Request for Proposal - Upper Adams School District€¦ · Request for Proposal March 6, 2018...

Upper Adams School District Request for Proposal

March 6, 2018

Request for Proposal Response for a Guaranteed Energy Savings Contract at Upper Adams School District Prepared for: Upper Adams School District 161 North Main Street Biglerville, PA 17307 March 6, 2018 Submitted by:

Company Name: McClure Company Company Address: 4101 North Sixth Street, Harrisburg, PA 17110 Contact Person: Mark J. Gallick, Account Executive (717) 574-6539 (phone) (717) 236-5239 (fax)

[email protected]

4101 North Sixth Street

P.O. Box 1579

Harrisburg, PA 17105-1579

717.232.9743 T • 717.236.5239 F

www.mcclureco.com

March 6, 2018

Mrs. Belinda Wallen

Business Administrator

161 North Main Street Biglerville, PA 17307

Re: Request for Proposal – Guaranteed Energy Savings Contract

Dear Mrs. Wallen,

We would like to thank you for the opportunity to work with you and your District. McClure Company is pleased to offer the proposal based on our interviews with District Administration, Staff, and Vendors familiar with the District.

Options

In our response, we included five (5) programs for your review. These programs have been developed to address several priorities that the District communicated with us. These programs are as follows:

• Program A – Address the deferred maintenance items in the existing schools. This includes adding cooling to Arendtsville and Bendersville Elementary Schools.

o Optional deduct pricing for alternative HVAC systems is offered and can be discussed further during the development of the project.

• Program B – Addresses everything in Program A, as well as an addition to Arendtsville Elementary School and closing Bendersville Elementary School.

o Optional deduct pricing is offered and can be discussed further during the development of the project.

o Does not include deferred maintenance items related to Bendersville Elementary School

• Program C – Addresses everything in Program A, as well as a large addition to Biglerville Elementary and closing both Arendtsville and Bendersville Elementary Schools.

o Does not include deferred maintenance items related to Arendtsville or Bendersville Elementary Schools.

• Program D – Addresses everything in Program A, as well as a large addition to Arendtsville, reprogramming the schools so that Biglerville Elementary School becomes a K-2 grade school and Arendtsville Elementary School becomes a 3-6 grades school. This option repurposes Bendersville Elementary School as the new District Office.

o Does not include deferred maintenance items related to Bendersville Elementary Schools.

• Program E – Addresses everything in Program A, as well as smaller additions to Arendtsville and Bendersville Elementary Schools and reprogramming the schools so that Arendtsville and Bendersville Elementary Schools become K-2 Schools and Biglerville Elementary School becomes a 3-6 grades school.

o Optional deduct pricing is offered and can be discussed further during the development of the project.

Education Enhancement

McClure Company is willing to provide an educational enhancement program, as a part of the Guaranteed Energy Savings Act, which will align with the Upper Adams School District’s Mission Statement. The program will incorporate curriculum enhancement and behavior modification activities such as Student and Staff Energy Conservation Awareness, Student Vocational Training, Internship Programs, Educational Curriculum Materials for Teachers, Energy Competitions, Scholarships and Grants, among others.

Educational Improvement Tax Credit Program (EITC)

McClure Company, as a partner of public education, is willing to offer developing, on the District’s behalf, a STEM lab in the existing District buildings. In addition, McClure Company will donate half of the cost of the STEM lab (Approximately $125,000) utilizing the EITC Program.

The McClure Difference

Our resume in Pennsylvania is second to none and includes:

• No Change Orders. The scope of work developed as a part of the GESA project will be performed at no risk to the District for change orders.

• We’ve never been in litigation for construction or measurement and verification. Section 6, Subsection b includes ten (10) examples of projects we have performed, scope, and their contact information for you to verify the exceptional service provided by McClure Company.

• Off Balance Sheet Project Funding. McClure Company can provide the upfront capital in the form of a tax exempt municipal lease purchase agreement. This arrangement provides an alternative funding mechanism without a negative impact to the District’s current or future debt capacity.

• Hybrid Projects. Hybrid Projects use the GESA Model and include targeted renovations. It has been shown to be an efficient, cost effective method for Districts to target the most impactful upgrades and still leverage the energy savings and control of quality for the project.

In addition to having a strong local presence and reputation, we are also a Pennsylvania State Qualified Energy Services Company through the Pennsylvania Department of General Services (PA DGS) and accredited with the National Association of Energy Services Companies (NAESCO). Both of these qualifications require extensive project history review and customer reference interviews to ensure company performance prior to receiving accreditation.

In closing, we would like to sit down and go over the details of this submission. Our team is available to meet at the District and allow you to make your decision based on the interactions with our team.

Thank you for your consideration and please contact me for further information and/or clarification.

Sincerely,

Mark J. Gallick

Account Manager (717) 574-6539 [email protected]

Upper Adams School District Request for Proposal

March 6, 2018

Page 2

Table of Contents

TABLE OF CONTENTS ...............................................................................................................2

SECTION 5.1: ESCO GENERAL INFORMATION FORM...................................................3

SECTION 5.2: ESCO PA STATE QUALIFICATIONS FORM .............................................4

SECTION 5.3: ESCO PA PUBLIC SCHOOLS QUALIFICATION FORM .........................5

SECTION 5.4: EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ..............................................................................13

SECTION 5.5: PROJECT MANAGEMENT APPROACH ...................................................14

SECTION 5.6: PROJECT SCOPE OF WORK.......................................................................15

APPENDIX A: COMMISSIONING PLAN .............................................................................66

APPENDIX B: CERTIFICATES AND LETTER OF RECOMMENDATIONS.................69

Upper Adams School District Request for Proposal of Qualifications Response

March 6, 2018

Page 3

Section 5.1: ESCO General Information Form 1. Firm Name: McClure Company

a. Business Address: 4101 North Sixth St.

b. City: Harrisburg

c. State: Pennsylvania

d. County: Dauphin

e. Zip Code: 17110

2. Names and Titles of Two Contact People

a. Mark J. Gallick – Account Executive

i. Phone: (717) 574-6539

b. Shayne Homan – Director of Energy Services

i. Phone: (717) 648-9633

3. Submittal is for:

a. Parent Company

b. Division (attach separate list if more than one is to be included)

c. X Subsidiary

i. Name of Institution: MBMH

ii. Address: 4101 North Sixth St., Harrisburg, PA 17110

4. Date Prepared: March 6, 2018

5. Type of Firm:

a. X Corporation, if yes are you an LLC (Yes or No): No

b. Partnership

c. Sole Ownership

d. Joint Venture

6. Federal Employer Identification Number: 23-1420865

7. Year Firm was Established: 1953

8. Name and Address of Parent Company, If applicable:

MB Mechanical Holdings

4101 North Sixth St.

Harrisburg, PA 17110

9. Former Firm Name(s), if applicable:

Talen Energy – 4 Years

PPL Energy Services – 8 Years

PPL Spectrum, Inc. – 4 Years

Spectrum Energy Services Corp. – 2 Years

10. Affirm that the Firm has been conducting business as an ESCO for no less than five (5) years.

McClure Company has been conducting business as an ESCO for 20 years. In addition, McClure

Company is a qualified Commonwealth of Pennsylvania’s Department of General Services Guaranteed

Energy Savings Contract Provider as well as being accredited by the National Association of Energy

Services Companies (NAESCO) and has been since 2009.


March 6, 2018

Page 4

Section 5.2: ESCO PA State Qualifications Form 1. Confirm that your firm is prequalified by the PA Department of General Services for each of

the following:

a. Contractor for the Commonwealth’s Guaranteed Energy Savings Program

McClure Company is a qualified Contractor for the Commonwealth’s Guaranteed Energy Savings

Program. Our SAP Vendor Number is 117888 and our Contract number with DGS is 4400016700. Our

ITQ number is 83100000-ITQ-203.

b. Energy Consultant for Commonwealth’s Guaranteed Energy Savings Program

McClure Company is a qualified Energy Consultant for the Commonwealth’s Guaranteed Energy

Savings Program. Our SAP Vendor Number is 117888 and our Contract number with DGS is

4400016700. Our ITQ number is 83100000-ITQ-204.

c. Statewide Construction Management

McClure Company has been the Construction Manager on all their ESCO projects. This totals over

$300 Million Dollars’ worth of construction projects on over 130 ESCO projects.

d. Statewide Commissioning Agent

McClure Company has been the Construction Manager on all their ESCO projects. This totals over

$300 Million Dollars’ worth of construction projects on over 130 ESCO projects. A description of our

Commissioning strategy is included in Appendix A


March 6, 2018

Page 5

Section 5.3: ESCO PA Public Schools Qualification Form 1. Confirm that the Firm is qualified as an ESCO and has successfully completed no less than

five (5) guaranteed energy savings projects with Pennsylvania school districts. Provide a list of

projects and contact information

McClure Company has successfully completed more than one hundred and thirty (130) guaranteed

energy savings projects with Pennsylvania school districts. A list of projects and contact information

follows, along with a comprehensive list of all of the customers McClure Company has worked with

over the years.

West Perry School District Elliottsburg, PA

Primary ECMs:

District Wide Lighting Upgrade

District Wide Building Envelope Upgrade

ADA Upgrades

HVAC Upgrades

Administration Suite Renovation

Secure Entrance Upgrade

Bathroom Renovations

Gym Upgrades

Window & Roof Upgrades

Sidewalk & Paving Replacement

Site Drainage Upgrades

Playground Upgrades

Flooring Replacement

Painting

Brick Repointing and Caulking

Clock System Upgrades

Annual Savings: $438,643 Project Owner Name and Location

West Perry School District 2606 Shermans Valley Road, Elliottsburg, PA 17024

Contract Type Guaranteed Energy Services Agreement (GESA)

Project Size 456,928 Square Feet

Project Cost $8,442,921

Date Started May 2018

Date Completed October 2018

Contract Start & End Dates

June 2018 to May 2038

Annual Operational Savings, Type

$148,567 Equipment and Maintenance Savings

Method of Savings, M&V IPMVP Option A & B

Project References Dr. Michael O’Brien, Superintendent Telephone Number: (717) 789-3934 [email protected]

ESCO Project Team

Mark Gallick – Account Manager Shayne Homan, PE, CEM – Director Brian Moore – Engineering Christopher Stultz, PE – Sr. Energy Engineering

http://www.google.com/url?sa=i&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=images&cd=&cad=rja&uact=8&ved=0ahUKEwio6euC_5PYAhUSSt8KHe4ZBQAQjRwIBw&url=http://westperry.ss13.sharpschool.com/&psig=AOvVaw3U-isirQ7vXyRX06nMAaA3&ust=1513701297311973

http://www.google.com/url?sa=i&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=images&cd=&cad=rja&uact=8&ved=0ahUKEwj7n92MgJTYAhWlneAKHRRSAPAQjRwIBw&url=http://mtstandard.com/sports/high-school/track-and-field/three-ennis-athletes-qualify-for-state/article_23b9d20f-236a-591b-ad85-841d4e91cc51.html&psig=AOvVaw0H5b7nO3fm3-NhO22xgRsP&ust=1513701614634122


March 6, 2018

Page 6

Greencastle-Antrim School District Greencastle, PA

Primary ECMs:

HS & MS HVAC Upgrades

District Wide Lighting

Building Envelope

Fire Alarm Upgrades

Auditorium Rigging System Upgrades

Auditorium Stage Repairs and Replacement

Gym Floor Replacement

External Door Upgrades

Panic Notification System

Standardized Lock System

Water Softener Upgrades

Window Blind Upgrades

Back-Up PA and Bell System

HS & MS Painting

Sprinkler System Replacement

Bathroom Renovations

Annual Savings: $1.1M Project Owner Name and Location

Greencastle-Antrim School District 500 E. Leitersburg St. Greencastle, PA 17225

Contract Type Guaranteed Energy Services Agreement (GESA)


Project Cost $18,838,805 over four (4) phases

Date Started 2015

Date Completed 2018 (Phase 4)


June 20, 2015 to May 14, 2018


$25,316 Equipment and Maintenance Savings

Utility, O&M Savings Escalation

3%

Method of Savings, M&V IPMVP Option A, B, C & D

Project References Mrs. J.C. Wilson, Business Manager Telephone Number: (717) 597-3226 x 50503

ESCO Project Team

Mark J. Gallick– Account Manager Shayne Homan, PE, CEM – Director John Gunning, PE, CEM – Engineering Mark Hyser – Project Manager Michael Grochalski, EIT – Energy Engineering Andrew McKenna – Commissioning, Measurement & Verification

Unique and/or Challenging Aspects of Work

The project was unique in that there were many different facility improvement measures relating to various facility infrastructures. The management of the multiple partners on the project made the project challenging, but proved our value to the customer and ensured future phases. A Letter of Recommendation can be found later in this section.


