Results from GPM GPROF V4 and Improvements Planned for...
Transcript of Results from GPM GPROF V4 and Improvements Planned for...
![Page 1: Results from GPM GPROF V4 and Improvements Planned for V5ipwg/meetings/bologna-2016/Bologna2016_Posters… · Changes in GPROF V5 correct implementation errors in the Tb bias correction](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022042400/5f0f4cdc7e708231d4437a49/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
GPROFV4Version 4 of the GPM radiometer algorithms were updated and deliveredin April 2016. Whereas Version 3 of the algorithm used a-prioridatabases constructed from a number of proxies such as TRMM,CloudSat, ground based radars and models, Version 4 constitutes the firstversion constructed from the GPM core satellite itself.
ConclusionsChanges in GPROF V5 correct implementation errors in the Tb bias correctionscheme, as well as dealing with precipitation known to be below the thresholdof the GPM radars. Over the remaining regimes, GPROF V5 will continue to relyon V4 of the GPM core satellite products for its a-priori database. Threerelatively simple but important changes highlighted above are beingimplemented for Version 5. More difficult changes related to convectivestructures over land; Convective/Stratiform separation and improved snowfallretrievals are being deferred to future versions.• .
GPROFV4Validation
Over land, a database using the DPR-Ku radar for the a-priori databaseshowed significantly better agreement with surface observations. Based onthese early result the Combined Radar/Radiometer product is used as thebasis for a-priori rainfall products over oceans, while DPR-Ku is used overland.
EarlyImplementationThefirstinternalversionofGPROFusedtheCombinedDPR/GMIalgorithm(CMB)asabasisforthea–prioridatabaseeverywhere.TheprofilesfromthecombinedalgorithmweremodifiedslightlytoleadtobetteragreementwiththeGMIhighfrequencychannelswhichwerenotpartofthecombinedalgorithmoptimizationprocess.ResultsfromGMIcanbeseentofollowtheCombinedalgorithmquitewellbutdifferenceswerenoticesagainstvalidationfromgaugesandMRMS
GPCCGauges
MRMS
GPROF/CMB
GPROF/DPR-Ku
-90
-60
-30
0
30
60
90
0 2 4 6 8 10
La#tude
mm/day
ANNUALSNOWFALLMERRASnowSep14-Aug15
ERASnowSep14-Aug15
-90
-60
-30
0
30
60
90
0 2 4 6 8 10
La#tude
mm/day
ANNUALRAINFALLMERRARainSep14-Aug15
ERARainSep14-Aug15
-90
-60
-30
0
30
60
90
0 2 4 6 8 10
La#tude
mm/day
ANNUALTOTALPRECIPITATIONMERRATotalPrecipSep14-Aug15
ERATotalPrecipSep14-Aug15
Global LandGMI – BlueCMB MS – GreenKu – RedDPR MS - Orange
GMI – BlueCMB MS – GreenKu – RedDPR MS - Orange
GlobalGMI – BlueCMB MS – GreenKu – RedDPR MS - Orange
LandGMI – BlueCMB MS – GreenKu – RedDPR MS - Orange
GPROFGMIV4followstheCombinedalgorithm(CMBMS)overoceansandDPR-Ku(Ku)overlandquitewell.
Comparedtothepre-launchalgorithm(Version3),Version4showssignificantlybetteragreementwithGPCCraingaugeaccumulations.WhileV3wassignificantlylowbiasedagainstgauges,Version4tendstobewithin10-20%.
CorrelationsagainstinstantaneousrainratesfromMRMSshowartifactswiththeVersion4productthatwerenottherepreviously.Theartifactisduetoanerrorinabias-adjustmentintendedtoeliminatethebiasbetweencomputedandobservedTbinthea-prioridatabase.
ComparisonsagainstMRMSfortemperatureslessthan270K(assumedtobesnow)alsorevealsubstantialunderestimationbyGPROFV4.ThiscanbetracedbacktomissingsnowintheKuradarproductwhichisnotsensitivetolightsnow.
AnunderestimationisalsoseenathighlatitudeoceanswhencomparedtoGPCPorMERRA.Theunderestimationisagainduetotheradar’sinabilitytodetectlightdrizzleknowntooccurintheselocations
GPROFV5Preparation
Theartifactsinthecorrelationplothavebeenresolvedbyfixingtheerrorinthecode.Forlandpixel,biasagainstMRMSis+6.8%withcorrelationof0.58.Snowisincludedinthisplot.
ThemissingsnownotseenbyKuradarhasbeenaddressedbyusinggroundbasedradar(MRMS)overtheUnitedStatestogetherwithcoincidentsatelliteoverpassesfor2yearstoconstructanewempiricaldatabaseasafunctionoftemperatureandhumidity.Itisappliedonlytosnowcoveredsurfaces.BiasesarereducedalthoughoverallskillofGPROFisstilllimited.
Overoceans,CloudSatprobabilitiesofprecipitationhavebeenusedtodetermineacloudwaterthresholdinanon-rainingGMIonlyretrieval.PrecipitationwillbeaddedtothesepixelstominimizedifferencesbetweenobservedandsimulatedTb.RainfallisconstrainedtobelessthanthatobservedbytheGPM.Thisstephasnotbeenimplemented.
ResultsfromGPMGPROFV4andImprovementsPlannedforV5ChristianKummerow,DavidRandel andVeljko PetkovicColoradoStateUniversity,FortCollins,USAe-mail: [email protected]
GPROFV5withMRMSSnowdatabaseTemp<270K
MRMSPrecipitationTemp<270K
GPROF2014UnifiedAlgorithmStructure
PreProcessor(sensorspecific)
Standardinputfile
SpacecraftpositionPixelLocation,TbsPixelTime,EIAChanFreqs &Errors
GPROFPrecipitationAlgorithm
L1CSensorDataSurface&EmissivityClassesECMWF/GANALT2m,TPWAutosnowSnowCoverReynoldsSea-Ice
AncillaryInfo/Datasets
SensorProfileDatabase
CompleteHDF5Outputfile
Post-processor(BinarytoHDF5)
A-PrioriMatchedProfiles- GMI/DPR
JMAforecast- NRTGANAL- Standard
ECMWF- Climatology
ModelPreparation
DenotesProcessesrunningattheSIPS
GPROFV4;Temp<270K GPROFV5;Temp<270K