Request for Qualifications - Manchester,...
Transcript of Request for Qualifications - Manchester,...
Town of Manchester, Connecticut General Services Department
Request for Proposals
Engineering Services for the Dredging of Center Springs Pond
RFP# 15/16-35
Proposals Due: December 18, 2015 @ 4:00 p.m.
General Services Department 494 Main St.
Manchester, CT 06040 (860) 647-3031
Fax (860) 647-5206
1
Request for Proposals Engineering Services for the
Dredging of Center Springs Pond I. INTRODUCTION The Town of Manchester is soliciting proposals from qualified consulting engineering firms to provide engineering design services for the preparation of complete engineering drawings, specifications, cost estimates, environmental documents and related services outlined herein for a project to dredge approximately 15,000 cubic yards of sediment from Center Springs Pond.
2
II. BACKGROUND Bigelow Brook is a major east-west running watercourse in the Town of Manchester. The brook flows through Center Springs Park into Center Springs Pond where water is impounded by a vertical concrete wall at the western edge of the pond and released by a control valve to a series of culverts which flow beneath Edgerton Street and an abandoned railroad embankment before discharging to an open channel easterly of Broad Street. The watershed area to the pond is approximately 1,100 acres. Center Springs Pond is located within Center Springs Park, an urban recreation area in the midst of several rehabilitation projects. Part of the Town’s desire to enhance this park includes improving the water quality in the pond, which exhibits algae outbreaks during the summer months. The Town contracted with Dr. Ken Wagner of Water Resource Services Inc. in 2014 to assess various options to improve the water quality. Dr. Wagner’s assessment concluded that dredging the pond would be the most effective. Earlier this year, the Town contracted with Weston & Sampson to collect bathymetric data and perform soft sediment sampling to quantify the amount of material to be dredged and to identify the best approach. It was determined that approximately 15,000 cubic yards of material should be dredged from the pond. III. SCOPE OF WORK The general scope of this project includes the following: Preliminary Design 1. Attend kickoff meeting with Town staff to discuss project approach and schedule.
2. Assemble base mapping required for design of proposed improvements using existing GIS
mapping and bathymetric mapping provided by the Town supplemented with utility mapping provided by utility companies and regulatory limits as shown on FEMA mapping and the Town of Manchester Wetlands Map. Field survey location and wetlands delineation is not anticipated for this project.
3. Prepare preliminary design plans showing dredging method and limits, dewatering areas and erosion and sedimentation control devices.
Environmental Permitting 4. Contact regulatory agencies to identify and verify all required environmental permits needed
based on the scope of work. It is expected that the project will require a Section 404 Permit from the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, a Section 401 Water Quality Certification and a General Permit for Water Resource Construction Activities from the Connecticut Department of Energy and Environmental Protection, and an Inland Wetland and Watercourses Permit, Floodplain Permit and Erosion and Sedimentation Control Permit from the Town of Manchester Planning and Zoning Commission.
3
5. Prepare necessary permit applications and supporting documentation for submittal to U.S.
Army Corps of Engineers, Connecticut Department of Energy and Environmental Protection and the Town of Manchester Planning and Zoning Commission. Provide draft applications to the Town for review and comment. Application fees will be paid directly by the Town.
6. Revise permit applications as required based on comments received during the permit review. 7. Attend one pre-application meeting with Town staff, one meeting with the Town’s
Conservation Commission, and up to two (2) meetings of the Town of Manchester Planning and Zoning Commission to present the project for approval.
Construction Documents 8. Prepare final contract plans, details, technical specifications and cost estimate. The Town will
furnish front end specifications for inclusion in bid package. 9. Prepare an estimated construction schedule for determination of contract time. 10. Deliverables include one final mylar, signed and sealed by the professional engineer in charge.
All other documents shall be delivered in electronic (.pdf) format. Bidding 11. Answer questions from potential bidders and prepare contract addenda as necessary. Construction 12. Attend one preconstruction meeting with the contractor. 13. Periodically visit site at the request of the Town’s construction inspector. For the construction phase, provide an hourly fee with an estimated quantity of 40 hours. IV. AVAILABLE INFORMATION The following information is attached to this request:
1. “An Assessment of Center Springs Pond” prepared by Weston & Sampson and Water Resource Services Inc.
2. Summary of sediment sampling and testing and conceptual quantity estimate prepared by Weston & Sampson.
4
V. DEADLINE AND DIRECTIONS FOR WRITTEN SUBMITTAL Consultants responding to this request shall submit four (4) copies of their proposal, placed in a sealed envelope and clearly marked “Engineering Services for the Dredging of Center Springs Pond”, RFQ NO. 15/16-35 no later than 4:00 p.m. on Friday, December 18, 2015 to:
HAND DELIVERY U.S. POSTAL MAIL DELIVERY Town of Manchester, Connecticut Town of Manchester, Connecticut Gerald Dupont Gerald Dupont Director of General Services Director of General Services Lincoln Center Lincoln Center 494 Main Street P.O. Box 191 Manchester, CT 06040 Manchester, CT 06045-0191
The following information is requested in the Proposal: 1. Brief background statement on the firm, discipline capabilities, principals, staff availability,
location, and financial stability. 2. Qualifications and position within firm(s) of those individuals who will be assigned to the
project. Include resumes of key personnel. 3. List and discussion of at least three similar projects by the key personnel and reference
names and addresses for these projects. 4. Proposed sub-consultants shall be clearly identified and the principal contact listed. 5. Personnel in responsible charge of the project will be required to possess and maintain a
valid Connecticut Professional Engineers License. 6. Concluding statement as to why your firm is best qualified to meet the needs of the Town
and why your firm should be selected. 7. Fee proposal in a separate sealed envelope. 8. Living Wage Certification Form VI. SELECTION PROCESS FOR CONSULTANTS Proposals will be reviewed by a selection committee of three or more. Proposals will be evaluated based on the following criteria:
• Quality of proposal • Demonstrated experience of the firm and assigned personnel on similar projects • Understanding of project scope • Fee proposal
The committee will select a successful consultant based on the above criteria.
5
VII. INQUIRIES All questions pertaining to this Request for Qualifications shall be emailed to Gerald R. Dupont, Director of General Services at [email protected] or by fax (860) 647-5206 no later than 7 days prior to the date proposals are due. All information given by the Town except by written addenda shall be informal and shall not be binding upon the Town nor shall it furnish a basis for legal action by any Proposer or prospective Proposer against the Town. This Request for Qualifications and any addendum shall only be issued on the Town web page http://generalservices1.townofmanchester.org/index.cfm/bids/. It shall be the responsibility of the bidder to download this information. THE TOWN OF MANCHESTER WILL NOT MAIL A SEPARATE HARD COPY OF ADDENDUM TO BIDDERS. No addendum will be issued less than 2 (two) calendar days before the scheduled bid opening unless it is to postpone the bid. VIII. LIVING WAGE ORDINANCE This RFQ is subject to the provisions of the Town of Manchester Living Wage Ordinance. A summary description of the ordinance and the certification form is attached. Firms are asked to indicate on the attached Certification Form if your firm would be considered a covered employer. The Certification Form shall be returned to the Town with the proposal. IX. GENERAL PROVISIONS A. The Town reserves the right to reject any and all proposals in whole or in part and to waive any informalities or technical defects in any proposal. Non selection of any proposal will mean that another acceptable proposal was deemed to be more advantageous to the Town of Manchester or that no proposal was accepted. B. The Town of Manchester is an equal opportunity employer, and requires an affirmative action policy for all of its Contractors and Vendors as a condition of doing business with the Town, as per Federal Order 11246. By submitting a Proposal for this Request for Proposal, all vendors and contractors agree to this condition of doing business with the Town and should the Town choose to audit their compliance, the vendor agrees to cooperate fully. C. Any act or acts of misrepresentation or collusion shall be a basis for disqualification of any proposal or proposals submitted by such persons guilty of said misrepresentation or collusion. In the event that the Town enters into a contract with any bidder who is guilty of misrepresentation or collusion and such conduct is discovered after the execution of said contract, the Town may cancel said contract without incurring liability, penalty or damages. D. All deliveries of commodities or services hereunder shall comply in every respect with all applicable laws of the Federal Government and/or the State of Connecticut. Purchases made by the Town of Manchester are exempt from payment of Federal Excise Taxes and the Connecticut Sales Tax and such taxes must not be included in bid prices.
6
E. Assignment by the successful respondent to a third party of any contract based on the Request for Proposal or any monies due is prohibited and will not be recognized by the Town of Manchester unless approved by the Town in writing. F. The Town will not be liable for any costs incurred in the preparation of the response for this Request for Proposal. All proposal submissions and materials become property of the Town and will not be returned. Respondents to this RFP are hereby notified that all proposals submitted and information contained therein and attached thereto shall be subject to disclosure under the Freedom of Information Act after evaluation and award decisions have been made. G. Selected consultants shall at its own expense and cost, obtain and keep in force, insurance per the attached limits during the duration of the project. Insurance coverage shall cover the consultant, all of its agents, employees, subcontractors and other providers of services. The contractor shall indemnify and hold harmless the Town of Manchester and their agents and employees from and against all claims, damages, losses, and expenses, including attorney’s fee of counsel selected by the Town of Manchester, arising out of or resulting from the performance of the work, and/or the supplying of materials, provided that any such claim, damage, loss or expense (a) is attributable to bodily injury, sickness, disease, or death, or to injury to or destruction of tangible property including the loss of use resulting therefrom and (b) is caused in whole or in part by any negligent act or omission of the Contractor, any Subcontractor, anyone directly or indirectly employed by any of them or anyone for whose acts any of them may be liable, regardless of whether or not it is caused in part by a party indemnified hereunder
7
X. INSURANCE REQUIREMENTS INSURANCE LIMITS AND HOLD HARMLESS LANGUAGE FOR CONTRACTOR/CONSULTANT AGREEMENTS 1. Firms providing professional services must provide A., B., or C. below, along with the
following: Errors and Omissions—aggregate limit of liability $1,000,000. A. General Liability and Property Damage -- $2,000,000 aggregate $1,000,000 each occurrence
B. Workers’ Compensation—as required by Connecticut State Statute C. Auto Liability and Property Damage -- $500,000 each occurrence
$1,000,000 aggregate (necessary if automobiles/trucks are used by contractors) 2. “The contractor/consultant agrees to indemnify and hold the Town of Manchester and its
employees, agents and servants harmless against any act, injury or claim arising from or as a result of the services provided by that contractor/consultant.”
3. All contractors/consultants are required to provide a certificate of insurance, naming the Town
of Manchester as “additional insured” on coverage’s A. and C. above.
8
Summary Description for Vendors Regarding Manchester’s Living Wage Ordinance
Effective February 1, 2010, the Town of Manchester adopted a living wage ordinance. This Summary Description is designed to provide any vendor bidding on a Town of Manchester contract with the key provisions of that ordinance. It does not contain the full ordinance. LIVING WAGE REQUIREMENT: The ordinance requires that companies awarded service contracts by the Town of Manchester exceeding $25,000 in any one fiscal year pay their Eligible Employees a living wage. Companies considered Covered Employers subject to this requirement are defined below. The Town of Manchester has determined that the contract resulting from this bid or Request for Proposals will be subject to the ordinance if the total contract value is $25,000 or more in any one fiscal year. The living wage is currently calculated to be $13.41/hour for employees that are provided comprehensive health care benefits, or $17.13/hour for employees that are not provided comprehensive health care benefits. The living wage and health benefit requirements are adjusted annually each July, effective July 1, 2010. Companies will be required to pay the applicable living wage rate in effect during the term of their contracts. COVERED EMPLOYERS AND EXEMPTIONS: The ordinance requires that Covered Employers pay the living wage rate. Certain employers are excluded from paying the living wage rate. They are as follows: - Non-profit organizations as defined by the ordinance, and - Entities that employ less than 25 eligible employees. ELIGIBLE EMPLOYEES: Eligible employees are all permanent, full time employees of the company (defined as a normal work week of at least 30 hours), working in the State of Connecticut, not just those working on the Town contract. The following are not considered eligible employees for the purposes of the living wage requirement: - Employees with a normal work week of less than 30 hours.
- Seasonal or temporary employees.
- Employees under the age of 18.
- Employees hired as part of a school-to-work program.
9
- Students who serves in a work-study program or as an intern. - Trainees participating for not more than six months in a training program. - Employees enrolled in a governmentally funded vocational rehabilitation program. - Volunteers working without pay. - Employees exempted under Section 14(c) of the Fair Labor Standards Act due to disabilities. - Any person whose wage rate is subject to a federal or State of Connecticut statute or regulation
mandating a prevailing wage rate. EMPLOYER OBLIGATIONS: Covered Employers are required to do the following pursuant to the ordinance. - Certify with the submission of their bid or proposal a) that they will pay the required living wage to
eligible employees if awarded a contract, or b) that they are exempt from requirements of the ordinance,
- Upon award, covered employers shall provide the Town a sworn affidavit affirming that all eligible
employees of the covered employer working in the State of Connecticut are receiving the living wage and health benefits required by this ordinance.
- This sworn affidavit shall be provided thereafter on an annual basis within 30 days of a request
being made by the Town if the duration of the contract exceeds one (1) year. - Notify their employees of their rights under the Living Wage Ordinance by posting a copy of the
ordinance and other materials prepared by the Town of Manchester in locations where employees will see them.
- Make best efforts to attempt to hire residents of the Town of Manchester for all new positions
which result from a service contract subject to the ordinance. PROHIBITED PRACTICES: - Covered Employers cannot decrease non-wage benefits (such as insurance, vacation, or
pension) as a means of complying with the living wage requirements. - Covered Employers cannot retaliate or discriminate against any employee for making a
complaint against the covered employer regarding compliance with living wage requirements.
10
ENFORCEMENT: The Town may enforce the provisions of this ordinance by the imposition of fines, suspension of contract or declaring the Covered Employer ineligible for future contracts. WAIVERS: The ordinance provides for the waiver of certain requirements in the ordinance. However, no waivers will be considered until the bidding process has been completed and a contract has been awarded. Requests for waivers must be made by the Covered Employer, in writing, to the General Manager. The General Manager shall submit the waiver request to the Board of Directors, which shall have the sole discretion as to whether it is granted. The above is intended to be a summary of the requirements of the living wage ordinance as they affect covered employers and is provided for informational purposes only. Employers should read the entire Living Wage Ordinance. It can be found online at www.townofmanchester.org on the left side of the page. Click on Document Center, scroll to General Services and click on Living Wage Ordinance.
11
TOWN OF MANCHESTER LIVING WAGE CERTIFICATION FORM
The Town of Manchester has determined that this contract may be subject to the provisions of the Manchester Living Wage Ordinance, Chapter 212 of the Manchester Code of Ordinances, Sections 212-1 through 212-11. Bidders are required to indicate whether they are a Covered Employer as defined by the Manchester Living Wage Ordinance or are exempt from the requirements by marking the appropriate section below. FAILURE TO INDICATE MAY RESULT IN THE REJECTION OF YOUR BID. I/We are a covered employer and shall pay the required living wage to eligible
employees and comply with the requirements of the ordinance during the term of the contract.
Or that:
I/We are not a Covered Employer and therefore not subject to Manchester’s Living Wage Ordinance for the reason indicated below: ____ Charitable foundations, charitable trusts or nonprofit agencies or nonprofit
corporations, provided that the foundation, trust or nonprofit agency or corporation is exempt from federal income taxation and may accept charitable contributions under Section 501 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, or any subsequent corresponding internal revenue code of the United States, as from time to time amended.
____ Bidder employs less than twenty five (25) eligible employees. ____ Annual contract value is less than $25,000. I, of do hereby certify Officer, Owner, Authorized Rep. Company Name that the representations made above are accurate for : Bid Name or RFP Name Signed by: Dated: TO BE RETURNED WITH BID OR RFP SUBMISSION.
An Assessment of Center Springs Pondin 2014 with Consideration of
Management Options
Prepared byWater Resource Services, Inc.
Wilbraham, MA
ForWeston & Sampson
Rocky Hill, CT
Revised February 2015
Table of Contents
Introduction and Background ......................................................................................................... 1
Project Approach ............................................................................................................................ 2
Results............................................................................................................................................. 3
Management Implications............................................................................................................... 8
Management Options ...................................................................................................................... 9
Summary....................................................................................................................................... 24
List of Tables
Table 1. Field Water Quality on October 7, 2014........................................................................... 7Table 2. Algae Management Options Review .............................................................................. 10
List of Figures
Figure 1. Center Springs Pond and Immediate Surroundings......................................................... 2Figure 2. Physical Park Peatures, Part 1 ......................................................................................... 4Figure 3. Physical Park Features, Part 2 ......................................................................................... 5Figure 4. Pond Periphery During Drawdown in October 2014 ...................................................... 6Figure 5. Plants of Center Springs Pond......................................................................................... 8Figure 6. Former Skating Ponds, Potential Detention/Treatment Ponds ...................................... 21
Page 1
Introduction and Background
Center Springs Park is a recreational resource for the Town of Manchester, Connecticut, locatedbetween Main Street (Rt 83) and Broad Street, slightly north of Center Street (Figure 1). CenterSprings Pond is the focal point of the park, a 6.1 acre, manmade water body constructed from alow marshy area fed by Bigelow Brook. Spring through fall activities have included walking,picnicking and fishing, while winter activities include sledding. Until the late 1990s two skatingand ice hockey areas were maintained in small basins separate from the stream and pond, butthese have been made obsolete by indoor rinks. The Parks and Recreation Department mainoffice is located in the park, overlooking the pond.
The park and the pond were the subject of a 1991-1992 diagnostic/feasibility study by BaystateEnvironmental Consultants of East Longmeadow, Massachusetts. Much of what was learned inthat study (BEC 1993) remains valid today, over two decades later. In particular, Center SpringsPond receives runoff from a 1.5 square mile urban drainage area (cover photo), bringing with it arange of contaminants including sediment, bacteria, nutrients, metals, hydrocarbons and a varietyof trash items. Background flows are low at about 1.1 cfs, but storm flows can exceed 100 cfs,causing flooding in the park.
The current water level of the pond was set in the 1920s with the erection of an outlet structure,but infilling over the years was substantial. Both coarse and fine materials, both inorganic andorganic, filled the pond to a substantial degree. In 1993 the average depth of the pond was 4.7feet, with a maximum of 10 feet observed near the dam. The BEC study recommended dredgingand a variety of structural and maintenance activities in the watershed to reduce future sedimentand trash inputs, but it was acknowledged the water quality problems would be an ongoingproblem in light of watershed features. Dredging was completed in 1995 and a trash rack wasplaced slightly upstream of the pond within the park to catch debris. Dedicated personnel on theParks and Recreation staff cleaned the trash rack regularly at one time, but clogging and erosioneventually forced removal of the trash rack. A sediment trapping forebay was constructed at thepoint of entry of Bigelow Brook to Center Springs Pond, and has trapped coarse solids very wellfor almost 20 years; it is cleaned every few years as warranted.
A promenade was constructed on top of the berm that separates the sedimentation forebay fromthe pond, providing handicapped access and facilitating fishing and a more complete water view.Plantings in the park have increased sledding safety and the overall visual effect. The primaryissue has remained the unaesthetic appearance of the pond during summer. Algae, floatingplants, and rooted submerged plants have created unsightly and malodorous conditions at times,and interfere with fishing. A secondary issue has been access, as the park is bordered byresidential streets with limited parking and parking space in the park itself is also limited.
Manchester recently acquired a parcel along Broad Street that allows creation of a new parkaccess point, with more adequate parking and entry under a historic railway, coming from thewest and bringing park users to the outlet of Center Springs Pond. Issues with the outlet pipe,known from the time of the dredging in the mid-1990s, are being addressed as part of the newentryway construction. There is also renewed interest in improving the pond as a more usefulpark amenity. This investigation and management evaluation is intended to advance that effort.
Page 2
Figure 1. Center Springs Pond and Immediate Surroundings
Project Approach
Water Resource Services, Inc. was asked to assist Weston & Sampson with the pond andwatershed evaluation. Dr. Kenneth Wagner of WRS worked on the original pond study as part ofthe BEC organization and is familiar with the dredging project. Dr. Wagner met with ScottSprague, the long-serving Director of Parks and Recreation, who has been involved with parkoperation and improvements for over 25 years, including the most recent entryway development.They toured the park, discussed current issues, and viewed the plans for the new entryway. Dr.Wagner spent a day in the park, on the pond, and in the watershed, evaluating conditions andcomparing issues to those of 20 years ago.
In-lake activities included assessment of algae, plants and field water quality, along with probingthe pond bottom. Center Springs Pond was drawn down approximately 5 feet while the newoutlet pipe is being installed, so considerable peripheral area was exposed. Most usefulinformation was gathered by simple observation. Familiarity with past assessment of the pondand the dredging project aided investigative efficiency, and Mr. Sprague’s insights were mosthelpful.
Page 3
Results
Watershed features are very similar to those encountered 20 years ago. Bigelow Brook drains anurbanized watershed of mostly residential area, but with a school, cemetery and somecommercial areas as well. Impervious surfaces represent a large portion of the watershed, suchthat runoff generation is high and storm flows are large relative to the size of the brook. Floodingis a very real threat to property, and the storm water drainage system is designed to get as muchwater into Bigelow Brook and out of the residential area as fast as possible. The result is elevatedflow with very little attenuation of volume or contaminants as it enters the park.
No water samples were collected during this investigation from storm water sources. Dryweather flows were observed and were low, as expected, but it is known from past experiencethat storm flows can be damaging. The stream is channelized, and in the park has steepembankments at least 3 feet high and very little meander. Water still overtops the stream banksin larger storms, as evidenced by debris and erosion outside the stream channel. The final stormbefore the trash rack was removed 3-4 years ago caused enough erosion after the rack clogged towarrant a restoration effort; the area has been filled and replanted.
Moving through the park from the eastern end where Bigelow Brook enters, the stream hasreinforced banks (concrete or rock) and a gravel/cobble bottom (Figure 2A). The former skatingareas run in parallel to the stream and are now unmanaged wetland areas (Figure 2B). BigelowBrook runs beside the former skating areas and passes under a bridge (Figure 2C) during low tomoderate flows; high flows have been known to exceed the height of the bridge decking. Thestream then traverses a long straight stretch with steep grassy banks bordered by grassy lawn(Figure 2D) until it reaches a buried culvert that leads to the sedimentation forebay (Figure 3A).The downstream side of the forebay is a berm upon which a wooden promenade has been placed,with a spillway at the southern (far) end (Figure 3B). The pond itself covers about 6 acres whenfull, but was lowered about 5 feet during the site visit (Figure 3C) for outlet construction. Theoutlet structure (Figure 3D) has both a subsurface drain and an overflow chamber.
The exposed periphery of the pond has some soft sediment (Figure 4A) and evidence offilamentous green algae mats (Figure 4B) that have dried upon exposure but are the source ofmany complaints when the pond is full. Aquatic smartweed (Polygonum amphibium) coveredmuch of the exposed area; this species is largely aquatic but can survive on pond banks as well.This plant has not been a dominant species in the pond when full in the past. Downed trees onthe wooded south side (Figures 4C and 4D) have been left as habitat, and are not visible with thepond full. Probing of the pond bottom revealed soft sediment averaging 1 foot deep in the upperthird of the pond, 2 feet deep in the middle area, and 3 feet deep at the outlet end. Coarsesediment is being trapped in the forebay, but finer sediments are moving into the pond andgradually refilling it.
Field water quality consisted of features that can be measured with instruments in the field,including temperature, dissolved oxygen, conductivity, pH, oxidation/reduction potential, andturbidity (Table 1). Values were elevated and similar to what was observed in the 1991-1992study, indicative of urban runoff impacts and elevated productivity in the pond itself. This doesnot preclude having an aesthetic pond that supports desirable fish and wildlife, but indicates thatthere will challenges to meet and obstacles to be overcome in order to meet use goals.
Figure 2. Physical Park Features, Part 1
A
Page 4
D
B
C
Figure 3. Physical Park Features, Part 2
A
Page 5
C
B
D
Figure 4. Pond Periphery during Drawdown in October 2014
Page 6
A
C
B
D
Page 7
Table 1. Field Water Quality on October 7, 2014
Plants observed in Center Springs Pond were exactly as observed in 1991-1992, with floatingmats of duckweed (Lemna minor) and watermeal (Wolffia columbiana) and submergent growthsof waterweed (Elodea canadensis) (Figure 5). Filamentous green algae clouds and mats wereabundant and were identified as Spirogyra under the microscope. This alga gives off a foul odorupon death and decay. Microscopic algae were not abundant, with two diatoms (Gomphonemaand Fragilaria) and a flagellate (Cryptomonas) encountered.
With the water level down and limited flushing in the weeks prior to the site visit, it would belogical to think that cyanobacteria could be dominant in Center Springs Pond, but a longstandingelevated nitrate level tends to depress cyanobacteria in favor of green algae. This may be littlecomfort for those seeing or smelling large green algae mats, but the high nitrogen level doesappear to prevent what could be more odorous or even toxic conditions. The duckweed andwatermeal are also indicators of high nitrate levels. Elevated levels of phosphorus tend to controlthe amount of algae and floating plants present, while the ratio of nitrogen to phosphorus tends todetermine the types of algae and floating plants present. Center Springs Pond has had a high N:Pratios for many years, and that appears to still be the case, based on observation of plants andalgae.
Park personnel report few problems with algae or floating plants since the dredging until just afew years ago. The elevated nitrate was found in the water inputs to the pond, and was not likelyaltered by dredging. But the incoming phosphorus is often in an unavailable form, and mustsettle in the pond and be processed before becoming available. It seems likely that the build-upof soft sediment, expected to be rich in phosphorus, since the 1995 dredging is the primarysource of available phosphorus, and has accumulated to a degree that allows floating plant andgreen algae mats to become nuisances again.
Fish were observed during the site visit, and included white suckers and small minnows inBigelow Brook and largemouth bass and bluegill sunfish in Center Springs Pond. Thisassemblage is the same as 20 years ago.
Date Time Depth Temp DO DO Sp. Cond pH ORP Turbidity
Station MM.DD.YY HH:MM:SS meters °C mg/l % Sat µS/cm Units mV NTU
Central 10.07.14 12:15:14 0.2 15.9 10.6 109.3 394 7.1 340 5.7
10.07.14 12:15:30 0.5 15.9 10.8 110.8 394 7.2 337 5.8
10.07.14 12:16:15 0.7 15.1 15.5 156.5 382 7.9 326 7.7
Outlet 10.07.14 12:31:23 0.1 15.9 9.5 97.8 402 8.0 225 7.4
10.07.14 12:31:57 0.5 15.7 10.6 108.5 401 8.0 230 6.8
10.07.14 12:33:32 0.8 14.8 12.5 124.7 399 8.0 244 6.4
Page 8
Figure 5. Plants of Center Springs Pond
Management Implications
Center Springs Pond is a manmade water body in an urbanized watershed. It was recognized inthe thorough study of over 20 years ago that managing the pond for acceptable conditions wouldbe a maintenance effort, and nothing has happened to change that situation. Adequate preventionis not really practical in an urban watershed, despite the federal government emphasis onwatershed management. Urban runoff tends to increase nutrient levels about tenfold, whilerestorative management methods tend to reduce nutrient levels by about half; the net increasecreates productivity problems in receiving ponds without at least periodic maintenance activities.
The environmental agencies of Connecticut have been more rational in their approach, seeking tolimit watershed inputs but acknowledging the near futility of trying to make urban runoff cleanenough to avoid problems in receiving lakes. Past management of Center Springs Pond has beenconducted with practical limitations in mind, but not enough maintenance has been conducted toretain desirable conditions indefinitely.
Page 9
Dredging was necessary to restore lost depth and remove sediment that was supporting denseplant growths and algae mats, and improved Center Springs Pond for about 15 years. Similarresults have been obtained in other urban park ponds. Removal of the soft sediment base greatlyminimizes mat forming algae and aquatic plants until the sediment is replaced. Formation of asedimentation forebay has limited infilling with coarse sediment, but fine sediment has passedthrough the forebay and settled in the pond. Enough of the capacity gained by dredging in 1995has been lost to warrant considering dredging again, but there are other options to be consideredas well.
Pond management can be divided into four general areas: prevention of problems, rapid responseto invasions or contamination, restoration from damage over time, and maintenance of conditionsin the face of continuing impact. Prevention is always desirable, but in an urban watershed thereare definite limits on what can be done short of buying property and converting it to uses thatcontribute fewer pollutants. The time for rapid response has long passed. Restoration wasattempted through dredging, and some success was achieved, but the continued input of sedimentand related contaminants has put Center Springs Pond back into a less desirable condition.Restoration could again be applied, but some form of maintenance activity is also needed.
There appears to be recognition of the need for maintenance in Manchester, and while morepermanent improvements are desirable, the cost and limited duration of benefits suggest thatmaintenance activities would be included in any major program this time. Further discussion ofneeds and options is advisable, but a technically feasible approach can be suggested here.
Management Options
Means for controlling algae and floating aquatic plants that get their nutrition from the watercolumn or surface of the sediment are plentiful, but not all will be applicable or feasible (Table2). Methods with high applicability include watershed management, dredging, and phosphorusinactivation. Approaches with moderate applicability include settling agents, algaecides,sonication and microbiological augmentation.
Watershed management of any kind would improve water quality in Center Springs Pond, andthere are undoubtedly things that could be done for low cost, including homeowner educationand routine catch basin cleaning. Phosphorus is being voluntarily removed from most lawnfertilizers by the manufacturers, so improved water quality should be evident over the nextdecade. However, no simple or affordable measures are available that will provide the level ofimprovement needed on a regular basis; the magnitude of loading from this watershed is simplytoo great.
Yet there is an opportunity to improve the quality of some of the water that enters the pond thatwould allow this improved water to be added after the flushing by the main body of the storm iscomplete. The former skating ponds (Figures 2B and 6), now almost empty and adjacent to thestream, could be used as detention areas for first flush storm water, usually of the poorest quality.Water detained or even treated in these basins could be discharged at the end of the storm toimprove water quality in the pond. The ponds would need some modification to function atmaximum effectiveness, but could be used as is with just the addition of a diversion point in thestream.
Page 10
Table 2. Algae Management Options Review
OPTION MODE OF ACTION ADVANTAGES DISADVANTAGES APPLICABILITY TOCENTER SPRINGS
WATERSHED CONTROLS
1) Management fornutrient inputreduction
♦ Includes wide rangeof watershed andlake edge activitiesintended to eliminatenutrient sources orreduce delivery tolake
♦ Essential componentof algal controlstrategy whereinternal recycling isnot the dominantnutrient source, anddesired even whereinternal recycling isimportant
♦ Acts against theoriginal source ofalgal nutrition
♦ Creates sustainablelimitation on algalgrowth
♦ May controldelivery of otherunwanted pollutantsto lake
♦ Facilitatesecosystemmanagementapproach whichconsiders more thanjust algal control
♦ May involveconsiderable lagtime beforeimprovementobserved
♦ May not besufficient toachieve goalswithout someform of in-lakemanagement
♦ Reduction ofoverall systemfertility mayimpact fisheries
♦ May cause shiftin nutrient ratioswhich favor lessdesirable algae
♦ High but with limits♦ Need source controls
and pollutant trappingthroughout watershed
♦ Cost will be veryhigh; expect $5-10Mper sq. mi (have 1.5sq. mi. to address).
♦ Could use old skatingareas for trappingprior to pond entry
Page 11
OPTION MODE OF ACTION ADVANTAGES DISADVANTAGES APPLICABILITY TOCENTER SPRINGS
IN-LAKE PHYSICAL CONTROLS
2) Circulation anddestratification
♦ Use of water or airto keep water inmotion
♦ Intended to preventor breakstratification
♦ Generally driven bymechanical orpneumatic force
♦ Reduces surfacebuild-up of algalscums
♦ May disrupt growthof blue-green algae
♦ Counteraction ofanoxia improveshabitat forfish/invertebrates
♦ Can eliminatelocalized problemswithout obviousimpact on wholelake
♦ May spreadlocalized impacts
♦ May loweroxygen levels inshallow water
♦ May promotedownstreamimpacts
♦ Low by itself♦ Cyanobacteria not
dominant in thissystem
♦ Not likely tocounteract all loadingimpacts
♦ Achieving even andconsistent mixingwill be a challenge inshallow system
♦ May support othertechniques, butinadequate by itself
2) Dilution/flushing ♦ Addition of water ofbetter quality candilute nutrients
♦ Addition of water ofsimilar or poorerquality flushessystem to minimizealgal build-up
♦ May havecontinuous orperiodic additions
♦ Dilution reducesnutrientconcentrationswithout alteringload
♦ Flushing minimizesdetention; responseto pollutants maybe reduced
♦ Diverts waterfrom other uses
♦ Flushing maywash desirablezooplankton fromlake
♦ Use of poorerquality waterincreases loads
♦ Possibledownstreamimpacts
♦ Low♦ No ready source of
water at key time(summer)
♦ Already get highflushing in wetweather
Page 12
OPTION MODE OF ACTION ADVANTAGES DISADVANTAGES APPLICABILITY TOCENTER SPRINGS
4) Drawdown ♦ Lowering of waterover autumn periodallows oxidation,desiccation andcompaction ofsediments
♦ Duration ofexposure and degreeof dewatering ofexposed areas areimportant
♦ Algae are affectedmainly by reductionin availablenutrients.