March 6, 2018

Page 7

Waynesboro Area School District Morrisdale, PA

Primary ECMs:

District Wide Roof Repairs & Replacements

District Wide Lighting and Envelope Upgrades

MS HVAC System Upgrade & Domestic Hot Water

Replacement

ES Water Heater Upgrade

ES Boiler, Pumps, and Central Plant Controls

Replacement

Administration Building Boiler Replacement & Attic

Insulation

MS & ES Gas line extension

All ES’s HVAC Upgrade

HS Locker Room & Choral Room Upgrade

Administration Building Mechanical System Upgrade


Waynesboro Area School District 210 Clayton Avenue Waynesboro, PA 17268

Project Size $12,308,669

Project Cost June 1, 2010 (Phase 1)

Date Started September 2, 2012 (Phase 3)

Date Completed May 25, 2010 to April 3, 2032


$211,521, Equipment and Maintenance Savings


IPMVP Option A, B, & D

Method of Savings, M&V Mr. Edward Wilson, V.P., WASD Board of Education Telephone Number: (717) 729-0782

Project References Waynesboro Area School District 210 Clayton Avenue Waynesboro, PA 17268

ESCO Project Team

Shayne Homan, PE, CEM – Director of Energy Services Matthew Tressler, PE, CEM – Senior Engineer Brian Moore, LEED GA – Engineering Alyssa Wingenfield, EIT, LEED AP – Engineering Chris Stultz, E.I.T., CEM – Energy Engineer Bill Smith – Measurement and Verification Dean Badorf – Construction Management


March 6, 2018

Page 8

Moon Area School District Moon Township, PA

Primary ECMs:

Brooks Elementary HVAC

Upgrades

Allard Elementary HVAC Upgrades

Hyde Elementary HVAC Upgrades


Moon Area School District 8353 University Boulevard, Moon Township, PA 15108


Project Cost $4,243,499

Date Started June, 2015

Date Completed May, 2016


June, 2015 to May, 2017


$0, Equipment and Maintenance Savings

Method of Savings, M&V 3%

Project References IPMVP Option A, B, & D

ESCO Project Team

Mr. A. Donald Main II AIA – Architect MM Architects 103 South Duck Street Lancaster, PA 17602 (717) 393-3211 [email protected]

Unique and/or Challenging Aspects of Work

Hybrid Project (Both PlanCon and GESA Component)


March 6, 2018

Page 9

East Lycoming School District Hughesville, PA

Primary ECMs:

High School Complete HVAC

System

High School Biomass Boiler

Plant & Building

Construction

High School 600 KW Solar

PV System

Two Elementary School

Geothermal HVAC Systems

District Wide Lighting

Retrofit

District Wide ATC System

Vocational Technical

Building HVAC System


East Lycoming School District 349 Cemetery St., Hughesville, PA 17737


Project Cost $13,770,779 over fourteen (14) phases

Date Started June 15, 2002 (Phase 1)

Date Completed September 30, 2012 (Phase 13)

Contract Start & End Dates March 11, 2002 to June 19, 2032


$139,178, Equipment and Maintenance Savings

Method of Savings, M&V IPMVP Option A, B, C, & D Project References Mr. Dave Maciejewski, Business Manager

Telephone: (570) 584-2131 [email protected]

ESCO Project Team

Shayne Homan, PE, CEM – Director of Energy Services Brian Moore, LEED GA – Engineering Alyssa Wingenfield, EIT, LEED AP – Engineering Richard Skinner, PE, CEM – Measurement & Verification Bill Smith – Commissioning Jeff Hockenbrock – Construction Management

mailto:[email protected]


March 6, 2018

Page 10

Conewago Valley School District New Oxford, PA

Primary ECMs:

Technical Education Addition

M.S./H.S. HVAC Upgrade

Lighting Upgrade

Building Envelope

Generator Upgrade

Secure Entrance Upgrade

Flooring Replacement

Ceiling Tile Replacement

Parking Lot Repaving

Window and Door Upgrades

Roofing Upgrades

Active Hybrid Development Reference Project Owner Name and Location

Conewago Valley School District 130 Berlin Road, New Oxford, PA 17350


Project Cost $15-$17 Million

Date Started June 2018

Date Completed September 30, 2012 (Phase 13)

Contract Start & End Dates March 11, 2002 to June 19, 2032


TBD

Method of Savings, M&V IPMVP Option A, B, C, & D Project References Dr. Russell Greenholt - Superintendent

Telephone: (717) 624-2157 [email protected]

ESCO Project Team

Mark J. Gallick – Account Executive Brian Moore, LEED GA – Engineering Alyssa Wingenfield, EIT, LEED AP – Engineering Richard Skinner, PE, CEM – Measurement & Verification Bill Smith – Commissioning Justin Seigler – Construction Management

mailto:[email protected]


March 6, 2018

Page 11

a. References: Adams County Government

Bald Eagle Area School District

Beaver County

Bedford County

Bellefonte Area School District

Benton Area School District

Bethany Towers

Bishop Hafey High School

Bloomsburg Hospital

Bryn Mawr College

Cameron County School District

Camp Hill School District

Carbon County Area VTS

Carlisle Water Pollution Control

Facility

Central PA Institute of Science

and Technology

Chichester School District

City of Allentown

City of Bethlehem

City of Bethlehem Ice Rink

City of Harrisburg

City of Lock Haven

Clearfield County Career &

Technology Center

Columbia-Montour AVTS

Commonwealth of PA, DPW,

Selinsgrove Center

Commonwealth of PA, DPW,

White Haven Center

Danville Area School District

Delaware Valley College

Derry Township School District

Eastern Lebanon County School

District

East Lycoming School District

Forest City Regional School

District

Fox Chase Cancer Center

Geisinger Health System

Good Shepherd Rehab Center

Gnauden Huetten

Greencastle Antrim School

District

Greenwood School District

Halifax Area School District

Hamilton Health

Hazleton Area School District

Jim Thorpe School District

Juniata County School District

Juniata County Government

King’s College

Lackawanna Trail School District

Lakeland School District

School District of Lancaster

Lehighton Area School District

Linden Hall School for Girls

Lycoming College

Lycoming Career and Technology

Center

Meadville Area Recreational

Facility

Mifflin County School District

Mifflin-Juniata Career and

Technology Center

Millville Area School District

Minersville Area School District

Moon Area School District

Mount Carmel Area School

District

Northampton County

Northern Potter School District

Northern York County School

District

Northumberland County AVTS

Northwest Area School District

Northwest Lehigh School District

Old Forge School District

Panther Valley School District

PA State Education Association

(PSEA)

Philipsburg-Osceola Area School

District

Pinnacle Health Systems

Pine Grove Area Chool District

Ringgold School District

St. Joseph’s University

Sacred Heart Hospital

Salisbury Area School District

Schuylkill County Government

South Eastern School District

South Middleton School District

Southern Tioga School District

Steelton Highspire School District

Sunbury Hospital

Susquehanna Township School

District

Tamaqua Area School District

Tri-Valley School District

Tunkhannock School District

Troy Area School District

Tuscarora School District

United School District

Upper Dauphin Area School

District

U.S. Naval Support Station,

Mechanicsburg, PA

Wallenpaupack Area School

District

Waynesboro Area School District

Weatherly Area School District

West Branch Area School District

West Perry School District

Williamsport Area School District

York County Government


March 6, 2018

Page 12

2. Confirm that the Firm is qualified as an Agency Construction Management firm and has

successfully completed no less than five (5) Agency CM projects (outside of ESCO projects)

with Pennsylvania school districts that include both major renovation and construction of new

schools. Provide a list of projects and contact information.

McClure Company Energy Services’ core business is ESCO. Each of these projects requires the ESCO

to be a Construction Manager. This totals over $300 Million Dollars’ worth of construction projects on

over 130 ESCO projects.

Requiring this classification limits the Districts responses to only one company for this project.

3. Confirm that the Firm is qualified as an MEP Design firm and has successfully completed no

less than five (5) MEP Design projects (outside of ESCO projects) with Pennsylvania school

districts that include both major renovation and construction of new schools. Provide a list of

projects and contact information.

McClure Company Energy Services’ core business is ESCO. The vast majority of our projects include

design and installation of MEP systems. In fact, McClure Company has the unique ability to self-

perform the engineering and installation of these systems which provides a substantial cost benefit to our

customers.

4. Confirm that the Firm is qualified as a Commissioning firm and has successfully completed no

less than five (5) Commissioning projects (outside of ESCO projects) with Pennsylvania school

districts that include both major renovation and construction of new schools. Provide a list of

projects and contact information.

McClure Company Energy Services’ core business is ESCO. Each of these projects requires the ESCO

to be a Commissioning Agent. This totals over $300 Million Dollars’ worth of construction projects on

over 130 ESCO projects.

Requiring this classification limits the Districts responses to only one company for this project.

5. Confirm that the Firm has not been involved with any projects where legal action or

injunctions have been sought as a result of the work provided by the Firm. If legal action or

injunctions have been sought provide an explanation and attach any opinions that resulted.

McClure Company has never been named in any legal action or injunction because of any Guaranteed

Energy Savings Agreements.

The recent case of Wescott v. Delaware County Intermediate Unit (DCIU), referenced in Section 1.3 of

this RFP, found in favor of DCIU in both the local trial and appellate courts. McClure Company was

“involved” in this project as the Mechanical Engineer, Mechanical Contractor and Electrical

Construction Manager. Likewise, all other professionals and contractors who provided services and

equipment to the project were also “involved” including but not limited to; Architect, General

Contractor, Roofing Contractor, Kitchen Equipment Manufacturer, Construction Manager, Electrical

Engineer, Plumbing Engineer and Structural Engineer.


March 6, 2018

Page 13

Section 5.4: Executive Summary McClure Company (McClure) appreciates the opportunity to provide our qualifications for a guaranteed

energy savings program for the District. Founded in 1953, McClure Company has built a strong reputation

as a quality full-service contractor in Pennsylvania. Also, within the past three (3) years, McClure

Company has helped our K-12 GESA customers secure approximately $3.5M in grants, low interest loans

and utility rebates. Furthermore, McClure Company is headquartered in Pennsylvania and accredited by

NAESCO (www.naesco.com).

No Change Orders

The scope of work developed as a part of the GESA project will be performed at no risk to the District for

change orders.

