Reproductions supplied by EDRS are the best that …DOCUMENT RESUME CE 085 229 Patel, Nisha; Strawn,...
Transcript of Reproductions supplied by EDRS are the best that …DOCUMENT RESUME CE 085 229 Patel, Nisha; Strawn,...
ED 480 001
AUTHOR
TITLE
INSTITUTIONPUB DATENOTE
AVAILABLEFROM
PUB TYPEEDRS PRICE
DESCRIPTORS
IDENTIFIERS
ABSTRACT
DOCUMENT RESUME
CE 085 229
Patel, Nisha; Strawn, Julie; Greenberg, Mark
WIA Reauthorization Recommendations [and] Side-by-SideComparison of Title I Provisions in Recent WIA ReauthorizationProposals (June 25, 2003 Update).Center for Law and Social Policy, Washington, DC.2003-00-0038p.
For full text (Recommendations):
http://www.clasp.org/DMS/Documents/1057258510.44/WIA_Recomm.pdf.For full text (Comparison): http://www.clasp.org/DMS/Documents/1056564883.68/WIA_sbs.pdf.Opinion Papers (120) Reports Evaluative (142)EDRS Price MF01/PCO2 Plus Postage.Access to Education; *Adult Education; Adult Literacy;Comparative Analysis; Eligibility; *Employment Services;*English (Second Language); Federal Aid; *Federal Legislation;Federal Programs; *Job Training; Limited English Speaking;Literacy Education; Out of School Youth; Policy Formation;Postsecondary Education; Public Policy; Second LanguageInstruction; Student Financial Aid
*Reauthorization Legislation; *Workforce Investment Act 1998
This publication on reauthorization recommendations for theWorkforce Investment Act of 1998 (WIA) comprises three documents. The firstis a short summary of reauthorization recommendations for Title I and II.Title I recommendations are to eliminate sequential eligibility; promotegreater access to training; improve adjustment of performance measures;require that performance measures take into account job quality and bettercapture earnings changes; address needs of those with limited English skills;encourage programs to combine adult education, English as a second language(ESL), and job training services; promote informed consumer choice bycreating a process for fixing problems with the provider certificationsystem; and clarify how WIA should take into account federal student aidreceived. Title II recommendations are to improve effectiveness of servicesby focusing funds on high quality programs; address needs of those withlimited English skills; encourage programs to combine adult education, ESL,and job training services; and strengthen links to postsecondary educationand job training. The second document, written by Nisha Patel and JulieStrawn, is a discussion of the rationale for each recommendation. The thirddocument, written by Nisha Patel and Mark Greenberg, is a summary and side-by-side comparison of Title I provisions in current law and these WIAreauthorization proposals: eight-page plan released by the BushAdministration in February 2003 and the bill (H.R. 1261) passed on May 8,2003. (YLB)
Reproductions supplied by EDRS are the best that can be madefrom the original document.
PERMISSION TO REPRODUCEANDDISSEMINATE THIS MATERIAL HAS
BEEN GRANTED BY
TO THE EDUCATIONAL RESOURCESINFORMATION CENTER (ERIC)
1
CLASPCENTER FOR LAW AND SOCIAL POLICY
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATIONOffice ol Educational Research and Improvement
EDUCATIONAL RESOURCES INFORMATIONCENTER (ERIC)
OiLlhis document has been reproduced asreceived from the person or organizationoriginating it.
0 Minor changes have been made toimprove reproduction quality.
Points of view or opinions stated in thisdocument do not necessarily representofficial OERI position or policy.
WIA REAUTHORIZATION RECOMMENDATIONS
By Nisha Patel and Julie Strawn
The Workforce Investment Act of 1998 (WIA) substantially altered the federally funded system for jobtraining and other employment-related services. Federal policy for these services is set out in Tide I ofWIA, which requires that each of nearly 600 local workforce areas develop and administer a one-stopdelivery system with a broad array of employment and training services available to job seekers andemployers. In addition, Congress folded into WIA the existing Adult Education and Family Literacy Act(AEFLA), as Tide II of the law. AEFLA, or WIA Tide II, is a federal program to assist undereducated orlimited English proficient adults or out-of-school youth in improving their skills. Congress is scheduled toreauthorize both titles by September 30, 2003; What follows is a short summary of reauthorizationrecommendations for both Tide I and II and a separate document that includes a discussion of therationale for each recommendation.
SUMMARY OF WIA TITLE I AND TITLE II RECOMMENDATIONS
TITLE I
1. ELIMINATE SEQUENTIAL ELIGIBILITY.> Eliminate sequential eligibility and allow individuals to receive intensive and training services in any
sequence determined appropriate by assessment in order to meet employment and earnings goalsestablished in conjunction with the one-stop operator or partner.
2. PROMOTE GREATER ACCESS TO TRAINING.> Require that states and local areas spend a minimum percentage of adult and dislocated worker funds
on training services.> Require that states and local areas that fail to meet the expenditure requirement receive the same
penalties for noncompliance that apply for failing to meet adjusted performance measures undercurrent law.
> Require that in order to receive \VIA incentive funds, states and local areas must spend at least theminimum percentage of funds on training.
> In their quarterly financial reports and annual reports, require that states report to the Department ofLabor, and that local areas report to states, on the amount of adult and dislocated worker funds spenton each category of services (core, intensive, training).
3. IMPROVE ADJUSTMENT OF PERFORMANCE MEASURES.> Adjust performance measures to take into account local conditions and characteristics of participants at
intake, including: lack of high school diploma or GED; limited employment history; physical and
BESTCOPYAVALA LECenter for Law and Social Policy 1
2
mental health problems (including documented disabilities); low basic skills; limited English proficiency;and local labor market conditions.
> To the extent that expected levels are adjusted to take into account populations with barriers toemployment, states and local areas should be held accountable for serving these populations.
4. REQUIRE THAT PERFORMANCE MEASURES TAKE INTO ACCOUNT JOB QUALITY ANDBETTER CAPTURE EARNINGS CHANGES.> Add a measure requiring documentation of wages at placement, as well as availability of employer-
sponsored health care and vacation/sick leave benefits.> Revise the earnings change measure to capture earnings changes 12 months after the program (as
compared to preprogram earnings).
5. ADDRESS THE NEEDS OF THOSE WITH LIMITED ENGLISH SKILLS.> State plans currently must describe how the state will meet the service needs of special populations.
Limited English proficient individuals should be added to the list of special populations.> Include assessment of English proficiency as part of core services.> Add ESL to the list of activities that can be provided in conjunction with other training activities for
adults.> Collect consistent data across key federal programs on adults with limited English skills. Data should
include the country participants were born in (nativity), when they arrived in the U.S., years ofeducation in the native country, and some measure of English language ability (ideally a test score, butat least the same self-reported data used by the Census Bureau).
6. ENCOURAGE PROGRAMS TO COMBINE ADULT EDUCATION ESL, AND JOB TRAININGSERVICES.> Allow programs that combine job training, ESL and adult education, and receive both Title I and Title
II funding under WIA, to be accountable for just one set of performance measures, with the programallowed to choose to use either those of Title I or Title II as is appropriate to their program design.
> Explicitly allow national research and demonstration funds to be used to create or expand, andevaluate, employment programs for individuals with low skills and/or limited English proficiency thatcombine job training, ESL and/or literacy services.
> Explicitly allow state reserve funds to be used for grants to create or expand combined adult education,ESL, and/or job training services.
> In performance measures for the adult funding stream, count English proficiency and literacy gains, aswell as credential attainment, when coupled with job placement.
7. PROMOTE INFORMED CONSUMER CHOICE BY CREATING A PROCESS FOR FIXINGPROBLEMS WITH THE PROVIDER CERTIFICATION SYSTEM.> Suspend the provider certification requirement temporarily. Create a task force of states and federal
government to meet and make a set of regulatory and legislative recommendations to Congress toensure that certification can be carried out at little or no cost to providers and in a uniform manner.Recommendations must be presented to Congress by 2006, and only when changes have been enactedand implemented would certification become effective again.
8. CLARIFY HOW WIA SHOULD TAKE INTO ACCOUNT FEDERAL STUDENT AID RECEIVED.> Allow one-stops to consider whether someone has received a Pell grant in approving them for WIA-
funded qaining, but in determining whether WIA should supplement the Pell grant, consider the extent
Center for Law and Social Policy 2
3
of unmet need using the definition of the cost of attendance in the Higher Education Act (whichincludes tuition and fees, books, supplies, dependent care, and living expenses).
TITLE II
1. IMPROVE EFFECTIVENESS OF SERVICES BY FOCUSING FUNDS ON HIGH-QUALITYPROGRAMS.> Shorten and focus the criteria by which states award grants to local service providers so that priority is
given to programs that provide a substantial number of hours of instruction to participants, have a highpercentage of full-time teachers, and have clearly defined pathways to employment, job training, andpostsecondary education (such as bridge programs customized to job training opportunities andarticulation agreements with college developmental education programs). Priority should also be givento programs whose teaching practices and curricula reflect scientific research on how adults learn andreflect the goals (often related to work or to family) of the students.
2. ADDRESS THE NEEDS OF THOSE WITH LIMITED ENGLISH SKILLS.> Include increasing English proficiency among the explicit purposes of adult education funding.> Include limited English proficient individuals in the formula for distributing adult education funding to
the states.> Require that the federal peer review process for state plans include ESL experts on the peer review
panel.> Collect consistent data across key federal programs on adults with limited English skills. Data should
include the country participants were born in (nativity), years of education in the native country, whenthey arrived in the U.S., and some measure of English language ability (ideally a test score, but at leastthe sanie self-reported data used by the Census Bureau).
3. ENCOURAGE PROGRAMS TO COMBINE ADULT EDUCATION, ESL, AND JOB TRAININGSERVICES.> Add vocational adult education and vocational ESL to the list of categories for required local activities.> Allow programs that combine job training, ESL, and adult education, and receive both Title I and Title
II funding under WLA, to be accountable for just one set of performance measures, with the programallowed to choose to use either those of Title I or Title II as is appropriate to their program design.
> Use national leadership funds to create or expand and evaluate programs that combine basic skillsand/or ESL, and job training services for individuals with limited English proficiency.
> Require states to report the number of combined job training and adult education/ESL programsfunded under Title II.
4. STRENGTHEN LINKS TO POSTSECONDARY EDUCATION AND JOB TRAINING.> Add as a purpose of the title "increase skills needed for access to, and success in, specific postsecondary
education and job training opportunities by adults with low skills and/or limited English."> Require state plans to include a description of how, on a regional basis, adult education will prepare
people with limited English skills and/or low basic skills (with or without high school diplomas) toenter job training and other postsecondary education, including bridge programs customized to jobtraining opportunities and articulation with college developmental education programs.
Center for Law and Social Policy 3
4
> Make explicit that entities other than the state education agency, such as those responsible forcommunity and technical colleges or for workforce development, are eligible to administer adulteducation.
> Require states to conduct a legislative review periodically of which state agencyamong thoseadministering K-12 education, community or technical colleges, or workforce investment activitiesisbest suited given its mission and capacity to also administer adult education, with a view towardimproving links and transitions to job training and other postsecondary education.
Center for Law and Social Policy 4
5
CLASPCENTER FOR LAW AND SOCIAL POLICY
WIA REAUTHORIZATION RECOMMENDATIONS
TITLE I
1. ELIMINATE SEQUENTIAL ELIGIBILITY.
Recommendation:> Eliminate sequential eligibility and allow individuals to receive intensive and training services in
any sequence determined appropriate by assessment in order to meet employment and earningsgoals established in conjunction with the one-stop operator or partner.
Background: The sequential eligibility requirements under current law unduly restrict the flexibilityof local boards and one-stop centers to provide the most appropriate services to customers on atimely basis. To the extent resources for intensive and training services are insufficient to serveevery eligible individual, local boards can and should be relied upon to make priority decisionsconsistent with other provisions of WIA, and their local needs. Sequential eligibility rules havecaused confusion in the field, and delays and denials of services to those who could benefit fromthem. Further, sequential eligibility rules send the message that intensive and training servicesshould be reserved for individuals who truly cannot find employment on their own. Thisinterpretation would preclude in most cases the use of WIA training to help low-wage workers,whether between jobs or currently employed, advance to better jobs. This was surely not theCongressional intent in creating WIA. As the Bush Administration has proposed, sequentialeligibility should be eliminated.
2. PROMOTE GREATER ACCESS TO TRAINING.
Recommendations:> Require that states and local areas spend a minimum percentage of adult and dislocated worker
funds on training services.> Require that states and local areas that fail to meet the expenditure requirement receive the same
penalties for noncompliance that apply for failing to meet adjusted performance measures undercurrent law.
> Require that in order to receive WIA incentive funds, states and local areas must spend at leastthe minimum percentage of funds on training.
> In their quarterly financial reports and annual reports, require that states report to theDepartment of Labor, and that local areas report to states, on the amount of adult and dislocatedworker funds spent on each category of services (core, intensive, training).
Background: The number of adults and dislocated workers who received training in the initial yearof WIA fell by 73 percent as compared to the number who received training during the final year of
www.clasp.org Center for Law and Social Policy (202) 906-80001015 15th Street, NW, Suite 400, Washington, DC 20005
6
JTPA.1 Many local areas report a lack of adequate funding for Individual Training Accounts (ITAs)as a key factor in this decline. Under current law, there is no dedicated funding for WIA adult anddislocated worker training. Creating a "floor" for the share of WIA funds to be spent on trainingwould help ensure that WIA remains primarily a skill development program, as Congress intended,and does not simply duplicate the labor exchange functions of other programs, such as Wagner-Peyser. The experience of Florida with such a policy shows it can be workable: Florida requires that50 percent of adult and dislocated worker funds be spent on ITAs, and state agency staff haveindicated they believe the policy has led to a greater number of individuals receiving access totraining.
In addition, states are not required to report to the Department of Labor on the amount of WIAfunds spent on training versus core and intensive services. As a result, stakeholders and taxpayersdo not have access to national data on the amount of WIA funds spent on training; only three statesincluded information on the share of funds spent on training in their 2001 WIA annual reports.
3. IMPROVE ADJUSTMENT OF PERFORMANCE MEASURES.
Recommendation:> Adjust performance measures to take into account local conditions and characteristics of
participants at intake, including:o Lack Of high school diploma or GED;o Limited employment history;o Physical and mental health problems, including documented disabilities;o Low basic skills;o Limited English proficiency; and,o Local labor market conditions.
> To the extent that expected levels are adjusted to take into account populations with barriers toemployment, states and local areas should be held accountable for serving these populations.
Background: Many stakeholders have raised concerns that the current system of negotiatingperformance levels, which was intended to allow the adjustment of expected levels, has not workedwell. According to the GAO, performance measures are driving local staff to be reluctant toprovide WIA-funded services to job seekers who may be less likely to find employment orexperience earnings increases when placed in a job.' As both the Bush Administration and H.R.1261 propose, stronger language is needed on the economic conditions and participantcharacteristics that should be taken into account when setting expected levels of performance. Anobjective methodology should be developed to adjust expected performance levels in a manner thatis fair and consistent among all states and localities.
4. REQUIRE THAT PERFORMANCE MEASURES TAKE INTO ACCOUNT JOB QUALITYAND BETTER CAPTURE EARNINGS CHANGES.
Recommendations:> Add a measure requiring documentation of wages at placement, as well as availability of
employer-sponsored health care and vacation/sick leave benefits.
Center for Law and Social Policy 2
7
> Revise the earnings change measure to capture earnings changes 12 months after the program (ascompared to preprogram earnings).
Background: If WIA is to achieve its stated purpose to "improve the quality of the workforce,reduce welfare dependency, and enhance the productivity and competitiveness of the Nation," it isvital that the system be held accountable for the quality of jobs obtained by those who benefit fromWIA-funded services. Research suggests that helping low-income adults obtain higher quality jobsthan they would find on their own can lead to better job retention and larger long-term wagegrowth. While current performance measures for adults and dislocated workers captureemployment placements, they fail to capture the quality of jobs in which participants are placed.Adding wages at placement and availability of employer-provided benefits would remedy this. Inaddition, research has shown that long-term follow-up is needed to see earnings gains for those inskill development programs.' The current six months is too short a period for such earnings gainsto become apparent.
5. ADDRESS THE NEEDS OF THOSE WITH LIMITED ENGLISH SKILLS.
Recommendations:> State plans currently must describe how the state will meet the service needs of special
populations. Limited English proficient individuals should be added to the list of specialpopulations.
> Include assessment of English proficiency as part of core services.> Add ESL to the list of activities that can be provided in conjunction with other training activities
for adults.> Collect consistent data across key federal programs on adults with limited English skills. Data
should include the country participants were born in (nativity), years of education in the nativecountry, when they arrived in the U.S., and some measure of English language ability (ideally atest score, but a.t least the same self-reported data used by the Census Bureau).
Background: The Census Bureau estimates that over 13 million legal immigrants arrived between1990 and 2000, with about 58 percent arriving between 1995 and 2000.4 In addition, the number ofimmigrants in our workforce has grown dramatically over the past decadeaccounting for nearlyhalf of all workforce growthand will continue to grow, with immigrants expected to account forall of the growth in the prime-aged workforce (age 25-54) between now and 2020.5 Yet there islittle recognition of the importance of ESL services in the WIA legislation. Changes are needed tobring the law up to date with current needs.
6. ENCOURAGE PROGRAMS TO COMBINE ADULT EDUCATION, ESL, AND JOBTRAINING SERVICES.
Recommendations:> Allow programs that combine job training, ESL, and adult education, and receive both Title I and
Title II funding under WIA, to be accountable for just one set of performance measures, with theprogram allowed to choose to use either those of Title I or Title II, as is appropriate to theirprogram design.
Center for Law and Social Policy 3
8
> Explicitly allow national research and demonstration funds to be used to create or expand, andevaluate, employment programs for individuals with low skills and/or limited English proficiencythat combine job training, ESL and/or literacy services.
> Explicitly allow state reserve funds to be used for grants to create or expand combined adulteducation, ESL, and/or job training services.
> In performance measures for the adult funding stream, count English proficiency and literacygains, as well as credential attainment, when coupled with job placement.
Background: Scientific research on adult education programs, conducted primarily in the contextof welfare reform evaluations, suggests that economic impacts (employment and earnings gains) arelarger when adult education is integrated with or closely connected to job training and otherpostsecondary education.' Yet few adult education programs currently combine adult education,ESL, and job training. Federal leadership could help create more of these programs so that adulteducation can become more effective for those whose primary goals are to find a job or move up toa better job.
7. PROMOTE INFORMED CONSUMER CHOICE BY CREATING A PROCESS FORFIXINGPROBLEMS WITH THE PROVIDER CERTIFICATION SYSTEM.
Recommendation:> Suspend the provider certification requirement temporarily. Create a task force of states and
federal government to meet and make regulatory and legislative recommendations to Congress toensure that certification can be carried out at little or no cost to providers and in a uniformmanner. Recommendations must be presented to Congress by 2006, and only when changeshave been enacted and implemented would certification become effective again.
Background: Current law requires that eligible training providers provide program-specificoutcome information for all program participants, if any of them are WIA customers. This includesprogram completion rates, the percentage that obtains employment, and the wages at employmentplacement. Monitoring the employment and earnings outcomes of participants for each eligibleprogram is critical to the successful use of ITAs under WIA, because it can allow customers to makeinformed choices about the training options available to them. Without that informationon theperformance of training programs, WIA customers could fall victim to ineffectiveor even fraudulentproviders, as did many students in the federal student aid programs in the 1980s.
Yet despite its importance, the provider certification system is currendy broken. The majority ofproviders appear to lack access to a cost-effective and timely means of tracking participantoutcomes. Many training providers, particularly the community colleges, assert that the reportingrequirements are costly and difficult to implement, especially relative to the small amount of trainingfunds many providers receive. Anecdotal evidence suggests that, far from promotingconsumerchoice in training, the certification system is currently having the opposite effect by drivingproviders out of the system. Federal leadership is needed to help states and localities work throughthe legal and logistical issues involved in creating the means for local training providers to track andreport outcome data easily and inexpensively, and in a consistent and timely manner, so that theseimportant reporting requirements do not deter training providers from serving WIA clients.
Center for Law and Social Policy 4
9
8. CLARIFY HOW WIA SHOULD TAKE INTO ACCOUNT FEDERAL STUDENT AIDRECEIVED.
Recommendation:> Allow one-stops to consider whether someone has received a Pell grant in approving them for
WIA-funded training, but in determining whether WIA should supplement the Pell grant,consider the extent of unmet need, using the definition of the cost of attendance in the HigherEducation Act (tuition and fees, books, supplies, dependent care, and living expenses).
