Research Plan SL
-
Upload
puppyarav2726 -
Category
Documents
-
view
227 -
download
0
Transcript of Research Plan SL
-
7/29/2019 Research Plan SL
1/16
DOCTORAL PROGRAM IN STRUCTURES
1
PLAN DE RECHERCHE
RESEARCH PLAN
PUNCHING OF FLAT SLABS WITH SHEAR REINFORCEMENT
Stefan Lips18.03.2009
Online Version
-
7/29/2019 Research Plan SL
2/16
DOCTORAL PROGRAM IN STRUCTURES
2
Summary
Theobjectiveofthisresearch isto introduceanewtheoreticalmodel forthecalculationofthe
punching shear resistance of flat slabs with shear reinforcement. In the past, several investigations took
place
but
no
theory
so
far
could
describe
the
punching
shear
behavior
of
flat
slabs
with
shear
reinforcementsatisfactorily.Consequently, thedesigncodes still rely on eitherempirical formulations or
usecoarsesimplifications.Thus,anewcomprehensivetheoryshouldbeestablishedtoimprovethecurrent
approachofpunchingshearcalculations.Besidesthetheoreticalmodel,newdesignprovisionsshouldbe
proposedbasedonasimplifiedmodel.Inaddition,thetheoreticalworkwillbevalidatedbyexperimental
testsfromtheliteratureandbyanexperimentaltestseriesattheEPFL.Infact,severalslabspecimenswith
varying parameter such as longitudinal reinforcement ratio, transversal reinforcement ratio, and slab
thicknesswillbeinvestigated.Theresultsfromthesetestswillcontributesignificantlytotheachievement
ofthepreviousmentionedobjectives.
Keywords:flatslab,slabcolumnconnection,punchingshear,shearreinforcement,criticalshearcrack
-
7/29/2019 Research Plan SL
3/16
DOCTORAL PROGRAM IN STRUCTURES
3
TableofContents
1.
Introduction...............................................................................................................................................
4
2. StateofResearch.......................................................................................................................................5
Performedresearch.......................................................................................................................................5
Criticalshearcracktheory(CSCT)..................................................................................................................6
CodeProvisions.............................................................................................................................................7
3. ResearchPlan............................................................................................................................................8
Objectives......................................................................................................................................................8
ExperimentalProgram...................................................................................................................................8
ExperimentalTestSetup..............................................................................................................................8
Measurements.............................................................................................................................................10
4. ResearchSchedule...................................................................................................................................12
5. Bibliography.............................................................................................................................................13
-
7/29/2019 Research Plan SL
4/16
DOCTORAL PROGRAM IN STRUCTURES
4
1. IntroductionDuringthelastcentury,theapplicationofflatslabsinbuildingsandespeciallyinparkinggarages
has prevailed. Flat slabs are easy to build and have through their narrow height an economical and
architectural advantage compared to ripped slabs. The limited height of these slabs leads to the main
designcriteria,whicharetypicallythedeflectionat theservicestateand thepunchingshearatthe limit
state.Themaindrawbackofthelatterdesigncriteriaisthatpunchingisanextremelybrittlefailuremode.
In fact, a column can suddenly punch through the slab without nearly any warning sign that could
eventually leadtoanevacuationofthebuilding incaseofacollapse.Onepromisingapproachtoprevent
brittlefailure istheuseofpunchingshearreinforcement.Inthe lastdecades,severalstudies investigated
the influence of shear reinforcement at the slab column connections. The main performed research of
punchingshearwithtransversereinforcementissummarizedinChapter2.Currently,noneoftheresulting
theoriesexplains
the
behavior
of
the
strength
of
punching
shear
of
flat
slabs
with
transverse
reinforcement
physicallysatisfactorily.Consequently,theyhavenogeneralacceptancesothatanewapproachhastobe
developed which not only predicts the resistance accurately but also bases on a consistent theory. This
would allow the use of one comprehensive model for different shear reinforcement systems and could
finallyimprovethecurrentdesignspecifications.
