TABLE 7

Waste Management - Holland Lagoons Superfund Site Work Plan:Subcontractors Budget Estimate

CLP LaboratoryCompuChem Laboratories, Inc.

Soil Analyses (3), Including QA/QCGroundwater Analyses (2), Including QA/QC

Total

$11,125$7,365

$18,490

iag\mdniMiolIand\RTABLE7.XLS

TABLES

Waste Maaa|«mtal • Holland UIOOBI Syprfuad Work Plaa:Eitlmated Bvdftt Sammary*

TASK DESCRIPTION

rro)tci AflRiiniMrMiofi • MMMfMMfM

MDNR/Siif MMInf

INITIAL ACTIVITIESWo* Plan FiMliMMm

Dtvtlop H * 3 Plui

PROJKCT ACTIVITIES

Owphytictl Sinty Ovtnifht

Will Survtyinj

Soil Strnpling Ovmighc

Croundwitir Sunplin) Owiifht

Doeum*nl Rtvitw A Cnmnwm (QA/QC)

TOTAL

TOTAL* PEE

DIRECT

LABORS

si, in

S7]0

S4.21I

SI74

S2.I20

S770

S2.050

J3.0JO

S5.4I6

122,133

$24,719

INDIRECT

LABORS

S5.677

11.215

S7.JU

SI.M4

S5.0M

IV6J9

S3.639

$9,647

$39,307

W4.24I

TOTAL

1 ABOR S

M.IJ7

$2.005

$11.1)9

$2.440

$7.154

$5.709

$5.709

SI 5,01]

Ml, 640

$69,037

TOTAL

OOTiS

$110

$160

$220

$12

$1,613

$446

1V160

$3,712

$635

$10,479

$10,191

SUBPOOL

S

$11.125

$7,365

$11,490

$19,692

TOTAL

TASKS

$9.037

$2.165

$12,059

$2.522

$9,469

$20.194

$16,156

$15.717

$90,610

$99.627

TOTAL ESTIMATED COSTS FOR THE PROJECT

NOM; • Eitlmiltd from SECD Fin*! Work Plin (Fibnury 1993)

itg\mdniMiollind\budgMbln

TABLE 9

Waste Management - Holland Lagoons Superfund Work Plan: Project Schedule*

TASK DESCRIPTION

INITIAL ACTIVITIESWork Plan Finalization

DevelopH&S Plan

PROJECT INVESTIGATIONGeophysical Survey Oversight

Well Surveying


Groundwater Sampling Oversight

Document Review & Comment (QA/QC)

WEEKS

I 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1 0 1 1 1 2 1 3 1 4 1 5 1 6

^>-7|

1 rt *I I

««i,:o1

Note: * Estimated from SECD Final Work Plan (February 1993).

REVISED DRAFT WORK PLAN FOR TECHNICAL OVERSIGHT

Documents

Transcript of REVISED DRAFT WORK PLAN FOR TECHNICAL OVERSIGHT