We’ve never been in litigation for construction or measurement and verification.

Page 5 of this submission gives examples of projects we have performed, scope, and their contact

information for you to verify the exceptional service provided by McClure Company.

Off Balance Sheet Project Funding

McClure Company can provide the upfront capital in the form of a tax exempt municipal lease purchase

agreement. This arrangement provides an alternative funding mechanism without a negative impact to the

District’s current or future debt capacity.

Unique Ability to Self-Perform Construction

In most renovation projects Mechanical Design and Construction is one of the most dominant cost factors.

Our unique ability to self-perform mechanical design and construction eliminates the need to subcontract

this work resulting in less layers of markup. When compared to other ESCOs serving solely as construction

managers, self-performing mechanical construction has proven to provide a significant cost savings. For

this reason, McClure is able to incorporate a larger scope of work without increasing project costs.

The District’s facilities have an opportunity to gain energy efficiencies while making improvements to areas

such as HVAC, Building Automation Systems, lighting, security systems, building envelope, as well as

many other areas of opportunity. We are excited for the opportunity to partner with the District and assist

you in addressing your facility needs.

Removed Budget Variable with Fixed Cost

Upon completion of the final system selection and analysis, we will deliver fixed hard and soft costs

associated with the system. This is possible through the Integrated Project Delivery method where all major

stakeholders (engineer, contractors, subcontractors, estimators, Architect and District) are able to openly and

effectively communicate upfront. This enables “unknowns” to be identified upfront and not subjected to

multiple change orders.

Our Submission

Our submission will demonstrate the thoroughness of our work. In three short weeks we have provided the

District with an evaluation of multiple options. Some of these options are unique to McClure as we

developed them from input from the District Administration and Staff, outside vendors and financial

advisors familiar with the District. The options are detailed in Section 5.6 of this submission.

http://www.naesco.com/


March 6, 2018

Page 14

Section 5.5: Project Management Approach General As the project begins, the Team will utilize “Microsoft Project” as our planning software. Communication and coordination with the District’s staff is critical to the success of a performance contract. We plan to meet with the District’s personnel on a regular basis, via weekly management meetings, to review progress and ensure communications are maintained. Our Project Manager will keep meeting minutes and assign action items to the appropriate parties as required.

Installation schedules will be communicated to the District’s personnel to facilitate coordination of our work and minimize building disruption. It will be the responsibility of McClure Company to obtain any and all required permits and governmental approval to meet the needs of the District.

We have developed a detailed Implementation Schedule which may be found at the end of this section. Successful execution of the plan will be accomplished through the Project Management Process (see Organizational Chart and Project Team Members). Justin Seigler is the Project Manager for Upper Adams School District. Justin will report directly to Dean Badorf, McClure Company’s Construction Manager. We can assure Upper Adams School District that this project can and will be completed successfully in the time frame that is required by the District.

Bid Procurement

McClure Company has the ability to utilize this legislation to maximize savings for our clients rather than

going through the traditional “lowest responsible bidder” procurement method, the District has the option of

implementing energy related upgrades through a Guaranteed Energy Savings Agreement (GESA). The

dominant energy upgrades specific to this renovation is replacement of the existing HVAC system. The

District will reap the following benefits by incorporating the HVAC upgrades through a Guaranteed Energy

Savings Agreement:

• Guaranteed Energy Savings - The District’s investment in the new system will be validated based

on actual energy consumption.

• High Quality Installation - McClure Company is a highly reputable mechanical engineering and

contracting firm and will be the single source of responsibility for all aspects of the new system;

initial specifications, procurement, installation, commissioning, measurement and verification.

• District Control - A Guaranteed Energy Savings Agreement is a performance-based contract,

therefore not subjected to the typical “lowest responsible bidder” procurement method. Collectively,

the District, and McClure Company can determine and specify the exact equipment and building

automation systems to be utilized for the project.

Accountability Guaranteed Energy Savings legislation was intentionally designed to make companies accountable. Because of their tie to energy savings, it is in the best interest of the ESCO to provide thorough commissioning, timely construction and closeout. These are important because the ESCO is guaranteeing the results of the project and without a robust Construction Management approach; these savings will be put in jeopardy. Our Project managers are an integral part of the development, implementation, closeout, and guarantee of our project to ensure customer satisfaction.

McClure Company leverages their customer references to obtain future work. Because of this, we are incentivized to make sure these projects are completed properly. One bad reference will affect our business far more than any other single event.

McClure Company has performed projects and utilized Liquidated Damages to ensure timely completion. These terms are negotiated with the District to ensure mutually beneficial results.


March 6, 2018

Page 15

Section 5.6: Project Scope of Work McClure Company is please to provide Upper Adams School District with the facility study and multiple

options to address the District needs. These Programs should be considered budgetary only as they need

further development and investigation to ensure that the scope balances the District’s needs with the

District’s budget.

District Needs

Through multiple interviews with the District Administration, the following needs were addressed:

1. Grade 4 Student Split

Currently the entire District K-3 student base attends Biglerville Elementary. Students are then required to

separate and attend either Arendtsville Elementary School or Bendersville Elementary School. This

negatively impacts the students within the District.

2. Provide cooling to all schools in the District

Currently two (2) of the District schools do not provide cooling. Arendtsville Elementary and Bendersville

Elementary Schools are heating only schools.

3. The District is in need of additional Support Services Space

While the existing enrollment shows a declining trend, the schools are at a high percentage of occupancy.

The District desires additional space to be used for Support Services offered by the District and third party

organizations.

4. Identifying and addressing deferred maintenance items in the District

Several of the systems in the District Facilities are approaching end of useful life and should be addressed.

The District needs to identify potential costs and a plan to upgrade these systems.

5. Additional Pre-K and Special Needs Space

The District would like to add an additional Pre-K classroom to be used for their Pre-K program.

The existing High School Special Education classroom is located in the Auditorium. This is not ideal as the

tiered structure of the Auditorium negatively impacts the physically challenged students in the class.

6. The citizens of the District have expressed interest in maintaining community schools in

Arendtsville and Bendersville

There are several programs that have been developed to close one or both of these schools. Significant

outcry from the citizenry has occurred from these programs.

Program Summary

Figure 1.0 below provides a snapshot of the options that are provided by McClure as a result of the Request

for Proposal by Upper Adams School District. The Program costs are provided for the District to evaluate

multiple options. These prices are not intended to be final pricing. Costs are based on historical data and

industrial standard cost matrices. Final pricing will be developed as the District finalizes its educational

program and defines the scope of building upgrades.

At the time of this submission, the utility data, historical student enrollment, and historic

maintenance costs were not made available to McClure Company. Because of this, average utility

consumption, operational hours, and rates were used based on previous Districts historical project

history. More exact calculations can be made when this information is made available.


March 6, 2018

Page 16

A description of each option is provided in the following pages of this section of the submission.

FFiigguurree 11..00 –– PPrrooggrraamm SSuummmmaarryy

ECM Description ECM ECM

Developmen

t Program Program Program Program Program

Cost Savings Status A B C D E

1 Arendtsville Elementary School Building Wide HVAC Upgrade (Cooling) -$ -$ Budget (2)

Deduct - 4-Pipe Unit Ventilators $450K-$550K -$ Budget (2)

Deduct - Classroom Cooling Only (VRF) $1.1M-$1.3M -$ Budget (2)

2 Bendersville Elementary School Buidling Wide HVAC Upgrade (Cooling) -$ -$ Budget (2)



3 Biglerville Elementary Targeted HVAC Upgrade -$ -$ Budget (2)

4 Middle/High School Targeted HVAC Upgrade -$ -$ Budget (2)

5 Middle/High School Targeted Control Upgrade -$ -$ Budget (2)

6 District Wide LED Lighting Upgrades (Interior & Exterior) -$ -$ Budget (2)

7 District Wide Buidling Envelope Upgrades -$ -$ Budget (2)

8 District Wide Mechanical Insulation Upgrade -$ -$ Budget (2)

9 District Wide Transformer Upgrades -$ -$ Budget (2)

10 District Wide Refrigeration Motor Upgrades -$ -$ Budget (2)

11 District Wide Plug Load Management Upgrade -$ -$ Budget (2)

12 Arendtsville Elementary School Addition (Close Bendersville) -$ -$ Budget (2)

Gymnasium Deduct $2.4M-$2.6M -$ Budget (2)

Science Classroom Deduct $225K-$275K -$ Budget (2)

Administration Deduct $225K-$275K -$ Budget (2)

Library Expansion Deduct $225K-$275K -$ Budget (2)

Kitchen Expansion Deduct $250K-$300K -$ Budget (2)

13 Biglerville Elementary School Classroom Addition (Close A.E.S. & B.E.S.) -$ -$ Budget (2)

14Arendtsville Elementary School Addition & Reprogramming (D.A.O. to

B.E.S.)-$ -$ Budget

(2)

15 Existing School Reprogramming -$ -$ Budget (2)

Arendtsville Gymnasium Deduct $1.35M-$1.85M -$ Budget (2)

Arendtsville Four (4) Classroom Addition Deduct $1.65M-$2.15M -$ Budget (2)

Bendersville Gymnasium Deduct $1.35M-$1.85M -$ Budget (2)

Bendersville Four (4) Classroom Addition Deduct $1.65M-$2.15M -$ Budget (2)

Program A Program B Program C Program D Program E

$6.6M-$7.6M $15.0M-16.5M $19.0M-$20.5M $18.5M-$20.0M $12.0M-$14.0M

20 20 20 20 20

$1.5M-$2.0M $5.5M-$6.5M $6.0M-$7.0M $4.0M-$5.0M $2.0M-$3.0M

$5.1M-$5.6M $9.5M-10.0M $13.0M-$13.5M $14.5M-15.0M $10.0M-$11.0M(1) ECM Developed and Pricing should be considered firm.(2) ECM requires further study. Pricing should be considered +/- 10%

Actual Project Cost (TPC-S):

Total Project Costs (TPC):

Project Term (Years):

20 Year Energy and Operational Savings (S):

Upper Adams School District Energy Conservation Measures


March 6, 2018

Page 17

PPrrooggrraamm AA -- DDiissttrriicctt WWiiddee FFaacciilliittiieess SSuurrvveeyy

4th Grade Separation

Air Conditioning All Buildings

Support Services

Space

Collaborative Learning

Pre-K & Special Space

Maintain Community

Schools

Deferred Maintenance

- Addresses

- Partially Addresses

- Does Not Address

FFiigguurree 11..11 –– DDiissttrriicctt PPrriioorriittyy MMaattrriixx

SSuummmmaarryy::

This program was developed to identify and address the deferred maintenance items within the District.

The following section explains, by school, the items that McClure was able to identify through interviews

with staff, Administration, and service providers familiar with the District..


