REPORT Victor Harbor Landfill
Transcript of REPORT Victor Harbor Landfill
REPORT
Victor Harbor Landfill Groundwater Monitoring Event - September 2019
Submitted to:
City of Victor Harbor 1 Bay Road, Victor Harbor South Australia 5211, Australia
Submitted by:
Golder Associates Pty Ltd 118 Franklin Street, Adelaide, South Australia 5000, Australia
+61 8 8213 2100
19127795-001-R-Rev0
11 November 2019
11 November 2019 19127795-001-R-Rev0
i
Distribution List City of Victor Harbor - 1 electronic copy
Golder Associates - 1 electronic copy
11 November 2019 19127795-001-R-Rev0
ii
Table of Contents
1.0 INTRODUCTION ......................................................................................................................................... 1
1.1 Objectives .......................................................................................................................................... 1
1.2 Scope of Work ................................................................................................................................... 1
2.0 SITE SETTING ............................................................................................................................................ 2
2.1 Site Location and Description ........................................................................................................... 2
2.2 Geology and Hydrogeology ............................................................................................................... 2
3.0 MONITORING PLAN .................................................................................................................................. 3
3.1 Summary of Monitoring Well Network ............................................................................................... 3
3.2 Sampling Methodology ...................................................................................................................... 3
3.2.1 Groundwater Levels ...................................................................................................................... 3
3.2.2 Groundwater Sampling ................................................................................................................. 3
3.2.3 Leachate and Surface Water Sampling ........................................................................................ 4
3.3 Laboratory Analytical Program .......................................................................................................... 5
3.4 Groundwater Assessment Screening Levels .................................................................................... 6
3.4.1 Local Groundwater Salinity and Use ............................................................................................. 6
3.4.2 Surface Water Interaction ............................................................................................................. 6
3.4.3 Applicable Environmental Values ................................................................................................. 7
3.4.4 Adopted Groundwater Assessment Screening Levels ................................................................. 7
4.0 MONITORING RESULTS ........................................................................................................................... 8
4.1 Groundwater Elevations and Flow .................................................................................................... 8
4.2 Groundwater and Surface Water Field Parameters .......................................................................... 9
4.3 Groundwater Analytical Results ...................................................................................................... 10
4.3.1 Major Ions and Salinity ................................................................................................................ 10
4.3.2 Biological and Chemical Oxygen Demand ................................................................................. 12
4.3.3 Total Organic Carbon .................................................................................................................. 12
4.3.4 Nutrients ...................................................................................................................................... 12
4.3.5 Metals .......................................................................................................................................... 15
4.3.6 TRH and BTEXN ......................................................................................................................... 18
4.3.7 Pesticides, PAH and Phenols ..................................................................................................... 18
11 November 2019 19127795-001-R-Rev0
iii
4.4 Surface Water and Leachate Results ............................................................................................. 19
5.0 QA/QC AND DATA VALIDATIONS ......................................................................................................... 20
6.0 CONCLUSIONS ........................................................................................................................................ 21
7.0 REFERENCES .......................................................................................................................................... 22
TABLES
Table 1: Summary of Well Details ........................................................................................................................ 3
Table 2: Laboratory Analysis ................................................................................................................................ 5
Table 3: Adopted Groundwater Assessment Criteria ........................................................................................... 7
Table 4: Summary of Groundwater Elevation 2004 – 2019 (m AHD) .................................................................. 8
Table 5: Field Parameters 2019 ......................................................................................................................... 10
FIGURES
Plot 1: Historical Groundwater Elevations ............................................................................................................ 9
Plot 2: TDS Concentrations ................................................................................................................................ 11
Plot 3: Chloride Concentrations .......................................................................................................................... 12
Plot 4: Total Phosphorus Concentrations ........................................................................................................... 13
Plot 5: Ammonia (as N) Concentrations ............................................................................................................. 14
Plot 6: Nitrate (as N) Concentrations .................................................................................................................. 15
Plot 7: Arsenic Concentrations ........................................................................................................................... 16
Plot 8: Copper Concentrations ........................................................................................................................... 17
Plot 9: Nickel Concentrations ............................................................................................................................. 18
APPENDICES
APPENDIX A EPA Licence and LEMP Extract
APPENDIX B Groundwater Sampling Sheets
APPENDIX C Chemical Results
APPENDIX D Lab Certificates and COC
APPENDIX E QAQC
11 November 2019 19127795-001-R-Rev0
iv
APPENDIX F Waterconnect
APPENDIX G Important Information
11 November 2019 19127795-001-R-Rev0
1
1.0 INTRODUCTION Golder Associates (Golder) was commissioned by the City of Victor Harbor (Council) to conduct a groundwater, surface water and leachate monitoring event (GME) at the Victor Harbor Landfill (‘the site’), situated on Jagger Road, Waitpinga, South Australia. A site location plan is provided as Figure 1.
The works outlined in the proposal (Golder reference P19127795-001-P-Rev0) dated 25th July 2019 were based on relevant South Australian Environment Protection Authority (SA EPA) guidance documents and to comply with conditions of the site’s current EPA licence (License No. 359) provided in Appendix A. Details of the groundwater, surface water and leachate monitoring is also presented in the Landfill Environmental Management Plan (LEMP), an extract of which was provided to Golder.
1.1 Objectives This report documents groundwater, surface water and leachate monitoring conducted by Golder at the site in September 2019, in the context of previous monitoring programs undertaken at the site since 2004. The principal objectives of the monitoring event were to:
Complete sampling and laboratory analysis of groundwater from existing onsite wells in accordance with the EPA license and LEMP.
Assess for potential impacts to surface water and groundwater associated with the closed landfill.
1.2 Scope of Work The following scope of work was undertaken:
Obtain groundwater samples from all seven groundwater wells at the site;
Obtain leachate samples from the leachate collection tank at the toe of the landfill
Collect a sample of surface water from downstream of the toe of the landfill
Send all samples for laboratory testing of the analytes required by the LEMP; and
Review and provide a report which summarises the results against the relevant guidelines and historical data.
11 November 2019 19127795-001-R-Rev0
2
2.0 SITE SETTING 2.1 Site Location and Description The Victor Harbor Landfill is classified as a large landfill (South Australia EPA Guidelines for Environmental Management of Landfill Facilities-Solid Waste Disposal, 2019). The landfill is located in a valley approximately 6 km south west of Victor Harbor. A site location plan is presented as Figure 1. The landfill and surrounding land are zoned as general farming, with the nearest residential property located approximately 550 m southeast of the landfill. The site is approximately 33.8 ha in area and is assigned as Allotment 60, Deposited Plan 72974. An area of approximately 4.5 ha in the north portion of the site was historically used for landfilling (URS, 2015).
The landfill occupies a portion of an approximately east-west trending valley with an average gradient of approximately 1V:10H towards the east, and with sides of approximate gradient of 1V:2H. The sea is located approximately 650 m from the nearest site boundary. Survey data contained in the LEMP indicates that the ground elevation at the toe of the landfill (assumed to correspond to the original elevation of the valley floor) is approximately 50 mAHD.
The facility commenced operation in 1974 and comprised three main areas: a resource recovery and waste transfer facility, a green organics processing area, and the main landfill waste disposal area. A leachate interception system was constructed at the toe of the landfill in March 2011. The leachate interception system was designed to collect seepages at the landfill toe via a gravel filled interception trench for temporary storage in a tank adjacent to the toe, before pumping to an evaporation pond on the upper portion of the northern valley side. The City of Victor Harbor advised that all landfill operations ceased at the site on 1 October 2012, with capping being completed in 2013.
Annual monitoring of groundwater, surface water and leachate is required at site as outlined in the LEMP, and multiple assessment rounds have been historically conducted since 2004.
2.2 Geology and Hydrogeology The South Australian Geological Survey 1:100,000 Encounter geological sheet indicates that the surface geology of the site corresponds to the Balquhidder Formation, part of the Kanmantoo Group (Cambrian Age). The Balquhidder formation consists of primarily metasandstones and metasiltstones. The rock dip is steeply to the southeast and strikes to the northeast.
The Balquidder Formation metasediments constitute a fractured rock aquifer system, with hydraulic parameters expected to be variable according to fracture geometry and connectivity. The observed depth to groundwater at the site has varied between 0.3 m and 66 m depending on location within the valley. Some of these observations may represent perched groundwater rather than the regional water table. Previous monitoring rounds suggest that groundwater flow is towards the east-southeast, parallel with the alignment of the valley.
A report by Water Search (2004) indicates that cross-cutting quartz veining is common in the area and has been associated with mineralized zones. Such mineralisation may be reflected in the minor ion chemistry of the local groundwater, particularly in the possible presence of elevated concentrations of sulphate and heavy metals.
Surface water at the site is expected to flow along the topography of the valley to the east and southeast. Prior to the landfilling activities, springs are documented as having existed in the general area at the base and sides of the landfill (URS, 2015). Drainage channels along the flanks of the landfill and the installation of the leachate interception system at the toe of the landfill would have altered the surface water movements across the site.
11 November 2019 19127795-001-R-Rev0
3
3.0 MONITORING PLAN Groundwater, surface water and leachate monitoring was undertaken based upon guidance provided in the following documents:
National Environmental Protection Council 1999 (amended 2013). National Environment Protection (Assessment of Site Contamination) Measure (ASC NEPM).
SA EPA, Guideline: Regulatory Monitoring and Testing – Groundwater Sampling, 2019
SA EPA, Guideline for the Assessment and Remediation of Site Contamination, 2018.
3.1 Summary of Monitoring Well Network Details of the existing groundwater monitoring well network at the site are summarised in Table 1 below. Well locations are presented on Figure 1 at the rear of this document. Golder located monitoring well DH3, however the well standpipe appeared to have been knocked over and was noted as being destroyed.
Table 1: Summary of Well Details
Monitoring Well Date Installed Well Depth
(m bgl)
Screened Interval (m bgl)
Elevation of top of casing (mAHD)
Status
65245 6 June 2004 10.0 4.0 – 10.0 96.23 Working
65246 7 June 2004 66.0 60.0 – 66.0 93.38 Working
65247 10 June 2004 63.5 57.5 – 63.5 86.77 Working
DH1 23 April 2005 33.0 20.2 – 33.2 46.657 Working
DH2 23 April 2005 8.0 5.0 – 8.0 49.132 Working
DH3 23 March 2006 29.5 23.5 – 29.5 96.47 Destroyed
DH4 21 March 2006 43.0 34.0 – 43.0 99.775 Working AHD – Australian Height Datum bgl – below ground level
3.2 Sampling Methodology 3.2.1 Groundwater Levels Groundwater levels were recorded in the monitoring wells (DH1, DH2, DH4, 65245, 65246 and 65247) on 12 September 2019. Water levels were measured using an electronic water level probe. The water level probe was rinsed with a Decon 90 solution and deionised water prior to the commencement of fieldwork and between sampling locations, to minimise the possibility of cross-contamination between bores.
3.2.2 Groundwater Sampling Groundwater samples were collected from the following monitoring wells (DH1, DH2, DH4, 65245, 65246, and 65247) on 12 September 2019.
Sampling from the four shallow groundwater monitoring wells (65245, DH1, DH2 and DH4) was undertaken using low-flow (micro-purge) method whereby a small volume of groundwater is slowly purged whilst maintaining a consistent drawdown. Groundwater field parameters including pH, dissolved oxygen (DO), electrical conductivity (EC), temperature, and redox potential were measured using a calibrated water quality
11 November 2019 19127795-001-R-Rev0
4
meter during low-flow purging. Once field parameters had stabilised a groundwater sample was collected. Field observations of the colour, turbidity and odour were also noted.
The two deeper monitoring wells 65246 and 65247 were sampled using disposable bailers. A small volume of groundwater was removed (~5 L) and field parameters measured prior to collection of a groundwater sample.
Field purge sheets recording the sampling methods and chemical parameters are included as Appendix B.
To minimise the potential for cross-contamination between bores during water level gauging and sampling, the interface probe and low-flow pump were cleaned with a Decon 90 solution and deionised water prior to the commencement of field work and between sampling locations. A new disposable bladder unit and dedicated tubing were used at each monitoring well. An equipment rinsate quality control sample (R01) was collected from the tubing used for purging and sampling the wells to confirm the absence of cross-contamination from sampling equipment. A trip blank quality control sample (TB01) was also submitted with the samples to the laboratory to confirm the absence of volatiles that may influence the samples during transport.
Six groundwater samples were collected, plus one intra-laboratory (blind) and one inter-laboratory (split) duplicate (from well 65245) and were placed into laboratory prepared bottles containing the appropriate preservatives. Samples analysed for dissolved metals were collected in the field using 0.45 micron filters. The samples were stored in cool boxes with ice bricks and dispatched to Australian Laboratory Services Pty Ltd (ALS), which is accredited by the National Association of Testing Authorities (NATA), under Golder chain of custody procedures.
3.2.3 Leachate and Surface Water Sampling A sample was collected from the leachate collection tank at the toe of the landfill (LT1), and a surface water sample (SW1) was collected east (down hydraulic gradient) of DH1 as shown in Figure 1. Field parameters were recorded at both locations. The samples were collected using an extendable swing sampler directly into laboratory supplied bottles and were sent to ALS. Surface water samples were analysed for total metals and therefore did not require filtering. The samples were transported to the analytical laboratory (ALS) in cool boxes with ice bricks under Golder chain of custody procedures.
11 November 2019 19127795-001-R-Rev0
5
3.3 Laboratory Analytical Program All groundwater, surface water and leachate samples were tested for the suite of analytes listed in the LEMP. These analytes are listed below in Table 2.
Table 2: Laboratory Analysis
Analyte Groundwater, Surface Water and Leachate Samples
pH ✓
Total Dissolved Solids (TDS) ✓
Chemical Oxygen Demand (COD) ✓
Biological Oxygen Demand (BOD) ✓
Total Organic Carbon (TOC) ✓
Major ions (Ca, Mg, Na, K, pH, EC, Cl, F, SO4, alkalinity, hardness & total dissolved solids)
✓
Nutrients (nitrate, nitrite, ammonia, reactive phosphorus, total phosphorous and nitrogen, total kjeldahl nitrogen)
✓
Metals (As, B, Cd, Cr, Cu, Hg, Ni, Pb and Zn) ✓ (Groundwater - Dissolved, Surface Water - Total)
Total Iron (Fe) ✓
Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons (TPH) ✓
TPH after silica gel clean-up (if TPH > LOR) ✓
Benzene, Toluene, Ethylbenzene, Xylene Naphthalene (BTEXN)
✓
Phenolic compounds ✓
Organochlorine (OC) and Organophosphorus (OP) Pesticides
✓
Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons (PAH) ✓
11 November 2019 19127795-001-R-Rev0
6
3.4 Groundwater Assessment Screening Levels The Environment Protection Act 1993 (the EP Act) and the Environment Protection (Site Contamination) Regulations 2009 [the EP(SC) Regulations] set the regulatory framework for the investigation and management of contaminated land and water in South Australia. The Environment Protection (Water Quality) Policy 2015 (WQEPP 2015) provides detail to support the EP Act and provides the structure for regulation and management of water quality in South Australian inland surface waters, marine waters and groundwaters.
The SA EPA license and LEMP do not provide advice regarding the comparison of monitoring results to guideline levels or criteria. Previous monitoring undertaken at the site compared results to water quality levels presented in the now superseded Environment Protection (Water Quality) policy 2003, as well as the ASC NEPM groundwater investigation levels (GILs) and the WQEPP 2015.
In July 2018, the South Australian Environment Protection Authority (SA EPA) issued Guidelines for the assessment and remediation of site contamination (GAR), which describes the legislative and policy approach to risk-based assessment and remediation of site contamination and supports the objects of the EP Act. Included in the GAR 2018 are the steps for determining the Environmental Values (as per WQEPP 2015) relevant for the site.
The 2018 Victor Harbor Landfill Groundwater, Leachate and Surface Water Monitoring Event report (AECOM 20181) included details regarding determination of the Environmental Values for groundwater and surface water at the site. A summary of the justification for the selected Environmental Values (as presented in AECOM 2018) and updated relevant information is provided below.
3.4.1 Local Groundwater Salinity and Use A groundwater bore search within a 2 km radius of the site was undertaken by Golder using the WaterConnect online groundwater database on 15 October 2019. The records are detailed in Appendix F, including the use and operational status of the 46 registered bores listed on the database.
Based on listed groundwater bore uses within a 2 km buffer distance of the site (Appendix F), the following registered groundwater uses were noted:
2 bores recording domestic use;
1 bore recording irrigation; and
8 bores for stock use.
Based on regional groundwater salinity (Appendix F), field measured salinity (as EC) (Appendix B) and laboratory TDS results (Appendix C), shallow groundwater was typically moderately saline (>2,500 mg/L).
3.4.2 Surface Water Interaction The following surface water bodies were identified within a 2 km buffer zone of the site:
Areas of intermittent ponded stormwater
Un-named and ephemeral creeks
Various farm dams (closest located 150 west of the site, downgradient closest dam was 350 m)
1 AECOM Australia Pty Ltd, report ref: vh landfill gwm r001-1 23nov18. Dated 23 November 2018.
11 November 2019 19127795-001-R-Rev0
7
3.4.3 Applicable Environmental Values Based upon the summary above, the following Environmental Values were considered applicable for the site:
Recreation and aesthetics (primary and aesthetic);
Primary Industries (irrigation, livestock and aquaculture); and
Aquatic ecosystem protection (fresh / marine);
Groundwater assessment criteria appropriate to these Environmental Values and recognised by the SA EPA have been selected in accordance with the GAR. It is noted that these applicable groundwater environmental values derived under direction from the GAR and the exclusion of potable use criteria are generally consistent with those previously applied EPPWQ 2015 in the 2017 monitoring round (Golder, 2017) and consistent with the 2018 monitoring round (AECOM, 2018).
3.4.4 Adopted Groundwater Assessment Screening Levels Table 3 presents the publication and adopted screening values for each Environmental Value.
Table 3: Adopted Groundwater Assessment Criteria
Environmental Value
Guideline / Publications Adopted Screening Levels
Primary Contact Recreation and Aesthetics
Guidelines for Managing Risks in Recreational Waters (2008), National Health and Medical Research Council
Health and Aesthetic guideline values
Primary Industry - Irrigation
Australia & New Zealand Guidelines for Fresh and Marine Water Quality
Long-term irrigation trigger values
Primary Industry – Livestock drinking water
Australia & New Zealand Guidelines for Fresh and Marine Water Quality
Livestock drinking water trigger values
Primary Industry – Aquaculture
Australia & New Zealand Guidelines for Fresh and Marine Water Quality
Aquaculture saltwater production
Aquatic ecosystems (freshwater)
Australia & New Zealand Guidelines for Fresh and Marine Water Quality
Trigger values for freshwater, slightly disturbed systems (95% species protection)
Aquatic ecosystems (marine)
Australia & New Zealand Guidelines for Fresh and Marine Water Quality
Trigger values for marine water, slightly disturbed systems (95% species protection)
11 November 2019 19127795-001-R-Rev0
8
4.0 MONITORING RESULTS 4.1 Groundwater Elevations and Flow Groundwater level data was collected from six wells on 12 September 2019. Standing Water Levels (SWL) were measured in monitoring wells prior to sampling. The SWL measurements recorded in September 2019 are summarised in Table 4, along with groundwater elevations in Australian Height Datum (AHD) calculated from top of casing survey measurements presented in the AECOM 2018 report.
The groundwater elevations ranged from 93.011 m AHD at the inferred up-hydraulic gradient well 65245, to 23.162 m AHD at the inferred down-hydraulic gradient DH1 located at the toe of the landfill. The inferred groundwater flow direction is to the southeast, along the valley and towards the ocean. Groundwater elevations are shown on Figure 2 at the rear of this document.
Table 4: Summary of Groundwater Elevation 2004 – 2019 (m AHD)
Date Monitoring Well
65245 65246 65247 DH1 DH2 DH3 DH4
07/07/2004 92.130 30.220 26.550 - - - -
04/05/2005 91.330 29.000 25.500 22.907 42.632 - -
21/09/2005 93.020 28.550 25.160 22.507 43.832 - -
19/04/2006 91.200 27.840 26.020 22.247 44.482 69.860 69.585
29/11/2006 90.750 27.380 24.120 21.787 47.042 69.520 68.905
09/05/2007 90.580 26.970 23.690 21.327 47.212 69.350 68.475
15/11/2007 91.040 Dry 23.620 21.357 47.782 69.110 68.305
02/07/2008 90.345 Dry Dry 20.957 47.687 68.800 67.595
24/11/2008 90.694 Dry Dry 22.110 48.222 69.280 67.838
14/10/2009 91.550 27.800 25.570 23.002 48.795 69.740 68.289
12/04/2010 90.520 29.725 26.105 23.297 48.662 70.100 -
16/11/2010 91.430 31.315 27.470 25.337 48.672 70.980 69.950
30/05/2011 91.070 30.310 26.670 23.167 45.012 70.640 70.045
20/02/2012 91.075 29.905 26.485 23.132 41.975 70.550 70.505
15/10/2012 92.680 36.523 32.600 28.562 46.332 73.640 73.710
12/06/2013 92.555 33.415 29.595 25.504 46.326 72.672 73.243
03/02/2014 92.955 42.180 37.131 31.687 47.807 78.070 77.760
22/07/2015 93.022 31.720 28.005 24.233 47.257 72.640 73.041
11 November 2019 19127795-001-R-Rev0
9
Date Monitoring Well
65245 65246 65247 DH1 DH2 DH3 DH4
17/09/2017 94.059 37.633 33.175 28.320 47.772 75.718 75.169
10/10/2018 93.521 34.150 29.345 25.419 47.212 73.698 73.555
12/09/2019 93.011 30.188 26.693 23.162 47.228 - 71.518
The groundwater elevation measured in 2019 were lower than the elevation measured in 2018 (AECOM 2018) at most locations but were within historically-recorded levels.
Plot 1: Historical Groundwater Elevations
4.2 Groundwater and Surface Water Field Parameters Field parameters including EC, pH, temperature, DO and redox potential measured immediately prior sampling and are summarised in Table 5. Field parameters measured for the surface water and leachate interception system are also presented.
The field measured pH values generally ranged between 6.67 (DH1) and 8.00 (DH4) for groundwater, 7.66 (SW1) for surface water and 7.98 (LT1) for leachate water. These values represent generally neutral conditions and were generally consistent with historical data.
Field-recorded EC values observed in groundwater ranged between 4,017 µs/cm (well 65245) and 8,367 µs/cm (well 65246) and were within historical maxima and minima.
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
23/04/2004 18/01/2007 14/10/2009 10/07/2012 6/04/2015 31/12/2017 26/09/2020
SWL
(mAH
D)
Date
Standing Water Level (m AHD)
DH1
DH2
DH3
DH4
65245
65246
65247
11 November 2019 19127795-001-R-Rev0
10
Field-recorded redox potentials ranged from -18.7 mV (DH4) to 124.7 mV (65245) and were within historical maxima and minima.
Dissolved oxygen (DO) concentrations in the groundwater ranged between 0.29 mg/L (DH1) and 9.45 mg/L (DH4). All DO concentrations observed during this monitoring event were reported within historical ranges, with the exception of DH4 which recorded its highest value.
Table 5: Field Parameters 2019
Location ID Media EC (uS/cm)
Temperature (°C) pH Redox
Potential (mV) DO
(mg/L)
65245 Groundwater 4017 16.5 7.16 124.7 1.42
65246 Groundwater 8367 18.2 6.67 115.1 1.80
65247 Groundwater 4456 17.6 6.82 -1.8 0.37
DH1 Groundwater 5842 18.4 6.76 108.6 0.29
DH2 Groundwater 4802 17.0 7.49 7.9 4.29
DH4 Groundwater 4104 17.0 8.00 -18.7 9.45
LT1 Leachate Interception Tank
5458 17.2 7.98 91.4 7.75
SW1 Pooled Water at Landfill Toe
5334 16.2 7.66 90.8 2.15
4.3 Groundwater Analytical Results Laboratory results for the 2019 monitoring event are presented in Appendix C. Laboratory certificates are included as Appendix D. The results are discussed below according to analyte groups. The results are also presented and discussed below according to analyte group.
4.3.1 Major Ions and Salinity TDS concentrations reported by the laboratory ranged from 2,680 mg/L (DH4) to 6,480 mg/L (65246), exceeding the ANZECC Livestock level in all groundwater wells. Concentrations in wells 65246, DH1, and DH2 also exceeded the ANZECC Freshwater Aquaculture screening level.
The historical trend graph for TDS is presented in Plot 2, which indicates that all TDS concentrations reported during this monitoring round were within historical ranges, with the exception of 65246 (6,480 mg/L) which exceeded its previous maximum TDS concentration of 6,410 mg/L recorded in 2006.
11 November 2019 19127795-001-R-Rev0
11
Plot 2: TDS Concentrations
The reported concentrations of sodium, magnesium, and potassium were within historical variation for all wells. Reported concentrations for magnesium in all collected groundwater samples exceeded the ANZECC Freshwater and Saltwater Aquaculture criteria.
Plot 3 below shows observed chloride concentrations against time. All wells reported concentrations of chloride within historical ranges. The chloride concentration trend is consistent with the observed TDS trend; with groundwater sampled from 65246 reporting the highest concentrations and 65245 and DH4 reporting the lowest concentrations.
1000
2000
3000
4000
5000
6000
7000
Apr-04 Jan-07 Oct-09 Jul-12 Apr-15 Dec-17 Sep-20
TDS
(mg/
L)
Date
TDS
DH1
DH2
DH3
DH4
65245
65246
65247
11 November 2019 19127795-001-R-Rev0
12
Plot 3: Chloride Concentrations
4.3.2 Biological and Chemical Oxygen Demand Biological Oxygen Demand (BOD) is a measure of the biologically degradable organic matter in water and is determined by measuring the amount of oxygen that bacteria require to degrade the organic matter.
Observed BOD concentrations in groundwater samples collected during the 2019 monitoring round ranged from less than the laboratory LOR of 2 mg/L in 65245 and 65246 to 52 mg/L in DH2. BOD concentrations in DH2 exceeded the ANZECC Freshwater Aquaculture screening levels, consistent with historical results.
Chemical oxygen demand (COD) is a measure of the quantity of oxygen used in biological and nonbiological oxidation of materials in water. COD results ranged from 16 mg/L in 65245 to 140 mg/L in DH2. COD concentrations in all groundwater samples exceeded the ANZECC Freshwater Aquaculture screening levels except for 65245, 65246 and DH4, similar to the 2018 monitoring round results.
4.3.3 Total Organic Carbon Reported concentrations of total organic carbon (TOC) ranged from less than the laboratory LOR of 1 mg/L in DH4 to 34 mg/L in 65247. All wells reported concentrations of TOC within historical ranges. Consistent with historical results, no TOC concentrations exceeded the adopted screening levels.
4.3.4 Nutrients Total Phosphorus
Concentrations of total phosphorus observed in the 2019 monitoring round ranged 0.04 mg/L in 65246 to 1.43 mg/L in DH2. Plot 4 below shows observed phosphorous concentrations against time. All sample results exceeded the ANZECC Irrigation screening levels, with the exception of well 65246. All wells reported concentrations of phosphorous within historical ranges and the results for most wells appear to have decreased since the 2018 monitoring round.
0
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
3000
3500
Apr-04 Jan-07 Oct-09 Jul-12 Apr-15 Dec-17 Sep-20
Chlo
ride
(mg/
L)
Date
Chloride
DH1
DH2
DH3
DH4
65245
65246
65247
11 November 2019 19127795-001-R-Rev0
13
Plot 4: Total Phosphorus Concentrations
Ammonia
Reported concentrations of ammonia observed in the 2019 monitoring round ranged from 0.09 mg/L DH4 to 35.4 mg/L in DH2, with two wells 65245 and 65246 reporting concentrations below the laboratory LOR. Plot 5 below shows observed ammonia concentrations against time for all wells, with the concentrations plotted on a logarithmic scale. The results for the well with the highest concentrations (DH2) appear to show an overall declining trend that commenced in 2007, however there has been a minor increase since the previous 2018 monitoring round.
0.01
0.1
1
10
100
Apr-04 Jan-07 Oct-09 Jul-12 Apr-15 Dec-17 Sep-20
Tota
l Pho
spho
rus (
mg/
L)
Date
Total Phosphorus
DH1
DH2
DH3
DH4
65245
65246
65247
11 November 2019 19127795-001-R-Rev0
14
Plot 5: Ammonia (as N) Concentrations
Nitrite as N
Nitrite concentrations were reported below or just exceeding the laboratory limits of detection (0.01 mg/L) in all groundwater samples, with exception of 65246 which reported concentration below the laboratory LOR. Concentrations of nitrite ranged from 0.02 mg/L (65247 and DH4) to 0.91 mg/L (DH2). Concentrations in two wells (DH1 and DH2) exceeded the ANZECC Freshwater Aquaculture screening levels.
Nitrate as N
Reported concentrations of nitrate ranged from 0.49 mg/L in 65247 to 2.59 mg/L in 65245. None of the groundwater sample results exceeded the adopted screening levels. Nitrate concentrations, as shown in Plot 6 below, were reported within historical ranges for all groundwater samples. A slight increase in nitrate was observed in wells DH1 and DH2 during the 2017, 2018 and 2019 events.
0.001
0.01
0.1
1
10
100
Apr-04 Jan-07 Oct-09 Jul-12 Apr-15 Dec-17 Sep-20
Amm
onia
as N
(mg/
L)
Date
Ammonia as N
DH1
DH2
DH3
DH4
65245
65246
65247
11 November 2019 19127795-001-R-Rev0
15
Plot 6: Nitrate (as N) Concentrations
Total Kjeldahl Nitrogen as N
Reported concentrations of TKN ranged from 0.1 mg/L in 65246 to 39 mg/L in the sample collected from DH2. All collected groundwater samples exceeded the ANZECC Freshwater and Saltwater Aquaculture screening levels with the exception of the samples collected from 65245, 65246 and DH4.
4.3.5 Metals Arsenic
Concentrations of arsenic ranged from 0.001 mg/L in well 65246 to 0.009 mg/L in DH4. All groundwater samples collected during this monitoring round reported concentrations of arsenic above the LOR but below the adopted investigation levels. Arsenic concentrations are generally decreasing and were within historical ranges for all groundwater samples.
0.01
0.1
1
10
100
Apr-04 Jan-07 Oct-09 Jul-12 Apr-15 Dec-17 Sep-20
Nitr
ate
as N
(mg/
L)
Date
Nitrate as NDH1
DH2
DH3
DH4
65245
65246
65247
11 November 2019 19127795-001-R-Rev0
16
Plot 7: Arsenic Concentrations
a
Boron
Concentrations of boron ranged from 0.55 mg/L (65247) to 0.98 mg/L (65246) exceeding the ANZECC Maintenance of Freshwater Ecosystems and Irrigation screening levels in collected samples. Boron concentrations were generally consistent with historical results.
Cadmium
Concentrations of cadmium were reported less than the laboratory LOR in all samples with the exception of 65246 (0.0003 mg/L) and DH1 (0.0002 mg/L), with 65246 exceeding the ANZECC Freshwater Aquaculture and maintenance of freshwater ecosystems screening levels. Concentrations of cadmium were reported within historical ranges for all groundwater samples.
Copper
Copper concentrations were reported in three monitoring wells 65245 (0.001 mg/L), 65247 (0.002 mg/L), and DH1 (0.023 mg/L). Concentrations of copper in 65247 and DH1 exceeded the ANZECC Maintenance of Freshwater and Marine Ecosystems screening levels, while only sample DH1 exceeded the ANZECC Freshwater and Saltwater Aquaculture screening levels. Copper concentrations across the site have decreased from the previous 2018 monitoring round as shown in Plot 8.
0
0.05
0.1
0.15
0.2
0.25
Apr-04 Jan-07 Oct-09 Jul-12 Apr-15 Dec-17 Sep-20
Arse
nic
(mg/
L)
Date
ArsenicDH1
DH2
DH3
DH4
65245
65246
65247
11 November 2019 19127795-001-R-Rev0
17
Plot 8: Copper Concentrations
Iron
Concentrations of total iron ranged from 2.68 mg/L in 65245 to 67.3 mg/L in DH2, exceeding the ANZECC Freshwater and Saltwater Aquaculture screening levels in all groundwater samples. Concentrations of iron also exceeded the ANZECC Irrigation screening levels in groundwater sampled from 65245, 65247, DH3, and DH4. Concentrations of iron in the groundwater samples have shown considerable fluctuation throughout the monitoring events. Iron concentrations are likely to be elevated as iron occurs naturally in the bedrock and the highest concentrations have historically been reported in background well 65245.
Mercury
Reported concentrations of mercury in all groundwater samples were reported below the LOR, consistent with historical results
Nickle
Concentrations of nickel ranged from 0.001 mg/L in 65245 and 65246 to 0.118 mg/L in DH1. The nickel concentration in the sample collected from DH1 exceeded the ANZECC Freshwater and Saltwater Aquaculture and ANZECC Maintenance of Freshwater and Marine Ecosystems screening levels. No other sample results exceeded the adopted screening levels. As shown in Plot 9 below, all reported results were within historical variation.
0
0.005
0.01
0.015
0.02
0.025
0.03
0.035
Apr-04 Jan-07 Oct-09 Jul-12 Apr-15 Dec-17 Sep-20
Copp
er (m
g/L)
Date
CopperDH1
DH2
DH3
DH4
65245
65246
65247
11 November 2019 19127795-001-R-Rev0
18
Plot 9: Nickel Concentrations
Zinc
Reported concentrations of zinc ranged from 0.007 mg/L in DH1 to 0.022 mg/L in 65247. Concentrations of zinc exceeded the ANZECC Freshwater and Saltwater Aquaculture and ANZECC Maintenance of Freshwater and Marine Ecosystems screening levels in groundwater sampled from all wells, with the exception of well 65246 which reported a concentration below the LOR. Concentrations of zinc were reported within historical ranges for all groundwater samples.
4.3.6 TRH and BTEXN Concentrations of TRH fractions were detected above the LOR in monitoring wells 65247, DH1, and DH2, and were consistent with historical results. Concentrations of TRH (C16-C34) (F3) were detected in collected sample from 65247, DH1 and DH2. Reported TRH concentrations did not exceed the NEPM 2013 Residential HSLs. TRH concentrations were below the LOR for all wells for both TRH F1 (C6-C10) and F2 (C10-C16) and consistent with historical results.
Silica gel clean-up and reanalysis was conducted on samples 65247, DH1 and DH2. A concentration of TRH (C16-C34) (F3) was detected in the sample from DH2 at 0.13 mg/L. However, concentrations have remained below the adopted assessment level, consistent with historical results.
BTEXN concentrations in all groundwater samples were below the LOR and below the adopted screening levels. In the 2018 monitoring round concentrations of toluene were detected in samples from 65246 and 65247.
4.3.7 Pesticides, PAH and Phenols Groundwater samples collected during this monitoring round were reported at concentrations below the laboratory LOR for all OC and OP pesticides, PAHs, and phenolic compounds, consistent with previous historical results.
0
0.02
0.04
0.06
0.08
0.1
0.12
0.14
0.16
0.18
Apr-04 Jan-07 Oct-09 Jul-12 Apr-15 Dec-17 Sep-20
Nic
kel (
mg/
L)
Date
Nickel
DH1
DH2
DH3
DH4
65245
65246
65247
11 November 2019 19127795-001-R-Rev0
19
4.4 Surface Water and Leachate Results Water samples were collected from the leachate collection tank at the toe of the landfill (LT1), west (up hydraulic gradient) of DH1 and surface water (SW1), east (down hydraulic gradient) of DH1. A summary of the results for surface and leachate are as follows:
Leachate sample:
▪ LT1 sample had concentrations of boron, iron, BOC, COD, nitrate, total kjeldahl nitrogen, total nitrogen, total phosphorus, and magnesium greater than of one or more adopted screening levels.
▪ These concentrations were consistent with the historical results.
▪ Concentrations of TPH (after silica gel clean-up) in LT1 were marginally above the LOR for TPH F3 fraction (>C15-C34).
Surface water sample:
▪ SW1 sample had concentrations boron, copper, iron, lead, nickel, zinc, BOD, COD, nitrite, total kjeldahl nitrogen, total nitrogen, total phosphorus, and magnesium greater than one or more adopted screening levels.
▪ Concentrations are consistent with historical results for the downstream surface water collected.
▪ Concentrations of TPH (after silica gel clean-up) in SW1 were below the laboratory LOR.
The reported concentrations in samples from LT1 and SW1 are observed to be similar to each other during this monitoring round. This similarity was observed during previous monitoring events.
11 November 2019 19127795-001-R-Rev0
20
5.0 QA/QC AND DATA VALIDATIONS The data validation guidelines adopted by Golder provide a consistent approach for the evaluation of analytical data. The process involves the checking of analytical procedure compliance and an assessment of the accuracy and precision of analytical data from a range of QA/QC measures, generated from both the sampling and analytical programs.
Validation summary reports are presented in Appendix E whilst tables of field duplicates are presented in Appendix C. From this information and with reference to the notes and discussion presented in Appendix E it is assessed that the quality of the analytical data is such that it can be used as a basis for interpretation.
Quality test results were generally within acceptable limits and are considered to demonstrate acceptable accuracy and precision.
11 November 2019 19127795-001-R-Rev0
21
6.0 CONCLUSIONS Based on the results of the 2019 monitoring round, the following key findings were made:
Groundwater:
▪ Groundwater flow at the site is generally towards the south-east, following the topography and consistent with previous monitoring rounds. The groundwater levels observed during the 2019 monitoring round had decreased since the 2018 monitoring round, however, were within historical ranges.
▪ Based on the inferred groundwater flow direction, monitoring well 65245 is located hydraulically up-gradient of the site and is likely to be representative of background conditions. Monitoring wells 65247, 65246, DH1 and DH2 are located in the inferred down hydraulic gradient direction.
▪ Field parameters taken in-situ were consistent with previous measurements and were within historical ranges.
▪ Boron, cadmium, copper, iron, nickel, zinc, total dissolved solids, nitrite (as N), Total Kjeldahl Nitrogen (as N), total nitrogen, total phosphorus (as P), COD, BOD and magnesium were detected in one or more groundwater wells at concentrations in excess of their respective adopted screening levels, however were within historical ranges.
The leachate tank sample (LT1) had concentrations of heavy metals, trace TRH and other analytes generally consistent with historical ranges presented in AECOM 2018.
The surface water sample (SW1) had concentrations of heavy metals and other analytes generally consistent with historical ranges presented in AECOM 2018. Concentrations of total petroleum hydrocarbons (TPH) were below the laboratory’s LOR.
Conclusions with respect to the monitoring objectives were as follows:
Groundwater monitoring was completed in accordance with the EPA Licence and LEMP.
The 2019 monitoring event results provided no indication of changes in surface water or groundwater quality associated with the closed landfill.
11 November 2019 19127795-001-R-Rev0
22
7.0 REFERENCES ANZECC, 2000, Australian and New Zealand Guidelines for Fresh and Marine Waters, National Water
Quality Management Strategy, Australian and New Zealand Environment and Conservation Council and Agriculture and Resource Management Council of Australia and New Zealand, October 2000.
