Réunion PARIS 29/06/2006 QSHA WP2 Status report 1 WP2 - Source characterization and Determination...
-
date post
21-Dec-2015 -
Category
Documents
-
view
213 -
download
0
Transcript of Réunion PARIS 29/06/2006 QSHA WP2 Status report 1 WP2 - Source characterization and Determination...
QSHA WP2 Status report
1Réunion PARIS 29/06/2006
WP2 - Source characterization and Determination of earthquake scenarios
WP-2-1: Seismo-tectonic investigation
PI: Christophe Larroque, GEOAZUR and Oona Scotti, IRSN
WP-2-2: Seismic source characteristics
PI: Martin Vallée, GEOAZUR
Laboratories involved: GEOAZUR, IRSN, CEREGE
QSHA WP2 Status report
2Réunion PARIS 29/06/2006
• Identification of potentially seismically active faults
• Estimates of the kinematics (slip rate, if possible) and mechanics (fault plane solution) of the active faults
• Identification of seismotectonic zones with « homogeneous seismic potential»
• List of potential seismic scenarios to be used by ground motions modelers
Long term objectives
QSHA WP2 Status report
3Réunion PARIS 29/06/2006
Progress report ( June 2006)
13 janvier 2006: Meeting in Nice: L. Siame, O. Bellier +Géoazur
9 March 2006: Meeting in Paris: O. Scotti and C. Larroque
27 april 2006: Meeting in Nice: J. Angelier, N. Béthoux, B. Delouis, A. Deschamps, C. Larroque, M. Régnier, M. Vallée
QSHA WP2 Status report
4Réunion PARIS 29/06/2006
WP2.1 Work plan
1. Seismic scénarios for the Nice region (2006/2007)
2. Seismotectonic investigations (2006-2008)
3. Regional studies of long/short term deformation rates (2006-2008)
QSHA WP2 Status report
6Réunion PARIS 29/06/2006
WP2.1.1 Seismic scénarios for the Nice region
Actions proposed in 2006
Scénario 1: based on the magnitude, location and depth estimates deduced for the two most important historical seismic events (1887, 1564) .....................................................D. Baumont and O. Scotti
Scénario 2:For the 1887 event, an attempt will be made to calculate the focal mechanisms.............stage M2R UNSA with C. Larroque, M. Ioualalen, O. Scotti
Scénario 3: Based on the recent study of the Blausasc fault: ..............F. Courboulex, C. Larroque, A. Deschamps et C. Sansorny
Scénario 4: Based on the future study of the « Var » fault ......................................................C. Larroque + B. Delouis
QSHA WP2 Status report
7Réunion PARIS 29/06/2006
WP2.1.2 Seismotectonic investigationsActions proposed for the Nice region
in 2006
Characterizing the source of recent moderate earthquakes (Magnitude, location, depth and where possible focal mechanism)...................................................... B. Delouis
Application of a new inversion method to compute the present-day stress field – identification of the « active » fault plane through a comparison with the prevalent direction of the nearest « active » faults................................................B. Delouis, J. Angelier
Study of the quaternary stress field through a systematic analysis of alluvial and conglomeratic plio-quaternary outcrops of the Var valley and at Cap d’Ail ......................Angelier, B. Delouis, C. Larroque
Waveform analysis of moderate ligurian earthquakes..........WP2.2
QSHA WP2 Status report
8Réunion PARIS 29/06/2006
WP2.1.3 Regional long/short term deformation rate estimates
Actions proposed in 2006
Study of the relationship between
1. the plio-quaternary long term uplift of the Var valley
2. the present-day strike-slip nature of the « Var » fault
3. and the evidence for important extensive processes active up till the Pliocene
L. Siame, JC Hyppolite, G. Clauzon, O. Bellier CEREGE
B. Delouis, C. Larroque GEOAZUR
QSHA WP2 Status report
9Réunion PARIS 29/06/2006
Deliverables WP2.1
Draft of potential seismic scenarios for the city of Nice (M, distance and most likely fault plane solution) based on seismotectonic arguments.......................................2006
Draft of potentially active faults with a description of their kinematics...................................................2007/2008
Dating of terraces in the Var valley.........................2008
Identify the driving mechanism of compressional and extensional processes ( role of gravity?)......................2008
QSHA WP2 Status report
10Réunion PARIS 29/06/2006
WP2.2 Work plan
Objectives for the three years
• Depth • Focal mechanism• Source duration
of well instrumented events (M>3) of the last 10 years in the region of Nice (Southern Alps)
F. Courboulex, B. Delouis, M. Vallée, F Courboulex, A. Deschamps, M. Régnier, N. Béthoux
QSHA WP2 Status report
11Réunion PARIS 29/06/2006
WP2.2.1 Hypocentral location techniques
Beuil earthquake (M=3.8 on 2005/12/20 at 23 :57 :32.591). located (44.120°, 6.988°):
3 seismological regional arrays (TGRS, SISMALP and DISTER (Italie))
and two national arrays (RAP and RENASS).
•good azimutal coverage. •1D velocity model used for location procedure is chosen very
simple. •Hypocentral location is found very stable, with RMS 0.2 sec •Depth: 0 and 2 km. •Five stations are located less than 20 km from epicenter •The shallowness of focal depth is confirmed by a conic wave arriving first at close stations.
QSHA WP2 Status report
12Réunion PARIS 29/06/2006
WP2.2.1 Deliverable 2006+
estimate the range of likely focal depths as a function of the
location and tectonic context of the earthquakes
QSHA WP2 Status report
13Réunion PARIS 29/06/2006
WP2.2.2 (FM) Polarity analysis of direct and refracted P waves
• stations between 10 and 150 km • very dependent on the velocity model (Moho depth for refracted waves)
QSHA WP2 Status report
14Réunion PARIS 29/06/2006
WP2.2.2 (FM) Waveform-fitting-
• few close stations (accelerometers or broad band stations)• model complete wavefield (near, intermediate and far-field)• less dependent on the assumed crustal structure than Polarity analysis
QSHA WP2 Status report
15Réunion PARIS 29/06/2006
Deliverables WP2.2 2006+
extend these methods to significant past earthquakes of the regions to better constrain the most likely seismic scenarios.
Polarity analysis method will also be used more specifically for recent earthquakes recorded by OBS, in order to get better information for simulation of an offshore earthquake close to Nice
QSHA WP2 Status report
16Réunion PARIS 29/06/2006
WP2.2.3 Source duration
Using the Empiral Green function (EGF) analysis
QSHA WP2 Status report
17Réunion PARIS 29/06/2006
Deliverable WP2.2 2006+
Objectif: Thanks to the good sensitivity of the local networks
find for most of the M>3 earthquakes one or several suitable EGFs
correlate the source duration of the earthquakes with their magnitude
confront with classical scaling laws
extrapolate towards bigger magnitudes, relevant for seismic scenarios
Correlate source duration and depth/focal mechanism