Chapter 9: Processing: Escrow Settlement, Title and Appraisal
Representative Service Awards and ... - Takata Settlement · coming into existence as a...
Transcript of Representative Service Awards and ... - Takata Settlement · coming into existence as a...
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
M iam i Division
M DL No. 2599
M aster File No. 15-02599-M D-M ORENO
14-24009-CV-M O RENO
IN RE:
TAKATA AIRBAG PRODUCTSLIABILITY LITIGATION
THIS DOCUM ENT RELATES TO
ALL ECONOM IC LOSS ACTION S
AGAINST TOYOTA DEFENDANTS/
FINAL ORDER APPROVING CLASS SETTLEM ENT ANDCERTIFYING SETTLEM ENT CLASS
THIS CAUSE came before the Court upon Plaintiffs' Omnibus M otion for Final
Approval of Class Settlements and Certification of Settlement Classes, and Application for Class
Representative Service Awards and ClassCounsel's Attorney's Fees (D.E. 2033), ûled on
Septem ber 8. 2017.
THE COURT has considered the motion, the supporting memoranda, objections, and
responses to objections, and other pertinent portions of the record, including the Settlement
Agreement between Class Representatives and the Toyota Defendants (D.E. 1724-4), and the
Order Preliminarily Approving Class Settlement and Certifying Settlement Clmss (D.E. 1799).
Having held a Fairness Hearing on October 25, 2017, and being otherwise fully advised in the
premises, it is
ADJUDG ED that the m otion is GRANTED as follows:
This Final Order Approving Class Settlement incomorates the Settlement
Agreement and its exhibits, and the Preliminary Approval Order. Unless otherwise provided, the
Case 1:14-cv-24009-FAM Document 694 Entered on FLSD Docket 11/01/2017 Page 1 of 13
terms defined in the Settlement Agreement and Preliminary Approval Order shall have the same
meanings for pumoses of this Final Order and the accompanying Final Judgment.
2. The Court has personal jurisdiction over all parties in the Action including a11
Class Members, and has subject matter jurisdiction over the Action, including jtlrisdiction to
approve the Settlement Agreement, grant final certification of the Class, settle and release al1
claims released in the Settlement Agreement, and dismiss with prejudice the economic loss
claims asserted against Toyota in the Action and enter final judgment with respect to Toyota in
the Action. Further, venue is proper in this Court.
1. TH E SETTLEM ENT CLASS
Based on the record before the Court, including a11 submissions in support of the
settlement, objections and responses, and al1 prior proceedings in the Action, as well as the
Settlement Agreement and its related documents and exhibits, the Court confirms the
certification of the following nationwide Class for settlement purposes only:
(1) a11 persons or entities who or which owned and/or leased, onthe date of the issuance of the Preliminary Approval Order, SubjectVehicles distributed for sale or lease in the United States or any of
its territories or possessions; and (2) a11 persons or entities who orwhich formerly owned and/or leased Subject Vehicles distributedfor sale or lease in the United States or any of its territories or
possessions, and who or which sold or returned, plzrsuant to a
lease, the Subject Vehicles after April 1 1, 2013 and through thedate of the issuance of the Preliminary Approval Order. Excluded
from this Class are: (a) Toyota, its officers, directors, employeesand outside counsel; its affiliates and affiliates' officers, directors
and employees; its distributors and distributors' oftkers, directorsand employees; and Toyota's Dealers and their officers and
directors; (b) Settlement Class Counsel, Plaintiffs' counsel, andtheir employees; (c) judicial officers and their immediate familymembers and associated court staff assigned to this cmse; (d)Automotive Recyclers and their outside counsel and employees;
and (e) persons or entities who or which timely and properlyexclude themselves from the Class.
2
Case 1:14-cv-24009-FAM Document 694 Entered on FLSD Docket 11/01/2017 Page 2 of 13
4. The Court finds that only those persons/entities/orgr izations listed in Appendix
B to this Final Order have timely and properly excluded themselves from the Class and,
therefore, are not bound by this Final Order or the accompanying Final Judgment.
The Court confirms, for settlement puposes and conditioned upon the occurrence
of the Effective Date, that the Class meets a11 the applicable requirements of Federal Rule of
Civil Procedure 23(a) and (b)(3):
a. Numerosity. The Class, which is ascertainable, consists of more than 9
million members located throughout the United States and satisfies the numerosity requirement
of Federal Rule of Civil Procedtlre 23(a)(1). Joinder of these widely dispersed, numerous Class
Members into one suit would be impracticable.
b. Commonality. There are some questions of law or fact common to the
Class with regard to the alleged activities of Toyota in this case. These issues are sufficient to
establish commonality under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 23(a)(2).
Typicality. The claims of class representatives are typical of the claims of
the Class M embers they seek to represent for purposes of settlement.
d. Adequate Representation. Plaintiffs' interests do not contlict with those of
absent members of the Class, and Plaintiffs' interests are co-extensive with those of absent Class
Members. Additionally, the Court recognizes the experience of Settlement Class Cotmsel.
Plaintiffs and their counsel have prosecuted this action vigorously on behalf of the Class. The
Court finds that the requirement of adequate representation of the Class has been fully met under
Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 23(a)(4).
e. Predominance of Common Issues.The questions of 1aw or fact common
to the Class Members predominate over any questions affecting any individual Class M ember.
Case 1:14-cv-24009-FAM Document 694 Entered on FLSD Docket 11/01/2017 Page 3 of 13
f. Superiority ofthe Class Action Mechanism. The class action mechanism
provides a superior procedtlral vehicle for resolution of this matter compared to other available
altematives. Class certification promotes efficiency and uniformity of judgment because the
many Class M embers will not be forced to separately pursue claims or execute settlements in
various courts around the country.
6. The designated
Collins, Corene Quirk, Cynthia Wishkovsky, John Huebner, Lisa Peterson, Marc Raiken, Shelley
Shader, and Nelson Powell. The Court tsnds that these Class M embers have adequately
represented the Class for pumoses of entering into and implementing the Settlement Agreement.
class representatives are as follows'.Angela Ruffin, Connie
The Court appoints Peter Prieto of Podhtlrst Orseck, P.A. as Lead Settlement Class Cotmsel, and
David Boies of Boies, Schiller & Flexner, L.L.P.; Todd A. Smith of Power, Rogers and Smith,
L.L.P.; Roland Tellis of Baron & Budd, P.C.; James E. Cecchi of Carella, Byrne, Cecchi,
Olstein, Brody, & Agnello, PC; and Elizabeth J. Cabraser of Lieff Cabraser Heimnnn &
Bemstein, LLP as Settlement Class Cotmsel.
