REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS FOR ENGINEERING …...consultants to develop the study’s contract. Secondly,...

REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS FOR

ENGINEERING TRANSPORTATION PLANNING SERVICES

The Bismarck-Mandan Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO) is requesting proposals from qualified consultants for the following project:

2020 Pavement Conditions and Analysis Report Qualifications based selection criteria will be used to analyze technical proposals and interviews from responding consultants. The MPO reserves the right to reject any or all proposals. This project has a not to exceed budget of $82,000. Interested firms should contact, Rachel Drewlow Transportation Planner, at the Bismarck-Mandan MPO, 221 N 5th Street P.O. Box 5503, Bismarck ND 58506. Contact can also be made via phone 701.355.1852 or by email: [email protected] All proposals received by 5:00 PM (CST) on April 9, 2020 will be given consideration for an interview. The Bismarck-Mandan MPO reserves the right to limit the interviews to a maximum of five (5) firms whose proposals most clearly meet the RFP requirements. Firms will be notified in writing or by phone of shortlist results. Successful candidates will receive date, time and location information for the interviews. It is the responsibility of the consultant to ensure all required elements of the proposal are submitted. Proposals missing required elements will be rejected and consultants will be denied interviews. Minority, women-owned, and disadvantaged business enterprises are encouraged to participate. Respondents must submit six (6) physical copies of the proposal and one (1) electronic copy of the proposal. The full length of the proposal shall be no more than eight (8) pages, but preferably printed as double sided. Appendix material may be supplied in addition to the eight (8) pages of the body. Submittals must be received no later than 5:00 PM (CST) April 9 and may be shipped or hand delivered to: Rachel Drewlow Bismarck-Mandan MPO 221 N 5th Street P.O. Box 5503 Bismarck, ND 58506-5503 Once submitted, the proposals become the property of the MPO. Proprietary information must be clearly noted in the proposal, or it will be subject to open records laws.

Contents I. PURPOSE OF THE REQUEST ........................................................................................................................................... 3 II. GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS ............................................................................................................................................. 3 III. CONTENT OF PROPOSALS ............................................................................................................................................ 4 IV: CONTRACT CLAUSES AND OTHER REQUIREMENTS ............................................................................................ 5 V. EVALUATION CRITERIA AND INTERVIEW PROCESS ............................................................................................. 6 VI. REGIONAL CONTEXT AND EXISTING CONDITIONS .............................................................................................. 7 VII. OBJECTIVE ..................................................................................................................................................................... 7 VIII: STUDY AREA ................................................................................................................................................................ 7 IX. SCOPE OF WORK ............................................................................................................................................................ 8 X. PROJECT COMPLETION ................................................................................................................................................. 9 XI: INFORMATION AVAILABLE TO THE CONSULTANT: ............................................................................................ 9 Figure 1: Bismarck-Mandan MPO Urban Functional Class System Appendix A: Proposed Sub-Consultant Request Form Appendix B: Consultant Self Certification of Government-Wide Debarment and Suspension (Nonprocurement) Form Appendix C: Federal, State and Local Clauses

I. PURPOSE OF THE REQUEST The purpose of this Request for Proposals (RFP) is to provide interested firms with information about professional services desired by the Bismarck-Mandan Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO) for the following project:

2020 Pavement Conditions and Analysis Report

The MPO is requesting services to evaluate pavement condition on all functionally classified collector and arterial roadways within the Bismarck-Mandan MPO. This is approximately 210-225 centerline miles. Consultants will provide data collection, assess pavement in both PCI and IRI formats, update the jurisdictions’ data programs as necessary, and provide additional analysis as requested. Data will be used by the MPO to monitor their federal performance target for pavement condition and help select preventive maintenance and/or reconstruction projects for the region. To elaborate upon the selection process, data will inform the next Metropolitan Transportation Plan update and constrained list of projects and be used, as needed, during project prioritization of the annual TIP solicitation. Also, data will help the jurisdictions to execute the rehabilitation/reconstruction of functionally classified roadways. This study will be in cooperation with the cities of Bismarck, Mandan, and Lincoln, the counties of Burleigh and Morton, the North Dakota Department of Transportation (NDDOT), the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA), and the Federal Transit Administration (FTA). II. GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS

A. Any questions or comments should be submitted to:

Rachel Drewlow, Transportation Planner 701.355.1852

[email protected]

B. Proposals shall be mailed to: Bismarck-Mandan MPO

City/County Office Building 221 N 5th Street P.O. Box 5503

Bismarck, ND 58506-5503

C. All Proposals must be clearly identified and marked as follows:

Proposal for: 2020 Pavement Conditions and Analysis Report

Bismarck-Mandan MPO Firm’s Name

D. The MPO will consider proposals received up to 5:00 PM Central Time April 9, 2020. Six (6) copies of the

written proposal and one (1) electronic copy must be received by the deadline. Electronic copies may be sent via flash drive or emailed to [email protected]. Proposals received after the deadline will not be considered for an interview. The MPO reserves the right to reject any or all proposals.