March 6, 2018

Page 18


Developmen

t Program Program Program Program Program

Cost Savings Status A B C D E
























B.E.S.)-$ -$ Budget

(2)






Program A Program B Program C Program D Program E

$6.6M-$7.6M $15.0M-16.5M $19.0M-$20.5M $18.5M-$20.0M $12.0M-$14.0M

20 20 20 20 20

$1.5M-$2.0M $5.5M-$6.5M $6.0M-$7.0M $4.0M-$5.0M $2.0M-$3.0M

$5.1M-$5.6M $9.5M-10.0M $13.0M-$13.5M $14.5M-15.0M $10.0M-$11.0M(1) ECM Developed and Pricing should be considered firm.(2) ECM requires further study. Pricing should be considered +/- 10%

Actual Project Cost (TPC-S):






March 6, 2018

Page 19

CASH FLOW

Upper Adams School District

Biglerville, PA

Project Proforma Cash Flows

20 Year Lease Term

One Time Escalation

7,600,000 Electric 0.0%

- Annual Escalation Rates

7,600,000 Electric 3.00%

Oil, Gallons 3.00%

Propane, Gallons3.00%

Natural Gas, CCF3.00%

74,431 Tons, Coal 3.00%

Water 3.00%

Maintenance 3.00%

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8

Total Avoided Lease Performance Net Accumulated

Year Savings Capital Payments Assurance Savings Savings

Outlays

const. - 0 -

1 74,431 74,431 457,144 531,576 - 0 -

2 76,664 76,664 454,911 531,576 - 0 -

3 78,964 78,964 452,612 531,576 - 0 -

4 81,333 81,333 450,243 531,576 - 0 -

5 83,773 83,773 447,803 531,576 - 0 -

6 86,286 86,286 445,289 531,576 - 0 -

7 88,875 88,875 442,701 531,576 - 0 -

8 91,541 91,541 440,035 531,576 - 0 -

9 94,287 94,287 437,288 531,576 - 0 -

10 97,116 97,116 434,460 531,576 - 0 -

11 100,030 100,030 431,546 531,576 - 0 -

12 103,030 103,030 428,545 531,576 - 0 -

13 106,121 106,121 425,454 531,576 - 0 -

14 109,305 109,305 422,271 531,576 - 0 -

15 112,584 112,584 418,992 531,576 - 0 -

16 115,962 115,962 415,614 531,576 - 0 -

17 119,441 119,441 412,135 531,576 - 0 -

18 123,024 123,024 408,552 531,576 - 0 -

19 126,714 126,714 404,861 531,576 - 0 -

20 130,516 130,516 401,060 531,576 - 0 -

2,000,000 2,000,000 8,631,516 10,631,516 - 0

Guaranteed Energy Savings Project

Total Project Cost

Less: Customer Equity

Energy &

Operational

Savings

Total Amount Financed

Total First Year Savings


March 6, 2018

Page 20

AArreennddttssvviillllee EElleemmeennttaarryy SScchhooooll

Address 136 Fohl Street, Arendtsville, PA 17303

Original Construction 1955

Building Square Footage 38,900 Sq. Ft.

Addition/Renovations 1969, 1989

Current Grade Grouping Grades 4-6

Building Capacity 225

Building Envelope

The building envelope is in good condition. There are no signs of brick pointing deteriorating. Some of the

caulking in the building joints and around windows is in need of replacement.

The original section of the building has single pain windows in the classrooms. The original construction

consisted of window walls that were enclosed in the wall during a renovation. To replace the windows, the

dryvit on the outside and drywall inside would need to be removed. The windows will not generate savings

that would pay for the replacement within the usable life of the windows.

The exterior doors are aluminum doors that are in fair shape. The weather-stripping on these doors should

be replaced

The roofing was evaluated by Tremco. The roof is in good condition. It was recommended that the District

implement a maintenance program for this roof to prolong the usable life.

Interior Finishes

The flooring is in fair condition. The District can expect to receive many more years of life from the

existing floors. Large scale replacement of the flooring would be for aesthetic reasons only.

The acoustical tile in the school is in poor condition. Because there is no humidity control in the building,

the ceiling tiles are beginning to sag. Leaks and accessing the ceiling has caused stains and broken tile

respectively. While there is no energy benefit, the acoustical tile should be addressed in the near future

The walls are constructed of drywall and masonry and finished with paint. The paint is in poor condition

and shows signs of leaks. A program to systematically paint the school should be implemented..

PPhhyyssiiccaall PPllaanntt

The HVAC system was installed in 2007 and is in good condition. It consists of a 2-pipe hot water system

with unit ventilators in the classrooms. The central heating plant contains two (2) natural gas fired Thermal

Solution boilers.

The automatic temperature controls were installed in 2007 and is in good condition. The system utilizes

pneumatic actuation for some of the systems. The pneumatic system should either be maintained, or the

pneumatic actuation should be replaced with electric actuation.

Cooling is only provided in certain rooms, such as the cafeteria and administration office. A comprehensive

cooling upgrade should be evaluated.


March 6, 2018

Page 21

The domestic water systems and plumbing systems are in good working order and do not require any work

at this time.

The electrical system is in good working order and does not require any work at this time.

The emergency generator, paging and intercom, data networking, and fire alarm system are in good working

order and do not require any work at this time.

BBeennddeerrssvviillllee EElleemmeennttaarryy SScchhooooll

AAddddrreessss 113377 CCaarrlliissllee SSttrreeeett,, BBeennddeerrssvviillllee,, PPAA 1177330066

OOrriiggiinnaall CCoonnssttrruuccttiioonn 11995511

BBuuiillddiinngg SSqquuaarree FFoooottaaggee 3388,,550000 SSqq.. FFtt..

AAddddiittiioonn//RReennoovvaattiioonnss 11998899

CCuurrrreenntt GGrraaddee GGrroouuppiinngg GGrraaddeess 44--66

BBuuiillddiinngg CCaappaacciittyy 117755

BBuuiillddiinngg EEnnvveellooppee

The building envelope is in good condition. There are no signs of brick pointing deteriorating. Some of the caulking

in the building joints and around windows is in need of replacement.

The original section of the building has single pain windows in the classrooms. The original construction consisted of

window walls that were enclosed in the wall during a renovation. To replace the windows, the dryvit on the outside

and drywall inside would need to be removed. The windows will not generate savings that would pay for the

replacement within the usable life of the windows.

The exterior doors are aluminum doors that are in fair shape. The weather-stripping on these doors should be replaced



IInntteerriioorr FFiinniisshheess

The flooring is in fair condition. The District can expect to receive many more years of life from the existing floors.

Large scale replacement of the flooring would be for aesthetic reasons only.

The acoustical tile in the school is in poor condition. Because there is no humidity control in the building, the ceiling

tiles are beginning to sag. Leaks and accessing the ceiling has caused stains and broken tile, respectively. While

there is no energy benefit, the acoustical tile should be addressed in the near future.

The walls are constructed of drywall and masonry and finished with paint. The paint is in poor condition and shows

signs of leaks. A program to systematically paint the school should be implemented.


The HVAC system was installed in 2007 and is in good condition. It consists of a 2-pipe hot water system

with unit ventilators in the classrooms. The central heating plant contains two (2) natural gas fired Thermal

Solution boilers.


March 6, 2018

Page 22

The automatic temperature controls were installed in 2007 and is in good condition. The system utilizes

pneumatic actuation for some of the systems. The pneumatic system should either be maintained, or the

pneumatic actuation should be replaced with electric actuation.

Cooling is only provided in certain rooms, such as the cafeteria and administration office. A comprehensive

cooling upgrade should be evaluated.


at this time.




BBiigglleerrvviillllee EElleemmeennttaarryy SScchhooooll

AAddddrreessss 33227700 BBiigglleerrvviillllee RRooaadd,, BBiigglleerrvviillllee,, PPAA

1177330077



AAddddiittiioonn//RReennoovvaattiioonnss 22000055

CCuurrrreenntt GGrraaddee GGrroouuppiinngg GGrraaddeess KK--33


Building Envelope

The building envelope is in good condition. There are no signs of brick pointing deteriorating.

The windows are a wood frame window with the outside clad in aluminum. Two (2) window sections are

rotting due to soffit issues above. These windows should be replaced.


be replaced

The roofing was evaluated by Tremco. The roof is in good condition. The soffit and gutter system on the

roof is in need of repair/replacement. It appears that the gutter system is causing some of the windows to rot

because of water infiltration.

Interior Finishes



The acoustical tile in the school is in fair condition. Insulation was installed directly on the ceiling and it is

causing the acoustical tile to bow. Several tiles have been replaced with tile that does not match. The

insulation system should be upgraded prior to addressing the ceiling tile.


March 6, 2018

Page 23

The walls are constructed of drywall and masonry and finished with paint. The paint is in good condition.

A program to systematically paint the school should be implemented.


The HVAC system is original to the construction of the sections of the building. The system is a VAV

system with hot water reheat coils. Direct Expansion air handling units provide the conditioned air to the

VAVs. The central heat plant consists of three (3) natural gas Patterson-Kelley boilers. The burners were

replaced in 2015 and are in good condition. The maintenance staff has indicated that the air handling units

are a source of persistent failures. The systems are installed in a location that makes service difficult. The

air handling units use R-22 refrigerant, which is being phased out. A comprehensive upgrade of the air

handling units should be evaluated

The automatic temperature control system was installed in 2005 and is in good condition.


at this time.




MMiiddddllee//HHiigghh SScchhooooll

AAddddrreessss 116611 NN.. MMaaiinn SSttrreeeett,, BBiigglleerrvviillllee,, PPAA 1177330077



AAddddiittiioonn//RReennoovvaattiioonnss 6600’’ss,, 7700’’ss,, 22000000

CCuurrrreenntt GGrraaddee GGrroouuppiinngg GGrraaddeess 77--1122


Building Envelope

The building envelope is in good condition. There are no signs of brick pointing deteriorating.

The windows appear to be in good condition.


be replaced.



Interior Finishes



The acoustical tile in the school is in fair condition.


March 6, 2018

Page 24

Existing AAON RTU

Existing DX Units

The walls are constructed of drywall and masonry and finished with paint. The paint is in good condition.

A program to systematically paint the school should be implemented.

Physical Plant

The HVAC system was installed in 2001. The system is a VAV roof top unit system. The central heat plant

consists of three (3) natural gas boilers and is in good condition. The maintenance staff has indicated that

the roof top units are a source of persistent failures. The roof top units are approaching the end of their

useful life. A comprehensive upgrade of the air handling units should be evaluated

The automatic temperature controls was installed in 2001. The VAV controllers are failing and causing

temperature problems throughout the building. These problems are exasperating the roof top unit failures.

A comprehensive upgrade of the VAV controllers should be evaluated.

The system utilizes pneumatic actuation for some of the systems. The pneumatic system should either be

maintained, or the pneumatic actuation should be replaced with electric actuation.


at this time.




DDeeffeerrrreedd MMaaiinntteennaannccee MMeeaassuurreess

Biglerville Elementary School Targeted HVAC Upgrade

McClure is proposing the replacement of the (5) variable air volume

(VAV) air handling units (AHU) and associated condensing units at

Biglerville Elementary. The units were installed in 1993 when the

building was originally constructed. The units require considerable

maintenance and are having issues with leaking drain pans and other

equipment deterioration. These units are at the end of their expected

equipment life and are therefore recommended for replacement.

McClure will provide (5) AHUs and associated condensing units in the

same locations as existing. Two of the condensing units will utilize the

existing concrete pads on grade and the other (3) condensing units will

reuse the existing structural roof supports for mounting. The existing refrigerant piping will be demolished

and replaced with new for each unit.

Middle/High School Targeted HVAC Upgrades

McClure is proposing the replacement of the (14) AAON rooftop

units (RTU) serving the High School/Middle School. The

existing units provide DX cooling to the building. The single

zone Cafeteria and Auditorium units are provided with gas heat

in the unit. Most of the units are provided with an enthalpy

wheel and space heating is handled at the downstream terminal


March 6, 2018

Page 25

VAV Box with Controller

units with hot water heating coils. The RTUs were installed in 2000, so they are nearing the end of their

anticipated equipment life. ASHRAE indicates an approximate service life of 15-20 years for this type of

equipment. The units are becoming more of a maintenance issue as compressors and other components of

the RTUs are being replaced more regularly.