In making all of the foregoing findings, the Court has exercised its discretion in
certifying the Class.
II. NOTICE AND OUTREACH TO CLASS MEM BERS, AND QUALIFIEDSETTLEM ENT FUND
Based on the record, the Court finds that the Class Notice has been given to the8.
Class in the manner approved in the Preliminary Approval Order. The Class Notice: (i) is
reasonable and constitutes the best practicable notice to Class M embers under the circumstances;
(ii) constitutes notice that was reasonably calculated, under the circumstances, to apprise Class
M embers of the pendency of the Action and the terms of the Settlement Agreement, their right to
exclude themselves from the Class or to object to a11 or any part of the Settlement Agreement,
4
Case 1:14-cv-24009-FAM Document 694 Entered on FLSD Docket 11/01/2017 Page 4 of 13
their right to appear at the Fairness Hearing (either on their own or through counsel hired at their
own expense), and the binding effect of the orders and Final Order and Final Judgment in the
Action, whether favorable or unfavorable, on a1l persons and entities who or which do not
exclude themselves from the Class; (iii) constitutes due, adequate, and sufscient notice to a11
persons or entities entitled to receive notice; and (iv) fully satisfied the requirements of the
United States Constitution (including the Due Process Clause), Federal Rule of Civil Procedure
23 and any other applicable 1aw as well as complying with the Federal Judicial Center's
illustrative class action notices.
9. The Court further finds that Toyota, through the Settlement Notice Administrator,
provided notice of the settlement to the appropriate state and federal government oftscials
plzrsuant to 28 U.S.C. j 1715.The Court has given the appropriate state and federal government
offcials the requisite 90-day period to comment or object to the Settlement Agreement before
entering its Final Order and Final Judgment.
10. The Parties' Settlement includes an Outreach Program by which a Settlement
Special Administrator will take additional actions to notify vehicle owners about the Takata
Airbag lnflator Recalls and to promptly remedy those issues. This Outreach Program includes:
(a) direct contact of Class Members via U.S. mail, landline and cellular telephone calls, social
media, email and texting; (b) contact of Class Members by third parties (e.g., independent repair
shops); and (c) multi-media campaigns, such as through print, television, radio, and internet.
Because this recall effort affects the health and safety of consllmers, the Court finds that it is in
the public interest and the federal govem ment's interest to begin this Outreach Progrnm as soon
as practicable, if not already begun, and that calls and texts made under the Outreach Program
are being made for emergency pumoses as that phrase is used in 47 U.S.C. j 227(b)(1)(A).
5
Case 1:14-cv-24009-FAM Document 694 Entered on FLSD Docket 11/01/2017 Page 5 of 13
Direct consumer contact through the Outreach Program is tmdertaken to convey important public
safety information to consumers. The Settlement Special Administrator and those working on
his behalf shall serve as agents of the federal government for these pumoses and shall be entitled
to any rights or privileges afforded to government agents or contractors in carrying out their
duties in this regard.
1 1. The Court finds that the Escrow Account is to be a çtqualified settlement fund'' as
defined in Section 1.468B-1(c) of the Treasury Regulations in that it satisfies each of the
following requirements:
(a)
and is subject to the continuing jurisdiction of this Court;
The Escrow Account is to be established pursuant to this Court's order,
(b) The Escrow Account is to be established to resolve or satisfy one or more
claims that have resulted or may result from an event that has occurred and that has given rise to
at least one claim asserting liabilities; and
(c) The assets of the Escrow Account are to be segregated from other assets of
Defendants, the transferor of the payment to the Settlement Ftmd, and controlled by an Escrow
Agreement.
12.
Treasury Regulations, the Court finds that Toyota may elect to treat the Escrow Accotmt as
coming into existence as a ççqualified settlement fund'' on the latter of the date the Escrow
Under the çlrelation back'' rule provided under Section 1.468B-1()(2)(i) of the
Account meets the requirements of Paragraphs 1 1(b) and 1 1(c) of this Order or January 1 of the
calendar year in which a1l of the requirements of Paragraph 1 1 of this Order are met. lf such a
relation-back election is m ade, the assets held by the Settlement Fund on such date shall be
treated as having been transferred to the Escrow Account on that date.
6
Case 1:14-cv-24009-FAM Document 694 Entered on FLSD Docket 11/01/2017 Page 6 of 13
111. FINAL APPROVAL OF SETTLEM ENT AGREEM ENT
13. The Court finds that the Settlement Agreement resulted from extensive arm's-
length, good-faith negotiations between Settlement Class Counsel and Toyota, through
experienced counsel.
14. Pursuant to Federal Court approves the
Settlement as set forth in the Settlement Agreement, and finds that the Settlement is fair,
reasonable, and adequate, and in the best interest of the Class and is in f'ull compliance with a1l
Rule of Civil Procedure 23(e), the
applicable requirements of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the United States Constitution
(including the Due Process Clause), the Class Action Fairness Act, and any other applicable law.
The Court declares that the Settlement Agreement is binding on al1 Class M embers, except those
identified on Appendix B, and it is to be preclusive in the Action. The decisions of the
Settlement Special Administrator relating to the review, processing, determination and payment
of Claims submitted pursuant to the Settlement Agreement are final and not appealable.
The Court finds that the Settlement Agreement is fair, reasonable and adequate
based on the following factors: (a) there is no fraud or collusion underlying the Settlement
Agreement; (b) the complexity, expense, uncertainty, and likely duration of litigation in the
Action favor settlement on behalf of the Class; and (c) the Settlement Agreement provides
meaningful benetks to the Class.
The Parties are directed to implement and consummate the Settlement according
to the terms and provisions of the Settlement Agreement. ln addition, the Parties are authorized
to agree to and adopt such nmendments and modifications to the Settlement Agreement as: (i)
shall be consistent in all material respects with this Final Order, and (ii) do not limit the rights of
the Class.
