Research on Motivation and Engagement

download Research on Motivation and Engagement

of 19

Transcript of Research on Motivation and Engagement

  • 8/10/2019 Research on Motivation and Engagement

    1/19

    1

    UKP6053-ANALISIS DATA DAN PENTAFSIRAN

    GROUP MEMBERS:

    MUHAMMAD IZZUDDIN BIN AZZMI M20122001203

    SUNDARAMOORTHY A/L GOVINDASAMY M20122001502

    NURUL AFNI BINTI ZULKIFLY M20122001207

    KOKILAVANNI A/P VALAN M201220011!

    Investigating the Effect of Motivation and Engagement on Students

    Achievement In Science Among Level Elementa!" School Students In

    #uala Selango!$ Selango!%

  • 8/10/2019 Research on Motivation and Engagement

    2/19

    &itle:

    I"#$%&'()&'"( &*$ E++$,& + M&'#)&'" )". E"()($$"& " S&.$"&% A,*'$#$$"& '" S,'$",$

    )"( L$#$ 2 E$$"&)4 S,* %&.$"&% '" K)) S$)"( S$)"(

    Resea!ch 'uestions:

    '8 9*)& '% &*$ &'#)&'") $#$ + %&.$"&%:

    ''8 9*)& '% &*$ $#$ $"()($$"& $#$ + %&.$"&%:'''8 H; &*$ &'#)&'") )". $"()($$"& $#$ + L$#$ 2 E$$"&)4 S,* %&.$"&%

    )++$,& &*$' ),*'$#$$"& '" S,'$",$:

    Aim of the !esea!ch:

    '8 T %&.4 &*$ $++$,& + &'#)&'") )". $"()($$"& $#$ " L$#$ 2 E$$"&)4

    S,* %&.$"&% ),*'$#$$"& '" S,'$",$

    Method

    &he Sam(le

    T*$ %)

    + &*$

  • 8/10/2019 Research on Motivation and Engagement

    3/19

  • 8/10/2019 Research on Motivation and Engagement

    4/19

    .$&$'"$ '+ &*$ '&$% $+$,& & &*$ &'#)&'") )". $"()($$"& $#$ "

    ),*'$#$$"& '" S,'$",$

    $)'"$ &*$ )

  • 8/10/2019 Research on Motivation and Engagement

    5/19

    *or face validity, the researcher considered how accurate the instrument loo+ed

    li+e in terms of the translation of the construct. A panel of eperts used to establish

    face validity for the instrument. An !nglish teacher from the !nglish -anguage nit,

    in /0 estari aya eamined the translated statements in terms of the

    appropriateness of the language. &o enhance clarity and conciseness, the !nglish

    teacher made suggestions about the terminologies of some items and modied

    them into 4alay -anguage according to the sample characteristics.

    ,ontent *alidit"

    *or content validity, the researcher chec+ed the operation against the relevant

    content domain for the construct. A panel of eperts in teaching science were

    trusted to establish content validity for the instrument. &he panel consisted of four

    members, they were selected based on their epertise and eperience in teaching

    primary science . All of them were 5egree holders. &hey gauged the items for their

    relevance to /cience teaching. &hey were free to respond positively by saying 67es8

    or negatively by saying 69o8. &hey had also the choice to suggest any alternatives

    to the items content and to write any comments about the items. &he researcher

    analy:ed the data, the score (1% was given for the item if the panel of eperts

    determined that it was related to student;s motivation and performance , and (

  • 8/10/2019 Research on Motivation and Engagement

    6/19

    F +'%& )". &*'. $%&'"")'$ ;*',* )$ &*$ S,'$",$ M&'#)&'" J$%&'"")'$ )". S$+-

    D$#$

  • 8/10/2019 Research on Motivation and Engagement

    7/19

    &he internal consistency procedure was used to obtain the reliability estimate of

    the internal consistency of the measurementE In other words, it aimed to ma+e

    6@udgment8 on the instrument by estimating how well the items that reFected the

    same construct yielded similar results. &he ?earson correlation coeDcient between

    each item score and total score were calculated (/ee Appendi 2%. &he results show

    that all of the items were correlated with the instrument total scores. It can be

    concluded that the instrument had good internal consistency.

    &he Relia.ilit"

    Abd!l"ahman (1##$% described reliability as the Gdegree of consistency with which

    an instrument measured what it is supposed to measure.G &he Hronbachs alpha,

    and split Chalf procedures were used to obtain the reliability estimate of the

    instrument. Also he argued that, Gthe HoeDcient Alpha is a suitable procedure to

    use when responses get a specic value (not 1 or uire the use of AlphaG. In splithalf

    reliability, all items prepared to measure the same construct, were randomly divided

    into two setsE the correlation between these two total scores for each item were

    randomly divided into halves to be calculated.

    'uestionnai!e /: Science Motivation 'uestionnai!e

    &he Hronbachs alpha coeDcient and splitChalf reliability test were used to

    obtain the reliability estimate of the instrument, the results of the pilot study were

    summari:ed in &able 1.

    K

  • 8/10/2019 Research on Motivation and Engagement

    8/19

    T)?$ 1 R$%&% + R$')?''&4 T$%&%

    &he coeDcient &he

    value

    Hronbachs alpha

  • 8/10/2019 Research on Motivation and Engagement

    9/19

    T)?$ 2 R$%&% + R$')?''&4 T$%&%

    &he coeDcient &he

    value

    Hronbachs alpha

  • 8/10/2019 Research on Motivation and Engagement

    10/19

    &he coeDcient &he value

    Hronbachs alpha 1. K2#

    split Chalf

    9 of items

    1. K1

    1