Resilience thinking and the sustainability of agricultural systems

33
Resilience Thinking and the Sustainability of Agricultural Systems Christo Fabricius & Brian Walker

description

 

Transcript of Resilience thinking and the sustainability of agricultural systems

Page 1: Resilience thinking and the sustainability of agricultural systems

Resilience Thinking and the Sustainability of Agricultural Systems

Christo Fabricius & Brian Walker

Page 2: Resilience thinking and the sustainability of agricultural systems

Structure of our presentation

Page 3: Resilience thinking and the sustainability of agricultural systems

1. Our numbers and global Co2

“We can no longer assume that our collective actions will not trigger tipping points as environmental thresholds are breached, risking irreversible damage to both ecosystems and human communities”. Ban Ki-moon High-Level Panel on Global Sustainability

400 ppm?

219 000 new people every day

Page 4: Resilience thinking and the sustainability of agricultural systems

2. Uneven distribution of per capita food production

Changes in per capita food production, 1960-2010. From Pretty et al 2011 International Journal of Agricultural Sustainability 9

Page 5: Resilience thinking and the sustainability of agricultural systems

The crisis of African food security

Changes in net per capita agricultural production in Africa (1960 = 100%) From Pretty et al 2011 International Journal of Agricultural Sustainability 9

Page 6: Resilience thinking and the sustainability of agricultural systems

6. Population growth

Sub-Saharan Africa

Global Harvest Initiative 2012

Page 7: Resilience thinking and the sustainability of agricultural systems

Per capita GDP

Per capita GDP

Foo

d c

on

sum

pti

on

Fo

od

exp

end

itu

re s

har

e

The relation between GDP and a) food consumption and (b) food as a share of total expenditure

a

b

3. Uneven income distribution: a driver of food consumption and affordability

From Cirera & Masset 2010 Phil Trans Royal Soc 365

Page 8: Resilience thinking and the sustainability of agricultural systems

4. Global demand for meat & fuel

Foley 2013 in litt

* People are moving ‘up the food chain’ * Tug of war between car owners, meat eaters and the world’s poor

Page 9: Resilience thinking and the sustainability of agricultural systems

Biofuels: the big unknown

Herve et al. 2011 in Economic Effects of Biofuel Production. Intech

Page 10: Resilience thinking and the sustainability of agricultural systems

Land and water availability

From Rulli et al in press, PNAS

• Ground water and soil depletion in many ‘grabbing’ countries • Cheap land in Africa; failed states, weak land rights

Page 11: Resilience thinking and the sustainability of agricultural systems

• 66 countries are not self-sufficient - land or water constraints

From Fader et al. 2013 Environ. Res. Lett. 8

% of popln dependent on

imported food

“available [land] per capita has shrunk from 13.5 ha/person in 1950 to 3.2 ha/person in 2005, and is projected to diminish to 1.5 ha/person in 2050” United Nations Population Fund 2007

But evidence of bans on exports (Earth Policy Institute)

Page 12: Resilience thinking and the sustainability of agricultural systems

Extent and modification of hydrological flows have increased over the past centuries

Gordon et al. 2008

Page 13: Resilience thinking and the sustainability of agricultural systems

Identified regime shifts related to agriculture and the hydrological cycle

EVAPORATION & LEAF AREA

Wet savanna -> dry savanna

Cloud forests -> Woodland

Forest -> savanna

Monsoons -> No monsoon

Gordon, et al. 2008

RUN-OFF QUANT, QUAL

Eutrophication

Hypoxic zones

River channel change

INFILTRATION, MOISTURE

Salinisation

Vegetation patterns

Soil structure

Atmosphere

Aquatic

Soil

Page 14: Resilience thinking and the sustainability of agricultural systems

CO

NSU

MP

TIO

N -

me

at &

fu

el

(ric

h o

ld m

illio

ns)

FOOD SELF-SUFFICIENCY (poor young billions)

High

High

Low

A safe operating space for the world’s food systems?

