Response of the Antarctic ice sheet to increased ice-shelf oceanic melting

12
Response of the Antarctic ice sheet to increased ice-shelf oceanic melting David Pollard Pennsylvania State University Robert DeConto University of Massachusetts GFDL Ocean Climate Model Development Meeting, October 28-30, 2009

description

Response of the Antarctic ice sheet to increased ice-shelf oceanic melting. David Pollard Pennsylvania State University Robert DeConto University of Massachusetts. GFDL Ocean Climate Model Development Meeting, October 28-30, 2009. Ice velocities across the grounding line… - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Transcript of Response of the Antarctic ice sheet to increased ice-shelf oceanic melting

Page 1: Response of the Antarctic ice sheet to increased ice-shelf oceanic melting

Response of the Antarctic ice sheet to increased ice-shelf oceanic melting

David PollardPennsylvania State University

Robert DeContoUniversity of Massachusetts

GFDL Ocean Climate Model Development Meeting, October 28-30, 2009

Page 2: Response of the Antarctic ice sheet to increased ice-shelf oceanic melting

Grounding-Line Retreat Instability

in 1000+ years?

?

in 100 years?BA

B

B

grounding line retreat

B A

ice interior

Ice velocities across the grounding line…

- are slowed by ice-shelf buttressing

- increase strongly with g.l. depth

So, if ice-shelf buttressing is lost, and the bed deepens upstream...then possibility of runaway retreat !

Weertman (1976, Nature); Mercer (1978, Nature); Schoof (2007, JGR)

Ross Ice Shelf

Pine Island & Thwaites

glaciers

Ronne Ice Shelf

Page 3: Response of the Antarctic ice sheet to increased ice-shelf oceanic melting

Outline

1. 3-D ice sheet-shelf model

2. Last 5 Myr, vs. ANDRILL record

3. Same model run into future O(103) years

- Prescribed sub-ice-shelf oceanic melting WAIS retreat?

- Other variations added

Page 4: Response of the Antarctic ice sheet to increased ice-shelf oceanic melting

Predicts ice thickness, temperature, bedrock elevation. 40 km grid size. Follows standard model lineage…

PLUS:

1) Hybrid combination of the 2 scaled equations for shearing (grounded interior) and stretching (floating/stream) ice flow

2) C. Schoof’s (2007,JGR) parameterization of flux across grounding lines (qg). Allows realistic grounding-line migration and ice-shelf buttressing

3) Simple parameterizations of forcings: - sea level - surface mass balance and temperature - sub-ice-shelf oceanic melt rate

Features in ice sheet-shelf model

qg

qgice

bedocean

Page 5: Response of the Antarctic ice sheet to increased ice-shelf oceanic melting

2. Last 5 million years

Page 6: Response of the Antarctic ice sheet to increased ice-shelf oceanic melting

ANtarctic geological DRILLing program

ANDRILLMIS

0

2

1

3

4

5

Depth(mbsf)

Approx. Age (Ma)

MIS core, upper 600m (last ~5 Myr)

• WAIS has been dynamic, advancing and retreating on ~40 kyr obliquity cycles

• Long-term trends:

- Modern glacials, 1 to 0 Ma

- Cooling transition, 3 to 1.5 Ma

- Warmest in early Pliocene, extended interglacials, 5 to 3.5 Ma

Main Results

Naish et al., Nature, 2009

Yellow = diatomite (open ocean)

Green = glacial till (grounded ice)

Grey = mud/silt/sand (ice nearby)

Orange = volcanic

photo: C. Millan

Page 7: Response of the Antarctic ice sheet to increased ice-shelf oceanic melting

Pollard and DeConto, Nature, 2009

Lisiecki and Raymo, Paleoceanogr., 2005

MODEL OUTPUT: total Antarctic ice volume

FORCING: benthic 18O

Model Antarctic ice volume, last 5 million years

Pleistocene WAIS collapses

Closest model grid point and ANDRILL core agree:

• ~5 to 3 Ma: Long periods with open ocean

• ~3 to 1 Ma: Cooling trend

• ~1 to 0 Ma: Current glacial cycles

MODEL OUTPUT: total Antarctic ice volume

ANDRILL MIS core:

Naish et al., Nature, 2009

pink = floating ice

shelves

~Modern

Super-Interglacials

Glacial maxima

Page 8: Response of the Antarctic ice sheet to increased ice-shelf oceanic melting

3. Next few thousand years

Page 9: Response of the Antarctic ice sheet to increased ice-shelf oceanic melting

Sources of sub-ice-shelf water depend on larger-scale circulation –

(Circumpolar Deep Water CDW, and High Salinity Shelf Water HSSW)

Circulation under ice shelves is an active research area with Regional Ocean Models –

(Dinniman, Galton-Fenzi, Hollands, Jenkins, Makinson, Little, Walker, et al!)

Sub-ice-shelf oceanic melt – most important future forcing

Beckmann and Goosse, Ocn. Model., 2003

Page 10: Response of the Antarctic ice sheet to increased ice-shelf oceanic melting

For now, we simply prescribe sudden increases in oceanic melt rates, from modern [.1,5,5] m/yr …but to what?

Modern ocean melt rates = [.1,5,5], where

.1 = protected shelf (most important)

5 = exposed shelf

5 = deep ocean areas

Overpeck et al., Science, 2006.Ocean T, 100m and 200 m, 2100 and 2130 AD

sub-ice melt increase per nearby ocean T, for large shelves (Beckmann and Goose, 2003)

x 2 m y-1 A-OGCM future warming x “empirical” coefficient:

0.4 m y-1 / oC

Page 11: Response of the Antarctic ice sheet to increased ice-shelf oceanic melting

Nested domain over West Antarctica

Continental Antarctica, 20 km grid Nested WAIS, 10 km grid

Page 12: Response of the Antarctic ice sheet to increased ice-shelf oceanic melting

Future WAIS summary

• Given plausible future increases in sub-ice-shelf ocean

melting, central WAIS is likely to collapse

• Time scale of collapse depends on magnitude of sub-ice ocean melt:

- 2 m/yr ~3000 years, m/yr ~300 years

- What future melt rates for the major ice shelves?

… Will need Regional Ocean Models and GCMs for projections.

… Different rates for different embayments? ~40 m/yr for PIG-THG!

• Test with next generation higher-order higher-resolution ice models!

0 yr 300 or 3000 yr?

Rignot and Jacobs, Science, 2002

Large melt rates are already observed under smaller shelves!