E. Selection Committee: The Selection Committee will consist of a six(6) person panel; five (5) voters and one (1) moderator. Committee members represent the following entities: MPO, City of Bismarck, City of Mandan, Burleigh County, and Morton County. The MPO project manager will moderate the interviews and provide a tie-breaking vote if neither top ranked consultant has a ND-DBE on their team.

F. Invitation for Interview: Based on the strength of the written proposals, three (3) to five (5) consultants will be selected for interviews. Consultants who are awarded an interview will be notified by phone. Consultants not selected for an interview will be notified in writing or by phone.

G. Interviews: The MPO will conduct web-based interviews on May 6-8, 2020. Each consultant is responsible for providing a meeting platform and invitation link. Consultants will be evaluated on both the written proposal and interviews. Consultants will be given forty-five (45) minutes to present their proposals and entertain questions. The consultants will be responsible for managing their interview and allowing time for questions. There will be fifteen (15) minute breaks between interviews. For more information on selection criteria see Section V: Evaluation Criteria and Interview Process.

H. Disadvantaged Business Enterprise: In the event of a tie for top consultant, positive consideration will be given to proposals which employ a Disadvantaged Business Enterprise (DBE) company. The DBE company must be certified with the North Dakota Department of Transportation (NDDOT). The DBE may be the Prime or Sub-Consulting company and should be identified in the proposal. (Should there be a tie and neither consultant has an ND-DBE, the moderator’s score will be used to select the top ranked consultant.)

I. Selection and Approvals: Consultants will be notified of the selection results by phone and formal letter. Approval of the top ranked consultant will be requested of the MPO’s Technical Advisory Committee (TAC) and Policy Board.

J. Contract Negotiations: Contract negotiations will begin immediately after Policy Board approval. First, the MPO requires consultants to develop the study’s contract. Secondly, the draft contract is reviewed by MPO Staff, local and federal partners, and legal counsel(s). Contract review can take 4-5 weeks and may require iterative revisions. After negotiations, the MPO intends to execute the contract upon staff authority. Final negotiations will also require submission of:

1) Prime Consultant scope of work and fee schedule not exceeding $82,000 2) Prime Consultant Certificate of Liability Insurance 3) Scope of work and fee schedule for ALL Sub-consultants 4) Prime Consultant Indirect Cost Form (blank form will be provided by MPO) 5) SFN 60233: Prime Consultant Request to Sublet Form (blank form will be provided by MPO)

III. CONTENT OF PROPOSALS Length: The proposal shall be no more than eight (8) pages, numbered, and preferably double sided. (The reverse page side would be page 2.) The cover page, table of contents, and appendix material will not count toward the eight (8) page limit. Proposal: The consultant’s written proposal shall address the following major sections:

1. Description of firm 2. Organizational chart showing project team and general activities 3. Table of key individuals’ time-available for project/study 4. Understanding of project and proposed work approach 5. Brief examples of past, pertinent work projects

Appendix: The proposal appendix must include the following items unless noted as ‘optional’. The following items will not count toward the eight (8) page limit and may take as many pages as needed.

• Proposed Project Schedule: Proposed schedules may begin as soon as July 1, 2020 and should detail all activities necessary to complete the study. Activities may include but are not limited to:

Reconnaissance activities Pavement Condition Collection Steering Committee Meetings

Documents/Tech Memos for Study Milestones Monthly Updates (via telephone or in person) to MPO TAC and Policy Boards Draft Report Development and review by MPO and Steering Committee (requires 2-3 weeks) Draft Report Review by NDDOT, FHWA, and FTA (requires up to 1 month) Technical Staff presentations or Final Presentation to the commissions of each partner jurisdiction Final Presentation to the MPO TAC and MPO Policy Board

• Quality Control/Quality Assurance (QC/QA) program: Detail the program that will be used on the project. This (QC/QA) program must identify the team members, their responsibilities, and stages of development at which each is to be responsible.

• Required Qualification Based Selection (QBS) Documents: Signed Proposed Sub-Consultant Request Form (Appendix A) Signed Consultant Self Certification of Government-Wide Debarment and Suspension (Nonprocurement)

Form (Appendix B) • Resumes or list of Personnel: Detail who will be assigned to work on the project (including titles, education,

and/or work experience). Open Records Disclosure: After the selection process, the contents of all proposals will be subject to Open Records Regulations and may be open to inspection by interested parties. Any information that the proposing firm(s) believe to be a trade secret or proprietary information must be clearly identified in the proposal. Any information identified as such may be exempt from disclosure. IV: CONTRACT CLAUSES AND OTHER REQUIREMENTS Federal and State Contract Clauses: Consultants should be prepared to abide by the necessary State and Federal clauses. These should be included verbatim and unaltered in a potential contract. The clauses can be reviewed in Appendix C: Federal, State and Local Clauses. MPO Contract Clauses: Consultants should include the following italicized sections unaltered in a potential contract. The MPO reserves the right to hold ten percent (10%) of the total contracted invoiced amounts until the MPO has received all of the following to its satisfaction:

• Contracted deliverables as described in the RFP and final contract; • Completed tasks as described in the RFP and final contract; and • Satisfactory final product project and/or study