The units will be replaced in kind with new RTUs in the same location. A few of the units currently

recirculate exhaust air from restrooms with a combined return/exhaust duct system. This is a code violation

that will be addressed by McClure with the installation of the new equipment.

Middle/High School Targeted Control Upgrades

The VAV box controllers installed in 1999 have begun to

fail and are causing issues with equipment control and

occupant comfort. The controller has been consistently

failing at the air flow differential pressure monitor. The

result of this controller failure is the air flow reading is

zero and consequentially the output will fully open the

air flow damper. The standard control sequence for a

VAV box is to control air flow between a minimum air

flow and a maximum air flow based on the temperature

differential between the space temperature and the space

temperature setpoint.

The proposed control upgrade is to replace all the controls for each VAV box in the high school and middle

school. There is a total of one hundred and twenty-two (122) VAV boxes. There are three different type of

boxes: fan-powered with hot water coil, Close-off boxes with a hot water coil and close-off with an electric

coil. The quantity of each box is listed below:

Fan powered with hot water 61

Close-off with hot water 35

Close-off with electric 26

The control replacement for each box will include:

New VAV box controller – which will include the air flow damper actuator

Space temperature sensor

Discharge air sensor

Hot water valve – if required

McClure Company will install the hot water valve provided by the ATC supplier. A balancer will be hired

to insure the air flow reading of the new controller is accurate. The balancer will read the actual air flow, the

air flow coefficient of the VAV box controller will be adjusted so the reading of the controller matches the

reading by the balancer.

The high school gymnasium has four air handlers that are part of the automation system, but the control

devices are pneumatic. Control devices that are pneumatic include the control valves and damper actuators.

There is no issue using pneumatic control devices as part of an automation system, the issue currently is that

the end devices have begun to fail and the pneumatic tubing has also begun to fail creating leaks in the


March 6, 2018

Page 26

Proposed LED Light

pneumatic system which does not allow pressure to build up in the pneumatic tube and control issues arise.

That is the current operating condition for the gymnasium area air handlers and there are currently numerous

resulting comfort issues.

The controls for the four gymnasium air handlers will be completely replaced and upgraded to the latest

operating version of controller. All the temperature sensors will be replaced along with all pneumatic

control devices. The new electronic valves will be provided by the ATC contractor and installed by

McClure Company.

EEnneerrggyy CCoonnsseerrvvaattiioonn MMeeaassuurreess

Along with the deferred maintenance items identified above, McClure Company evaluated the facilities for

potential energy upgrades that will reduce the utility, operations, and maintenance budgets. The reduction

would allow the District to divert funds from those budgets to help offset the costs of the capital program

that they are considering.

District Wide Lighting Upgrades

The existing facility is a mix of primarily 32-Watt and 28-

Watt T8 fixtures of varying vintages. There are also

incandescent fixtures in select locations. While the T8

fixtures are from the style of fluorescent lamps most

commonly used today, the wattages can vary greatly, along

with the condition and type of ballasts, making T8 fixtures a

prime candidate for upgrades to LED technology.

This measure includes the necessary components to retrofit

the existing fixtures to a Type B LED installation, in which

new tombstones are installed to accept line voltage to drive a

compatible self-ballasted LED tube lamp. This requires some rework of the existing fixtures to

accommodate the LED lamp but provides the best upfront cost and savings. Select fixtures may require

replacement as modification of the existing is cost prohibitive. New fixtures will be only used where

necessary and will be consistent in design with the retrofit fixtures to provide equipment continuity. Any

incandescent or CFL lamp will also be replaced with new LED fixtures compatible with the fixtures they are

installed in. Lighting controls (occupancy sensors) were identified for areas that typically benefit from the

technology, such as group meeting areas, restrooms, and offices, however due to the lower wattage of LED

tubes, lighting controls do no pay back within the 20-year threshold for the ESCO project and are not

recommended.

This measure also provides an opportunity for utility sponsored rebates on the LED lamps.

In addition, given the existing system conditions at the facility and the cost effectiveness of the LED

installation, McClure is not recommending replacement with a non-LED solution. A fluorescent lamp

solution would require the same labor costs for upgrades, with new ballasts and lamps, along with select

fixture replacements and only a slight savings on the material (lamps). The fluorescent lamp solution would

not provide the same level of savings or the level of potential for utility sponsored rebates. For these

reasons, McClure has not proposed this solution.

District Wide Building Envelope Upgrades


March 6, 2018

Page 27

Existing Transformer

Infiltration Around Door

Heat Loss Through Uninsulated Pumps

McClure Company is proposing to perform building envelope upgrades at

the facility. Outside of the weather-stripping for the doors, additional

items can be made weather/air tight to prevent infiltration and heat loss.

This includes air sealing of roof to wall interfaces, overhangs, soffits, and

any interior to exterior penetration which allows unconditioned outside air

to enter the building.

From the preliminary survey, the building façade at each building was

briefly surveyed and appeared to be in good condition. Further study will

be needed during the IGA to determine if brick repointing/repairs or lintel

repairs need to be completed.

District Wide Mechanical Insulation Upgrade

McClure Company evaluated the performance of two different systems consisting of piping and equipment

at each of the four schools in the district. Most mechanical systems

appeared to be generally well insulated however equipment such as

strainers, valves, reducers, pumps and flange pairs tend to be

uninsulated causing excessive loss of heat.

The proposed solution would be to install additional fiberglass

insulation over the bare equipment and piping where applicable. If

standard piping insulation cannot be used such as over valves, then

removeable insulation jackets will be used instead. This allows for

continued maintenance of the equipment without having to cut off

existing insulation.

District Wide Transformer Upgrades

McClure Company surveyed the existing transformers in the buildings which had them and found that most

if not all have exceeded their life expectancy. McClure is proposing to upgrade the existing building dry

type transformers located during the survey in the High School/Middle School and Biglerville Elementary

School to new, high efficiency transformers.

Dry type transformers are simple pieces of equipment used to

convert higher voltage, grid electricity to the lower voltage

electricity required at various points within the facility. The

equipment is always under some load and never actually off, as they

are constantly providing the necessary “step down” of voltage to the

buildings circuits. While the task each transformer performs is

straightforward and there are no actual moving parts, transformers

vary widely on their efficiency, largely based on their vintage and

construction materials. The inefficiency of the transformer is

presented in the amount of waste heat it creates during the “step

down” process and equates to lost electrical energy from the conversion, especially during lightly loaded

operation.


March 6, 2018

Page 28

Existing Refrigeration Motor

Proposed Plug Load Device

The transformers McClure Company has selected for replacement have an estimated efficiency of 88%,

with some as low as 83%. The replacement, high efficiency, custom built transformers utilize higher quality

internal components, in this case aluminum cores, and optimized internal configurations to combat

inefficiencies in the operation of the unit. The basis of design for the replacement transformers meet the US

Department of Energy’s Candidate Standard Level three (CSL-3), the level of efficiency deemed to provide

the lowest lifecycle cost of the unit and surpass all minimum requirements of EPACT2005. The new

transformers will also exceed NEMA TP-1 efficiency.

The high efficiency units will be custom built to the same approximate size as those being removed to

minimize on any reconfigurations or space loss.

District Wide Refrigerant Motor Upgrades

McClure Company is proposing to replace the existing shade pole

(SP) or permanent split capacitor (PSC) motors that serve the

evaporator fans located within the walk-in coolers and freezers in the

facilities. Although these motors are fractional horsepower, they

operate continuously and consume a measurable amount of energy

on an annual basis.

The SP or PSC motors will be replaced with Electro Commutated

Motors (ECM). The EC motors are direct replacements for SP or

PSC motor currently installed. Motor replacement will vary from

unit to unit, so various motors may be used. EC motors consume

roughly 30% of the energy that their SP or PSC counterparts do under the same operating conditions.

EC motor efficiencies can be maintained at low speeds, so less motor heat is released to the surrounding

refrigerated space. Lower temperatures increase motor life, and in-built soft starting gives longer bearing

life.

District Wide Plug Load Management Upgrades

McClure Company evaluated the opportunity for installation of plug load

management devices allowing for increased control over computer

workstations and other electrical devices during non-use periods.

Through a combination of “smart” outlets, control management

equipment, and software integration, this system will allow for work

stations, and other devices using the outlet, to be powered down based on

un-occupancy, idle use, or a master operation schedule. Monitoring and

controlling energy consumption is an important step in improving a

facilities overall efficiency.

While the product use has many opportunities, the preliminary focus is to control computer workstations

and ancillary equipment. Workstations offer a great advantage for this measure as there is opportunity for

savings from not only the workstation itself, but also the monitor and possibly other devices such as

printers, copiers, and scanners. Other opportunities evaluated as part of this study include water

fountains/coolers, laptop storage/charging carts, commercial copiers, and other devices that may be powered

down overnight.


March 6, 2018

Page 29

EEnneerrggyy SSaavviinnggss

HVAC Upgrades

Energy savings associated with the new equipment is a combination of equipment efficiencies and advanced

operational strategies now capable through the new equipment and modern control systems. Savings for

the new units is a result of implementing demand control ventilation, single zone VAV, and ionization

methodologies. For demand control ventilation the amount of outdoor air (OA) fluctuates based on CO2

concentrations in the space as compared to outdoor levels. This allows for the OA dampers to modulate,

often to minimal position, to minimize the amount of OA that is treated. Single zone VAV operation

modulates the fan speed based on actual space requirements and outdoor conditions while still providing the

necessary ventilation air. The ionization product further reduces the design OA levels through particulate

concentration using charged ions to lower the level of concentration resulting in less OA to dilute the return

air. The savings are calculated using standard 8,760 weather bins and the basic calculations below:

1.085 x CFM (Outdoor Air) x (Set Point Temperature – Outdoor Air Temperature) = BTU

This equation is used with weather bin data over all existing and proposed occupied hours. The change in

the CFM (Outdoor Air) variable results in the savings for the demand control ventilation and the ionization

upgrades. The difference between the base case using the design CFM (Outdoor Air) and the proposed

reduced CFM equating to the energy savings. Using the equipment efficiencies, the BTUs are then

converting into the respective fuel savings for the facility.

0.746 kW/HP x Unit HP x Time (hours) x Equipment Load (%)= kWh

The above equation is used to calculate the resulting savings for the single zone VAV operation. For the

base case assume full equipment load as there is no means to vary the speed of the existing fans (Equipment

Load = 100%). The proposed case modulates the required equipment load through a correlation to the

outdoor conditions and building occupancy from 65% minimum operation to full 100% operation. The

difference between the two summations equates to the anticipated savings.