7
Case 1:14-cv-24009-FAM Document 694 Entered on FLSD Docket 11/01/2017 Page 7 of 13
17. The Court has considered all objections, timely and proper or otherwise, to the
Settlement Agreement, and denies and overrules them as without merit.
IV. SETTLEM ENT CLASS COUNSEL'S FEE APPLICATION AND INCENTIVEAW ARDS TO CLASS REPRESENTATIVES
18. Class Counsel has applied for a service award in the amount of $5,000 for each
Class Representative. Here, the Class Representatives clearly devoted considerable time and
resources to this Action. Specifcally, the Class Representatives maintained regular contact with
Class Cotmsel, responded to written discovery requests, and many appeared for depositions.
Thus, the Court approves the application of Service Awards of $5,000 for each Class
Representative, to be paid f'rom the common fund. Accordingly, Class Counsel's application for
Service Awards of $5,000 for each named Class Representatives is GRANTED.
19. Class Counsel has filed an application for attorneys' fees equal to 30 percent of
the $278,500,000 common fund created through their efforts in prosecuting and settling this
Action, totaling $83,550,000.
20. As recognized by the United States Supreme Court, the 1aw is well established
that $ta litigant or lawyer who recovers a common fund for the benefit of persons other than
himself or his client is entitled to a reasonable attorney's fee from the fund as a whole.'' Boeing
Co. v. Van Gemert, 444 U.S. 472, 478 (1980). The 1aw is equally well-established in the
Eleventh Circuit that lçlaqttorneys' fees awarded from a common fund shall be based upon a
reasonable percentage of the fund established for the benefk of the class.'' Camden I Condo.
Ass 'n v. Dunkle, 946 F.2d 768, 771 (11th Cir. 1991).
21. Per Camden 1, the nonexclusive list of factors the Court should consider in
determining the reasonableness of the attorneys' fees are as follows:
8
Case 1:14-cv-24009-FAM Document 694 Entered on FLSD Docket 11/01/2017 Page 8 of 13
(1) the time and labor required; (2) the novelty and difûculty of thequestions; (3) the skill required to perform the legal servicesproperly; (4) the precluslon of other employment; (5) thecustomary fee; (6) whether the fee is fixed or contingent; (7) thetime limitations imposed by the client or the circumstances; (8) theamount involved and the results obtained; (9) the experience,reputation, and ability of the attorneys; (10) the ttundesirability'' ofthe case; (1 1) the nattlre and length of the professional relationshipwith the client; and (12) awards in similar cases.
f#. at 772 n.3.
22. In support of their request for attorneys' fees equal to 30 percent of the common
fund, Class Counsel has presented the Declaration of Professor Brian Fitzpatrick, a leading
scholar on class actions, and the Declration of Peter Prieto, Esq., the Court-appointed Chair
Lead Counsel in this litigation. Both Declarations analyze each of the factors set forth in
Camden 1, and conclude that every applicable factor supports the reasonableness of the instant
fee request. This Court agrees. The Court independently has analyzed the Camden I factors
against the unique facts of this case and concludes that every applicable factor supports the
reasonableness of the instant fee request.
23. Further, two additional factors support the reasonableness of the requested fee.
First, as highlighted in the Declarations, the requested fee actually amounts to less than 30
percent of value of the common fund created through the settlement, due to the value of the
Customer Support Progrnm made available to all Class M embers.lSee Carter v. Forjas Taurus,
S.A., No. 16-15277, 2017 W L 2813844, at *5 (1 1th Cir. June 29, 2017) (holding that fee award
was f$a reasonable percentage of the settlementvalue'' when considering the value of an
' ln Plaintiffs' motion for tinal approval, and at the Fairness Hearing, Class Counscl assertcd that although the four
Settlement Amounts at issue (BMW, Mazda, Subaru, and Toyota) total $553,567,307, the value of the combinedsettlements increases to $741,287,307 when accounting for the value of the Customer Support Programs associatedwith the scttlements. Thus, the attorneys suggest that the fec request really amounts to 22.4 percent of the combinedsettlement value. The Court makes no tinding on the value of the settlements. lndeed, the valuc of the settlementsmay not be as large as the attorneys suggest. However, an attom eys' fee request totaling 30 percent of the
Settlement Amount is reasonable.
9
Case 1:14-cv-24009-FAM Document 694 Entered on FLSD Docket 11/01/2017 Page 9 of 13
tsenhanced warranty, which is itself a significant tangible benefif'). Second, in addition to the
time and labor already devoted to this case, Class Counsel will be required to expend
considerable time and effort over the fotlr-year lifespan of the settlement by overseeing and
adjusting the Outreach Program and Out-of-pocket Claims Process forthe benefk of Class
Members. See Allapattah Services, Inc. v. Exxon Corp., 454 F. Supp. 2d 1 185, 1216 (S.D. Fla.
2006) (holding that class counsel's post-approval work ççsupports the application of a higher fee
percentage award'').
24. Accordingly, the Court approves the application for attorneys' fees of 30 percent
of the $278,500,000 Settlement Amount, to be paid from the common fund.
V. DISM ISSAL OF CLAIM S; RELEASE
25. A11 economic loss claims asserted against Toyota in the Action are dismissed with
prejudice on the merits and without costs to any party, except as otherwise provided in this Order
or in the Settlement Agreement.
26. Upon entry of this Final Order and the Final Judgment, Class Representatives and
each Class Member (except those listed on Appendix B), on behalf of themselves and any other
legal or natural persons and entities who or which may claim by, tkough, or under them, release
their claims as outlined in the Settlement Agreement.
27. lf a Class M ember who does not opt out commences, files, initiates, or institutes
any new legal action or other proceeding against a Released Party for any claim released in this
Settlement in any federal or state court, arbitral tribtmal, or administrative or other forum, such
legal action or proceeding shall be dismissed with prejudice at that Class Member's cost.
28. The Court orders that the Settlem ent Agreem ent shall be the exclusive remedy for
al1 claim s released in the Settlement Agreem ent for a11 Class M em bers not listed on Appendix B.