If the MPO determines that the progress of the study is not acceptable as measured through the consultant supplied project schedule, which will be an attachment to the signed and approved contract, the MPO reserves the right to terminate the contract with the consultant with a 45-day written notice. The MPO desires continuity of consultant staff throughout the project from the firm chosen. If the consultant replaces key staff and the MPO is dissatisfied with replacement staff, the firm chosen will have 30 days from written notice from the MPO to supply replacement key staff acceptable to the MPO. If the firm chosen fails to supply acceptable replacement staff within the 30-day period, the MPO may cancel the contract. Ownership of Work Product: All work products and copyrights of the contract, which result from the contract, are the exclusive property of NDDOT, with an unlimited license for use by the federal government and its assignees without charge. General Information: The Bismarck-Mandan MPO reserves the right to enter into a supplementary agreement to have the selected firm perform any additional work not currently assigned. Additional work will need prior approval from the MPO and NDDOT. Jurisdictions may elect to evaluate local roadways. Data collection may occur concurrently with the MPO effort, but the

local road effort should be contracted with the jurisdiction directly. If the contract is terminated prior to completion of the final report, all work completed, shall become the property of the NDDOT, as per the ‘Ownership of Work Product’ Clause. The final report will be submitted using the following formats and standards, if applicable:

• MS Word/ MS Excel • Adobe Acrobat (Standard or Compatible) • NDDOT Data Collection Codes and Procedures • NDDOT and/or City, as applicable, Drafting Standards • NDDOT Design Manual • Chapter 19 NDDOT Survey and Photogrammetry Manual

GIS Data Requirements: Acceptable data formats include ESRI shapefile and file geodatabase. The following is the required projection.

Coordinate System • State Plane Horizontal Datum • NAD 1983 (2011 adjusted) Vertical Datum • NGVD88 Zone • ND South (3302) Units • International Feet

Metadata must be FGDC compliant and delivered in .txt format. It is recommended to utilize ArcCatalog to generate the .txt file. The following are required parameters:

• Identification – General 1. Keywords 2. Abstract 3. Purpose 4. Supplemental information 5. Native dataset format

• Identification – Status 1. Progress 2. Update Frequency

• Identification – Time Period 1. Current-ness reference 2. Range of dates: beginning date/end

date • Identification – Citation

1. Citation title 2. Originator 3. Publication date

• Metadata Reference 1. Metadata date 2. Contact – who completed the

document 3. Organization 4. Address 5. City, State, Zipcode 6. Telephone 7. E-Mail

• Data Quality 1. Attribute accuracy 2. Positional accuracy – horizontal/

vertical 3. Source information 4. Process step

• Entity Attribute 1. Entity Type 2. Attribute

V. EVALUATION CRITERIA AND INTERVIEW PROCESS The selection process will be completed in accordance with Bismarck-Mandan MPO policies. Written proposals shall address the firm’s ability to perform the necessary services in the allotted time with qualified personnel. Selection will be based on the following criteria:

1. Recent, current, and projected workloads of the person and/or firm(s) 2. Ability of professional personnel (staff experience and technical capabilities) 3. Related experience on similar projects 4. Willingness to meet time and budget requirements 5. Project understanding, issues and approach 6. Past Performance

Consultant selection will be based on written proposals along with web-based interviews. All firms not selected will be notified by phone and in writing. In the event of equally ranked consultants, additional positive consideration will be given to proposals which employ a Disadvantaged Business Enterprise (DBE) company. See Section II: General Instructions for more information. A final scope of work and price will be negotiated with the successful firm. An agreement will be executed with a single firm. If unable to arrive at an agreement with the top ranked firm, the MPO retains the right to move on to negotiations with the second (then third, etc.) ranked firm. Minor portions of work will be permitted by sub-consultant(s) contracted through the prime consultant. Schedule for Contract Development and Final Study Deadline: RFP Submittal Deadline April 9, 2020 Notification for Interviews April 22-24, 2020 Interviews and Notification of Ranking May 6-8, 2020