Page 15: Resilience thinking and the sustainability of agricultural systems

“the capacity to absorb disturbance and re-organise so as to retain essentially the same function, structure and feedbacks – to have the same identity”

involves three, intertwined concepts: 1. Thresholds (specified resilience) 2. Adaptability (general resilience) 3. Transformability (capacity to become a different system)

Resilience

Page 16: Resilience thinking and the sustainability of agricultural systems

resilience, per se, is neither ‘good’ nor ‘bad’ undesirable states of systems can be very resilient (dictatorships, saline landscapes) a system state that once was desirable can become ‘undesirable’ through changes in external conditions (context)

Page 17: Resilience thinking and the sustainability of agricultural systems

• most losses in resilience are unintended consequences of processes beyond the scale of focus

• in particular, failure to recognise cross-scale and cross-domain feedbacks

Page 18: Resilience thinking and the sustainability of agricultural systems

The shape and size of the basin can change – thresholds move, and so resilience changes

Page 19: Resilience thinking and the sustainability of agricultural systems

Alternate stable states of a rangeland in western NSW

Grassy state Shrubby state

critical feedback loop amount of shrubs amount of grass (fuel load) intensity of fire shrub mortality

Page 20: Resilience thinking and the sustainability of agricultural systems

Thresholds & tipping points

COSTS (Chemicals; fuel; labour; ecosystem services management)

YIEL

D p

er H

ecta

re

Droughts Fuel price

Overgrazing Infrequent fires

Meat demand

Page 21: Resilience thinking and the sustainability of agricultural systems

Thresholds & tipping points

COSTS (Chemicals; fuel; labour; ecosystem services management)

YIEL

D p

er H

ecta

re

Droughts

Cheap imports

Over-investment Ecosystem mismanagement

Demand for dairy products

Recession

Over-pumping

Page 22: Resilience thinking and the sustainability of agricultural systems

Transformability

• preparedness to change • getting beyond the state of denial

• options for change

• new ‘trajectories’ - emerge from support for experiments, novelty, continual learning

• capacity to change

• levels of capitals (including ‘social capital’), higher-scale support - governance

Capacity to make use of ‘windows of opportunity’

Folke et al. 2009 In: Principles of Ecosystem Stewardship: Springer

Page 23: Resilience thinking and the sustainability of agricultural systems

Just LOOKING at the problem will not solve it

Page 24: Resilience thinking and the sustainability of agricultural systems

Social-ecological systems framework

Goulburn Broken Catchment Management Plan, Australia http://www.gbcma.vic.gov.au

With participation and empowerment at every level and in every sphere

Page 25: Resilience thinking and the sustainability of agricultural systems

Innovation: no holy cows anymore

Global Harvest Initiative 2012

Page 26: Resilience thinking and the sustainability of agricultural systems

Investing in APPROPRIATE research & extension services

Global Harvest Initiative 2012

Returns to investment in research, and extension, respectively is 43% and 49% (Alston 2000; Global Harvest Initiative 2012)

Page 27: Resilience thinking and the sustainability of agricultural systems

Innovation

• The promise of cooperatives

– Milk production: Indian National Dairy Development Corporation

– Agri-cooperatives

• BUT require

– Governance

– Trust

– Leadership

Page 28: Resilience thinking and the sustainability of agricultural systems

The Fort Hare Agri-park, South Africa

Over time a range of economic activities and developments will occur, towards expanded and holistic enhancement of local livelihoods, led in the longer term by organized, capacitated, self-representing and flourishing communities

FEEDER PLOT co-owned by community members in collective/ cooperative structure

Independent local producers

AGRO-PROCESSING

FACILITY co-owned with community members-workers

NURSERY - Co-operatively owned supplying planting material to local producers

Public Sector

Markets

- Schools (SNP) - Hospitals & Clinics

- Other public establishments

Private

Sector

Markets

domestic and international

R&D, capacity-building and other development support by university, departments and other institutions

Depot

Depot

Courtesy of Prof Jan Raats

Page 29: Resilience thinking and the sustainability of agricultural systems

Working with farmers to incorporate local knowledge Is the perception that it is getting drier true?

Enfors and Gordon, 2007

Not for seasonal rainfall..

…but dryspells are increasing

Page 30: Resilience thinking and the sustainability of agricultural systems

What promotes resilience thinking and practice?

1. foster an understanding of SES as complex adaptive systems

2. maintain diversity and redundancy

3. manage connectivity

4. manage slow variables and feedbacks

5. encourage learning and experimentation

6. broaden participation

7. promote distributed systems for decision making at multiple levels

Biggs et al. 2012. Annual Review of Environment and Resources 37

Page 31: Resilience thinking and the sustainability of agricultural systems

Social transformation

• From only productivity-focused to using a resilience lens

• Diversification

• Looking across scales and knowledge systems. From policy reform to local use of technology

• Linking ecosystems, society, economic systems and governance

• “Novel social infrastructure” built on trust

• “Collaborative resilience”: private sector, governments, farmers

• Empowerment of women

– Farming is an excellent entry point

Page 32: Resilience thinking and the sustainability of agricultural systems

Resilience resources:

-www.resalliance.org -information and news - workbooks (free, downloadable)

-Ecology and Society -www.ecologyandsociety.org

-Twitter: @christofab @resilienceSci