Responding to Climate Change - Driving Ohio Forward
-
Upload
greencitybluelake-institute -
Category
Technology
-
view
438 -
download
3
description
Transcript of Responding to Climate Change - Driving Ohio Forward
1
Responding to climate change in
Northeast Ohio
November 2009
2
Who we are
• Sustainability center at the Cleveland Museum of Natural History
• Connecting cities and nature
• Climate change planning for Northeast Ohio
• Services tocommunity – website,speakers, projectsponsorship, technicalassistance
3
• Event calendar
• Sustainability news and project updates
• Climate change plans and actions
www.gcbl.orgOnline home for sustainability
in Northeast Ohio
4
Climate change 101
5
What we know
• The Earth is warming and the climate is changing
• Scientific consensus that climate change is caused by unprecedented, human generated emissions of greenhouse gases, mainly from the burning of fossil fuels and deforestation
• Melting glaciers and ice caps, acidifying oceans, more extreme weather events (droughts, floods, heat waves), changing growing seasons, rising sea levels, more widespread disease
Source: IPCC AR4 Synthesis Report
6
Projected local impacts
• Continued changes in growing seasons
• Lower lake levels due to increased evaporation results from the decrease in lake ice
• More frequent, severe, and longer heat waves
• Disease carrying insects will survive and thrive easier in a warmer climate (ticks and mosquitoes)
• Wetter winters and springs, with more heavy downpours
• Longer periods between rainfalls
Sources: U.S. Global Change Research Program and Union of Concerned Scientists
7
GCBL climate change activities
• Regional CO2
emissions inventory
• Detailed transition plans– Energy Generation
– Transportation
– Buildings
• Toolkits for taking action– Individuals
– Schools
– Business
– Communities
Resource link
8
CMNH climate change research• Ohio long-term butterfly monitoring project
– CMNH Invertebrate Zoology, ODNR and Ohio
Lepidopterists
• Ohio bird migration tracking project
• Ohio natural areas preservation and monitoring– 4600+ acres
Resource link
9
Carbon budgeting
10
Qatar
(55.5)Kuwait
(30.7)Texas
(29.5)Ohio
(24.7)U.S.
(19.9)
Metric tons CO2e per person in 2005
Mic
higa
n (1
9.4)
Cal
iforn
ia (1
1.0)
New
Yor
k (1
1.0)
Japa
n (9
.8)
UK (8.
9)EU
27
(8.4
)C
hina
(5.
5)B
razi
l (1.
9)In
dia
(1.1
)
Source: CAIT (WRI)
Global perspective
11
Average Clevelander
2009 TOTAL
29 MT CO2
Housing12 MT CO2
2030 TOTAL
14.5 MT CO2
(50% reduction)
2050 TOTAL
2.9 MT CO2
(90% reduction)
Transport8 MT CO2 Food
3 MT CO2
Goods3 MT CO2
Services3 MT CO2
Source: Cleveland Carbon Fund
A local perspective
12
ExplorerOutback
2030 TARGET
Large home (2,500-4,000 SF)
Medium home
(1,500-2,499 SF)
Apartment(<1,000 SF)
Sydney
Avg. energy use in a...
Roundtrip flight from CLE to...
Hong Kong
London
Los Angeles
New York City
Hummer
Civic
Prius
15,000 miles in a...
Carbon budgeting
Mad meat
eater
Avg. American
VegetarianVegan
2050 TARGET
Resource link
Resource link for flight, home, auto
13
, ,
Transportation Transportation
BuildingsBuildings
Electricity
Electricity
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
2005 2050 2050
Mil
lio
n T
on
s C
O2
7-County CO2 emissions
Business as usual (BAU) assumptions: flat population growth rate, no growth in Vehicle Miles Traveled (VMT), does not include CAFE standards,
.8% y-o-y growth in electricity demand
Business as usual
Energy
generation transitionplan
Transportation transition plan
Buildingstransition plan
90% reduction
CO2 reductions in Northeast Ohio
Baseline
Resource link
14
Transportation Sector Transition
15
Transportation SectorHow do we accomplish reductions?
