Reproductions supplied by EDRS are the best that …DOCUMENT RESUME CE 085 229 Patel, Nisha; Strawn,...

39
ED 480 001 AUTHOR TITLE INSTITUTION PUB DATE NOTE AVAILABLE FROM PUB TYPE EDRS PRICE DESCRIPTORS IDENTIFIERS ABSTRACT DOCUMENT RESUME CE 085 229 Patel, Nisha; Strawn, Julie; Greenberg, Mark WIA Reauthorization Recommendations [and] Side-by-Side Comparison of Title I Provisions in Recent WIA Reauthorization Proposals (June 25, 2003 Update). Center for Law and Social Policy, Washington, DC. 2003-00-00 38p. For full text (Recommendations): http://www.clasp.org/DMS/Documents/1057258510.44/WIA_Recomm.pdf. For full text (Comparison): http://www.clasp.org/ DMS/Documents/1056564883.68/WIA_sbs.pdf. Opinion Papers (120) Reports Evaluative (142) EDRS Price MF01/PCO2 Plus Postage. Access to Education; *Adult Education; Adult Literacy; Comparative Analysis; Eligibility; *Employment Services; *English (Second Language); Federal Aid; *Federal Legislation; Federal Programs; *Job Training; Limited English Speaking; Literacy Education; Out of School Youth; Policy Formation; Postsecondary Education; Public Policy; Second Language Instruction; Student Financial Aid *Reauthorization Legislation; *Workforce Investment Act 1998 This publication on reauthorization recommendations for the Workforce Investment Act of 1998 (WIA) comprises three documents. The first is a short summary of reauthorization recommendations for Title I and II. Title I recommendations are to eliminate sequential eligibility; promote greater access to training; improve adjustment of performance measures; require that performance measures take into account job quality and better capture earnings changes; address needs of those with limited English skills; encourage programs to combine adult education, English as a second language (ESL), and job training services; promote informed consumer choice by creating a process for fixing problems with the provider certification system; and clarify how WIA should take into account federal student aid received. Title II recommendations are to improve effectiveness of services by focusing funds on high quality programs; address needs of those with limited English skills; encourage programs to combine adult education, ESL, and job training services; and strengthen links to postsecondary education and job training. The second document, written by Nisha Patel and Julie Strawn, is a discussion of the rationale for each recommendation. The third document, written by Nisha Patel and Mark Greenberg, is a summary and side- by-side comparison of Title I provisions in current law and these WIA reauthorization proposals: eight-page plan released by the Bush Administration in February 2003 and the bill (H.R. 1261) passed on May 8, 2003. (YLB) Reproductions supplied by EDRS are the best that can be made from the original document.

Transcript of Reproductions supplied by EDRS are the best that …DOCUMENT RESUME CE 085 229 Patel, Nisha; Strawn,...

Page 1: Reproductions supplied by EDRS are the best that …DOCUMENT RESUME CE 085 229 Patel, Nisha; Strawn, Julie; Greenberg, Mark WIA Reauthorization Recommendations [and] Side-by-Side Comparison

ED 480 001

AUTHOR

TITLE

INSTITUTIONPUB DATENOTE

AVAILABLEFROM

PUB TYPEEDRS PRICE

DESCRIPTORS

IDENTIFIERS

ABSTRACT

DOCUMENT RESUME

CE 085 229

Patel, Nisha; Strawn, Julie; Greenberg, Mark

WIA Reauthorization Recommendations [and] Side-by-SideComparison of Title I Provisions in Recent WIA ReauthorizationProposals (June 25, 2003 Update).Center for Law and Social Policy, Washington, DC.2003-00-0038p.

For full text (Recommendations):

http://www.clasp.org/DMS/Documents/1057258510.44/WIA_Recomm.pdf.For full text (Comparison): http://www.clasp.org/DMS/Documents/1056564883.68/WIA_sbs.pdf.Opinion Papers (120) Reports Evaluative (142)EDRS Price MF01/PCO2 Plus Postage.Access to Education; *Adult Education; Adult Literacy;Comparative Analysis; Eligibility; *Employment Services;*English (Second Language); Federal Aid; *Federal Legislation;Federal Programs; *Job Training; Limited English Speaking;Literacy Education; Out of School Youth; Policy Formation;Postsecondary Education; Public Policy; Second LanguageInstruction; Student Financial Aid

*Reauthorization Legislation; *Workforce Investment Act 1998

This publication on reauthorization recommendations for theWorkforce Investment Act of 1998 (WIA) comprises three documents. The firstis a short summary of reauthorization recommendations for Title I and II.Title I recommendations are to eliminate sequential eligibility; promotegreater access to training; improve adjustment of performance measures;require that performance measures take into account job quality and bettercapture earnings changes; address needs of those with limited English skills;encourage programs to combine adult education, English as a second language(ESL), and job training services; promote informed consumer choice bycreating a process for fixing problems with the provider certificationsystem; and clarify how WIA should take into account federal student aidreceived. Title II recommendations are to improve effectiveness of servicesby focusing funds on high quality programs; address needs of those withlimited English skills; encourage programs to combine adult education, ESL,and job training services; and strengthen links to postsecondary educationand job training. The second document, written by Nisha Patel and JulieStrawn, is a discussion of the rationale for each recommendation. The thirddocument, written by Nisha Patel and Mark Greenberg, is a summary and side-by-side comparison of Title I provisions in current law and these WIAreauthorization proposals: eight-page plan released by the BushAdministration in February 2003 and the bill (H.R. 1261) passed on May 8,2003. (YLB)

Reproductions supplied by EDRS are the best that can be madefrom the original document.

Page 2: Reproductions supplied by EDRS are the best that …DOCUMENT RESUME CE 085 229 Patel, Nisha; Strawn, Julie; Greenberg, Mark WIA Reauthorization Recommendations [and] Side-by-Side Comparison

PERMISSION TO REPRODUCEANDDISSEMINATE THIS MATERIAL HAS

BEEN GRANTED BY

TO THE EDUCATIONAL RESOURCESINFORMATION CENTER (ERIC)

1

CLASPCENTER FOR LAW AND SOCIAL POLICY

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATIONOffice ol Educational Research and Improvement

EDUCATIONAL RESOURCES INFORMATIONCENTER (ERIC)

OiLlhis document has been reproduced asreceived from the person or organizationoriginating it.

0 Minor changes have been made toimprove reproduction quality.

Points of view or opinions stated in thisdocument do not necessarily representofficial OERI position or policy.

WIA REAUTHORIZATION RECOMMENDATIONS

By Nisha Patel and Julie Strawn

The Workforce Investment Act of 1998 (WIA) substantially altered the federally funded system for jobtraining and other employment-related services. Federal policy for these services is set out in Tide I ofWIA, which requires that each of nearly 600 local workforce areas develop and administer a one-stopdelivery system with a broad array of employment and training services available to job seekers andemployers. In addition, Congress folded into WIA the existing Adult Education and Family Literacy Act(AEFLA), as Tide II of the law. AEFLA, or WIA Tide II, is a federal program to assist undereducated orlimited English proficient adults or out-of-school youth in improving their skills. Congress is scheduled toreauthorize both titles by September 30, 2003; What follows is a short summary of reauthorizationrecommendations for both Tide I and II and a separate document that includes a discussion of therationale for each recommendation.

SUMMARY OF WIA TITLE I AND TITLE II RECOMMENDATIONS

TITLE I

1. ELIMINATE SEQUENTIAL ELIGIBILITY.> Eliminate sequential eligibility and allow individuals to receive intensive and training services in any

sequence determined appropriate by assessment in order to meet employment and earnings goalsestablished in conjunction with the one-stop operator or partner.

2. PROMOTE GREATER ACCESS TO TRAINING.> Require that states and local areas spend a minimum percentage of adult and dislocated worker funds

on training services.> Require that states and local areas that fail to meet the expenditure requirement receive the same

penalties for noncompliance that apply for failing to meet adjusted performance measures undercurrent law.

> Require that in order to receive \VIA incentive funds, states and local areas must spend at least theminimum percentage of funds on training.

> In their quarterly financial reports and annual reports, require that states report to the Department ofLabor, and that local areas report to states, on the amount of adult and dislocated worker funds spenton each category of services (core, intensive, training).

3. IMPROVE ADJUSTMENT OF PERFORMANCE MEASURES.> Adjust performance measures to take into account local conditions and characteristics of participants at

intake, including: lack of high school diploma or GED; limited employment history; physical and

BESTCOPYAVALA LECenter for Law and Social Policy 1

2

Page 3: Reproductions supplied by EDRS are the best that …DOCUMENT RESUME CE 085 229 Patel, Nisha; Strawn, Julie; Greenberg, Mark WIA Reauthorization Recommendations [and] Side-by-Side Comparison

mental health problems (including documented disabilities); low basic skills; limited English proficiency;and local labor market conditions.

> To the extent that expected levels are adjusted to take into account populations with barriers toemployment, states and local areas should be held accountable for serving these populations.

4. REQUIRE THAT PERFORMANCE MEASURES TAKE INTO ACCOUNT JOB QUALITY ANDBETTER CAPTURE EARNINGS CHANGES.> Add a measure requiring documentation of wages at placement, as well as availability of employer-

sponsored health care and vacation/sick leave benefits.> Revise the earnings change measure to capture earnings changes 12 months after the program (as

compared to preprogram earnings).

5. ADDRESS THE NEEDS OF THOSE WITH LIMITED ENGLISH SKILLS.> State plans currently must describe how the state will meet the service needs of special populations.

Limited English proficient individuals should be added to the list of special populations.> Include assessment of English proficiency as part of core services.> Add ESL to the list of activities that can be provided in conjunction with other training activities for

adults.> Collect consistent data across key federal programs on adults with limited English skills. Data should

include the country participants were born in (nativity), when they arrived in the U.S., years ofeducation in the native country, and some measure of English language ability (ideally a test score, butat least the same self-reported data used by the Census Bureau).

6. ENCOURAGE PROGRAMS TO COMBINE ADULT EDUCATION ESL, AND JOB TRAININGSERVICES.> Allow programs that combine job training, ESL and adult education, and receive both Title I and Title

II funding under WIA, to be accountable for just one set of performance measures, with the programallowed to choose to use either those of Title I or Title II as is appropriate to their program design.

> Explicitly allow national research and demonstration funds to be used to create or expand, andevaluate, employment programs for individuals with low skills and/or limited English proficiency thatcombine job training, ESL and/or literacy services.

> Explicitly allow state reserve funds to be used for grants to create or expand combined adult education,ESL, and/or job training services.

> In performance measures for the adult funding stream, count English proficiency and literacy gains, aswell as credential attainment, when coupled with job placement.

7. PROMOTE INFORMED CONSUMER CHOICE BY CREATING A PROCESS FOR FIXINGPROBLEMS WITH THE PROVIDER CERTIFICATION SYSTEM.> Suspend the provider certification requirement temporarily. Create a task force of states and federal

government to meet and make a set of regulatory and legislative recommendations to Congress toensure that certification can be carried out at little or no cost to providers and in a uniform manner.Recommendations must be presented to Congress by 2006, and only when changes have been enactedand implemented would certification become effective again.

8. CLARIFY HOW WIA SHOULD TAKE INTO ACCOUNT FEDERAL STUDENT AID RECEIVED.> Allow one-stops to consider whether someone has received a Pell grant in approving them for WIA-

funded qaining, but in determining whether WIA should supplement the Pell grant, consider the extent

Center for Law and Social Policy 2

3

Page 4: Reproductions supplied by EDRS are the best that …DOCUMENT RESUME CE 085 229 Patel, Nisha; Strawn, Julie; Greenberg, Mark WIA Reauthorization Recommendations [and] Side-by-Side Comparison

of unmet need using the definition of the cost of attendance in the Higher Education Act (whichincludes tuition and fees, books, supplies, dependent care, and living expenses).

TITLE II

1. IMPROVE EFFECTIVENESS OF SERVICES BY FOCUSING FUNDS ON HIGH-QUALITYPROGRAMS.> Shorten and focus the criteria by which states award grants to local service providers so that priority is

given to programs that provide a substantial number of hours of instruction to participants, have a highpercentage of full-time teachers, and have clearly defined pathways to employment, job training, andpostsecondary education (such as bridge programs customized to job training opportunities andarticulation agreements with college developmental education programs). Priority should also be givento programs whose teaching practices and curricula reflect scientific research on how adults learn andreflect the goals (often related to work or to family) of the students.

2. ADDRESS THE NEEDS OF THOSE WITH LIMITED ENGLISH SKILLS.> Include increasing English proficiency among the explicit purposes of adult education funding.> Include limited English proficient individuals in the formula for distributing adult education funding to

the states.> Require that the federal peer review process for state plans include ESL experts on the peer review

panel.> Collect consistent data across key federal programs on adults with limited English skills. Data should

include the country participants were born in (nativity), years of education in the native country, whenthey arrived in the U.S., and some measure of English language ability (ideally a test score, but at leastthe sanie self-reported data used by the Census Bureau).

3. ENCOURAGE PROGRAMS TO COMBINE ADULT EDUCATION, ESL, AND JOB TRAININGSERVICES.> Add vocational adult education and vocational ESL to the list of categories for required local activities.> Allow programs that combine job training, ESL, and adult education, and receive both Title I and Title

II funding under WLA, to be accountable for just one set of performance measures, with the programallowed to choose to use either those of Title I or Title II as is appropriate to their program design.

> Use national leadership funds to create or expand and evaluate programs that combine basic skillsand/or ESL, and job training services for individuals with limited English proficiency.

> Require states to report the number of combined job training and adult education/ESL programsfunded under Title II.

4. STRENGTHEN LINKS TO POSTSECONDARY EDUCATION AND JOB TRAINING.> Add as a purpose of the title "increase skills needed for access to, and success in, specific postsecondary

education and job training opportunities by adults with low skills and/or limited English."> Require state plans to include a description of how, on a regional basis, adult education will prepare

people with limited English skills and/or low basic skills (with or without high school diplomas) toenter job training and other postsecondary education, including bridge programs customized to jobtraining opportunities and articulation with college developmental education programs.

Center for Law and Social Policy 3

4

Page 5: Reproductions supplied by EDRS are the best that …DOCUMENT RESUME CE 085 229 Patel, Nisha; Strawn, Julie; Greenberg, Mark WIA Reauthorization Recommendations [and] Side-by-Side Comparison

> Make explicit that entities other than the state education agency, such as those responsible forcommunity and technical colleges or for workforce development, are eligible to administer adulteducation.

> Require states to conduct a legislative review periodically of which state agencyamong thoseadministering K-12 education, community or technical colleges, or workforce investment activitiesisbest suited given its mission and capacity to also administer adult education, with a view towardimproving links and transitions to job training and other postsecondary education.

Center for Law and Social Policy 4

5

Page 6: Reproductions supplied by EDRS are the best that …DOCUMENT RESUME CE 085 229 Patel, Nisha; Strawn, Julie; Greenberg, Mark WIA Reauthorization Recommendations [and] Side-by-Side Comparison

CLASPCENTER FOR LAW AND SOCIAL POLICY

WIA REAUTHORIZATION RECOMMENDATIONS

TITLE I

1. ELIMINATE SEQUENTIAL ELIGIBILITY.

Recommendation:> Eliminate sequential eligibility and allow individuals to receive intensive and training services in

any sequence determined appropriate by assessment in order to meet employment and earningsgoals established in conjunction with the one-stop operator or partner.

Background: The sequential eligibility requirements under current law unduly restrict the flexibilityof local boards and one-stop centers to provide the most appropriate services to customers on atimely basis. To the extent resources for intensive and training services are insufficient to serveevery eligible individual, local boards can and should be relied upon to make priority decisionsconsistent with other provisions of WIA, and their local needs. Sequential eligibility rules havecaused confusion in the field, and delays and denials of services to those who could benefit fromthem. Further, sequential eligibility rules send the message that intensive and training servicesshould be reserved for individuals who truly cannot find employment on their own. Thisinterpretation would preclude in most cases the use of WIA training to help low-wage workers,whether between jobs or currently employed, advance to better jobs. This was surely not theCongressional intent in creating WIA. As the Bush Administration has proposed, sequentialeligibility should be eliminated.

2. PROMOTE GREATER ACCESS TO TRAINING.

Recommendations:> Require that states and local areas spend a minimum percentage of adult and dislocated worker

funds on training services.> Require that states and local areas that fail to meet the expenditure requirement receive the same

penalties for noncompliance that apply for failing to meet adjusted performance measures undercurrent law.

> Require that in order to receive WIA incentive funds, states and local areas must spend at leastthe minimum percentage of funds on training.

> In their quarterly financial reports and annual reports, require that states report to theDepartment of Labor, and that local areas report to states, on the amount of adult and dislocatedworker funds spent on each category of services (core, intensive, training).

Background: The number of adults and dislocated workers who received training in the initial yearof WIA fell by 73 percent as compared to the number who received training during the final year of

www.clasp.org Center for Law and Social Policy (202) 906-80001015 15th Street, NW, Suite 400, Washington, DC 20005

6

Page 7: Reproductions supplied by EDRS are the best that …DOCUMENT RESUME CE 085 229 Patel, Nisha; Strawn, Julie; Greenberg, Mark WIA Reauthorization Recommendations [and] Side-by-Side Comparison

JTPA.1 Many local areas report a lack of adequate funding for Individual Training Accounts (ITAs)as a key factor in this decline. Under current law, there is no dedicated funding for WIA adult anddislocated worker training. Creating a "floor" for the share of WIA funds to be spent on trainingwould help ensure that WIA remains primarily a skill development program, as Congress intended,and does not simply duplicate the labor exchange functions of other programs, such as Wagner-Peyser. The experience of Florida with such a policy shows it can be workable: Florida requires that50 percent of adult and dislocated worker funds be spent on ITAs, and state agency staff haveindicated they believe the policy has led to a greater number of individuals receiving access totraining.

In addition, states are not required to report to the Department of Labor on the amount of WIAfunds spent on training versus core and intensive services. As a result, stakeholders and taxpayersdo not have access to national data on the amount of WIA funds spent on training; only three statesincluded information on the share of funds spent on training in their 2001 WIA annual reports.

3. IMPROVE ADJUSTMENT OF PERFORMANCE MEASURES.

Recommendation:> Adjust performance measures to take into account local conditions and characteristics of

participants at intake, including:o Lack Of high school diploma or GED;o Limited employment history;o Physical and mental health problems, including documented disabilities;o Low basic skills;o Limited English proficiency; and,o Local labor market conditions.

> To the extent that expected levels are adjusted to take into account populations with barriers toemployment, states and local areas should be held accountable for serving these populations.

Background: Many stakeholders have raised concerns that the current system of negotiatingperformance levels, which was intended to allow the adjustment of expected levels, has not workedwell. According to the GAO, performance measures are driving local staff to be reluctant toprovide WIA-funded services to job seekers who may be less likely to find employment orexperience earnings increases when placed in a job.' As both the Bush Administration and H.R.1261 propose, stronger language is needed on the economic conditions and participantcharacteristics that should be taken into account when setting expected levels of performance. Anobjective methodology should be developed to adjust expected performance levels in a manner thatis fair and consistent among all states and localities.

4. REQUIRE THAT PERFORMANCE MEASURES TAKE INTO ACCOUNT JOB QUALITYAND BETTER CAPTURE EARNINGS CHANGES.

Recommendations:> Add a measure requiring documentation of wages at placement, as well as availability of

employer-sponsored health care and vacation/sick leave benefits.

Center for Law and Social Policy 2

7

Page 8: Reproductions supplied by EDRS are the best that …DOCUMENT RESUME CE 085 229 Patel, Nisha; Strawn, Julie; Greenberg, Mark WIA Reauthorization Recommendations [and] Side-by-Side Comparison

> Revise the earnings change measure to capture earnings changes 12 months after the program (ascompared to preprogram earnings).

Background: If WIA is to achieve its stated purpose to "improve the quality of the workforce,reduce welfare dependency, and enhance the productivity and competitiveness of the Nation," it isvital that the system be held accountable for the quality of jobs obtained by those who benefit fromWIA-funded services. Research suggests that helping low-income adults obtain higher quality jobsthan they would find on their own can lead to better job retention and larger long-term wagegrowth. While current performance measures for adults and dislocated workers captureemployment placements, they fail to capture the quality of jobs in which participants are placed.Adding wages at placement and availability of employer-provided benefits would remedy this. Inaddition, research has shown that long-term follow-up is needed to see earnings gains for those inskill development programs.' The current six months is too short a period for such earnings gainsto become apparent.

5. ADDRESS THE NEEDS OF THOSE WITH LIMITED ENGLISH SKILLS.

Recommendations:> State plans currently must describe how the state will meet the service needs of special

populations. Limited English proficient individuals should be added to the list of specialpopulations.

> Include assessment of English proficiency as part of core services.> Add ESL to the list of activities that can be provided in conjunction with other training activities

for adults.> Collect consistent data across key federal programs on adults with limited English skills. Data

should include the country participants were born in (nativity), years of education in the nativecountry, when they arrived in the U.S., and some measure of English language ability (ideally atest score, but a.t least the same self-reported data used by the Census Bureau).

Background: The Census Bureau estimates that over 13 million legal immigrants arrived between1990 and 2000, with about 58 percent arriving between 1995 and 2000.4 In addition, the number ofimmigrants in our workforce has grown dramatically over the past decadeaccounting for nearlyhalf of all workforce growthand will continue to grow, with immigrants expected to account forall of the growth in the prime-aged workforce (age 25-54) between now and 2020.5 Yet there islittle recognition of the importance of ESL services in the WIA legislation. Changes are needed tobring the law up to date with current needs.

6. ENCOURAGE PROGRAMS TO COMBINE ADULT EDUCATION, ESL, AND JOBTRAINING SERVICES.

Recommendations:> Allow programs that combine job training, ESL, and adult education, and receive both Title I and

Title II funding under WIA, to be accountable for just one set of performance measures, with theprogram allowed to choose to use either those of Title I or Title II, as is appropriate to theirprogram design.

Center for Law and Social Policy 3

8

Page 9: Reproductions supplied by EDRS are the best that …DOCUMENT RESUME CE 085 229 Patel, Nisha; Strawn, Julie; Greenberg, Mark WIA Reauthorization Recommendations [and] Side-by-Side Comparison

> Explicitly allow national research and demonstration funds to be used to create or expand, andevaluate, employment programs for individuals with low skills and/or limited English proficiencythat combine job training, ESL and/or literacy services.