Approval and Notice to Proceed May 19, 2020 Formal Notification of Firms May 20-22, 2020 Negotiation of Work Fee and Scope of Work May – June 2020 Final Project Report & Presentations No later than December 31, 2020 VI. REGIONAL CONTEXT AND EXISTING CONDITIONS Local Conditions: The Bismarck-Mandan MPO consists of the cities of Mandan, Bismarck, and Lincoln, and the metropolitan portions of Burleigh and Morton County. The climate for the Bismarck-Mandan MPO area is quite varied, consisting of summers where temperatures can reach over 100° F and winters where they can fall to -30° F or lower. The average temperature in January is 14° F and in July it is 72° F. The average annual precipitation is variable with an average of 17.8 inches. An average of 50 inches of snow falls per year typically between October and April. In an average year the frost depth averages about 4.5 feet and the ground remains frozen from approximately December 1 through May 1. The streets are typically cleaned of residual deicing solutions, sand and/or salt in mid-May. Past Pavement Collections: The last MPO collection of pavement condition occurred in 2012 and evaluated roadways in Bismarck and Mandan. Since that time, the city of Bismarck directed a collection in 2016. The City of Bismarck currently utilizes MicroPAVER® 7 software for their pavement management system. The City of Mandan has had MicroPAVER® in the past and may be interested in purchasing a renewal. Burleigh County, Morton County, and the City of Lincoln currently do not use a computerized pavement management system and do not plan to purchase MicroPAVER® software. VII. OBJECTIVE This project will include data collection for the MPO’s entire urban functionally classified network. The network consists of approximately 210-225 miles of collector and arterial roadway. The road network should include both directions of travel on all roadways. Approximately one-third of area of each direction of roadway shall be collected at a time. The data shall be collected in accordance with ASTM D6433-09 and be compatible with MicroPAVER® software. The data shall be compatible with the existing jurisdictional GIS systems. Additional analysis will be requested to identify jurisdictional-specific repair programs, which will include timing of repair and cost. VIII: STUDY AREA The study area includes all arterial and collector roadways on the MPO’s urban functionally classified system. See Figure 1 for map.

NOTE: Local roads may be added as part of a three-way contract with the City of Bismarck. Collection of local road conditions is not eligible for the MPO’s federal funding, so the City has allocated a not to exceed budget of $45,000 for this portion of the project. The City anticipates surveying approximately 130 centerline miles of local roadway, or less depending on cost per mile. The City is expected to cost share on the project’s mobilization fee at a rate matching the percentage of local roads in the total project. Any fee or expense resulting from the local road collection should be directly invoiced to the City of Bismarck. IX. SCOPE OF WORK The firm selected shall provide professional services for pavement evaluation which may include, but not be limited to:

1. Project initiation, including: a. Development of a steering committee (with assistance from MPO staff). Steering committee should

include jurisdictional staff, MPO staff, and possible state and federal oversight. b. Kick off meeting with the steering committee. c. Coordination with existing geospatial and pavement management systems.

2. Project management a. Activities required to manage the project including staff, equipment, and documentation. b. Lead Steering Committee meetings at appropriate times throughout the project. c. Preparation of progress reports, documenting travel and expense receipts, and preparing and

submitting invoices in a timely manner. d. Monthly progress reports to the MPO, the Technical Advisory Committee, and to the Policy Board.

3. Geo-referenced digital pavement data collection, including high resolution downward facing line-scan images and high resolution forward and side facing images at 25 foot intervals.

4. Pavement evaluation including International Roughness Index (IRI) and Pavement Condition Index (PCI). 5. Pavement management software database creation and/or updates, as required, and image viewer software

installation and database creation. 6. Linkage of pavement evaluation data and digital images to existing Bismarck, Burleigh County, and Morton

County respective GIS systems. 7. Database import into MicroPAVER® pavement management software, possible update of software license

(paid at jurisdictional expense), and possible staff training in MicroPAVER®. 8. Analysis of pavement condition scores and development of condition reports. Depending on the need of the

jurisdiction, analysis and reports may include: a. Condition report noting pavement scores as a PDF, GIS-shapefile, or similar format. Consultant

should provide an ordered list of roadways to improve over the next 5-10 years. List should be based on pavement score and an assumed, generic cost estimate.

b. Conditions report noting pavement scores AND additional analysis on longevity of the roadways. Consultant should prioritize roadway improvements for next 5-10 years. This would note which roadway/sections to improve, the year of improvement, and the type of improvement (mill and overlay vs. reconstruction). This would use jurisdiction-specific costs estimates and be constrained by a jurisdiction-specified budget and/or condition target.

9. Provide final presentations. Depending on the need of the jurisdiction, final presentation may include: a. Staff-level technical update robust enough for the city/county staff to address their boards about the

report. This is to be given in person or by web-based video conference. b. Commission presentation where the consultant presents by phone or in-person. Possible action item. c. In-person presentations to the MPO TAC and Policy Board for their review and possible approval.

10. Collection, analysis, and reporting of local road conditions for the City of Bismarck (See ‘Section VIII: Study Area’ for more information.)

X. PROJECT COMPLETION

A. Development and Review of Draft Report: A draft report shall be produced after all recommendations have been developed and approved by the Steering Committee(s). Electronic and/ or paper copies of the draft report shall be provided for the Steering Committee(s), the MPO project manager, NDDOT, FHWA and FTA for their review and comment. All comments from the MPO, NDDOT, FHWA, and FTA shall be addressed to the respective entity’s satisfaction prior to development of the final draft and final presentations.

B. Final Presentations:

The draft report shall be advertised and made available to the public for a minimum of fifteen (15) days before the final presentations.

The consultant will be requested to provide a technical presentation to the staff of the five jurisdictions. This is to be given in person or by a web-based video-conference. Additionally, they shall make a presentation to the Bismarck Board of City Commissioners, the Mandan Board of City Commissioners, the Lincoln City Council, the MPO Technical Advisory Committee and the MPO Policy Board for review and acceptance/approval of the final draft report. Presentations to the jurisdictional governing bodies may be given by phone or in person. Presentation to the TAC and Policy Board shall be given in person. Approval of the final draft report by the MPO Policy Board, and subsequent distribution of study deliverables, will mark the completion of the study.