Background: In part due to conflicting messages from the Department of Labor and theDepartment of Education, confusion has arisen about whether Pell grants or WIA-funded ITAsshould be the first source of funding considered in paying for education and training for individualswho are eligible to receive funding from both sources. This confusion should be resolved throughthe addition of clarifying language to the WIA statute to make it explicit that while one-stops canconsider whether someone has received a Pell grant in considering whether to award an ITA, adultshave other, substantial costs associated with participating in training beyond tuition and fees.
TITLE II
1. IMPROVE EFFECTIVENESS OF SERVICES BY FOCUSING FUNDS ON HIGH-QUALITYPROGRAMS.
Recommendation:> Shorten and focus the criteria by which states award grants to local service providers so that
priority is given to programs that provide a substantial number of hours of instruction toparticipants, have a high percentage of full-time teachers, and have clearly defined pathways toemployment, job training, and postsecondary education (such as bridge programs customized tojob training opportunities and articulation agreements with college developmental educationprograms). Priority should also be given to programs whose teaching practices and curriculareflect scientific research on how adults learn and reflect the goals (often related to work or tofamily) of the students.
Background: Current law directs states to consider a dozen different factors in awarding grants tolocal adult education providers; H.R. 1261 would expand the list still further. Congress could send amuch clearer and stronger message to states and local providers about what it considers most criticalfor success in adult education by shortening this list to a small number of key programcharacteristics and directing states to give priority in funding accordingly. Hours of instruction areclearly central to success, as scientific research shows that many adult education students fail toobtain enough hours of instruction to make educational progress. Similarly, having full-timeteachers is a necessary prerequisite for providing more hours of instruction and also for staff andcurriculum development. Finally, as more scientific research on how adults learn becomes available,programs should be encouraged to base their teaching practices and curricula on it, taking intoaccount the goals that adult learners bring to their studies.
Center for Law and Social Policy 5
1 0
2. ADDRESS THE NEEDS OF THOSE WITH LIMITED ENGLISH SKILLS.
Recommendations:D Include increasing English proficiency among the explicit purposes of adult education funding.D Include limited English proficient individuals in the formula for distributing adult education
funding to the states.> Require that the federal peer review process for state plans include ESL experts on the peer
review panel.> Collect consistent data across key federal programs on adults with limited English skills. Data
should include the country participants were born in (nativity), years of education in the nativecountry, when they arrived in the U.S., and some measure of English language ability (ideally atest score, but at least the same self-reported data used by the Census Bureau).
Background: The Census Bureau estimates that over 13 million legal immigrants arrived between1990 and 2000, with about 58 percent arriving between 1995 and 2000.7 In addition, the number ofimmigrants in our workforce has grown dramatically over the past decadeaccounting for nearlyhalf of all workforce growthand will continue to grow, with immigrants expected to account forall of the growth in the prime-aged workforce (age 25-54) between now and 2020.8 Not surprisingly,English language learners are the fastest growing segment of those served in adult education, andcurrent resources for language and job training services are dwarfed by the need. Yet there is littlerecognition of the importance of ESL services in the adult education legislation. Changes areneeded to bring the law up to date with current needs.
3. ENCOURAGE PROGRAMS TO COMBINE ADULT EDUCATION, ESL, AND JOBTRAINING SERVICES.
Recommendations:> Add vocational adult education and ESL to the list of categories for required local activities.> Allow programs that combine job training, ESL and adult education, and receive both Tide I and
Tide II funding under WIA, to be accountable for just one set of performance measures, with theprogram allowed to choose to use either those of Tide I or Tide II as is appropriate to theirprogram design.
> Use national leadership funds to create or expand and evaluate programs that combine basicskills and/or ESL, and job training services for individuals with limited English proficiency.
> Require states to report the number of combined job training and adult education/ESL programsfunded under Tide II.
Background: Scientific research on adult education programs, conducted primarily in the contextof welfare reform evaluations, suggests that economic impacts (employment and earnings gains) arelarger when adult education is integrated with or closely connected to job training and otherpostsecondary education.9 Yet few adult education programs currently combine adult education,ESL, and job training. Federal leadership could help create more of these programs so that adulteducation can become more effective for those whose primary goals are to find a job or move up toa better job.
Center for Law and Social Policy 6
1 1
4. STRENGTHEN LINKS TO POSTSECONDARY EDUCATION AND JOB TRAINING.
Recommendations:> Add as a purpose of the title "increase skills needed for access to, and success in, specific
postsecondary education and job training opportunities by adults with low skills and/or limitedEnglish."
> Require state plans to include a description of how, on a regional basis, adult education willprepare people with limited English skills and/or low basic skills (with or without high schooldiplomas) to enter job training and other postsecondary education, including bridge programscustomized to job training opportunities and articulation with college developmental educationprograms.
> Make explicit that entities other than the state education agency, such as those responsible forcommunity and technical colleges or for workforce development, are eligible to administer adulteducation.
> Require states to conduct a legislative review periodically of which state agencyamong thoseadministering K-12 education, community or technical colleges, or workforce investmentactivitiesis best suited given its mission and capacity to also administer adult education, with aview toward improving links and transitions to job training and other postsecondary education.
Background: Scientific research from welfare-to-work evaluations shows that the biggesteconomic impacts for adult education participants (employment and earnings gains) are for thosewho go on to job training or other postsecondary education. Yet many adult education programslack clear pathways that articulate the content and credentials of their programs to job training andpostsecondary education opportunities in the community. Encouraging regional planning to createsuch pathways would help more adults make these transitions, encourage more collaborationbetween adult education, job training, and postsecondary education, and make the links betweenadult education and college developmental education programs more coherent.
I See Frank, A., et al. (2003). The Workforce Investment Act: A First Look at Participation, Demographics, andServices. Washington, DC: Center for Law and Social Policy.2 U.S. General Accounting Office. (June 18, 2003). GAO-03-884T. Workforce Investment Act: Exemplary One-Stops Devised Strategies to Strengthen Services, but Challenges Remain for Reauthorization. Washington, DC:Author.3 Saulcy, S. et al. (2003). Connecting Business and the Wyoming Community College System: A Study ofEmployment Outcomes of 2001 Graduates from Wyoming Community Colleges. Casper, WY: Wyoming Departmentof Employment, Research, and Planning; Martinson, K., & Strawn, J. (2003). Built to Last: Why Skills Matter forLong-Run Success in Welfare Reform. Washington, DC: Center for Law and Social Policy.4 CLASP calculations from U.S. Censlis Bureau. (2002). Retrieved from tables produced athttp://factfindcr.census.gov. Figures include the District of Columbia, but not Puerto Rico or other territories.5 Ellwood, D. (2002). "How We Got Here" in Grow Faster Together. Or Grow Slowly Apart. Washington, DC: TheAspen Institute.6 For a recent summary of this research, see Martinson, K., & Strawn, J. (2003) in Note 3 above.7 See Note 4 above.8 See Note 5 above.9 See Martinson, K., & Strawn, J. (2003) in Note 3 above.
Center for Law and Social Policy 7
12
CIA
SPC
EN
TE
R F
OR
LA
W A
ND
SO
CIA
L P
OL
ICY
Sid
e-by
-Sid
e C
ompa
rison
of T
itle
I Pro
visi
ons
in R
ecen
t WIA
Rea
utho
rizat
ion
Pro
posa
ls
by N
isha
Pat
el a
nd M
ark
Gre
enbe
rg (
Upd
ated
Jun
e 25
, 200
3)
Thi
s.do
cum
ent s
umm
ariz
es a
nd c
ompa
res
prov
isio
ns in
cur
rent
law
and
the
follo
win
g W
IA r
eaut
horiz
atio
n pr
opos
als:
An
8-pa
ge p
lan
rele
ased
by
the
Bus
h A
dmin
istr
atio
n in
Feb
ruar
y 20
03.
A b
ill (
H.R
. 126
1) in
trod
uced
by
Rep
. McK
eon
(R-C
A)
and
pass
ed b
y th
e H
ouse
of R
epre
sent
ativ
es o
n M
ay 8
, 200
3.
Cur
rent
Law
Bus
h A
dmin
istr
atio
n's
Pro
posa
lH
ouse
Bill
(H
.R. 1
261)
Adu
lt F
undi
ngA
utho
rizes
sep
arat
e fo
rmul
a fu
ndin
g st
ream
sC
onso
lidat
es A
dult,
Dis
loca
ted
Wor
ker,
and
Con
solid
ates
Adu
lt, D
islo
cate
d W
orke
r, a
ndfo
r ad
ults
and
dis
loca
ted
wor
kers
FY
1999
-E
mpl
oym
ent S
ervi
ce fu
ndin
g st
ream
s. L
abor
Em
ploy
men
t Ser
vice
fund
ing
stre
ams
into
a20
03. S
epar
ate
fund
ing
for
the
Em
ploy
men
tS
ervi
ce is
als
o au
thor
ized
for
FY
1999
-200
3ex
chan
ge s
ervi
ces
wou
ld b
e th
e fo
unda
tion,
with
rem
aini
ng fu
nds
focu
sed
on tr
aini
ng a
ndsi
ngle
fund
ing
stre
am fo
r "C
ompr
ehen
sive
Em
ploy
men
t and
Tra
inin
g A
ctiv
ities
for
Adu
lts."
thro
ugh
the
Wag
ner-
Pey
ser
Act
.in
tens
ive
serv
ices
.A
utho
rizes
fund
ing
thro
ugh
this
fund
ing
stre
amfo
r F
Y20
04-2
009.
Pro
vide
s th
at n
o st
ate
shal
lre
ceiv
e an
allo
tmen
t les
s th
an th
e to
tal a
mou
ntof
adu
lt, d
islo
cate
d w
orke
r, a
nd W
agne
r-P
eyse
r fu
nds
the
stat
e re
ceiv
ed in
FY
2003
.
You
th F
undi
ngA
utho
rizes
you
th fo
rmul
a fu
ndin
g st
ream
for
Ref
orm
s cu
rren
t pro
gram
s fo
r yo
uth
thro
ugh
aA
utho
rizes
fund
ing
thro
ugh
yout
h fu
ndin
gF
Y19
99-2
003.
Tar
gete
d S
tate
For
mul
a P
rogr
am d
esig
ned
tose
rve
out-
of-s
choo
l you
th. F
orm
ula
fund
sst
ream
for
FY
2004
-200
9.
At a
min
imum
, 30
perc
ent o
f fun
ds m
ust b
ew
ould
be
allo
cate
d to
sta
tes,
and
, as
unde
rN
ot m
ore
than
30
perc
ent o
f fun
ds fo
rus
ed to
ser
ve o
ut-o
f-sc
hool
you
th.
curr
ent l
aw, t
he g
over
nor
and
the
stat
e bo
ard
wou
ld b
e re
spon
sibl
e fo
r se
tting
pol
icie
s an
dst
rate
gies
to g
uide
the
use
of th
e fu
nds
at th
elo
cal l
evel
.
stat
ewid
e ac
tiviti
es a
nd n
ot m
ore
than
30
perc
ent o
f fun
ds a
vaila
ble
to lo
cal a
reas
may
be s
pent
on
activ
ities
for
in-s
choo
l you
th.
Act
iviti
es fo
r in
-sch
ool y
outh
may
onl
y be
carr
ied
out i
n no
n-sc
hool
hou
rs o
r pe
riods
whe
n sc
hool
is n
ot in
ses
sion
(su
ch a
s be
fore
or a
fter
scho
ol o
r du
ring
sum
mer
rec
ess)
.
Not
mor
e th
an 5
per
cent
of y
outh
ser
ved
in a
loca
l are
a m
ay b
e in
divi
dual
s w
ho d
o no
t mee
tin
com
e cr
iteria
, pro
vide
d th
ey m
eet o
ther
barr
ier-
rela
ted
elig
ibili
ty c
riter
ia,
Aut
horiz
es u
p to
$25
0M in
add
ition
al fu
ndin
g
Rem
oves
exc
eptio
n to
allo
w 5
per
cent
of y
outh
serv
ed to
rec
eive
ser
vice
s if
they
do
not m
eet
inco
me
crite
ria b
ut m
eet o
ther
bar
rier-
rela
ted
elig
ibili
ty c
riter
ia.
Elim
inat
es Y
outh
Opp
ortu
nity
Gra
nts.
ww
w.c
lasp
.org
Cen
ter
for
Law
and
Soc
ial P
olic
y(2
02)
906-
8000
1015
15t
h St
reet
, NW
, Sui
te 4
00, W
ashi
ngto
n, D
C 2
0005
Cur
rent
Law
Bus
h A
dmin
istr
atio
n's
Pro
posa
lH
ouse
Bill
(H
.R. 1
261)
for
com
petit
ive
gran
ts to
loca
l are
as o
f hig
hpo
vert
y th
roug
h Y
outh
Opp
ortu
nity
Gra
nts
Cha
lleng
e G
rant
s to
Citi
es a
nd R
ural
Are
as:
Pro
vide
s th
at 2
5 pe
rcen
t of a
nnua
l(Y
OG
s).
Citi
es a
nd r
ural
are
as w
ith p
rogr
ams
that
inco
rpor
ate
prov
en s
trat
egie
s w
ould
app
ly to
the
Dep
artm
ent o
f Lab
or fo
r th
is ta
rget
edfu
ndin
g. T
his
incl
udes
less
ons
lear
ned
from
the
YO
G in
itiat
ive
and
othe
r de
mon
stra
tions
.
appr
opria
tion
of y
outh
form
ula
fund
s be
use
dfo
r Y
outh
Cha
lleng
e G
rant
s. In
fisc
al y
ears
in w
hich
the
appr
opria
tion
exce
eds
$1B
,$2
50M
wou
ld b
e re
serv
ed fo
r Y
outh
Cha
lleng
eG
rant
s.G
rant
ees
wou
ld n
eed
to d
emon
stra
tepa
rtne
rshi
ps, f
inan
cial
con
trib
utio
ns fr
om a
varie
ty o
f sou
rces
incl
udin
g ed
ucat
ion
and
busi
ness
com
mun
ities
, and
incl
usio
n of
"be
stpr
actic
es"
as p
art o
f the
pro
gram
des
ign.
Not
less
than
80
perc
ent m
ust b
e us
ed fo
rco
mpe
titiv
e gr
ants
to s
tate
s, lo
cal b
oard
s,N
ativ
e A
mer
ican
ent
ities
, and
pub
lic o
rpr
ivat
e en
titie
s ap
plyi
ng in
con
junc
tion
with
loca
l boa
rds.
Gra
nts
are
for
one
year
and
may
be
rene
wed
for
four
add
ition
al y
ears
.S
ecre
tary
may
req
uire
a m
atch
from
gran
tees
to p
rovi
de a
non
-Fed
eral
sha
re o
fth
e co
st. P
rogr
am p
artic
ipan
ts m
ay b
eyo
uth
ages
14-
19. F
unds
may
be
used
for
activ
ities
des
igne
d to
ass
ist y
outh
inac
quiri
ng s
kills
, cre
dent
ials
, and
empl
oym
ent e
xper
ienc
e ne
cess
ary
tosu
ccee
d in
labo
r fo
rce.
Up
to 2
0 pe
rcen
t may
be
used
for
disc
retio
nary
gra
nts
to p
ublic
or
priv
ate
entit
ies
to p
rovi
de a
ctiv
ities
to a
ssis
t you
thin
pre
parin
g fo
r, e
nter
ing,
and
ret
aini
ngem
ploy
men
t. F
unds
may
be
used
for
out-
of-s
choo
l you
th a
nd fo
r as
sist
ing
in-s
choo
lyo
uth
to s
tay
in s
choo
l and
gai
n w
ork
expe
rienc
e. S
ecre
tary
may
req
uire
am
atch
from
gra
ntee
s to
pro
vide
a n
on-
fede
ral s
hare
of t
he c
ost a
nd m
ay r
equi
regr
ante
es to
par
ticip
ate
in e
valu
atio
ns.
Infr
astr
uctu
reN
o pr
ovis
ion.
Ope
ratio
nal c
ost o
f one
-sto
p sy
stem
fina
nced
Aut
horiz
es g
over
nors
to s
peci
fy a
por
tion
ofF
undi
ngth
roug
h de
dica
ted
"One
-Sto
p In
fras
truc
ture
"fu
ndin
g th
roug
h co
ntrib
utio
ns o
f fun
ds fr
ompa
rtne
r pr
ogra
ms
eith
er a
t the
fede
ral l
evel
or
as a
set
-asi
de a
t the
sta
te le
vel.
Fun
ding
wou
ld g
o to
the
gove
rnor
for
loca
l allo
catio
n,S
tate
and
loca
l par
tner
s co
uld
augm
ent t
his
fund
ing
as n
eede
d. T
he s
tate
boa
rd w
ould
wor
k w
ith g
over
nor
to d
eter
min
e th
e m
ost
fede
ral f
unds
from
req
uire
d an
d ad
ditio
nal
part
ners
to b
e ta
ken
and
used
to p
rovi
dein
fras
truc
ture
fund
ing
for
one-
stop
s, ta
king
into
cons
ider
atio
n th
e pr
opor
tiona
te u
se o
f one
-st
op c
ente
rs b
y ea
ch p
artn
er, t
he c
osts
of
adm
inis
trat
ion
for
purp
oses
not
rel
ated
to o
ne-
stop
cen
ters
for
each
par
tner
, and
oth
erre
leva
nt fa
ctor
s..
stra
tegi
c us
es fo
r th
is fu
ndin
g w
ithin
the
stat
e.F
unds
cou
ld b
e ta
ken
only
from
fund
sav
aila
ble
for
adm
inis
trat
ive
cost
s un
der
the
part
ner
prog
ram
and
wou
ld b
e su
bjec
t to
Cen
ter
for
Law
and
Soc
ial P
olic
y2
Cur
rent
Law
Bus
h A
dmin
istr
atio
n's
Pro
posa
lH
ouse
Bill
(H
.R. 1
261)
the
limits
on
port
ions
of f
undi
ng th
at c
anbe
use
d fo
r ad
min
istr
ativ
e co
sts
unde
r th
epa
rtne
r pr
ogra
m.
Pro
gram
s th
at a
re fe
dera
l dire
ct s
pend
ing
unde
r S
ec. 2
50(c
)(8)
of t
he B
alan
ced
Bud
get a
nd E
mer
genc
y D
efic
it C
ontr
ol A
ctof
198
5 sh
all n
ot b
e re
quire
d to
pro
vide
an
amou
nt in
exc
ess
of th
e am
ount
dete
rmin
ed to
be
equi
vale
nt to
the
prog
ram
's p
ropo
rtio
nate
use
of o
ne-s
top
cent
ers
in th
e st
ate.
Fun
ds w
ould
be
allo
cate
d to
cer
tifie
d on
e-st
ops
base
d on
a fo
rmul
a de
velo
ped
by th
est
ate
boar
d.
Infr
astr
uctu
re fu
nds
are
defin
ed a
s
..% A
"non
pers
onne
l cos
ts th
at a
re n
eces
sary
for
the
gene
ral o
pera
tion
of a
one
-sto
p ce
nter
,in
clud
ing
rent
al c
osts
of t
he fa
cilit
ies,
cos
ts o
fut
ilitie
s an
d m
aint
enan
ce, e
quip
men
t (in
clud
ing
adap
tive
tech
nolo
gy fo
r in
divi
dual
s w
ithdi
sabi
litie
s), s
trat
egic
pla
nnin
g ac
tiviti
es fo
r th
ece
nter
, and
com
mon
out
reac
h ac
tiviti
es.
Req
uire
s pa
rtne
r pr
ogra
ms
to c
over
cos
ts o
rpr
ovid
e no
ncas
h re
sour
ces
rela
ting
to th
eop
erat
ion
of th
e on
e-st
op d
eliv
ery
syst
em th
atar
e no
t pai
d fo
r w
ith th
e ab
ove
infr
astr
uctu
refu
nds
(to
the
exte
nt n
ot in
cons
iste
nt w
ith th
efe
dera
l law
invo
lved
) in
clud
ing:
Infr
astr
uctu
re c
osts
in e
xces
s of
abo
vein
fras
truc
ture
fund
s
.
Com
mon
cos
ts th
at a
re in
add
ition
s to
infr
astr
uctu
re c
osts
Cos
ts o
f pro
visi
on o
f cor
e se
rvic
esap
plic
able
to e
ach
prog
ram
The
met
hod
of d
eter
min
ing
the
port
ion
of fu
nds
to b
e pr
ovid
ed b
y ea
ch p
rogr
am w
ill b
ede
term
ined
as
part
of l
ocal
Mem
oran
da o
fU
nder
stan
ding
(M
OU
).
