Reporting and Evaluating DSM Performance Staff Workshop – April 28, 2011.
-
Upload
haley-miles -
Category
Documents
-
view
215 -
download
0
Transcript of Reporting and Evaluating DSM Performance Staff Workshop – April 28, 2011.
![Page 1: Reporting and Evaluating DSM Performance Staff Workshop – April 28, 2011.](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022082604/55157f26550346486b8b53af/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
Reporting and Evaluating DSM Performance
Staff Workshop – April 28, 2011
![Page 2: Reporting and Evaluating DSM Performance Staff Workshop – April 28, 2011.](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022082604/55157f26550346486b8b53af/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
Purpose of Goals and Programs
Economically defer power plant construction Conserve expensive resources (fuel savings) Encourage development of demand-side
renewables (solar pv, solar thermal)
![Page 3: Reporting and Evaluating DSM Performance Staff Workshop – April 28, 2011.](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022082604/55157f26550346486b8b53af/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
Potential Consequences of Not Meeting Goals (to Ratepayers)
Increased costs – plant and fuel Increased environmental emissions Local economic impacts (jobs)
![Page 4: Reporting and Evaluating DSM Performance Staff Workshop – April 28, 2011.](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022082604/55157f26550346486b8b53af/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
Historic Reporting Methods
FEECA Statutes (Sections 366.80 – 85 and Section 403.519, F.S.)
PSC to provide report to Legislature and Governor by March 1
Rule 25-17.0021(5), F.A.C. Utilities report DSM achievements for prior calendar year
to PSC by March 1 Order PSC-09-0855-FOF-EG
Separate Residential and C/I categories Annual Numeric Goals Solar Pilot Programs Required
![Page 5: Reporting and Evaluating DSM Performance Staff Workshop – April 28, 2011.](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022082604/55157f26550346486b8b53af/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
Current Situation – 2010 Filings
Goal Achieved Goal Achieved Goal Achieved
FPL 33.2 38.3 67.7 92.9 119.6 141.3PEF 81.3 80.0 79.6 41.0 261.6 55.0
TECO 6.4 10.6 4.6 7.6 9.8 16.3Gulf 5.9 8.1 7.5 6.8 35.0 6.2
FPUC 0.1 0.4 0.2 0.2 0.5 0.5OUC 0.2 0.8 0.5 1.0 1.8 3.0JEA 1.0 2.5 1.2 2.1 5.4 13.7
ResidentialWinter Summer Annual Energy
![Page 6: Reporting and Evaluating DSM Performance Staff Workshop – April 28, 2011.](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022082604/55157f26550346486b8b53af/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
Current Situation – 2010 Filings
Goal Achieved Goal Achieved Goal Achieved
FPL 8.1 21.1 42.7 36.1 84.7 63.3PEF 5.3 30.0 13.7 34.0 31.1 62.0
TECO 0.9 6.8 2.5 10.4 6.5 17.3Gulf 0.5 16.1 1.2 30.2 3.2 33.3
FPUC 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.1 0.8 0.3OUC 0.7 0.9 0.7 1.7 1.8 5.8JEA 0.4 1.1 0.6 1.1 10.1 13.2
CommercialWinter Summer Annual Energy
![Page 7: Reporting and Evaluating DSM Performance Staff Workshop – April 28, 2011.](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022082604/55157f26550346486b8b53af/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
Current SituationMar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sept Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr2010 2011
FPL Plan Filed Non-Compliant Rev Plan Filed
PEF Plan Filed Non-Compliant Rev Plan Filed
TECO Plan Filed Non-Compliant Rev Plan Approved Standards Approved
GULF Plan Filed Non-Compliant Rev Plan Filed Rev Plan Approved
FPUC Plan Filed Rev Plan Filed Rev Plan Approved Standards Approved
OUC Plan Filed Plan Approved
JEA Plan Filed Plan Approved
![Page 8: Reporting and Evaluating DSM Performance Staff Workshop – April 28, 2011.](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022082604/55157f26550346486b8b53af/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
2012 FEECA ReportDraft to Internal Affairs early 2012 - will include:
1) MW, MWh Savings compared to goalsResidential, C/I, and combinedAnnual and Cumulative
2) Utility justification for goal variances3) Solar Pilot Programs (MW, MWh, number of
installations, etc.)4) Ratepayer impact of utility performance (goal
achievement or failure)
![Page 9: Reporting and Evaluating DSM Performance Staff Workshop – April 28, 2011.](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022082604/55157f26550346486b8b53af/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
2012 FEECA ReportDraft Report will also contain recommendations
for next steps. Options include: Accept filings and justifications – no further
action Program revisions or additions – docketed
proceeding for affected utility Reward/penalty – docketed proceeding for
affected utility Other?
