REPORT OF THE FINANCE COMMITTEE

AUGUST 18, 2021

A meeting of the Finance Committee was held on Wednesday, August 18, 2021, at 7:00 p.m. in the Aldermanic Chamber and via Zoom. The meeting link information can be found on the agenda. Mayor Jim Donchess, Chairman, presided. Members of the Committee present: Alderman-at-Large Michael B. O’Brien Alderwoman-at-Large Shoshanna Kelly Alderwoman Elizabeth Lu Alderman Linda Harriott-Gathright Members not in Attendance: Alderman Patricia Klee, Vice Chair Alderman-at-Large Brandon Michael Laws Also in Attendance: John Griffin, CFO/Comptroller David Fredette, Treasurer/Tax Collector Kim Kleiner, Administrative Services Director Nick Miseirvitch, Deputy IT Director Kelly Parkinson, Purchasing Manager Dan Hudson, City Engineer Steve Buxton, Deputy Fire Chief Alderman Jan Schmidt ____________________________________________________________________________________ PUBLIC COMMENT Laurie Ortolano Laurie Ortolano, 41 Berkeley Street. I just noticed the change order that’s put in for the energy upgrade at Wastewater and I was wondering when you talk about it if you could tell me when that project was started and the completion date. When I look at the contract, I can’t quite tell when this project is expected to be done and that’s my only comment. Thank you. Mayor Donchess Any other members of the public wish to address the Committee? All right, we’ll go on to Communications. COMMUNICATIONS From: Kelly Parkinson, Purchasing Manager Re: Software & Hardware Maintenance in the amount not to exceed $74,406.81 funded from accounts

54407 Software Maintenance & 54412 Hardware Maintenance MOTION BY ALDERMAN HARRIOTT-GATHRIGHT TO ACCEPT, PLACE ON FILE AND APPROVE THE ANNUAL RENEWAL FOR KRONOS SOFTWARE MAINTENANCE WITH KRONOS, INC., A UKG COMPANY, IN AN AMOUNT NOT TO EXCEED $74,406.81. FUNDING WILL BE THROUGH: DEPARTMENT 122 INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY; FUND: 54412 HARDWARE MAINTENANCE - $14,107.59 AND 54407 SOFTWARE MAINTENANCE - $60,299.22 ON THE QUESTION

Finance Committee – 08/18/2021 Page 2 Kim Kleiner, Administrative Services Director Good evening Mayor. I actually asked Nick Miseirvitch to attend so that he may answer the Committee’s questions. Mayor Donchess So please just give us a brief outline of what the contract is for. Nick Miseirvitch, Deputy IT Director This is for the annual software support and maintenance and hardware support for our KRONOS environment that services the entire citywide employees. This is a yearly item so you’ll be seeing me every year around this time on this item. Mayor Donchess Any questions, comments from the Committee? Do we have anybody attending remotely? We also have Alderwoman Jan Schmidt here present via Zoom but I don’t believe she’s a member of the Committee. Since we have no committee members attending remotely, all those in favor, opposed. MOTION CARRIED From: Kelly Parkinson, Purchasing Manager Re: Energy Recovery Upgrades Change Order in the amount not to exceed $200,000 funded from

accounts 81300 Machinery & Equipment Mayor Donchess Before we do the motion, there is an amended communication on this, right? Daniel Hudson, City Engineer Yes there is. There was some confusion due to a price change between BPW approval and tonight’s agenda. Mayor Donchess So would the proper motion be the same except that the $200,000 would be substituted for $230,000? Daniel Hudson, City Engineer That’s correct Mr. Mayor. Mayor Donchess If there’s no objection, we will accept the new communication as a substitute for the old. To begin, I will call on Alderman Harriott-Gathright to make the motion with the understanding that the not to exceed 230 has now become not to exceed 200. MOTION BY ALDERMAN TO ACCEPT, PLACE ON FILE AND APPROVE CHANGE ORDER #8 TO THE ENERGY RECOVERY UPGRADE CONTRACT WITH METHUEN CONSTRUCTION COMPANY OF PLAISTOW, NH, IN AN AMOUNT NOT TO EXCEED $200,000 FOR FINAL COMPLETION OF REMAINING WORK FOR UPGRADES TO THE ENERGY RECOVERY FACILITY. FUNDING WIL BE THROUGH: DEPARTMENT 169 – WASTEWATER; FUND: WASTEWATER; ACTIVITY: ENERGY RECOVERY UPGRADE PROJECT