♦ May reduceavailable nutrientsor nutrient ratios,affecting algalbiomass andcomposition
♦ Opportunity forshoreline clean-up/structure repair
♦ Flood control utility♦ May provide rooted
plant control aswell
♦ Possible impactson non-targetresources
♦ Possibleimpairment ofwater supply
♦ Alteration ofdownstreamflows and winterwater level
♦ May result ingreater nutrientavailability ifflushinginadequate
♦ Low♦ Would have to nearly
drain lake to impactmost rooted plants
♦ Will not impact keyareas of nutrientreserves
♦ May harm fish♦ Could help flush
internal loaddownstream, but notwithout risks andlong termcontinuation
5) Dredging ♦ Sediment isphysically removedby wet or dryexcavation, withdeposition in acontainment area fordewatering
♦ Nutrient reserves areremoved and algalgrowth can belimited by nutrientavailability
♦ Mechanical orhydraulic options
♦ Can control algae ifinternal recycling ismain source
♦ Increases waterdepth
♦ Can reducesediment oxygendemand
♦ Can improvespawning habitatfor many fishspecies
♦ Temporarilyremoves benthicinvertebrates
♦ May createturbidity
♦ May eliminatefish community
♦ Possible impactsfrom dredgedmaterial disposal
♦ Interference withrecreation orother uses duringdredging
♦ High, done before♦ Removing
accumulatedsediment from areasof the pond withelevated availablesediment P would bebeneficial
♦ Very expensiveproposition,considerableadditionalinvestigation neededto plan project
Page 13
OPTION MODE OF ACTION ADVANTAGES DISADVANTAGES APPLICABILITY TOCENTER SPRINGS
6.a) Dyes ♦ Water-soluble dye ismixed with lakewater, therebylimiting lightpenetration andinhibiting algalgrowth
♦ Dyes remain insolution untilwashed out ofsystem.
♦ Produces appealingcolor
♦ Creates illusion ofgreater depth
♦ May not controlsurface bloom-forming species
♦ May not controlgrowth of shallowwater algal mats
♦ Altered thermalregime
♦ Low♦ Big storm could flush
dye out of system♦ Impacts fishing♦ Public acceptability
in question
6.b) Surface covers ♦ Opaque sheetmaterial applied towater surface
♦ Minimizesatmospheric andwildlife pollutantinputs
♦ Minimizesatmospheric gasexchange
♦ Limits recreation
♦ Low♦ Prevents most uses
7) Mechanical removal ♦ Filtering of pumpedwater for watersupply purposes
♦ Collection offloating scums ormats with booms,nets, or otherdevices
♦ Continuous ormultiple applicationsper year usuallyneeded
♦ Algae andassociated nutrientscan be removedfrom system
♦ Surface collectioncan be applied asneeded
♦ May removefloating debris
♦ Collected algae dryto minimal volume
♦ Filtration requireshigh backwashand sludgehandlingcapability
♦ Labor and/orcapital intensive
♦ Variablecollectionefficiency
♦ Possible impactson non-targetaquatic life
♦ Low♦ Filtering arrangement
would have to belarge, expensive, andspace intensive
Page 14
OPTION MODE OF ACTION ADVANTAGES DISADVANTAGES APPLICABILITY TOCENTER SPRINGS
8)Selective withdrawal ♦ Discharge of bottomwater which maycontain (or besusceptible to) lowoxygen and highernutrient levels
♦ May be pumped orutilize passive headdifferential
♦ Removes targetedwater from lakeefficiently
♦ May prevent anoxiaand phosphorusbuild up
♦ May remove initialphase of algalblooms which startin deep water
♦ May createcoldwaterconditionsdownstream
♦ Possibledownstreamimpacts of poorwater quality
♦ May promotemixing of poorquality bottomwater withsurface waters
♦ May causeunintendeddrawdown ifinflows do notmatch withdrawal
♦ Low♦ Pond not strongly
stratified; hard to getjust deepest waterinto discharge
♦ May cause summerdrawdown
9) Sonication ♦ Sound waves disruptalgal cells
♦ Supposedly affectsonly algae (newtechnique)
♦ Applicable inlocalized areas
♦ Unknown effectson non-targetorganisms
♦ May releasecellular toxins orother undesirablecontents
♦ Moderate♦ Technique gaining
acceptance, mayprevent matformation
♦ Would need multipleunits
IN-LAKE CHEMICAL CONTROLS
10) Hypolimneticaeration oroxygenation
♦ Addition of air oroxygen providesoxic conditions
♦ Maintainsstratification
♦ Can also withdrawwater, oxygenate,then replace
♦ Oxic conditionsreduce Pavailability
♦ Oxygen improveshabitat
♦ Oxygen reducesbuild-up of reducedcpds
♦ May disruptthermal layersimportant to fishcommunity
♦ Supersaturationwith gasesharmful to fish
♦ Low♦ No real hypolimnion,
not clear that there isan oxygen problem
Page 15
OPTION MODE OF ACTION ADVANTAGES DISADVANTAGES APPLICABILITY TOCENTER SPRINGS
11) Algaecides ♦ Liquid or pelletizedalgaecides applied totarget area
♦ Algae killed bydirect toxicity ormetabolicinterference
♦ Typically requiresapplication at leastonce/yr, often morefrequently
♦ Rapid eliminationof algae from watercolumn , normallywith increasedwater clarity
♦ May result in netmovement ofnutrients to bottomof lake
♦ Possible toxicityto non-targetspecies
♦ Restrictions onwater use forvarying time aftertreatment
♦ Increased oxygendemand andpossible toxicity
♦ Possible recyclingof nutrients
♦ Moderate♦ Not the preferred
approach, but helpsmaintain clarity asinterim measure
♦ Could be applied onan as needed basis
♦ Most algaecides notespecially effective ongreen algae mats
12) Phosphorusinactivation
♦ Typically salts ofaluminum,lanthanum orcalcium are added tothe lake
♦ Phosphorus in thetreated water columnis complexed andsettled to the bottomof the lake
♦ Phosphorus in uppersediment layer iscomplexed, reducingrelease fromsediment
♦ Permanence ofbinding varies bybinder
♦ Can provide rapid,major decrease inphosphorusconcentration inwater column
♦ Can minimizerelease ofphosphorus fromsediment
♦ May remove othernutrients andcontaminants aswell as phosphorus
♦ Flexible withregard to depth ofapplication andspeed ofimprovement
♦ Possible toxicityto fish andinvertebrates
♦ May causefluctuations inwater chemistry,especially pH,during treatment
♦ Possibleresuspension offloc in shallowareas
♦ Adds to bottomsediment, buttypically aninsignificantamount
♦ High♦ Results in water
column can bedramatically positive,but do not last withcontinued loading
♦ Can offset loadingvery quickly; interimand back-up forwatershedmanagement
♦ May be essential forsediment Pinactivation
♦ Must maintain pHbetween 6 and 8 SUto minimize non-target impacts
Page 16
OPTION MODE OF ACTION ADVANTAGES DISADVANTAGES APPLICABILITY TOCENTER SPRINGS
13) Sedimentoxidation
♦ Addition ofoxidants, bindersand pH adjustors tooxidize sediment
♦ Binding ofphosphorus isenhanced
♦ Denitrification isstimulated
♦ Can reducephosphorus supplyto algae
♦ Can alter N:P ratiosin water column
♦ May decreasesediment oxygendemand
♦ Possible impactson benthic biota
♦ Longevity ofeffects not wellknown
♦ Possible source ofnitrogen for blue-green algae
♦ Low♦ Applicable, but rarely
implemented in theUSA
♦ Will not counteractexternal load;expensive substitutefor P inactivationtreatment
14) Settling agents ♦ Closely aligned withphosphorusinactivation, but canbe used to reducealgae directly too
♦ Lime, alum orpolymers applied
♦ Creates a floc withalgae and othersuspended particles
♦ Floc settles tobottom of lake
♦ Removes algae andincreases waterclarity withoutlysing most cells
♦ Reduces nutrientrecycling if flocsufficient
♦ Removes non-algalparticles as well asalgae
♦ May reducedissolved P levels
♦ Possible impactson aquatic fauna
♦ Resuspension offloc possible inshallow, well-mixed waters
♦ Promotesincreasedsedimentaccumulation
♦ Moderate♦ Aluminum use for P
inactivation also fillsthis function
♦ Alternativecoagulants exist, butmay not inactivate Pto desired extent
15) Selective nutrientaddition
♦ Ratio of nutrientschanged byadditions of selectednutrients
♦ Addition of non-limiting nutrientscan changecomposition of algalcommunity
♦ Can reduce algallevels wherecontrol of limitingnutrient not feasible
♦ Can promote non-nuisance forms ofalgae
♦ Can improveenergy flow
♦ May result ingreater algalabundance
♦ May requirefrequentapplication
♦ Possibledownstreameffects
♦ Low♦ Not usually
implemented wherenutrient loading ishigh
♦ High nitrate alreadyprovides most benefitof this approach
Page 17
OPTION MODE OF ACTION ADVANTAGES DISADVANTAGES APPLICABILITY TOCENTER SPRINGS
IN-LAKE BIOLOGICAL CONTROLS
16) Enhanced grazing ♦ Manipulation ofbiologicalcomponents ofsystem to achievegrazing control overalgae
♦ Typically involvesalteration of fishcommunity topromote growth ofgrazing zooplankton
♦ May increase waterclarity by changesin algal biomass orcell size withoutreduction ofnutrient levels
♦ Can convertunwanted algae intofish
♦ Harnesses naturalprocesses
♦ May involveintroduction ofexotic species
♦ Effects may notbe controllable orlasting
♦ May foster shiftsin algalcomposition toeven lessdesirable forms
♦ Low♦ Reliability over time
tends to be low;biological controlsare not stable
♦ High flushingimpacts zooplanktongrazers
16.a) Herbivorous fish ♦ Stocking of fish thateat algae
♦ Converts algaedirectly intopotentiallyharvestable fish
♦ Grazing pressurecan be adjustedthrough stockingrate
♦ Typically requiresintroduction ofnon-nativespecies
♦ Difficult tocontrol over longterm
♦ Smaller algalforms may bebenefited andbloom
♦ Low♦ Non-native species
introductionsgenerallyinappropriate
♦ Possible permittingissues
Page 18
OPTION MODE OF ACTION ADVANTAGES DISADVANTAGES APPLICABILITY TOCENTER SPRINGS
16.b) Herbivorouszooplankton
♦ Reduction inplanktivorous fishto promote grazingpressure byzooplankton
♦ May involvestocking piscivoresor removingplanktivores
♦ May also involvestockingzooplankton orestablishing refugia
♦ Converts algaeindirectly intoharvestable fish
♦ Zooplanktonresponse toincreasing algaecan be rapid
♦ Generallycompatible withmost fisherymanagement goals
♦ Highly variableresponse expected;temporal andspatial variabilitymay be high
♦ Requires carefulmonitoring andmanagementaction on 1-5 yrbasis
♦ Larger or toxicalgal forms may bebenefitted andbloom
♦ Low♦ More large zooplankton
will not affect mats♦ Limited by fish
community composition;may consume addedzooplankton
♦ High flushing reducesability of zooplanktonpopulation to stay large
17) Bottom-feedingfish removal
♦ Removes fish thatbrowse amongbottom deposits,releasing nutrientsto the water columnby physicalagitation andexcretion
♦ Reduces turbidityand nutrientadditions from thissource
♦ May restructurefish community inmore desirablemanner
♦ Targeted fishspecies aredifficult to control
♦ Reduction in fishpopulations valuedby some lake users(human/non-human)
♦ Low♦ Not a known problem at
this time
18) Microbialcompetition
♦ Addition ofmicrobes, oftenwith oxygenation,can tie up nutrientsand limit algae
♦ Tends to control Nmore than P
♦ Shifts nutrient useto organisms thatdo not form scumsHarnesses naturalprocesses
♦ May decreasesediment
♦ Minimal scientificevaluation
♦ N control may stillfavorcyanobacteria
♦ May need aerationsystem to getacceptable results
♦ Moderate♦ Little documented
success, but no knownadverse impacts
♦ Relatively inexpensiveoption for experimentation
Page 19
OPTION MODE OF ACTION ADVANTAGES DISADVANTAGES APPLICABILITY TOCENTER SPRINGS
19) Pathogens ♦ Addition ofinoculum to initiateattack on algal cells
♦ May involve fungi,bacteria or viruses
♦ May createlakewide“epidemic” andreduction of algalbiomass
♦ May providesustained controlthrough cycles
♦ Can be highlyspecific to algae
♦ Largelyexperimental
♦ May promoteresistant forms
♦ May cause highoxygen demand orrelease of toxins
♦ Effects on non-target organismsuncertain
♦ Low♦ No commercially
available forms♦ Results not impressive to
date
20) Competitionand allelopathyby plants
♦ Plants may tie upsufficient nutrientsto limit algae
♦ Plants may create alight limitationChemical inhibitionof algae may occurthrough substancesreleased by otherorganisms
♦ Harnesses powerof naturalbiologicalinteractions
♦ May provideresponsive andprolonged control
♦ Some algal formsappear resistant
♦ Use of plants maylead to problemswith vascularplants
♦ Use of plantmaterial may causedepression ofoxygen levels
♦ Low♦ Potential for dense rooted
plant community high,not desirable
20a) Plantings fornutrient control
♦ Plant growths ofsufficient densitymay limit algalaccess to nutrients
♦ Plants can exudeallelopathicsubstances whichinhibit algal growth
♦ Can be managedto limitinterference withrecreation andprovide habitat
♦ Wetland cells in oradjacent to thelake can minimizenutrient inputs
♦ Vascular plantsmay achievenuisance densities
♦ Vascular plantsenescence mayrelease nutrients
♦ Low♦ Potential for dense rooted
plant community high,not desirable
Page 20
OPTION MODE OF ACTION ADVANTAGES DISADVANTAGES APPLICABILITY TOCENTER SPRINGS
20b) Plantings forlight control
♦ Plant species withfloating leaves canshade out manyalgal growths atelevated densities
♦ Vascular plantscan be more easilyharvested thanmost algae
♦ Many floatingspecies providewaterfowl food
♦ Floating plants canbe a recreationalnuisance
♦ Low surfacemixing andatmosphericcontact promoteanoxia
♦ Low♦ Shallow lake, not likely
to get enough lightcontrol with plants
20c) Addition ofbarley straw
♦ Input of barleystraw can set off aseries of chemicalreactions whichlimit algal growth
♦ Release ofallelopathicchemicals can killalgae
♦ Release of humicsubstances can bindphosphorus
♦ Materials andapplication arerelativelyinexpensive
♦ Decline in algalabundance is moregradual than withalgaecides,limiting oxygendemand and therelease of cellcontents
♦ Success appearslinked to uncertainand potentiallyuncontrollablewater chemistryfactors
♦ Depression ofoxygen levels mayresult
♦ Water chemistrymay be altered inother waysunsuitable for non-target organisms
♦ Low♦ Not registered as an
algaecide♦ Unreliable results in
other systems♦ Cyanobacteria not a
problem in this pond
Page 21
Figure 6. Former Skating Ponds, Potential Detention/Treatment Ponds
The basic layout would include a leaping weir in the stream thatcontinue to the pond via the Bigelow Brook channel but diverts muchformer skating ponds as detention areas. When the detention ponds arinlet culvert would tend to shift flows back to the Bigelow Brook chainto the detention ponds could be held for as long as desired, but woCenter Springs Pond by a permeable outlet structure (gabion weir orallowed the detention ponds to gradually drain back into the Bigelodownstream end. Ideally, the former skating ponds can be cleaned oueffective detention areas, and as manmade structures they shouldwetlands regulation, but a discussion with the local commission and st
One additional improvement could be the installation of a dosing statother coagulants to be added to incoming storm water. Enhanced(former skating ponds) would greatly improve the quality of water discThis is not source management, but would be a major improvementcoagulant addition and enhanced settling, more storm water could bdetention basins, to the point where water quality in Center Springs Pnearly all times.
Former Skating Ponds
allowed normal flows toof the elevated flow to thee full, back pressure at thennel. Storm water diverteduld be most easily sent tofunctional equivalent) thatw Brook channel at their
t and made into maximallynot be subject to inland
ate agencies is needed.
ion, allowing aluminum orsettling in the two basinsharged back to the stream.
to pollutant trapping. Withe processed through theseond could be acceptable at
Page 22
A detention/treatment system involving the former skating ponds would be within the park andmore easily managed than diffuse efforts in the watershed. Such systems are fairly common inFlorida, where the difficulty of managing urban storm water has been recognized and alternativeapproaches to maintaining lake water quality have been sought. A capital cost approaching$200,000 is anticipated, including a dosing station for treating storm water, and the operatingcost will depend on the weather and storm water volume treated. Assuming that water equatingto about five pond volumes was treated each year, the annual operation cost would be on theorder of $10,000 to $15,000.
As an alternative, aluminum or another coagulant could be dosed into the forebay, probably intothe stream just upstream of the culvert, allowing mixing to occur in the culvert with particlesettling in the forebay. This would improve solids retention in the forebay and lower phosphoruslevels entering the pond. It may be necessary to alter the outlet arrangement from the forebayfrom submerged pipes with an overflow weir to the pipes having their intakes near the surface orthe weir becoming the primary exit point. Calculation of the detention time of the forebay overthe range of flows experienced should be performed, but under most circumstances most solidsshould be retained. Where coagulated solids do pass through the forebay, the associatedphosphorus should be largely inactivated and not fuel algal mats.
An inactivation system associated with the forebay would require less effort than one in theformer skating ponds, and could be made more secure in association with the park building nearthat site. A chemical tank and metering pump with controls could feed coagulant via anunderground line to the stream just upstream of the culvert leading to the forebay for about$50,000. Enhanced mixing with compressed air would raise the cost by about $30,000, but maybe unnecessary. Some baffling within or just upstream of the culvert in the stream should besufficient to mix the coagulant with the storm water at minimal cost. Operation costs would besimilar to those projected for the former skating ponds site ($10,000 - $15,000). One additionthat would be desirable would be an automated control system that would turn the system on inresponse to precipitation or increased flow; a cost of about $25,000 would be anticipated.
Treatment of the pond directly is also an option, with a dosing distribution system that includes amixing function. This would be turned on after storms to clear the water in the pond andinactivate phosphorus that has entered it. While accumulation of solids in the pond wouldincrease under such a scenario, it would not be much more than currently experienced. However,as the pond has experienced substantial infilling since dredging about 20 years ago, capturingmore solids in the forebay would seem preferable, especially if dredging is repeated. An in-pondtreatment system would be more expensive than the forebay option, mainly owing to moredistribution tubing and the need for an active mixing system (usually compressed air). A cost ofabout $150,000 is envisioned. Operational costs would be proportional to use; more chemicalwould probably be used and more power would be needed to run the mixing system, suggestingan annual operational cost of $20,000 to $25,000.
As an alternative to a dosing station to directly address the pond, periodic treatment by boat toinactivate phosphorus in the water and surficial sediment would limit growth of algae, but theduration of effectiveness is uncertain. The dose needed is also uncertain at this point, butassuming a dose of 50 g/m2 (about the average for such treatments in New England) over 5 acresof pond, a treatment would cost about $15,000. Unless storm water is also treated, the benefits
Page 23
may only last a short time, but algal mat formation might be prevented for the summer seasonwith a single late spring treatment. Rooted plant growth would be largely unaffected. If anything,clearer water may increase plant growth.
Dredging was performed in 1994 – 1995 and improved conditions to some extent for about 15years, despite continued urban runoff dominance. Repeated dredging would be expected toprovide similar benefits, although failure to address runoff inputs will limit success and durationof benefits. Soft sediment currently in Center Springs Pond is estimated at about 16,000 cubicyards. Removal would be expected to cost on the order of $500,000 at today’s rates. This is adesirable but expensive option.
Estimation of dredging cost is a highly site specific effort, and should be conducted by anexperienced engineering firm that considers sediment quantity and quality, physical removalmethods, disposal options, and restoration of peripheral sites and any containment area. We donot have recent sediment quality data and the estimation of sediment quantity is based on limitedprobing, but there is no reason to believe that the project would be appreciably different than theone conducted 20 years ago. Representatives of the Town of Manchester have suggested thatdisposal in an existing town landfill would be possible, limiting disposal costs. Costs have risenin 20 years, but the process would likely be the same, with water routed around the side of thepond in a channel and sediment removal conducted with conventional equipment under “dry”conditions.
The original cost estimate provided by BEC in 1992 was $403,450, but this included forebayconstruction and the fishing pier, among other improvements, and actual dredging cost wasestimated at about $300,000 for up to 21,500 cubic yards, or about $14/cy, exclusive of designand permitting costs. The range of costs encountered in recent dredging projects have rangedfrom $30 to $100 per cubic yard, all inclusive, with position along that range largely determinedby sediment quality and disposal requirements, which have assumed increased importance overthe last two decades. Assuming that the town landfill can accommodate the current sediment inCenter Springs Pond, a cost near the low end of the recent range would be expected. This leadsto a very rough estimate of $480,000, rounded up to $500,000 above. A cost in excess of $40/cywould not be expected, suggesting a cost of $640,000 as a maximum.
To further the dredging option, sediment quantity and quality need to be more preciselyevaluated. Mapping and calculation of sediment quantity will cost about $5000. Sediment qualityis now assessed with one sample per 1000 cy removed, so for the currently estimated 16,000 cywe would need to collect 16 samples at a cost of about $3000 and analyze them at a cost of about$16,000 ($1000 per sample), or $19,000. Adding consideration of dredging and disposal options,a dredging feasibility assessment that more precisely estimates costs and serves as the basis fordesign and permitting could be produced for $30,000.
Other options for pond improvement with more moderate applicability include settling agents,algaecides, sonication and microbiological treatments. Settling agents would include thealuminum treatments previously described, but could include alternative coagulants that wouldmostly settle solids and might be less effective at making phosphorus unavailable. At similar costto aluminum coagulants, settling agents would be much less favored.
Page 24
Algaecides include mainly copper and peroxide compounds, neither of which is very effectiveagainst filamentous green mats. A relatively new herbicide with the active ingredientflumioxazin has shown promise for control of algal mats and could be tried. If a single treatmentper year would suffice, this could be an affordable option at about $5000 per treatment.
Sonication is also a relatively new technique, but is based on laboratory procedures that break upalgal clumps for analysis and is applicable to field situations. Sound waves of a specificfrequency range have been found to damage algae cells, although not all algae are susceptible.The method requires direct exposure to the sound waves; rocks, plants or other obstructionsminimize impact. Consequently, multiple units may be necessary to cover an area like CenterSprings Pond and some form of plant control may be needed. Also, green algae mats are fairlyresistant once formed, so the units would need to operate all the time and be focused on most ofthe pond bottom. Units cost $3000 to $5000 each, and as many as 6 units might be needed inCenter Springs Pond, but once in place the only operational costs are power and maintenance(i.e, keeping units clean). It is not clear that sonication will solve the algae problem in CenterSprings Pond, but a unit might be tested in a target area as an experiment.
Microbiological treatments are difficult to evaluate, as there is virtually no peer reviewedliterature. The theory is that additives that help break down organic compounds or stimulatebacterial activity, possibly along with engineered bacteria, can digest organic sediment andminimize algae growths. The exact mechanisms are not well explained, but in most cases thetreatment is coupled with some form of oxygenation, as oxygen is needed for bacterialrespiration. Documented successes do exist, but there are also many failures and no publishedevaluation of this group of techniques. Some experimentation may be warranted, but it cannot beconsidered a front line technique at this time.
The above management options do not consider rooted plant issues in Center Springs Pond. Thefloating plants duckweed and watermeal behave more like algae, taking their nutrition from thewater column. The dominant rooted plant in Center Springs Pond is waterweed, which has notbeen mentioned as a problem, and may in fact not be an issue for management at this time. But ifthere are concerns over waterweed density, an entirely different list of rooted plant managementoptions would need to be considered. Dredging and herbicides are on that list, but no otheroptions discussed here would be applicable.
Summary
Center Springs Pond is a valued resource and the centerpiece of the associated park. It sufferswater quality impairment as a consequence of its largely urbanized watershed, and no reasonableamount of watershed management can be expected to improve pond condition to the desiredlevel. The condition of the pond will become even more important with park accessimprovements now underway, and the Town of Manchester is looking into best managementpractices for maintaining Center Springs Pond.
A short survey in October of 2014 found water quality influences similar to those encountered inthe early 1990s; storm water runoff is the main contributor of nutrients, sediment and othercontaminants to the pond, considerable soft sediment has built up in the pond since dredgingabout 20 years ago, and pond biology is nearly identical to that encountered two decades ago.Dredging improved conditions for about 15 years, and continued management of the forebay
Page 25
installed in association with the dredging has limited coarse sediment accumulation in the pond,but restoration and/or maintenance actions are again needed to enhance pond condition.
Review of options narrowed the preferred approach to repeated dredging with enhancedcoagulation of incoming storm water. If dredging is not conducted, direct treatment of thesediment to inactivate phosphorus that fuels algal mat development would be desirable, and mayneed to be repeated at least annually at a cost on the order of $15,000 per treatment. If dredgingis conducted, benefits can be prolonged by installation of a dosing station for coagulants thatfocuses on phosphorus but also removes many other contaminants. A system could be installedin association with the former skating ponds, the forebay, or in the pond itself. The leastexpensive but effective option, estimated at about $75,000 capital cost and $15,000 annualoperating cost, would involve automated metering of an aluminum compound into the streamjust upstream of the culvert leading to the forebay.
Proper evaluation of dredging options and costs would be part of a feasibility assessment focusedon sediment quantity and quality at an estimated cost of $30,000. However, based on thedredging conducted 20 years ago, indication of available landfill capacity by the town, and recentdredging projects, a total cost on the order of $500,000 to $640,000 for removal of 16,000 cubicyards is currently envisioned. The dredging feasibility assessment is critical to verifyingassumptions made in this preliminary estimate and refining it to the point where design andbidding can proceed.
Even if dredging and enhanced coagulation in the forebay are implemented, actions upstream ofthe pond are warranted to protect the investment. Watershed management is always appropriate,but will not be sufficient by itself to protect the pond; the urban nature of the watershed is notamenable to adequate water quality improvement through available best management practices.Conversion of the former skating ponds into detention basins to hold first flush water, with orwithout enhanced coagulation, has potential to greatly improve incoming water quality, althoughthe potential capacity of those ponds requires additional evaluation.
Massachusetts Connecticut New Hampshire Vermont New York Pennsylvania New Jersey South Carolina Florida
273 Dividend RoadRocky Hill, CT 06067
tel: 860-513-1473 fax: 860-513-1483www.westonandsampson.com
July 31, 2015
Mr. Jeff LaMalvaTown EngineerTown of Manchester494 Main StreetLincoln Center2nd FloorManchester, Connecticut 06040
Re: Summary of Results - Center Springs Pond, Manchester, CT
Dear Mr. LaMalva:
This letter report serves to summarize fieldwork and results related to providing you with an initial costestimate for dredging Center Springs Pond. The work involved (1) measuring pond depth and sedimentthickness; (2) obtaining and analyzing three composite sediment samples; (3) estimating the thicknessof soft sediment and (4) developing an initial cost estimate.
WORK PERFORMED
An initial reconnaissance noted a continuous band of mature forest along the southern edge ofthe pond; the northern edge is partially grassed and sloping. Some algal mats were noted alongwith aquatic vegetation in the pond.
Actual field measurements and sampling was carried out by a two-person crew utilizing a Park& Recreation Department boat. Bathymetric data was measured utilizing a graduated staff. AGPS Trimble Unit (GeoXH) was used to locate each point. The staff was hand driven throughthe sediment layer until refusal with GPS recordings taken at the top of soft sediment and at thedepth of refusal.
Three (3) soft sediment samples were obtained by hand auger, then composited. The sampleswere transported to Con-Test Analytical Laboratory (East Longmeadow, MA) for analysis.
The Connecticut Department of Energy and Environmental Protection’s (CTDEEP) on-lineNatural Diversity Database (December 2014) map was reviewed for an initial screening of Stateand Federal Listed Species and Significant Natural Communities. Center Springs Pond is notwithin or near an area identified as potentially sensitive.
CTDEEP’s on-line Water Classification Map (August 2014) was reviewed. Center Springs Pondis assigned Class A Surface Water and Class GB for groundwater.
The Federal Emergency Management Agency’s on-line FIRM mapping was utilized to identifyfloodway areas and special flood hazard areas.
GPS data points and field data were inputted in AutoCad to depict bathymetric and softsediment measurements.
Measured soft sediment volume, as calculated using AutoCad, is 11,920 cubic yards.
Mr. Jeff LaMalvaCenter Springs Pond
July 31, 2015Page 2
The results of the sediment analyses were evaluated by Weston & Sampson LicensedEnvironmental Professionals and compared against the Connecticut Department of Energy andEnvironmental Protection’s Remediation Standard Regulations (RSRs) and the Town ofManchester’s Landfill Waste Characterization Parameters and Acceptance Limits. The resultsindicate elevated levels of certain semi-volatile organic compounds, with an exceedance ofCTDEEP’s Industrial/Commercial Direct Exposure Criteria and GB Pollution Mobility Criteria andthe Town’s landfill acceptance limits for Benzo(a)pyrene.
Several dredging/excavation contractors were contacted. Many requested that a site visit beconducted and inquired about whether the project would be bid or would the Town requestsimply cost estimates.
DREDGING ESTIMATE
See attached table for the opinion of probable construction costs. The costs are based on lowering thepond.
Very truly yours,
WESTON & SAMPSON ENGINEERS, INC.
