Response of Organically Managed Crops to Struvite Fertilizer · 2019. 10. 23. · v Struvite has...
Transcript of Response of Organically Managed Crops to Struvite Fertilizer · 2019. 10. 23. · v Struvite has...
v Field studies were conducted in 2017-2018 near Libau, Manitoba, under organic management
v Selected soil properties:§ Soil pH, 8.0–8.2; Olsen P, 2–3 mg kg-1
v Experimental design: RCBD with four replicationsv Treatments: Unamended control, plus three rates of
commercial struvite fertilizer:§ Wheat and flax studies: 20, 30, 40 kg P ha-1
§ Alfalfa-grass forage study: 30, 60, 90 kg P ha-1
v Field operations and management outlined in Table 1v Statistical analysis: One-way ANOVA using Proc
GLIMMIX of SAS; mean separation using Tukey’s test (! = 0.05).
Response of Organically Managed Crops to Struvite Fertilizer
Backgroundv Available soil phosphorus (P) often becomes depleted in Canadian prairie
organic cropping systems.1v Struvite (NH4MgPO4-6H2O) recovered from municipal wastewater is
gaining attention as a slow-release P fertilizer that helps close the global P cycle and is being considered for use in organic systems.
v Crop response to struvite may be poor in high-pH soils due to low solubility.2
v Struvite has not been tested in organically managed grain or forage crops in Canadian prairie soil and climate conditions.
Figure 2. Forage biomass and tissue P concentration of alfalfa-grass in each of four hay cuts in 2017–2018, following addition of differing rates of struvite fertilizer in the spring of 2017.
Figure 3. Control (left) and 90 kg P ha-1 (right) treatments at time of “Cut 2” sampling in August 2018, 15 months after struvite application.
Control 30 kg P ha-1 60 kg P ha-1 90 kg P ha-1
A
B
Materials and Methods
v Organic grain crops exhibited inconsistent responses to struvite addition in this low-P, high-pH soil.
v Struvite was an effective P source for organic alfalfa-grass forage in this low-P, high-pH soil.
Conclusions
v Struvite addition increased grain yield of organically grown spring wheat (1 of 2 years), but not flax.
v Struvite addition increased alfalfa-grass forage biomass and tissue P concentration over two years.
Wheat Grain Yieldv In 2017, wheat yield did not respond to struvite addition (Fig. 1A)v In 2018, all struvite treatments out-yielded the control (Fig. 1A); wheat
yield was greatest where the highest rate of struvite was applied.
Flax Grain Yieldv Flax yield was not affected by struvite application in either year (Fig. 1B)
Alfalfa-Grass Biomass Productionv Forage biomass production in struvite treatments was greater than the
control at all sampling dates except 2017 Cut 1 (Fig. 2A). v In 2018, forage biomass in the medium and high struvite rate treatments
was greater relative to the low struvite rate treatment (Fig. 2A; Fig. 3).
Alfalfa-Grass P Concentrationv Forage P concentration increased with the high rate of struvite application
at 3 out of 4 sampling dates (Fig. 2B).
1 Knight, et al. 2010. Can. J. Soil Sci. 90: 667-678.2 Degryse et al. 2017. Plant Soil 410: 139-152.
Highlights
To evaluate the agronomic response of organically managed grain and forage crops to differing rates of struvite fertilizer addition in a low-P, high-pH soil.
Next Stepsv Repeat wheat and flax experiments in 2019, assessing biomass
production, tissue P concentration and yield.v Monitor alfalfa-grass biomass production and tissue P in 2019 to
assess the duration of the response to struvite addition. v Additional measurements in all 2018 and 2019 experiments:
§ Soil P fractions as determined by various P extractions, to determine fate of struvite P in soil
§ Mycorrhizal colonization of crop roots; relationships among AMF, rate of P addition and soil P fractions
v Calculate P use efficiency indices for all experiments.v Investigate the role of differing plant P acquisition mechanisms in
struvite P mobilization and uptake.
References
This study was funded by Ostara Nutrient Recovery Technologies. Ongoing research is funded by the Organic Science Cluster 3 under the AgriScienceProgram of Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada’s Canadian Agricultural Partnership, with support from Ostara Nutrient Recovery Technologies.
Acknowledgements
Joanne Thiessen Martens1, Kimberley Schneider1, Francis Zvomuya1 and Martin Entz2
1Department of Soil Science, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg MB; 2Department of Plant Science, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg MB
Presenting author email: [email protected]
0
0.5
1
1.5
2
2.5
3
2017, Cut 1 2017, Cut 2 2018, Cut 1 2018, Cut 2
g kg
-1
Alfalfa-Grass Forage Tissue P Concentration
P = 0.004 P = 0.051 P < 0.0001 P = 0.014
bb
aba a a a
a
c ba a
bab
aab
0
1000
2000
3000
4000
5000
6000
2017, Cut 1 2017, Cut 2 2018, Cut 1 2018, Cut 2
kg h
a-1
Alfalfa-Grass Forage Biomass
P < 0.0001 P < 0.0001P = 0.070 P = 0.001
a a aa
b
a a ac
b
a a
cb
a a
Figure 1. Grain yield of wheat and flax in separate field trials in 2017 and 2018, following addition of differing rates of struvite fertilizer.
0
1000
2000
3000
4000
5000
2017 2018
kg h
a-1
Wheat Grain Yield
a a aa b ba
c
P < 0.0001P = 0.25
0
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
2017 2018
kg h
a-1
Flax Grain Yield
a a aaa a aa
P = 0.18 P = 0.10
Control 20 kg P ha-1 30 kg P ha-1 40 kg P ha-1
Results
Table 1. Field operations and management in wheat, flax and alfalfa-grass studies.Wheat, Flax (2017, 2018) Alfalfa-Grass (2017–2018)
Establishment Seeded and struvite applied in mid-May, 2017 & 2018
Struvite applied to established forage stand in mid-May 2017
Struvite application
Banded with seed in the seed-row
Banded approx. 2.5 cm deep, 15 cm spacing
Management Mechanical weed control when required (2017 only)
Forage cut for hay in early July and late August and removed from plots
Measurements Grain yield, collected with plot combine (wheat; flax 2017) or by hand-harvesting (flax 2018)
Above-ground biomass samples collected prior to each hay cut to determine forage productivity and tissue P concentration
A BResults, continued
Study Objective