> Explicitly allow state reserve funds to be used for grants to create or expand combined adulteducation, ESL, and/or job training services.

> In performance measures for the adult funding stream, count English proficiency and literacygains, as well as credential attainment, when coupled with job placement.

Background: Scientific research on adult education programs, conducted primarily in the contextof welfare reform evaluations, suggests that economic impacts (employment and earnings gains) arelarger when adult education is integrated with or closely connected to job training and otherpostsecondary education.' Yet few adult education programs currently combine adult education,ESL, and job training. Federal leadership could help create more of these programs so that adulteducation can become more effective for those whose primary goals are to find a job or move up toa better job.

7. PROMOTE INFORMED CONSUMER CHOICE BY CREATING A PROCESS FORFIXINGPROBLEMS WITH THE PROVIDER CERTIFICATION SYSTEM.

Recommendation:> Suspend the provider certification requirement temporarily. Create a task force of states and

federal government to meet and make regulatory and legislative recommendations to Congress toensure that certification can be carried out at little or no cost to providers and in a uniformmanner. Recommendations must be presented to Congress by 2006, and only when changeshave been enacted and implemented would certification become effective again.

Background: Current law requires that eligible training providers provide program-specificoutcome information for all program participants, if any of them are WIA customers. This includesprogram completion rates, the percentage that obtains employment, and the wages at employmentplacement. Monitoring the employment and earnings outcomes of participants for each eligibleprogram is critical to the successful use of ITAs under WIA, because it can allow customers to makeinformed choices about the training options available to them. Without that informationon theperformance of training programs, WIA customers could fall victim to ineffectiveor even fraudulentproviders, as did many students in the federal student aid programs in the 1980s.

Yet despite its importance, the provider certification system is currendy broken. The majority ofproviders appear to lack access to a cost-effective and timely means of tracking participantoutcomes. Many training providers, particularly the community colleges, assert that the reportingrequirements are costly and difficult to implement, especially relative to the small amount of trainingfunds many providers receive. Anecdotal evidence suggests that, far from promotingconsumerchoice in training, the certification system is currently having the opposite effect by drivingproviders out of the system. Federal leadership is needed to help states and localities work throughthe legal and logistical issues involved in creating the means for local training providers to track andreport outcome data easily and inexpensively, and in a consistent and timely manner, so that theseimportant reporting requirements do not deter training providers from serving WIA clients.

Center for Law and Social Policy 4

9

Page 10: Reproductions supplied by EDRS are the best that …DOCUMENT RESUME CE 085 229 Patel, Nisha; Strawn, Julie; Greenberg, Mark WIA Reauthorization Recommendations [and] Side-by-Side Comparison

8. CLARIFY HOW WIA SHOULD TAKE INTO ACCOUNT FEDERAL STUDENT AIDRECEIVED.

Recommendation:> Allow one-stops to consider whether someone has received a Pell grant in approving them for

WIA-funded training, but in determining whether WIA should supplement the Pell grant,consider the extent of unmet need, using the definition of the cost of attendance in the HigherEducation Act (tuition and fees, books, supplies, dependent care, and living expenses).

Background: In part due to conflicting messages from the Department of Labor and theDepartment of Education, confusion has arisen about whether Pell grants or WIA-funded ITAsshould be the first source of funding considered in paying for education and training for individualswho are eligible to receive funding from both sources. This confusion should be resolved throughthe addition of clarifying language to the WIA statute to make it explicit that while one-stops canconsider whether someone has received a Pell grant in considering whether to award an ITA, adultshave other, substantial costs associated with participating in training beyond tuition and fees.

TITLE II

1. IMPROVE EFFECTIVENESS OF SERVICES BY FOCUSING FUNDS ON HIGH-QUALITYPROGRAMS.

Recommendation:> Shorten and focus the criteria by which states award grants to local service providers so that

priority is given to programs that provide a substantial number of hours of instruction toparticipants, have a high percentage of full-time teachers, and have clearly defined pathways toemployment, job training, and postsecondary education (such as bridge programs customized tojob training opportunities and articulation agreements with college developmental educationprograms). Priority should also be given to programs whose teaching practices and curriculareflect scientific research on how adults learn and reflect the goals (often related to work or tofamily) of the students.

Background: Current law directs states to consider a dozen different factors in awarding grants tolocal adult education providers; H.R. 1261 would expand the list still further. Congress could send amuch clearer and stronger message to states and local providers about what it considers most criticalfor success in adult education by shortening this list to a small number of key programcharacteristics and directing states to give priority in funding accordingly. Hours of instruction areclearly central to success, as scientific research shows that many adult education students fail toobtain enough hours of instruction to make educational progress. Similarly, having full-timeteachers is a necessary prerequisite for providing more hours of instruction and also for staff andcurriculum development. Finally, as more scientific research on how adults learn becomes available,programs should be encouraged to base their teaching practices and curricula on it, taking intoaccount the goals that adult learners bring to their studies.

Center for Law and Social Policy 5

1 0

Page 11: Reproductions supplied by EDRS are the best that …DOCUMENT RESUME CE 085 229 Patel, Nisha; Strawn, Julie; Greenberg, Mark WIA Reauthorization Recommendations [and] Side-by-Side Comparison

2. ADDRESS THE NEEDS OF THOSE WITH LIMITED ENGLISH SKILLS.

Recommendations:D Include increasing English proficiency among the explicit purposes of adult education funding.D Include limited English proficient individuals in the formula for distributing adult education

funding to the states.> Require that the federal peer review process for state plans include ESL experts on the peer

review panel.> Collect consistent data across key federal programs on adults with limited English skills. Data

should include the country participants were born in (nativity), years of education in the nativecountry, when they arrived in the U.S., and some measure of English language ability (ideally atest score, but at least the same self-reported data used by the Census Bureau).

Background: The Census Bureau estimates that over 13 million legal immigrants arrived between1990 and 2000, with about 58 percent arriving between 1995 and 2000.7 In addition, the number ofimmigrants in our workforce has grown dramatically over the past decadeaccounting for nearlyhalf of all workforce growthand will continue to grow, with immigrants expected to account forall of the growth in the prime-aged workforce (age 25-54) between now and 2020.8 Not surprisingly,English language learners are the fastest growing segment of those served in adult education, andcurrent resources for language and job training services are dwarfed by the need. Yet there is littlerecognition of the importance of ESL services in the adult education legislation. Changes areneeded to bring the law up to date with current needs.

3. ENCOURAGE PROGRAMS TO COMBINE ADULT EDUCATION, ESL, AND JOBTRAINING SERVICES.

Recommendations:> Add vocational adult education and ESL to the list of categories for required local activities.> Allow programs that combine job training, ESL and adult education, and receive both Tide I and

Tide II funding under WIA, to be accountable for just one set of performance measures, with theprogram allowed to choose to use either those of Tide I or Tide II as is appropriate to theirprogram design.

> Use national leadership funds to create or expand and evaluate programs that combine basicskills and/or ESL, and job training services for individuals with limited English proficiency.

> Require states to report the number of combined job training and adult education/ESL programsfunded under Tide II.

Background: Scientific research on adult education programs, conducted primarily in the contextof welfare reform evaluations, suggests that economic impacts (employment and earnings gains) arelarger when adult education is integrated with or closely connected to job training and otherpostsecondary education.9 Yet few adult education programs currently combine adult education,ESL, and job training. Federal leadership could help create more of these programs so that adulteducation can become more effective for those whose primary goals are to find a job or move up toa better job.

Center for Law and Social Policy 6

1 1

Page 12: Reproductions supplied by EDRS are the best that …DOCUMENT RESUME CE 085 229 Patel, Nisha; Strawn, Julie; Greenberg, Mark WIA Reauthorization Recommendations [and] Side-by-Side Comparison

4. STRENGTHEN LINKS TO POSTSECONDARY EDUCATION AND JOB TRAINING.

Recommendations:> Add as a purpose of the title "increase skills needed for access to, and success in, specific

postsecondary education and job training opportunities by adults with low skills and/or limitedEnglish."

> Require state plans to include a description of how, on a regional basis, adult education willprepare people with limited English skills and/or low basic skills (with or without high schooldiplomas) to enter job training and other postsecondary education, including bridge programscustomized to job training opportunities and articulation with college developmental educationprograms.

> Make explicit that entities other than the state education agency, such as those responsible forcommunity and technical colleges or for workforce development, are eligible to administer adulteducation.

> Require states to conduct a legislative review periodically of which state agencyamong thoseadministering K-12 education, community or technical colleges, or workforce investmentactivitiesis best suited given its mission and capacity to also administer adult education, with aview toward improving links and transitions to job training and other postsecondary education.

Background: Scientific research from welfare-to-work evaluations shows that the biggesteconomic impacts for adult education participants (employment and earnings gains) are for thosewho go on to job training or other postsecondary education. Yet many adult education programslack clear pathways that articulate the content and credentials of their programs to job training andpostsecondary education opportunities in the community. Encouraging regional planning to createsuch pathways would help more adults make these transitions, encourage more collaborationbetween adult education, job training, and postsecondary education, and make the links betweenadult education and college developmental education programs more coherent.

I See Frank, A., et al. (2003). The Workforce Investment Act: A First Look at Participation, Demographics, andServices. Washington, DC: Center for Law and Social Policy.2 U.S. General Accounting Office. (June 18, 2003). GAO-03-884T. Workforce Investment Act: Exemplary One-Stops Devised Strategies to Strengthen Services, but Challenges Remain for Reauthorization. Washington, DC:Author.3 Saulcy, S. et al. (2003). Connecting Business and the Wyoming Community College System: A Study ofEmployment Outcomes of 2001 Graduates from Wyoming Community Colleges. Casper, WY: Wyoming Departmentof Employment, Research, and Planning; Martinson, K., & Strawn, J. (2003). Built to Last: Why Skills Matter forLong-Run Success in Welfare Reform. Washington, DC: Center for Law and Social Policy.4 CLASP calculations from U.S. Censlis Bureau. (2002). Retrieved from tables produced athttp://factfindcr.census.gov. Figures include the District of Columbia, but not Puerto Rico or other territories.5 Ellwood, D. (2002). "How We Got Here" in Grow Faster Together. Or Grow Slowly Apart. Washington, DC: TheAspen Institute.6 For a recent summary of this research, see Martinson, K., & Strawn, J. (2003) in Note 3 above.7 See Note 4 above.8 See Note 5 above.9 See Martinson, K., & Strawn, J. (2003) in Note 3 above.

Center for Law and Social Policy 7

12

Page 13: Reproductions supplied by EDRS are the best that …DOCUMENT RESUME CE 085 229 Patel, Nisha; Strawn, Julie; Greenberg, Mark WIA Reauthorization Recommendations [and] Side-by-Side Comparison

CIA

SPC

EN

TE

R F

OR

LA

W A

ND

SO

CIA

L P

OL

ICY

Sid

e-by

-Sid

e C

ompa

rison

of T

itle

I Pro

visi

ons

in R

ecen

t WIA

Rea

utho

rizat

ion

Pro

posa

ls

by N

isha

Pat

el a

nd M

ark

Gre

enbe

rg (

Upd

ated

Jun

e 25

, 200

3)

Thi

s.do

cum

ent s

umm

ariz

es a

nd c

ompa

res

prov

isio

ns in

cur

rent

law

and

the

follo

win

g W

IA r

eaut

horiz

atio

n pr

opos

als:

An

8-pa

ge p

lan

rele

ased

by

the

Bus

h A

dmin

istr

atio

n in

Feb

ruar

y 20

03.

A b

ill (

H.R

. 126

1) in

trod

uced

by

Rep

. McK

eon

(R-C

A)

and

pass

ed b

y th

e H

ouse

of R

epre

sent

ativ

es o

n M

ay 8

, 200

3.

Cur

rent

Law

Bus

h A

dmin

istr

atio

n's

Pro

posa

lH

ouse

Bill

(H

.R. 1

261)

Adu

lt F

undi

ngA

utho

rizes

sep

arat

e fo

rmul

a fu

ndin

g st

ream

sC

onso

lidat

es A

dult,

Dis

loca

ted

Wor

ker,

and

Con

solid

ates

Adu

lt, D

islo

cate

d W

orke

r, a

ndfo

r ad

ults

and

dis

loca

ted

wor

kers

FY

1999

-E

mpl

oym

ent S

ervi

ce fu

ndin

g st

ream

s. L

abor

Em

ploy

men

t Ser

vice

fund

ing

stre

ams

into

a20

03. S

epar

ate

fund

ing

for

the

Em

ploy

men

tS

ervi

ce is

als

o au

thor

ized

for

FY

1999

-200

3ex

chan

ge s

ervi

ces

wou

ld b

e th

e fo

unda

tion,

with

rem

aini

ng fu

nds

focu

sed

on tr

aini

ng a

ndsi

ngle

fund

ing

stre

am fo

r "C

ompr

ehen

sive

Em

ploy

men

t and

Tra

inin

g A

ctiv

ities

for

Adu

lts."

thro

ugh

the

Wag

ner-

Pey

ser

Act

.in

tens

ive

serv

ices

.A

utho

rizes

fund

ing

thro

ugh

this

fund

ing

stre

amfo

r F

Y20

04-2

009.

Pro

vide

s th

at n

o st

ate

shal

lre

ceiv

e an

allo

tmen

t les

s th

an th

e to

tal a

mou

ntof

adu

lt, d

islo

cate

d w

orke

r, a

nd W

agne

r-P

eyse

r fu

nds

the

stat

e re

ceiv

ed in

FY

2003

.

You

th F

undi

ngA

utho

rizes

you

th fo

rmul

a fu

ndin

g st

ream

for

Ref

orm

s cu

rren

t pro

gram

s fo

r yo

uth

thro

ugh

aA

utho

rizes

fund

ing

thro

ugh

yout

h fu

ndin

gF

Y19

99-2

003.

Tar

gete

d S

tate

For

mul

a P

rogr

am d

esig

ned

tose

rve

out-

of-s

choo

l you

th. F

orm

ula

fund

sst

ream

for

FY

2004

-200

9.

At a

min

imum

, 30

perc

ent o

f fun

ds m

ust b

ew

ould

be

allo

cate

d to

sta

tes,

and

, as

unde

rN

ot m

ore

than

30

perc

ent o

f fun

ds fo

rus

ed to

ser

ve o

ut-o

f-sc

hool

you

th.

curr

ent l

aw, t

he g

over

nor

and

the

stat

e bo

ard

wou

ld b

e re

spon

sibl

e fo

r se

tting

pol

icie

s an

dst

rate

gies

to g

uide

the

use

of th

e fu

nds

at th

elo

cal l

evel

.

stat

ewid

e ac

tiviti

es a

nd n

ot m

ore

than

30

perc

ent o

f fun

ds a

vaila

ble

to lo

cal a

reas

may

be s

pent

on

activ

ities

for

in-s

choo

l you

th.

Act

iviti

es fo

r in

-sch

ool y

outh

may

onl

y be

carr

ied

out i

n no

n-sc

hool

hou

rs o

r pe

riods

whe

n sc

hool

is n

ot in

ses

sion

(su

ch a

s be

fore

or a

fter

scho

ol o

r du

ring

sum

mer

rec

ess)

.

Not

mor

e th

an 5

per

cent

of y

outh

ser

ved

in a

loca

l are

a m

ay b

e in

divi

dual

s w

ho d

o no

t mee

tin

com

e cr

iteria

, pro

vide

d th

ey m

eet o

ther

barr

ier-

rela

ted

elig

ibili

ty c

riter

ia,

Aut

horiz

es u

p to

$25

0M in

add

ition

al fu

ndin

g

Rem

oves

exc

eptio

n to

allo

w 5

per

cent

of y

outh

serv

ed to

rec

eive

ser

vice

s if

they

do

not m

eet

inco

me

crite

ria b

ut m

eet o

ther

bar

rier-

rela

ted

elig

ibili

ty c

riter

ia.

Elim

inat

es Y

outh

Opp

ortu

nity

Gra

nts.

ww

w.c

lasp

.org

Cen

ter

for

Law

and

Soc

ial P

olic

y(2

02)

906-

8000

1015

15t

h St

reet

, NW

, Sui

te 4

00, W

ashi

ngto

n, D

C 2

0005

Page 14: Reproductions supplied by EDRS are the best that …DOCUMENT RESUME CE 085 229 Patel, Nisha; Strawn, Julie; Greenberg, Mark WIA Reauthorization Recommendations [and] Side-by-Side Comparison

Cur

rent

Law

Bus

h A

dmin

istr

atio

n's

Pro

posa

lH

ouse

Bill

(H

.R. 1

261)

for

com

petit

ive

gran

ts to

loca

l are

as o

f hig

hpo

vert

y th

roug

h Y

outh

Opp

ortu

nity

Gra

nts

Cha

lleng

e G

rant

s to

Citi

es a

nd R

ural

Are

as:

Pro

vide

s th

at 2

5 pe

rcen

t of a

nnua

l(Y

OG

s).

Citi

es a

nd r

ural

are

as w

ith p

rogr

ams

that

inco

rpor

ate

prov

en s

trat

egie

s w

ould

app

ly to

the

Dep

artm

ent o

f Lab

or fo

r th

is ta

rget

edfu

ndin

g. T

his

incl

udes

less

ons

lear

ned

from

the

YO

G in

itiat

ive

and

othe

r de

mon

stra

tions

.

appr

opria

tion

of y

outh

form

ula

fund

s be

use

dfo

r Y

outh

Cha

lleng

e G

rant

s. In

fisc

al y

ears

in w

hich

the

appr

opria

tion

exce

eds

$1B

,$2

50M

wou

ld b

e re

serv

ed fo

r Y

outh

Cha

lleng

eG

rant

s.G

rant

ees

wou

ld n

eed

to d

emon

stra

tepa

rtne

rshi

ps, f

inan

cial

con

trib

utio

ns fr

om a

varie

ty o

f sou

rces

incl

udin

g ed

ucat

ion

and

busi

ness

com

mun

ities

, and

incl

usio

n of

"be

stpr

actic

es"

as p

art o

f the

pro

gram

des

ign.

Not

less

than

80

perc

ent m

ust b

e us

ed fo

rco

mpe

titiv

e gr

ants

to s

tate

s, lo

cal b

oard

s,N

ativ

e A

mer

ican

ent

ities

, and

pub

lic o

rpr

ivat

e en

titie

s ap

plyi

ng in

con

junc

tion

with

loca

l boa

rds.

Gra

nts

are

for

one

year

and

may

be

rene

wed

for

four

add

ition

al y

ears

.S

ecre

tary

may

req

uire

a m

atch

from

gran

tees

to p

rovi

de a

non

-Fed

eral

sha

re o

fth

e co

st. P

rogr

am p

artic

ipan

ts m

ay b

eyo

uth

ages

14-

19. F

unds

may

be

used

for

activ

ities

des

igne

d to

ass

ist y

outh

inac

quiri

ng s

kills

, cre

dent

ials

, and

empl

oym

ent e

xper

ienc

e ne

cess

ary

tosu

ccee

d in

labo

r fo

rce.

Up

to 2

0 pe

rcen

t may

be

used

for

disc

retio

nary

gra

nts

to p

ublic

or

priv

ate

entit

ies

to p

rovi

de a

ctiv

ities

to a

ssis

t you

thin

pre

parin

g fo

r, e

nter

ing,

and

ret

aini

ngem

ploy

men

t. F

unds

may

be

used

for

out-

of-s

choo

l you

th a

nd fo

r as

sist

ing

in-s

choo

lyo

uth

to s

tay

in s

choo

l and

gai

n w

ork

expe

rienc

e. S

ecre

tary

may

req

uire

am

atch

from

gra

ntee

s to

pro

vide

a n

on-

fede

ral s

hare

of t

he c

ost a

nd m

ay r

equi

regr

ante

es to

par

ticip

ate

in e

valu

atio

ns.

Infr

astr

uctu

reN

o pr

ovis

ion.

Ope

ratio

nal c

ost o

f one

-sto

p sy

stem

fina

nced

Aut

horiz

es g

over

nors

to s

peci

fy a

por

tion

ofF

undi

ngth

roug

h de

dica

ted

"One

-Sto

p In

fras

truc

ture

"fu

ndin

g th

roug

h co

ntrib

utio

ns o

f fun

ds fr

ompa

rtne

r pr

ogra

ms

eith

er a

t the

fede

ral l

evel

or

as a

set

-asi

de a

t the

sta

te le

vel.

Fun

ding

wou

ld g

o to

the

gove

rnor

for

loca

l allo

catio

n,S

tate

and

loca

l par

tner

s co

uld

augm

ent t

his

fund

ing

as n

eede

d. T

he s

tate

boa

rd w

ould

wor

k w

ith g

over

nor

to d

eter

min

e th

e m

ost

fede

ral f

unds

from

req

uire

d an

d ad

ditio

nal

part

ners

to b

e ta

ken

and

used

to p

rovi

dein

fras

truc

ture

fund

ing

for

one-

stop

s, ta

king

into

cons

ider

atio

n th

e pr

opor

tiona

te u

se o

f one

-st

op c

ente

rs b

y ea

ch p

artn

er, t

he c

osts

of

adm

inis

trat

ion

for

purp

oses

not

rel

ated

to o

ne-

stop

cen

ters

for

each

par

tner

, and

oth

erre

leva

nt fa

ctor

s..

stra

tegi

c us

es fo

r th

is fu

ndin

g w

ithin

the

stat

e.F

unds

cou

ld b

e ta

ken

only

from

fund

sav

aila

ble

for

adm

inis

trat

ive

cost

s un

der

the

part

ner

prog

ram

and

wou

ld b

e su

bjec

t to

Cen

ter

for

Law

and

Soc

ial P

olic

y2

Page 15: Reproductions supplied by EDRS are the best that …DOCUMENT RESUME CE 085 229 Patel, Nisha; Strawn, Julie; Greenberg, Mark WIA Reauthorization Recommendations [and] Side-by-Side Comparison

Cur

rent

Law

Bus

h A

dmin

istr

atio

n's

Pro

posa

lH

ouse

Bill

(H

.R. 1

261)

the

limits

on

port

ions

of f

undi

ng th

at c

anbe

use

d fo

r ad

min

istr

ativ

e co

sts

unde

r th

epa

rtne

r pr

ogra

m.