C. Final Deliverables:

The final report shall be produced after all comments on the draft report are addressed, final presentations are complete, and the report has been approved by the MPO TAC and Policy Board. A minimum of three (3) paper copies shall be provided of the Bismarck/Burleigh County Report and a minimum of three (3) paper copies shall be provided of the Mandan/ Morton County Report. A pdf-based copy of each report and all appendices shall also be provided. All products are to be delivered to the MPO project manager for dissemination.

XI: INFORMATION AVAILABLE TO THE CONSULTANT: The following resources/data/information is available for the study from the Bismarck-Mandan MPO and its partners: Available for Download:

1. Travel Demand Model Review and Socio-Economic Projections Final Report – 2018 2. MPO 2020-2023 Transportation Improvement Plan 3. Arrive 2045 (2020-2045 MTP) – 2020 4. Envision 2040 (2015-2040 LRTP) – 2015 5. NDDOT Traffic Operations Manual – 2018 6. FHWA Traffic Signal Timing Manual – 2008 7. Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices for Streets and Highways (2009 Ed. with Revision # 1 and 2) – 2012

Available by Direct Request:

1. GIS geodatabase information; a. MPO-wide Centerline Files b. MPO-wide Urban Functionally Classified Roadways c. Land base/Infrastructure data from member jurisdictions d. MPO-wide Colored Digital Orthophotography – 5-inch resolution – 2016 e. MPO-wide Digital Elevation Data – 1-foot contours – 2016

2. Bismarck State of the Streets Report including MicroPAVER Technical Documentation (November 2012) 3. Street records including pavement section and width, date paved, and miscellaneous additional design information; 4. Bismarck, Burleigh County, and Mandan street and roadway maintenance project records; 5. Location specific soil information, where available, including geotechnical studies for specific areas.