Figure1.Examplesofdifferentshearreinforcementsystems
-
7/29/2019 Research Plan SL
5/16
DOCTORAL PROGRAM IN STRUCTURES
5
2. StateofResearchPerformedresearch
Atthebeginningof the20thcentury,the first flatslabsweredesigned inEurope [1]andNorth
America
[2].
Until
the
1950s,
they
were
typically
designed
with
mushroomheaded
columns
to
prevent
punching.Attheearly60s inSweden, thedevelopmentof the firstrationalapproach forpunchingshear
without transverse reinforcement began [3]. Nevertheless, most codes did not implement this approach
duetothecomplicateddesignexpressions.Nearlyatthesame time, the investigationofpunchingshear
reinforcementbegan.Oneofthefirststudiesofpunchingofflatslabswithshearreinforcementwasdone
byAnderssoninSweden[4].InNorthAmerica,Hawkinsinvestigatedtheinfluenceofshearreinforcement
onthepunchingbehaviorattheUniversityofWashington[5],[6],[7],[8],[9]andGhaliandDilgeratthe
UniversityofCalgary[10],[11],[12],[13],[14],[15][16],[17].Hawkinsstudiedtheshearstrengthofslabs
withmomenttransferredtothecolumnduetoeccentric loadings.Fortheexperimental investigation,he
usedslabswithoutandwithshearreinforcement,forwhichheusedstirrups.GahliandDilgerinvestigated
differentshearreinforcementtypesandtheirarrangements.In2001,Dechtaintroducedtheshearfriction
modelforflatslabswithshearreinforcement[18]andBirkleappliedandfurtherimprovedthemodelwith
respecttotheshearreinforcement[19].Although,theapproach ispromising, itwasnot implementedto
theCanadiancodeso far.Further researchconcerningpunchingshearreinforcementhavebeendone in
theUnitedKingdomandlateroninBrazilbyRegan[20],[21],[22],[23],[24][25].Primarily,hevariedthe
typeof
the
shear
reinforcement
such
as
bent
up
bars,
stirrups,
and
studs.
Likewise,
Broms
investigated
in
Swedenaspecialcombinationofbentupbarsandastirrupcagetoenhanceaductilebehaviorattheslab
column connection [26], [27], [28], [29], [30]. In Germany at the University of Aachen, Hegger has done
research on different shear reinforcement types, mostly in respect to the anchorage of the different
systems [31], [32], [33], [34], [35]. Additionally, they investigated the use of finite element analysis
programstomodelthepunchingphenomena.Inconclusion, itcanbesaidthatalthoughalotofresearch
hasbeendone inthisarea,nophysicalconsistentapproachhasbeenproposedforpunchingofflatslabs
withshearreinforcementsofar.Therefore,anewapproachhasbeenproposedbyMuttoniandFernandez
basedonthecriticalshearcracktheory[36].
-
7/29/2019 Research Plan SL
6/16
DOCTORAL PROGRAM IN STRUCTURES
6
Criticalshearcracktheory(CSCT)
Thecriticalshearcracktheorywasdevelopedduringthe1980sandlateronfurtherdevelopedfor
theapplicationofpunchingofflatslabswithouttransversereinforcement [37],[38], [39], [40][41], [42],
[43],[44],[45].Finally,theCSCTwasalsoimplementedinthecurrentSwisscodeSIA262:2003[46]forthe
design of flat slabs without transverse reinforcement. The CSCT baseson the assumption that theshear
strengthinmemberswithouttransversereinforcementcorrelatestotheproductofthesquarerootofthe
concretecompressivestrengthandafunctionofthecrackwidthandtheaggregatesize.Thisrelationship
canbedescribedas
, , ()
whereVR istheshearstrength,b0 isacontrolperimeter,d istheeffectivedepthofthemember,fc isthe
compressive strength of the concrete,w is the width of the critical shear crack, anddg is the maximum
aggregatesize.
Thisapproachshowsanexcellentagreementtoexperimentaltestresults.Figure2showsthecomparison
of results of 99 punching tests on slabs without shear reinforcement and the theoretical approach by
displayingtheshearresistanceasafunctionoftherotation.