Pro

gram

s th

at a

re fe

dera

l dire

ct s

pend

ing

unde

r S

ec. 2

50(c

)(8)

of t

he B

alan

ced

Bud

get a

nd E

mer

genc

y D

efic

it C

ontr

ol A

ctof

198

5 sh

all n

ot b

e re

quire

d to

pro

vide

an

amou

nt in

exc

ess

of th

e am

ount

dete

rmin

ed to

be

equi

vale

nt to

the

prog

ram

's p

ropo

rtio

nate

use

of o

ne-s

top

cent

ers

in th

e st

ate.

Fun

ds w

ould

be

allo

cate

d to

cer

tifie

d on

e-st

ops

base

d on

a fo

rmul

a de

velo

ped

by th

est

ate

boar

d.

Infr

astr

uctu

re fu

nds

are

defin

ed a

s

..% A

"non

pers

onne

l cos

ts th

at a

re n

eces

sary

for

the

gene

ral o

pera

tion

of a

one

-sto

p ce

nter

,in

clud

ing

rent

al c

osts

of t

he fa

cilit

ies,

cos

ts o

fut

ilitie

s an

d m

aint

enan

ce, e

quip

men

t (in

clud

ing

adap

tive

tech

nolo

gy fo

r in

divi

dual

s w

ithdi

sabi

litie

s), s

trat

egic

pla

nnin

g ac

tiviti

es fo

r th

ece

nter

, and

com

mon

out

reac

h ac

tiviti

es.

Req

uire

s pa

rtne

r pr

ogra

ms

to c

over

cos

ts o

rpr

ovid

e no

ncas

h re

sour

ces

rela

ting

to th

eop

erat

ion

of th

e on

e-st

op d

eliv

ery

syst

em th

atar

e no

t pai

d fo

r w

ith th

e ab

ove

infr

astr

uctu

refu

nds

(to

the

exte

nt n

ot in

cons

iste

nt w

ith th

efe

dera

l law

invo

lved

) in

clud

ing:

Infr

astr

uctu

re c

osts

in e

xces

s of

abo

vein

fras

truc

ture

fund

s

.

Com

mon

cos

ts th

at a

re in

add

ition

s to

infr

astr

uctu

re c

osts

Cos

ts o

f pro

visi

on o

f cor

e se

rvic

esap

plic

able

to e

ach

prog

ram

The

met

hod

of d

eter

min

ing

the

port

ion

of fu

nds

to b

e pr

ovid

ed b

y ea

ch p

rogr

am w

ill b

ede

term

ined

as

part

of l

ocal

Mem

oran

da o

fU

nder

stan

ding

(M

OU

).

Ince

ntiv

eR

equi

res

Sec

reta

ry to

aw

ard

gran

ts b

etw

een

Doe

s no

t add

ress

.R

estr

uctu

res

ince

ntiv

e gr

ants

to b

e aw

arde

d to

Gra

nts

$750

,000

and

$3M

to s

tate

s th

at e

xcee

d th

eir

_.st

ates

bas

ed o

n m

eetin

g or

exc

eedi

ng W

IA

Cen

ter

for

Law

and

Soc

ial P

olic

y3

Page 16: Reproductions supplied by EDRS are the best that …DOCUMENT RESUME CE 085 229 Patel, Nisha; Strawn, Julie; Greenberg, Mark WIA Reauthorization Recommendations [and] Side-by-Side Comparison

Cur

rent

Law

Bus

h A

dmin

istr

atio

n's

Pro

posa

lH

ouse

Bill

(H

.R. 1

261)

adju

sted

WIA

per

form

ance

leve

ls, t

heir

expe

cted

Adu

lt E

duca

tion

perf

orm

ance

leve

ls,

and

thei

r P

erki

ns p

erfo

rman

ce le

vels

,

.

perf

orm

ance

mea

sure

s; o

n pe

rfor

man

ce in

serv

ing

spec

ial p

opul

atio

ns, i

nclu

ding

the

leve

ls o

f ser

vice

pro

vide

d an

d th

e pe

rfor

man

ceou

tcom

es; a

nd s

uch

othe

r fa

ctor

s re

latin

g to

perf

orm

ance

as

the

Sec

reta

ry d

eter

min

esap

prop

riate

. Gov

erno

rs m

ay a

lso

awar

din

cent

ive

gran

ts to

loca

l are

as b

ased

on

exem

plar

y pe

rfor

man

ce w

ith r

espe

ct to

perf

orm

ance

mea

sure

s an

d in

ser

ving

spe

cial

popu

latio

ns, i

nclu

ding

leve

ls o

f ser

vice

and

perf

orm

ance

out

com

es.

Nat

iona

lE

mer

genc

yG

rant

s

Aut

horiz

es S

ecre

tary

to p

rovi

de g

rant

s to

stat

es, l

ocal

are

as, a

nd o

ther

ent

ities

topr

ovid

e em

ploy

men

t and

trai

ning

ass

ista

nce

tow

orke

rs a

ffect

ed b

y m

ajor

dis

loca

tions

and

tost

ates

that

suf

fer

emer

genc

ies

or m

ajor

disa

ster

s.

Req

uire

s S

ecre

tary

to d

esig

nate

a n

atio

nal

disl

ocat

ed w

orke

r of

fice

to c

oord

inat

eem

ploy

men

t and

trai

ning

act

iviti

es fo

rdi

sloc

ated

wor

kers

, inc

ludi

ng N

atio

nal

Em

erge

ncy

Gra

nts.

Pro

vide

s fo

r ad

ditio

nal N

atio

nal E

mer

genc

yG

rant

s as

sist

ance

to th

e 8

stat

es w

hose

PY

1998

adu

lt fu

ndin

g al

loca

tion

divi

ded

bycu

rren

t pro

gram

yea

r ad

ult f

undi

ng a

lloca

tion

yiel

ds th

e gr

eate

st q

uotie

nt.

Incr

ease

s th

e pr

opor

tion

of fu

ndin

g fo

rN

atio

nal R

eser

ve fo

r N

atio

nal D

islo

cate

dW

orke

r G

rant

s (f

orm

erly

Nat

iona

l Em

erge

ncy

Gra

nts)

. Nat

iona

l Dis

loca

ted

Wor

ker

Gra

nts

wou

ld b

e pr

ovid

ed to

sta

tes

and

loca

litie

s at

the

Sec

reta

ry's

dis

cret

ion

to a

ddre

ss s

peci

alla

yoff

situ

atio

ns.

Ren

ames

Nat

iona

l Em

erge

ncy

Gra

nts

as"N

atio

nal D

islo

cate

d W

orke

r G

rant

s."

Elim

inat

es n

atio

nal d

islo

cate

d w

orke

r of

fice.

Elim

inat

es p

rovi

sion

allo

win

g ad

ditio

nal

Nat

iona

l Em

erge

ncy

Gra

nts

assi

stan

ce to

the

8 st

ates

who

se P

Y 1

998

adul

t fun

ding

allo

catio

n di

vide

d by

cur

rent

pro

gram

yea

rad

ult f

undi

ng a

lloca

tion

yiel

ds th

e gr

eate

stqu

otie

nt.

Lim

itatio

ns o

nU

se o

f Fun

dsN

o W

IA fu

nds

may

be

used

for

empl

oym

ent

gene

ratin

g ac

tiviti

es, e

cono

mic

dev

elop

men

tac

tiviti

es, i

nves

tmen

t in

revo

lvin

g lo

an fu

nds,

capi

taliz

atio

n of

bus

ines

ses,

inve

stm

ent i

nco

ntra

ct b

iddi

ng r

esou

rce

cent

ers,

and

sim

ilar

activ

ities

that

are

not

dire

ctly

rel

ated

to tr

aini

ngfo

r el

igib

le in

divi

dual

s,

No

fund

s fo

r st

atew

ide

and

loca

l wor

kfor

cein

vest

men

t sys

tem

s m

ay b

e us

ed fo

r fo

reig

ntr

avel

,

Str

ong

fisca

l con

trol

s ne

ed to

be

esta

blis

hed

atal

l lev

els

of th

e sy

stem

. An

emph

asis

sho

uld

be p

lace

d on

dat

a va

lidat

ion,

str

engt

hene

dm

onito

ring,

and

ove

rsig

ht in

ord

er to

ens

ure

appr

opria

te u

se o

f fed

eral

fund

s. P

rude

nt u

seof

taxp

ayer

dol

lars

is a

cor

e pr

inci

ple,

Elim

inat

es r

estr

ictio

n on

use

of W

IA fu

nds

for

empl

oym

ent g

ener

atin

g ac

tiviti

es, e

cono

mic

deve

lopm

ent a

ctiv

ities

, inv

estm

ent i

n re

volv

ing

loan

fund

s, c

apita

lizat

ion

of b

usin

esse

s,in

vest

men

t in

cont

ract

bid

ding

res

ourc

ece

nter

s, a

nd s

imila

r ac

tiviti

es th

at a

re n

otdi

rect

ly r

elat

ed to

trai

ning

for

elig

ible

indi

vidu

als.

Add

s re

quire

men

t tha

t WIA

fund

s ca

nnot

be

used

to e

stab

lish

or o

pera

te s

tand

-alo

ne fe

e-fo

r-se

rvic

e en

terp

rises

(do

es n

ot in

clud

e on

e-st

op c

ente

rs)

that

com

pete

with

priv

ate

sect

or

Cen

ter

for

Law

and

Soc

ial P

olic

y4

Page 17: Reproductions supplied by EDRS are the best that …DOCUMENT RESUME CE 085 229 Patel, Nisha; Strawn, Julie; Greenberg, Mark WIA Reauthorization Recommendations [and] Side-by-Side Comparison

Cur

rent

Law

Bus

h A

dmin

istr

atio

n's

Pro

posa

lH

ouse

Bill

(H

.R. 1

261)

No

yout

h fu

nds

can

be u

sed

to d

evel

op o

rim

plem

ent e

duca

tion

curr

icul

a fo

r sc

hool

syst

ems.

empl

oym

ent a

genc

ies.

No

yout

h fu

nds

can

be u

sed

to d

evel

op o

rim

plem

ent e

duca

tion

curr

icul

a fo

r sc

hool

syst

ems.

Pur

pose

"To

prov

ide

wor

kfor

ce in

vest

men

t act

iviti

es,

thro

ugh

stat

ewid

e an

d lo

cal w

orkf

orce

inve

stm

ent s

yste

ms,

that

incr

ease

the

empl

oym

ent,

rete

ntio

n, a

nd e

arni

ngs

ofpa

rtic

ipan

ts, a

nd, a

s a

resu

lt, im

prov

e th

equ

ality

of t

he w

orkf

orce

, red

uce

wel

fare

depe

nden

cy, a

nd e

nhan

ce th

e pr

oduc

tivity

and

com

petit

iven

ess

of th

e N

atio

n."

Doe

s no

t add

ress

.A

dds

lang

uage

sta

ting,

"It

is a

lso

the

purp

ose

of th

is s

ubtit

le to

pro

vide

wor

kfor

ce in

vest

men

tac

tiviti

es in

a m

anne

r th

at p

rom

otes

the

info

rmed

cho

ice

of p

artic

ipan

ts a

nd a

ctiv

ely

invo

lves

par

ticip

ants

in d

ecis

ions

affe

ctin

g th

eir

part

icip

atio

n in

suc

h ac

tiviti

es."

Sta

te B

oard

Mem

bers

hip

Mem

bers

hip

mus

t inc

lude

:G

over

nor

2 m

embe

rs o

f eac

h ch

ambe

r of

the

stat

ele

gisl

atur

e, a

ndR

epre

sent

ativ

es a

ppoi

nted

by

the

gove

rnor

, inc

ludi

ng:

o B

usin

ess

repr

esen

tativ

eso

Chi

ef e

lect

ed o

ffici

als

(rep

rese

ntin

gbo

th c

ities

and

cou

ntie

s w

here

appr

opria

te)

o La

bor

repr

esen

tativ

eso

You

th o

rgan

izat

ion

repr

esen

tativ

eso

Rep

rese

ntat

ives

of i

ndiv

idua

ls a

ndor

gani

zatio

ns w

ith e

xper

ienc

e an

dex

pert

ise

in th

e de

liver

y of

wor

kfor

cein

vest

men

t act

iviti

es in

clud

ing

chie

fex

ecut

ive

offic

ers

of c

omm

unity

colle

ges

and

com

mun

ity b

ased

orga

niza

tions

o Le

ad s

tate

offi

cial

s of

man

dato

rypa

rtne

r ag

enci

eso

Oth

er r

epre

sent

ativ

es th

at th

ego

vern

or m

ay d

esig

nate

Mem

bers

mus

t rep

rese

nt d

iver

se r

egio

ns o

fth

e st

ate

and

a m

ajor

ity m

ust b

e bu

sine

ssre

pres

enta

tives

.

Sta

te m

ay u

se a

n al

tern

ativ

e en

tity

as a

sta

tebo

ard

if it

was

est

ablis

hed

unde

r JT

PA

and

in

Str

eam

lines

sta

te b

oard

mem

bers

hip

requ

irem

ents

to in

clud

e at

a m

inim

um:

Sta

te a

genc

ies

resp

onsi

ble

for

adm

inis

terin

g on

e-st

op p

artn

er p

rogr

ams

Sta

te e

cono

mic

dev

elop

men

t age

ncy

Bus

ines

s re

pres

enta

tives

Wor

ker

advo

cate

sS

tate

legi

slat

ors

Elim

inat

es b

usin

ess

maj

ority

req

uire

men

t, bu

tch

air

is s

till r

equi

red

to b

e m

embe

r of

bus

ines

sco

mm

unity

. Giv

es g

over

nors

aut

horit

y to

expa

nd b

oard

mem

bers

hip.

Elim

inat

es a

ltern

ativ

e en

tity

gran

dfat

herin

g

Req

uire

s th

at s

tate

reh

abili

tatio

n ag

ency

dire

ctor

s an

d ec

onom

ic d

evel

opm

ent a

genc

yof

ficia

ls b

e m

embe

rs o

f sta

te b

oard

.

Rem

oves

req

uire

men

t tha

t rep

rese

ntat

ive

ofyo

uth

orga

niza

tion

be m

embe

r of

sta

te b

oard

.

Add

s th

e fo

llow

ing

perm

issi

ble

part

ners

, whi

ch,

if m

ade

man

dato

ry b

y th

e go

vern

or, w

ould

be

requ

ired

mem

bers

of t

he s

tate

boa

rd:

Em

ploy

men

t and

trai

ning

pro

gram

sad

min

iste

red

by th

e S

ocia

l Sec

urity

Adm

inis

trat

ion,

incl

udin

g T

icke

t-to

-Wor

kpr

ogra

mP

rogr

ams

unde

r th

e IV

-D C

hild

Sup

port

prog

ram

Pro

gram

s ca

rrie

d ou

t in

the

loca

l are

as fo

rin

divi

dual

s w

ith d

isab

ilitie

s, in

clud

ing

prog

ram

s ca

rrie

d ou

t by

stat

e ag

enci

esre

latin

g to

men

tal h

ealth

, men

tal

reta

rdat

ion,

and

dev

elop

men

tal d

isab

ilitie

s;st

ate

Med

icai

d ag

enci

es; S

tate

Inde

pend

ent L

ivin

g C

ounc

ils; a

ndIn

depe

nden

t Liv

ing

Cen

ters

Elim

inat

es a

ltern

ativ

e en

tity

gran

dfat

herin

g

Cen

ter

for

Law

and

Soc

ial P

olic

y5

Page 18: Reproductions supplied by EDRS are the best that …DOCUMENT RESUME CE 085 229 Patel, Nisha; Strawn, Julie; Greenberg, Mark WIA Reauthorization Recommendations [and] Side-by-Side Comparison

Cur

rent

Law

Bus

h A

dmin

istr

atio

n's

Pro

posa

lH

ouse

Bill

(H

.R. 1

261)

exis

tenc

e on

Dec

embe

r 31

, 199

7, s

ubst

antia

llysi

mila

r to

a s

tate

boa

rd r

equi

red

unde

r W

IA,

and

incl

udes

rep

rese

ntat

ives

of b

usin

ess

and

labo

r or

gani

zatio

ns.

prov

isio

ns,

prov

isio

ns.

Sta

te B

oard

Fun

ctio

nsF

unct

ions

are

to a

ssis

t gov

erno

r in

:D

evel

opm

ent o

f the

sta

te p

lan

Dev

elop

men

t of c

ontin

uous

impr

ovem

ent

of s

tate

wid

e ac

tiviti

es, i

nclu

ding

link

ages

toas

sure

coo

rdin

atio

n an

d no

ndup

licat

ion

ofac

tiviti

es a

nd r

evie

w o

f loc

al p

lans

Com

men

ting

at le

ast o

nce

annu

ally

on

Per

kins

per

form

ance

mea

sure

sD

esig

natio

n of

loca

l are

asD

evel

opm

ent o

f adu

lt an

d yo

uth

allo

catio

nfo

rmul

asD

evel

opm

ent a

nd c

ontin

uous

impr

ovem

ent

of c

ompr

ehen

sive

sta

te p

erfo

rman

cem

easu

res

Pre

para

tion

of a

nnua

l rep

ort t

o S

ecre

tary

of D

OL

Dev

elop

men

t of s

tate

wid

e em

ploy

men

tst

atis

tics

syst

em u

nder

Wag

ner-

Pey

ser

A c

t

Dev

elop

men

t of a

pplic

atio

n fo

r in

cent

ive

gran

ts

Fun

ctio

ns w

ould

be

to s

et p

olic

ies

and

prio

ritie

s fo

r on

e-st

op c

aree

r ce

nter

sys

tem

,in

clud

ing

deve

lopm

ent o

f min

imum

ser

vice

deliv

ery

stan

dard

s, c

ompr

ehen

sive

out

reac

hst

rate

gies

, and

eco

nom

ic d

evel

opm

ent

stra

tegi

es.

Add

s fu

nctio

n of

ass

istin

g go

vern

or in

deve

lopm

ent a

nd r

evie

w o

f sta

tew

ide

polic

ies

affe

ctin

g in

tegr

ated

ser

vice

pro

visi

on, i

nclu

ding

one-

stop

cer

tific

atio

n cr

iteria

, one

-sto

pin

fras

truc

ture

fund

ing

allo

catio

n, a

nd e

quita

ble

and

effic

ient

cos

t allo

catio

n in

one

-sto

pde

liver

y sy

stem

s.

Rem

oves

req

uire

men

t tha

t sta

te b

oard

rev

iew

Per

kins

per

form

ance

mea

sure

s.

Req

uire

s st

ate

boar

d to

ass

ist g

over

nor

tode

velo

p cr

iteria

for

appo

intm

ent a

ndce

rtifi

catio

n of

loca

l boa

rds.

Req

uire

s st

ate

boar

d to

set

up

crite

ria a

ndpr

oced

ures

for

cert

ifyin

g on

e-st

ops

and

spec

ifies

that

cer

tific

atio

n is

a r

equi

rem

ent t

ore

ceiv

e in

fras

truc

ture

fund

s. C

riter

ia fo

rce

rtifi

catio

n sh

all i

nclu

de m

inim

um s

tand

ards

rela

ting

to s

cope

and

deg

ree

of s

ervi

cein

tegr

atio

n an

d ho

w th

e ce

nter

s en

sure

that

prov

ider

s m

eet t

he e

mpl

oym

ent n

eeds

of l

ocal

empl

oyer

s an

d pa

rtic

ipan

ts.

Exp

licitl

y au

thor

izes

sta

te b

oard

to h

ire s

taff.

Sta

te P

lans

Req

uire

s a

stat

e pl

an th

at o

utlin

es a

5-y

ear

stra

tegy

for

the

stat

ewid

e w

orkf

orce

inve

stm

ent s

yste

m.

List

s sp

ecia

l pop

ulat

ions

for

whi

ch p

lan

mus

tsp

ecify

how

ser

vice

nee

ds w

ill b

e m

et:

disl

ocat

ed w

orke

rs a

nd d

ispl

aced

hom

emak

ers,

low

-inco

me

indi

vidu

als

(incl

udin

g re

cipi

ents

of p

ublic

ass

ista

nce)

,in

divi

dual

s tr

aini

ng fo

r no

ntra

ditio

nal

empl

oym

ent,

and

othe

rs w

ith m

ultip

le b

arrie

rsto

em

ploy

men

t (in

clud

ing

olde

r in

divi

dual

s an

din

divi

dual

s w

ith d

isab

ilitie

s).

Req

uire

s 2-

year

pla

ns r

athe

r th

an 5

-yea

rpl

ans.

Req

uire

s 2-

year

pla

ns r

athe

r th

an 5

-yea

rpl

ans.

Add

s th

e fo

llow

ing

to th

e lis

t of s

peci

alpo

pula

tions

for

whi

ch p

lan

mus

t spe

cify

how

serv

ice

need

s w

ill b

e m

et: H

omel

ess;

ex-

offe

nder

s; a

nd fo

rmer

ly s

elf-

empl

oyed

and

tran

sitio

ning

farm

ers,

ran

cher

s, a

nd fi

sher

man

.

Add

s re

quire

men

t to

desc

ribe

how

ser

vice

s w

illbe

pro

vide

d to

indi

vidu

als

with

dis

abili

ties

cons

iste

nt w

ith S

ec. 1

88 a

nd E

xecu

tive

Ord

er13

217

(con

cern

ing

com

mun

ity-b

ased

Cen

ter

for

Law

and

Soc

ial P

olic

y6

Page 19: Reproductions supplied by EDRS are the best that …DOCUMENT RESUME CE 085 229 Patel, Nisha; Strawn, Julie; Greenberg, Mark WIA Reauthorization Recommendations [and] Side-by-Side Comparison

Cur

rent

Law

Bus

h A

dmin

istr

atio

n's

Pro

posa

lH

ouse

Bill

(H

.R. 1

261)

alte

rnat

ives

).

Loca

l Are

asG

over

nors

req

uire

d to

des

igna

te lo

cal a

reas

and

take

into

con

side

ratio

n:G

eogr

aphi

c ar

eas

serv

ed b

y lo

cal

educ

atio

nal a

genc

ies

and

inte

rmed

iate

educ

atio

nal a

genc

ies

Geo

grap

hic

area

s se

rved

by

post

seco

ndar

y ed

ucat

iona

l ins

titut

ions

and

area

voc

atio

nal e

duca

tion

scho

ols

Add

s pr

omot

ion

of e

ffici

ency

in d

eliv

ery

ofse

rvic

es a

s a

cons

ider

atio

n fo

r de

sign

atio

n of

loca

l are

as.