-16,142,64690%-8,968,13750%Total CO2 Reductions
896,814
896,814
5,380,882
1,793,627
Tons CO2
Reduced
5%
10%
50%
25%
Potential CO2
Reductions
20502030
896,8145%Align costs of externalities with end users
4
3
2
1
1,793,6275%Reduce CO2 intensity of fuel sources
8,968,13730%Increase efficiency of vehicles
4,484,06810%Reduce number of vehicles and need to travel
Tons CO2
Reduced
Potential CO2
Reductions
Transportation Strategies
16
1. Retrofit and Renovate: Energy Efficient Products
Buildings Scenario 4.1
2. New Construction: Aggressive Energy Reductions
• “Green” suburban home uses more energy on average than non-green urban home
• Significantly less transportation energy required for urban homes on average
3. Educate and
4.1.2 LEED 4.1 Zoning and Planning to Support Grid Development 4.2 Energy Star4.3
4. Efficient Land Use Planning
17
1. Retrofit and Renovate: Energy Efficient Products
Buildings Scenario 4.1
2. New Construction: Aggressive Energy Reductions
• Population 1.4 million and rising
• Grid development pattern
3. Educate and
4.1.2 LEED 4.1 Zoning and Planning to Support Grid Development 4.2 Energy Star4.3
4. Efficient Land Use Planning
Developed LandCuyahoga County (1948)
18
1. Retrofit and Renovate: Energy Efficient Products
Buildings Scenario 4.1
2. New Construction: Aggressive Energy Reductions
• Population 1.4 million and declining
• Disconnected development pattern
3. Educate and
4.1.2 LEED 4.1 Zoning and Planning to Support Grid Development 4.2 Energy Star4.3
4. Efficient Land Use Planning
Developed LandCuyahoga County (2002)
19
Transportation Scenario 1.2
2. Increase Efficiency3. Reduce CO2 in Fu
1.1 Land Use
4. Extern1. Reduce Number of Vehicles and Need to Travel
• NOACA and AMATS MPOs have adopted climate change language in LRTPs
• ODOT 21st Century Priorities Task Force
• Plans are largely done, challenge exists to set, trackand implement meaningful metrics (VMT reduction, CO2 reduction, mode splits)
• Complete Streets policies one “easy” solution to start with
1.2 Align Long Range Transportation Plans 1.3 Decrease 1.4
20
Transportation Scenario 1.3
2. Increase Efficiency3. Reduce CO2 in Fu
1.1 Land Use 1.4
4. Extern1. Reduce Number of Vehicles and Need to Travel
U.S. Population and Vehicle Miles Traveled, 1982-2006
Source: Bailey, et.al, “The Broader Connection
between Public Transportation, Energy Conservation
and Greenhouse Gas Reduction,” February 2008,
www.apta.com/research/info/online/documents/land_
use.pdf
• VMT rate of growth is slowing, and declined in 2008
• Many regional and state plans use VMT growth rate of 1 to 2% per year in planning vs. a flat or declining VMT
1.2 Align Long Range1.3 Decrease Per Capita VMT by 30%
21
1.5
Transportation Scenario 1.4
2. Increase Efficiency3. Reduce CO2 in Fu
1.1 Land Use
4. Extern1. Reduce Number of Vehicles and Need to Travel
• Transit is more efficient mode in most situations
• Won’t work for everyone, but small percentage increases in ridership and trip share have significant impacts on CO2 emissions, congestion
1.2 Align Long Range1.3 Decrease Per Capita VMT by 30%1.4 Improve Access, Availability and Efficiency of Public Transit
22
Transportation Scenario 1.6
2. Increase Efficiency3. Reduce CO2 in Fu
1.1 Land Use
4. Extern1. Reduce Number of Vehicles and Need to Travel
• Single Occupancy Vehicle travel is increasing
• Public transit and carpooling % decreasing
• What does 2010, 2020 mode split look like?
• What do we need/want it to be?
1.2 Align Long Range1.3 Decrease Per Capita VMT by 30%1.4 1.5 1.6 Increase Mode Shift to Bikes, Walking, Transit
23
Transportation Scenario 1.6
Distance to Work
3%
20%
20%
29%
10%
6%
1%
3%
8%
3%
24%
23%
30%
8%
3%
0%
2%
6%
0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30% 35%
Less than 1 mile
1 to 4 miles
5 to 9 miles
10 to 19 miles
20 to 29 miles
30 to 49 miles
50 miles or more
Works at home
No f ixed place of w ork
City of Cleveland
Cleveland PMSA
2. Increase Efficiency3. Reduce CO2 in Fu
1.1 Land Use
4. Extern1. Reduce Number of Vehicles and Need to Travel
1.2 Align Long Range1.3 Decrease Per Capita VMT by 30%1.4 1.5 1.6 Increase Mode Shift to Bikes, Walking, Transit
Time to Work
29%
37%
15%
5%
2%
0%
3%
8%
0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30% 35% 40%
Less than 15 minutes
15 to 29 minutes
30 to 44 minutes
45 to 59 minutes
1 hour to 1 hour and 29 minutes
1 hour 30 minutes or more
Works at home
No fixed place of work
• Travel time and distance play key roles in shifting modes
24
Transportation Scenario 1.6
2. Increase Efficiency3. Reduce CO2 in Fu
1.1 Land Use
4. Extern1. Reduce Number of Vehicles and Need to Travel
1.2 Align Long Range1.3 Decrease Per Capita VMT by 30%1.4 1.5 1.6 Increase Mode Shift to Bikes, Walking, Transit
Cleveland PMSA Principal Means of Transportation to Work
84%
7%
4%
0%
0%
2%
0%
3%
60%
14%
10%
0%
5%
5%
0%
6%
36%
18%
15%
0%
8%
8%
0%
15%
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90%
Drives self
Carpool
Mass Transportation
Taxicab
Bicycle or motorcycle
Walks only
Other means
Works at home 205020302004
25
1. Reduce Number of Vehicles and Need to Travel
Transportation Scenario 2.1
2.1 National Efficiency Standards
2. Increase Efficiency of Remaining Vehicles 3. Reduce CO2 Inten
2.2 Smaller Vehicles 2.3 Hybrids
2005 MPG Emissions Factors
Vehicle Mix % # vehicles Avg.