Ingrid M. Jacobs, PETeam Leader / Project Manager
Preliminary Opinion of Probable Costs
Dredging of Center Springs Pond
Town of Manchester, ConnecticutJuly 2015 (rev. August 5, 2015)
Item No. Description Unit
Estimated
Quantity Unit Cost Total Cost
ENGINEERING DESIGN & BIDDING: APPLIES TO ANY METHODOLOGY
1 Sampling & Laboratory LS 1 75,000.00$ 75,000.00$2 Design & Permitting LS 1 60,000.00$ 60,000.00$3 Bidding LS 1 7,500.00$ 7,500.00$
142,500.00$DREDGING: ASSUME POND IS DEWATERED
4 Mobilization/demobilization LS 1 40,000.00$ 40,000.00$5 Dredging CY 15,000 35.00$ 525,000.00$6 Dewatering CY 15,000 8.00$ 120,000.00$7 Transport to Landfill TON 10,200 15.00$ 153,000.00$8 Site Restoration LS 1 20,000.00$ 20,000.00$
858,000.00$
Contingency (25%) 214,500.00$Bonds & Insurance (2%) 17,200.00$Total Construction Cost 1,089,700.00$
Total Project Cost 1,232,200.00$
Engineering Sub-Total
Construction Sub-Total
Number Minimum Elevation Maximum Elevation Color
FIRM MAPCENTER SPRINGS POND
MANCHESTER, CTSCALE:1"=500'
Oakland
Wapping
Lydallville
Talcottville
Highland Park
Forest Village
Mayberry Village
Manchester Green
Manchester
Vernon
Bolton
Glastonbury
South Windsor
East Hartford
Hebron
I 84
Middle Tpke
State Hwy 30
Wilbur Cross Hwy
Sta
te H
wy 8
3
Tolland Tpke
Center StI 384
Sta
te H
wy 8
5
Ke
ene
y S
t
US Hwy 44
I 291
Lake St
Cla
rk S
t
Hills St
Deming St
Ellington Rd
Spring StB
ell S
t
US Hwy 44A
Hill
sto
wn
Rd
Hartford Rd
Hilliard St
Porter St
Ave
ry S
t
Chapel Rd
Taylor St
Ad
am
s S
t
Hartford Tpke
Bro
ad S
t
Forest St
Oak St
Tu
nne
l Rd
Route
83
Gard
ner S
t
Bush Hill Rd
Fe
lt R
d
Kelly Rd
Silver Ln
Fo
ste
r S
t
Line St
Wetherell StO
akland Rd
Fern St
Oakla
nd S
t
Smith St
Su
mm
it St
Lydall St
Fin
ley S
t
Highland St
Vo
lpi R
d
US Hwy 6
Ph
oen
ix S
t
Wetherall St
Campmeeting Rd
Carter St
Woodbridge S
t
Pleasant Valley Rd
Henry St
Tolland St
Echo Dr
Elm
St
Woodland St
Ma
nche
ste
r Rd
Olcott St
Bidwell St
Scott Dr
Route 30
Pa
rke
r St
Sp
ruce
StSpencer St
Lo
ng
Hill S
t
Green Rd
School St
Lo
ng
Hill
Rd
Burnham St
Au
tum
n S
t
Ad
dis
on
Rd
Pin
e S
t
Route 6
Sla
ter S
t
State Hwy 534
Boston T
pke
Unio
n S
t
Dobso
n R
d
New
Sta
te H
wy
Garth Rd
Hackmatack St
Bolton Center Rd
Ferguso
n Rd
Hilt
on D
r
Warren Ave
Risley Rd
How
e Rd
Wells St
McK
ee
St
Elm H
ill Rd
Bir
ch
Mo
unta
in R
dTimber Trl
VL Falls Rd
Hale Rd
Holl S
t
Oconnell Dr
Briarw
ood Dr
Hollister St
Trinity Ave
Fo
ste
r R
d Maple St
Park St
Croft Dr
Main
St
Tinke
r Pond R
d
Box Mountain Dr
Governors Hwy
Mountain Rd
Love
Ln
Sandra Dr
Great Swamp Rd
Sheldon Rd
Charter Oak St
Buckland Hills Dr
Bo
x M
ou
nta
in R
d
Oak
Gro
ve S
t
Bissell St
Wylly
s S
t
Irvin
g S
t
Kenne
dy
Rd
Montauk Dr
Vern
on S
t
Wa
lnu
t St
Den
nis
on
Rdg
Lexington Rd
Villa
Lo
uis
a R
d
Bryan
Dr
Le
no
x S
t
Redwood Rd
Cid
ermill R
d
Timrod Rd
Pitk
in S
t
Coo
pe
r St
Gray Rd
Chester St
Be
nto
n S
t
Clinton Dr
Cougar Dr
Pie
rce
Rd
Timrod Trl
Brent Dr
Laurel St
Ham
ilton
Dr
Ram
ey D
r
Barry Rd
Cooper Hill St
Birch St
Wa
lke
r StC
an
no
n R
d
Gre
en
woo
d D
r
Lefo
ll B
lvd
Gra
nd
e R
d
Qry Brook Dr
Brent Rd
Lyne
ss S
t
St John St
Kent D
r
Dartm
ou
th R
d
Bo
bby L
n
Pavilion Dr
Valle
y V
iew
Dr
Country Ln
Talc
ottvi
lle R
d
May Rd
Judy Ln
Ced
ar S
t
Diane Dr
Birch Rd
Orchard Hill Dr
Long Hill Dr
Burnside Ave
Woodland Dr
Mill St
Je
nn
y C
lfs
Tudor Ln
Griswold St
Haw
thorn
e S
t
Gerald Dr
Boulder Rd
Carriage Dr
Bu
ttern
ut
Ln
Leland Dr
Indian Hill Trl
Opal D
r
Po
nd L
n
Yale
Dr
Cip
olla
Dr
Route 74
West St
Sa
ddle
Hill R
d
Florence St
Wic
kha
m D
r
Loomis St
Min
necha
ug D
r
Loomis Rd
Fiano Rd
Blu
e R
idg
e D
r
Northview Dr
Bu
ckla
nd R
d
Walek Farms Rd
Ced
ar
Rid
ge
Ter
Harv
est L
n
Hercules Dr
Welle
s R
d
Margaret Dr
Mather St
Anita Dr
Mallard Dr
Am
an
da D
r
Batso
n D
r
Bo
lton
St
Lookout Lndg
Shallowbrook Ln
Uconn Ave
Bayberry Trl
Rid
gew
ood R
d
Uto
pia
Rd Pro
gress
Dr
Be
ldo
n R
d
Ralph Rd
Parking Lot
Oliver Rd
Hansen Dr
Benedic
t D
r
Hickory Dr
Sally Dr
Mohegan Trl
Wheele
r R
d
Be
lle W
ood
s D
r
Wa
dde
ll Rd
Dee
r R
un
Trl
Redstone Rd
Elro
St
Richmond Dr
Ta
ma
rac D
r
Gard
en G
rove
Rd
Nile
s S
t
Am
he
rst D
r
Russell St
Joan Cir
Thompson Rd
Bentley Dr
Coo
p S
aw
mill
Rd
Woodside St
Fairway Xing
Lexi Dr
Bellridge Rd
Laurel Ln
Stra
wb
erry
Ln
Skylin
e D
r
Brookfield Dr
Glo
de L
n
Campbell Ave
Grady Rd
Esse
x S
t
Villa
ge
St
Mile
sto
ne
Dr
Rosew
ood Ln
Ivy Ln
Lakewood Cir
Carpenter R
d
Winthrop Rd
Founders Dr
Ba
yb
erry
Rd
Davis
Rd
Bouldercrest Ln
Still Field Rd
Judge Ln
Tracy Dr
Deepwood Dr
Castle Hl
April Dr
Discovery Rd
Be
tte D
r
Hemlock St
Echo
Rid
ge D
r
Sh
erw
oo
d D
r
Woodhaven Rd
Acce
ss D
r
Anth
ony R
d
Che
ne
y L
n
La
ure
l Te
r
Lo
ng
vie
w D
r
Arnold Dr
Woodhill Rd
Cotta
ge
St
Elio
t Dr
Santina Dr
Frances Dr
Sa
wka D
r
Hartl Dr
Glenwood St
Jean Rd
Jeffe
rson S
t
Terrace Ave
Chelsea Rdg
Rustic Ln
Gerard St
Pe
ila D
r
Windsor St
Mountain Dr
Towhee Ln
Gilb
ert
Ln
Cas
e D
r
Hol
lis R
d
Knollwood Rd
Gerb
er
RdElizabeth St
Grove St
Eastern Blvd
Tunxis Trl
Lyda
ll Rd
Lorraine Rd
Hunter Ln
Ma
no
r Ln
Am
ato
Dr
Au
stin
Cir
Kim
berly
Dr
McN
ulty
Dr
Ruff Cir
Te
xa
s S
t
Bru
ce
Rd
Gle
n R
d
Whitney Rd
Rushforde Dr
Hudson St
Elberta Rd
Syra
cu
se
Dr
Fowler Ln
Lila
c S
t
Driggs R
d
Mu
rie
lle D
r
Po
nd V
iew
Rd
Primer Rd
Fir Grove Rd
Nancy
Dr
En
rico
Rd
Berkley Dr
Grisso
m R
d
Haylin
Dr
Rossetto Dr
Landfill W
ay
Ma
rge
ry D
r
Em
ily Ln
Scarborough Rd
John Dr
Horiz
on W
ay
Autumn Dr
Rub
y Dr
Lilley St
Ree
d R
d
Se
rve
r St
Avo
n D
r
Gre
en
woo
d S
t
Esqu
ire D
r
Kane
RdC
laire
Rd
Cardinal Dr
Higbie D
rW
edgewood D
r
Holyo
ke D
r
Burnham Street Ext
Dep
ot S
t
Cherrytree Dr
Sto
ck P
l
Apel Pl
Mill P
ond Dr
Chester Dr
Pe
nny L
n
Zimmer Rd
Alpine Dr
South St
Fernwood Dr
Blu
efie
ld D
r
Exete
r Ct
Sterling Pl
Oak S
t
Timber Trl
Diane D
r
US Hwy 6
Main St
Route
30
Oak St
Forest St
Bayberry Rd
I 291
Gerald Dr
Elm
St
Tim
be
r T
rl
I 384 Birch
Mounta
in R
d
I 84
Pa
rke
r St
Wilb
ur C
ross
Hw
y
Sla
ter S
t
Mounta
in R
d
Scho
ol S
t
Dia
ne
Dr
Hilt
on
Dr
Blue Ridge Dr
US Hwy 6
Exit 1
Exit 4
Exit 5
Exit 61
Exit 60
Exit 62 & 60
Exit 65
Exit 3
Exit 63
Exit 2
Exit 5
Exit 2
Exit 1
§¦291
§¦384
§¦84
§¦291
£¤6
£¤44
£¤44A
SV30
SV85
SV83
SV194
Natural Diversity Data Base
December 2014
Areas
NOTE: This map shows general locationsof State and Federal Listed Species and
Significant Natural Communities. Informationon listed species is collected and compiledby the Natural Diversity Data Base (NDDB)
from a number of data sources . Exact locations of species have been buffered to produce the general locations. Exact locations
of species and communities occur somewhere in the shaded areas, not necessarily in the center. A new mapping format is being employed
that more accurately models important riparian and aquatic areas and eliminates the need for the upstream/downstream searches required
in previous versions.
This map is intended for use as a
preliminary screening tool for conducting aNatural Diversity Data Base Review Request.To use the map, locate the project boundaries
and any additional affected areas. If theproject is within a shaded area there may be a potential conflict with a listed species. For
more information, complete a Request for Natural Diversity Data Base State Listed Species Review form (DEP-APP-007), and
submit it to the NDDB along with the required maps and information. More detailed instructions are provided with
the request form on our website.
www.ct.gov/deep/nddbrequest
Use the CTECO Interactive Map Viewersat www.cteco.uconn.edu to more precisely
search for and locate a site and to view aerial imagery with NDDB Areas.
QUESTIONS: Department of Energy and Environmental Protection (DEEP)
79 Elm St., Hartford CT 06106Phone (860) 424-3011
MANCHESTER, CT
0 10.5Miles ±
Town Boundary
State and Federal Listed Species & Significant Natural Communities
SAMPLE LOCATION S-1 S-2 S-3
DATE SAMPLED 7/7/2015 7/7/2015 7/7/2015
WORK ORDER NO. 15G0314 15G0314 15G0314 RES DEC I/C DEC GB PMC3
PARAMETER (Units)2
Polychlorinated Biphenyls by EPA method 8082A (mg/kg)
Total PCBs BDL BDL BDL 1 10 -- NA
Volatile Organic Compounds by EPA method 8260C (mg/kg) BDL BDL BDL CS CS CS NA
Semivolatile Organic Compounds by EPA method 8270D (mg/kg)
Acenaphthylene 0.80 0.41 <0.43 1,000 2,500 84 NA
Anthracene 1.0 0.69 <0.43 1,000 2,500 400 NA
Benzo(a)anthracene 4.2 2.6 0.62 1 7.8 1 NA
Benzo(a)pyrene 4.8 2.7 0.70 1 1 1 NA
Benzo(b)fluoranthene 6.9 3.6 0.99 1 7.8 1 NA
Benzo(g,h,i)perylene 4.0 2.0 0.55 NE NE NE NA
Benzo(k)fluoranthene 2.6 1.4 <0.43 8.4 78 1 NA
Bis(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate 1.6 1.0 <0.87 44 410 11 NA
Carbazole 0.55 <0.31 <0.43 NE NE NE NA
Chrysene 6.4 3.6 0.90 NE NE NE NA
Dibenz(a,h)anthracene 0.76 0.45 <0.43 NE NE NE NA
Fluoranthene 11 6.5 1.5 1,000 2,500 56 NA
Fluorene 0.66 0.41 <0.43 1,000 2,500 56 NA
Indeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene 4.0 2.0 0.56 NE NE NE NA
Phenanthrene 6.5 3.7 0.71 1,000 2,500 40 NA
Pyrene 9.1 7.1 1.5 1,000 2,500 40 NA
Extractable Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons by CT method (mg/kg) 850 470 440 500 2,500 2,500 NE
TCLP RCRA 8 Metals by EPA methods 1311 / 6010C / 7470A (mg/l)
Barium 1.6 0.84 1.3 -- -- 10 100
Cadmium 0.0076 0.0042 0.0053 -- -- 0.05 1.0
Lead 0.14 0.12 0.12 -- -- 0.15 5.0
Reactive Cyanide by method 9014 (mg/kg) <4.0 <3.9 <3.9 NE NE NE NE
Reactive Sulfide by method 9030A (mg/kg) <20 <20 <19 NE NE NE NE
Ignitability by method 1030 ABSENT ABSENT ABSENT NE NE NE NE
Free Liquids by method 9095B PRESENT PRESENT PRESENT NE NE NE NE
Specific Gravity 1.6510 1.3078 1.6271 NE NE NE NE
Percent Moisture 45.10 60.94 39.81 NE NE NE NE
pH by method 9045C (standard units) 6.7 6.8 6.6 NE NE NE <2 and >12.5
Total Solids by method 2540G (%) 34.8 54.9 39.2 NE NE NE NE
R:\Manchester CT\Center Springs Pond\Phase 1 Sampling-Analysis\Tables\[Soil Analytical Table_Revised.xls]Soil Summary
NOTES:
1. Analytical results compared to Connecticut Remediation Standard Regulations (January 1996; revised Amended 2013).
2. Only compounds that were detected are provided in this table. For a complete list of analytes refer to laboratory report.
3. Center Springs Pond is located within a GB groundwater area.
** = Criteria is based upon detection limit
mg/kg = milligrams per kilogram = Exceeds RES DEC
mg/l = milligrams per liter = Exceeds RES DEC and I/C DEC
CS = Compound Specific = Exceeds GB PMC
NA = Not Applicable = Exceeds GB PMC and RES DEC
NE = Not Established by DEEP = Exceeds RES DEC, I/C DEC and GB PMC
BOLD = compound detected at that concentration.
BDL = Below Detection Limit
GB PMC = Pollutant Mobility Criteria for GB Groundwater Areas
RES DEC = Residential Direct Exposure Criteria
I/C DEC = Industrial/Commercial Direct Exposure Criteria
-- = Not Applicable
TCLP = Toxicity Characteristic Leaching Procedure
REMEDIATION STANDARD REGULATIONS1 Hazardous Waste Criteria4
MANCHESTER, CONNECTICUT
SUMMARY OF SOIL SAMPLE ANALYTICAL RESULTS
TABLE 1
CENTER SPRINGS POND
July 2015
Page 1 of 1Prepared by: JCWReviewed by: ___
39 Spruce Street * East Longmeadow, MA 01028 * FAX 413/525-6405 * TEL. 413/525-2332
July 15, 2015
Valarie Ferro
Weston & Sampson
273 Dividend Road
Rocky Hill, CT 06067
Project Location: Manchester, CT
Client Job Number:
Project Number: [none]
Laboratory Work Order Number: 15G0314
Enclosed are results of analyses for samples received by the laboratory on July 8, 2015. If you have any questions concerning
this report, please feel free to contact me.
Sincerely,
James M. Georgantas
Project Manager
Page 1 of 74 15G0314_1 Contest_Final 07 15 15 1002 07/15/15 10:02:29
Table of Contents
Table of Contents
Sample Summary 4
Case Narrative 6
Sample Results 8
15G0314-01 8
15G0314-02 21
15G0314-03 34
Sample Preparation Information 45
QC Data 47
Volatile Organic Compounds by GC/MS 47
B125866 47
Semivolatile Organic Compounds by GC/MS 50
B125812 50
Polychlorinated Biphenyls By GC/ECD 55
B125806 55
Petroleum Hydrocarbons Analyses 56
B125809 56
Conventional Chemistry Parameters by EPA/APHA/SW-846 Methods (Total) 57
B125823 57
B125846 57
B125864 57
B125865 57
TCLP - Metals Analyses 58
B125932 58
B125941 58
B126039 58
Dual Column RPD Report 60
Page 2 of 74 15G0314_1 Contest_Final 07 15 15 1002 07/15/15 10:02:29
Table of Contents
Table of Contents (continued)
Flag/Qualifier Summary 62
Certifications 63
Chain of Custody/Sample Receipt 67
Page 3 of 74 15G0314_1 Contest_Final 07 15 15 1002 07/15/15 10:02:29
Table of Contents
39 Spruce Street * East Longmeadow, MA 01028 * FAX 413/525-6405 * TEL. 413/525-2332
ANALYTICAL SUMMARY
7/15/2015
Weston & Sampson
273 Dividend Road
Rocky Hill, CT 06067
ATTN: Valarie Ferro
[none]
15G0314
The results of analyses performed on the following samples submitted to the CON-TEST Analytical Laboratory are found in this report.
PROJECT LOCATION:
PURCHASE ORDER NUMBER:
PROJECT NUMBER:
REPORT DATE:
WORK ORDER NUMBER:
FIELD SAMPLE # LAB ID: MATRIX TESTSAMPLE DESCRIPTION SUB LAB
Manchester, CT
S-1 15G0314-01 Soil - MA M-MA071/CT
PH-0520
ASTM D792 MA M-MA071/CT
PH-0520
CTDEP ETPH
SM 2540G
SM D 422-63 GAI-LAP-20-1996/AASH
TO
SW-846 1030
SW-846 1311
SW-846 6010C
SW-846 7470A
SW-846 8082A
SW-846 8260C
SW-846 8270D
SW-846 9014
SW-846 9030A
SW-846 9045C
SW-846 9095B
S-2 15G0314-02 Soil - MA M-MA071/CT
PH-0520
ASTM D792 MA M-MA071/CT
PH-0520
CTDEP ETPH
SM 2540G
SM D 422-63 GAI-LAP-20-1996/AASH
TO
SW-846 1030
SW-846 1311
SW-846 6010C
SW-846 7470A
SW-846 8082A
SW-846 8260C
SW-846 8270D
SW-846 9014
SW-846 9030A
SW-846 9045C
SW-846 9095B
[TOC_1]Sample Summary[TOC]
Page 4 of 74 15G0314_1 Contest_Final 07 15 15 1002 07/15/15 10:02:29
Table of Contents
39 Spruce Street * East Longmeadow, MA 01028 * FAX 413/525-6405 * TEL. 413/525-2332
ANALYTICAL SUMMARY
7/15/2015
Weston & Sampson
273 Dividend Road
Rocky Hill, CT 06067
ATTN: Valarie Ferro
[none]
15G0314
The results of analyses performed on the following samples submitted to the CON-TEST Analytical Laboratory are found in this report.
PROJECT LOCATION:
PURCHASE ORDER NUMBER:
PROJECT NUMBER:
REPORT DATE:
WORK ORDER NUMBER:
FIELD SAMPLE # LAB ID: MATRIX TESTSAMPLE DESCRIPTION SUB LAB
Manchester, CT
S-3 15G0314-03 Soil - MA M-MA071/CT
PH-0520
ASTM D792 MA M-MA071/CT
PH-0520
CTDEP ETPH
SM 2540G
SM D 422-63 GAI-LAP-20-1996/AASH
TO
SW-846 1030
SW-846 1311
SW-846 6010C
SW-846 7470A
SW-846 8082A
SW-846 8260C
SW-846 8270D
SW-846 9014
SW-846 9030A
SW-846 9045C
SW-846 9095B
Page 5 of 74 15G0314_1 Contest_Final 07 15 15 1002 07/15/15 10:02:29
Table of Contents
39 Spruce Street * East Longmeadow, MA 01028 * FAX 413/525-6405 * TEL. 413/525-2332
CASE NARRATIVE SUMMARY
All reported results are within defined laboratory quality control objectives unless listed below or otherwise qualified in this report.
[TOC_1]Case Narrative[TOC]
SW-846 8260C
Qualifications:
Continuing calibration did not meet method specifications and was biased on the low side for this compound. Increased uncertainty is
associated with the reported value which is likely to be biased on the low side.Analyte & Samples(s) Qualified:
V-05
1,2-Dibromo-3-chloropropane (DBCP)
15G0314-01[S-1], 15G0314-02[S-2], 15G0314-03[S-3], B125866-BLK1, B125866-BS1
SW-846 8270D
Qualifications:
Reported result is estimated. Value reported over verified calibration range.
Analyte & Samples(s) Qualified:
E
Fluoranthene
15G0314-01[S-1], 15G0314-02[S-2]
Pyrene
15G0314-01[S-1]
Laboratory fortified blank/laboratory control sample recovery and duplicate recovery are outside of control limits. Reported value for this
compound is likely to be biased on the low side.Analyte & Samples(s) Qualified:
L-04
2,4-Dinitrophenol
15G0314-01[S-1], 15G0314-01RE1[S-1], 15G0314-02[S-2], 15G0314-02RE1[S-2], 15G0314-03[S-3], B125812-BLK1, B125812-BS1, B125812-BSD1
Response factor is less than method specified minimum acceptable value. Reduced precision and accuracy may be associated with reported
result.Analyte & Samples(s) Qualified:
V-16
Pentachloronitrobenzene
15G0314-01[S-1], 15G0314-01RE1[S-1], 15G0314-02[S-2], 15G0314-02RE1[S-2], 15G0314-03[S-3], B125812-BLK1, B125812-BS1, B125812-BSD1
Page 6 of 74 15G0314_1 Contest_Final 07 15 15 1002 07/15/15 10:02:29
Table of Contents
39 Spruce Street * East Longmeadow, MA 01028 * FAX 413/525-6405 * TEL. 413/525-2332
SW-846 8270D
The LCS sample recoveries for required RCP 8270 compounds were all within control limits specified by the method, 40-140% for base/neutrals and 30-130% for acids except
for �difficult analytes� listed below and/or otherwise listed in this narrative: Difficult analytes for soil - limits between 10 and 180% depending on the compound (see QC
summary for limits): 3,3�-Dichlorobenzidine, Pyridine, Aniline, 4-Chloroaniline, 3-Nitroaniline, and n-Nitrosodiphenylamine.
All reporting limits specified on the chain-of-custody were met, except for Pyridine, 1,2,4,5-Tetrachlorobenzene and Pentachloronitrobenzene for the most protective criteria since
the laboratory cannot achieve the required RCP calibration criteria at these levels unless otherwise listed in this narrative .
The results of analyses reported only relate to samples submitted to the Con-Test Analytical Laboratory for testing.
I certify that the analyses listed above, unless specifically listed as subcontracted, if any, were performed under my direction according to the approved methodologies listed
in this document, and that based upon my inquiry of those individuals immediately responsible for obtaining the information, the material contained in this report is, to the
best of my knowledge and belief, accurate and complete.
Johanna K. Harrington
Manager, Laboratory Reporting
Page 7 of 74 15G0314_1 Contest_Final 07 15 15 1002 07/15/15 10:02:29
Table of Contents
39 Spruce Street * East Longmeadow, MA 01028 * FAX 413/525-6405 * TEL. 413/525-2332
Date Received: 7/8/2015
Work Order: 15G0314Sample Description:Project Location: Manchester, CT
Sample ID: 15G0314-01
Field Sample #: S-1
Sample Matrix: Soil
Sampled: 7/8/2015 11:00
[TOC_2]15G0314-01[TOC]
AnalystAnalyzedDilution Flag/QualRLResultsAnalyte
Date/Time
Units
Date
PreparedMethod
Volatile Organic Compounds by GC/MS
ND 0.17 7/9/15 15:04 MFFmg/Kg dry 7/9/15SW-846 8260C1Acetone
ND 0.010 7/9/15 15:04 MFFmg/Kg dry 7/9/15SW-846 8260C1Acrylonitrile
ND 0.0034 7/9/15 15:04 MFFmg/Kg dry 7/9/15SW-846 8260C1Benzene
ND 0.0034 7/9/15 15:04 MFFmg/Kg dry 7/9/15SW-846 8260C1Bromobenzene
ND 0.0034 7/9/15 15:04 MFFmg/Kg dry 7/9/15SW-846 8260C1Bromodichloromethane
ND 0.0034 7/9/15 15:04 MFFmg/Kg dry 7/9/15SW-846 8260C1Bromoform
ND 0.017 7/9/15 15:04 MFFmg/Kg dry 7/9/15SW-846 8260C1Bromomethane
ND 0.068 7/9/15 15:04 MFFmg/Kg dry 7/9/15SW-846 8260C12-Butanone (MEK)
ND 0.0068 7/9/15 15:04 MFFmg/Kg dry 7/9/15SW-846 8260C1n-Butylbenzene
ND 0.0068 7/9/15 15:04 MFFmg/Kg dry 7/9/15SW-846 8260C1sec-Butylbenzene
ND 0.0068 7/9/15 15:04 MFFmg/Kg dry 7/9/15SW-846 8260C1tert-Butylbenzene
ND 0.034 7/9/15 15:04 MFFmg/Kg dry 7/9/15SW-846 8260C1Carbon Disulfide
ND 0.0034 7/9/15 15:04 MFFmg/Kg dry 7/9/15SW-846 8260C1Carbon Tetrachloride
ND 0.0034 7/9/15 15:04 MFFmg/Kg dry 7/9/15SW-846 8260C1Chlorobenzene
ND 0.0017 7/9/15 15:04 MFFmg/Kg dry 7/9/15SW-846 8260C1Chlorodibromomethane
ND 0.034 7/9/15 15:04 MFFmg/Kg dry 7/9/15SW-846 8260C1Chloroethane
ND 0.0068 7/9/15 15:04 MFFmg/Kg dry 7/9/15SW-846 8260C1Chloroform
ND 0.017 7/9/15 15:04 MFFmg/Kg dry 7/9/15SW-846 8260C1Chloromethane
ND 0.0034 7/9/15 15:04 MFFmg/Kg dry 7/9/15SW-846 8260C12-Chlorotoluene
ND 0.0034 7/9/15 15:04 MFFmg/Kg dry 7/9/15SW-846 8260C14-Chlorotoluene
ND 0.0034 7/9/15 15:04 MFFmg/Kg dry 7/9/15SW-846 8260C1 V-051,2-Dibromo-3-chloropropane (DBCP)
ND 0.0034 7/9/15 15:04 MFFmg/Kg dry 7/9/15SW-846 8260C11,2-Dibromoethane (EDB)
ND 0.0034 7/9/15 15:04 MFFmg/Kg dry 7/9/15SW-846 8260C1Dibromomethane
ND 0.0034 7/9/15 15:04 MFFmg/Kg dry 7/9/15SW-846 8260C11,2-Dichlorobenzene
ND 0.0034 7/9/15 15:04 MFFmg/Kg dry 7/9/15SW-846 8260C11,3-Dichlorobenzene
ND 0.0034 7/9/15 15:04 MFFmg/Kg dry 7/9/15SW-846 8260C11,4-Dichlorobenzene
ND 0.0068 7/9/15 15:04 MFFmg/Kg dry 7/9/15SW-846 8260C1trans-1,4-Dichloro-2-butene
ND 0.034 7/9/15 15:04 MFFmg/Kg dry 7/9/15SW-846 8260C1Dichlorodifluoromethane (Freon 12)
ND 0.0034 7/9/15 15:04 MFFmg/Kg dry 7/9/15SW-846 8260C11,1-Dichloroethane
ND 0.0034 7/9/15 15:04 MFFmg/Kg dry 7/9/15SW-846 8260C11,2-Dichloroethane
ND 0.0068 7/9/15 15:04 MFFmg/Kg dry 7/9/15SW-846 8260C11,1-Dichloroethylene
ND 0.0034 7/9/15 15:04 MFFmg/Kg dry 7/9/15SW-846 8260C1cis-1,2-Dichloroethylene
ND 0.0034 7/9/15 15:04 MFFmg/Kg dry 7/9/15SW-846 8260C1trans-1,2-Dichloroethylene
ND 0.0034 7/9/15 15:04 MFFmg/Kg dry 7/9/15SW-846 8260C11,2-Dichloropropane
ND 0.0017 7/9/15 15:04 MFFmg/Kg dry 7/9/15SW-846 8260C11,3-Dichloropropane
ND 0.0034 7/9/15 15:04 MFFmg/Kg dry 7/9/15SW-846 8260C12,2-Dichloropropane
ND 0.0034 7/9/15 15:04 MFFmg/Kg dry 7/9/15SW-846 8260C11,1-Dichloropropene
ND 0.0017 7/9/15 15:04 MFFmg/Kg dry 7/9/15SW-846 8260C1cis-1,3-Dichloropropene
ND 0.0017 7/9/15 15:04 MFFmg/Kg dry 7/9/15SW-846 8260C1trans-1,3-Dichloropropene
ND 0.0034 7/9/15 15:04 MFFmg/Kg dry 7/9/15SW-846 8260C1Ethylbenzene
ND 0.0068 7/9/15 15:04 MFFmg/Kg dry 7/9/15SW-846 8260C1Hexachlorobutadiene
ND 0.034 7/9/15 15:04 MFFmg/Kg dry 7/9/15SW-846 8260C12-Hexanone (MBK)
ND 0.0034 7/9/15 15:04 MFFmg/Kg dry 7/9/15SW-846 8260C1Isopropylbenzene (Cumene)
ND 0.0068 7/9/15 15:04 MFFmg/Kg dry 7/9/15SW-846 8260C1p-Isopropyltoluene (p-Cymene)
[TOC_1]Sample Results[TOC]
Page 8 of 74 15G0314_1 Contest_Final 07 15 15 1002 07/15/15 10:02:29
Table of Contents
39 Spruce Street * East Longmeadow, MA 01028 * FAX 413/525-6405 * TEL. 413/525-2332
Date Received: 7/8/2015
Work Order: 15G0314Sample Description:Project Location: Manchester, CT
Sample ID: 15G0314-01
Field Sample #: S-1
Sample Matrix: Soil
Sampled: 7/8/2015 11:00
AnalystAnalyzedDilution Flag/QualRLResultsAnalyte
Date/Time
Units
Date
PreparedMethod
Volatile Organic Compounds by GC/MS
ND 0.0068 7/9/15 15:04 MFFmg/Kg dry 7/9/15SW-846 8260C1Methyl tert-Butyl Ether (MTBE)
ND 0.034 7/9/15 15:04 MFFmg/Kg dry 7/9/15SW-846 8260C1Methylene Chloride
ND 0.034 7/9/15 15:04 MFFmg/Kg dry 7/9/15SW-846 8260C14-Methyl-2-pentanone (MIBK)
ND 0.0068 7/9/15 15:04 MFFmg/Kg dry 7/9/15SW-846 8260C1Naphthalene
ND 0.0034 7/9/15 15:04 MFFmg/Kg dry 7/9/15SW-846 8260C1n-Propylbenzene
ND 0.0034 7/9/15 15:04 MFFmg/Kg dry 7/9/15SW-846 8260C1Styrene
ND 0.0034 7/9/15 15:04 MFFmg/Kg dry 7/9/15SW-846 8260C11,1,1,2-Tetrachloroethane
ND 0.0017 7/9/15 15:04 MFFmg/Kg dry 7/9/15SW-846 8260C11,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane
ND 0.0034 7/9/15 15:04 MFFmg/Kg dry 7/9/15SW-846 8260C1Tetrachloroethylene
ND 0.017 7/9/15 15:04 MFFmg/Kg dry 7/9/15SW-846 8260C1Tetrahydrofuran
ND 0.0034 7/9/15 15:04 MFFmg/Kg dry 7/9/15SW-846 8260C1Toluene
ND 0.0034 7/9/15 15:04 MFFmg/Kg dry 7/9/15SW-846 8260C11,2,3-Trichlorobenzene
ND 0.0034 7/9/15 15:04 MFFmg/Kg dry 7/9/15SW-846 8260C11,2,4-Trichlorobenzene
ND 0.0034 7/9/15 15:04 MFFmg/Kg dry 7/9/15SW-846 8260C11,1,1-Trichloroethane
ND 0.0034 7/9/15 15:04 MFFmg/Kg dry 7/9/15SW-846 8260C11,1,2-Trichloroethane
ND 0.0034 7/9/15 15:04 MFFmg/Kg dry 7/9/15SW-846 8260C1Trichloroethylene
ND 0.017 7/9/15 15:04 MFFmg/Kg dry 7/9/15SW-846 8260C1Trichlorofluoromethane (Freon 11)
ND 0.0034 7/9/15 15:04 MFFmg/Kg dry 7/9/15SW-846 8260C11,2,3-Trichloropropane