Figure 1: MPO Urban Functionally Classified System

§¦94

SILVER RANCH RD

HIGHWAY 1806

RIVERRD

INTERSTATE 94

44TH ST

NE 43RD AVE

NE 71ST AVE

NE 97TH AVE

NW HIGHWAY 1804

COUNTY ROAD 138A

E MAIN AVE

NE 136TH AVE

53RD ST

NE 123RD AVE

COUNTY ROAD 138

NE 162ND AVE

37TH ST

LINCOLN RD

NW 149TH AVE

SE HIG HWAY 1804

APPLE CREEK RD

COUNTY ROAD 137

E E AVE

23RD A

E DIVIDE AVE

OLD RED TRL NW

22ND A

SUNNY RD S

E ROSSER AVE

NW 110TH AVE NE 110TH AVE

C OUNTYROAD81

WAY 1806 S

32 1/2 ST

E CENTURY AVE

38TH ST

3RD ST SE

E BISMARCK EXPY

34TH ST

HOGUE RD

SE 62ND AVE

IS LAN

WILLOW RD N

MAIN ST E

46TH ST

19TH ST SE N 26T

INTERSTATE 94 BUSINESS LOOP

E CAPITOL AVE

SHOAL DR

W B AVE

MEMORIAL HWY SE

E BURLEIGH AVE

E HIGHWAY 10

FTLINCOLN RDS TA R LN

NE 84TH AVE

W C AVE

8 THAVE SE

E LA SAL LE DR

1ST ST NWMAIN ST W

RWOOD DR

SUNSET DRNW

N BISM

MORRISON AVE

NW 136TH AVE

50TH ST

BISMARCKEXPY

W MAI N AVE

22 1/2ST

MOO NSTONE

33RD ST

MIRIAM AVE

3RD ST SW

19THAVE

TWIN CITY DR SE

SE 55TH AVE

SKY LN

DOLAN DR

WARD RD

NE 57TH AVECO

COLLINS AVE

37 TH ST NW

DOWNIN

NE 17TH AVE

48TH ST

RNT CREEK LOOP

LEE AVE

49TH ST

W D IVIDE AVE

SW 48TH AVE

VALL EY D R

NW 57TH AVE

NW 104TH AVE

COUNTY ROAD 140

3RDAVE NE

SE 80TH ST

14 THAVE SE

17TH AVE

LINK DR

T IFF ANY D

1 6THAV E SW

MEDO RA AVE

RAILROAD AVE

LARSON RD

1ST ST SE

EAS T VALL

WOODROW DR

SE 28TH AVE

SE 89TH AVE

MANDAN AVE NE

W TURNPIKE AVE

N31 ST ST

49 1/2 ST

APPLE CR E EKDR

SOMMER DR N

KEITH DR

HAMILTON ST

35TH ST N

HIGHWAY 1806 N

W BURLEIGH AVE

7TH ST NW

RIVER PLACE DRN

SANDY RIVER DR

ASPEN AVE

1 4TH ST SE

F AR W E ST DR

FERNWOO D DR

W SWEET AVE

BERGER DR

NE HIGHWAY 1804 CODY DR

SUNFLOWER DR

1ST ST SW

FUL LER AVE

4T H ST NW

SUSAN DR

NW 84TH AVE

NE 30TH AVEPA LO MINO DR N

NE 73RD AVE

E WACHTER AVE

YNICKLAUS DR

W IN TER STATE AVE

TELLURIDE LN

W BISMARCK EXPY

NW 97 TH A VE

12TH AVE

S RENO DR

SLA TE D R

C UST ER DR

DUBL IN DR

MISSOURI LOOP N

ROCKY RD

SABER DR

E BR ISTOL DR

E TURNPIKE AVE

GOL D DR

SOUTHR IDGE LN

E CALGARY AVE

NE 79TH AVE

16TH ST NE

E DENVER AVE

SE 22N D AVE

ALLEN DR

SE 48TH AVE

OLIVE LN

HITCHCOCK DR

27TH ST NW

KRISTEN LN

FOREST DR

LOHSTRETER RD NW

SE 4TH AVE

MISTY W A TERS DR

LAKE W O OD DR SE

BAINE DR

PAR K AVE

NE 90TH AVE

SOUTH BA Y DR SE

GRASSY LN

BOUNDARY RD

MCDONALD RD

KEEPSAK E LN

OTTER C R E EK RD N

15TH ST NE PATRIOT DR

R ED O A KDR

A VE NE

RIDGEDALE ST

VIKING DR

KINGSWOOD RD

PARKE R RANCH RD

FO XTAIL LN N

34TH AVE SE

19TH ST SW

RESTFUL DR

DOVER DR

LOOKOUT TR L

SKYLINE B LVD

N 2ND ST

EASY ST

ENDICOTT DR

LONDON AVE

SUNDOWN DR

FLATR O CKDR

HIGH COUNTRY DR N

NE 82ND AVERIDGE WAY

SUMMIT BLVD

H DR S

NW 64TH AVE

HIGHLANDRD N

NW 123RD AVE

DARIN DR

OAKFIELD DR

RIFLE RANGE DR

NE 78TH AVE

LONG S PUR TRL SE

CLOVER LN

CO N NAR DR

PONY EXPRESS DR

HARM O N LN N

LO RRAIN DR

SE 102ND AVE

BROOKSIDE LN

TIMBERHAVEN DR S

KEIDEL TRL SW

CAPTAIN L EACH DR

FRONTIER TRL S

VIS IO N ST

SHEEHAN RD

OLIVE TREE DR

W A AVE

HUMBERT DR

GREENFIELD LN

HELEN DR N

CANE DR

NER DR

INTERSTATE 94 RAMP

W ARBOR AVE

48TH ST NW

NE 46TH ST

N EUGENE DR

BALTUS DR

LILAC LN

STONEWOOD WAY

E C AVE

N 19TH ST

JERICHO RD

TELSTAR DR

10TH AVE

NW 156TH AVE

MATTS DR N

DEEREWOOD LN

39TH ST N

BRADS WAY

E F AVE

2ND ST NE

BOHE DR

IVY AVE

NE 76TH AVE

W F AVE

31ST ST NW

NW 149TH AVE

NW 156TH AVE

INTERSTATE 94

NE HIGHWAY 83

46TH ST

37TH ST

INTERSTATE 94

COUNTY ROAD 82

SE 102ND AVE

HIGHWAY 1806

48TH ST

INTERSTATE 94

NE 84TH AVE

22ND A

NE 57TH AVE

SE 48TH AVE

Map LegendCollectorInterstateMinor ArterialPrincipal Arterial

Existing StreetsPavedGravelProposed or Not BuiltMPO Adjusted Urbanized Area (UZA)Missouri RiverCity Limits

µThis map is neither a legally recorded map nor a survey and is not intended to be used as such. The City of Bismarck does not guarantee the accuracy,

current status, or completeness of the material contained herein and is not responsible for any misuse or misrepresentation of this information or its derivatives.In no event shall The City of Bismarck become liable to users of this data for any loss arising from the use or misuse of this map.

To ensure the accuracy of the data in this application, users are encouraged to provide feedback/information to the GIS Office.

0 1 20.5Mile

2 0 1 9 B i s - M a n M P O F u n c t i o n a l C l a s s2 0 1 9 B i s - M a n M P O F u n c t i o n a l C l a s s( A w a i t i n g N D D O T A p p r o v a l )( A w a i t i n g N D D O T A p p r o v a l )

W i t h L o c a l R o a d s U p d a t e d t o 3 / 1 3 / 2 0 2 0W i t h L o c a l R o a d s U p d a t e d t o 3 / 1 3 / 2 0 2 0

Appendix A: Proposed Sub-Consultant Request Form

Appendix B: Consultant Self Certification of Government-Wide Debarment and Suspension (Nonprocurement) Form

Federal Certifications

GOVERNMENTWIDE DEBARMENT AND SUSPENSION (NONPROCUREMENT)

Instructions for Certification: By signing and submitting this bid or proposal, the prospective lower tier participant is providing the signedcertification set out below.