Finance Committee – 08/18/2021 Page 3 ON THE QUESTION Mayor Donchess You’ve heard the motion. Now Mr. Hudson could you please summarize the need for the change order in the context of discussion that if you have information regarding when the project began and when I may end. Could you please give us that as well? Daniel Hudson, City Engineer Mr. Mayor I’ll do my best. Unfortunately Superintendent Boucher could not be here tonight. He’s on a vacation so I’m doing my best to fill in here for him. This energy recovery project just as a little background it’s a project to take digester gas and run it through a turbine which generates power. So where in the past at the plant they would simply flair off the excessive gas created by the waste process. This will actually utilize that gas to generate energy and help offset some of the energy costs that the city has to run this plant. This plant obviously had lots of pumps and things that uses a lot of energy. Speaking to Mrs. Ortolano’ s question, I don’t have a specific contract start date. I’m aware that this project was bid out in August of 2018 or so and I believe started in 2019. It’s been a long project to be coming to fruition. We’re close but we’re not there quite yet and we don’t have a specific end date. We had to send a meter back for calibration so we’re waiting for that to come back. Then the system is running on digester gas and we’re permitted for that but is a setup to blend natural gas in cases where digested gas doesn’t have sufficient BTUs to run it just on that. There’s still a little bit of fine tuning I guess I would characterize it as to complete this. I expect that will be done this fall. Again, I don’t have a specific end date. This change order is to address delays in the project that occurred. A few things were encountered where one of the generators is going to go. There was some conduits under the floor. There’s a little bit of delay there while they created a plan to address that. Relocated some facilities. There was also a delay in determining how to hang some pipes in the building. There was a system that had to be developed for that because the plant system wouldn’t work. Those are some major items and the rest is miscellaneous costs to complete the remaining work and change order items which we negotiated and mutually agreed with Methuen Construction on. It’s been a long time coming. The good news is that this change order will get us across the finish line but it has taken a long time to come to fruition as noted. It’s a very complex project that you can imagine – complex system, complex construction, complex permitting. That’s what I had to share with you. I’d be happy to try to address any questions. Mayor Donchess Question or comments from committee members? MOTION CARRIED From: Kelly Parkinson, Purchasing Manager Re: Personal Protective Clothing & Equipment in the amount not to exceed $29,800.40 funded from

accounts 61110 Protective Clothing MOTION BY ALDERMAN HARRIOTT-GATHRIGHT TO ACCEPT, PLACE ON FILE AND APPROVE THE PROCUREMENT OF FOURTEEN (14) SETS OF PERSONAL PROTECTIVE EQUIPMENT (PPE) FROM BERGERON CLOTHING IN AN AMOUNT NOT TO EXCEED $29,800.40. FUNDING WILL BE THROUGH DEPARTMENT 152 FIRE RESCUE; FUND: 61110 PROTECTIVE CLOTHING ON THE QUESTION

