Report Jet-veto SF and Uncertainties Jet smearing
description
Transcript of Report Jet-veto SF and Uncertainties Jet smearing
![Page 1: Report Jet-veto SF and Uncertainties Jet smearing](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062408/56813b6f550346895da47769/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
ReportJet-veto SF and Uncertainties
Jet smearing
Lailin Xu, Haijun Yang, Bing ZhouThe University of Michigan
![Page 2: Report Jet-veto SF and Uncertainties Jet smearing](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062408/56813b6f550346895da47769/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
Outline
• Jet-veto SF and uncertainties
• Effects of Jet smearing on MET• MET with/without METUtility
• WW/top/tautau background uncertainties
![Page 3: Report Jet-veto SF and Uncertainties Jet smearing](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062408/56813b6f550346895da47769/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
Jet Veto SF and Uncertainties• SF =ZZ(data)/ ZZ(MC) = Z(data)/Z(MC)• Control samples: Data (p833, 4.7 fb-1) Z ee and Z mm MC (MC11C): Z ll MC@NLO/Herwig, ALPGEN, PYTHIA• Systematic uncertainties
–Parton showing modeling (with diff. MC generator)–JES/JER (using ATLAS package to smear jet ET)
![Page 4: Report Jet-veto SF and Uncertainties Jet smearing](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062408/56813b6f550346895da47769/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
Jet-veto SF Results
• SF = 0.96 (both for ee and for mm) from MC@LNO Z MC
compared to WW analysis: SF = 0.963• Systematic uncertainty
–< 0.3% due to JES/JER–~ 5% due to different MC generator (Alpgen
gives SF = 1.00; Pythia gives SF = 1.02)
![Page 5: Report Jet-veto SF and Uncertainties Jet smearing](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062408/56813b6f550346895da47769/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
Jet smearing effects on MET:ee
With jet smearing (for all the EM-jets by hand) Compared to no jet smearing
![Page 6: Report Jet-veto SF and Uncertainties Jet smearing](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062408/56813b6f550346895da47769/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
Jet smearing effects on MET:mm
With jet smearing (for all the EM-jets by hand) Compared to no jet smearing
![Page 7: Report Jet-veto SF and Uncertainties Jet smearing](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062408/56813b6f550346895da47769/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
MET with METUtility:ee
MET with the ToolCompared to without tool
![Page 8: Report Jet-veto SF and Uncertainties Jet smearing](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062408/56813b6f550346895da47769/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
MET with METUtility:mm
MET with the ToolMET without the Tool
![Page 9: Report Jet-veto SF and Uncertainties Jet smearing](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062408/56813b6f550346895da47769/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
WW/top/tautau background estimation method
dataee
dataDYnondatae
DYnondata
datadataeeeeee
DYnondatae
DYnondataee
NNkkNN
NNkkNN
/*5.0,
/*5.0,
,,
,,
kkee ,
mce
datae
DYnondatae NNN ,
formular:
are efficiency factor for ee and mm events
gammaWmce
jetsZmce
jetsWmce
WZmce
ZZmce
mce NNNNNN ,,,,,
Here Z+jets is the DY contribution without Ztautau
![Page 10: Report Jet-veto SF and Uncertainties Jet smearing](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062408/56813b6f550346895da47769/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
10
Cut flow for ee (final 34 events)
![Page 11: Report Jet-veto SF and Uncertainties Jet smearing](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062408/56813b6f550346895da47769/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
11
Cutflow:mm (final 45 events)
![Page 12: Report Jet-veto SF and Uncertainties Jet smearing](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062408/56813b6f550346895da47769/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
Cut flow em (final numner 15)
![Page 13: Report Jet-veto SF and Uncertainties Jet smearing](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062408/56813b6f550346895da47769/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
13
estimated background after all cuts
data estimated background
mc background(WW/ttbar/tW/tautau)
ee 6.4+/-1.8+/-0.020 4.7+/-0.4+/-0.69
mm 8.4+/-2.4+/-0.027 10.8+/-1.2+/-1.66
![Page 14: Report Jet-veto SF and Uncertainties Jet smearing](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062408/56813b6f550346895da47769/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
Error propagation in data driven method
,
,
,
,
2
2 2 , 2 2
2
, 2 2
2 2
( .)
( ( .)) ( / ) / 4
( ) ( ) / /16
( .)
data non DYee
data non DYeee
mc non DYe
data non DYee
N
data non DYee e kN
data data datae eeN
data mc non DY data data datae e ee
N N
stat
k N
N stat N N
N N N N N
syst
,
2( .)mc non DYe
eesyst k
![Page 15: Report Jet-veto SF and Uncertainties Jet smearing](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062408/56813b6f550346895da47769/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
back up
![Page 16: Report Jet-veto SF and Uncertainties Jet smearing](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062408/56813b6f550346895da47769/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
Compared to no jet smearing
![Page 17: Report Jet-veto SF and Uncertainties Jet smearing](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062408/56813b6f550346895da47769/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
With jet smearing for all EM jets (by hand)
![Page 18: Report Jet-veto SF and Uncertainties Jet smearing](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062408/56813b6f550346895da47769/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
Compared to no jet energy smearing