CRC CARE (2011), Health screening levels for petroleum hydrocarbons in soil and groundwater (Technical report no. 10). September 2011.
DEWNR (2015), Water Connect Online Database, Department of Environment, Water and Natural Resources Government of South Australia, viewed 15 October 2019, https://www.waterconnect.sa.gov.au/GD.
GMRRW (2008), Guidelines for Managing Risks in Recreational Waters, National Health and Medical Research Council.
Environment Protection Act 1993.
Environment Protection (Site Contamination) Regulations 2008.
Environment Protection (Water Quality) Policy 2003.
NEPC (2013), National Environment Protection (Assessment of Site Contamination) Measure 1999, National Environment Protection Council (Amended 2013).
NHMRC / NRMMC, 2011, Australian Drinking Water Guidelines (6), National Water Quality.
South Australian Geological Survey (2009) Encounter, 1:100,000, Map no. 6626, Department of Primary Industries and Resources, SA.
SA EPA (2007), South Australian EPA Guidelines for Environmental Management of Landfill Facilities, February 2007.
SA EPA (2009), Site Contamination – Guidelines for the Assessment and Remediation of Groundwater Contamination, South Australian Environment Protection Authority, February 2009.
SA EPA (2015) - The Environment Protection (Water Quality) Policy 2015, South Australian Environment Protection Authority, January 2018.
SA EPA (2018) – Guidelines for the assessment and remediation of site contamination. South Australian Environment Protection Authority, 2018.
URS (2005) Additional Well Installation and Groundwater Monitoring at Victor Harbor Landfill, File Ref. 42656012\R002B.doc, dated 27 May 2005.
URS (2006) Victor Harbor Landfill, Landfill Gas and Groundwater Monitoring – November 2006.
URS (2007) Victor Harbor Landfill, Landfill Gas and Groundwater Monitoring – November 2007.
URS (2008) Victor Harbor Landfill Groundwater Monitoring – December 2008.
URS (2009) Victor Harbor Landfill Environment Management Plan, December 2009.
URS (2010) Victor Harbor Landfill, Landfill Gas and Groundwater Monitoring – Spring 2010.
URS (2011) Victor Harbor Landfill, Landfill Gas and Groundwater Monitoring – Autumn 2011.
URS (2012) Victor Harbor Landfill, Landfill Gas and Groundwater Monitoring – October 2012.
URS (2013) Victor Harbor Landfill, Landfill Gas and Groundwater Monitoring – June 2013.
URS (2014) Victor Harbor Landfill, Landfill Gas and Groundwater Monitoring – February 2014.
11 November 2019 19127795-001-R-Rev0
23
URS (2015) Victor Harbor Landfill, Landfill Gas and Groundwater Monitoring – July 2015.
Golder (2017) Victor Harbor Landfill, Landfill Gas and Groundwater Monitoring – September 2017
AECOM (2018) Victor Harbor Landfill, Groundwater Monitoring - October 2018
Water Search Pty Ltd (2004) Monitoring Wells Drilling and Sampling, Victor Harbor Landfill, Section 164 Hundred Waitpinga, Victor Harbor City Council, Report Bk. 2004/14, September 2004.
11 November 2019 19127795-001-R-Rev0
24
Signature Page
Golder Associates Pty Ltd
Josh Innes James Corbett Environmental Engineer Principal Environmental Engineer
JI/JGC/JBC/ro
A.B.N. 64 006 107 857 Golder and the G logo are trademarks of Golder Associates Corporation
https://golderassociates.sharepoint.com/sites/113196/project files/6 deliverables/19127795-001-r-rev0.docx
@A@A@A
@A@A
@A
@A
@A@A
LEACHATEEVAPORATION
POND
FORMER DEMOLITIONWASTE
FORMER TIMBER AREA
LANDFILLTOE
NATURALGULLY
FORMER SCRAPSTEEL
FORMER HARDSTANDAND PROCESSING AREA
FORMER GREEN ORGANICS
FRONT GATE
FORMERSTORMWATER
DAM
WEIGHBRIDGE
SW1LT1DH3
DH1DH2
DH465245
65246
65247
CLIENTVICTOR HARBOR COUNCIL
Approximate Site Boundary@A Approximate Borehole Location@A Borehole (Destroyed)
@A Approximate Surface Water Location
NOTE(S)
REFERENCE(S)
1. AERIAL PHOTOGRAPH SOURCED FROM NEARMAP. DATE OF CAPTURE 17/11/2018.RESOLUTION 15CM.
1. AERIAL PHOTOGRAPHY COPYRIGHT NEARMAP PTY LTD.
PROJECTGROUNDWATER MONITORING
TITLESITE LOCATION PLAN
19127795 001-R 0 1
04-10-2019
JI
-
OH
JBC
PATH
: V:\V
icto
r H
arbo
r Cou
ncil\
Wai
tpin
ga\1
9127
795
- GM
E\P
roje
ct\D
eliv
erab
le\1
9127
795-
001-
R-F
0001
-Rev
0.m
xd C
RE
ATE
D O
N: 2
019-
10-0
4 AT
: 10:
44:4
7 A
M
IF T
HIS
ME
AS
UR
EM
EN
T D
OE
S N
OT
MAT
CH
WH
AT IS
SH
OW
N, T
HE
SH
EE
T S
IZE
HA
S B
EE
N M
OD
IFIE
D F
RO
M: I
SO
A3
CONSULTANT
PROJECT NO. CONTROL REV. FIGURE
DD-MM-YYYY
DESIGNED
PREPARED
REVIEWED
APPROVED
25m
m0
¸KEY MAP
0 180Meters
1:2,500 GDA 1994 MGA ZONE 54
@A@A@A
@A@A
@A
@A
DH3DH123.162
DH247.228
DH471.518
6524593.011
6524630.188
6524726.693
CLIENTVICTOR HARBOR COUNCIL
LEGEND
Approximate Site Boundary@A Approximate Borehole Location@A Approximate Borehole (Destroyed)
NOTE(S)
REFERENCE(S)
1. AERIAL PHOTOGRAPH SOURCED FROM NEARMAP. DATE OF CAPTURE 17/11/2018.RESOLUTION 15CM.
1. AERIAL PHOTOGRAPHY COPYRIGHT NEARMAP PTY LTD.
PROJECTGROUNDWATER MONITORING
TITLEWELL LOCATION PLAN AND GROUNDWATER ELEVATIONS
19127795 001-R 0 2
04-10-2019
JI
-
OH
JBC
PATH
: V:\V
icto
r H
arbo
r Cou
ncil\
Wai
tpin
ga\1
9127
795
- GM
E\P
roje
ct\D
eliv
erab
le\1
9127
795-
001-
R-F
0002
-Rev
0.m
xd C
RE
ATE
D O
N: 2
019-
10-0
4 AT
: 11:
03:3
6 A
M
IF T
HIS
ME
AS
UR
EM
EN
T D
OE
S N
OT
MAT
CH
WH
AT IS
SH
OW
N, T
HE
SH
EE
T S
IZE
HA
S B
EE
N M
OD
IFIE
D F
RO
M: I
SO
A3
CONSULTANT
PROJECT NO. CONTROL REV. FIGURE
DD-MM-YYYY
DESIGNED
PREPARED
REVIEWED
APPROVED
25m
m0
¸KEY MAP
0 150Meters
1:2,000 GDA 1994 MGA ZONE 54
11 November 2019 19127795-001-R-Rev0
APPENDIX A
EPA Licence and LEMP Extract
Licence No. 35901 Feb 2017
31 Jan 2022
CITY OF VICTOR HARBORSection 164, Jagger Road, WAITPINGA SA 5211
South Australian Environment Protection AuthorityGPO Box 2607 ADELAIDE 5001Phone 08 8204 2004
EPA Licence 359Page 2 of 9
South Australian Environment Protection AuthorityGPO Box 2607 ADELAIDE 5001Phone 08 8204 2004
EPA Licence 359Page 3 of 9
Environment Protection Authority
LICENCE NUMBER 359
LICENSEE DETAILSLicence Holder: CITY OF VICTOR HARBOR
Premises Address(es):
LICENSED ACTIVITIES
The Licensee is authorised to undertake, at the location(s) shown above, the following prescribed activities of environmental significance under Schedule 1 Part A of the Act, subject to the conditions in this Licence.
3(3)(a) Landfill Depot
TERMS OF LICENCE
Commencement Date: 01 Feb 2017
Expiry Date: 31 Jan 2022
Amended Date: 22 Aug 2019
Section 164, Jagger Road, WAITPINGA SA 5211
South Australian Environment Protection AuthorityGPO Box 2607 ADELAIDE 5001Phone 08 8204 2004
EPA Licence 359Page 4 of 9
Table of Contents
Licence Explanatory Notes – Do Not Form Part of the Licence ................................................5
Definitions ..................................................................................................................................6
Acronyms...................................................................................................................................6
Conditions of Licence ................................................................................................................7
Attachments...............................................................................................................................9
South Australian Environment Protection AuthorityGPO Box 2607 ADELAIDE 5001Phone 08 8204 2004
EPA Licence 359Page 5 of 9
Licence Explanatory Notes – Do Not Form Part of the Licence
Compliance with this licenceThe EPA seeks to ensure that all reasonable and practicable measures are taken to protect, restore and enhance the quality of the environment according to the principles of ecologically sustainable development. To achieve this objective, the EPA uses a number of regulatory decision making principles and actions outlined in the ‘Compliance and enforcement regulatory options and tools’ document available on the EPA website.
Notification – serious or material environmental harm caused or threatenedIf serious or material environmental harm from pollution is caused or threatened in the course of an activity, the licence holder must, as soon as reasonably practicable after becoming aware of the harm or threatened harm, notify the EPA (preferably on EPA emergency phone number 1800 100 833) of the harm or threatened harm, its nature, the circumstances in which it occurred and the action taken to deal with it in accordance with section 83 of the Environment Protection Act 1993 (the Act). In the event that the primary emergency phone number is out of order, the licence holder should phone (08) 8204 2004.
Variations, transfers and surrender of a licenceThe EPA may impose or vary the conditions of a licence by notice in writing to the licence holder in accordance with sections 45 and 46 of the Act. Public notice may be required where the variation of licence conditions results in a relaxation of the requirements imposed for the protection or restoration of the environment and results in an adverse effect on any adjoining land or its amenity. If a licence holder wishes to vary the conditions of a licence, transfer a licence to another entity, or surrender a licence, the licence holder must submit an application to the EPA in accordance with the applicable provisions of the Act (sections 45, 49 and 56, respectively). A licence remains in effect and in its original form until such time as any proposed variation, application for surrender, or transfer has been made and approved in writing by the EPA.
Suspension or cancellation of a licenceThe EPA may suspend or cancel a licence by notice in writing to the licence holder in accordance with section 55 of the Act if satisfied the licence holder has either obtained the licence improperly, contravened a requirement under the Act or if the holder is a body corporate, a director of the body corporate has been guilty of misconduct of a prescribed kind (whether in this State or elsewhere).
Responsibilities under Environment Protection legislationIn addition to the conditions of any licence, a licence holder must comply with their obligations under all State and Federal legislation (as amended from time to time) including: the Environment Protection Act 1993; the Environment Protection Regulations 2009; all Environment Protection Policies made under the Environment Protection Act 1993; and any National Environment Protection Measures not operating as an Environment Protection Policy under the Environment Protection Act 1993
Public Register InformationThe EPA maintains and makes available a Public Register of details related to its determinations and other information it considers appropriate (i.e. excluding trade processes or financial information) in accordance with section 109 of the Act. These details include, but are not limited to:
licensing and beverage container applications and approvals enforcement actions site contamination serious or material environmental harm caused or threatened in the course of an activity environment improvement programmes and environment performance agreements environment assessment reports; results of testing, monitoring or evaluation required by a licence EPA advice or direction regarding development approvals referred to the EPA by a planning authority
South Australian Environment Protection AuthorityGPO Box 2607 ADELAIDE 5001Phone 08 8204 2004
EPA Licence 359Page 6 of 9
DefinitionsUnless the contrary intention appears, terms used in this licence that are defined in the Act (including any regulations or environment protection policies made pursuant to the Act) have the respective meanings assigned to those terms by the Act.
THE ACT: The Environment Protection Act 1993
PREMISES: The whole of the land comprised in Titles Register - Certificate of Title, Crown Lease and Crown Record.
CT6009/936
AUTHORISATION FEE PAYMENT DATE: means the anniversary of the grant or renewal of this authorisation.
ENVIRONMENTAL HARM: means the same as is defined in section 5 of the Environment Protection Act 1993.
THE AUTHORITY: means the Environment Protection Authority established under Division 1 of Part 3 of the Act.
WASTE: means -
1. As defined under the Environment Protection Act 1993,
1(a) any discarded, dumped, rejected, abandoned, unwanted or surplus matter, whether or not intended for sale or for purification or resource recovery by a separate operation from that which produced the matter; or
1(b) any matter declared by regulation to be waste for the purposes of this Act (following consultation by the Minister on the regulation with prescribed bodies in accordance with the regulations); or
1(c) any matter declared by an environment protection policy to be waste for the purposes of this Act,
whether or not of value.
2. However, waste does not include—
2(a) an approved recovered resource whilst it is being dealt with in accordance with the declaration of that resource—see section 4A; or
2(b) anything declared by regulation or an environment protection policy not to be waste for the purposes of this Act,
even though the resource or the thing so declared might otherwise, but for the declaration, fall within the definition of waste in subsection (1).
AcronymsEPA: means Environment Protection Authority
South Australian Environment Protection AuthorityGPO Box 2607 ADELAIDE 5001Phone 08 8204 2004
EPA Licence 359Page 7 of 9
Conditions of LicenceThe Licensee is authorised to conduct the prescribed activities as described in this Licence at the Premises nominated, subject to the following conditions:
1 OPERATIONAL MANAGEMENT
1.1 COMPLY WITH APPROVED DOCUMENT (T - 1036)
The Licensee must implement and comply with the approved Golder document entitled Operations Plan for Secondary Leachate Pond, Victor Harbor Landfill, dated June 2019 or any revised Plan approved in writing by the EPA.
1.2 IMPLEMENT CONSTRUCTION QA PLAN (315 - 655)
The Licensee must implement and comply with the approved URS Australia document entitled 'Construction Quality Assurance Plan - Victor Harbor Landfill - Landfill Cap, Ref: 42656821/CQA_R006/A' and dated October 8, 2010.
1.3 SECURITY (S - 157)
The Licensee must take all reasonable and practicable measures to prevent unauthorised access to the Premises.
1.4 SIGNAGE (S - 98)
The Licensee must display a sign at the entrance to the Premises clearly stating:
1.4.1 the Licensee's name;
1.4.2 the Licensee's authorisation number;
1.4.3 an emergency contact name and telephone number; and
1.4.4 the type of wastes that can be received subject to this Authorisation.
2 MONITORING AND REPORTING
2.1 GROUNDWATER MONITORING PROGRAMME (305 - 566)
The Licensee must:
2.1.1 maintain a groundwater monitoring programme of the onsite bores on the Premises to record potential impacts of past landfill operations on groundwater;
2.1.2 ensure that the monitoring programme is carried out in accordance with the EPA Guideline document: 'Regulatory monitoring and testing, Groundwater Sampling' June 2007;
South Australian Environment Protection AuthorityGPO Box 2607 ADELAIDE 5001Phone 08 8204 2004
EPA Licence 359Page 8 of 9
2.1.3 carry out monitoring at the onsite bores every 12 months on or about the 1st September in each year; and
2.1.4 submit results and interpretation of those results in writing to the Authority, within two months of each monitoring cycle being carried out.
NOTES
Guidance on reporting can be found in the EPA Guideline document 'Regulatory monitoring and testing, Reporting Requirements, updated August 2007
3 ADMINISTRATION
3.1 ANNUAL RETURN AND PAYMENT OF ANNUAL FEES (A - 4)
For the purposes of section 48(2)(a) of the Act, the date in each year for the lodgement of the Annual Return is no later than 90 days before the anniversary of the grant or renewal of the Licence; and
3.1.1 For the purposes of section 48(2)(b) of the Act, the date in each year for the payment of Annual Authorisation Fee is the anniversary of the grant of the Licence.
3.2 APPROVAL OF OPERATING PROCESSES (A - 6)
The Licensee must not undertake changes to operating processes conducted pursuant to the Licence at the Premises without written approval from the EPA, where such changes:
3.2.1 have the potential to increase emissions or alter the nature of pollutants or waste currently generated by, or from the licensed activity; or
3.2.2 have the potential to increase the risk of environmental harm; or
3.2.3 would relocate the point of discharge of pollution or waste at the Premises.
3.3 APPROVAL OF WORKS (A - 5)
The Licensee must not construct or alter a building or structure, or install or alter any plant or equipment, for use of an activity undertaken pursuant to the Licence at the Premises without written approval from the EPA, where such changes:
3.3.1 have the potential to increase the emissions or alter the nature of pollutants or waste currently generated by, or from the licensed activity; or
3.3.2 have the potential to increase the risk of environmental harm; or
3.3.3 would relocate the point of discharge of pollution or waste at the Premises.
South Australian Environment Protection AuthorityGPO Box 2607 ADELAIDE 5001Phone 08 8204 2004
EPA Licence 359Page 9 of 9
3.4 CHANGE OF LICENSEE DETAILS (A - 3)
If the Licensee's name or postal address (or both) changes, the Licensee must inform the EPA within 28 days of the change occurring.
3.5 LICENCE RENEWAL (A - 2)
For the purposes of section 43(3) of the Act, an application for Renewal of the Licence must be made no later than 90 days before the expiry date of the Licence.
3.6 OBLIGATIONS TO EMPLOYEES, AGENTS AND CONTRACTORS (A - 1)
The Licensee must ensure that every employee, agent or contractor responsible for undertaking any activity regulated by the Licence, is informed as to the conditions of the Licence.
AttachmentsThere are no documents attached to this licence.
359
11 November 2019 19127795-001-R-Rev0
APPENDIX B
Groundwater Sampling Sheets
PROJECT INFORMATION
Project Number: WELL ID Client: Date:
Site Location: Sampled By:
GROUNDWATER WELL DATA
Information recorded on site Information from fileSurveyed reference point
Depth of well (from log)
Depth of pump intake (mbRP)
Length of hose (m)
Volume in hose (L)
Thickness of product (interface probe) (m) Note: Standard reference point is top of PVC standpipe
mbRP - metres below top of reference point
Hose volume - 0.1 L/m of 12mm internal diameter hose
Hose volume - 0.05 L/m of 8mm internal diameter hose
Gatic / Standpipe Condition: Hose volume - 0.03 L/m of 6.35mm internal diameter hose
EQUIPMENT RECORD
Purging & Sampling Method: Low Flow Bladder pump
YSI Pro Plus Serial No: Calibrated by: AIRMET Calibration Date: 5/09/2019
PURGING RECORD
Depth to water after placement of pump (mbRP)
Time Volume Purged (L) (not cumulative) Temp (oC)
Dissolved Oxygen (mg/L)
Conductivity (uS/cm) pH
Redox Potential
(mV)Stabilisation Range ± 0.5 oC ± 10% ± 5% ± 0.1 ± 10 mV
8:35 1 16.3 1.55 4016 7.14 143 3.283 0.069
8:40 1 16.5 1.36 4031 7.16 138 3.440 0.226
8:45 1 16.4 1.40 4023 7.16 131.5 3.467 0.253
8:50 1 16.4 1.47 4018 7.16 127 3.470 0.256
8:55 1 16.5 1.42 4017 7.16 124.7 3.476 0.262
-3.214
-3.214
-3.214
Calculated Stabilisation Range 0.1 2.4 0.1 0.00 7 Drawdown (m) 0.262
Total vol. purged (L) 5
Purged vol. (from well) (L) 2.0698 Discharge Refill CPMFlow Rate (L/min) 0.2 #DIV/0!
SAMPLING RECORD
Time sampled: 9:00 Sample ID:Colour: Clear Duplicate Taken: Duplicate ID:Odour: No Rinsate Taken: Rinsate ID:
Turbidity: Low Trip Blank Taken: Field Blank ID:Hydrocarbon sheen/LNAPL?: No
Sample Container and Preservation: (F = Filtered, UF = Unfiltered, P = Preserved, UP = Unpreserved)2 Metals (F/UF) 3 Vials (P) Ferrous Iron (F/P)1 Green Plastic 1 Amber (UP) PFAS1 Purple Plastic (P) 1 COD/NH3/Phenols (UNF/P) Other
OBSERVATIONS
Weather Conditions: Temperature: Precipitation / Wind: slight windNotes:
20
YesYes
R01TB01
Standpipe stick up (m)
Time
Interface probe used?
Depth to product (mbRP)*
Depth to water (mbRP)
-
-
9.89
8:15
3.219
Bladder Pump Adjustments
65245Yes
Appearance (colour, turbidity, odour, etc)
Depth to Water (mbRP) Drawdown (m)
Clear, low, none
DUP1A & DUP1B
3.214
18J104342
Total depth of well (mbRP)
Bailed Thickness (m) -
7
9
-
GROUNDWATER SAMPLING RECORD FORM
TOC
19127795VHC
Landfill
6524512/9/19
JI
50
0.70
Diameter of standpipe (mm)
Yes
PROJECT INFORMATION
Project Number: WELL ID Client: Date:
Site Location: Sampled By:
GROUNDWATER WELL DATA
Information recorded on site Information from fileSurveyed reference point
Depth of well (from log)
Depth of pump intake (mbRP)
Length of hose (m)
Volume in hose (L)
Thickness of product (interface probe) (m) Note: Standard reference point is top of PVC standpipe
mbRP - metres below top of reference point
Hose volume - 0.1 L/m of 12mm internal diameter hose
Hose volume - 0.05 L/m of 8mm internal diameter hose
Gatic / Standpipe Condition: Hose volume - 0.03 L/m of 6.35mm internal diameter hose
EQUIPMENT RECORD
Purging & Sampling Method: Bailer N/A
YSI Pro Plus Serial No: Calibrated by: AIRMET Calibration Date: 5/09/2019
PURGING RECORD
Depth to water after placement of pump (mbRP)
Time Volume Purged (L) (not cumulative) Temp (oC)
Dissolved Oxygen (mg/L)
Conductivity (uS/cm) pH
Redox Potential
(mV)Stabilisation Range ± 0.5 oC ± 10% ± 5% ± 0.1 ± 10 mV
2:40 5 18.2 1.80 8367 6.67 115.1 0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
Calculated Stabilisation Range - - - - - Drawdown (m) 0.000
Total vol. purged (L) 5
Purged vol. (from well) (L) 0 Discharge Refill CPMFlow Rate (L/min) 1 #DIV/0!
SAMPLING RECORD
Time sampled: 2:45 Sample ID:Colour: Clear Duplicate Taken: Duplicate ID:Odour: No Rinsate Taken: Rinsate ID:
Turbidity: Low Trip Blank Taken: Field Blank ID:Hydrocarbon sheen/LNAPL?: No
Sample Container and Preservation: (F = Filtered, UF = Unfiltered, P = Preserved, UP = Unpreserved)2 Metals (F/UF) 3 Vials (P) Ferrous Iron (F/P)1 Green Plastic 1 Amber (UP) PFAS1 Purple Plastic (P) 1 COD/NH3/Phenols (UNF/P) Other
OBSERVATIONS
Weather Conditions: Temperature: Precipitation / Wind: slight windNotes:
-
GROUNDWATER SAMPLING RECORD FORM
TOC
19127795VHC
Landfill
6524612/9/19
JI
50
0.70
Diameter of standpipe (mm)
Yes
18J104342
Total depth of well (mbRP)
Bailed Thickness (m) -
Bladder Pump Adjustments
65246No
Appearance (colour, turbidity, odour, etc)
Depth to Water (mbRP) Drawdown (m)
Clear, low, none
-
-
2:30
63.192
Standpipe stick up (m)
Time
Interface probe used?
Depth to product (mbRP)*
Depth to water (mbRP)
20
No No
PROJECT INFORMATION
Project Number: WELL ID Client: Date:
Site Location: Sampled By:
GROUNDWATER WELL DATA
Information recorded on site Information from fileSurveyed reference point
Depth of well (from log)
Depth of pump intake (mbRP)
Length of hose (m)
Volume in hose (L)
Thickness of product (interface probe) (m) Note: Standard reference point is top of PVC standpipe
mbRP - metres below top of reference point
Hose volume - 0.1 L/m of 12mm internal diameter hose
Hose volume - 0.05 L/m of 8mm internal diameter hose
Gatic / Standpipe Condition: Hose volume - 0.03 L/m of 6.35mm internal diameter hose
EQUIPMENT RECORD
Purging & Sampling Method: Bailer N/A
YSI Pro Plus Serial No: Calibrated by: AIRMET Calibration Date: 5/09/2019
PURGING RECORD
Depth to water after placement of pump (mbRP)
Time Volume Purged (L) (not cumulative) Temp (oC)
Dissolved Oxygen (mg/L)
Conductivity (uS/cm) pH
Redox Potential
(mV)Stabilisation Range ± 0.5 oC ± 10% ± 5% ± 0.1 ± 10 mV
3:40 5 17.6 0.37 4456 6.82 -1.8 0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
Calculated Stabilisation Range - - - - - Drawdown (m) 0.000
Total vol. purged (L) 5
Purged vol. (from well) (L) 0 Discharge Refill CPMFlow Rate (L/min) 1 #DIV/0!
SAMPLING RECORD
Time sampled: 3:45 Sample ID:Colour: Clear Duplicate Taken: Duplicate ID:Odour: No Rinsate Taken: Rinsate ID:
Turbidity: Low Trip Blank Taken: Field Blank ID:Hydrocarbon sheen/LNAPL?: No
Sample Container and Preservation: (F = Filtered, UF = Unfiltered, P = Preserved, UP = Unpreserved)2 Metals (F/UF) 3 Vials (P) Ferrous Iron (F/P)1 Green Plastic 1 Amber (UP) PFAS1 Purple Plastic (P) 1 COD/NH3/Phenols (UNF/P) Other
OBSERVATIONS
Weather Conditions: Temperature: Precipitation / Wind: slight windNotes:
20
No No
Standpipe stick up (m)
Time
Interface probe used?
Depth to product (mbRP)*
Depth to water (mbRP)
-
-
3:30
60.077
Bladder Pump Adjustments
65247No
Appearance (colour, turbidity, odour, etc)
Depth to Water (mbRP) Drawdown (m)
Clear, low, none
18J104342
Total depth of well (mbRP)
Bailed Thickness (m) -
-
GROUNDWATER SAMPLING RECORD FORM
TOC
19127795VHC
Landfill
6524712/9/19
JI
50
0.70
Diameter of standpipe (mm)
Yes
PROJECT INFORMATION
Project Number: WELL ID Client: Date:
Site Location: Sampled By:
GROUNDWATER WELL DATA
Information recorded on site Information from fileSurveyed reference point
Depth of well (from log)
Depth of pump intake (mbRP)
Length of hose (m)
Volume in hose (L)
Thickness of product (interface probe) (m) Note: Standard reference point is top of PVC standpipe
mbRP - metres below top of reference point
Hose volume - 0.1 L/m of 12mm internal diameter hose
Hose volume - 0.05 L/m of 8mm internal diameter hose
Gatic / Standpipe Condition: Hose volume - 0.03 L/m of 6.35mm internal diameter hose27
EQUIPMENT RECORD
Purging & Sampling Method: Low Flow Bladder pump
YSI Pro Plus Serial No: Calibrated by: AIRMET Calibration Date: 5/09/2019
PURGING RECORD
Depth to water after placement of pump (mbRP)
Time Volume Purged (L) (not cumulative) Temp (oC)
Dissolved Oxygen (mg/L)
Conductivity (uS/cm) pH
Redox Potential
(mV)Stabilisation Range ± 0.5 oC ± 10% ± 5% ± 0.1 ± 10 mV
11:45 1 18.8 2.70 5884 6.84 111.7 24.660 1.165
11:50 1 18.7 0.50 5884 6.77 110.7 24.650 1.155
11:55 1 18.4 0.27 5831 6.73 111.2 24.650 1.155
12;00 1 18.5 0.29 5834 6.76 109 24.650 1.155
12:05 1 18.4 0.29 5842 6.76 108.6 24.650 1.155
Calculated Stabilisation Range 0.1 3.6 0.1 0.03 3 Drawdown (m) 1.165
Total vol. purged (L) 5
Purged vol. (from well) (L) 9.2035 Discharge Refill CPMFlow Rate (L/min) 0.2 30 30 1.0
SAMPLING RECORD
Time sampled: 12:15 Sample ID:Colour: Clear Duplicate Taken: Duplicate ID:Odour: No Rinsate Taken: Rinsate ID:
Turbidity: Low Trip Blank Taken: Field Blank ID:Hydrocarbon sheen/LNAPL?: No
Sample Container and Preservation: (F = Filtered, UF = Unfiltered, P = Preserved, UP = Unpreserved)2 Metals (F/UF) 3 Vials (P) Ferrous Iron (F/P)1 Green Plastic 1 Amber (UP) PFAS1 Purple Plastic (P) 1 COD/NH3/Phenols (UNF/P) Other
OBSERVATIONS
Weather Conditions: Temperature: Precipitation / Wind: slight windNotes:
27
29
-
GROUNDWATER SAMPLING RECORD FORM
TOC
19127795VHC
Landfill
DH112/9/19
JI
50
0.30
Diameter of standpipe (mm)
Yes
23.495
OK
18J104342
Total depth of well (mbRP)
Bailed Thickness (m) -
Bladder Pump Adjustments
DH1No
Appearance (colour, turbidity, odour, etc)
Depth to Water (mbRP) Drawdown (m)
Clear, low, none
-
-
32.00
11:35
23.495
Standpipe stick up (m)
Time
Interface probe used?
Depth to product (mbRP)*
Depth to water (mbRP)
20
No No
PROJECT INFORMATION
Project Number: WELL ID Client: Date:
Site Location: Sampled By:
GROUNDWATER WELL DATA
Information recorded on site Information from fileSurveyed reference point
Depth of well (from log)
Depth of pump intake (mbRP)
Length of hose (m)
Volume in hose (L)
Thickness of product (interface probe) (m) Note: Standard reference point is top of PVC standpipe
mbRP - metres below top of reference point
Hose volume - 0.1 L/m of 12mm internal diameter hose
Hose volume - 0.05 L/m of 8mm internal diameter hose
Gatic / Standpipe Condition: Hose volume - 0.03 L/m of 6.35mm internal diameter hose27
EQUIPMENT RECORD
Purging & Sampling Method: Low Flow Bladder pump
YSI Pro Plus Serial No: Calibrated by: AIRMET Calibration Date: 5/09/2019
PURGING RECORD
Depth to water after placement of pump (mbRP)
Time Volume Purged (L) (not cumulative) Temp (oC)
Dissolved Oxygen (mg/L)
Conductivity (uS/cm) pH
Redox Potential
(mV)Stabilisation Range ± 0.5 oC ± 10% ± 5% ± 0.1 ± 10 mV
12:35 1 16.4 8.70 4856 7.67 52 2.105 0.255
12:40 1 16.8 4.26 4812 7.50 14.2 2.113 0.263
12:45 1 17.1 4.31 4817 7.47 10.1 2.116 0.266
12:50 1 17.0 4.29 4802 7.49 7.9 2.119 0.269
-1.850
-1.850
-1.850
-1.850
Calculated Stabilisation Range 0.3 0.6 0.2 0.03 6 Drawdown (m) 0.269
Total vol. purged (L) 4
Purged vol. (from well) (L) 2.1251 Discharge Refill CPMFlow Rate (L/min) 0.2 30 30 1.0
SAMPLING RECORD
Time sampled: 1:00 Sample ID:Colour: Clear Duplicate Taken: Duplicate ID:Odour: No Rinsate Taken: Rinsate ID:
Turbidity: Low Trip Blank Taken: Field Blank ID:Hydrocarbon sheen/LNAPL?: No
Sample Container and Preservation: (F = Filtered, UF = Unfiltered, P = Preserved, UP = Unpreserved)2 Metals (F/UF) 3 Vials (P) Ferrous Iron (F/P)1 Green Plastic 1 Amber (UP) PFAS1 Purple Plastic (P) 1 COD/NH3/Phenols (UNF/P) Other
OBSERVATIONS
Weather Conditions: Temperature: Precipitation / Wind: slight windNotes:
7
9
-
GROUNDWATER SAMPLING RECORD FORM
TOC
19127795VHC
Landfill
DH212/9/19
JI
50
0.30
Diameter of standpipe (mm)
Yes
1.85
OK
18J104342
Total depth of well (mbRP)
Bailed Thickness (m) -
Bladder Pump Adjustments
DH2No
Appearance (colour, turbidity, odour, etc)
Depth to Water (mbRP) Drawdown (m)
Brown, low, none
-
-
9.60
12:30
1.904
Standpipe stick up (m)
Time
Interface probe used?
Depth to product (mbRP)*
Depth to water (mbRP)
20Blocked at 1.5 m, pushed pump through, consider using footvalve next round
No No
PROJECT INFORMATION
Project Number: WELL ID Client: Date:
Site Location: Sampled By:
GROUNDWATER WELL DATA
Information recorded on site Information from fileSurveyed reference point
Depth of well (from log)
Depth of pump intake (mbRP)
Length of hose (m)
Volume in hose (L)
Thickness of product (interface probe) (m) Note: Standard reference point is top of PVC standpipe
mbRP - metres below top of reference point
Hose volume - 0.1 L/m of 12mm internal diameter hose
Hose volume - 0.05 L/m of 8mm internal diameter hose
Gatic / Standpipe Condition: Hose volume - 0.03 L/m of 6.35mm internal diameter hose
EQUIPMENT RECORD
Purging & Sampling Method: Low Flow Bladder pump
YSI Pro Plus Serial No: Calibrated by: AIRMET Calibration Date: 5/09/2019
PURGING RECORD
Depth to water after placement of pump (mbRP)
Time Volume Purged (L) (not cumulative) Temp (oC)
Dissolved Oxygen (mg/L)
Conductivity (uS/cm) pH
Redox Potential
(mV)Stabilisation Range ± 0.5 oC ± 10% ± 5% ± 0.1 ± 10 mV
9:25 1 16.9 10.10 2302 7.69 -13.9 28.502 0.357
9:30 1 16.9 9.60 2987 7.97 -18.2 28.500 0.355
9:35 1 17.1 9.36 4093 7.99 -19.1 28.500 0.355
9:40 1 17.0 9.47 4098 8.00 -18.2 28.500 0.355
9:45 1 17.0 9.45 4104 8.00 -18.7 28.500 0.355
-28.145
-28.145
-28.145
Calculated Stabilisation Range 0.1 0.6 0.1 0.01 1 Drawdown (m) 0.357
Total vol. purged (L) 5
Purged vol. (from well) (L) 2.8203 Discharge Refill CPMFlow Rate (L/min) 0.2 30 30 1.0
SAMPLING RECORD
Time sampled: 9:45 Sample ID:Colour: Clear Duplicate Taken: Duplicate ID:Odour: No Rinsate Taken: Rinsate ID:
Turbidity: Low Trip Blank Taken: Field Blank ID:Hydrocarbon sheen/LNAPL?: No
Sample Container and Preservation: (F = Filtered, UF = Unfiltered, P = Preserved, UP = Unpreserved)2 Metals (F/UF) 3 Vials (P) Ferrous Iron (F/P)1 Green Plastic 1 Amber (UP) PFAS1 Purple Plastic (P) 1 COD/NH3/Phenols (UNF/P) Other
OBSERVATIONS
Weather Conditions: Temperature: Precipitation / Wind: slight windNotes:
20
No No
Standpipe stick up (m)
Time
Interface probe used?