Ince
ntiv
eR
equi
res
Sec
reta
ry to
aw
ard
gran
ts b
etw
een
Doe
s no
t add
ress
.R
estr
uctu
res
ince
ntiv
e gr
ants
to b
e aw
arde
d to
Gra
nts
$750
,000
and
$3M
to s
tate
s th
at e
xcee
d th
eir
_.st
ates
bas
ed o
n m
eetin
g or
exc
eedi
ng W
IA
Cen
ter
for
Law
and
Soc
ial P
olic
y3
Cur
rent
Law
Bus
h A
dmin
istr
atio
n's
Pro
posa
lH
ouse
Bill
(H
.R. 1
261)
adju
sted
WIA
per
form
ance
leve
ls, t
heir
expe
cted
Adu
lt E
duca
tion
perf
orm
ance
leve
ls,
and
thei
r P
erki
ns p
erfo
rman
ce le
vels
,
.
perf
orm
ance
mea
sure
s; o
n pe
rfor
man
ce in
serv
ing
spec
ial p
opul
atio
ns, i
nclu
ding
the
leve
ls o
f ser
vice
pro
vide
d an
d th
e pe
rfor
man
ceou
tcom
es; a
nd s
uch
othe
r fa
ctor
s re
latin
g to
perf
orm
ance
as
the
Sec
reta
ry d
eter
min
esap
prop
riate
. Gov
erno
rs m
ay a
lso
awar
din
cent
ive
gran
ts to
loca
l are
as b
ased
on
exem
plar
y pe
rfor
man
ce w
ith r
espe
ct to
perf
orm
ance
mea
sure
s an
d in
ser
ving
spe
cial
popu
latio
ns, i
nclu
ding
leve
ls o
f ser
vice
and
perf
orm
ance
out
com
es.
Nat
iona
lE
mer
genc
yG
rant
s
Aut
horiz
es S
ecre
tary
to p
rovi
de g
rant
s to
stat
es, l
ocal
are
as, a
nd o
ther
ent
ities
topr
ovid
e em
ploy
men
t and
trai
ning
ass
ista
nce
tow
orke
rs a
ffect
ed b
y m
ajor
dis
loca
tions
and
tost
ates
that
suf
fer
emer
genc
ies
or m
ajor
disa
ster
s.
Req
uire
s S
ecre
tary
to d
esig
nate
a n
atio
nal
disl
ocat
ed w
orke
r of
fice
to c
oord
inat
eem
ploy
men
t and
trai
ning
act
iviti
es fo
rdi
sloc
ated
wor
kers
, inc
ludi
ng N
atio
nal
Em
erge
ncy
Gra
nts.
Pro
vide
s fo
r ad
ditio
nal N
atio
nal E
mer
genc
yG
rant
s as
sist
ance
to th
e 8
stat
es w
hose
PY
1998
adu
lt fu
ndin
g al
loca
tion
divi
ded
bycu
rren
t pro
gram
yea
r ad
ult f
undi
ng a
lloca
tion
yiel
ds th
e gr
eate
st q
uotie
nt.
Incr
ease
s th
e pr
opor
tion
of fu
ndin
g fo
rN
atio
nal R
eser
ve fo
r N
atio
nal D
islo
cate
dW
orke
r G
rant
s (f
orm
erly
Nat
iona
l Em
erge
ncy
Gra
nts)
. Nat
iona
l Dis
loca
ted
Wor
ker
Gra
nts
wou
ld b
e pr
ovid
ed to
sta
tes
and
loca
litie
s at
the
Sec
reta
ry's
dis
cret
ion
to a
ddre
ss s
peci
alla
yoff
situ
atio
ns.
Ren
ames
Nat
iona
l Em
erge
ncy
Gra
nts
as"N
atio
nal D
islo
cate
d W
orke
r G
rant
s."
Elim
inat
es n
atio
nal d
islo
cate
d w
orke
r of
fice.
Elim
inat
es p
rovi
sion
allo
win
g ad
ditio
nal
Nat
iona
l Em
erge
ncy
Gra
nts
assi
stan
ce to
the
8 st
ates
who
se P
Y 1
998
adul
t fun
ding
allo
catio
n di
vide
d by
cur
rent
pro
gram
yea
rad
ult f
undi
ng a
lloca
tion
yiel
ds th
e gr
eate
stqu
otie
nt.
Lim
itatio
ns o
nU
se o
f Fun
dsN
o W
IA fu
nds
may
be
used
for
empl
oym
ent
gene
ratin
g ac
tiviti
es, e
cono
mic
dev
elop
men
tac
tiviti
es, i
nves
tmen
t in
revo
lvin
g lo
an fu
nds,
capi
taliz
atio
n of
bus
ines
ses,
inve
stm
ent i
nco
ntra
ct b
iddi
ng r
esou
rce
cent
ers,
and
sim
ilar
activ
ities
that
are
not
dire
ctly
rel
ated
to tr
aini
ngfo
r el
igib
le in
divi
dual
s,
No
fund
s fo
r st
atew
ide
and
loca
l wor
kfor
cein
vest
men
t sys
tem
s m
ay b
e us
ed fo
r fo
reig
ntr
avel
,
Str
ong
fisca
l con
trol
s ne
ed to
be
esta
blis
hed
atal
l lev
els
of th
e sy
stem
. An
emph
asis
sho
uld
be p
lace
d on
dat
a va
lidat
ion,
str
engt
hene
dm
onito
ring,
and
ove
rsig
ht in
ord
er to
ens
ure
appr
opria
te u
se o
f fed
eral
fund
s. P
rude
nt u
seof
taxp
ayer
dol
lars
is a
cor
e pr
inci
ple,
Elim
inat
es r
estr
ictio
n on
use
of W
IA fu
nds
for
empl
oym
ent g
ener
atin
g ac
tiviti
es, e
cono
mic
deve
lopm
ent a
ctiv
ities
, inv
estm
ent i
n re
volv
ing
loan
fund
s, c
apita
lizat
ion
of b
usin
esse
s,in
vest
men
t in
cont
ract
bid
ding
res
ourc
ece
nter
s, a
nd s
imila
r ac
tiviti
es th
at a
re n
otdi
rect
ly r
elat
ed to
trai
ning
for
elig
ible
indi
vidu
als.
Add
s re
quire
men
t tha
t WIA
fund
s ca
nnot
be
used
to e
stab
lish
or o
pera
te s
tand
-alo
ne fe
e-fo
r-se
rvic
e en
terp
rises
(do
es n
ot in
clud
e on
e-st
op c
ente
rs)
that
com
pete
with
priv
ate
sect
or
Cen
ter
for
Law
and
Soc
ial P
olic
y4
Cur
rent
Law
Bus
h A
dmin
istr
atio
n's
Pro
posa
lH
ouse
Bill
(H
.R. 1
261)
No
yout
h fu
nds
can
be u
sed
to d
evel
op o
rim
plem
ent e
duca
tion
curr
icul
a fo
r sc
hool
syst
ems.
empl
oym
ent a
genc
ies.
No
yout
h fu
nds
can
be u
sed
to d
evel
op o
rim
plem
ent e
duca
tion
curr
icul
a fo
r sc
hool
syst
ems.
Pur
pose
"To
prov
ide
wor
kfor
ce in
vest
men
t act
iviti
es,
thro
ugh
stat
ewid
e an
d lo
cal w
orkf
orce
inve
stm
ent s
yste
ms,
that
incr
ease
the
empl
oym
ent,
rete
ntio
n, a
nd e
arni
ngs
ofpa
rtic
ipan
ts, a
nd, a
s a
resu
lt, im
prov
e th
equ
ality
of t
he w
orkf
orce
, red
uce
wel
fare
depe
nden
cy, a
nd e
nhan
ce th
e pr
oduc
tivity
and
com
petit
iven
ess
of th
e N
atio
n."
Doe
s no
t add
ress
.A
dds
lang
uage
sta
ting,
"It
is a
lso
the
purp
ose
of th
is s
ubtit
le to
pro
vide
wor
kfor
ce in
vest
men
tac
tiviti
es in
a m
anne
r th
at p
rom
otes
the
info
rmed
cho
ice
of p
artic
ipan
ts a
nd a
ctiv
ely
invo
lves
par
ticip
ants
in d
ecis
ions
affe
ctin
g th
eir
part
icip
atio
n in
suc
h ac
tiviti
es."
Sta
te B
oard
Mem
bers
hip
Mem
bers
hip
mus
t inc
lude
:G
over
nor
2 m
embe
rs o
f eac
h ch
ambe
r of
the
stat
ele
gisl
atur
e, a
ndR
epre
sent
ativ
es a
ppoi
nted
by
the
gove
rnor
, inc
ludi
ng:
o B
usin
ess
repr
esen
tativ
eso
Chi
ef e
lect
ed o
ffici
als
(rep
rese
ntin
gbo
th c
ities
and
cou
ntie
s w
here
appr
opria
te)
o La
bor
repr
esen
tativ
eso
You
th o
rgan
izat
ion
repr
esen
tativ
eso
Rep
rese
ntat
ives
of i
ndiv
idua
ls a
ndor
gani
zatio
ns w
ith e
xper
ienc
e an
dex
pert
ise
in th
e de
liver
y of
wor
kfor
cein
vest
men
t act
iviti
es in
clud
ing
chie
fex
ecut
ive
offic
ers
of c
omm
unity
colle
ges
and
com
mun
ity b
ased
orga
niza
tions
o Le
ad s
tate
offi
cial
s of
man
dato
rypa
rtne
r ag
enci
eso
Oth
er r
epre
sent
ativ
es th
at th
ego
vern
or m
ay d
esig
nate
Mem
bers
mus
t rep
rese
nt d
iver
se r
egio
ns o
fth
e st
ate
and
a m
ajor
ity m
ust b
e bu
sine
ssre
pres
enta
tives
.
Sta
te m
ay u
se a
n al
tern
ativ
e en
tity
as a
sta
tebo
ard
if it
was
est
ablis
hed
unde
r JT
PA
and
in
Str
eam
lines
sta
te b
oard
mem
bers
hip
requ
irem
ents
to in
clud
e at
a m
inim
um:
Sta
te a
genc
ies
resp
onsi
ble
for
adm
inis
terin
g on
e-st
op p
artn
er p
rogr
ams
Sta
te e
cono
mic
dev
elop
men
t age
ncy
Bus
ines
s re
pres
enta
tives
Wor
ker
advo
cate
sS
tate
legi
slat
ors
Elim
inat
es b
usin
ess
maj
ority
req
uire
men
t, bu
tch
air
is s
till r
equi
red
to b
e m
embe
r of
bus
ines
sco
mm
unity
. Giv
es g
over
nors
aut
horit
y to
expa
nd b
oard
mem
bers
hip.
Elim
inat
es a
ltern
ativ
e en
tity
gran
dfat
herin
g
Req
uire
s th
at s
tate
reh
abili
tatio
n ag
ency
dire
ctor
s an
d ec
onom
ic d
evel
opm
ent a
genc
yof
ficia
ls b
e m
embe
rs o
f sta
te b
oard
.
Rem
oves
req
uire
men
t tha
t rep
rese
ntat
ive
ofyo
uth
orga
niza
tion
be m
embe
r of
sta
te b
oard
.
Add
s th
e fo
llow
ing
perm
issi
ble
part
ners
, whi
ch,
if m
ade
man
dato
ry b
y th
e go
vern
or, w
ould
be
requ
ired
mem
bers
of t
he s
tate
boa
rd:
Em
ploy
men
t and
trai
ning
pro
gram
sad
min
iste
red
by th
e S
ocia
l Sec
urity
Adm
inis
trat
ion,
incl
udin
g T
icke
t-to
-Wor
kpr
ogra
mP
rogr
ams
unde
r th
e IV
-D C
hild
Sup
port
prog
ram
Pro
gram
s ca
rrie
d ou
t in
the
loca
l are
as fo
rin
divi
dual
s w
ith d
isab
ilitie
s, in
clud
ing
prog
ram
s ca
rrie
d ou
t by
stat
e ag
enci
esre
latin
g to
men
tal h
ealth
, men
tal
reta
rdat
ion,
and
dev
elop
men
tal d
isab
ilitie
s;st
ate
Med
icai
d ag
enci
es; S
tate
Inde
pend
ent L
ivin
g C
ounc
ils; a
ndIn
depe
nden
t Liv
ing
Cen
ters
Elim
inat
es a
ltern
ativ
e en
tity
gran
dfat
herin
g
Cen
ter
for
Law
and
Soc
ial P
olic
y5
Cur
rent
Law
Bus
h A
dmin
istr
atio
n's
Pro
posa
lH
ouse
Bill
(H
.R. 1
261)
exis
tenc
e on
Dec
embe
r 31
, 199
7, s
ubst
antia
llysi
mila
r to
a s
tate
boa
rd r
equi
red
unde
r W
IA,
and
incl
udes
rep
rese
ntat
ives
of b
usin
ess
and
labo
r or
gani
zatio
ns.
prov
isio
ns,
prov
isio
ns.
Sta
te B
oard
Fun
ctio
nsF
unct
ions
are
to a
ssis
t gov
erno
r in
:D
evel
opm
ent o
f the
sta
te p
lan
Dev
elop
men
t of c
ontin
uous
impr
ovem
ent
of s
tate
wid
e ac
tiviti
es, i
nclu
ding
link
ages
toas
sure
coo
rdin
atio
n an
d no
ndup
licat
ion
ofac
tiviti
es a
nd r
evie
w o
f loc
al p
lans
Com
men
ting
at le
ast o
nce
annu
ally
on
Per
kins
per
form
ance
mea
sure
sD
esig
natio
n of
loca
l are
asD
evel
opm
ent o
f adu
lt an
d yo
uth
allo
catio
nfo
rmul
asD
evel
opm
ent a
nd c
ontin
uous
impr
ovem
ent
of c
ompr
ehen
sive
sta
te p
erfo
rman
cem
easu
res
Pre
para
tion
of a
nnua
l rep
ort t
o S
ecre
tary
of D
OL
Dev
elop
men
t of s
tate
wid
e em
ploy
men
tst
atis
tics
syst
em u
nder
Wag
ner-
Pey
ser
A c
t
Dev
elop
men
t of a
pplic
atio
n fo
r in
cent
ive
gran
ts
Fun
ctio
ns w
ould
be
to s
et p
olic
ies
and
prio
ritie
s fo
r on
e-st
op c
aree
r ce
nter
sys
tem
,in
clud
ing
deve
lopm
ent o
f min
imum
ser
vice
deliv
ery
stan
dard
s, c
ompr
ehen
sive
out
reac
hst
rate
gies
, and
eco
nom
ic d
evel
opm
ent
stra
tegi
es.
Add
s fu
nctio
n of
ass
istin
g go
vern
or in
deve
lopm
ent a
nd r
evie
w o
f sta
tew
ide
polic
ies
affe
ctin
g in
tegr
ated
ser
vice
pro
visi
on, i
nclu
ding
one-
stop
cer
tific
atio
n cr
iteria
, one
-sto
pin
fras
truc
ture
fund
ing
allo
catio
n, a
nd e
quita
ble
and
effic
ient
cos
t allo
catio
n in
one
-sto
pde
liver
y sy
stem
s.
Rem
oves
req
uire
men
t tha
t sta
te b
oard
rev
iew
Per
kins
per
form
ance
mea
sure
s.
Req
uire
s st
ate
boar
d to
ass
ist g
over
nor
tode
velo
p cr
iteria
for
appo
intm
ent a
ndce
rtifi
catio
n of
loca
l boa
rds.
Req
uire
s st
ate
boar
d to
set
up
crite
ria a
ndpr
oced
ures
for
cert
ifyin
g on
e-st
ops
and
spec
ifies
that
cer
tific
atio
n is
a r
equi
rem
ent t
ore
ceiv
e in
fras
truc
ture
fund
s. C
riter
ia fo
rce
rtifi
catio
n sh
all i
nclu
de m
inim
um s
tand
ards
rela
ting
to s
cope
and
deg
ree
of s
ervi
cein
tegr
atio
n an
d ho
w th
e ce
nter
s en
sure
that
prov
ider
s m
eet t
he e
mpl
oym
ent n
eeds
of l
ocal
empl
oyer
s an
d pa
rtic
ipan
ts.
Exp
licitl
y au
thor
izes
sta
te b
oard
to h
ire s
taff.
Sta
te P
lans
Req
uire
s a
stat
e pl
an th
at o
utlin
es a
5-y
ear
stra
tegy
for
the
stat
ewid
e w
orkf
orce
inve
stm
ent s
yste
m.
List
s sp
ecia
l pop
ulat
ions
for
whi
ch p
lan
mus
tsp
ecify
how
ser
vice
nee
ds w
ill b
e m
et:
disl
ocat
ed w
orke
rs a
nd d
ispl
aced
hom
emak
ers,
low
-inco
me
indi
vidu
als
(incl
udin
g re
cipi
ents
of p
ublic
ass
ista
nce)
,in
divi
dual
s tr
aini
ng fo
r no
ntra
ditio
nal
empl
oym
ent,
and
othe
rs w
ith m
ultip
le b
arrie
rsto
em
ploy
men
t (in
clud
ing
olde
r in
divi
dual
s an
din
divi
dual
s w
ith d
isab
ilitie
s).
Req
uire
s 2-
year
pla
ns r
athe
r th
an 5
-yea
rpl
ans.
Req
uire
s 2-
year
pla
ns r
athe
r th
an 5
-yea
rpl
ans.
Add
s th
e fo
llow
ing
to th
e lis
t of s
peci
alpo
pula
tions
for
whi
ch p
lan
mus
t spe
cify
how
serv
ice
need
s w
ill b
e m
et: H
omel
ess;
ex-
offe
nder
s; a
nd fo
rmer
ly s
elf-
empl
oyed
and
tran
sitio
ning
farm
ers,
ran
cher
s, a
nd fi
sher
man
.
Add
s re
quire
men
t to
desc
ribe
how
ser
vice
s w
illbe
pro
vide
d to
indi
vidu
als
with
dis
abili
ties
cons
iste
nt w
ith S
ec. 1
88 a
nd E
xecu
tive
Ord
er13
217
(con
cern
ing
com
mun
ity-b
ased
Cen
ter
for
Law
and
Soc
ial P
olic
y6
Cur
rent
Law
Bus
h A
dmin
istr
atio
n's
Pro
posa
lH
ouse
Bill
(H
.R. 1
261)
alte
rnat
ives
).
Loca
l Are
asG
over
nors
req
uire
d to
des
igna
te lo
cal a
reas
and
take
into
con
side
ratio
n:G
eogr
aphi
c ar
eas
serv
ed b
y lo
cal
educ
atio
nal a
genc
ies
and
inte
rmed
iate
educ
atio
nal a
genc
ies
Geo
grap
hic
area
s se
rved
by
post
seco
ndar
y ed
ucat
iona
l ins
titut
ions
and
area
voc
atio
nal e
duca
tion
scho
ols
Add
s pr
omot
ion
of e
ffici
ency
in d
eliv
ery
ofse
rvic
es a
s a
cons
ider
atio
n fo
r de
sign
atio
n of
loca
l are
as.
Ext
ent t
o w
hich
loca
l are
as a
re c
onsi
sten
tw
ith la
bor
mar
ket a
reas
Res
ourc
es a
vaila
ble
to e
ffect
ivel
yad
min
iste
r re
quire
d ac
tiviti
es,
Gov
erno
r of
a s
tate
that
was
a s
ingl
e st
ate
serv
ice
deliv
ery
area
und
er J
TP
A a
s of
Jul
y 1,
1998
, may
des
igna
te s
tate
as
sing
le s
tate
loca
lar
ea u
nder
WIA
.
Gov
erno
r re
quire
d to
aut
omat
ical
ly a
ppro
veE
limin
ates
initi
al a
nd s
ubse
quen
t des
igna
tion
Giv
es g
over
nors
aut
horit
y to
den
y re
ques
t for
any
requ
est f
or d
esig
natio
n as
a lo
cal a
rea
for:
Any
uni
t of l
ocal
gov
ernm
ent w
ith
prov
isio
ns,
cont
inue
d au
tom
atic
loca
l are
a de
sign
atio
n, if
gove
rnor
det
erm
ines
loca
l are
a no
t to
have
popu
latio
n of
500
,000
or
mor
e;pe
rfor
med
suc
cess
fully
dur
ing
prec
edin
g 2-
A J
TP
A r
ural
con
cent
rate
d em
ploy
men
tgr
ant r
ecip
ient
of d
emon
stra
ted
effe
ctiv
enes
s th
at s
erve
d as
a s
ervi
ce
year
per
iod.
Elim
inat
es a
utom
atic
loca
l are
a de
sign
atio
n
deliv
ery
area
or
subs
tate
are
a un
der
JTP
Are
quire
men
t for
a J
TP
A a
rea
in a
sta
te th
at h
as
(if r
eque
st s
ubm
itted
); o
ra
popu
latio
n of
not
mor
e th
at 1
,100
,000
and
a
A J
TP
A a
rea
in a
sta
te th
at h
as a
popu
latio
n de
nsity
gre
ater
than
900
per
sons
popu
latio
n of
not
mor
e th
at 1
,100
,000
and
a po
pula
tion
dens
ity g
reat
er th
an 9
00pe
rson
s pe
r sq
uare
mile
..
per
squa
re m
ile.