Ext

ent t

o w

hich

loca

l are

as a

re c

onsi

sten

tw

ith la

bor

mar

ket a

reas

Res

ourc

es a

vaila

ble

to e

ffect

ivel

yad

min

iste

r re

quire

d ac

tiviti

es,

Gov

erno

r of

a s

tate

that

was

a s

ingl

e st

ate

serv

ice

deliv

ery

area

und

er J

TP

A a

s of

Jul

y 1,

1998

, may

des

igna

te s

tate

as

sing

le s

tate

loca

lar

ea u

nder

WIA

.

Gov

erno

r re

quire

d to

aut

omat

ical

ly a

ppro

veE

limin

ates

initi

al a

nd s

ubse

quen

t des

igna

tion

Giv

es g

over

nors

aut

horit

y to

den

y re

ques

t for

any

requ

est f

or d

esig

natio

n as

a lo

cal a

rea

for:

Any

uni

t of l

ocal

gov

ernm

ent w

ith

prov

isio

ns,

cont

inue

d au

tom

atic

loca

l are

a de

sign

atio

n, if

gove

rnor

det

erm

ines

loca

l are

a no

t to

have

popu

latio

n of

500

,000

or

mor

e;pe

rfor

med

suc

cess

fully

dur

ing

prec

edin

g 2-

A J

TP

A r

ural

con

cent

rate

d em

ploy

men

tgr

ant r

ecip

ient

of d

emon

stra

ted

effe

ctiv

enes

s th

at s

erve

d as

a s

ervi

ce

year

per

iod.

Elim

inat

es a

utom

atic

loca

l are

a de

sign

atio

n

deliv

ery

area

or

subs

tate

are

a un

der

JTP

Are

quire

men

t for

a J

TP

A a

rea

in a

sta

te th

at h

as

(if r

eque

st s

ubm

itted

); o

ra

popu

latio

n of

not

mor

e th

at 1

,100

,000

and

a

A J

TP

A a

rea

in a

sta

te th

at h

as a

popu

latio

n de

nsity

gre

ater

than

900

per

sons

popu

latio

n of

not

mor

e th

at 1

,100

,000

and

a po

pula

tion

dens

ity g

reat

er th

an 9

00pe

rson

s pe

r sq

uare

mile

..

per

squa

re m

ile.

Pro

vide

s fo

r ap

peal

pro

cess

(as

est

ablis

hed

inst

ate

plan

) fo

r lo

cal g

over

nmen

t or

gran

tre

cipi

ent t

hat r

eque

sts,

but

is n

ot g

rant

ed,

desi

gnat

ion

as a

loca

l are

a.

Elim

inat

es lo

cal a

rea

right

s to

app

eal n

on-

desi

gnat

ion

to th

e S

ecre

tary

.

Sta

te m

ay r

equi

re r

egio

nal p

lann

ing

by lo

cal

boar

ds fo

r a

desi

gnat

ed r

egio

n in

the

stat

e,m

ay r

equi

re lo

cal b

oard

s to

par

ticip

ate

in a

Pro

vide

s th

at a

sta

te m

ay r

equi

re lo

cal b

oard

sfo

r a

desi

gnat

ed r

egio

n to

pre

pare

a s

ingl

e

plan

ning

pro

cess

for

esta

blis

hmen

t of r

egio

nal

regi

onal

pla

n th

at in

corp

orat

es e

lem

ents

perf

orm

ance

mea

sure

s, a

nd m

ay a

war

dre

quire

d in

loca

l pla

ns a

nd th

at is

sub

mitt

edan

d ap

prov

ed in

lieu

of s

epar

ate

loca

l pla

ns.

Cen

ter

for

Law

and

Soc

ial P

olic

y7

Page 20: Reproductions supplied by EDRS are the best that …DOCUMENT RESUME CE 085 229 Patel, Nisha; Strawn, Julie; Greenberg, Mark WIA Reauthorization Recommendations [and] Side-by-Side Comparison

Cur

rent

Law

Bus

h A

dmin

istr

atio

n's

Pro

posa

lH

ouse

Bill

(H

.R. 1

261)

regi

onal

ince

ntiv

e gr

ants

to d

esig

nate

d re

gion

sth

at m

eet o

r ex

ceed

reg

iona

l per

form

ance

mea

sure

s.

Loca

l Boa

rdM

emlb

ersh

ipan

d F

unct

ions

Mem

bers

hip

mus

t inc

lude

rep

rese

ntat

ives

of:

Bus

ines

sLo

cal e

duca

tiona

l ent

ities

Labo

r or

gani

zatio

nsC

omm

unity

-bas

ed o

rgan

izat

ions

Eco

nom

ic d

evel

opm

ent a

genc

ies

One

-sto

p pa

rtne

rsO

ther

ent

ities

the

chie

f loc

al e

lect

ed o

ffici

alde

term

ines

app

ropr

iate

Maj

ority

of m

embe

rs m

ust b

e bu

sine

ssre

pres

enta

tives

.

Req

uire

s es

tabl

ishm

ent o

f You

th C

ounc

ils a

s a

subg

roup

of L

WIB

to d

evel

op p

ortio

n of

loca

lpl

an r

elat

ing

to y

outh

, coo

rdin

ate

WIA

-fun

ded

yout

h ac

tiviti

es, r

ecom

men

d pr

ovid

ers

of y

outh

activ

ities

to b

e aw

arde

d gr

ants

/con

trac

ts, a

ndco

nduc

t ove

rsig

ht o

f pro

vide

rs.

Allo

ws

alte

rnat

ive

entit

ies

that

exi

sted

und

erJT

PA

that

are

sub

stan

tially

sim

ilar

to lo

cal

boar

ds to

be

gran

dfat

here

d in

as

loca

l boa

rds.

Rem

oves

req

uire

men

t tha

t one

-sto

p pa

rtne

rpr

ogra

ms

have

a s

eat o

n lo

cal b

oard

s.

Ens

ure

that

loca

l boa

rd m

embe

rs r

epre

sent

lead

ing

indu

stry

sec

tor

as w

ell a

s ge

ogra

phic

area

s w

ithin

the

loca

l com

mun

ity.

Opt

ion

to c

reat

e "O

pera

ting

Com

mitt

ees"

com

pris

ed o

f one

-sto

p pa

rtne

rs a

nd o

ther

key

part

ies

to p

rovi

de a

dvic

e on

ope

ratio

nal

issu

es.

Fun

ctio

n sh

ould

be

focu

sed

on s

trat

egic

olic

men

tan

dla

nnin

gp

yp

.p

deve

lo

Mak

es Y

outh

Cou

ncils

opt

iona

l.

Elim

inat

es a

ltern

ativ

e en

tity

gran

dfat

herin

gpr

ovis

ions

.

Mak

es th

e fo

llow

ing

mod

ifica

tions

tom

embe

rshi

p co

mpo

sitio

n:R

equi

res

busi

ness

rep

rese

ntat

ives

be

from

amon

g le

adin

g in

dust

ries

in lo

cal a

rea

and

incl

ude

both

larg

e an

d sm

all b

usin

esse

s.R

equi

res

loca

l sec

onda

ry s

choo

l sys

tem

supe

rinte

nden

ts a

nd p

resi

dent

s or

chi

efex

ecut

ive

offic

ers

of p

osts

econ

dary

educ

atio

nal i

nstit

utio

ns (

incl

udin

gco

mm

unity

col

lege

s w

here

suc

h en

titie

sex

ist)

.R

equi

res

repr

esen

tativ

es fr

om fa

ith-b

ased

orga

niza

tions

.E

limin

ates

req

uire

men

t tha

t one

-sto

ppa

rtne

rs a

nd r

epre

sent

ativ

es o

f loc

aled

ucat

ion

entit

ies

be o

n lo

cal b

oard

.M

embe

rs r

equi

red

to r

epre

sent

div

erse

geog

raph

ic s

ectio

ns w

ithin

loca

l are

a.

Mak

es Y

outh

Cou

ncils

opt

iona

l.

Elim

inat

es a

ltern

ativ

e en

tity

gran

dfat

herin

gpr

ovis

ions

.

Loca

l Pla

nsR

equi

res

loca

l boa

rd to

dev

elop

and

sub

mit

togo

vern

or a

com

preh

ensi

ve 5

-yea

r lo

cal p

lan

inpa

rtne

rshi

p w

ith a

ppro

pria

te c

hief

ele

cted

offic

ial.

Loca

l pla

n m

ust i

nclu

de a

cop

y of

eac

h M

OU

betw

een

the

LWIB

and

eac

h on

e-st

op p

artn

er.

Req

uire

s 2-

year

pla

ns r

athe

r th

an 5

-yea

rpl

ans.

Req

uire

s 2-

year

pla

ns r

athe

r th

an 5

-yea

r:

plan

s.

Dro

ps r

equi

rem

ent t

hat l

ocal

pla

n in

clud

eco

pies

of M

OU

s w

ith p

artn

ers.

One

-Sto

pS

yste

ms

Req

uire

d P

artn

ers:

WIA

Wag

ner-

Pey

ser

Adu

lt E

duca

tion

and

Lite

racy

pro

gram

sR

ehab

ilita

tion

Act

pro

gram

sW

elfa

re-t

o-W

ork

Old

er A

mer

ican

s A

ct p

rogr

ams

Per

kins

pos

tsec

onda

ry v

ocat

iona

l

Bui

ld s

tron

g co

nnec

tions

bet

wee

n th

e on

e-st

opsy

stem

and

pro

gram

s fu

nded

und

er a

dult

educ

atio

n an

d vo

catio

nal e

duca

tion.

,

Req

uire

d P

artn

ers:

Add

s T

AN

F, u

nles

s th

ego

vern

or o

pts

out a

nd n

otifi

es H

HS

and

DO

LS

ecre

tarie

s in

writ

ing.

Elim

inat

es W

agne

r-P

eyse

r an

d W

elfa

re-t

o-W

ork

as r

equi

red

part

ners

.

Cen

ter

for

Law

and

Soc

ial P

olic

y8

Page 21: Reproductions supplied by EDRS are the best that …DOCUMENT RESUME CE 085 229 Patel, Nisha; Strawn, Julie; Greenberg, Mark WIA Reauthorization Recommendations [and] Side-by-Side Comparison

Cur

rent

Law

Bus

h A

dmin

istr

atio

n's

Pro

posa

lH

ouse

Bill

(H

.R. 1

261)

educ

atio

n ac

tiviti

esT

rade

Adj

ustm

ent A

ssis

tanc

e an

d N

AF

TA

-T

AA

pro

gram

sV

eter

ans

Em

ploy

men

t and

Tra

inin

gC

omm

unity

Ser

vice

Blo

ck G

rant

empl

oym

ent a

nd tr

aini

ng a

ctiv

ities

HU

D e

mpl

oym

ent a

nd tr

aini

ng a

ctiv

ities

Une

mpl

oym

ent c

ompe

nsat

ion

prog

ram

s

Per

mis

sibl

e P

artn

ers:

TA

NF

Foo

d S

tam

p em

ploy

men

t, tr

aini

ng, a

ndw

ork

prog

ram

sN

atio

nal a

nd C

omm

unity

Ser

vice

Act

prog

ram

sO

ther

fede

ral,

stat

e, o

r lo

cal p

rogr

ams,

incl

udin

g pr

ivat

e se

ctor

pro

gram

s

Incl

udes

gra

ndfa

ther

pro

visi

on fo

r pr

e-W

IAon

e-st

ops.

Per

mis

sibl

e P

artn

ers:

Add

s th

e fo

llow

ing:

Em

ploy

men

t and

trai

ning

pro

gram

sad

min

iste

red

by S

ocia

l Sec

urity

Adm

inis

trat

ion,

incl

udin

g T

icke

t to

Wor

kpr

ogra

mC

hild

sup

port

enf

orce

men

t pro

gram

sun

der

IV-D

of t

he S

ocia

l Sec

urity

Act

Pro

gram

s fo

r in

divi

dual

s,w

ith d

isab

ilitie

s,in

clud

ing

prog

ram

s ca

rrie

d ou

t by

stat

eag

enci

es r

elat

ing

to m

enta

l hea

lth, m

enta

lre

tard

atio

n, a

nd d

evel

opm

enta

l dis

abili

ties,

stat

e M

edic

aid

agen

cies

, Sta

teIn

depe

nden

t Liv

ing

Cou

ncils

, and

Inde

pend

ent L

ivin

g C

ente

rs

Elim

inat

es o

ne-s

top

gran

dfat

her

prov

isio

n fo

rpr

e-W

IA o

ne-s

tops

.

Elig

ible

Tra

inin

gP

rovi

ders

To

be e

ligib

le to

rec

eive

fund

s, p

rovi

der

isre

quire

d to

be:

1) a

pos

tsec

onda

ry in

stitu

tion

that

is e

ligib

le to

rece

ive

fede

ral f

unds

und

er th

e H

ighe

rE

duca

tion

Act

of 1

965

and

that

pro

vide

s a

prog

ram

that

lead

s to

an

asso

ciat

e or

bacc

alau

reat

e de

gree

, or

cert

ifica

te; 2

) an

entit

y th

at c

arrie

rs o

ut p

rogr

ams

unde

r th

eN

atio

nal A

ppre

ntic

eshi

p A

ct; o

r 3)

ano

ther

publ

ic o

r pr

ivat

e pr

ovid

er o

f a p

rogr

am o

ftr

aini

ng s

ervi

ces.

Ent

ities

in c

ateg

orie

s (1

) an

d(2

) au

tom

atic

ally

rec

eive

initi

al e

ligib

ility

upo

nap

plic

atio

n. O

ther

pro

vide

rs a

re r

equi

red

tosu

bmit

perf

orm

ance

and

pro

gram

cos

tin

form

atio

n an

d m

eet a

ppro

pria

te p

erfo

rman

cele

vels

in o

rder

rec

eive

initi

al e

ligib

ility

. For

subs

eque

nt e

ligib

ility

, all

prov

ider

s m

ust

subm

it pe

rfor

man

ce a

nd p

rogr

am c

ost

info

rmat

ion

and

annu

ally

mee

t app

ropr

iate

perf

orm

ance

leve

ls.

Pro

vide

gov

erno

rs w

ith th

e au

thor

ity to

dete

rmin

e w

hat s

tand

ards

, inf

orm

atio

n, a

ndda

ta w

ould

be

requ

ired

for

the

elig

ible

trai

ning

prov

ider

s in

thei

r st

ate.

Gov

erno

r w

ould

be

requ

ired

to s

et m

inim

um s

tand

ards

for

all

prov

ider

s in

a m

anne

r th

at w

ould

ens

ure

qual

ity, c

hoic

e, a

nd a

ccou

ntab

ility

to th

efe

dera

l gov

ernm

ent,

Rem

oves

cur

rent

elig

ibili

ty r

equi

rem

ents

for

trai

ning

pro

vide

rs a

nd g

ives

gov

erno

rs b

road

auth

ority

to d

evel

op c

riter

ia a

nd p

roce

dure

s fo

rce

rtify

ing

trai

ning

pro

vide

rs th

at is

bot

hpe

rfor

man

ce a

nd n

on-p

erfo

rman

ce b

ased

.G

over

nor

may

aut

horiz

e lo

cal a

reas

toes

tabl

ish

addi

tiona

l crit

eria

or

mod

ify th

ego

vern

or's

crit

eria

. Pro

cedu

res

deve

lope

d by

gove

rnor

sha

ll id

entif

y ap

plic

atio

n pr

oces

s fo

rtr

aini

ng p

rovi

der

to b

ecom

e el

igib

le, r

oles

of

stat

e an

d lo

cal a

reas

in r

ecei

ving

and

rene

win

g ap

plic

atio

ns a

nd m

akin

g el

igib

ility

dete

rmin

atio

ns, a

nd p

roce

ss fo

r pr

ovid

ers

toap

peal

den

ial o

r te

rmin

atio

n of

elig

ibili

ty.

Gov

erno

r sh

all e

nsur

e th

at a

ppro

pria

te li

st o

rlis

ts o

f elig

ible

pro

vide

rs, a

long

with

suc

hin

form

atio

n as

gov

erno

r de

term

ines

appr

opria

te, i

s pr

ovid

ed to

loca

l boa

rds

to b

em

ade

avai

labl

e to

par

ticip

ants

and

the

publ

ic.

You

thLo

cal b

oard

req

uire

d to

iden

tify

elig

ible

Doe

s no

t add

ress

.Lo

cal b

oard

req

uire

d to

iden

tify

elig

ible

Cen

ter

for

Law

and

Soc

ial P

olic

y

Page 22: Reproductions supplied by EDRS are the best that …DOCUMENT RESUME CE 085 229 Patel, Nisha; Strawn, Julie; Greenberg, Mark WIA Reauthorization Recommendations [and] Side-by-Side Comparison

Cur

rent

Law

Bus

h A

dmin

istr

atio

n's

Pro

posa

lH

ouse

Bill

(H

.R. 1

261)

Act

iviti

esP

rovi

ders

prov

ider

s of

you

th a

ctiv

ities

by

awar

ding

gra

nts

or c

ontr

acts

on

a co

mpe

titiv

e ba

sis,

bas

ed o

nyo

uth

coun

cil r

ecom

men

datio

ns a

nd s

tate

pla

ncr

iteria

,

prov

ider

s of

you

th a

ctiv

ities

by

awar

ding

gra

nts

or c

ontr

acts

on

a co

mpe

titiv

e ba

sis'

, bas

ed o

nst

ate

plan

crit

eria

. Allo

ws

sole

-sou

rce

gran

tsor

con

trac

ts if

loca

l boa

rd d

eter

min

es th

atth

ere

are

an in

suffi

cien

t num

ber

of e

ligib

lepr

ovid

ers

for

gran

ts to

be

awar

ded

on a

com

petit

ive

basi

s.S

tate

Adu

lt: 1

/4 o

f 1 p

erce

nt is

res

erve

d fo

r ou

tlyin

gC

onso

lidat

ed A

dult

Blo

ck G

rant

: For

mul

aC

onso

lidat

ed A

dult

Blo

ck G

rant

: 10

perc

ent

Allo

tmen

ts:

area

s an

d th

e re

mai

nder

is d

istr

ibut

ed to

shou

ld ta

ke in

to a

ccou

nt fo

rmul

a fa

ctor

s us

edre

serv

ed b

y S

ecre

tary

of w

hich

:A

dult

stat

es b

ased

on:

for

the

Adu

lt, D

islo

cate

d W

orke

r, a

nd W

agne

r-N

ot le

ss th

an 7

5 pe

rcen

t mus

t be

used

for

For

mul

asR

elat

ive

num

ber

of u

nem

ploy

edP

eyse

r pr

ogra

ms.

Sec

reta

ry's

rea

llotm

ent

Nat

iona

l Dis

loca

ted

Wor

ker

Gra

nts.

indi

vidu

als

in a

reas

of s

ubst

antia

lau

thor

ity w

ould

be

base

d on

exp

endi

ture

sN

ot m

ore

than

20

perc

ent m

ay b

e us

ed fo

run

empl

oym

ent (

at le

ast 6

.5 p

erce

nt)

Rel

ativ

e ex

cess

num

ber

of u

nem

ploy

edin

divi

dual

s (n

umbe

r ab

ove

4.5

perc

ent)

rath

er th

an o

blig

atio

ns,

dem

onst

ratio

n pr

ojec

ts.

Not

mor

e th

an 5

per

cent

may

be

used

topr

ovid

e te

chni

cal a

ssis

tanc

e.R

elat

ive

num

ber

of d

isad

vant

aged

adu

ltsH

old

harm

less

and

sm

all s

tate

min

imum

prov

isio

ns

Dis

loca

ted

Wor

ker:

20

perc

ent o

f fun

ds

Of t

he r

emai

ning

90

perc

ent,

not m

ore

than

1/4

of 1

per

cent

is r

eser

ved

for

outly

ing

area

s an

dth

e re

mai

nder

is d

istr

ibut

ed to

sta

tes

base

d on

the

on th

e fo

llow

ing

form

ula:

rese

rved

by

Sec

reta

ry fo

r te

chni

cal a

ssis

tanc

e,de

mon

stra

tion

proj

ects

, Nat

iona

l Em

erge

ncy

Gra

nts,

and

ass

ista

nce

to o

utly

ing

area

s. T

here

mai

nder

is d

istr

ibut

ed to

sta

tes

base

d on

:R

elat

ive

num

ber

of u

nem

ploy

edin

divi

dual

sR

elat

ive

exce

ss n

umbe

r (n

umbe

r ab

ove

4.5

perc

ent)

of u

nem

ploy

ed in

divi

dual

sR

elat

ive

num

ber

of in

divi

dual

s in

eac

hst

ate

who

hav

e be

en u

nem

ploy

ed fo

r 15

wee

ks o

r m

ore

In F

Y 2

004,

26

perc

ent i

s di

strib

uted

base

d on

FY

200

3 W

agne

r-P

eyse

ral

lotm

ents

if th

e am

ount

ava

ilabl

e in

FY

2004

is n

o gr

eate

r th

an th

e am

ount

avai

labl

e in

FY

200

3; in

FY

2005

and

ther

eafte

r, 2

6 pe

rcen

t is

allo

tted

base

d on

the

allo

tmen

t per

cent

age

of th

e pr

evio

usfis

cal y

ear

unle

ss th

e av

aila

ble

amou

nt is

incr

ease

d.74

per

cent

is d

istr

ibut

ed b

ased

prim

arily

on: o R

elat

ive

num

ber

of u

nem

ploy

edin

divi

dual

so

Rel

ativ

e ex

cess

num

ber

(num

ber

abov

e 4.