1. It will comply and facilitate compliance with U.S. DOT regulations, “Nonprocurement Suspension and Debarment,” 2 CFR part 1200, whichadopts and supplements the U.S. Office of Management and Budget (U.S. OMB) “Guidelines to Agencies on Governmentwide Debarment andSuspension (Nonprocurement),” 2 CFR part 180,

2. To the best of its knowledge and belief, that its Principals and Subrecipients at the first tier:

a. Are eligible to participate in covered transactions of any Federal department or agency and are not presently:

1. Debarred

2. Suspended

3. Proposed for debarment

4. Declared ineligible

5. Voluntarily excluded

6. Disqualified

b. Its management has not within a threeyear period preceding its latest application or proposal been convicted of or had a civil judgmentrendered against any of them for:

1. Commission of fraud or a criminal offense in connection with obtaining, attempting to obtain, or performing a public (Federal, State,or local) transaction, or contract under a public transaction,

2. Violation of any Federal or State antitrust statute, or

3. Proposed for debarment commission of embezzlement, theft, forgery, bribery, falsification or destruction of records, making anyfalse statement, or receiving stolen property

c. It is not presently indicted for, or otherwise criminally or civilly charged by a governmental entity (Federal, State, or local) withcommission of any of the offenses listed in the preceding subsection 2.b of this Certification,

d. It has not had one or more public transactions (Federal, State, or local) terminated for cause or default within a threeyear periodpreceding this Certification,

e. If, at a later time, it receives any information that contradicts the statements of subsections 2.a – 2.d above, it will promptly provide thatinformation to FTA,

f. It will treat each lower tier contract or lower tier subcontract under its Project as a covered lower tier contract for purposes of 2 CFR part1200 and 2 CFR part 180 if it:

1. Equals or exceeds $25,000,

2. Is for audit services, or

3. Requires the consent of a Federal official, and

g. It will require that each covered lower tier contractor and subcontractor:

1. Comply and facilitate compliance with the Federal requirements of 2 CFR parts 180 and 1200, and

2. Assure that each lower tier participant in its Project is not presently declared by any Federal department or agency to be:

a. Debarred from participation in its federally funded Project,

b. Suspended from participation in its federally funded Project,

c. Proposed for debarment from participation in its federally funded Project,

d. Declared ineligible to participate in its federally funded Project,

e. Voluntarily excluded from participation in its federally funded Project, or

f. Disqualified from participation in its federally funded Project, and

3. It will provide a written explanation as indicated on a page attached in FTA’s TrAMSWeb or the Signature Page if it or any of its principals,including any of its first tier Subrecipients or its Third Party Participants at a lower tier, is unable to certify compliance with the precedingstatements in this Certification Group.

Certification

Contractor __________________________________________________________________________Signature of Authorized Official ____________________________________ Date ___/ ___/ ________Name and Title of Contractor's Authorized Official __________________________________________

Appendix C: Federal, State and Local Clauses

Federal Clauses

Fly America Requirements – Applicability – all contracts involving transportation of persons or property, by air between the U.S. and/or placesoutside the U.S. These requirements do not apply to micropurchases ($10,000 or less, except for construction contracts over $2,000). Contractor shallcomply with 49 USC 40118 (the “Fly America” Act) in accordance with General Services Administration regulations 41 CFR 30110, stating that recipientsand subrecipients of Federal funds and their contractors are required to use US Flag air carriers for US Governmentfinanced international air travel andtransportation of their personal effects or property, to the extent such service is available, unless travel by foreign air carrier is a matter of necessity, asdefined by the Fly America Act. Contractor shall submit, if a foreign air carrier was used, an appropriate certification or memorandum adequately explainingwhy service by a US flag air carrier was not available or why it was necessary to use a foreign air carrier and shall, in any event, provide a certificate ofcompliance with the Fly America requirements. Contractor shall include the requirements of this section in all subcontracts that may involve international airtransportation.

Seismic Safety – Applicability – Construction of new buildings or additions to existing buildings. These requirements do not apply to micropurchases($10,000 or less, except for construction contracts over $2,000). Contractor agrees that any new building or addition to an existing building shall be designedand constructed in accordance with the standards required in USDOT Seismic Safety Regulations 49 CFR 41 and shall certify compliance to the extentrequired by the regulation. Contractor shall also ensure that all work performed under this contract, including work performed by subcontractors, complieswith the standards required by 49 CFR 41 and the certification of compliance issued on the project.

Energy Conservation – Applicability – All Contracts except micropurchases ($10,000 or less, except for construction contracts over $2,000)Contractor shall comply with mandatory standards and policies relating to energy efficiency, stated in the state energy conservation plan issued incompliance with the Energy Policy & Conservation Act.