Pro
vide
s fo
r ap
peal
pro
cess
(as
est
ablis
hed
inst
ate
plan
) fo
r lo
cal g
over
nmen
t or
gran
tre
cipi
ent t
hat r
eque
sts,
but
is n
ot g
rant
ed,
desi
gnat
ion
as a
loca
l are
a.
Elim
inat
es lo
cal a
rea
right
s to
app
eal n
on-
desi
gnat
ion
to th
e S
ecre
tary
.
Sta
te m
ay r
equi
re r
egio
nal p
lann
ing
by lo
cal
boar
ds fo
r a
desi
gnat
ed r
egio
n in
the
stat
e,m
ay r
equi
re lo
cal b
oard
s to
par
ticip
ate
in a
Pro
vide
s th
at a
sta
te m
ay r
equi
re lo
cal b
oard
sfo
r a
desi
gnat
ed r
egio
n to
pre
pare
a s
ingl
e
plan
ning
pro
cess
for
esta
blis
hmen
t of r
egio
nal
regi
onal
pla
n th
at in
corp
orat
es e
lem
ents
perf
orm
ance
mea
sure
s, a
nd m
ay a
war
dre
quire
d in
loca
l pla
ns a
nd th
at is
sub
mitt
edan
d ap
prov
ed in
lieu
of s
epar
ate
loca
l pla
ns.
Cen
ter
for
Law
and
Soc
ial P
olic
y7
Cur
rent
Law
Bus
h A
dmin
istr
atio
n's
Pro
posa
lH
ouse
Bill
(H
.R. 1
261)
regi
onal
ince
ntiv
e gr
ants
to d
esig
nate
d re
gion
sth
at m
eet o
r ex
ceed
reg
iona
l per
form
ance
mea
sure
s.
Loca
l Boa
rdM
emlb
ersh
ipan
d F
unct
ions
Mem
bers
hip
mus
t inc
lude
rep
rese
ntat
ives
of:
Bus
ines
sLo
cal e
duca
tiona
l ent
ities
Labo
r or
gani
zatio
nsC
omm
unity
-bas
ed o
rgan
izat
ions
Eco
nom
ic d
evel
opm
ent a
genc
ies
One
-sto
p pa
rtne
rsO
ther
ent
ities
the
chie
f loc
al e
lect
ed o
ffici
alde
term
ines
app
ropr
iate
Maj
ority
of m
embe
rs m
ust b
e bu
sine
ssre
pres
enta
tives
.
Req
uire
s es
tabl
ishm
ent o
f You
th C
ounc
ils a
s a
subg
roup
of L
WIB
to d
evel
op p
ortio
n of
loca
lpl
an r
elat
ing
to y
outh
, coo
rdin
ate
WIA
-fun
ded
yout
h ac
tiviti
es, r
ecom
men
d pr
ovid
ers
of y
outh
activ
ities
to b
e aw
arde
d gr
ants
/con
trac
ts, a
ndco
nduc
t ove
rsig
ht o
f pro
vide
rs.
Allo
ws
alte
rnat
ive
entit
ies
that
exi
sted
und
erJT
PA
that
are
sub
stan
tially
sim
ilar
to lo
cal
boar
ds to
be
gran
dfat
here
d in
as
loca
l boa
rds.
Rem
oves
req
uire
men
t tha
t one
-sto
p pa
rtne
rpr
ogra
ms
have
a s
eat o
n lo
cal b
oard
s.
Ens
ure
that
loca
l boa
rd m
embe
rs r
epre
sent
lead
ing
indu
stry
sec
tor
as w
ell a
s ge
ogra
phic
area
s w
ithin
the
loca
l com
mun
ity.
Opt
ion
to c
reat
e "O
pera
ting
Com
mitt
ees"
com
pris
ed o
f one
-sto
p pa
rtne
rs a
nd o
ther
key
part
ies
to p
rovi
de a
dvic
e on
ope
ratio
nal
issu
es.
Fun
ctio
n sh
ould
be
focu
sed
on s
trat
egic
olic
men
tan
dla
nnin
gp
yp
.p
deve
lo
Mak
es Y
outh
Cou
ncils
opt
iona
l.
Elim
inat
es a
ltern
ativ
e en
tity
gran
dfat
herin
gpr
ovis
ions
.
Mak
es th
e fo
llow
ing
mod
ifica
tions
tom
embe
rshi
p co
mpo
sitio
n:R
equi
res
busi
ness
rep
rese
ntat
ives
be
from
amon
g le
adin
g in
dust
ries
in lo
cal a
rea
and
incl
ude
both
larg
e an
d sm
all b
usin
esse
s.R
equi
res
loca
l sec
onda
ry s
choo
l sys
tem
supe
rinte
nden
ts a
nd p
resi
dent
s or
chi
efex
ecut
ive
offic
ers
of p
osts
econ
dary
educ
atio
nal i
nstit
utio
ns (
incl
udin
gco
mm
unity
col
lege
s w
here
suc
h en
titie
sex
ist)
.R
equi
res
repr
esen
tativ
es fr
om fa
ith-b
ased
orga
niza
tions
.E
limin
ates
req
uire
men
t tha
t one
-sto
ppa
rtne
rs a
nd r
epre
sent
ativ
es o
f loc
aled
ucat
ion
entit
ies
be o
n lo
cal b
oard
.M
embe
rs r
equi
red
to r
epre
sent
div
erse
geog
raph
ic s
ectio
ns w
ithin
loca
l are
a.
Mak
es Y
outh
Cou
ncils
opt
iona
l.
Elim
inat
es a
ltern
ativ
e en
tity
gran
dfat
herin
gpr
ovis
ions
.
Loca
l Pla
nsR
equi
res
loca
l boa
rd to
dev
elop
and
sub
mit
togo
vern
or a
com
preh
ensi
ve 5
-yea
r lo
cal p
lan
inpa
rtne
rshi
p w
ith a
ppro
pria
te c
hief
ele
cted
offic
ial.
Loca
l pla
n m
ust i
nclu
de a
cop
y of
eac
h M
OU
betw
een
the
LWIB
and
eac
h on
e-st
op p
artn
er.
Req
uire
s 2-
year
pla
ns r
athe
r th
an 5
-yea
rpl
ans.
Req
uire
s 2-
year
pla
ns r
athe
r th
an 5
-yea
r:
plan
s.
Dro
ps r
equi
rem
ent t
hat l
ocal
pla
n in
clud
eco
pies
of M
OU
s w
ith p
artn
ers.
One
-Sto
pS
yste
ms
Req
uire
d P
artn
ers:
WIA
Wag
ner-
Pey
ser
Adu
lt E
duca
tion
and
Lite
racy
pro
gram
sR
ehab
ilita
tion
Act
pro
gram
sW
elfa
re-t
o-W
ork
Old
er A
mer
ican
s A
ct p
rogr
ams
Per
kins
pos
tsec
onda
ry v
ocat
iona
l
Bui
ld s
tron
g co
nnec
tions
bet
wee
n th
e on
e-st
opsy
stem
and
pro
gram
s fu
nded
und
er a
dult
educ
atio
n an
d vo
catio
nal e
duca
tion.
,
Req
uire
d P
artn
ers:
Add
s T
AN
F, u
nles
s th
ego
vern
or o
pts
out a
nd n
otifi
es H
HS
and
DO
LS
ecre
tarie
s in
writ
ing.
Elim
inat
es W
agne
r-P
eyse
r an
d W
elfa
re-t
o-W
ork
as r
equi
red
part
ners
.
Cen
ter
for
Law
and
Soc
ial P
olic
y8
Cur
rent
Law
Bus
h A
dmin
istr
atio
n's
Pro
posa
lH
ouse
Bill
(H
.R. 1
261)
educ
atio
n ac
tiviti
esT
rade
Adj
ustm
ent A
ssis
tanc
e an
d N
AF
TA
-T
AA
pro
gram
sV
eter
ans
Em
ploy
men
t and
Tra
inin
gC
omm
unity
Ser
vice
Blo
ck G
rant
empl
oym
ent a
nd tr
aini
ng a
ctiv
ities
HU
D e
mpl
oym
ent a
nd tr
aini
ng a
ctiv
ities
Une
mpl
oym
ent c
ompe
nsat
ion
prog
ram
s
Per
mis
sibl
e P
artn
ers:
TA
NF
Foo
d S
tam
p em
ploy
men
t, tr
aini
ng, a
ndw
ork
prog
ram
sN
atio
nal a
nd C
omm
unity
Ser
vice
Act
prog
ram
sO
ther
fede
ral,
stat
e, o
r lo
cal p
rogr
ams,
incl
udin
g pr
ivat
e se
ctor
pro
gram
s
Incl
udes
gra
ndfa
ther
pro
visi
on fo
r pr
e-W
IAon
e-st
ops.
Per
mis
sibl
e P
artn
ers:
Add
s th
e fo
llow
ing:
Em
ploy
men
t and
trai
ning
pro
gram
sad
min
iste
red
by S
ocia
l Sec
urity
Adm
inis
trat
ion,
incl
udin
g T
icke
t to
Wor
kpr
ogra
mC
hild
sup
port
enf
orce
men
t pro
gram
sun
der
IV-D
of t
he S
ocia
l Sec
urity
Act
Pro
gram
s fo
r in
divi
dual
s,w
ith d
isab
ilitie
s,in
clud
ing
prog
ram
s ca
rrie
d ou
t by
stat
eag
enci
es r
elat
ing
to m
enta
l hea
lth, m
enta
lre
tard
atio
n, a
nd d
evel
opm
enta
l dis
abili
ties,
stat
e M
edic
aid
agen
cies
, Sta
teIn
depe
nden
t Liv
ing
Cou
ncils
, and
Inde
pend
ent L
ivin
g C
ente
rs
Elim
inat
es o
ne-s
top
gran
dfat
her
prov
isio
n fo
rpr
e-W
IA o
ne-s
tops
.
Elig
ible
Tra
inin
gP
rovi
ders
To
be e
ligib
le to
rec
eive
fund
s, p
rovi
der
isre
quire
d to
be:
1) a
pos
tsec
onda
ry in
stitu
tion
that
is e
ligib
le to
rece
ive
fede
ral f
unds
und
er th
e H
ighe
rE
duca
tion
Act
of 1
965
and
that
pro
vide
s a
prog
ram
that
lead
s to
an
asso
ciat
e or
bacc
alau
reat
e de
gree
, or
cert
ifica
te; 2
) an
entit
y th
at c
arrie
rs o
ut p
rogr
ams
unde
r th
eN
atio
nal A
ppre
ntic
eshi
p A
ct; o
r 3)
ano
ther
publ
ic o
r pr
ivat
e pr
ovid
er o
f a p
rogr
am o
ftr
aini
ng s
ervi
ces.
Ent
ities
in c
ateg
orie
s (1
) an
d(2
) au
tom
atic
ally
rec
eive
initi
al e
ligib
ility
upo
nap
plic
atio
n. O
ther
pro
vide
rs a
re r
equi
red
tosu
bmit
perf
orm
ance
and
pro
gram
cos
tin
form
atio
n an
d m
eet a
ppro
pria
te p
erfo
rman
cele
vels
in o
rder
rec
eive
initi
al e
ligib
ility
. For
subs
eque
nt e
ligib
ility
, all
prov
ider
s m
ust
subm
it pe
rfor
man
ce a
nd p
rogr
am c
ost
info
rmat
ion
and
annu
ally
mee
t app
ropr
iate
perf
orm
ance
leve
ls.
Pro
vide
gov
erno
rs w
ith th
e au
thor
ity to
dete
rmin
e w
hat s
tand
ards
, inf
orm
atio
n, a
ndda
ta w
ould
be
requ
ired
for
the
elig
ible
trai
ning
prov
ider
s in
thei
r st
ate.
Gov
erno
r w
ould
be
requ
ired
to s
et m
inim
um s
tand
ards
for
all
prov
ider
s in
a m
anne
r th
at w
ould
ens
ure
qual
ity, c
hoic
e, a
nd a
ccou
ntab
ility
to th
efe
dera
l gov
ernm
ent,
Rem
oves
cur
rent
elig
ibili
ty r
equi
rem
ents
for
trai
ning
pro
vide
rs a
nd g
ives
gov
erno
rs b
road
auth
ority
to d
evel
op c
riter
ia a
nd p
roce
dure
s fo
rce
rtify
ing
trai
ning
pro
vide
rs th
at is
bot
hpe
rfor
man
ce a
nd n
on-p
erfo
rman
ce b
ased
.G
over
nor
may
aut
horiz
e lo
cal a
reas
toes
tabl
ish
addi
tiona
l crit
eria
or
mod
ify th
ego
vern
or's
crit
eria
. Pro
cedu
res
deve
lope
d by
gove
rnor
sha
ll id
entif
y ap
plic
atio
n pr
oces
s fo
rtr
aini
ng p
rovi
der
to b
ecom
e el
igib
le, r
oles
of
stat
e an
d lo
cal a
reas
in r
ecei
ving
and
rene
win
g ap
plic
atio
ns a
nd m
akin
g el
igib
ility
dete
rmin
atio
ns, a
nd p
roce
ss fo
r pr
ovid
ers
toap
peal
den
ial o
r te
rmin
atio
n of
elig
ibili
ty.
Gov
erno
r sh
all e
nsur
e th
at a
ppro
pria
te li
st o
rlis
ts o
f elig
ible
pro
vide
rs, a
long
with
suc
hin
form
atio
n as
gov
erno
r de
term
ines
appr
opria
te, i
s pr
ovid
ed to
loca
l boa
rds
to b
em
ade
avai
labl
e to
par
ticip
ants
and
the
publ
ic.
You
thLo
cal b
oard
req
uire
d to
iden
tify
elig
ible
Doe
s no
t add
ress
.Lo
cal b
oard
req
uire
d to
iden
tify
elig
ible
Cen
ter
for
Law
and
Soc
ial P
olic
y
Cur
rent
Law
Bus
h A
dmin
istr
atio
n's
Pro
posa
lH
ouse
Bill
(H
.R. 1
261)
Act
iviti
esP
rovi
ders
prov
ider
s of
you
th a
ctiv
ities
by
awar
ding
gra
nts
or c
ontr
acts
on
a co
mpe
titiv
e ba
sis,
bas
ed o
nyo
uth
coun
cil r
ecom
men
datio
ns a
nd s
tate
pla
ncr
iteria
,
prov
ider
s of
you
th a
ctiv
ities
by
awar
ding
gra
nts
or c
ontr
acts
on
a co
mpe
titiv
e ba
sis'
, bas
ed o
nst
ate
plan
crit
eria
. Allo
ws
sole
-sou
rce
gran
tsor
con
trac
ts if
loca
l boa
rd d
eter
min
es th
atth
ere
are
an in
suffi
cien
t num
ber
of e
ligib
lepr
ovid
ers
for
gran
ts to
be
awar
ded
on a
com
petit
ive
basi
s.S
tate
Adu
lt: 1
/4 o
f 1 p
erce
nt is
res
erve
d fo
r ou
tlyin
gC
onso
lidat
ed A
dult
Blo
ck G
rant
: For
mul
aC
onso
lidat
ed A
dult
Blo
ck G
rant
: 10
perc
ent
Allo
tmen
ts:
area
s an
d th
e re
mai
nder
is d
istr
ibut
ed to
shou
ld ta
ke in
to a
ccou
nt fo
rmul
a fa
ctor
s us
edre
serv
ed b
y S
ecre
tary
of w
hich
:A
dult
stat
es b
ased
on:
for
the
Adu
lt, D
islo
cate
d W
orke
r, a
nd W
agne
r-N
ot le
ss th
an 7
5 pe
rcen
t mus
t be
used
for
For
mul
asR
elat
ive
num
ber
of u
nem
ploy
edP
eyse
r pr
ogra
ms.
Sec
reta
ry's
rea
llotm
ent
Nat
iona
l Dis
loca
ted
Wor
ker
Gra
nts.
indi
vidu
als
in a
reas
of s
ubst
antia
lau
thor
ity w
ould
be
base
d on
exp
endi
ture
sN
ot m
ore
than
20
perc
ent m
ay b
e us
ed fo
run
empl
oym
ent (
at le
ast 6
.5 p
erce
nt)
Rel
ativ
e ex
cess
num
ber
of u
nem
ploy
edin
divi
dual
s (n
umbe
r ab
ove
4.5
perc
ent)
rath
er th
an o
blig
atio
ns,
dem
onst
ratio
n pr
ojec
ts.
Not
mor
e th
an 5
per
cent
may
be
used
topr
ovid
e te
chni
cal a
ssis
tanc
e.R
elat
ive
num
ber
of d
isad
vant
aged
adu
ltsH
old
harm
less
and
sm
all s
tate
min
imum
prov
isio
ns
Dis
loca
ted
Wor
ker:
20
perc
ent o
f fun
ds
Of t
he r
emai
ning
90
perc
ent,
not m
ore
than
1/4
of 1
per
cent
is r
eser
ved
for
outly
ing
area
s an
dth
e re
mai
nder
is d
istr
ibut
ed to
sta
tes
base
d on
the
on th
e fo
llow
ing
form
ula:
rese
rved
by
Sec
reta
ry fo
r te
chni
cal a
ssis
tanc
e,de
mon
stra
tion
proj
ects
, Nat
iona
l Em
erge
ncy
Gra
nts,
and
ass
ista
nce
to o
utly
ing
area
s. T
here
mai
nder
is d
istr
ibut
ed to
sta
tes
base
d on
:R
elat
ive
num
ber
of u
nem
ploy
edin
divi
dual
sR
elat
ive
exce
ss n
umbe
r (n
umbe
r ab
ove
4.5
perc
ent)
of u
nem
ploy
ed in
divi
dual
sR
elat
ive
num
ber
of in
divi
dual
s in
eac
hst
ate
who
hav
e be
en u
nem
ploy
ed fo
r 15
wee
ks o
r m
ore
In F
Y 2
004,
26
perc
ent i
s di
strib
uted
base
d on
FY
200
3 W
agne
r-P
eyse
ral
lotm
ents
if th
e am
ount
ava
ilabl
e in
FY
2004
is n
o gr
eate
r th
an th
e am
ount
avai
labl
e in
FY
200
3; in
FY
2005
and
ther
eafte
r, 2
6 pe
rcen
t is
allo
tted
base
d on
the
allo
tmen
t per
cent
age
of th
e pr
evio
usfis
cal y
ear
unle
ss th
e av
aila
ble
amou
nt is
incr
ease
d.74
per
cent
is d
istr
ibut
ed b
ased
prim
arily
on: o R
elat
ive
num
ber
of u
nem
ploy
edin
divi
dual
so
Rel
ativ
e ex
cess
num
ber
(num
ber
abov
e 4.
5 pe
rcen
t) o
f une
mpl
oyed
indi
vidu
als
o R
elat
ive
num
ber
of d
isad
vant
aged
adul
tso
Res
truc
ture
d ho
ld h
arm
less
and
sm
all
stat
e m
inim
um p
rovi
sion
s
Rea
llotm
ent:
The
Sec
reta
ry is
aut
horiz
ed to
real
lot t
he a
mou
nt b
y w
hich
a s
tate
'sR
eallo
tmen
t: T
he S
ecre
tary
is a
utho
rized
tore
allo
t the
am
ount
by
whi
ch a
sta
te's
Cen
ter
for
Law
and
Soc
ial P
olic
y10
Cur
rent
Law
Bus
h A
dmin
istr
atio
n's
Pro
posa
lH
ouse
Bill
(H
.R. 1
261)
unob
ligat
ed b
alan
ce e
xcee
ds20
perc
ent o
f its
allo
tmen
t for
the
prog
ram
yea
r.un
expe
nded
bal
ance
, exc
ludi
ng a
ccru
edex
pend
iture
s, e
xcee
ds 3
0 pe
rcen
t of i
tsal
lotm
ent f
or th
e pr
ogra
m y
ear.
Add
s de
finiti
on o
f Acc
rued
Exp
endi
ture
s as
incl
udin
g "t
he s
um o
f act
ual c
ash
disb
urse
men
ts fo
r di
rect
cha
rges
for
good
san
d se
rvic
es, t
he n
et in
crea
se o
r de
crea
se in
the
amou
nts
owed
by
reci
pien
ts, g
oods
and
othe
r pr
oper
ty r
ecei
ved
for
serv
ices
per
form
edby
em
ploy
ees,
con
trac
tors
, sub
gran
tees
, or
othe
r pa
yees
, and
oth
er a
mou
nts
beco
min
gow
ned
for
whi
ch n
o cu
rren
t ser
vice
or
perf
orm
ance
is r
equi
red.
"S
tate
Allo
tmen
ts:
You
thF
orm
ulas
In y
ears
in w
hich
the
appr
opria
te e
xcee
ds $
1B,
a po
rtio
n of
fund
s in
exc
ess
of $
1B s
hall
bere
serv
ed fo
r m
igra
nt a
nd s
easo
nal f
arm
wor
ker
prog
ram
s an
d up
to$250Mfor Youth
Opp
ortu
nity
Gra
nts.