Figure2.Comparisonofthefailurecriteriontothestrengthof99slabswithoutshearreinforcementfailinginpunchingshear
[44]
However,sofaronlyflatslabswithoutshearreinforcementhavebeenconsideredbytheCSCT.Although
FernandezandMuttoniproposedapromisingapproachbasedontheCSCT for flatslabswith transverse
reinforcement[36],itisstillassociatedwithanuncertaintyofinfluentialparameterssuchastheactivation
oftheshearreinforcementduetotherotationorthepositioninganddetailingoftheshearreinforcement.
-
7/29/2019 Research Plan SL
7/16
DOCTORAL PROGRAM IN STRUCTURES
7
CodeProvisions
Currently,mostcodessuchas theEuroCode2 (EC2) [47]and theAmericanConcrete Institute
Building Code (ACI 31805) [48] base on empirical formulation for the calculation of the punching shear
resistance with shear reinforcement. As Figure 3 shows, these formulations lead, in comparison to
experimentaltestresult,toscatteredresults.TheSwissCode(SIA262:2003)[46]usesanapproachbased
onthetheoryofplasticitybutwithcoarsesimplification.Infact,itneglectsthecontributionoftheconcrete
andconsidersonlytheshearreinforcementfortheoverallshearresistance.Thisfactleadstoconservative
calculationoftheamountofshearreinforcement.Therefore,allthesecodedesignspecificationsresultdue
tothescatteringineitherconservativethuscostlydesign(ACI31805andSIA262:2003)orinevenunsafe
design(EC2).Hence,anewapproachcouldimprovethedesignguidelinessignificantly.
a) b)
c)
Figure3.Comparisonofa)ACI31805,b)EC2,andc)SIA262:2003withavailabletestresults[36]
-
7/29/2019 Research Plan SL
8/16
DOCTORAL PROGRAM IN STRUCTURES
8
3.ResearchPlanObjectives
Themainobjectiveofthisresearchistodevelopanew,comprehensivetheoreticalmodelforthe
calculation
of
the
punching
shear
resistance
of
flat
slabs
with
shear
reinforcement.
The
formulated
theoretical model will be compared to existing experimental data. Additionally, a test series containing
fifteen specimens will be performed to validate and improve the model. Finally, new design guidelines
shouldbeproposed.
ExperimentalProgram
Specimen Slabthickness
[mm]
Supportplate
[mm]
Flexuralreinforcement
ratio[%]
Shearreinforcement
ratio[%]
PL075012250 250 260x260 0.75 0.12
PL075050250 250 260x260 0.75 0.50
PL075100250 250 260x260 0.75 1.00
PL150012250 250 260x260 1.50 0.12
PL150050250 250 260x260 1.50 0.50
PL150100250 250 260x260 1.50 1.00
PL075056320 320 340x340 0.75 0.56
PL150056320 320 340x340 1.50 0.56
PL075000320 320 340x340 0.75 0.00
PL150000320 320 340x340 1.50 0.00
PL1501003202 320 260x260 1.50 1.00
PL1500003202 320 260x260 1.50 0.00
Table1.
Mechanical
properties
of
the
first
series
Specimen Distanceofthefirststudto
thesupportplate[mm]
PL15010025002 42(0.2d)PL15010025006 126(0.6d)PL15010025008 168(0.8d)
Table2.Geometricalpropertiesfortestsofthesecondseries
ExperimentalTestSet-up
Figure4andFigure5showthedetailsoftheexperimentalsetup.Thisexperimentaltestsetup
hasbeenused forseveralprevious punchingshear tests.Theapplied force isprovidedby four hydraulic
cylinders. The force is distributed by four steel beams and afterwards transferred to eight tension bars.
Thesebarsgothroughopeningsintheconcreteslabandapplytheforcesonthetopsurfaceoftheslab.To
resisttheload,theslabissupportedbyaquadraticsteelplate(260x260mm/340x340mm).Belowthe
steelplateloadcellsmeasurethesupportforces.Finally,asteelbeamdirectstheloadtoaconcretecubic
(500x500x500mm),whichcarriestheloadtothefloor.