![Page 10: Reporting and Evaluating DSM Performance Staff Workshop – April 28, 2011.](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022082604/55157f26550346486b8b53af/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
Options Going ForwardHow should 2010 DSM achievements be reported and evaluated for purposes of the 2012 FEECA Report?
1. Is it more appropriate to measure 2010 DSM achievements against the goals established in 2004 or 2009?
2. What is the appropriate date range to use for judging utility performance: annual, or a band of 3 to 6 years?
3. How should achievements be measured: against annual goals, cumulative goals or both?
4. How should savings for Residential and C/I customer classes be evaluated: separately, combined, or both?
5. What type of information should be provided for solar pilot projects? (i.e., number of installations, savings per installation, amount of expenditures, problems encountered and lessons learned.)
6. What additional information should be provided to assist staff in evaluating utilities’ 2010 performance?
![Page 11: Reporting and Evaluating DSM Performance Staff Workshop – April 28, 2011.](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022082604/55157f26550346486b8b53af/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
Next Steps
Post Workshop Comments – within a week. Staff intends to issue data requests within the
next few weeks.
![Page 12: Reporting and Evaluating DSM Performance Staff Workshop – April 28, 2011.](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022082604/55157f26550346486b8b53af/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
Options Going ForwardHow should 2010 DSM achievements be reported and evaluated for purposes of the 2012 FEECA Report?
1. Is it more appropriate to measure 2010 DSM achievements against the goals established in 2004 or 2009?
![Page 13: Reporting and Evaluating DSM Performance Staff Workshop – April 28, 2011.](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022082604/55157f26550346486b8b53af/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
Options Going ForwardHow should 2010 DSM achievements be reported and evaluated for purposes of the 2012 FEECA Report?
2. What is the appropriate date range to use for judging utility performance: annual, or a band of 3 to 6 years?
![Page 14: Reporting and Evaluating DSM Performance Staff Workshop – April 28, 2011.](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022082604/55157f26550346486b8b53af/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
Options Going ForwardHow should 2010 DSM achievements be reported and evaluated for purposes of the 2012 FEECA Report?
3. How should achievements be measured: against annual goals, cumulative goals or both?
![Page 15: Reporting and Evaluating DSM Performance Staff Workshop – April 28, 2011.](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022082604/55157f26550346486b8b53af/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
Options Going ForwardHow should 2010 DSM achievements be reported and evaluated for purposes of the 2012 FEECA Report?
4. How should savings for Residential and C/I customer classes be evaluated: separately, combined, or both?
![Page 16: Reporting and Evaluating DSM Performance Staff Workshop – April 28, 2011.](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022082604/55157f26550346486b8b53af/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
Options Going ForwardHow should 2010 DSM achievements be reported and evaluated for purposes of the 2012 FEECA Report?
5. What type of information should be provided for solar pilot projects? (i.e., number of installations, savings per installation, amount of expenditures, problems encountered and lessons learned.)
![Page 17: Reporting and Evaluating DSM Performance Staff Workshop – April 28, 2011.](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022082604/55157f26550346486b8b53af/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
Options Going ForwardHow should 2010 DSM achievements be reported and evaluated for purposes of the 2012 FEECA Report?
6. What additional information should be provided to assist staff in evaluating utilities’ 2010 performance?