Rethinking the Experiential Advantage on Consumption...
Transcript of Rethinking the Experiential Advantage on Consumption...
Rethinking the Experiential Advantage on Consumption Happiness
Joseph K. Goodman
Associate Professor of Marketing
Marketing in Israel 13
• Brittney Dalton, Washington Univ. in St Louis
• Julie Irwin, The University of Texas at Austin
• Selin Malkoc, Washington Univ. in St Louis
• Leonardo Nicolao, TCU
• Joachim Vosgerau, Tilburg University
Collaborators
What would make you happier?
What would make you happier?
The Experiential Advantage
• Experiences make people happier than “luxurious goods” or “pecuniary market objects”
(eg, Van Boven & Gilovich 2003; Easterlin 2003; Frank 1999; Scitovsky 1976; Hume 1975/1737)
• “Experience Recommendation” à We should buy experiences, not material goods
• Multiple Advantages • Less Comparable/Interchangeable (Carter & Gilovich 2010;
Rosenzweig & Gilovich 2012)
• Central to one’s identity (Carter & Gilovich 2012)
• More social (Caprariello & Reis 2013)
• Slower to adaptat (Nicolao, Irwin, & Goodman 2009)
• Do material goods have advantages?
Five Advantages to Material Purchases
1. Less extreme (in good and bad) When purchases go bad (Nicolao, Irwin, & Goodman 2009)
2. More enduring in memory Marking special achievements (Dalton, Goodman, & Malkoc)
3. Easier to justify The case of indulgence (Dalton & Goodman)
4. More traditional & require less effort The case of gift giving (Goodman)
5. Can be experienced The case of being “in the moment” (Goodman, Vosgerau, & Malkoc)
1. Material Purchases are Less Extreme
Recall a purchase that turned out positively (negatively)…
(Nicolao, Irwin, & Goodman 2009)
2.5
3
3.5
4
4.5
5
5.5
6
6.5
Negative Positive
Mea
n H
appi
ness
Material Purchase
Experiential Purchase
Five Advantages to Material Purchases
1. Less extreme (in good and bad) When purchases go bad (Nicolao, Irwin, & Goodman 2009)
2. More enduring in memory Marking special achievements (Dalton, Goodman, & Malkoc)
3. Easier to justify The case of indulgence (Dalton & Goodman)
4. More traditional & require less effort The case of gift giving (Goodman)
5. Can be experienced The case of being “in the moment” (Goodman, Vosgerau, & Malkoc)
2. Material Purchases are More Enduring
• Material goods are memory markers (Zauberman, Ratner, & Kim 2009)
• If so, what is the best way to mark a special achievement? • Celebrate (ie, an experience) • Commemorate (ie, material good)
• Commemorate à create a longer lasting memory
Wedding Study: Better to Commemorate in the Long Run
• N = 152 married U.S. Mturk workers who had a reception/ring
• Independent Variables: • Prime: Experiential (wedding reception) vs. Material
(wedding ring)
• Measured Time since wedding (log transformed)
• DVs • Memory of achievement • Purchase reminds me of achievement (mediator)
4
4.5
5
5.5
6
6.5
7
7.5
4 8 12 16 20 24
Mem
ory
of A
chie
vem
ent
Time: Years Since Married
Better Memory from Ring, not Reception
Celebrate: Reception
Commemoration: Ring
Ring is a Better Reminder of Achievement over Time
4
4.5
5
5.5
6
6.5
7
4 8 12 16 20 24
Purc
hase
is a
Rem
inde
r of
Ach
ieve
men
t
Time: Years Since Married
Celebrate: Reception
Commemoration: Ring
Commemorating Increases Positive Affect via Memory
Mediation: Significant indirect effects with bootstrapping
Stronger Memory
Commemorating (vs. Celebrating)
Reminder
What Is the Best Way to Mark an Achievement or Special Occasion?
• N = 124 U.S. Mturk workers described purchase following graduation
• Independent Variables: • Prime: Experiential vs. Material
• “Did you do (get) something to celebrate (commemorate) your graduation?”
