Resistance-associated and fitness-associated substitutions...
Transcript of Resistance-associated and fitness-associated substitutions...
Resistance-associated and fitness-associated substitutions on NS3,
NS5A and NS5B genes in real-life HCV positive patient
failed to 3D therapy
Nadia Marascio, PhD
“Magna Graecia” University, Catanzaro, Italy June 8, 2017
Session 1: Hepatitis C Resistance
NO adverse events were reported
during and until the end of therapy
Adherence was good
HCV RNA viral load was determined by Cobas AmpliPrep/Cobas TaqMan HCV test v2.0
(Roche Diagnostics, Milan, Italy) (quantification range 15 to 100 million IU/mL)
Time (week)
HC
V R
NA
vir
al lo
ad (
IU/m
l)
3D – R therapy (12 weeks) therapy failure
0
1000000
2000000
3000000
4000000
5000000
6000000
7000000
8000000
start week 4 end of treatment SVR12 follow up
TND
baseline
week 12 after treatment
week 32 after treatment
1. Could have we foreseen failure from basic clinical and virological
features?
2. Was this a relapse or a reinfection?
3. What drugs could we use?
4. Should we treat with drugs currently available or better wait?
Questions
Patient characteristics
• 65 year old man, HCV1b positive
• not co-infected with HIV or HBV
• naïve to all HCV treatments
• AST 36U/ml / ALT 65U/l
• liver stiffness 10.5 kPa (F3 according to Metavir scoring system)
• type 2 diabetes
• No cryoglobulinemia
• risk factors: surgery before 90’s.
April, 2016
(adapted from EASL Recommendations on Treatment of Hepatitis C 2016)
One tablet contains ombitasvir 12.5 mg/ paritaprevir 75 mg/ritonavir 50 mg (2 tablets
once daily). The other tablet contains dasabuvir 250 mg (1 tablet twice daily) (EASL 2016)
3D therapy without ribavirin
Treatment outcome with 3D in HCV1b naive patients
without cirrhosis
(adapted from Hussaini T. 2016)
1. Could have we foreseen failure from basic clinical and virological
features?
2. Was this a relapse or a reinfection?
3. What drugs could we use?
4. Should we treat with drugs currently available or better wait?
Questions
Serum samples
at different time points
Population sequencing (ABI PRISM 3500 genetic analyzer Applied Biosystems)
cut-off for substitutions detection > 15% (clinically significant right now)
Phylogenetic analysis
Neighbour-Joining (NJ) under Tamura–Nei (TN) model, generating 1000 bootstrap replicates (MEGA v.5)
Subtyping determination
Bioafrica Oxford HCV v.2.0 and COMET HCV subtyping tools
Methods workflow
HCV genome
5’ 3’
NS3 c E1 E2 P7 NS2 NS4A NS4B
NS5A NS5B
Figure 1. NS3_NS5A_NS5B concatenate regions NJ tree was reconstructed under TN model with 1000 bootstraps replicates.
Genetic distance is at the bottom.
100
HCV1b
100
100
0.03
High
bootstrap support
1. Could have we foreseen failure from basic clinical and virological
features?
2. Was this a relapse or a reinfection?
3. What drugs could we use?
4. Should we treat with drugs currently available or better wait?
Questions
3D therapy is a fixed-dose tablet comprising NS3/4A protease inhibitor, ritonavir (to
boost paritaprevir exposure), NS5A inhibitor and NS5B polymerase inhibitor with or
without ribavirin.
5’ 3’
NS3 c E1 E2 P7 NS2 NS4A NS4B
paritaprevir target
NS5A NS5B
ombitasvir target
dasabuvir target
HCV genome
Virologic failure in HCV1b positive patients who do not achieve
SVR was related to RASs selection to one or more of 3 DAAs
NS3 paritaprevir
RASs
NS5A ombitasvir
RASs
NS5B dasabuvir
RASs
56H
168A/V/H/E/T/Y
28M/T
31F 93H
316Y
414I/T 556G/R
(Feld J.J. et al., 2014; Zeuzem S. et al. 2014; Pilot-Matias et al. 2015; Krishnan et al. 2015; Kati
et al. 2015; Pawlotsky J.M. 2016; Di Maio V.C. et al, 2016)
Population sequencing (ABI PRISM 3500 genetic analyzer Applied Biosystems)
cut-off for substitutions detection > 15% (clinically significant right now)
Non-synonymous substitutions detection
Alignment of newly generated sequences to HCV1b reference sequences (SeaView v.4).
