Research presentation spira final 2

10
The Relationship between Transiency and Student Performance Emily M. Spira Piedmont College

Transcript of Research presentation spira final 2

Page 1: Research presentation spira final 2

The Relationship between Transiency and

Student Performance

Emily M. SpiraPiedmont College

Page 2: Research presentation spira final 2

According to data from the 2010 Current Population Survey 100.2 million people aged 5 years and

over lived in a different residence 5 years ago.

Why student transiency? America has the highest rate of transiency in the world. On average,

forty-three million Americans move every year.

Page 3: Research presentation spira final 2

Why student transiency?

Page 4: Research presentation spira final 2

• The goal of this study is to determine whether transiency affects student performance.

• Transiency is a growing problem at the elementary school level• Challenges exist for teachers and students• Students can have gaps in their learning

• Curriculum differences• Calendar differences

• Student mobility also affects a students’ social and emotional well-being

Problem Statement

Page 5: Research presentation spira final 2

According to the Literature:

HypothesisI suspected student mobility impacted student achievement in

reading and math negatively.

Four times more likely to

drop out of school before

graduating high school when moved three

times before 8th grade

Lower standardized test scores

Challenges for teachers and

students

Multiple moves result in

significant impact

Significant relationship

between poverty and

mobility

Page 6: Research presentation spira final 2

What impact does transiency have on student achievement in reading and

math?

Research Question

Page 7: Research presentation spira final 2

Methodology

Approval process

Participants:89 3rd grade

students

Students were designated as1. Not Mobile

2. Mobile3. Highly Mobile

Instrument: Reading and Math GCRCT

Data collection in May 2013

Analysis of Variance

test

Page 8: Research presentation spira final 2

Not Mobile 867.5

Mobile 860.9

Highly Mobile 855.9

Data AnalysisReading GCRCT Mean Scores

Not Mobile

Mobile

Highly Mobile

850 852 854 856 858 860 862 864 866 868

Series1

Math GCRCT Mean Scores

Not Mobile 870.1

Mobile 861.4

Highly Mobile 849.9

Not Mobile

Mobile

Highly Mobile

835 840 845 850 855 860 865 870 875

Series1

Page 9: Research presentation spira final 2

Conclusion

• There is not a significant difference between any of the groups on the reading or math GCRCT (p>.05).

• The findings indicate transiency does not impact third grade

student achievement in reading and math as measured by GCRCT.

Page 10: Research presentation spira final 2

Thank you for coming!

Questions?