Lighting Upgrades

Energy savings for this ECM are based on manufacturer’s specified wattage reductions from the existing

system based on stipulated lighting hours. A detailed line by line of all fixtures can be found following this

write up. The equation used to calculate savings is as follows:

kWh Savingst = u [ (kW/fixturebaseline x Quantitybaseline ) - ( kW/Fixturepost x Quantitypost) x Hours of

Operation]t,u


March 6, 2018

Page 30

kWh Savings t = kilowatt-hour savings realized during the post-

installation time period t

kW/fixturebaseline = lighting baseline demand per fixture for usage group u

kW/fixturepost = lighting demand per fixture during post-installation

period for usage group u

Quantitybaseline = quantity of affected fixtures before the lighting retrofit

adjusted for inoperative lighting fixtures for usage

group u

Quantitypost = quantity of affected fixtures after the lighting retrofit

for usage group u and time period t

Hours of Operation = total number of post-installation operating hours

(assumes number is the same before and after the

lighting retrofit) for usage

Building Envelope Upgrades

Energy savings associated with this ECM are based on a custom hourly spreadsheet analysis utilizing

ASHRAE standard engineering calculations and weather bin data. The equation used to calculate savings is

as follows:

Infiltration Rate

Q = k * dp^n * A

Q = average air flow infiltration in cubic feet per minute

A = Total infiltration crack area in square feet

k= flow coefficient = 80 cfm/pascalft^2

dp^n = differential pressure across the crack opening due to wind

n = 0.65 from ASHRAE fundamentals

dp^n = depend on average regional wind conditions

Air Leakage Cooling Loss Calculation

Cooling loss per year (BTU/year) = 60 * Q * rho * cp * CDD *24

Rho = density = 0.075

Cp = specific heat = 0.24

CDD = Cooling degree days (determined locally from weather conditions)

Conductive Cooling Loss

Cooling Energy Lost per year (BTU/year) = U * A * CDD * 24

U = 1/R = BTU/hr F ft^2


March 6, 2018

Page 31

A = Area ft^2

CDD = Cooling degree days (determined locally from weather conditions)

Air Leakage Heat Loss

Heat Lost per year (BTU/year) = 60 * Q * rho * Cp * HDD *24

Where:

60 min/hr

Q = Infiltration rate

Rho = density 0.075 lb/ft^3

Cp = 0.24 BTU/lb F

HDD = Heating Degree Days

Resulting Equation:

Heat Lost per year (BTU/year) = 25.92 * Q * HDD

Mechanical Insulation Upgrades

Energy savings for this ECM are based on the industry standard calculations. Insulation is applied as a

safeguard to protect personnel from burns. Insulation is used to reduce ambient temperatures to prevent

personnel from working under stressful high temperature conditions. “ASTM Standard Practice C 1057”

contains a Standard Practice for Determination of Skin Contact Temperature from heated surfaces. The

Standard Industry Practice is to use 140°F as the maximum temperature of a heated surface that may be

contacted by working personnel.

Design of Insulation Systems is a process that must utilize numerous criteria to determine the best materials,

applications and temperature changes. We have evaluated the mechanical systems and the design

requirements in order to provide solutions to best integrate the often-conflicting demands of initial investment,

durability, value and life cycle costs. We have tried to minimize the variation of temperature in processes and to

minimize energy use. In fluid systems the temperature drop can be calculated using the following equation;

(Ti – Tf) = (Ti – Ta) x [1 – e-[(U x P x L)/(m x Cp)]]

Where:

Ti = initial (entering) fluid temperature, oF

Tf = final (leaving) fluid temperature, oF

Ta = ambient temperature, oF

U = overall heat transfer coefficient, BTU/(hr x ft2 x oF)

P = outside perimeter of pipe or duct, ft

L = length of pipe or duct run, ft

m = flow rate of fluid, lbm/hr

Cp= specific heat of fluid, BTU/(lbm x oF)


March 6, 2018

Page 32

Energy savings for the pipe insulation can also be calculated using the following:

Q = K (Δ T) / (L + (K/Ht))

Where:

QQ == HHeeaatt LLoossss ((BBttuu//hhrr//ssqq..fftt..))

KK == TThheerrmmaall CCoonndduuccttiivviittyy ((BBttuu--iinn//hhrr--ssqq.. fftt..-- FF))

LL == IInnssuullaattiioonn TThhiicckknneessss ((wwiitthh iinnssuullaattiioonn == 11 iinncchh,, bbaarree mmeettaall == 00 iinncchheess))

DDeellttaa TT == SSuurrffaaccee TTeemmpp –– AAmmbbiieenntt TTeemmpp ((7755FF))

HHtt == CCoommbbiinneedd CCooeeffffiicciieennttss ((33..22)) ((RRaaddiiaattiioonn,, CCoonnvveeccttiioonn aanndd CCoonndduuccttiioonn)) ((BBttuu--

iinn//hhrr--ssqq.. fftt..--FF))

Transformer Upgrades

Energy savings for this ECM are calculated using the manufacturer’s specifications of the equipment. The

annual baseline energy is measured and calculated following the installation. The energy use is again

metered and the reduction in electrical use is documented.

Energy savings for transformer upgrades are calculated as listed below.

KWH baseline = ((KW losses baseline *hours of operation*Operating days per year+ KW losses baseline * 24 *

(365 – Operating days per year)

KWH post = ((KW losses post *hours of operation*Operating days per year+ KW losses post * 24 * (365 –

Operating days per year)

KWH savings = KWH baseline - KWH post

Plug Load Management Upgrades

Energy savings for this ECM are calculated using the manufacturer’s specifications of the controlled

equipment for stand by power consumption and anticipated off hours. The power consumption is multiplied

by the hours the management device would be active resulting in the energy savings.

Refrigeration Motor Upgrades

Energy savings for this ECM are calculated using manufactures data on existing motors to new ECM

motors. The annual baseline energy is measured and calculated following the installation. The energy use is

again metered and the reduction in electrical use is documented.

Equations for Calculation of Energy

KWH baseline = (Volts * Amps * PF *1.732)/1,000 * sample period Interval (hr)

KWH post = (Volts * Amps * PF *1.732)/1,000 * sample period Interval (hr)

KWH savings = KWH baseline - KWH post

Volts = Measured both pre and post installation

Amps = Measured by a programmable data logger

PF = Measured one time for both pre and post installation


March 6, 2018

Page 33

PPrrooggrraamm BB -- EEvvaalluuaattiioonn ooff CClloossiinngg BBeennddeerrssvviillllee EElleemmeennttaarryy SScchhooooll aanndd

RReennoovvaattiinngg aanndd AAddddiinngg oonnttoo AArreennddttssvviillllee EElleemmeennttaarryy SScchhooooll



Support Services

Space


Pre-K & Special Space

Maintain Community

Schools


- Addresses


- Does Not Address


SSuummmmaarryy::

This program was developed and presented to the District by Crabtree, Rohrbaugh, & Associates Architects

as Option #2. This program was developed as a program that address some, but not all, of the

communicated needs of the District. It was a lower cost option for the District to consider for the facility

needs. The cost for Option #2 was budgeted at $14,200,000.00. It is important to note that the study is two

(2) years old.

This program only included deferred maintenance “as required” and was not included in the budget for

Option #2. Our Program B includes the deferred maintenance upgrades identified in Program A.

The core project was at Arendtsville Elementary School. Currently both Arendtsville and Bendersville Elementary

Schools have 3-6 grade alignments. Arendtsville Elementary School would be expanded to allow for the entire

District 3-6 grade population. The school would be fully renovated, and Air Conditioning would be added to

improve the learning environment for the children and staff.

Bendersville Elementary School (175 Student Capacity) is smaller than Arendtsville Elementary School (225 Student

Capacity) and would be closed

The Middle School and High School only included deferred maintenance “as required” and was not included in the

budget for Option #2. Our Program B includes the deferred maintenance upgrades identified in Program A.


March 6, 2018

Page 34


Developmen

t Program

Cost Savings Status B
























B.E.S.)-$ -$ Budget

(2)






Program B

$15.0M-16.5M

20

$5.5M-$6.5M

$9.5M-10.0MActual Project Cost (TPC-S):






March 6, 2018

Page 35

Cash Flow


Biglerville, PA


20 Year Lease Term

One Time Escalation

16,500,000 Electric 0.0%


16,500,000 Electric 3.00%

Oil, Gallons 3.00%



241,902 Tons, Coal 3.00%

Water 3.00%

Maintenance 3.00%

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8



Outlays

const. - 0 -

1 241,902 241,902 912,177 1,154,079 - 0 -

2 249,159 249,159 904,920 1,154,079 - 0 -

3 256,634 256,634 897,445 1,154,079 - 0 -

4 264,333 264,333 889,746 1,154,079 - 0 -

5 272,263 272,263 881,816 1,154,079 - 0 -

6 280,431 280,431 873,648 1,154,079 - 0 -

7 288,844 288,844 865,235 1,154,079 - 0 -

8 297,509 297,509 856,570 1,154,079 - 0 -

9 306,434 306,434 847,645 1,154,079 - 0 -

10 315,627 315,627 838,452 1,154,079 - 0 -

11 325,096 325,096 828,983 1,154,079 - 0 -

12 334,849 334,849 819,230 1,154,079 - 0 -

13 344,895 344,895 809,184 1,154,079 - 0 -

14 355,241 355,241 798,838 1,154,079 - 0 -

15 365,899 365,899 788,180 1,154,079 - 0 -

16 376,876 376,876 777,203 1,154,079 - 0 -

17 388,182 388,182 765,897 1,154,079 - 0 -

18 399,827 399,827 754,252 1,154,079 - 0 -

19 411,822 411,822 742,257 1,154,079 - 0 -

20 424,177 424,177 729,902 1,154,079 - 0 -

6,500,000 6,500,000 16,581,580 23,081,580 - 0


Total Project Cost


Energy &

Operational

Savings




March 6, 2018

Page 36

FFiigguurree 22..22 –– SScchheemmaattiicc DDeessiiggnn ooff AArreennddttssvviillllee EElleemmeennttaarryy SScchhooooll

Currently the entire District’s K-3 student base attends Biglerville Elementary. Because of the current

configuration, the students get split up to go to grades 4-6 at Arendtsville and Bendersville Elementary

Schools. This program addresses the 4th Grade Separation issues that the District currently experiences by

consolidating the entire 4-6 grade student base in Arendtsville Elementary School.

Both Arendtsville and Bendersville Elementary Schools are heating only buildings and do not provide

cooling. This program addresses this issue by providing an HVAC upgrade to provide cooling for

Arendtsville and closing Bendersville.

The District currently lacks Support Services Space in all of their schools. This program partially addresses

this issued by providing these spaces for Arendtsville Elementary School but does not provide any

additional spaces in Biglerville Elementary School or the Middle/High Schools.

The District is currently in need of additional Pre-K space in Biglerville Elementary School and Special

Education Space in the Middle/High Schools. This program does not address this issue.

The District currently has schools in Arendtsville, Bendersville, and Biglerville. This program would

remove a community school from Bendersville.

There is currently a substantial list of Deferred Maintenance items that are identified in the District Wide

Facilities Survey in this submission. Our Program B addresses the Deferred Maintenance items in


March 6, 2018

Page 37

Proposed VUV

Arendtsville Elementary School but does not address any of the deferred maintenance items in the other

schools in the District.

Facility Improvement Measures:

Individual write-ups for the deferred maintenance measures and energy conservations measures, ECM’s 3-

11 in the above program table, can be found in Program A.

AArreennddttssvviillllee EElleemmeennttaarryy SScchhooooll BBuuiillddiinngg WWiiddee HHVVAACC UUppggrraaddee ((CCoooolliinngg))

Arendtsville Elementary School currently has very limited

cooling within the building. The cafeteria and library are

provided with split system cooling. The office area is

provided with self-contained thru-wall units for cooling.

McClure is proposing to provide cooling for all of the

Arendtsville classrooms. The existing heating-only unit

ventilators would be removed and replaced with tall

vertical heat pump unit ventilator (VUV) with DX cooling

and HW heating. The VUV will operate as a heat pump

when outdoor ambient temperatures are above 35°F and

heat pump operation is most efficient. During the coldest

periods of winter, the hot water heating coil will provide

space heating. The existing unit ventilator louver will be

insulated and blanked off. A new louver will be installed to

provide the code required outdoor airflow to the unit.