10
Case 1:14-cv-24009-FAM Document 694 Entered on FLSD Docket 11/01/2017 Page 10 of 13
29. Therefore, except for those listed on Appendix B, al1 class representatives, Class
Members and their representatives are permanently barred and enjoined from, either directly,
through their representatives, or in any other capacity instituting, commencing, filing,
maintaining, continuing or prosecuting against any of the Released Parties any action or
proceeding in any court or tribtmalasserting any of the matters, claim s, or causes of action
described. ln addition, al1 class representatives, Class M embers, and a11 persons and entities in
active concert or participation with Class Members are permanently barred and enjoined from
organizing Class M embers who have not been excluded from the Class into a separate class for
purposes of pursuing, as a purported class action, any lawsuit against the Released Parties based
on or relating to the claim s and causes of action in the Complaint in the Action, or the facts and
circtlmstances relating thereto or the release in the Settlement Agreement. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C.
jj 1651(a) and 2283, the Court finds that issuance of this permanent injunction is necessary and
appropriate in aid of its continuing jurisdiction and authority over the settlement as set forth in
the Settlement Agreement, and the Action.
30. Class M embers are not precluded from addressing, contacting, dealing with, or
complying with requestsor inquiries from any govemmental authorities relating to the issues
raised in this class adion settlem ent.
Vl. OTH ER PROVISIONS
W ithout affecting the finality of this Final Order or the accompanying Final
Judgment, the Court retains continuing and exclusive jurisdiction over the Action and all matters
relating to the adm inistration, consumm ation, enforcem ent, and interpretation of the Settlement
Agreem ent and of this Final Order and the accompanying Final Judgm ent, to protect and
effectuate this Final Order and the accompanying Final Judgment, and for any other necessary
11
Case 1:14-cv-24009-FAM Document 694 Entered on FLSD Docket 11/01/2017 Page 11 of 13
purpose. The Parties, Class Representatives, and each Class M ember not listed on Appendix B
are deemed to have irrevocably submitted to the exclusive jurisdiction of this Court, for the
purpose of any suit, action, proceeding or dispute arising out of or relating to the Settlement
Agreement or the applicability of the Settlement Agreement, including the exhibits, and only for
such purposes.
32. If the Effective
automatically vacated and this Final Order and the accompanying Final Judgment, and other
Date does not occur, certification of the Class shall be
orders entered in connection with the Settlement Agreement and releases delivered in cormection
with the Settlement Agreement, shall be vacated and rendered null and void as provided by the
Settlement Agreement.
33. W ithout further order of the Courq the Parties may agree to reasonably necessary
extensions of time to carry out any of the provisions of the Settlement Agreement. Likewise, the
Parties may, without further order of the Court, agree to and adopt amendments to the Settlement
Agreement (including exhibits) as are consistent with this Final Order and the accompanying
Final Judgment and do not limit the rights of Class M embers under the Settlement Agreement.
34. Nothing in this Final Order or the accompanying Final Judgment shall preclude
any action in this Court to enforce the terms of the Settlement Agreement.
35. Neither this Final Order nor the accompanying Final Judgment (nor any document
related to the Settlement Agreement) is or shall be construed as an admission by the Parties.
Neither the Settlement Agreement (or its exhibits), this Final Order, the accompanying Final
Judgm ent, or any docum ent related to the Settlem ent Agreem ent shall be offered in any
proceeding as evidence against any of the Parties of any fact or legal claim; provided, however,
that Toyota and the Released Parties may file any and al1 such documents in support of any
12
Case 1:14-cv-24009-FAM Document 694 Entered on FLSD Docket 11/01/2017 Page 12 of 13