Access to Records and Reports – Applicability – As shown below. These requirements do not apply to micropurchases ($10,000 or less,except for construction contracts over $2,000) The following access to records requirements apply to this Contract:

1. Where the purchaser is not a State but a local government and is an FTA recipient or a subgrantee of FTA recipient in accordance with 49 CFR18.36(i), contractor shall provide the purchaser, the FTA, the US Comptroller General or their authorized representatives access to any books,documents, papers and contractor records which are pertinent to this contract for the purposes of making audits, examinations, excerpts andtranscriptions. Contractor shall also, pursuant to 49 CFR 633.17, provide authorized FTA representatives, including any PMO contractor, access tocontractor's records and construction sites pertaining to a capital project, defined at 49 USC 5302(a)1, which is receiving FTA assistance through theprograms described at 49 USC 5307, 5309 or 5311.

2. Where the purchaser is a State and is an FTA recipient or a subgrantee of FTA recipient in accordance with 49 CFR 633.17, contractor shall providethe purchaser, authorized FTA representatives, including any PMO Contractor, access to contractor's records and construction sites pertaining to acapital project, defined at 49 USC 5302(a)1, which receives FTA assistance through the programs described at 49 USC 5307, 5309 or 5311. Bydefinition, a capital project excludes contracts of less than the simplified acquisition threshold currently set at $250,000.

3. Where the purchaser enters into a negotiated contract for other than a small purchase or under the simplified acquisition threshold and is an institutionof higher education, a hospital or other nonprofit organization and is an FTA recipient or a subgrantee of FTA recipient in accordance with 49 CFR19.48, contractor shall provide the purchaser, the FTA, the US Comptroller General or their authorized representatives, access to any books,documents, papers and record of the contractor which are directly pertinent to this contract for the purposes of making audits, examinations, excerpts and transcriptions.

4. Where a purchaser which is an FTA recipient or a subgrantee of FTA recipient in accordance with 49 USC 5325(a) enters into a contract for a capitalproject or improvement (defined at 49 USC 5302(a)1) through other than competitive bidding, contractor shall make available records related to thecontract to the purchaser, the Secretary of USDOT and the US Comptroller General or any authorized officer or employee of any of them for thepurposes of conducting an audit and inspection.

5. Contractor shall permit any of the foregoing parties to reproduce by any means whatsoever or to copy excerpts and transcriptions as reasonablyneeded.

6. Contractor shall maintain all books, records, accounts and reports required under this contract for a period of not less than three (3) years after thedate of termination or expiration of this contract, except in the event of litigation or settlement of claims arising from the performance of this contract, inwhich case contractor agrees to maintain same until the recipient, FTA Administrator, US Comptroller General, or any of their authorizedrepresentatives, have disposed of all such litigation, appeals, claims or exceptions related thereto. Re: 49 CFR 18.39(i)(11).

FTA does not require the inclusion of these requirements in subcontracts.

Federal Changes – Applicability – All Contracts except micropurchases ($10,000 or less, except for construction contracts over $2,000) Contractorshall comply with all applicable FTA regulations, policies, procedures and directives, including without limitation those listed directly or by reference in theMaster Agreement between the recipient and FTA, as they may be amended or promulgated from time to time during the term of the contract. Contractor'sfailure to comply shall constitute a material breach of the contract.

No Government Obligation to Third Parties – Applicability – All contracts except micropurchases ($10,000 or less, except for constructioncontracts over $2,000)

(1) The recipient and contractor acknowledge and agree that, notwithstanding any concurrence by the US Government in or approval of the solicitationor award of the underlying contract, absent the express written consent by the US Government, the US Government is not a party to this contract andshall not be subject to any obligations or liabilities to the recipient, the contractor, or any other party (whether or not a party to that contract) pertaining toany matter resulting from the underlying contract.

(2) Contractor agrees to include the above clause in each subcontract financed in whole or in part with FTA assistance. It is further agreed that theclause shall not be modified, except to identify the subcontractor who will be subject to its provisions.

Program Fraud and False or Fraudulent Statements or Related Acts – Applicability – All contracts except micropurchases($10,000 or less, except for construction contracts over $2,000)

(1) Contractor acknowledges that the provisions of the Program Fraud Civil Remedies Act of 1986, as amended, 31 USC 3801 et seq. and USDOTregulations, "Program Fraud Civil Remedies," 49 CFR 31, apply to its actions pertaining to this project. Upon execution of the underlying contract,contractor certifies or affirms the truthfulness and accuracy of any statement it has made, it makes, it may make, or causes to be made, pertaining tothe underlying contract or FTA assisted project for which this contract work is being performed. In addition to other penalties that may be applicable,contractor further acknowledges that if it makes, or causes to be made, a false, fictitious, or fraudulent claim, statement, submittal, or certification, theUS Government reserves the right to impose the penalties of the Program Fraud Civil Remedies Act (1986) on contractor to the extent the USGovernment deems appropriate.

(2) If contractor makes, or causes to be made, a false, fictitious, or fraudulent claim, statement, submittal, or certification to the US Government under acontract connected with a project that is financed in whole or in part with FTA assistance under the authority of 49 USC 5307, the Government reservesthe right to impose the penalties of 18 USC 1001 and 49 USC 5307(n)(1) on contractor, to the extent the US Government deems appropriate. (3)Contractor shall include the above two clauses in each subcontract financed in whole or in part with FTA assistance. The clauses shall not be modified,except to identify the subcontractor who will be subject to the provisions.