ND 0.017 7/9/15 15:04 MFFmg/Kg dry 7/9/15SW-846 8260C11,1,2-Trichloro-1,2,2-trifluoroethane
(Freon 113)
ND 0.0034 7/9/15 15:04 MFFmg/Kg dry 7/9/15SW-846 8260C11,2,4-Trimethylbenzene
ND 0.0034 7/9/15 15:04 MFFmg/Kg dry 7/9/15SW-846 8260C11,3,5-Trimethylbenzene
ND 0.017 7/9/15 15:04 MFFmg/Kg dry 7/9/15SW-846 8260C1Vinyl Chloride
ND 0.0068 7/9/15 15:04 MFFmg/Kg dry 7/9/15SW-846 8260C1m+p Xylene
ND 0.0034 7/9/15 15:04 MFFmg/Kg dry 7/9/15SW-846 8260C1o-Xylene
Surrogates % Recovery Recovery Limits Flag/Qual
1,2-Dichloroethane-d4 106 7/9/15 15:0470-130
Toluene-d8 97.8 7/9/15 15:0470-130
4-Bromofluorobenzene 97.9 7/9/15 15:0470-130
Page 9 of 74 15G0314_1 Contest_Final 07 15 15 1002 07/15/15 10:02:29
Table of Contents
39 Spruce Street * East Longmeadow, MA 01028 * FAX 413/525-6405 * TEL. 413/525-2332
Date Received: 7/8/2015
Work Order: 15G0314Sample Description:Project Location: Manchester, CT
Sample ID: 15G0314-01
Field Sample #: S-1
Sample Matrix: Soil
Sampled: 7/8/2015 11:00
AnalystAnalyzedDilution Flag/QualRLResultsAnalyte
Date/Time
Units
Date
PreparedMethod
Semivolatile Organic Compounds by GC/MS
ND 0.49 7/9/15 17:19 CMRmg/Kg dry 7/9/15SW-846 8270D1Acenaphthene
ND 0.97 7/10/15 12:09 CMRmg/Kg dry 7/9/15SW-846 8270D2Acenaphthene
0.80 0.49 7/9/15 17:19 CMRmg/Kg dry 7/9/15SW-846 8270D1Acenaphthylene
ND 0.97 7/10/15 12:09 CMRmg/Kg dry 7/9/15SW-846 8270D2Acenaphthylene
ND 0.97 7/9/15 17:19 CMRmg/Kg dry 7/9/15SW-846 8270D1Aniline
ND 1.9 7/10/15 12:09 CMRmg/Kg dry 7/9/15SW-846 8270D2Aniline
1.0 0.49 7/9/15 17:19 CMRmg/Kg dry 7/9/15SW-846 8270D1Anthracene
ND 0.97 7/10/15 12:09 CMRmg/Kg dry 7/9/15SW-846 8270D2Anthracene
4.2 0.49 7/9/15 17:19 CMRmg/Kg dry 7/9/15SW-846 8270D1Benzo(a)anthracene
3.8 0.97 7/10/15 12:09 CMRmg/Kg dry 7/9/15SW-846 8270D2Benzo(a)anthracene
4.8 0.49 7/9/15 17:19 CMRmg/Kg dry 7/9/15SW-846 8270D1Benzo(a)pyrene
4.5 0.97 7/10/15 12:09 CMRmg/Kg dry 7/9/15SW-846 8270D2Benzo(a)pyrene
6.9 0.49 7/9/15 17:19 CMRmg/Kg dry 7/9/15SW-846 8270D1Benzo(b)fluoranthene
6.7 0.97 7/10/15 12:09 CMRmg/Kg dry 7/9/15SW-846 8270D2Benzo(b)fluoranthene
4.0 0.49 7/9/15 17:19 CMRmg/Kg dry 7/9/15SW-846 8270D1Benzo(g,h,i)perylene
3.1 0.97 7/10/15 12:09 CMRmg/Kg dry 7/9/15SW-846 8270D2Benzo(g,h,i)perylene
2.6 0.49 7/9/15 17:19 CMRmg/Kg dry 7/9/15SW-846 8270D1Benzo(k)fluoranthene
2.5 0.97 7/10/15 12:09 CMRmg/Kg dry 7/9/15SW-846 8270D2Benzo(k)fluoranthene
ND 0.97 7/9/15 17:19 CMRmg/Kg dry 7/9/15SW-846 8270D1Bis(2-chloroethoxy)methane
ND 1.9 7/10/15 12:09 CMRmg/Kg dry 7/9/15SW-846 8270D2Bis(2-chloroethoxy)methane
ND 0.97 7/9/15 17:19 CMRmg/Kg dry 7/9/15SW-846 8270D1Bis(2-chloroethyl)ether
ND 1.9 7/10/15 12:09 CMRmg/Kg dry 7/9/15SW-846 8270D2Bis(2-chloroethyl)ether
ND 0.97 7/9/15 17:19 CMRmg/Kg dry 7/9/15SW-846 8270D1Bis(2-chloroisopropyl)ether
ND 1.9 7/10/15 12:09 CMRmg/Kg dry 7/9/15SW-846 8270D2Bis(2-chloroisopropyl)ether
1.6 0.97 7/9/15 17:19 CMRmg/Kg dry 7/9/15SW-846 8270D1Bis(2-Ethylhexyl)phthalate
ND 1.9 7/10/15 12:09 CMRmg/Kg dry 7/9/15SW-846 8270D2Bis(2-Ethylhexyl)phthalate
ND 0.97 7/9/15 17:19 CMRmg/Kg dry 7/9/15SW-846 8270D14-Bromophenylphenylether
ND 1.9 7/10/15 12:09 CMRmg/Kg dry 7/9/15SW-846 8270D24-Bromophenylphenylether
ND 0.97 7/9/15 17:19 CMRmg/Kg dry 7/9/15SW-846 8270D1Butylbenzylphthalate
ND 1.9 7/10/15 12:09 CMRmg/Kg dry 7/9/15SW-846 8270D2Butylbenzylphthalate
0.55 0.49 7/9/15 17:19 CMRmg/Kg dry 7/9/15SW-846 8270D1Carbazole
ND 0.97 7/10/15 12:09 CMRmg/Kg dry 7/9/15SW-846 8270D2Carbazole
ND 1.9 7/9/15 17:19 CMRmg/Kg dry 7/9/15SW-846 8270D14-Chloroaniline
ND 3.8 7/10/15 12:09 CMRmg/Kg dry 7/9/15SW-846 8270D24-Chloroaniline
ND 1.9 7/9/15 17:19 CMRmg/Kg dry 7/9/15SW-846 8270D14-Chloro-3-methylphenol
ND 3.8 7/10/15 12:09 CMRmg/Kg dry 7/9/15SW-846 8270D24-Chloro-3-methylphenol
ND 0.97 7/9/15 17:19 CMRmg/Kg dry 7/9/15SW-846 8270D12-Chloronaphthalene
ND 1.9 7/10/15 12:09 CMRmg/Kg dry 7/9/15SW-846 8270D22-Chloronaphthalene
ND 0.97 7/9/15 17:19 CMRmg/Kg dry 7/9/15SW-846 8270D12-Chlorophenol
ND 1.9 7/10/15 12:09 CMRmg/Kg dry 7/9/15SW-846 8270D22-Chlorophenol
ND 0.97 7/9/15 17:19 CMRmg/Kg dry 7/9/15SW-846 8270D14-Chlorophenylphenylether
ND 1.9 7/10/15 12:09 CMRmg/Kg dry 7/9/15SW-846 8270D24-Chlorophenylphenylether
6.4 0.49 7/9/15 17:19 CMRmg/Kg dry 7/9/15SW-846 8270D1Chrysene
5.8 0.97 7/10/15 12:09 CMRmg/Kg dry 7/9/15SW-846 8270D2Chrysene
Page 10 of 74 15G0314_1 Contest_Final 07 15 15 1002 07/15/15 10:02:29
Table of Contents
39 Spruce Street * East Longmeadow, MA 01028 * FAX 413/525-6405 * TEL. 413/525-2332
Date Received: 7/8/2015
Work Order: 15G0314Sample Description:Project Location: Manchester, CT
Sample ID: 15G0314-01
Field Sample #: S-1
Sample Matrix: Soil
Sampled: 7/8/2015 11:00
AnalystAnalyzedDilution Flag/QualRLResultsAnalyte
Date/Time
Units
Date
PreparedMethod
Semivolatile Organic Compounds by GC/MS
0.76 0.49 7/9/15 17:19 CMRmg/Kg dry 7/9/15SW-846 8270D1Dibenz(a,h)anthracene
ND 0.97 7/10/15 12:09 CMRmg/Kg dry 7/9/15SW-846 8270D2Dibenz(a,h)anthracene
ND 0.97 7/9/15 17:19 CMRmg/Kg dry 7/9/15SW-846 8270D1Dibenzofuran
ND 1.9 7/10/15 12:09 CMRmg/Kg dry 7/9/15SW-846 8270D2Dibenzofuran
ND 0.97 7/9/15 17:19 CMRmg/Kg dry 7/9/15SW-846 8270D1Di-n-butylphthalate
ND 1.9 7/10/15 12:09 CMRmg/Kg dry 7/9/15SW-846 8270D2Di-n-butylphthalate
ND 0.49 7/9/15 17:19 CMRmg/Kg dry 7/9/15SW-846 8270D13,3-Dichlorobenzidine
ND 0.97 7/10/15 12:09 CMRmg/Kg dry 7/9/15SW-846 8270D23,3-Dichlorobenzidine
ND 0.97 7/9/15 17:19 CMRmg/Kg dry 7/9/15SW-846 8270D12,4-Dichlorophenol
ND 1.9 7/10/15 12:09 CMRmg/Kg dry 7/9/15SW-846 8270D22,4-Dichlorophenol
ND 0.97 7/9/15 17:19 CMRmg/Kg dry 7/9/15SW-846 8270D1Diethylphthalate
ND 1.9 7/10/15 12:09 CMRmg/Kg dry 7/9/15SW-846 8270D2Diethylphthalate
ND 0.97 7/9/15 17:19 CMRmg/Kg dry 7/9/15SW-846 8270D12,4-Dimethylphenol
ND 1.9 7/10/15 12:09 CMRmg/Kg dry 7/9/15SW-846 8270D22,4-Dimethylphenol
ND 0.97 7/9/15 17:19 CMRmg/Kg dry 7/9/15SW-846 8270D1Dimethylphthalate
ND 1.9 7/10/15 12:09 CMRmg/Kg dry 7/9/15SW-846 8270D2Dimethylphthalate
ND 0.97 7/9/15 17:19 CMRmg/Kg dry 7/9/15SW-846 8270D14,6-Dinitro-2-methylphenol
ND 1.9 7/10/15 12:09 CMRmg/Kg dry 7/9/15SW-846 8270D24,6-Dinitro-2-methylphenol
ND 1.9 7/9/15 17:19 CMRmg/Kg dry 7/9/15SW-846 8270D1 L-042,4-Dinitrophenol
ND 3.8 7/10/15 12:09 CMRmg/Kg dry 7/9/15SW-846 8270D2 L-042,4-Dinitrophenol
ND 0.97 7/9/15 17:19 CMRmg/Kg dry 7/9/15SW-846 8270D12,4-Dinitrotoluene
ND 1.9 7/10/15 12:09 CMRmg/Kg dry 7/9/15SW-846 8270D22,4-Dinitrotoluene
ND 0.97 7/9/15 17:19 CMRmg/Kg dry 7/9/15SW-846 8270D12,6-Dinitrotoluene
ND 1.9 7/10/15 12:09 CMRmg/Kg dry 7/9/15SW-846 8270D22,6-Dinitrotoluene
ND 0.97 7/9/15 17:19 CMRmg/Kg dry 7/9/15SW-846 8270D1Di-n-octylphthalate
ND 1.9 7/10/15 12:09 CMRmg/Kg dry 7/9/15SW-846 8270D2Di-n-octylphthalate
13 0.49 7/9/15 17:19 CMRmg/Kg dry 7/9/15SW-846 8270D1 EFluoranthene
11 0.97 7/10/15 12:09 CMRmg/Kg dry 7/9/15SW-846 8270D2Fluoranthene
0.66 0.49 7/9/15 17:19 CMRmg/Kg dry 7/9/15SW-846 8270D1Fluorene
ND 0.97 7/10/15 12:09 CMRmg/Kg dry 7/9/15SW-846 8270D2Fluorene
ND 0.97 7/9/15 17:19 CMRmg/Kg dry 7/9/15SW-846 8270D1Hexachlorobenzene
ND 1.9 7/10/15 12:09 CMRmg/Kg dry 7/9/15SW-846 8270D2Hexachlorobenzene
ND 0.97 7/9/15 17:19 CMRmg/Kg dry 7/9/15SW-846 8270D1Hexachlorobutadiene
ND 1.9 7/10/15 12:09 CMRmg/Kg dry 7/9/15SW-846 8270D2Hexachlorobutadiene
ND 0.97 7/9/15 17:19 CMRmg/Kg dry 7/9/15SW-846 8270D1Hexachlorocyclopentadiene
ND 1.9 7/10/15 12:09 CMRmg/Kg dry 7/9/15SW-846 8270D2Hexachlorocyclopentadiene
ND 0.97 7/9/15 17:19 CMRmg/Kg dry 7/9/15SW-846 8270D1Hexachloroethane
ND 1.9 7/10/15 12:09 CMRmg/Kg dry 7/9/15SW-846 8270D2Hexachloroethane
4.0 0.49 7/9/15 17:19 CMRmg/Kg dry 7/9/15SW-846 8270D1Indeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene
3.1 0.97 7/10/15 12:09 CMRmg/Kg dry 7/9/15SW-846 8270D2Indeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene
ND 0.97 7/9/15 17:19 CMRmg/Kg dry 7/9/15SW-846 8270D1Isophorone
ND 1.9 7/10/15 12:09 CMRmg/Kg dry 7/9/15SW-846 8270D2Isophorone
ND 0.49 7/9/15 17:19 CMRmg/Kg dry 7/9/15SW-846 8270D12-Methylnaphthalene
ND 0.97 7/10/15 12:09 CMRmg/Kg dry 7/9/15SW-846 8270D22-Methylnaphthalene
Page 11 of 74 15G0314_1 Contest_Final 07 15 15 1002 07/15/15 10:02:29
Table of Contents
39 Spruce Street * East Longmeadow, MA 01028 * FAX 413/525-6405 * TEL. 413/525-2332
Date Received: 7/8/2015
Work Order: 15G0314Sample Description:Project Location: Manchester, CT
Sample ID: 15G0314-01
Field Sample #: S-1
Sample Matrix: Soil
Sampled: 7/8/2015 11:00
AnalystAnalyzedDilution Flag/QualRLResultsAnalyte
Date/Time
Units
Date
PreparedMethod
Semivolatile Organic Compounds by GC/MS
ND 0.97 7/9/15 17:19 CMRmg/Kg dry 7/9/15SW-846 8270D12-Methylphenol
ND 1.9 7/10/15 12:09 CMRmg/Kg dry 7/9/15SW-846 8270D22-Methylphenol
ND 0.97 7/9/15 17:19 CMRmg/Kg dry 7/9/15SW-846 8270D13/4-Methylphenol
ND 1.9 7/10/15 12:09 CMRmg/Kg dry 7/9/15SW-846 8270D23/4-Methylphenol
ND 0.49 7/9/15 17:19 CMRmg/Kg dry 7/9/15SW-846 8270D1Naphthalene
ND 0.97 7/10/15 12:09 CMRmg/Kg dry 7/9/15SW-846 8270D2Naphthalene
ND 0.97 7/9/15 17:19 CMRmg/Kg dry 7/9/15SW-846 8270D12-Nitroaniline
ND 1.9 7/10/15 12:09 CMRmg/Kg dry 7/9/15SW-846 8270D22-Nitroaniline
ND 0.97 7/9/15 17:19 CMRmg/Kg dry 7/9/15SW-846 8270D13-Nitroaniline
ND 1.9 7/10/15 12:09 CMRmg/Kg dry 7/9/15SW-846 8270D23-Nitroaniline
ND 0.97 7/9/15 17:19 CMRmg/Kg dry 7/9/15SW-846 8270D14-Nitroaniline
ND 1.9 7/10/15 12:09 CMRmg/Kg dry 7/9/15SW-846 8270D24-Nitroaniline
ND 0.97 7/9/15 17:19 CMRmg/Kg dry 7/9/15SW-846 8270D1Nitrobenzene
ND 1.9 7/10/15 12:09 CMRmg/Kg dry 7/9/15SW-846 8270D2Nitrobenzene
ND 0.97 7/9/15 17:19 CMRmg/Kg dry 7/9/15SW-846 8270D12-Nitrophenol
ND 1.9 7/10/15 12:09 CMRmg/Kg dry 7/9/15SW-846 8270D22-Nitrophenol
ND 1.9 7/9/15 17:19 CMRmg/Kg dry 7/9/15SW-846 8270D14-Nitrophenol
ND 3.8 7/10/15 12:09 CMRmg/Kg dry 7/9/15SW-846 8270D24-Nitrophenol
ND 0.97 7/9/15 17:19 CMRmg/Kg dry 7/9/15SW-846 8270D1N-Nitrosodiphenylamine
ND 1.9 7/10/15 12:09 CMRmg/Kg dry 7/9/15SW-846 8270D2N-Nitrosodiphenylamine
ND 0.97 7/9/15 17:19 CMRmg/Kg dry 7/9/15SW-846 8270D1N-Nitrosodi-n-propylamine
ND 1.9 7/10/15 12:09 CMRmg/Kg dry 7/9/15SW-846 8270D2N-Nitrosodi-n-propylamine
ND 0.97 7/9/15 17:19 CMRmg/Kg dry 7/9/15SW-846 8270D1 V-16Pentachloronitrobenzene
ND 1.9 7/10/15 12:09 CMRmg/Kg dry 7/9/15SW-846 8270D2 V-16Pentachloronitrobenzene
ND 0.97 7/9/15 17:19 CMRmg/Kg dry 7/9/15SW-846 8270D1Pentachlorophenol
ND 1.9 7/10/15 12:09 CMRmg/Kg dry 7/9/15SW-846 8270D2Pentachlorophenol
6.5 0.49 7/9/15 17:19 CMRmg/Kg dry 7/9/15SW-846 8270D1Phenanthrene
5.7 0.97 7/10/15 12:09 CMRmg/Kg dry 7/9/15SW-846 8270D2Phenanthrene
ND 0.97 7/9/15 17:19 CMRmg/Kg dry 7/9/15SW-846 8270D1Phenol
ND 1.9 7/10/15 12:09 CMRmg/Kg dry 7/9/15SW-846 8270D2Phenol
12 0.49 7/9/15 17:19 CMRmg/Kg dry 7/9/15SW-846 8270D1 EPyrene
9.1 0.97 7/10/15 12:09 CMRmg/Kg dry 7/9/15SW-846 8270D2Pyrene
ND 0.97 7/9/15 17:19 CMRmg/Kg dry 7/9/15SW-846 8270D1Pyridine
ND 1.9 7/10/15 12:09 CMRmg/Kg dry 7/9/15SW-846 8270D2Pyridine
ND 0.97 7/9/15 17:19 CMRmg/Kg dry 7/9/15SW-846 8270D11,2,4,5-Tetrachlorobenzene
ND 1.9 7/10/15 12:09 CMRmg/Kg dry 7/9/15SW-846 8270D21,2,4,5-Tetrachlorobenzene
ND 0.97 7/9/15 17:19 CMRmg/Kg dry 7/9/15SW-846 8270D11,2,4-Trichlorobenzene
ND 1.9 7/10/15 12:09 CMRmg/Kg dry 7/9/15SW-846 8270D21,2,4-Trichlorobenzene
ND 0.97 7/9/15 17:19 CMRmg/Kg dry 7/9/15SW-846 8270D12,4,5-Trichlorophenol
ND 1.9 7/10/15 12:09 CMRmg/Kg dry 7/9/15SW-846 8270D22,4,5-Trichlorophenol
ND 0.97 7/9/15 17:19 CMRmg/Kg dry 7/9/15SW-846 8270D12,4,6-Trichlorophenol
ND 1.9 7/10/15 12:09 CMRmg/Kg dry 7/9/15SW-846 8270D22,4,6-Trichlorophenol
Surrogates % Recovery Recovery Limits Flag/Qual
2-Fluorophenol 79.7 7/9/15 17:1930-130
Page 12 of 74 15G0314_1 Contest_Final 07 15 15 1002 07/15/15 10:02:29
Table of Contents
39 Spruce Street * East Longmeadow, MA 01028 * FAX 413/525-6405 * TEL. 413/525-2332
Date Received: 7/8/2015
Work Order: 15G0314Sample Description:Project Location: Manchester, CT
Sample ID: 15G0314-01
Field Sample #: S-1
Sample Matrix: Soil
Sampled: 7/8/2015 11:00
AnalystAnalyzedDilution Flag/QualRLResultsAnalyte
Date/Time
Units
Date
PreparedMethod
Semivolatile Organic Compounds by GC/MS
Surrogates % Recovery Recovery Limits Flag/Qual
2-Fluorophenol 70.5 7/10/15 12:0930-130
Phenol-d6 80.4 7/9/15 17:1930-130
Phenol-d6 72.9 7/10/15 12:0930-130
Nitrobenzene-d5 83.5 7/9/15 17:1930-130
Nitrobenzene-d5 73.0 7/10/15 12:0930-130
2-Fluorobiphenyl 82.6 7/9/15 17:1930-130
2-Fluorobiphenyl 71.0 7/10/15 12:0930-130
2,4,6-Tribromophenol 74.7 7/9/15 17:1930-130
2,4,6-Tribromophenol 71.1 7/10/15 12:0930-130
p-Terphenyl-d14 86.8 7/9/15 17:1930-130
p-Terphenyl-d14 68.8 7/10/15 12:0930-130
Page 13 of 74 15G0314_1 Contest_Final 07 15 15 1002 07/15/15 10:02:29
Table of Contents
39 Spruce Street * East Longmeadow, MA 01028 * FAX 413/525-6405 * TEL. 413/525-2332
Date Received: 7/8/2015
Work Order: 15G0314Sample Description:Project Location: Manchester, CT
Sample ID: 15G0314-01
Field Sample #: S-1
Sample Matrix: Soil
Sampled: 7/8/2015 11:00
AnalystAnalyzedDilution Flag/QualRLResultsAnalyte
Date/Time
Units
Date
PreparedMethod
Polychlorinated Biphenyls By GC/ECD
ND 0.29 7/10/15 20:47 KALmg/Kg dry 7/9/15SW-846 8082A5Aroclor-1016 [1]
ND 0.29 7/10/15 20:47 KALmg/Kg dry 7/9/15SW-846 8082A5Aroclor-1221 [1]
ND 0.29 7/10/15 20:47 KALmg/Kg dry 7/9/15SW-846 8082A5Aroclor-1232 [1]
ND 0.29 7/10/15 20:47 KALmg/Kg dry 7/9/15SW-846 8082A5Aroclor-1242 [1]
ND 0.29 7/10/15 20:47 KALmg/Kg dry 7/9/15SW-846 8082A5Aroclor-1248 [1]
ND 0.29 7/10/15 20:47 KALmg/Kg dry 7/9/15SW-846 8082A5Aroclor-1254 [1]
ND 0.29 7/10/15 20:47 KALmg/Kg dry 7/9/15SW-846 8082A5Aroclor-1260 [1]
ND 0.29 7/10/15 20:47 KALmg/Kg dry 7/9/15SW-846 8082A5Aroclor-1262 [1]
ND 0.29 7/10/15 20:47 KALmg/Kg dry 7/9/15SW-846 8082A5Aroclor-1268 [2]
Surrogates % Recovery Recovery Limits Flag/Qual
Decachlorobiphenyl [1] 64.1 7/10/15 20:4730-150
Decachlorobiphenyl [2] 79.7 7/10/15 20:4730-150
Tetrachloro-m-xylene [1] 68.6 7/10/15 20:4730-150
Tetrachloro-m-xylene [2] 62.9 7/10/15 20:4730-150
Page 14 of 74 15G0314_1 Contest_Final 07 15 15 1002 07/15/15 10:02:29
Table of Contents
39 Spruce Street * East Longmeadow, MA 01028 * FAX 413/525-6405 * TEL. 413/525-2332
Date Received: 7/8/2015
Work Order: 15G0314Sample Description:Project Location: Manchester, CT
Sample ID: 15G0314-01
Field Sample #: S-1
Sample Matrix: Soil
Sampled: 7/8/2015 11:00
AnalystAnalyzedDilution Flag/QualRLResultsAnalyte
Date/Time
Units
Date
PreparedMethod
Petroleum Hydrocarbons Analyses
850 140 7/10/15 12:19 SCSmg/Kg dry 7/9/15CTDEP ETPH5CT ETPH
Surrogates % Recovery Recovery Limits Flag/Qual
o-Terphenyl 60.3 7/10/15 12:1950-150
Page 15 of 74 15G0314_1 Contest_Final 07 15 15 1002 07/15/15 10:02:29
Table of Contents
39 Spruce Street * East Longmeadow, MA 01028 * FAX 413/525-6405 * TEL. 413/525-2332
Date Received: 7/8/2015
Work Order: 15G0314Sample Description:Project Location: Manchester, CT
Sample ID: 15G0314-01
Field Sample #: S-1
Sample Matrix: Soil
Sampled: 7/8/2015 11:00
AnalystAnalyzedDilution Flag/QualRLResultsAnalyte
Date/Time
Units
Date
PreparedMethod
Conventional Chemistry Parameters by EPA/APHA/SW-846 Methods (Total)
Present 7/9/15 8:15 LLpresent/absent 7/9/15SW-846 9095B1Free Liquid
Absent 7/9/15 15:50 AGpresent/absent 7/9/15SW-846 10301Ignitability
6.7 7/9/15 9:25 MMHpH Units 7/9/15SW-846 9045C1pH @19.5°C
ND 4.0 7/10/15 15:10 DJMmg/Kg 7/9/15SW-846 90141Reactive Cyanide
ND 20 7/10/15 14:25 DJMmg/Kg 7/9/15SW-846 9030A1Reactive Sulfide
34.8 7/9/15 17:28 MJR% Wt 7/9/15SM 2540G1% Solids
Page 16 of 74 15G0314_1 Contest_Final 07 15 15 1002 07/15/15 10:02:29
Table of Contents
39 Spruce Street * East Longmeadow, MA 01028 * FAX 413/525-6405 * TEL. 413/525-2332
Date Received: 7/8/2015
Work Order: 15G0314Sample Description:Project Location: Manchester, CT
Sample ID: 15G0314-01
Field Sample #: S-1
Sample Matrix: Soil
Sampled: 7/8/2015 11:00
AnalystAnalyzedDilution Flag/QualRLResultsAnalyte
Date/Time
Units
Date
PreparedMethod
TCLP - Metals Analyses
ND 0.010 7/10/15 19:30 MJHmg/L 7/10/15SW-846 6010C1Arsenic
ND 0.00010 7/13/15 13:34 SCBmg/L 7/13/15SW-846 7470A1Mercury
1.6 0.050 7/10/15 19:30 MJHmg/L 7/10/15SW-846 6010C1Barium
0.0076 0.0040 7/10/15 19:30 MJHmg/L 7/10/15SW-846 6010C1Cadmium
ND 0.010 7/10/15 19:30 MJHmg/L 7/10/15SW-846 6010C1Chromium
0.14 0.010 7/10/15 19:30 MJHmg/L 7/10/15SW-846 6010C1Lead
ND 0.050 7/10/15 19:30 MJHmg/L 7/10/15SW-846 6010C1Selenium
ND 0.0050 7/10/15 19:30 MJHmg/L 7/10/15SW-846 6010C1Silver
Page 17 of 74 15G0314_1 Contest_Final 07 15 15 1002 07/15/15 10:02:29
Table of Contents
39 Spruce Street * East Longmeadow, MA 01028 * FAX 413/525-6405 * TEL. 413/525-2332
Date Received: 7/8/2015
Work Order: 15G0314Sample Description:Project Location: Manchester, CT
Sample ID: 15G0314-01
Field Sample #: S-1
Sample Matrix: Soil
Sampled: 7/8/2015 11:00
AnalystAnalyzedDilution Flag/QualRLResultsAnalyte
Date/Time
Units
Date
PreparedMethod
Miscellaneous Inorganic Analyses
1.651 7/13/15 0:00 SALg/mL ASTM D7921Specific Gravity
Page 18 of 74 15G0314_1 Contest_Final 07 15 15 1002 07/15/15 10:02:29
Table of Contents
39 Spruce Street * East Longmeadow, MA 01028 * FAX 413/525-6405 * TEL. 413/525-2332
Date Received: 7/8/2015
Work Order: 15G0314Sample Description:Project Location: Manchester, CT
Sample ID: 15G0314-01
Field Sample #: S-1
Sample Matrix: Soil
Sampled: 7/8/2015 11:00
AnalystAnalyzedDilution Flag/QualRLResultsAnalyte
Date/Time
Units
Date
PreparedMethod
Miscellaneous Test
45.1 7/13/15 0:00 SAL% ASTM D31731Moisture, %
Page 19 of 74 15G0314_1 Contest_Final 07 15 15 1002 07/15/15 10:02:29
Table of Contents
39 Spruce Street * East Longmeadow, MA 01028 * FAX 413/525-6405 * TEL. 413/525-2332
Date Received: 7/8/2015
Work Order: 15G0314Sample Description:Project Location: Manchester, CT
Sample ID: 15G0314-01
Field Sample #: S-1
Sample Matrix: Soil
Sampled: 7/8/2015 11:00
AnalystAnalyzedDilution Flag/QualRLResultsAnalyte
Date/Time
Units
Date
PreparedMethod
Conventional Chemistry Parameters by EPA/APHA/SW-846 Methods (Total)
Attached 7/15/15 0:00 GTX% SM D 422-631See Attached Subcontracted Report
Page 20 of 74 15G0314_1 Contest_Final 07 15 15 1002 07/15/15 10:02:29
Table of Contents
39 Spruce Street * East Longmeadow, MA 01028 * FAX 413/525-6405 * TEL. 413/525-2332
Date Received: 7/8/2015
Work Order: 15G0314Sample Description:Project Location: Manchester, CT
Sample ID: 15G0314-02
Field Sample #: S-2
Sample Matrix: Soil
Sampled: 7/8/2015 11:30
[TOC_2]15G0314-02[TOC]
AnalystAnalyzedDilution Flag/QualRLResultsAnalyte
Date/Time
Units
Date
PreparedMethod
Volatile Organic Compounds by GC/MS
ND 0.090 7/9/15 15:35 MFFmg/Kg dry 7/9/15SW-846 8260C1Acetone
ND 0.0054 7/9/15 15:35 MFFmg/Kg dry 7/9/15SW-846 8260C1Acrylonitrile
ND 0.0018 7/9/15 15:35 MFFmg/Kg dry 7/9/15SW-846 8260C1Benzene
ND 0.0018 7/9/15 15:35 MFFmg/Kg dry 7/9/15SW-846 8260C1Bromobenzene
ND 0.0018 7/9/15 15:35 MFFmg/Kg dry 7/9/15SW-846 8260C1Bromodichloromethane
ND 0.0018 7/9/15 15:35 MFFmg/Kg dry 7/9/15SW-846 8260C1Bromoform
ND 0.0090 7/9/15 15:35 MFFmg/Kg dry 7/9/15SW-846 8260C1Bromomethane
ND 0.036 7/9/15 15:35 MFFmg/Kg dry 7/9/15SW-846 8260C12-Butanone (MEK)
ND 0.0036 7/9/15 15:35 MFFmg/Kg dry 7/9/15SW-846 8260C1n-Butylbenzene
ND 0.0036 7/9/15 15:35 MFFmg/Kg dry 7/9/15SW-846 8260C1sec-Butylbenzene
ND 0.0036 7/9/15 15:35 MFFmg/Kg dry 7/9/15SW-846 8260C1tert-Butylbenzene
ND 0.018 7/9/15 15:35 MFFmg/Kg dry 7/9/15SW-846 8260C1Carbon Disulfide
ND 0.0018 7/9/15 15:35 MFFmg/Kg dry 7/9/15SW-846 8260C1Carbon Tetrachloride
ND 0.0018 7/9/15 15:35 MFFmg/Kg dry 7/9/15SW-846 8260C1Chlorobenzene
ND 0.00090 7/9/15 15:35 MFFmg/Kg dry 7/9/15SW-846 8260C1Chlorodibromomethane
ND 0.018 7/9/15 15:35 MFFmg/Kg dry 7/9/15SW-846 8260C1Chloroethane
ND 0.0036 7/9/15 15:35 MFFmg/Kg dry 7/9/15SW-846 8260C1Chloroform
ND 0.0090 7/9/15 15:35 MFFmg/Kg dry 7/9/15SW-846 8260C1Chloromethane
ND 0.0018 7/9/15 15:35 MFFmg/Kg dry 7/9/15SW-846 8260C12-Chlorotoluene
ND 0.0018 7/9/15 15:35 MFFmg/Kg dry 7/9/15SW-846 8260C14-Chlorotoluene
ND 0.0018 7/9/15 15:35 MFFmg/Kg dry 7/9/15SW-846 8260C1 V-051,2-Dibromo-3-chloropropane (DBCP)
ND 0.0018 7/9/15 15:35 MFFmg/Kg dry 7/9/15SW-846 8260C11,2-Dibromoethane (EDB)
ND 0.0018 7/9/15 15:35 MFFmg/Kg dry 7/9/15SW-846 8260C1Dibromomethane
ND 0.0018 7/9/15 15:35 MFFmg/Kg dry 7/9/15SW-846 8260C11,2-Dichlorobenzene
ND 0.0018 7/9/15 15:35 MFFmg/Kg dry 7/9/15SW-846 8260C11,3-Dichlorobenzene
ND 0.0018 7/9/15 15:35 MFFmg/Kg dry 7/9/15SW-846 8260C11,4-Dichlorobenzene
ND 0.0036 7/9/15 15:35 MFFmg/Kg dry 7/9/15SW-846 8260C1trans-1,4-Dichloro-2-butene
ND 0.018 7/9/15 15:35 MFFmg/Kg dry 7/9/15SW-846 8260C1Dichlorodifluoromethane (Freon 12)
ND 0.0018 7/9/15 15:35 MFFmg/Kg dry 7/9/15SW-846 8260C11,1-Dichloroethane
ND 0.0018 7/9/15 15:35 MFFmg/Kg dry 7/9/15SW-846 8260C11,2-Dichloroethane
ND 0.0036 7/9/15 15:35 MFFmg/Kg dry 7/9/15SW-846 8260C11,1-Dichloroethylene
ND 0.0018 7/9/15 15:35 MFFmg/Kg dry 7/9/15SW-846 8260C1cis-1,2-Dichloroethylene
ND 0.0018 7/9/15 15:35 MFFmg/Kg dry 7/9/15SW-846 8260C1trans-1,2-Dichloroethylene
ND 0.0018 7/9/15 15:35 MFFmg/Kg dry 7/9/15SW-846 8260C11,2-Dichloropropane
ND 0.00090 7/9/15 15:35 MFFmg/Kg dry 7/9/15SW-846 8260C11,3-Dichloropropane
ND 0.0018 7/9/15 15:35 MFFmg/Kg dry 7/9/15SW-846 8260C12,2-Dichloropropane
ND 0.0018 7/9/15 15:35 MFFmg/Kg dry 7/9/15SW-846 8260C11,1-Dichloropropene
ND 0.00090 7/9/15 15:35 MFFmg/Kg dry 7/9/15SW-846 8260C1cis-1,3-Dichloropropene
ND 0.00090 7/9/15 15:35 MFFmg/Kg dry 7/9/15SW-846 8260C1trans-1,3-Dichloropropene
ND 0.0018 7/9/15 15:35 MFFmg/Kg dry 7/9/15SW-846 8260C1Ethylbenzene
ND 0.0036 7/9/15 15:35 MFFmg/Kg dry 7/9/15SW-846 8260C1Hexachlorobutadiene
ND 0.018 7/9/15 15:35 MFFmg/Kg dry 7/9/15SW-846 8260C12-Hexanone (MBK)
ND 0.0018 7/9/15 15:35 MFFmg/Kg dry 7/9/15SW-846 8260C1Isopropylbenzene (Cumene)
ND 0.0036 7/9/15 15:35 MFFmg/Kg dry 7/9/15SW-846 8260C1p-Isopropyltoluene (p-Cymene)
Page 21 of 74 15G0314_1 Contest_Final 07 15 15 1002 07/15/15 10:02:29
Table of Contents
39 Spruce Street * East Longmeadow, MA 01028 * FAX 413/525-6405 * TEL. 413/525-2332
Date Received: 7/8/2015
Work Order: 15G0314Sample Description:Project Location: Manchester, CT
Sample ID: 15G0314-02
Field Sample #: S-2
Sample Matrix: Soil
Sampled: 7/8/2015 11:30
AnalystAnalyzedDilution Flag/QualRLResultsAnalyte
Date/Time
Units
Date
PreparedMethod
Volatile Organic Compounds by GC/MS
ND 0.0036 7/9/15 15:35 MFFmg/Kg dry 7/9/15SW-846 8260C1Methyl tert-Butyl Ether (MTBE)
ND 0.018 7/9/15 15:35 MFFmg/Kg dry 7/9/15SW-846 8260C1Methylene Chloride
ND 0.018 7/9/15 15:35 MFFmg/Kg dry 7/9/15SW-846 8260C14-Methyl-2-pentanone (MIBK)
ND 0.0036 7/9/15 15:35 MFFmg/Kg dry 7/9/15SW-846 8260C1Naphthalene
ND 0.0018 7/9/15 15:35 MFFmg/Kg dry 7/9/15SW-846 8260C1n-Propylbenzene
ND 0.0018 7/9/15 15:35 MFFmg/Kg dry 7/9/15SW-846 8260C1Styrene
ND 0.0018 7/9/15 15:35 MFFmg/Kg dry 7/9/15SW-846 8260C11,1,1,2-Tetrachloroethane
ND 0.00090 7/9/15 15:35 MFFmg/Kg dry 7/9/15SW-846 8260C11,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane
ND 0.0018 7/9/15 15:35 MFFmg/Kg dry 7/9/15SW-846 8260C1Tetrachloroethylene
ND 0.0090 7/9/15 15:35 MFFmg/Kg dry 7/9/15SW-846 8260C1Tetrahydrofuran
ND 0.0018 7/9/15 15:35 MFFmg/Kg dry 7/9/15SW-846 8260C1Toluene
ND 0.0018 7/9/15 15:35 MFFmg/Kg dry 7/9/15SW-846 8260C11,2,3-Trichlorobenzene
ND 0.0018 7/9/15 15:35 MFFmg/Kg dry 7/9/15SW-846 8260C11,2,4-Trichlorobenzene