defense that the Settlement Agreement, this Final Order, the accompanying Final Judgment, and
any other related document is binding on and shall have res judicata, collateral estoppel, and/or
preclusive effect in any pending or f'uttlre lawsuit by any person or entity who is subject to the
release asserting a released claim against any of the Released Parties.
36. A copy of this Final Order shall be tiled in, and applies to, each economic loss
member action in this multidistrict litigation. Filed concurrently is the Court's Final Judgment.
Attached as Appendix A is a list of the Subject Vehicles (identified by make, model, and year) to
which these Orders and the Court's Final Judgment apply. Also attached as Appendix B is a list
of persons, entities, and organizations who have excluded themselves from (or ttopted out'' ot)
the Class.
DONE AND OIIDERED in Chambers#/ of october 2017.at M iami, Florida, this
FE . M OREN O
D STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Copies furnished to:
Counsel of Record
13
Case 1:14-cv-24009-FAM Document 694 Entered on FLSD Docket 11/01/2017 Page 13 of 13
APPENDIX A
TOYOTA SUBJECT VEHICLES
M odel Years M ake and M odel
2002-2004 Toyota Sequoia
2002-2005 Lexus 5C430
2003-2004 Toyota Tundra
2003-2007 GM -pontiac Vibe
2003-2007 Toyota Corolla (JPN)
2003-2008 Toyota Corolla (NAP)2003-2008 Toyota M atrix
2004-2005 Toyota RAV4
2005-2006 Toyota Ttmdra
2005-2007 Toyota Sequoia
2006-2010 Lexus SC430
2006-201 1 Toyota Yaris (HB)2006-2013 Lexus IS
2007-2012 Lexus ES350
2007-2012 Toyota Yaris (SDN)2008-2014 Lexus IS-F
2008-2015 Scion XB
2009-2013 Toyota Corolla (JPN)
2009-2013 Toyota Corolla (NAP)2009-2013 Toyota M atrix
2010-2015 Lexus IS250C/350C
2010-2016 Toyota 4Runner
2010-2017 Lexus GX460
2011-2014 Toyota Sienna
2012 Lexus LF-A
2014-2015 Lexus 15250/350
2014-2017 Toyota Corolla (NAP)2015-2017 Lexus RC350/300/2001
2015-2017 Lexus RC-F
2016 Scion iM
2016-2017 Lexus 15350/300/2007-
2017 Lexus GX460
2017 Toyota 4Runner
2017 Toyota iM
Case 1:14-cv-24009-FAM Document 694-1 Entered on FLSD Docket 11/01/2017 Page 1 of 1
APPENDIX B
PERSONS, ENTITIES, AND ORGANIZATIONS THAT HAVE EXCLUDED
THEM SELVES FROM THE TOYOTA SETTLEM ENT CLASS
1. KRISTINE A TOW ER
2. DIANA A SHERIN
3. JESSE JOHN PIETM S
4. EILEEN SULIVAN
5. JAN ICE B KING
6. JOHN W BAUKNECHT
7. HELEN J ROSE
8. HETALBEN N PM JAPATI
9. VERONICA J SYRIAC
10. LAUM X KALIL-YAGUE
11. RICHARD F HERR
12. ANNETTE V HERR
13. DIANE E OLDEN
14. ROBERT W GU STAVUS
15. DAVID E GAO NER
16. ARYEH S NATAN K ATZ
17. CHERYL A SZABLEW SKI
18. HAROLD L DIXON
19. PHYLLIS A HAM M
20. RICHAO PEA SE
21. NEOS PRODCTNS INC
22. PATRICIA F DICKEN S
23. GM CIE M SADLER
24. JEROM E HABER
25. PATRICIA A W ORTHINGTON
26. KENNETH J W ORTHINGTON
27. THOM AS H KREIM EIER
28. SUSAN F SYM INGTON
29. EILEEN M SM ITH
30. M ARILYN S M OLL
31. DIANE M JA COBS
32. JOEL N M EYERS
33. GOODM AN CARE INC
34. DIANNE C SULLER
35. ANTHON Y M VARRON
36. DIANA A DUMAS
Case 1:14-cv-24009-FAM Document 694-2 Entered on FLSD Docket 11/01/2017 Page 1 of 16
37. M ARIANNE E PISER
38. JUNE E LEN Z
39. EILEEN M M CGOW AN
40. CYNTHIA H RIVERS
41. SUSAN E SM ITH
42. KATHRYN W OBERTO
43. M ICHAEL J FLYN N
44. PATRICIA K BANNISTER
45. RYAN S YUSKO
46. DARLENE S M CKINNEY
47. DAVID M LUCAS
48. LORETTA M GRUTKOW SKI
49. DONNA G SILVERM AN
50. PHILLIP T KITCHEN
51. BERNARD S EM BLER
52. AARON S ZAK
53. ISAAC E KURTZ
54. M ARJLYN L BARRETT
55. W ILLIAM T O'HARA
56. SARAH C KORTA
57. CARLOS M AM ADOR
58. ALLISON R CLOSE
59. JAM ES R M CM URRAY
60. CYNTHIA H RIVERS
61. GREGG A M OCK
62. GEORGE S MELLGARD
63. VIJAYKUM AR B KHANDGE
64. SCOTT L MCCARTHY
65. PATRICIA A CURTIS
66. LOIS E PRESLIPSKY
67. HAE K LlM
68. FM NCES M RIN G
69. ESTORIA A PATTON
70. KENNETH J M ILLS
71. DAVID R GREEN
72. PATRICIA L SHAFFER
73. TERESA P OSBORN
74. NICHOLAS H CASEN TA
75. BRIAN C SEXTON
76. CAROL L FAN D
2
Case 1:14-cv-24009-FAM Document 694-2 Entered on FLSD Docket 11/01/2017 Page 2 of 16
77. ROLAND E HEILIG
78. BEVERLY M ETZGER
79. N URIA PEREZ
80. G THLEEN B HARDEN
81. M ARLA J SOTO-GONZALEZ
82. GEORGE L ARM STRONG JR
83. M ICHAEL A M ARCHEGIANO
84. M ICHAEL R HANCOCK
85. JULIE A TROUTW INE
86. ELIZABETH D RITCHEY
87. RONALD W CROCKETT
88. NASHALA L DUPLAIN
89. JOHN O HAY