Depth to product (mbRP)*
Depth to water (mbRP)
-
-
43.70
8:15
28.257
Bladder Pump Adjustments
DH4No
Appearance (colour, turbidity, odour, etc)
Depth to Water (mbRP) Drawdown (m)
Clear, low, none
28.145
ok
18J104342
Total depth of well (mbRP)
Bailed Thickness (m)
7
9
-
GROUNDWATER SAMPLING RECORD FORM
TOC
19127795VHC
Landfill
DH412/9/19
JI
50
0.70
Diameter of standpipe (mm)
Yes
11 November 2019 19127795-001-R-Rev0
APPENDIX C
Chemical Results
Chemical Data Table
Groundwater Samples
Project number: 19127795Project: City of Victor Harbor, 2019 Lanfill GME
Arse
nic
(filte
red)
Boro
n (fi
ltere
d)
Cadm
ium
(filt
ered
)
Chro
miu
m (f
ilter
ed)
Copp
er (f
ilter
ed)
Iron
Lead
(filt
ered
)
Mer
cury
(filt
ered
)
Nic
kel (
filte
red)
Zinc
(filt
ered
)
C6 -
C9 F
ract
ion
C10
- C1
4 Fr
actio
n
C15
- C28
Fra
ctio
n
TRH
C29
- C36
Fra
ctio
n
C10
- C36
(Sum
of t
otal
) (La
b Re
port
ed)
C10
- C40
(Sum
of t
otal
) (La
b Re
port
ed)
C6 -
C10
Frac
tion
F1
C6 -
C10
Frac
tion
Less
BTE
X F1
C10
- C16
Fra
ctio
n F2
C10
- C16
Fra
ctio
n Le
ss N
apht
hale
ne F
2
C16
- C34
Fra
ctio
n F3
C34
- C40
Fra
ctio
n F4
TRH
C10
- C14
SG
Clea
nup
TRH
C15
- C28
SG
Clea
nup
TRH
C29
- C36
SG
Clea
nup
TRH
C10
- C36
(Sum
, Lab
Rep
orte
d) S
G Cl
eanu
p
TRH
>C10
- C1
6 SG
Cle
anup
F2
TRH
>C16
- C3
4 SG
Cle
anup
F3
TRH
>C34
- C4
0 SG
Cle
anup
F4
TRH
C10
- C40
(Sum
, Lab
Rpt
d) S
G Cl
eanu
p
Benz
ene
Tolu
ene
Ethy
lben
zene
Xyle
nes (
m &
p)
Xyle
ne (o
)
Xyle
nes (
Sum
of t
otal
) (La
b Re
port
ed)
Tota
l BTE
X
Nap
htha
lene
Acen
apht
hene
Acen
apht
hyle
ne
Anth
race
ne
Benz
(a)a
nthr
acen
e
Benz
o(a)
pyre
ne
Benz
o(b)
&(j)
fluor
anth
ene
Benz
o(g,
h,i)p
eryl
ene
Benz
o(k)
fluor
anth
ene
Chry
sene
Dibe
nz(a
,h)a
nthr
acen
e
Fluo
rant
hene
Fluo
rene
Inde
no(1
,2,3
-c,d
)pyr
ene
Phen
anth
rene
Pyre
ne
Carc
inog
enic
PAH
(BaP
TEQ
) (lo
wer
bou
nd)
Tota
l PAH
s
p,p-
DDE
Aldr
in
Diel
drin
Aldr
in &
Die
ldrin
(Sum
of t
otal
)
a-BH
C
b-BH
C
d-BH
C
g-BH
C
Chlo
rdan
e (S
um o
f tot
al)
cis-
Chlo
rdan
e
tran
s-Ch
lord
ane
mg/L mg/L mg/L mg/L mg/L mg/L mg/L mg/L mg/L mg/L mg/L mg/L mg/L mg/L mg/L mg/L mg/L mg/L mg/L mg/L mg/L mg/L mg/L mg/L mg/L mg/L mg/L mg/L mg/L mg/L mg/L mg/L mg/L mg/L mg/L mg/L mg/L mg/L ` mg/L mg/L mg/L mg/L mg/L mg/L mg/L mg/L mg/L mg/L mg/L mg/L mg/L mg/L mg/L mg/L mg/L mg/L mg/L mg/L mg/L mg/L mg/L mg/L mg/L mg/L mg/LLOR 0.001 0.05 0.0001 0.001 0.001 0.05 0.001 0.0001 0.001 0.005 0.02 0.05 0.1 0.05 0.05 0.1 0.02 0.02 0.05 0.05 0.1 0.1 0.05 0.1 0.05 0.05 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.001 0.001 0.001 0.002 0.001 0.002 0.001 0.001 0.001 0.001 0.001 0.001 0.0005 0.001 0.001 0.001 0.001 0.001 0.001 0.001 0.001 0.001 0.001 0.0005 0.0005 0.0005 0.0005 0.0005 0.0005 0.0005 0.0005 0.0005 0.0005 0.0005 0.0005 0.0005ANZECC 2000 Freshwater Aquaculture 0.05 0.0002 0.02 0.005 0.01 0.001 0.001 0.1 0.005ANZECC 2000 Saltwater Aquaculture 0.03 0.0005 0.02 0.005 0.01 0.001 0.001 0.1 0.005ANZECC 2000 Freshwater 95% 0.37 0.0002 0.0014 0.0034 0.0006 0.011 0.008 0.95 0.35 0.016 0.0002 0.00008ANZECC 2000 Irrigation 0.1 0.5 0.01 0.2 0.2 2 0.002 0.2 2ANZECC 2000 Livestock 0.5 5 0.01 1 0.4 0.1 0.002 1 20ANZECC 2000 Marine 95% 0.0055 0.0013 0.0044 0.0004 0.07 0.015 0.5 0.05NHRMC 2008 Guidelines for Managing Risk in Recreational Waters 0.1 40 0.02 20 0.1 0.01 0.2 0.01 0.025 0.003 0.02NEPM 2013 Table 1A(4) Comm/Ind HSL D GW for Vapour Intrusion, Sand, 2-4 m 6 NL 5 NL NL NL NLNEPM 2013 Table 1A(4) Res HSL A & B GW for Vapour Intrusion, Sand, 2-4 m 1 1 0.8 NL NL NL NL
Location Code Date Field ID Laboratory Report Number Sample Type
65245 EB1924599 / EB1925719 Normal 0.003 0.81 <0.0001 <0.001 0.001 2.68 <0.001 <0.0001 0.001 0.008 <0.02 <0.05 <0.1 <0.05 <0.05 <0.1 <0.02 <0.02 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 - - - - - - - - <0.001 <0.002 <0.002 <0.002 <0.002 <0.002 <0.001 <0.0010 <0.0010 <0.0010 <0.0010 <0.0010 <0.0005 <0.0010 <0.0010 <0.0010 <0.0010 <0.0010 <0.0010 <0.0010 <0.0010 <0.0010 <0.0010 <0.0005 <0.0005 <0.0005 <0.0005 <0.0005 <0.0005 <0.0005 <0.0005 <0.0005 <0.0005 <0.0005 <0.0005 <0.0005DUP1A EB1924599 / EB1925719 Field_Duplicate - - - - - <0.05 - - - - <0.02 <0.05 <0.1 <0.05 <0.05 <0.1 <0.02 <0.02 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 - - - - - - - - <0.001 <0.002 <0.002 <0.002 <0.002 <0.002 <0.001 <0.005 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - DUP1B 678159 Interlab_Duplicate 0.002 0.87 <0.0002 <0.001 0.002 2.1 <0.001 <0.0001 <0.001 0.009 <0.02 <0.05 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.02 <0.02 <0.05 <0.05 <0.1 <0.1 - - - - - - - - <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.002 <0.001 <0.003 - <0.01 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
65246 12/09/2019 65246 EB1924599 / EB1925719 Normal 0.001 0.98 0.0003 <0.001 <0.001 0.09 <0.001 <0.0001 0.001 <0.005 <0.02 <0.05 <0.1 <0.05 <0.05 <0.1 <0.02 <0.02 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 - - - - - - - - <0.001 <0.002 <0.002 <0.002 <0.002 <0.002 <0.001 <0.0010 <0.0010 <0.0010 <0.0010 <0.0010 <0.0005 <0.0010 <0.0010 <0.0010 <0.0010 <0.0010 <0.0010 <0.0010 <0.0010 <0.0010 <0.0010 <0.0005 <0.0005 <0.0005 <0.0005 <0.0005 <0.0005 <0.0005 <0.0005 <0.0005 <0.0005 <0.0005 <0.0005 <0.000565247 12/09/2019 65247 EB1924599 / EB1925719 Normal 0.008 0.55 <0.0001 <0.001 0.002 15.7 0.001 <0.0001 0.008 0.022 <0.02 <0.05 0.32 0.11 0.43 0.48 <0.02 <0.02 <0.1 <0.1 0.35 0.13 <0.05 <0.1 <0.05 <0.05 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.001 <0.002 <0.002 <0.002 <0.002 <0.002 <0.001 <0.0010 <0.0010 <0.0010 <0.0010 <0.0010 <0.0005 <0.0010 <0.0010 <0.0010 <0.0010 <0.0010 <0.0010 <0.0010 <0.0010 <0.0010 <0.0010 <0.0005 <0.0005 <0.0005 <0.0005 <0.0005 <0.0005 <0.0005 <0.0005 <0.0005 <0.0005 <0.0005 <0.0005 <0.0005DH1 12/09/2019 DH1 EB1924599 / EB1925719 Normal 0.002 0.88 0.0002 <0.001 0.023 0.16 <0.001 <0.0001 0.118 0.007 <0.02 <0.05 0.12 <0.05 0.12 0.12 <0.02 <0.02 <0.1 <0.1 0.12 <0.1 <0.05 <0.1 <0.05 <0.05 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.001 <0.002 <0.002 <0.002 <0.002 <0.002 <0.001 <0.0010 <0.0010 <0.0010 <0.0010 <0.0010 <0.0005 <0.0010 <0.0010 <0.0010 <0.0010 <0.0010 <0.0010 <0.0010 <0.0010 <0.0010 <0.0010 <0.0005 <0.0005 <0.0005 <0.0005 <0.0005 <0.0005 <0.0005 <0.0005 <0.0005 <0.0005 <0.0005 <0.0005 <0.0005DH2 12/09/2019 DH2 EB1924599 / EB1925719 Normal 0.006 0.90 <0.0001 0.001 <0.001 67.3 <0.001 <0.0001 0.006 0.009 <0.02 0.06 0.29 0.19 0.54 0.42 <0.02 <0.02 <0.1 <0.1 0.42 <0.1 <0.05 <0.1 <0.05 <0.05 <0.1 0.13 <0.1 0.13 <0.001 <0.002 <0.002 <0.002 <0.002 <0.002 <0.001 <0.0010 <0.0010 <0.0010 <0.0010 <0.0010 <0.0005 <0.0010 <0.0010 <0.0010 <0.0010 <0.0010 <0.0010 <0.0010 <0.0010 <0.0010 <0.0010 <0.0005 <0.0005 <0.0005 <0.0005 <0.0005 <0.0005 <0.0005 <0.0005 <0.0005 <0.0005 <0.0005 <0.0005 <0.0005DH4 12/09/2019 DH4 EB1924599 / EB1925719 Normal 0.009 0.64 <0.0001 <0.001 <0.001 3.90 <0.001 <0.0001 0.003 <0.005 <0.02 <0.05 <0.1 <0.05 <0.05 <0.1 <0.02 <0.02 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 - - - - - - - - <0.001 <0.002 <0.002 <0.002 <0.002 <0.002 <0.001 <0.0010 <0.0010 <0.0010 <0.0010 <0.0010 <0.0005 <0.0010 <0.0010 <0.0010 <0.0010 <0.0010 <0.0010 <0.0010 <0.0010 <0.0010 <0.0010 <0.0005 <0.0005 <0.0005 <0.0005 <0.0005 <0.0005 <0.0005 <0.0005 <0.0005 <0.0005 <0.0005 <0.0005 <0.0005Leachate Tank 12/09/2019 LT1 EB1924599 / EB1925719 Normal 0.007 0.89 <0.0001 0.001 <0.001 5.46 <0.001 <0.0001 0.004 <0.005 <0.02 0.05 0.44 <0.05 0.49 0.42 <0.02 <0.02 <0.1 <0.1 0.42 <0.1 <0.05 0.18 <0.05 0.18 <0.1 0.15 <0.1 0.15 <0.001 <0.002 <0.002 <0.002 <0.002 <0.002 <0.001 <0.0010 <0.0010 <0.0010 <0.0010 <0.0010 <0.0005 <0.0010 <0.0010 <0.0010 <0.0010 <0.0010 <0.0010 <0.0010 <0.0010 <0.0010 <0.0010 <0.0005 <0.0005 <0.0005 <0.0005 <0.0005 <0.0005 <0.0005 <0.0005 <0.0005 <0.0005 <0.0005 <0.0005 <0.0005Surface Water 12/09/2019 SW1 EB1924599 / EB1925719 Normal 0.004 1.18 <0.0001 0.008 0.014 4.31 0.002 <0.0001 0.018 0.026 <0.02 <0.05 0.26 0.11 0.37 0.33 <0.02 <0.02 <0.1 <0.1 0.33 <0.1 <0.05 <0.1 <0.05 <0.05 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.001 <0.002 <0.002 <0.002 <0.002 <0.002 <0.001 <0.0010 <0.0010 <0.0010 <0.0010 <0.0010 <0.0005 <0.0010 <0.0010 <0.0010 <0.0010 <0.0010 <0.0010 <0.0010 <0.0010 <0.0010 <0.0010 <0.0005 <0.0005 <0.0005 <0.0005 <0.0005 <0.0005 <0.0005 <0.0005 <0.0005 <0.0005 <0.0005 <0.0005 <0.0005
Prepared by: JI Date: 14/10/19Checked By: JGC Date: 5/11/2019
mg/L: milligrams per litreLOR: limit of reporting
Organo BTEXN Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons (PAH)
65245 12/09/2019
Heavy Metals Total Recoverable Hydrocarbons Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons (Silica Gel Cleanup)
VHC -Tabulated Chem Data Page [Page] of [Number Of Pages] Print Date:[Date]
Chemical Data Table
Groundwater Samples
Project number: 19127795Project: City of Victor Harbor, 2019 Lanfill GME
LORANZECC 2000 Freshwater AquacultureANZECC 2000 Saltwater AquacultureANZECC 2000 Freshwater 95%ANZECC 2000 IrrigationANZECC 2000 LivestockANZECC 2000 Marine 95%NHRMC 2008 Guidelines for Managing Risk in Recreational WatersNEPM 2013 Table 1A(4) Comm/Ind HSL D GW for Vapour Intrusion, Sand, 2-4 mNEPM 2013 Table 1A(4) Res HSL A & B GW for Vapour Intrusion, Sand, 2-4 m
Location Code Date Field ID Laboratory Report Number Sample Type
65245 EB1924599 / EB1925719 NormalDUP1A EB1924599 / EB1925719 Field_DuplicateDUP1B 678159 Interlab_Duplicate
65246 12/09/2019 65246 EB1924599 / EB1925719 Normal65247 12/09/2019 65247 EB1924599 / EB1925719 NormalDH1 12/09/2019 DH1 EB1924599 / EB1925719 NormalDH2 12/09/2019 DH2 EB1924599 / EB1925719 NormalDH4 12/09/2019 DH4 EB1924599 / EB1925719 NormalLeachate Tank 12/09/2019 LT1 EB1924599 / EB1925719 NormalSurface Water 12/09/2019 SW1 EB1924599 / EB1925719 Normal
Prepared by: JI Date: 14/10/19Checked By: JGC Date: 5/11/2019
mg/L: milligrams per litreLOR: limit of reporting
65245 12/09/2019
Halogenated Benzenes
DDD
DDT
DDT+
DDE+
DDD
(Sum
of t
otal
)
Endo
sulfa
n I
Endo
sulfa
n II
Endo
sulfa
n su
lpha
te
Endr
in
Endr
in a
ldeh
yde
Endr
in k
eton
e
Hept
achl
or
Hept
achl
or e
poxi
de
Met
hoxy
chlo
r
Hexa
chlo
robe
nzen
e
2,4-
Dim
ethy
lphe
nol
2-M
ethy
lphe
nol
2-N
itrop
heno
l
3- &
4- M
ethy
lphe
nol
Phen
ol
2,4,
5-Tr
ichl
orop
heno
l
2,4,
6-Tr
ichl
orop
heno
l
2,4-
Dich
loro
phen
ol
2,6-
Dich
loro
phen
ol
2-Ch
loro
phen
ol
4-Ch
loro
-3-m
ethy
lphe
nol
Pent
achl
orop
heno
l
Sodi
um (f
ilter
ed)
Pota
ssiu
m (f
ilter
ed)
Calc
ium
(filt
ered
)
Mag
nesiu
m (f
ilter
ed)
Chlo
ride
Sulp
hate
(as S
O4)
(filt
ered
)
Bica
rbon
ate
Alka
linity
(as C
aCO
3)
Carb
onat
e Al
kalin
ity (a
s CaC
O3)
Hydr
oxid
e Al
kalin
ity (a
s CaC
O3)
Tota
l Alk
alin
ity (a
s CaC
O3)
Nitr
ate
(as N
)
Nitr
ite (a
s N)
Nitr
ogen
(Tot
al O
xidi
sed)
Amm
onia
(as N
)
Tota
l Kje
ldah
l Nitr
ogen
(as N
)
Nitr
ogen
(Tot
al)
Tota
l Pho
spho
rus (
as P
)
Biol
ogic
al O
xyge
n De
man
d
Chem
ical
Oxy
gen
Dem
and
Tota
l Ani
ons
Tota
l Cat
ions
Tota
l Org
anic
Car
bon
Ioni
c Ba
lanc
e (L
ab)
pH (L
ab)
Tota
l Diss
olve
d So
lids @
180°
C
mg/L mg/L mg/L mg/L mg/L mg/L mg/L mg/L mg/L mg/L mg/L mg/L mg/L mg/L mg/L mg/L mg/L mg/L mg/L mg/L mg/L mg/L mg/L mg/L mg/L mg/L mg/L mg/L mg/L mg/L mg/L mg/L mg/L mg/L mg/L mg/L mg/L mg/L mg/L mg/L mg/L mg/L mg/L mg/L meq/L meq/L mg/L % pH_Units mg/L0.0005 0.002 0.0005 0.0005 0.0005 0.0005 0.0005 0.0005 0.0005 0.0005 0.0005 0.002 0.0005 0.001 0.001 0.001 0.002 0.001 0.001 0.001 0.001 0.001 0.001 0.001 0.002 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.1 0.1 0.01 2 10 0.01 0.01 1 0.01 0.01 10
15 11.3 0.1 1 15 40 5-9 300015 22.6 1 6-9 33000-37000
0.00001 0.00002 0.00009 0.32 0.02 0.16 0.49 0.015 0.05 6-8.5
1,000 1,000 90.3 9.12 20000.000008 0.4 0.022
250 113 9
<0.0005 <0.0020 <0.0005 <0.0005 <0.0005 <0.0005 <0.0005 <0.0005 <0.0005 <0.0005 <0.0005 <0.0020 <0.0005 <0.0010 <0.0010 <0.0010 <0.0020 <0.0010 <0.0010 <0.0010 <0.0010 <0.0010 <0.0010 <0.0010 <0.0020 880 11 106 64 1,100 185 577 <1 <1 577 2.59 0.04 2.63 <0.01 0.4 3.0 0.05 <2 16 46.4 49.1 4 2.83 7.36 2,750 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - <1 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
<0.0005 <0.0020 <0.0005 <0.0005 <0.0005 <0.0005 <0.0005 <0.0005 <0.0005 <0.0005 <0.0005 <0.0020 <0.0005 <0.0010 <0.0010 <0.0010 <0.0020 <0.0010 <0.0010 <0.0010 <0.0010 <0.0010 <0.0010 <0.0010 <0.0020 1,640 48 194 213 2,870 356 397 <1 <1 397 1.61 <0.01 1.61 <0.01 0.1 1.7 0.04 <2 <50 96.3 99.8 2 1.77 6.88 6,480<0.0005 <0.0020 <0.0005 <0.0005 <0.0005 <0.0005 <0.0005 <0.0005 <0.0005 <0.0005 <0.0005 <0.0020 <0.0005 <0.0010 <0.0010 <0.0010 <0.0020 <0.0010 <0.0010 <0.0010 <0.0010 <0.0010 <0.0010 <0.0010 <0.0020 898 33 108 84 1,210 15 817 <1 <1 817 0.49 0.02 0.51 1.53 3.2 3.7 0.32 5 89 50.8 52.2 34 1.40 6.85 2,770<0.0005 <0.0020 <0.0005 <0.0005 <0.0005 <0.0005 <0.0005 <0.0005 <0.0005 <0.0005 <0.0005 <0.0020 <0.0005 <0.0010 <0.0010 <0.0010 <0.0020 <0.0010 <0.0010 <0.0010 <0.0010 <0.0010 <0.0010 <0.0010 <0.0020 1,120 40 128 123 1,650 73 779 <1 <1 779 1.16 0.15 1.31 1.62 3.0 4.3 0.07 12 59 63.6 66.2 26 2.02 6.95 3,800<0.0005 <0.0020 <0.0005 <0.0005 <0.0005 <0.0005 <0.0005 <0.0005 <0.0005 <0.0005 <0.0005 <0.0020 <0.0005 0.0024 0.0026 <0.0010 <0.0020 <0.0010 <0.0010 <0.0010 <0.0010 <0.0010 <0.0010 <0.0010 <0.0020 908 94 81 86 1,380 2 721 <1 <1 721 1.13 0.91 2.04 35.4 39.0 41.0 1.43 52 140 53.4 53.0 19 0.33 7.45 3,060<0.0005 <0.0020 <0.0005 <0.0005 <0.0005 <0.0005 <0.0005 <0.0005 <0.0005 <0.0005 <0.0005 <0.0020 <0.0005 <0.0010 <0.0010 <0.0010 <0.0020 <0.0010 <0.0010 <0.0010 <0.0010 <0.0010 <0.0010 <0.0010 <0.0020 884 21 93 56 1,100 177 632 <1 <1 632 <0.01 0.02 <0.01 0.09 0.3 0.3 0.39 2 23 47.3 48.2 <1 0.94 7.95 2,680<0.0005 <0.0020 <0.0005 <0.0005 <0.0005 <0.0005 <0.0005 <0.0005 <0.0005 <0.0005 <0.0005 <0.0020 <0.0005 <0.0010 <0.0010 <0.0010 <0.0020 <0.0010 <0.0010 <0.0010 <0.0010 <0.0010 <0.0010 <0.0010 <0.0020 1,070 99 84 117 1,510 <1 887 <1 <1 887 0.05 0.18 0.23 46.3 42.1 42.3 0.08 17 110 60.3 62.9 53 2.09 7.62 3,400<0.0005 <0.0020 <0.0005 <0.0005 <0.0005 <0.0005 <0.0005 <0.0005 <0.0005 <0.0005 <0.0005 <0.0020 <0.0005 <0.0010 <0.0010 <0.0010 <0.0020 <0.0010 <0.0010 <0.0010 <0.0010 <0.0010 <0.0010 <0.0010 <0.0020 1,150 112 97 128 1,570 12 747 <1 <1 747 10.1 1.44 11.5 10.4 16.4 27.9 0.19 40 226 59.5 68.3 39 6.89 7.67 3,520
ochlorine Pesticides Nutrients and InorganicsPhenolics Phenolics-Halogenated
VHC -Tabulated Chem Data Page [Page] of [Number Of Pages] Print Date:[Date]
11 November 2019 19127795-001-R-Rev0
APPENDIX D
Lab Certificates and COC
Certificate of Analysis
Golder Associates Pty Ltd
118 Franklin Street
Adelaide
SA 5000
Attention: Josh Innes
Report 678159-W
Project name VHC LANDFILL
Project ID 19127795
Received Date Sep 23, 2019
Client Sample ID DUP1B
Sample Matrix Water
Eurofins Sample No. B19-Se31493
Date Sampled Sep 12, 2019
Test/Reference LOR Unit
Total Recoverable Hydrocarbons - 1999 NEPM Fractions
TRH C6-C9 0.02 mg/L < 0.02
TRH C10-C14 0.05 mg/L < 0.05
TRH C15-C28 0.1 mg/L < 0.1
TRH C29-C36 0.1 mg/L < 0.1
TRH C10-C36 (Total) 0.1 mg/L < 0.1
BTEX
Benzene 0.001 mg/L < 0.001
Toluene 0.001 mg/L < 0.001
Ethylbenzene 0.001 mg/L < 0.001
m&p-Xylenes 0.002 mg/L < 0.002
o-Xylene 0.001 mg/L < 0.001
Xylenes - Total 0.003 mg/L < 0.003
4-Bromofluorobenzene (surr.) 1 % 77
Total Recoverable Hydrocarbons - 2013 NEPM Fractions
NaphthaleneN02 0.01 mg/L < 0.01
TRH C6-C10 0.02 mg/L < 0.02
TRH C6-C10 less BTEX (F1)N04 0.02 mg/L < 0.02
TRH >C10-C16 0.05 mg/L < 0.05
TRH >C10-C16 less Naphthalene (F2)N01 0.05 mg/L < 0.05
TRH >C16-C34 0.1 mg/L < 0.1
TRH >C34-C40 0.1 mg/L < 0.1
TRH >C10-C40 (total)* 0.1 mg/L < 0.1
Heavy Metals
Arsenic (filtered) 0.001 mg/L 0.002
Boron (filtered) 0.05 mg/L 0.87
Cadmium (filtered) 0.0002 mg/L < 0.0002
Chromium (filtered) 0.001 mg/L < 0.001
Copper (filtered) 0.001 mg/L 0.002
Iron 0.05 mg/L 2.1
Lead (filtered) 0.001 mg/L < 0.001
Mercury (filtered) 0.0001 mg/L < 0.0001
Nickel (filtered) 0.001 mg/L < 0.001
Zinc (filtered) 0.005 mg/L 0.009
Date Reported: Oct 01, 2019
Eurofins Environment Testing 1/21 Smallwood Place, Murarrie, QLD, Australia, 4172
ABN : 50 005 085 521 Telephone: +61 7 3902 4600
Page 1 of 8
Report Number: 678159-W
NATA AccreditedAccreditation Number 1261Site Number 20794
Accredited for compliance with ISO/IEC 17025 – TestingThe results of the tests, calibrations and/ormeasurements included in this document are traceableto Australian/national standards.
Sample HistoryWhere samples are submitted/analysed over several days, the last date of extraction and analysis is reported.A recent review of our LIMS has resulted in the correction or clarification of some method identifications. Due to this, some of the method reference information on reports has changed. However,no substantive change has been made to our laboratory methods, and as such there is no change in the validity of current or previous results.
If the date and time of sampling are not provided, the Laboratory will not be responsible for compromised results should testing be performed outside the recommended holding time.
Description Testing Site Extracted Holding Time
Eurofins | mgt Suite B1
Total Recoverable Hydrocarbons - 1999 NEPM Fractions Melbourne Sep 25, 2019 7 Days
- Method: LTM-ORG-2010 TRH C6-C40
BTEX Melbourne Sep 25, 2019 14 Days
- Method: LTM-ORG-2010 TRH C6-C40
Total Recoverable Hydrocarbons - 2013 NEPM Fractions Melbourne Sep 25, 2019 7 Days
- Method: LTM-ORG-2010 TRH C6-C40
Total Recoverable Hydrocarbons - 2013 NEPM Fractions Melbourne Sep 25, 2019
- Method: LTM-ORG-2010 TRH C6-C40
Metals M8 filtered Melbourne Sep 25, 2019 28 Days
- Method: LTM-MET-3040 Metals in Waters, Soils & Sediments by ICP-MS
Heavy Metals (filtered) Melbourne Sep 25, 2019 180 Days
- Method: LTM-MET-3040 Metals in Waters, Soils & Sediments by ICP-MS
Heavy Metals Melbourne Sep 26, 2019 180 Days
- Method: LTM-MET-3040 Metals in Waters, Soils & Sediments by ICP-MS
Date Reported: Oct 01, 2019
Eurofins Environment Testing 1/21 Smallwood Place, Murarrie, QLD, Australia, 4172
ABN : 50 005 085 521 Telephone: +61 7 3902 4600
Page 2 of 8
Report Number: 678159-W
V2
ABN – 50 005 085 521e.mail : [email protected] : www.eurofins.com.au
Melbourne6 Monterey RoadDandenong South VIC 3175Phone : +61 3 8564 5000NATA # 1261Site # 1254 & 14271
SydneyUnit F3, Building F16 Mars RoadLane Cove West NSW 2066Phone : +61 2 9900 8400NATA # 1261 Site # 18217
Brisbane1/21 Smallwood PlaceMurarrie QLD 4172Phone : +61 7 3902 4600NATA # 1261 Site # 20794
Perth2/91 Leach HighwayKewdale WA 6105Phone : +61 8 9251 9600NATA # 1261Site # 23736
Company Name: Golder Associates Pty Ltd (Adelaide) Order No.: Received: Sep 19, 2019 12:00 PMAddress: 118 Franklin Street Report #: 678159 Due: Sep 26, 2019
Adelaide Phone: 08 8213 2100 Priority: 5 DaySA 5000 Fax: 618 8213 2101 Contact Name: Josh Innes
Project Name: VHC LANDFILLProject ID: 19127795
Eurofins Analytical Services Manager : Michael Cassidy
Sample Detail
Biochem
ical Oxygen D
emand (B
OD
-5 Day)
Boron (filtered)
Chem
ical Oxygen D
emand (C
OD
)
Iron
Nitrite (as N
)
pH (at 25°C
)
Phosphate total (as P
)
Total D
issolved Solids D
ried at 180°C ±
2°C
Total N
itrogen (as N)
Total O
rganic Carbon
Metals M
8 filtered
Eurofins | m
gt Suite B
11
Eurofins | m
gt Suite B
1
Melbourne Laboratory - NATA Site # 1254 & 14271 X X X X X X X X X X X X X
Sydney Laboratory - NATA Site # 18217
Brisbane Laboratory - NATA Site # 20794
Perth Laboratory - NATA Site # 23736
External Laboratory
No Sample ID Sample Date SamplingTime
Matrix LAB ID
1 DUP1B Sep 12, 2019 Water B19-Se31493 X X X X X X X X X X X X X
Test Counts 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
Date Reported:Oct 01, 2019
Eurofins Environment Testing 1/21 Smallwood Place, Murarrie, QLD, Australia, 4172
ABN : 50 005 085 521 Telephone: +61 7 3902 4600
Page 3 of 8
Report Number: 678159-W
Internal Quality Control Review and Glossary
General
Holding Times
Units
Terms
QC - Acceptance Criteria
QC Data General Comments
1. Laboratory QC results for Method Blanks, Duplicates, Matrix Spikes, and Laboratory Control Samples follows guidelines delineated in the National Environment Protection (Assessment of Site
Contamination) Measure 1999, as amended May 2013 and are included in this QC report where applicable. Additional QC data may be available on request.
2. All soil/sediment/solid results are reported on a dry basis, unless otherwise stated.
3. All biota/food results are reported on a wet weight basis on the edible portion, unless otherwise stated.
4. Actual LORs are matrix dependant. Quoted LORs may be raised where sample extracts are diluted due to interferences.
5. Results are uncorrected for matrix spikes or surrogate recoveries except for PFAS compounds.
6. SVOC analysis on waters are performed on homogenised, unfiltered samples, unless noted otherwise.
7. Samples were analysed on an 'as received' basis.
8. Information identified on this report with blue colour, indicates data provided by customer, that may have an impact on the results.
9. This report replaces any interim results previously issued.
Please refer to 'Sample Preservation and Container Guide' for holding times (QS3001).
For samples received on the last day of holding time, notification of testing requirements should have been received at least 6 hours prior to sample receipt deadlines as stated on the SRA.
If the Laboratory did not receive the information in the required timeframe, and regardless of any other integrity issues, suitably qualified results may still be reported.
Holding times apply from the date of sampling, therefore compliance to these may be outside the laboratory's control.
For VOCs containing vinyl chloride, styrene and 2-chloroethyl vinyl ether the holding time is 7 days however for all other VOCs such as BTEX or C6-10 TRH then the holding time is 14 days.
**NOTE: pH duplicates are reported as a range NOT as RPD
mg/kg: milligrams per kilogram mg/L: milligrams per litre ug/L: micrograms per litre
ppm: Parts per million ppb: Parts per billion %: Percentage
org/100mL: Organisms per 100 millilitres NTU: Nephelometric Turbidity Units MPN/100mL: Most Probable Number of organisms per 100 millilitres
Dry Where a moisture has been determined on a solid sample the result is expressed on a dry basis.
LOR Limit of Reporting.
SPIKE Addition of the analyte to the sample and reported as percentage recovery.
RPD Relative Percent Difference between two Duplicate pieces of analysis.
LCS Laboratory Control Sample - reported as percent recovery.
CRM Certified Reference Material - reported as percent recovery.
Method Blank In the case of solid samples these are performed on laboratory certified clean sands and in the case of water samples these are performed on de-ionised water.
Surr - Surrogate The addition of a like compound to the analyte target and reported as percentage recovery.
Duplicate A second piece of analysis from the same sample and reported in the same units as the result to show comparison.
USEPA United States Environmental Protection Agency
APHA American Public Health Association
TCLP Toxicity Characteristic Leaching Procedure
COC Chain of Custody
SRA Sample Receipt Advice
QSM US Department of Defense Quality Systems Manual Version 5.3
CP Client Parent - QC was performed on samples pertaining to this report
NCP Non-Client Parent - QC performed on samples not pertaining to this report, QC is representative of the sequence or batch that client samples were analysed within.
TEQ Toxic Equivalency Quotient
RPD Duplicates: Global RPD Duplicates Acceptance Criteria is 30% however the following acceptance guidelines are equally applicable:
Results <10 times the LOR : No Limit
Results between 10-20 times the LOR : RPD must lie between 0-50%
Results >20 times the LOR : RPD must lie between 0-30%
Surrogate Recoveries: Recoveries must lie between 20-130% Phenols & 50-150% PFASs
PFAS field samples that contain surrogate recoveries in excess of the QC limit designated in QSM 5.3 where no positive PFAS results have been reported have been reviewed and no data was
affected.
WA DWER (n=10): PFBA, PFPeA, PFHxA, PFHpA, PFOA, PFBS, PFHxS, PFOS, 6:2 FTSA, 8:2 FTSA
1. Where a result is reported as a less than (<), higher than the nominated LOR, this is due to either matrix interference, extract dilution required due to interferences or contaminant levels within
the sample, high moisture content or insufficient sample provided.
2. Duplicate data shown within this report that states the word "BATCH" is a Batch Duplicate from outside of your sample batch, but within the laboratory sample batch at a 1:10 ratio. The Parent
and Duplicate data shown is not data from your samples.
3. Organochlorine Pesticide analysis - where reporting LCS data, Toxaphene & Chlordane are not added to the LCS.
4. Organochlorine Pesticide analysis - where reporting Spike data, Toxaphene is not added to the Spike.
5. Total Recoverable Hydrocarbons - where reporting Spike & LCS data, a single spike of commercial Hydrocarbon products in the range of C12-C30 is added and it's Total Recovery is reported
in the C10-C14 cell of the Report.
6. pH and Free Chlorine analysed in the laboratory - Analysis on this test must begin within 30 minutes of sampling.Therefore laboratory analysis is unlikely to be completed within holding time.
Analysis will begin as soon as possible after sample receipt.
7. Recovery Data (Spikes & Surrogates) - where chromatographic interference does not allow the determination of Recovery the term "INT" appears against that analyte.
8. Polychlorinated Biphenyls are spiked only using Aroclor 1260 in Matrix Spikes and LCS.
9. For Matrix Spikes and LCS results a dash " -" in the report means that the specific analyte was not added to the QC sample.
10. Duplicate RPDs are calculated from raw analytical data thus it is possible to have two sets of data.
Date Reported: Oct 01, 2019
Eurofins Environment Testing 1/21 Smallwood Place, Murarrie, QLD, Australia, 4172
ABN : 50 005 085 521 Telephone: +61 7 3902 4600
Page 4 of 8
Report Number: 678159-W
Quality Control Results
Test Units Result 1 AcceptanceLimits
PassLimits
QualifyingCode
Method Blank
Total Recoverable Hydrocarbons - 1999 NEPM Fractions
TRH C6-C9 mg/L < 0.02 0.02 Pass
TRH C10-C14 mg/L < 0.05 0.05 Pass
TRH C15-C28 mg/L < 0.1 0.1 Pass
TRH C29-C36 mg/L < 0.1 0.1 Pass
Method Blank
BTEX
Benzene mg/L < 0.001 0.001 Pass
Toluene mg/L < 0.001 0.001 Pass
Ethylbenzene mg/L < 0.001 0.001 Pass
m&p-Xylenes mg/L < 0.002 0.002 Pass
o-Xylene mg/L < 0.001 0.001 Pass
Xylenes - Total mg/L < 0.003 0.003 Pass
Method Blank
Total Recoverable Hydrocarbons - 2013 NEPM Fractions
Naphthalene mg/L < 0.01 0.01 Pass
TRH C6-C10 mg/L < 0.02 0.02 Pass
TRH >C10-C16 mg/L < 0.05 0.05 Pass
TRH >C16-C34 mg/L < 0.1 0.1 Pass
TRH >C34-C40 mg/L < 0.1 0.1 Pass
Method Blank
Heavy Metals
Arsenic (filtered) mg/L < 0.001 0.001 Pass
Boron (filtered) mg/L < 0.05 0.05 Pass
Cadmium (filtered) mg/L < 0.0002 0.0002 Pass
Chromium (filtered) mg/L < 0.001 0.001 Pass
Copper (filtered) mg/L < 0.001 0.001 Pass
Iron mg/L < 0.05 0.05 Pass
Lead (filtered) mg/L < 0.001 0.001 Pass
Mercury (filtered) mg/L < 0.0001 0.0001 Pass
Nickel (filtered) mg/L < 0.001 0.001 Pass
Zinc (filtered) mg/L < 0.005 0.005 Pass
LCS - % Recovery
Total Recoverable Hydrocarbons - 1999 NEPM Fractions
TRH C6-C9 % 88 70-130 Pass
TRH C10-C14 % 85 70-130 Pass
LCS - % Recovery
BTEX
Benzene % 95 70-130 Pass
Toluene % 88 70-130 Pass
Ethylbenzene % 93 70-130 Pass
m&p-Xylenes % 92 70-130 Pass
Xylenes - Total % 92 70-130 Pass
LCS - % Recovery
Total Recoverable Hydrocarbons - 2013 NEPM Fractions
Naphthalene % 83 70-130 Pass
TRH C6-C10 % 89 70-130 Pass
TRH >C10-C16 % 81 70-130 Pass
LCS - % Recovery
Heavy Metals
Iron % 86 80-120 Pass
Date Reported: Oct 01, 2019
Eurofins Environment Testing 1/21 Smallwood Place, Murarrie, QLD, Australia, 4172
ABN : 50 005 085 521 Telephone: +61 7 3902 4600
Page 5 of 8
Report Number: 678159-W
Test Lab Sample ID QASource Units Result 1 Acceptance
LimitsPass
LimitsQualifying
Code
Spike - % Recovery
Total Recoverable Hydrocarbons - 1999 NEPM Fractions Result 1
TRH C6-C9 M19-Se37731 NCP % 113 70-130 Pass
TRH C10-C14 M19-Se33415 NCP % 96 70-130 Pass
Spike - % Recovery
BTEX Result 1
Benzene M19-Se37731 NCP % 101 70-130 Pass
Toluene M19-Se37731 NCP % 94 70-130 Pass
Ethylbenzene M19-Se37731 NCP % 96 70-130 Pass
m&p-Xylenes M19-Se37731 NCP % 99 70-130 Pass
o-Xylene M19-Se37731 NCP % 95 70-130 Pass
Xylenes - Total M19-Se37731 NCP % 97 70-130 Pass
Spike - % Recovery
Total Recoverable Hydrocarbons - 2013 NEPM Fractions Result 1
Naphthalene M19-Se37731 NCP % 82 70-130 Pass
TRH C6-C10 M19-Se37731 NCP % 113 70-130 Pass
TRH >C10-C16 M19-Se33415 NCP % 91 70-130 Pass
Spike - % Recovery
Heavy Metals Result 1
Arsenic (filtered) M19-Se35184 NCP % 104 70-130 Pass
Boron (filtered) M19-Se36023 NCP % 86 75-125 Pass
Cadmium (filtered) M19-Se35184 NCP % 103 70-130 Pass
Chromium (filtered) M19-Se35184 NCP % 102 70-130 Pass
Copper (filtered) M19-Se35184 NCP % 101 70-130 Pass
Iron M19-Se36132 NCP % 91 75-125 Pass
Lead (filtered) M19-Se35184 NCP % 100 70-130 Pass
Nickel (filtered) M19-Se35184 NCP % 101 70-130 Pass
Zinc (filtered) M19-Se35184 NCP % 102 70-130 Pass
Test Lab Sample ID QASource Units Result 1 Acceptance
LimitsPass
LimitsQualifying
Code
Duplicate
Total Recoverable Hydrocarbons - 1999 NEPM Fractions Result 1 Result 2 RPD
TRH C6-C9 M19-Se37724 NCP mg/L < 0.02 < 0.02 <1 30% Pass
TRH C10-C14 M19-Se36145 NCP mg/L < 0.05 < 0.05 <1 30% Pass
TRH C15-C28 M19-Se36145 NCP mg/L < 0.1 < 0.1 <1 30% Pass
TRH C29-C36 M19-Se36145 NCP mg/L < 0.1 < 0.1 <1 30% Pass
Duplicate
BTEX Result 1 Result 2 RPD
Benzene M19-Se37724 NCP mg/L < 0.001 < 0.001 <1 30% Pass
Toluene M19-Se37724 NCP mg/L 0.001 0.001 16 30% Pass
Ethylbenzene M19-Se37724 NCP mg/L < 0.001 < 0.001 <1 30% Pass
m&p-Xylenes M19-Se37724 NCP mg/L < 0.002 < 0.002 <1 30% Pass
o-Xylene M19-Se37724 NCP mg/L < 0.001 < 0.001 <1 30% Pass
Xylenes - Total M19-Se37724 NCP mg/L < 0.003 < 0.003 <1 30% Pass
Duplicate
Total Recoverable Hydrocarbons - 2013 NEPM Fractions Result 1 Result 2 RPD
Naphthalene M19-Se37724 NCP mg/L < 0.01 < 0.01 <1 30% Pass
TRH C6-C10 M19-Se37724 NCP mg/L < 0.02 < 0.02 <1 30% Pass
TRH >C10-C16 M19-Se36145 NCP mg/L < 0.05 < 0.05 <1 30% Pass
TRH >C16-C34 M19-Se36145 NCP mg/L < 0.1 < 0.1 <1 30% Pass
TRH >C34-C40 M19-Se36145 NCP mg/L < 0.1 < 0.1 <1 30% Pass
Date Reported: Oct 01, 2019
Eurofins Environment Testing 1/21 Smallwood Place, Murarrie, QLD, Australia, 4172
ABN : 50 005 085 521 Telephone: +61 7 3902 4600
Page 6 of 8
Report Number: 678159-W
Duplicate
Heavy Metals Result 1 Result 2 RPD
Arsenic (filtered) M19-Se35184 NCP mg/L < 0.001 < 0.001 <1 30% Pass
Boron (filtered) M19-Se36023 NCP mg/L < 0.05 < 0.05 <1 30% Pass
Cadmium (filtered) M19-Se35184 NCP mg/L < 0.0002 < 0.0002 <1 30% Pass
Chromium (filtered) M19-Se35184 NCP mg/L < 0.001 < 0.001 <1 30% Pass
Copper (filtered) M19-Se35184 NCP mg/L < 0.001 0.001 11 30% Pass
Iron M19-Se36132 NCP mg/L 0.20 0.21 2.0 30% Pass
Lead (filtered) M19-Se35184 NCP mg/L < 0.001 < 0.001 <1 30% Pass
Mercury (filtered) M19-Se35184 NCP mg/L < 0.0001 < 0.0001 <1 30% Pass
Nickel (filtered) M19-Se35184 NCP mg/L 0.003 0.003 4.0 30% Pass
Zinc (filtered) M19-Se35184 NCP mg/L 0.034 0.035 3.0 30% Pass
Date Reported: Oct 01, 2019
Eurofins Environment Testing 1/21 Smallwood Place, Murarrie, QLD, Australia, 4172
ABN : 50 005 085 521 Telephone: +61 7 3902 4600
Page 7 of 8
Report Number: 678159-W
Comments
Sample IntegrityCustody Seals Intact (if used) N/A
Attempt to Chill was evident Yes
Sample correctly preserved Yes
Appropriate sample containers have been used Yes
Sample containers for volatile analysis received with minimal headspace Yes
Samples received within HoldingTime Yes
Some samples have been subcontracted No
Qualifier Codes/Comments
Code Description
N01F2 is determined by arithmetically subtracting the "naphthalene" value from the ">C10-C16" value. The naphthalene value used in this calculation is obtained from volatiles(Purge & Trap analysis).
