Resilience in Aboriginal Children and Adolescents in Out-of-Home Care: A Test of an Initial...
-
Upload
beatrice-bailey -
Category
Documents
-
view
223 -
download
8
Transcript of Resilience in Aboriginal Children and Adolescents in Out-of-Home Care: A Test of an Initial...
Resilience in Aboriginal Children and Adolescents in Out-of-Home Care:A Test of an Initial Explanatory Model
Katharine M. Filbert
School of Psychology
Centre for Research on Educational and Community Services (CRECS)
University of Ottawa, ON, Canada
Presentation Overview Background Information:
Aboriginal children and adolescents Resilience Developmental assets High levels of functioning
Methodology Results Implications Limitations Future Research
Aboriginal Children and Adolescents
30-40% (80,000) of young people in foster care in Canada
< 5% (27,000) of the general youth population
(Gough, Trocmé, Brown, Knoke, & Blackstock, 2005) Have heightened risks
Resilience Positive adaptation during or following
adversity or serious threats to development Inferred from judgments about:
quality of an individual’s functioning or development
exposure to a threat to functioning or development
Not a personality trait or attribute
Developmental Assets(http://www.search-institute.org/assets/) 40 developmental assets organized into eight categories and
further divided into external and internal factors:- External assets:
Support Empowerment Boundaries and Expectations Constructive Use of Time
- Internal assets: Commitment to Learning Positive Values Social Competencies Positive Identity
Comparison of Average Number of Developmental Assets Per Youth In United States (Search Institute sample): 18 In Canada (OnLAC sample): 27.5 Differences between samples in:
measures rating sources average quality of placement homes ratings
High Levels of Functioning in Aboriginal Youth Research has indicated that developmental assets explained
47% of the variance in high levels of functioning (Scales et al., 2000)
Important developmental assets: other adult relationships personal power sense of purpose caring cultural competence responsibility valuing diversity leadership school success
Resilience of In-Care Youth % of youth identified as resilient varies widely
within and across studies Small to moderate number of maltreated youth are
typically competent in one or more developmental tasks within at least one point in time
In general, resilient functioning is less common in maltreated children than those who have experienced other familial adversities
(Legault, Anawati, & Flynn, 2006)
Resilience of Aboriginal Youth (Lalonde, 2006) Promotion of culture is related to increased
resilience Aboriginal communities with restored self-
government had 85% lower risk of youth suicide than those communities without
In communities that controlled and implemented plans for children in care, youth suicide rate was 25% lower than communities without this control
Purpose of the Present Study To examine resilience-promoting factors
(Masten, 2006) on the child, family, and community level that are associated with positive mental health and educational outcomes in an Aboriginal sample of youths living in out-of-home care.
Participants 103 First Nations youths
48 females (M = 13.40 years; SD = 2.05) 55 males (M = 13.16 years; SD = 1.92) aged 10-17 years drawn from year five (2005-2006) of the larger
Looking After Children in Ontario (OnLAC) project
Assessment and Action Record (second Canadian adaptation; AAR-C2; Flynn et al., 2006)
Mandated by the Ontario Ministry of Children and Youth Services for use every year, with all young people who have been in foster care in Ontario for a year or more
7 outcome domains: (1) health (2) education(3) identity(4) family and social relationships(5) social presentation(6) emotional and behavioural development(7) self-care skills
Predictor Variables Age (M = 13.27 years; SD = 1.98)
Gender (48 females; 55 males) Cumulative risk (M = 6.09; SD = 3.34 )
First Nations cultural opportunities (M = 1.37; SD = 1.34 )
Developmental assets (M = 27.00; SD = 7.84)
Pro-social Scale (N = 102)
+.03
-.07 -.03
+.04
+.41
-0.8-0.6-0.4-0.2
00.20.40.60.8
Beta coefficients
Age Gen.(M)
Cum.Risk
FN.Opp.
D.Assets
PREDICTORS (* = significant at .05)
*
Total Difficulties Score (N = 102)
-.21
+.02 +.17
-.21 -.46
-0.8-0.6-0.4-0.2
00.20.40.60.8
Beta coefficients
Age Gen.(M)
Cum.Risk
FN.Opp.
D.Assets
PREDICTORS (* = significant at .05)
*
*
* *
General Self-Esteem Scale (N = 101)
-.03
+.19
-.04 -.03
+.41
-0.8-0.6-0.4-0.2
00.20.40.60.8
Beta coefficients
Age Gen.(M)
Cum.Risk
FN. Opp. D.Assets
PREDICTORS (* = signficant at .05)
*
Education Scale (N = 101)
+.010
-.13
+.12+.34
-0.8-0.6-0.4-0.2
00.20.40.60.8
Beta coefficients
Age Gen.(M)
Cum.Risk
FN. Opp. D.Assets
PREDICTORS (* = significant at .05)
*
Implications Developmental assets was consistently the
strongest predictor Consistent with resilience theory Importance of First Nations cultural
opportunities Incorporation of assets into plan-of-care Strategies to offset risk factors
Future Research Métis and Inuit in-care youths Methods to increase developmental assets Ways to offset the consequences of having
few assets
ReferencesFlynn, R. J., Dudding, P. M., & Barber J. G. (Eds.). (2006a). Promoting resilience in child welfare. Ottawa, ON:
University of Ottawa Press.Flynn, R. J., Ghazal, H., & Legault, L. (2006b). Looking After Children: Good parenting, good outcomes,
assessment and action records (second Canadian adaptation). Ottawa, ON & London, UK: Centre for Research on Community Services, University of Ottawa & Her Majesty’s Stationary Office.
Goodman, R. (1997). The Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire: A research note. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 38, 581-586.
Gough, P., Trocmé, N., Brown, I., Knoke, I., & Blackstock, C. (2005). Pathways to the overrepresentation of Aboriginal children in care. CECW Information. Retrieved from http://www.cecw-ceph.ca
Lalonde, C. E. (2006). Identity formation and cultural resilience in Aboriginal communities. In R. J. Flynn, P. M. Dudding, & J. G. Barber (Eds.), Promoting resilience in child welfare (pp. 52-71). Ottawa, ON: University of Ottawa Press.
Legault, L., Anawati, M., & Flynn, R. (2006). Factors favoring psychological resilience among fostered young people. Children and Youth Services Review, 28, 1024-1038.
Masten, A. S. (2006). Promoting resilience in development: A general framework for systems of care. In R. J. Flynn, P. M. Dudding, & J. G. Barber (Eds.), Promoting resilience in child welfare (pp. 3-17). Ottawa, ON: University of Ottawa Press.
Scales, P. C., Benson, P. L., Leffert, N., & Blyth, D. A. (2000). Contribution of developmental assets to the prediction of thriving among adolescents. Applied Developmental Science, 4, 27-46.
Scales, P. C. (1999). Reducing risks and building developmental assets: Essential actions for promoting adolescent health. Journal of School Health, 69, 113-119.