Retail Market Subcommittee June 9, 2010 Performance Measures 1st Quarter 2010 Transaction...

9
Retail Market Subcommittee June 9, 2010 Performance Measures 1st Quarter 2010 Transaction Comparison

Transcript of Retail Market Subcommittee June 9, 2010 Performance Measures 1st Quarter 2010 Transaction...

Page 1: Retail Market Subcommittee June 9, 2010 Performance Measures 1st Quarter 2010 Transaction Comparison.

Retail Market SubcommitteeJune 9, 2010

Performance Measures1st Quarter 2010

Transaction Comparison

Page 2: Retail Market Subcommittee June 9, 2010 Performance Measures 1st Quarter 2010 Transaction Comparison.

Reporting Issues

• Taken from Page 3 – Attachment A 02 – Analysis of Performance Measures Report 1Q 2010

• A reporting issue is an issue with the reporting tool, Electronic Transaction System (ETS). There is no impact with the transactions being sent to the Market Participants.

• Reporting Issue 1

• There first reporting system issue this quarter was a missed reporting impact relating to the Expedited Switch resulted in protocol calculations that were inaccurate for the Switch 814_06 (Scheduled Notification).  The protocol calculation was not changed in the ETS system.  The calculation expected the 814_06 to be sent five days prior to the scheduled date.  The process creates the transaction two days prior to scheduled date.  Each 814_06 was calculated as being out of protocol due to this reporting system issue.  This reporting issue was corrected with Emergency SIR 12518.  The SIR was implemented on February 17, 2010.  Manual calculations were made at the market level and are used in this quarter’s reports.  The impact was in figures reported in both January and February.  

• Reporting Issue 2

• As part of the analysis process, the number of 814_06 transactions reported appears to be low and could be a potential issue.  On-going analysis is being conducted to determine the accuracy of the 814_06 count in the reporting tool.  This issue potentially impacts Switch, Standard Move-In and Priority Move-In 814_06 (Scheduled Notifications to losing CR).   The percentage in protocol for the counts reported are correct.  The issue is currently under analysis.

2

Page 3: Retail Market Subcommittee June 9, 2010 Performance Measures 1st Quarter 2010 Transaction Comparison.

Variance Explanation

3

•Processing Issue 1System changes implemented on January 23 resulted in EDI transactions that were not able to be processed by market participants.  A roll-back of the code and reprocessing of transactions resulted in transactions being out of protocol.  This was most noticeable in the Standard Move-In business process 814_06 (Schedule Notification) transactions.   •Processing Issue 2On March 1st, one market participant submitted over ten thousand 814_26 (Historical Usage Request) transactions.  This is much higher than the normal volume.  The resulting 867_02 Historical Usage transactions being forwarded impacted not only the 814_26 (Ad Hoc Historical Usage Requests) but those Historical Usage Requests included in the 814_01 (Switch), 814_16 (Standard Move-In and 814_16 (Priority Move-In) transactions.  The resulting 867_02 (Historical Usage)  transactions have a four hour turn around timing that resulted in a backlog and required longer than the four hours to clear all the files through the system.     •Processing Issue 3The 814_06 Sent Pending (Schedule Notifications) transactions are to be sent by 6:00 a.m.  On March 9th, batch processing was not completed until 7:37 a.m. resulting in 1,400 Standard Move-In notifications being out of protocol.  

Page 4: Retail Market Subcommittee June 9, 2010 Performance Measures 1st Quarter 2010 Transaction Comparison.

4

Switches

PUC #36141 Performance Measures

Retail Market Subcommittee

  Q1 2010 Q4 2009

Transaction Qty % Qty %

814_01 194,756 - 175,758 -

814_02 12,964 100% 12,746 100%

814_03 181,772 100% 162,928 100%

814_04 184,434 100% 163,633 100%

814_05 180,415 100% 163,055 100%

814_06 147,862 98% 132,703 100%

814_07 121,104 99% 121,146 99%

867_02 Received 186,115 98% 162,079 99%

867_02 Sent 186,114 99% 162,040 100%

867_04 Sent 170,585 100% 162,766 100%

Page 5: Retail Market Subcommittee June 9, 2010 Performance Measures 1st Quarter 2010 Transaction Comparison.

5

Standard Move-In

PUC #36141 Performance Measures

Retail Market Subcommittee

  Q1 2010 Q4 2009

Transaction Qty % Qty %

814_16 432,825 -  450,420 - 

814_17 3,689 99% 9,550 100%

814_03 429,009 100% 441,316 100%

814_04 426,935 100% 436,557 100%

814_05 420,969 100% 434,824 99%

814_06 205,986 99% 156,183 99%

814_07 187,856 99% 194,560 99%

867_02 Received 387,636 99% 375,822 98%

867_02 Sent 387,631 99% 375,616 100%

867_04 Sent 393,115 100% 421,827 100%

Page 6: Retail Market Subcommittee June 9, 2010 Performance Measures 1st Quarter 2010 Transaction Comparison.

6

Priority Move-In

PUC #36141 Performance Measures

Retail Market Subcommittee

  Q1 2010 Q4 2009

Transaction Qty % Qty %

814_16 154,234 - 132,136 -

814_17 2,850 100% 4,123 99%

814_03 151,352 99% 127,910 99%

814_04 152,026 100% 127,287 100%

814_05 149,053 100% 126,848 99%

814_06 74,680 100% 58,837 100%

814_07 60,037 98% 50,479 99%

867_02 Received 148,593 97% 118,478 99%

867_02 Sent 148,589 99% 118,421 100%

867_04 Sent 139,826 100% 118,304 100%

Page 7: Retail Market Subcommittee June 9, 2010 Performance Measures 1st Quarter 2010 Transaction Comparison.

7

Move-Out

PUC #36141 Performance Measures

Retail Market Subcommittee

  Q1 2010 Q4 2009

Transaction Qty % Qty %

814_24 Received 346,067 - 364,652 -

814_24 Sent 239,161 100% 253,608 100%

814_25 Received 240,865 100% 254,759 100%

814_25 Sent 343,868 100% 364,370 100%

867_03 Received 294,917 - 342,150 -

867_03 Sent 294,734 100% 341,203 100%

Page 8: Retail Market Subcommittee June 9, 2010 Performance Measures 1st Quarter 2010 Transaction Comparison.

8

ESI ID Create/Maintain

PUC #36141 Performance Measures

Retail Market Subcommittee

  Q1 2010 Q4 2009

Transaction Qty % Qty %

814_20 Create 34,277 - 31,988 -

814_21 Create 34,096 100% 31,843 100%

814_20 Maintain 1,014,263 - 1,189,611 -

814_21 Maintain 1,026,886 100% 1,184,668 100%

Page 9: Retail Market Subcommittee June 9, 2010 Performance Measures 1st Quarter 2010 Transaction Comparison.

9

Questions?