N02
Where we have reported both volatile (P&T GCMS) and semivolatile (GCMS) naphthalene data, results may not be identical. Provided correct sample handling protocols havebeen followed, any observed differences in results are likely to be due to procedural differences within each methodology. Results determined by both techniques have passedall QAQC acceptance criteria, and are entirely technically valid.
N04F1 is determined by arithmetically subtracting the "Total BTEX" value from the "C6-C10" value. The "Total BTEX" value is obtained by summing the concentrations of BTEXanalytes. The "C6-C10" value is obtained by quantitating against a standard of mixed aromatic/aliphatic analytes.
Authorised By
Michael Cassidy Analytical Services Manager
Emily Rosenberg Senior Analyst-Metal (VIC)
Harry Bacalis Senior Analyst-Volatile (VIC)
Joseph Edouard Senior Analyst-Organic (VIC)
Glenn Jackson
General Manager
- Indicates Not Requested
* Indicates NATA accreditation does not cover the performance of this service
Measurement uncertainty of test data is available on request or please click here.Eurofins shall not be liable for loss, cost, damages or expenses incurred by the client, or any other person or company, resulting from the use of any information or interpretation given in this report. In no case shall Eurofins be liable for consequential damages including, but not limited to, lostprofits, damages for failure to meet deadlines and lost production arising from this report. This document shall not be reproduced except in full and relates only to the items tested. Unless indicated otherwise, the tests were performed on the samples as received.
Date Reported: Oct 01, 2019
Eurofins Environment Testing 1/21 Smallwood Place, Murarrie, QLD, Australia, 4172
ABN : 50 005 085 521 Telephone: +61 7 3902 4600
Page 8 of 8
Report Number: 678159-W
0 0.00 True
Environmental
CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSISWork Order : Page : 1 of 10EB1924599
:: LaboratoryClient GOLDER ASSOCIATES Environmental Division Brisbane
: :ContactContact MR JOSH INNES Kieren Burns
:: AddressAddress Level 3, 118 Franklin Street
ADELAIDE SA, AUSTRALIA 5000
2 Byth Street Stafford QLD Australia 4053
:Telephone +61 08 8213 2100 :Telephone +61881625130
:Project 19127795 VHC Landfill Date Samples Received : 18-Sep-2019 14:30
:Order number 19127795 Date Analysis Commenced : 19-Sep-2019
:C-O-C number ---- Issue Date : 25-Sep-2019 17:25
Sampler : JI
Site : ----
Quote number : AD/044/19
11:No. of samples received
11:No. of samples analysed
This report supersedes any previous report(s) with this reference. Results apply to the sample(s) as submitted. This document shall not be reproduced, except in full.
This Certificate of Analysis contains the following information:
l General Comments
l Analytical Results
l Surrogate Control Limits
Additional information pertinent to this report will be found in the following separate attachments: Quality Control Report, QA/QC Compliance Assessment to assist with
Quality Review and Sample Receipt Notification.
SignatoriesThis document has been electronically signed by the authorized signatories below. Electronic signing is carried out in compliance with procedures specified in 21 CFR Part 11.
Signatories Accreditation CategoryPosition
Diana Mesa 2IC Organic Chemist Brisbane Organics, Stafford, QLD
Kim McCabe Senior Inorganic Chemist Brisbane Inorganics, Stafford, QLD
R I G H T S O L U T I O N S | R I G H T P A R T N E R
2 of 10:Page
Work Order :
:Client
EB1924599
19127795 VHC Landfill:Project
GOLDER ASSOCIATES
General Comments
The analytical procedures used by the Environmental Division have been developed from established internationally recognized procedures such as those published by the USEPA, APHA, AS and NEPM. In house
developed procedures are employed in the absence of documented standards or by client request.
Where moisture determination has been performed, results are reported on a dry weight basis.
Where a reported less than (<) result is higher than the LOR, this may be due to primary sample extract/digestate dilution and/or insufficient sample for analysis.
Where the LOR of a reported result differs from standard LOR, this may be due to high moisture content, insufficient sample (reduced weight employed) or matrix interference.
When sampling time information is not provided by the client, sampling dates are shown without a time component. In these instances, the time component has been assumed by the laboratory for processing
purposes.
Where a result is required to meet compliance limits the associated uncertainty must be considered. Refer to the ALS Contact for details.
CAS Number = CAS registry number from database maintained by Chemical Abstracts Services. The Chemical Abstracts Service is a division of the American Chemical Society.
LOR = Limit of reporting
^ = This result is computed from individual analyte detections at or above the level of reporting
ø = ALS is not NATA accredited for these tests.
~ = Indicates an estimated value.
Key :
EP026SP (COD); Sample 2 (65246) required x5 dilution due to salinity; LOR adjusted accordingly.l
It has been noted that EK055G (Ammonia as N) is greater than EK061G (Total Kjeldahl Nitrogen as N) for sample EB1924599_007 (LT1), however this difference is within the limits of experimental variation.l
Sodium Adsorption Ratio (where reported): Where results for Na, Ca or Mg are <LOR, a concentration at half the reported LOR is incorporated into the SAR calculation. This represents a conservative approach
for Na relative to the assumption that <LOR = zero concentration and a conservative approach for Ca & Mg relative to the assumption that <LOR is equivalent to the LOR concentration.
l
3 of 10:Page
Work Order :
:Client
EB1924599
19127795 VHC Landfill:Project
GOLDER ASSOCIATES
Analytical Results
DH2DH1652476524665245Client sample IDSub-Matrix: WATER
(Matrix: WATER)
12-Sep-2019 00:0012-Sep-2019 00:0012-Sep-2019 00:0012-Sep-2019 00:0012-Sep-2019 00:00Client sampling date / time
EB1924599-005EB1924599-004EB1924599-003EB1924599-002EB1924599-001UnitLORCAS NumberCompound
Result Result Result Result Result
EA005P: pH by PC Titrator
7.36 6.88 6.85 6.95 7.45pH Unit0.01----pH Value
EA015: Total Dissolved Solids dried at 180 ± 5 °C
2750 6480 2770 3800 3060mg/L10----Total Dissolved Solids @180°C
ED037P: Alkalinity by PC Titrator
<1Hydroxide Alkalinity as CaCO3 <1 <1 <1 <1mg/L1DMO-210-001
<1Carbonate Alkalinity as CaCO3 <1 <1 <1 <1mg/L13812-32-6
577Bicarbonate Alkalinity as CaCO3 397 817 779 721mg/L171-52-3
577 397 817 779 721mg/L1----Total Alkalinity as CaCO3
ED041G: Sulfate (Turbidimetric) as SO4 2- by DA
185Sulfate as SO4 - Turbidimetric 356 15 73 2mg/L114808-79-8
ED045G: Chloride by Discrete Analyser
1100Chloride 2870 1210 1650 1380mg/L116887-00-6
ED093F: Dissolved Major Cations
106Calcium 194 108 128 81mg/L17440-70-2
64Magnesium 213 84 123 86mg/L17439-95-4
880Sodium 1640 898 1120 908mg/L17440-23-5
11Potassium 48 33 40 94mg/L17440-09-7
EG020F: Dissolved Metals by ICP-MS
0.003Arsenic 0.001 0.008 0.002 0.006mg/L0.0017440-38-2
<0.0001Cadmium 0.0003 <0.0001 0.0002 <0.0001mg/L0.00017440-43-9
<0.001Chromium <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 0.001mg/L0.0017440-47-3
0.001Copper <0.001 0.002 0.023 <0.001mg/L0.0017440-50-8
<0.001Lead <0.001 0.001 <0.001 <0.001mg/L0.0017439-92-1
0.001Nickel 0.001 0.008 0.118 0.006mg/L0.0017440-02-0
0.008Zinc <0.005 0.022 0.007 0.009mg/L0.0057440-66-6
0.81Boron 0.98 0.55 0.88 0.90mg/L0.057440-42-8
EG020T: Total Metals by ICP-MS
2.68Iron 0.09 15.7 0.16 67.3mg/L0.057439-89-6
EG035F: Dissolved Mercury by FIMS
<0.0001Mercury <0.0001 <0.0001 <0.0001 <0.0001mg/L0.00017439-97-6
EK055G: Ammonia as N by Discrete Analyser
<0.01Ammonia as N <0.01 1.53 1.62 35.4mg/L0.017664-41-7
EK057G: Nitrite as N by Discrete Analyser
4 of 10:Page
Work Order :
:Client
EB1924599
19127795 VHC Landfill:Project
GOLDER ASSOCIATES
Analytical Results
DH2DH1652476524665245Client sample IDSub-Matrix: WATER
(Matrix: WATER)
12-Sep-2019 00:0012-Sep-2019 00:0012-Sep-2019 00:0012-Sep-2019 00:0012-Sep-2019 00:00Client sampling date / time
EB1924599-005EB1924599-004EB1924599-003EB1924599-002EB1924599-001UnitLORCAS NumberCompound
Result Result Result Result Result
EK057G: Nitrite as N by Discrete Analyser - Continued
0.04Nitrite as N <0.01 0.02 0.15 0.91mg/L0.0114797-65-0
EK058G: Nitrate as N by Discrete Analyser
2.59Nitrate as N 1.61 0.49 1.16 1.13mg/L0.0114797-55-8
EK059G: Nitrite plus Nitrate as N (NOx) by Discrete Analyser
2.63 1.61 0.51 1.31 2.04mg/L0.01----Nitrite + Nitrate as N
EK061G: Total Kjeldahl Nitrogen By Discrete Analyser
0.4 0.1 3.2 3.0 39.0mg/L0.1----Total Kjeldahl Nitrogen as N
EK062G: Total Nitrogen as N (TKN + NOx) by Discrete Analyser
3.0^ 1.7 3.7 4.3 41.0mg/L0.1----Total Nitrogen as N
EK067G: Total Phosphorus as P by Discrete Analyser
0.05 0.04 0.32 0.07 1.43mg/L0.01----Total Phosphorus as P
EN055: Ionic Balance
46.4ø 96.3 50.8 63.6 53.4meq/L0.01----Total Anions
49.1ø 99.8 52.2 66.2 53.0meq/L0.01----Total Cations
2.83ø 1.77 1.40 2.02 0.33%0.01----Ionic Balance
EP005: Total Organic Carbon (TOC)
4 2 34 26 19mg/L1----Total Organic Carbon
EP026SP: Chemical Oxygen Demand (Spectrophotometric)
16 <50 89 59 140mg/L10----Chemical Oxygen Demand
EP030: Biochemical Oxygen Demand (BOD)
<2 <2 5 12 52mg/L2----Biochemical Oxygen Demand
EP080/071: Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons
<20 <20 <20 <20 <20µg/L20----C6 - C9 Fraction
<50 <50 <50 <50 60µg/L50----C10 - C14 Fraction
<100 <100 320 120 290µg/L100----C15 - C28 Fraction
<50 <50 110 <50 190µg/L50----C29 - C36 Fraction
<50^ <50 430 120 540µg/L50----C10 - C36 Fraction (sum)
EP080/071: Total Recoverable Hydrocarbons - NEPM 2013 Fractions
<20C6 - C10 Fraction <20 <20 <20 <20µg/L20C6_C10
<20^ C6 - C10 Fraction minus BTEX
(F1)
<20 <20 <20 <20µg/L20C6_C10-BTEX
<100 <100 <100 <100 <100µg/L100---->C10 - C16 Fraction
<100 <100 350 120 420µg/L100---->C16 - C34 Fraction
5 of 10:Page
Work Order :
:Client
EB1924599
19127795 VHC Landfill:Project
GOLDER ASSOCIATES
Analytical Results
DH2DH1652476524665245Client sample IDSub-Matrix: WATER
(Matrix: WATER)
12-Sep-2019 00:0012-Sep-2019 00:0012-Sep-2019 00:0012-Sep-2019 00:0012-Sep-2019 00:00Client sampling date / time
EB1924599-005EB1924599-004EB1924599-003EB1924599-002EB1924599-001UnitLORCAS NumberCompound
Result Result Result Result Result
EP080/071: Total Recoverable Hydrocarbons - NEPM 2013 Fractions - Continued
<100 <100 130 <100 <100µg/L100---->C34 - C40 Fraction
<100^ <100 480 120 420µg/L100---->C10 - C40 Fraction (sum)
<100^ <100 <100 <100 <100µg/L100---->C10 - C16 Fraction minus Naphthalene
(F2)
EP080: BTEXN
<1Benzene <1 <1 <1 <1µg/L171-43-2
<2Toluene <2 <2 <2 <2µg/L2108-88-3
<2Ethylbenzene <2 <2 <2 <2µg/L2100-41-4
<2meta- & para-Xylene <2 <2 <2 <2µg/L2108-38-3 106-42-3
<2ortho-Xylene <2 <2 <2 <2µg/L295-47-6
<2^ <2 <2 <2 <2µg/L2----Total Xylenes
<1^ <1 <1 <1 <1µg/L1----Sum of BTEX
<5Naphthalene <5 <5 <5 <5µg/L591-20-3
EP080S: TPH(V)/BTEX Surrogates
1021.2-Dichloroethane-D4 112 101 116 106%217060-07-0
98.8Toluene-D8 94.9 96.2 92.9 99.7%22037-26-5
1024-Bromofluorobenzene 100 101 103 104%2460-00-4
6 of 10:Page
Work Order :
:Client
EB1924599
19127795 VHC Landfill:Project
GOLDER ASSOCIATES
Analytical Results
TB01R01SW1LT1DH4Client sample IDSub-Matrix: WATER
(Matrix: WATER)
12-Sep-2019 00:0012-Sep-2019 00:0012-Sep-2019 00:0012-Sep-2019 00:0012-Sep-2019 00:00Client sampling date / time
EB1924599-010EB1924599-009EB1924599-008EB1924599-007EB1924599-006UnitLORCAS NumberCompound
Result Result Result Result Result
EA005P: pH by PC Titrator
7.95 7.62 7.67 ---- ----pH Unit0.01----pH Value
EA015: Total Dissolved Solids dried at 180 ± 5 °C
2680 3400 3520 ---- ----mg/L10----Total Dissolved Solids @180°C
ED037P: Alkalinity by PC Titrator
<1Hydroxide Alkalinity as CaCO3 <1 <1 ---- ----mg/L1DMO-210-001
<1Carbonate Alkalinity as CaCO3 <1 <1 ---- ----mg/L13812-32-6
632Bicarbonate Alkalinity as CaCO3 887 747 ---- ----mg/L171-52-3
632 887 747 ---- ----mg/L1----Total Alkalinity as CaCO3
ED041G: Sulfate (Turbidimetric) as SO4 2- by DA
177Sulfate as SO4 - Turbidimetric <1 12 ---- ----mg/L114808-79-8
ED045G: Chloride by Discrete Analyser
1100Chloride 1510 1570 ---- ----mg/L116887-00-6
ED093F: Dissolved Major Cations
93Calcium 84 97 ---- ----mg/L17440-70-2
56Magnesium 117 128 ---- ----mg/L17439-95-4
884Sodium 1070 1150 ---- ----mg/L17440-23-5
21Potassium 99 112 ---- ----mg/L17440-09-7
EG020F: Dissolved Metals by ICP-MS
0.009Arsenic ---- ---- ---- ----mg/L0.0017440-38-2
<0.0001Cadmium ---- ---- ---- ----mg/L0.00017440-43-9
<0.001Chromium ---- ---- ---- ----mg/L0.0017440-47-3
<0.001Copper ---- ---- ---- ----mg/L0.0017440-50-8
<0.001Lead ---- ---- ---- ----mg/L0.0017439-92-1
0.003Nickel ---- ---- ---- ----mg/L0.0017440-02-0
<0.005Zinc ---- ---- ---- ----mg/L0.0057440-66-6
0.64Boron ---- ---- ---- ----mg/L0.057440-42-8
EG020T: Total Metals by ICP-MS
----Arsenic 0.007 0.004 0.004 ----mg/L0.0017440-38-2
----Cadmium <0.0001 <0.0001 <0.0001 ----mg/L0.00017440-43-9
----Chromium 0.001 0.008 0.006 ----mg/L0.0017440-47-3
----Copper <0.001 0.014 0.006 ----mg/L0.0017440-50-8
----Lead <0.001 0.002 0.004 ----mg/L0.0017439-92-1
----Nickel 0.004 0.018 0.004 ----mg/L0.0017440-02-0
----Zinc <0.005 0.026 0.023 ----mg/L0.0057440-66-6
7 of 10:Page
Work Order :
:Client
EB1924599
19127795 VHC Landfill:Project
GOLDER ASSOCIATES
Analytical Results
TB01R01SW1LT1DH4Client sample IDSub-Matrix: WATER
(Matrix: WATER)
12-Sep-2019 00:0012-Sep-2019 00:0012-Sep-2019 00:0012-Sep-2019 00:0012-Sep-2019 00:00Client sampling date / time
EB1924599-010EB1924599-009EB1924599-008EB1924599-007EB1924599-006UnitLORCAS NumberCompound
Result Result Result Result Result
EG020T: Total Metals by ICP-MS - Continued
----Boron 0.89 1.18 0.79 ----mg/L0.057440-42-8
3.90Iron 5.46 4.31 3.17 ----mg/L0.057439-89-6
EG035F: Dissolved Mercury by FIMS
<0.0001Mercury ---- ---- ---- ----mg/L0.00017439-97-6
EG035T: Total Recoverable Mercury by FIMS
----Mercury <0.0001 <0.0001 ---- ----mg/L0.00017439-97-6
EK055G: Ammonia as N by Discrete Analyser
0.09Ammonia as N 46.3 10.4 ---- ----mg/L0.017664-41-7
EK057G: Nitrite as N by Discrete Analyser
0.02Nitrite as N 0.18 1.44 ---- ----mg/L0.0114797-65-0
EK058G: Nitrate as N by Discrete Analyser
<0.01Nitrate as N 0.05 10.1 ---- ----mg/L0.0114797-55-8
EK059G: Nitrite plus Nitrate as N (NOx) by Discrete Analyser
<0.01 0.23 11.5 ---- ----mg/L0.01----Nitrite + Nitrate as N
EK061G: Total Kjeldahl Nitrogen By Discrete Analyser
0.3 42.1 16.4 ---- ----mg/L0.1----Total Kjeldahl Nitrogen as N
EK062G: Total Nitrogen as N (TKN + NOx) by Discrete Analyser
0.3^ 42.3 27.9 ---- ----mg/L0.1----Total Nitrogen as N
EK067G: Total Phosphorus as P by Discrete Analyser
0.39 0.08 0.19 ---- ----mg/L0.01----Total Phosphorus as P
EN055: Ionic Balance
47.3ø 60.3 59.5 ---- ----meq/L0.01----Total Anions
48.2ø 62.9 68.3 ---- ----meq/L0.01----Total Cations
0.94ø 2.09 6.89 ---- ----%0.01----Ionic Balance
EP005: Total Organic Carbon (TOC)
<1 53 39 ---- ----mg/L1----Total Organic Carbon
EP026SP: Chemical Oxygen Demand (Spectrophotometric)
23 110 226 ---- ----mg/L10----Chemical Oxygen Demand
EP030: Biochemical Oxygen Demand (BOD)
2 17 40 ---- ----mg/L2----Biochemical Oxygen Demand
EP080/071: Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons
<20 <20 <20 <20 <20µg/L20----C6 - C9 Fraction
<50 50 <50 <50 <50µg/L50----C10 - C14 Fraction
8 of 10:Page
Work Order :
:Client
EB1924599
19127795 VHC Landfill:Project
GOLDER ASSOCIATES
Analytical Results
TB01R01SW1LT1DH4Client sample IDSub-Matrix: WATER
(Matrix: WATER)
12-Sep-2019 00:0012-Sep-2019 00:0012-Sep-2019 00:0012-Sep-2019 00:0012-Sep-2019 00:00Client sampling date / time
EB1924599-010EB1924599-009EB1924599-008EB1924599-007EB1924599-006UnitLORCAS NumberCompound
Result Result Result Result Result
EP080/071: Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons - Continued
<100 440 260 <100 <100µg/L100----C15 - C28 Fraction
<50 <50 110 <50 <50µg/L50----C29 - C36 Fraction
<50^ 490 370 <50 <50µg/L50----C10 - C36 Fraction (sum)
EP080/071: Total Recoverable Hydrocarbons - NEPM 2013 Fractions
<20C6 - C10 Fraction <20 <20 <20 <20µg/L20C6_C10
<20^ C6 - C10 Fraction minus BTEX
(F1)
<20 <20 <20 <20µg/L20C6_C10-BTEX
<100 <100 <100 <100 <100µg/L100---->C10 - C16 Fraction
<100 420 330 <100 <100µg/L100---->C16 - C34 Fraction
<100 <100 <100 <100 <100µg/L100---->C34 - C40 Fraction
<100^ 420 330 <100 <100µg/L100---->C10 - C40 Fraction (sum)
<100^ <100 <100 <100 <100µg/L100---->C10 - C16 Fraction minus Naphthalene
(F2)
EP080: BTEXN
<1Benzene <1 <1 <1 <1µg/L171-43-2
<2Toluene <2 <2 <2 <2µg/L2108-88-3
<2Ethylbenzene <2 <2 <2 <2µg/L2100-41-4
<2meta- & para-Xylene <2 <2 <2 <2µg/L2108-38-3 106-42-3
<2ortho-Xylene <2 <2 <2 <2µg/L295-47-6
<2^ <2 <2 <2 <2µg/L2----Total Xylenes
<1^ <1 <1 <1 <1µg/L1----Sum of BTEX
<5Naphthalene <5 <5 <5 <5µg/L591-20-3
EP080S: TPH(V)/BTEX Surrogates
1081.2-Dichloroethane-D4 110 101 98.7 112%217060-07-0
91.5Toluene-D8 96.8 97.8 96.6 93.7%22037-26-5
1004-Bromofluorobenzene 105 104 102 104%2460-00-4
9 of 10:Page
Work Order :
:Client
EB1924599
19127795 VHC Landfill:Project
GOLDER ASSOCIATES
Analytical Results
----------------DUP1AClient sample IDSub-Matrix: WATER
(Matrix: WATER)
----------------12-Sep-2019 00:00Client sampling date / time
--------------------------------EB1924599-011UnitLORCAS NumberCompound
Result ---- ---- ---- ----
EG020T: Total Metals by ICP-MS
<0.05Iron ---- ---- ---- ----mg/L0.057439-89-6
EP005: Total Organic Carbon (TOC)
<1 ---- ---- ---- ----mg/L1----Total Organic Carbon
EP080/071: Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons
<20 ---- ---- ---- ----µg/L20----C6 - C9 Fraction
<50 ---- ---- ---- ----µg/L50----C10 - C14 Fraction
<100 ---- ---- ---- ----µg/L100----C15 - C28 Fraction
<50 ---- ---- ---- ----µg/L50----C29 - C36 Fraction
<50^ ---- ---- ---- ----µg/L50----C10 - C36 Fraction (sum)
EP080/071: Total Recoverable Hydrocarbons - NEPM 2013 Fractions
<20C6 - C10 Fraction ---- ---- ---- ----µg/L20C6_C10
<20^ C6 - C10 Fraction minus BTEX
(F1)
---- ---- ---- ----µg/L20C6_C10-BTEX
<100 ---- ---- ---- ----µg/L100---->C10 - C16 Fraction
<100 ---- ---- ---- ----µg/L100---->C16 - C34 Fraction
<100 ---- ---- ---- ----µg/L100---->C34 - C40 Fraction
<100^ ---- ---- ---- ----µg/L100---->C10 - C40 Fraction (sum)
<100^ ---- ---- ---- ----µg/L100---->C10 - C16 Fraction minus Naphthalene
(F2)
EP080: BTEXN
<1Benzene ---- ---- ---- ----µg/L171-43-2
<2Toluene ---- ---- ---- ----µg/L2108-88-3
<2Ethylbenzene ---- ---- ---- ----µg/L2100-41-4
<2meta- & para-Xylene ---- ---- ---- ----µg/L2108-38-3 106-42-3
<2ortho-Xylene ---- ---- ---- ----µg/L295-47-6
<2^ ---- ---- ---- ----µg/L2----Total Xylenes
<1^ ---- ---- ---- ----µg/L1----Sum of BTEX
<5Naphthalene ---- ---- ---- ----µg/L591-20-3
EP080S: TPH(V)/BTEX Surrogates
1061.2-Dichloroethane-D4 ---- ---- ---- ----%217060-07-0
96.0Toluene-D8 ---- ---- ---- ----%22037-26-5
1014-Bromofluorobenzene ---- ---- ---- ----%2460-00-4
10 of 10:Page
Work Order :
:Client
EB1924599
19127795 VHC Landfill:Project
GOLDER ASSOCIATES
Surrogate Control Limits
Recovery Limits (%)Sub-Matrix: WATER
Compound CAS Number Low High
EP080S: TPH(V)/BTEX Surrogates
1.2-Dichloroethane-D4 17060-07-0 66 138
Toluene-D8 2037-26-5 79 120
4-Bromofluorobenzene 460-00-4 74 118
False
2 2.00True
Environmental
QUALITY CONTROL REPORTWork Order : EB1924599 Page : 1 of 12
:: LaboratoryClient Environmental Division BrisbaneGOLDER ASSOCIATES
:Contact MR JOSH INNES :Contact Kieren Burns
:Address Level 3, 118 Franklin Street
ADELAIDE SA, AUSTRALIA 5000
Address : 2 Byth Street Stafford QLD Australia 4053
::Telephone +61 08 8213 2100 +61881625130:Telephone
:Project 19127795 VHC Landfill Date Samples Received : 18-Sep-2019
:Order number 19127795 Date Analysis Commenced : 19-Sep-2019
:C-O-C number ---- Issue Date : 25-Sep-2019
Sampler : JI
Site : ----
Quote number : AD/044/19
No. of samples received 11:
No. of samples analysed 11:
This report supersedes any previous report(s) with this reference. Results apply to the sample(s) as submitted. This document shall not be reproduced, except in full.
This Quality Control Report contains the following information:
l Laboratory Duplicate (DUP) Report; Relative Percentage Difference (RPD) and Acceptance Limits
l Method Blank (MB) and Laboratory Control Spike (LCS) Report ; Recovery and Acceptance Limits
l Matrix Spike (MS) Report; Recovery and Acceptance Limits
SignatoriesThis document has been electronically signed by the authorized signatories below. Electronic signing is carried out in compliance with procedures specified in 21 CFR Part 11.
Signatories Accreditation CategoryPosition
Diana Mesa 2IC Organic Chemist Brisbane Organics, Stafford, QLD
Kim McCabe Senior Inorganic Chemist Brisbane Inorganics, Stafford, QLD
R I G H T S O L U T I O N S | R I G H T P A R T N E R
2 of 12:Page
Work Order :
:Client
EB1924599
GOLDER ASSOCIATES
19127795 VHC Landfill:Project
General Comments
The analytical procedures used by the Environmental Division have been developed from established internationally recognized procedures such as those published by the USEPA, APHA, AS and NEPM. In house
developed procedures are employed in the absence of documented standards or by client request.
Where moisture determination has been performed, results are reported on a dry weight basis.
Where a reported less than (<) result is higher than the LOR, this may be due to primary sample extract/digestate dilution and/or insufficient sample for analysis. Where the LOR of a reported result differs from standard LOR, this may be due to high moisture content, insufficient sample (reduced weight employed) or matrix interference.
Anonymous = Refers to samples which are not specifically part of this work order but formed part of the QC process lot
CAS Number = CAS registry number from database maintained by Chemical Abstracts Services. The Chemical Abstracts Service is a division of the American Chemical Society.
LOR = Limit of reporting
RPD = Relative Percentage Difference
# = Indicates failed QC
Key :
Laboratory Duplicate (DUP) Report
The quality control term Laboratory Duplicate refers to a randomly selected intralaboratory split. Laboratory duplicates provide information regarding method precision and sample heterogeneity. The permitted ranges
for the Relative Percent Deviation (RPD) of Laboratory Duplicates are specified in ALS Method QWI -EN/38 and are dependent on the magnitude of results in comparison to the level of reporting: Result < 10 times LOR:
No Limit; Result between 10 and 20 times LOR: 0% - 50%; Result > 20 times LOR: 0% - 20%.