Finance Committee – 08/18/2021 Page 4 Steve Buxton, Assistant Fire Chief Good evening. Steve Buxton, Assistant Chief, Nashua Fire. The fourteen sets are to put protective clothing on the backs of our recent hires. Those are to fill 14 positions that were created through retirement or departures from the department at this point in time. The funding comes from our normal protective clothing budget line and this is a normal process. The group is a little bit bigger because it is two years in the making due to COVID. Usually we had between 7 and 10 employees that come and go throughout the year. So 14 is a little bit larger number than normal. Mayor Donchess Thank you. Questions? Comments? Alderman O’Brien Mr. Mayor and to the Clerk, please excuse me it might be my hearing issues but when you gave the dollar amount did you say $.40 and if not may I just to make sure when it gets transcribed the amount we’re talking about is $29,800.40. I don’t know if you said the $.40. If you did, I apologize. It’s the hearing. Mayor Donchess If we can save $.40 we’ll do it right Chief? Steve Buxton, Assistant Fire Chief Yes. I will muscle that through it you need me to. Alderman O’Brien I’m worried about the 40. Every dollar counts. Alderwoman Lu I also have a hearing problem. I didn’t hear what account this is coming out of. Was it the general fund? Alderman Harriott-Gathright Department 152 Fire Rescue and funds – 61110 protective clothing. Alderwoman Lu Okay. All right. So that would be the general fund, correct? Mayor Donchess Correct. It’s out of the fire budget but that’s vetted through city tax revenue. Alderwoman Lu I just had another out of curiosity. How many retirees has the department had that are being filled? Steve Buxton, Assistant Fire Chief So these 14 were to fill vacancies in the suppression floors. Since we’ve filled that, we’ve had 4 members

Finance Committee – 08/18/2021 Page 5 come and go since we started the hiring process back in October I guess it was. So it’s a lengthy process we put them through but like I said, it’s normal to have somewhere between 7 and 10 per year. Alderwoman Lu No I understand. Is this for 7 people or – they have 2… Steve Buxton, Assistant Fire Chief 14 because we did not hire in 2020 due to the COVID pandemic. We didn’t have the ability when it first got started. We tend to hire in the spring. The weather works a little bit more in our favor for our recruit school and a couple of other factors. If you remember correctly in 2020, the pandemic was just getting started and we were trying to flatten the curve for a couple of weeks there and we missed the bus in hiring at that point in time. Alderwoman Lu Okay thank you. Alderman Harriott-Gathright Just wondering since – were you able to use any of the pandemic funding for any of this type of equipment or that’s not the norm since we are still in a pandemic. Just curious. Steve Buxton, Assistant Fire Chief No we weren’t able to use any of the pandemic funding for that at this point in time. Most of that comes from City Hall. We do have a line in our budget that funds this and it does usually account for the attrition factor within the organization so retirements, departures, and the like. MOTION CARRIED UNFINISHED BUSINESS - None NEW BUSINESS – RESOLUTIONS - None NEW BUSINESS – ORDINANCES - None RECORD OF EXPENDITURES MOTION BY ALDERMAN HARRIOTT-GATHRIGHT THAT THE FINANCE COMMITTEE HAS COMPLIED WITH THE CITY CHARTER AND ORDINANCES PERTAINING TO THE RECORD OF EXPENDITURES FOR THE PERIOD FROM JULY 30, 2021 TO AUGUST 12, 2021 ON THE QUESTION Alderwoman Lu I had a couple of questions. If I could just ask about the overlay account 11500. There was a $21,000 payment and it seems to be a payment to the same people who received an abatement. I had hoped that CFO Griffin could just answer and help me with that question. It was one of the questions I sent to you today but I know you weren’t able to address it. John Griffin, CFO CFO Griffin. Thank you Mr. Chairman. Yes as Alderwoman Lu indicated, she had send me some questions