Supply air distribution for each unit will be provided with

overhead ductwork. This improves the thermal comfort of

the occupants as there will be more even air distribution throughout the spaces rather than the existing

system with air blown along the perimeter at one location. Additionally, each VUV will be provided with a

variable speed supply fan for comfort control and energy savings, enthalpy wheel, modulating refrigerant

reheat for humidity control, and demand-controlled ventilation (DCV). The DCV monitors the carbon

dioxide levels within the space and modulates the outdoor air provided in response.

Deduct Alternative: 4-pipe Unit Ventilators – As an alternative to the VUV solution recommended above,

McClure is proposing to provide a 4-pipe unit ventilator deduct option. New unit ventilators with chilled

water and hot water coils will be provided in the location of the existing. The existing outdoor air louvers at

the back of the units will be reused. A new air cooled chiller will be provided on grade. Chilled water

piping will be routed underground from the chiller to the building. New duty/standby chilled water pumps

will be provided in the existing boiler room along with chilled water piping accessories like air/dirt

separator, expansion tank, etc. The chilled water piping will be routed above the ceiling to the 4-pipe

classroom unit ventilators. The unit ventilators will be provided with an EC fan motor to modulate supply

airflow to the classrooms. This will improve the thermal comfort in the space and reduce unit noise.


March 6, 2018

Page 38

Operational & Maintenance Savings:

The Operational & Maintenance Savings are made up of maintenance savings, transportation savings (or

increases), and full-time employee reduction. These savings are based on historical information provided by

the District as well as increases and savings stipulated by the District.

Maintenance:

The Bendersville and Arendtsville Elementary Schools are the two oldest schools in the District. There are

potential for savings in those buildings from upgrading infrastructure as well as closing one of the schools.

The savings can be determined by looking at historical data from the District as the project is further

developed.

Transportation:

The Bendersville and Arendtsville Elementary Schools have students that currently walk to school. When

Bendersville Elementary School is closed, an additional bus route will be needed to transport those students

to Arendtsville Elementary School. The District has stipulated that the cost of an additional bus route would

be $35,000-$40,000 per year.

Full Time Employees:

Because Bendersville and Arendtsville Elementary Schools have similar uses, there is the potential for

reducing duplicate employees. However, because of the curriculum needs, the reduction in full time

employees is anticipated to only be one (1). This reduction would occur through attrition and would save

$200,000.00 per year, beginning in 5 years.

Energy Savings:

Energy Savings strategies and calculations can be found above in Program A. The strategies and

methodology will carry through each of the programs for any measures that involve energy savings.


March 6, 2018

Page 39

PPrrooggrraamm CC -- EEvvaalluuaattiioonn ooff CClloossiinngg AArreennddttssvviillllee EElleemmeennttaarryy SScchhooooll aanndd

BBeennddeerrssvviillllee EElleemmeennttaarryy SScchhooooll aanndd RReennoovvaattiinngg aanndd AAddddiinngg oonnttoo

BBiigglleerrvviillllee EElleemmeennttaarryy SScchhooooll



Support Services

Space


Pre-K & Special Ed

Space

Maintain Community

Schools


- Addresses


- Does Not Address


Summary:

This program was developed by McClure Company as a part of this response. This option would include

building an addition on Biglerville Elementary.

Our Program C includes the deferred maintenance upgrades identified in Program A.

The entire project would be at Biglerville Elementary School and would include a 68,000 square foot

addition. The new addition is sized appropriately to house the District’s entire Kindergarten through Sixth

Grade population.

Bendersville Elementary School and Arendtsville Elementary School would be closed.

The Middle School and High School only included deferred maintenance “as required” and was not

included in the budget for Option 2.


March 6, 2018

Page 40


Developmen

t Program

Cost Savings Status C
























B.E.S.)-$ -$ Budget

(2)






Program C

$19.0M-$20.5M

20

$6.0M-$7.0M

$13.0M-$13.5MActual Project Cost (TPC-S):






March 6, 2018

Page 41

CCaasshh FFllooww


Biglerville, PA


20 Year Lease Term

One Time Escalation

20,500,000 Electric 0.0%


20,500,000 Electric 3.00%

Oil, Gallons 3.00%



260,510 Tons, Coal 3.00%

Water 3.00%

Maintenance 3.00%

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8



Outlays

const. - 0 -

1 260,510 260,510 1,173,346 1,433,856 - 0 -

2 268,325 268,325 1,165,530 1,433,856 - 0 -

3 276,375 276,375 1,157,481 1,433,856 - 0 -

4 284,666 284,666 1,149,189 1,433,856 - 0 -

5 293,206 293,206 1,140,649 1,433,856 - 0 -

6 302,002 302,002 1,131,853 1,433,856 - 0 -

7 311,063 311,063 1,122,793 1,433,856 - 0 -

8 320,394 320,394 1,113,461 1,433,856 - 0 -

9 330,006 330,006 1,103,850 1,433,856 - 0 -

10 339,906 339,906 1,093,949 1,433,856 - 0 -

11 350,104 350,104 1,083,752 1,433,856 - 0 -

12 360,607 360,607 1,073,249 1,433,856 - 0 -

13 371,425 371,425 1,062,431 1,433,856 - 0 -

14 382,568 382,568 1,051,288 1,433,856 - 0 -

15 394,045 394,045 1,039,811 1,433,856 - 0 -

16 405,866 405,866 1,027,990 1,433,856 - 0 -

17 418,042 418,042 1,015,814 1,433,856 - 0 -

18 430,583 430,583 1,003,272 1,433,856 - 0 -

19 443,501 443,501 990,355 1,433,856 - 0 -

20 456,806 456,806 977,050 1,433,856 - 0 -

7,000,000 7,000,000 21,677,114 28,677,115 - 0


Total Project Cost


Energy &

Operational

Savings




March 6, 2018

Page 42

FFiigguurree 33..22 –– SScchheemmaattiicc DDeessiiggnn ooff tthhee ffiirrsstt fflloooorr ooff BBiigglleerrvviillllee EElleemmeennttaarryy SScchhooooll AAddddiittiioonn

FFiigguurree 33..33 –– SScchheemmaattiicc DDeessiiggnn ooff tthhee sseeccoonndd fflloooorr ooff BBiigglleerrvviillllee EElleemmeennttaarryy SScchhooooll AAddddiittiioonn


March 6, 2018

Page 43

Existing DX Unit


configuration, the students split to go to grades 4-6 at Arendtsville and Bendersville Elementary Schools.

This program addresses the 4th Grade Separation issues that the District currently experiences by

consolidating the entire K-6 grade student base in Biglerville Elementary School.


cooling. This program addresses this issue by closing both Arendtsville and Bendersville Elementary

Schools.


this issued by providing these spaces for Biglerville Elementary School but does not provide any additional

spaces in the Middle/High Schools.

The District is currently in need of additional Pre-K space in Biglerville Elementary School. The program

addresses this issue by providing additional space for the Pre-K program.

The District is currently in need of additional Special Education Space in the Middle/High Schools. This

program does not address this issue.


remove a community school from Arendtsville and Bendersville.


Facilities Survey in this submission. This program addresses the Deferred Maintenance items in

Arendtsville Elementary School but does not address any of the deferred maintenance items in the other

schools in the District.

FFaacciilliittyy IImmpprroovveemmeenntt MMeeaassuurreess::


11 in the above program table, can be found in Program A.

Biglerville Elementary School Classroom Addition HVAC Upgrade

In addition to the defined scope in Program A under Deferred

Maintenance for Biglerville Elementary School, McClure Company is

proposing to extend a system of similar design to the addition on

Biglerville Elementary School. This design will incorporate the use of

either Air Handling Units or Roof Top Units connected to a Variable Air

Volume discharge system. However, during the investment grade audit

this design will be further studied as well as potential other design

considerations.


March 6, 2018

Page 44




the District as well as increases and savings stipulated by the District

Maintenance:




developed.

Transportation:




be $35,000-$40,000 per year.






Energy Savings:




March 6, 2018

Page 45

Program D - Evaluation of Renovating, Adding onto, and Reprogramming

Arendtsville Elementary School as a 3-6 Grade School, Reprogramming

Biglerville Elementary School as a K-2 School and Repurposing

Bendersville Elementary School as the New District Office



Support Services

Space


Pre-K & Special Ed

Space

Maintain Community

Schools


- Addresses


- Does Not Address


Summary:

This program was developed by McClure Company as a part of this response. This option would include

building a larger addition onto Arendtsville Elementary School and reprogramming the grades. The new

programming would include K-2 at Biglerville and 3-6 grades at Arendtsville Elementary School.

Bendersville Elementary School would be repurposed as the new District Office and the existing District

Office would be renovated to create new educational space for the Middle/High Schools.

The core project was at Arendtsville Elementary School. Currently both Arendtsville and Bendersville

Elementary Schools have 3-6 grade alignments. Arendtsville Elementary School would be expanded to

allow for the entire District 3-6 grade population. The school would be fully renovated, and Air

Conditioning would be added to improve the learning environment for the children and staff.

Bendersville Elementary School (175 Student Capacity) is smaller than Arendtsville Elementary School

(225 Student Capacity) and would become the new District Office.


March 6, 2018

Page 46


Developmen

t Program

Cost Savings Status D
























B.E.S.)-$ -$ Budget

(2)






Program D

$18.5M-$20.0M

20

$4.0M-$5.0M

$14.5M-15.0MActual Project Cost (TPC-S):





March 6, 2018

Page 47

CCaasshh FFllooww


Biglerville, PA


20 Year Lease Term

One Time Escalation

20,000,000 Electric 0.0%


20,000,000 Electric 3.00%

Oil, Gallons 3.00%



186,079 Tons, Coal 3.00%

Water 3.00%

Maintenance 3.00%

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8



Outlays

const. - 0 -

1 186,079 186,079 1,212,805 1,398,884 - 0 -

2 191,661 191,661 1,207,223 1,398,884 - 0 -

3 197,411 197,411 1,201,473 1,398,884 - 0 -

4 203,333 203,333 1,195,551 1,398,884 - 0 -

5 209,433 209,433 1,189,451 1,398,884 - 0 -

6 215,716 215,716 1,183,168 1,398,884 - 0 -

7 222,188 222,188 1,176,696 1,398,884 - 0 -

8 228,853 228,853 1,170,030 1,398,884 - 0 -

9 235,719 235,719 1,163,165 1,398,884 - 0 -

10 242,790 242,790 1,156,093 1,398,884 - 0 -

11 250,074 250,074 1,148,810 1,398,884 - 0 -

12 257,576 257,576 1,141,307 1,398,884 - 0 -

13 265,304 265,304 1,133,580 1,398,884 - 0 -

14 273,263 273,263 1,125,621 1,398,884 - 0 -

15 281,461 281,461 1,117,423 1,398,884 - 0 -

16 289,904 289,904 1,108,979 1,398,884 - 0 -

17 298,601 298,601 1,100,282 1,398,884 - 0 -

18 307,560 307,560 1,091,324 1,398,884 - 0 -

19 316,786 316,786 1,082,097 1,398,884 - 0 -

20 326,290 326,290 1,072,594 1,398,884 - 0 -

5,000,000 5,000,000 22,977,672 27,977,673 - 0


Total Project Cost


Energy &

Operational

Savings




March 6, 2018

Page 48

Figure 4.2 – Schematic Design of the Arendtsville Elementary School







Arendtsville and Bendersville.


this issued by providing these spaces for Arendtsville Elementary School, reprogramming the schools to

move 3rd grade out of Biglerville Elementary School and moving the District Office to Bendersville

Elementary School. This creates room at both Biglerville (approx. 6 classrooms) and the Middle/High

Schools for Support services, an additional Pre-K, and Special Education in the Middle/High Schools.


continue to operate a facility in all three (3) municipalities.