-
7/29/2019 Research Plan SL
9/16
DOCTORAL PROGRAM IN STRUCTURES
9
Figure4.Drawingsoftheexperimentaltestsetup
-
7/29/2019 Research Plan SL
10/16
DOCTORAL PROGRAM IN STRUCTURES
10
Figure5.Picturesoftheexperimentaltestsetup
Measurements
Themeasurementscorrespondtothemeasurementofformerpunchingsheartests,whichcanbe
seen in Figure 7. Additionally, the strain of the shear reinforcement will be measured. The following list
concludesthemeasurementsthatwillbetaken:
o Deflectionatthetopandbottomsurfaceoftheslab(Figure7b,c)o Rotationsoftheslabinthreedirections(Figure7a)o Strainsattheconcretesurfaceusingomegashapedgauges(Figure7d,e)o Strainsintheshearreinforcementclosetothesupportarearegion(usingstraingauges)o Inplanedilatancyoftheslab(usingmechanicaldevices)o Observetheshapeandthepositionofthecriticalshearcrackbysawcutoftheslabsaftertesting
(Figure6)
Thesemeasurementsallowvalidatingandfurtherdevelopingtheestablishedtheoreticalmodel.
a) b)
c) d)
Figure6.Possiblefailuremodes
-
7/29/2019 Research Plan SL
11/16
DOCTORAL PROGRAM IN STRUCTURES
11
a) b)
c) d)
e) f)
Figure7.Typeandplacingofthemeasurementdevices
-
7/29/2019 Research Plan SL
12/16
DOCTORAL PROGRAM IN STRUCTURES
12
4.ResearchScheduleTheresearchprojectisplannedtobeperformedaccordingthefallowingschedule.
2008 2009 2010 2011 2012
Literaturereview
Developmentofatheoreticalmodel
Developmentoftestcampaign
Testing
Validationandfurtherdevelopment
ofthetheoreticalmodel
Establish
design
rules
based
on
the
theoreticalmodel
Documentation/Writingthesis
Table3.Researchschedule
-
7/29/2019 Research Plan SL
13/16
DOCTORAL PROGRAM IN STRUCTURES
13
5.Bibliography[1]Frst,A.,&Marti,P.(1997).RobertMaillart'sDesignApproachforFlatSlabs.ASCEJournalofStructural
Engineering,1102
1110.
[2]Gasparini,D.A.(2002).ContributionsofC.A.P.TurnertoDevelopmentofReinforcedConcreteFlat
Slabs19051909.ASCEJournalofStructuralEngineering(Vol.128),12431252.
[3]Kinnunen,S.,&Nylander,H.(1960).PunchingofConcreteSlabsWithoutShearReinforcement.Stockholm:TransactionsoftheRoyalInstituteofTechnology.
[4]Andersson,J.(1963).PunchingofConcreteSlabswithShearReinforcement.Stockholm:TransactionsoftheRoyalInstituteofTechnology.
[5]Hawkins,N.,&Corley,W.(1971).InfluenceofColumnRectangularityontheBehaviorofFlatPlateStructures.Detroit:ACISP306.
[6]Hawkins
,N.
(1974).
Shear
Strength
of
Slabs
with
Moments
Transferred
to
Columns.
ACI
SP
42
35.
[7]Hawkins,N.(1974).ShearStrengthofSlabswithShearReinforcement.Detroit:ACISP4234.
[8]Hawkins,N.,&Corley,W.(1974).MomentTransfertoColumnsinSlabswithShearheadReinforcement.ACISP4236.
[9]Hawkins,N.M.,Bao,A.,&Yamazaki,J.(1989).MomentTransferfromConcreteSlabstoColumns.ACI
StructuralJournal(6),705716.
[10]Langohr,P.H.,Ghali,A.,&Dilger,W.H.(1976).SpecialShearReinforcementforConcreteFlatPlates.
ACIJournal(Vol.73),141146.
[11]Dilger,W.H.,Mahmoud,Z.,&Ghali,A.(1978).FlatPlateswithSpecialShearReinforcementSubjected
toStatic
Dynamic
Moment
Transfer.
ACI
Journal
(75
56),
543
549.