The
rem
aini
ng a
mou
nt in
exce
ss o
f $1B
sha
ll be
use
d fo
r fu
ndin
g to
outly
ing
area
s an
d to
sta
tes
for
Nat
ive
Am
eric
an p
rogr
ams
and
for
yout
h ac
tiviti
esan
d st
atew
ide
wor
kfor
ce in
vest
men
t act
iviti
es.
Rem
aind
er is
dis
trib
uted
to s
tate
s ba
sed
on:
Rel
ativ
e nu
mbe
r of
une
mpl
oyed
indi
vidu
als
in a
reas
of s
ubst
antia
lun
empl
oym
ent
Rel
ativ
e ex
cess
num
ber
of u
nem
ploy
edin
divi
dual
sR
elat
ive
num
ber
of d
isad
vant
aged
you
thH
old
harm
less
and
sm
all s
tate
min
imum
prov
isio
ns
Rea
llotm
ent:
Sam
e as
Adu
lt F
orm
ula
abov
e.
Doe
s no
t spe
cify
form
ula.
Elim
inat
es fu
ndin
g fo
r m
igra
nt a
nd s
easo
nal
farm
wor
ker
prog
ram
s an
d Y
outh
Opp
ortu
nity
Gra
nts.
25
perc
ent o
f the
am
ount
appr
opria
ted
for
yout
h re
quire
d to
be
rese
rved
for
Cha
lleng
e G
rant
s (u
p to
a m
axim
um o
f$250M).
Of t
he r
emai
ning
fund
s:N
ot m
ore
1/4
of 1
per
cent
res
erve
d fo
ras
sist
ance
to o
utly
ing
area
s.N
ot m
ore
than
1 1
/2 p
erce
nt r
eser
ved
for
Nat
ive
Am
eric
an p
rogr
ams.
The
rem
aind
er is
dis
trib
uted
to s
tate
spr
imar
ily b
ased
on
curr
ent l
aw fo
rmul
a,w
ith r
estr
uctu
red
hold
har
mle
ss a
nd s
mal
lst
ate
min
imum
pro
visi
ons.
Rea
llotm
ent:
Sam
e as
Adu
lt F
orm
ula
abov
e.
Acc
rued
Exp
endi
ture
s: S
ame
as A
dult
For
mul
a ab
ove.
With
in S
tate
Allo
catio
ns:
Adu
lt F
undi
ng
Adu
lt:15
perc
ent o
f fun
ds r
eser
ved
at s
tate
leve
l for
sta
tew
ide
wor
kfor
ce in
vest
men
tac
tiviti
es. O
f the
rem
aini
ng85
perc
ent:
Fun
ds a
lloca
ted
to lo
cal a
reas
bas
ed o
nea
ch o
f the
thre
e fa
ctor
s us
ed b
yS
ecre
tary
to d
eter
min
e st
ate
allo
catio
n.A
ltern
ativ
ely,
a s
tate
may
dis
trib
ute
70
Con
solid
ated
Adu
lt B
lock
Gra
nt: G
over
nors
wou
ld a
lloca
te a
t lea
st50
perc
ent t
o lo
cal
area
s: 40 p
erce
nt a
ccor
ding
to s
tatu
tory
form
ula,
and
10 p
erce
nt a
ccor
ding
to fo
rmul
ade
term
ined
by
gove
rnor
bas
ed o
n
Con
solid
ated
Adu
lt B
lock
Gra
nt: G
over
nor
may
res
erve
up
to50
perc
ent f
or s
tate
wid
eac
tiviti
es (
not l
ess
than
hal
f of w
hich
mus
t be
used
to s
uppo
rt p
rovi
sion
of c
ore
serv
ices
inlo
cal a
reas
; see
Sta
tew
ide
Act
iviti
es b
elow
).O
f the
rem
aini
ng50
perc
ent:
85
perc
ent m
ust b
e al
loca
ted
to lo
cal
Cen
ter
for
Law
and
Soc
ial P
olic
y11
Cur
rent
Law
Bus
h A
dmin
istr
atio
n's
Pro
posa
lH
ouse
Bill
(H
.R. 1
261)
perc
ent o
f fun
ds a
s ou
tline
d ab
ove
and
30pe
rcen
t of f
unds
bas
ed o
n ot
her
fact
ors
econ
omic
and
dem
ogra
phic
fact
ors.
area
s ba
sed
on s
ame
fact
ors
used
by
Sec
reta
ry to
det
erm
ine
stat
e al
loca
tion.
rela
ting
to e
xces
s po
vert
y an
dR
emai
ning
fund
s av
aila
ble
to g
over
nor
for
15 p
erce
nt a
lloca
ted
to lo
cal a
reas
bas
edun
empl
oym
ent d
evel
oped
by
stat
e bo
ard
activ
ities
suc
h as
rap
id r
espo
nse,
sup
port
for
on a
n ob
ject
ive
and
geog
raph
ical
lyan
d in
clud
ed in
sta
te p
lan.
Dis
loca
ted
Wor
ker:
15
perc
ent o
f fun
dsre
serv
ed a
t sta
te le
vel f
or s
tate
wid
e w
orkf
orce
inve
stm
ent a
ctiv
ities
. Gov
erno
r m
ay r
eser
veup
to a
n ad
ditio
nal 2
5 pe
rcen
t for
rap
idre
spon
se a
ctiv
ities
. Rem
aini
ng fu
nds
allo
cate
d to
loca
l are
as b
ased
on
form
ula
pres
crib
ed b
y go
vern
or.
core
ser
vice
s, e
valu
atio
ns, a
ndde
mon
stra
tions
:eq
uita
ble
form
ula
deve
lope
d by
gov
erno
raf
ter
cons
ulta
tion
with
sta
te b
oard
and
loca
l boa
rds.
Rea
lloca
tion:
The
am
ount
by
whi
ch a
loca
lar
ea's
uno
blig
ated
bal
ance
exc
eeds
20
perc
ent o
f its
allo
catio
n fo
r th
e pr
ogra
m y
ear
may
be
real
loca
ted,
Adm
inis
trat
ive
Cos
ts: 1
0 pe
rcen
t cap
on
amou
nt o
f adu
lt an
d di
sloc
ated
wor
ker
fund
sth
at c
an b
e us
ed fo
r ad
min
istr
ativ
e co
sts
atlo
cal l
evel
.
Rea
lloca
tion:
Gov
erno
r m
ay r
eallo
t am
ount
by w
hich
a lo
cal a
rea'
s un
oblig
ated
bal
ance
at
the
end
of th
e pr
ogra
m y
ear,
exc
ludi
ngac
crue
d ex
pend
iture
s, e
xcee
ds 3
0 pe
rcen
t of
its a
lloca
tion
for
the
prog
ram
yea
r.
Adm
inis
trat
ive
Cos
ts: 1
0 pe
rcen
t cap
on
use
of fu
nds
by lo
cal b
oard
s fo
r ad
min
istr
ativ
eco
sts.
Tra
nsfe
rabi
lity:
Up
to 2
0 pe
rcen
t of f
unds
at
the
loca
l lev
el m
ay b
e tr
ansf
erre
d be
twee
nad
ult a
nd d
islo
cate
d w
orke
r fu
ndin
g st
ream
sw
ith a
ppro
val o
f gov
erno
r; in
crea
sed
to 3
0pe
rcen
t for
FY
2003
.
With
in S
tate
Not
mor
e th
an 1
5 pe
rcen
t of y
outh
form
ula
Gov
erno
rs w
ould
hav
e di
scre
tion
to ta
rget
Red
uces
the
amou
nt o
f you
th fo
rmul
a fu
nds
Allo
catio
ns:
fund
s ca
n be
res
erve
d at
the
stat
e le
vel.
Fun
dsfu
nds
to lo
cal a
reas
with
the
high
est e
ligib
leth
at c
an b
e re
serv
ed a
t the
sta
te le
vel t
o no
tY
outh
Fun
ding
allo
cate
d to
loca
l are
as b
ased
on
each
of t
heth
ree
fact
ors
used
by
Sec
reta
ry to
det
erm
ine
yout
h po
pula
tion,
mor
e th
an 1
0 pe
rcen
t. O
f the
rem
aini
ng 9
0pe
rcen
t:st
ate
allo
catio
n.
Rea
lloca
tion,
Adm
inis
trat
ive
Cos
ts, a
nd
80 p
erce
nt a
lloca
ted
to lo
cal a
reas
bas
edon
the
thre
e fa
ctor
s us
ed b
y S
ecre
tary
tode
term
ine
stat
e al
loca
tion
Tra
nsfe
rabi
lity:
Sam
e as
Adu
lt F
undi
ngab
ove,
20 p
erce
nt a
lloca
ted
to lo
cal a
reas
inac
cord
ance
with
suc
h de
mog
raph
ic a
ndec
onom
ic fa
ctor
s as
the
gove
rnor
, afte
rco
nsul
tatio
n w
ith s
tate
and
loca
l boa
rds,
dete
rmin
es a
ppro
pria
te.
Rea
lloca
tion
and
Adm
inis
trat
ive
Cos
ts:
Sam
e as
Adu
lt F
undi
ng a
bove
.
Cen
ter
for
Law
and
Soc
ial P
olic
y12
Cur
rent
Law
Bus
h A
dmin
istr
atio
n's
Pro
posa
lH
ouse
Bill
(H
.R. 1
261)
Sta
tew
ide
Req
uire
d A
ctiv
ities
for
Adu
lt an
dD
oes
not a
ddre
ss.
Req
uire
d A
ctiv
ities
for
Con
solid
ated
Adu
ltA
ctiv
ities
:D
islo
cate
d W
orke
r F
unds
Res
erve
d at
Sta
teF
unds
Res
erve
d at
Sta
te L
evel
:A
dults
Leve
l: Con
duct
ing
eval
uatio
nsP
rovi
ding
ince
ntiv
e gr
ants
to lo
cal a
reas
for
regi
onal
coo
pera
tion,
loca
l coo
rdin
atio
nof
act
iviti
es, a
nd e
xem
plar
y pe
rfor
man
ceon
loca
l per
form
ance
mea
sure
sP
rovi
ding
tech
nica
l ass
ista
nce
to lo
cal
area
s th
at fa
il to
mee
t loc
al p
erfo
rman
cem
easu
res
Ass
istin
g in
the
esta
blis
hmen
t and
oper
atio
n of
one
-sto
p de
liver
y sy
stem
sO
pera
ting
a fis
cal a
nd m
anag
emen
tac
coun
tabi
lity
info
rmat
ion
syst
em
Gov
erno
r re
quire
d to
use
not
less
than
50
perc
ent o
f res
erve
d fu
nds
to s
uppo
rtpr
ovis
ion
of c
ore
serv
ices
in lo
cal a
reas
by
dist
ribut
ing
fund
s to
loca
l are
as. S
uch
fund
s m
ay b
e us
ed b
y st
ates
to e
mpl
oyst
ate
pers
onne
l to
prov
ide
such
ser
vice
s in
loca
l are
as in
con
sulta
tion
with
loca
lbo
ards
.R
emai
ning
50
perc
ent m
ust b
e us
ed fo
rra
pid
resp
onse
act
iviti
es a
nd m
ay b
e us
edto
pro
vide
per
mis
sibl
e ac
tiviti
es d
escr
ibed
belo
w.
Rap
id r
espo
nse
activ
ities
are
a r
equi
red
activ
ity fo
r di
sloc
ated
wor
ker
fund
sP
erm
issi
ble
Act
iviti
es fo
r C
onso
lidat
edA
dult
Fun
ds R
eser
ved
at S
tate
Lev
el:
Per
mis
sibl
e A
ctiv
ities
for
Adu
lt an
dN
ot m
ore
than
5 p
erce
nt c
an b
e us
ed fo
rad
min
istr
ativ
e ac
tiviti
esD
islo
cate
d W
orke
r F
unds
Res
erve
d at
Sta
teS
uppo
rtin
g th
e pr
ovis
ion
of c
ore
serv
ices
Leve
l:C
ondu
ctin
g ev
alua
tions
Not
mor
e th
an 5
per
cent
can
be
used
for
adm
inis
trat
ive
activ
ities
Pro
vidi
ng c
apac
ity b
uild
ing
and
tech
nica
las
sist
ance
Pro
vidi
ng in
cent
ive
gran
ts to
loca
lar
eas
for
regi
onal
coo
pera
tion,
loca
l coo
rdin
atio
nof
act
iviti
es, a
nd e
xem
plar
y pe
rfor
man
ceon
loca
l per
form
ance
mea
sure
sR
esea
rch
and
dem
onst
ratio
nsIn
nova
tive
incu
mbe
nt w
orke
r tr
aini
ngpr
ogra
ms
Pro
gram
s ta
rget
ed to
em
pow
erm
ent z
ones
and
ente
rpris
e co
mm
uniti
es
Pro
vidi
ng te
chni
cal a
ssis
tanc
e an
dca
paci
ty b
uild
ing
Pro
vidi
ng a
fisc
al a
nd m
anag
emen
tac
coun
tabi
lity
syst
emM
onito
ring
and
over
sigh
t of a
ctiv
ities
Sup
port
for
iden
tific
atio
n of
elig
ible
trai
ning
prov
ider
sIn
nova
tive
prog
ram
s fo
r di
spla
ced
hom
emak
ers
Impl
emen
ting
inno
vativ
e pr
ogra
ms,
suc
has
incu
mbe
nt w
orke
r tr
aini
ng p
rogr
ams,
prog
ram
s th
at s
erve
indi
vidu
als
with
disa
bilit
ies
Pro
gram
s to
incr
ease
the
num
ber
ofin
divi
dual
s tr
aini
ng fo
r an
d pl
aced
inno
ntra
ditio
nal e
mpl
oym
ent
Oth
er a
ctiv
ities
that
the
stat
e de
term
ines
nece
ssar
y to
ass
ist l
ocal
are
as in
car
ryin
gou
t loc
al a
ctiv
ities
Dev
elop
ing
stra
tegi
es fo
r ef
fect
ivel
yse
rvin
g ha
rd-t
o-se
rve
popu
latio
ns a
nd fo
rin
tegr
atin
g pr
ogra
ms
and
serv
ices
amon
gon
e-st
op p
artn
ers
Impl
emen
ting
inno
vativ
e pr
ogra
ms
for
disp
lace
d ho
mem
aker
s, w
hich
may
incl
ude
publ
ic a
ssis
tanc
e re
cipi
ents
with
in 2
year
sof
exh
aust
ing
lifet
ime
TA
NF
elig
ibili
tyIm
plem
entin
g pr
ogra
ms
to in
crea
senu
mbe
r of
indi
vidu
als
trai
ning
for
and
Cen
ter
for
Law
and
Soc
ial P
olic
y13
Cur
rent
Law
Bus
h A
dmin
istr
atio
n's
Pro
posa
lH
ouse
Bill
(H
.R. 1
261)
plac
ed in
non
trad
ition
al e
mpl
oym
ent
Sta
tew
ide
Act
iviti
es:
You
th
Req
uire
d A
ctiv
ities
for
You
th F
unds
Res
erve
d at
Sta
te L
evel
:A
ll re
quire
d ac
tiviti
es fo
r ad
ult f
unds
list
edab
ove
Dis
sem
inat
ing
a lis
t of e
ligib
le p
rovi
ders
of
yout
h ac
tiviti
es a
nd o
f tra
inin
g se
rvic
esP
rovi
ding
add
ition
al a
ssis
tanc
e to
loca
lar
eas
that
hav
e hi
gh c
once
ntra
tions
of
elig
ible
you
th to
car
ry o
ut a
ctiv
ities
Not
mor
e th
an 5
per
cent
can
be
used
for
adm
inis
trat
ive
activ
ities
Per
mis
sibl
e A
ctiv
ities
for
You
th F
unds
Res
erve
d at
Sta
te L
evel
:A
ll pe
rmis
sibl
e ac
tiviti
es fo
r ad
ult f
unds
liste
d ab
ove.
Car
ryin
g ou
t req
uire
d lo
cal a
ctiv
ities
(des
crib
ed b
elow
) on
a s
tate
wid
e ba
sis.
No
fund
s ca
n be
use
d to
dev
elop
or
impl
emen
t edu
catio
n cu
rric
ula
for
scho
olsy
stem
s.N
ot m
ore
than
5 p
erce
nt c
an b
e us
ed fo
rad
min
istr
ativ
e ac
tiviti
es.
Doe
s no
t add
ress
.R
equi
red
Act
iviti
es fo
r Y
outh
Fun
dsR
eser
ved
at S
tate
Lev
el: S
ame
as c
urre
ntla
w.
Per
mis
sibl
e A
ctiv
ities
for
You
th F
unds
Res
erve
d at
Sta
te L
evel
:A
ll pe
rmis
sibl
e ac
tiviti
es fo
r ad
ult f
unds
liste
d ab
ove.
Add
ition
al a
ssis
tanc
e to
are
as th
at h
ave
high
con
cent
ratio
ns o
f elig
ible
you
th.
No
fund
s ca
n be
use
d to
dev
elop
or
impl
emen
t edu
catio
n cu
rric
ula
for
scho
olsy
stem
s.N
ot m
ore
than
5 p
erce
nt o
f fun
ds m
ay b
eus
ed b
y th
e st
ate
for
adm
inis
trat
ive
activ
ities
.
Loca
lA
ctiv
ities
:A
dults
Req
uire
d A
ctiv
ities
for
Adu
lts a
ndD
islo
cate
d W
orke
rs:
Est
ablis
h on
e-st
op d
eliv
ery
syst
emP
rovi
de c
ore
serv
ices
incl
udin
g:o
Elig
ibili
ty d
eter
min
atio
n fo
r W
IAse
rvic
eso
Out
reac
h, in
take
, and
orie
ntat
ion
oIn
itial
ass
essm
ent o
f ski
ll le
vels
,ap
titud
es, a
bilit
ies,
and
sup
port
ive
serv
ice
need
s,
oJo
b se
arch
and
pla
cem
ent a
ssis
tanc
e,an
d, w
here
app
ropr
iate
, car
eer
coun
selin
go
Em
ploy
men
t sta
tistic
s in
form
atio
no
Per
form
ance
and
pro
gram
cos
tin
form
atio
n on
loca
l pro
vide
rso
Loca
l are
a pe
rfor
man
ce in
form
atio
no
Info
rmat
ion
on a
vaila
bilit
y of
supp
ortiv
e se
rvic
eso
Info
rmat
ion
rega
rdin
g fil
ing
Doe
s no
t add
ress
.R
equi
red
Act
iviti
es fo
r A
dults
(in
clud
ing
disl
ocat
ed w
orke
rs):
Ret
ains
req
uire
men
t to
esta
blis
h on
e-st
opde
liver
y sy
stem
Cor
e se
rvic
es m
ust a
lso
incl
ude:
oE
ligib
ility
det
erm
inat
ions
for
all o
ne-
stop
par
tner
pro
gram
so
Labo
r ex
chan
ge s
ervi
ces,
incl
udin
g jo
bse
arch
and
pla
cem
ent a
ssis
tanc
e; a
ndw
here
app
ropr
iate
car
eer
coun
selin
g;ap
prop
riate
rec
ruitm
ent s
ervi
ces
for
empl
oyer
s; a
nd r
eem
ploy
men
t ser
vice
spr
ovid
ed to
une
mpl
oym
ent c
laim
ants
oA
dmin
istr
atio
n of
the
wor
k te
st fo
run
empl
oym
ent c
ompe
nsat
ion
Elim
inat
es r
equi
rem
ent t
o pr
ovid
e as
sist
ance
in e
stab
lishi
ng e
ligib
ility
for
Wel
fare
-to-
Wor
kac
tiviti
es (
auth
oriz
atio
n fo
r th
is p
rogr
am h
as
Cen
ter
for
Law
and
Soc
ial P
olic
y14
Cur
rent
Law
Bus
h A
dmin
istr
atio
n's
Pro
posa
lH
ouse
Bill
(H
.R. 1
261)
unem
ploy
men
t com
pens
atio
n cl
aim
so
Ass
ista
nce
in e
stab
lishi
ng e
ligib
ility
for
ende
d).