• Measured Time since graduation (log transformed)
• Dependent Variables • Positive affect with achievement • Memory of achievement • Purchase reminds me of achievement
4.00
4.20
4.40
4.60
4.80
5.00
5.20
5.40
4 8 12 16 20 24
Vivi
d M
emor
y of
Ach
ieve
men
t
Time: Years Since Graduation
Commemoration Increased Memory over Time
Celebration
Commemoration
Commemoration is a Better Reminder of Achievement over Time
3.50
4.00
4.50
5.00
5.50
6.00
6.50
4 8 12 16 20 24 Purc
hase
is a
Rem
inde
r of A
chie
vem
ent
Time: Years Since Graduation
Celebration
Commemoration
Commemoration Increases Positive Affect over Time
4.00
4.05
4.10
4.15
4.20
4.25
4.30
4.35
4 8 12 16 20 24
Posi
tive
Affe
ct
Celebration
Commemoration
Commemorating Increases Positive Affect via Memory
Mediation: Significant indirect effects with bootstrapping
More Positive Affect
Commemorating (vs. Celebrating)
Stronger Memories Reminder
Five Advantages to Material Purchases
1. Less extreme (in good and bad) When purchases go bad (Nicolao, Irwin, & Goodman 2009)
2. More enduring in memory Marking special achievements (Dalton, Goodman, & Malkoc)
3. Easier to justify The case of indulgence (Dalton & Goodman)
4. More traditional & require less effort The case of gift giving (Goodman)
5. Can be experienced The case of being “in the moment” (Goodman, Vosgerau, & Malkoc)
3. Material Purchases are Easier to Justify
• Important when trying to indulge or looking for a “license to indulge”
• When trying to indulge, easier to justify utilitarian purchases (Kivetz & Zheng 2006; Okada, 2005; Zemack-Rugar, Bettman, & Fitzsimons)
• If so, then justification should lead to choosing more material goods
Justification à More utilitarian à Choose more material goods
Does Justifying Lead to more Material Purchases?
• Scenario: Have extra $1000 to spend from savings (bonus). What would you purchase? • N = 252 U.S. MTurk Participants
• 2(Justification vs. Control) x 2(Windfall/Bonus vs. Savings) • Justification Manipulation: We would also like you to explain to
a friend why you made this purchase
• DV: Item purchased (experiential-material) • 2 coders rated items on 5-pt scale
Yes! Justification Increases Material Purchases
More Material
More Experiential 2.2
2.4
2.6
2.8
3
3.2
3.4
Bonus Saving
No Justification Justification
Justification vs. No Justification: p < .05 Bonus vs. Savings: ns (Dalton & Goodman working paper)
Justifications to Utilitarian to Material Purchases
• 2(Justification vs Control) • N = 314 U.S. MTurk Participants
• Scenario: Have extra $100 to spend. What would you purchase?
• Measure • Utilitarian (5 items) • Hedonic (5 items) • Material-Experiential Rating: “primary intention
to acquire a material good or a life experience”
Justification Leads to Material Purchases
2.5
3
3.5
4
4.5
No Justification
Justification
More Material
More Experiential
Justification Leads to More Utilitarian Purchases (& not Hedonic)
5
5.1
5.2
5.3
5.4
5.5
5.6
5.7
No Justification Justification
Hedonic
5
5.1
5.2
5.3
5.4
5.5
5.6
5.7
5.8
5.9
No Justification Justification
Utilitarian
Utilitarian Aspects Mediates Effect, Hedonic Aspects Do Not
Bootstrapping: • Significant indirect effect via utilitarian • No indirect effect through hedonic
Material Purchase
Utilitarian Rating
Purchase Justification
Five Advantages to Material Purchases
1. Less extreme (in good and bad) When purchases go bad (Nicolao, Irwin, & Goodman 2009)
2. More enduring in memory Marking special achievements (Dalton, Goodman, & Malkoc)
3. Easier to justify The case of indulgence (Dalton & Goodman)
4. More traditional & require less effort The case of gift giving (Goodman)
5. Can be experienced The case of being “in the moment” (Goodman, Vosgerau, & Malkoc)
4. Material Purchases are Traditional & Effortless
• Being traditional and thoughtful are important considerations in gift giving literature (eg, Belk 1996)
• Givers’ gift choices should reflect traditional and thoughtfulness and thus lead to • More instances of material gifts • No difference in prediction of happiness with material
vs. experiential gifts
Are Material Gifts Different?