5 pe

rcen

t) o

f une

mpl

oyed

indi

vidu

als

o R

elat

ive

num

ber

of d

isad

vant

aged

adul

tso

Res

truc

ture

d ho

ld h

arm

less

and

sm

all

stat

e m

inim

um p

rovi

sion

s

Rea

llotm

ent:

The

Sec

reta

ry is

aut

horiz

ed to

real

lot t

he a

mou

nt b

y w

hich

a s

tate

'sR

eallo

tmen

t: T

he S

ecre

tary

is a

utho

rized

tore

allo

t the

am

ount

by

whi

ch a

sta

te's

Cen

ter

for

Law

and

Soc

ial P

olic

y10

Page 23: Reproductions supplied by EDRS are the best that …DOCUMENT RESUME CE 085 229 Patel, Nisha; Strawn, Julie; Greenberg, Mark WIA Reauthorization Recommendations [and] Side-by-Side Comparison

Cur

rent

Law

Bus

h A

dmin

istr

atio

n's

Pro

posa

lH

ouse

Bill

(H

.R. 1

261)

unob

ligat

ed b

alan

ce e

xcee

ds20

perc

ent o

f its

allo

tmen

t for

the

prog

ram

yea

r.un

expe

nded

bal

ance

, exc

ludi

ng a

ccru

edex

pend

iture

s, e

xcee

ds 3

0 pe

rcen

t of i

tsal

lotm

ent f

or th

e pr

ogra

m y

ear.

Add

s de

finiti

on o

f Acc

rued

Exp

endi

ture

s as

incl

udin

g "t

he s

um o

f act

ual c

ash

disb

urse

men

ts fo

r di

rect

cha

rges

for

good

san

d se

rvic

es, t

he n

et in

crea

se o

r de

crea

se in

the

amou

nts

owed

by

reci

pien

ts, g

oods

and

othe

r pr

oper

ty r

ecei

ved

for

serv

ices

per

form

edby

em

ploy

ees,

con

trac

tors

, sub

gran

tees

, or

othe

r pa

yees

, and

oth

er a

mou

nts

beco

min

gow

ned

for

whi

ch n

o cu

rren

t ser

vice

or

perf

orm

ance

is r

equi

red.

"S

tate

Allo

tmen

ts:

You

thF

orm

ulas

In y

ears

in w

hich

the

appr

opria

te e

xcee

ds $

1B,

a po

rtio

n of

fund

s in

exc

ess

of $

1B s

hall

bere

serv

ed fo

r m

igra

nt a

nd s

easo

nal f

arm

wor

ker

prog

ram

s an

d up

to$250Mfor Youth

Opp

ortu

nity

Gra

nts.

The

rem

aini

ng a

mou

nt in

exce

ss o

f $1B

sha

ll be

use

d fo

r fu

ndin

g to

outly

ing

area

s an

d to

sta

tes

for

Nat

ive

Am

eric

an p

rogr

ams

and

for

yout

h ac

tiviti

esan

d st

atew

ide

wor

kfor

ce in

vest

men

t act

iviti

es.

Rem

aind

er is

dis

trib

uted

to s

tate

s ba

sed

on:

Rel

ativ

e nu

mbe

r of

une

mpl

oyed

indi

vidu

als

in a

reas

of s

ubst

antia

lun

empl

oym

ent

Rel

ativ

e ex

cess

num

ber

of u

nem

ploy

edin

divi

dual

sR

elat

ive

num

ber

of d

isad

vant

aged

you

thH

old

harm

less

and

sm

all s

tate

min

imum

prov

isio

ns

Rea

llotm

ent:

Sam

e as

Adu

lt F

orm

ula

abov

e.

Doe

s no

t spe

cify

form

ula.

Elim

inat

es fu

ndin

g fo

r m

igra

nt a

nd s

easo

nal

farm

wor

ker

prog

ram

s an

d Y

outh

Opp

ortu

nity

Gra

nts.

25

perc

ent o

f the

am

ount

appr

opria

ted

for

yout

h re

quire

d to

be

rese

rved

for

Cha

lleng

e G

rant

s (u

p to

a m

axim

um o

f$250M).

Of t

he r

emai

ning

fund

s:N

ot m

ore

1/4

of 1

per

cent

res

erve

d fo

ras

sist

ance

to o

utly

ing

area

s.N

ot m

ore

than

1 1

/2 p

erce

nt r

eser

ved

for

Nat

ive

Am

eric

an p

rogr

ams.

The

rem

aind

er is

dis

trib

uted

to s

tate

spr

imar

ily b

ased

on

curr

ent l

aw fo

rmul

a,w

ith r

estr

uctu

red

hold

har

mle

ss a

nd s

mal

lst

ate

min

imum

pro

visi

ons.

Rea

llotm

ent:

Sam

e as

Adu

lt F

orm

ula

abov

e.

Acc

rued

Exp

endi

ture

s: S

ame

as A

dult

For

mul

a ab

ove.

With

in S

tate

Allo

catio

ns:

Adu

lt F

undi

ng

Adu

lt:15

perc

ent o

f fun

ds r

eser

ved

at s

tate

leve

l for

sta

tew

ide

wor

kfor

ce in

vest

men

tac

tiviti

es. O

f the

rem

aini

ng85

perc

ent:

Fun

ds a

lloca

ted

to lo

cal a

reas

bas

ed o

nea

ch o

f the

thre

e fa

ctor

s us

ed b

yS

ecre

tary

to d

eter

min

e st

ate

allo

catio

n.A

ltern

ativ

ely,

a s

tate

may

dis

trib

ute

70

Con

solid

ated

Adu

lt B

lock

Gra

nt: G

over

nors

wou

ld a

lloca

te a

t lea

st50

perc

ent t

o lo

cal

area

s: 40 p

erce

nt a

ccor

ding

to s

tatu

tory

form

ula,

and

10 p

erce

nt a

ccor

ding

to fo

rmul

ade

term

ined

by

gove

rnor

bas

ed o

n

Con

solid

ated

Adu

lt B

lock

Gra

nt: G

over

nor

may

res

erve

up

to50

perc

ent f

or s

tate

wid

eac

tiviti

es (

not l

ess

than

hal

f of w

hich

mus

t be

used

to s

uppo

rt p

rovi

sion

of c

ore

serv

ices

inlo

cal a

reas

; see

Sta

tew

ide

Act

iviti

es b

elow

).O

f the

rem

aini

ng50

perc

ent:

85

perc

ent m

ust b

e al

loca

ted

to lo

cal

Cen

ter

for

Law

and

Soc

ial P

olic

y11

Page 24: Reproductions supplied by EDRS are the best that …DOCUMENT RESUME CE 085 229 Patel, Nisha; Strawn, Julie; Greenberg, Mark WIA Reauthorization Recommendations [and] Side-by-Side Comparison

Cur

rent

Law

Bus

h A

dmin

istr

atio

n's

Pro

posa

lH

ouse

Bill

(H

.R. 1

261)

perc

ent o

f fun

ds a

s ou

tline

d ab

ove

and

30pe

rcen

t of f

unds

bas

ed o

n ot

her

fact

ors

econ

omic

and

dem

ogra

phic

fact

ors.

area

s ba

sed

on s

ame

fact

ors

used

by

Sec

reta

ry to

det

erm

ine

stat

e al

loca

tion.

rela

ting

to e

xces

s po

vert

y an

dR

emai

ning

fund

s av

aila

ble

to g

over

nor

for

15 p

erce

nt a

lloca

ted

to lo

cal a

reas

bas

edun

empl

oym

ent d

evel

oped

by

stat

e bo

ard

activ

ities

suc

h as

rap

id r

espo

nse,

sup

port

for

on a

n ob

ject

ive

and

geog

raph

ical

lyan

d in

clud

ed in

sta

te p

lan.

Dis

loca

ted

Wor

ker:

15

perc

ent o

f fun

dsre

serv

ed a

t sta

te le

vel f

or s

tate

wid

e w

orkf

orce

inve

stm

ent a

ctiv

ities

. Gov

erno

r m

ay r

eser

veup

to a

n ad

ditio

nal 2

5 pe

rcen

t for

rap

idre

spon

se a

ctiv

ities

. Rem

aini

ng fu

nds

allo

cate

d to

loca

l are

as b

ased

on

form

ula

pres

crib

ed b

y go

vern

or.

core

ser

vice

s, e

valu

atio

ns, a

ndde

mon

stra

tions

:eq

uita

ble

form

ula

deve

lope

d by

gov

erno

raf

ter

cons

ulta

tion

with

sta

te b

oard

and

loca

l boa

rds.

Rea

lloca

tion:

The

am

ount

by

whi

ch a

loca

lar

ea's

uno

blig

ated

bal

ance

exc

eeds

20

perc

ent o

f its

allo

catio

n fo

r th

e pr

ogra

m y

ear

may

be

real

loca

ted,

Adm

inis

trat

ive

Cos

ts: 1

0 pe

rcen

t cap

on

amou

nt o

f adu

lt an

d di

sloc

ated

wor

ker

fund

sth

at c

an b

e us

ed fo

r ad

min

istr

ativ

e co

sts

atlo

cal l

evel

.

Rea

lloca

tion:

Gov

erno

r m

ay r

eallo

t am

ount

by w

hich

a lo

cal a

rea'

s un

oblig

ated

bal

ance

at

the

end

of th

e pr

ogra

m y

ear,

exc

ludi

ngac

crue

d ex

pend

iture

s, e

xcee

ds 3

0 pe

rcen

t of

its a

lloca

tion

for

the

prog

ram

yea

r.

Adm

inis

trat

ive

Cos

ts: 1

0 pe

rcen

t cap

on

use

of fu

nds

by lo

cal b

oard

s fo

r ad

min

istr

ativ

eco

sts.

Tra

nsfe

rabi

lity:

Up

to 2

0 pe

rcen

t of f

unds

at

the

loca

l lev

el m

ay b

e tr

ansf

erre

d be

twee

nad

ult a

nd d

islo

cate

d w

orke

r fu

ndin

g st

ream

sw

ith a

ppro

val o

f gov

erno

r; in

crea

sed

to 3

0pe

rcen

t for

FY

2003

.

With

in S

tate

Not

mor

e th

an 1

5 pe

rcen

t of y

outh

form

ula

Gov

erno

rs w

ould

hav

e di

scre

tion

to ta

rget

Red

uces

the

amou

nt o

f you

th fo

rmul

a fu

nds

Allo

catio

ns:

fund

s ca

n be

res

erve

d at

the

stat

e le

vel.

Fun

dsfu

nds

to lo

cal a

reas

with

the

high

est e

ligib

leth

at c

an b

e re

serv

ed a

t the

sta

te le

vel t

o no

tY

outh

Fun

ding

allo

cate

d to

loca

l are

as b

ased

on

each

of t

heth

ree

fact

ors

used

by

Sec

reta

ry to

det

erm

ine

yout

h po

pula

tion,

mor

e th

an 1

0 pe

rcen

t. O

f the

rem

aini

ng 9

0pe

rcen

t:st

ate

allo

catio

n.

Rea

lloca

tion,

Adm

inis

trat

ive

Cos

ts, a

nd

80 p

erce

nt a

lloca

ted

to lo

cal a

reas

bas

edon

the

thre

e fa

ctor

s us

ed b

y S

ecre

tary

tode

term

ine

stat

e al

loca

tion

Tra

nsfe

rabi

lity:

Sam

e as

Adu

lt F

undi

ngab

ove,

20 p

erce

nt a

lloca

ted

to lo

cal a

reas

inac

cord

ance

with

suc

h de

mog

raph

ic a

ndec

onom

ic fa

ctor

s as

the

gove

rnor

, afte

rco

nsul

tatio

n w

ith s

tate

and

loca

l boa

rds,

dete

rmin

es a

ppro

pria

te.

Rea

lloca

tion

and

Adm

inis

trat

ive

Cos

ts:

Sam

e as

Adu

lt F

undi

ng a

bove

.

Cen

ter

for

Law

and

Soc

ial P

olic

y12

Page 25: Reproductions supplied by EDRS are the best that …DOCUMENT RESUME CE 085 229 Patel, Nisha; Strawn, Julie; Greenberg, Mark WIA Reauthorization Recommendations [and] Side-by-Side Comparison

Cur

rent

Law

Bus

h A

dmin

istr

atio

n's

Pro

posa

lH

ouse

Bill

(H

.R. 1

261)

Sta

tew

ide

Req

uire

d A

ctiv

ities

for

Adu

lt an

dD

oes

not a

ddre

ss.

Req

uire

d A

ctiv

ities

for

Con

solid

ated

Adu

ltA

ctiv

ities

:D

islo

cate

d W

orke

r F

unds

Res

erve

d at

Sta

teF

unds

Res

erve

d at

Sta

te L

evel

:A

dults

Leve

l: Con

duct

ing

eval

uatio

nsP

rovi

ding

ince

ntiv

e gr

ants

to lo

cal a

reas

for

regi

onal

coo

pera

tion,

loca

l coo

rdin

atio

nof

act

iviti

es, a

nd e

xem

plar

y pe

rfor

man

ceon

loca

l per

form

ance

mea

sure

sP

rovi

ding

tech

nica

l ass

ista

nce

to lo

cal

area

s th

at fa

il to

mee

t loc

al p

erfo

rman

cem

easu

res

Ass

istin

g in

the

esta

blis

hmen

t and

oper

atio

n of

one

-sto

p de

liver

y sy

stem

sO

pera

ting

a fis

cal a

nd m

anag

emen

tac

coun

tabi

lity

info

rmat

ion

syst

em

Gov

erno

r re

quire

d to

use

not

less

than

50

perc

ent o

f res

erve

d fu

nds

to s

uppo

rtpr

ovis

ion

of c

ore

serv

ices

in lo

cal a

reas

by

dist

ribut

ing

fund

s to

loca

l are

as. S

uch

fund

s m

ay b

e us

ed b

y st

ates

to e

mpl

oyst

ate

pers

onne

l to

prov

ide

such

ser

vice

s in

loca

l are

as in

con

sulta

tion

with

loca

lbo

ards

.R

emai

ning

50

perc

ent m

ust b

e us

ed fo

rra

pid

resp

onse

act

iviti

es a

nd m

ay b

e us

edto

pro

vide

per

mis

sibl

e ac

tiviti

es d

escr

ibed

belo

w.

Rap

id r

espo

nse

activ

ities

are

a r

equi

red

activ

ity fo

r di

sloc

ated

wor

ker

fund

sP

erm

issi

ble

Act

iviti

es fo

r C

onso

lidat

edA

dult

Fun

ds R

eser

ved

at S

tate

Lev

el:

Per

mis

sibl

e A

ctiv

ities

for

Adu

lt an

dN

ot m

ore

than

5 p

erce

nt c

an b

e us

ed fo

rad

min

istr

ativ

e ac

tiviti

esD

islo

cate

d W

orke

r F

unds

Res

erve

d at

Sta

teS

uppo

rtin

g th

e pr

ovis

ion

of c

ore

serv

ices

Leve

l:C

ondu

ctin

g ev

alua

tions

Not

mor

e th

an 5

per

cent

can

be

used

for

adm

inis

trat

ive

activ

ities

Pro

vidi

ng c

apac

ity b

uild

ing

and

tech

nica

las

sist

ance

Pro

vidi

ng in

cent

ive

gran

ts to

loca

lar

eas

for

regi

onal

coo

pera

tion,

loca

l coo

rdin

atio

nof

act

iviti

es, a

nd e

xem

plar

y pe

rfor

man

ceon

loca

l per

form

ance

mea

sure

sR

esea

rch

and

dem

onst

ratio

nsIn

nova

tive

incu

mbe

nt w

orke

r tr

aini

ngpr

ogra

ms

Pro

gram

s ta

rget

ed to

em

pow

erm

ent z

ones

and

ente

rpris

e co

mm

uniti

es

Pro

vidi

ng te

chni

cal a

ssis

tanc

e an

dca

paci

ty b

uild

ing

Pro

vidi

ng a

fisc

al a

nd m

anag

emen

tac

coun

tabi

lity

syst

emM

onito

ring

and

over

sigh

t of a

ctiv

ities

Sup

port

for

iden

tific

atio

n of

elig

ible

trai

ning

prov

ider

sIn

nova

tive

prog

ram

s fo

r di

spla

ced

hom

emak

ers

Impl

emen

ting

inno

vativ

e pr

ogra

ms,

suc

has

incu

mbe

nt w

orke

r tr

aini

ng p

rogr

ams,

prog

ram

s th

at s

erve

indi

vidu

als

with

disa

bilit

ies

Pro

gram

s to

incr

ease

the

num

ber

ofin

divi

dual

s tr

aini

ng fo

r an

d pl

aced

inno

ntra

ditio

nal e

mpl

oym

ent

Oth

er a

ctiv

ities

that

the

stat

e de

term

ines

nece

ssar

y to

ass

ist l

ocal

are

as in

car

ryin

gou

t loc

al a

ctiv

ities

Dev

elop

ing

stra

tegi

es fo

r ef

fect

ivel

yse

rvin

g ha

rd-t

o-se

rve

popu

latio

ns a

nd fo

rin

tegr

atin

g pr

ogra

ms

and

serv

ices

amon

gon

e-st

op p

artn

ers

Impl

emen

ting

inno

vativ

e pr

ogra

ms

for

disp

lace

d ho

mem

aker

s, w

hich

may

incl

ude

publ

ic a

ssis

tanc

e re

cipi

ents

with

in 2

year

sof

exh

aust

ing

lifet

ime

TA

NF

elig

ibili

tyIm

plem

entin

g pr

ogra

ms

to in

crea

senu

mbe

r of

indi

vidu

als

trai

ning

for

and

Cen

ter

for

Law

and

Soc

ial P

olic

y13

Page 26: Reproductions supplied by EDRS are the best that …DOCUMENT RESUME CE 085 229 Patel, Nisha; Strawn, Julie; Greenberg, Mark WIA Reauthorization Recommendations [and] Side-by-Side Comparison

Cur

rent

Law

Bus

h A

dmin

istr

atio

n's

Pro

posa

lH

ouse

Bill

(H

.R. 1

261)

plac

ed in

non

trad

ition

al e

mpl

oym

ent

Sta

tew

ide

Act

iviti

es:

You

th

Req

uire

d A

ctiv

ities

for

You

th F

unds

Res

erve

d at

Sta

te L

evel

:A

ll re

quire

d ac

tiviti

es fo

r ad

ult f

unds

list

edab

ove

Dis

sem

inat

ing

a lis

t of e

ligib

le p

rovi

ders

of

yout

h ac

tiviti

es a

nd o

f tra

inin

g se

rvic

esP

rovi

ding

add

ition

al a

ssis

tanc

e to

loca

lar

eas

that

hav

e hi

gh c

once

ntra

tions

of

elig

ible

you

th to

car

ry o

ut a

ctiv

ities

Not

mor

e th

an 5

per

cent

can

be

used

for

adm

inis

trat

ive

activ

ities

Per

mis

sibl

e A

ctiv

ities

for

You

th F

unds

Res

erve

d at

Sta

te L

evel

:A

ll pe

rmis

sibl

e ac

tiviti

es fo

r ad

ult f

unds

liste

d ab

ove.

Car

ryin

g ou

t req

uire

d lo

cal a

ctiv

ities

(des

crib

ed b

elow

) on

a s

tate

wid

e ba

sis.

No

fund

s ca

n be

use

d to

dev

elop

or

impl

emen

t edu

catio

n cu

rric

ula

for

scho

olsy

stem

s.N

ot m

ore

than

5 p

erce

nt c

an b

e us

ed fo

rad

min

istr

ativ

e ac

tiviti

es.

Doe

s no

t add

ress

.R

equi

red

Act

iviti

es fo

r Y

outh

Fun

dsR

eser

ved

at S

tate

Lev

el: S

ame

as c

urre

ntla

w.

Per

mis

sibl

e A

ctiv

ities

for

You

th F

unds

Res

erve

d at

Sta

te L

evel

:A

ll pe

rmis

sibl

e ac

tiviti

es fo

r ad

ult f

unds

liste

d ab

ove.

Add

ition

al a

ssis

tanc

e to

are

as th

at h

ave

high

con

cent

ratio

ns o

f elig

ible

you

th.

No

fund

s ca

n be

use

d to

dev

elop

or

impl

emen

t edu

catio

n cu

rric

ula

for

scho

olsy

stem

s.N

ot m

ore

than

5 p

erce

nt o

f fun

ds m

ay b

eus

ed b

y th

e st

ate

for

adm

inis

trat

ive

activ

ities

.

Loca

lA

ctiv

ities

:A

dults

Req

uire

d A

ctiv

ities

for

Adu

lts a

ndD

islo

cate

d W

orke

rs:

Est

ablis

h on

e-st

op d

eliv

ery

syst

emP

rovi

de c

ore

serv

ices

incl

udin

g:o

Elig

ibili

ty d

eter

min

atio

n fo

r W

IAse

rvic

eso

Out

reac

h, in

take

, and

orie

ntat

ion

oIn

itial

ass

essm

ent o

f ski

ll le

vels

,ap

titud

es, a

bilit

ies,

and

sup

port

ive

serv

ice

need

s,

oJo

b se

arch

and

pla

cem

ent a

ssis

tanc

e,an

d, w

here

app

ropr

iate

, car

eer

coun

selin

go

Em

ploy

men

t sta

tistic

s in

form

atio

no

Per

form

ance

and

pro

gram

cos

tin

form

atio

n on

loca

l pro

vide

rso

Loca

l are

a pe

rfor

man

ce in

form

atio

no

Info

rmat

ion

on a

vaila

bilit

y of

supp

ortiv

e se

rvic

eso

Info

rmat

ion

rega

rdin

g fil

ing

Doe

s no

t add

ress

.R

equi

red

Act

iviti

es fo

r A

dults

(in

clud

ing

disl

ocat

ed w

orke

rs):

Ret

ains

req

uire

men

t to

esta

blis

h on

e-st

opde

liver

y sy

stem

Cor

e se

rvic

es m

ust a

lso

incl

ude:

oE

ligib

ility

det

erm

inat

ions

for

all o

ne-

stop

par

tner

pro

gram

so

Labo

r ex

chan

ge s

ervi

ces,

incl

udin

g jo

bse

arch

and

pla

cem

ent a

ssis

tanc

e; a

ndw

here

app

ropr

iate

car

eer

coun

selin

g;ap

prop

riate

rec

ruitm

ent s

ervi

ces

for

empl

oyer

s; a

nd r

eem

ploy

men

t ser

vice

spr

ovid

ed to

une

mpl

oym

ent c

laim

ants

oA

dmin

istr

atio

n of

the

wor

k te

st fo

run

empl

oym

ent c

ompe

nsat

ion

Elim

inat

es r

equi

rem

ent t

o pr

ovid

e as

sist

ance

in e

stab

lishi

ng e

ligib

ility

for

Wel

fare

-to-

Wor

kac

tiviti

es (

auth

oriz

atio

n fo

r th

is p

rogr

am h

as

Cen

ter

for

Law

and

Soc

ial P

olic

y14

Page 27: Reproductions supplied by EDRS are the best that …DOCUMENT RESUME CE 085 229 Patel, Nisha; Strawn, Julie; Greenberg, Mark WIA Reauthorization Recommendations [and] Side-by-Side Comparison

Cur

rent

Law

Bus

h A

dmin

istr

atio

n's

Pro

posa

lH

ouse

Bill

(H

.R. 1

261)

unem

ploy

men

t com

pens

atio

n cl

aim

so

Ass

ista

nce

in e

stab

lishi

ng e

ligib

ility

for

ende

d).