Wel
fare
-to-
Wor
k ac
tiviti
es a
nd o
ther
prog
ram
s of
fina
ncia
l aid
ass
ista
nce
for
educ
atio
n an
d tr
aini
ngo
Fol
low
-up
serv
ices
for
not l
ess
than
12
mon
ths
Inte
nsiv
e se
rvic
es a
re r
etai
ned,
but
Pro
vide
inte
nsiv
e se
rvic
es, i
nclu
ding
:re
vise
d as
follo
ws:
oC
ompr
ehen
sive
and
spe
cial
ized
oC
ase
man
agem
ent n
o lo
nger
asse
ssm
ents
of s
kills
and
ser
vice
nee
dsre
stric
ted
to p
artic
ipan
ts s
eeki
ng tr
aini
ngo
Dev
elop
men
t of i
ndiv
idua
l em
ploy
men
tse
rvic
es.
plan
so
Add
s in
tern
ship
s an
d w
ork
expe
rienc
e.o
Gro
up c
ouns
elin
go
Add
s lit
erac
y ac
tiviti
es r
elat
ing
to w
ork
oIn
divi
dual
cou
nsel
ing
and
care
erre
adin
ess,
and
fina
ncia
l lite
racy
act
iviti
es.
plan
ning
oA
dds
out-
of-a
rea
job
sear
cho
Cas
e m
anag
emen
t for
par
ticip
ants
seek
ing
trai
ning
oS
hort
-ter
m p
re-v
ocat
iona
l ser
vice
s
assi
stan
ce a
nd r
eloc
atio
n as
sist
ance
.
Pro
vide
trai
ning
ser
vice
s, in
clud
ing:
oO
ccup
atio
nal s
kills
trai
ning
, inc
ludi
ngtr
aini
ng fo
r no
ntra
ditio
nal e
mpl
oym
ent
oO
n-th
e-jo
b tr
aini
ngo
Pro
gram
s th
at c
ombi
ne w
orkp
lace
trai
ning
with
rel
ated
inst
ruct
ion
oT
rain
ing
prog
ram
s op
erat
ed b
y th
epr
ivat
e se
ctor
oS
kill
upgr
adin
g an
d tr
aini
ngo
Ent
repr
eneu
rial t
rain
ing
oJo
b re
adin
ess
trai
ning
oA
dult
educ
atio
n an
d lit
erac
y ac
tiviti
espr
ovid
ed in
com
bina
tion
with
the
abov
eac
tiviti
eso
Cus
tom
ized
trai
ning
con
duct
ed w
ith a
com
mitm
ent b
y an
em
ploy
er o
r gr
oup
ofem
ploy
ers
to e
mpl
oy a
n in
divi
dual
upo
nsu
cces
sful
com
plet
ion
of th
e tr
aini
ng
Per
mis
sibl
e A
ctiv
ities
for
Adu
lts a
ndP
erm
issi
ble
Act
iviti
es fo
r A
dults
(in
clud
ing
Dis
loca
ted
Wor
kers
:di
sloc
ated
wor
kers
): A
dds
the
follo
win
gC
usto
miz
ed tr
aini
ng a
nd r
efer
ral o
fac
tiviti
es:
qual
ified
trai
ning
par
ticip
ants
toC
usto
mer
sup
port
to n
avig
ate
amon
gem
ploy
men
tm
ultip
le s
ervi
ces
and
activ
ities
for
spec
ial
Cus
tom
ized
em
ploy
men
t-re
late
d se
rvic
espo
pula
tions
that
face
bar
riers
toto
em
ploy
ers
on a
fee-
for-
serv
ice
basi
sem
ploy
men
t, in
clud
ing
indi
vidu
als
with
Cen
ter
for
Law
and
Soc
ial P
olic
y15
Cur
rent
Law
Bus
h A
dmin
istr
atio
n's
Pro
posa
lH
ouse
Bill
(H
.R. 1
261)
Sup
port
ive
serv
ices
to p
artic
ipan
ts in
cor
e,in
tens
ive,
or
trai
ning
ser
vice
s w
ho a
reun
able
to o
btai
n su
ppor
tive
serv
ices
thro
ugh
othe
r pr
ogra
ms
disa
bilit
ies
Em
ploy
men
t and
trai
ning
ass
ista
nce
prov
ided
in c
oord
inat
ion
with
chi
ld s
uppo
rten
forc
emen
t act
iviti
esN
eeds
-rel
ated
pay
men
ts to
trai
ning
part
icip
ants
who
do
not q
ualif
y fo
r (o
r ha
vece
ased
to q
ualif
y fo
r) U
nem
ploy
men
tIn
sura
nce
Wor
k su
ppor
t act
iviti
es d
esig
ned
to a
ssis
tlo
w-w
age
wor
kers
in r
etai
ning
and
enha
ncin
g em
ploy
men
t, in
clud
ing
assi
stan
ce in
acc
essi
ng fi
nanc
ial s
uppo
rts,
prov
isio
n of
em
ploy
men
t and
trai
ning
activ
ities
dur
ing
nont
radi
tiona
l hou
rs, a
ndpr
ovis
ion
of o
n-si
te c
hild
car
eIn
cum
bent
wor
ker
trai
ning
pro
gram
s, in
whi
cho
Loca
l boa
rd m
ay u
se u
p to
10
perc
ent
of fu
nds.
oP
rogr
ams
mus
t be
carr
ied
out i
nco
njun
ctio
n w
ith e
mpl
oyer
s fo
r pu
rpos
e of
assi
stin
g w
orke
rs to
obt
ain
skill
sne
cess
ary
to r
etai
n em
ploy
meh
t and
ave
rtla
yoffs
.o
Em
ploy
ers
mus
t pay
a p
ortio
n of
cos
tas
est
ablis
hed
by g
over
nor
(or
dele
gate
dto
loca
l boa
rds)
: not
less
than
10
perc
ent
for
empl
oyer
s w
ith 5
0 or
few
er e
mpl
oyee
s;25
per
cent
for
empl
oyer
s w
ith m
ore
than
50, b
ut le
ss th
an 1
00 e
mpl
oyee
s; 5
0pe
rcen
t for
em
ploy
ers
with
100
or
mor
eem
ploy
ees.
oW
ages
pai
d by
em
ploy
er d
urin
gtr
aini
ng m
ay b
e co
unte
d to
war
d em
ploy
erpa
ymen
t.
Loca
lR
equi
red
Ser
vice
s fo
r Y
outh
:D
oes
not a
ddre
ss.
Req
uire
d S
ervi
ces
for
You
th:
Act
iviti
es:
Pre
para
tion
for
post
seco
ndar
y ed
ucat
iona
lP
rovi
des
that
ser
vice
s m
ust b
e di
rect
lyY
outh
oppo
rtun
ities
Str
ong
linka
ges
betw
een
acad
emic
and
occu
patio
nal l
earn
ing
Pre
para
tion
for
unsu
bsid
ized
em
ploy
men
top
port
uniti
esE
ffect
ive
conn
ectio
ns to
inte
rmed
iarie
sw
ith s
tron
g lin
ks to
the
job
mar
ket a
ndlo
cal a
nd r
egio
nal e
mpl
oyer
s
Req
uire
d P
rogr
am E
lem
ents
for
You
th:
linke
d to
one
or
mor
e of
the
law
'spe
rfor
man
ce o
utco
mes
.A
dds
activ
ities
lead
ing
to th
e at
tain
men
t of
high
sch
ool d
iplo
ma
or G
ED
(in
clud
ing
reco
gniz
ed a
ltern
ativ
e st
anda
rds
for
indi
vidu
als
with
dis
abili
ties)
.A
dds
prep
arat
ion
for
adva
nced
trai
ning
.C
hang
es s
tron
g lin
kage
s be
twee
noc
cupa
tiona
l lea
rnin
g by
add
ing
the
phra
se "
that
lead
to th
e at
tain
men
t of
Cen
ter
for
Law
and
Soc
ial P
olic
y16
Cur
rent
Law
Bus
h A
dmin
istr
atio
n's
Pro
posa
lH
ouse
Bill
(H
.R. 1
261)
Tut
orin
g, s
tudy
ski
lls tr
aini
ng, a
ndin
stru
ctio
n, le
adin
g to
com
plet
ion
ofse
cond
ary
scho
ol, i
nclu
ding
dro
pout
prev
entio
n st
rate
gies
Alte
rnat
ive
seco
ndar
y sc
hool
ser
vice
sS
umm
er e
mpl
oym
ent o
ppor
tuni
ties
that
are
dire
ctly
link
ed to
aca
dem
ic a
ndoc
cupa
tiona
l lea
rnin
g
reco
gniz
ed c
rede
ntia
ls."
Alte
rs e
ffect
ive
conn
ectio
ns to
inte
rmed
iarie
s to
"E
ffect
ive
conn
ectio
ns to
empl
oyer
s in
sec
tors
of t
he lo
cal l
abor
mar
ket e
xper
ienc
ing
high
gro
wth
inem
ploy
men
t opp
ortu
nitie
s."
Req
uire
d P
rogr
am E
lem
ents
for
You
th:
Pai
d an
d un
paid
wor
k ex
perie
nces
Add
s G
ED
pre
para
tion
Occ
upat
iona
l ski
lls tr
aini
ngA
dds
on-t
he jo
b tr
aini
ngLe
ader
ship
dev
elop
men
t opp
ortu
nitie
sA
dds
finan
cial
lite
racy
ski
llsS
uppo
rtiv
e se
rvic
esA
dult
men
torin
gF
ollo
w-u
p se
rvic
esC
ompr
ehen
sive
gui
danc
e an
d co
unse
ling
Elig
ibili
ty fo
rA
dults
and
dis
loca
ted
wor
kers
who
mee
t the
Pro
vide
gre
ater
flex
ibili
ty in
del
iver
y of
cor
e,A
dults
(in
clud
ing
disl
ocat
ed w
orke
rs)
who
Inte
nsiv
e an
dfo
llow
ing
crite
ria a
re e
ligib
le fo
r in
tens
ive
inte
nsiv
e, a
nd tr
aini
ng s
ervi
ces.
Indi
vidu
als
mee
t the
follo
win
g cr
iteria
are
elig
ible
for
Tra
inin
gse
rvic
es:
shou
ld h
ave
the
oppo
rtun
ity to
rec
eive
the
inte
nsiv
e se
rvic
es:
Ser
vice
sA
re u
nem
ploy
ed a
nd a
re u
nabl
e to
obt
ain
serv
ices
mos
t app
ropr
iate
for
thei
r un
ique
Are
une
mpl
oyed
and
are
det
erm
ined
by
empl
oym
ent t
hrou
gh c
ore
serv
ices
; and
Hav
e be
en d
eter
min
ed b
y a
one-
stop
need
s.th
e on
e-st
op o
pera
tor
to b
e un
likel
y or
unab
le to
obt
ain
suita
ble
empl
oym
ent
oper
ator
to b
e in
nee
d of
mor
e in
tens
ive
Rem
ove
any
barr
iers
to s
ervi
ng ta
rget
edth
roug
h co
re s
ervi
ces
and
in n
eed
ofse
rvic
es to
obt
ain
empl
oym
ent;
orpo
pula
tions
thou
gh a
com
preh
ensi
ve o
ne-s
top
inte
nsiv
e se
rvic
es in
ord
er to
obt
ain
Are
em
ploy
ed, b
ut a
re d
eter
min
ed b
y a
one-
stop
ope
rato
r to
nee
d in
tens
ive
syst
em.
suita
ble
empl
oym
ent;
orA
re e
mpl
oyed
, but
are
det
erm
ined
by
ase
rvic
es to
obt
ain
or r
etai
n em
ploy
men
tC
oncu
rren
t del
iver
y of
ser
vice
s su
ch a
s E
SL
one-
stop
ope
rato
r to
nee
d in
tens
ive
that
allo
ws
for
self-
suffi
cien
cy,
and
occu
patio
nal t
rain
ing
wou
ld a
lso
besp
ecifi
cally
aut
horiz
ed a
s ne
eded
.se
rvic
es to
obt
ain
or r
etai
n su
itabl
eem
ploy
men
t.A
dults
and
dis
loca
ted
wor
kers
who
mee
t the
follo
win
g cr
iteria
are
elig
ible
for
trai
ning
serv
ices
:Lo
cal a
reas
aut
horiz
ed to
pro
vide
a w
ide
rang
eof
ser
vice
s (e
.g.,
finan
cial
wor
k su
ppor
ts, s
uch
"Sui
tabl
e em
ploy
men
t" d
efin
ed b
y go
vern
or.
Hav
e m
et e
ligib
ility
req
uire
men
ts fo
ras
Foo
d S
tam
ps a
nd M
edic
aid
tran
sitio
nal
Adu
lts (
incl
udin
g di
sloc
ated
wor
kers
) w
hoin
tens
ive
serv
ices
and
are
una
ble
to o
btai
nas
sist
ance
, and
ret
entio
n an
d ad
vanc
emen
tm
eet t
he fo
llow
ing
crite
ria a
re e
ligib
le fo
ror
ret
ain
empl
oym
ent t
hrou
gh s
uch
serv
ices
, suc
h as
on-
site
chi
ld c
are
and
trai
ning
ser
vice
s:se
rvic
es;
Afte
r in
terv
iew
, eva
luat
ion,
or
asse
ssm
ent,
and
case
man
agem
ent,
have
bee
n
trai
ning
dur
ing
nont
radi
tiona
l hou
rs)
for
low
-w
age
wor
kers
that
wou
ld e
nhan
ce c
aree
rad
vanc
emen
t opp
ortu
nitie
s th
roug
h th
e on
e-
Afte
r in
terv
iew
, eva
luat
ion,
or
asse
ssm
ent,
and
case
man
agem
ent,
have
bee
nde
term
ined
by
a on
e-st
op o
pera
tor
or o
ne-
dete
rmin
ed b
y on
e-st
op o
pera
tor
orst
op s
yste
m. T
hese
sup
port
s an
d se
rvic
esst
op p
artn
er, a
s ap
prop
riate
, to:
part
ner
to n
eed
trai
ning
and
hav
e sk
ills
wou
ld b
e fu
nded
by
a va
riety
of o
ne-s
top
oB
e un
likel
y or
una
ble
to o
btai
n or
and
qual
ifica
tions
to s
ucce
ssfu
llypa
rtne
rs a
nd m
ade
avai
labl
e th
roug
h th
e on
e-re
tain
sui
tabl
e em
ploy
men
t thr
ough
part
icip
ate
in th
e se
lect
ed tr
aini
ng;
Sel
ect t
rain
ing
dire
ctly
link
ed to
empl
oym
ent o
ppor
tuni
ties
in th
e lo
cal a
rea
stop
sys
tem
.in
tens
ive
serv
ices
oB
e in
nee
d of
trai
ning
to o
btai
n or
reta
in s
uita
ble
empl
oym
ent;
and
Cen
ter
for
Law
and
Soc
ial P
olic
y17
Cur
rent
Law
Bus
h A
dmin
istr
atio
n's
Pro
posa
lH
ouse
Bill
(H
.R. 1
261)
or a
noth
er a
rea
whe
re w
illin
g to
rel
ocat
e;o
Hav
e th
e sk
ills
and
qual
ifica
tions
and
nece
ssar
y to
suc
cess
fully
par
ticip
ate
in th
eA
re u
nabl
e to
obt
ain
othe
r gr
ant
sele
cted
trai
ning
pro
gram
.as
sist
ance
, inc
ludi
ng P
ell g
rant
s, o
rS
elec
t tra
inin
g di
rect
ly li
nked
tore
quire
ass
ista
nce
beyo
nd o
ther
gra
ntem
ploy
men
t opp
ortu
nitie
s in
the
loca
l are
aas
sist
ance
, inc
ludi
ng P
ell g
rant
s.or
ano
ther
are
a w
here
will
ing
to c
omm
ute
Prio
rity
of s
ervi
ce s
houl
d be
pla
ced
onor
rel
ocat
e; o
rP
riorit
y fo
r in
tens
ive
and
trai
ning
ser
vice
sun
empl
oyed
wor
kers
. In
addi
tion,
if s
tate
Are
una
ble
to o
btai
n ot
her
gran
tgi
ven
to p
ublic
ass
ista
nce
reci
pien
ts a
nd lo
w-
dete
rmin
es th
at fu
nds
are
limite
d, a
sec
ond-
assi
stan
ce, i
nclu
ding
Pel
l gra
nts,
or
inco
me
indi
vidu
als
whe
n ad
ult f
unds
allo
cate
dtie
r pr
iorit
y w
ould
als
o be
pla
ced
on lo
w-
requ
ire a
ssis
tanc
e be
yond
oth
er g
rant
to a
loca
l are
a ar
e lim
ited,
inco
me
indi
vidu
als,
assi
stan
ce, i
nclu
ding
Pel
l gra
nts.
Am
ount
of fe
dera
l stu
dent
fina
ncia
l aid
rec
eive
dLo
w-I
ncom
e In
divi
dual
: An
indi
vidu
al w
ho:
may
be
take
n in
to a
ccou
nt in
det
erm
inin
g
,R
ecei
ves,
or
is a
mem
ber
of a
fam
ily th
atre
ceiv
es, c
ash
paym
ents
und
er a
fede
ral,
elig
ibili
ty.
stat
e, o
r lo
cal i
ncom
e-ba
sed
publ
icP
riorit
y fo
r in
tens
ive
and
trai
ning
ser
vice
sas
sist
ance
pro
gram
;gi
ven
to u
nem
ploy
ed in
divi
dual
s; if
fund
s in
aR
ecei
ved,
or
is a
mem
ber
of a
fam
ily th
atlo
cal a
rea
are
limite
d, p
riorit
y al
so g
iven
tore
ceiv
ed a
tota
l fam
ily in
com
e, fo
r th
e 6-
publ
ic a
ssis
tanc
e re
cipi
ents
and
oth
er lo
w-
mon
th p
erio
d pr
ior
to a
pplic
atio
n fo
r th
epr
ogra
m in
volv
ed, t
hat i
n re
latio
n to
fam
ily
0
inco
me
indi
vidu
als,
incl
udin
g si
ngle
par
ents
,di
spla
ced
hom
emak
ers,
and
pre
gnan
t sin
gle
size
, doe
s no
t exc
eed
the
high
er o
f the
pove
rty
line
or 7
0 pe
rcen
t of t
he lo
wer
livin
g st
anda
rd in
com
e le
vel;
wom
en.
Low
-Inc
ome
Indi
vidu
al: C
hang
es d
efin
ition
Is a
mem
ber
of a
hou
seho
ld th
at r
ecei
ved
so th
at in
com
e ca
nnot
exc
eed
the
pove
rty
line
(or
has
been
det
erm
ined
with
in th
e 6-
or th
e 70
per
cent
of t
he lo
wer
livi
ng s
tand
ard
mon
th p
erio
d pr
ior
to a
pplic
atio
n fo
r th
ein
com
e le
vel.
Add
s "r
ecei
ves
or is
elig
ible
topr
ogra
m in
volv
ed to
be
elig
ible
to r
ecei
ve)
rece
ive
free
or
redu
ced
pric
e lu
nch.
"F
ood
Sta
mps
;Q
ualif
ies
as a
hom
eles
s in
divi
dual
und
erth
e M
cKin
ney
Hom
eles
s A
ssis
tanc
e A
ct;
Is a
fost
er c
hild
on
beha
lf of
who
m s
tate
or
loca
l gov
ernm
ent p
aym
ents
are
mad
e; o
rIn
cas
es p
erm
itted
by
DO
L re
gula
tions
, is
an in
divi
dual
with
a d
isab
ility
who
se o
wn
inco
me
mee
ts o
ne o
f the
firs
t tw
ore
quire
men
ts a
bove
, but
who
se fa
mily
inco
me
does
not
.
i
Low
er L
ivin
g S
tand
ard
Inco
me
Leve
l: T
hat
Low
er L
ivin
g S
tand
ard
Inco
me
Leve
l:in
com
e le
vel (
adju
sted
for
regi
onal
,m
etro
polit
an, u
rban
, and
rur
al d
iffer
ence
s an
dfa
mily
siz
e) d
eter
min
ed a
nnua
lly b
y th
e
Rem
oves
def
initi
on.
Sec
reta
ry b
ased
on
the
mos
t rec
ent l
ower
Cen
ter
for
Law
and
Soc
ial P
olic
y18
Cur
rent
Law
Bus
h A
dmin
istr
atio
n's
Pro
posa
lH
ouse
Bill
(H
.R. 1
261)
livin
g fa
mily
bud
get i
ssue
d by
the
Sec
reta
ry.
Exp
and
ITA
s by
cha
ngin
g th
em in
to C
aree
rT
rain
ing
serv
ices
mus
t be
prov
ided
thou
gh u
seof
indi
vidu
al tr
aini
ng a
ccou
nts
(IT
As)
, with
the
Sch
olar
ship
s, w
hich
cou
ld b
e en
hanc
ed b
yad
ding
oth
er r
esou
rces
suc
h as
priv
ate
ITA
s m
ay in
clud
e, in
add
ition
to W
IA fu
nds,
fund
s fr
om o
ther
pro
gram
s an
d so
urce
s th
atfo
llow
ing
exce
ptio
ns, w
hich
allo
w fo
r co
ntra
cts:
On-
the-
job
trai
ning
or
cust
omiz
ed tr
aini
ng(e
mpl
oyer
pai
d) a
nd in
divi
dual
res
ourc
es to
faci
litat
e tr
aini
ng. C
aree
r S
chol
arsh
ips
wou
ldw
ill a
ssis
t ind
ivid
uals
in o
btai
ning
trai
ning
.