90. JOHN W FLEM W G
91. CHARLES W HORNBECK
92. JESSE M LINDM AR
93. RONALD C LEN Z
94. M ATTHEW C W ISE
95. DAVID M M ARTIN
96. NICHOLAS P MARTIN
97. DOROTHY H ELBERT
98. LASCELLE A SHERRILL
99. VIRGINIA H M EDCALF
100. DOLORES M CORMIER
101. BENJAM W J LIEN
102. JENNIFER B DEGROOT
103. NORA K FINLEY
104. SYBLE D GARDNER
105. VICTOR W TSAI
106. M ARILYN A STEENW YK
107. CHRISTY ON EAL
108. DOAN D TH1 TRUSTEE
109. TOURAJ KHALILI
110. JOHN W FOSTER
111. DALE T W ILLIAM S
112. FAITH B PATTIU N
113. RITA E M ENDELSON
1 14. KIM BERLY A PALM ER
115. DIANE J YODER
116. N ICOLE A BEST
3
Case 1:14-cv-24009-FAM Document 694-2 Entered on FLSD Docket 11/01/2017 Page 3 of 16
117. PHILIP A LYNCH
118. SETH P W ISSN ER
119. PAM ELA J W IESER
120. FRAN COISE H LAM ONICA
121. LINDSAY R W OODS
122. M ILDRED D M OORE
123. PAM ELA A LAZARIS
124. KRISTIN J BAUM AN N
125. CAROLE S M OON
126. DAN IEL G W AINW RIGHT
127. KAREN A GEORGIADIS
128. W ENDY L YOUNG
129. YOOK L LOUIE
130. DEBM K SM ILEY
131. EUDYR DEM AGALHAES
132. CATHERINE E LAND
133. M ARY J M ULROONEY
134. MELISSA HAUGER
135. CHAD M CCOY
136. JASON ALEM NDER
137. RUTH E SHOEM AKER
138. DIONNE M GRANT
139. LEANDRO GIACOM ELLI
140. TRINA P JACKSON
141. ELIZABETH J CASEY
142. SAN G H LEE
143. LESLIE R PINCHUK
144. EVA E FAIRM AN
145. JACQUELW E P ROBINSON
146. JACQUELINE P ROBINSON147. CHARLEN E R KELM
148. RUTH K BATES
149. SUM A ALSAFFAR
150. ROSALIN M ENDEZ
151. JAM ES L W INES
152. PETRONA S TRUJILLO
153. M YM LlU
154. M ARIA l M ARISTANY
155. CHRISTY ONEAL
156. THOM A S M BUTTS
4
Case 1:14-cv-24009-FAM Document 694-2 Entered on FLSD Docket 11/01/2017 Page 4 of 16
157. GARY W LAMBRECHT
158. DENA M BARON
159. M ARK G MAGEE
160. STEPHANIE N GORDON
161. DALE C HUBER
162. VALERIE J DAVIS
163. JEFFREY S AGUINAGA
164. REBECCA G CM W L
165. M ARIA PIAZZA
166. JESSICA L RJTZKE
167. ZEYAD T ALW AHIB
168. CAROL D TAGGART
169. GISELA M BALINA
170. ELAINE BEST
171. HELEN A M IYAGI
172. SARA K FLYNN
173. SAM K FLYNN
174. SARA K FLYNN
175. SANDRA L GRAHAM
176. TERRI N GAUTIER SVETICH
177. EM ILY R LECKIE
178. LOAN BU1
179. CAROL H CONNAW AY
180. ELLEN HILDNER
181. JOEL K HANSON
182. GARY HALEY
183. STELLA Y CHIU
184. KATHLEEN OLEKSZULW
185. JOANNE G ROM E
186. REBECCA A THOM AS
187. SAN DRA FAYARD
188. KENNETH P HVARRE
189. BENJAM IN H PICKENS
190. VERONICA DEIGHAN
191. W ILLIAM EKLOW & JOANNA M ORRIS
192. FUM EI LIANG
193. EDW ARD G ROBINSON
194. SUSAN P M ON SON
195. M ARK JOHNSON
196. VICHET KHAUV
5
Case 1:14-cv-24009-FAM Document 694-2 Entered on FLSD Docket 11/01/2017 Page 5 of 16
197. JEANE M I N AITO
198. HARRY R W ALLEN
199. GEORGE A LUCE
200. CHRISTOPHER M KIRCHER
201. ZACHARY KERSULIS
202. PATRICK DECHANT
203. RUSSELL H GIBBS
204. M ARVIN V SW DEL
205. W AUNITA GOOCH
206. GEORGIA COLLINS
207. PAUL T DECLERCQ208. AM IE L BM NT
209. JOHN A DAVIS
210. RILEY A SM ITH
21 1. K AREN L HANM HAN
212. M ICHAEL D M ILLER
213. ANDREI BUCUR
214. RICHARD A EICHER
215. THOM AS K SM ITH
216. EARLINE A MENARD
217. JO SEPH F LETTIERI
218. REBECCA H BENZER
219. ROSE M W ALDRON
220. GEORGE S CANDY
221. LARRY W HURST
222. TIM OTHY L SCHM IDT
223. STEPHEN M W ARD
224. M A SAKAZU K M ATSUSHITA
225. CAROL N JUBB
226. REBECCA J STEW ART
227. EDW ARD M BUTRICK
228. M ERRY SU SSM AN
229. JOANNE G GARCIA
230. M LPH P RUFFOLO
231. HELEN K M ULHERN
232. CHARLOTTE L ANDERSON
233. ELON L TURPIN
234. SUSAN SCHM IDT
235. REBECCA L GARBER
236. CAROLYN K M AU HEW S
6
Case 1:14-cv-24009-FAM Document 694-2 Entered on FLSD Docket 11/01/2017 Page 6 of 16
237. M ARY S REU SCH
238. ANGELA W VICTOIUA JACOBS
239. VICTOR F JIM ENEZ
240. M ATTHEW M YRICK
241. JANETTE G BABER
242. SUZANNE REX
243. CASANDM JUDD
244. M ICHAEL AM BURGEY
245. STEPHEN C OSBORNE
246. FM N K T GRYW ALSKI
247. W ILSON S DOBBS
248. BONNIE E PUTM AN
249. DOUGLAS E W RIGHT
250. IRENE RODRIGUEZ
251. STEPHANIE A CHOURY
252. TERI L GIOVAN W EHODGES
253. ROBIN KEEGAN
254. JOSEPH BRENCIC & PROVIDEN CE BM N CIC
255. KlM M HUNTER
256. JERRY JAM ES JOHNS SR TRUST
257. M ELANIE K LEE
258. ANDREA N DELONG
259. CAROL A HAM M ER
260. CAROLYN M CCAM BRIDGE
261. CATHERW E GILCHRIEST
262. BROOKE R DUKES
263. SANDRA K EVERSON
264. ROBERT E BRANCH
265. DEBRA L KUMM ERS
266. LINDA A BROW ER
267. CRYSTALE J REASON