Wel

fare

-to-

Wor

k ac

tiviti

es a

nd o

ther

prog

ram

s of

fina

ncia

l aid

ass

ista

nce

for

educ

atio

n an

d tr

aini

ngo

Fol

low

-up

serv

ices

for

not l

ess

than

12

mon

ths

Inte

nsiv

e se

rvic

es a

re r

etai

ned,

but

Pro

vide

inte

nsiv

e se

rvic

es, i

nclu

ding

:re

vise

d as

follo

ws:

oC

ompr

ehen

sive

and

spe

cial

ized

oC

ase

man

agem

ent n

o lo

nger

asse

ssm

ents

of s

kills

and

ser

vice

nee

dsre

stric

ted

to p

artic

ipan

ts s

eeki

ng tr

aini

ngo

Dev

elop

men

t of i

ndiv

idua

l em

ploy

men

tse

rvic

es.

plan

so

Add

s in

tern

ship

s an

d w

ork

expe

rienc

e.o

Gro

up c

ouns

elin

go

Add

s lit

erac

y ac

tiviti

es r

elat

ing

to w

ork

oIn

divi

dual

cou

nsel

ing

and

care

erre

adin

ess,

and

fina

ncia

l lite

racy

act

iviti

es.

plan

ning

oA

dds

out-

of-a

rea

job

sear

cho

Cas

e m

anag

emen

t for

par

ticip

ants

seek

ing

trai

ning

oS

hort

-ter

m p

re-v

ocat

iona

l ser

vice

s

assi

stan

ce a

nd r

eloc

atio

n as

sist

ance

.

Pro

vide

trai

ning

ser

vice

s, in

clud

ing:

oO

ccup

atio

nal s

kills

trai

ning

, inc

ludi

ngtr

aini

ng fo

r no

ntra

ditio

nal e

mpl

oym

ent

oO

n-th

e-jo

b tr

aini

ngo

Pro

gram

s th

at c

ombi

ne w

orkp

lace

trai

ning

with

rel

ated

inst

ruct

ion

oT

rain

ing

prog

ram

s op

erat

ed b

y th

epr

ivat

e se

ctor

oS

kill

upgr

adin

g an

d tr

aini

ngo

Ent

repr

eneu

rial t

rain

ing

oJo

b re

adin

ess

trai

ning

oA

dult

educ

atio

n an

d lit

erac

y ac

tiviti

espr

ovid

ed in

com

bina

tion

with

the

abov

eac

tiviti

eso

Cus

tom

ized

trai

ning

con

duct

ed w

ith a

com

mitm

ent b

y an

em

ploy

er o

r gr

oup

ofem

ploy

ers

to e

mpl

oy a

n in

divi

dual

upo

nsu

cces

sful

com

plet

ion

of th

e tr

aini

ng

Per

mis

sibl

e A

ctiv

ities

for

Adu

lts a

ndP

erm

issi

ble

Act

iviti

es fo

r A

dults

(in

clud

ing

Dis

loca

ted

Wor

kers

:di

sloc

ated

wor

kers

): A

dds

the

follo

win

gC

usto

miz

ed tr

aini

ng a

nd r

efer

ral o

fac

tiviti

es:

qual

ified

trai

ning

par

ticip

ants

toC

usto

mer

sup

port

to n

avig

ate

amon

gem

ploy

men

tm

ultip

le s

ervi

ces

and

activ

ities

for

spec

ial

Cus

tom

ized

em

ploy

men

t-re

late

d se

rvic

espo

pula

tions

that

face

bar

riers

toto

em

ploy

ers

on a

fee-

for-

serv

ice

basi

sem

ploy

men

t, in

clud

ing

indi

vidu

als

with

Cen

ter

for

Law

and

Soc

ial P

olic

y15

Page 28: Reproductions supplied by EDRS are the best that …DOCUMENT RESUME CE 085 229 Patel, Nisha; Strawn, Julie; Greenberg, Mark WIA Reauthorization Recommendations [and] Side-by-Side Comparison

Cur

rent

Law

Bus

h A

dmin

istr

atio

n's

Pro

posa

lH

ouse

Bill

(H

.R. 1

261)

Sup

port

ive

serv

ices

to p

artic

ipan

ts in

cor

e,in

tens

ive,

or

trai

ning

ser

vice

s w

ho a

reun

able

to o

btai

n su

ppor

tive

serv

ices

thro

ugh

othe

r pr

ogra

ms

disa

bilit

ies

Em

ploy

men

t and

trai

ning

ass

ista

nce

prov

ided

in c

oord

inat

ion

with

chi

ld s

uppo

rten

forc

emen

t act

iviti

esN

eeds

-rel

ated

pay

men

ts to

trai

ning

part

icip

ants

who

do

not q

ualif

y fo

r (o

r ha

vece

ased

to q

ualif

y fo

r) U

nem

ploy

men

tIn

sura

nce

Wor

k su

ppor

t act

iviti

es d

esig

ned

to a

ssis

tlo

w-w

age

wor

kers

in r

etai

ning

and

enha

ncin

g em

ploy

men

t, in

clud

ing

assi

stan

ce in

acc

essi

ng fi

nanc

ial s

uppo

rts,

prov

isio

n of

em

ploy

men

t and

trai

ning

activ

ities

dur

ing

nont

radi

tiona

l hou

rs, a

ndpr

ovis

ion

of o

n-si

te c

hild

car

eIn

cum

bent

wor

ker

trai

ning

pro

gram

s, in

whi

cho

Loca

l boa

rd m

ay u

se u

p to

10

perc

ent

of fu

nds.

oP

rogr

ams

mus

t be

carr

ied

out i

nco

njun

ctio

n w

ith e

mpl

oyer

s fo

r pu

rpos

e of

assi

stin

g w

orke

rs to

obt

ain

skill

sne

cess

ary

to r

etai

n em

ploy

meh

t and

ave

rtla

yoffs

.o

Em

ploy

ers

mus

t pay

a p

ortio

n of

cos

tas

est

ablis

hed

by g

over

nor

(or

dele

gate

dto

loca

l boa

rds)

: not

less

than

10

perc

ent

for

empl

oyer

s w

ith 5

0 or

few

er e

mpl

oyee

s;25

per

cent

for

empl

oyer

s w

ith m

ore

than

50, b

ut le

ss th

an 1

00 e

mpl

oyee

s; 5

0pe

rcen

t for

em

ploy

ers

with

100

or

mor

eem

ploy

ees.

oW

ages

pai

d by

em

ploy

er d

urin

gtr

aini

ng m

ay b

e co

unte

d to

war

d em

ploy

erpa

ymen

t.

Loca

lR

equi

red

Ser

vice

s fo

r Y

outh

:D

oes

not a

ddre

ss.

Req

uire

d S

ervi

ces

for

You

th:

Act

iviti

es:

Pre

para

tion

for

post

seco

ndar

y ed

ucat

iona

lP

rovi

des

that

ser

vice

s m

ust b

e di

rect

lyY

outh

oppo

rtun

ities

Str

ong

linka

ges

betw

een

acad

emic

and

occu

patio

nal l

earn

ing

Pre

para

tion

for

unsu

bsid

ized

em

ploy

men

top

port

uniti

esE

ffect

ive

conn

ectio

ns to

inte

rmed

iarie

sw

ith s

tron

g lin

ks to

the

job

mar

ket a

ndlo

cal a

nd r

egio

nal e

mpl

oyer

s

Req

uire

d P

rogr

am E

lem

ents

for

You

th:

linke

d to

one

or

mor

e of

the

law

'spe

rfor

man

ce o

utco

mes

.A

dds

activ

ities

lead

ing

to th

e at

tain

men

t of

high

sch

ool d

iplo

ma

or G

ED

(in

clud

ing

reco

gniz

ed a

ltern

ativ

e st

anda

rds

for

indi

vidu

als

with

dis

abili

ties)

.A

dds

prep

arat

ion

for

adva

nced

trai

ning

.C

hang

es s

tron

g lin

kage

s be

twee

noc

cupa

tiona

l lea

rnin

g by

add

ing

the

phra

se "

that

lead

to th

e at

tain

men

t of

Cen

ter

for

Law

and

Soc

ial P

olic

y16

Page 29: Reproductions supplied by EDRS are the best that …DOCUMENT RESUME CE 085 229 Patel, Nisha; Strawn, Julie; Greenberg, Mark WIA Reauthorization Recommendations [and] Side-by-Side Comparison

Cur

rent

Law

Bus

h A

dmin

istr

atio

n's

Pro

posa

lH

ouse

Bill

(H

.R. 1

261)

Tut

orin

g, s

tudy

ski

lls tr

aini

ng, a

ndin

stru

ctio

n, le

adin

g to

com

plet

ion

ofse

cond

ary

scho

ol, i

nclu

ding

dro

pout

prev

entio

n st

rate

gies

Alte

rnat

ive

seco

ndar

y sc

hool

ser

vice

sS

umm

er e

mpl

oym

ent o

ppor

tuni

ties

that

are

dire

ctly

link

ed to

aca

dem

ic a

ndoc

cupa

tiona

l lea

rnin

g

reco

gniz

ed c

rede

ntia

ls."

Alte

rs e

ffect

ive

conn

ectio

ns to

inte

rmed

iarie

s to

"E

ffect

ive

conn

ectio

ns to

empl

oyer

s in

sec

tors

of t

he lo

cal l

abor

mar

ket e

xper

ienc

ing

high

gro

wth

inem

ploy

men

t opp

ortu

nitie

s."

Req

uire

d P

rogr

am E

lem

ents

for

You

th:

Pai

d an

d un

paid

wor

k ex

perie

nces

Add

s G

ED

pre

para

tion

Occ

upat

iona

l ski

lls tr

aini

ngA

dds

on-t

he jo

b tr

aini

ngLe

ader

ship

dev

elop

men

t opp

ortu

nitie

sA

dds

finan

cial

lite

racy

ski

llsS

uppo

rtiv

e se

rvic

esA

dult

men

torin

gF

ollo

w-u

p se

rvic

esC

ompr

ehen

sive

gui

danc

e an

d co

unse

ling

Elig

ibili

ty fo

rA

dults

and

dis

loca

ted

wor

kers

who

mee

t the

Pro

vide

gre

ater

flex

ibili

ty in

del

iver

y of

cor

e,A

dults

(in

clud

ing

disl

ocat

ed w

orke

rs)

who

Inte

nsiv

e an

dfo

llow

ing

crite

ria a

re e

ligib

le fo

r in

tens

ive

inte

nsiv

e, a

nd tr

aini

ng s

ervi

ces.

Indi

vidu

als

mee

t the

follo

win

g cr

iteria

are

elig

ible

for

Tra

inin

gse

rvic

es:

shou

ld h

ave

the

oppo

rtun

ity to

rec

eive

the

inte

nsiv

e se

rvic

es:

Ser

vice

sA

re u

nem

ploy

ed a

nd a

re u

nabl

e to

obt

ain

serv

ices

mos

t app

ropr

iate

for

thei

r un

ique

Are

une

mpl

oyed

and

are

det

erm

ined

by

empl

oym

ent t

hrou

gh c

ore

serv

ices

; and

Hav

e be

en d

eter

min

ed b

y a

one-

stop

need

s.th

e on

e-st

op o

pera

tor

to b

e un

likel

y or

unab

le to

obt

ain

suita

ble

empl

oym

ent

oper

ator

to b

e in

nee

d of

mor

e in

tens

ive

Rem

ove

any

barr

iers

to s

ervi

ng ta

rget

edth

roug

h co

re s

ervi

ces

and

in n

eed

ofse

rvic

es to

obt

ain

empl

oym

ent;

orpo

pula

tions

thou

gh a

com

preh

ensi

ve o

ne-s

top

inte

nsiv

e se

rvic

es in

ord

er to

obt

ain

Are

em

ploy

ed, b

ut a

re d

eter

min

ed b

y a

one-

stop

ope

rato

r to

nee

d in

tens

ive

syst

em.

suita

ble

empl

oym

ent;

orA

re e

mpl

oyed

, but

are

det

erm

ined

by

ase

rvic

es to

obt

ain

or r

etai

n em

ploy

men

tC

oncu

rren

t del

iver

y of

ser

vice

s su

ch a

s E

SL

one-

stop

ope

rato

r to

nee

d in

tens

ive

that

allo

ws

for

self-

suffi

cien

cy,

and

occu

patio

nal t

rain

ing

wou

ld a

lso

besp

ecifi

cally

aut

horiz

ed a

s ne

eded

.se

rvic

es to

obt

ain

or r

etai

n su

itabl

eem

ploy

men

t.A

dults

and

dis

loca

ted

wor

kers

who

mee

t the

follo

win

g cr

iteria

are

elig

ible

for

trai

ning

serv

ices

:Lo

cal a

reas

aut

horiz

ed to

pro

vide

a w

ide

rang

eof

ser

vice

s (e

.g.,

finan

cial

wor

k su

ppor

ts, s

uch

"Sui

tabl

e em

ploy

men

t" d

efin

ed b

y go

vern

or.

Hav

e m

et e

ligib

ility

req

uire

men

ts fo

ras

Foo

d S

tam

ps a

nd M

edic

aid

tran

sitio

nal

Adu

lts (

incl

udin

g di

sloc

ated

wor

kers

) w

hoin

tens

ive

serv

ices

and

are

una

ble

to o

btai

nas

sist

ance

, and

ret

entio

n an

d ad

vanc

emen

tm

eet t

he fo

llow

ing

crite

ria a

re e

ligib

le fo

ror

ret

ain

empl

oym

ent t

hrou

gh s

uch

serv

ices

, suc

h as

on-

site

chi

ld c

are

and

trai

ning

ser

vice

s:se

rvic

es;

Afte

r in

terv

iew

, eva

luat

ion,

or

asse

ssm

ent,

and

case

man

agem

ent,

have

bee

n

trai

ning

dur

ing

nont

radi

tiona

l hou

rs)

for

low

-w

age

wor

kers

that

wou

ld e

nhan

ce c

aree

rad

vanc

emen

t opp

ortu

nitie

s th

roug

h th

e on

e-

Afte

r in

terv

iew

, eva

luat

ion,

or

asse

ssm

ent,

and

case

man

agem

ent,

have

bee

nde

term

ined

by

a on

e-st

op o

pera

tor

or o

ne-

dete

rmin

ed b

y on

e-st

op o

pera

tor

orst

op s

yste

m. T

hese

sup

port

s an

d se

rvic

esst

op p

artn

er, a

s ap

prop

riate

, to:

part

ner

to n

eed

trai

ning

and

hav

e sk

ills

wou

ld b

e fu

nded

by

a va

riety

of o

ne-s

top

oB

e un

likel

y or

una

ble

to o

btai

n or

and

qual

ifica

tions

to s

ucce

ssfu

llypa

rtne

rs a

nd m

ade

avai

labl

e th

roug

h th

e on

e-re

tain

sui

tabl

e em

ploy

men

t thr

ough

part

icip

ate

in th

e se

lect

ed tr

aini

ng;

Sel

ect t

rain

ing

dire

ctly

link

ed to

empl

oym

ent o

ppor

tuni

ties

in th

e lo

cal a

rea

stop

sys

tem

.in

tens

ive

serv

ices

oB

e in

nee

d of

trai

ning

to o

btai

n or

reta

in s

uita

ble

empl

oym

ent;

and

Cen

ter

for

Law

and

Soc

ial P

olic

y17

Page 30: Reproductions supplied by EDRS are the best that …DOCUMENT RESUME CE 085 229 Patel, Nisha; Strawn, Julie; Greenberg, Mark WIA Reauthorization Recommendations [and] Side-by-Side Comparison

Cur

rent

Law

Bus

h A

dmin

istr

atio

n's

Pro

posa

lH

ouse

Bill

(H

.R. 1

261)

or a

noth

er a

rea

whe

re w

illin

g to

rel

ocat

e;o

Hav

e th

e sk

ills

and

qual

ifica

tions

and

nece

ssar

y to

suc

cess

fully

par

ticip

ate

in th

eA

re u

nabl

e to

obt

ain

othe

r gr

ant

sele

cted

trai

ning

pro

gram

.as

sist

ance

, inc

ludi

ng P

ell g

rant

s, o

rS

elec

t tra

inin

g di

rect

ly li

nked

tore

quire

ass

ista

nce

beyo

nd o

ther

gra

ntem

ploy

men

t opp

ortu

nitie

s in

the

loca

l are

aas

sist

ance

, inc

ludi

ng P

ell g

rant

s.or

ano

ther

are

a w

here

will

ing

to c

omm

ute

Prio

rity

of s

ervi

ce s

houl

d be

pla

ced

onor

rel

ocat

e; o

rP

riorit

y fo

r in

tens

ive

and

trai

ning

ser

vice

sun

empl

oyed

wor

kers

. In

addi

tion,

if s

tate

Are

una

ble

to o

btai

n ot

her

gran

tgi

ven

to p

ublic

ass

ista

nce

reci

pien

ts a

nd lo

w-

dete

rmin

es th

at fu

nds

are

limite

d, a

sec

ond-

assi

stan

ce, i

nclu

ding

Pel

l gra

nts,

or

inco

me

indi

vidu

als

whe

n ad

ult f

unds

allo

cate

dtie

r pr

iorit

y w

ould

als

o be

pla

ced

on lo

w-

requ

ire a

ssis

tanc

e be

yond

oth

er g

rant

to a

loca

l are

a ar

e lim

ited,

inco

me

indi

vidu

als,

assi

stan

ce, i

nclu

ding

Pel

l gra

nts.

Am

ount

of fe

dera

l stu

dent

fina

ncia

l aid

rec

eive

dLo

w-I

ncom

e In

divi

dual

: An

indi

vidu

al w

ho:

may

be

take

n in

to a

ccou

nt in

det

erm

inin

g

,R

ecei

ves,

or

is a

mem

ber

of a

fam

ily th

atre

ceiv

es, c

ash

paym

ents

und

er a

fede

ral,

elig

ibili

ty.

stat

e, o

r lo

cal i

ncom

e-ba

sed

publ

icP

riorit

y fo

r in

tens

ive

and

trai

ning

ser

vice

sas

sist

ance

pro

gram

;gi

ven

to u

nem

ploy

ed in

divi

dual

s; if

fund

s in

aR

ecei

ved,

or

is a

mem

ber

of a

fam

ily th

atlo

cal a

rea

are

limite

d, p

riorit

y al

so g

iven

tore

ceiv

ed a

tota

l fam

ily in

com

e, fo

r th

e 6-

publ

ic a

ssis

tanc

e re

cipi

ents

and

oth

er lo

w-

mon

th p

erio

d pr

ior

to a

pplic

atio

n fo

r th

epr

ogra

m in

volv

ed, t

hat i

n re

latio

n to

fam

ily

0

inco

me

indi

vidu

als,

incl

udin

g si

ngle

par

ents

,di

spla

ced

hom

emak

ers,

and

pre

gnan

t sin

gle

size

, doe

s no

t exc

eed

the

high

er o

f the

pove

rty

line

or 7

0 pe

rcen

t of t

he lo

wer

livin

g st

anda

rd in

com

e le

vel;

wom

en.

Low

-Inc

ome

Indi

vidu

al: C

hang

es d

efin

ition

Is a

mem

ber

of a

hou

seho

ld th

at r

ecei

ved

so th

at in

com

e ca

nnot

exc

eed

the

pove

rty

line

(or

has

been

det

erm

ined

with

in th

e 6-

or th

e 70

per

cent

of t

he lo

wer

livi

ng s

tand

ard

mon

th p

erio

d pr

ior

to a

pplic

atio

n fo

r th

ein

com

e le

vel.

Add

s "r

ecei

ves

or is

elig

ible

topr

ogra

m in

volv

ed to

be

elig

ible

to r

ecei

ve)

rece

ive

free

or

redu

ced

pric

e lu

nch.

"F

ood

Sta

mps

;Q

ualif

ies

as a

hom

eles

s in

divi

dual

und

erth

e M

cKin

ney

Hom

eles

s A

ssis

tanc

e A

ct;

Is a

fost

er c

hild

on

beha

lf of

who

m s

tate

or

loca

l gov

ernm

ent p

aym

ents

are

mad

e; o

rIn

cas

es p

erm

itted

by

DO

L re

gula

tions

, is

an in

divi

dual

with

a d

isab

ility

who

se o

wn

inco

me

mee

ts o

ne o

f the

firs

t tw

ore

quire

men

ts a

bove

, but

who

se fa

mily

inco

me

does

not

.

i

Low

er L

ivin

g S

tand

ard

Inco

me

Leve

l: T

hat

Low

er L

ivin

g S

tand

ard

Inco

me

Leve

l:in

com

e le

vel (

adju

sted

for

regi

onal

,m

etro

polit

an, u

rban

, and

rur

al d

iffer

ence

s an

dfa

mily

siz

e) d

eter

min

ed a

nnua

lly b

y th

e

Rem

oves

def

initi

on.

Sec

reta

ry b

ased

on

the

mos

t rec

ent l

ower

Cen

ter

for

Law

and

Soc

ial P

olic

y18

Page 31: Reproductions supplied by EDRS are the best that …DOCUMENT RESUME CE 085 229 Patel, Nisha; Strawn, Julie; Greenberg, Mark WIA Reauthorization Recommendations [and] Side-by-Side Comparison

Cur

rent

Law

Bus

h A

dmin

istr

atio

n's

Pro

posa

lH

ouse

Bill

(H

.R. 1

261)

livin

g fa

mily

bud

get i

ssue

d by

the

Sec

reta

ry.