Sub-Matrix: WATER Laboratory Duplicate (DUP) Report
Original Result RPD (%)Laboratory sample ID Client sample ID Method: Compound CAS Number LOR Unit Duplicate Result Recovery Limits (%)
EA005P: pH by PC Titrator (QC Lot: 2592110)
EA005-P: pH Value ---- 0.01 pH Unit 7.15 7.18 0.419 0% - 20%Anonymous EB1924609-002
EA005-P: pH Value ---- 0.01 pH Unit 7.62 7.63 0.131 0% - 20%LT1 EB1924599-007
EA015: Total Dissolved Solids dried at 180 ± 5 °C (QC Lot: 2592426)
EA015H: Total Dissolved Solids @180°C ---- 10 mg/L 46500 45700 1.72 0% - 20%Anonymous EB1924238-007
EA015H: Total Dissolved Solids @180°C ---- 10 mg/L 1130 1070 5.94 0% - 20%Anonymous EB1920255-003
EA015: Total Dissolved Solids dried at 180 ± 5 °C (QC Lot: 2592428)
EA015H: Total Dissolved Solids @180°C ---- 10 mg/L 2680 2630 2.15 0% - 20%DH4 EB1924599-006
ED037P: Alkalinity by PC Titrator (QC Lot: 2592109)
ED037-P: Hydroxide Alkalinity as CaCO3 DMO-210-001 1 mg/L <1 <1 0.00 No LimitLT1 EB1924599-007
ED037-P: Carbonate Alkalinity as CaCO3 3812-32-6 1 mg/L <1 <1 0.00 No Limit
ED037-P: Bicarbonate Alkalinity as CaCO3 71-52-3 1 mg/L 887 892 0.527 0% - 20%
ED037-P: Total Alkalinity as CaCO3 ---- 1 mg/L 887 892 0.527 0% - 20%
ED037-P: Hydroxide Alkalinity as CaCO3 DMO-210-001 1 mg/L <1 <1 0.00 No LimitAnonymous EB1924586-001
ED037-P: Carbonate Alkalinity as CaCO3 3812-32-6 1 mg/L <1 <1 0.00 No Limit
ED037-P: Bicarbonate Alkalinity as CaCO3 71-52-3 1 mg/L <1 <1 0.00 No Limit
ED037-P: Total Alkalinity as CaCO3 ---- 1 mg/L <1 <1 0.00 No Limit
ED041G: Sulfate (Turbidimetric) as SO4 2- by DA (QC Lot: 2591997)
ED041G: Sulfate as SO4 - Turbidimetric 14808-79-8 1 mg/L 185 186 0.610 0% - 20%65245 EB1924599-001
ED041G: Sulfate as SO4 - Turbidimetric 14808-79-8 1 mg/L 12 12 0.00 0% - 50%Anonymous EB1924615-001
ED045G: Chloride by Discrete Analyser (QC Lot: 2591996)
ED045G: Chloride 16887-00-6 1 mg/L 1100 1100 0.00 0% - 20%65245 EB1924599-001
ED093F: Dissolved Major Cations (QC Lot: 2592061)
ED093F: Calcium 7440-70-2 1 mg/L 84 86 2.70 0% - 20%LT1 EB1924599-007
ED093F: Magnesium 7439-95-4 1 mg/L 117 120 2.76 0% - 20%
3 of 12:Page
Work Order :
:Client
EB1924599
GOLDER ASSOCIATES
19127795 VHC Landfill:Project
Sub-Matrix: WATER Laboratory Duplicate (DUP) Report
Original Result RPD (%)Laboratory sample ID Client sample ID Method: Compound CAS Number LOR Unit Duplicate Result Recovery Limits (%)
ED093F: Dissolved Major Cations (QC Lot: 2592061) - continued
ED093F: Sodium 7440-23-5 1 mg/L 1070 1090 1.38 0% - 20%LT1 EB1924599-007
ED093F: Potassium 7440-09-7 1 mg/L 99 103 4.59 0% - 20%
ED093F: Dissolved Major Cations (QC Lot: 2592077)
ED093F: Calcium 7440-70-2 1 mg/L 162 162 0.00 0% - 20%Anonymous EB1924575-001
ED093F: Magnesium 7439-95-4 1 mg/L 449 450 0.239 0% - 20%
ED093F: Sodium 7440-23-5 1 mg/L 3770 3780 0.0753 0% - 20%
ED093F: Potassium 7440-09-7 1 mg/L 138 142 2.84 0% - 20%
ED093F: Calcium 7440-70-2 1 mg/L 8 8 0.00 No LimitAnonymous EB1924575-010
ED093F: Magnesium 7439-95-4 1 mg/L 6 6 0.00 No Limit
ED093F: Sodium 7440-23-5 1 mg/L 34 33 0.00 0% - 20%
ED093F: Potassium 7440-09-7 1 mg/L 5 5 0.00 No Limit
EG020F: Dissolved Metals by ICP-MS (QC Lot: 2592078)
EG020A-F: Cadmium 7440-43-9 0.0001 mg/L <0.0001 <0.0001 0.00 No LimitAnonymous EB1924575-001
EG020A-F: Arsenic 7440-38-2 0.001 mg/L <0.001 <0.001 0.00 No Limit
EG020A-F: Chromium 7440-47-3 0.001 mg/L <0.001 <0.001 0.00 No Limit
EG020A-F: Copper 7440-50-8 0.001 mg/L <0.001 <0.001 0.00 No Limit
EG020A-F: Lead 7439-92-1 0.001 mg/L <0.001 <0.001 0.00 No Limit
EG020A-F: Nickel 7440-02-0 0.001 mg/L 0.001 0.002 0.00 No Limit
EG020A-F: Zinc 7440-66-6 0.005 mg/L <0.005 <0.005 0.00 No Limit
EG020A-F: Boron 7440-42-8 0.05 mg/L 1.53 1.61 5.60 0% - 20%
EG020A-F: Cadmium 7440-43-9 0.0001 mg/L <0.0001 <0.0001 0.00 No LimitAnonymous EB1924575-010
EG020A-F: Arsenic 7440-38-2 0.001 mg/L 0.001 0.001 0.00 No Limit
EG020A-F: Chromium 7440-47-3 0.001 mg/L <0.001 <0.001 0.00 No Limit
EG020A-F: Copper 7440-50-8 0.001 mg/L <0.001 <0.001 0.00 No Limit
EG020A-F: Lead 7439-92-1 0.001 mg/L <0.001 <0.001 0.00 No Limit
EG020A-F: Nickel 7440-02-0 0.001 mg/L <0.001 <0.001 0.00 No Limit
EG020A-F: Zinc 7440-66-6 0.005 mg/L <0.005 <0.005 0.00 No Limit
EG020A-F: Boron 7440-42-8 0.05 mg/L 0.09 0.08 0.00 No Limit
EG020T: Total Metals by ICP-MS (QC Lot: 2592137)
EG020A-T: Cadmium 7440-43-9 0.0001 mg/L <0.0001 <0.0001 0.00 No LimitAnonymous EB1924575-010
EG020A-T: Arsenic 7440-38-2 0.001 mg/L 0.001 0.001 0.00 No Limit
EG020A-T: Chromium 7440-47-3 0.001 mg/L <0.001 <0.001 0.00 No Limit
EG020A-T: Copper 7440-50-8 0.001 mg/L 0.001 0.001 0.00 No Limit
EG020A-T: Lead 7439-92-1 0.001 mg/L <0.001 <0.001 0.00 No Limit
EG020A-T: Nickel 7440-02-0 0.001 mg/L <0.001 <0.001 0.00 No Limit
EG020A-T: Zinc 7440-66-6 0.005 mg/L <0.005 <0.005 0.00 No Limit
EG020A-T: Boron 7440-42-8 0.05 mg/L <0.05 <0.05 0.00 No Limit
EG020A-T: Iron 7439-89-6 0.05 mg/L 6.33 6.18 2.47 0% - 20%
EG020A-T: Cadmium 7440-43-9 0.0001 mg/L <0.0001 <0.0001 0.00 No Limit65247 EB1924599-003
EG020A-T: Arsenic 7440-38-2 0.001 mg/L 0.017 0.016 8.59 0% - 50%
4 of 12:Page
Work Order :
:Client
EB1924599
GOLDER ASSOCIATES
19127795 VHC Landfill:Project
Sub-Matrix: WATER Laboratory Duplicate (DUP) Report
Original Result RPD (%)Laboratory sample ID Client sample ID Method: Compound CAS Number LOR Unit Duplicate Result Recovery Limits (%)
EG020T: Total Metals by ICP-MS (QC Lot: 2592137) - continued
EG020A-T: Chromium 7440-47-3 0.001 mg/L 0.004 0.003 0.00 No Limit65247 EB1924599-003
EG020A-T: Copper 7440-50-8 0.001 mg/L 0.003 0.004 0.00 No Limit
EG020A-T: Lead 7439-92-1 0.001 mg/L 0.024 0.024 0.00 0% - 20%
EG020A-T: Nickel 7440-02-0 0.001 mg/L 0.009 0.009 0.00 No Limit
EG020A-T: Zinc 7440-66-6 0.005 mg/L 0.046 0.043 7.66 No Limit
EG020A-T: Boron 7440-42-8 0.05 mg/L 0.57 0.56 0.00 0% - 50%
EG020A-T: Iron 7439-89-6 0.05 mg/L 15.7 15.0 4.48 0% - 20%
EG020T: Total Metals by ICP-MS (QC Lot: 2594821)
EG020A-T: Cadmium 7440-43-9 0.0001 mg/L <0.0001 <0.0001 0.00 No LimitAnonymous EB1924559-001
EG020A-T: Arsenic 7440-38-2 0.001 mg/L <0.001 <0.001 0.00 No Limit
EG020A-T: Chromium 7440-47-3 0.001 mg/L <0.001 <0.001 0.00 No Limit
EG020A-T: Copper 7440-50-8 0.001 mg/L 0.008 0.008 0.00 No Limit
EG020A-T: Lead 7439-92-1 0.001 mg/L 0.002 0.002 0.00 No Limit
EG020A-T: Nickel 7440-02-0 0.001 mg/L <0.001 <0.001 0.00 No Limit
EG020A-T: Zinc 7440-66-6 0.005 mg/L 0.028 0.028 0.00 No Limit
EG020A-T: Boron 7440-42-8 0.05 mg/L 51.1 50.0 2.10 0% - 20%
EG020A-T: Iron 7439-89-6 0.05 mg/L 2.86 2.80 2.11 0% - 20%
EG020A-T: Cadmium 7440-43-9 0.0001 mg/L 0.148 0.148 0.205 0% - 20%Anonymous EB1924690-001
EG020A-T: Arsenic 7440-38-2 0.001 mg/L <0.001 <0.001 0.00 No Limit
EG020A-T: Chromium 7440-47-3 0.001 mg/L 0.001 0.001 0.00 No Limit
EG020A-T: Copper 7440-50-8 0.001 mg/L 0.017 0.018 0.00 0% - 50%
EG020A-T: Lead 7439-92-1 0.001 mg/L 0.004 0.004 0.00 No Limit
EG020A-T: Nickel 7440-02-0 0.001 mg/L 0.096 0.096 0.00 0% - 20%
EG020A-T: Zinc 7440-66-6 0.005 mg/L 0.958 0.956 0.278 0% - 20%
EG020A-T: Boron 7440-42-8 0.05 mg/L <0.05 <0.05 0.00 No Limit
EG020A-T: Iron 7439-89-6 0.05 mg/L 0.38 0.42 8.74 No Limit
EG035F: Dissolved Mercury by FIMS (QC Lot: 2592079)
EG035F: Mercury 7439-97-6 0.0001 mg/L <0.0001 <0.0001 0.00 No Limit65245 EB1924599-001
EG035F: Mercury 7439-97-6 0.0001 mg/L <0.0001 <0.0001 0.00 No LimitAnonymous EB1924600-005
EG035T: Total Recoverable Mercury by FIMS (QC Lot: 2592135)
EG035T: Mercury 7439-97-6 0.0001 mg/L <0.0001 <0.0001 0.00 No LimitAnonymous EB1924508-005
EG035T: Mercury 7439-97-6 0.0001 mg/L <0.0001 <0.0001 0.00 No LimitAnonymous EB1924508-011
EK055G: Ammonia as N by Discrete Analyser (QC Lot: 2593408)
EK055G: Ammonia as N 7664-41-7 0.01 mg/L 83.1 80.7 2.90 0% - 20%Anonymous EB1924583-001
EK055G: Ammonia as N 7664-41-7 0.01 mg/L 35.4 34.5 2.65 0% - 20%DH2 EB1924599-005
EK057G: Nitrite as N by Discrete Analyser (QC Lot: 2591995)
EK057G: Nitrite as N 14797-65-0 0.01 mg/L <0.01 <0.01 0.00 No LimitAnonymous EB1924377-001
EK057G: Nitrite as N 14797-65-0 0.01 mg/L <0.01 <0.01 0.00 No LimitAnonymous EB1924615-001
EK059G: Nitrite plus Nitrate as N (NOx) by Discrete Analyser (QC Lot: 2593409)
5 of 12:Page
Work Order :
:Client
EB1924599
GOLDER ASSOCIATES
19127795 VHC Landfill:Project
Sub-Matrix: WATER Laboratory Duplicate (DUP) Report
Original Result RPD (%)Laboratory sample ID Client sample ID Method: Compound CAS Number LOR Unit Duplicate Result Recovery Limits (%)
EK059G: Nitrite plus Nitrate as N (NOx) by Discrete Analyser (QC Lot: 2593409) - continued
EK059G: Nitrite + Nitrate as N ---- 0.01 mg/L 0.01 0.01 0.00 No LimitAnonymous EB1924583-001
EK059G: Nitrite + Nitrate as N ---- 0.01 mg/L 2.04 2.26 10.4 0% - 20%DH2 EB1924599-005
EK061G: Total Kjeldahl Nitrogen By Discrete Analyser (QC Lot: 2596819)
EK061G: Total Kjeldahl Nitrogen as N ---- 0.1 mg/L 105 103 1.35 0% - 20%Anonymous EB1924492-001
EK061G: Total Kjeldahl Nitrogen as N ---- 0.1 mg/L 0.1 <0.1 0.00 No Limit65246 EB1924599-002
EK067G: Total Phosphorus as P by Discrete Analyser (QC Lot: 2596818)
EK067G: Total Phosphorus as P ---- 0.01 mg/L 6.18 6.01 2.85 0% - 20%Anonymous EB1924492-001
EK067G: Total Phosphorus as P ---- 0.01 mg/L 0.04 0.04 0.00 No Limit65246 EB1924599-002
EP005: Total Organic Carbon (TOC) (QC Lot: 2592147)
EP005: Total Organic Carbon ---- 1 mg/L <1 <1 0.00 No LimitAnonymous EB1924494-001
EP005: Total Organic Carbon ---- 1 mg/L 28 25 11.7 0% - 20%Anonymous EB1924586-003
EP005: Total Organic Carbon (TOC) (QC Lot: 2601137)
EP005: Total Organic Carbon ---- 1 mg/L <1 <1 0.00 No LimitDUP1A EB1924599-011
EP005: Total Organic Carbon ---- 1 mg/L 18 11 45.4 0% - 50%Anonymous EB1925069-001
EP026SP: Chemical Oxygen Demand (Spectrophotometric) (QC Lot: 2598813)
EP026SP: Chemical Oxygen Demand ---- 10 mg/L 306 294 4.00 0% - 20%Anonymous EB1923317-004
EP026SP: Chemical Oxygen Demand ---- 10 mg/L 3890 3930 1.02 0% - 20%Anonymous EB1924604-001
EP030: Biochemical Oxygen Demand (BOD) (QC Lot: 2593890)
EP030: Biochemical Oxygen Demand ---- 2 mg/L 5 7 32.3 No Limit65247 EB1924599-003
EP030: Biochemical Oxygen Demand ---- 2 mg/L 18 15 13.4 No LimitAnonymous EB1924613-001
EP080/071: Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons (QC Lot: 2594902)
EP071: C15 - C28 Fraction ---- 100 µg/L <0.10 mg/L <100 0.00 No LimitAnonymous EB1924593-001
EP071: C10 - C14 Fraction ---- 50 µg/L <0.05 mg/L <50 0.00 No Limit
EP071: C29 - C36 Fraction ---- 50 µg/L <0.05 mg/L <50 0.00 No Limit
EP071: C15 - C28 Fraction ---- 100 µg/L <0.10 mg/L <100 0.00 No LimitAnonymous EB1924593-003
EP071: C10 - C14 Fraction ---- 50 µg/L <0.05 mg/L <50 0.00 No Limit
EP071: C29 - C36 Fraction ---- 50 µg/L 0.06 mg/L 60 0.00 No Limit
EP080/071: Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons (QC Lot: 2598258)
EP080: C6 - C9 Fraction ---- 20 µg/L <20 <20 0.00 No Limit65245 EB1924599-001
EP080: C6 - C9 Fraction ---- 20 µg/L <20 <20 0.00 No LimitDUP1A EB1924599-011
EP080/071: Total Recoverable Hydrocarbons - NEPM 2013 Fractions (QC Lot: 2594902)
EP071: >C10 - C16 Fraction ---- 100 µg/L <0.10 mg/L <100 0.00 No LimitAnonymous EB1924593-001
EP071: >C16 - C34 Fraction ---- 100 µg/L <0.10 mg/L <100 0.00 No Limit
EP071: >C34 - C40 Fraction ---- 100 µg/L <0.10 mg/L <100 0.00 No Limit
EP071: >C10 - C16 Fraction ---- 100 µg/L <0.10 mg/L <100 0.00 No LimitAnonymous EB1924593-003
EP071: >C16 - C34 Fraction ---- 100 µg/L 0.13 mg/L 130 0.00 No Limit
EP071: >C34 - C40 Fraction ---- 100 µg/L <0.10 mg/L <100 0.00 No Limit
EP080/071: Total Recoverable Hydrocarbons - NEPM 2013 Fractions (QC Lot: 2598258)
6 of 12:Page
Work Order :
:Client
EB1924599
GOLDER ASSOCIATES
19127795 VHC Landfill:Project
Sub-Matrix: WATER Laboratory Duplicate (DUP) Report
Original Result RPD (%)Laboratory sample ID Client sample ID Method: Compound CAS Number LOR Unit Duplicate Result Recovery Limits (%)
EP080/071: Total Recoverable Hydrocarbons - NEPM 2013 Fractions (QC Lot: 2598258) - continued
EP080: C6 - C10 Fraction C6_C10 20 µg/L <20 <20 0.00 No Limit65245 EB1924599-001
EP080: C6 - C10 Fraction C6_C10 20 µg/L <20 <20 0.00 No LimitDUP1A EB1924599-011
EP080: BTEXN (QC Lot: 2598258)
EP080: Benzene 71-43-2 1 µg/L <1 <1 0.00 No Limit65245 EB1924599-001
EP080: Toluene 108-88-3 2 µg/L <2 <2 0.00 No Limit
EP080: Ethylbenzene 100-41-4 2 µg/L <2 <2 0.00 No Limit
EP080: meta- & para-Xylene 108-38-3
106-42-3
2 µg/L <2 <2 0.00 No Limit
EP080: ortho-Xylene 95-47-6 2 µg/L <2 <2 0.00 No Limit
EP080: Naphthalene 91-20-3 5 µg/L <5 <5 0.00 No Limit
EP080: Benzene 71-43-2 1 µg/L <1 <1 0.00 No LimitDUP1A EB1924599-011
EP080: Toluene 108-88-3 2 µg/L <2 <2 0.00 No Limit
EP080: Ethylbenzene 100-41-4 2 µg/L <2 <2 0.00 No Limit
EP080: meta- & para-Xylene 108-38-3
106-42-3
2 µg/L <2 <2 0.00 No Limit
EP080: ortho-Xylene 95-47-6 2 µg/L <2 <2 0.00 No Limit
EP080: Naphthalene 91-20-3 5 µg/L <5 <5 0.00 No Limit
7 of 12:Page
Work Order :
:Client
EB1924599
GOLDER ASSOCIATES
19127795 VHC Landfill:Project
Method Blank (MB) and Laboratory Control Spike (LCS) Report
The quality control term Method / Laboratory Blank refers to an analyte free matrix to which all reagents are added in the same volumes or proportions as used in standard sample preparation. The purpose of this QC
parameter is to monitor potential laboratory contamination. The quality control term Laboratory Control Spike (LCS) refers to a certified reference material, or a known interference free matrix spiked with target
analytes. The purpose of this QC parameter is to monitor method precision and accuracy independent of sample matrix. Dynamic Recovery Limits are based on statistical evaluation of processed LCS.
Sub-Matrix: WATER Method Blank (MB)
Report
Laboratory Control Spike (LCS) Report
Spike Spike Recovery (%) Recovery Limits (%)
Result Concentration HighLowLCSMethod: Compound CAS Number LOR Unit
EA005P: pH by PC Titrator (QCLot: 2592110)
EA005-P: pH Value ---- ---- pH Unit ---- 98.84 pH Unit 10298.0
---- 99.67 pH Unit 10298.0
EA015: Total Dissolved Solids dried at 180 ± 5 °C (QCLot: 2592426)
EA015H: Total Dissolved Solids @180°C ---- 10 mg/L <10 1042460 mg/L 11288.0
<10 104293 mg/L 11288.0
<10 1002000 mg/L 11880.9
EA015: Total Dissolved Solids dried at 180 ± 5 °C (QCLot: 2592428)
EA015H: Total Dissolved Solids @180°C ---- 10 mg/L <10 1042460 mg/L 11288.0
<10 104293 mg/L 11288.0
<10 99.72000 mg/L 11880.9
ED037P: Alkalinity by PC Titrator (QCLot: 2592109)
ED037-P: Total Alkalinity as CaCO3 ---- ---- mg/L ---- 10550 mg/L 12080.0
ED041G: Sulfate (Turbidimetric) as SO4 2- by DA (QCLot: 2591997)
ED041G: Sulfate as SO4 - Turbidimetric 14808-79-8 1 mg/L <1 99.425 mg/L 11885.0
<1 95.5100 mg/L 11885.0
ED045G: Chloride by Discrete Analyser (QCLot: 2591996)
ED045G: Chloride 16887-00-6 1 mg/L <1 96.810 mg/L 11590.0
<1 1041000 mg/L 11590.0
ED093F: Dissolved Major Cations (QCLot: 2592061)
ED093F: Calcium 7440-70-2 1 mg/L <1 10350 mg/L 13070.0
ED093F: Magnesium 7439-95-4 1 mg/L <1 10950 mg/L 13070.0
ED093F: Sodium 7440-23-5 1 mg/L <1 10550 mg/L 13070.0
ED093F: Potassium 7440-09-7 1 mg/L <1 10750 mg/L 13070.0
ED093F: Dissolved Major Cations (QCLot: 2592077)
ED093F: Calcium 7440-70-2 1 mg/L <1 99.650 mg/L 13070.0
ED093F: Magnesium 7439-95-4 1 mg/L <1 96.650 mg/L 13070.0
ED093F: Sodium 7440-23-5 1 mg/L <1 99.150 mg/L 13070.0
ED093F: Potassium 7440-09-7 1 mg/L <1 94.850 mg/L 13070.0
EG020F: Dissolved Metals by ICP-MS (QCLot: 2592078)
EG020A-F: Arsenic 7440-38-2 0.001 mg/L <0.001 95.30.1 mg/L 11688.0
EG020A-F: Cadmium 7440-43-9 0.0001 mg/L <0.0001 96.00.1 mg/L 10888.0
EG020A-F: Chromium 7440-47-3 0.001 mg/L <0.001 1050.1 mg/L 11387.0
EG020A-F: Copper 7440-50-8 0.001 mg/L <0.001 89.80.1 mg/L 11488.0
EG020A-F: Lead 7439-92-1 0.001 mg/L <0.001 89.60.1 mg/L 11089.0
8 of 12:Page
Work Order :
:Client
EB1924599
GOLDER ASSOCIATES
19127795 VHC Landfill:Project
Sub-Matrix: WATER Method Blank (MB)
Report
Laboratory Control Spike (LCS) Report
Spike Spike Recovery (%) Recovery Limits (%)
Result Concentration HighLowLCSMethod: Compound CAS Number LOR Unit
EG020F: Dissolved Metals by ICP-MS (QCLot: 2592078) - continued
EG020A-F: Nickel 7440-02-0 0.001 mg/L <0.001 89.10.1 mg/L 11389.0
EG020A-F: Zinc 7440-66-6 0.005 mg/L <0.005 88.50.1 mg/L 11387.0
EG020A-F: Boron 7440-42-8 0.05 mg/L <0.05 1050.5 mg/L 12581.0
EG020T: Total Metals by ICP-MS (QCLot: 2592137)
EG020A-T: Arsenic 7440-38-2 0.001 mg/L <0.001 1070.1 mg/L 11288.0
EG020A-T: Cadmium 7440-43-9 0.0001 mg/L <0.0001 1000.1 mg/L 11188.0
EG020A-T: Chromium 7440-47-3 0.001 mg/L <0.001 1030.1 mg/L 11589.0
EG020A-T: Copper 7440-50-8 0.001 mg/L <0.001 1020.1 mg/L 11688.0
EG020A-T: Lead 7439-92-1 0.001 mg/L <0.001 93.00.1 mg/L 11289.0
EG020A-T: Nickel 7440-02-0 0.001 mg/L <0.001 1010.1 mg/L 11688.0
EG020A-T: Zinc 7440-66-6 0.005 mg/L <0.005 1020.1 mg/L 11484.0
EG020A-T: Boron 7440-42-8 0.05 mg/L <0.05 87.20.5 mg/L 12882.0
EG020A-T: Iron 7439-89-6 0.05 mg/L <0.05 1030.5 mg/L 11882.0
EG020T: Total Metals by ICP-MS (QCLot: 2594821)
EG020A-T: Arsenic 7440-38-2 0.001 mg/L <0.001 99.40.1 mg/L 11288.0
EG020A-T: Cadmium 7440-43-9 0.0001 mg/L <0.0001 98.00.1 mg/L 11188.0
EG020A-T: Chromium 7440-47-3 0.001 mg/L <0.001 1120.1 mg/L 11589.0
EG020A-T: Copper 7440-50-8 0.001 mg/L <0.001 1060.1 mg/L 11688.0
EG020A-T: Lead 7439-92-1 0.001 mg/L <0.001 1000.1 mg/L 11289.0
EG020A-T: Nickel 7440-02-0 0.001 mg/L <0.001 1060.1 mg/L 11688.0
EG020A-T: Zinc 7440-66-6 0.005 mg/L <0.005 1040.1 mg/L 11484.0
EG020A-T: Boron 7440-42-8 0.05 mg/L <0.05 1070.5 mg/L 12882.0
EG020A-T: Iron 7439-89-6 0.05 mg/L <0.05 1030.5 mg/L 11882.0
EG035F: Dissolved Mercury by FIMS (QCLot: 2592079)
EG035F: Mercury 7439-97-6 0.0001 mg/L <0.0001 1040.01 mg/L 11884.0
EG035T: Total Recoverable Mercury by FIMS (QCLot: 2592135)
EG035T: Mercury 7439-97-6 0.0001 mg/L <0.0001 94.40.01 mg/L 11884.0
EK055G: Ammonia as N by Discrete Analyser (QCLot: 2593408)
EK055G: Ammonia as N 7664-41-7 0.01 mg/L <0.01 1000.5 mg/L 11483.5
EK057G: Nitrite as N by Discrete Analyser (QCLot: 2591995)
EK057G: Nitrite as N 14797-65-0 0.01 mg/L <0.01 1020.5 mg/L 11090.0
EK059G: Nitrite plus Nitrate as N (NOx) by Discrete Analyser (QCLot: 2593409)
EK059G: Nitrite + Nitrate as N ---- 0.01 mg/L <0.01 93.80.5 mg/L 11185.7
EK061G: Total Kjeldahl Nitrogen By Discrete Analyser (QCLot: 2596819)
EK061G: Total Kjeldahl Nitrogen as N ---- 0.1 mg/L <0.1 92.310 mg/L 10870.1
EK067G: Total Phosphorus as P by Discrete Analyser (QCLot: 2596818)
EK067G: Total Phosphorus as P ---- 0.01 mg/L <0.01 91.14.42 mg/L 10579.2
9 of 12:Page
Work Order :
:Client
EB1924599
GOLDER ASSOCIATES
19127795 VHC Landfill:Project
Sub-Matrix: WATER Method Blank (MB)
Report
Laboratory Control Spike (LCS) Report
Spike Spike Recovery (%) Recovery Limits (%)
Result Concentration HighLowLCSMethod: Compound CAS Number LOR Unit
EP005: Total Organic Carbon (TOC) (QCLot: 2592147)
EP005: Total Organic Carbon ---- 1 mg/L <1 90.010 mg/L 11379.0
<1 96.3100 mg/L 11379.0
EP005: Total Organic Carbon (TOC) (QCLot: 2601137)
EP005: Total Organic Carbon ---- 1 mg/L <1 92.310 mg/L 11379.0
<1 96.9100 mg/L 11379.0
EP026SP: Chemical Oxygen Demand (Spectrophotometric) (QCLot: 2598813)
EP026SP: Chemical Oxygen Demand ---- 10 mg/L <10 94.050 mg/L 11286.0
<10 96.4500 mg/L 11286.0
EP030: Biochemical Oxygen Demand (BOD) (QCLot: 2593890)
EP030: Biochemical Oxygen Demand ---- 2 mg/L <2 92.9198 mg/L 11577.0
EP080/071: Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons (QCLot: 2592141)
EP071: C10 - C14 Fraction ---- 50 µg/L <50 86.41070 µg/L 13565.0
EP071: C15 - C28 Fraction ---- 100 µg/L <100 75.01770 µg/L 13862.0
EP071: C29 - C36 Fraction ---- 50 µg/L <50 -------- --------
EP080/071: Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons (QCLot: 2594902)
EP071: C10 - C14 Fraction ---- 50 µg/L <50 83.51070 µg/L 13565.0
EP071: C15 - C28 Fraction ---- 100 µg/L <100 95.51770 µg/L 13862.0
EP071: C29 - C36 Fraction ---- 50 µg/L <50 -------- --------
EP080/071: Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons (QCLot: 2598258)
EP080: C6 - C9 Fraction ---- 20 µg/L <20 105180 µg/L 12266.8
EP080/071: Total Recoverable Hydrocarbons - NEPM 2013 Fractions (QCLot: 2592141)
EP071: >C10 - C16 Fraction ---- 100 µg/L <100 82.61560 µg/L 13466.0
EP071: >C16 - C34 Fraction ---- 100 µg/L <100 75.41190 µg/L 13961.0
EP071: >C34 - C40 Fraction ---- 100 µg/L <100 -------- --------
EP080/071: Total Recoverable Hydrocarbons - NEPM 2013 Fractions (QCLot: 2594902)
EP071: >C10 - C16 Fraction ---- 100 µg/L <100 86.61560 µg/L 13466.0
EP071: >C16 - C34 Fraction ---- 100 µg/L <100 100.01190 µg/L 13961.0
EP071: >C34 - C40 Fraction ---- 100 µg/L <100 -------- --------
EP080/071: Total Recoverable Hydrocarbons - NEPM 2013 Fractions (QCLot: 2598258)
EP080: C6 - C10 Fraction C6_C10 20 µg/L <20 100225 µg/L 12365.1
EP080: C6 - C10 Fraction minus BTEX (F1) C6_C10-BTE
X
20 µg/L <20 -------- --------
EP080: BTEXN (QCLot: 2598258)
EP080: Benzene 71-43-2 1 µg/L <1 91.510 µg/L 11579.8
EP080: Toluene 108-88-3 2 µg/L <2 94.510 µg/L 11678.6
EP080: Ethylbenzene 100-41-4 2 µg/L <2 96.610 µg/L 11577.3
10 of 12:Page
Work Order :
:Client
EB1924599
GOLDER ASSOCIATES
19127795 VHC Landfill:Project
Sub-Matrix: WATER Method Blank (MB)
Report
Laboratory Control Spike (LCS) Report
Spike Spike Recovery (%) Recovery Limits (%)
Result Concentration HighLowLCSMethod: Compound CAS Number LOR Unit
EP080: BTEXN (QCLot: 2598258) - continued
EP080: meta- & para-Xylene 108-38-3
106-42-3
2 µg/L <2 97.320 µg/L 12075.8
EP080: ortho-Xylene 95-47-6 2 µg/L <2 99.010 µg/L 11580.9
EP080: Total Xylenes ---- 2 µg/L <2 -------- --------
EP080: Sum of BTEX ---- 1 µg/L <1 -------- --------
EP080: Naphthalene 91-20-3 5 µg/L <5 10210 µg/L 11677.8
Matrix Spike (MS) ReportThe quality control term Matrix Spike (MS) refers to an intralaboratory split sample spiked with a representative set of target analytes. The purpose of this QC parameter is to monitor potential matrix effects on
analyte recoveries. Static Recovery Limits as per laboratory Data Quality Objectives (DQOs). Ideal recovery ranges stated may be waived in the event of sample matrix interference.
Sub-Matrix: WATER Matrix Spike (MS) Report
SpikeRecovery(%) Recovery Limits (%)Spike
HighLowMSConcentrationLaboratory sample ID Client sample ID Method: Compound CAS Number
ED041G: Sulfate (Turbidimetric) as SO4 2- by DA (QCLot: 2591997)
65246 EB1924599-002 14808-79-8ED041G: Sulfate as SO4 - Turbidimetric # Not
Determined
20 mg/L 13070.0
ED045G: Chloride by Discrete Analyser (QCLot: 2591996)
65246 EB1924599-002 16887-00-6ED045G: Chloride # Not
Determined
400 mg/L 13070.0
EG020F: Dissolved Metals by ICP-MS (QCLot: 2592078)
Anonymous EB1924575-002 7440-38-2EG020A-F: Arsenic 94.11 mg/L 13070.0
7440-43-9EG020A-F: Cadmium 93.10.25 mg/L 13070.0
7440-47-3EG020A-F: Chromium 91.61 mg/L 13070.0
7440-50-8EG020A-F: Copper 87.71 mg/L 13070.0
7439-92-1EG020A-F: Lead 87.51 mg/L 13070.0
7440-02-0EG020A-F: Nickel 88.91 mg/L 13070.0
7440-66-6EG020A-F: Zinc 90.01 mg/L 13070.0
EG020T: Total Metals by ICP-MS (QCLot: 2592137)
Anonymous EB1924575-011 7440-38-2EG020A-T: Arsenic 1071 mg/L 13070.0
7440-43-9EG020A-T: Cadmium 99.20.25 mg/L 13070.0
7440-47-3EG020A-T: Chromium 1021 mg/L 13070.0
7440-50-8EG020A-T: Copper 1061 mg/L 13070.0
7439-92-1EG020A-T: Lead 1051 mg/L 13070.0
7440-02-0EG020A-T: Nickel 1021 mg/L 13070.0
7440-66-6EG020A-T: Zinc 1041 mg/L 13070.0
EG020T: Total Metals by ICP-MS (QCLot: 2594821)
Anonymous EB1924559-002 7440-38-2EG020A-T: Arsenic 1051 mg/L 13070.0
11 of 12:Page
Work Order :
:Client
EB1924599
GOLDER ASSOCIATES
19127795 VHC Landfill:Project
Sub-Matrix: WATER Matrix Spike (MS) Report
SpikeRecovery(%) Recovery Limits (%)Spike
HighLowMSConcentrationLaboratory sample ID Client sample ID Method: Compound CAS Number
EG020T: Total Metals by ICP-MS (QCLot: 2594821) - continued
Anonymous EB1924559-002 7440-43-9EG020A-T: Cadmium 97.30.25 mg/L 13070.0
7440-47-3EG020A-T: Chromium 1001 mg/L 13070.0
7440-50-8EG020A-T: Copper 98.81 mg/L 13070.0
7439-92-1EG020A-T: Lead 95.91 mg/L 13070.0
7440-02-0EG020A-T: Nickel 98.61 mg/L 13070.0
7440-66-6EG020A-T: Zinc 1061 mg/L 13070.0
EG035F: Dissolved Mercury by FIMS (QCLot: 2592079)
65246 EB1924599-002 7439-97-6EG035F: Mercury 91.60.01 mg/L 13070.0
EG035T: Total Recoverable Mercury by FIMS (QCLot: 2592135)
Anonymous EB1924508-006 7439-97-6EG035T: Mercury 87.40.01 mg/L 13070.0
EK055G: Ammonia as N by Discrete Analyser (QCLot: 2593408)
Anonymous EB1924583-002 7664-41-7EK055G: Ammonia as N 94.30.4 mg/L 13070.0
EK057G: Nitrite as N by Discrete Analyser (QCLot: 2591995)
Anonymous EB1924377-002 14797-65-0EK057G: Nitrite as N 98.70.4 mg/L 13070.0
EK059G: Nitrite plus Nitrate as N (NOx) by Discrete Analyser (QCLot: 2593409)
Anonymous EB1924583-002 ----EK059G: Nitrite + Nitrate as N # Not
Determined
0.4 mg/L 13070.0
EK061G: Total Kjeldahl Nitrogen By Discrete Analyser (QCLot: 2596819)
Anonymous EB1924583-001 ----EK061G: Total Kjeldahl Nitrogen as N 91.250 mg/L 13070.0
EK067G: Total Phosphorus as P by Discrete Analyser (QCLot: 2596818)
Anonymous EB1924583-001 ----EK067G: Total Phosphorus as P 97.310 mg/L 13070.0
EP005: Total Organic Carbon (TOC) (QCLot: 2592147)
Anonymous EB1924494-002 ----EP005: Total Organic Carbon 96.0100 mg/L 13070.0
EP005: Total Organic Carbon (TOC) (QCLot: 2601137)
Anonymous EB1925037-001 ----EP005: Total Organic Carbon 88.1100 mg/L 13070.0
EP026SP: Chemical Oxygen Demand (Spectrophotometric) (QCLot: 2598813)
Anonymous EB1924492-001 ----EP026SP: Chemical Oxygen Demand 86.6291 mg/L 13070.0
EP080/071: Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons (QCLot: 2594902)
Anonymous EB1924593-002 ----EP071: C10 - C14 Fraction 91.51070 µg/L 13449.0
----EP071: C15 - C28 Fraction 1011770 µg/L 13250.0
EP080/071: Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons (QCLot: 2598258)
65246 EB1924599-002 ----EP080: C6 - C9 Fraction 11040 µg/L 13070.0
EP080/071: Total Recoverable Hydrocarbons - NEPM 2013 Fractions (QCLot: 2594902)
Anonymous EB1924593-002 ----EP071: >C10 - C16 Fraction 94.21560 µg/L 11943.0
12 of 12:Page
Work Order :
:Client
EB1924599
GOLDER ASSOCIATES
19127795 VHC Landfill:Project
Sub-Matrix: WATER Matrix Spike (MS) Report
SpikeRecovery(%) Recovery Limits (%)Spike
HighLowMSConcentrationLaboratory sample ID Client sample ID Method: Compound CAS Number
EP080/071: Total Recoverable Hydrocarbons - NEPM 2013 Fractions (QCLot: 2594902) - continued
Anonymous EB1924593-002 ----EP071: >C16 - C34 Fraction 1031190 µg/L 11438.0
EP080/071: Total Recoverable Hydrocarbons - NEPM 2013 Fractions (QCLot: 2598258)
65246 EB1924599-002 C6_C10EP080: C6 - C10 Fraction 10540 µg/L 13070.0
EP080: BTEXN (QCLot: 2598258)
65246 EB1924599-002 71-43-2EP080: Benzene 10510 µg/L 13070.0
108-88-3EP080: Toluene 93.810 µg/L 13070.0
True
Environmental
QA/QC Compliance Assessment to assist with Quality ReviewWork Order : EB1924599 Page : 1 of 12
:: LaboratoryClient Environmental Division BrisbaneGOLDER ASSOCIATES
:Contact MR JOSH INNES Telephone : +61881625130
:Project 19127795 VHC Landfill Date Samples Received : 18-Sep-2019
Site : ---- Issue Date : 25-Sep-2019
JI:Sampler No. of samples received : 11
:Order number 19127795 No. of samples analysed : 11
This report is automatically generated by the ALS LIMS through interpretation of the ALS Quality Control Report and several Quality Assurance parameters measured by ALS. This automated
reporting highlights any non-conformances, facilitates faster and more accurate data validation and is designed to assist internal expert and external Auditor review. Many components of this
report contribute to the overall DQO assessment and reporting for guideline compliance.
Brief method summaries and references are also provided to assist in traceability.
Summary of Outliers
Outliers : Quality Control Samples
This report highlights outliers flagged in the Quality Control (QC) Report.
l NO Method Blank value outliers occur.
l NO Duplicate outliers occur.
l NO Laboratory Control outliers occur.
l Matrix Spike outliers exist - please see following pages for full details.
l For all regular sample matrices, NO surrogate recovery outliers occur.
Outliers : Analysis Holding Time Compliance
l Analysis Holding Time Outliers exist - please see following pages for full details.
Outliers : Frequency of Quality Control Samples
l Quality Control Sample Frequency Outliers exist - please see following pages for full details.
R I G H T S O L U T I O N S | R I G H T P A R T N E R
2 of 12:Page
Work Order :
:Client
EB1924599
GOLDER ASSOCIATES
19127795 VHC Landfill:Project
Outliers : Quality Control Samples
Duplicates, Method Blanks, Laboratory Control Samples and Matrix Spikes
Matrix: WATER
Compound Group Name CommentLimitsDataAnalyteClient Sample IDLaboratory Sample ID CAS Number
Matrix Spike (MS) Recoveries
EB1924599--002 14808-79-8Sulfate as SO4 -
Turbidimetric
65246 MS recovery not determined,
background level greater than or
equal to 4x spike level.
----Not
Determined
ED041G: Sulfate (Turbidimetric) as SO4 2- by DA
EB1924599--002 16887-00-6Chloride65246 MS recovery not determined,
background level greater than or
equal to 4x spike level.
----Not
Determined
ED045G: Chloride by Discrete Analyser
EB1924583--002 ----Nitrite + Nitrate as NAnonymous MS recovery not determined,
background level greater than or
equal to 4x spike level.
----Not
Determined
EK059G: Nitrite plus Nitrate as N (NOx) by Discrete Analyser
Outliers : Analysis Holding Time Compliance
Matrix: WATER
AnalysisExtraction / Preparation
Date analysedDate extractedContainer / Client Sample ID(s) Days
overdue
Days
overdue
Due for extraction Due for analysis
Method
EA005P: pH by PC Titrator
Clear Plastic Bottle - Natural
12-Sep-2019----65245, 65246,
65247, DH1,
DH2, DH4,
LT1, SW1
19-Sep-2019---- ---- 7
EK057G: Nitrite as N by Discrete Analyser
Clear Plastic Bottle - Natural
14-Sep-2019----65245, 65246,
65247, DH1,
DH2, DH4,
LT1, SW1
19-Sep-2019---- ---- 5
EP030: Biochemical Oxygen Demand (BOD)
Clear Plastic Bottle - Natural
14-Sep-2019----65245, 65246,
65247, DH1,
DH2, DH4,
LT1, SW1
19-Sep-2019---- ---- 5
EP080/071: Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons
Amber Glass Bottle - Unpreserved
----19-Sep-2019R01, TB01,
DUP1A
----20-Sep-2019 1 ----
EP080/071: Total Recoverable Hydrocarbons - NEPM 2013 Fractions
3 of 12:Page
Work Order :
:Client
EB1924599
GOLDER ASSOCIATES
19127795 VHC Landfill:Project
Matrix: WATER
AnalysisExtraction / Preparation
Date analysedDate extractedContainer / Client Sample ID(s) Days
overdue
Days
overdue
Due for extraction Due for analysis
Method
EP080/071: Total Recoverable Hydrocarbons - NEPM 2013 Fractions - Analysis Holding Time
Compliance
Amber Glass Bottle - Unpreserved
----19-Sep-2019R01, TB01,
DUP1A
----20-Sep-2019 1 ----
Outliers : Frequency of Quality Control Samples
Matrix: WATER
Quality Control SpecificationQuality Control Sample Type
Method ExpectedQC Regular Actual
Rate (%)Quality Control Sample Type Count
Laboratory Duplicates (DUP)
NEPM 2013 B3 & ALS QC StandardTRH - Semivolatile Fraction 8.00 10.002 25
Matrix Spikes (MS)
NEPM 2013 B3 & ALS QC StandardTRH - Semivolatile Fraction 4.00 5.001 25
Analysis Holding Time Compliance
Holding times for VOC in soils vary according to analytes of interest. Vinyl Chloride and Styrene holding time is 7 days; others 14 days. A recorded breach does not guarantee a breach for all VOC analytes and
should be verified in case the reported breach is a false positive or Vinyl Chloride and Styrene are not key analytes of interest/concern.
Holding time for leachate methods (e.g. TCLP) vary according to the analytes reported. Assessment compares the leach date with the shortest analyte holding time for the equivalent soil method. These are: organics
14 days, mercury 28 days & other metals 180 days. A recorded breach does not guarantee a breach for all non-volatile parameters.
If samples are identified below as having been analysed or extracted outside of recommended holding times, this should be taken into consideration when interpreting results.
This report summarizes extraction / preparation and analysis times and compares each with ALS recommended holding times (referencing USEPA SW 846, APHA, AS and NEPM) based on the sample container
provided. Dates reported represent first date of extraction or analysis and preclude subsequent dilutions and reruns. A listing of breaches (if any) is provided herein.
Matrix: WATER Evaluation: û = Holding time breach ; ü = Within holding time.
AnalysisExtraction / PreparationSample DateMethod
EvaluationDue for analysisDate analysedEvaluationDue for extractionDate extractedContainer / Client Sample ID(s)
EA005P: pH by PC Titrator
Clear Plastic Bottle - Natural (EA005-P)
65245, 65246,
65247, DH1,
DH2, DH4,
LT1, SW1
12-Sep-2019---- 19-Sep-2019----12-Sep-2019 ---- û
EA015: Total Dissolved Solids dried at 180 ± 5 °C
Clear Plastic Bottle - Natural (EA015H)
65245, 65246,
65247, DH1,
DH2, DH4,
LT1, SW1
19-Sep-2019---- 19-Sep-2019----12-Sep-2019 ---- ü
4 of 12:Page
Work Order :
:Client
EB1924599
GOLDER ASSOCIATES
19127795 VHC Landfill:Project
Matrix: WATER Evaluation: û = Holding time breach ; ü = Within holding time.
