Rethinking language documentation & support for the 21st century
description
Transcript of Rethinking language documentation & support for the 21st century
Rethinking language documentation & support
for the 21st century
David Nathan
Endangered Languages Archive
SOAS University of London
rethinking …
archiving preservation update what we hold access management archive model interface & navigation participation functions
documentation media spatial information & sense co-ordination
preservation update
preparation, preservationpreservation, publication
preservation update - text
plain text in Unicode (UTF8) XML, XHTML
files produced by linguistic software (e.g. .eaf files produced by ELAN)
PDF/A, ODT
MS Word
preservation update - audio
wav ogg, XX
MP3
AAC, XX
preservation update - images
TIFF PNG, BMP
JPEG (JPG), GIF
PSD, other formats
preservation update - video
MPEG4/H264/AVCHD, JPEG2000
AVI, MOV
manufacturers’ formats
rethinking what archives hold
metadocumentation images – with captions, metadata academic papers reference & teaching materials, e.g.
learners’ primers cellphone apps
may have widely sourced and well-organised data – valuable to archive!
links & relationships
rethinking archive access management
documentation can be sensitive needs a powerful but flexible access management transparency – ease of understanding use positively – social networking model
access through relationships relationships & sharing produce new
opportunities
User xx has just applied for access to restricted material in the deposit johnston2012auslan. The following message was attached to the application:
"Hello [depositor], xx here. I'm interested in having a look at some of your video deposit, including annotation files. I am working on a project documenting Central Australian Indigenous sign with yy (see http://iltyemiltyem.tumblr.com/). If ok, I'd like to see how you do the annotation - we have worked out a template and annotation protocol, but this needs a lot of refinement. Regards, MC"
Application: from depositor’s friend, re methods
This email is to inform you that user xx's application for access to restricted material in the deposit kunbarlang-389 has just been approved. The depositor included the following note to the user:
"Hi xxI've approved your access to this collection, but you should know that there is an update in the material I've just deposited, with much more information on both music and texts. I'd be happy to give you access to that when it is processed.
Next time I come to London (October or November this year) I'd be happy to meet up if you would like to discuss."
Response: further info and offer to meet
User xx has just applied for access to restricted material in the deposit cappadocian-375. The following message was attached to the application:
"Dear [depositor], I work as a research assistant in Nevsehir University in Cappadocia, Turkey. As you know, Cappadocian language has some relics in this region despite speakers of Cappadocian do not live anymore. In my university, there are few research on this subject with collaboration of Greek friends and local societies … I would like to access to your material … By the way, i would like to interview with you about Cappadocian language for our international journal of art and language. I hope you will have time for our journal . Thank you in advance."
Application: establish credentials and make request
This email is to inform you that user xx's application for access to restricted material in the deposit johnston2012auslan has just been approved. The depositor included the following note to the user:
"I am giving you user access which means you should be able to see the ELAN eaf annotation files for the topics "The boy who cried wolf" and for "The hare and the tortoise. You should also be able to see most other movies except those tagged "1a" "4a" and "5". If you cannot see the ELAN eaf annotations I hope the problem will be fixed soon. I told the ELAR team about this."
Response: approval with details and guide
rethinking the archive model
progressive archiving challenge to whole approach of documentary
linguistics
“classical” archiving
collect resources/data archive them
rethinking the archive interface
driven by providers and users, not technology contextualisation degrees of presentation navigation
rethinking archive participation
users e.g. add bookmarks, negotiate access
depositors e.g. updating and editing content negotiate access monitoring usage
collaborations exchange & share information establish groups community curation
rethinking archive functions
publishing & convergence forums for collaboration exhibition space, “guest” curators
rethinking documentation media
media capture should be more scientific audio recording to capture acoustic events
more fully and accurately video with audio: better co-ordination of
modalities/senses
Anthony Jukes