MPG
ANNUAL VMT
Total
Gasonline
Consumption
(Gallons)
Gasoline CO2
Emissions Factor
(lbs/CO2 per Gal)
Lbs/CO2
Short Tons
CO2
(1=2000lbs)Full Size Auto 7.5% 201,726 17 2,200,292,362 129,428,962 20.71 2,680,344,384 1,340,172
Mid Size Auto 17.0% 457,246 20 4,987,329,354 249,366,468 20.71 5,164,130,180 2,582,065
Sub Compact/Compact 27.1% 728,904 25 7,950,389,735 318,015,589 20.71 6,585,784,841 3,292,892Hybrid cars 0.5% 13,448 40 146,686,157 3,667,154 20.71 75,943,091 37,972
Biodiesel cars 0.5% 13,448 40 146,686,157 3,667,154 20.71 75,943,091 37,972
Plug-in hybrid 0.5% 13,448 52 146,686,157 2,820,888 20.71 58,417,762 29,209Electric cars 0.0% 0 60 0 0 20.71 0 0
Light-duty trucks / SUV 46.5% 1,250,702 14 13,641,812,645 974,415,189 20.71 20,179,164,148 10,089,582Motorcycle (2WV) 0.4% 10,759 25 117,348,926 4,693,957 20.71 97,211,850 48,606
TOTAL 100.0% 2,689,682 29,337,231,495 1,686,075,361 20.71 34,916,939,347 17,458,470
UtlizationUnits
2030 MPG Emissions Factors
Vehicle Mix % # vehicles Avg.
MPG
ANNUAL VMT
Total
Gasonline
Consumption
(Gallons)
Gasoline CO2
Emissions Factor
(lbs/CO2 per Gal)
Lbs/CO2
Short Tons
CO2
(1=2000lbs)Full Size Auto 7.5% 201,726 25 2,200,292,362 88,011,694 20.71 1,822,634,181 911,317
Mid Size Auto 17.0% 457,246 28 4,987,329,354 178,118,906 20.71 3,688,664,414 1,844,332
Sub Compact/Compact 27.1% 728,904 35 7,950,389,735 227,153,992 20.71 4,704,132,029 2,352,066Hybrid cars 0.5% 13,448 45 146,686,157 3,259,692 20.71 67,504,970 33,752
Biodiesel cars 0.5% 13,448 45 146,686,157 3,259,692 20.71 67,504,970 33,752
Plug-in hybrid 0.5% 13,448 52 146,686,157 2,820,888 20.71 58,417,762 29,209Electric cars 0.0% 0 60 0 0 20.71 0 0
Light-duty trucks / SUV 46.5% 1,250,702 23 13,641,812,645 593,122,289 20.71 12,282,969,481 6,141,485Motorcycle (2WV) 0.4% 10,759 25 117,348,926 4,693,957 20.71 97,211,850 48,606
TOTAL 100.0% 2,689,682 29,337,231,495 1,100,441,111 20.71 22,789,039,658 11,394,520
34.73%
UtlizationUnits
26
What you can do
27
What you can do at home
• Calculate your carbon footprint – set priorities
• Change light bulbs
• Drive less
• Reduce, reuse, recycle (and compost)
• Use less water
• Eat lower on the food chain
• Adjust your thermostat
First steps to a low-carbon lifestyle…
Resource link
28
What you can do in your community
• Encourage mayor to sign Mayors Climate
Protection Agreement
• Support
– Renewable energy use and energy efficiency
– Walkable neighborhoods
– Transportation choices –transit, bikes
– “First steps” – recycling, composting
Resource link
29
Support complete streets
• What do we want the Innerbelt Bridge to look like?
30
• Calculate your impact
• Learn how to reduce
• Donate to local projects
http://www.ClevelandCarbonFund.org
Cleveland Carbon Fund
31
• Save money and become more efficient
• Innovate and become more competitive
• Create thousands of jobs in Ohio
• Improve health
• Rebuild our cities
• Protect natural areas and wildlife
Benefits of a clean energy future
32
GreenCityBlueLake InstituteThe Cleveland Museum of Natural Historyhttp://www.gcbl.org/climatechange
Brad [email protected]
© 2009 Cleveland Museum of Natural History