AnalysisExtraction / PreparationSample DateMethod
EvaluationDue for analysisDate analysedEvaluationDue for extractionDate extractedContainer / Client Sample ID(s)
ED037P: Alkalinity by PC Titrator
Clear Plastic Bottle - Natural (ED037-P)
65245, 65246,
65247, DH1,
DH2, DH4,
LT1, SW1
26-Sep-2019---- 19-Sep-2019----12-Sep-2019 ---- ü
ED041G: Sulfate (Turbidimetric) as SO4 2- by DA
Clear Plastic Bottle - Natural (ED041G)
65245, 65246,
65247, DH1,
DH2, DH4,
LT1, SW1
10-Oct-2019---- 19-Sep-2019----12-Sep-2019 ---- ü
ED045G: Chloride by Discrete Analyser
Clear Plastic Bottle - Natural (ED045G)
65245, 65246,
65247, DH1,
DH2, DH4,
LT1, SW1
10-Oct-2019---- 19-Sep-2019----12-Sep-2019 ---- ü
ED093F: Dissolved Major Cations
Clear Plastic Bottle - Filtered; Lab-acidified (ED093F)
65245, 65246,
65247, DH1,
DH2, DH4
10-Oct-2019---- 20-Sep-2019----12-Sep-2019 ---- ü
Clear Plastic Bottle - Natural (ED093F)
LT1, SW1 19-Sep-2019---- 19-Sep-2019----12-Sep-2019 ---- üEG020F: Dissolved Metals by ICP-MS
Clear Plastic Bottle - Filtered; Lab-acidified (EG020A-F)
65245, 65246,
65247, DH1,
DH2, DH4
10-Mar-2020---- 20-Sep-2019----12-Sep-2019 ---- ü
EG020T: Total Metals by ICP-MS
Clear Plastic Bottle - Unfiltered; Lab-acidified (EG020A-T)
65245, 65246,
65247, DH1,
DH2, DH4,
LT1, SW1,
R01, DUP1A
10-Mar-202010-Mar-2020 20-Sep-201920-Sep-201912-Sep-2019 ü ü
EG035F: Dissolved Mercury by FIMS
Clear Plastic Bottle - Filtered; Lab-acidified (EG035F)
65245, 65246,
65247, DH1,
DH2, DH4
10-Oct-2019---- 20-Sep-2019----12-Sep-2019 ---- ü
5 of 12:Page
Work Order :
:Client
EB1924599
GOLDER ASSOCIATES
19127795 VHC Landfill:Project
Matrix: WATER Evaluation: û = Holding time breach ; ü = Within holding time.
AnalysisExtraction / PreparationSample DateMethod
EvaluationDue for analysisDate analysedEvaluationDue for extractionDate extractedContainer / Client Sample ID(s)
EG035T: Total Recoverable Mercury by FIMS
Clear Plastic Bottle - Unfiltered; Lab-acidified (EG035T)
LT1, SW1 10-Oct-2019---- 24-Sep-2019----12-Sep-2019 ---- üEK055G: Ammonia as N by Discrete Analyser
Clear Plastic Bottle - Sulfuric Acid (EK055G)
65245, 65246,
65247, DH1,
DH2, DH4,
LT1, SW1
10-Oct-2019---- 19-Sep-2019----12-Sep-2019 ---- ü
EK057G: Nitrite as N by Discrete Analyser
Clear Plastic Bottle - Natural (EK057G)
65245, 65246,
65247, DH1,
DH2, DH4,
LT1, SW1
14-Sep-2019---- 19-Sep-2019----12-Sep-2019 ---- û
EK059G: Nitrite plus Nitrate as N (NOx) by Discrete Analyser
Clear Plastic Bottle - Sulfuric Acid (EK059G)
65245, 65246,
65247, DH1,
DH2, DH4,
LT1, SW1
10-Oct-2019---- 19-Sep-2019----12-Sep-2019 ---- ü
EK061G: Total Kjeldahl Nitrogen By Discrete Analyser
Clear Plastic Bottle - Sulfuric Acid (EK061G)
65245, 65246,
65247, DH1,
DH2, DH4,
LT1, SW1
10-Oct-201910-Oct-2019 23-Sep-201923-Sep-201912-Sep-2019 ü ü
EK067G: Total Phosphorus as P by Discrete Analyser
Clear Plastic Bottle - Sulfuric Acid (EK067G)
65245, 65246,
65247, DH1,
DH2, DH4,
LT1, SW1
10-Oct-201910-Oct-2019 23-Sep-201923-Sep-201912-Sep-2019 ü ü
EP005: Total Organic Carbon (TOC)
Amber TOC Vial - Sulfuric Acid (EP005)
65245, 65246,
65247, DH1,
DH2, DH4,
LT1, SW1
10-Oct-2019---- 19-Sep-2019----12-Sep-2019 ---- ü
Amber VOC Vial - Sulfuric Acid (EP005)
DUP1A 10-Oct-2019---- 24-Sep-2019----12-Sep-2019 ---- ü
6 of 12:Page
Work Order :
:Client
EB1924599
GOLDER ASSOCIATES
19127795 VHC Landfill:Project
Matrix: WATER Evaluation: û = Holding time breach ; ü = Within holding time.
AnalysisExtraction / PreparationSample DateMethod
EvaluationDue for analysisDate analysedEvaluationDue for extractionDate extractedContainer / Client Sample ID(s)
EP026SP: Chemical Oxygen Demand (Spectrophotometric)
Clear Plastic Bottle - Sulfuric Acid (EP026SP)
65245, 65246,
65247, DH1,
DH2, DH4,
LT1, SW1
10-Oct-2019---- 23-Sep-2019----12-Sep-2019 ---- ü
EP030: Biochemical Oxygen Demand (BOD)
Clear Plastic Bottle - Natural (EP030)
65245, 65246,
65247, DH1,
DH2, DH4,
LT1, SW1
14-Sep-2019---- 19-Sep-2019----12-Sep-2019 ---- û
EP080/071: Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons
Amber Glass Bottle - Unpreserved (EP071)
65245, 65246,
65247, DH1,
DH2, DH4,
LT1, SW1
29-Oct-201919-Sep-2019 23-Sep-201919-Sep-201912-Sep-2019 ü ü
Amber Glass Bottle - Unpreserved (EP071)
R01, TB01,
DUP1A
30-Oct-201919-Sep-2019 23-Sep-201920-Sep-201912-Sep-2019 û ü
Amber VOC Vial - Sulfuric Acid (EP080)
65245, 65246,
65247, DH1,
DH2, DH4,
LT1, SW1,
R01, TB01,
DUP1A
26-Sep-201926-Sep-2019 23-Sep-201923-Sep-201912-Sep-2019 ü ü
7 of 12:Page
Work Order :
:Client
EB1924599
GOLDER ASSOCIATES
19127795 VHC Landfill:Project
Matrix: WATER Evaluation: û = Holding time breach ; ü = Within holding time.
AnalysisExtraction / PreparationSample DateMethod
EvaluationDue for analysisDate analysedEvaluationDue for extractionDate extractedContainer / Client Sample ID(s)
EP080/071: Total Recoverable Hydrocarbons - NEPM 2013 Fractions
Amber Glass Bottle - Unpreserved (EP071)
65245, 65246,
65247, DH1,
DH2, DH4,
LT1, SW1
29-Oct-201919-Sep-2019 23-Sep-201919-Sep-201912-Sep-2019 ü ü
Amber Glass Bottle - Unpreserved (EP071)
R01, TB01,
DUP1A
30-Oct-201919-Sep-2019 23-Sep-201920-Sep-201912-Sep-2019 û ü
Amber VOC Vial - Sulfuric Acid (EP080)
65245, 65246,
65247, DH1,
DH2, DH4,
LT1, SW1,
R01, TB01,
DUP1A
26-Sep-201926-Sep-2019 23-Sep-201923-Sep-201912-Sep-2019 ü ü
EP080: BTEXN
Amber VOC Vial - Sulfuric Acid (EP080)
65245, 65246,
65247, DH1,
DH2, DH4,
LT1, SW1,
R01, TB01,
DUP1A
26-Sep-201926-Sep-2019 23-Sep-201923-Sep-201912-Sep-2019 ü ü
8 of 12:Page
Work Order :
:Client
EB1924599
GOLDER ASSOCIATES
19127795 VHC Landfill:Project
Quality Control Parameter Frequency ComplianceThe following report summarises the frequency of laboratory QC samples analysed within the analytical lot(s) in which the submitted sample(s) was(were) processed. Actual rate should be greater than or equal to
the expected rate. A listing of breaches is provided in the Summary of Outliers.
Matrix: WATER Evaluation: û = Quality Control frequency not within specification ; ü = Quality Control frequency within specification.
Quality Control SpecificationQuality Control Sample Type
ExpectedQC Regular Actual
Rate (%)Quality Control Sample Type CountEvaluationAnalytical Methods Method
Laboratory Duplicates (DUP)
NEPM 2013 B3 & ALS QC Standard 13.33 10.002 15 üAlkalinity by PC Titrator ED037-P
NEPM 2013 B3 & ALS QC Standard 11.11 10.002 18 üAmmonia as N by Discrete analyser EK055G
NEPM 2013 B3 & ALS QC Standard 10.53 10.002 19 üBiochemical Oxygen Demand (BOD) EP030
NEPM 2013 B3 & ALS QC Standard 10.00 10.002 20 üChemical Oxygen Demand (COD) (Spectrophotometric) EP026SP
NEPM 2013 B3 & ALS QC Standard 10.00 10.001 10 üChloride by Discrete Analyser ED045G
NEPM 2013 B3 & ALS QC Standard 11.11 10.002 18 üDissolved Mercury by FIMS EG035F
NEPM 2013 B3 & ALS QC Standard 10.00 10.002 20 üDissolved Metals by ICP-MS - Suite A EG020A-F
NEPM 2013 B3 & ALS QC Standard 13.64 10.003 22 üMajor Cations - Dissolved ED093F
NEPM 2013 B3 & ALS QC Standard 11.11 10.002 18 üNitrite and Nitrate as N (NOx) by Discrete Analyser EK059G
NEPM 2013 B3 & ALS QC Standard 12.50 10.002 16 üNitrite as N by Discrete Analyser EK057G
NEPM 2013 B3 & ALS QC Standard 10.00 10.002 20 üpH by PC Titrator EA005-P
NEPM 2013 B3 & ALS QC Standard 20.00 10.002 10 üSulfate (Turbidimetric) as SO4 2- by Discrete Analyser ED041G
NEPM 2013 B3 & ALS QC Standard 13.04 10.003 23 üTotal Dissolved Solids (High Level) EA015H
NEPM 2013 B3 & ALS QC Standard 10.00 10.002 20 üTotal Kjeldahl Nitrogen as N By Discrete Analyser EK061G
NEPM 2013 B3 & ALS QC Standard 12.50 10.002 16 üTotal Mercury by FIMS EG035T
NEPM 2013 B3 & ALS QC Standard 11.43 10.004 35 üTotal Metals by ICP-MS - Suite A EG020A-T
NEPM 2013 B3 & ALS QC Standard 10.81 10.004 37 üTotal Organic Carbon EP005
NEPM 2013 B3 & ALS QC Standard 10.53 10.002 19 üTotal Phosphorus as P By Discrete Analyser EK067G
NEPM 2013 B3 & ALS QC Standard 8.00 10.002 25 ûTRH - Semivolatile Fraction EP071
NEPM 2013 B3 & ALS QC Standard 10.00 10.002 20 üTRH Volatiles/BTEX EP080
Laboratory Control Samples (LCS)
NEPM 2013 B3 & ALS QC Standard 6.67 5.001 15 üAlkalinity by PC Titrator ED037-P
NEPM 2013 B3 & ALS QC Standard 5.56 5.001 18 üAmmonia as N by Discrete analyser EK055G
NEPM 2013 B3 & ALS QC Standard 5.26 5.001 19 üBiochemical Oxygen Demand (BOD) EP030
NEPM 2013 B3 & ALS QC Standard 10.00 10.002 20 üChemical Oxygen Demand (COD) (Spectrophotometric) EP026SP
NEPM 2013 B3 & ALS QC Standard 20.00 10.002 10 üChloride by Discrete Analyser ED045G
NEPM 2013 B3 & ALS QC Standard 5.56 5.001 18 üDissolved Mercury by FIMS EG035F
NEPM 2013 B3 & ALS QC Standard 5.00 5.001 20 üDissolved Metals by ICP-MS - Suite A EG020A-F
NEPM 2013 B3 & ALS QC Standard 9.09 5.002 22 üMajor Cations - Dissolved ED093F
NEPM 2013 B3 & ALS QC Standard 5.56 5.001 18 üNitrite and Nitrate as N (NOx) by Discrete Analyser EK059G
NEPM 2013 B3 & ALS QC Standard 6.25 5.001 16 üNitrite as N by Discrete Analyser EK057G
NEPM 2013 B3 & ALS QC Standard 10.00 10.002 20 üpH by PC Titrator EA005-P
NEPM 2013 B3 & ALS QC Standard 20.00 10.002 10 üSulfate (Turbidimetric) as SO4 2- by Discrete Analyser ED041G
NEPM 2013 B3 & ALS QC Standard 26.09 15.006 23 üTotal Dissolved Solids (High Level) EA015H
NEPM 2013 B3 & ALS QC Standard 5.00 5.001 20 üTotal Kjeldahl Nitrogen as N By Discrete Analyser EK061G
NEPM 2013 B3 & ALS QC Standard 6.25 5.001 16 üTotal Mercury by FIMS EG035T
9 of 12:Page
Work Order :
:Client
EB1924599
GOLDER ASSOCIATES
19127795 VHC Landfill:Project
Matrix: WATER Evaluation: û = Quality Control frequency not within specification ; ü = Quality Control frequency within specification.
Quality Control SpecificationQuality Control Sample Type
ExpectedQC Regular Actual
Rate (%)Quality Control Sample Type CountEvaluationAnalytical Methods Method
Laboratory Control Samples (LCS) - Continued
NEPM 2013 B3 & ALS QC Standard 5.71 5.002 35 üTotal Metals by ICP-MS - Suite A EG020A-T
NEPM 2013 B3 & ALS QC Standard 10.81 10.004 37 üTotal Organic Carbon EP005
NEPM 2013 B3 & ALS QC Standard 5.26 5.001 19 üTotal Phosphorus as P By Discrete Analyser EK067G
NEPM 2013 B3 & ALS QC Standard 8.00 5.002 25 üTRH - Semivolatile Fraction EP071
NEPM 2013 B3 & ALS QC Standard 5.00 5.001 20 üTRH Volatiles/BTEX EP080
Method Blanks (MB)
NEPM 2013 B3 & ALS QC Standard 5.56 5.001 18 üAmmonia as N by Discrete analyser EK055G
NEPM 2013 B3 & ALS QC Standard 5.26 5.001 19 üBiochemical Oxygen Demand (BOD) EP030
NEPM 2013 B3 & ALS QC Standard 5.00 5.001 20 üChemical Oxygen Demand (COD) (Spectrophotometric) EP026SP
NEPM 2013 B3 & ALS QC Standard 10.00 5.001 10 üChloride by Discrete Analyser ED045G
NEPM 2013 B3 & ALS QC Standard 5.56 5.001 18 üDissolved Mercury by FIMS EG035F
NEPM 2013 B3 & ALS QC Standard 5.00 5.001 20 üDissolved Metals by ICP-MS - Suite A EG020A-F
NEPM 2013 B3 & ALS QC Standard 9.09 5.002 22 üMajor Cations - Dissolved ED093F
NEPM 2013 B3 & ALS QC Standard 5.56 5.001 18 üNitrite and Nitrate as N (NOx) by Discrete Analyser EK059G
NEPM 2013 B3 & ALS QC Standard 6.25 5.001 16 üNitrite as N by Discrete Analyser EK057G
NEPM 2013 B3 & ALS QC Standard 10.00 5.001 10 üSulfate (Turbidimetric) as SO4 2- by Discrete Analyser ED041G
NEPM 2013 B3 & ALS QC Standard 8.70 5.002 23 üTotal Dissolved Solids (High Level) EA015H
NEPM 2013 B3 & ALS QC Standard 5.00 5.001 20 üTotal Kjeldahl Nitrogen as N By Discrete Analyser EK061G
NEPM 2013 B3 & ALS QC Standard 6.25 5.001 16 üTotal Mercury by FIMS EG035T
NEPM 2013 B3 & ALS QC Standard 5.71 5.002 35 üTotal Metals by ICP-MS - Suite A EG020A-T
NEPM 2013 B3 & ALS QC Standard 5.41 5.002 37 üTotal Organic Carbon EP005
NEPM 2013 B3 & ALS QC Standard 5.26 5.001 19 üTotal Phosphorus as P By Discrete Analyser EK067G
NEPM 2013 B3 & ALS QC Standard 8.00 5.002 25 üTRH - Semivolatile Fraction EP071
NEPM 2013 B3 & ALS QC Standard 5.00 5.001 20 üTRH Volatiles/BTEX EP080
Matrix Spikes (MS)
NEPM 2013 B3 & ALS QC Standard 5.56 5.001 18 üAmmonia as N by Discrete analyser EK055G
NEPM 2013 B3 & ALS QC Standard 5.00 5.001 20 üChemical Oxygen Demand (COD) (Spectrophotometric) EP026SP
NEPM 2013 B3 & ALS QC Standard 10.00 5.001 10 üChloride by Discrete Analyser ED045G
NEPM 2013 B3 & ALS QC Standard 5.56 5.001 18 üDissolved Mercury by FIMS EG035F
NEPM 2013 B3 & ALS QC Standard 5.00 5.001 20 üDissolved Metals by ICP-MS - Suite A EG020A-F
NEPM 2013 B3 & ALS QC Standard 5.56 5.001 18 üNitrite and Nitrate as N (NOx) by Discrete Analyser EK059G
NEPM 2013 B3 & ALS QC Standard 6.25 5.001 16 üNitrite as N by Discrete Analyser EK057G
NEPM 2013 B3 & ALS QC Standard 10.00 5.001 10 üSulfate (Turbidimetric) as SO4 2- by Discrete Analyser ED041G
NEPM 2013 B3 & ALS QC Standard 5.00 5.001 20 üTotal Kjeldahl Nitrogen as N By Discrete Analyser EK061G
NEPM 2013 B3 & ALS QC Standard 6.25 5.001 16 üTotal Mercury by FIMS EG035T
NEPM 2013 B3 & ALS QC Standard 5.71 5.002 35 üTotal Metals by ICP-MS - Suite A EG020A-T
NEPM 2013 B3 & ALS QC Standard 5.41 5.002 37 üTotal Organic Carbon EP005
NEPM 2013 B3 & ALS QC Standard 5.26 5.001 19 üTotal Phosphorus as P By Discrete Analyser EK067G
NEPM 2013 B3 & ALS QC Standard 4.00 5.001 25 ûTRH - Semivolatile Fraction EP071
NEPM 2013 B3 & ALS QC Standard 5.00 5.001 20 üTRH Volatiles/BTEX EP080
10 of 12:Page
Work Order :
:Client
EB1924599
GOLDER ASSOCIATES
19127795 VHC Landfill:Project
Brief Method SummariesThe analytical procedures used by the Environmental Division have been developed from established internationally recognized procedures such as those published by the US EPA, APHA, AS and NEPM. In house
developed procedures are employed in the absence of documented standards or by client request. The following report provides brief descriptions of the analytical procedures employed for results reported in the
Certificate of Analysis. Sources from which ALS methods have been developed are provided within the Method Descriptions.
Analytical Methods Method DescriptionsMatrixMethod
In house: Referenced to APHA 4500 H+ B. This procedure determines pH of water samples by automated ISE.
This method is compliant with NEPM (2013) Schedule B(3)
pH by PC Titrator EA005-P WATER
In house: Referenced to APHA 2540C. A gravimetric procedure that determines the amount of `filterable` residue
in an aqueous sample. A well-mixed sample is filtered through a glass fibre filter (1.2um). The filtrate is
evaporated to dryness and dried to constant weight at 180+/-5C. This method is compliant with NEPM (2013)
Schedule B(3)
Total Dissolved Solids (High Level) EA015H WATER
In house: Referenced to APHA 2320 B This procedure determines alkalinity by automated measurement (e.g. PC
Titrate) using pH 4.5 for indicating the total alkalinity end-point. This method is compliant with NEPM (2013)
Schedule B(3)
Alkalinity by PC Titrator ED037-P WATER
In house: Referenced to APHA 4500-SO4. Dissolved sulfate is determined in a 0.45um filtered sample. Sulfate
ions are converted to a barium sulfate suspension in an acetic acid medium with barium chloride. Light
absorbance of the BaSO4 suspension is measured by a photometer and the SO4-2 concentration is determined
by comparison of the reading with a standard curve. This method is compliant with NEPM (2013) Schedule B(3)
Sulfate (Turbidimetric) as SO4 2- by
Discrete Analyser
ED041G WATER
In house: Referenced to APHA 4500 Cl - G.The thiocyanate ion is liberated from mercuric thiocyanate through
sequestration of mercury by the chloride ion to form non-ionised mercuric chloride.in the presence of ferric ions
the librated thiocynate forms highly-coloured ferric thiocynate which is measured at 480 nm APHA 21st edition
seal method 2 017-1-L april 2003
Chloride by Discrete Analyser ED045G WATER
In house: Referenced to APHA 3120 and 3125; USEPA SW 846 - 6010 and 6020; Cations are determined by
either ICP-AES or ICP-MS techniques. This method is compliant with NEPM (2013) Schedule B(3)
Sodium Adsorption Ratio is calculated from Ca, Mg and Na which determined by ALS in house method
QWI-EN/ED093F. This method is compliant with NEPM (2013) Schedule B(3)
Hardness parameters are calculated based on APHA 2340 B. This method is compliant with NEPM (2013)
Schedule B(3)
Major Cations - Dissolved ED093F WATER
In house: Referenced to APHA 3125; USEPA SW846 - 6020, ALS QWI-EN/EG020. Samples are 0.45µm filtered
prior to analysis. The ICPMS technique utilizes a highly efficient argon plasma to ionize selected elements. Ions
are then passed into a high vacuum mass spectrometer, which separates the analytes based on their distinct
mass to charge ratios prior to their measurement by a discrete dynode ion detector.
Dissolved Metals by ICP-MS - Suite A EG020A-F WATER
In house: Referenced to APHA 3125; USEPA SW846 - 6020, ALS QWI-EN/EG020. The ICPMS technique utilizes
a highly efficient argon plasma to ionize selected elements. Ions are then passed into a high vacuum mass
spectrometer, which separates the analytes based on their distinct mass to charge ratios prior to their
measurement by a discrete dynode ion detector.
Total Metals by ICP-MS - Suite A EG020A-T WATER
11 of 12:Page
Work Order :
:Client
EB1924599
GOLDER ASSOCIATES
19127795 VHC Landfill:Project
Analytical Methods Method DescriptionsMatrixMethod
In house: Referenced to AS 3550, APHA 3112 Hg - B (Flow-injection (SnCl2)(Cold Vapour generation) AAS)
Samples are 0.45µm filtered prior to analysis. FIM-AAS is an automated flameless atomic absorption technique.
A bromate/bromide reagent is used to oxidise any organic mercury compounds in the filtered sample. The ionic
mercury is reduced online to atomic mercury vapour by SnCl2 which is then purged into a heated quartz cell.
Quantification is by comparing absorbance against a calibration curve. This method is compliant with NEPM
(2013) Schedule B(3)
Dissolved Mercury by FIMS EG035F WATER
In house: Referenced to AS 3550, APHA 3112 Hg - B (Flow-injection (SnCl2)(Cold Vapour generation) AAS)
FIM-AAS is an automated flameless atomic absorption technique. A bromate/bromide reagent is used to oxidise
any organic mercury compounds in the unfiltered sample. The ionic mercury is reduced online to atomic
mercury vapour by SnCl2 which is then purged into a heated quartz cell. Quantification is by comparing
absorbance against a calibration curve. This method is compliant with NEPM (2013) Schedule B(3)
Total Mercury by FIMS EG035T WATER
In house: Referenced to APHA 4500-NH3 G Ammonia is determined by direct colorimetry by Discrete Analyser.
This method is compliant with NEPM (2013) Schedule B(3)
Ammonia as N by Discrete analyser EK055G WATER
In house: Referenced to APHA 4500-NO2- B. Nitrite is determined by direct colourimetry by Discrete Analyser.
This method is compliant with NEPM (2013) Schedule B(3)
Nitrite as N by Discrete Analyser EK057G WATER
In house: Referenced to APHA 4500-NO3- F. Nitrate is reduced to nitrite by way of a chemical reduction followed
by quantification by Discrete Analyser. Nitrite is determined seperately by direct colourimetry and result for Nitrate
calculated as the difference between the two results. This method is compliant with NEPM (2013) Schedule B(3)
Nitrate as N by Discrete Analyser EK058G WATER
In house: Referenced to APHA 4500-NO3- F. Combined oxidised Nitrogen (NO2+NO3) is determined by
Chemical Reduction and direct colourimetry by Discrete Analyser. This method is compliant with NEPM (2013)
Schedule B(3)
Nitrite and Nitrate as N (NOx) by Discrete
Analyser
EK059G WATER
In house: Referenced to APHA 4500-Norg D (In house). An aliquot of sample is digested using a high
temperature Kjeldahl digestion to convert nitrogenous compounds to ammonia. Ammonia is determined
colorimetrically by discrete analyser. This method is compliant with NEPM (2013) Schedule B(3)
Total Kjeldahl Nitrogen as N By Discrete
Analyser
EK061G WATER
In house: Referenced to APHA 4500-Norg / 4500-NO3-. This method is compliant with NEPM (2013) Schedule
B(3)
Total Nitrogen as N (TKN + Nox) By
Discrete Analyser
EK062G WATER
In house: Referenced to APHA 4500-P H, Jirka et al (1976), Zhang et al (2006). This procedure involves
sulphuric acid digestion of a sample aliquot to break phosphorus down to orthophosphate. The orthophosphate
reacts with ammonium molybdate and antimony potassium tartrate to form a complex which is then reduced and
its concentration measured at 880nm using discrete analyser. This method is compliant with NEPM (2013)
Schedule B(3)
Total Phosphorus as P By Discrete
Analyser
EK067G WATER
In house: Referenced to APHA 1030F. This method is compliant with NEPM (2013) Schedule B(3)Ionic Balance by PCT DA and Turbi SO4
DA
* EN055 - PG WATER
In house: Referenced to APHA 5310 B, The automated TOC analyzer determines Total and Inorganic Carbon by
IR cell. TOC is calculated as the difference. This method is compliant with NEPM (2013) Schedule B(3)
Total Organic Carbon EP005 WATER
In house: Referenced to APHA 5220 D. Samples are digested with a known excess of an acidic potassium
dichromate solution using silver sulfate as a catalyst. The chromium is reduced from the Cr (VI) oxidation state
to the Cr (III) state by the oxygen present in the organic material. Both of these chromium species are coloued
and absorb in the visible region of (400nm & 600nm) the spectrum. The oxidisable organic matter can be
calculated in terms of oxygen equivalents.
Chemical Oxygen Demand (COD)
(Spectrophotometric)
EP026SP WATER
12 of 12:Page
Work Order :
:Client
EB1924599
GOLDER ASSOCIATES
19127795 VHC Landfill:Project
Analytical Methods Method DescriptionsMatrixMethod
In house: Referenced to APHA 5210 B. The 5-Day BOD test provides an empirical measure of the oxygen
consumption capacity of a given water. A portion of the sample is diluted into oxygenated, nutrient rich water, and
a seed added to begin biological decay. The initial dissolved oxygen content is measured, then the bottle is
sealed and incubated for five days. The remaining dissolved oxygen is measured, and from the difference, the
demand for oxygen, by biological decay, is determined. This method is compliant with NEPM (2013) Schedule
B(3)
Biochemical Oxygen Demand (BOD) EP030 WATER
In house: Referenced to USEPA SW 846 - 8015A The sample extract is analysed by Capillary GC/FID and
quantification is by comparison against an established 5 point calibration curve of n-Alkane standards. This
method is compliant with the QC requirements of NEPM (2013) Schedule B(3)
TRH - Semivolatile Fraction EP071 WATER
In house: Referenced to USEPA SW 846 - 8260B Water samples are directly purged prior to analysis by
Capillary GC/MS and quantification is by comparison against an established 5 point calibration curve.
Alternatively, a sample is equilibrated in a headspace vial and a portion of the headspace determined by GCMS
analysis. This method is compliant with the QC requirements of NEPM (2013) Schedule B(3)
TRH Volatiles/BTEX EP080 WATER
Preparation Methods Method DescriptionsMatrixMethod
In house: Referenced to APHA 4500 Norg - D; APHA 4500 P - H. This method is compliant with NEPM (2013)
Schedule B(3)
TKN/TP Digestion EK061/EK067 WATER
In house: Referenced to USEPA SW846-3005. Method 3005 is a Nitric/Hydrochloric acid digestion procedure
used to prepare surface and ground water samples for analysis by ICPAES or ICPMS. This method is compliant
with NEPM (2013) Schedule B(3)
Digestion for Total Recoverable Metals EN25 WATER
In house: Referenced to USEPA SW 846 - 3510B 100 mL to 1L of sample is transferred to a separatory funnel
and serially extracted three times using DCM for each extract. The resultant extracts are combined, dehydrated
and concentrated for analysis. This method is compliant with NEPM (2013) Schedule B(3) . ALS default excludes
sediment which may be resident in the container.
Separatory Funnel Extraction of Liquids ORG14 WATER
A 5 mL aliquot or 5 mL of a diluted sample is added to a 40 mL VOC vial for sparging.Volatiles Water Preparation ORG16-W WATER
Environmental
SAMPLE RECEIPT NOTIFICATION (SRN)Work Order : EB1924599
:: LaboratoryClient Environmental Division BrisbaneGOLDER ASSOCIATES
: :ContactContact MR JOSH INNES Kieren Burns
:: AddressAddress Level 3, 118 Franklin Street
ADELAIDE SA, AUSTRALIA 5000
2 Byth Street Stafford QLD Australia
4053
:: E-mailE-mail [email protected] [email protected]
:: TelephoneTelephone +61 08 8213 2100 +61881625130
:: FacsimileFacsimile +61 08 8213 2101 +61-7-3243 7218
::Project 19127795 VHC Landfill Page 1 of 3
:Order number ---- :Quote number EM2019GOLASS0035 (AD/044/19)
:C-O-C number ---- :QC Level NEPM 2013 B3 & ALS QC Standard
Site : ----
Sampler : JI
DatesDate Samples Received : Issue Date : 18-Sep-201918-Sep-2019 14:30
Scheduled Reporting Date: 25-Sep-2019:Client Requested Due
Date
25-Sep-2019
Delivery DetailsMode of Delivery : :Carrier Intact.Security Seal
No. of coolers/boxes : :5 Temperature 18.1°C / 17.3°C / 12.4°C /
12.9°C / 11.4°C - Ice
Bricks present
: : 12 / 8HARD MEDIUM ESKYReceipt Detail No. of samples received / analysed
General Comments
This report contains the following information:l
- Sample Container(s)/Preservation Non-Compliances
- Summary of Sample(s) and Requested Analysis
- Proactive Holding Time Report
- Requested Deliverables
l Please be advised that four extra samples were received that were not listed on the Chain of
Custody: 'DUP1A', 'DUP1B', 'R01', 'TB01'. No analysis has been assigned to these samples. If you
wish to assign analysis to these, please contact client services at
[email protected] Please be advised that as per directive from Client, analysis is to proceed despite holding time
breaches. If you wish to discuss this, please contact client services at
[email protected] Discounted Package Prices apply only when specific ALS Group Codes ('W', 'S', 'NT' suites) are referenced on COCs.
l Please direct any turn around / technical queries to the laboratory contact designated above.
l Sample Disposal - Aqueous (3 weeks), Solid (2 months ± 1 week) from receipt of samples.
l Analysis will be conducted by ALS Environmental, Brisbane, NATA accreditation no. 825, Site No. 818 (Micro site no. 18958).
l Sample(s) requiring volatile organic compound analysis received in airtight containers (ZHE).l Breaches in recommended extraction / analysis holding times (if any) are displayed overleaf in
the Proactive Holding Time Report table.l Please be aware that APHA/NEPM recommends water and soil samples be chilled to less than or equal to 6°C for chemical
analysis, and less than or equal to 10°C but unfrozen for Microbiological analysis. Where samples are received above this
temperature, it should be taken into consideration when interpreting results. Refer to ALS EnviroMail 85 for ALS
recommendations of the best practice for chilling samples after sampling and for maintaining a cool temperature during transit.
R I G H T S O L U T I O N S | R I G H T P A R T N E R
:Client GOLDER ASSOCIATES
Work Order : EB1924599 Amendment 02 of 3:Page
18-Sep-2019:Issue Date
Sample Container(s)/Preservation Non-Compliances
All comparisons are made against pretreatment/preservation AS, APHA, USEPA standards.
l No sample container / preservation non-compliance exists.
Summary of Sample(s) and Requested Analysis
Some items described below may be part of a laboratory
process necessary for the execution of client requested
tasks. Packages may contain additional analyses, such
as the determination of moisture content and preparation
tasks, that are included in the package.
If no sampling time is provided, the sampling time will
default 00:00 on the date of sampling. If no sampling date
is provided, the sampling date will be assumed by the
laboratory and displayed in brackets without a time
component
WA
TE
R -
EA
005P
pH
(P
CT
)
WA
TE
R -
EA
015H
Tota
l Dis
solv
ed S
olid
s -
Sta
ndard
Leve
l
WA
TE
R -
EP
005
Tota
l Org
anic
Carb
on (
TO
C)
WA
TE
R -
EP
026S
P
Chem
ical O
xygen D
em
and (
CO
D)
WA
TE
R -
EP
030
BO
D
WA
TE
R -
NT
-01 &
02
Ca, M
g, N
a, K
, C
l, S
O4, A
lkalin
ity
WA
TE
R -
W-0
4
TR
H/B
TE
XN
EB1924599-001 12-Sep-2019 00:00 65245 ü ü ü ü ü ü ü
EB1924599-002 12-Sep-2019 00:00 65246 ü ü ü ü ü ü ü
EB1924599-003 12-Sep-2019 00:00 65247 ü ü ü ü ü ü ü
EB1924599-004 12-Sep-2019 00:00 DH1 ü ü ü ü ü ü ü
EB1924599-005 12-Sep-2019 00:00 DH2 ü ü ü ü ü ü ü
EB1924599-006 12-Sep-2019 00:00 DH4 ü ü ü ü ü ü ü
EB1924599-007 12-Sep-2019 00:00 LT1 ü ü ü ü ü ü ü
EB1924599-008 12-Sep-2019 00:00 SW1 ü ü ü ü ü ü ü
Matrix: WATER
Client sample IDLaboratory sample
ID
Client sampling
date / time
(On
Ho
ld)
WA
TE
R
No a
na
lysi
s re
qu
est
ed
WA
TE
R -
EG
02
0F
Dis
solv
ed
Me
tals
by
ICP
/MS
WA
TE
R -
EG
02
0T
To
tal M
eta
ls b
y IC
P/M
S (
incl
ud
ing
dig
est
ion
)
WA
TE
R -
EG
03
5F
Dis
solv
ed
Me
rcu
ry
WA
TE
R -
EG
03
5T
To
tal M
erc
ury
WA
TE
R -
NT
-08
To
tal N
itro
ge
n +
NO
2 +
NO
3 +
NH
3 +
To
tal P
EB1924599-001 12-Sep-2019 00:00 65245 ü ü ü ü
EB1924599-002 12-Sep-2019 00:00 65246 ü ü ü ü
EB1924599-003 12-Sep-2019 00:00 65247 ü ü ü ü
EB1924599-004 12-Sep-2019 00:00 DH1 ü ü ü ü
EB1924599-005 12-Sep-2019 00:00 DH2 ü ü ü ü
EB1924599-006 12-Sep-2019 00:00 DH4 ü ü ü ü
EB1924599-007 12-Sep-2019 00:00 LT1 ü ü ü
EB1924599-008 12-Sep-2019 00:00 SW1 ü ü ü
EB1924599-009 12-Sep-2019 00:00 DUP1A ü
EB1924599-010 12-Sep-2019 00:00 DUP1B ü
EB1924599-011 12-Sep-2019 00:00 R01 ü
EB1924599-012 12-Sep-2019 00:00 TB01 ü
Matrix: WATER
Client sample IDLaboratory sample
ID
Client sampling
date / time
Proactive Holding Time Report
The following table summarises breaches of recommended holding times that have occurred prior to samples/instructions being
received at the laboratory.
:Client GOLDER ASSOCIATES
Work Order : EB1924599 Amendment 03 of 3:Page
18-Sep-2019:Issue Date
Evaluation: û = Holding time breach ; ü = Within holding time. Matrix: WATER
EvaluationClient Sample ID(s)
Due for
extraction
Due for
analysis Evaluation
Samples Received Instructions Received
Date Date
Method
Container
EA005-P: pH by PC Titrator
65245 û --------18-Sep-201912-Sep-2019----Clear Plastic Bottle - Natural
65246 û --------18-Sep-201912-Sep-2019----Clear Plastic Bottle - Natural
65247 û --------18-Sep-201912-Sep-2019----Clear Plastic Bottle - Natural
DH1 û --------18-Sep-201912-Sep-2019----Clear Plastic Bottle - Natural
DH2 û --------18-Sep-201912-Sep-2019----Clear Plastic Bottle - Natural
DH4 û --------18-Sep-201912-Sep-2019----Clear Plastic Bottle - Natural
LT1 û --------18-Sep-201912-Sep-2019----Clear Plastic Bottle - Natural
SW1 û --------18-Sep-201912-Sep-2019----Clear Plastic Bottle - Natural
EK057G: Nitrite as N by Discrete Analyser
65245 û --------18-Sep-201914-Sep-2019----Clear Plastic Bottle - Natural
65246 û --------18-Sep-201914-Sep-2019----Clear Plastic Bottle - Natural
65247 û --------18-Sep-201914-Sep-2019----Clear Plastic Bottle - Natural
DH1 û --------18-Sep-201914-Sep-2019----Clear Plastic Bottle - Natural
DH2 û --------18-Sep-201914-Sep-2019----Clear Plastic Bottle - Natural
DH4 û --------18-Sep-201914-Sep-2019----Clear Plastic Bottle - Natural
LT1 û --------18-Sep-201914-Sep-2019----Clear Plastic Bottle - Natural
SW1 û --------18-Sep-201914-Sep-2019----Clear Plastic Bottle - Natural
EP030: Biochemical Oxygen Demand (BOD)
65245 û --------18-Sep-201914-Sep-2019----Clear Plastic Bottle - Natural
65246 û --------18-Sep-201914-Sep-2019----Clear Plastic Bottle - Natural
65247 û --------18-Sep-201914-Sep-2019----Clear Plastic Bottle - Natural
DH1 û --------18-Sep-201914-Sep-2019----Clear Plastic Bottle - Natural
DH2 û --------18-Sep-201914-Sep-2019----Clear Plastic Bottle - Natural
DH4 û --------18-Sep-201914-Sep-2019----Clear Plastic Bottle - Natural
LT1 û --------18-Sep-201914-Sep-2019----Clear Plastic Bottle - Natural
SW1 û --------18-Sep-201914-Sep-2019----Clear Plastic Bottle - Natural
Requested Deliverables
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE
- A4 - AU Tax Invoice (INV) Email [email protected]
u
JOSH INNES
- *AU Certificate of Analysis - NATA (COA) Email [email protected]
- *AU Interpretive QC Report - DEFAULT (Anon QCI Rep) (QCI) Email [email protected]
- *AU QC Report - DEFAULT (Anon QC Rep) - NATA (QC) Email [email protected]
- A4 - AU Sample Receipt Notification - Environmental HT (SRN) Email [email protected]
- A4 - AU Tax Invoice (INV) Email [email protected]
- Chain of Custody (CoC) (COC) Email [email protected]
- EDI Format - ESDAT (ESDAT) Email [email protected]
OWEN HENDER
- *AU Certificate of Analysis - NATA (COA) Email [email protected]
- *AU Interpretive QC Report - DEFAULT (Anon QCI Rep) (QCI) Email [email protected]
- *AU QC Report - DEFAULT (Anon QC Rep) - NATA (QC) Email [email protected]
- A4 - AU Sample Receipt Notification - Environmental HT (SRN) Email [email protected]
- Chain of Custody (CoC) (COC) Email [email protected]
- EDI Format - ESDAT (ESDAT) Email [email protected]
SA CONTAMINATION
- *AU Certificate of Analysis - NATA (COA) Email SAContaminatedLandGroup@golde
r.com
- *AU Interpretive QC Report - DEFAULT (Anon QCI Rep) (QCI) Email SAContaminatedLandGroup@golde
r.com
- *AU QC Report - DEFAULT (Anon QC Rep) - NATA (QC) Email SAContaminatedLandGroup@golde
r.com
- A4 - AU Sample Receipt Notification - Environmental HT (SRN) Email SAContaminatedLandGroup@golde
r.com
- Chain of Custody (CoC) (COC) Email SAContaminatedLandGroup@golde
r.com
- EDI Format - ESDAT (ESDAT) Email SAContaminatedLandGroup@golde
r.com
0 0.00 True
Environmental
CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSISWork Order : Page : 1 of 9EB1925719
:: LaboratoryClient GOLDER ASSOCIATES Environmental Division Brisbane
: :ContactContact MR OWEN HENDER Kieren Burns
:: AddressAddress Level 3, 118 Franklin Street
ADELAIDE SA, AUSTRALIA 5000
2 Byth Street Stafford QLD Australia 4053
:Telephone +61 08 8213 2100 :Telephone +61881625130
:Project 19127795 VHC Landfill Date Samples Received : 27-Sep-2019 10:33
:Order number ---- Date Analysis Commenced : 20-Sep-2019
:C-O-C number ---- Issue Date : 04-Oct-2019 14:23
Sampler : ----
Site : Cowper Street, Footscray
Quote number : AD/044/19
8:No. of samples received
8:No. of samples analysed
This report supersedes any previous report(s) with this reference. Results apply to the sample(s) as submitted. This document shall not be reproduced, except in full.