Finance Committee – 08/18/2021 Page 6 today but I was unfortunately tied up in a series of meetings. I will be addressing each and every one of those questions tomorrow but if there is a charge to account 11500 overlay, it’s either a consultant person which I think this isn’t or it’s the charge that gives them back their amount of abatement but I can check tomorrow. Alderwoman Lu I thought that the abatement was coded 21780? In the past it has been. John Griffin, CFO Right. Just for clarification, the 21780 is we’ve talked a lot about it over the last year or so. That’s the refunds that includes overpayments, abatements, etc. The charge to the overlay account is generally for abatements and any consultants that work on behalf of the city but I will definitely verify and get an exact number and I will also check to see 21780 if it was coded as a refund. I’ll definitely get an answer. Alderwoman Lu If you’d like, we can talk when you have a chance to review my questions. John Griffin, CFO Sure. Alderwoman Lu Okay. Thank you. I’ll wait to vote on it after I’ve reviewed. Mayor Donchess Okay. Any other questions or comments? MOTION CARRIED GENERAL DISCUSSION - None PUBLIC COMMENT Laurie Ortolano Laurie Ortolano, 41 Berkeley Street. Hi. Good evening. I just wanted to talk to you a little bit about the use of subcommittees when we’re making big changes on items like our Charter. You know our Charter is like our city constitution and it requires a lot of close and careful vetting before we make these changes. I really feel it was a mistake to push a petition through the way it’s going through right now and not having this subcommittee meet. I wanted to let you all know that I’m on an Assessing Standards Boards subcommittee up in Concord. The committee was formed as a subcommittee to address releasing sanctions against assessors who are sanctioned by the DRA. This became a little bit of a hot issue when we had some of our assessors down here fall in the category of having some sanctions issued and the Assessing Standards Board realized that those sanctions were not being released publicly and they had anticipated when they set up the regulations that they would be released publicly. Now to address that, they didn’t put it through and rush it through this year as a board change. They formed a subcommittee and I’m on that subcommittee. That subcommittee has been vetting the issued in meetings to allow open meetings all other chiefs and assessors from the State to come in and participate and it’s been discussed at the full meetings of the board. The DRA and the DOJ have taken a neutral position, aren’t going to block it. Basically the DRA is willing to give control over to the Assessing Standards Board who would like to put it under the Office of Professional Licensure and Certification. Now

Finance Committee – 08/18/2021 Page 7 that’s all done by committee and it may take about two years to get this change through as law. We’re going to write the law this September. It’s a process and we’re doing the process. I think we’re jipping ourselves down here in Nashua when we have a Mayor, some aldermen, and figureheads – leadership people pushing a petition. This is not really a citizen’s petition and anyone who says everyone has the right to push a petition, that’s true but when it’s your Mayor who is doing it, you’re a figurehead. You’re a leader. When you’re going door to door, people may be assuming that it had adequate vetting. There was adequate discussion. That the facts are being laid out the way they should be. I don’t think that’s really the case and you have a higher level of influence sitting as a figurehead than a general citizen who brings forth the petition. I came to this Board of Aldermen and asked if they would back a petition change for the Board of Assessors to require that all assessing board members living… Alderman Harriott-Gathright Thirty seconds. Laurie Ortolano …in the City of Nashua. It received no attention at all or acknowledgement. Now that would be a case where as a citizen I could go out and ask for signatures and bring it forward because I tried to work with the Board. There was no acknowledgement and I could do it separately but you have not been willing to work with the Board Mr. Mayor. You were not willing to work on the subcommittee and you’re jamming this through as a power grab over financial issues. That is really the wrong reason to do it and you’re doing the wrong Charter change. The change should be for a city manager. You’re in the right church but you’re in the wrong pew here. When you compare us to Dover who has a City Manager… Alderman Harriott-Gathright Your time is up Ms. Ortolano. Laurie Ortolano …and that with a $400 million budget has a mayor. Let’s work on the correct Charter change. Thank you. Mayor Donchess Any other members of the public who wish to address the committee? REMARKS BY THE ALDERMEN Alderman O’Brien I would like to welcome our youngest member over here that’s diligently and watched this meeting and welcome to the chamber. I know you’re with Grandma so that’s fantastic. You can say hello. Unidentified Female Speaker Hi. Mayor Donchess All right. Any other remarks by Aldermen? NON-PUBLIC SESSION - None

Finance Committee – 08/18/2021 Page 8 ADJOURNMENT MOTION BY ALDERMAN O’BRIEN TO ADJOURN MOTION CARRIED The Finance Committee meeting was adjourned at 7:22 p.m. Alderman-at-Large Michael B. O’Brien, Sr. Committee Clerk

City of Nashua Purchasing Department

Administrative Services Division 229 Main Street - Nashua, NH 03060

(603) 589-3330 Fax (603) 594-3233

August 17, 2021

Memo #22-158

TO: Mayor Donchess

Finance Committee

SUBJECT: Energy Recovery Upgrades Change Order in the amount not to exceed $200,000 funded

from accounts 81300 Machinery & Equipment

Please see attached communications from David Boucher, Superintendent of the Wastewater Department,

dated July 22, 2021 for project specific details related to this purchase. Below please find a summary of

the purchase approval request:

Item: Change Order #8 for Upgrade of the Energy Recovery Room Project to reconcile

claimed delays for relocating buried electric conduits & providing pipe supports

and complete remaining open change order items.