Interpretation by geno2pheno tool and published data
Methods workflow
HCV genome
5’ 3’
NS3 c E1 E2 P7 NS2 NS4A NS4B
NS5A NS5B
Serum samples
at different time points
NS3 region analysis (1-181 amino acids)
Table 1. NS3 non-synonymous substitutions
* resistance-associated polymorphisms (RAPs) (related to 122R simeprevir RAS)
baseline week 12 (SVR12) week 32 (follow up)
RASs Polymorphisms RASs Polymorphisms RASs Polymorphisms
none
48I
none
48I
none
48I
66G 66G 66G
86Q 86Q 86Q
87A 87A 87A
89S P89 P89
122G 122G 122G
125A 125A 125A
147S 147S 147S
* * *
amino acid change
NS5A region analysis (1-213 amino acids)
Table 2. NS5A non-synonymous substitutions
baseline week 12 (SVR12) week 32 (follow up)
RASs Polymorphisms RASs Polymorphisms RASs Polymorphisms
none
6R
93H
6R
93H
6R
34V 34V 34V
44R 44R 44R
61V 61V 61V
78R 78R 78R
R108 R108 108K
138L 138L 138L
ombitasvir RAS
amino acid change
NS5B region analysis (91- 340 aa and 350-556 aa)
Table 3. NS5B non-synonymous substitutions
sofosbuvir RAS
dasabuvir RAS
*fitness associated substitution
amino acid change
baseline week 12 (SVR12) week 32 (follow up)
RASs Polymorphisms RASs Polymorphisms RASs Polymorphisms
159F
98K
159F
98K
159F
98K
117T 117T 117T
127L 127L 127L
189P 189P 189P
213S 213S 213S
218S 218S 218S
254K 254K 254K
S300 300T 300T
316N 316N 316N
335N 335N 335N
work in progress 556G data not shown 556G data not shown
* * *
Time (week)
HC
V R
NA
vir
al lo
ad
(IU
/ml)
0
1000000
2000000
3000000
4000000
5000000
6000000
7000000
8000000
start week 4 end of treatment SVR12 follow up
“viral population at baseline”
NS5B159F sofosbuvir RAS +
NS5B316N fitness associated substitution +
NS5B556G dasabuvir RAS (?)
“viral population at relapse”
NS5A93H daclatasvir, elbasvir, ledipasvir and velpatasvir RAS +
NS5B159F sofosbuvir RAS +
NS5B316N fitness associated substitution +
NS5B556G dasabuvir RAS
TND
8 months after the end of treatment
NS5A93H + NS5B159F + NS5B556G RASs
are still present
According to new AIFA n. 500/2017, prescriptive and redeemable
combinations by Italian National Health Service (SSN) for HCV1 failure
with NS5A treatment are (EASL Recommendation 2016 and AISF
Recommendation 2017):
Elbasvir/Grazoprevir + Sofosbuvir + Ribavirin for 24 weeks, HCV1b positive
patient with metavir F3-F4.
Ombitasvir/Paritaprevir/Ritonavir + Dasabuvir + Sofosbuvir + Ribavirin for
24 weeks, HCV1b positive patient with metavir F3-F4.
Daclatasvir + Simeprevir + Sofosbuvir + Ribavirin for 24 weeks, HCV1b
positive patient with metavir F3-F4 (suboptimal according to AISF).
1. Could have we foreseen failure from basic clinical and virological
features?
2. Was this a relapse or a reinfection?
3. What drugs could we use?
4. Should we treat with drugs currently available or better wait?
Questions
In the third quarter of 2017, two pipeline salvage
agents will likely be available (Molino et al, 2017):
Sofosbuvir/Velpatasvir/Voxilaprevir (GS-9857) received FDA breakthrough therapy
designation (BTD) for genotype 1 patients who have failed treatment with an NS5A inhibitor.
Glecaprevir/Pibrentasvir (ABT-493/ABT-530), second-generation NS3/4A and NS5A
inhibitors, received FDA BTD for genotype 1 patients who have failed previous DAA
treatment (pan-genotypic activity and higher genetic barrier to resistance).
It is important to perform resistance testing at failure, as well as at baseline, on three eligible
genes for a personalized IFN-free DAA treatment.
Pre-existing RASs (93H?) could be present below detection limit of Sanger sequencing, a new
significant threshold (from 1% to 15%) using deep-sequencing should be determined.
Amino acid changes co-evolving on HCV genome during IFN-free therapy, especially without
ribavirin, could be related to fitness associated effect promoting further accumulation of RASs.
Conclusions
“Magna Graecia” University
Alfredo Focá
Maria Carla Liberto
Carlo Torti
Nicola Perrotti
Grazia Pavia
Emilia Zicca
Vito Marano
Acknowledgments
“Mater Domini” Hospital
Sebastiano Di Salvo
Massimo De Siena
Francesca Giancotti
Tiziana Gravina
Giorgio Settimo Barreca
Fernanda Fabiani
Thank you all for the kind attention!
Campus map