Characteristics Material
Gifts Experiential
Gifts t p
Traditional 3.92 3.56 2.27 0.02
Memorable 4.81 5.03 1.49 0.14
Enjoyable 5.58 5.63 0.42 0.69
Risk 2.22 2.42 1.34 0.18
Appreciate 5.84 5.89 0.48 0.63
Decision Difficulty 2.88 2.92 0.25 0.80
Giver Effort 3.29 3.41 0.68 0.49
Receiver Effort 2.06 2.89 5.58 <.01
N = 405 givers, material vs experiential between subjects
ns
But not more enjoyable
Most Gifts are Material
• N = 100 U.S Mturk workers, > 95% approval
• Recall a gift given for holidays or birthday • Rate gifts on 7-point scale
• Most are material • 81% of holiday gifts (< midpoint of 4) • 66% of birthday gifts (< midpoint of 4)
Do Receivers & Givers Show an Experiential Advantage?
" 2(Give vs. Receive) x 2(Material vs. Experiential)
between subjects N = 159 undergrads
" “…tell us about an experiential (material) gift that you gave to (received from) someone for the holidays that costs under $50”
" Happiness of Receiver (3 q’s): “When the receiver (you) thinks of this gift, how happy does it make the person you (you) gave it to?
Givers Do Not Estimate an Advantage
4.00
4.50
5.00
5.50
6.00
By Givers By Receivers
Hap
pine
ss
Happiness of Receiver
Material Gift
Experiential Gift
Do Givers Predict the Effect?
• 2(give vs. receive)
• Recall 3 gifts • Rate each in terms of happiness (same 3 measures) • Rate each on material-experiential continuum (7-pt scale) • N = 127 undergrads
• Hierarchical regression • Regression for each person based on 3 gifts (g)
Happinessg = β0 + β1(Experience/Material)g • If β1 > 0, then Experiential Advantage • If β1 < 0, then Material Advantage
Again, Experiential Advantage Only for Receivers
0.23*
-0.10
-0.30
-0.20
-0.10
0.00
0.10
0.20
0.30
0.40
By Receivers By Givers
Slop
e: E
xper
ienc
es v
s. M
ater
ial
Gift
s
Happiness of Receiver Experiences led
to more Happiness
Material led to more Happiness
Five Advantages to Material Purchases
1. Less extreme (in good and bad) When purchases go bad (Nicolao, Irwin, & Goodman 2009)
2. More enduring in memory Marking special achievements (Dalton, Goodman, & Malkoc)
3. Easier to justify The case of indulgence (Dalton & Goodman)
4. More traditional & require less effort The case of gift giving (Goodman)
5. Can be experienced The case of being “in the moment” (Goodman, Vosgerau, & Malkoc)
Some Material Purchases are “Owned”
Some Material Purchases can be “Experienced”
Experiences being “Obtained”
5. Material Purchases can be Experienced
Can Being “In the Moment” (in the “here and now”) make purchases feel more experiential?
Can Being “In the Moment” make Purchases feel more Experiential?
• 3 (Concrete, Abstract, Control) • N = 226, Mturk
• Rate 12 purchases on a material-experiential scale • eg, TV, grill, speakers, cooking class, vacation
Purchases are more Experiential when In the Moment
3.00
3.20
3.40
3.60
3.80
4.00
4.20
4.40
4.60
Concrete Abstract Control
All Purchases
Mor
e Ex
perie
ntia
l (v
s. M
ater
ial)
(Goodman, Malkoc, & Vosgerau working paper)
Does being In the Moment Enhance Happiness?
" Manipulate material vs. experiential " “…tell us about an experiential (material)
purchase you made”
" Manipulate Mental Construal: " Abstract vs Concrete
" Happiness (3 q’s from previous studies) N = 338 U.S. Mturk
Yes! In the Moment Increases Retrospective Happiness
4.20
4.40
4.60
4.80
5.00
5.20
5.40
5.60
5.80
Material Experiential
Hap
pine
ss
Concrete Abstract
Advantages of Material Purchases
1. Less extreme (in good and bad) When purchases go bad (Nicolao, Irwin & Goodman 2013)
2. More traditional & easier to consumer The case of gift giving (Goodman 2013)
3. More enduring in memory Marking special achievements (Dalton, Goodman & Malkoc 2013)
4. Easier to justify The case of indulgence (Dalton & Goodman 2013)
5. Can be experienced The case of being “in the moment” (Goodman, Vosgerau & Malkoc 2013)