Value: Initial Approved Total: $1,787,378.00

Change Orders 1-7: $ 144,792.27

Change Order 8: $ 200,000.00

New Project Total: $1,902,170.27

Vendor: Methuen Construction

Department: 169 Wastewater

Source Fund: 54210 Lead Hazzard Remediation

Ordinance: Pursuant to § 5-84 Special purchase procedures. A/ (5) Purchases from a sole

manufacturer, where it is determined to be more efficient and economical to

reduce costs of maintenance of additional repair parts, supplies or services.

The Board of Public Works (7/22/21 BPW meeting), Division of Public Works: Wastewater, and the

Purchasing Department respectfully request your approval of this contract.

Regards,

Kelly Parkinson Purchasing Manager

Cc: D Boucher

C O'Connor

7/30/21

(See attached)(See Attached)

(See Attached)(Summary+PCO-18R1,22R1,26, 29R1)

City of NashuaEnergy Recovery Upgrades

CHANGE ORDER 8- SUMMARY

Change Order 8 is composed of the following items:

1. Lump sum amount of $200,000, which includes:a. *Compensation for down time experienced during resolution of method to proceed

for supporting generator no. 1, and all other miscellaneous delays.b. PCO (Proposed Change Order) l8Rl- fuel blending skid relocation in the amount of

$17,918.01 (this work is complete).c. PCO22RI-Piping relocation for generators in the amount of $1,273.56 (this work is

complete).d. PCO26-Natural Gas Testing in the amount of $6,715.96 (this work is complete).e. PCO29R1-SCADA HMI Interface-installed SCADA on PLC in generator room in the

amount of $8344.88 (this work is complete).(Copies ofPCOt8Rt, 22R1, 26 and 29R1 are attached)

*Note that as part of this agreement and compensation sum Methuen will not seek any furtherdelay charges against the City and in return the City will not seek compensation in the form ofliquidated damages. Methuen fUrther agrees to complete the remaining work as quickly aspossible; a final date of completion has been set, but will be further amended, if needed, due tocircumstances beyond Methuen’s control.

Methuen Construction Co., Inc.144 Main Street - PO Box 980Plaistow, New Hampshire 03865Phone: (603) 328-2222

Project: 181012 - Nashua Energy Recovery Upgrade2 Sawmill Rd.

Nashua, New Hampshire 03060

Prime Contract Potential Change Order #018:  Fuel Blending SkidRelocation

TO: City of Nashua229 Main StreetNashua New Hampshire, 03060

FROM: Methuen Construction Co., Inc.144 Main Street PO Box 980Plaistow New Hampshire, 03865

PCO NUMBER/REVISION: 018 / 1 CONTRACT: IFB0501-090618 NASHUA PO #146861 -Nashua Energy Recovery Upgrade  

REQUEST RECEIVED FROM: Jeremy Smith, P.E.  (Waldron Engineering &Construction, Inc.)

CREATED BY: Kelly Jegorow  (Methuen Construction Co.,Inc.)

STATUS: Pending - In Review   CREATED DATE: 4/10 /2020 

REFERENCE:  DATE SENT: 10/19/2020

FIELD CHANGE:  No PRIME CONTRACTCHANGE ORDER:

None  

LOCATION:  Fuel Blending Skid  

SCHEDULE IMPACT:  20 days ACCOUNTINGMETHOD:

Amount Based  

PAID IN FULL:  No TOTAL AMOUNT: $17,918.01

Methuen Construction (MC), hereby submits this PCO in accordance with the documentation referenced herein. It is expressly understood and agreedthat this proposal is valid for the time as specified within this document from the date of the PCO. The Proposal is based upon current day constructioncosts and does not include escalation costs for any material items that are either volatile or market sensitive. This Proposal does not include overtimeacceleration or expediting costs. This proposal does not  include  the costs associated with out of sequence construction,  interference,  impact  relateddelays and disruptions. MC reserves its rights under the agreement to seek additional time, indirect and impact costs associated with the PCO, once theimpacts can be fully evaluated. This proposal is submitted based on the understanding that it is exempt from WBE/MBE participation requirements andacceptance of this proposal waives the participation requirements associated with this additional work.  POTENTIAL CHANGE ORDER TITLE: Fuel Blending Skid Relocation CHANGE REASON: Client Request POTENTIAL CHANGE ORDER DESCRIPTION: (The Contract Is Changed As Follows)CE #042 - PCO 018 Fuel Blending Skid Relocation  Per RFI#21 the Owner requested the relocation of the fuel blending skid to maintain access to the digester.  This relocation has caused in an increasein costs related to this work.  This proposal covers the additional labor and materials required for the relocation including added vent pipe length, addedbiogas, natural gas and blended gas piping, additional hangers as well as custom supports for the skid.  In addition, this relocation impacted the overallproject completion so we are requesting and additional 20 days be added to the contract completion date.   ATTACHMENTS:PCO No 18- FBS Extra Work.pdf # Cost Code Description Type Amount

Burden Rate(43.00% Applies to Labor.)

Subtotal

187-0306 -Fuel Train

Labor Labor $ 5,160.88 $ 2,219.18 $7,380.06

222-0150 -PROCESSPIPING

Subcontractor LaborSubcontractor

$ 12,078.23 $ 0.00 $12,078.23

Methuen Construction Co., Inc. page 1 of 2 Printed On: 10/19/ 2020  11 :59 AM

PCO #018

INSTALLATION

3

22-0150 -PROCESSPIPINGINSTALLATION

LaborSubcontractor

($9,739.48) $ 0.00 ($9,739.48)

4

22-0150 -PROCESSPIPINGINSTALLATION

Material Material $ 3,774.82 $ 0.00 $3,774.82

587-0306 -Fuel Train

Equipment Equipment $ 952.00 $ 0.00 $952.00

601-0520 -PROJECTENGINEER

As-builts Material $ 160.00 $ 0.00 $160.00

Subtotal: $12,386.45 $2,219.18 $14,605.63

GC Work Total Fee - Labor: 15.00% Applies to Labor. $ 1,107.01

GC Work Total Fee - Material & Equipment: 15.00% Applies to Other, Material, and Equipment. $ 733.02

GC Subcontractors Work Fee:  ≈ 47.93% Applies to Subcontractor. $ 1,121.02

Bond & General Liability: 2.00% Applies to Other, Material, Committed Costs, Labor, Rental Equipment Relief, Equipment, Subcontractor, and Burden. $ 351.33

    Grand Total: $17,918.01

Jeremy Smith, P.E. (Waldron Engineering& Construction, Inc.)

  City of Nashua   Methuen Construction Co., Inc.

37 Industrial Drive Suite G-1   229 Main Street   144 Main Street PO Box 980Exeter, New Hampshire 03833   Nashua, New Hampshire 03060   Plaistow, New Hampshire 03865                  ProcoreArchitectSignHere ProcoreArchitectSignedDate   ProcoreOwnerSignHere ProcoreOwnerSignedDate   ProcoreGeneralContractorSignHere ProcoreGeneralContractorSignedDate

SIGNATURE DATE   SIGNATURE DATE   SIGNATURE DATE

Methuen Construction Co., Inc. page 2 of 2 Printed On: 10/19/ 2020  11 :59 AM

PCO #018

Methuen Construction Co., Inc.144 Main Street - PO Box 980Plaistow, New Hampshire 03865Phone: (603) 328-2222

Project: 181012 - Nashua Energy Recovery Upgrade2 Sawmill Rd.