[12]Seible,F.,Ghali,A.,&Dilger,W.H.(1980).Preassembledshearreinforcingunitsforflatplates.ACIJournal,Proceedings77(1),2835.
[13]Mokhtar,A.S.,Ghali,A.,&Dilger,W.H.(1985).StudShearReinforcementforFlatConcretePlates.ACIJournal(8260),676683.
[14]Ghali,A.,&Hammill,N.(1992).EffectivenessofShearReinforcementinSlabs.ConcreteInternational.
[15]Megally,S.H.,&Ghali,A.(1994).DesignConsiderationsforSlabColumnConnectionsinSeismicZones.
ACIStructuralJournal,91(3),303314.
[16]Ghali,A.,&Megally,S.H.(2000).StudShearReinforcementforPunching:NorthAmericanand
EuropeanPractices.InternationalWorkshoponPunchingShearCapacityofRCSlabs,(pp.201 209).Stockholm.
[17]Megally,S.H.,&Ghali,A.(2000).PunchingShearDesignofEarthquakeResistantSlabColumn
Connections.ACIStructuralJournal(Vol.97),720730.
[18]Dechka,D.C.(2001).ResponseofShearStudReinforcementContinousSlabColumnFramestoSeismicLoads.Calgary,Canada:PhDThesis.
[19]Birkle,G.(2004).PunchingofFlatSlabs:TheInfluenceofSlabThicknessandStudLayout.Calgary:Dissertation,UniversityofCalgary.
[20]Regan,P.,&Khan,M.(1974).BentUpBarsasShearReinforcement.ACISpecialPublicationSP4211.
[21]Regan,P.(1985).ShearCombs,ReinforcementagainstPunching(Vol.63B).TheStructuralEngineering.
[22]Regan,P.(1986).SymmetricPunchingofReinforcedConcreteSlabs.MagazineofConcreteResearch.
-
7/29/2019 Research Plan SL
14/16
DOCTORAL PROGRAM IN STRUCTURES
14
[23]Oliveira,D.R.,Melo,G.S.,&Regan,P.E.(2000).PunchingStrengthsofFlatPlateswithVerticalor
InclinedStirrups.ACIStructuralJournal(Vol.97),485491.
[24]Regan,P.,&Samadian,F.(2001).ShearReinforcementagainstpunchinginreinforcedconcreteflatslabs.London:TheStructuralEngineer.
[25]
Oliveira
,
D.,
Regan
,
P.,
&
Melo
,
G.
(2004).
Punching
resistance
of
RC
slabs
with
rectangular
columns.
MagazineofConcreteResearch.
[26]Broms,C.E.(1990).PunchingofFlatPlates AQuestionofConcretePropertiesinBiaxialCompression
andSizeEffect.ACIStructuralJournal(V.87),292304.
[27]Broms,C.E.(1990).ShearReinforcementforDeflectionDuctilityofFlatPlates.ACIStructuralJournal,87(6),696 705.
[28]Broms,C.E.(2000).Amethodtoavoidthepunchingfailuremode.InternationalWorkshoponPunchingShearCapacityofRCSlabs,(pp.117124).Stockholm.
[29]Broms,C.(2006).Concreteflatslabsandfootings:Designmethodforpunchinganddetailingforductility.Stockholm:KTH,CivilandArchitecturalEngineering.
[30]Broms,C.E.(2007).DuctilityofFlatPlates:ComparisonofShearReinforcementSystems.ACIStructuralJournal,104,703711.
[31]Hegger,J.,&Beutel,R.(1998).SicherheitgegenDurchstanzenvonschubbewehrtenFlachdecken.Aachen:RWTHReport,AiFForschungsvorhaben10644N(DBV185).
[32]Hegger,J.,&Beutel,R.(1999).Durchstanzen VersucheundBemessung.DerPrfingenieur,Zeitschrift
derBundesvereinigungderPrfingenieurefrBautechnik.
[33]Beutel,R.,&Hegger,J.(2000).PunchingbehaviourofShearReinforcedFlatSlabsatInteriorcolumns
EffectiveandEconomicShearSystems.(pp.171179).Stockholm:InternationalWorkshoponPunching
ShearCapacityofRCSlabs.