If th
e lo
cal b
oard
det
erm
ines
ther
e ar
e an
be a
vaila
ble
to u
nem
ploy
ed a
s w
ell a
s ce
rtai
nA
dds
indi
vidu
als
with
dis
abili
ties
to th
e lis
t of
insu
ffici
ent n
umbe
r of
elig
ible
trai
ning
prov
ider
s in
the
loca
l are
a to
acc
ompl
ish
the
purp
oses
of I
TA
s
grou
ps o
f em
ploy
ed w
orke
rs.
spec
ial p
opul
atio
ns fo
r th
e pu
rpos
es o
fco
ntra
ctin
g fo
r tr
aini
ng.
The
loca
l boa
rd d
eter
min
es th
ere
is a
trai
ning
pro
gram
of d
emon
stra
ted
effe
ctiv
enes
s of
fere
d in
the
loca
l are
a by
aco
mm
unity
-bas
ed o
rgan
izat
ion
or o
ther
priv
ate
orga
niza
tion
to s
erve
spe
cial
part
icip
ant p
opul
atio
ns th
at fa
ce m
ultip
leba
rrie
rs to
em
ploy
men
t, w
hich
incl
ude:
oIn
divi
dual
s w
ith s
ubst
antia
l lan
guag
eor
cul
tura
l bar
riers
oO
ffend
ers
oH
omel
ess
indi
vidu
als
oO
ther
har
d-to
-ser
ve p
opul
atio
ns a
sde
fined
by
gove
rnor
Sim
plify
the
requ
irem
ents
for
cust
omiz
edC
usto
miz
ed T
rain
ing
is d
efin
ed a
s tr
aini
ngtr
aini
ng, o
n-th
e-jo
b tr
aini
ng, a
nd in
cum
bent
Cus
tom
ized
Tra
inin
g: C
hang
es e
mpl
oyer
that
is d
esig
ned
to m
eet t
he s
peci
alw
orke
r tr
aini
ng in
a w
ay th
at w
ould
incr
ease
cont
ribut
ion
requ
irem
ent t
o "a
sig
nific
ant
requ
irem
ents
of a
n em
ploy
er (
incl
udin
g a
grou
p of
em
ploy
ers)
; tha
t is
cond
ucte
d w
ith a
com
mitm
ent b
y th
e em
ploy
er to
em
ploy
an
indi
vidu
al o
n su
cces
sful
com
plet
ion
of th
etr
aini
ng; a
nd fo
r w
hich
the
empl
oyer
pay
s fo
rno
t les
s th
an 5
0 pe
rcen
t of t
he c
ost o
f the
empl
oyer
util
izat
ion
of th
ese
tool
s w
hile
mai
ntai
ning
fisc
al in
tegr
ity. F
or e
xam
ple,
with
appr
oval
of t
he g
over
nor,
loca
l are
as c
ould
spen
d up
to 1
0 pe
rcen
t of t
heir
Adu
lt fu
nds
onin
cum
bent
wor
ker
trai
ning
. An
empl
oyer
mat
ch w
ould
be
requ
ired.
The
am
ount
of t
he
port
ion"
as
dete
rmin
ed b
y th
e lo
cal b
oard
.
trai
ning
,m
atch
wou
ld b
e de
term
ined
acc
ordi
ng to
the
size
of t
he e
mpl
oyer
.,
Elig
ibili
ty fo
rE
ligib
le Y
outh
: An
indi
vidu
al w
ho is
not
less
Doe
s no
t add
ress
.R
emov
es c
urre
nt d
efin
ition
s of
elig
ible
you
thY
outh
Ser
vice
sth
an a
ge 1
4 an
d no
t mor
e th
an a
ge 2
1 w
ho is
a lo
w-in
com
e in
divi
dual
and
is a
n in
divi
dual
with
one
or
mor
e of
the
follo
win
g: d
efic
ient
inba
sic
liter
acy
skill
s; a
sch
ool d
ropo
ut;
hom
eles
s, a
run
away
, or
a fo
ster
chi
ld;
preg
nant
or
a pa
rent
; an
offe
nder
; an
indi
vidu
alw
ho r
equi
res
addi
tiona
l ass
ista
nce
to c
ompl
ete
an e
duca
tiona
l pro
gram
, or
to s
ecur
e an
d ho
ldem
ploy
men
t,
and
out-
of-s
choo
l you
th.
Out
-of-
Sch
ool a
re e
ligib
le if
they
are
not
youn
ger
than
age
16
or o
lder
than
age
24
and
one
or m
ore
of th
e fo
llow
ing:
sch
ool d
ropo
uts;
reci
pien
ts o
f a s
econ
dary
sch
ool d
iplo
ma
orG
ED
who
are
def
icie
nt in
bas
ic s
kills
; cou
rt-
invo
lved
you
th a
ttend
ing
an a
ltern
ativ
e sc
hool
;yo
uth
in fo
ster
car
e or
who
hav
e be
en in
fost
er
Cen
ter
for
Law
and
Soc
ial P
olic
y19
Cur
rent
Law
Bus
h A
dmin
istr
atio
n's
Pro
posa
lH
ouse
Bill
(H
.R. 1
261)
Out
-of-
Sch
ool Y
outh
: An
elig
ible
you
th w
hois
a s
choo
l dro
pout
or
an e
ligib
le y
outh
who
has
rece
ived
a s
econ
dary
sch
ool d
iplo
ma
or it
seq
uiva
lent
but
is b
asic
ski
lls d
efic
ient
,un
empl
oyed
, or
unde
rem
ploy
ed.
care
.
In-S
choo
l You
th a
re e
ligib
le if
they
are
low
-in
com
e in
divi
dual
s an
d on
e or
mor
e of
the
follo
win
g:D
efic
ient
in li
tera
cy s
kills
Hom
eles
s, r
unaw
ay, o
r fo
ster
chi
ldre
nP
regn
ant o
r pa
rent
sO
ffend
ers
Indi
vidu
als
who
req
uire
add
ition
alas
sist
ance
to c
ompl
ete
an e
duca
tiona
lpr
ogra
m, o
r to
sec
ure
and
hold
empl
oym
ent
Giv
es p
riorit
y fo
r se
rvic
es to
sch
ool d
ropo
uts.
Sta
teP
erfo
rman
ceA
ccou
ntab
ility
_.
Cor
e In
dica
tors
for
Adu
lts a
nd O
lder
You
th(1
9-21
):E
ntry
into
uns
ubsi
dize
d em
ploy
men
tR
eten
tion
in u
nsub
sidi
zed
empl
oym
ent 6
mon
ths
afte
r en
try
into
em
ploy
men
tE
arni
ngs
chan
ge 6
mon
ths
afte
r en
try
into
empl
oym
ent
Cre
dent
ial r
ate
amon
g th
ose
who
ent
erin
to u
nsub
sidi
zed
empl
oym
ent (
for
olde
ryo
uth,
cre
dent
ial r
ate
amon
g th
ose
who
ente
r in
to p
osts
econ
dary
edu
catio
n,ad
vanc
ed tr
aini
ng, o
r un
subs
idiz
edem
ploy
men
t)
Cor
e In
dica
tors
for
Dis
loca
ted
Wor
kers
:E
ntry
into
uns
ubsi
dize
d em
ploy
men
tR
eten
tion
in u
nsub
sidi
zed
empl
oym
ent 6
mon
ths
afte
r en
try
into
em
ploy
men
tE
arni
ngs
repl
acem
ent r
ate
Cre
dent
ial r
ate
amon
g th
ose
who
ent
erin
to u
nsub
sidi
zed
empl
oym
ent (
for
olde
ryo
uth,
cre
dent
ial r
ate
amon
g th
ose
who
ente
r in
to p
osts
econ
dary
edu
catio
n,ad
vanc
ed tr
aini
ng, o
r un
subs
idiz
edem
ploy
men
t
The
abo
ve in
dica
tors
exc
lude
indi
vidu
als
who
part
icip
ate
in o
nly
self-
serv
ice
and
Cha
nges
sho
uld
be m
ade
to c
urre
ntpe
rfor
man
ce a
ccou
ntab
ility
sys
tem
to e
nsur
elo
cal p
rogr
am o
pera
tors
are
not
driv
en a
way
from
ser
ving
thos
e m
ost i
n ne
ed.
Cur
rent
indi
cato
rs w
ould
be
repl
aced
by
the
8in
dica
tors
(4
for
yout
h an
d 4
for
adul
ts)
bein
gde
velo
ped
by th
e fe
dera
l par
tner
age
ncie
s as
part
of a
new
com
mon
mea
sure
s in
itiat
ive
for
empl
oym
ent a
nd jo
b tr
aini
ng p
rogr
ams.
Som
efe
dera
l par
tner
s m
ay r
etai
n ot
her
mea
sure
s of
impo
rtan
ce to
thei
r pr
ogra
ms.
As
part
of t
he c
omm
on m
easu
res
initi
ativ
e, th
eco
re s
et o
f mea
sure
s w
ould
als
o ha
ve a
com
mon
set
of d
efin
ition
s an
d da
ta s
ets.
Est
ablis
h lo
ng-t
erm
nat
iona
l per
form
ance
goal
s th
roug
h no
tice
and
com
men
t rul
emak
ing.
The
se n
atio
nal t
arge
ts w
ould
form
the
basi
s of
stat
e-le
vel n
egot
iatio
ns, w
ith th
e in
divi
dual
stat
e-ne
gotia
ted
leve
ls a
vera
ging
the
esta
blis
hed
natio
nal t
arge
ts. A
mor
e dy
nam
icpe
rfor
man
ce n
egot
iatio
n pr
oces
s sh
ould
be
desi
gned
that
wou
ld ta
ke in
to a
ccou
nt lo
cal
labo
r m
arke
t nee
ds a
nd th
e ch
arac
teris
tics
ofin
divi
dual
s be
ing
serv
ed. S
tron
ger
lang
uage
shou
ld b
e ad
ded
to th
e st
atut
e to
enc
oura
ge
Cor
e In
dica
tors
for
Adu
lts:
Elim
inat
es c
rede
ntia
l rat
e m
easu
re.
Add
s ef
ficie
ncy
of p
rogr
am in
obt
aini
ngem
ploy
men
t, re
tent
ion,
and
ear
ning
sm
easu
res.
Elim
inat
es e
xclu
sion
of i
ndiv
idua
ls w
hopa
rtic
ipat
e in
onl
y se
lf-se
rvic
e an
din
form
atio
nal a
ctiv
ities
.
Cen
ter
for
Law
and
Soc
ial P
olic
y20
Cur
rent
Law
Bus
h A
dmin
istr
atio
n's
Pro
posa
lH
ouse
Bill
(H
.R. 1
261)
info
rmat
iona
l act
iviti
es,
all l
evel
s of
the
syst
em to
take
a v
arie
ty o
ffa
ctor
s in
to a
ccou
nt w
hen
esta
blis
hing
leve
lsC
ore
Indi
cato
rs fo
r Y
oung
er Y
outh
(14
-18)
:of
per
form
ance
. Suc
h fa
ctor
s co
uld
incl
ude
Cor
e In
dica
tors
for
You
th (
16-2
4):
Atta
inm
ent o
f bas
ic s
kills
and
, as
diffe
renc
es in
eco
nom
ic c
ondi
tions
, suc
h as
Red
efin
es m
easu
res
as fo
llow
s:ap
prop
riate
, wor
k re
adin
ess
orth
e ra
te o
f job
cre
atio
n or
loss
, and
diff
eren
ces
Ent
ry in
to e
mpl
oym
ent,
educ
atio
n or
occu
patio
nal s
kills
;in
par
ticip
ant c
hara
cter
istic
s, s
uch
asad
vanc
ed tr
aini
ng, o
r m
ilita
ry s
ervi
ceA
ttain
men
t of h
igh
scho
ol d
iplo
mas
and
indi
cato
rs o
f poo
r w
ork
hist
ory
or w
elfa
reA
ttain
men
t of h
igh
scho
ol d
iplo
ma
or G
ED
thei
r re
cogn
ized
equ
ival
ents
; and
Pla
cem
ent a
nd r
eten
tion
in p
osts
econ
dary
educ
atio
n or
adv
ance
d tr
aini
ng, o
rpl
acem
ent a
nd r
eten
tion
in m
ilita
ry s
ervi
ce,
empl
oym
ent,
or q
ualif
ied
appr
entic
eshi
ps.
depe
nden
cy.
(incl
udin
g re
cogn
ized
alte
rnat
ive
stan
dard
sfo
r in
divi
dual
s w
ith d
isab
ilitie
s)A
ttain
men
t of l
itera
cy o
r nu
mer
acy
skill
sE
ffici
ency
of p
rogr
am in
obt
aini
ng th
eou
tcom
es a
bove
Cus
tom
er S
atis
fact
ion
Indi
cato
rs:
Cus
tom
er S
atis
fact
ion
Indi
cato
rs:
Cus
tom
er s
atis
fact
ion
of e
mpl
oyer
s an
dpa
rtic
ipan
ts, w
hich
may
be
mea
sure
dth
roug
h su
rvey
s co
nduc
ted
afte
r th
eco
nclu
sion
of p
artic
ipat
ion
in a
ctiv
ities
.
Elim
inat
es r
equi
rem
ent f
or c
usto
mer
satis
fact
ion
indi
cato
rs.
Sta
te A
djus
ted
Leve
ls o
f Per
form
ance
: Set
for
two
year
s, c
onsi
sten
t with
new
pro
visi
on fo
rS
tate
Adj
uste
d Le
vels
of P
erfo
rman
ce: S
etfo
r fir
st th
ree
year
s; a
djus
ted
leve
ls fo
r fo
urth
and
fifth
yea
rs s
et p
rior
to fo
urth
yea
r.
Fac
tors
take
n in
to a
ccou
nt in
adj
ustin
g
2-ye
ar s
tate
and
loca
l pla
ns.
Per
form
ance
leve
ls s
hall
be a
djus
ted
base
don
fact
ors
in c
urre
nt la
w w
ith th
e fo
llow
ing
revi
sion
s:pe
rfor
man
ce le
vels
:E
xten
t to
whi
ch le
vels
will
ass
ist s
tate
inat
tain
ing
high
leve
l of c
usto
mer
satis
fact
ion;
How
leve
ls c
ompa
re w
ith a
djus
ted
leve
lsof
oth
er s
tate
s ta
king
into
acc
ount
fact
ors
incl
udin
g di
ffere
nces
in e
cono
mic
cond
ition
s, p
artic
ipan
t cha
ract
eris
tics
aten
try,
and
ser
vice
s to
be
prov
ided
; and
Ext
ent t
o w
hich
leve
ls p
rom
ote
cont
inuo
usim
prov
emen
t in
perf
orm
ance
and
ens
ure
optim
al r
etur
n on
inve
stm
ent o
f fed
eral
fund
s.
Elim
inat
es c
onsi
dera
tion
of w
heth
er le
vels
will
ass
ist t
he s
tate
in a
ttain
ing
a hi
gh le
vel
of c
usto
mer
sat
isfa
ctio
n.P
rovi
des
that
taki
ng in
to a
ccou
nt e
cono
mic
cond
ition
s w
hen
setti
ng p
erfo
rman
cele
vels
incl
udes
con
side
ratio
ns "
such
as
unem
ploy
men
t rat
es a
nd jo
b lo
sses
or
gain
s in
par
ticul
ar in
dust
ries.
"P
rovi
des
that
con
side
ratio
n of
par
ticip
ant
char
acte
ristic
s w
hen
setti
ng p
erfo
rman
cele
vels
incl
udes
cor
isid
erat
ions
"su
ch a
sin
dica
tors
of p
oor
wor
k hi
stor
y, la
ck o
fw
ork
expe
rienc
e, lo
w le
vels
of l
itera
cy o
rE
nglis
h pr
ofic
ienc
y, d
isab
ility
sta
tus,
and
wel
fare
dep
ende
ncy.
"
Loca
lLo
cal p
erfo
rman
ce m
easu
res
cons
ist o
f the
Loca
l per
form
ance
mea
sure
s w
ould
con
sist
of
Fac
tors
take
n in
to a
ccou
nt in
adj
ustin
gP
erfo
rman
cesa
me
core
indi
cato
rs a
nd c
usto
mer
the
sam
e co
re in
dica
tors
req
uire
d fo
r st
ates
.pe
rfor
man
ce le
vels
: Sam
e se
t of f
acto
rsA
ccou
ntab
ility
satis
fact
ion
indi
cato
rs r
equi
red
for
stat
es.
Gov
erno
rs w
ould
hav
e au
thor
ity to
add
addi
tiona
l mea
sure
s fo
r us
e w
ithin
thei
r st
ate.
cons
ider
ed fo
r st
ates
will
be
cons
ider
ed w
hen
loca
l are
a pe
rfor
man
ce le
vels
are
set
; in
Cen
ter
for
Law
and
Soc
ial P
olic
y21
Cur
rent
Law
Bus
h A
dmin
istr
atio
n's
Pro
posa
lH
ouse
Bill
(H
.R. 1
261)
addi
tion,
dis
abili
ty s
tatu
s of
par
ticip
ants
will
be
cons
ider
ed.
A lo
cal a
rea
subj
ect t
o a
reor
gani
zatio
n pl
anfo
r fa
iling
to m
eet p
erfo
rman
ce le
vels
for
2co
nsec
utiv
e ye
ars,
may
app
eal t
o th
e go
vern
orto
res
cind
or
revi
se th
e pl
an w
ithin
30
days
of
rece
ivin
g no
tice.
With
in 3
0 da
ys o
f rec
eivi
ngth
e de
cisi
on o
f the
gov
erno
r, s
tate
may
app
eal
to S
ecre
tary
.
Incl
udes
lang
uage
that
req
uire
s st
ates
toes
tabl
ish
fisca
l and
man
agem
ent
acco
unta
bilit
y in
form
atio
n sy
stem
s th
at u
tiliz
equ
arte
rly w
ages
rec
ords
and
adh
ere
to F
amily
Edu
catio
nal R
ight
s an
d P
rivac
y A
ct.
Elim
inat
es r
ight
to a
ppea
l to
Sec
reta
ry a
fter
unsu
cces
sful
app
eal t
o go
vern
or if
loca
l are
asa
nctio
ned
for
failu
re to
mee
t per
form
ance
stan
dard
s.
Sec
reta
ry m
ay a
war
d gr
ants
to s
tate
s fo
rex
empl
ary
perf
orm
ance
on
mea
sure
sde
scrib
ed a
bove
, on
serv
ing
spec
ial
popu
latio
ns, a
nd o
ther
fact
ors
as d
eter
min
edby
Sec
reta
ry. G
over
nors
may
aw
ard
gran
ts to
loca
l are
as fo
r ex
empl
ary
perf
orm
ance
on
mea
sure
s de
scrib
ed a
bove
and
on
serv
ing
spec
ial p
opul
atio
ns.
Rep
ortin
gR
equi
rem
ents
Dat
a R
epor
ts: S
tate
and
loca
l boa
rds
requ
ired
to m
ake
acce
ssib
le r
epor
ts w
ith in
form
atio
nre
gard
ing
prog
ram
s an
d ac
tiviti
es c
arrie
d ou
tpe
rtai
ning
to:
Doe
s no
t add
ress
.
Rel
evan
t dem
ogra
phic
cha
ract
eris
tics
(incl
udin
g ra
ce, e
thni
city
, sex
, and
age
)an
d ot
her
rela
ted
info
rmat
ion
rega
rdin
gpa
rtic
ipan
tsP
rogr
ams
and
activ
ities
in w
hich
part
icip
ants
are
enr
olle
d, a
nd le
ngth
of
time
that
par
ticip
ants
are
eng
aged
in s
uch
prog
ram
s an
d ac
tiviti
esO
utco
mes
for
part
icip
ants
, inc
ludi
ng th
eoc
cupa
tions
and
pla
cem
ent i
nno
ntra
ditio
nal e
mpl
oym
ent
Spe
cifie
d co
sts
of th
e pr
ogra
ms
and
activ
ities
Info
rmat
ion
nece
ssar
y to
pre
pare
rep
orts
to c
ompl
y w
ith n
ondi
scrim
inat
ion
prov
isio
ns
.
Sta
te A
nnua
l Rep
orts
: At m
inim
um, m
ust
incl
ude
info
rmat
ion
on p
artic
ipan
ts r
elat
ing
to:
. Ent
ry in
to e
mpl
oym
ent r
elat
ed to
trai
ning
rece
ived
Sta
te A
nnua
l Rep
orts
: Req
uire
s pe
rfor
man
cein
dica
tors
to in
clud
e pa
rtic
ipan
ts w
ho r
ecei
ved
only
sel
f-se
rvic
e an
d in
form
atio
nal a
ctiv
ities
.