268. JASON E CASTRO
269. ALBERT YOUNAN
270. SHARON A RODRIGUEZ
271. DAVID L W ILLIAM S
272. AUDREY DOU GHTY
273. RUSSELL A M ILLER
274. RUSSELL A M ILLER
275. DONNA L ASHURST
276. M ARYLOUISE LILLEM OEN
7
Case 1:14-cv-24009-FAM Document 694-2 Entered on FLSD Docket 11/01/2017 Page 7 of 16
277. HIM M LEE-GONZALEZ
278. JONATHAN GARCEAU
279. DEBORAH LYN IUCHTER 2005 LIVING TRUST
280. DENNIS N KESSLER
281. INGRID K KIMM ONS
282. NATALIE C M ACHTIG
283. RICARDO G M INJARES & SHARON M W JARES
284. N EIL D W ISE
285. W ILLIAM H M ORROW
286. M ICHAEL R OVERTON
287. CHRISTOPHER E CHILDS
288. M ARIO J SAFFOLD
289. N ORM A S
290. BARBAM J PENNEY
291. LAUREL A GINGRICH
292. IVELLISS SANTOS-COTTO
293. BARBAM J W ORTHAM
294. M ONDAM PHAY
295. SHIRLEY Y BOLIN
296. BARBAM L ENGLAND
297. JOHN N VASILAKIS
298. GRAHAM STEEN
299. RAGHUNANDAN KESHAVAM URTHY
300. ROBYN M COFFIN
301. LONNIE ROBIN SON
302. JUDITH L M CGUIN N
303. ROBIN J M ARSHALL
304. FLORENCE SARACSON
305. DENNIS B BAEZA
306. CHARLES L BRITTON
307. LOUISE CADDEN
308. REYNALDO C PASA
309. AM ANDA C W HELESS
310. M EGHAN M PIERSON
311. EDGARDO M PANCIPANCI
312. JANET R PEIFFER
313. EDNA JOHN SON
314. JOYCE Y BURGESS
315. GORDON TAM
316. CLAIRE S W ESTENHAVER LORETZ
8
Case 1:14-cv-24009-FAM Document 694-2 Entered on FLSD Docket 11/01/2017 Page 8 of 16
317. JOANN SCHANO
318. KAREN LAGRECA
319. RISHA A SM ITH
320. RAYM OND J HOW ARD
321. HYAE RHEE
322. SCOTT W M ORRISON
323. IRENE BOREVITZ
324. LAUM R CONTI
325. DIBA KAZERANI
326. JASM INE C COLEM AN BLAIR
327. CHRISTIAN NE L KURTZ
328. RUTH A BALSLEY
329. SAMANTHA S HODGES
330. STACY N OUTLAW
331. FLORENCE T SHAM BERGER
332. ANN W ILDE
333. NIKOLA PENAVA
334. KENNETH D W ARD
335. HETTIE C STATEN
336. RAYM OND C W HEATLEY
337. LIBAN M AHAM ED
338. ELAINE L GURGANUS
339. PATIUCIA M CARRANZA
340. GARY W CLIFTON
341. W ESLEY B BELLEVILLE
342. LEON ARD L LOM BARD
343. ANDREA LOM BARD
344. SALLY M FORT
345. M ATTHEW NIBLETT
346. EVANN M HOPKW S
347. SALLY P HARRELL
348. MELISSA S DAVIS
349. TED A HAM ILTON
350. U TH Y J W ISKOFSKE
351. EVA M GENTRY
352. LAYLA M FISEK
353. LAUM YOSHIDA
354. M ICHAEL H OSTLEY & M ARY E OSTLEY
355. LILY N AYANO
356. KATHERINE L NELSON
9
Case 1:14-cv-24009-FAM Document 694-2 Entered on FLSD Docket 11/01/2017 Page 9 of 16
357. AM ANDA M LARUE
358. BOBBIE GOGGW S
359. GRACE KAM INSKI
360. JAN E E CM W FORD
361. JOHN H FEROLITO
362. BRENDA B M ILLER
363. SCOTT R BUB
364. GRISSEL G FONSECA ESCOBAR
365. TIRUW ORK K ALEMU
366. ROSS C MADSEN
367. JOHN F GAUGHAN
368. ELIZABETH A KERR
369. BERNADETTE HAN
370. DAV ID B POSNER
371. KATE S LANDRIES
372. BRADLEY 1 BRU STM AN M ARSHALL
373. CRISTINA E GROSCHEL
374. SUSAN J LAVELL
375. DIANNE L FITCH
376. KENNETH DAVID PINCKNEY
377. ROBIN L TANNEHILL
378. JOYCE SHOOK
379. LEW G SCHUW EILER
380. CRAIG A GILL
381. IQATHERINE M GARFIELD
382. FELICITA SANCHEZ
383. LYNNE J STEINEL
384. JEANETTE F PINION
385. JESSE R BURKHOLDER
386. LINDA D M ILLER
387. CLIFFORD L GALLIN GTON
388. IQAREN T KW OK
389. RODN EY P W AIR
390. JORGE V PADILLA
391. JULIE C GILL
392. JILL A GERONTIS
393. EDUARDO M HERNANDEZ
394. M ELISSA F RICHARDSON
395. LINDA L TORREAN O-OUAHM ANE
396. ERIKA TOLLCZYK
10
Case 1:14-cv-24009-FAM Document 694-2 Entered on FLSD Docket 11/01/2017 Page 10 of 16
397. M ICHAEL DUH
398. RITA D CHA SE
399. ALYSSA L ALAS
400. JAM IE L M OLTZAN
401. FROTASHA BUXTON
402. TIDO J HOLTKAM P
403. PHYLLIS E STANDISH
404. DUSTY D DOM INA
405. CHRISTOPHER J SUTTON-PM STON
406. M ELISSA S DOW NES
407. RENEE M EBY
408. ROBERT D HEDDEN
409. VALERIE S CAM BALLO
410. PATRICIA K M URPHY
411. ALFRED J BORREGO
412. ROBERT L JENKINS
413. JANE E CM W FORD
414. M ARGARETE A K AHLER
415. JOAN A HESSLER
416. FRANCISCA VAZQUEZ-MIM NDA417. KERRY BRINSON
418. DIANE F RETH
419. N ELSON J FERRER BLAN CO
420. M ANSUKH D KARDANI
421. JOSEPH C LANDW EHR
422. DOUGLAS A ROLAN
423. BILLY J RO SS
424. BETTY W ALKER
425. CHAD A LYN N
426. FERN R COM BS
427. ROSENDA CASTILLA
428. HEATHER FILBRUN
429. LUTHER M M ATTHEW S
430. JAMES J W OJCIK
431. BELW DA F LADD
432. JENNIFER R OSTERTAG
433. LINDA L PHILLIPS
434. ROBERTO J BRITO GUEVARA
435. GARY D LEW IS
436. NAN CY C SURLES
11
Case 1:14-cv-24009-FAM Document 694-2 Entered on FLSD Docket 11/01/2017 Page 11 of 16