This Certificate of Analysis contains the following information:
l General Comments
l Analytical Results
l Surrogate Control Limits
Additional information pertinent to this report will be found in the following separate attachments: Quality Control Report, QA/QC Compliance Assessment to assist with
Quality Review and Sample Receipt Notification.
SignatoriesThis document has been electronically signed by the authorized signatories below. Electronic signing is carried out in compliance with procedures specified in 21 CFR Part 11.
Signatories Accreditation CategoryPosition
Diana Mesa 2IC Organic Chemist Brisbane Organics, Stafford, QLD
R I G H T S O L U T I O N S | R I G H T P A R T N E R
2 of 9:Page
Work Order :
:Client
EB1925719
19127795 VHC Landfill:Project
GOLDER ASSOCIATES
General Comments
The analytical procedures used by the Environmental Division have been developed from established internationally recognized procedures such as those published by the USEPA, APHA, AS and NEPM. In house
developed procedures are employed in the absence of documented standards or by client request.
Where moisture determination has been performed, results are reported on a dry weight basis.
Where a reported less than (<) result is higher than the LOR, this may be due to primary sample extract/digestate dilution and/or insufficient sample for analysis.
Where the LOR of a reported result differs from standard LOR, this may be due to high moisture content, insufficient sample (reduced weight employed) or matrix interference.
When sampling time information is not provided by the client, sampling dates are shown without a time component. In these instances, the time component has been assumed by the laboratory for processing
purposes.
Where a result is required to meet compliance limits the associated uncertainty must be considered. Refer to the ALS Contact for details.
CAS Number = CAS registry number from database maintained by Chemical Abstracts Services. The Chemical Abstracts Service is a division of the American Chemical Society.
LOR = Limit of reporting
^ = This result is computed from individual analyte detections at or above the level of reporting
ø = ALS is not NATA accredited for these tests.
~ = Indicates an estimated value.
Key :
Benzo(a)pyrene Toxicity Equivalent Quotient (TEQ) per the NEPM (2013) is the sum total of the concentration of the eight carcinogenic PAHs multiplied by their Toxicity Equivalence Factor (TEF) relative to
Benzo(a)pyrene. TEF values are provided in brackets as follows: Benz(a)anthracene (0.1), Chrysene (0.01), Benzo(b+j) & Benzo(k)fluoranthene (0.1), Benzo(a)pyrene (1.0), Indeno(1.2.3.cd)pyrene (0.1),
Dibenz(a.h)anthracene (1.0), Benzo(g.h.i)perylene (0.01). Less than LOR results for 'TEQ Zero' are treated as zero.
l
EP068 and EP075(SIM): Analysis performed on original EB1924599 EP071 extract. No surrogate or QC reported.l
3 of 9:Page
Work Order :
:Client
EB1925719
19127795 VHC Landfill:Project
GOLDER ASSOCIATES
Analytical Results
DH2
EB1924599_005
DH1
EB1924599_004
65247
EB1924599_003
65246
EB1924599_002
65245
EB1924599_001
Client sample IDSub-Matrix: WATER
(Matrix: WATER)
12-Sep-2019 00:0012-Sep-2019 00:0012-Sep-2019 00:0012-Sep-2019 00:0012-Sep-2019 00:00Client sampling date / time
EB1925719-005EB1925719-004EB1925719-003EB1925719-002EB1925719-001UnitLORCAS NumberCompound
Result Result Result Result Result
EP068A: Organochlorine Pesticides (OC)
<0.5alpha-BHC <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5µg/L0.5319-84-6
<0.5Hexachlorobenzene (HCB) <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5µg/L0.5118-74-1
<0.5beta-BHC <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5µg/L0.5319-85-7
<0.5gamma-BHC <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5µg/L0.558-89-9
<0.5delta-BHC <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5µg/L0.5319-86-8
<0.5Heptachlor <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5µg/L0.576-44-8
<0.5Aldrin <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5µg/L0.5309-00-2
<0.5Heptachlor epoxide <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5µg/L0.51024-57-3
<0.5trans-Chlordane <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5µg/L0.55103-74-2
<0.5alpha-Endosulfan <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5µg/L0.5959-98-8
<0.5cis-Chlordane <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5µg/L0.55103-71-9
<0.5Dieldrin <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5µg/L0.560-57-1
<0.54.4`-DDE <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5µg/L0.572-55-9
<0.5Endrin <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5µg/L0.572-20-8
<0.5beta-Endosulfan <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5µg/L0.533213-65-9
<0.54.4`-DDD <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5µg/L0.572-54-8
<0.5Endrin aldehyde <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5µg/L0.57421-93-4
<0.5Endosulfan sulfate <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5µg/L0.51031-07-8
<2.04.4`-DDT <2.0 <2.0 <2.0 <2.0µg/L2.050-29-3
<0.5Endrin ketone <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5µg/L0.553494-70-5
<2.0Methoxychlor <2.0 <2.0 <2.0 <2.0µg/L2.072-43-5
<0.5^ <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5µg/L0.5----Total Chlordane (sum)
<0.5^ Sum of DDD + DDE + DDT <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5µg/L0.572-54-8/72-55-9/5
0-2
<0.5^ Sum of Aldrin + Dieldrin <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5µg/L0.5309-00-2/60-57-1
EP071 SG: Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons - Silica gel cleanup
---- ---- <50 <50 <50µg/L50----C10 - C36 Fraction (sum)
EP071 SG: Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons - SV Silica gel cleanup
---- ---- <50 <50 <50µg/L50----C10 - C14 Fraction
---- ---- <100 <100 <100µg/L100----C15 - C28 Fraction
---- ---- <50 <50 <50µg/L50----C29 - C36 Fraction
EP071 SG: Total Recoverable Hydrocarbons - NEPM 2013 Fractions - Silica gel cleanup
---- ---- <100 <100 130µg/L100---->C10 - C40 Fraction (sum)
EP071 SG: Total Recoverable Hydrocarbons - SV NEPM 2013 Fractions - Silica gel cleanup
4 of 9:Page
Work Order :
:Client
EB1925719
19127795 VHC Landfill:Project
GOLDER ASSOCIATES
Analytical Results
DH2
EB1924599_005
DH1
EB1924599_004
65247
EB1924599_003
65246
EB1924599_002
65245
EB1924599_001
Client sample IDSub-Matrix: WATER
(Matrix: WATER)
12-Sep-2019 00:0012-Sep-2019 00:0012-Sep-2019 00:0012-Sep-2019 00:0012-Sep-2019 00:00Client sampling date / time
EB1925719-005EB1925719-004EB1925719-003EB1925719-002EB1925719-001UnitLORCAS NumberCompound
Result Result Result Result Result
EP071 SG: Total Recoverable Hydrocarbons - SV NEPM 2013 Fractions - Silica gel cleanup - Continued
---- ---- <100 <100 <100µg/L100---->C10 - C16 Fraction
---- ---- <100 <100 130µg/L100---->C16 - C34 Fraction
---- ---- <100 <100 <100µg/L100---->C34 - C40 Fraction
EP075(SIM)A: Phenolic Compounds
<1.0Phenol <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0µg/L1.0108-95-2
<1.02-Chlorophenol <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0µg/L1.095-57-8
<1.02-Methylphenol <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 2.6µg/L1.095-48-7
<2.03- & 4-Methylphenol <2.0 <2.0 <2.0 <2.0µg/L2.01319-77-3
<1.02-Nitrophenol <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0µg/L1.088-75-5
<1.02.4-Dimethylphenol <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 2.4µg/L1.0105-67-9
<1.02.4-Dichlorophenol <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0µg/L1.0120-83-2
<1.02.6-Dichlorophenol <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0µg/L1.087-65-0
<1.04-Chloro-3-methylphenol <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0µg/L1.059-50-7
<1.02.4.6-Trichlorophenol <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0µg/L1.088-06-2
<1.02.4.5-Trichlorophenol <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0µg/L1.095-95-4
<2.0Pentachlorophenol <2.0 <2.0 <2.0 <2.0µg/L2.087-86-5
EP075(SIM)B: Polynuclear Aromatic Hydrocarbons
<1.0Naphthalene <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0µg/L1.091-20-3
<1.0Acenaphthylene <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0µg/L1.0208-96-8
<1.0Acenaphthene <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0µg/L1.083-32-9
<1.0Fluorene <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0µg/L1.086-73-7
<1.0Phenanthrene <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0µg/L1.085-01-8
<1.0Anthracene <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0µg/L1.0120-12-7
<1.0Fluoranthene <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0µg/L1.0206-44-0
<1.0Pyrene <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0µg/L1.0129-00-0
<1.0Benz(a)anthracene <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0µg/L1.056-55-3
<1.0Chrysene <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0µg/L1.0218-01-9
<1.0Benzo(b+j)fluoranthene <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0µg/L1.0205-99-2 205-82-3
<1.0Benzo(k)fluoranthene <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0µg/L1.0207-08-9
<0.5Benzo(a)pyrene <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5µg/L0.550-32-8
<1.0Indeno(1.2.3.cd)pyrene <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0µg/L1.0193-39-5
<1.0Dibenz(a.h)anthracene <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0µg/L1.053-70-3
<1.0Benzo(g.h.i)perylene <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0µg/L1.0191-24-2
<0.5^ <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5µg/L0.5----Sum of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons
5 of 9:Page
Work Order :
:Client
EB1925719
19127795 VHC Landfill:Project
GOLDER ASSOCIATES
Analytical Results
DH2
EB1924599_005
DH1
EB1924599_004
65247
EB1924599_003
65246
EB1924599_002
65245
EB1924599_001
Client sample IDSub-Matrix: WATER
(Matrix: WATER)
12-Sep-2019 00:0012-Sep-2019 00:0012-Sep-2019 00:0012-Sep-2019 00:0012-Sep-2019 00:00Client sampling date / time
EB1925719-005EB1925719-004EB1925719-003EB1925719-002EB1925719-001UnitLORCAS NumberCompound
Result Result Result Result Result
EP075(SIM)B: Polynuclear Aromatic Hydrocarbons - Continued
<0.5^ <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5µg/L0.5----Benzo(a)pyrene TEQ (zero)
EP068S: Organochlorine Pesticide Surrogate
Not DeterminedDibromo-DDE Not Determined Not Determined Not Determined Not Determined%0.521655-73-2
EP068T: Organophosphorus Pesticide Surrogate
Not DeterminedDEF Not Determined Not Determined Not Determined Not Determined%0.578-48-8
EP075(SIM)S: Phenolic Compound Surrogates
Not DeterminedPhenol-d6 Not Determined Not Determined Not Determined Not Determined%1.013127-88-3
Not Determined2-Chlorophenol-D4 Not Determined Not Determined Not Determined Not Determined%1.093951-73-6
Not Determined2.4.6-Tribromophenol Not Determined Not Determined Not Determined Not Determined%1.0118-79-6
EP075(SIM)T: PAH Surrogates
Not Determined2-Fluorobiphenyl Not Determined Not Determined Not Determined Not Determined%1.0321-60-8
Not DeterminedAnthracene-d10 Not Determined Not Determined Not Determined Not Determined%1.01719-06-8
Not Determined4-Terphenyl-d14 Not Determined Not Determined Not Determined Not Determined%1.01718-51-0
6 of 9:Page
Work Order :
:Client
EB1925719
19127795 VHC Landfill:Project
GOLDER ASSOCIATES
Analytical Results
--------SW1
EB1924599_008
LT1
EB1924599_007
DH4
EB1924599_006
Client sample IDSub-Matrix: WATER
(Matrix: WATER)
--------12-Sep-2019 00:0012-Sep-2019 00:0012-Sep-2019 00:00Client sampling date / time
----------------EB1925719-008EB1925719-007EB1925719-006UnitLORCAS NumberCompound
Result Result Result ---- ----
EP068A: Organochlorine Pesticides (OC)
<0.5alpha-BHC <0.5 <0.5 ---- ----µg/L0.5319-84-6
<0.5Hexachlorobenzene (HCB) <0.5 <0.5 ---- ----µg/L0.5118-74-1
<0.5beta-BHC <0.5 <0.5 ---- ----µg/L0.5319-85-7
<0.5gamma-BHC <0.5 <0.5 ---- ----µg/L0.558-89-9
<0.5delta-BHC <0.5 <0.5 ---- ----µg/L0.5319-86-8
<0.5Heptachlor <0.5 <0.5 ---- ----µg/L0.576-44-8
<0.5Aldrin <0.5 <0.5 ---- ----µg/L0.5309-00-2
<0.5Heptachlor epoxide <0.5 <0.5 ---- ----µg/L0.51024-57-3
<0.5trans-Chlordane <0.5 <0.5 ---- ----µg/L0.55103-74-2
<0.5alpha-Endosulfan <0.5 <0.5 ---- ----µg/L0.5959-98-8
<0.5cis-Chlordane <0.5 <0.5 ---- ----µg/L0.55103-71-9
<0.5Dieldrin <0.5 <0.5 ---- ----µg/L0.560-57-1
<0.54.4`-DDE <0.5 <0.5 ---- ----µg/L0.572-55-9
<0.5Endrin <0.5 <0.5 ---- ----µg/L0.572-20-8
<0.5beta-Endosulfan <0.5 <0.5 ---- ----µg/L0.533213-65-9
<0.54.4`-DDD <0.5 <0.5 ---- ----µg/L0.572-54-8
<0.5Endrin aldehyde <0.5 <0.5 ---- ----µg/L0.57421-93-4
<0.5Endosulfan sulfate <0.5 <0.5 ---- ----µg/L0.51031-07-8
<2.04.4`-DDT <2.0 <2.0 ---- ----µg/L2.050-29-3
<0.5Endrin ketone <0.5 <0.5 ---- ----µg/L0.553494-70-5
<2.0Methoxychlor <2.0 <2.0 ---- ----µg/L2.072-43-5
<0.5^ <0.5 <0.5 ---- ----µg/L0.5----Total Chlordane (sum)
<0.5^ Sum of DDD + DDE + DDT <0.5 <0.5 ---- ----µg/L0.572-54-8/72-55-9/5
0-2
<0.5^ Sum of Aldrin + Dieldrin <0.5 <0.5 ---- ----µg/L0.5309-00-2/60-57-1
EP071 SG: Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons - Silica gel cleanup
---- 180 <50 ---- ----µg/L50----C10 - C36 Fraction (sum)
EP071 SG: Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons - SV Silica gel cleanup
---- <50 <50 ---- ----µg/L50----C10 - C14 Fraction
---- 180 <100 ---- ----µg/L100----C15 - C28 Fraction
---- <50 <50 ---- ----µg/L50----C29 - C36 Fraction
EP071 SG: Total Recoverable Hydrocarbons - NEPM 2013 Fractions - Silica gel cleanup
---- 150 <100 ---- ----µg/L100---->C10 - C40 Fraction (sum)
EP071 SG: Total Recoverable Hydrocarbons - SV NEPM 2013 Fractions - Silica gel cleanup
7 of 9:Page
Work Order :
:Client
EB1925719
19127795 VHC Landfill:Project
GOLDER ASSOCIATES
Analytical Results
--------SW1
EB1924599_008
LT1
EB1924599_007
DH4
EB1924599_006
Client sample IDSub-Matrix: WATER
(Matrix: WATER)
--------12-Sep-2019 00:0012-Sep-2019 00:0012-Sep-2019 00:00Client sampling date / time
----------------EB1925719-008EB1925719-007EB1925719-006UnitLORCAS NumberCompound
Result Result Result ---- ----
EP071 SG: Total Recoverable Hydrocarbons - SV NEPM 2013 Fractions - Silica gel cleanup - Continued
---- <100 <100 ---- ----µg/L100---->C10 - C16 Fraction
---- 150 <100 ---- ----µg/L100---->C16 - C34 Fraction
---- <100 <100 ---- ----µg/L100---->C34 - C40 Fraction
EP075(SIM)A: Phenolic Compounds
<1.0Phenol <1.0 <1.0 ---- ----µg/L1.0108-95-2
<1.02-Chlorophenol <1.0 <1.0 ---- ----µg/L1.095-57-8
<1.02-Methylphenol <1.0 <1.0 ---- ----µg/L1.095-48-7
<2.03- & 4-Methylphenol <2.0 <2.0 ---- ----µg/L2.01319-77-3
<1.02-Nitrophenol <1.0 <1.0 ---- ----µg/L1.088-75-5
<1.02.4-Dimethylphenol <1.0 <1.0 ---- ----µg/L1.0105-67-9
<1.02.4-Dichlorophenol <1.0 <1.0 ---- ----µg/L1.0120-83-2
<1.02.6-Dichlorophenol <1.0 <1.0 ---- ----µg/L1.087-65-0
<1.04-Chloro-3-methylphenol <1.0 <1.0 ---- ----µg/L1.059-50-7
<1.02.4.6-Trichlorophenol <1.0 <1.0 ---- ----µg/L1.088-06-2
<1.02.4.5-Trichlorophenol <1.0 <1.0 ---- ----µg/L1.095-95-4
<2.0Pentachlorophenol <2.0 <2.0 ---- ----µg/L2.087-86-5
EP075(SIM)B: Polynuclear Aromatic Hydrocarbons
<1.0Naphthalene <1.0 <1.0 ---- ----µg/L1.091-20-3
<1.0Acenaphthylene <1.0 <1.0 ---- ----µg/L1.0208-96-8
<1.0Acenaphthene <1.0 <1.0 ---- ----µg/L1.083-32-9
<1.0Fluorene <1.0 <1.0 ---- ----µg/L1.086-73-7
<1.0Phenanthrene <1.0 <1.0 ---- ----µg/L1.085-01-8
<1.0Anthracene <1.0 <1.0 ---- ----µg/L1.0120-12-7
<1.0Fluoranthene <1.0 <1.0 ---- ----µg/L1.0206-44-0
<1.0Pyrene <1.0 <1.0 ---- ----µg/L1.0129-00-0
<1.0Benz(a)anthracene <1.0 <1.0 ---- ----µg/L1.056-55-3
<1.0Chrysene <1.0 <1.0 ---- ----µg/L1.0218-01-9
<1.0Benzo(b+j)fluoranthene <1.0 <1.0 ---- ----µg/L1.0205-99-2 205-82-3
<1.0Benzo(k)fluoranthene <1.0 <1.0 ---- ----µg/L1.0207-08-9
<0.5Benzo(a)pyrene <0.5 <0.5 ---- ----µg/L0.550-32-8
<1.0Indeno(1.2.3.cd)pyrene <1.0 <1.0 ---- ----µg/L1.0193-39-5
<1.0Dibenz(a.h)anthracene <1.0 <1.0 ---- ----µg/L1.053-70-3
<1.0Benzo(g.h.i)perylene <1.0 <1.0 ---- ----µg/L1.0191-24-2
<0.5^ <0.5 <0.5 ---- ----µg/L0.5----Sum of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons
8 of 9:Page
Work Order :
:Client
EB1925719
19127795 VHC Landfill:Project
GOLDER ASSOCIATES
Analytical Results
--------SW1
EB1924599_008
LT1
EB1924599_007
DH4
EB1924599_006
Client sample IDSub-Matrix: WATER
(Matrix: WATER)
--------12-Sep-2019 00:0012-Sep-2019 00:0012-Sep-2019 00:00Client sampling date / time
----------------EB1925719-008EB1925719-007EB1925719-006UnitLORCAS NumberCompound
Result Result Result ---- ----
EP075(SIM)B: Polynuclear Aromatic Hydrocarbons - Continued
<0.5^ <0.5 <0.5 ---- ----µg/L0.5----Benzo(a)pyrene TEQ (zero)
EP068S: Organochlorine Pesticide Surrogate
Not DeterminedDibromo-DDE Not Determined Not Determined ---- ----%0.521655-73-2
EP068T: Organophosphorus Pesticide Surrogate
Not DeterminedDEF Not Determined Not Determined ---- ----%0.578-48-8
EP075(SIM)S: Phenolic Compound Surrogates
Not DeterminedPhenol-d6 Not Determined Not Determined ---- ----%1.013127-88-3
Not Determined2-Chlorophenol-D4 Not Determined Not Determined ---- ----%1.093951-73-6
Not Determined2.4.6-Tribromophenol Not Determined Not Determined ---- ----%1.0118-79-6
EP075(SIM)T: PAH Surrogates
Not Determined2-Fluorobiphenyl Not Determined Not Determined ---- ----%1.0321-60-8
Not DeterminedAnthracene-d10 Not Determined Not Determined ---- ----%1.01719-06-8
Not Determined4-Terphenyl-d14 Not Determined Not Determined ---- ----%1.01718-51-0
9 of 9:Page
Work Order :
:Client
EB1925719
19127795 VHC Landfill:Project
GOLDER ASSOCIATES
Surrogate Control Limits
Recovery Limits (%)Sub-Matrix: WATER
Compound CAS Number Low High
EP068S: Organochlorine Pesticide Surrogate
Dibromo-DDE 21655-73-2 45 139
EP068T: Organophosphorus Pesticide Surrogate
DEF 78-48-8 45 139
EP075(SIM)S: Phenolic Compound Surrogates
Phenol-d6 13127-88-3 10 72
2-Chlorophenol-D4 93951-73-6 27 130
2.4.6-Tribromophenol 118-79-6 19 181
EP075(SIM)T: PAH Surrogates
2-Fluorobiphenyl 321-60-8 14 146
Anthracene-d10 1719-06-8 35 137
4-Terphenyl-d14 1718-51-0 36 154
False
1 1.00True
Environmental
QUALITY CONTROL REPORTWork Order : EB1925719 Page : 1 of 5
:: LaboratoryClient Environmental Division BrisbaneGOLDER ASSOCIATES
:Contact MR OWEN HENDER :Contact Kieren Burns
:Address Level 3, 118 Franklin Street
ADELAIDE SA, AUSTRALIA 5000
Address : 2 Byth Street Stafford QLD Australia 4053
::Telephone +61 08 8213 2100 +61881625130:Telephone
:Project 19127795 VHC Landfill Date Samples Received : 27-Sep-2019
:Order number ---- Date Analysis Commenced : 20-Sep-2019
:C-O-C number ---- Issue Date : 04-Oct-2019
Sampler : ----
Site : Cowper Street, Footscray
Quote number : AD/044/19
No. of samples received 8:
No. of samples analysed 8:
This report supersedes any previous report(s) with this reference. Results apply to the sample(s) as submitted. This document shall not be reproduced, except in full.
This Quality Control Report contains the following information:
l Laboratory Duplicate (DUP) Report; Relative Percentage Difference (RPD) and Acceptance Limits
l Method Blank (MB) and Laboratory Control Spike (LCS) Report ; Recovery and Acceptance Limits
l Matrix Spike (MS) Report; Recovery and Acceptance Limits
SignatoriesThis document has been electronically signed by the authorized signatories below. Electronic signing is carried out in compliance with procedures specified in 21 CFR Part 11.
Signatories Accreditation CategoryPosition
Diana Mesa 2IC Organic Chemist Brisbane Organics, Stafford, QLD
R I G H T S O L U T I O N S | R I G H T P A R T N E R
2 of 5:Page
Work Order :
:Client
EB1925719
GOLDER ASSOCIATES
19127795 VHC Landfill:Project
General Comments
The analytical procedures used by the Environmental Division have been developed from established internationally recognized procedures such as those published by the USEPA, APHA, AS and NEPM. In house
developed procedures are employed in the absence of documented standards or by client request.
Where moisture determination has been performed, results are reported on a dry weight basis.
Where a reported less than (<) result is higher than the LOR, this may be due to primary sample extract/digestate dilution and/or insufficient sample for analysis. Where the LOR of a reported result differs from standard LOR, this may be due to high moisture content, insufficient sample (reduced weight employed) or matrix interference.
Anonymous = Refers to samples which are not specifically part of this work order but formed part of the QC process lot
CAS Number = CAS registry number from database maintained by Chemical Abstracts Services. The Chemical Abstracts Service is a division of the American Chemical Society.
LOR = Limit of reporting
RPD = Relative Percentage Difference
# = Indicates failed QC
Key :
Laboratory Duplicate (DUP) Report
The quality control term Laboratory Duplicate refers to a randomly selected intralaboratory split. Laboratory duplicates provide information regarding method precision and sample heterogeneity. The permitted ranges
for the Relative Percent Deviation (RPD) of Laboratory Duplicates are specified in ALS Method QWI -EN/38 and are dependent on the magnitude of results in comparison to the level of reporting: Result < 10 times LOR:
No Limit; Result between 10 and 20 times LOR: 0% - 50%; Result > 20 times LOR: 0% - 20%.
l No Laboratory Duplicate (DUP) Results are required to be reported.
3 of 5:Page
Work Order :
:Client
EB1925719
GOLDER ASSOCIATES
19127795 VHC Landfill:Project
Method Blank (MB) and Laboratory Control Spike (LCS) Report
The quality control term Method / Laboratory Blank refers to an analyte free matrix to which all reagents are added in the same volumes or proportions as used in standard sample preparation. The purpose of this QC
parameter is to monitor potential laboratory contamination. The quality control term Laboratory Control Spike (LCS) refers to a certified reference material, or a known interference free matrix spiked with target
analytes. The purpose of this QC parameter is to monitor method precision and accuracy independent of sample matrix. Dynamic Recovery Limits are based on statistical evaluation of processed LCS.
Sub-Matrix: WATER Method Blank (MB)
Report
Laboratory Control Spike (LCS) Report
Spike Spike Recovery (%) Recovery Limits (%)
Result Concentration HighLowLCSMethod: Compound CAS Number LOR Unit
EP071 SG: Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons - SV Silica gel cleanup (QCLot: 2612614)
EP071-SVSG: C10 - C14 Fraction ---- 50 µg/L <50 77.21070 µg/L 11034.0
EP071-SVSG: C15 - C28 Fraction ---- 100 µg/L <100 68.41770 µg/L 10543.0
EP071-SVSG: C29 - C36 Fraction ---- 50 µg/L <50 -------- --------
EP071 SG: Total Recoverable Hydrocarbons - SV NEPM 2013 Fractions - Silica gel cleanup (QCLot: 2612614)
EP071-SVSG: >C10 - C16 Fraction ---- 100 µg/L <100 75.21560 µg/L 11034.0
EP071-SVSG: >C16 - C34 Fraction ---- 100 µg/L <100 66.01190 µg/L 11043.0
EP071-SVSG: >C34 - C40 Fraction ---- 100 µg/L <100 -------- --------
EP068A: Organochlorine Pesticides (OC) (QCLot: 2612613)
EP068: alpha-BHC 319-84-6 0.5 µg/L <0.5 -------- --------
EP068: Hexachlorobenzene (HCB) 118-74-1 0.5 µg/L <0.5 -------- --------
EP068: beta-BHC 319-85-7 0.5 µg/L <0.5 -------- --------
EP068: gamma-BHC 58-89-9 0.5 µg/L <0.5 -------- --------
EP068: delta-BHC 319-86-8 0.5 µg/L <0.5 -------- --------
EP068: Heptachlor 76-44-8 0.5 µg/L <0.5 -------- --------
EP068: Aldrin 309-00-2 0.5 µg/L <0.5 -------- --------
EP068: Heptachlor epoxide 1024-57-3 0.5 µg/L <0.5 -------- --------
EP068: trans-Chlordane 5103-74-2 0.5 µg/L <0.5 -------- --------
EP068: alpha-Endosulfan 959-98-8 0.5 µg/L <0.5 -------- --------
EP068: cis-Chlordane 5103-71-9 0.5 µg/L <0.5 -------- --------
EP068: Dieldrin 60-57-1 0.5 µg/L <0.5 -------- --------
EP068: 4.4`-DDE 72-55-9 0.5 µg/L <0.5 -------- --------
EP068: Endrin 72-20-8 0.5 µg/L <0.5 -------- --------
EP068: beta-Endosulfan 33213-65-9 0.5 µg/L <0.5 -------- --------
EP068: 4.4`-DDD 72-54-8 0.5 µg/L <0.5 -------- --------
EP068: Endrin aldehyde 7421-93-4 0.5 µg/L <0.5 -------- --------
EP068: Endosulfan sulfate 1031-07-8 0.5 µg/L <0.5 -------- --------
EP068: 4.4`-DDT 50-29-3 2 µg/L <2.0 -------- --------
EP068: Endrin ketone 53494-70-5 0.5 µg/L <0.5 -------- --------
EP068: Methoxychlor 72-43-5 2 µg/L <2.0 -------- --------
EP068: Total Chlordane (sum) ---- 0.5 µg/L <0.5 -------- --------
EP068: Sum of DDD + DDE + DDT 72-54-8/72-5
5-9/50-2
0.5 µg/L <0.5 -------- --------
EP068: Sum of Aldrin + Dieldrin 309-00-2/60-
57-1
0.5 µg/L <0.5 -------- --------
4 of 5:Page
Work Order :
:Client
EB1925719
GOLDER ASSOCIATES
19127795 VHC Landfill:Project
Sub-Matrix: WATER Method Blank (MB)
Report
Laboratory Control Spike (LCS) Report
Spike Spike Recovery (%) Recovery Limits (%)
Result Concentration HighLowLCSMethod: Compound CAS Number LOR Unit
EP071 SG: Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons - Silica gel cleanup (QCLot: 2612614)
EP071-SVSG: C10 - C36 Fraction (sum) ---- 50 µg/L <50 -------- --------
EP071 SG: Total Recoverable Hydrocarbons - NEPM 2013 Fractions - Silica gel cleanup (QCLot: 2612614)
EP071-SVSG: >C10 - C40 Fraction (sum) ---- 100 µg/L <100 -------- --------
EP075(SIM)A: Phenolic Compounds (QCLot: 2612612)
EP075(SIM): Phenol 108-95-2 1 µg/L <1.0 -------- --------
EP075(SIM): 2-Chlorophenol 95-57-8 1 µg/L <1.0 -------- --------
EP075(SIM): 2-Methylphenol 95-48-7 1 µg/L <1.0 -------- --------
EP075(SIM): 3- & 4-Methylphenol 1319-77-3 2 µg/L <2.0 -------- --------
EP075(SIM): 2-Nitrophenol 88-75-5 1 µg/L <1.0 -------- --------
EP075(SIM): 2.4-Dimethylphenol 105-67-9 1 µg/L <1.0 -------- --------
EP075(SIM): 2.4-Dichlorophenol 120-83-2 1 µg/L <1.0 -------- --------
EP075(SIM): 2.6-Dichlorophenol 87-65-0 1 µg/L <1.0 -------- --------
EP075(SIM): 4-Chloro-3-methylphenol 59-50-7 1 µg/L <1.0 -------- --------
EP075(SIM): 2.4.6-Trichlorophenol 88-06-2 1 µg/L <1.0 -------- --------
EP075(SIM): 2.4.5-Trichlorophenol 95-95-4 1 µg/L <1.0 -------- --------
EP075(SIM): Pentachlorophenol 87-86-5 2 µg/L <2.0 -------- --------
EP075(SIM)B: Polynuclear Aromatic Hydrocarbons (QCLot: 2612612)
EP075(SIM): Naphthalene 91-20-3 1 µg/L <1.0 -------- --------
EP075(SIM): Acenaphthylene 208-96-8 1 µg/L <1.0 -------- --------
EP075(SIM): Acenaphthene 83-32-9 1 µg/L <1.0 -------- --------
EP075(SIM): Fluorene 86-73-7 1 µg/L <1.0 -------- --------
EP075(SIM): Phenanthrene 85-01-8 1 µg/L <1.0 -------- --------
EP075(SIM): Anthracene 120-12-7 1 µg/L <1.0 -------- --------
EP075(SIM): Fluoranthene 206-44-0 1 µg/L <1.0 -------- --------
EP075(SIM): Pyrene 129-00-0 1 µg/L <1.0 -------- --------
EP075(SIM): Benz(a)anthracene 56-55-3 1 µg/L <1.0 -------- --------
EP075(SIM): Chrysene 218-01-9 1 µg/L <1.0 -------- --------
EP075(SIM): Benzo(b+j)fluoranthene 205-99-2
205-82-3
1 µg/L <1.0 -------- --------
EP075(SIM): Benzo(k)fluoranthene 207-08-9 1 µg/L <1.0 -------- --------
EP075(SIM): Benzo(a)pyrene 50-32-8 0.5 µg/L <0.5 -------- --------
EP075(SIM): Indeno(1.2.3.cd)pyrene 193-39-5 1 µg/L <1.0 -------- --------
EP075(SIM): Dibenz(a.h)anthracene 53-70-3 1 µg/L <1.0 -------- --------
EP075(SIM): Benzo(g.h.i)perylene 191-24-2 1 µg/L <1.0 -------- --------
Matrix Spike (MS) ReportThe quality control term Matrix Spike (MS) refers to an intralaboratory split sample spiked with a representative set of target analytes. The purpose of this QC parameter is to monitor potential matrix effects on
analyte recoveries. Static Recovery Limits as per laboratory Data Quality Objectives (DQOs). Ideal recovery ranges stated may be waived in the event of sample matrix interference.
5 of 5:Page
Work Order :
:Client
EB1925719
GOLDER ASSOCIATES
19127795 VHC Landfill:Project
l No Matrix Spike (MS) or Matrix Spike Duplicate (MSD) Results are required to be reported.
True
Environmental
QA/QC Compliance Assessment to assist with Quality ReviewWork Order : EB1925719 Page : 1 of 6
:: LaboratoryClient Environmental Division BrisbaneGOLDER ASSOCIATES
:Contact MR OWEN HENDER Telephone : +61881625130
:Project 19127795 VHC Landfill Date Samples Received : 27-Sep-2019
Site : Cowper Street, Footscray Issue Date : 04-Oct-2019
----:Sampler No. of samples received : 8
:Order number ---- No. of samples analysed : 8
This report is automatically generated by the ALS LIMS through interpretation of the ALS Quality Control Report and several Quality Assurance parameters measured by ALS. This automated
reporting highlights any non-conformances, facilitates faster and more accurate data validation and is designed to assist internal expert and external Auditor review. Many components of this
report contribute to the overall DQO assessment and reporting for guideline compliance.
Brief method summaries and references are also provided to assist in traceability.
Summary of Outliers
Outliers : Quality Control Samples
This report highlights outliers flagged in the Quality Control (QC) Report.
l NO Method Blank value outliers occur.
l NO Duplicate outliers occur.
l NO Laboratory Control outliers occur.
l NO Matrix Spike outliers occur.
l For all regular sample matrices, NO surrogate recovery outliers occur.
Outliers : Analysis Holding Time Compliance
l Analysis Holding Time Outliers exist - please see following pages for full details.
Outliers : Frequency of Quality Control Samples
l Quality Control Sample Frequency Outliers exist - please see following pages for full details.