ND 0.0018 7/9/15 15:35 MFFmg/Kg dry 7/9/15SW-846 8260C11,1,1-Trichloroethane
ND 0.0018 7/9/15 15:35 MFFmg/Kg dry 7/9/15SW-846 8260C11,1,2-Trichloroethane
ND 0.0018 7/9/15 15:35 MFFmg/Kg dry 7/9/15SW-846 8260C1Trichloroethylene
ND 0.0090 7/9/15 15:35 MFFmg/Kg dry 7/9/15SW-846 8260C1Trichlorofluoromethane (Freon 11)
ND 0.0018 7/9/15 15:35 MFFmg/Kg dry 7/9/15SW-846 8260C11,2,3-Trichloropropane
ND 0.0090 7/9/15 15:35 MFFmg/Kg dry 7/9/15SW-846 8260C11,1,2-Trichloro-1,2,2-trifluoroethane
(Freon 113)
ND 0.0018 7/9/15 15:35 MFFmg/Kg dry 7/9/15SW-846 8260C11,2,4-Trimethylbenzene
ND 0.0018 7/9/15 15:35 MFFmg/Kg dry 7/9/15SW-846 8260C11,3,5-Trimethylbenzene
ND 0.0090 7/9/15 15:35 MFFmg/Kg dry 7/9/15SW-846 8260C1Vinyl Chloride
ND 0.0036 7/9/15 15:35 MFFmg/Kg dry 7/9/15SW-846 8260C1m+p Xylene
ND 0.0018 7/9/15 15:35 MFFmg/Kg dry 7/9/15SW-846 8260C1o-Xylene
Surrogates % Recovery Recovery Limits Flag/Qual
1,2-Dichloroethane-d4 105 7/9/15 15:3570-130
Toluene-d8 96.3 7/9/15 15:3570-130
4-Bromofluorobenzene 97.0 7/9/15 15:3570-130
Page 22 of 74 15G0314_1 Contest_Final 07 15 15 1002 07/15/15 10:02:29
Table of Contents
39 Spruce Street * East Longmeadow, MA 01028 * FAX 413/525-6405 * TEL. 413/525-2332
Date Received: 7/8/2015
Work Order: 15G0314Sample Description:Project Location: Manchester, CT
Sample ID: 15G0314-02
Field Sample #: S-2
Sample Matrix: Soil
Sampled: 7/8/2015 11:30
AnalystAnalyzedDilution Flag/QualRLResultsAnalyte
Date/Time
Units
Date
PreparedMethod
Semivolatile Organic Compounds by GC/MS
ND 0.31 7/9/15 17:42 CMRmg/Kg dry 7/9/15SW-846 8270D1Acenaphthene
ND 0.62 7/10/15 12:32 CMRmg/Kg dry 7/9/15SW-846 8270D2Acenaphthene
0.41 0.31 7/9/15 17:42 CMRmg/Kg dry 7/9/15SW-846 8270D1Acenaphthylene
ND 0.62 7/10/15 12:32 CMRmg/Kg dry 7/9/15SW-846 8270D2Acenaphthylene
ND 0.62 7/9/15 17:42 CMRmg/Kg dry 7/9/15SW-846 8270D1Aniline
ND 1.2 7/10/15 12:32 CMRmg/Kg dry 7/9/15SW-846 8270D2Aniline
0.69 0.31 7/9/15 17:42 CMRmg/Kg dry 7/9/15SW-846 8270D1Anthracene
ND 0.62 7/10/15 12:32 CMRmg/Kg dry 7/9/15SW-846 8270D2Anthracene
2.6 0.31 7/9/15 17:42 CMRmg/Kg dry 7/9/15SW-846 8270D1Benzo(a)anthracene
2.3 0.62 7/10/15 12:32 CMRmg/Kg dry 7/9/15SW-846 8270D2Benzo(a)anthracene
2.7 0.31 7/9/15 17:42 CMRmg/Kg dry 7/9/15SW-846 8270D1Benzo(a)pyrene
2.4 0.62 7/10/15 12:32 CMRmg/Kg dry 7/9/15SW-846 8270D2Benzo(a)pyrene
3.6 0.31 7/9/15 17:42 CMRmg/Kg dry 7/9/15SW-846 8270D1Benzo(b)fluoranthene
3.3 0.62 7/10/15 12:32 CMRmg/Kg dry 7/9/15SW-846 8270D2Benzo(b)fluoranthene
2.0 0.31 7/9/15 17:42 CMRmg/Kg dry 7/9/15SW-846 8270D1Benzo(g,h,i)perylene
1.6 0.62 7/10/15 12:32 CMRmg/Kg dry 7/9/15SW-846 8270D2Benzo(g,h,i)perylene
1.4 0.31 7/9/15 17:42 CMRmg/Kg dry 7/9/15SW-846 8270D1Benzo(k)fluoranthene
1.3 0.62 7/10/15 12:32 CMRmg/Kg dry 7/9/15SW-846 8270D2Benzo(k)fluoranthene
ND 0.62 7/9/15 17:42 CMRmg/Kg dry 7/9/15SW-846 8270D1Bis(2-chloroethoxy)methane
ND 1.2 7/10/15 12:32 CMRmg/Kg dry 7/9/15SW-846 8270D2Bis(2-chloroethoxy)methane
ND 0.62 7/9/15 17:42 CMRmg/Kg dry 7/9/15SW-846 8270D1Bis(2-chloroethyl)ether
ND 1.2 7/10/15 12:32 CMRmg/Kg dry 7/9/15SW-846 8270D2Bis(2-chloroethyl)ether
ND 0.62 7/9/15 17:42 CMRmg/Kg dry 7/9/15SW-846 8270D1Bis(2-chloroisopropyl)ether
ND 1.2 7/10/15 12:32 CMRmg/Kg dry 7/9/15SW-846 8270D2Bis(2-chloroisopropyl)ether
1.0 0.62 7/9/15 17:42 CMRmg/Kg dry 7/9/15SW-846 8270D1Bis(2-Ethylhexyl)phthalate
ND 1.2 7/10/15 12:32 CMRmg/Kg dry 7/9/15SW-846 8270D2Bis(2-Ethylhexyl)phthalate
ND 0.62 7/9/15 17:42 CMRmg/Kg dry 7/9/15SW-846 8270D14-Bromophenylphenylether
ND 1.2 7/10/15 12:32 CMRmg/Kg dry 7/9/15SW-846 8270D24-Bromophenylphenylether
ND 0.62 7/9/15 17:42 CMRmg/Kg dry 7/9/15SW-846 8270D1Butylbenzylphthalate
ND 1.2 7/10/15 12:32 CMRmg/Kg dry 7/9/15SW-846 8270D2Butylbenzylphthalate
ND 0.31 7/9/15 17:42 CMRmg/Kg dry 7/9/15SW-846 8270D1Carbazole
ND 0.62 7/10/15 12:32 CMRmg/Kg dry 7/9/15SW-846 8270D2Carbazole
ND 1.2 7/9/15 17:42 CMRmg/Kg dry 7/9/15SW-846 8270D14-Chloroaniline
ND 2.4 7/10/15 12:32 CMRmg/Kg dry 7/9/15SW-846 8270D24-Chloroaniline
ND 1.2 7/9/15 17:42 CMRmg/Kg dry 7/9/15SW-846 8270D14-Chloro-3-methylphenol
ND 2.4 7/10/15 12:32 CMRmg/Kg dry 7/9/15SW-846 8270D24-Chloro-3-methylphenol
ND 0.62 7/9/15 17:42 CMRmg/Kg dry 7/9/15SW-846 8270D12-Chloronaphthalene
ND 1.2 7/10/15 12:32 CMRmg/Kg dry 7/9/15SW-846 8270D22-Chloronaphthalene
ND 0.62 7/9/15 17:42 CMRmg/Kg dry 7/9/15SW-846 8270D12-Chlorophenol
ND 1.2 7/10/15 12:32 CMRmg/Kg dry 7/9/15SW-846 8270D22-Chlorophenol
ND 0.62 7/9/15 17:42 CMRmg/Kg dry 7/9/15SW-846 8270D14-Chlorophenylphenylether
ND 1.2 7/10/15 12:32 CMRmg/Kg dry 7/9/15SW-846 8270D24-Chlorophenylphenylether
3.6 0.31 7/9/15 17:42 CMRmg/Kg dry 7/9/15SW-846 8270D1Chrysene
3.2 0.62 7/10/15 12:32 CMRmg/Kg dry 7/9/15SW-846 8270D2Chrysene
Page 23 of 74 15G0314_1 Contest_Final 07 15 15 1002 07/15/15 10:02:29
Table of Contents
39 Spruce Street * East Longmeadow, MA 01028 * FAX 413/525-6405 * TEL. 413/525-2332
Date Received: 7/8/2015
Work Order: 15G0314Sample Description:Project Location: Manchester, CT
Sample ID: 15G0314-02
Field Sample #: S-2
Sample Matrix: Soil
Sampled: 7/8/2015 11:30
AnalystAnalyzedDilution Flag/QualRLResultsAnalyte
Date/Time
Units
Date
PreparedMethod
Semivolatile Organic Compounds by GC/MS
0.45 0.31 7/9/15 17:42 CMRmg/Kg dry 7/9/15SW-846 8270D1Dibenz(a,h)anthracene
ND 0.62 7/10/15 12:32 CMRmg/Kg dry 7/9/15SW-846 8270D2Dibenz(a,h)anthracene
ND 0.62 7/9/15 17:42 CMRmg/Kg dry 7/9/15SW-846 8270D1Dibenzofuran
ND 1.2 7/10/15 12:32 CMRmg/Kg dry 7/9/15SW-846 8270D2Dibenzofuran
ND 0.62 7/9/15 17:42 CMRmg/Kg dry 7/9/15SW-846 8270D1Di-n-butylphthalate
ND 1.2 7/10/15 12:32 CMRmg/Kg dry 7/9/15SW-846 8270D2Di-n-butylphthalate
ND 0.31 7/9/15 17:42 CMRmg/Kg dry 7/9/15SW-846 8270D13,3-Dichlorobenzidine
ND 0.62 7/10/15 12:32 CMRmg/Kg dry 7/9/15SW-846 8270D23,3-Dichlorobenzidine
ND 0.62 7/9/15 17:42 CMRmg/Kg dry 7/9/15SW-846 8270D12,4-Dichlorophenol
ND 1.2 7/10/15 12:32 CMRmg/Kg dry 7/9/15SW-846 8270D22,4-Dichlorophenol
ND 0.62 7/9/15 17:42 CMRmg/Kg dry 7/9/15SW-846 8270D1Diethylphthalate
ND 1.2 7/10/15 12:32 CMRmg/Kg dry 7/9/15SW-846 8270D2Diethylphthalate
ND 0.62 7/9/15 17:42 CMRmg/Kg dry 7/9/15SW-846 8270D12,4-Dimethylphenol
ND 1.2 7/10/15 12:32 CMRmg/Kg dry 7/9/15SW-846 8270D22,4-Dimethylphenol
ND 0.62 7/9/15 17:42 CMRmg/Kg dry 7/9/15SW-846 8270D1Dimethylphthalate
ND 1.2 7/10/15 12:32 CMRmg/Kg dry 7/9/15SW-846 8270D2Dimethylphthalate
ND 0.62 7/9/15 17:42 CMRmg/Kg dry 7/9/15SW-846 8270D14,6-Dinitro-2-methylphenol
ND 1.2 7/10/15 12:32 CMRmg/Kg dry 7/9/15SW-846 8270D24,6-Dinitro-2-methylphenol
ND 1.2 7/9/15 17:42 CMRmg/Kg dry 7/9/15SW-846 8270D1 L-042,4-Dinitrophenol
ND 2.4 7/10/15 12:32 CMRmg/Kg dry 7/9/15SW-846 8270D2 L-042,4-Dinitrophenol
ND 0.62 7/9/15 17:42 CMRmg/Kg dry 7/9/15SW-846 8270D12,4-Dinitrotoluene
ND 1.2 7/10/15 12:32 CMRmg/Kg dry 7/9/15SW-846 8270D22,4-Dinitrotoluene
ND 0.62 7/9/15 17:42 CMRmg/Kg dry 7/9/15SW-846 8270D12,6-Dinitrotoluene
ND 1.2 7/10/15 12:32 CMRmg/Kg dry 7/9/15SW-846 8270D22,6-Dinitrotoluene
ND 0.62 7/9/15 17:42 CMRmg/Kg dry 7/9/15SW-846 8270D1Di-n-octylphthalate
ND 1.2 7/10/15 12:32 CMRmg/Kg dry 7/9/15SW-846 8270D2Di-n-octylphthalate
7.6 0.31 7/9/15 17:42 CMRmg/Kg dry 7/9/15SW-846 8270D1 EFluoranthene
6.5 0.62 7/10/15 12:32 CMRmg/Kg dry 7/9/15SW-846 8270D2Fluoranthene
0.41 0.31 7/9/15 17:42 CMRmg/Kg dry 7/9/15SW-846 8270D1Fluorene
ND 0.62 7/10/15 12:32 CMRmg/Kg dry 7/9/15SW-846 8270D2Fluorene
ND 0.62 7/9/15 17:42 CMRmg/Kg dry 7/9/15SW-846 8270D1Hexachlorobenzene
ND 1.2 7/10/15 12:32 CMRmg/Kg dry 7/9/15SW-846 8270D2Hexachlorobenzene
ND 0.62 7/9/15 17:42 CMRmg/Kg dry 7/9/15SW-846 8270D1Hexachlorobutadiene
ND 1.2 7/10/15 12:32 CMRmg/Kg dry 7/9/15SW-846 8270D2Hexachlorobutadiene
ND 0.62 7/9/15 17:42 CMRmg/Kg dry 7/9/15SW-846 8270D1Hexachlorocyclopentadiene
ND 1.2 7/10/15 12:32 CMRmg/Kg dry 7/9/15SW-846 8270D2Hexachlorocyclopentadiene
ND 0.62 7/9/15 17:42 CMRmg/Kg dry 7/9/15SW-846 8270D1Hexachloroethane
ND 1.2 7/10/15 12:32 CMRmg/Kg dry 7/9/15SW-846 8270D2Hexachloroethane
2.0 0.31 7/9/15 17:42 CMRmg/Kg dry 7/9/15SW-846 8270D1Indeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene
1.6 0.62 7/10/15 12:32 CMRmg/Kg dry 7/9/15SW-846 8270D2Indeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene
ND 0.62 7/9/15 17:42 CMRmg/Kg dry 7/9/15SW-846 8270D1Isophorone
ND 1.2 7/10/15 12:32 CMRmg/Kg dry 7/9/15SW-846 8270D2Isophorone
ND 0.31 7/9/15 17:42 CMRmg/Kg dry 7/9/15SW-846 8270D12-Methylnaphthalene
ND 0.62 7/10/15 12:32 CMRmg/Kg dry 7/9/15SW-846 8270D22-Methylnaphthalene
Page 24 of 74 15G0314_1 Contest_Final 07 15 15 1002 07/15/15 10:02:29
Table of Contents
39 Spruce Street * East Longmeadow, MA 01028 * FAX 413/525-6405 * TEL. 413/525-2332
Date Received: 7/8/2015
Work Order: 15G0314Sample Description:Project Location: Manchester, CT
Sample ID: 15G0314-02
Field Sample #: S-2
Sample Matrix: Soil
Sampled: 7/8/2015 11:30
AnalystAnalyzedDilution Flag/QualRLResultsAnalyte
Date/Time
Units
Date
PreparedMethod
Semivolatile Organic Compounds by GC/MS
ND 0.62 7/9/15 17:42 CMRmg/Kg dry 7/9/15SW-846 8270D12-Methylphenol
ND 1.2 7/10/15 12:32 CMRmg/Kg dry 7/9/15SW-846 8270D22-Methylphenol
ND 0.62 7/9/15 17:42 CMRmg/Kg dry 7/9/15SW-846 8270D13/4-Methylphenol
ND 1.2 7/10/15 12:32 CMRmg/Kg dry 7/9/15SW-846 8270D23/4-Methylphenol
ND 0.31 7/9/15 17:42 CMRmg/Kg dry 7/9/15SW-846 8270D1Naphthalene
ND 0.62 7/10/15 12:32 CMRmg/Kg dry 7/9/15SW-846 8270D2Naphthalene
ND 0.62 7/9/15 17:42 CMRmg/Kg dry 7/9/15SW-846 8270D12-Nitroaniline
ND 1.2 7/10/15 12:32 CMRmg/Kg dry 7/9/15SW-846 8270D22-Nitroaniline
ND 0.62 7/9/15 17:42 CMRmg/Kg dry 7/9/15SW-846 8270D13-Nitroaniline
ND 1.2 7/10/15 12:32 CMRmg/Kg dry 7/9/15SW-846 8270D23-Nitroaniline
ND 0.62 7/9/15 17:42 CMRmg/Kg dry 7/9/15SW-846 8270D14-Nitroaniline
ND 1.2 7/10/15 12:32 CMRmg/Kg dry 7/9/15SW-846 8270D24-Nitroaniline
ND 0.62 7/9/15 17:42 CMRmg/Kg dry 7/9/15SW-846 8270D1Nitrobenzene
ND 1.2 7/10/15 12:32 CMRmg/Kg dry 7/9/15SW-846 8270D2Nitrobenzene
ND 0.62 7/9/15 17:42 CMRmg/Kg dry 7/9/15SW-846 8270D12-Nitrophenol
ND 1.2 7/10/15 12:32 CMRmg/Kg dry 7/9/15SW-846 8270D22-Nitrophenol
ND 1.2 7/9/15 17:42 CMRmg/Kg dry 7/9/15SW-846 8270D14-Nitrophenol
ND 2.4 7/10/15 12:32 CMRmg/Kg dry 7/9/15SW-846 8270D24-Nitrophenol
ND 0.62 7/9/15 17:42 CMRmg/Kg dry 7/9/15SW-846 8270D1N-Nitrosodiphenylamine
ND 1.2 7/10/15 12:32 CMRmg/Kg dry 7/9/15SW-846 8270D2N-Nitrosodiphenylamine
ND 0.62 7/9/15 17:42 CMRmg/Kg dry 7/9/15SW-846 8270D1N-Nitrosodi-n-propylamine
ND 1.2 7/10/15 12:32 CMRmg/Kg dry 7/9/15SW-846 8270D2N-Nitrosodi-n-propylamine
ND 0.62 7/9/15 17:42 CMRmg/Kg dry 7/9/15SW-846 8270D1 V-16Pentachloronitrobenzene
ND 1.2 7/10/15 12:32 CMRmg/Kg dry 7/9/15SW-846 8270D2 V-16Pentachloronitrobenzene
ND 0.62 7/9/15 17:42 CMRmg/Kg dry 7/9/15SW-846 8270D1Pentachlorophenol
ND 1.2 7/10/15 12:32 CMRmg/Kg dry 7/9/15SW-846 8270D2Pentachlorophenol
3.7 0.31 7/9/15 17:42 CMRmg/Kg dry 7/9/15SW-846 8270D1Phenanthrene
3.2 0.62 7/10/15 12:32 CMRmg/Kg dry 7/9/15SW-846 8270D2Phenanthrene
ND 0.62 7/9/15 17:42 CMRmg/Kg dry 7/9/15SW-846 8270D1Phenol
ND 1.2 7/10/15 12:32 CMRmg/Kg dry 7/9/15SW-846 8270D2Phenol
7.1 0.31 7/9/15 17:42 CMRmg/Kg dry 7/9/15SW-846 8270D1Pyrene
5.5 0.62 7/10/15 12:32 CMRmg/Kg dry 7/9/15SW-846 8270D2Pyrene
ND 0.62 7/9/15 17:42 CMRmg/Kg dry 7/9/15SW-846 8270D1Pyridine
ND 1.2 7/10/15 12:32 CMRmg/Kg dry 7/9/15SW-846 8270D2Pyridine
ND 0.62 7/9/15 17:42 CMRmg/Kg dry 7/9/15SW-846 8270D11,2,4,5-Tetrachlorobenzene
ND 1.2 7/10/15 12:32 CMRmg/Kg dry 7/9/15SW-846 8270D21,2,4,5-Tetrachlorobenzene
ND 0.62 7/9/15 17:42 CMRmg/Kg dry 7/9/15SW-846 8270D11,2,4-Trichlorobenzene
ND 1.2 7/10/15 12:32 CMRmg/Kg dry 7/9/15SW-846 8270D21,2,4-Trichlorobenzene
ND 0.62 7/9/15 17:42 CMRmg/Kg dry 7/9/15SW-846 8270D12,4,5-Trichlorophenol
ND 1.2 7/10/15 12:32 CMRmg/Kg dry 7/9/15SW-846 8270D22,4,5-Trichlorophenol
ND 0.62 7/9/15 17:42 CMRmg/Kg dry 7/9/15SW-846 8270D12,4,6-Trichlorophenol
ND 1.2 7/10/15 12:32 CMRmg/Kg dry 7/9/15SW-846 8270D22,4,6-Trichlorophenol
Surrogates % Recovery Recovery Limits Flag/Qual
2-Fluorophenol 83.0 7/9/15 17:4230-130
Page 25 of 74 15G0314_1 Contest_Final 07 15 15 1002 07/15/15 10:02:29
Table of Contents
39 Spruce Street * East Longmeadow, MA 01028 * FAX 413/525-6405 * TEL. 413/525-2332
Date Received: 7/8/2015
Work Order: 15G0314Sample Description:Project Location: Manchester, CT
Sample ID: 15G0314-02
Field Sample #: S-2
Sample Matrix: Soil
Sampled: 7/8/2015 11:30
AnalystAnalyzedDilution Flag/QualRLResultsAnalyte
Date/Time
Units
Date
PreparedMethod
Semivolatile Organic Compounds by GC/MS
Surrogates % Recovery Recovery Limits Flag/Qual
2-Fluorophenol 74.0 7/10/15 12:3230-130
Phenol-d6 85.0 7/9/15 17:4230-130
Phenol-d6 77.8 7/10/15 12:3230-130
Nitrobenzene-d5 86.8 7/9/15 17:4230-130
Nitrobenzene-d5 77.8 7/10/15 12:3230-130
2-Fluorobiphenyl 84.5 7/9/15 17:4230-130
2-Fluorobiphenyl 74.0 7/10/15 12:3230-130
2,4,6-Tribromophenol 81.0 7/9/15 17:4230-130
2,4,6-Tribromophenol 68.4 7/10/15 12:3230-130
p-Terphenyl-d14 90.2 7/9/15 17:4230-130
p-Terphenyl-d14 69.8 7/10/15 12:3230-130
Page 26 of 74 15G0314_1 Contest_Final 07 15 15 1002 07/15/15 10:02:29
Table of Contents
39 Spruce Street * East Longmeadow, MA 01028 * FAX 413/525-6405 * TEL. 413/525-2332
Date Received: 7/8/2015
Work Order: 15G0314Sample Description:Project Location: Manchester, CT
Sample ID: 15G0314-02
Field Sample #: S-2
Sample Matrix: Soil
Sampled: 7/8/2015 11:30
AnalystAnalyzedDilution Flag/QualRLResultsAnalyte
Date/Time
Units
Date
PreparedMethod
Polychlorinated Biphenyls By GC/ECD
ND 0.18 7/10/15 21:00 KALmg/Kg dry 7/9/15SW-846 8082A5Aroclor-1016 [1]
ND 0.18 7/10/15 21:00 KALmg/Kg dry 7/9/15SW-846 8082A5Aroclor-1221 [1]
ND 0.18 7/10/15 21:00 KALmg/Kg dry 7/9/15SW-846 8082A5Aroclor-1232 [1]
ND 0.18 7/10/15 21:00 KALmg/Kg dry 7/9/15SW-846 8082A5Aroclor-1242 [1]
ND 0.18 7/10/15 21:00 KALmg/Kg dry 7/9/15SW-846 8082A5Aroclor-1248 [1]
ND 0.18 7/10/15 21:00 KALmg/Kg dry 7/9/15SW-846 8082A5Aroclor-1254 [1]
ND 0.18 7/10/15 21:00 KALmg/Kg dry 7/9/15SW-846 8082A5Aroclor-1260 [1]
ND 0.18 7/10/15 21:00 KALmg/Kg dry 7/9/15SW-846 8082A5Aroclor-1262 [1]
ND 0.18 7/10/15 21:00 KALmg/Kg dry 7/9/15SW-846 8082A5Aroclor-1268 [2]
Surrogates % Recovery Recovery Limits Flag/Qual
Decachlorobiphenyl [1] 81.8 7/10/15 21:0030-150
Decachlorobiphenyl [2] 79.8 7/10/15 21:0030-150
Tetrachloro-m-xylene [1] 80.2 7/10/15 21:0030-150
Tetrachloro-m-xylene [2] 73.8 7/10/15 21:0030-150
Page 27 of 74 15G0314_1 Contest_Final 07 15 15 1002 07/15/15 10:02:29
Table of Contents
39 Spruce Street * East Longmeadow, MA 01028 * FAX 413/525-6405 * TEL. 413/525-2332
Date Received: 7/8/2015
Work Order: 15G0314Sample Description:Project Location: Manchester, CT
Sample ID: 15G0314-02
Field Sample #: S-2
Sample Matrix: Soil
Sampled: 7/8/2015 11:30
AnalystAnalyzedDilution Flag/QualRLResultsAnalyte
Date/Time
Units
Date
PreparedMethod
Petroleum Hydrocarbons Analyses
470 91 7/10/15 12:37 SCSmg/Kg dry 7/9/15CTDEP ETPH5CT ETPH
Surrogates % Recovery Recovery Limits Flag/Qual
o-Terphenyl 67.4 7/10/15 12:3750-150
Page 28 of 74 15G0314_1 Contest_Final 07 15 15 1002 07/15/15 10:02:29
Table of Contents
39 Spruce Street * East Longmeadow, MA 01028 * FAX 413/525-6405 * TEL. 413/525-2332
Date Received: 7/8/2015
Work Order: 15G0314Sample Description:Project Location: Manchester, CT
Sample ID: 15G0314-02
Field Sample #: S-2
Sample Matrix: Soil
Sampled: 7/8/2015 11:30
AnalystAnalyzedDilution Flag/QualRLResultsAnalyte
Date/Time
Units
Date
PreparedMethod
Conventional Chemistry Parameters by EPA/APHA/SW-846 Methods (Total)
Present 7/9/15 8:15 LLpresent/absent 7/9/15SW-846 9095B1Free Liquid
Absent 7/9/15 15:50 AGpresent/absent 7/9/15SW-846 10301Ignitability
6.8 7/9/15 9:25 MMHpH Units 7/9/15SW-846 9045C1pH @19.4°C
ND 3.9 7/10/15 15:10 DJMmg/Kg 7/9/15SW-846 90141Reactive Cyanide
ND 20 7/10/15 14:25 DJMmg/Kg 7/9/15SW-846 9030A1Reactive Sulfide
54.9 7/9/15 17:28 MJR% Wt 7/9/15SM 2540G1% Solids
Page 29 of 74 15G0314_1 Contest_Final 07 15 15 1002 07/15/15 10:02:29
Table of Contents
39 Spruce Street * East Longmeadow, MA 01028 * FAX 413/525-6405 * TEL. 413/525-2332
Date Received: 7/8/2015
Work Order: 15G0314Sample Description:Project Location: Manchester, CT
Sample ID: 15G0314-02
Field Sample #: S-2
Sample Matrix: Soil
Sampled: 7/8/2015 11:30
AnalystAnalyzedDilution Flag/QualRLResultsAnalyte
Date/Time
Units
Date
PreparedMethod
TCLP - Metals Analyses
ND 0.010 7/10/15 19:35 MJHmg/L 7/10/15SW-846 6010C1Arsenic
ND 0.00010 7/13/15 10:23 SCBmg/L 7/10/15SW-846 7470A1Mercury
0.84 0.050 7/10/15 19:35 MJHmg/L 7/10/15SW-846 6010C1Barium
0.0042 0.0040 7/10/15 19:35 MJHmg/L 7/10/15SW-846 6010C1Cadmium
ND 0.010 7/10/15 19:35 MJHmg/L 7/10/15SW-846 6010C1Chromium
0.12 0.010 7/10/15 19:35 MJHmg/L 7/10/15SW-846 6010C1Lead
ND 0.050 7/10/15 19:35 MJHmg/L 7/10/15SW-846 6010C1Selenium
ND 0.0050 7/10/15 19:35 MJHmg/L 7/10/15SW-846 6010C1Silver
Page 30 of 74 15G0314_1 Contest_Final 07 15 15 1002 07/15/15 10:02:29
Table of Contents
39 Spruce Street * East Longmeadow, MA 01028 * FAX 413/525-6405 * TEL. 413/525-2332
Date Received: 7/8/2015
Work Order: 15G0314Sample Description:Project Location: Manchester, CT
Sample ID: 15G0314-02
Field Sample #: S-2
Sample Matrix: Soil
Sampled: 7/8/2015 11:30
AnalystAnalyzedDilution Flag/QualRLResultsAnalyte
Date/Time
Units
Date
PreparedMethod
Miscellaneous Inorganic Analyses
1.3078 7/13/15 0:00 SALg/mL ASTM D7921Specific Gravity
Page 31 of 74 15G0314_1 Contest_Final 07 15 15 1002 07/15/15 10:02:29
Table of Contents
39 Spruce Street * East Longmeadow, MA 01028 * FAX 413/525-6405 * TEL. 413/525-2332
Date Received: 7/8/2015
Work Order: 15G0314Sample Description:Project Location: Manchester, CT
Sample ID: 15G0314-02
Field Sample #: S-2
Sample Matrix: Soil
Sampled: 7/8/2015 11:30
AnalystAnalyzedDilution Flag/QualRLResultsAnalyte
Date/Time
Units
Date
PreparedMethod
Miscellaneous Test
60.94 7/13/15 0:00 SAL% ASTM D31731Moisture, %
Page 32 of 74 15G0314_1 Contest_Final 07 15 15 1002 07/15/15 10:02:29
Table of Contents
39 Spruce Street * East Longmeadow, MA 01028 * FAX 413/525-6405 * TEL. 413/525-2332
Date Received: 7/8/2015
Work Order: 15G0314Sample Description:Project Location: Manchester, CT
Sample ID: 15G0314-02
Field Sample #: S-2
Sample Matrix: Soil
Sampled: 7/8/2015 11:30
AnalystAnalyzedDilution Flag/QualRLResultsAnalyte
Date/Time
Units
Date
PreparedMethod
Conventional Chemistry Parameters by EPA/APHA/SW-846 Methods (Total)
Attached 7/15/15 0:00 GTX% SM D 422-631See Attached Subcontracted Report
Page 33 of 74 15G0314_1 Contest_Final 07 15 15 1002 07/15/15 10:02:29
Table of Contents
39 Spruce Street * East Longmeadow, MA 01028 * FAX 413/525-6405 * TEL. 413/525-2332
Date Received: 7/8/2015
Work Order: 15G0314Sample Description:Project Location: Manchester, CT
Sample ID: 15G0314-03
Field Sample #: S-3
Sample Matrix: Soil
Sampled: 7/8/2015 12:00
[TOC_2]15G0314-03[TOC]
AnalystAnalyzedDilution Flag/QualRLResultsAnalyte
Date/Time
Units
Date
PreparedMethod
Volatile Organic Compounds by GC/MS
ND 0.21 7/9/15 16:06 MFFmg/Kg dry 7/9/15SW-846 8260C1Acetone
ND 0.013 7/9/15 16:06 MFFmg/Kg dry 7/9/15SW-846 8260C1Acrylonitrile
ND 0.0042 7/9/15 16:06 MFFmg/Kg dry 7/9/15SW-846 8260C1Benzene
ND 0.0042 7/9/15 16:06 MFFmg/Kg dry 7/9/15SW-846 8260C1Bromobenzene
ND 0.0042 7/9/15 16:06 MFFmg/Kg dry 7/9/15SW-846 8260C1Bromodichloromethane
ND 0.0042 7/9/15 16:06 MFFmg/Kg dry 7/9/15SW-846 8260C1Bromoform
ND 0.021 7/9/15 16:06 MFFmg/Kg dry 7/9/15SW-846 8260C1Bromomethane
ND 0.084 7/9/15 16:06 MFFmg/Kg dry 7/9/15SW-846 8260C12-Butanone (MEK)
ND 0.0084 7/9/15 16:06 MFFmg/Kg dry 7/9/15SW-846 8260C1n-Butylbenzene
ND 0.0084 7/9/15 16:06 MFFmg/Kg dry 7/9/15SW-846 8260C1sec-Butylbenzene
ND 0.0084 7/9/15 16:06 MFFmg/Kg dry 7/9/15SW-846 8260C1tert-Butylbenzene
ND 0.042 7/9/15 16:06 MFFmg/Kg dry 7/9/15SW-846 8260C1Carbon Disulfide
ND 0.0042 7/9/15 16:06 MFFmg/Kg dry 7/9/15SW-846 8260C1Carbon Tetrachloride
ND 0.0042 7/9/15 16:06 MFFmg/Kg dry 7/9/15SW-846 8260C1Chlorobenzene
ND 0.0021 7/9/15 16:06 MFFmg/Kg dry 7/9/15SW-846 8260C1Chlorodibromomethane
ND 0.042 7/9/15 16:06 MFFmg/Kg dry 7/9/15SW-846 8260C1Chloroethane
ND 0.0084 7/9/15 16:06 MFFmg/Kg dry 7/9/15SW-846 8260C1Chloroform
ND 0.021 7/9/15 16:06 MFFmg/Kg dry 7/9/15SW-846 8260C1Chloromethane
ND 0.0042 7/9/15 16:06 MFFmg/Kg dry 7/9/15SW-846 8260C12-Chlorotoluene
ND 0.0042 7/9/15 16:06 MFFmg/Kg dry 7/9/15SW-846 8260C14-Chlorotoluene
ND 0.0042 7/9/15 16:06 MFFmg/Kg dry 7/9/15SW-846 8260C1 V-051,2-Dibromo-3-chloropropane (DBCP)
ND 0.0042 7/9/15 16:06 MFFmg/Kg dry 7/9/15SW-846 8260C11,2-Dibromoethane (EDB)
ND 0.0042 7/9/15 16:06 MFFmg/Kg dry 7/9/15SW-846 8260C1Dibromomethane
ND 0.0042 7/9/15 16:06 MFFmg/Kg dry 7/9/15SW-846 8260C11,2-Dichlorobenzene
ND 0.0042 7/9/15 16:06 MFFmg/Kg dry 7/9/15SW-846 8260C11,3-Dichlorobenzene
ND 0.0042 7/9/15 16:06 MFFmg/Kg dry 7/9/15SW-846 8260C11,4-Dichlorobenzene
ND 0.0084 7/9/15 16:06 MFFmg/Kg dry 7/9/15SW-846 8260C1trans-1,4-Dichloro-2-butene
ND 0.042 7/9/15 16:06 MFFmg/Kg dry 7/9/15SW-846 8260C1Dichlorodifluoromethane (Freon 12)
ND 0.0042 7/9/15 16:06 MFFmg/Kg dry 7/9/15SW-846 8260C11,1-Dichloroethane
ND 0.0042 7/9/15 16:06 MFFmg/Kg dry 7/9/15SW-846 8260C11,2-Dichloroethane
ND 0.0084 7/9/15 16:06 MFFmg/Kg dry 7/9/15SW-846 8260C11,1-Dichloroethylene
ND 0.0042 7/9/15 16:06 MFFmg/Kg dry 7/9/15SW-846 8260C1cis-1,2-Dichloroethylene
ND 0.0042 7/9/15 16:06 MFFmg/Kg dry 7/9/15SW-846 8260C1trans-1,2-Dichloroethylene
ND 0.0042 7/9/15 16:06 MFFmg/Kg dry 7/9/15SW-846 8260C11,2-Dichloropropane
ND 0.0021 7/9/15 16:06 MFFmg/Kg dry 7/9/15SW-846 8260C11,3-Dichloropropane
ND 0.0042 7/9/15 16:06 MFFmg/Kg dry 7/9/15SW-846 8260C12,2-Dichloropropane
ND 0.0042 7/9/15 16:06 MFFmg/Kg dry 7/9/15SW-846 8260C11,1-Dichloropropene
ND 0.0021 7/9/15 16:06 MFFmg/Kg dry 7/9/15SW-846 8260C1cis-1,3-Dichloropropene
ND 0.0021 7/9/15 16:06 MFFmg/Kg dry 7/9/15SW-846 8260C1trans-1,3-Dichloropropene
ND 0.0042 7/9/15 16:06 MFFmg/Kg dry 7/9/15SW-846 8260C1Ethylbenzene
ND 0.0084 7/9/15 16:06 MFFmg/Kg dry 7/9/15SW-846 8260C1Hexachlorobutadiene
ND 0.042 7/9/15 16:06 MFFmg/Kg dry 7/9/15SW-846 8260C12-Hexanone (MBK)
ND 0.0042 7/9/15 16:06 MFFmg/Kg dry 7/9/15SW-846 8260C1Isopropylbenzene (Cumene)
ND 0.0084 7/9/15 16:06 MFFmg/Kg dry 7/9/15SW-846 8260C1p-Isopropyltoluene (p-Cymene)
Page 34 of 74 15G0314_1 Contest_Final 07 15 15 1002 07/15/15 10:02:29
Table of Contents
39 Spruce Street * East Longmeadow, MA 01028 * FAX 413/525-6405 * TEL. 413/525-2332
Date Received: 7/8/2015
Work Order: 15G0314Sample Description:Project Location: Manchester, CT
Sample ID: 15G0314-03
Field Sample #: S-3
Sample Matrix: Soil
Sampled: 7/8/2015 12:00
AnalystAnalyzedDilution Flag/QualRLResultsAnalyte
Date/Time
Units
Date
PreparedMethod
Volatile Organic Compounds by GC/MS
ND 0.0084 7/9/15 16:06 MFFmg/Kg dry 7/9/15SW-846 8260C1Methyl tert-Butyl Ether (MTBE)
ND 0.042 7/9/15 16:06 MFFmg/Kg dry 7/9/15SW-846 8260C1Methylene Chloride
ND 0.042 7/9/15 16:06 MFFmg/Kg dry 7/9/15SW-846 8260C14-Methyl-2-pentanone (MIBK)
ND 0.0084 7/9/15 16:06 MFFmg/Kg dry 7/9/15SW-846 8260C1Naphthalene
ND 0.0042 7/9/15 16:06 MFFmg/Kg dry 7/9/15SW-846 8260C1n-Propylbenzene
ND 0.0042 7/9/15 16:06 MFFmg/Kg dry 7/9/15SW-846 8260C1Styrene
ND 0.0042 7/9/15 16:06 MFFmg/Kg dry 7/9/15SW-846 8260C11,1,1,2-Tetrachloroethane
ND 0.0021 7/9/15 16:06 MFFmg/Kg dry 7/9/15SW-846 8260C11,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane
ND 0.0042 7/9/15 16:06 MFFmg/Kg dry 7/9/15SW-846 8260C1Tetrachloroethylene
ND 0.021 7/9/15 16:06 MFFmg/Kg dry 7/9/15SW-846 8260C1Tetrahydrofuran
ND 0.0042 7/9/15 16:06 MFFmg/Kg dry 7/9/15SW-846 8260C1Toluene
ND 0.0042 7/9/15 16:06 MFFmg/Kg dry 7/9/15SW-846 8260C11,2,3-Trichlorobenzene
ND 0.0042 7/9/15 16:06 MFFmg/Kg dry 7/9/15SW-846 8260C11,2,4-Trichlorobenzene
ND 0.0042 7/9/15 16:06 MFFmg/Kg dry 7/9/15SW-846 8260C11,1,1-Trichloroethane
ND 0.0042 7/9/15 16:06 MFFmg/Kg dry 7/9/15SW-846 8260C11,1,2-Trichloroethane
ND 0.0042 7/9/15 16:06 MFFmg/Kg dry 7/9/15SW-846 8260C1Trichloroethylene
ND 0.021 7/9/15 16:06 MFFmg/Kg dry 7/9/15SW-846 8260C1Trichlorofluoromethane (Freon 11)
ND 0.0042 7/9/15 16:06 MFFmg/Kg dry 7/9/15SW-846 8260C11,2,3-Trichloropropane
ND 0.021 7/9/15 16:06 MFFmg/Kg dry 7/9/15SW-846 8260C11,1,2-Trichloro-1,2,2-trifluoroethane
(Freon 113)
ND 0.0042 7/9/15 16:06 MFFmg/Kg dry 7/9/15SW-846 8260C11,2,4-Trimethylbenzene
ND 0.0042 7/9/15 16:06 MFFmg/Kg dry 7/9/15SW-846 8260C11,3,5-Trimethylbenzene
ND 0.021 7/9/15 16:06 MFFmg/Kg dry 7/9/15SW-846 8260C1Vinyl Chloride
ND 0.0084 7/9/15 16:06 MFFmg/Kg dry 7/9/15SW-846 8260C1m+p Xylene
ND 0.0042 7/9/15 16:06 MFFmg/Kg dry 7/9/15SW-846 8260C1o-Xylene
Surrogates % Recovery Recovery Limits Flag/Qual
1,2-Dichloroethane-d4 106 7/9/15 16:0670-130
Toluene-d8 98.1 7/9/15 16:0670-130
4-Bromofluorobenzene 98.8 7/9/15 16:0670-130
Page 35 of 74 15G0314_1 Contest_Final 07 15 15 1002 07/15/15 10:02:29
Table of Contents
39 Spruce Street * East Longmeadow, MA 01028 * FAX 413/525-6405 * TEL. 413/525-2332
Date Received: 7/8/2015
Work Order: 15G0314Sample Description:Project Location: Manchester, CT
Sample ID: 15G0314-03
Field Sample #: S-3
Sample Matrix: Soil
Sampled: 7/8/2015 12:00
AnalystAnalyzedDilution Flag/QualRLResultsAnalyte
Date/Time
Units
Date
PreparedMethod
Semivolatile Organic Compounds by GC/MS
ND 0.43 7/9/15 18:05 CMRmg/Kg dry 7/9/15SW-846 8270D1Acenaphthene
ND 0.43 7/9/15 18:05 CMRmg/Kg dry 7/9/15SW-846 8270D1Acenaphthylene
ND 0.87 7/9/15 18:05 CMRmg/Kg dry 7/9/15SW-846 8270D1Aniline
ND 0.43 7/9/15 18:05 CMRmg/Kg dry 7/9/15SW-846 8270D1Anthracene
0.62 0.43 7/9/15 18:05 CMRmg/Kg dry 7/9/15SW-846 8270D1Benzo(a)anthracene
0.70 0.43 7/9/15 18:05 CMRmg/Kg dry 7/9/15SW-846 8270D1Benzo(a)pyrene
0.99 0.43 7/9/15 18:05 CMRmg/Kg dry 7/9/15SW-846 8270D1Benzo(b)fluoranthene
0.55 0.43 7/9/15 18:05 CMRmg/Kg dry 7/9/15SW-846 8270D1Benzo(g,h,i)perylene
ND 0.43 7/9/15 18:05 CMRmg/Kg dry 7/9/15SW-846 8270D1Benzo(k)fluoranthene
ND 0.87 7/9/15 18:05 CMRmg/Kg dry 7/9/15SW-846 8270D1Bis(2-chloroethoxy)methane
ND 0.87 7/9/15 18:05 CMRmg/Kg dry 7/9/15SW-846 8270D1Bis(2-chloroethyl)ether
ND 0.87 7/9/15 18:05 CMRmg/Kg dry 7/9/15SW-846 8270D1Bis(2-chloroisopropyl)ether
ND 0.87 7/9/15 18:05 CMRmg/Kg dry 7/9/15SW-846 8270D1Bis(2-Ethylhexyl)phthalate
ND 0.87 7/9/15 18:05 CMRmg/Kg dry 7/9/15SW-846 8270D14-Bromophenylphenylether
ND 0.87 7/9/15 18:05 CMRmg/Kg dry 7/9/15SW-846 8270D1Butylbenzylphthalate
ND 0.43 7/9/15 18:05 CMRmg/Kg dry 7/9/15SW-846 8270D1Carbazole
ND 1.7 7/9/15 18:05 CMRmg/Kg dry 7/9/15SW-846 8270D14-Chloroaniline
ND 1.7 7/9/15 18:05 CMRmg/Kg dry 7/9/15SW-846 8270D14-Chloro-3-methylphenol
ND 0.87 7/9/15 18:05 CMRmg/Kg dry 7/9/15SW-846 8270D12-Chloronaphthalene
ND 0.87 7/9/15 18:05 CMRmg/Kg dry 7/9/15SW-846 8270D12-Chlorophenol
ND 0.87 7/9/15 18:05 CMRmg/Kg dry 7/9/15SW-846 8270D14-Chlorophenylphenylether
0.90 0.43 7/9/15 18:05 CMRmg/Kg dry 7/9/15SW-846 8270D1Chrysene
ND 0.43 7/9/15 18:05 CMRmg/Kg dry 7/9/15SW-846 8270D1Dibenz(a,h)anthracene
ND 0.87 7/9/15 18:05 CMRmg/Kg dry 7/9/15SW-846 8270D1Dibenzofuran
ND 0.87 7/9/15 18:05 CMRmg/Kg dry 7/9/15SW-846 8270D1Di-n-butylphthalate
ND 0.43 7/9/15 18:05 CMRmg/Kg dry 7/9/15SW-846 8270D13,3-Dichlorobenzidine
ND 0.87 7/9/15 18:05 CMRmg/Kg dry 7/9/15SW-846 8270D12,4-Dichlorophenol
ND 0.87 7/9/15 18:05 CMRmg/Kg dry 7/9/15SW-846 8270D1Diethylphthalate
ND 0.87 7/9/15 18:05 CMRmg/Kg dry 7/9/15SW-846 8270D12,4-Dimethylphenol
ND 0.87 7/9/15 18:05 CMRmg/Kg dry 7/9/15SW-846 8270D1Dimethylphthalate
ND 0.87 7/9/15 18:05 CMRmg/Kg dry 7/9/15SW-846 8270D14,6-Dinitro-2-methylphenol
ND 1.7 7/9/15 18:05 CMRmg/Kg dry 7/9/15SW-846 8270D1 L-042,4-Dinitrophenol
ND 0.87 7/9/15 18:05 CMRmg/Kg dry 7/9/15SW-846 8270D12,4-Dinitrotoluene
ND 0.87 7/9/15 18:05 CMRmg/Kg dry 7/9/15SW-846 8270D12,6-Dinitrotoluene
ND 0.87 7/9/15 18:05 CMRmg/Kg dry 7/9/15SW-846 8270D1Di-n-octylphthalate
1.5 0.43 7/9/15 18:05 CMRmg/Kg dry 7/9/15SW-846 8270D1Fluoranthene
ND 0.43 7/9/15 18:05 CMRmg/Kg dry 7/9/15SW-846 8270D1Fluorene
ND 0.87 7/9/15 18:05 CMRmg/Kg dry 7/9/15SW-846 8270D1Hexachlorobenzene
ND 0.87 7/9/15 18:05 CMRmg/Kg dry 7/9/15SW-846 8270D1Hexachlorobutadiene
ND 0.87 7/9/15 18:05 CMRmg/Kg dry 7/9/15SW-846 8270D1Hexachlorocyclopentadiene
ND 0.87 7/9/15 18:05 CMRmg/Kg dry 7/9/15SW-846 8270D1Hexachloroethane
0.56 0.43 7/9/15 18:05 CMRmg/Kg dry 7/9/15SW-846 8270D1Indeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene
ND 0.87 7/9/15 18:05 CMRmg/Kg dry 7/9/15SW-846 8270D1Isophorone
ND 0.43 7/9/15 18:05 CMRmg/Kg dry 7/9/15SW-846 8270D12-Methylnaphthalene
Page 36 of 74 15G0314_1 Contest_Final 07 15 15 1002 07/15/15 10:02:29
Table of Contents
39 Spruce Street * East Longmeadow, MA 01028 * FAX 413/525-6405 * TEL. 413/525-2332
Date Received: 7/8/2015
Work Order: 15G0314Sample Description:Project Location: Manchester, CT
Sample ID: 15G0314-03
Field Sample #: S-3
Sample Matrix: Soil
Sampled: 7/8/2015 12:00
AnalystAnalyzedDilution Flag/QualRLResultsAnalyte
Date/Time
Units
Date
PreparedMethod
Semivolatile Organic Compounds by GC/MS
ND 0.87 7/9/15 18:05 CMRmg/Kg dry 7/9/15SW-846 8270D12-Methylphenol
ND 0.87 7/9/15 18:05 CMRmg/Kg dry 7/9/15SW-846 8270D13/4-Methylphenol
ND 0.43 7/9/15 18:05 CMRmg/Kg dry 7/9/15SW-846 8270D1Naphthalene
ND 0.87 7/9/15 18:05 CMRmg/Kg dry 7/9/15SW-846 8270D12-Nitroaniline
ND 0.87 7/9/15 18:05 CMRmg/Kg dry 7/9/15SW-846 8270D13-Nitroaniline
ND 0.87 7/9/15 18:05 CMRmg/Kg dry 7/9/15SW-846 8270D14-Nitroaniline
ND 0.87 7/9/15 18:05 CMRmg/Kg dry 7/9/15SW-846 8270D1Nitrobenzene
ND 0.87 7/9/15 18:05 CMRmg/Kg dry 7/9/15SW-846 8270D12-Nitrophenol
ND 1.7 7/9/15 18:05 CMRmg/Kg dry 7/9/15SW-846 8270D14-Nitrophenol
ND 0.87 7/9/15 18:05 CMRmg/Kg dry 7/9/15SW-846 8270D1N-Nitrosodiphenylamine
ND 0.87 7/9/15 18:05 CMRmg/Kg dry 7/9/15SW-846 8270D1N-Nitrosodi-n-propylamine
ND 0.87 7/9/15 18:05 CMRmg/Kg dry 7/9/15SW-846 8270D1 V-16Pentachloronitrobenzene
ND 0.87 7/9/15 18:05 CMRmg/Kg dry 7/9/15SW-846 8270D1Pentachlorophenol
0.71 0.43 7/9/15 18:05 CMRmg/Kg dry 7/9/15SW-846 8270D1Phenanthrene
ND 0.87 7/9/15 18:05 CMRmg/Kg dry 7/9/15SW-846 8270D1Phenol
1.5 0.43 7/9/15 18:05 CMRmg/Kg dry 7/9/15SW-846 8270D1Pyrene
ND 0.87 7/9/15 18:05 CMRmg/Kg dry 7/9/15SW-846 8270D1Pyridine
ND 0.87 7/9/15 18:05 CMRmg/Kg dry 7/9/15SW-846 8270D11,2,4,5-Tetrachlorobenzene
ND 0.87 7/9/15 18:05 CMRmg/Kg dry 7/9/15SW-846 8270D11,2,4-Trichlorobenzene
ND 0.87 7/9/15 18:05 CMRmg/Kg dry 7/9/15SW-846 8270D12,4,5-Trichlorophenol
ND 0.87 7/9/15 18:05 CMRmg/Kg dry 7/9/15SW-846 8270D12,4,6-Trichlorophenol
Surrogates % Recovery Recovery Limits Flag/Qual
2-Fluorophenol 87.2 7/9/15 18:0530-130
Phenol-d6 89.4 7/9/15 18:0530-130
Nitrobenzene-d5 88.0 7/9/15 18:0530-130
2-Fluorobiphenyl 84.7 7/9/15 18:0530-130
2,4,6-Tribromophenol 80.2 7/9/15 18:0530-130
p-Terphenyl-d14 88.3 7/9/15 18:0530-130
Page 37 of 74 15G0314_1 Contest_Final 07 15 15 1002 07/15/15 10:02:29
Table of Contents
39 Spruce Street * East Longmeadow, MA 01028 * FAX 413/525-6405 * TEL. 413/525-2332
Date Received: 7/8/2015
Work Order: 15G0314Sample Description:Project Location: Manchester, CT
Sample ID: 15G0314-03
Field Sample #: S-3
Sample Matrix: Soil
Sampled: 7/8/2015 12:00
AnalystAnalyzedDilution Flag/QualRLResultsAnalyte
Date/Time
Units
Date
PreparedMethod
Polychlorinated Biphenyls By GC/ECD
ND 0.26 7/10/15 21:13 KALmg/Kg dry 7/9/15SW-846 8082A5Aroclor-1016 [1]
ND 0.26 7/10/15 21:13 KALmg/Kg dry 7/9/15SW-846 8082A5Aroclor-1221 [1]
ND 0.26 7/10/15 21:13 KALmg/Kg dry 7/9/15SW-846 8082A5Aroclor-1232 [1]
ND 0.26 7/10/15 21:13 KALmg/Kg dry 7/9/15SW-846 8082A5Aroclor-1242 [1]
ND 0.26 7/10/15 21:13 KALmg/Kg dry 7/9/15SW-846 8082A5Aroclor-1248 [1]
ND 0.26 7/10/15 21:13 KALmg/Kg dry 7/9/15SW-846 8082A5Aroclor-1254 [1]
ND 0.26 7/10/15 21:13 KALmg/Kg dry 7/9/15SW-846 8082A5Aroclor-1260 [1]
ND 0.26 7/10/15 21:13 KALmg/Kg dry 7/9/15SW-846 8082A5Aroclor-1262 [1]
ND 0.26 7/10/15 21:13 KALmg/Kg dry 7/9/15SW-846 8082A5Aroclor-1268 [2]
Surrogates % Recovery Recovery Limits Flag/Qual
Decachlorobiphenyl [1] 70.9 7/10/15 21:1330-150
Decachlorobiphenyl [2] 70.7 7/10/15 21:1330-150
Tetrachloro-m-xylene [1] 76.1 7/10/15 21:1330-150
Tetrachloro-m-xylene [2] 72.0 7/10/15 21:1330-150
Page 38 of 74 15G0314_1 Contest_Final 07 15 15 1002 07/15/15 10:02:29
Table of Contents
39 Spruce Street * East Longmeadow, MA 01028 * FAX 413/525-6405 * TEL. 413/525-2332
Date Received: 7/8/2015
Work Order: 15G0314Sample Description:Project Location: Manchester, CT
Sample ID: 15G0314-03
Field Sample #: S-3
Sample Matrix: Soil
Sampled: 7/8/2015 12:00
AnalystAnalyzedDilution Flag/QualRLResultsAnalyte
Date/Time
Units
Date
PreparedMethod
Petroleum Hydrocarbons Analyses
440 130 7/10/15 12:55 SCSmg/Kg dry 7/9/15CTDEP ETPH5CT ETPH
Surrogates % Recovery Recovery Limits Flag/Qual
o-Terphenyl 59.9 7/10/15 12:5550-150
Page 39 of 74 15G0314_1 Contest_Final 07 15 15 1002 07/15/15 10:02:29
Table of Contents
39 Spruce Street * East Longmeadow, MA 01028 * FAX 413/525-6405 * TEL. 413/525-2332
Date Received: 7/8/2015
Work Order: 15G0314Sample Description:Project Location: Manchester, CT
Sample ID: 15G0314-03
Field Sample #: S-3
Sample Matrix: Soil
Sampled: 7/8/2015 12:00
AnalystAnalyzedDilution Flag/QualRLResultsAnalyte
Date/Time
Units
Date
PreparedMethod
Conventional Chemistry Parameters by EPA/APHA/SW-846 Methods (Total)
Present 7/9/15 8:15 LLpresent/absent 7/9/15SW-846 9095B1Free Liquid
Absent 7/9/15 15:50 AGpresent/absent 7/9/15SW-846 10301Ignitability
6.6 7/9/15 9:25 MMHpH Units 7/9/15SW-846 9045C1pH @19.1°C
ND 3.9 7/10/15 15:10 DJMmg/Kg 7/9/15SW-846 90141Reactive Cyanide
ND 19 7/10/15 14:25 DJMmg/Kg 7/9/15SW-846 9030A1Reactive Sulfide
39.2 7/9/15 17:28 MJR% Wt 7/9/15SM 2540G1% Solids
Page 40 of 74 15G0314_1 Contest_Final 07 15 15 1002 07/15/15 10:02:29
Table of Contents
39 Spruce Street * East Longmeadow, MA 01028 * FAX 413/525-6405 * TEL. 413/525-2332
Date Received: 7/8/2015
Work Order: 15G0314Sample Description:Project Location: Manchester, CT
Sample ID: 15G0314-03
Field Sample #: S-3
Sample Matrix: Soil
Sampled: 7/8/2015 12:00
AnalystAnalyzedDilution Flag/QualRLResultsAnalyte
Date/Time
Units
Date
PreparedMethod
TCLP - Metals Analyses
ND 0.010 7/10/15 19:39 MJHmg/L 7/10/15SW-846 6010C1Arsenic
ND 0.00010 7/13/15 10:24 SCBmg/L 7/10/15SW-846 7470A1Mercury
1.3 0.050 7/10/15 19:39 MJHmg/L 7/10/15SW-846 6010C1Barium
0.0053 0.0040 7/10/15 19:39 MJHmg/L 7/10/15SW-846 6010C1Cadmium
ND 0.010 7/10/15 19:39 MJHmg/L 7/10/15SW-846 6010C1Chromium
0.12 0.010 7/10/15 19:39 MJHmg/L 7/10/15SW-846 6010C1Lead
ND 0.050 7/10/15 19:39 MJHmg/L 7/10/15SW-846 6010C1Selenium
ND 0.0050 7/10/15 19:39 MJHmg/L 7/10/15SW-846 6010C1Silver
Page 41 of 74 15G0314_1 Contest_Final 07 15 15 1002 07/15/15 10:02:29
Table of Contents
39 Spruce Street * East Longmeadow, MA 01028 * FAX 413/525-6405 * TEL. 413/525-2332
Date Received: 7/8/2015
Work Order: 15G0314Sample Description:Project Location: Manchester, CT
Sample ID: 15G0314-03
Field Sample #: S-3
Sample Matrix: Soil
Sampled: 7/8/2015 12:00
AnalystAnalyzedDilution Flag/QualRLResultsAnalyte
Date/Time
Units
Date
PreparedMethod
Miscellaneous Inorganic Analyses
1.6271 7/13/15 0:00 SALg/mL ASTM D7921Specific Gravity
Page 42 of 74 15G0314_1 Contest_Final 07 15 15 1002 07/15/15 10:02:29
Table of Contents
39 Spruce Street * East Longmeadow, MA 01028 * FAX 413/525-6405 * TEL. 413/525-2332
Date Received: 7/8/2015
Work Order: 15G0314Sample Description:Project Location: Manchester, CT
Sample ID: 15G0314-03
Field Sample #: S-3
Sample Matrix: Soil
Sampled: 7/8/2015 12:00
AnalystAnalyzedDilution Flag/QualRLResultsAnalyte
Date/Time
Units
Date
PreparedMethod
Miscellaneous Test
39.81 7/13/15 0:00 SAL% ASTM D31731Moisture, %
Page 43 of 74 15G0314_1 Contest_Final 07 15 15 1002 07/15/15 10:02:29
Table of Contents
39 Spruce Street * East Longmeadow, MA 01028 * FAX 413/525-6405 * TEL. 413/525-2332
Date Received: 7/8/2015
Work Order: 15G0314Sample Description:Project Location: Manchester, CT
Sample ID: 15G0314-03
Field Sample #: S-3
Sample Matrix: Soil
Sampled: 7/8/2015 12:00
AnalystAnalyzedDilution Flag/QualRLResultsAnalyte
Date/Time
Units
Date
PreparedMethod
Conventional Chemistry Parameters by EPA/APHA/SW-846 Methods (Total)
Attached 7/15/15 0:00 GTX% SM D 422-631See Attached Subcontracted Report
Page 44 of 74 15G0314_1 Contest_Final 07 15 15 1002 07/15/15 10:02:29
Table of Contents
39 Spruce Street * East Longmeadow, MA 01028 * FAX 413/525-6405 * TEL. 413/525-2332
Sample Extraction Data
Prep Method: SW-846 3546-CTDEP ETPH
Lab Number [Field ID] Batch DateInitial [g] Final [mL]
B125809 07/09/1530.0 1.0015G0314-01 [S-1]
B125809 07/09/1530.0 1.0015G0314-02 [S-2]
B125809 07/09/1530.0 1.0015G0314-03 [S-3]
Prep Method: % Solids-SM 2540G
Lab Number [Field ID] Batch Date
B125823 07/09/1515G0314-01 [S-1]
B125823 07/09/1515G0314-02 [S-2]
B125823 07/09/1515G0314-03 [S-3]
SW-846 1030
Lab Number [Field ID] Batch DateInitial [g]
B125852 07/09/1550.015G0314-01 [S-1]
B125852 07/09/1550.015G0314-02 [S-2]
B125852 07/09/1550.015G0314-03 [S-3]
Prep Method: SW-846 3010A-SW-846 6010C
Lab Number [Field ID] Batch DateInitial [mL] Final [mL]
Leachates were extracted on 7/9/2015 per SW-846 1311 in Batch B125827
B125941 07/10/1550.0 50.015G0314-01 [S-1]
B125941 07/10/1550.0 50.015G0314-02 [S-2]
B125941 07/10/1550.0 50.015G0314-03 [S-3]
Prep Method: SW-846 7470A Prep-SW-846 7470A
Lab Number [Field ID] Batch DateInitial [mL] Final [mL]
Leachates were extracted on 7/9/2015 per SW-846 1311 in Batch B125827
B125932 07/10/156.00 6.0015G0314-02 [S-2]
B125932 07/10/156.00 6.0015G0314-03 [S-3]
Prep Method: SW-846 7470A Prep-SW-846 7470A
Lab Number [Field ID] Batch DateInitial [mL] Final [mL]
Leachates were extracted on 7/9/2015 per SW-846 1311 in Batch B125827
B126039 07/13/156.00 6.0015G0314-01 [S-1]
Prep Method: SW-846 3546-SW-846 8082A
Lab Number [Field ID] Batch DateInitial [g] Final [mL]
B125806 07/09/1510.0 10.015G0314-01 [S-1]
B125806 07/09/1510.0 10.015G0314-02 [S-2]
B125806 07/09/1510.0 10.015G0314-03 [S-3]
Prep Method: SW-846 5035-SW-846 8260C
Lab Number [Field ID] Batch DateInitial [g] Final [mL]
[TOC_1]Sample Preparation Information[TOC]
Page 45 of 74 15G0314_1 Contest_Final 07 15 15 1002 07/15/15 10:02:29
Table of Contents
39 Spruce Street * East Longmeadow, MA 01028 * FAX 413/525-6405 * TEL. 413/525-2332
Sample Extraction Data
Prep Method: SW-846 5035-SW-846 8260C
Lab Number [Field ID] Batch DateInitial [g] Final [mL]
B125866 07/09/158.47 10.015G0314-01 [S-1]
B125866 07/09/1510.1 10.015G0314-02 [S-2]
B125866 07/09/156.09 10.015G0314-03 [S-3]
Prep Method: SW-846 3546-SW-846 8270D
Lab Number [Field ID] Batch DateInitial [g] Final [mL]
B125812 07/09/1530.1 1.0015G0314-01 [S-1]
B125812 07/09/1530.1 1.0015G0314-01RE1 [S-1]
B125812 07/09/1530.0 1.0015G0314-02 [S-2]
B125812 07/09/1530.0 1.0015G0314-02RE1 [S-2]
B125812 07/09/1530.0 1.0015G0314-03 [S-3]
SW-846 9014
Lab Number [Field ID] Batch DateInitial [g] Final [mL]
B125864 07/09/1525.2 25015G0314-01 [S-1]
B125864 07/09/1525.5 25015G0314-02 [S-2]
B125864 07/09/1525.7 25015G0314-03 [S-3]
SW-846 9030A
Lab Number [Field ID] Batch DateInitial [g] Final [mL]
B125865 07/09/1525.2 25015G0314-01 [S-1]
B125865 07/09/1525.5 25015G0314-02 [S-2]
B125865 07/09/1525.7 25015G0314-03 [S-3]
SW-846 9045C
Lab Number [Field ID] Batch DateInitial [g]
B125846 07/09/1520.015G0314-01 [S-1]
B125846 07/09/1520.015G0314-02 [S-2]
B125846 07/09/1520.015G0314-03 [S-3]
SW-846 9095B
Lab Number [Field ID] Batch DateInitial [g] Final [mL]
B125810 07/09/15100 10015G0314-01 [S-1]
B125810 07/09/15100 10015G0314-02 [S-2]
B125810 07/09/15100 10015G0314-03 [S-3]
Page 46 of 74 15G0314_1 Contest_Final 07 15 15 1002 07/15/15 10:02:29
Table of Contents
39 Spruce Street * East Longmeadow, MA 01028 * FAX 413/525-6405 * TEL. 413/525-2332
Result Limit
Reporting
Units Level
Spike
Result
Source
%REC
%REC
Limits RPD
RPD
Limit Notes Analyte
Volatile Organic Compounds by GC/MS - Quality Control
QUALITY CONTROL
[TOC_2]Volatile Organic Compounds by GC/MS[TOC]
Batch B125866 - SW-846 5035[TOC_3]B125866[TOC]
Blank (B125866-BLK1) Prepared & Analyzed: 07/09/15
Acetone mg/Kg wet0.10ND
Acrylonitrile mg/Kg wet0.0060ND
Benzene mg/Kg wet0.0020ND
Bromobenzene mg/Kg wet0.0020ND
Bromodichloromethane mg/Kg wet0.0020ND
Bromoform mg/Kg wet0.0020ND
Bromomethane mg/Kg wet0.010ND
2-Butanone (MEK) mg/Kg wet0.040ND
n-Butylbenzene mg/Kg wet0.0040ND
sec-Butylbenzene mg/Kg wet0.0040ND
tert-Butylbenzene mg/Kg wet0.0040ND
Carbon Disulfide mg/Kg wet0.020ND
Carbon Tetrachloride mg/Kg wet0.0020ND
Chlorobenzene mg/Kg wet0.0020ND
Chlorodibromomethane mg/Kg wet0.0010ND
Chloroethane mg/Kg wet0.020ND
Chloroform mg/Kg wet0.0040ND
Chloromethane mg/Kg wet0.010ND
2-Chlorotoluene mg/Kg wet0.0020ND
4-Chlorotoluene mg/Kg wet0.0020ND
1,2-Dibromo-3-chloropropane (DBCP) mg/Kg wet0.0020 V-05ND
1,2-Dibromoethane (EDB) mg/Kg wet0.0020ND
Dibromomethane mg/Kg wet0.0020ND
1,2-Dichlorobenzene mg/Kg wet0.0020ND
1,3-Dichlorobenzene mg/Kg wet0.0020ND
1,4-Dichlorobenzene mg/Kg wet0.0020ND
trans-1,4-Dichloro-2-butene mg/Kg wet0.0040ND
Dichlorodifluoromethane (Freon 12) mg/Kg wet0.020ND
1,1-Dichloroethane mg/Kg wet0.0020ND
1,2-Dichloroethane mg/Kg wet0.0020ND
1,1-Dichloroethylene mg/Kg wet0.0040ND
cis-1,2-Dichloroethylene mg/Kg wet0.0020ND
trans-1,2-Dichloroethylene mg/Kg wet0.0020ND
1,2-Dichloropropane mg/Kg wet0.0020ND
1,3-Dichloropropane mg/Kg wet0.0010ND
2,2-Dichloropropane mg/Kg wet0.0020ND
1,1-Dichloropropene mg/Kg wet0.0020ND
cis-1,3-Dichloropropene mg/Kg wet0.0010ND
trans-1,3-Dichloropropene mg/Kg wet0.0010ND
Ethylbenzene mg/Kg wet0.0020ND
Hexachlorobutadiene mg/Kg wet0.0040ND
2-Hexanone (MBK) mg/Kg wet0.020ND
Isopropylbenzene (Cumene) mg/Kg wet0.0020ND
p-Isopropyltoluene (p-Cymene) mg/Kg wet0.0040ND
Methyl tert-Butyl Ether (MTBE) mg/Kg wet0.0040ND
Methylene Chloride mg/Kg wet0.020ND
4-Methyl-2-pentanone (MIBK) mg/Kg wet0.020ND
Naphthalene mg/Kg wet0.0040ND
n-Propylbenzene mg/Kg wet0.0020ND
Styrene mg/Kg wet0.0020ND
1,1,1,2-Tetrachloroethane mg/Kg wet0.0020ND
1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane mg/Kg wet0.0010ND
[TOC_1]QC Data[TOC]
Page 47 of 74 15G0314_1 Contest_Final 07 15 15 1002 07/15/15 10:02:29
Table of Contents
39 Spruce Street * East Longmeadow, MA 01028 * FAX 413/525-6405 * TEL. 413/525-2332
Result Limit
Reporting
Units Level
Spike
Result
Source
%REC
%REC
Limits RPD
RPD
Limit Notes Analyte
Volatile Organic Compounds by GC/MS - Quality Control
QUALITY CONTROL
Batch B125866 - SW-846 5035
Blank (B125866-BLK1) Prepared & Analyzed: 07/09/15
Tetrachloroethylene mg/Kg wet0.0020ND
Tetrahydrofuran mg/Kg wet0.010ND
Toluene mg/Kg wet0.0020ND
1,2,3-Trichlorobenzene mg/Kg wet0.0020ND
1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene mg/Kg wet0.0020ND
1,1,1-Trichloroethane mg/Kg wet0.0020ND
1,1,2-Trichloroethane mg/Kg wet0.0020ND
Trichloroethylene mg/Kg wet0.0020ND
Trichlorofluoromethane (Freon 11) mg/Kg wet0.010ND
1,2,3-Trichloropropane mg/Kg wet0.0020ND
1,1,2-Trichloro-1,2,2-trifluoroethane (Freon
113)
mg/Kg wet0.010ND
1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene mg/Kg wet0.0020ND
1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene mg/Kg wet0.0020ND
Vinyl Chloride mg/Kg wet0.010ND
m+p Xylene mg/Kg wet0.0040ND
o-Xylene mg/Kg wet0.0020ND
mg/Kg wet 0.0500 70-130Surrogate: 1,2-Dichloroethane-d4 98.20.0491
mg/Kg wet 0.0500 70-130Surrogate: Toluene-d8 96.10.0480
mg/Kg wet 0.0500 70-130Surrogate: 4-Bromofluorobenzene 1010.0504
LCS (B125866-BS1) Prepared & Analyzed: 07/09/15
Acetone mg/Kg wet0.10 0.200 70-1301160.232
Acrylonitrile mg/Kg wet0.0060 0.0200 70-1301090.0218
Benzene mg/Kg wet0.0020 0.0200 70-1301110.0223
Bromobenzene mg/Kg wet0.0020 0.0200 70-13092.80.0186
Bromodichloromethane mg/Kg wet0.0020 0.0200 70-13097.20.0194
Bromoform mg/Kg wet0.0020 0.0200 70-13090.90.0182
Bromomethane mg/Kg wet0.010 0.0200 70-1301280.0255
2-Butanone (MEK) mg/Kg wet0.040 0.200 70-1301130.227
n-Butylbenzene mg/Kg wet0.0040 0.0200 70-13080.20.0160
sec-Butylbenzene mg/Kg wet0.0040 0.0200 70-13084.00.0168
tert-Butylbenzene mg/Kg wet0.0040 0.0200 70-13084.50.0169
Carbon Disulfide mg/Kg wet0.020 0.200 70-1301070.215
Carbon Tetrachloride mg/Kg wet0.0020 0.0200 70-1301010.0202
Chlorobenzene mg/Kg wet0.0020 0.0200 70-13094.20.0188
Chlorodibromomethane mg/Kg wet0.0010 0.0200 70-1301020.0204
Chloroethane mg/Kg wet0.020 0.0200 70-1301070.0214
Chloroform mg/Kg wet0.0040 0.0200 70-1301120.0223
Chloromethane mg/Kg wet0.010 0.0200 70-1301090.0217
2-Chlorotoluene mg/Kg wet0.0020 0.0200 70-13089.90.0180
4-Chlorotoluene mg/Kg wet0.0020 0.0200 70-13087.30.0175
1,2-Dibromo-3-chloropropane (DBCP) mg/Kg wet0.0020 0.0200 V-0570-13092.30.0185
1,2-Dibromoethane (EDB) mg/Kg wet0.0020 0.0200 70-1301080.0216
Dibromomethane mg/Kg wet0.0020 0.0200 70-1301050.0209
1,2-Dichlorobenzene mg/Kg wet0.0020 0.0200 70-13087.20.0174
1,3-Dichlorobenzene mg/Kg wet0.0020 0.0200 70-13090.70.0181
1,4-Dichlorobenzene mg/Kg wet0.0020 0.0200 70-13090.10.0180
trans-1,4-Dichloro-2-butene mg/Kg wet0.0040 0.0200 70-13081.60.0163
Dichlorodifluoromethane (Freon 12) mg/Kg wet0.020 0.0200 70-1301140.0228
1,1-Dichloroethane mg/Kg wet0.0020 0.0200 70-1301090.0218
1,2-Dichloroethane mg/Kg wet0.0020 0.0200 70-1301020.0205
1,1-Dichloroethylene mg/Kg wet0.0040 0.0200 70-1301020.0203
Page 48 of 74 15G0314_1 Contest_Final 07 15 15 1002 07/15/15 10:02:29
Table of Contents
39 Spruce Street * East Longmeadow, MA 01028 * FAX 413/525-6405 * TEL. 413/525-2332
Result Limit
Reporting
Units Level
Spike
Result
Source
%REC
%REC
Limits RPD
RPD
Limit Notes Analyte
Volatile Organic Compounds by GC/MS - Quality Control
QUALITY CONTROL
Batch B125866 - SW-846 5035
LCS (B125866-BS1) Prepared & Analyzed: 07/09/15
cis-1,2-Dichloroethylene mg/Kg wet0.0020 0.0200 70-1301060.0212
trans-1,2-Dichloroethylene mg/Kg wet0.0020 0.0200 70-13093.90.0188
1,2-Dichloropropane mg/Kg wet0.0020 0.0200 70-1301090.0217
1,3-Dichloropropane mg/Kg wet0.0010 0.0200 70-1301060.0212
2,2-Dichloropropane mg/Kg wet0.0020 0.0200 70-13094.60.0189
1,1-Dichloropropene mg/Kg wet0.0020 0.0200 70-1301030.0205
cis-1,3-Dichloropropene mg/Kg wet0.0010 0.0200 70-1301040.0207
trans-1,3-Dichloropropene mg/Kg wet0.0010 0.0200 70-13099.80.0200
Ethylbenzene mg/Kg wet0.0020 0.0200 70-13089.90.0180
Hexachlorobutadiene mg/Kg wet0.0020 0.0200 70-13085.30.0171
2-Hexanone (MBK) mg/Kg wet0.020 0.200 70-1301070.214
Isopropylbenzene (Cumene) mg/Kg wet0.0020 0.0200 70-13090.10.0180
p-Isopropyltoluene (p-Cymene) mg/Kg wet0.0040 0.0200 70-13083.20.0166
Methyl tert-Butyl Ether (MTBE) mg/Kg wet0.0040 0.0200 70-1301010.0202
Methylene Chloride mg/Kg wet0.020 0.0200 70-13097.80.0196
4-Methyl-2-pentanone (MIBK) mg/Kg wet0.020 0.200 70-1301100.220
Naphthalene mg/Kg wet0.0040 0.0200 70-13094.10.0188
n-Propylbenzene mg/Kg wet0.0020 0.0200 70-13088.90.0178
Styrene mg/Kg wet0.0020 0.0200 70-13090.20.0180