Nashua, New Hampshire 03060

Prime Contract Potential Change Order #022:  Piping Relocation forGenerator Engines

TO: City of Nashua229 Main StreetNashua New Hampshire, 03060

FROM: Methuen Construction Co., Inc.144 Main Street PO Box 980Plaistow New Hampshire, 03865

PCO NUMBER/REVISION: 022 / 1 CONTRACT: IFB0501-090618 NASHUA PO #146861 -Nashua Energy Recovery Upgrade  

REQUEST RECEIVED FROM:    CREATED BY: Anthony Crespo  (Methuen Construction Co.,Inc.)

STATUS: Pending - In Review   CREATED DATE: 6/29 /2020 

REFERENCE:  DATE SENT: 10/20/2020

FIELD CHANGE:  No PRIME CONTRACTCHANGE ORDER:

None  

LOCATION:   

SCHEDULE IMPACT:  0 days ACCOUNTINGMETHOD:

Amount Based  

PAID IN FULL:  No TOTAL AMOUNT: $1,273.56

Methuen Construction (MC), hereby submits this PCO in accordance with the documentation referenced herein. It is expressly understood and agreedthat this proposal is valid for the time as specified within this document from the date of the PCO. The Proposal is based upon current day constructioncosts and does not include escalation costs for any material items that are either volatile or market sensitive. This Proposal does not include overtimeacceleration or expediting costs. This proposal does not  include  the costs associated with out of sequence construction,  interference,  impact  relateddelays and disruptions. MC reserves its rights under the agreement to seek additional time, indirect and impact costs associated with the PCO, once theimpacts can be fully evaluated. This proposal is submitted based on the understanding that it is exempt from WBE/MBE participation requirements andacceptance of this proposal waives the participation requirements associated with this additional work.  POTENTIAL CHANGE ORDER TITLE: Piping Relocation for Generator Engines CHANGE REASON: No Change Reason POTENTIAL CHANGE ORDER DESCRIPTION: (The Contract Is Changed As Follows)CE #052 - PCO 022- Pipe Relocation for Generators Proposal has been revised to remove 1/2 of MCC labor costs and the request for an additional day of contract time.   ATTACHMENTS: # Cost Code Description Type Amount

Burden Rate(43.00% Applies to Labor.)

Subtotal

1

22-0150 -PROCESSPIPINGINSTALLATION

LABOR Labor $ 288.68 $ 124.13 $412.81

2

22-0150 -PROCESSPIPINGINSTALLATION

EQUIPMENT Equipment $ 68.00 $ 0.00 $68.00

Methuen Construction Co., Inc. page 1 of 2 Printed On: 10/20/ 2020  02 :37 PM

PCO #022

3

22-0150 -PROCESSPIPINGINSTALLATION

SUBCONTRACTORSubcontractor

$ 640.00 $ 0.00 $640.00

Subtotal: $996.68 $124.13 $1,120.81

GC Work Total Fee - Labor: 15.00% Applies to Labor. $ 61.92

GC Work Total Fee - Material & Equipment: 15.00% Applies to Other, Material, and Equipment. $ 10.20

GC Subcontractors Work Fee:  ≈ 8.7% Applies to Subcontractor. $ 55.65

Bond & General Liability: 2.00% Applies to Other, Material, Committed Costs, Labor, Rental Equipment Relief, Equipment, Subcontractor, and Burden. $ 24.98

    Grand Total: $1,273.56

Jeremy Smith, P.E. (Waldron Engineering& Construction, Inc.)

  City of Nashua   Methuen Construction Co., Inc.

37 Industrial Drive Suite G-1   229 Main Street   144 Main Street PO Box 980Exeter, New Hampshire 03833   Nashua, New Hampshire 03060   Plaistow, New Hampshire 03865                  ProcoreArchitectSignHere ProcoreArchitectSignedDate   ProcoreOwnerSignHere ProcoreOwnerSignedDate   ProcoreGeneralContractorSignHere ProcoreGeneralContractorSignedDate

SIGNATURE DATE   SIGNATURE DATE   SIGNATURE DATE

Methuen Construction Co., Inc. page 2 of 2 Printed On: 10/20/ 2020  02 :37 PM

PCO #022