[34]Beutel,R.,&Hegger,J.(2002).Theeffectofanchorageontheeffectivenessoftheshearreinforcementinthepunchingzone.CementandConcreteComposites.
[35]Hegger,J.,Beutel,R.,&Kerkeni,N.(2004).EinfluderDeckenschlankheitaufdenDurchstanzwiderstandnachDIN10451,SIA262,NormB4700(01)undEurocodeprEN199211.BetonundStahlbetonbau.
[36]Fernndez,R.M.,&Muttoni,A.(2008).Applicationsofthecriticalshearcracktheorytopunchingof
R/Cslabswithtransversereinforcement.ACIStructuralJournal(Sumbittedforpublication).
[37]Muttoni,A.,&Schwartz,J.(1991).BehaviorofBeamsandPunchinginSlabswithoutShear
Reinforcement.IABSEColloquium,(pp.703708).Stuttgart.
[38]Muttoni
,A.
(2003).
Schubfestigkeit
und
Durchstanzen
von
Platten
ohne
Querkarftbewehrung
(Vol.
98).
Berlin:Beton undStahlbetonbau.
[39]Guandalini,S.,&Muttoni,A.(2004).Essaisdepoinonnementsymtriquedesdallesenbtonarmsansarmaturel'efforttranchant.Lausanne:Rapportd'essai.
[40]Guandalini,S.(2005).Poinonnementsymtriquedesdallesenbtonarm.Lausanne:Thsededoctorat.
[41]Muttoni,A.,&Guandalini,S.(2006).KommentarzumDurchstanzennachSIA262.Lausanne.
[42]Muttoni,A.,&Fernndez,R.M.(2007).Shearstrengthpredictionsaccordingtothecriticalshearcrack
theoryandtheSwisscodeSIA262(2003).Workshoponassessmentmethodsfordeterminingtheshear
strengthof
existing
structures,
(p.
14).
Rotterdam.
-
7/29/2019 Research Plan SL
15/16
DOCTORAL PROGRAM IN STRUCTURES
15
[43]Muttoni,A.,&Fernndez,R.M.(2008).Shearstrengthofmemberswithouttransversereinforcement
asfunctionofcriticalshearcrackwidth.ACIStructuralJournal,105(2),163172.
[44]Muttoni,A.(2008).Punchingshearstrengthofreinforcedconcreteslabswithouttransverse
reinforcement.ACIStructuralJournal,105(4),440450.
[45]
Guandalini,
S.,
Burdet,
O.,
&
Muttoni,
A.
(2008).
Punching
tests
of
slabs
with
low
reinforcement
ratios.
ACIStructuralJournal(Acceptedforpublication).
[46]SIA.(2003).Betonbau.Zurich.
[47]Eurocode,2.(2002).Designofconcretestructures,part1:Generalrulesandrulesforbuildings.
[48]ACI.(1999).BuildingCodeRequirementsforStructuralConcrete.Detroit:ACI31899,American
ConcreteInstitute.
[49]Yamazaki,J.,&Hawkins,N.(1980).FiniteElementPredictionsoftheBehaviorofSlabColumnConnectionsTransferringMoment.Detroit:ACISP63.
[50]Vaz,R.(2007).ShearStrengthofReinforcedConcreteBridgeDeckSlabs.Lausanne:EPFL,PhDthesis.
[51]Shehata
,I.(1985).
Theory
of
punching
in
RC
slabs
(Vol.
Ph.D
Thesis).
[52]Nlting,D.(1984).DasDurchstanzenvonPlattenausStahlbeton Tragverhalten,Berechnung,Bemessung .Braunschweig:Thsededoctorat.
[53]Negele,A.(2006).DurchstanzverhaltenvonFlachdeckenmitneuerSchubbewehrungundDrucklagernausUHPC.Beton undStahlbetonbau.
[54]Muttoni,A.,Fernndez,R.,&Guandalini,S.(2007).Poinonnementdespontsdalles.Bern:DocumentationSIA,4.FBH/ASTRAStudientagung'NeuesausderBrckenforschung'.