1,1,1,2-Tetrachloroethane mg/Kg wet0.0020 0.0200 70-13093.20.0186
1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane mg/Kg wet0.0010 0.0200 70-13095.90.0192
Tetrachloroethylene mg/Kg wet0.0020 0.0200 70-1301020.0204
Tetrahydrofuran mg/Kg wet0.010 0.0200 70-1301070.0214
Toluene mg/Kg wet0.0020 0.0200 70-1301030.0205
1,2,3-Trichlorobenzene mg/Kg wet0.0020 0.0200 70-13091.00.0182
1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene mg/Kg wet0.0020 0.0200 70-13086.60.0173
1,1,1-Trichloroethane mg/Kg wet0.0020 0.0200 70-1301030.0206
1,1,2-Trichloroethane mg/Kg wet0.0020 0.0200 70-1301090.0218
Trichloroethylene mg/Kg wet0.0020 0.0200 70-1301050.0210
Trichlorofluoromethane (Freon 11) mg/Kg wet0.010 0.0200 70-1301000.0200
1,2,3-Trichloropropane mg/Kg wet0.0020 0.0200 70-13095.40.0191
1,1,2-Trichloro-1,2,2-trifluoroethane (Freon
113)
mg/Kg wet0.010 0.0200 70-1301050.0210
1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene mg/Kg wet0.0020 0.0200 70-13085.50.0171
1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene mg/Kg wet0.0020 0.0200 70-13086.50.0173
Vinyl Chloride mg/Kg wet0.010 0.0200 70-1301080.0215
m+p Xylene mg/Kg wet0.0040 0.0400 70-13087.80.0351
o-Xylene mg/Kg wet0.0020 0.0200 70-13089.20.0178
mg/Kg wet 0.0500 70-130Surrogate: 1,2-Dichloroethane-d4 94.30.0472
mg/Kg wet 0.0500 70-130Surrogate: Toluene-d8 1020.0510
mg/Kg wet 0.0500 70-130Surrogate: 4-Bromofluorobenzene 1060.0530
Page 49 of 74 15G0314_1 Contest_Final 07 15 15 1002 07/15/15 10:02:29
Table of Contents
39 Spruce Street * East Longmeadow, MA 01028 * FAX 413/525-6405 * TEL. 413/525-2332
Result Limit
Reporting
Units Level
Spike
Result
Source
%REC
%REC
Limits RPD
RPD
Limit Notes Analyte
Semivolatile Organic Compounds by GC/MS - Quality Control
QUALITY CONTROL
[TOC_2]Semivolatile Organic Compounds by GC/MS[TOC]
Batch B125812 - SW-846 3546[TOC_3]B125812[TOC]
Blank (B125812-BLK1) Prepared & Analyzed: 07/09/15
Acenaphthene mg/Kg wet0.17ND
Acenaphthylene mg/Kg wet0.17ND
Aniline mg/Kg wet0.34ND
Anthracene mg/Kg wet0.17ND
Benzo(a)anthracene mg/Kg wet0.17ND
Benzo(a)pyrene mg/Kg wet0.17ND
Benzo(b)fluoranthene mg/Kg wet0.17ND
Benzo(g,h,i)perylene mg/Kg wet0.17ND
Benzo(k)fluoranthene mg/Kg wet0.17ND
Bis(2-chloroethoxy)methane mg/Kg wet0.34ND
Bis(2-chloroethyl)ether mg/Kg wet0.34ND
Bis(2-chloroisopropyl)ether mg/Kg wet0.34ND
Bis(2-Ethylhexyl)phthalate mg/Kg wet0.34ND
4-Bromophenylphenylether mg/Kg wet0.34ND
Butylbenzylphthalate mg/Kg wet0.34ND
Carbazole mg/Kg wet0.17ND
4-Chloroaniline mg/Kg wet0.66ND
4-Chloro-3-methylphenol mg/Kg wet0.66ND
2-Chloronaphthalene mg/Kg wet0.34ND
2-Chlorophenol mg/Kg wet0.34ND
4-Chlorophenylphenylether mg/Kg wet0.34ND
Chrysene mg/Kg wet0.17ND
Dibenz(a,h)anthracene mg/Kg wet0.17ND
Dibenzofuran mg/Kg wet0.34ND
Di-n-butylphthalate mg/Kg wet0.34ND
3,3-Dichlorobenzidine mg/Kg wet0.17ND
2,4-Dichlorophenol mg/Kg wet0.34ND
Diethylphthalate mg/Kg wet0.34ND
2,4-Dimethylphenol mg/Kg wet0.34ND
Dimethylphthalate mg/Kg wet0.34ND
4,6-Dinitro-2-methylphenol mg/Kg wet0.34ND
2,4-Dinitrophenol mg/Kg wet0.66 L-04ND
2,4-Dinitrotoluene mg/Kg wet0.34ND
2,6-Dinitrotoluene mg/Kg wet0.34ND
Di-n-octylphthalate mg/Kg wet0.34ND
Fluoranthene mg/Kg wet0.17ND
Fluorene mg/Kg wet0.17ND
Hexachlorobenzene mg/Kg wet0.34ND
Hexachlorobutadiene mg/Kg wet0.34ND
Hexachlorocyclopentadiene mg/Kg wet0.34ND
Hexachloroethane mg/Kg wet0.34ND
Indeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene mg/Kg wet0.17ND
Isophorone mg/Kg wet0.34ND
2-Methylnaphthalene mg/Kg wet0.17ND
2-Methylphenol mg/Kg wet0.34ND
3/4-Methylphenol mg/Kg wet0.34ND
Naphthalene mg/Kg wet0.17ND
2-Nitroaniline mg/Kg wet0.34ND
3-Nitroaniline mg/Kg wet0.34ND
4-Nitroaniline mg/Kg wet0.34ND
Nitrobenzene mg/Kg wet0.34ND
2-Nitrophenol mg/Kg wet0.34ND
Page 50 of 74 15G0314_1 Contest_Final 07 15 15 1002 07/15/15 10:02:29
Table of Contents
39 Spruce Street * East Longmeadow, MA 01028 * FAX 413/525-6405 * TEL. 413/525-2332
Result Limit
Reporting
Units Level
Spike
Result
Source
%REC
%REC
Limits RPD
RPD
Limit Notes Analyte
Semivolatile Organic Compounds by GC/MS - Quality Control
QUALITY CONTROL
Batch B125812 - SW-846 3546
Blank (B125812-BLK1) Prepared & Analyzed: 07/09/15
4-Nitrophenol mg/Kg wet0.66ND
N-Nitrosodiphenylamine mg/Kg wet0.34ND
N-Nitrosodi-n-propylamine mg/Kg wet0.34ND
Pentachloronitrobenzene mg/Kg wet0.34 V-16ND
Pentachlorophenol mg/Kg wet0.34ND
Phenanthrene mg/Kg wet0.17ND
Phenol mg/Kg wet0.34ND
Pyrene mg/Kg wet0.17ND
Pyridine mg/Kg wet0.34ND
1,2,4,5-Tetrachlorobenzene mg/Kg wet0.34ND
1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene mg/Kg wet0.34ND
2,4,5-Trichlorophenol mg/Kg wet0.34ND
2,4,6-Trichlorophenol mg/Kg wet0.34ND
mg/Kg wet 6.67 30-130Surrogate: 2-Fluorophenol 86.85.79
mg/Kg wet 6.67 30-130Surrogate: Phenol-d6 91.96.13
mg/Kg wet 3.33 30-130Surrogate: Nitrobenzene-d5 90.03.00
mg/Kg wet 3.33 30-130Surrogate: 2-Fluorobiphenyl 86.02.87
mg/Kg wet 6.67 30-130Surrogate: 2,4,6-Tribromophenol 75.25.01
mg/Kg wet 3.33 30-130Surrogate: p-Terphenyl-d14 91.83.06
LCS (B125812-BS1) Prepared & Analyzed: 07/09/15
Acenaphthene mg/Kg wet0.17 1.67 40-14084.11.40
Acenaphthylene mg/Kg wet0.17 1.67 40-14086.31.44
Aniline mg/Kg wet0.34 1.67 40-14055.2 �0.921
Anthracene mg/Kg wet0.17 1.67 40-14089.71.50
Benzo(a)anthracene mg/Kg wet0.17 1.67 40-14087.71.46
Benzo(a)pyrene mg/Kg wet0.17 1.67 40-14087.41.46
Benzo(b)fluoranthene mg/Kg wet0.17 1.67 40-14091.51.53
Benzo(g,h,i)perylene mg/Kg wet0.17 1.67 40-14075.11.25
Benzo(k)fluoranthene mg/Kg wet0.17 1.67 40-14091.31.52
Bis(2-chloroethoxy)methane mg/Kg wet0.34 1.67 40-14088.81.48
Bis(2-chloroethyl)ether mg/Kg wet0.34 1.67 40-14089.71.50
Bis(2-chloroisopropyl)ether mg/Kg wet0.34 1.67 40-14095.01.58
Bis(2-Ethylhexyl)phthalate mg/Kg wet0.34 1.67 40-1401071.78
4-Bromophenylphenylether mg/Kg wet0.34 1.67 40-14092.11.54
Butylbenzylphthalate mg/Kg wet0.34 1.67 40-14094.21.57
Carbazole mg/Kg wet0.17 1.67 40-14084.71.41
4-Chloroaniline mg/Kg wet0.66 1.67 40-14053.8 �0.897
4-Chloro-3-methylphenol mg/Kg wet0.66 1.67 30-13085.71.43
2-Chloronaphthalene mg/Kg wet0.34 1.67 40-14081.41.36
2-Chlorophenol mg/Kg wet0.34 1.67 30-13081.11.35
4-Chlorophenylphenylether mg/Kg wet0.34 1.67 40-14088.41.47
Chrysene mg/Kg wet0.17 1.67 40-14087.61.46
Dibenz(a,h)anthracene mg/Kg wet0.17 1.67 40-14071.41.19
Dibenzofuran mg/Kg wet0.34 1.67 40-14085.71.43
Di-n-butylphthalate mg/Kg wet0.34 1.67 40-14093.91.56
3,3-Dichlorobenzidine mg/Kg wet0.17 1.67 40-14065.5 �1.09
2,4-Dichlorophenol mg/Kg wet0.34 1.67 30-13082.31.37
Diethylphthalate mg/Kg wet0.34 1.67 40-14092.51.54
2,4-Dimethylphenol mg/Kg wet0.34 1.67 30-13081.41.36
Dimethylphthalate mg/Kg wet0.34 1.67 40-14091.61.53
4,6-Dinitro-2-methylphenol mg/Kg wet0.34 1.67 30-13053.30.888
Page 51 of 74 15G0314_1 Contest_Final 07 15 15 1002 07/15/15 10:02:29
Table of Contents
39 Spruce Street * East Longmeadow, MA 01028 * FAX 413/525-6405 * TEL. 413/525-2332
Result Limit
Reporting
Units Level
Spike
Result
Source
%REC
%REC
Limits RPD
RPD
Limit Notes Analyte
Semivolatile Organic Compounds by GC/MS - Quality Control
QUALITY CONTROL
Batch B125812 - SW-846 3546
LCS (B125812-BS1) Prepared & Analyzed: 07/09/15
2,4-Dinitrophenol mg/Kg wet0.66 1.67 L-0430-13027.7 *0.462
2,4-Dinitrotoluene mg/Kg wet0.34 1.67 40-14087.81.46
2,6-Dinitrotoluene mg/Kg wet0.34 1.67 40-14090.61.51
Di-n-octylphthalate mg/Kg wet0.34 1.67 40-14099.41.66
Fluoranthene mg/Kg wet0.17 1.67 40-14083.61.39
Fluorene mg/Kg wet0.17 1.67 40-14090.11.50
Hexachlorobenzene mg/Kg wet0.34 1.67 40-14092.01.53
Hexachlorobutadiene mg/Kg wet0.34 1.67 40-14077.41.29
Hexachlorocyclopentadiene mg/Kg wet0.34 1.67 30-14069.71.16
Hexachloroethane mg/Kg wet0.34 1.67 40-14078.71.31
Indeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene mg/Kg wet0.17 1.67 40-14073.41.22
Isophorone mg/Kg wet0.34 1.67 40-14092.91.55
2-Methylnaphthalene mg/Kg wet0.17 1.67 40-14079.41.32
2-Methylphenol mg/Kg wet0.34 1.67 30-13079.81.33
3/4-Methylphenol mg/Kg wet0.34 1.67 30-13089.01.48
Naphthalene mg/Kg wet0.17 1.67 40-14080.81.35
2-Nitroaniline mg/Kg wet0.34 1.67 40-1401181.97
3-Nitroaniline mg/Kg wet0.34 1.67 40-14077.3 �1.29
4-Nitroaniline mg/Kg wet0.34 1.67 40-14081.61.36
Nitrobenzene mg/Kg wet0.34 1.67 40-14086.61.44
2-Nitrophenol mg/Kg wet0.34 1.67 30-13081.61.36
4-Nitrophenol mg/Kg wet0.66 1.67 10-13087.11.45
N-Nitrosodiphenylamine mg/Kg wet0.34 1.67 40-1401191.98
N-Nitrosodi-n-propylamine mg/Kg wet0.34 1.67 40-14094.21.57
Pentachloronitrobenzene mg/Kg wet0.34 1.67 V-1640-14094.91.58
Pentachlorophenol mg/Kg wet0.34 1.67 30-13051.10.852
Phenanthrene mg/Kg wet0.17 1.67 40-14090.51.51
Phenol mg/Kg wet0.34 1.67 20-13086.31.44
Pyrene mg/Kg wet0.17 1.67 40-14091.11.52
Pyridine mg/Kg wet0.34 1.67 10-14061.2 �1.02
1,2,4,5-Tetrachlorobenzene mg/Kg wet0.34 1.67 40-14083.91.40
1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene mg/Kg wet0.34 1.67 40-14076.91.28
2,4,5-Trichlorophenol mg/Kg wet0.34 1.67 30-13082.21.37
2,4,6-Trichlorophenol mg/Kg wet0.34 1.67 30-13084.31.41
mg/Kg wet 6.67 30-130Surrogate: 2-Fluorophenol 87.15.81
mg/Kg wet 6.67 30-130Surrogate: Phenol-d6 90.76.05
mg/Kg wet 3.33 30-130Surrogate: Nitrobenzene-d5 88.62.95
mg/Kg wet 3.33 30-130Surrogate: 2-Fluorobiphenyl 91.73.06
mg/Kg wet 6.67 30-130Surrogate: 2,4,6-Tribromophenol 90.86.06
mg/Kg wet 3.33 30-130Surrogate: p-Terphenyl-d14 95.83.19
LCS Dup (B125812-BSD1) Prepared & Analyzed: 07/09/15
Acenaphthene mg/Kg wet0.17 1.67 3040-14090.2 7.091.50
Acenaphthylene mg/Kg wet0.17 1.67 3040-14093.4 7.931.56
Aniline mg/Kg wet0.34 1.67 5040-14058.8 6.18 � �0.979
Anthracene mg/Kg wet0.17 1.67 3040-14096.8 7.551.61
Benzo(a)anthracene mg/Kg wet0.17 1.67 3040-14093.4 6.271.56
Benzo(a)pyrene mg/Kg wet0.17 1.67 3040-14094.0 7.321.57
Benzo(b)fluoranthene mg/Kg wet0.17 1.67 3040-14098.8 7.671.65
Benzo(g,h,i)perylene mg/Kg wet0.17 1.67 3040-14080.4 6.841.34
Benzo(k)fluoranthene mg/Kg wet0.17 1.67 3040-14097.6 6.651.63
Bis(2-chloroethoxy)methane mg/Kg wet0.34 1.67 3040-14096.2 8.021.60
Page 52 of 74 15G0314_1 Contest_Final 07 15 15 1002 07/15/15 10:02:29
Table of Contents
39 Spruce Street * East Longmeadow, MA 01028 * FAX 413/525-6405 * TEL. 413/525-2332
Result Limit
Reporting
Units Level
Spike
Result
Source
%REC
%REC
Limits RPD
RPD
Limit Notes Analyte
Semivolatile Organic Compounds by GC/MS - Quality Control
QUALITY CONTROL
Batch B125812 - SW-846 3546
LCS Dup (B125812-BSD1) Prepared & Analyzed: 07/09/15
Bis(2-chloroethyl)ether mg/Kg wet0.34 1.67 3040-14095.7 6.451.59
Bis(2-chloroisopropyl)ether mg/Kg wet0.34 1.67 3040-140102 6.931.70
Bis(2-Ethylhexyl)phthalate mg/Kg wet0.34 1.67 3040-140118 10.11.96
4-Bromophenylphenylether mg/Kg wet0.34 1.67 3040-14099.9 8.061.66
Butylbenzylphthalate mg/Kg wet0.34 1.67 3040-140100 6.371.67
Carbazole mg/Kg wet0.17 1.67 3040-14090.1 6.091.50
4-Chloroaniline mg/Kg wet0.66 1.67 3040-14057.6 6.82 �0.960
4-Chloro-3-methylphenol mg/Kg wet0.66 1.67 3030-13091.4 6.441.52
2-Chloronaphthalene mg/Kg wet0.34 1.67 3040-14088.9 8.791.48
2-Chlorophenol mg/Kg wet0.34 1.67 3030-13086.8 6.791.45
4-Chlorophenylphenylether mg/Kg wet0.34 1.67 3040-14093.9 5.991.56
Chrysene mg/Kg wet0.17 1.67 3040-14092.6 5.621.54
Dibenz(a,h)anthracene mg/Kg wet0.17 1.67 3040-14077.7 8.421.30
Dibenzofuran mg/Kg wet0.34 1.67 3040-14091.9 7.031.53
Di-n-butylphthalate mg/Kg wet0.34 1.67 3040-140100 6.751.67
3,3-Dichlorobenzidine mg/Kg wet0.17 1.67 3040-14070.1 6.82 � �1.17
2,4-Dichlorophenol mg/Kg wet0.34 1.67 3030-13088.4 7.151.47
Diethylphthalate mg/Kg wet0.34 1.67 3040-14097.6 5.371.63
2,4-Dimethylphenol mg/Kg wet0.34 1.67 3030-13088.9 8.761.48
Dimethylphthalate mg/Kg wet0.34 1.67 5040-14097.1 5.891.62
4,6-Dinitro-2-methylphenol mg/Kg wet0.34 1.67 5030-13055.7 4.550.929
2,4-Dinitrophenol mg/Kg wet0.66 1.67 50 L-0430-13029.1 4.72*0.484
2,4-Dinitrotoluene mg/Kg wet0.34 1.67 3040-14093.3 6.071.56
2,6-Dinitrotoluene mg/Kg wet0.34 1.67 3040-14095.2 5.021.59
Di-n-octylphthalate mg/Kg wet0.34 1.67 3040-140107 7.611.79
Fluoranthene mg/Kg wet0.17 1.67 3040-14088.7 5.941.48
Fluorene mg/Kg wet0.17 1.67 3040-14095.1 5.491.59
Hexachlorobenzene mg/Kg wet0.34 1.67 3040-14099.7 8.031.66
Hexachlorobutadiene mg/Kg wet0.34 1.67 3040-14082.4 6.251.37
Hexachlorocyclopentadiene mg/Kg wet0.34 1.67 5030-14077.2 10.21.29
Hexachloroethane mg/Kg wet0.34 1.67 5040-14083.2 5.631.39
Indeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene mg/Kg wet0.17 1.67 5040-14077.7 5.741.30
Isophorone mg/Kg wet0.34 1.67 3040-140101 8.231.68
2-Methylnaphthalene mg/Kg wet0.17 1.67 3040-14086.1 8.001.43
2-Methylphenol mg/Kg wet0.34 1.67 3030-13086.3 7.751.44
3/4-Methylphenol mg/Kg wet0.34 1.67 3030-13095.1 6.601.59
Naphthalene mg/Kg wet0.17 1.67 3040-14086.8 7.211.45
2-Nitroaniline mg/Kg wet0.34 1.67 3040-140124 4.872.07
3-Nitroaniline mg/Kg wet0.34 1.67 3040-14081.8 5.58 �1.36
4-Nitroaniline mg/Kg wet0.34 1.67 3040-14085.3 4.411.42
Nitrobenzene mg/Kg wet0.34 1.67 3040-14092.9 6.951.55
2-Nitrophenol mg/Kg wet0.34 1.67 3030-13086.7 6.061.45
4-Nitrophenol mg/Kg wet0.66 1.67 5010-13090.4 3.79 �1.51
N-Nitrosodiphenylamine mg/Kg wet0.34 1.67 3040-140128 7.142.13
N-Nitrosodi-n-propylamine mg/Kg wet0.34 1.67 3040-140101 7.151.69
Pentachloronitrobenzene mg/Kg wet0.34 1.67 30 V-1640-14097.5 2.701.63
Pentachlorophenol mg/Kg wet0.34 1.67 5030-13051.8 1.280.863
Phenanthrene mg/Kg wet0.17 1.67 3040-14096.7 6.641.61
Phenol mg/Kg wet0.34 1.67 3020-13094.0 8.561.57
Pyrene mg/Kg wet0.17 1.67 3040-14096.8 6.111.61
Pyridine mg/Kg wet0.34 1.67 5010-14062.7 2.45 �1.04
1,2,4,5-Tetrachlorobenzene mg/Kg wet0.34 1.67 3040-14092.4 9.731.54
Page 53 of 74 15G0314_1 Contest_Final 07 15 15 1002 07/15/15 10:02:29
Table of Contents
39 Spruce Street * East Longmeadow, MA 01028 * FAX 413/525-6405 * TEL. 413/525-2332
Result Limit
Reporting
Units Level
Spike
Result
Source
%REC
%REC
Limits RPD
RPD
Limit Notes Analyte
Semivolatile Organic Compounds by GC/MS - Quality Control
QUALITY CONTROL
Batch B125812 - SW-846 3546
LCS Dup (B125812-BSD1) Prepared & Analyzed: 07/09/15
1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene mg/Kg wet0.34 1.67 3040-14082.5 7.051.37
2,4,5-Trichlorophenol mg/Kg wet0.34 1.67 3030-13088.2 7.041.47
2,4,6-Trichlorophenol mg/Kg wet0.34 1.67 5030-13091.0 7.571.52
mg/Kg wet 6.67 30-130Surrogate: 2-Fluorophenol 94.16.28
mg/Kg wet 6.67 30-130Surrogate: Phenol-d6 99.86.66
mg/Kg wet 3.33 30-130Surrogate: Nitrobenzene-d5 97.53.25
mg/Kg wet 3.33 30-130Surrogate: 2-Fluorobiphenyl 1023.39
mg/Kg wet 6.67 30-130Surrogate: 2,4,6-Tribromophenol 99.16.61
mg/Kg wet 3.33 30-130Surrogate: p-Terphenyl-d14 1043.47
Page 54 of 74 15G0314_1 Contest_Final 07 15 15 1002 07/15/15 10:02:29
Table of Contents
39 Spruce Street * East Longmeadow, MA 01028 * FAX 413/525-6405 * TEL. 413/525-2332
Result Limit
Reporting
Units Level
Spike
Result
Source
%REC
%REC
Limits RPD
RPD
Limit Notes Analyte
Polychlorinated Biphenyls By GC/ECD - Quality Control
QUALITY CONTROL
[TOC_2]Polychlorinated Biphenyls By GC/ECD[TOC]
Batch B125806 - SW-846 3546[TOC_3]B125806[TOC]
Blank (B125806-BLK1) Prepared: 07/09/15 Analyzed: 07/10/15
Aroclor-1016 mg/Kg wet0.020ND
Aroclor-1016 [2C] mg/Kg wet0.020ND
Aroclor-1221 mg/Kg wet0.020ND
Aroclor-1221 [2C] mg/Kg wet0.020ND
Aroclor-1232 mg/Kg wet0.020ND
Aroclor-1232 [2C] mg/Kg wet0.020ND
Aroclor-1242 mg/Kg wet0.020ND
Aroclor-1242 [2C] mg/Kg wet0.020ND
Aroclor-1248 mg/Kg wet0.020ND
Aroclor-1248 [2C] mg/Kg wet0.020ND
Aroclor-1254 mg/Kg wet0.020ND
Aroclor-1254 [2C] mg/Kg wet0.020ND
Aroclor-1260 mg/Kg wet0.020ND
Aroclor-1260 [2C] mg/Kg wet0.020ND
Aroclor-1262 mg/Kg wet0.020ND
Aroclor-1262 [2C] mg/Kg wet0.020ND
Aroclor-1268 mg/Kg wet0.020ND
Aroclor-1268 [2C] mg/Kg wet0.020ND
mg/Kg wet 0.200 30-150Surrogate: Decachlorobiphenyl 94.90.190
mg/Kg wet 0.200 30-150Surrogate: Decachlorobiphenyl [2C] 89.70.179
mg/Kg wet 0.200 30-150Surrogate: Tetrachloro-m-xylene 1080.216
mg/Kg wet 0.200 30-150Surrogate: Tetrachloro-m-xylene [2C] 94.40.189
LCS (B125806-BS1) Prepared: 07/09/15 Analyzed: 07/10/15
Aroclor-1016 mg/Kg wet0.020 0.200 40-14093.00.19
Aroclor-1016 [2C] mg/Kg wet0.020 0.200 40-14096.50.19
Aroclor-1260 mg/Kg wet0.020 0.200 40-14099.80.20
Aroclor-1260 [2C] mg/Kg wet0.020 0.200 40-14097.10.19
mg/Kg wet 0.200 30-150Surrogate: Decachlorobiphenyl 91.90.184
mg/Kg wet 0.200 30-150Surrogate: Decachlorobiphenyl [2C] 86.80.174
mg/Kg wet 0.200 30-150Surrogate: Tetrachloro-m-xylene 1030.207
mg/Kg wet 0.200 30-150Surrogate: Tetrachloro-m-xylene [2C] 91.80.184
LCS Dup (B125806-BSD1) Prepared: 07/09/15 Analyzed: 07/10/15
Aroclor-1016 mg/Kg wet0.020 0.200 3040-14087.9 5.620.18
Aroclor-1016 [2C] mg/Kg wet0.020 0.200 3040-14091.8 5.010.18
Aroclor-1260 mg/Kg wet0.020 0.200 3040-14096.0 3.810.19
Aroclor-1260 [2C] mg/Kg wet0.020 0.200 3040-14093.0 4.340.19
mg/Kg wet 0.200 30-150Surrogate: Decachlorobiphenyl 87.30.175
mg/Kg wet 0.200 30-150Surrogate: Decachlorobiphenyl [2C] 82.20.164
mg/Kg wet 0.200 30-150Surrogate: Tetrachloro-m-xylene 95.70.191
mg/Kg wet 0.200 30-150Surrogate: Tetrachloro-m-xylene [2C] 85.10.170
Page 55 of 74 15G0314_1 Contest_Final 07 15 15 1002 07/15/15 10:02:29
Table of Contents
39 Spruce Street * East Longmeadow, MA 01028 * FAX 413/525-6405 * TEL. 413/525-2332
Result Limit
Reporting
Units Level
Spike
Result
Source
%REC
%REC
Limits RPD
RPD
Limit Notes Analyte
Petroleum Hydrocarbons Analyses - Quality Control
QUALITY CONTROL
[TOC_2]Petroleum Hydrocarbons Analyses[TOC]
Batch B125809 - SW-846 3546[TOC_3]B125809[TOC]
Blank (B125809-BLK1) Prepared: 07/09/15 Analyzed: 07/10/15
CT ETPH mg/Kg wet10ND
mg/Kg wet 3.33 50-150Surrogate: o-Terphenyl 71.92.40
LCS (B125809-BS1) Prepared: 07/09/15 Analyzed: 07/10/15
CT ETPH mg/Kg wet10 33.3 60-12076.525.5
mg/Kg wet 3.33 50-150Surrogate: o-Terphenyl 65.12.17
LCS Dup (B125809-BSD1) Prepared: 07/09/15 Analyzed: 07/10/15
CT ETPH mg/Kg wet10 33.3 3060-12082.1 6.9827.4
mg/Kg wet 3.33 50-150Surrogate: o-Terphenyl 69.62.32
Page 56 of 74 15G0314_1 Contest_Final 07 15 15 1002 07/15/15 10:02:29
Table of Contents
39 Spruce Street * East Longmeadow, MA 01028 * FAX 413/525-6405 * TEL. 413/525-2332
Result Limit
Reporting
Units Level
Spike
Result
Source
%REC
%REC
Limits RPD
RPD
Limit Notes Analyte
Conventional Chemistry Parameters by EPA/APHA/SW-846 Methods (Total) - Quality Control
QUALITY CONTROL
[TOC_2]Conventional Chemistry Parameters by EPA/APHA/SW-846 Methods (Total)[TOC]
Batch B125823 - % Solids[TOC_3]B125823[TOC]
Duplicate (B125823-DUP1) Prepared & Analyzed: 07/09/15 Source: 15G0314-01
% Solids % Wt 203.6736.1 34.8
Batch B125846 - SW-846 9045C[TOC_3]B125846[TOC]
LCS (B125846-BS1) Prepared & Analyzed: 07/09/15
pH pH Units 6.00 98.6-1021006.02
LCS (B125846-BS2) Prepared & Analyzed: 07/09/15
pH pH Units 6.00 98.6-1021006.03
Batch B125864 - SW-846 9014[TOC_3]B125864[TOC]
Blank (B125864-BLK1) Prepared: 07/09/15 Analyzed: 07/10/15
Reactive Cyanide mg/Kg0.40ND
LCS (B125864-BS1) Prepared: 07/09/15 Analyzed: 07/10/15
Reactive Cyanide mg/Kg0.40 10.0 86.4-10795.49.5
Batch B125865 - SW-846 9030A[TOC_3]B125865[TOC]
Blank (B125865-BLK1) Prepared: 07/09/15 Analyzed: 07/10/15
Reactive Sulfide mg/Kg2.0ND
LCS (B125865-BS1) Prepared: 07/09/15 Analyzed: 07/10/15
Reactive Sulfide mg/Kg2.0 14.8 42.9-13297.314
Page 57 of 74 15G0314_1 Contest_Final 07 15 15 1002 07/15/15 10:02:29
Table of Contents
39 Spruce Street * East Longmeadow, MA 01028 * FAX 413/525-6405 * TEL. 413/525-2332
Result Limit
Reporting
Units Level
Spike
Result
Source
%REC
%REC
Limits RPD
RPD
Limit Notes Analyte
TCLP - Metals Analyses - Quality Control
QUALITY CONTROL
[TOC_2]TCLP - Metals Analyses[TOC]
Batch B125932 - SW-846 7470A Prep[TOC_3]B125932[TOC]
Blank (B125932-BLK1) Prepared: 07/10/15 Analyzed: 07/13/15
Mercury mg/L0.00010ND
LCS (B125932-BS1) Prepared: 07/10/15 Analyzed: 07/13/15
Mercury mg/L0.00010 0.00200 80-1201050.00211
LCS Dup (B125932-BSD1) Prepared: 07/10/15 Analyzed: 07/13/15
Mercury mg/L0.00010 0.00200 2080-120109 3.130.00218
Matrix Spike (B125932-MS1) Prepared: 07/10/15 Analyzed: 07/13/15 Source: 15G0314-02
Mercury mg/L0.00010 0.00200 75-1251080.00219 0.0000335
Batch B125941 - SW-846 3010A[TOC_3]B125941[TOC]
Blank (B125941-BLK1) Prepared & Analyzed: 07/10/15
Arsenic mg/L0.010ND
Barium mg/L0.050ND
Cadmium mg/L0.0040ND
Chromium mg/L0.010ND
Lead mg/L0.010ND
Selenium mg/L0.050ND
Silver mg/L0.0050ND
LCS (B125941-BS1) Prepared & Analyzed: 07/10/15
Arsenic mg/L0.010 0.500 80-1201060.529
Barium mg/L0.050 0.500 80-12094.50.473
Cadmium mg/L0.0040 0.500 80-12099.80.499
Chromium mg/L0.010 0.500 80-12092.60.463
Lead mg/L0.010 0.500 80-12090.50.453
Selenium mg/L0.050 0.500 80-1201110.556
Silver mg/L0.0050 0.500 80-12094.10.470
LCS Dup (B125941-BSD1) Prepared & Analyzed: 07/10/15
Arsenic mg/L0.010 0.500 2080-120107 1.310.536
Barium mg/L0.050 0.500 2080-12095.6 1.110.478
Cadmium mg/L0.0040 0.500 2080-120101 1.210.505
Chromium mg/L0.010 0.500 2080-12093.8 1.280.469
Lead mg/L0.010 0.500 2080-12091.7 1.220.458
Selenium mg/L0.050 0.500 2080-120111 0.4080.554
Silver mg/L0.0050 0.500 2080-12095.0 0.9730.475
Batch B126039 - SW-846 7470A Prep[TOC_3]B126039[TOC]
Blank (B126039-BLK1) Prepared & Analyzed: 07/13/15
Mercury mg/L0.00010ND
Page 58 of 74 15G0314_1 Contest_Final 07 15 15 1002 07/15/15 10:02:29
Table of Contents
39 Spruce Street * East Longmeadow, MA 01028 * FAX 413/525-6405 * TEL. 413/525-2332
Result Limit
Reporting
Units Level
Spike
Result
Source
%REC
%REC
Limits RPD
RPD
Limit Notes Analyte
TCLP - Metals Analyses - Quality Control
QUALITY CONTROL
Batch B126039 - SW-846 7470A Prep
LCS (B126039-BS1) Prepared & Analyzed: 07/13/15
Mercury mg/L0.00010 0.00200 80-1201030.00206
LCS Dup (B126039-BSD1) Prepared & Analyzed: 07/13/15
Mercury mg/L0.00010 0.00200 2080-120101 2.190.00201
Matrix Spike (B126039-MS1) Prepared & Analyzed: 07/13/15 Source: 15G0314-01
Mercury mg/L0.00010 0.00200 75-12598.10.00196 ND
Page 59 of 74 15G0314_1 Contest_Final 07 15 15 1002 07/15/15 10:02:29
Table of Contents
39 Spruce Street * East Longmeadow, MA 01028 * FAX 413/525-6405 * TEL. 413/525-2332
IDENTIFICATION SUMMARY
FOR SINGLE COMPONENT ANALYTES LCS
SW-846 8082A
Lab Sample ID: Date(s) Analyzed:B125806-BS1
Instrument ID (1):
GC Column (1): ID: (mm) (mm)ID:GC Column (2):
Instrument ID (2):
07/10/2015 07/10/2015
ANALYTE CONCENTRATION %DCOL RTRT WINDOW
FROM TO
Aroclor-1016 1 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.19
0.190.000.000.002 2
Aroclor-1260 1 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.20
0.190.000.000.002 5
[TOC_1]Dual Column RPD Report[TOC]
Page 60 of 74 15G0314_1 Contest_Final 07 15 15 1002 07/15/15 10:02:29
Table of Contents
39 Spruce Street * East Longmeadow, MA 01028 * FAX 413/525-6405 * TEL. 413/525-2332
IDENTIFICATION SUMMARY
FOR SINGLE COMPONENT ANALYTES LCS Dup
SW-846 8082A
Lab Sample ID: Date(s) Analyzed:B125806-BSD1
Instrument ID (1):
GC Column (1): ID: (mm) (mm)ID:GC Column (2):
Instrument ID (2):
07/10/2015 07/10/2015
ANALYTE CONCENTRATION %DCOL RTRT WINDOW
FROM TO
Aroclor-1016 1 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.18
0.180.000.000.002 2
Aroclor-1260 1 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.19
0.190.000.000.002 1
Page 61 of 74 15G0314_1 Contest_Final 07 15 15 1002 07/15/15 10:02:29
Table of Contents
39 Spruce Street * East Longmeadow, MA 01028 * FAX 413/525-6405 * TEL. 413/525-2332
FLAG/QUALIFIER SUMMARY
* QC result is outside of established limits.