R I G H T S O L U T I O N S | R I G H T P A R T N E R
2 of 6:Page
Work Order :
:Client
EB1925719
GOLDER ASSOCIATES
19127795 VHC Landfill:Project
Outliers : Analysis Holding Time Compliance
Matrix: WATER
AnalysisExtraction / Preparation
Date analysedDate extractedContainer / Client Sample ID(s) Days
overdue
Days
overdue
Due for extraction Due for analysis
Method
EP068A: Organochlorine Pesticides (OC)
Glass amber extract vial
----19-Sep-201965245 - EB1924599_001, 65246 - EB1924599_002,
65247 - EB1924599_003, DH1 - EB1924599_004,
DH2 - EB1924599_005, DH4 - EB1924599_006,
LT1 - EB1924599_007, SW1 - EB1924599_008
----20-Sep-2019 1 ----
EP071 SG: Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons - Silica gel cleanup
Glass amber extract vial
----19-Sep-201965247 - EB1924599_003, DH1 - EB1924599_004,
DH2 - EB1924599_005, LT1 - EB1924599_007,
SW1 - EB1924599_008
----20-Sep-2019 1 ----
EP071 SG: Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons - SV Silica gel cleanup
Glass amber extract vial
----19-Sep-201965247 - EB1924599_003, DH1 - EB1924599_004,
DH2 - EB1924599_005, LT1 - EB1924599_007,
SW1 - EB1924599_008
----20-Sep-2019 1 ----
EP071 SG: Total Recoverable Hydrocarbons - NEPM 2013 Fractions - Silica gel cleanup
Glass amber extract vial
----19-Sep-201965247 - EB1924599_003, DH1 - EB1924599_004,
DH2 - EB1924599_005, LT1 - EB1924599_007,
SW1 - EB1924599_008
----20-Sep-2019 1 ----
EP071 SG: Total Recoverable Hydrocarbons - SV NEPM 2013 Fractions - Silica gel cleanup
Glass amber extract vial
----19-Sep-201965247 - EB1924599_003, DH1 - EB1924599_004,
DH2 - EB1924599_005, LT1 - EB1924599_007,
SW1 - EB1924599_008
----20-Sep-2019 1 ----
EP075(SIM)A: Phenolic Compounds
Glass amber extract vial
----19-Sep-201965245 - EB1924599_001, 65246 - EB1924599_002,
65247 - EB1924599_003, DH1 - EB1924599_004,
DH2 - EB1924599_005, DH4 - EB1924599_006,
LT1 - EB1924599_007, SW1 - EB1924599_008
----20-Sep-2019 1 ----
EP075(SIM)B: Polynuclear Aromatic Hydrocarbons
Glass amber extract vial
----19-Sep-201965245 - EB1924599_001, 65246 - EB1924599_002,
65247 - EB1924599_003, DH1 - EB1924599_004,
DH2 - EB1924599_005, DH4 - EB1924599_006,
LT1 - EB1924599_007, SW1 - EB1924599_008
----20-Sep-2019 1 ----
Outliers : Frequency of Quality Control Samples
3 of 6:Page
Work Order :
:Client
EB1925719
GOLDER ASSOCIATES
19127795 VHC Landfill:Project
Matrix: WATER
Quality Control SpecificationQuality Control Sample Type
Method ExpectedQC Regular Actual
Rate (%)Quality Control Sample Type Count
Laboratory Duplicates (DUP)
NEPM 2013 B3 & ALS QC StandardPAH/Phenols (GC/MS - SIM) 0.00 10.000 8
NEPM 2013 B3 & ALS QC StandardPesticides by GCMS 0.00 10.000 8
Laboratory Control Samples (LCS)
NEPM 2013 B3 & ALS QC StandardPAH/Phenols (GC/MS - SIM) 0.00 5.000 8
NEPM 2013 B3 & ALS QC StandardPesticides by GCMS 0.00 5.000 8
Matrix Spikes (MS)
NEPM 2013 B3 & ALS QC StandardPAH/Phenols (GC/MS - SIM) 0.00 5.000 8
NEPM 2013 B3 & ALS QC StandardPesticides by GCMS 0.00 5.000 8
Analysis Holding Time Compliance
Holding times for VOC in soils vary according to analytes of interest. Vinyl Chloride and Styrene holding time is 7 days; others 14 days. A recorded breach does not guarantee a breach for all VOC analytes and
should be verified in case the reported breach is a false positive or Vinyl Chloride and Styrene are not key analytes of interest/concern.
Holding time for leachate methods (e.g. TCLP) vary according to the analytes reported. Assessment compares the leach date with the shortest analyte holding time for the equivalent soil method. These are: organics
14 days, mercury 28 days & other metals 180 days. A recorded breach does not guarantee a breach for all non-volatile parameters.
If samples are identified below as having been analysed or extracted outside of recommended holding times, this should be taken into consideration when interpreting results.
This report summarizes extraction / preparation and analysis times and compares each with ALS recommended holding times (referencing USEPA SW 846, APHA, AS and NEPM) based on the sample container
provided. Dates reported represent first date of extraction or analysis and preclude subsequent dilutions and reruns. A listing of breaches (if any) is provided herein.
Matrix: WATER Evaluation: û = Holding time breach ; ü = Within holding time.
AnalysisExtraction / PreparationSample DateMethod
EvaluationDue for analysisDate analysedEvaluationDue for extractionDate extractedContainer / Client Sample ID(s)
EP068A: Organochlorine Pesticides (OC)
Glass amber extract vial (EP068)
65245 - EB1924599_001, 65246 - EB1924599_002,
65247 - EB1924599_003, DH1 - EB1924599_004,
DH2 - EB1924599_005, DH4 - EB1924599_006,
LT1 - EB1924599_007, SW1 - EB1924599_008
30-Oct-201919-Sep-2019 02-Oct-201920-Sep-201912-Sep-2019 û ü
EP071 SG: Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons - Silica gel cleanup
Glass amber extract vial (EP071-SVSG)
65247 - EB1924599_003, DH1 - EB1924599_004,
DH2 - EB1924599_005, LT1 - EB1924599_007,
SW1 - EB1924599_008
30-Oct-201919-Sep-2019 02-Oct-201920-Sep-201912-Sep-2019 û ü
EP071 SG: Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons - SV Silica gel cleanup
Glass amber extract vial (EP071-SVSG)
65247 - EB1924599_003, DH1 - EB1924599_004,
DH2 - EB1924599_005, LT1 - EB1924599_007,
SW1 - EB1924599_008
30-Oct-201919-Sep-2019 02-Oct-201920-Sep-201912-Sep-2019 û ü
EP071 SG: Total Recoverable Hydrocarbons - NEPM 2013 Fractions - Silica gel cleanup
Glass amber extract vial (EP071-SVSG)
65247 - EB1924599_003, DH1 - EB1924599_004,
DH2 - EB1924599_005, LT1 - EB1924599_007,
SW1 - EB1924599_008
30-Oct-201919-Sep-2019 02-Oct-201920-Sep-201912-Sep-2019 û ü
4 of 6:Page
Work Order :
:Client
EB1925719
GOLDER ASSOCIATES
19127795 VHC Landfill:Project
Matrix: WATER Evaluation: û = Holding time breach ; ü = Within holding time.
AnalysisExtraction / PreparationSample DateMethod
EvaluationDue for analysisDate analysedEvaluationDue for extractionDate extractedContainer / Client Sample ID(s)
EP071 SG: Total Recoverable Hydrocarbons - SV NEPM 2013 Fractions - Silica gel cleanup
Glass amber extract vial (EP071-SVSG)
65247 - EB1924599_003, DH1 - EB1924599_004,
DH2 - EB1924599_005, LT1 - EB1924599_007,
SW1 - EB1924599_008
30-Oct-201919-Sep-2019 02-Oct-201920-Sep-201912-Sep-2019 û ü
EP075(SIM)A: Phenolic Compounds
Glass amber extract vial (EP075(SIM))
65245 - EB1924599_001, 65246 - EB1924599_002,
65247 - EB1924599_003, DH1 - EB1924599_004,
DH2 - EB1924599_005, DH4 - EB1924599_006,
LT1 - EB1924599_007, SW1 - EB1924599_008
30-Oct-201919-Sep-2019 02-Oct-201920-Sep-201912-Sep-2019 û ü
EP075(SIM)B: Polynuclear Aromatic Hydrocarbons
Glass amber extract vial (EP075(SIM))
65245 - EB1924599_001, 65246 - EB1924599_002,
65247 - EB1924599_003, DH1 - EB1924599_004,
DH2 - EB1924599_005, DH4 - EB1924599_006,
LT1 - EB1924599_007, SW1 - EB1924599_008
30-Oct-201919-Sep-2019 02-Oct-201920-Sep-201912-Sep-2019 û ü
5 of 6:Page
Work Order :
:Client
EB1925719
GOLDER ASSOCIATES
19127795 VHC Landfill:Project
Quality Control Parameter Frequency ComplianceThe following report summarises the frequency of laboratory QC samples analysed within the analytical lot(s) in which the submitted sample(s) was(were) processed. Actual rate should be greater than or equal to
the expected rate. A listing of breaches is provided in the Summary of Outliers.
Matrix: WATER Evaluation: û = Quality Control frequency not within specification ; ü = Quality Control frequency within specification.
Quality Control SpecificationQuality Control Sample Type
ExpectedQC Regular Actual
Rate (%)Quality Control Sample Type CountEvaluationAnalytical Methods Method
Laboratory Duplicates (DUP)
NEPM 2013 B3 & ALS QC Standard 0.00 10.000 8 ûPAH/Phenols (GC/MS - SIM) EP075(SIM)
NEPM 2013 B3 & ALS QC Standard 0.00 10.000 8 ûPesticides by GCMS EP068
Laboratory Control Samples (LCS)
NEPM 2013 B3 & ALS QC Standard 0.00 5.000 8 ûPAH/Phenols (GC/MS - SIM) EP075(SIM)
NEPM 2013 B3 & ALS QC Standard 0.00 5.000 8 ûPesticides by GCMS EP068
NEPM 2013 B3 & ALS QC Standard 20.00 5.001 5 üTRH - Semivolatile Fractions Only (after Silica Gel
Cleanup)
EP071-SVSG
Method Blanks (MB)
NEPM 2013 B3 & ALS QC Standard 12.50 5.001 8 üPAH/Phenols (GC/MS - SIM) EP075(SIM)
NEPM 2013 B3 & ALS QC Standard 12.50 5.001 8 üPesticides by GCMS EP068
NEPM 2013 B3 & ALS QC Standard 20.00 5.001 5 üTRH - Semivolatile Fractions Only (after Silica Gel
Cleanup)
EP071-SVSG
Matrix Spikes (MS)
NEPM 2013 B3 & ALS QC Standard 0.00 5.000 8 ûPAH/Phenols (GC/MS - SIM) EP075(SIM)
NEPM 2013 B3 & ALS QC Standard 0.00 5.000 8 ûPesticides by GCMS EP068
6 of 6:Page
Work Order :
:Client
EB1925719
GOLDER ASSOCIATES
19127795 VHC Landfill:Project
Brief Method SummariesThe analytical procedures used by the Environmental Division have been developed from established internationally recognized procedures such as those published by the US EPA, APHA, AS and NEPM. In house
developed procedures are employed in the absence of documented standards or by client request. The following report provides brief descriptions of the analytical procedures employed for results reported in the
Certificate of Analysis. Sources from which ALS methods have been developed are provided within the Method Descriptions.
Analytical Methods Method DescriptionsMatrixMethod
In house: Referenced to USEPA SW 846 - 8270D Sample extracts are analysed by Capillary GC/MS and
quantification is by comparison against an established 5 point calibration curve. This method is compliant with
NEPM (2013) Schedule B(3)
Pesticides by GCMS EP068 WATER
In house: Referenced to USEPA SW 846 - 8015A Sample extracts cleaned up using silica gel and are analysed
by Capillary GC/FID and quantified against alkane standards over the range C10 - C36. This method is
compliant with NEPM (2013) Schedule B(3) (Method 506.1)
TRH - Semivolatile Fractions Only (after
Silica Gel Cleanup)
EP071-SVSG WATER
In house: Referenced to USEPA SW 846 - 8270D Sample extracts are analysed by Capillary GC/MS in SIM Mode
and quantification is by comparison against an established 5 point calibration curve. This method is compliant
with NEPM (2013) Schedule B(3)
PAH/Phenols (GC/MS - SIM) EP075(SIM) WATER
Preparation Methods Method DescriptionsMatrixMethod
In house: Referenced to USEPA SW 846 - 3510B 100 mL to 1L of sample is transferred to a separatory funnel
and serially extracted three times using DCM for each extract. The resultant extracts are combined, dehydrated
and concentrated for analysis. This method is compliant with NEPM (2013) Schedule B(3) . ALS default excludes
sediment which may be resident in the container.
Separatory Funnel Extraction of Liquids ORG14 WATER
Environmental
SAMPLE RECEIPT NOTIFICATION (SRN)Work Order : EB1925719
:: LaboratoryClient Environmental Division BrisbaneGOLDER ASSOCIATES
: :ContactContact MR OWEN HENDER Kieren Burns
:: AddressAddress Level 3, 118 Franklin Street
ADELAIDE SA, AUSTRALIA 5000
2 Byth Street Stafford QLD Australia
4053
:: E-mailE-mail [email protected] [email protected]
:: TelephoneTelephone +61 08 8213 2100 +61881625130
:: FacsimileFacsimile +61 08 8213 2101 +61-7-3243 7218
::Project 19127795 VHC Landfill Page 1 of 3
:Order number ---- :Quote number EM2019GOLASS0035 (AD/044/19)
:C-O-C number ---- :QC Level NEPM 2013 B3 & ALS QC Standard
Site : Cowper Street, Footscray
Sampler :
DatesDate Samples Received : Issue Date : 27-Sep-201927-Sep-2019 10:33
Scheduled Reporting Date: 04-Oct-2019:Client Requested Due
Date
04-Oct-2019
Delivery DetailsMode of Delivery : :Samples On Hand Not AvailableSecurity Seal
No. of coolers/boxes : :---- Temperature ----
: : 8 / 8REBATCHReceipt Detail No. of samples received / analysed
General Comments
This report contains the following information:l
- Sample Container(s)/Preservation Non-Compliances
- Summary of Sample(s) and Requested Analysis
- Proactive Holding Time Report
- Requested Deliverables
l This workorder was created to rebatch samples from EB1924599l Discounted Package Prices apply only when specific ALS Group Codes ('W', 'S', 'NT' suites) are referenced on COCs.
l Please direct any turn around / technical queries to the laboratory contact designated above.
l Sample Disposal - Aqueous (3 weeks), Solid (2 months ± 1 week) from receipt of samples.
l Analysis will be conducted by ALS Environmental, Brisbane, NATA accreditation no. 825, Site No. 818 (Micro site no. 18958).
l Breaches in recommended extraction / analysis holding times (if any) are displayed overleaf in
the Proactive Holding Time Report table.l Please be aware that APHA/NEPM recommends water and soil samples be chilled to less than or equal to 6°C for chemical
analysis, and less than or equal to 10°C but unfrozen for Microbiological analysis. Where samples are received above this
temperature, it should be taken into consideration when interpreting results. Refer to ALS EnviroMail 85 for ALS
recommendations of the best practice for chilling samples after sampling and for maintaining a cool temperature during transit.
R I G H T S O L U T I O N S | R I G H T P A R T N E R
:Client GOLDER ASSOCIATES
Work Order : EB1925719 Amendment 02 of 3:Page
27-Sep-2019:Issue Date
Sample Container(s)/Preservation Non-Compliances
All comparisons are made against pretreatment/preservation AS, APHA, USEPA standards.
MethodSample Container Received Preferred Sample Container for AnalysisClient sample ID
PAH/Phenols (GC/MS - SIM) : EP075(SIM)
65245 EB1924599_001 - Glass amber extract vial - Amber Glass Bottle - Unpreserved
65246 EB1924599_002 - Glass amber extract vial - Amber Glass Bottle - Unpreserved
65247 EB1924599_003 - Glass amber extract vial - Amber Glass Bottle - Unpreserved
DH1 EB1924599_004 - Glass amber extract vial - Amber Glass Bottle - Unpreserved
DH2 EB1924599_005 - Glass amber extract vial - Amber Glass Bottle - Unpreserved
DH4 EB1924599_006 - Glass amber extract vial - Amber Glass Bottle - Unpreserved
LT1 EB1924599_007 - Glass amber extract vial - Amber Glass Bottle - Unpreserved
SW1 EB1924599_008 - Glass amber extract vial - Amber Glass Bottle - Unpreserved
Pesticides by GCMS : EP068
65245 EB1924599_001 - Glass amber extract vial - Amber Glass Bottle - Unpreserved
65246 EB1924599_002 - Glass amber extract vial - Amber Glass Bottle - Unpreserved
65247 EB1924599_003 - Glass amber extract vial - Amber Glass Bottle - Unpreserved
DH1 EB1924599_004 - Glass amber extract vial - Amber Glass Bottle - Unpreserved
DH2 EB1924599_005 - Glass amber extract vial - Amber Glass Bottle - Unpreserved
DH4 EB1924599_006 - Glass amber extract vial - Amber Glass Bottle - Unpreserved
LT1 EB1924599_007 - Glass amber extract vial - Amber Glass Bottle - Unpreserved
SW1 EB1924599_008 - Glass amber extract vial - Amber Glass Bottle - Unpreserved
Any sample identifications that cannot be displayed entirely in the analysis summary table will be listed below.
EB1925719-001 : [ 12-Sep-2019 ] : 65245 - EB1924599_001
EB1925719-002 : [ 12-Sep-2019 ] : 65246 - EB1924599_002
EB1925719-003 : [ 12-Sep-2019 ] : 65247 - EB1924599_003
Summary of Sample(s) and Requested Analysis
Some items described below may be part of a laboratory
process necessary for the execution of client requested
tasks. Packages may contain additional analyses, such
as the determination of moisture content and preparation
tasks, that are included in the package.
If no sampling time is provided, the sampling time will
default 00:00 on the date of sampling. If no sampling date
is provided, the sampling date will be assumed by the
laboratory and displayed in brackets without a time
component
WA
TE
R -
EP
06
8A
(O
C)
OC
Pe
stic
ide
s
WA
TE
R -
EP
07
1-S
VS
G
TR
H -
Se
miv
ola
tile
Fra
ctio
ns
On
ly (
afte
r S
ilica
WA
TE
R -
EP
07
5 S
IM P
AH
on
ly
SIM
- P
AH
on
ly
WA
TE
R -
EP
07
5 S
IM P
he
no
ls o
nly
SIM
- P
he
no
ls o
nly
EB1925719-001 12-Sep-2019 00:00 65245 EB1924599_001 ü ü ü
EB1925719-002 12-Sep-2019 00:00 65246 EB1924599_002 ü ü ü
EB1925719-003 12-Sep-2019 00:00 65247 EB1924599_003 ü ü ü ü
EB1925719-004 12-Sep-2019 00:00 DH1 EB1924599_004 ü ü ü ü
EB1925719-005 12-Sep-2019 00:00 DH2 EB1924599_005 ü ü ü ü
EB1925719-006 12-Sep-2019 00:00 DH4 EB1924599_006 ü ü ü
EB1925719-007 12-Sep-2019 00:00 LT1 EB1924599_007 ü ü ü ü
EB1925719-008 12-Sep-2019 00:00 SW1 EB1924599_008 ü ü ü ü
Matrix: WATER
Client sample IDLaboratory sample
ID
Client sampling
date / time
Proactive Holding Time Report
The following table summarises breaches of recommended holding times that have occurred prior to samples/instructions being
received at the laboratory.
Evaluation: û = Holding time breach ; ü = Within holding time. Matrix: WATER
EvaluationClient Sample ID(s)
Due for
extraction
Due for
analysis Evaluation
Samples Received Instructions Received
Date Date
Method
Container
EP068: Pesticides by GCMS
65245 û --------27-Sep-201930-Oct-201919-Sep-2019Glass amber extract vial
65246 û --------27-Sep-201930-Oct-201919-Sep-2019Glass amber extract vial
:Client GOLDER ASSOCIATES
Work Order : EB1925719 Amendment 03 of 3:Page
27-Sep-2019:Issue Date
65247 û --------27-Sep-201930-Oct-201919-Sep-2019Glass amber extract vial
DH1 û --------27-Sep-201930-Oct-201919-Sep-2019Glass amber extract vial
DH2 û --------27-Sep-201930-Oct-201919-Sep-2019Glass amber extract vial
DH4 û --------27-Sep-201930-Oct-201919-Sep-2019Glass amber extract vial
LT1 û --------27-Sep-201930-Oct-201919-Sep-2019Glass amber extract vial
SW1 û --------27-Sep-201930-Oct-201919-Sep-2019Glass amber extract vial
EP071-SVSG: TRH - Semivolatile Fractions Only (after Silica Gel Cleanup)
65247 û --------27-Sep-201930-Oct-201919-Sep-2019Glass amber extract vial
DH1 û --------27-Sep-201930-Oct-201919-Sep-2019Glass amber extract vial
DH2 û --------27-Sep-201930-Oct-201919-Sep-2019Glass amber extract vial
LT1 û --------27-Sep-201930-Oct-201919-Sep-2019Glass amber extract vial
SW1 û --------27-Sep-201930-Oct-201919-Sep-2019Glass amber extract vial
EP075(SIM): PAH/Phenols (GC/MS - SIM)
65245 û --------27-Sep-201930-Oct-201919-Sep-2019Glass amber extract vial
65246 û --------27-Sep-201930-Oct-201919-Sep-2019Glass amber extract vial
65247 û --------27-Sep-201930-Oct-201919-Sep-2019Glass amber extract vial
DH1 û --------27-Sep-201930-Oct-201919-Sep-2019Glass amber extract vial
DH2 û --------27-Sep-201930-Oct-201919-Sep-2019Glass amber extract vial
DH4 û --------27-Sep-201930-Oct-201919-Sep-2019Glass amber extract vial
LT1 û --------27-Sep-201930-Oct-201919-Sep-2019Glass amber extract vial
SW1 û --------27-Sep-201930-Oct-201919-Sep-2019Glass amber extract vial
Requested Deliverables
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE
- A4 - AU Tax Invoice (INV) Email [email protected]
u
JOSH INNES
- *AU Certificate of Analysis - NATA (COA) Email [email protected]
- *AU Interpretive QC Report - DEFAULT (Anon QCI Rep) (QCI) Email [email protected]
- *AU QC Report - DEFAULT (Anon QC Rep) - NATA (QC) Email [email protected]
- A4 - AU Sample Receipt Notification - Environmental HT (SRN) Email [email protected]
- A4 - AU Tax Invoice (INV) Email [email protected]
- Chain of Custody (CoC) (COC) Email [email protected]
- EDI Format - ENMRG (ENMRG) Email [email protected]
- EDI Format - ESDAT (ESDAT) Email [email protected]
- EDI Format - XTab (XTAB) Email [email protected]
OWEN HENDER
- *AU Certificate of Analysis - NATA (COA) Email [email protected]
- *AU Interpretive QC Report - DEFAULT (Anon QCI Rep) (QCI) Email [email protected]
- *AU QC Report - DEFAULT (Anon QC Rep) - NATA (QC) Email [email protected]
- A4 - AU Sample Receipt Notification - Environmental HT (SRN) Email [email protected]
- A4 - AU Tax Invoice (INV) Email [email protected]
- Chain of Custody (CoC) (COC) Email [email protected]
- EDI Format - ENMRG (ENMRG) Email [email protected]
- EDI Format - ESDAT (ESDAT) Email [email protected]
- EDI Format - XTab (XTAB) Email [email protected]
11 November 2019 19127795-001-R-Rev0
APPENDIX E
QAQC
19127795
Appendix E
Number of Primary Samples: Number of Triplicate Samples:Number of Duplicate Samples: Number of Other QAQC Samples:
Sample volumes sufficient for QC analysis?
TypeMB Method Blank TB TB01 12-Sep-19RB R01 12-Sep-19
Batch Number Analyte(s)EB1924599 SulfateEB1924599 ChlorideEB1924599 Nitrite and Nitrate (as N)
Batch Number Analyte(s) Sample IDEB1924599 TRH - Semivolatile Fraction Unknown 10.00% expected, 8.00% actual
All other LD results from ALS and Eurofins were within the laboratory control limits.
Analyte Group Primary ID Duplicate IDMetals - Iron 65245 DUP1A
Total Organic Carbon 65245 DUP1A
Analyte Group Primary ID Triplicate IDMetals - Arsenic 65245 DUP1BMetals - Copper 65245 DUP1B RPD of 67: Concentration difference is only 0.001 mg/L between samples, RPD acceptable
Metals - Iron 65245 DUP1B RPD of 24: Primary concentration still larger than DUP1B
Analyte Group Analyte(s)
Note: Data validation assesses each analyte in terms of all the data validation variables and only the exceedances and outliers are reported in this form.*When concentrations are less than the LOR for both primary and duplicate/triplicate results, no RPDs are calculated
Performed By: Josh Innes James ColeyDate: 17/10/2019 5/11/2019
DATA VALIDATION SUMMARY SHEET
RPD of 120: Duplicate recorded a value <LOR indicating low precision.
MS Recovery not determined, background level greater than or equal to 4x spike levelMS Recovery not determined, background level greater than or equal to 4x spike level
The minor holding time breaches are considered unlikely to impact on the interpretations within this report as all data was within the expected range based on previous monitoring.
RPD of 40: Concentration difference is only 0.001 mg/L between samples, RPD acceptable
No method blank outliers occurredAll results were below LOR
Comments
COC completed properly? Y
Laboratory reports signed by authorised personnel? Y
Surrogate Compound Monitoring Analyses
FD and FT results exceeding an RPD of 20 had a primary concentration greater than the duplicate sample. The elevated RPDs are generally a result of low precision that is typically associated with comparison of analyte concentrations close to labortory limts of reporting.
Laboratory Duplicates (LD) AnalysesComments
CommentsRPD of 193: Duplicate recorded a value <LOR indicating low precision.
Field Triplicates (FT) Analyses - QC OutliersComments
Comments
Overall Comments
Y
N
R01 Metals above LOR (Arsenic, Boron, Chromium, Copper, Iron, Lead, Nickel, and Zinc)1
Y/N CommentsSigned by field and laboratory personnel.
All requested analysis completed? Y
Chromatograms supplied as appropriate?Are there non-NATA accredited methods used? N
Samples received intact and chilled? Y ALS: 11.4-18.1 °C ice bricks present. Intact.
Samples analysed within appropiate holding times? EB1924599: A holding time breach of 7 days for pH, 5 days for Nitrite and BOD for 8 sample. EB1925719: A holding breach of 1 day for OC, TRH, Phenols, PAH
Y
QAQC Sample Information (Method Blank - MB, Rinsate Blank - RB, Field Blank - FB, Trip Blank - TB) Sample ID
Project Name: Victor Harbor Council - Landfill GME Project Number: 19127795
1 2Documentation and Sample Handling Information
Date Sampled: 12/09/2019 Sample Medium: WaterSample Information
8 1
Primary Laboratory: ALS Workorder Number: EB1924599, EB1925719Secondary Laboratory: Eurofins Workorder Number: 678159
Date:
Field Duplicates (FD) Analyses- QC Outliers
Rinse Blank R01 had results above the LOR in all metals (excluding cadmium). R01 was taken after sampling well 65245 and prior to sampling DH4. Results in both wells for cadmium, chromium, copper, lead, mercury and zinc (DH4) were all reported below the LOR, suggesting metals detected in R01 were not assocaited with cross contamination from either well. The elevated concentrations of metals in R01 may be assocaited with laboratory supplied water. Metals results in primary samplers were within historical results. It is considered unlikely that samples were impacted as a result of cross contamination from sampling equipment.
Checked By:
This batch has been validated and is considered suitable for environmental interpretive use.
All surrogates were within the laboratory control limits.
Matrix Spike (MS) AnalysesComments
Laboratory Control Spike (LCS) AnalysesAnalyte Group Comments
All LCS results were within laboratory control limits.
All other ALS & Eurofins MS recoveries were within laboratory control limits.
MS Recovery not determined, background level greater than or equal to 4x spike level
Golder Associates Pty Ltd. \\golderassociates.sharepoint.com@SSL\DavWWWRoot\sites\113196\Project Files\6 Deliverables\Appendix E - QAQC\1. Data Validation
11 November 2019 19127795-001-R-Rev0
APPENDIX F
Waterconnect
10/15/2019 Groundwater Data
https://www.waterconnect.sa.gov.au/_layouts/15/dfw.sharepoint.wdd/Print.aspx 1/1
Circle Centre -35.59633,138.575183, Radius 2km
Except where otherwise noted this work is licensed under a Crea� ve Commons A� ribu� on 3.0 Australia License © Crown in right of the State of South AustraliaMap data ©2019 Imagery ©2019 , CNES / Airbus, Maxar TechnologiesReport a map error
Appendix F
WaterConnect Register Search
Project Number: 19127795 Purpose StatusProject: VHC Landfill GME 2019 APN: Anode Protection FND: Foundations REC: Recharge ABD: Abandoned NOP: Not Operational
Site Address: Jagger Road, Waitpinga APP: Appraisal GEN: General Usage RHL: Rock Hole BKF: Backfilled UFL: Uncontrolled flowingSearch Date: 15/10/2019 ASR: Aquifer Storage and Recovery GTH: Geothermal Energy RIV: River CFL: Controlled flowing UKN: UnknownPrepared by: JI CMT: Construction Materials HOL: Water Hole SCI: Scientific NL: Not located RHB: RehabilitatedChecked by: OH COA: Coal IND: Industrial SEA: Sea Water OPR: Operational
DAM: Dam INV: Investigation SEI: Seismic StatusDEP: Deepening IRR: Irrigation SOK: Soak DEV: Development LAK: Lake SPR: Spring DOM: Domestic LWD: Liquid Waste Disposal STK: Stock
Acronyms DRN: Drainage MON: Monitoring TNK: Tank Search Radius: 2 kmEC: Electrical Conductivity (µS/cm) DWT: Dewatering MWS: Mine Water Supply TWS: Town Water Supply Total number of wells: 46TDS: Total Dissolved Solids (mg/L) ENV: Environmental OBS: Observation UKN: Uknown Number of onsite wells: 7RWL: Relative standing water level ETH: Earthing PRO: Production WAS: Waste Disposal Inferred shallow wells (<20 m): 19SWL: Standing water level EXP: Exploration RCL: Recreational Min: 230
FIR: Fire Fighting RDC: Road Construction / Maintenance Max: 17692
Unit_No Drillhole AquiferMax drill
depthMax drill
datePurpose
Latest status
Latest status date
SWL RSWLWater level
dateTDS EC Salinity date pH pH date Yield Yield date
6626-485 WW Ek 91 5/02/2014 8.0 5/02/2014 2642 4730 5/02/2014 16626-233 WW Ek 90 24/11/1983 IRR OPR 24/11/1983 1.0 102.3 24/11/1983 1228 2220 23/11/1983 16626-256 WW Ek 75 13/03/1987 STK OPR 13/03/1987 5.0 138.1 13/03/1987 542 985 2/04/1987 06626-413 WW Ek 73 9/06/2004 MON 62.0 32.9 9/06/20046626-414 WW Ek 64 12/06/2004 MON 60.0 27.3 12/06/20046626-282 WW Ek 57 26/03/1991 INVOBS FL 26/03/1991 -1.6 110.7 31/07/1991 3303 5890 23/03/1991 8 23/03/1991 3 7.926626-285 WW Ek 57 26/03/1991 INV OPR 26/08/1991 -1.6 110.7 31/07/1991 3035 5420 17/10/1991 8 17/10/1991 3 8.26626-286 WW Ek 57 26/03/1991 INV FL 26/03/1991 -1.6 110.7 31/07/1991 3322 5920 23/03/1991 8 23/03/1991 3 86626-283 WW Ek 48 28/03/1991 INV OPR 28/03/1994 8.2 111.6 31/07/1991 1687 3040 26/03/1991 8 26/03/1991 1 8.316626-287 WW Ek 48 28/03/1991 INV OPR 28/03/1991 8.4 111.4 31/07/1991 1513 2730 17/10/1991 8 17/10/1991 1 7.546626-288 WW Ek 48 28/03/1991 INV OPR 28/03/1991 8.6 111.2 31/07/1991 1149 2080 17/10/1991 7 17/10/1991 1 7.486626-432 WW Elb 43 21/03/2006 INV 29.7 70.5 21/03/20066626-411 WW Ek 40 26/05/2004 STK 14.0 97.8 26/05/2004 6389 11150 25/05/2004 56626-13 WW Ek 36.58 STK OPR 11/05/1976 6.1 101.7 11/05/1976 4215 7471 2/12/1969 7 2/12/1969 1 76626-15 WW CP-j 33.5 11/05/1976 STK OPR 11/05/1976 6.1 117.3 11/05/1976 2085 3749 2/12/1969 8 2/12/1969 1 8
6626-421 WW, Strat Elb 33.2 23/04/2005 MON 22.9 70.6 23/04/20056626-431 WW Elb 29.5 23/03/2006 MON 29.0 67.4 23/03/20066626-17 WW CP-j 27.43 2/12/1969 ABD 2/12/19696626-26 WW Ek 16.7 13/05/1976 STK ABD 3/12/1969
6626-412 WW Ek 14 6/06/2004 MON 4.0 92.8 6/06/20046626-28 WW Ek 8.23 STK OPR 3/12/1969 3.1 33.6 4/05/1954 230 418 3/12/1969 7 3/12/1969 6.5
6626-420 WW Elb 8 10/05/2005 MON6626-32 WW Ek 7.4 8/11/1974 STK OPR 8/11/1974 71.7 8/11/1974 1300 2350 8/11/1974 7 8/11/1974 0 6.7
6626-292 WW Q 5.49 1/02/1991 OBS UKN6626-297 WW Q 5.45 1/02/1991 OBS UKN 17692 29000 1/02/19916626-294 WW Q 5.26 1/02/1991 OBS UKN 9576 16434 1/02/19916626-208 WW Q 4.88 22/02/1971 DRY 22/02/19716626-299 WW Q 3.89 1/02/1991 OBS UKN -0.5 109.96626-290 WW Q 3.49 1/02/1991 OBS UKN6626-24 WW CP-j 2.74 2/12/1969 DOMSTK OPR 1/12/1969 1.4 84.4 2/12/1969 255 464 2/12/1969 6 2/12/1969 6
6626-289 WW Q 2.5 1/02/1991 OBS UKN6626-295 WW Q 2.23 1/02/1991 OBS UKN6626-293 WW Q 2.15 1/02/1991 OBS UKN 11350 19268 1/02/19916626-298 WW Q 2.15 1/02/1991 OBS UKN6626-291 WW Q 2.02 1/02/1991 OBS UKN6626-25 WW CP-j 1.68 2/12/1969 DOMSTK OPR 2/12/1969 89.7 2/12/1969 255 464 2/12/1969 6 2/12/1969 6
6626-296 WW Q 0.68 1/02/1991 OBS UKN6626-16 WW ABD 2/12/19696626-19 WW CP-j STK NL 1/12/1969 10635 18119 26/01/19376626-20 WP SOK 3455 6155 22/02/1971 8 22/02/1971 86626-21 WP SPR 3530 6285 3/12/1969 8 3/12/1969 86626-22 WP SPR 9255 15913 2/12/1969 8 2/12/1969 86626-23 WP SOKSTK 530 964 2/12/1969 7 2/12/1969 76626-27 WP SPR 2415 4332 3/12/1969 8 3/12/1969 86626-29 WP SOKSTK 3170 5659 3/12/1969 8 3/12/1969 86626-30 WP SPR 3385 6032 3/12/1969 8 3/12/1969 8
Salinity in wells(TDS in mg/L)
Well Search Summary
Appendix F
WaterConnect Register Search
Project Number: 19127795 Purpose StatusProject: VHC Landfill GME 2019 APN: Anode Protection FND: Foundations REC: Recharge ABD: Abandoned NOP: Not Operational
Site Address: Jagger Road, Waitpinga APP: Appraisal GEN: General Usage RHL: Rock Hole BKF: Backfilled UFL: Uncontrolled flowingSearch Date: 15/10/2019 ASR: Aquifer Storage and Recovery GTH: Geothermal Energy RIV: River CFL: Controlled flowing UKN: UnknownPrepared by: JI CMT: Construction Materials HOL: Water Hole SCI: Scientific NL: Not located RHB: RehabilitatedChecked by: OH COA: Coal IND: Industrial SEA: Sea Water OPR: Operational
DAM: Dam INV: Investigation SEI: Seismic StatusDEP: Deepening IRR: Irrigation SOK: Soak DEV: Development LAK: Lake SPR: Spring DOM: Domestic LWD: Liquid Waste Disposal STK: Stock
Acronyms DRN: Drainage MON: Monitoring TNK: Tank Search Radius: 2 kmEC: Electrical Conductivity (µS/cm) DWT: Dewatering MWS: Mine Water Supply TWS: Town Water Supply Total number of wells: 46TDS: Total Dissolved Solids (mg/L) ENV: Environmental OBS: Observation UKN: Uknown Number of onsite wells: 7RWL: Relative standing water level ETH: Earthing PRO: Production WAS: Waste Disposal Inferred shallow wells (<20 m): 19SWL: Standing water level EXP: Exploration RCL: Recreational Min: 230
FIR: Fire Fighting RDC: Road Construction / Maintenance Max: 17692
Unit_No Drillhole AquiferMax drill
depthMax drill
datePurpose
Latest status
Latest status date
SWL RSWLWater level
dateTDS EC Salinity date pH pH date Yield Yield date
Salinity in wells(TDS in mg/L)
Well Search Summary
11 November 2019 19127795-001-R-Rev0
APPENDIX G
Important Information
GOLDER ASSOCIATES PTY LTD IMPORTANT INFORMATION RELATING TO THIS REPORT
Error! Unknown document property name. Page 1 of 1 GAP Form No. LEG04 RL2
5/2018
The document (“Report”) to which this page is attached and which this page forms a part of, has been issued by Golder Associates Pty Ltd (“Golder”) subject to the important limitations and other qualifications set out below.
This Report constitutes or is part of services (“Services”) provided by Golder to its client (“Client”) under and subject to a contract between Golder and its Client (“Contract”). The contents of this page are not intended to and do not alter Golder’s obligations (including any limits on those obligations) to its Client under the Contract.
This Report is provided for use solely by Golder’s Client and persons acting on the Client’s behalf, such as its professional advisers. Golder is responsible only to its Client for this Report. Golder has no responsibility to any other person who relies or makes decisions based upon this Report or who makes any other use of this Report. Golder accepts no responsibility for any loss or damage suffered by any person other than its Client as a result of any reliance upon any part of this Report, decisions made based upon this Report or any other use of it.
This Report has been prepared in the context of the circumstances and purposes referred to in, or derived from, the Contract and Golder accepts no responsibility for use of the Report, in whole or in part, in any other context or circumstance or for any other purpose.
The scope of Golder’s Services and the period of time they relate to are determined by the Contract and are subject to restrictions and limitations set out in the Contract. If a service or other work is not expressly referred to in this Report, do not assume that it has been provided or performed. If a matter is not addressed in this Report, do not assume that any determination has been made by Golder in regards to it.
At any location relevant to the Services conditions may exist which were not detected by Golder, in particular due to the specific scope of the investigation Golder has been engaged to undertake. Conditions can only be verified at the exact location of any tests undertaken. Variations in conditions may occur between tested locations and there may be conditions which have not been revealed by the investigation and which have not therefore been taken into account in this Report.
Golder accepts no responsibility for and makes no representation as to the accuracy or completeness of the information provided to it by or on behalf of the Client or sourced from any third party. Golder has assumed that such information is correct unless otherwise stated and no responsibility is accepted by Golder for incomplete or inaccurate data supplied by its Client or any other person for whom Golder is not responsible. Golder has not taken account of matters that may have existed when the Report was prepared but which were only later disclosed to Golder.
Having regard to the matters referred to in the previous paragraphs on this page in particular, carrying out the Services has allowed Golder to form no more than an opinion as to the actual conditions at any relevant location. That opinion is necessarily constrained by the extent of the information collected by Golder or otherwise made available to Golder. Further, the passage of time may affect the accuracy, applicability or usefulness of the opinions, assessments or other information in this Report. This Report is based upon the information and other circumstances that existed and were known to Golder when the Services were performed and this Report was prepared. Golder has not considered the effect of any possible future developments including physical changes to any relevant location or changes to any laws or regulations relevant to such location.
Where permitted by the Contract, Golder may have retained subconsultants affiliated with Golder to provide some or all of the Services. However, it is Golder which remains solely responsible for the Services and there is no legal recourse against any of Golder’s affiliated companies or the employees, officers or directors of any of them.
By date, or revision, the Report supersedes any prior report or other document issued by Golder dealing with any matter that is addressed in the Report.
Any uncertainty as to the extent to which this Report can be used or relied upon in any respect should be referred to Golder for clarification
golder.com