Wag
es a
t em
ploy
men
t ent
ryA
dds
lang
uage
sta
ting
that
in p
repa
ring
repo
rts
"Sta
tes
shal
l est
ablis
h pr
oced
ures
, con
sist
ent
Cen
ter
for
Law
and
Soc
ial P
olic
y22
Cur
rent
Law
Bus
h A
dmin
istr
atio
n's
Pro
posa
lH
ouse
Bill
(H
.R. 1
261)
Cos
t of a
ctiv
ities
rel
ativ
e to
effe
ct o
npa
rtic
ipan
t per
form
ance
Ret
entio
n an
d ea
rnin
gs 1
2 m
onth
s af
ter
empl
oym
ent e
ntry
with
gui
delin
es is
sued
by
the
Sec
reta
ry, t
oen
sure
the
info
rmat
ion
cont
aine
d in
the
repo
rtis
val
id a
nd r
elia
ble.
"
Per
form
ance
on
indi
cato
rs fo
r pa
rtic
ipan
tsw
ho r
ecei
ve tr
aini
ng c
ompa
red
to th
ose
.
who
rec
eive
d on
ly s
ervi
ces
othe
r th
antr
aini
ng (
excl
udin
g pa
rtic
ipan
ts w
hore
ceiv
ed o
nly
self-
serv
ice
and
info
rmat
iona
l act
iviti
es)
Per
form
ance
on
indi
cato
rs b
y pu
blic
assi
stan
ce r
ecip
ient
s, o
ut-o
f-sc
hool
you
th,
vete
rans
, ind
ivid
uals
with
dis
abili
ties,
disp
lace
d ho
mem
aker
s, a
nd o
lder
indi
vidu
als
Qua
rter
ly F
inan
cial
Rep
orts
: Loc
al b
oard
sre
quire
d to
sub
mit
quar
terly
fina
ncia
l rep
orts
toth
e go
vern
or w
ith r
espe
ct to
pro
gram
s an
dac
tiviti
es c
arrie
d ou
t. R
epor
ts r
equi
red
toin
clud
e in
form
atio
n id
entif
ying
all
prog
ram
and
activ
ity c
osts
by
cost
cat
egor
y in
acc
orda
nce
with
gen
eral
ly a
ccep
ted
acco
untin
g pr
inci
ples
and
by y
ear
of th
e ap
prop
riatio
n in
volv
ed.
Sta
tes
requ
ired
to s
ubm
it su
mm
ary
repo
rts
toS
ecre
tary
on
a qu
arte
rly b
asis
.
Fis
cal M
anag
emen
t and
Acc
ount
abili
tyS
yste
m: G
over
nor,
in c
oord
inat
ion
with
loca
lbo
ards
and
chi
ef e
lect
ed o
ffici
als
in th
e st
ate,
requ
ired
to e
stab
lish
and
oper
ate
a fis
cal a
ndm
anag
emen
t acc
ount
abili
ty in
form
atio
nsy
stem
bas
ed o
n gu
idel
ines
est
ablis
hed
by th
e
.
Sec
reta
ry a
fter
cons
ulta
tion
with
the
gove
rnor
s, lo
cal e
lect
ed o
ffici
als,
and
one
-sto
ppa
rtne
rs. G
uide
lines
req
uire
d to
pro
mot
eef
ficie
nt c
olle
ctio
n an
d us
e of
fisc
al a
ndm
anag
emen
t inf
orm
atio
n fo
r re
port
ing
and
mon
itorin
g th
e us
e of
fund
s.
Tec
hnic
alR
equi
res
Sec
reta
ry to
pro
vide
, coo
rdin
ate,
and
Doe
s no
t add
ress
.A
dds
lang
uage
that
req
uire
s S
ecre
tary
to a
lso
Ass
ista
nce
supp
ort d
evel
opm
ent o
f app
ropr
iate
trai
ning
,te
chni
cal a
ssis
tanc
e, s
taff
deve
lopm
ent,
and
othe
r ac
tiviti
es, i
nclu
ding
ass
ista
nce
in
prov
ide
tech
nica
l ass
ista
nce
that
incl
udes
trai
ning
of s
taff
prov
idin
g ra
pid
resp
onse
serv
ices
, the
trai
ning
of o
ther
WIA
sta
ff, p
eer
Cen
ter
for
Law
and
Soc
ial P
olic
y23
Cur
rent
Law
Bus
h A
dmin
istr
atio
n's
Pro
posa
lH
ouse
Bill
(H
.R. 1
261)
repl
icat
ing
prog
ram
s of
dem
onst
rate
def
fect
iven
ess,
revi
ew a
ctiv
ities
, and
ass
ista
nce
rega
rdin
gac
coun
ting
and
prog
ram
ope
ratio
n pr
actic
es(w
hen
such
ass
ista
nce
wou
ld n
ot b
edu
plic
ativ
e to
ass
ista
nce
prov
ided
by
the
stat
e).
Pro
vide
s fo
r di
sloc
ated
wor
ker
tech
nica
las
sist
ance
to s
tate
s no
t mee
ting
perf
orm
ance
mea
sure
s fo
r di
sloc
ated
wor
kers
, for
cont
inuo
us im
prov
emen
t of d
islo
cate
d w
orke
rse
rvic
es, a
nd tr
aini
ng o
f sta
ff w
ho p
rovi
dera
pid
resp
onse
ser
vice
s,
Elim
inat
es d
islo
cate
d w
orke
r te
chni
cal
assi
stan
ce.
Req
uire
s S
ecre
tary
to e
stab
lish
a sy
stem
for
stat
es to
sha
re b
est p
ract
ices
info
rmat
ion.
Dem
onst
ratio
nD
emon
stra
tion
and
Pilo
t Pro
ject
s: S
ecre
tary
Doe
s no
t add
ress
.D
emon
stra
tion
and
Pilo
t Pro
ject
s:an
d R
esea
rch
requ
ired
to c
arry
out
, thr
ough
gra
nts
and
Res
truc
ture
s al
low
able
pro
ject
s to
incl
ude
the
Pro
ject
sco
ntra
cts,
dem
onst
ratio
n an
d pi
lot p
roje
cts
that
follo
win
g:in
clud
e pr
ovis
ion
of d
irect
ser
vice
s to
indi
vidu
als
to e
nhan
ce e
mpl
oym
ent
oppo
rtun
ities
and
an
eval
uatio
n co
mpo
nent
.P
roje
cts
may
incl
ude:
Est
ablis
hmen
t of a
dvan
ced
man
ufac
turin
gte
chno
logy
ski
ll ce
nter
s
Ass
ista
nce
to n
atio
nal e
mpl
oyer
s in
conn
ectin
g w
ith th
e w
orkf
orce
inve
stm
ent
syst
em to
faci
litat
e re
crui
tmen
t and
empl
oym
ent o
f nee
ded
wor
kers
and
topr
ovid
e in
form
atio
n to
suc
h sy
stem
on
skill
s an
d oc
cupa
tions
in d
eman
dS
kills
upg
rade
trai
ning
for
empl
oyed
wor
kers
who
res
ide
and
are
empl
oyed
inen
terp
rise
com
mun
ities
and
em
pow
erm
ent
zone
sJo
int p
rogr
ams
with
Dep
artm
ent o
fD
efen
se to
dev
elop
trai
ning
usi
ngco
mpu
ter-
base
d an
d ot
her
inno
vativ
ele
arni
ng te
chno
logi
esP
rom
otio
n of
dis
tanc
e le
arni
ngA
ssis
tanc
e in
pro
vidi
ng c
ompr
ehen
sive
serv
ices
to in
crea
se e
mpl
oym
ent r
ates
of
out-
of-s
choo
l you
th r
esid
ing
in ta
rget
hig
h-po
vert
y ar
eas
with
in e
mpo
wer
men
t zon
esan
d en
terp
rise
com
mun
ities
Par
tner
ship
s w
ith n
atio
nal o
rgan
izat
ions
with
exp
ertis
e in
em
ploy
men
t and
trai
ning
serv
ices
for
indi
vidu
als
with
dis
abili
ties
Ass
istin
g pu
blic
hou
sing
aut
horit
ies
that
prov
ide
publ
ic h
ousi
ng r
esid
ents
with
job
trai
ning
that
dem
onst
rate
s su
cces
s in
upgr
adin
g sk
ills
and
prom
otin
gem
ploy
men
tA
ssis
ting
loca
l are
as to
dev
elop
and
Pro
mot
ing
deve
lopm
ent o
f sys
tem
s th
atw
ill im
prov
e pr
ogra
m e
ffect
iven
ess
and
effic
ienc
yO
ppor
tuni
ties
for
empl
oym
ent i
n in
dust
ries
and
sect
ors
of in
dust
ries
that
are
expe
rienc
ing
or a
re li
kely
to e
xper
ienc
ehi
gh r
ates
of g
row
thS
tate
and
loca
l pro
ject
s to
test
inno
vativ
eap
proa
ches
to d
eliv
erin
g em
ploy
men
t-re
late
d se
rvic
esP
artn
ersh
ips
with
nat
iona
l org
aniz
atio
nsw
ith e
xper
tise
in e
mpl
oym
ent a
nd tr
aini
ngse
rvic
es fo
r in
divi
dual
s w
ith d
isab
ilitie
sA
ssis
ting
publ
ic h
ousi
ng a
utho
ritie
s th
atpr
ovid
e pu
blic
hou
sing
res
iden
ts w
ith jo
btr
aini
ng th
at d
emon
stra
tes
succ
ess
inup
grad
ing
skill
s an
d pr
omot
ing
empl
oym
ent
Pro
ject
s th
at p
rovi
de r
eten
tion
gran
ts to
qual
ified
job
trai
ning
pro
gram
s up
onpl
acem
ent o
r re
tent
ion
of a
low
-inco
me
indi
vidu
al tr
aine
d by
that
pro
gram
inem
ploy
men
t with
a s
ingl
e em
ploy
er fo
r a
Cen
ter
for
Law
and
Soc
ial P
olic
y24
Cur
rent
Law
Bus
h A
dmin
istr
atio
n's
Pro
posa
lH
ouse
Bill
(H
.R. 1
261)
impl
emen
t sel
f-su
ffici
ency
sta
ndar
ds to
eval
uate
deg
ree
to w
hich
par
ticip
ants
are
achi
evin
g se
lf-su
ffici
ency
Ent
ities
elig
ible
to r
ecei
ve g
rant
s an
d co
ntra
cts
incl
ude: Tho
se w
ith e
xper
tise
in:
oC
ondu
ctin
g na
tiona
l dem
onst
ratio
npr
ojec
ts;
oU
tiliz
ing
stat
e-of
-the
-art
dem
onst
ratio
nm
etho
ds; o
ro
Con
duct
ing
eval
uatio
ns o
f wor
kfor
cein
vest
men
t pro
ject
s; o
rS
tate
and
loca
l ent
ities
with
exp
ertis
e in
oper
atin
g or
ove
rsee
ing
wor
kfor
cein
vest
men
t pro
gram
s.
Res
earc
h P
roje
cts:
Req
uire
s S
ecre
tary
toca
rry
out r
esea
rch
proj
ects
, thr
ough
gra
nts
and
cont
ract
s th
at w
ill c
ontr
ibut
e to
the
solu
tion
ofem
ploy
men
t pro
blem
s in
the
U.S
.
perio
d of
1 y
ear;
suc
h em
ploy
men
t mus
tpr
ovid
e in
com
e of
not
less
than
200
perc
ent o
f pov
erty
Elim
inat
es d
islo
cate
d w
orke
r pr
ojec
ts.
Elim
inat
es la
ngua
ge a
bout
elig
ible
ent
ities
.
.
Res
earc
h P
roje
cts:
Add
s re
quire
men
t tha
tS
ecre
tary
con
duct
stu
dies
to d
eter
min
e ne
tim
pact
s of
pro
gram
s, s
ervi
ces,
and
act
iviti
es.
Sec
reta
ry r
equi
red
to d
isse
min
ate
publ
icre
port
s co
ntai
ning
res
ults
of s
tudi
es.
Adm
inis
trat
ive
Pro
visi
ons
Pro
gram
Yea
r: W
ith th
e ex
cept
ion
of y
outh
fund
s, a
ppro
pria
tions
sha
ll be
ava
ilabl
e fo
rob
ligat
ion
only
on
the
basi
s of
a p
rogr
am y
ear,
whi
ch s
hall
begi
n on
Jul
y 1
in th
e fis
cal y
ear
for
whi
ch th
e ap
prop
riatio
n is
mad
e. Y
outh
fund
s sh
all b
e av
aila
ble
for
oblig
atio
nbe
ginn
ing
Apr
il 1
in th
e fis
cal y
ear
for
whi
chth
e ap
prop
riatio
n is
mad
e.
Grie
vanc
e P
roce
dure
: Req
uire
s S
ecre
tary
toin
vest
igat
e al
lega
tions
of v
iola
tions
if d
ecis
ion
rela
ting
to v
iola
tion
has
not b
een
reac
hed
with
in 6
0 da
ys a
nd e
ither
par
ty a
ppea
ls to
Sec
reta
ry o
r a
deci
sion
has
bee
n re
ache
dw
ithin
60
days
and
par
ty to
whi
ch d
ecis
ion
isad
vers
e ap
peal
s to
Sec
reta
ry.
Non
disc
rimin
atio
n: P
rohi
bits
dis
crim
inat
ion
inpa
rtic
ipat
ion,
ben
efits
, or
empl
oym
ent b
ecau
seof
rac
e, c
olor
, rel
igio
n, s
ex, n
atio
nal o
rigin
,ag
e, d
isab
ility
, or
polit
ical
affi
liatio
n or
bel
ief.
Doe
s no
t add
ress
.P
rogr
am Y
ear:
All
appr
opria
tions
sha
ll be
avai
labl
e fo
r ob
ligat
ion
only
on
the
basi
s of
apr
ogra
m y
ear,
whi
ch s
hall
begi
n on
Jul
y 1
inth
e fis
cal y
ear
for
whi
ch th
e ap
prop
riatio
n is
mad
e.
Grie
vanc
e P
roce
dure
: Elim
inat
esre
quire
men
t for
Sec
reta
ry to
inve
stig
ate,
but
says
Sec
reta
ry m
ay in
vest
igat
e.
Non
disc
rimin
atio
n: A
llow
s re
cipi
ent o
f WIA
fund
s th
at is
a r
elig
ious
cor
pora
tion,
asso
ciat
ion,
edu
catio
nal i
nstit
utio
n, o
r so
ciet
yto
dis
crim
inat
e in
em
ploy
men
t on
the
basi
s of
relig
ion.
Wai
vers
Sec
reta
ry m
ay w
aive
, for
any
sta
te o
r lo
cal
Sta
tuto
ry li
mita
tions
to in
crea
sed
wai
ver
In li
eu o
f cur
rent
wai
ver
requ
est s
ubm
issi
on
Cen
ter
for
Law
and
Soc
ial P
olic
y25
Cur
rent
Law
Bus
h A
dmin
istr
atio
n's
Pro
posa
lH
ouse
Bill
(H
.R. 1
261)
area
, any
WIA
sta
tuto
ry o
r re
gula
tory
auth
ority
sho
uld
be r
emov
ed. W
aive
r pr
oces
sal
low
s S
ecre
tary
to e
stab
lish
requ
irem
ent (
exce
pt r
equi
rem
ents
rel
atin
gw
age
and
labo
r st
anda
rds,
incl
udin
gno
ndis
plac
emen
t pro
tect
ions
, wor
ker
right
s,pa
rtic
ipat
ion
and
prot
ectio
n of
wor
kers
and
part
icip
ants
, grie
vanc
e pr
oced
ures
and
judi
cial
revi
ew, n
ondi
scrim
inat
ion,
allo
catio
n of
fund
sto
loca
l are
as, e
ligib
ility
of p
rovi
ders
or
part
icip
ants
, the
est
ablis
hmen
t and
func
tions
.
of lo
cal a
rea
and
loca
l boa
rds,
and
pro
cedu
res
for
revi
ew a
nd a
ppro
val o
f pla
ns)
and
cert
ain
spec
ified
Wag
ner-
Pey
ser
stat
utor
y an
dre
gula
tory
req
uire
men
ts.
Gov
erno
r re
ques
ting
a w
aive
r re
quire
d to
subm
it a
plan
to S
ecre
tary
des
crib
ing
requ
irem
ents
to b
e w
aive
d, a
ctio
ns ta
ken
tore
mov
e st
ate
or lo
cal s
tatu
tory
or
regu
lato
ryw
aive
rs, g
oal o
f wai
ver
and
expe
cted
outc
omes
, ind
ivid
uals
impa
cted
, pro
cess
use
dto
mon
itor
impl
emen
tatio
n, a
nd p
roce
ss b
yw
hich
not
ice
and
oppo
rtun
ity to
com
men
t on
requ
est h
as b
een
prov
ided
to lo
cal b
oard
.S
ecre
tary
req
uire
d to
pro
vide
wai
ver
with
in 9
0da
ys if
and
onl
y to
the
exte
nt th
at S
ecre
tary
dete
rmin
es r
equi
rem
ents
req
uest
ed to
be
wai
ved
impe
de a
bilit
y to
impl
emen
t pla
n an
dst
ate
has
exec
uted
MO
U w
ith S
ecre
tary
requ
iring
sta
te to
mee
t (or
ens
ure
that
loca
lar
ea m
eets
) ag
reed
upo
n ou
tcom
es a
nd to
impl
emen
t oth
er a
ppro
pria
te m
easu
res
toen
sure
acc
ount
abili
ty.
shou
ld b
e si
mpl
ified
.,
Wor
k-F
lex
shou
ld b
e si
mpl
ified
to a
llow
a"S
tate
Opt
ion"
in w
hich
gov
erno
rs c
ould
app
lyfo
r bl
ock
gran
t aut
horit
y. U
nder
this
opt
ion,
gove
rnor
s w
ould
hav
e co
mpl
ete
disc
retio
n as
to h
ow to
adm
inis
ter
both
adu
lt an
d yo
uth
form
ula
prog
ram
s. G
over
nors
wou
ldde
term
ine
sub-
stat
e fu
ndin
g an
d go
vern
ance
stru
ctur
es. T
he b
lock
gra
nts
wou
ld b
e gu
ided
by a
set
of g
uidi
ng p
aram
eter
s, w
hich
sho
uld
incl
ude
the
use
of th
e on
e-st
op c
aree
r sy
stem
as th
e co
re s
ervi
ce d
eliv
ery
syst
em, a
s w
ell a
sa
basi
c se
t of s
ervi
ces
to b
e pr
ovid
ed.
How
ever
, gov
erno
rs w
ould
hav
e th
ere
spon
sibi
lity
for
sele
ctin
g pa
rtne
r pr
ogra
ms
and
the
arra
y of
ser
vice
s. G
over
nors
adm
inis
terin
g th
eir
prog
ram
s un
der
the
Sta
teO
ptio
n w
ould
nee
d to
sub
mit
a pl
an, s
imila
r to
the
TA
NF
pla
n, to
the
Dep
artm
ent.
Thi
s pl
anw
ould
incl
ude
expe
cted
leve
ls o
f per
form
ance
unde
r fe
dera
l com
mon
mea
sure
s fo
rem
ploy
men
t and
job
trai
ning
pro
gram
s. A
stat
e th
at fa
ils to
mee
t neg
otia
ted
leve
ls o
fpe
rfor
man
ce tw
o ye
ars
in a
row
wou
ld b
esu
bjec
t to
sanc
tions
and
loss
of t
he a
utho
rity
toru
n pr
ogra
ms
unde
r th
is o
ptio
n.
,req
uire
men
ts,
expe
dite
d pr
oced
ure
for
exte
ndin
g ap
prov
edw
aive
rs to
add
ition
al s
tate
s.
Per
sona
lN
o pr
ovis
ion.
Est
ablis
h au
thor
ity to
cre
ate
Ree
mpl
oym
ent
No
prov
isio
n.R
eem
ploy
men
tA
ccou
nts
Acc
ount
s, s
peci
al s
elf-
man
aged
acc
ount
s fo
rus
e by
indi
vidu
als
who
are
out
of w
ork
and
who
hav
e be
en id
entif
ied
as v
ery
likel
y to
exha
ust t
heir
Une
mpl
oym
ent I
nsur
ance
bene
fits.
Cen
ter
for
Law
and
Soc
ial P
olic
y26
U.S. Department of EducationOffice of Educational Research and Improvement (OERI)
National Library of Education (NLE)Educational Resources Information Center (ERIC)
NOTICE
Reproduction Basis
;
Eitiet Ionel kw= loniiiion Unto
This document is covered by a signed "Reproduction Release (Blanket)"form (on file within the ERIC system), encompassing all or classes ofdocuments from its source organization and, therefore, does not require a"Specific Document" Release form.
This document is Federally-funded, or carries its own permission toreproduce, or is otherwise in the public domain and, therefore, may bereproduced by ERIC without a signed Reproduction Release form (either"Specific Document" or "Blanket").
EFF-089 (1/2003)