437. STEPHEN R M OYE
438. M ARVIN D M OTT
439. TODD ZIEBARTH
440. M UOI N LAM
441. M ARJA E BLACKM ON & KELLY RYAN BLACKM ON
442. AM Y E VARGO
443. CHARLES M RHINEHART
444. CAROL L BOZIGIAN
445. HANNAH C PULCASTRO
446. TIM OTHY J DONATO
447. JILL DONATO
448. ROBERT A ROONEY
449. SANDM P LILLY
450. DONNA J ST. AM AND
451. LORETTA M LYNN
452. M ARY A LEV INE
453. SONJA A GRZECH
454. M ICHELLE L DURHAM
455. SIVARAM AKRISHNA NELABHOTLA
456. DAVID S LUTZEW ITZ
457. M ARITZA A GOM EZ
458. CM IG L EVERHART
459. ROBERT L CHRISTIAN SON
460. SYLV IA E HUDEC
461. M ARGARITA J BAZELEY
462. BRITTANY J SM ALL
463. AM Y K W INKLER
464. JOHN V FM NCIS
465. AKLILU M AA SHO
466. SUM ITAVA DE
467. BECKY HOLESAPPLE
468. AM BER L DENNIS
469. CYNANNBRAH ISOM
470. JONATHAN Z VINCENT
471. JARED PETERS
472. JOCELYN A JOHNSON
473. KEITH G LEE
474. TERESA R DYKEM A
475. DAVID G CHEUNG
476. ALICE J VAN DERHYDEN
12
Case 1:14-cv-24009-FAM Document 694-2 Entered on FLSD Docket 11/01/2017 Page 12 of 16
477. VADA MCNERTNEY
478. JAM ES P PHILLIPS
479. JONATHAN A BALASA
480. ALICJA W BA LA SA
481. JAE H CHOI
482. HYUN J KIM
483. M ILDRED M PHELPS M ADISON
484. GREGORY S M OSTROM
485. NIKITA M JONES
486. M ARYELLEN T M ARZETTA
487. BRIAN D HEALY
488. JAY M ANNING & ROBERTA MANNW G
489. SANDRA M PIEDM ONTE
490. LATASHA M W ATERS
491. BONNIE L CROYL
492. YOLANDA D W INFIELD
493. M ARCIE L MUSEN
494. DAVID J ALEM N DER
495. W ANDA K HARTLE
496. ALPHON SO A JOHNSON
497. TERESA P ALW OOD
498. TANNY T TRINH
499. W ILLIAM A SETTER
500. RENATE W ILLIAM S
501. M ARIA M M OS
502. PATRICIA E GONSALVES & ALFRED GONSALVES
503. GENE P NYM AN
504. M UL GON ZALEZ
505. ELIZABETH VERAS
506. M ILDRED F DOM INGUEZ
507. M IGUEL A GARCES TAPIA
508. M IGUEL A GARCES TAPIA
509. M IGUEL A GARCES TAPIA
510. W ILLIE E BM DLEY
511. M AM O J SAFFOLD
512. SONIA BUENROSTRO
513. SARA K FLYNN
514. JAM ES T HAN SEN
515. VICTORIA L HUFFM AN
516. RIA W ESTPHAL
13
Case 1:14-cv-24009-FAM Document 694-2 Entered on FLSD Docket 11/01/2017 Page 13 of 16
517. NIM IT JAIN
518. ELAINE DANEY
519. SHIRLEY A HOLLEY
520. DAVID C M ILLER
521. DOUGLA S LINDE
522. SANDM L TAYLOR
523. M ATTHEW J POLDER
524. JINLIE LOUM ILLER
525. ELIZABETH A BELL
526. OSAM AH I SHAREEF
527. RICHARD SEPESI
528. JONATHAN STINE
529. LISA DETTLING
530. AILEEN E PAU LSON
531. KIM BERLY VILLALOBOS
532. SRAVAN K BUSIREDDY
533. M ELVIN G UFFM AN
534. JOAN P HILLIARD
535. NANCY M AGUIM
536. KAYLA E LIBBY
537. M ELISSA TETER
538. M ELISSA TETER
539. LYNN P CLOUD
540. CM IG D EDGAR
541. SUM IN I SOEPARN O
542. ALVARO G RW ERA
543. TERRI LYNN W ILLETT
544. CYNTHIA L HAGOOD
545. LAURA BAIRD
546. HEM ERT C JONES
547. ANDRE H W ADE M ARCEL
548. YISSEL S LOPEZ
549. SARA M SCHILLING
550. JASON R PETTIT
551. N ICOLE P HUNT
552. THOM AS A M ILLER & STEPHANIE CHARLENE M ILLER
553. CHRISTINA M RENCIS
554. M ICHAEL E W INKELM AN
555. M ELVW W OODRUFF
556. GLEN NA JON ES
14
Case 1:14-cv-24009-FAM Document 694-2 Entered on FLSD Docket 11/01/2017 Page 14 of 16
557. PAUL F CONNERS
558. RENE GIANOLA
559. GAIL SHULER
560. SARAH E SKELTON
561. DAVID A N IELSEN
562. JUDITH M HUNT
563. JEROM E L HUNT
564. ASHLI ENGEN
565. CURTIS STEIER
566. CAROL STEIER
567. FM NK S KUPIDLOW SKI
568. PAM ELA KRUPKE
569. ANDRE C VAN SLEE
570. ALEJAN DRO PM CIA DO
571. M ARY HASSANI
572. U YLA L EICKHOFF
573. EARLENE JAM ES
574. M ADONNA BAILEY
575. LARRY W COKER
576. FERN R COM BS
577. ROBERT DUNLAP
578. GEM LD A AUST & BELINDA K AU ST
579. DAW N I POOLE
580. ELENA BECKER
581. HERBERT B SHEPHEO
582. W ENDELL EM ERY
583. SHAYLA K SCOTT
584. JONATHAN M ECK
585. NIDIA PRIETO
586. LILIA VALITOVA
587. M ICHELLE SHAFM R
588. M OSHE SHAFRIR
589. REBEKAH RICHM ON D
590. CLINTON E BOUCHER
591. ENEDELIA LEDESM A
592. ROBERT J HATHORN
593. ROSEM ARY C HARRISON
594. M ARTHA URIEGA S
595. KATHLEEN L THOM PSON
596. LEONAD L LISIECKI
15
Case 1:14-cv-24009-FAM Document 694-2 Entered on FLSD Docket 11/01/2017 Page 15 of 16
597. ISABEL ROSALIA SIFUENTES
598. M ARK D SU LTON
599. SUZANNE L W OLDING
600. SU SAN M M ATHEW S
601. EDGARDO SAUL
602. KRISTINE R EVAN S
603. DANIEL W RONA
604. LIAN E LOPEZ
605. CONOR M CGUINN
16
Case 1:14-cv-24009-FAM Document 694-2 Entered on FLSD Docket 11/01/2017 Page 16 of 16