Exp

and

ITA

s by

cha

ngin

g th

em in

to C

aree

rT

rain

ing

serv

ices

mus

t be

prov

ided

thou

gh u

seof

indi

vidu

al tr

aini

ng a

ccou

nts

(IT

As)

, with

the

Sch

olar

ship

s, w

hich

cou

ld b

e en

hanc

ed b

yad

ding

oth

er r

esou

rces

suc

h as

priv

ate

ITA

s m

ay in

clud

e, in

add

ition

to W

IA fu

nds,

fund

s fr

om o

ther

pro

gram

s an

d so

urce

s th

atfo

llow

ing

exce

ptio

ns, w

hich

allo

w fo

r co

ntra

cts:

On-

the-

job

trai

ning

or

cust

omiz

ed tr

aini

ng(e

mpl

oyer

pai

d) a

nd in

divi

dual

res

ourc

es to

faci

litat

e tr

aini

ng. C

aree

r S

chol

arsh

ips

wou

ldw

ill a

ssis

t ind

ivid

uals

in o

btai

ning

trai

ning

.

If th

e lo

cal b

oard

det

erm

ines

ther

e ar

e an

be a

vaila

ble

to u

nem

ploy

ed a

s w

ell a

s ce

rtai

nA

dds

indi

vidu

als

with

dis

abili

ties

to th

e lis

t of

insu

ffici

ent n

umbe

r of

elig

ible

trai

ning

prov

ider

s in

the

loca

l are

a to

acc

ompl

ish

the

purp

oses

of I

TA

s

grou

ps o

f em

ploy

ed w

orke

rs.

spec

ial p

opul

atio

ns fo

r th

e pu

rpos

es o

fco

ntra

ctin

g fo

r tr

aini

ng.

The

loca

l boa

rd d

eter

min

es th

ere

is a

trai

ning

pro

gram

of d

emon

stra

ted

effe

ctiv

enes

s of

fere

d in

the

loca

l are

a by

aco

mm

unity

-bas

ed o

rgan

izat

ion

or o

ther

priv

ate

orga

niza

tion

to s

erve

spe

cial

part

icip

ant p

opul

atio

ns th

at fa

ce m

ultip

leba

rrie

rs to

em

ploy

men

t, w

hich

incl

ude:

oIn

divi

dual

s w

ith s

ubst

antia

l lan

guag

eor

cul

tura

l bar

riers

oO

ffend

ers

oH

omel

ess

indi

vidu

als

oO

ther

har

d-to

-ser

ve p

opul

atio

ns a

sde

fined

by

gove

rnor

Sim

plify

the

requ

irem

ents

for

cust

omiz

edC

usto

miz

ed T

rain

ing

is d

efin

ed a

s tr

aini

ngtr

aini

ng, o

n-th

e-jo

b tr

aini

ng, a

nd in

cum

bent

Cus

tom

ized

Tra

inin

g: C

hang

es e

mpl

oyer

that

is d

esig

ned

to m

eet t

he s

peci

alw

orke

r tr

aini

ng in

a w

ay th

at w

ould

incr

ease

cont

ribut

ion

requ

irem

ent t

o "a

sig

nific

ant

requ

irem

ents

of a

n em

ploy

er (

incl

udin

g a

grou

p of

em

ploy

ers)

; tha

t is

cond

ucte

d w

ith a

com

mitm

ent b

y th

e em

ploy

er to

em

ploy

an

indi

vidu

al o

n su

cces

sful

com

plet

ion

of th

etr

aini

ng; a

nd fo

r w

hich

the

empl

oyer

pay

s fo

rno

t les

s th

an 5

0 pe

rcen

t of t

he c

ost o

f the

empl

oyer

util

izat

ion

of th

ese

tool

s w

hile

mai

ntai

ning

fisc

al in

tegr

ity. F

or e

xam

ple,

with

appr

oval

of t

he g

over

nor,

loca

l are

as c

ould

spen

d up

to 1

0 pe

rcen

t of t

heir

Adu

lt fu

nds

onin

cum

bent

wor

ker

trai

ning

. An

empl

oyer

mat

ch w

ould

be

requ

ired.

The

am

ount

of t

he

port

ion"

as

dete

rmin

ed b

y th

e lo

cal b

oard

.

trai

ning

,m

atch

wou

ld b

e de

term

ined

acc

ordi

ng to

the

size

of t

he e

mpl

oyer

.,

Elig

ibili

ty fo

rE

ligib

le Y

outh

: An

indi

vidu

al w

ho is

not

less

Doe

s no

t add

ress

.R

emov

es c

urre

nt d

efin

ition

s of

elig

ible

you

thY

outh

Ser

vice

sth

an a

ge 1

4 an

d no

t mor

e th

an a

ge 2

1 w

ho is

a lo

w-in

com

e in

divi

dual

and

is a

n in

divi

dual

with

one

or

mor

e of

the

follo

win

g: d

efic

ient

inba

sic

liter

acy

skill

s; a

sch

ool d

ropo

ut;

hom

eles

s, a

run

away

, or

a fo

ster

chi

ld;

preg

nant

or

a pa

rent

; an

offe

nder

; an

indi

vidu

alw

ho r

equi

res

addi

tiona

l ass

ista

nce

to c

ompl

ete

an e

duca

tiona

l pro

gram

, or

to s

ecur

e an

d ho

ldem

ploy

men

t,

and

out-

of-s

choo

l you

th.

Out

-of-

Sch

ool a

re e

ligib

le if

they

are

not

youn

ger

than

age

16

or o

lder

than

age

24

and

one

or m

ore

of th

e fo

llow

ing:

sch

ool d

ropo

uts;

reci

pien

ts o

f a s

econ

dary

sch

ool d

iplo

ma

orG

ED

who

are

def

icie

nt in

bas

ic s

kills

; cou

rt-

invo

lved

you

th a

ttend

ing

an a

ltern

ativ

e sc

hool

;yo

uth

in fo

ster

car

e or

who

hav

e be

en in

fost

er

Cen

ter

for

Law

and

Soc

ial P

olic

y19

Page 32: Reproductions supplied by EDRS are the best that …DOCUMENT RESUME CE 085 229 Patel, Nisha; Strawn, Julie; Greenberg, Mark WIA Reauthorization Recommendations [and] Side-by-Side Comparison

Cur

rent

Law

Bus

h A

dmin

istr

atio

n's

Pro

posa

lH

ouse

Bill

(H

.R. 1

261)

Out

-of-

Sch

ool Y

outh

: An

elig

ible

you

th w

hois

a s

choo

l dro

pout

or

an e

ligib

le y

outh

who

has

rece

ived

a s

econ

dary

sch

ool d

iplo

ma

or it

seq

uiva

lent

but

is b

asic

ski

lls d

efic

ient

,un

empl

oyed

, or

unde

rem

ploy

ed.

care

.

In-S

choo

l You

th a

re e

ligib

le if

they

are

low

-in

com

e in

divi

dual

s an

d on

e or

mor

e of

the

follo

win

g:D

efic

ient

in li

tera

cy s

kills

Hom

eles

s, r

unaw

ay, o

r fo

ster

chi

ldre

nP

regn

ant o

r pa

rent

sO

ffend

ers

Indi

vidu

als

who

req

uire

add

ition

alas

sist

ance

to c

ompl

ete

an e

duca

tiona

lpr

ogra

m, o

r to

sec

ure

and

hold

empl

oym

ent

Giv

es p

riorit

y fo

r se

rvic

es to

sch

ool d

ropo

uts.

Sta

teP

erfo

rman

ceA

ccou

ntab

ility

_.

Cor

e In

dica

tors

for

Adu

lts a

nd O

lder

You

th(1

9-21

):E

ntry

into

uns

ubsi

dize

d em

ploy

men

tR

eten

tion

in u

nsub

sidi

zed

empl

oym

ent 6

mon

ths

afte

r en

try

into

em

ploy

men

tE

arni

ngs

chan

ge 6

mon

ths

afte

r en

try

into

empl

oym

ent

Cre

dent

ial r

ate

amon

g th

ose

who

ent

erin

to u

nsub

sidi

zed

empl

oym

ent (

for

olde

ryo

uth,

cre

dent

ial r

ate

amon

g th

ose

who

ente

r in

to p

osts

econ

dary

edu

catio

n,ad

vanc

ed tr

aini

ng, o

r un

subs

idiz

edem

ploy

men

t)

Cor

e In

dica

tors

for

Dis

loca

ted

Wor

kers

:E

ntry

into

uns

ubsi

dize

d em

ploy

men

tR

eten

tion

in u

nsub

sidi

zed

empl

oym

ent 6

mon

ths

afte

r en

try

into

em

ploy

men

tE

arni

ngs

repl

acem

ent r

ate

Cre

dent

ial r

ate

amon

g th

ose

who

ent

erin

to u

nsub

sidi

zed

empl

oym

ent (

for

olde

ryo

uth,

cre

dent

ial r

ate

amon

g th

ose

who

ente

r in

to p

osts

econ

dary

edu

catio

n,ad

vanc

ed tr

aini

ng, o

r un

subs

idiz

edem

ploy

men

t

The

abo

ve in

dica

tors

exc

lude

indi

vidu

als

who

part

icip

ate

in o

nly

self-

serv

ice

and

Cha

nges

sho

uld

be m

ade

to c

urre

ntpe

rfor

man

ce a

ccou

ntab

ility

sys

tem

to e

nsur

elo

cal p

rogr

am o

pera

tors

are

not

driv

en a

way

from

ser

ving

thos

e m

ost i

n ne

ed.

Cur

rent

indi

cato

rs w

ould

be

repl

aced

by

the

8in

dica

tors

(4

for

yout

h an

d 4

for

adul

ts)

bein

gde

velo

ped

by th

e fe

dera

l par

tner

age

ncie

s as

part

of a

new

com

mon

mea

sure

s in

itiat

ive

for

empl

oym

ent a

nd jo

b tr

aini

ng p

rogr

ams.

Som

efe

dera

l par

tner

s m

ay r

etai

n ot

her

mea

sure

s of

impo

rtan

ce to

thei

r pr

ogra

ms.

As

part

of t

he c

omm

on m

easu

res

initi

ativ

e, th

eco

re s

et o

f mea

sure

s w

ould

als

o ha

ve a

com

mon

set

of d

efin

ition

s an

d da

ta s

ets.

Est

ablis

h lo

ng-t

erm

nat

iona

l per

form

ance

goal

s th

roug

h no

tice

and

com

men

t rul

emak

ing.

The

se n

atio

nal t

arge

ts w

ould

form

the

basi

s of

stat

e-le

vel n

egot

iatio

ns, w

ith th

e in

divi

dual

stat

e-ne

gotia

ted

leve

ls a

vera

ging

the

esta

blis

hed

natio

nal t

arge

ts. A

mor

e dy

nam

icpe

rfor

man

ce n

egot

iatio

n pr

oces

s sh

ould

be

desi

gned

that

wou

ld ta

ke in

to a

ccou

nt lo

cal

labo

r m

arke

t nee

ds a

nd th

e ch

arac

teris

tics

ofin

divi

dual

s be

ing

serv

ed. S

tron

ger

lang

uage

shou

ld b

e ad

ded

to th

e st

atut

e to

enc

oura

ge

Cor

e In

dica

tors

for

Adu

lts:

Elim

inat

es c

rede

ntia

l rat

e m

easu

re.

Add

s ef

ficie

ncy

of p

rogr

am in

obt

aini

ngem

ploy

men

t, re

tent

ion,

and

ear

ning

sm

easu

res.

Elim

inat

es e

xclu

sion

of i

ndiv

idua

ls w

hopa

rtic

ipat

e in

onl

y se

lf-se

rvic

e an

din

form

atio

nal a

ctiv

ities

.

Cen

ter

for

Law

and

Soc

ial P

olic

y20

Page 33: Reproductions supplied by EDRS are the best that …DOCUMENT RESUME CE 085 229 Patel, Nisha; Strawn, Julie; Greenberg, Mark WIA Reauthorization Recommendations [and] Side-by-Side Comparison

Cur

rent

Law

Bus

h A

dmin

istr

atio

n's

Pro

posa

lH

ouse

Bill

(H

.R. 1

261)

info

rmat

iona

l act

iviti

es,

all l

evel

s of

the

syst

em to

take

a v

arie

ty o

ffa

ctor

s in

to a

ccou

nt w

hen

esta

blis

hing

leve

lsC

ore

Indi

cato

rs fo

r Y

oung

er Y

outh

(14

-18)

:of

per

form

ance

. Suc

h fa

ctor

s co

uld

incl

ude

Cor

e In

dica

tors

for

You

th (

16-2

4):

Atta

inm

ent o

f bas

ic s

kills

and

, as

diffe

renc

es in

eco

nom

ic c

ondi

tions

, suc

h as

Red

efin

es m

easu

res

as fo

llow

s:ap

prop

riate

, wor

k re

adin

ess

orth

e ra

te o

f job

cre

atio

n or

loss

, and

diff

eren

ces

Ent

ry in

to e

mpl

oym

ent,

educ

atio

n or

occu

patio

nal s

kills

;in

par

ticip

ant c

hara

cter

istic

s, s

uch

asad

vanc

ed tr

aini

ng, o

r m

ilita

ry s

ervi

ceA

ttain

men

t of h

igh

scho

ol d

iplo

mas

and

indi

cato

rs o

f poo

r w

ork

hist

ory

or w

elfa

reA

ttain

men

t of h

igh

scho

ol d

iplo

ma

or G

ED

thei

r re

cogn

ized

equ

ival

ents

; and

Pla

cem

ent a

nd r

eten

tion

in p

osts

econ

dary

educ

atio

n or

adv

ance

d tr

aini

ng, o

rpl

acem

ent a

nd r

eten

tion

in m

ilita

ry s

ervi

ce,

empl

oym

ent,

or q

ualif

ied

appr

entic

eshi

ps.

depe

nden

cy.

(incl

udin

g re

cogn

ized

alte

rnat

ive

stan

dard

sfo

r in

divi

dual

s w

ith d

isab

ilitie

s)A

ttain

men

t of l

itera

cy o

r nu

mer

acy

skill

sE

ffici

ency

of p

rogr

am in

obt

aini

ng th

eou

tcom

es a

bove

Cus

tom

er S

atis

fact

ion

Indi

cato

rs:

Cus

tom

er S

atis

fact

ion

Indi

cato

rs:

Cus

tom

er s

atis

fact

ion

of e

mpl

oyer

s an

dpa

rtic

ipan

ts, w

hich

may

be

mea

sure

dth

roug

h su

rvey

s co

nduc

ted

afte

r th

eco

nclu

sion

of p

artic

ipat

ion

in a

ctiv

ities

.

Elim

inat

es r

equi

rem

ent f

or c

usto

mer

satis

fact

ion

indi

cato

rs.

Sta

te A

djus

ted

Leve

ls o

f Per

form

ance

: Set

for

two

year

s, c

onsi

sten

t with

new

pro

visi

on fo

rS

tate

Adj

uste

d Le

vels

of P

erfo

rman

ce: S

etfo

r fir

st th

ree

year

s; a

djus

ted

leve

ls fo

r fo

urth

and

fifth

yea

rs s

et p

rior

to fo

urth

yea

r.

Fac

tors

take

n in

to a

ccou

nt in

adj

ustin

g

2-ye

ar s

tate

and

loca

l pla

ns.

Per

form

ance

leve

ls s

hall

be a

djus

ted

base

don

fact

ors

in c

urre

nt la

w w

ith th

e fo

llow

ing

revi

sion

s:pe

rfor

man

ce le

vels

:E

xten

t to

whi

ch le

vels

will

ass

ist s

tate

inat

tain

ing

high

leve

l of c

usto

mer

satis

fact

ion;

How

leve

ls c

ompa

re w

ith a

djus

ted

leve

lsof

oth

er s

tate

s ta

king

into

acc

ount

fact

ors

incl

udin

g di

ffere

nces

in e

cono

mic

cond

ition

s, p

artic

ipan

t cha

ract

eris

tics

aten

try,

and

ser

vice

s to

be

prov

ided

; and

Ext

ent t

o w

hich

leve

ls p

rom

ote

cont

inuo

usim

prov

emen

t in

perf

orm

ance

and

ens

ure

optim

al r

etur

n on

inve

stm

ent o

f fed

eral

fund

s.

Elim

inat

es c

onsi

dera

tion

of w

heth

er le

vels

will

ass

ist t

he s

tate

in a

ttain

ing

a hi

gh le

vel

of c

usto

mer

sat

isfa

ctio

n.P

rovi

des

that

taki

ng in

to a

ccou

nt e

cono

mic

cond

ition

s w

hen

setti

ng p

erfo

rman

cele

vels

incl

udes

con

side

ratio

ns "

such

as

unem

ploy

men

t rat

es a

nd jo

b lo

sses

or

gain

s in

par

ticul

ar in

dust

ries.

"P

rovi

des

that

con

side

ratio

n of

par

ticip

ant

char

acte

ristic

s w

hen

setti

ng p

erfo

rman

cele

vels

incl

udes

cor

isid

erat

ions

"su

ch a

sin

dica

tors

of p

oor

wor

k hi

stor

y, la

ck o

fw

ork

expe

rienc

e, lo

w le

vels

of l

itera

cy o

rE

nglis

h pr

ofic

ienc

y, d

isab

ility

sta

tus,

and

wel

fare

dep

ende

ncy.

"

Loca

lLo

cal p

erfo

rman

ce m

easu

res

cons

ist o

f the

Loca

l per

form

ance

mea

sure

s w

ould

con

sist

of

Fac

tors

take

n in

to a

ccou

nt in

adj

ustin

gP

erfo

rman

cesa

me

core

indi

cato

rs a

nd c

usto

mer

the

sam

e co

re in

dica

tors

req

uire

d fo

r st

ates

.pe

rfor

man

ce le

vels

: Sam

e se

t of f

acto

rsA

ccou

ntab

ility

satis

fact

ion

indi

cato

rs r

equi

red

for

stat

es.

Gov

erno

rs w

ould

hav

e au

thor

ity to

add

addi

tiona

l mea

sure

s fo

r us

e w

ithin

thei

r st

ate.

cons

ider

ed fo

r st

ates

will

be

cons

ider

ed w

hen

loca

l are

a pe

rfor

man

ce le

vels

are

set

; in

Cen

ter

for

Law

and

Soc

ial P

olic

y21

Page 34: Reproductions supplied by EDRS are the best that …DOCUMENT RESUME CE 085 229 Patel, Nisha; Strawn, Julie; Greenberg, Mark WIA Reauthorization Recommendations [and] Side-by-Side Comparison

Cur

rent

Law

Bus

h A

dmin

istr

atio

n's

Pro

posa

lH

ouse

Bill

(H

.R. 1

261)

addi

tion,

dis

abili

ty s

tatu

s of

par

ticip

ants

will

be

cons

ider

ed.

A lo

cal a

rea

subj

ect t

o a

reor

gani

zatio

n pl

anfo

r fa

iling

to m

eet p

erfo

rman

ce le

vels

for

2co

nsec

utiv

e ye

ars,

may

app

eal t

o th

e go

vern

orto

res

cind

or

revi

se th

e pl

an w

ithin

30

days

of

rece

ivin

g no

tice.

With

in 3

0 da

ys o

f rec

eivi

ngth

e de

cisi

on o

f the

gov

erno

r, s

tate

may

app

eal

to S

ecre

tary

.

Incl

udes

lang

uage

that

req

uire

s st

ates

toes

tabl

ish

fisca

l and

man

agem

ent

acco

unta

bilit

y in

form

atio

n sy

stem

s th

at u

tiliz

equ

arte

rly w

ages

rec

ords

and

adh

ere

to F

amily

Edu

catio

nal R

ight

s an

d P

rivac

y A

ct.

Elim

inat

es r

ight

to a

ppea

l to

Sec

reta

ry a

fter

unsu

cces

sful

app

eal t

o go

vern

or if

loca

l are

asa

nctio

ned

for

failu

re to

mee

t per

form

ance

stan

dard

s.

Sec

reta

ry m

ay a

war

d gr

ants

to s

tate

s fo

rex

empl

ary

perf

orm

ance

on

mea

sure

sde

scrib

ed a

bove

, on

serv

ing

spec

ial

popu

latio

ns, a

nd o

ther

fact

ors

as d

eter

min

edby

Sec

reta

ry. G

over

nors

may

aw

ard

gran

ts to

loca

l are

as fo

r ex

empl

ary

perf

orm

ance

on

mea

sure

s de

scrib

ed a

bove

and

on

serv

ing

spec

ial p

opul

atio

ns.

Rep

ortin

gR

equi

rem

ents

Dat

a R

epor

ts: S

tate

and

loca

l boa

rds

requ

ired

to m

ake

acce

ssib

le r

epor

ts w

ith in

form

atio

nre

gard

ing

prog

ram

s an

d ac

tiviti

es c

arrie

d ou

tpe

rtai

ning

to:

Doe

s no

t add

ress

.

Rel

evan

t dem

ogra

phic

cha

ract

eris

tics

(incl

udin

g ra

ce, e

thni

city

, sex

, and

age

)an

d ot

her

rela

ted

info

rmat

ion

rega

rdin

gpa

rtic

ipan

tsP

rogr

ams

and

activ

ities

in w

hich

part

icip

ants

are

enr

olle

d, a

nd le

ngth

of

time

that

par

ticip

ants

are

eng

aged

in s

uch

prog

ram

s an

d ac

tiviti

esO

utco

mes

for

part

icip

ants

, inc

ludi

ng th

eoc

cupa

tions

and

pla

cem

ent i

nno

ntra

ditio

nal e

mpl

oym

ent

Spe

cifie

d co

sts

of th

e pr

ogra

ms

and

activ

ities

Info

rmat

ion

nece

ssar

y to

pre

pare

rep

orts

to c

ompl

y w

ith n

ondi

scrim

inat

ion

prov

isio

ns

.

Sta

te A

nnua

l Rep

orts

: At m

inim

um, m

ust

incl

ude

info

rmat

ion

on p

artic

ipan

ts r

elat

ing

to:

. Ent

ry in

to e

mpl

oym

ent r

elat

ed to

trai

ning

rece

ived

Sta

te A

nnua

l Rep

orts

: Req

uire

s pe

rfor

man

cein

dica

tors

to in

clud

e pa

rtic

ipan

ts w

ho r

ecei

ved

only

sel

f-se

rvic

e an

d in

form

atio

nal a

ctiv

ities

.

