Reproductive and Somatic Effort in Dogwoods Week II

11
Reproductive and Somatic Effort in Dogwoods Week II Principles of Ecology BIOL 3060

description

Reproductive and Somatic Effort in Dogwoods Week II. Principles of Ecology BIOL 3060. Review . Life history An organism’s typical pattern of : Growth & Survival Reproduction Somatic effort Growth/survival Reproductive effort Phenotypic plasticity - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Transcript of Reproductive and Somatic Effort in Dogwoods Week II

Page 1: Reproductive and  Somatic Effort  in Dogwoods Week II

Reproductive and Somatic Effort in Dogwoods

Week II Principles of Ecology BIOL 3060

Page 2: Reproductive and  Somatic Effort  in Dogwoods Week II

Review • Life history

• An organism’s typical pattern of :• Growth & Survival• Reproduction

• Somatic effort• Growth/survival

• Reproductive effort• Phenotypic plasticity

• A single organism can have >1 phenotype

• Spigot Model•Reproduction only when somatic is topped-off

Page 3: Reproductive and  Somatic Effort  in Dogwoods Week II

Age & Reproduction

• H1 With more energy on one size of a plant than the other, phenotypic plasticity allows greater reproduction to occur on that side.

• prediction: the sunny side of the tree has more flower buds than the shady side.

Hypothesis 1

Page 4: Reproductive and  Somatic Effort  in Dogwoods Week II

Age & Reproduction

• H2 Trees with more total energy can invest more in reproduction.

• prediction: trees with more sun have more flower buds.

Hypothesis 2

Page 5: Reproductive and  Somatic Effort  in Dogwoods Week II

Age & Reproduction

• H3 Delayed maturity and indeterminate growth cause older/larger trees to have greater reproduction.

• prediction: there is a significant positive correlation between the proportion of flower buds and the DBH of the tree.

Hypothesis 3

Page 6: Reproductive and  Somatic Effort  in Dogwoods Week II

H1 prediction: % flower buds is greater on the sunny than shady side of roadside trees

T-TEST1 22 21 2

1 2

x xTs sn n

X1

AVG % flower buds on the sunny side

(roadside)

X2

AVG % flower buds on the shady side

(roadside)

Note: this is a one-tailed test, with 38 d.f.

Page 7: Reproductive and  Somatic Effort  in Dogwoods Week II

H2 prediction: % flower buds is greater for trees in the sun than for

those in the shade

T-TEST1 22 21 2

1 2

x xTs sn n

X2

AVG % flower buds in understory

X1

AVG % flower buds on sunny side of roadside trees

Note: this is a one-tailed test, with 38 d.f.

Page 8: Reproductive and  Somatic Effort  in Dogwoods Week II

Correlation

a) If there is NO difference between % flower buds in sunny and shady environments:

Correlation #1: % total flower buds on roadside and understory trees (y-

axis) vs DBH (x-axis)

b) If there IS a difference between % flower buds in sunny and shady environments:

Correlation #1: % total flower buds on roadside trees (y-axis) vs DBH (x-

axis)Correlation #2: % total

flower buds on understory trees (y-axis) vs DBH (x-

axis)

H3 prediction: % flower buds and tree age/size (DBH) are significantly positively correlated

Page 9: Reproductive and  Somatic Effort  in Dogwoods Week II

Why do we have conditional analysis?

Page 10: Reproductive and  Somatic Effort  in Dogwoods Week II

Hypothesis & Prediction 3H3 prediction: % flower buds and tree age-size

(DBH) are significantly positively correlated

What do you get?→ correlation coefficient: r

-positive/negative relationship-significance of relationship

CORRELATION ANALYSIS

If correlation (r) between mean % flower buds and DBH is positive, look up the

significance

Note: (n1-2) = d.f.

Page 11: Reproductive and  Somatic Effort  in Dogwoods Week II

Roadside Trees Understory Trees (40)

Sunny-side (20) Shady-side (20)

Total Total Total

Tree DBHFlowe

rLea

f % FlrFlowe

r Leaf % FlrFlowe

rFlowe

r Tree DBH LeafFlowe

rFlowe

r1 5 11 9 55% 5 15 25% 16 40% 1 3 31 9 23%2 9 15 5 75% 10 10 50% 25 63% 2 8 25 15 38%3 9 14 6 70% 9 11 45% 23 58% 3 8 25 15 38%

etc. etc. etc. etc. etc. etc. etc. etc. etc. etc. etc. etc. etc. etc. etc.

18 13 18 2 90% 13 7 65% 31 78% 18 7 18 22 55%19 8 13 7 65% 19 1 95% 32 80% 19 7 23 17 43%20 10 17 3 85% 12 8 60% 29 73% 20 5 4 36 90%

Mean 7.95 12.70   64% 10.80   54% 23.50 0.59   6.15   19.10 48%

S.D. 3.69 3.41   17% 3.68   18% 5.49 0.14   2.08   6.92 18%