Facilities Survey in this submission. This program addresses the Deferred Maintenance items in


March 6, 2018

Page 49

Arendtsville Elementary School and Bendersville Elementary School but does not address any of the

deferred maintenance items in the other schools in the District.



11 in the above program table, can be found in Program A. The Arendtsville Elementary School HVAC

Upgrade can be reference in Program B.

Bendersville Elementary School Building Wide HVAC Upgrade (Cooling)

Bendersville Elementary School currently has very limited cooling within the building. The library and

office area are provided with split system cooling. McClure is proposing to provide cooling for all of the

Bendersville classrooms. The existing heating-only unit ventilators would be removed and replaced with

tall vertical heat pump unit ventilator (VUV) with DX cooling and HW heating. The VUV will operate as a

heat pump when outdoor ambient temperatures are above 35°F and heat pump operation is most efficient.

During the coldest periods of winter, the hot water heating coil will provide space heating. The existing unit

ventilator louver will be insulated and blanked off. A new louver will be installed to provide the code

required outdoor airflow to the unit. Supply air distribution for each unit will be provided with overhead

ductwork. This improves the thermal comfort of the occupants as there will be more even air distribution

throughout the spaces rather than the existing system with air blown along the perimeter at one location.

Additionally, each VUV will be provided with a variable speed supply fan for comfort control and energy

savings, enthalpy wheel, modulating refrigerant reheat for humidity control, and demand controlled

ventilation (DCV). The DCV monitors the carbon dioxide levels within the space and modulates the

outdoor air provided in response.

Deduct Alternative: 4-pipe Unit Ventilators – As an alternative to the VUV solution recommended above,

McClure is proposing to provide a 4-pipe unit ventilator deduct option. New unit ventilators with chilled

water and hot water coils will be provided in the location of the existing. The existing outdoor air louvers at

the back of the units will be reused. A new air-cooled chiller will be provided on grade. Chilled water

piping will be routed underground from the chiller to the building. New duty/standby chilled water pumps

will be provided in the existing boiler room along with chilled water piping accessories like air/dirt

separator, expansion tank, etc. The chilled water piping will be routed above the ceiling to the 4-pipe classroom unit ventilators. The unit ventilators will be provided with an EC fan motor to modulate supply airflow to

the classrooms. This will improve the thermal comfort in the space and reduce unit noise.





Maintenance:




developed.


March 6, 2018

Page 50

Transportation:




be $35,000-$40,000 per year.






Energy Savings:




March 6, 2018

Page 51

Program E - Evaluation of Renovating and Reprogramming Arendtsville Elementary School and Bendersville Elementary School as a K-2 Intermediate School and Reprogramming Biglerville Elementary School as a 3-6 School



Support Services

Space


Pre-K & Special Ed

Space

Maintain Community

Schools


- Addresses


- Does Not Address


Summary:

This program was developed by McClure Company as a part of this response. This is the lowest cost option

that addresses the majority of the District needs. The program includes reprogramming Arendtsville

Elementary School and Bendersville Elementary School as Primary K-2 schools, reprogramming Biglerville

Elementary School as an Elementary 3-6 school, and addressing the District’s deferred maintenance. This

option includes additional space however it could be done keeping existing facilities, but that will need to

further study with the District during the investment grade audit.







Arendtsville and Bendersville.

The District currently lacks Support Services Space, An additional Pre-K Classroom, and a Special

Education Classroom in the High School. This program addresses this issue by providing the entire student

body with computer tablets or laptop computers. This would allow the District to repurpose the computer

rooms. Additionally, the Libraries can be repurposed as Media Centers. This would add additional space

for Support Services. Representative layouts of these types of rooms are included below.


March 6, 2018

Page 52


Developmen

t Program

Cost Savings Status E
























B.E.S.)-$ -$ Budget

(2)






Program E

$12.0M-$14.0M

20

$2.0M-$3.0M

$10.0M-$11.0MActual Project Cost (TPC-S):






March 6, 2018

Page 53

CCaasshh FFllooww


Biglerville, PA


20 Year Lease Term

One Time Escalation

14,000,000 Electric 0.0%


14,000,000 Electric 3.00%

Oil, Gallons 3.00%



111,647 Tons, Coal 3.00%

Water 3.00%

Maintenance 3.00%

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8



Outlays

const. - 0 -

1 111,647 111,647 867,571 979,219 - 0 -

2 114,997 114,997 864,222 979,219 - 0 -

3 118,446 118,446 860,772 979,219 - 0 -

4 122,000 122,000 857,219 979,219 - 0 -

5 125,660 125,660 853,559 979,219 - 0 -

6 129,430 129,430 849,789 979,219 - 0 -

7 133,313 133,313 845,906 979,219 - 0 -

8 137,312 137,312 841,907 979,219 - 0 -

9 141,431 141,431 837,787 979,219 - 0 -

10 145,674 145,674 833,544 979,219 - 0 -

11 150,044 150,044 829,174 979,219 - 0 -

12 154,546 154,546 824,673 979,219 - 0 -

13 159,182 159,182 820,036 979,219 - 0 -

14 163,958 163,958 815,261 979,219 - 0 -

15 168,876 168,876 810,342 979,219 - 0 -

16 173,943 173,943 805,276 979,219 - 0 -

17 179,161 179,161 800,058 979,219 - 0 -

18 184,536 184,536 794,683 979,219 - 0 -

19 190,072 190,072 789,147 979,219 - 0 -

20 195,774 195,774 783,445 979,219 - 0 -

3,000,000 3,000,000 16,584,371 19,584,371 - 0


Total Project Cost


Energy &

Operational

Savings




March 6, 2018

Page 54


March 6, 2018

Page 55


March 6, 2018

Page 56


March 6, 2018

Page 57


March 6, 2018

Page 58


March 6, 2018

Page 59


March 6, 2018

Page 60


March 6, 2018

Page 61


March 6, 2018

Page 62


March 6, 2018

Page 63

In addition to the repurposed space, we are recommending replacing the furniture in Arendtsville and

Bendersville Elementary Schools. This will make the room more customizable and allow for collaborative

learning. Sample layouts of these rooms are below.


March 6, 2018

Page 64


March 6, 2018

Page 65



11 in the above program table, can be found in Program A. The Arendtsville Elementary School HVAC

Upgrade can be referenced in Program B and the Bendersville Elementary School HVAC Upgrade can be

referenced in Program D.





Maintenance:




developed.

Transportation:

There would be no transportation savings in this program.


There would be no impact on Full Time Employees.

Energy Savings:




March 6, 2018

Page 66

Appendix A: Commissioning Plan Proposed Commissioning Plan

The purpose of the commissioning plan is to guide the installation contractor and commissioning team

through an effective process.

The commissioning tasks for the contractors will be identified in the commissioning specification and will

include:

• General commissioning requirements common to all systems and assemblies

• Detailed description of the responsibilities of all parties

• Details of the commissioning process (i.e. schedule and sequence of activities)

• Reporting & documentation requirements

• Alternatives to coordination issues

• Deficiency resolution

• Commissioning meetings

• Submittals

• O& M Manuals

• Construction Checklists

• Functional testing process and specific functional test requirements including acceptance criteria

• As-built drawings

Complete Final Commissioning Report

During post-construction, the commissioning supervisor is responsible for delivering a final commissioning

report. The final commissioning report shall include at a minimum:

• A statement that systems have been completed in accordance with the contract documents and that

the systems are performing in accordance with the final Owner’s Project Requirements document

• Identification and discussion of any substitutions, compromises or variances between the final

design intent, contract documents and as-built conditions

• Description of components and systems that exceed Owner’s Project Requirements and those which

do not meet the requirements and why

• Summary of all issues resolved and unresolved and any recommendations for resolution

• Post-Construction activities and results including deferred & seasonal testing results, test data

reports and additional training documentation

• Lessons learned for future commissioning project efforts

The final commissioning report will serve as a critical reference and benchmark document for future re

commissioning of the facility. In addition, the commissioning supervisor is responsible at this stage to

assure the design professional updates to the CAD As-Built drawings have been completed.


March 6, 2018

Page 67

Levels of Intensity

Proposed Energy Conservation Measures (ECMs) can vary greatly in size, scope and complexity. Systems

can be of a critical or highly specialized nature or can be as simple as plugging in a new specialized control.

Because of this potential for variance, McClure Company will employ three different levels of

commissioning intensity.

Level 1 - System Readiness and Startup

The McClure Company project manager, commissioning supervisor, and appropriate subcontractor shall

perform Level 1 Commissioning during the construction and acceptance phases of the project. This level

basically involves a visual inspection of the installation.

The contractor performs all required tasks. The Commissioning supervisor documents the installation. One

example of an ECM specific to this project that level 1 commissioning is appropriate is the vending misers.

Level 1 commissioning is intended to:

• Ensure that the contractor meets basic contractual requirements to produce a complete

installation, in accordance with the contract documents.

• Help the contractor plan, organize, and coordinate that part of his/her work related to completing

the installation and getting equipment and systems ready to start properly, safely, and on

schedule.

• Identify problems that may arise and provide a mechanism for problem resolution by the

responsible parties, with necessary follow-up.

• Provide documentation showing that system installation is in accordance with requirements.

Level 2 - Initial Operation

Level 2 commissioning requires the pre-start up testing of the various systems. The commissioning

supervisor along with the appropriate subcontractor conducts systems tests to ensure system condition and

capacities.

Level 2 commissioning is proper level of commissioning for an ECM that acts as an independent system

and is not a component of a larger integrated system. An example of an independent system that is proposed

for this project is the steam and condensate replacement. While the replacement of the steam and condensate

system will have an impact on energy savings, the replacement of the steam and condensate system once it

has been pressure tested and no longer leaks, will not have an impact on heating systems.

Level 2 commissioning is intended to include comprehensive pre-start up checks and tests, and to:

• Ensure that the contractor meets basic contractual requirements to produce a fully functioning

installation in accordance with the contract documents.


March 6, 2018

Page 68

• Ensure that system operations are checked, and that specified performance is achieved in all

respects. This is where McClure Company’s approach of using the service of an independent

commissioning supervisor really adds value.

• Provide documentation showing that system operation is in accordance with requirements.

• Ensure that the contractor is able to operate the equipment and systems, and can demonstrate

system performance according to contract requirements.

• Provide a framework for giving training demonstrations in proper systems operation to the

Client(s), and for providing maintenance instructions and recommendations for the completed

system.

Level 3 - Functional System Test

Level 3 commissioning is the most detailed and exhaustive application of the commissioning process.

Level 3 is the required level of commissioning when the individual components of the system are integrated

into a control system. Dual fuel summer boilers are an example of a system that will require level 3

commissioning.

Level 3 commissioning is intended to:

• Ensure that systems operation, including all control sequences, is adequately checked and that

functional performance, as specified by the requirements, is achieved in all respects.

• Provide documentation that reflects system operation in accordance with requirements.

• Ensure that the contractor is able to operate the equipment and systems, and demonstrate system

performance and functionality (according to contract requirements), to the client(s).

• Provide a framework for giving training in proper systems operation to the clients(s), and for

providing maintenance instructions and recommendations for the completed system.


March 6, 2018

Page 69

Appendix B: Certificates and Letter of Recommendations


March 6, 2018

Page 70


March 6, 2018

Page 71


March 6, 2018

Page 72


March 6, 2018

Page 73

Request for Proposal - Upper Adams School District€¦ · Request for Proposal March 6, 2018...

Documents

Transcript of Request for Proposal - Upper Adams School District€¦ · Request for Proposal March 6, 2018...