Wag

es a

t em

ploy

men

t ent

ryA

dds

lang

uage

sta

ting

that

in p

repa

ring

repo

rts

"Sta

tes

shal

l est

ablis

h pr

oced

ures

, con

sist

ent

Cen

ter

for

Law

and

Soc

ial P

olic

y22

Page 35: Reproductions supplied by EDRS are the best that …DOCUMENT RESUME CE 085 229 Patel, Nisha; Strawn, Julie; Greenberg, Mark WIA Reauthorization Recommendations [and] Side-by-Side Comparison

Cur

rent

Law

Bus

h A

dmin

istr

atio

n's

Pro

posa

lH

ouse

Bill

(H

.R. 1

261)

Cos

t of a

ctiv

ities

rel

ativ

e to

effe

ct o

npa

rtic

ipan

t per

form

ance

Ret

entio

n an

d ea

rnin

gs 1

2 m

onth

s af

ter

empl

oym

ent e

ntry

with

gui

delin

es is

sued

by

the

Sec

reta

ry, t

oen

sure

the

info

rmat

ion

cont

aine

d in

the

repo

rtis

val

id a

nd r

elia

ble.

"

Per

form

ance

on

indi

cato

rs fo

r pa

rtic

ipan

tsw

ho r

ecei

ve tr

aini

ng c

ompa

red

to th

ose

.

who

rec

eive

d on

ly s

ervi

ces

othe

r th

antr

aini

ng (

excl

udin

g pa

rtic

ipan

ts w

hore

ceiv

ed o

nly

self-

serv

ice

and

info

rmat

iona

l act

iviti

es)

Per

form

ance

on

indi

cato

rs b

y pu

blic

assi

stan

ce r

ecip

ient

s, o

ut-o

f-sc

hool

you

th,

vete

rans

, ind

ivid

uals

with

dis

abili

ties,

disp

lace

d ho

mem

aker

s, a

nd o

lder

indi

vidu

als

Qua

rter

ly F

inan

cial

Rep

orts

: Loc

al b

oard

sre

quire

d to

sub

mit

quar

terly

fina

ncia

l rep

orts

toth

e go

vern

or w

ith r

espe

ct to

pro

gram

s an

dac

tiviti

es c

arrie

d ou

t. R

epor

ts r

equi

red

toin

clud

e in

form

atio

n id

entif

ying

all

prog

ram

and

activ

ity c

osts

by

cost

cat

egor

y in

acc

orda

nce

with

gen

eral

ly a

ccep

ted

acco

untin

g pr

inci

ples

and

by y

ear

of th

e ap

prop

riatio

n in

volv

ed.

Sta

tes

requ

ired

to s

ubm

it su

mm

ary

repo

rts

toS

ecre

tary

on

a qu

arte

rly b

asis

.

Fis

cal M

anag

emen

t and

Acc

ount

abili

tyS

yste

m: G

over

nor,

in c

oord

inat

ion

with

loca

lbo

ards

and

chi

ef e

lect

ed o

ffici

als

in th

e st

ate,

requ

ired

to e

stab

lish

and

oper

ate

a fis

cal a

ndm

anag

emen

t acc

ount

abili

ty in

form

atio

nsy

stem

bas

ed o

n gu

idel

ines

est

ablis

hed

by th

e

.

Sec

reta

ry a

fter

cons

ulta

tion

with

the

gove

rnor

s, lo

cal e

lect

ed o

ffici

als,

and

one

-sto

ppa

rtne

rs. G

uide

lines

req

uire

d to

pro

mot

eef

ficie

nt c

olle

ctio

n an

d us

e of

fisc

al a

ndm

anag

emen

t inf

orm

atio

n fo

r re

port

ing

and

mon

itorin

g th

e us

e of

fund

s.

Tec

hnic

alR

equi

res

Sec

reta

ry to

pro

vide

, coo

rdin

ate,

and

Doe

s no

t add

ress

.A

dds

lang

uage

that

req

uire

s S

ecre

tary

to a

lso

Ass

ista

nce

supp

ort d

evel

opm

ent o

f app

ropr

iate

trai

ning

,te

chni

cal a

ssis

tanc

e, s

taff

deve

lopm

ent,

and

othe

r ac

tiviti

es, i

nclu

ding

ass

ista

nce

in

prov

ide

tech

nica

l ass

ista

nce

that

incl

udes

trai

ning

of s

taff

prov

idin

g ra

pid

resp

onse

serv

ices

, the

trai

ning

of o

ther

WIA

sta

ff, p

eer

Cen

ter

for

Law

and

Soc

ial P

olic

y23

Page 36: Reproductions supplied by EDRS are the best that …DOCUMENT RESUME CE 085 229 Patel, Nisha; Strawn, Julie; Greenberg, Mark WIA Reauthorization Recommendations [and] Side-by-Side Comparison

Cur

rent

Law

Bus

h A

dmin

istr

atio

n's

Pro

posa

lH

ouse

Bill

(H

.R. 1

261)

repl

icat

ing

prog

ram

s of

dem

onst

rate

def

fect

iven

ess,

revi

ew a

ctiv

ities

, and

ass

ista

nce

rega

rdin

gac

coun

ting

and

prog

ram

ope

ratio

n pr

actic

es(w

hen

such

ass

ista

nce

wou

ld n

ot b

edu

plic

ativ

e to

ass

ista

nce

prov

ided

by

the

stat

e).

Pro

vide

s fo

r di

sloc

ated

wor

ker

tech

nica

las

sist

ance

to s

tate

s no

t mee

ting

perf

orm

ance

mea

sure

s fo

r di

sloc

ated

wor

kers

, for

cont

inuo

us im

prov

emen

t of d

islo

cate

d w

orke

rse

rvic

es, a

nd tr

aini

ng o

f sta

ff w

ho p

rovi

dera

pid

resp

onse

ser

vice

s,

Elim

inat

es d

islo

cate

d w

orke

r te

chni

cal

assi

stan

ce.

Req

uire

s S

ecre

tary

to e

stab

lish

a sy

stem

for

stat

es to

sha

re b

est p

ract

ices

info

rmat

ion.

Dem

onst

ratio

nD

emon

stra

tion

and

Pilo

t Pro

ject

s: S

ecre

tary

Doe

s no

t add

ress

.D

emon

stra

tion

and

Pilo

t Pro

ject

s:an

d R

esea

rch

requ

ired

to c

arry

out

, thr

ough

gra

nts

and

Res

truc

ture

s al

low

able

pro

ject

s to

incl

ude

the

Pro

ject

sco

ntra

cts,

dem

onst

ratio

n an

d pi

lot p

roje

cts

that

follo

win

g:in

clud

e pr

ovis

ion

of d

irect

ser

vice

s to

indi

vidu

als

to e

nhan

ce e

mpl

oym

ent

oppo

rtun

ities

and

an

eval

uatio

n co

mpo

nent

.P

roje

cts

may

incl

ude:

Est

ablis

hmen

t of a

dvan

ced

man

ufac

turin

gte

chno

logy

ski

ll ce

nter

s

Ass

ista

nce

to n

atio

nal e

mpl

oyer

s in

conn

ectin

g w

ith th

e w

orkf

orce

inve

stm

ent

syst

em to

faci

litat

e re

crui

tmen

t and

empl

oym

ent o

f nee

ded

wor

kers

and

topr

ovid

e in

form

atio

n to

suc

h sy

stem

on

skill

s an

d oc

cupa

tions

in d

eman

dS

kills

upg

rade

trai

ning

for

empl

oyed

wor

kers

who

res

ide

and

are

empl

oyed

inen

terp

rise

com

mun

ities

and

em

pow

erm

ent

zone

sJo

int p

rogr

ams

with

Dep

artm

ent o

fD

efen

se to

dev

elop

trai

ning

usi

ngco

mpu

ter-

base

d an

d ot

her

inno

vativ

ele

arni

ng te

chno

logi

esP

rom

otio

n of

dis

tanc

e le

arni

ngA

ssis

tanc

e in

pro

vidi

ng c

ompr

ehen

sive

serv

ices

to in

crea

se e

mpl

oym

ent r

ates

of

out-

of-s

choo

l you

th r

esid

ing

in ta

rget

hig

h-po

vert

y ar

eas

with

in e

mpo

wer

men

t zon

esan

d en

terp

rise

com

mun

ities

Par

tner

ship

s w

ith n

atio

nal o

rgan

izat

ions

with

exp

ertis

e in

em

ploy

men

t and

trai

ning

serv

ices

for

indi

vidu

als

with

dis

abili

ties

Ass

istin

g pu

blic

hou

sing

aut

horit

ies

that

prov

ide

publ

ic h

ousi

ng r

esid

ents

with

job

trai

ning

that

dem

onst

rate

s su

cces

s in

upgr

adin

g sk

ills

and

prom

otin

gem

ploy

men

tA

ssis

ting

loca

l are

as to

dev

elop

and

Pro

mot

ing

deve

lopm

ent o

f sys

tem

s th

atw

ill im

prov

e pr

ogra

m e

ffect

iven

ess

and

effic

ienc

yO

ppor

tuni

ties

for

empl

oym

ent i

n in

dust

ries

and

sect

ors

of in

dust

ries

that

are

expe

rienc

ing

or a

re li

kely

to e

xper

ienc

ehi

gh r

ates

of g

row

thS

tate

and

loca

l pro

ject

s to

test

inno

vativ

eap

proa

ches

to d

eliv

erin

g em

ploy

men

t-re

late

d se

rvic

esP

artn

ersh

ips

with

nat

iona

l org

aniz

atio

nsw

ith e

xper

tise

in e

mpl

oym

ent a

nd tr

aini

ngse

rvic

es fo

r in

divi

dual

s w

ith d

isab

ilitie

sA

ssis

ting

publ

ic h

ousi

ng a

utho

ritie

s th

atpr

ovid

e pu

blic

hou

sing

res

iden

ts w

ith jo

btr

aini

ng th

at d

emon

stra

tes

succ

ess

inup

grad

ing

skill

s an

d pr

omot

ing

empl

oym

ent

Pro

ject

s th

at p

rovi

de r

eten

tion

gran

ts to

qual

ified

job

trai

ning

pro

gram

s up

onpl

acem

ent o

r re

tent

ion

of a

low

-inco

me

indi

vidu

al tr

aine

d by

that

pro

gram

inem

ploy

men

t with

a s

ingl

e em

ploy

er fo

r a

Cen

ter

for

Law

and

Soc

ial P

olic

y24

Page 37: Reproductions supplied by EDRS are the best that …DOCUMENT RESUME CE 085 229 Patel, Nisha; Strawn, Julie; Greenberg, Mark WIA Reauthorization Recommendations [and] Side-by-Side Comparison

Cur

rent

Law

Bus

h A

dmin

istr

atio

n's

Pro

posa

lH

ouse

Bill

(H

.R. 1

261)

impl

emen

t sel

f-su

ffici

ency

sta

ndar

ds to

eval

uate

deg

ree

to w

hich

par

ticip

ants

are

achi

evin

g se

lf-su

ffici

ency

Ent

ities

elig

ible

to r

ecei

ve g

rant

s an

d co

ntra

cts

incl

ude: Tho

se w

ith e

xper

tise

in:

oC

ondu

ctin

g na

tiona

l dem

onst

ratio

npr

ojec

ts;

oU

tiliz

ing

stat

e-of

-the

-art

dem

onst

ratio

nm

etho

ds; o

ro

Con

duct

ing

eval

uatio

ns o

f wor

kfor

cein

vest

men

t pro

ject

s; o

rS

tate

and

loca

l ent

ities

with

exp

ertis

e in

oper

atin

g or

ove

rsee

ing

wor

kfor

cein

vest

men

t pro

gram

s.

Res

earc

h P

roje

cts:

Req

uire

s S

ecre

tary

toca

rry

out r

esea

rch

proj

ects

, thr

ough

gra

nts

and

cont

ract

s th

at w

ill c

ontr

ibut

e to

the

solu

tion

ofem

ploy

men

t pro

blem

s in

the

U.S

.

perio

d of

1 y

ear;

suc

h em

ploy

men

t mus

tpr

ovid

e in

com

e of

not

less

than

200

perc

ent o

f pov

erty

Elim

inat

es d

islo

cate

d w

orke

r pr

ojec

ts.

Elim

inat

es la

ngua

ge a

bout

elig

ible

ent

ities

.

.

Res

earc

h P

roje

cts:

Add

s re

quire

men

t tha

tS

ecre

tary

con

duct

stu

dies

to d

eter

min

e ne

tim

pact

s of

pro

gram

s, s

ervi

ces,

and

act

iviti

es.

Sec

reta

ry r

equi

red

to d

isse

min

ate

publ

icre

port

s co

ntai

ning

res

ults

of s

tudi

es.

Adm

inis

trat

ive

Pro

visi

ons

Pro

gram

Yea

r: W

ith th

e ex

cept

ion

of y

outh

fund

s, a

ppro

pria

tions

sha

ll be

ava

ilabl

e fo

rob

ligat

ion

only

on

the

basi

s of

a p

rogr

am y

ear,

whi

ch s

hall

begi

n on

Jul

y 1

in th

e fis

cal y

ear

for

whi

ch th

e ap

prop

riatio

n is

mad

e. Y

outh

fund

s sh

all b

e av

aila

ble

for

oblig

atio

nbe

ginn

ing

Apr

il 1

in th

e fis

cal y

ear

for

whi

chth

e ap

prop

riatio

n is

mad

e.

Grie

vanc

e P

roce

dure

: Req

uire

s S

ecre

tary

toin

vest

igat

e al

lega

tions

of v

iola

tions

if d

ecis

ion

rela

ting

to v

iola

tion

has

not b

een

reac

hed

with

in 6

0 da

ys a

nd e

ither

par

ty a

ppea

ls to

Sec

reta

ry o

r a

deci

sion

has

bee

n re

ache

dw

ithin

60

days

and

par

ty to

whi

ch d

ecis

ion

isad

vers

e ap

peal

s to

Sec

reta

ry.

Non

disc

rimin

atio

n: P

rohi

bits

dis

crim

inat

ion

inpa

rtic

ipat

ion,

ben

efits

, or

empl

oym

ent b

ecau

seof

rac

e, c

olor

, rel

igio

n, s

ex, n

atio

nal o

rigin

,ag

e, d

isab

ility

, or

polit

ical

affi

liatio

n or

bel

ief.

Doe

s no

t add

ress

.P

rogr

am Y

ear:

All

appr

opria

tions

sha

ll be

avai

labl

e fo

r ob

ligat

ion

only

on

the

basi

s of

apr

ogra

m y

ear,

whi

ch s

hall

begi

n on

Jul

y 1

inth

e fis

cal y

ear

for

whi

ch th

e ap

prop

riatio

n is

mad

e.

Grie

vanc

e P

roce

dure

: Elim

inat

esre

quire

men

t for

Sec

reta

ry to

inve

stig

ate,

but

says

Sec

reta

ry m

ay in

vest

igat

e.

Non

disc

rimin

atio

n: A

llow

s re

cipi

ent o

f WIA

fund

s th

at is

a r

elig

ious

cor

pora

tion,

asso

ciat

ion,

edu

catio

nal i

nstit

utio

n, o

r so

ciet

yto

dis

crim

inat

e in

em

ploy

men

t on

the

basi

s of

relig

ion.

Wai

vers

Sec

reta

ry m

ay w

aive

, for

any

sta

te o

r lo

cal

Sta

tuto

ry li

mita

tions

to in

crea

sed

wai

ver

In li

eu o

f cur

rent

wai

ver

requ

est s

ubm

issi

on

Cen

ter

for

Law

and

Soc

ial P

olic

y25

Page 38: Reproductions supplied by EDRS are the best that …DOCUMENT RESUME CE 085 229 Patel, Nisha; Strawn, Julie; Greenberg, Mark WIA Reauthorization Recommendations [and] Side-by-Side Comparison

Cur

rent

Law

Bus

h A

dmin

istr

atio

n's

Pro

posa

lH

ouse

Bill

(H

.R. 1

261)

area

, any

WIA

sta

tuto

ry o

r re

gula

tory

auth

ority

sho

uld

be r

emov

ed. W

aive

r pr

oces

sal

low

s S

ecre

tary

to e

stab

lish

requ

irem

ent (

exce

pt r

equi

rem

ents

rel

atin

gw

age

and

labo

r st

anda

rds,

incl

udin

gno

ndis

plac

emen

t pro

tect

ions

, wor

ker

right

s,pa

rtic

ipat

ion

and

prot

ectio

n of

wor

kers

and

part

icip

ants

, grie

vanc

e pr

oced

ures

and

judi

cial

revi

ew, n

ondi

scrim

inat

ion,

allo

catio

n of

fund

sto

loca

l are

as, e

ligib

ility

of p

rovi

ders

or

part

icip

ants

, the

est

ablis

hmen

t and

func

tions

.

of lo

cal a

rea

and

loca

l boa

rds,

and

pro

cedu

res

for

revi

ew a

nd a

ppro

val o

f pla

ns)

and

cert

ain

spec

ified

Wag

ner-

Pey

ser

stat

utor

y an

dre

gula

tory

req

uire

men

ts.

Gov

erno

r re

ques

ting

a w

aive

r re

quire

d to

subm

it a

plan

to S

ecre

tary

des

crib

ing

requ

irem

ents

to b

e w

aive

d, a

ctio

ns ta

ken

tore

mov

e st

ate

or lo

cal s

tatu

tory

or

regu

lato

ryw

aive

rs, g

oal o

f wai

ver

and

expe

cted

outc

omes

, ind

ivid

uals

impa

cted

, pro

cess

use

dto

mon

itor

impl

emen

tatio

n, a

nd p

roce

ss b

yw

hich

not

ice

and

oppo

rtun

ity to

com

men

t on

requ

est h

as b

een

prov

ided

to lo

cal b

oard

.S

ecre

tary

req

uire

d to

pro

vide

wai

ver

with

in 9

0da

ys if

and

onl

y to

the

exte

nt th

at S

ecre

tary

dete

rmin

es r

equi

rem

ents

req

uest

ed to

be

wai

ved

impe

de a

bilit

y to

impl

emen

t pla

n an

dst

ate

has

exec

uted

MO

U w

ith S

ecre

tary

requ

iring

sta

te to

mee

t (or

ens

ure

that

loca

lar

ea m

eets

) ag

reed

upo

n ou

tcom

es a

nd to

impl

emen

t oth

er a

ppro

pria

te m

easu

res

toen

sure

acc

ount

abili

ty.

shou

ld b

e si

mpl

ified

.,

Wor

k-F

lex

shou

ld b

e si

mpl

ified

to a

llow

a"S

tate

Opt

ion"

in w

hich

gov

erno

rs c

ould

app

lyfo

r bl

ock

gran

t aut

horit

y. U

nder

this

opt

ion,

gove

rnor

s w

ould

hav

e co

mpl

ete

disc

retio

n as

to h

ow to

adm

inis

ter

both

adu

lt an

d yo

uth

form

ula

prog

ram

s. G

over

nors

wou

ldde

term

ine

sub-

stat

e fu

ndin

g an

d go

vern

ance

stru

ctur

es. T

he b

lock

gra

nts

wou

ld b

e gu

ided

by a

set

of g

uidi

ng p

aram

eter

s, w

hich

sho

uld

incl

ude

the

use

of th

e on

e-st

op c

aree

r sy

stem

as th

e co

re s

ervi

ce d

eliv

ery

syst

em, a

s w

ell a

sa

basi

c se

t of s

ervi

ces

to b

e pr

ovid

ed.

How

ever

, gov

erno

rs w

ould

hav

e th

ere

spon

sibi

lity

for

sele

ctin

g pa

rtne

r pr

ogra

ms

and

the

arra

y of

ser

vice

s. G

over

nors

adm

inis

terin

g th

eir

prog

ram

s un

der

the

Sta

teO

ptio

n w

ould

nee

d to

sub

mit

a pl

an, s

imila

r to

the

TA

NF

pla

n, to

the

Dep

artm

ent.

Thi

s pl

anw

ould

incl

ude

expe

cted

leve

ls o

f per

form

ance

unde

r fe

dera

l com

mon

mea

sure

s fo

rem

ploy

men

t and

job

trai

ning

pro

gram

s. A

stat

e th

at fa

ils to

mee

t neg

otia

ted

leve

ls o

fpe

rfor

man

ce tw

o ye

ars

in a

row

wou

ld b

esu

bjec

t to

sanc

tions

and

loss

of t

he a

utho

rity

toru

n pr

ogra

ms

unde

r th

is o

ptio

n.

,req

uire

men

ts,

expe

dite

d pr

oced

ure

for

exte

ndin

g ap

prov

edw

aive

rs to

add

ition

al s

tate

s.

Per

sona

lN

o pr

ovis

ion.

Est

ablis

h au

thor

ity to

cre

ate

Ree

mpl

oym

ent

No

prov

isio

n.R

eem

ploy

men

tA

ccou

nts

Acc

ount

s, s

peci

al s

elf-

man

aged

acc

ount

s fo

rus

e by

indi

vidu

als

who

are

out

of w

ork

and

who

hav

e be

en id

entif

ied

as v

ery

likel

y to

exha

ust t

heir

Une

mpl

oym

ent I

nsur

ance

bene

fits.

Cen

ter

for

Law

and

Soc

ial P

olic

y26

Page 39: Reproductions supplied by EDRS are the best that …DOCUMENT RESUME CE 085 229 Patel, Nisha; Strawn, Julie; Greenberg, Mark WIA Reauthorization Recommendations [and] Side-by-Side Comparison

U.S. Department of EducationOffice of Educational Research and Improvement (OERI)

National Library of Education (NLE)Educational Resources Information Center (ERIC)

NOTICE

Reproduction Basis

;

Eitiet Ionel kw= loniiiion Unto

This document is covered by a signed "Reproduction Release (Blanket)"form (on file within the ERIC system), encompassing all or classes ofdocuments from its source organization and, therefore, does not require a"Specific Document" Release form.

This document is Federally-funded, or carries its own permission toreproduce, or is otherwise in the public domain and, therefore, may bereproduced by ERIC without a signed Reproduction Release form (either"Specific Document" or "Blanket").

EFF-089 (1/2003)