� Wide recovery limits established for difficult compound.
� Wide RPD limits established for difficult compound.
# Data exceeded client recommended or regulatory level
Percent recoveries and relative percent differences (RPDs) are determined by the software using values in the
calculation which have not been rounded.
No results have been blank subtracted unless specified in the case narrative section.
Reported result is estimated. Value reported over verified calibration range.E
Laboratory fortified blank/laboratory control sample recovery and duplicate recovery are outside of control limits.
Reported value for this compound is likely to be biased on the low side.
L-04
Continuing calibration did not meet method specifications and was biased on the low side for this compound.
Increased uncertainty is associated with the reported value which is likely to be biased on the low side.
V-05
Response factor is less than method specified minimum acceptable value. Reduced precision and accuracy may
be associated with reported result.
V-16
[TOC_1]Flag/Qualifier Summary[TOC]
Page 62 of 74 15G0314_1 Contest_Final 07 15 15 1002 07/15/15 10:02:29
Table of Contents
39 Spruce Street * East Longmeadow, MA 01028 * FAX 413/525-6405 * TEL. 413/525-2332
CertificationsAnalyte
CERTIFICATIONS
Certified Analyses included in this Report
CTDEP ETPH in Soil
CTCT ETPH
SW-846 1030 in Soil
NY,NH,CT,NC,ME,VA,NJIgnitability
SW-846 6010C in Water
NY,CT,NC,ME,NH,VA,NJArsenic
NY,CT,ME,NC,NH,VA,NJBarium
NY,CT,ME,NC,NH,VA,NJCadmium
NY,CT,ME,NC,NH,VA,NJChromium
NY,CT,ME,NC,NH,VA,NJLead
CT,ME,NC,NH,NY,VA,NJSelenium
CT,ME,NC,NH,NY,VA,NJSilver
SW-846 7470A in Water
CT,ME,NC,NH,NY,VA,NJMercury
SW-846 8082A in Soil
CT,NH,NY,NC,ME,VA,NJAroclor-1016
CT,NH,NY,NC,ME,VA,NJAroclor-1016 [2C]
CT,NH,NY,NC,ME,VA,NJAroclor-1221
CT,NH,NY,NC,ME,VA,NJAroclor-1221 [2C]
CT,NH,NY,NC,ME,VA,NJAroclor-1232
CT,NH,NY,NC,ME,VA,NJAroclor-1232 [2C]
CT,NH,NY,NC,ME,VA,NJAroclor-1242
CT,NH,NY,NC,ME,VA,NJAroclor-1242 [2C]
CT,NH,NY,NC,ME,VA,NJAroclor-1248
CT,NH,NY,NC,ME,VA,NJAroclor-1248 [2C]
CT,NH,NY,NC,ME,VA,NJAroclor-1254
CT,NH,NY,NC,ME,VA,NJAroclor-1254 [2C]
CT,NH,NY,NC,ME,VA,NJAroclor-1260
CT,NH,NY,NC,ME,VA,NJAroclor-1260 [2C]
NCAroclor-1262
NCAroclor-1262 [2C]
NCAroclor-1268
NCAroclor-1268 [2C]
SW-846 8260C in Soil
CT,NH,NY,MEAcetone
CT,NH,NY,MEAcrylonitrile
CT,NH,NY,MEBenzene
NH,NY,MEBromobenzene
CT,NH,NY,MEBromodichloromethane
CT,NH,NY,MEBromoform
CT,NH,NY,MEBromomethane
CT,NH,NY,ME2-Butanone (MEK)
CT,NH,NY,MEn-Butylbenzene
CT,NH,NY,MEsec-Butylbenzene
CT,NH,NY,MEtert-Butylbenzene
CT,NH,NY,MECarbon Disulfide
[TOC_1]Certifications[TOC]
Page 63 of 74 15G0314_1 Contest_Final 07 15 15 1002 07/15/15 10:02:29
Table of Contents
39 Spruce Street * East Longmeadow, MA 01028 * FAX 413/525-6405 * TEL. 413/525-2332
CertificationsAnalyte
CERTIFICATIONS
Certified Analyses included in this Report
SW-846 8260C in Soil
CT,NH,NY,MECarbon Tetrachloride
CT,NH,NY,MEChlorobenzene
CT,NH,NY,MEChlorodibromomethane
CT,NH,NY,MEChloroethane
CT,NH,NY,MEChloroform
CT,NH,NY,MEChloromethane
CT,NH,NY,ME2-Chlorotoluene
CT,NH,NY,ME4-Chlorotoluene
NH,NY,MEDibromomethane
CT,NH,NY,ME1,2-Dichlorobenzene
CT,NH,NY,ME1,3-Dichlorobenzene
CT,NH,NY,ME1,4-Dichlorobenzene
NY,MEDichlorodifluoromethane (Freon 12)
CT,NH,NY,ME1,1-Dichloroethane
CT,NH,NY,ME1,2-Dichloroethane
CT,NH,NY,ME1,1-Dichloroethylene
CT,NH,NY,MEcis-1,2-Dichloroethylene
CT,NH,NY,MEtrans-1,2-Dichloroethylene
CT,NH,NY,ME1,2-Dichloropropane
NH,NY,ME1,3-Dichloropropane
NH,NY,ME2,2-Dichloropropane
NH,NY,ME1,1-Dichloropropene
CT,NH,NY,MEcis-1,3-Dichloropropene
CT,NH,NY,MEtrans-1,3-Dichloropropene
CT,NH,NY,MEEthylbenzene
NH,NY,MEHexachlorobutadiene
CT,NH,NY,ME2-Hexanone (MBK)
CT,NH,NY,MEIsopropylbenzene (Cumene)
NH,NYp-Isopropyltoluene (p-Cymene)
NYMethyl tert-Butyl Ether (MTBE)
CT,NH,NY,MEMethylene Chloride
CT,NH,NY4-Methyl-2-pentanone (MIBK)
NH,NY,MENaphthalene
NH,NYn-Propylbenzene
CT,NH,NY,MEStyrene
CT,NH,NY,ME1,1,1,2-Tetrachloroethane
CT,NH,NY,ME1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane
CT,NH,NY,METetrachloroethylene
CT,NH,NY,METoluene
NH,NY,ME1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene
CT,NH,NY,ME1,1,1-Trichloroethane
CT,NH,NY,ME1,1,2-Trichloroethane
CT,NH,NY,METrichloroethylene
CT,NH,NY,METrichlorofluoromethane (Freon 11)
NH,NY,ME1,2,3-Trichloropropane
CT,NH,NY,ME1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene
CT,NH,NY,ME1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene
Page 64 of 74 15G0314_1 Contest_Final 07 15 15 1002 07/15/15 10:02:29
Table of Contents
39 Spruce Street * East Longmeadow, MA 01028 * FAX 413/525-6405 * TEL. 413/525-2332
CertificationsAnalyte
CERTIFICATIONS
Certified Analyses included in this Report
SW-846 8260C in Soil
CT,NH,NY,MEVinyl Chloride
CT,NH,NY,MEm+p Xylene
CT,NH,NY,MEo-Xylene
SW-846 8270D in Soil
CT,NY,NHAcenaphthene
CT,NY,NHAcenaphthylene
NY,NHAniline
CT,NY,NHAnthracene
CT,NY,NHBenzo(a)anthracene
CT,NY,NHBenzo(a)pyrene
CT,NY,NHBenzo(b)fluoranthene
CT,NY,NHBenzo(g,h,i)perylene
CT,NY,NHBenzo(k)fluoranthene
CT,NY,NHBis(2-chloroethoxy)methane
CT,NY,NHBis(2-chloroethyl)ether
CT,NY,NHBis(2-chloroisopropyl)ether
CT,NY,NHBis(2-Ethylhexyl)phthalate
CT,NY,NH4-Bromophenylphenylether
CT,NY,NHButylbenzylphthalate
CT,NY,NH4-Chloroaniline
CT,NY,NH4-Chloro-3-methylphenol
CT,NY,NH2-Chloronaphthalene
CT,NY,NH2-Chlorophenol
CT,NY,NH4-Chlorophenylphenylether
CT,NY,NHChrysene
CT,NY,NHDibenz(a,h)anthracene
CT,NY,NHDibenzofuran
CT,NY,NHDi-n-butylphthalate
NY,NH1,2-Dichlorobenzene
NY,NH1,3-Dichlorobenzene
NY,NH1,4-Dichlorobenzene
CT,NY,NH3,3-Dichlorobenzidine
CT,NY,NH2,4-Dichlorophenol
CT,NY,NHDiethylphthalate
CT,NY,NH2,4-Dimethylphenol
CT,NY,NHDimethylphthalate
CT,NY,NH4,6-Dinitro-2-methylphenol
CT,NY,NH2,4-Dinitrophenol
CT,NY,NH2,4-Dinitrotoluene
CT,NY,NH2,6-Dinitrotoluene
CT,NY,NHDi-n-octylphthalate
CT,NY,NHFluoranthene
NY,NHFluorene
CT,NY,NHHexachlorobenzene
CT,NY,NHHexachlorobutadiene
CT,NY,NHHexachlorocyclopentadiene
Page 65 of 74 15G0314_1 Contest_Final 07 15 15 1002 07/15/15 10:02:29
Table of Contents
39 Spruce Street * East Longmeadow, MA 01028 * FAX 413/525-6405 * TEL. 413/525-2332
CertificationsAnalyte
CERTIFICATIONS
Certified Analyses included in this Report
SW-846 8270D in Soil
CT,NY,NHHexachloroethane
CT,NY,NHIndeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene
CT,NY,NHIsophorone
CT,NY,NH2-Methylnaphthalene
CT,NY,NH2-Methylphenol
CT,NY,NH3/4-Methylphenol
CT,NY,NHNaphthalene
CT,NY,NH2-Nitroaniline
CT,NY,NH3-Nitroaniline
CT,NY,NH4-Nitroaniline
CT,NY,NHNitrobenzene
CT,NY,NH2-Nitrophenol
CT,NY,NH4-Nitrophenol
CT,NY,NHN-Nitrosodiphenylamine
CT,NY,NHN-Nitrosodi-n-propylamine
CT,NY,NHPentachlorophenol
CT,NY,NHPhenanthrene
CT,NY,NHPhenol
CT,NY,NHPyrene
CT,NY,NHPyridine
CT,NY,NH1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene
CT,NY,NH2,4,5-Trichlorophenol
CT,NY,NH2,4,6-Trichlorophenol
The CON-TEST Environmental Laboratory operates under the following certifications and accreditations:
Code Description Number Expires
100033AIHA-LAP, LLCAIHA 02/1/2016
M-MA100Massachusetts DEPMA 06/30/2016
PH-0567Connecticut Department of Publilc HealthCT 09/30/2015
10899 NELAPNew York State Department of HealthNY 04/1/2016
2516 NELAPNew Hampshire Environmental LabNH-S 02/5/2016
LAO00112Rhode Island Department of HealthRI 12/30/2015
652North Carolina Div. of Water QualityNC 12/31/2015
MA007 NELAPNew Jersey DEPNJ 09/30/2015
E871027 NELAPFlorida Department of HealthFL 06/30/2016
LL015036Vermont Department of Health Lead LaboratoryVT 07/30/2015
C2065State of Washington Department of EcologyWA 02/23/2016
2011028State of MaineME 06/9/2017
460217Commonwealth of VirginiaVA 12/14/2015
2557 NELAPNew Hampshire Environmental LabNH-P 09/6/2015
Page 66 of 74 15G0314_1 Contest_Final 07 15 15 1002 07/15/15 10:02:29
Table of Contents
Page 67 of 74 15G0314_1 Contest_Final 07 15 15 1002 07/15/15 10:02:29
Table of Contents
Page 68 of 74 15G0314_1 Contest_Final 07 15 15 1002 07/15/15 10:02:29
Table of Contents
Page 69 of 74 15G0314_1 Contest_Final 07 15 15 1002 07/15/15 10:02:29
Table of Contents
Page 70 of 74 15G0314_1 Contest_Final 07 15 15 1002 07/15/15 10:02:29
Table of Contents
Client: Con-Test Analytical LabProject: 15G0314Location: --- Project No: GTX-303441Boring ID: ---Sample ID: 15G0314-01Depth : ---
Sample Type: jarTest Date: 07/15/15Test Id: 338805
Tested By: jbrChecked By: jdt
Test Comment: ---Sample Description: Moist, very dark gray sandy siltSample Comment: Sample contains organics
Particle Size Analysis - ASTM D422
printed 7/15/2015 7:26:45 AM
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
0.0010.010.11101001000
Per
cent
Fin
er
Grain Size (mm)
0.5
in
0.3
75 in
#4
#1
0
#2
0
#4
0
#6
0
#1
00
#2
00
% Cobble
---
% Gravel
1.4
% Sand
36.4
% Silt & Clay Size
62.2
Sieve Name Sieve Size, mm Percent Finer Spec. Percent Complies
0.5 in
0.375 in
#4
#10
#20
#40
#60
#100
#200
12.50
9.50
4.75
2.00
0.85
0.42
0.25
0.15
0.075
100
99
99
97
94
87
80
74
62
CoefficientsD =0.3734 mm85
D =N/A60
D =N/A50
D =N/A30
D =N/A15
D =N/A10
C =N/Au C =N/Ac
Classification ASTM N/A
AASHTO Silty Soils (A-4 (0))
Sample/Test DescriptionSand/Gravel Particle Shape : ---
Sand/Gravel Hardness : ---
Page 71 of 74 15G0314_1 Contest_Final 07 15 15 1002 07/15/15 10:02:29
Table of Contents
Client: Con-Test Analytical LabProject: 15G0314Location: --- Project No: GTX-303441Boring ID: ---Sample ID: 15G0314-02Depth : ---
Sample Type: jarTest Date: 07/15/15Test Id: 338806
Tested By: jbrChecked By: jdt
Test Comment: ---Sample Description: Moist, very dark brown silty sandSample Comment: Sample contain organics
Particle Size Analysis - ASTM D422
printed 7/15/2015 7:26:46 AM
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
0.0010.010.11101001000
Per
cent
Fin
er
Grain Size (mm)
1 in
0.7
5 in
0.5
in
0.3
75 in
#4
#1
0
#2
0
#4
0
#6
0
#1
00
#2
00
% Cobble
---
% Gravel
3.1
% Sand
56.4
% Silt & Clay Size
40.5
Sieve Name Sieve Size, mm Percent Finer Spec. Percent Complies
1 in
0.75 in
0.5 in
0.375 in
#4
#10
#20
#40
#60
#100
#200
25.00
19.00
12.50
9.50
4.75
2.00
0.85
0.42
0.25
0.15
0.075
100
100
99
98
97
94
86
70
55
46
41
CoefficientsD =0.7996 mm85
D =0.3005 mm60
D =0.1869 mm50
D =N/A30
D =N/A15
D =N/A10
C =N/Au C =N/Ac
Classification ASTM N/A
AASHTO Silty Soils (A-4 (0))
Sample/Test DescriptionSand/Gravel Particle Shape : ANGULAR
Sand/Gravel Hardness : SOFT
Page 72 of 74 15G0314_1 Contest_Final 07 15 15 1002 07/15/15 10:02:29
Table of Contents
Client: Con-Test Analytical LabProject: 15G0314Location: --- Project No: GTX-303441Boring ID: ---Sample ID: 15G0314-03Depth : ---
Sample Type: jarTest Date: 07/15/15Test Id: 338807
Tested By: jbrChecked By: jdt
Test Comment: ---Sample Description: Moist, very dark brown silty sandSample Comment: Sample contains organics
Particle Size Analysis - ASTM D422
printed 7/15/2015 7:26:46 AM
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
0.0010.010.11101001000
Per
cent
Fin
er
Grain Size (mm)
0.5
in
0.3
75 in
#4
#1
0
#2
0
#4
0
#6
0
#1
00
#2
00
% Cobble
---
% Gravel
5.5
% Sand
68.6
% Silt & Clay Size
25.9
Sieve Name Sieve Size, mm Percent Finer Spec. Percent Complies
0.5 in
0.375 in
#4
#10
#20
#40
#60
#100
#200
12.50
9.50
4.75
2.00
0.85
0.42
0.25
0.15
0.075
100
99
94
90
80
63
47
34
26
CoefficientsD =1.2868 mm85
D =0.3802 mm60
D =0.2728 mm50
D =0.1078 mm30
D =N/A15
D =N/A10
C =N/Au C =N/Ac
Classification ASTM N/A
AASHTO Silty Gravel and Sand (A-2-4 (0))
Sample/Test DescriptionSand/Gravel Particle Shape : ANGULAR
Sand/Gravel Hardness : HARD
Page 73 of 74 15G0314_1 Contest_Final 07 15 15 1002 07/15/15 10:02:29
Table of Contents
�������������� ��������������������������������������������������������������� !"�#$%�!&'(%)*&'�&+ ,&% ,( -#$% !.�&/0$ !123�4��5��6�7���8�����5��6�7����7��3�4������������9��:2��;<=>?�@ABCDEFGDHICJKLBDMBILN OPQRSOT9��:2��<���=>?�OPQRSOT"RO%U,VOPQRSOT"RS RW�RX�YROP� �����Z[�-"XT\OSOO[�-"XT\\ROR[�-"XT\WTWR�[�-"XT\XRXY�[�-"XT\XY\R[�-"XT\XYWR �&!*U#$%#,[�
] ^_ �#$ � � ,#&*U&!&'(%)*&'/#%U ,#a#,#!*#)!%U)$'&+ ,&% ,(,#0 ,%0&*b&c#[d#,#&''$0#*)a)#����0#,a ,/&!*#*,)%#,)&a '' d#[)!*'V)!c%U#,#eV),#/#!%% #f0'&)!&!(*,)%#,)&a&'')!c V%$)# a&**#0%&+'#cV)#')!#$[&$$0#*)a)#)!%U#� ��/#%U "$0#*)a)*�#&$ !&+'# !a)#!*#�, % * ' *V/#!%$g ] ^_h �#$ � -#,#%U#/#%U $0#*)a)#0,#$#,i&%) !&!U ')!c%)/#,#eV),#/#!%$/#%g ^ ^]_j �#$ � klmn�Z&!��Z�#%U $ !'(o-&$%U#n�Z&!��Z/#%U * !V*%#d)%U V%$)c!)a)*&!%/ )a)*&%) !$p$##�#*%) !OOqS a,#$0#*%)i#��/#%U $rg ] ^s �#$ � -#,#&''$&/0'#$,#*#)i#+(%U#'&+ ,&% ,()!&* !)%) !* !$)$%#!%d)%U%U&%#$*,)+# !%U#&$$ *)&%#*U&)!" a"*V$% ( *V/#!%p$rg ] ^^t �#$ � klm-#,#$&/0'#$,#*#)i#&%&!&00, 0,)&%#%#/0#,&%V,#pu\#c,##$qrg ^ ]v �#$ � -#,#&''����0#,a ,/&!*#*,)%#,)&$0#*)a)#)!%U#� ���#&$ !&+'# !a)#!*#�, % * ' *V/#!%$&*U)#i#g ^ ]wh �#$ � -#,#,#0 ,%)!c')/)%$$0#*)a)# ,,#a#,#!*# !%U#*U&)!" a"*V$% (g ^ ^wj �#$ � -#,#%U#$#,#0 ,%)!c')/)%$/#%g ^ ]x �#$ � � ,#&*U&!&'(%)*&'/#%U ,#a#,#!*#)!%U)$'&+ ,&% ,(,#0 ,%0&*b&c#[d#,#,#$V'%$,#0 ,%#a ,&''* !$%)%V#!%$)#!%)a)#)!%U#/#%U "$0#*)a)*&!&'(%#')$%$0,#$#!%#)!%U#�#&$ !&+'# !a)#!*#�, % * ' *V/#!%$g ] ^y �#$ � �,#0, z#*%"$0#*)a)*/&%,)f$0)b#$&!'&+ ,&% ,(V0')*&%#$)!*'V#)!%U)$&%&$#%g� %#$o� ,&''eV#$%) !$% dU)*U%U#,#$0 !$#d&${� {pd)%U%U##f*#0%) ! aeV#$%) !|Wr[& )%) !&')!a ,/&%) !/V$%+#0, i)#)!&!&%%&*U#!&,,&%)i#q�a%U#&!$d#,% eV#$%) !|O[|O�[ ,|O�)${� {[%U#&%&0&*b&c# #$! %/##%%U#,#eV),#/#!%$a ,{�#&$ !&+'# !a)#!*#q{�U)$a ,//&(! %+#&'%#,#&!&''eV#$%) !$/V$%+#&!$d#,#q}~�����������������������������������������������~���������
����~�����������������������������~����������������������������������~��������~�������������������������������������������������������������������������~�������������������������������~����������������������������~�������������������������~��������������������������������������h��~�������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������� ��������¡���������������������������¢�����£�~�����¤��¥�������������������������������������������������������¦������§y_w_w�}¦©������¡����������h��������ªhª����������������«����¬�¢��������s§§y¡����������ª�������h�������������ª������������������������������������������������������
�������������� ��������������������������������������������������������������� !"�#$%�!&'(%)*&'�&+ ,&% ,( -#$% !.�&/0$ !123�4��5��6�7���8�����5��6�7����7��3�4������������9��:2��;<=>?�@ABCDEFGDHICJKLBDMBILN OPQRSOT9��:2��<���=>?�OPQRSOT"RO%U,VOPQRSOT"RS RW�RX�YROP� �����Z[�-"XT\OSOO[�-"XT\\ROR[�-"XT\WTWR�[�-"XT\XRXY�[�-"XT\XY\R[�-"XT\XYWR �&!*U#$%#,[�
] ^_ �#$ � � ,#&*U&!&'(%)*&'/#%U ,#a#,#!*#)!%U)$'&+ ,&% ,(,#0 ,%0&*b&c#[d#,#&''$0#*)a)#����0#,a ,/&!*#*,)%#,)&a '' d#[)!*'V)!c%U#,#eV),#/#!%% #f0'&)!&!(*,)%#,)&a&'')!c V%$)# a&**#0%&+'#cV)#')!#$[&$$0#*)a)#)!%U#� ��/#%U "$0#*)a)*�#&$ !&+'# !a)#!*#�, % * ' *V/#!%$g ] ^_h �#$ � -#,#%U#/#%U $0#*)a)#0,#$#,i&%) !&!U ')!c%)/#,#eV),#/#!%$/#%g ^ ^]_j �#$ � klmn�Z&!��Z�#%U $ !'(o-&$%U#n�Z&!��Z/#%U * !V*%#d)%U V%$)c!)a)*&!%/ )a)*&%) !$p$##�#*%) !OOqS a,#$0#*%)i#��/#%U $rg ] ^s �#$ � -#,#&''$&/0'#$,#*#)i#+(%U#'&+ ,&% ,()!&* !)%) !* !$)$%#!%d)%U%U&%#$*,)+# !%U#&$$ *)&%#*U&)!" a"*V$% ( *V/#!%p$rg ] ^^t �#$ � klm-#,#$&/0'#$,#*#)i#&%&!&00, 0,)&%#%#/0#,&%V,#pu\#c,##$qrg ^ ]v �#$ � -#,#&''����0#,a ,/&!*#*,)%#,)&$0#*)a)#)!%U#� ���#&$ !&+'# !a)#!*#�, % * ' *V/#!%$&*U)#i#g ^ ]wh �#$ � -#,#,#0 ,%)!c')/)%$$0#*)a)# ,,#a#,#!*# !%U#*U&)!" a"*V$% (g ^ ^wj �#$ � -#,#%U#$#,#0 ,%)!c')/)%$/#%g ^ ]x �#$ � � ,#&*U&!&'(%)*&'/#%U ,#a#,#!*#)!%U)$'&+ ,&% ,(,#0 ,%0&*b&c#[d#,#,#$V'%$,#0 ,%#a ,&''* !$%)%V#!%$)#!%)a)#)!%U#/#%U "$0#*)a)*&!&'(%#')$%$0,#$#!%#)!%U#�#&$ !&+'# !a)#!*#�, % * ' *V/#!%$g ] ^y �#$ � �,#0, z#*%"$0#*)a)*/&%,)f$0)b#$&!'&+ ,&% ,(V0')*&%#$)!*'V#)!%U)$&%&$#%g� %#$o� ,&''eV#$%) !$% dU)*U%U#,#$0 !$#d&${� {pd)%U%U##f*#0%) ! aeV#$%) !|Wr[& )%) !&')!a ,/&%) !/V$%+#0, i)#)!&!&%%&*U#!&,,&%)i#q�a%U#&!$d#,% eV#$%) !|O[|O�[ ,|O�)${� {[%U#&%&0&*b&c# #$! %/##%%U#,#eV),#/#!%$a ,{�#&$ !&+'# !a)#!*#q{�U)$a ,//&(! %+#&'%#,#&!&''eV#$%) !$/V$%+#&!$d#,#q}~�����������������������������������������������~���������
����~�����������������������������~����������������������������������~��������~�������������������������������������������������������������������������~�������������������������������~����������������������������~�������������������������~��������������������������������������h��~�������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������� ��������¡���������������������������¢�����£�~�����¤��¥�������������������������������������������������������¦������§y_w_w�}¦©������¡����������h��������ªhª����������������«����¬�¢��������s§§y¡����������ª�������h�������������ª������������������������������������������������������Page 74 of 74 15G0314_1 Contest_Final 07 15 15 1002 07/15/15 10:02:29
Table of Contents