[55]Hassanzadeh,G.,&Sundquist,H.(2000).StrengtheningOfBridgeSlabsOnColumns.Stockholm:Nordicconcreteresearch.
[56]Guidotti
,R.,
Fernndez
,R.,
&
Muttoni
,A.
(2007).
Essais
de
poinonnement.
Rapport
d'essais,
Essais
depoinonnement.
[57]Broms,C.(2006).Ductilityreinforcementforflatslabsinsismicareas.London:MagazineofConcrete
Research,ThomasTelford.
[58]Andr,H.P.(1981).ZumTragverhaltenvonFlachdeckenmitDbelleisten,BewehrunginAuflagerbereich(Thestrengthofthesupportzonesofflatslabsreinforcedwithshearcombs).Beton undStahlbetonbau.
[59]Andr,H.P.,Dilger,W.,&Ghali,A.(1979).DurchstanzbewehrungfrFlachdecken(Vol.74).Berlin:
Beton undStahlbetonbau.
[60]Andr
,H.
P.
(1979).
Dbelleisten
zur
Verhinderung
des
Durchstanzens
bei
hochbelasteten
Flachdecken
(Shearcombsasreinforcementagainstpunchinginheavilyloadedflatslabs).Bautechnik.
[61]Alexander,S.,&Hawkins,N.(2005).ADesignPerspectiveonPunchingShear.ACI.
[62]Corley,W.G.,&Hawkins,N.M.(1968).ShearheadReinforcementforSlabs.ACIJournal(6559),811824.
[63]Broms,C.E.(2000).EliminationofFlatPlatePunchingFailureMode.ACIStructuralJournal,97(1),94
101.
[64]Broms,C.E.(2007).FlatPlatesinSeismicAreas:ComparisonofShearReinforcementSystems.ACIStructuralJournal,104,712721.
[65]Elgabry,
A.,
&
Ghali,
A.
(1990).
Design
of
Stud
Shear
Reinforcement
for
Slabs.
ACI
Structural
Journal
(Vol.873),351361.
-
7/29/2019 Research Plan SL
16/16
DOCTORAL PROGRAM IN STRUCTURES
16
[66]Elgabry,A.,&Ghali,A.(1987).TestsonConcreteSlabColumnConnectionswithStudShear
ReinforcementSubjectedtoShearMomentTransfer.ACIStructuralJournal,433 442.
[67]Gardner,N.J.(1990).RelationofthePunchingShearCapacityofReinforcedConcreteSlabswith
ConcreteStrength.ACIStructuralJournal(Vol.87),6671.
[68]
Gomes,
R.
B.,
&
Regan,
P.
E.
(1999).
Punching
Resistance
of
RC
Flat
Slabs
with
Shear
Reinforcement.
ASCEJournalofStructuralEngineering,125(ue6),684692.
[69]Hammill,N.,&Ghali,A.(1994).PunchingShearResistanceofCornerSlabColumnConnections.ACIStructuralJournal,91(6),697707.
[70]Megally,S.H.,&Ghali,A.(1993).PunchingShearofSlabsinSeismicZones.AnnualConference CanadianSocietyforCivilEngineeringCSCE/SCGCJune811,(pp.145154).Fredericton.
[71]Mentrey,P.(1999).PunchinginSlabswithShearReinforcements:aTensileFailure.fibSymposium.Prague.
[72]Mentrey,P.,Walther,R.,Zimmermann,T.,Willam,K.J.,&Regan,P.E.(1997).SimulationofPunching
FailureinReinforcedConcreteStructures.ASCEJournalofStructuralEngineering(Vol123),652659.
[73]Pilakoutas,K.,&Li,X.(2003).AlternativeShearReinforcementforReinforcedConcreteFlatSlabs.ASCEJournalofStructuralEngineering(Vol.129),11641172.
[74]Rosenthal,I.(1959).ExperimentalInvestigationofFlatPlateFloors.ACIJournal,Proceedings59(5612),153166.
[75]Van,d.V.,Dilger,W.H.,&Ghali,A.(1982).ConcreteFlatPlateswithWellAnchoredShear
ReinforcementElements.CanadianJournalofCivilEngineering,9(1),107114.